Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Learning Times Required to Identify the Stimulated Position and Shortening of Propagation Path by Hebb’s Rule in Neural Network

1 Graduate School of Applied Informatics, University of Hyogo, Kobe 650-0047, Japan;
2 Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Japan;
3 NBL Technovator Co., Ltd, 631 Shindachimakino, Sennan 590-0522, Japan

To deepen the understanding of the human brain, many researchers have created a new way of analyzing neural data. In many previous studies, researchers have examined neural networks from a macroscopic point of view, based on neuronal firing patterns. On the contrary, we have studied neural networks locally, in order to understand their communication strategies. To understand information processing in the brain, we simulated the firing activities of neural networks in a 9 × 9 two-dimensional neural network to analyze spike behavior. In this research study, we used two kinds of learning processes. As the main learning process, we implemented the learning process to identify the stimulated position. As the subsidiary one, we implemented Hebb’s learning rule which changes weight between neurons. Three channels with transmission and reception were preset, each of which has a different distance and direction. When all three channels succeeded in identifying the source stimulation in the receiving neuron group, it was regarded as an overall success and the learning was termed as successful. Furthermore, in order to see the effect of the second learning procedure, we elucidated the average of necessary learning times in each channel type and compared the firing propagation time of the first trial and an overall successful trial, in each channel. We found that the firing path after learning is shorter than the firing path before learning. Therefore, we deduced that Hebb’s rule contributes to shortening the firing path. Thus, Hebb’s rule contributes to speeding up communication in a neuronal network.
  Article Metrics

Keywords spike wave; Hebb’s rule; learning times; firing propagation times; neural network

Citation: Shun Sakuma, Yuko Mizuno-Matsumoto, Yoshi Nishitani, Shinichi Tamura. Learning Times Required to Identify the Stimulated Position and Shortening of Propagation Path by Hebb’s Rule in Neural Network. AIMS Neuroscience, 2017, 4(4): 238-253. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2017.4.238


  • 1. Hebb DO (1972) Textbook of Psychology. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders, PA, USA.
  • 2. Lansner A (2009) Associative memory models: from the cell-assembly theory to biophysically detailed cortex simulations. Trends Neurosci 32: 178-186.    
  • 3. Okada M (1996) Notions of associative memory and sparse coding. Neural Netw 9: 1429-1458.    
  • 4. Abeles M (1991) Corticonics: neural circuits of the cerebral cortex. Cambridge University Press.
  • 5. Ermentrout GB, Abeles M (1981) Local cortical circuits: an electrophysiological study. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York.
  • 6. Tanaka T, Kaneko T, Aoyagi T (2009) Recurrent infomax generates cell assemblies, neuronal avalanches, and simple cell-like selectivity. Neural Comput 21: 1038-1067.    
  • 7. Kleinfeld D (2001) Traveling electrical waves in cortex: insights from phase dynamics and speculation on a computational role. Neuron 29: 33-44.    
  • 8. Zennir MN, Benmohammed M, Martinez D (2017) Robust path planning by propagating rhythmic spiking activity in a hippocampal network model. Biol Inspir Cogn Arc 20: 47-58.
  • 9. Ponulak F, Hopfield JJ (2013) Rapid, parallel path planning by propagating wavefronts of spiking neural activity. Front Comput Neurosci 7: 98.
  • 10. Ermentrout B (1996) Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony. Neural Comput 8: 979-1001.    
  • 11. Gutkin BS, Ermentrout GB, Reyes AD (2005) Phase-response curves give the responses of neurons to transient inputs. J Neurophysiol 94: 1623-1635.    
  • 12. Tyukin I, Tyukina T, van Leeuwen C (2009) Invariant template matching in systems with spatiotemporal coding: A matter of instability. Neural Netw 22: 425-449.    
  • 13. Ammar M, Stefan S, Satoshi M, et al. (2013) Training spiking neural networks to associate spatio-temporal input-output spike patterns. Neurocomputing 107: 3-10.    
  • 14. Izhikevich EM (2006) Polychronization: computation with spikes. Neural Comput 18: 245-282.    
  • 15. Zhang HH, Wang QY, Perc M, et al. (2013) Synaptic plasticity induced transition of spike propagation in neuronal networks. Commun Nonlinear Sci 18: 601-615.    
  • 16. Mizuno-Matsumoto Y, Ishijima M, Shinosaki K, et al. (2001) Transient Global Amnesia (TGA) in an MEG Study. Brain Topogry 13: 269-274.    
  • 17. Mizuno-Matsumoto Y, Yoshimine T, Nii Y, et al. (2001) Landau-Kleffner syndrome: localization of epileptogenic lesion using wavelet-crosscorrelation analysis. Epilepsy Behav 2: 288-294.    
  • 18. Mizuno-Matsumoto Y, Ukai S, Ishii R, et al. (2005) Wavelet-crosscorrelation analysis: Non-stationary analysis of neurophysiological signals. Brain Topogr 17: 237-252.    
  • 19. Tamura S, Nakano S, Okazaki K (1985) Optical code-multiplex transmission by Gold-sequences. J Lightwave Technol 1: 21-127.
  • 20. Nishitani Y, Hosokawa C, Mizuno-Matsumoto Y, et al. (2012) Detection of M-sequences from spike sequence in neuronal networks. Comput Intell Neurosci 2012: 862579.
  • 21. Tamura S, Nishitani Y, Hosokawa C, et al. (2016) Spike code flow in cultured neuronal networks. Comput Intell Neurosci 2016:7267691.
  • 22. Tamura S, Yoshi Nishitani, Yakuya Kamimura, et al. (2013) Multiplexed spatiotemporal communication model in artificial neural networks. ACIS 1: 121-130.    
  • 23. Müller M (2007) Information retrieval for music and motion. Springer: 69-84.
  • 24. Nishitani Y, Hosokawa C, Mizuno-Matsumoto Y, et al. (2016) Variance of spatiotemporal spiking patterns by different stimulated neurons in cultured neuronal networks. Int J Acad Res Ref 4: 11-19.
  • 25. Sakuma S, Mizuno-Matsumoto Y, Nishitani Y, et al. (2016) Simulation of spike wave propagation and two-to-one communication with dynamic time warping. AIMS Neurosci 3: 474-486.    
  • 26. Gerstner W, Kistler WM (2002) Spiking neuron models. single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge University Press.
  • 27. Tamura S, Nishitani Y, Hosokawa C, et al. (2016) Simulation of code spectrum and code flow of cultured neuronal networks. Comput Intell Neurosci 2016: 7186092.
  • 28. Tamura S, Nishitani Y, Hosokawa C (2016) Feasibility of multiplex communication in 2D mesh asynchronous neural network with fluctuations. AIMS Neurosci 3: 385-397.    
  • 29. Ji D, Wilson MA (2007) Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nat Neurosci 10, 100-107.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Shinichi Tamura, Yoshi Nishitani, Chie Hosokawa, Yuko Mizuno-Matsumoto, Asynchronous Multiplex Communication Channels in 2-D Neural Network With Fluctuating Characteristics, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2019, 30, 8, 2336, 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2880565

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2017, Shun Sakuma, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved