Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Implications of climate change on nutrient pollution: a look into the nitrogen and phosphorus loadings in the Great Miami and Little Miami watersheds in Ohio

Agricultural Research Development Program (ARDP), Central State University, Wilberforce, OH 45384, USA

The Great Miami (GM) and Little Miami (LM) watersheds in Ohio are included in the 51 major river systems in the United States for long-term assessment of conditions of water quality under the USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) loadings have decreased over the years in the GM and LM basins, however, they still remain among the highest concentrations detected in the nation. The latest nutrient loading analysis from Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) showed slightly above period of record averages for N and P. Significant amounts of mobilized agricultural N and P from fertilizers in watersheds are transported to the Ohio River and other coastal marine systems such as the Gulf of Mexico, leading to increased growth of harmful algal blooms. In the GM and LM watersheds, changes in flood frequency and intensity are projected to occur in the future as heavy precipitation events are likely to increase as a result of climate change. As climate plays a role for nutrient transformation and transport, studies have shown that N and P inputs to surface waters from agriculture and other sources are projected to continue to increase over the next several decades. This paper reviewed the means of how the GM and LM watersheds are ecologically affected by the N and P nutrient pollution and how climate change impacts the quantity of N and P loadings that go into the river systems. Without better understanding of the nutrient loading processes and their association with various agricultural practices and interactions with climate, there could be additional threats to water quality in both the GM and LM watersheds in decades to come. This literature review has made references to many pertinent new publications that have become available in recent years, as well as to the classic literature.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords algal bloom; climate projections; GCM; global warming; nutrient loadings; Ohio watersheds

Citation: Eric Ariel L. Salas, Sakthi Kumaran Subburayalu. Implications of climate change on nutrient pollution: a look into the nitrogen and phosphorus loadings in the Great Miami and Little Miami watersheds in Ohio. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(3): 186-221. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.3.186

References

  • 1. Ohio Department of Development (ODD) Population and Housing: Ohio's population; Ohio Development Services Agency, 2010. Available from: https://development.ohio.gov/reports/reports_pop_proj_map.htm.
  • 2. Tong STY, Sun Y, Ranatunga T, et al. (2012) Predicting plausible impacts of sets of climate and land use change scenarios on water resources. Appl Geogr 32: 477–489.    
  • 3. Debrewer LM, Rowe GL, Reutter DC, et al. Environmental setting and effects on water quality in the Great and Little Miami River basins, Ohio and Indiana: Water-Resources Investigations Report, 2000. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1999/4201/report.pdf.
  • 4. OEPA biological and water quality study of the Upper Little Miami River. Clark, Clinton, Greene, Madison, Montgomery, and Warren Counties, Ohio. OHIO EPA Technical Report: Division of Surface Water, 2011. Available from: https://epa.ohio.gov/Portals/35/documents/LMR_Upper_Basin_2011_TSD.pdf.
  • 5. Pitt R, Bozeman M. Water quality and biological effects of urban runoff in Coyote Creek, U.S. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 1980. Available from: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=30000C3M.TXT.
  • 6. Tong STY (1990) The hydrologic effects of urban land use: A case study of the little Miami River Basin. Landsc and Urban Plan 19: 99–105.    
  • 7. Turner RE, Rabalais NN (2004) Suspended sediment, C, N, P, and Si yields from the Mississippi River Basin. Hydrobiologia 511: 79–89.    
  • 8. Rowe GL, Reutter DC, Runkle DL, et al. Water quality in the Great and Little Miami River Basins, Ohio and Indiana, 1999–2001, USGS, 2004. Available from: https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/cir1229.
  • 9. Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Band LE, et al. (2008) Interaction between urbanization and climate variability amplifies watershed nitrate export in Maryland. Environ Sci Technol 42: 5872–5878.    
  • 10. OEPA Nutrient Mass Balance Study for Ohio's Major Rivers, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water Modeling, Assessment and TMDL Section, 2016. Available from: https://epa.ohio.gov/Portals/35/documents/Nutrient%20Mass%20Balance%20Study%202018_F inal.pdf.
  • 11. Yu S, Yu GB, Liu Y, et al. (2012) Urbanization impairs surface water quality: Eutrophication and metal stress in the Grand Canal of China. River Res Appl 28: 1135–1148.    
  • 12. EPA National Nonpoint Source Program-a catalyst for water quality improvements, 2017. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-10/documents/nps_program_highlights_report-508.pdf.
  • 13. MCD Lower Great Miami River Nutrient Management Project, 2017. Available from: https://www.mcdwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017-LGMR_Report-FINAL_02-28-17_Compressed_Graphics.pdf.
  • 14. Naramngam S, Tong STY (2013) Environmental and economic implications of various conservative agricultural practices in the Upper Little Miami River basin. Agric Water Manag 119: 65–79.    
  • 15. Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 333–365.    
  • 16. Center for Watershed Protection, Impacts of impervious cover on aquatic ecosystems, Watershed Protection Research Monograph No. 1. Center for Watershed Protection, 2003. Available from: https://clear.uconn.edu/projects/TMDL/library/papers/Schueler_2003.pdf.
  • 17. OEPA Ohio Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 2013. Available from: https://epa.ohio.gov/Portals/35/wqs/ONRS_final_jun13.pdf.
  • 18. Townsend AR, Howarth RW, Bazzaz FA, et al. (2003) Human health effects of a changing global nitrogen cycle. Front Ecol Environ 1: 240–246.    
  • 19. Newcomber G, House J, Ho L, et al. Management strategies for cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) and their toxins: A guide for water utilities. Water Quality Research Australia Limited, 2009. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lionel_Ho/publication/242740698_Management_Strategie s_for_Cyanobacteria_Blue-Green_Algae_A_Guide_for_Water_Utilities/links/02e7e52d62273e8f70000000/Management-Strategies-for-Cyanobacteria-Blue-Green-Algae-A-Guide-for-Water-Utilities.pdf.
  • 20. Graham J, Loftin K, Meyer M, et al. (2010) Cyanotoxin mixtures and taste-and-odor compounds in cyanobacterial blooms from the Midwestern United States. Environ Sc. Technol 44: 7361–7368.    
  • 21. MCD nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and loads in the Great Miami River Watershed, Ohio 2005 – 2011, 2012. Available from: https://www.mcdwater.org/wp-content/uploads/PDFs/2012NutrientMonitoringReport_Final.pdf.
  • 22. OEPA biological and water quality study of the Middle and Lower Great Miami River and selected tributaries, 1995-Volume I, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 1997. Available from: https://epa.ohio.gov/portals/35/documents/lmgmr95.pdf.
  • 23. Smith JH. Miami River algae draws local attention, 2011. Available from: https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/local/miami-river-algae-draws-local- attention/Rh715SpRPOMoJsF6qMyghK.
  • 24. NPS Nonpoint Source Management Plan Update, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 2018. Available from: https://www.epa.ohio.gov/portals/35/nps/nps_mgmt_plan.pdf.
  • 25. OEPA Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 2018. Available from: https://www.epa.ohio.gov/Portals/35/tmdl/2018intreport/2018IR_Final.pdf.
  • 26. Takle ES, Xia M, Guan F, et al. (2006) Upper Mississippi River basin modeling system part 4: climate change impacts on flow and water quality, In: Coastal Hydrology and Processes, Water Resources Publications, 135–142.
  • 27. Luo Y, Ficklin DL, Liu X, et al. (2013) Assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology and water quality with a watershed modeling approach. Sci Total Environ 450–451: 72–82.
  • 28. Ekness P, Randhir TO (2015) Effect of climate and land cover changes on watershed runoff: A multivariate assessment for storm water management. J Geophys Res-Geosciences 120: 1785–1796.    
  • 29. Rahman K, da Silva AG, Tejeda EM (2015) An independent and combined effect analysis of land use and climate change in the upper Rhone River watershed, Switzerland. Appl Geogr 63: 264–272.    
  • 30. Li Z, Fang H (2017) Modeling the impact of climate change on watershed discharge and sediment yield in the black soil region, northeastern China. Geomorphology 293: 255–271.    
  • 31. Barnett TP, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438: 303–309.    
  • 32. Wang GQ, Zhang JY, Xuan YQ (2013) Simulating the Impact of Climate Change on Runoff in a Typical River Catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. J Hydrometeor 14: 1553–1561.    
  • 33. Barranco LM, Álvarez-Rodríguez J, Olivera F (2014) Assessment of the expected runoff change in Spain using climate simulations. J Hydrol Eng 19: 1481–1490.    
  • 34. Demaria EMC, Roundy JK, Wi S (2016) The effects of climate change on seasonal snowpack and the hydrology of the Northeastern and Upper Midwest United States. J Climate 29: 6527–6541.    
  • 35. Wagena MB, Collick AS, Ross AC (2018) Impact of climate change and climate anomalies on hydrologic and biogeochemical processes in an agricultural catchment of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA. Sci Total Environ 637–638: 1443–1454.
  • 36. Gleick PH (1989) Climate change, hydrology, and water resources. Rev Geophys 27: 329–344.    
  • 37. Dyer F, ElSawah S, Croke B, et al. (2014) The effects of climate change on ecologically-relevant flow regime and water quality attributes. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28: 67–82.    
  • 38. Ferrer J, Pérez-Martín MA, Jiménez S, et al. (2012) GIS-based models for water quantity and quality assessment in the Júcar River Basin, Spain, including climate change effects. Sci Total Environ 440: 42–59.    
  • 39. Van Liew M, Feng S, Pathak T (2013) Assessing climate change impacts on water balance, runoff, and water quality at the field scale for four locations in the heartland. Transactions of the ASABE 56: 833–900.
  • 40. Butterbach-Bahl K, Dannenmann M (2011) Denitrification and associated soil N2O emissions due to agricultural activities in a changing climate. Curr Opin Env Sust 3: 389–395.    
  • 41. OEPA Ohio Nutrient Reduction Strategy, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 2016. Available from: https://epa.ohio.gov/Portals/35/wqs/ONRS_addendum.pdf.
  • 42. OEPA Ohio water resource inventory, executive summary: Summary, conclusions, and recommendations Division of Surface Water and Monitoring Assessment Section, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 1996. Available from: https://www.epa.ohio.gov/portals/35/documents/exsumm96.pdf.
  • 43. Tong STY, Liu AJ, Goodrich JA (2007) Climate change impacts on nutrient and sediment loads in a Midwestern agricultural watershed. J Environ Inform 9: 18–28.    
  • 44. Rowe GL, Baker NT. National Water-Quality Assessment Program, Great and Little Miami River Basins, 1997. Available from: https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/circ1229.
  • 45. Cross WP, Drainage areas of Ohio streams, supplement to Gazetteer of Ohio streams; Ohio Water Plan Inventory Report: Ohio Department of Natural Resources, 1967, 61.
  • 46. OEPA East Fork Little Miami River comprehensive water quality report, Little Miami River Basin, Clinton, Highland, Brown, and Clermont Counties: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 1985. Available from: http://msdgc.org/downloads/initiatives/water_quality/2012_lmr_biological_water_quality_study. pdf.
  • 47. Rankin ET, Yoder CO, Mishne D. Ohio water resources inventory executive summary-Summary, conclusions and recommendation: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 1996, 75 p. Available from: https://www.epa.ohio.gov/portals/35/documents/exsumm96.pdf.
  • 48. Miami Conservancy District Flood protection dams: Miami Conservancy District, 2018. Available from: http://www.conservancy.com/dams.asp#dams.
  • 49. National Research Council Alternative agriculture, National Academy Press, 1989. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1208/alternative-agriculture.
  • 50. Dickey E, Shelton DP, Jasa P, et al. (1985) Soil erosion from tillage systems used in soybean and corn residues. T ASAE 28: 1124–1130.    
  • 51. Walters D, Jasa P. Conservation tillage in the United States: An overview, 2018. Available from: http://agecon.okstate.edu/isct/labranza/walters/conservation.doc.
  • 52. Tebrügge F, Düring R-A (1999) Reducing tillage intensity - a review of results from a long-term study in Germany. Soil Tillage Res 53: 15–28.    
  • 53. Armand R, Bockstaller C, Auzet A-V, et al. (2009) Runoff generation related to intra-field soil surface characteristics variability: Application to conservation tillage context. Soil Tillage Res 102: 27–37.    
  • 54. Borie F, Rubio R, Ruanet JL, et al. (2006) Effects of tillage systems on soil characteristics, glomalin and mycorrhizal propagules in a Chilean Ultisol. Soil Tillage Res 88: 253–261.    
  • 55. Rocha EO, Calijuri ML, Santiago AF, et al. (2012) The contribution of conservation practices in reducing runoff, soil loss, and transport of nutrients at the watershed level. Water Resour Manage 26: 3831–3852.    
  • 56. Jarecki MK, Lal R (2003) Crop management for soil carbon sequestration. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22: 471–502.    
  • 57. Mangalassery S, Sjögersten S, Sparkes DL, et al. (2014) To what extent can zero tillage lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from temperate soils? Sci Rep 4: 4586.
  • 58. Baker NT. Tillage practices in the conterminous United States, 1989–2004-Datasets aggregated by watershed, USGS, 2011, 22 p. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/ds573/pdf/dataseries573final.pdf.
  • 59. Cox WJ, Zobel RW, van Es HM, et al. (1990) Growth development and yield of maize under three tillage systems in the northeastern U.S.A. Soil Tillage Res 18: 295–310.    
  • 60. Ruffo ML, Bollero GA (2003) Modeling rye and hairy vetch residue decomposition as a function of degree-days and decomposition-days. Agron J 95: 900–907.    
  • 61. Findlater PA, Carter DJ (1990) A model to predict the effects of prostrate ground cover on wind erosion. Aust J Soil Res 28: 609–622.    
  • 62. Staver KW, Brinsfield RB (1998) Using cereal grain winter cover crops to reduce groundwater nitrate contamination in the mid-Atlantic coastal plain. J Soil Water Conserv 53: 230–240.
  • 63. Whish JPM, Price L, Castor PA (2009) Do spring cover crops rob water and so reduce wheat yields in the northern grain zone of eastern Australia? Crop Pasture Sci 60: 517–525.    
  • 64. Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Bailey BA (2018) Role of cover crops in improving soil and row crop productivity. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36: 19–20.
  • 65. Hoorman JJ. Using cover crops to convert to no-till, 2018. Available from: https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/SAG-11.
  • 66. Dabney SM, Delgado JA, Reeves DW (2001) Using winter cover crops to improve soil and water quality. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32: 1221–1250.    
  • 67. SARE- CTIC Report of the 2013–2014 Cover Crop Survey. Joint publication of the Conservation Technology Information Center and the North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program.; Conservation Technology Information Center: West Lafayette, Indiana, 2014. Available from: https://www.sare.org/Learning-Center/From-the-Field/North-Central-SARE-From-the-Field/2013-14-Cover-Crops-Survey-Analysis.
  • 68. Creamer NG, Baldwin KR (2000) An evaluation of summer cover crops for use in vegetable production systems in North Carolina. HortScience 35: 600–603.    
  • 69. SARE- CTIC Cover Crop survey report. Conservation Technology Information Center. 2014. Report of the 2013-14 Cover Crop Survey. Joint publication of the Conservation Technology Information Center and the North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program; Conservation Technology Information Center: West Lafayette, Indiana, 2015. Available from: https://www.sare.org/Learning-Center/From-the-Field/North-Central-SARE-From-the-Field/2016-Cover-Crop-Survey-Analysis.
  • 70. Nokes S, Ward A. Surface water quality best management practices summary guide: Columbus, The Ohio State University Extension Factsheet, 1997. Available from: http://epa.ohio.gov/dsw/storm/technical_guidance.
  • 71. Gorham T, Jia Y, Shum CK, et al. (2017) Ten-year survey of cyanobacterial blooms in Ohio's waterbodies using satellite remote sensing. Harmful Algae 66: 13–19.    
  • 72. Goolsby DA, Battaglin WA, Lawrence GB, et al. Flux and sources of nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin: Topic 3 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, 1999. Available from: http://www.cop.noaa.gov/pubs/das/das17.pdf.
  • 73. Baker DB, Richards RP, Kramer JW. Point source-nonpoint source trading: applicability to stream TMDLs in Ohio. In Proceedings of the Proceedings – Innovations in Reducing Nonpoint Source Pollution, 2006, 328–337.
  • 74. Scavia D, Justic D, Bierman VJ (2004) Reducing hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Advice from three models. Estuaries 27: 419–425.    
  • 75. Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Alexander RB (1997) Regional interpretation of water-quality monitoring data. Water Resour Res 33: 2781–2798.    
  • 76. Battaglin WA, Goolsby DA. Spatial data in geographic information system format on agricultural chemical use, land use, and cropping practices in the United States, 1995. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1994/4176/report.pdf.
  • 77. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Díaz RJ, et al. (2009) Global change and eutrophication of coastal waters. ICES J Mar Sci 66: 1528–1537.    
  • 78. Midwest Biodiversity Institute Biological and water quality assessment of the Great Miami River and tributaries 2013 Hamilton County, Ohio, 2014, 121. Available from: https://midwestbiodiversityinst.org/reports/biological-and-water-quality-study-of-the-little-miami-river-and-tributaries-2012-hamilton-county-ohio/LMR%202012%20MSDGC%20FINAL%20REPORT%2020130930.pdf.
  • 79. OEPA Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. Available from: https://www.epa.ohio.gov/portals/35/tmdl/2002IntReport/Ohio2002IntegratedReport_100102.pdf.
  • 80. MCD Water Data Report, Great Miami River Watershed, Ohio, 2015. Available from: https://www.mcdwater.org/wp-content/uploads/PDFs/2015-Water-Data-Report-FINAL-reduced.pdf.
  • 81. Hayhoe K, Edmonds J, Kopp RE, et al. (2017) Climate models, scenarios, and projections: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment; U.S. Global Change Research Program, 133–160.
  • 82. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland,. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr.
  • 83. IPCC Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing Team; Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/syr.
  • 84. Meehl GA, Tebaldi C (2004) More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science 305: 994–997.    
  • 85. Rosenzweig C, Major DC, Demong K, et al. (2007) Managing climate change risks in New York City's water system: assessment and adaptation planning. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12: 1391–1409.    
  • 86. Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC. Global climate change impacts in the United States, Cambridge University Press: UK, 2009. Available from: http://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1006/ML100601201.pdf.
  • 87. Lawrimore JH, Menne MJ, Gleason BE, et al. (2011) An overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network monthly mean temperature data set, version 3. JGR Atmospheres 2011, 116.
  • 88. Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, et al. (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467: 555–561.    
  • 89. Lettenmaier DP, Milly PCD (2009) Land waters and sea level. Nature Geoscience 2009, 2, 3.
  • 90. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH (2004) Impacts of changing precipitation patterns on water quality. J Soil Water Conserv 59: 51–58.
  • 91. Prowse TD, Beltaos S, Gardner JT, et al. (2006) Climate change, flow regulation and land-use effects on the hydrology of the Peace-Athabasca-Slave System; Findings from the Northern Rivers Ecosystem Initiative. Environ Monit Assess 113: 167–197.    
  • 92. Zhang A, Zhang C, Fu G, et al. (2012) Assessments of impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff with SWAT for the Huifa River Basin, Northeast China. Water Resour Manage 26: 2199–2217.    
  • 93. Ye L, Grimm NB (2013) Modelling potential impacts of climate change on water and nitrate export from a mid-sized, semiarid watershed in the US Southwest. Climatic Change 120: 419–431.    
  • 94. Zahabiyoun B, Goodarzi MR, Bavani ARM, et al. (2013) Assessment of climate change impact on the Gharesou River Basin using SWAT hydrological model. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water 41: 601–609.    
  • 95. Backlund,P, Janetos A Schimel D. The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States. Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.3. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Science Program, 2008, 240.
  • 96. Peterson TC, Heim RR, Hirsch R, et al. (2013) Monitoring and understanding changes in heat waves, cold waves, floods, and droughts in the United States: State of knowledge. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 94: 821–834.    
  • 97. Dudula J, Randhir TO (2016) Modeling the influence of climate change on watershed systems: Adaptation through targeted practices. J Hydrol 541: 703–713.    
  • 98. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673–679.    
  • 99. Feeley KJ, Silman MR (2010) Land-use and climate change effects on population size and extinction risk of Andean plants. Glob Chang Biol 16: 3215–3222.    
  • 100. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 637–669.    
  • 101. Poloczanska ES, Brown CJ, Sydeman WJ, et al. (2013) Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nature Clim Chang 3: 919–925.    
  • 102. Runion GB (2003) Climate change and plant pathosystems: Future disease prevention starts here. New Phytol 159: 531–533.    
  • 103. Smith DL, Almaraz JJ (2004) Climate change and crop production: contributions, impacts, and adaptations. Can J Plant Pathol 26: 253–266.    
  • 104. Ashmore M, Toet S, Emberson L (2006) Ozone – a significant threat to future world food production? New Phytol 170: 201–204.    
  • 105. Alexander JM, Diez JM, Levine JM (2015) Novel competitors shape species' responses to climate change. Nature 525: 515–518.    
  • 106. Duku C, Zwart SJ, Hein L (2018) Impacts of climate change on cropping patterns in a tropical, sub-humid watershed. PLOS ONE 13, e0192642.
  • 107. Aguilera R, Marcé R, Sabater S (2015) Detection and attribution of global change effects on river nutrient dynamics in a large Mediterranean basin. Biogeosciences 12: 4085–4098.    
  • 108. Cousino LK, Becker RH, Zmijewski KA (2015) Modeling the effects of climate change on water, sediment, and nutrient yields from the Maumee River watershed. J Hydrol Reg Stud 4: 762–775.    
  • 109. Cordovil C, Cruz S, Brito A, et al. (2018) A simplified nitrogen assessment in Tagus River Basin: A management focused review. Water 10, 406.
  • 110. Easterling DR (2002) Recent changes in frost days and the frost-free season in the united states. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 83: 1327–1332.    
  • 111. Easterling DR, Evans JL, Groisman PY, et al. (2000) Observed variability and trends in extreme climate events: A brief review. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 81: 417–426.    
  • 112. Williamson S, Lakhey S, Karetnikov D, et al. Economic impacts of climate change on Ohio; Center for Integrative Environmental Research, University of Maryland: College Park, Maryland, USA, 2008, 20.
  • 113. Kundzewicz ZW, Mata LJ, Arnell NW, et al. (2008) The implications of projected climate change for freshwater resources and their management. Hydrolog Sci J 53: 3–10.    
  • 114. Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438: 347–350.    
  • 115. Wu S-Y (2010) Potential impact of climate change on flooding in the Upper Great Miami River Watershed, Ohio, USA: a simulation-based approach. Hydrolog Sci J 55: 1251–1263.    
  • 116. Jha M, Pan Z, Takle ES, et al. (2004) Impacts of climate change on streamflow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin: A regional climate model perspective. JGR Atmospheres 2004, 109.
  • 117. Pathak P, Kalra A, Ahmad S (2017) Temperature and precipitation changes in the Midwestern United States: implications for water management. Int J Water Resour Dev 33: 1003–1019.    
  • 118. Milly PCD, Dunne KA (2001) Trends in evaporation and surface cooling in the Mississippi River Basin. Geophys Res Lett 28: 1219–1222.    
  • 119. WorldClim - Global Climate Data, Free climate data for ecological modeling and GIS. Available from: http://www.worldclim.org.
  • 120. Gent PR, Danabasoglu G, Donner LJ, et al. (2011) The Community Climate System Model Version 4. J Climate 24: 4973–4991.    
  • 121. Watanabe M, Suzuki T, O'ishi R, et al. (2010) Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: Mean States, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity. J Climate 23: 6312–6335.    
  • 122. Collins WJ, Bellouin N, Doutriaux-Boucher M, et al. (2011) Development and evaluation of an Earth-System model – HadGEM2. Geosci Model Dev 4: 1051–1075.    
  • 123. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2011) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 93: 485–498.
  • 124. Sheffield J, Barrett AP, Colle B, et al. (2013) North American climate in CMIP5 experiments. Part I: Evaluation of historical simulations of continental and regional climatology. J Climate 26: 9209–9245.
  • 125. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, et al. (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change 109: 5.    
  • 126. Knutti R, Sedláček J (2013) Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nat Clim Chang 3: 369–373.    
  • 127. Zwiers FW, Kharin VV (1998) Changes in the extremes of the climate simulated by CCC GCM2 under CO2 doubling. J Climate 11: 2200–2222.    
  • 128. Kharin VV, Zwiers FW (2000). Changes in the extremes in an ensemble of transient climate simulations with a coupled atmosphere–ocean GCM. J Climate 13: 3760–3788.    
  • 129. Cubash U, Meehl GA. Projections of future climate change. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis.; Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third IPCC Scientific Assessment; Cambridge University Press: UK, 2001: 524–582.
  • 130. Semenov V, Bengtsson L (2002) Secular trends in daily precipitation characteristics: greenhouse gas simulation with a coupled AOGCM. Clim Dyn 19: 123–140.    
  • 131. Murdoch PS, Baron JS, Miller TL (2000) Potential effects of climate change on surface water quality in North America 1. JAWRA 36: 347–366.
  • 132. Srinivasan R, Arnold JG, Jones CA (1998) Hydrologic modelling of the United States with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Int J Water Resour Dev 14: 315–325.    
  • 133. Arnold JG, Williams JR, Srinivasan R, et al. SWAT-Soil and Water Assessment Tool User Manual, 2018. Available from: https://swat.tamu.edu/media/69296/swat-io-documentation-2012.pdf.
  • 134. Pease LM, Oduor P, Padmanabhan G (2010) Estimating sediment, nitrogen, and phosphorous loads from the Pipestem Creek watershed, North Dakota, using AnnAGNPS. Comput Geosci 36: 282–291.    
  • 135. Borah DK, Xia R, Bera M. DWSM−A dynamic watershed simulation model for studying agricultural nonpoint−source pollution. Paper number 012028, ASAE Annual Meeting St. Joseph, Michigan, 2001.
  • 136. Bicknell BR, Imhoff JC, Kittle JL, et al. Hydrological Simulation Program--Fortran, User's manual for version 11: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: National Exposure Research Laboratory, 1997, 755.
  • 137. Singh VP, Frevert DK (2002) Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology. J Hydrol Eng 7: 270–292.    
  • 138. Shen Z, Liao Q, Hong Q, Gong Y (2012) An overview of research on agricultural non-point source pollution modelling in China. Sep Pur Technol 84: 104–111.    
  • 139. Weller DE, Baker ME (2014) Cropland riparian buffers throughout Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Spatial patterns and effects on nitrate loads delivered to streams. JAWRA 50: 696–712.
  • 140. Sharifi A, Lang MW, McCarty GW, et al. (2016) Improving model prediction reliability through enhanced representation of wetland soil processes and constrained model auto calibration – A paired watershed study. J Hydrol 541: 1088–1103.    
  • 141. Borah DK, Bera M (2003) Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of mathematical bases. T ASAE 46: 1553–1566.    
  • 142. Robson BJ (2014) State of the art in modelling of phosphorus in aquatic systems: Review, criticisms and commentary. Environ Modell Softw 61: 339–359.    
  • 143. Rinke A, Dethloff K, Cassano JJ, et al. (2006) Evaluation of an ensemble of Arctic regional climate models: spatiotemporal fields during the SHEBA year. Clim Dyn 26: 459–472.    
  • 144. Mohammed IN, Bomblies A, Wemple BC (2015) The use of CMIP5 data to simulate climate change impacts on flow regime within the Lake Champlain Basin. J Hydrol Reg Stud 3: 160–186.    
  • 145. Nour MH, Smith DW, El-Din MG, et al. (2008) Effect of watershed subdivision on water-phase phosphorus modelling: An artificial neural network modelling application. J Environ Eng Sci 7: 95–108.    
  • 146. Kim RJ, Loucks DP, Stedinger JR (2012) Artificial neural network models of watershed nutrient loading. Water Resour Manage 26: 2781–2797.    
  • 147. Tang X, Xia M, Guan F, et al. (2016) Spatial distribution of soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium stocks in Moso bamboo forests in subtropical China. Forests 7, 267.
  • 148. Mohanty S, Jha MK, Kumar A, et al. (2010) Artificial neural network modeling for groundwater level forecasting in a river island of eastern India. Water Resour Manage 24: 1845–1865.    
  • 149. Kalin L, Isik S, Schoonover JE, et al. (2010) Predicting water quality in unmonitored watersheds using artificial neural networks. J Environ Qual 39: 1429–1440.    
  • 150. Fogelman S, Blumenstein M, Zhao H (2006) Estimation of chemical oxygen demand by ultraviolet spectroscopic profiling and artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Applic 15: 197–203.    
  • 151. Dogan E, Sengorur B, Koklu R (2009) Modeling biological oxygen demand of the Melen River in Turkey using an artificial neural network technique. J Environ Manag 90: 1229–1235.    
  • 152. Iliadis LS, Maris F (2007) An artificial neural network model for mountainous water-resources management: The case of Cyprus mountainous watersheds. Environ Modell Softw 22: 1066–1072.    
  • 153. Noori N, Kalin L (2016) Coupling SWAT and ANN models for enhanced daily streamflow prediction. J Hydrol 533: 141–151.    
  • 154. Okkan U, Serbes ZA (2012) Rainfall–runoff modeling using least squares support vector machines. Environmetrics 23: 549–564.    
  • 155. Huang S, Chang J, Huang Q, Chen Y (2014) Monthly streamflow prediction using modified EMD-based support vector machine. J Hydrol 511: 764–775.    
  • 156. Jajarmizadeh M, Harun S, Salarpour M. An assessment of a proposed hybrid neural network for daily flow prediction in arid climate, 2014. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/mse/2014/635018.
  • 157. Gassman P, Reyes M, Green C, Arnold J (2007) The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions. T ASABE 7: 1211–1250.
  • 158. Niraula R, Kalin L, Wang R, et al. (2012) Determining nutrient and sediment critical source areas with SWAT model: effect of lumped calibration. T ASABE 55: 137–147.
  • 159. White M, Gambone M, Yen H, et al. (2015) Regional blue and green water balances and use by selected crops in the U.S. JAWRA 51: 1626–1642.
  • 160. Wang R, Bowling LC, Cherkauer KA (2016) Estimation of the effects of climate variability on crop yield in the Midwest USA. Agric For Meteorol 216: 141–156.    
  • 161. Yen H, White MJ, Arnold JG, et al. (2016) Western Lake Erie Basin: Soft-data-constrained, NHDPlus resolution watershed modeling and exploration of applicable conservation scenarios. Sci Total Environ 569–570: 1265–1281.
  • 162. Arnold JG, Fohner N (2005) Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 19: 563–572.    
  • 163. Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, et al. (2001) Validation of the Swat Model on a Large Rwer Basin with Point and Nonpoint Sources. JAWRA 37: 1169–1188.
  • 164. Bosch DD, Sheridan JM, Batten HL, et al. (2004) Evaluation of the SWAT model on a coastal plain agricultural watershed. T ASAE 47: 1493–1506.    
  • 165. Saleh A, Du B (2004) Evaluation of SWAT and HSPF within BASINS program for the Upper North Bosque River watershed in central Texas. T ASAE 47: 1039–1049.    
  • 166. Tripathi MP, Panda RK, Raghuwanshi NS (2005) Development of effective management plan for critical subwatersheds using SWAT model. Hydrol Process 19: 809–826.    
  • 167. Grunwald S, Qi C (2006) Gis-Based Water Quality Modeling in the Sandusky Watershed, Ohio, USA. JAWRA 42: 957–973.
  • 168. Setegn SG, Srinivasan R, Dargahi B (2008) Hydrological Modelling in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia Using SWAT Model. TOHJ, 2: 49–62.
  • 169. SWAT Literature Database SWAT Literature Database for Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles Available from: https://www.card.iastate.edu/swat_articles.
  • 170. Tuo Y, Chiogna G, Disse M, et al. (2015) A multi-criteria model selection protocol for practical applications to nutrient transport at the catchment scale. Water 7: 2851–2880.    
  • 171. Krysanova V, Hattermann F, Huang S, et al. (2015) Modelling climate and land-use change impacts with SWIM: lessons learnt from multiple applications. Hydrol Sci J 60: 606–635.    
  • 172. Čerkasova N, Umgiesser G, Ertürk A (2018) Development of a hydrology and water quality model for a large transboundary river watershed to investigate the impacts of climate change – A SWAT application. Ecol Eng 124: 99–115.    
  • 173. Cho J, Oh C, Choi J, et al. (2018) Climate change impacts on agricultural non-point source pollution with consideration of uncertainty in CMIP5. Irrig Drain 65: 209–220.
  • 174. Yang X, Warren R, He Y, et al. (2018) Impacts of climate change on TN load and its control in a River Basin with complex pollution sources. Sci Total Environ 615: 1155–1163.    
  • 175. Lee S, Yeo I-Y, Sadeghi AM, et al. (2018) Comparative analyses of hydrological responses of two adjacent watersheds to climate variability and change using the SWAT model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22: 689–708.    
  • 176. Jha MK, Gassman PW, Panagopoulos Y (2015) Regional changes in nitrate loadings in the Upper Mississippi River Basin under predicted mid-century climate. Reg Environ Change 15: 449–460.    
  • 177. Chiew FHS, McMahon TA (1993) Detection of trend or change in annual flow of Australian rivers. Int J Clim 13: 643–653.    
  • 178. Gellens D, Roulin E (1998) Streamflow response of Belgian catchments to IPCC climate change scenarios. J Hydrol 210: 242–258.    
  • 179. Jha M, Gassman PW, Secchi S, et al. (2004) Effect of watershed subdivision on Swat flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions. JAWRA 40: 811–825.
  • 180. Glavan M, Ceglar A, Pintar M (2015) Assessing the impacts of climate change on water quantity and quality modelling in small Slovenian Mediterranean catchment – lesson for policy and decision makers. Hydrol Process 29: 3124–3144.    
  • 181. Kroeze C, Seitzinger SP (1998) Nitrogen inputs to rivers, estuaries and continental shelves and related nitrous oxide emissions in 1990 and 2050: a global model. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 52: 195–212.    
  • 182. Seitzinger SP, Kroeze C, Bouwman AF, et al. (2002) Global patterns of dissolved inorganic and particulate nitrogen inputs to coastal systems: Recent conditions and future projections. Estuaries 25: 640–655.    
  • 183. Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, et al. (2004) Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70: 153–226.    
  • 184. Bouwman AF, Drecht GV, Knoop JM, et al. (2005) Exploring changes in river nitrogen export to the world's oceans. Global Biogeochem Cy 19: GB1002.
  • 185. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, et al. (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292: 281–284.    
  • 186. Fisher R (2013) Cost estimates of phosphorus removal at wastewater treatment plants.; Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, p. 50.
  • 187. Kronvang B, Bechmann M, Pedersen ML, et al. (2003) Phosphorus dynamics and export in streams draining micro-catchments: Development of empirical models. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166: 469–474.    
  • 188. Osmond D, Meals D, Hoag D, et al. (2012). Improving conservation practices programming to protect water quality in agricultural watersheds: Lessons learned from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture–Conservation Effects Assessment Project. J Soil Water Conserv 67: 122–127.    
  • 189. Gburek WJ, Drungil CC, Srinivasan MS, et al. (2002) Variable-source-area controls on phosphorus transport: Bridging the gap between research and design. J Soil Water Conserv 57: 534–543.
  • 190. Gitau MW, Veith TL, Gburek WJ (2004) Farm-level optimization of BMP placement for cost-effective pollution reduction. T ASAE 47: 1923–1931.    
  • 191. Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2006) Cost‐effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm - Arabi. Water Resouce Res 42: W10429.
  • 192. Caswell M, Fuglie K, Ingram C, et al. Adoption of agricultural production practices. Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 792, USDA, 2001.
  • 193. Gabriel M, Knightes C, Cooter E, et al. (2018) Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin. J Hydrol Reg Stud 18: 68–79.    
  • 194. Holman IP, Rounsevell MDA, Shackley S, et al. (2005) A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK. Climatic Change 71: 9–41.    
  • 195. Dowd BM, Press D, Huertos ML (2008) Agricultural nonpoint source water pollution policy: The case of California's Central Coast. Agr Ecosyst Environ 128: 151–161.    

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved