Research article Special Issues

Improving rice-based rainfed production systems in Southeast Asia for contributing towards food security and rural development through sustainable crop production intensification

  • Received: 17 January 2016 Accepted: 29 March 2016 Published: 25 January 2016
  • Continuing degradation of the environment and the cumulating food, energy, water and financial crises have led to a situation where many people’s access to sufficient, nutritious food is affected as well as their livelihoods, income, and ultimate food and nutrition security. In the wake of these stresses and crises, there is an emerging interest to find efficient, easily accessible and sustainable approaches that can address these crises. One candidate for this is the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) with its “less can produce more” prescription. A regional collaborative project currently underway is being implemented in rainfed areas of the Lower Mekong River Basin (LMB) countries. This involves smallholder rice farmers, researchers, extension personnel, and development professionals, together with staff of relevant government ministries (http://www.sri-lmb.ait.asia/). The project objective is to produce healthier and profitable rice crops under rainfed conditions using SRI methods, evaluated and refined through farmers’ participatory action research (FPAR). As part of the action-research, more than 120 sets of field experiments have been carried out at 60 FPAR sites in Cambodia and Thailand, directly involving 3600 farmers. The experiments have ranged from the integration of many SRI principles with farmers’ current local practices or improved practices which was termed as “SRI-transition” to full demonstrations and assessments of SRI methodology, i.e., SRI demonstration. The initial calculation of yields has showed an average paddy yield of 5.03 t/ha with SRI-transition, whereas with SRI-demonstration the average yield was 6.41 t/ha. These yields were 60 and 100% higher than the average baseline yield in the region, 3.14 t/ha, for the same farmers and same locales. Productivity gains (dollars gained/dollars spent per ha) were calculated for both rainfed and irrigated production areas. In comparative terms, the economic gains for farmers were found to be higher in rainfed areas when using the new methods. This paper addresses the potential of new strategies to promote food security in rainfed areas in the LMB region by managing household and natural resources more productively.

    Citation: Abha Mishra, Prabhat Kumar, Jan Willem Ketelaar. Improving rice-based rainfed production systems in Southeast Asia for contributing towards food security and rural development through sustainable crop production intensification[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(2): 102-123. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.2.102

    Related Papers:

  • Continuing degradation of the environment and the cumulating food, energy, water and financial crises have led to a situation where many people’s access to sufficient, nutritious food is affected as well as their livelihoods, income, and ultimate food and nutrition security. In the wake of these stresses and crises, there is an emerging interest to find efficient, easily accessible and sustainable approaches that can address these crises. One candidate for this is the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) with its “less can produce more” prescription. A regional collaborative project currently underway is being implemented in rainfed areas of the Lower Mekong River Basin (LMB) countries. This involves smallholder rice farmers, researchers, extension personnel, and development professionals, together with staff of relevant government ministries (http://www.sri-lmb.ait.asia/). The project objective is to produce healthier and profitable rice crops under rainfed conditions using SRI methods, evaluated and refined through farmers’ participatory action research (FPAR). As part of the action-research, more than 120 sets of field experiments have been carried out at 60 FPAR sites in Cambodia and Thailand, directly involving 3600 farmers. The experiments have ranged from the integration of many SRI principles with farmers’ current local practices or improved practices which was termed as “SRI-transition” to full demonstrations and assessments of SRI methodology, i.e., SRI demonstration. The initial calculation of yields has showed an average paddy yield of 5.03 t/ha with SRI-transition, whereas with SRI-demonstration the average yield was 6.41 t/ha. These yields were 60 and 100% higher than the average baseline yield in the region, 3.14 t/ha, for the same farmers and same locales. Productivity gains (dollars gained/dollars spent per ha) were calculated for both rainfed and irrigated production areas. In comparative terms, the economic gains for farmers were found to be higher in rainfed areas when using the new methods. This paper addresses the potential of new strategies to promote food security in rainfed areas in the LMB region by managing household and natural resources more productively.


    加载中
    [1] Matsuo K (2002) Development of upland cropping systems for Crop-Animal integrated farming systems in Northeast Thailand. Report of Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Department of Agriculture (DOA) and Khon Kaen University (KKU), Thailand.
    [2] MAFF (2008) Report on Activities of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Workshop on National Achievement in 2007-2008 and Planning for 2008-2009. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2-3 April 2008 (in Khmer).
    [3] FAO (2004) FAOSTAT. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx
    [4] Kirby M, Mainuddin M (2006) Water Productivity Assessment: Mekong River Basin Approach, BFP Working Paper 4. In: An advance edition of a working paper on the assessment of water productivity from the approach of the Mekong River Basin. Available from: http://www.waterandfood.org/fileadmin/CPWF_Documents/Documents/Basin_Focal_Projects/BFP_Publications/MekongBasinWaterProductivityBFPwp04Draft02.pdf
    [5] UN Population Division (2006) World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2006/wpp2006.htm
    [6] Nesbitt HJ (2005) Water Used for Agriculture in the Lower Mekong Basin. MRC Technical paper No 11, Mekong River Commission, Vientiane.
    [7] Molle F, Wester P, Hirsch P, et al. (2007) River basin development and management. In: Water for Food Water for Life, A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Molden, D. (Eds.). London Earthscan. 585-625.
    [8] Behera D, Chaudhary AK, Vutukuru VK, et al. (2013) Enhancing agricultural livelihoods through community institutions in Bihar, India, In: South Asia rural livelihoods. Series 3 note no. 1. Washington D.C., The Worldbank.
    [9] Mishra A, Whitten M, Ketelaar JW, et al. (2006) The system of rice intensification (SRI): a challenge for science, and an opportunity for farmer empowerment towards sustainable agriculture. Int J Agric Sustain 4: 193-212. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2006.9684802
    [10] Mishra A, Kumar P, Noble A (2013) Assessing the potential of SRI management principles and the FFS approach in Northeast Thailand for sustainable rice intensification in the context of climate change. Int J Agric Sustain 11: 4-22. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2012.658648
    [11] Uphoff N, Randriamiharisoa R (2002) Possibilities for reducing water use in irrigated rice production through the Madagascar System of Rice Intensification, In: Water-Wise Rice Production. Bouman B et al. (Eds.). Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 71-88.
    [12] Kabir H, Uphoff N (2007) Results of disseminating the system of rice intensification with farmer field school methods in Northern Myanmar. Exp Agric 43: 463-476. doi: 10.1017/S0014479707005340
    [13] Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2008) Growing More Rice with Less Water in Asia: Identifying and Exploring Opportunities through System of Rice Intensification, In: Agricultural Systems: Economics, Technology and Diversity. Oliver, W. Castalonge (Eds.). Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers. 173-191.
    [14] Cohen J (1992) Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1: 98-101. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
    [15] FAO Rice Market Monitor (2015) Volume XVIII, Issue No 2, July 2015. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/COMM_MARKETS_MONITORING/Rice/Images/RMM/RMM_JUL15_H.pdf
    [16] Birdsall N, Ross D, Sabot R (1995) Inequality and growth reconsidered: lessons from East Asia. World Bank Econ Rev 9: 477-508. doi: 10.1093/wber/9.3.477
    [17] Dawe D (1996) A new look at the effects of export instability on investment and growth. World Dev 24: 1905-1914. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00080-0
    [18] Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2010) The effects of planting pattern and water regime on root morphology, physiology and grain yield in rice. J Agron Crop Sci 196: 368-378. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00421.x
    [19] Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2011) Rice root growth and physiological responses to SRI water management and implications for crop productivity. Paddy Water Environ 9: 41-52. doi: 10.1007/s10333-010-0240-4
    [20] Mishra A, Uphoff NT (2013) Morphological and physiological responses of rice root and shoots to varying water regimes and soil microbial densities. Arch Agron Soil Sci 59: 705-731. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2012.669474
    [21] Horie T, Shiraiwa T, Homma K, et al. (2005). Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that they showed in the 1980s? Plant Prod Sci 8: 251-272. doi: 10.1626/pps.8.259
    [22] Thakur AK, Uphoff NT, Stoop WA (2015) Scientific underpinnings of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI): What is known so far? Adv Agron 135: 147-179 doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2015.09.004
    [23] Mishra A, Kumar P (2015) Sustaining and Enhancing the Momentum for Innovation and Learning around the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in the Lower Mekong River Basin. Regional Review and Planning Workshop Report. 40p. Available from: http://www.sri-lmb.ait.asia/country/doc/Regional%20Review%20and%20Planning%20Workshop-REPORT%20(02-03%20June%202015).pdf
    [24] Isvilanonda S, Kao-ent S (2009) Dynamics of Thailand Rice production economy and future outlook. A paper presented to Thailand Research Fund, Bangkok.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4989) PDF downloads(1883) Cited by(4)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)  /  Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog