Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

A Buffer Model Account of Behavioral and ERP Patterns in the Von Restorff Paradigm

1 Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Campus, Building A2.4., Room 2.23, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany;
2 Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, Lynn University, Boca Raton, FL, USA;
3 Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Topical Section: Advances in Memory Theories

We combined a mechanistic model of episodic encoding with theories on the functional significance of two event-related potential (ERP) components to develop an integrated account for the Von Restorff effect, which refers to the enhanced recall probability for an item that deviates in some feature from other items in its study list. The buffer model of Lehman and Malmberg (2009, 2013) can account for this effect such that items encountered during encoding enter an episodic buffer where they are actively rehearsed. When a deviant item is encountered, in order to re-allocate encoding resources towards this item the buffer is emptied from its prior content, a process labeled “compartmentalization”. Based on theories on their functional significance, the P300 component of the ERP may co-occur with this hypothesized compartmentalization process, while the frontal slow wave may index rehearsal. We derived predictions from this integrated model for output patterns in free recall, systematic variance in ERP components, as well as associations between the two types of measures in a dataset of 45 participants who studied and freely recalled lists of the Von Restorff type. Our major predictions were confirmed and the behavioral and physiological results were consistent with the predictions derived from the model. These findings demonstrate that constraining mechanistic models of episodic memory with brain activity patterns and generating predictions for relationships between brain activity and behavior can lead to novel insights into the relationship between the brain, the mind, and behavior.
  Article Metrics


1. Lehman M, Malmberg KJ (2013) A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychol Rev 120: 155-189. doi:10.1037/a0030851

2. Lehman M, Malmberg KJ (2009) A global theory of remembering and forgetting from multiple lists. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35: 970-988. doi:10.1037/a0015728

3. Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM (1968) Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology Learn Motivation 2: 89-195.

4. Von Restorff H (1933) Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychologische Forschung 18: 299-342. doi:10.1007/BF02409636

5. Malmberg KJ, Shiffrin RM (2005) The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage. J Experiment Psychology-Learn Memory Cognition 31: 322-336. doi:Doi 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.322    

6. Schmidt SR (1991) Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory Cognition 19: 523-542.    

7. Sokolov EN (1963) Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex. Annu Rev Physiol 25: 545-580. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.002553

8. Hunt RR, Lamb CA (2001) What causes the isolation effect?. J Experiment Psychol Learn Memory Cognition 27: 1359.    

9. Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, et al. (1965) Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150: 1187-1188. doi:10.1126/science.150.3700.1187

10. Donchin E (1981) Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology 18: 493-513. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x

11. Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988) Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavior Brain Sci 11: 357. doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027

12. Karis D, Fabiani M, Donchin E (1984) “P300” and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect. Cognitive Psychology 16: 177-216. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(84)90007-0

13. Wiswede D, Rüsseler J, Münte TF (2007) Serial position effects in free memory recall--An ERP-study. Biol Psychol 75: 185-193. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.02.002

14. Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14: 456-467. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1977.tb01312.x

15. Wickens C, Kramer A, Vanasse L, et al. (1983) Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science 221: 1080-1082. doi:10.1126/science.6879207

16. Löw A, Rockstroh B, Cohen R, et al. (1999) Determining working memory from ERP topography. Brain Topogr 12: 39-47. doi:10.1023/A:1022229623355

17. Ruchkin DS, Canoune HL, Johnson R, et al. (1995) Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 32: 399-410. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01223.x

18. Mecklinger A, Pfeifer E (1996) Event-related potentials reveal topographical and temporal distinct neuronal activation patterns for spatial and object working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 4: 211-224. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(96)00034-1

19. Johnson R (1995) Event-related potential insights into the neurobiology of memory systems. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 10, pp. 135-163). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

20. Münte TF, Schiltz K, Kutas M (1998) When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature 395: 71-73. doi:10.1038/25731

21. Lehnert G, Zimmer HD (2008) Common coding of auditory and visual spatial information in working memory. Brain Res 1230: 158-167. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.005

22. Jäger T, Mecklinger A, Kipp KH (2006) Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuron 52: 535-545. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.013

23. Kamp S.-M, Zimmer HD (2015) Contributions of attention and elaboration to associative encoding in young and older adults. Neuropsychologia 75: 252-264. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.026

24. Kim ASN, Vallesi A, Picton TW, et al. (2009) Cognitive association formation in episodic memory: evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia 47: 3162-3173. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.015

25. Fabiani M, Donchin E (1995) Encoding processes and memory organization: a model of the von Restorff effect. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21: 224-240. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.224

26. Fabiani M, Karis D, Donchin E (1990) Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75: 22-35. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(90)90149-E

27. Raaijmakers JG, Shiffrin RM (1981) Search of associative memory. Psychological Rev 88: 93.

28. Kahana MJ (1996) Associative retrieval processes in free recall. Mem Cognit 24: 103-109. doi:10.3758/BF03197276

29. Luck SJ, Vogel EK (1997) The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390: 279-281. doi:10.1038/36846

30. Kamp S.-M, Brumback T, Donchin E (2013) The component structure of ERP subsequent memory effects in the Von Restorff paradigm and the word frequency effect in recall. Psychophysiology 50: 1079-1093. doi:10.1111/psyp.12090

31. Kamp S.-M, Potts GF, Donchin E (2015) On the role of distinctiveness and semantic expectancies in episodic encoding of emotional words. Psychophysiology 52: 1599-1609.

32. Francis WN, Kucera H (1982) Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar: Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

33. Dien J (2010) The ERP PCA Toolkit: an open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. J Neurosci Methods 187: 138-145. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.12.009

34. Spencer KM, Dien J, Donchin E (1999) A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology 36: 409-414. doi:10.1017/S0048577299981180

35. Kamp S.-M, Donchin E (2015) ERP and pupil responses to deviance in an oddball paradigm. Psychophysiology 52: 460-471. doi:10.1111/psyp.12378

36. Wiswede D, Rüsseler J, Hasselbach S, et al. (2006) Memory recall in arousing situation—an emotional von Restorff effect? BMC Neurosci 7: 57. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-7-57

37. Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol 62: 621-647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123

38. Dunlosky J, Hunt RR, Clark E (2000) Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the Von Restorff effect? J Experiment Psychol Learn Memory Cognition 26: 649-657.

39. Nairne JS (2006) Modeling Distinctiveness: Implications for general memory theory. R.R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Copyright Info: © 2016, Siri-Maria Kamp, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved