AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(4): 585-600. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.4.585 Research article Topical Section

Export file:

Format

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
BibTex
Text

Content

Citation Only
Citation and Abstract

Thermomechanical analysis of porous solid oxide fuel cell by using peridynamics

Hanlin Wang, Erkan Oterkus, Selahattin Celik, Serkan Toros

1 Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, United Kingdom
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde 51240, Turkey

Received: , Accepted: , Published:

Topical Section: Energy and Materials Science

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure/Table Related pages

Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is widely used in hybrid marine propulsion systems due to its high power output, excellent emission control and wide fuel suitability. However, the operating temperature in SOFC will rise up to 800–1000 ℃ due to redox reaction among hydrogen and oxygen ions. This provides a suitable environment for ions transporting through ceramic materials. Under such operation temperatures, degradation may occur in the electrodes and electrolyte. As a result, unstable voltage, low capacity and cell failure may eventually occur. This study presents thermomechanical analysis of a porous SOFC cell plate which contains electrodes, electrolytes and pores. A microscale specimen in the shape of a plate is considered in order to maintain uniform temperature loading and increase the accuracy of estimation. A new computational technique, peridynamics, is utilized to calculate the deformations and stresses of the cell plate. Moreover, the crack formation and propagation are also obtained by using peridynamics. According to the numerical results, damage evolution depends on the electrolyte/electrode interface strength during the charging process. For weak interface strength case, damage emerges at the electrode/electrolyte interface. On the other hand, for stronger interface cases, damage emerges on pore boundaries especially with sharp corner.

Figure/Table

Supplementary

Article Metrics

References

1. Herdzik J (2011) Emissions from marine engines versus IMO certification and requirements of tier 3. J Kones 18: 161–167.

2. Rayment C, Sherwin S (2003) Introduction to fuel cell technology. Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, 11–12.

3. Celik S, Ibrahimoglu B, Mat MD, et al. (2015) Micro level two dimensional stress and thermal analysis anode/electrolyte interface of a solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energ 40: 7895–7902.

4. Laosiripojana N, Wiyaratn W, Kiatkittipong W, et al. (2009) Reviews on solid oxide fuel cell technology. Eng J 13: 65–84.

5. Dusastre V, Kilner JA (1999) Optimisation of composite cathodes for intermediate temperature SOFC applications. Solid State Ionics 126: 163–174.

6. Papurello D, Lanzini A, Drago D, et al. (2016) Limiting factors for planar solid oxide fuel cells under different trace compound concentrations. Energy 95: 67–78.

7. Aguiar P, Lapena RN, Chadwick D, et al. (2001) Improving catalyst structures and reactor configurations for autothermal reaction systems: application to solid oxide fuel cells. Chem Eng Sci 56: 651–658.

8. Papurello D, Lanzini A, Fiorilli S, et al. (2016) Sulfur poisoning in Ni-anode solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs): deactivation in single cells and a stack. Chem Eng J 283: 1224–1233.

9. Papurello D, Lanzini A, Leone P, et al. (2016) The effect of heavy tars (toluene and naphthalene) on the electrochemical performance of an anode-supported SOFC running on bio-syngas. Renew Energ 99: 747–753.

10. Madi H, Lanzini A, Papurello D, et al. (2016) Solid oxide fuel cell anode degradation by the effect of hydrogen chloride in stack and single cell environments. J Power Sources 326: 349–356.

11. Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83: 1526–1535.

12. Madenci E, Oterkus E (2014) Peridynamic theory and its applications. New York: Springer.

13. Laurencin J, Delette G, Dupeux M, et al. (2007) A numerical approach to predict SOFC fracture: the case of an anode supported cell. ECS Transactions 7: 677–686.

14. Diyaroglu C, Oterkus E, Oterkus S, et al. (2015) Peridynamics for bending of beams and plates with transverse shear deformation. Int J Solids Struct s69–70: 152–168.

15. Oterkus E, Guven I, Madenci E (2010) Fatigue failure model with peridynamic theory. Proceedings of ITherm 2010, Las Vegas, NV.

16. Oterkus E, Barut A, Madenci E (2010) Damage Growth Prediction from Loaded Composite Fastener Holes by Using Peridynamic Theory. 51th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, Paper No. 2010–3026.

17. Oterkus E, Madenci E (2012) Peridynamics for Failure Prediction in Composites. 53th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, Paper No. 2012–1692.

18. Oterkus S, Madenci E, Oterkus E, et al. (2014) Hygro-Thermo-Mechanical Analysis and Failure Prediction in Electronic Packages by Using Peridynamics. 64th Electronic Components & Technology Conference, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA.

19. De Meo D, Diyaroglu C, Zhu N, et al. (2016) Multiphysics modelling of stress corrosion cracking by using peridynamics. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41: 6593–6609.

20. Oterkus S, Fox J, Madenci E (2013) Simulation of electro-migration through peridynamics. IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), 1488–1493.

21. Rice JR (1988) Elastic fracture mechanics concepts for interfacial cracks. J Appl Mech 55: 98–103.

22. Stamps MA, Huang HYS (2012) Mixed modes fracture and fatigue evaluation for lithium-ion batteries. ASME 2012 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 97–103.

23. Malvern LE (1969) Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

24. Ivers TE, Weber A, Herbstritt D (2001) Materials and technologies for SOFC-components. J Eur Ceram Soc 21: 1805–1811.

25. Shearing PR, Gelb J, Brandon NP (2010) X-ray nano computerised tomography of SOFC electrodes using a focused ion beam sample-preparation technique. J Eur Ceram Soc 30: 1809–1814.

Copyright Info: © 2017, Erkan Oterkus, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline