Citation: Ehab I. El-Amin, Gamal Y. Ahmed, Waled Amen Mohammed Ahmed, Khalid E. Khalid, Ashraf M. E. A. Sakran. Lengths and Positions of the Vermiform Appendix among Sudanese Cadavers[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(3): 222-227. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.3.222
[1] | Asha Usha Vijayakumar, Manju Sudhakaran, Leelabhai Janaki Yovel . Human basilar artery: morphology & variations. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(4): 278-292. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020017 |
[2] | Ali Fathi Jouzdani, Soheila Madadi, Mohammad Azhar Abbas, Hania Razavi, Tahereh Alizamir . The comparison stature estimation from forearm, hand length and foot length between Iranian and Pakistani medical students. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(4): 496-511. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022027 |
[3] | Diogo Henrique Constantino Coledam, Philippe Fanelli Ferraiol, Gustavo Aires de Arruda, Arli Ramos de Oliveira . Correlates of the use of health services among elementary school teachers: A cross-sectional exploratory study. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(4): 273-290. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023021 |
[4] | Sylvia Kirchengast, Beda Hartmann . Maternal prepregnancy nutritional status influences newborn size and mode of delivery. AIMS Medical Science, 2018, 5(1): 53-66. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2018.1.53 |
[5] | Wenyang Liu, Dan Ruan . Segmentation of Left Ventricle with a Coupled Length Regularization and Sparse Composite Shape Prior: a Variational Approach. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(4): 295-302. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.4.295 |
[6] | Amelia Crabtree, Tyler J Lane, Lisa Mahon, Taryn Petch, Christina L Ekegren . The impact of an End-PJ-Paralysis quality improvement intervention in post-acute care: an interrupted time series analysis. AIMS Medical Science, 2021, 8(1): 23-35. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2021003 |
[7] | Ray Marks . Narrative Review of Vitamin D and Its Specific Impact on Balance Capacity in Older Adults. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(4): 345-358. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.4.345 |
[8] | Carol J. Farran, Olimpia Paun, Fawn Cothran, Caryn D. Etkin, Kumar B. Rajan, Amy Eisenstein, and Maryam Navaie . Impact of an Individualized Physical Activity Intervention on Improving Mental Health Outcomes in Family Caregivers of Persons with Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(1): 15-31. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.1.15 |
[9] | Emmanuel Rowlands . “I just need respect as a man that's all”: dynamics of respect and physical intimate violence among African men in Johannesburg. AIMS Medical Science, 2024, 11(4): 403-420. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2024028 |
[10] | Kathryn Biddle, Kelly Pagidas . Associated outcomes of various iterations of the dedicated orthopaedic trauma room: a literature review. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(3): 450-466. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022024 |
Vermiform appendix is a narrow blind tube that forms a part of the gastro-intestinal tract, and lies postero-medial to the cecum. It is usually about three to four inches (7.6 to 10.2 cm) long and extends from the cecum in the lower right-hand part of the abdomen [1]. Even though its anatomy displays great variations in length and position across different populations, thus far, very few studies have attempted to attribute these variations to specific etiological factor. Some authors propose that appendix is the shrunken remainder of the cecum that was found in remote human ancestors. However, in 2013, Smith refuted the idea of an inverse relationship between cecum presence and size with the appendix size [2].
According to Wakeley, vermiform appendix can be found in subcaecal, retrocaecal, retrocolic, post-ileal, preileal, and pelvic position [3]. Its length can also vary considerably from 2 to 20 cm with an average of 9 cm, and is usually about 0.5 cm longer in males than in females [4]. It is typically longer in infants and may atrophy or diminish in size in later adulthood [5]. Appendix position was found to be important, as the appendicitis may produce different symptoms and signs [6]. Hence, obtaining evidence of these variations is essential for accurate diagnosis and tre atment of the condition [7].
In a recent study correlates the histological features of the appendix as a function of age and found no significant correlation [8].
Appendicitis is diagnosed through medical examination whereby typical signs and symptoms are noted. Thus, being aware of possible appendix positions facilitates the diagnosis. Owing to different positions of the appendix, appendicitis can be misdiagnosed as other diseases, increasing the potential for subsequent complications [9]. Owing to this issue, this study aims to determine the positions and lengths of vermiform appendix, as well as, their relationship with age and sex of the individual.
The present study was performed on sixty Sudanese cadavers (30 male, 30 female) to determine the lengths and positions of vermiform appendices. The data was collected in the period from June 2013 to June 2014.
The dissection for the appendix was performed 4-6 hours after autopsy processing, before the organ was displaced by manipulation and dissection from the right iliac fossa. The abdomen was opened by a long midline incision and the flaps were reflected to provide a good view of the abdominal cavity and its contents. The anterior caecal taenia coli acts as the best guide for the vermiform appendix, as the length of the vermiform appendix is established by measuring the distance from the base to the tip of the appendix with the help of a measuring tape graduated in millimeters. Although the relation of the base of the appendix to the caecum is constant, the position of the free part of the vermiform appendix was studied in relation to the caecum, the terminal parts of ileum and the direction of the tip of the appendix.
The data was collected by observation checklist for measuring the lengths and positions of vermiform appendix. The positions of the vermiform appendix were studied in relation to the caecum with the terminal parts of ileum and the direction of the tip of the appendix, while the lengths were measured by ruler in millimeters. The ethical approval was taken from the authorities of the Omdurman Teaching Hospital and the ethical committee of Omdurman Islamic University. The demographic data were taken from different medico-legal cases, such as homicidal, suicidal, and road traffic accidents. All samples were included, since the appendix morphology was found normal following dissection. The data was analyzed by using SPSS statistical software version 20. The descriptive analysis was performed then the chi square test was done to identify the relationship between the demographic characteristics compared to the lengths and positions of the vermiform appendix. The p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
The study included 60 Cadavers (30 male, 30 female), with age groups ranged from 20 years to 80 years. Table 1 showed the positions of vermiform appendix among Sudanese Cadavers; 60% of them with normal positions (retrocaecal), while (35%) pelvic, (3.3%) post-ileal and pre-ileal (1.7%), however, the subcaecal was not found in the present study. The lengths of vermiform appendix among Sudanese Cadavers were ranged from 31 mm to 160 mm. The normal length (70-110 mm) were found in 60% while the abnormalities have seen in 40% divided into (23.3%) below normal length (31-69 mm), and above normal length (111-149 mm) were recorded in 15% and 1.7% has length between 150-160 mm (Table 1).
Parameter | n(%) | |
Sex | Male | 30 (50%) |
Female | 30 (50%) | |
20-40 years | 22 (36.7%) | |
Age | 41-60 years | 28 (46.7%) |
61-80 years | 10 (16.6%) | |
Retrocaecal | 36 (60%) | |
Pelvic | 21(35%) | |
Positions | Post-ileal | 2 (3.3%) |
Pre-ileal | 1 (1.7%) | |
Sub-caecal | 0 (0%) | |
31-69 mm | 14 (23.3%) | |
Lengths | 70-110 mm | 36 (60%) |
111-149 mm | 9 (15%) | |
150-160 mm | 1 (1.7%) | |
n = number |
In this study it was found that: age groups was influencing factor for the positions of vermiform appendix among Sudanese Cadavers significantly (p = 0.04), while gender was not influencing factor for the positions of vermiform appendix among Sudanese Cadavers (p = 0.35) (Table 2).
Position Variable | Retrocaecal | Pelvic | Post-ileal | Pre-ileal | Sub-caecal | p-value |
Age | 19-40 | 15 (68.2%) | 6 (27.3%) | 1 (4.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0.04* |
41-60 | 17 (60.7%) | 9 (32.1%) | 1 (3.6%) | 1 (3.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
60 -80 | 4 (40%) | 6 (60%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Gender | Male | 19 (63.3%) | 10 (33.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.35 |
Female | 17 (56.7%) | 11 (36.7%) | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
* Significant |
The present study found that, age groups and gender were found to be not influencing factors for the lengths of vermiform appendixes among Sudanese Cadavers (p = 0.08, and 0.23 respectively), and the length of normal appendixes was found longer in males than in females (Table 3).
Length Variable | 31-69 mm | 70-110 mm | 111-149 mm | 150-160 mm | p-value | |
Age | 19-40 | 9 (40.9%) | 10 (45.5%) | 3 (13.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
41-60 | 5 (17.9%) | 20 (71.4%) | 3 (10.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.08 | |
60-80 | 0 (0%) | 6 (60%) | 3 (30%) | 1 (10%) | ||
Gender | Male | 2 (6.7%) | 26 (86.6%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | |
Female | 12 (40%) | 10 (33.3%) | 7 (23.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0.23 |
Appendicitis is one of the common causes of acute abdominal pain, and its variable position and length may compromise the diagnosis [10].
In the present study, appendix was usually found in the retrocaecal position (60%), which is the normal developmental position of the appendix, followed by pelvis position (35.0%), and the pre-ileal position (1.7%). These findings are similar to those reported by Uttam [11], Wakeley [3], Maisel [12], Solanke [13], Gladstone and Wakeley [14], Clegg-Lamptey et al. [15], Ajmani and Ajmani [16], and Mwachaka et al. [17], where retrocaecal position was more prevalent than the pelvis one.
Even though no explanation has been provided for the differences in retrocaecal appendix positions they are most likely affected by genetic and life style factors such as nutritional regimen [18].
In human beings, the interactions between the immune system and the microbiome have led to an improvement in the understanding of the function of the appendix as repository for beneficial bacteria in the colon [19]. Having a good understanding of the position, length, outer girth and distance from ileocaecal junction of vermiform appendix would help in minimizing the complications of appendicular pathology [20].
As can be seen, our results did not coincide with those reported in other studies, such as Ghorbani et al. [21], Paul et al. [22], Ojeifo et al. [23], and Rahman et al. [20], who found that, pelvis position was more common than the retrocaecal one. We posit that the differences are due to the variation in ethnic groups.
Even though retrocaecal is the most common appendix location in both males and females, its frequency was higher among males. Thus, it is likely that the variation between our results and those reported in the aforementioned stems from our small sample size and population differences.
In this study, the length of the normal appendix was greater in males than in females, in line with the works of Ajmani and Ajmani [16],Gholalipour et al. [24], and Katzurski et al. [25], However, Bakheit and Warille [26] and Rahman et al. [27], reported opposite findings.
It has been stated that, appendix achieved its adult proportions and doesn’t continue to grow throughout childhood after 3 years of age [28]. However, and in consistent with Ghorbani et al. [21] this study found that the appendix length significantly increased with study subjects age.
In conclusion, this study determined the most common variety, lengths of appendix among Sudanese Cadavers, which can likely help in diagnosis of acute appendicitis based on our findings.
The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding this paper.
The authors would like to acknowledge contributions of Omdurman Teaching Hospital, Sudan.
[1] |
Shugaba AI, Umar MBT, Singh SP (2006) Histomorphometric profile of the human vermiform appendix. J Med Sci 6: 445-451. doi: 10.3923/jms.2006.445.451
![]() |
[2] | Smith HF, Parker W, Kotzé SH, et al. (2013) Multiple independent appearances of the cecal appendix in mammalian evolution and an investigation of related ecological and anatomical factors. C R Palevol. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2012.12.001. |
[3] | Wakeley CPG (1933) The position of the vermiform appendix as ascertained by an analysis of 10,000 cases. J Anat 67: 277-283. |
[4] | Russell RCG, Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK (2004) Bailey and Lovs short practice surgery. 24th ed. London: Hodder Headline Group. 203-206. |
[5] | Glover JW (1988) The human vermiform appendix. TJ Arch 3(1): 31-38. |
[6] | Sabiston DC, Townsend, Courtney M (2001) Sabiston’s textbook of surgery, the biological basis of modern surgical practice. In: Appendix. W.B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia 16(2): 918. |
[7] | Bakheit MA, Warille AA (1999) Anomalies of the Vermiform Appendix and Prevalence of Acute Appendicitis in Khartoum. East Afr Med J 16 (6): 338-340. |
[8] | Bakar SM, Shamim M, Salam A, et al. (2015) Microscopic studies on postmortem vermiform appendix of the adult males of Bangladesh. Irish J Med Sci. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-015-1287-4. |
[9] | Ramsden WH, Mannion RAJ, Simpkins KC, et al. (1993) Is the appendix where you think it is—and if not does it matter? Clin Radiol 47(2): 100-103. |
[10] | Turkoglu H, Onur MR, Poyraz AK, et al. (2012) Evaluation of normal appendix vermiform in adults with multi detector computed tomography. Clin Imaging 36(6): 758-762. |
[11] | Paul UK (2009) Position of Vermiform Appendix: A Postmortem Study. Bangladesh J Anat 7(1): 34-36. |
[12] |
Maisel H (1960) The position of the human vermiform appendix in foetal and adult age groups. Anat Record 136: 385-389. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091360305
![]() |
[13] | Solanke TF (1970) The position, length and content of the vermiform appendix in Nigerians. Br J Surg 57(2): 100-102. |
[14] | Gladstone RJ, Wakeley CPG (1924) The relative frequency of the various positions of the vermiform appendix: an ascertained by an analysis of 3,000 cases: with an account of its development. Br J Surg 11: 503-520. |
[15] | Clegg-Lamptey JNA, Armah H, Naaeder SB, et al. (2006) Position and susceptibility to inflammation of vermiform appendix in Accra, Ghana. East Afr Med J 83(12): 670-678. |
[16] | Ajmani ML, Ajmani K (1983) The position, length and arterial supply of vermiform appendix. Anat Anz 1(153): 369-374. |
[17] | Mwachaka P, El-busaidy H, Sinkeet S, et al. (2014) Variations in the Position and Length of the Vermiform Appendix in a Black Kenyan Population. ISRN Anatomy 2014: 1-5. |
[18] | Tofighi H, Taghadosi-nejad F, Abbaspour A, et al. (2013) The anatomical position of appendix in Iranian cadavers. Int J Med Toxicology and Forensic Med 3(4): 126-130. |
[19] | Cancado Jr (1988) Apendicite aguda e outras afecçoes do apendice. Gastroenterologia clínica. 2nd Ed. S.A. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan in Dani, R., Castro, L P. 2; 822-829. |
[20] | Rahman MM, Khalil M, Hussain M, et al. (2007) Length of Human Vermiform Appendix in Bangladeshi People. J Bangladesh Soc Physiol 2: 13-16. |
[21] | Ghorbani A, Forouzesh M, Kazemifar AM (2014) Variation in Anatomical Position of Vermiform Appendix among Iranian Population: An Old Issue Which Has Not Lost Its Importance. Anatomy Res Int: 1-4. |
[22] | Paul UK, Naushaba H, Begum T, et al. (2009) Position of vermiform appendix: a postmortem study. Bangladesh J Anat 7(1): 34-36. |
[23] | Ojeifo JO, Ejiwunmi AB, Iklaki J (1989) The position of the vermiform appendix in Nigerians with a review of the literature. West Afr J Med 8(3):198-204. |
[24] | Golalipour MJ, Arya B, Azarhoosh R, et al. (2003) Anatomical variations of vermiform appendix in South-East Caspian Sea (Gorgan-Iran). J Anat Soc 52(2): 141-143. |
[25] | Katzarski MM, GopalRao UK, Brady K (1979) Blood supply and position of the vermiform appendix in Zambians. Med J Zambia 13(2): 32-34. |
[26] | Bakheit MA, Warille AA (1999) Anomalies of the vermiform appendix and prevalence of acute appendicitis in Khartoum. East Afr Med J 76(6): 338-340. |
[27] | Rahman MM, Khalil M, Rahman H, et al. (2006) Anatomical positions of vermiform appendix in Bangladeshi people. J Bangladesh Soc Physiolo 1: 5-9. |
[28] | Searle AR, Ismail KA, Macgregor D, et al. (2013) Changes in the length and diameter of the normal appendix throughout childhood. J Pediatric Surg 48(7): 1535-1539. |
1. | Jovan Lovrenski, Radoica Jokić, Ivan Varga, Sonographically detected free appendicolith as a sign of retrocecal perforated appendicitis in a 2-year-old child, 2016, 44, 00912751, 395, 10.1002/jcu.22337 | |
2. | Slobodan Todorovic, Borislav Toskovic, Jasna Gačić, Hana Karaca, Natasa Colakovic, An Unusually Long Appendix: A Case Report and Literature Review, 2023, 11, 1857-9655, 53, 10.3889/oamjms.2023.11177 | |
3. | Nisha Nupur, Satyakam Jena, Mukesh Singh, Shrabana Kumar Naik, Thejaswi Hiriyur Thipperudrappa, Sachin Mittal, Position and Length of Appendix among Delhi Population-An Autopsy Based Study, 2024, 6, 2593-8339, 73, 10.24018/ejmed.2024.6.1.1942 | |
4. | Mohini M. Joshi, Sandeep V. Pakhale, Morphological variations of vermiform appendix: A cadaveric study, 2023, 9, 2581-5210, 20, 10.18231/j.ijashnb.2023.005 |
Parameter | n(%) | |
Sex | Male | 30 (50%) |
Female | 30 (50%) | |
20-40 years | 22 (36.7%) | |
Age | 41-60 years | 28 (46.7%) |
61-80 years | 10 (16.6%) | |
Retrocaecal | 36 (60%) | |
Pelvic | 21(35%) | |
Positions | Post-ileal | 2 (3.3%) |
Pre-ileal | 1 (1.7%) | |
Sub-caecal | 0 (0%) | |
31-69 mm | 14 (23.3%) | |
Lengths | 70-110 mm | 36 (60%) |
111-149 mm | 9 (15%) | |
150-160 mm | 1 (1.7%) | |
n = number |
Position Variable | Retrocaecal | Pelvic | Post-ileal | Pre-ileal | Sub-caecal | p-value |
Age | 19-40 | 15 (68.2%) | 6 (27.3%) | 1 (4.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0.04* |
41-60 | 17 (60.7%) | 9 (32.1%) | 1 (3.6%) | 1 (3.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
60 -80 | 4 (40%) | 6 (60%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Gender | Male | 19 (63.3%) | 10 (33.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.35 |
Female | 17 (56.7%) | 11 (36.7%) | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
* Significant |
Length Variable | 31-69 mm | 70-110 mm | 111-149 mm | 150-160 mm | p-value | |
Age | 19-40 | 9 (40.9%) | 10 (45.5%) | 3 (13.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
41-60 | 5 (17.9%) | 20 (71.4%) | 3 (10.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.08 | |
60-80 | 0 (0%) | 6 (60%) | 3 (30%) | 1 (10%) | ||
Gender | Male | 2 (6.7%) | 26 (86.6%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | |
Female | 12 (40%) | 10 (33.3%) | 7 (23.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0.23 |
Parameter | n(%) | |
Sex | Male | 30 (50%) |
Female | 30 (50%) | |
20-40 years | 22 (36.7%) | |
Age | 41-60 years | 28 (46.7%) |
61-80 years | 10 (16.6%) | |
Retrocaecal | 36 (60%) | |
Pelvic | 21(35%) | |
Positions | Post-ileal | 2 (3.3%) |
Pre-ileal | 1 (1.7%) | |
Sub-caecal | 0 (0%) | |
31-69 mm | 14 (23.3%) | |
Lengths | 70-110 mm | 36 (60%) |
111-149 mm | 9 (15%) | |
150-160 mm | 1 (1.7%) | |
n = number |
Position Variable | Retrocaecal | Pelvic | Post-ileal | Pre-ileal | Sub-caecal | p-value |
Age | 19-40 | 15 (68.2%) | 6 (27.3%) | 1 (4.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0.04* |
41-60 | 17 (60.7%) | 9 (32.1%) | 1 (3.6%) | 1 (3.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
60 -80 | 4 (40%) | 6 (60%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Gender | Male | 19 (63.3%) | 10 (33.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.35 |
Female | 17 (56.7%) | 11 (36.7%) | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
* Significant |
Length Variable | 31-69 mm | 70-110 mm | 111-149 mm | 150-160 mm | p-value | |
Age | 19-40 | 9 (40.9%) | 10 (45.5%) | 3 (13.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
41-60 | 5 (17.9%) | 20 (71.4%) | 3 (10.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.08 | |
60-80 | 0 (0%) | 6 (60%) | 3 (30%) | 1 (10%) | ||
Gender | Male | 2 (6.7%) | 26 (86.6%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | |
Female | 12 (40%) | 10 (33.3%) | 7 (23.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0.23 |