
Foodborne bacterial infections, particularly those caused by contaminated food sources, pose significant public health challenges and result in substantial economic losses. This review aims to provide insights into recent literature on the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in North African food supply chains and their pathogenicity. Additionally, it seeks to summarize the available information on health-related issues and the current state of antibiotic resistance. The reviewed evidence highlights a gap in our understanding of the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in North African food supplies. Molecular characterization efforts to identify the sources of Campylobacter spp. are limited, and there are few surveys that have specifically targeted this bacterium in the food supply. While qualitative data indicates either the presence or absence of Campylobacter spp., quantitative data on the actual amounts of these bacteria in chicken meat supplies across North African countries are notably lacking. Despite frequent reports of Campylobacter spp. in animal-derived foods, the literature reviewed emphasizes the ongoing challenge that Campylobacter spp. pose to food safety and public health in North Africa.
Citation: Mohamed-Yousif Ibrahim Mohamed. Campylobacteriosis in North Africa[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(3): 801-821. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024043
[1] | Mohamed-Yousif Ibrahim Mohamed, Ihab Habib . Listeria monocytogenes in food products, and its virulence in North Africa. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 97-128. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025006 |
[2] | Victoria Blaeske, Felicitas Maria Schumann-Muck, Ahmad Hamedy, Peggy G. Braun, Martin Koethe . Campylobacter colonisation of slaughterhouse surfaces may be affected by ultra-thin silica coating. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 52-68. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024004 |
[3] | Julieta Silva, Joana Barbosa, Helena Albano, Maria Sequeira, Ana Pinto, Conceição Costa Bonito, Margarida Saraiva, Paula Teixeira . Microbiological characterization of different formulations of alheiras (fermented sausages). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(2): 399-413. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.399 |
[4] | Farid Hellal, Mohamed Abdel-Hady, Ismail Khatab, Saied El-Sayed, Chedly Abdelly . Yield characterization of Mediterranean barley under drought stress condition. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(3): 518-533. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.518 |
[5] | Michelle Marais, Henry Jordaan, Willem Abraham Lombard, Yonas T. Bahta . Assessing the potential of a niche market for wool products in South Africa. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 108-128. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024007 |
[6] | Anthony Temitope Idowu, Oluwakemi Osarumwense Igiehon, Ademola Ezekiel Adekoya, Solomon Idowu . Dates palm fruits: A review of their nutritional components, bioactivities and functional food applications. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 734-755. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.734 |
[7] | Milka N. Kiboi, Felix K. Ngetich, Daniel N. Mugendi . Nitrogen budgets and flows in African smallholder farming systems. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(2): 429-446. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.429 |
[8] | Saber Ibrahim, Amany Badr El-Deen Abd El-Aziz, Hanan Hassan Abdel-Khalek . Effect of γ irradiation on the antibacterial activity of poly lactic acid films encapsulated with essential oils against some common food borne pathogens. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 715-733. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.715 |
[9] | Heru Irianto, Mujiyo Mujiyo, Aulia Qonita, Ato Sulistyo, Erlyna Wida Riptanti . The development of jarak towo cassava as a high economical raw material in sustainability-based food processing industry. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 125-141. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021008 |
[10] | María Cámara-Ruiz, José María García Beltrán, Francisco Antonio Guardiola, María Ángeles Esteban . In vitro and in vivo effects of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 799-824. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.799 |
Foodborne bacterial infections, particularly those caused by contaminated food sources, pose significant public health challenges and result in substantial economic losses. This review aims to provide insights into recent literature on the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in North African food supply chains and their pathogenicity. Additionally, it seeks to summarize the available information on health-related issues and the current state of antibiotic resistance. The reviewed evidence highlights a gap in our understanding of the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in North African food supplies. Molecular characterization efforts to identify the sources of Campylobacter spp. are limited, and there are few surveys that have specifically targeted this bacterium in the food supply. While qualitative data indicates either the presence or absence of Campylobacter spp., quantitative data on the actual amounts of these bacteria in chicken meat supplies across North African countries are notably lacking. Despite frequent reports of Campylobacter spp. in animal-derived foods, the literature reviewed emphasizes the ongoing challenge that Campylobacter spp. pose to food safety and public health in North Africa.
Globally, the presence of foodborne pathogens continues to pose significant challenges to both food safety and international trade. In Europe and various other regions, foodborne infections remain a major public health concern [1]. Data compiled by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Zoonoses Reports of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) suggest that instances of human campylobacteriosis, primarily associated with Campylobacter jejuni, have remained below the radar in the past, leading to intermittent periods over the past decade where reported cases surpassed those of salmonellosis [2,3]. In the United States of America (USA), C. jejuni has been identified as the primary pathogen that caused foodborne illnesses, closely followed by Salmonella. According to the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) operated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), documented hospitalizations due to foodborne campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis have increased over recent years [4].
In a 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) report, the Middle East and North Africa were ranked third regarding the global burden per population of foodborne diseases, just behind Africa and the South-East Asian regions [5]. Moreover, the study indicated that around 70% of the total foodborne illness in this region was caused by Campylobacter, E. coli, intestinal non-typhoidal Salmonella, and Norwalk Virus, underlining these pathogenic agents' crucial role in the foodborne infections in the area. However, determining the actual rate of food-borne infections in the region can be a bit challenging due to low systematic investigations. These efforts can help in the early identification of sporadic cases, the containment of outbreaks, and having isolates for source attribution and risk assessment nationally and regionally. Additionally, there is incomplete knowledge regarding antimicrobial resistance in bacteria that cause foodborne infections based on the Middle Eastern region [6,7]. Nevertheless, an understanding of this problem remains elusive.
This review presents the current and updated knowledge of the epidemiology of Campylobacter spp., which is often associated with global cases of foodborne infections around the world. Using the systematic review approach, where each included study is the basic unit of analysis, helps create the database. Authors extracted key characteristics from these studies, including the publication year, the methodologies employed, the data collection techniques, and the research outcomes. Subsequently, a frequency analysis was utilized to derive quantitative findings [8,9]. To identify pertinent research articles on foodborne infections across various food types in North African countries over the past two decades, searches were conducted on platforms such as PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Moreover, both electronic postgraduate theses and national reports were used to gather information on foodborne pathogens in the North African region. This region, which includes Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia, has difficult environments with limited water resources. This region covers approximately 4,758,160 square kilometers, where 90% of the region is characterized by arid or semi-arid climate, therefore posing difficulties in the control and management of foodborne infections.
In this research, our objective is to elucidate (ⅰ) the historical understanding and recent advancements, drawn from published research over the past twenty years, on the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in the food chain and (ⅱ) its pathogenicity in North African countries.
Campylobacter spp. were initially identified in 1913 as Vibrio fetus in veterinary specimens. Subsequently, Vibrio jejuni was coined in 1927, followed by Vibrio coli in 1944, and Vibrio bubulus in bovine reproductive tracts. In 1963, Sebald and Veron reclassified Vibrio fetus and V. bubulus as the Campylobacter species. Veron and Chatelain identified four primary species: C. jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter sputorum, and Campylobacter fetus [10]. In 1980, Campylobacter lari was discovered by Skirrow and Benjamin. The term "Campylobacter" was derived from the Greek words for "curved" and "rod, " encompassing 31 species and 13 subspecies. C. jejuni has two subspecies: jejuni (common in human cases) and doylei (lacking an animal host). This distinction is vital when specifically referring to C. jejuni, typically indicating C. jejuni subsp. jejuni [11,12,13].
Campylobacter spp., microaerophilic bacteria, flourish in oxygen concentrations ranging from 5% to 10%, in conjunction with 10% carbon dioxide [14]. These microorganisms are Gram-negative and exhibit either a spiral-shaped, coccal, or curved morphology, presenting as motile rods with flagella. They commonly reside in the intestines of mammals and birds as commensals [15]. Given their slow growth, they require specialized growth media containing charcoal and antibiotics such as cephalothin to suppress the competing microorganisms in fecal samples. Notably, C. jejuni and C. coli, recognized for their thermotolerance, optimally thrive at 42 ℃ [16]. However, not all Campylobacter spp. demonstrate the same degree of thermotolerance; for instance, C. fetus lacks this trait [17]. Stool cultures for cases of human diarrhea typically follow standard practices at 42 ℃, utilizing media containing cephalothin to isolate C. jejuni and C. coli; however, this method may not be suitable for other species such as C. fetus or C. upsaliensis, which cause illness less frequently [4,18,19].
Campylobacteriosis is primarily caused by Campylobacter spp., and continues to pose a threat to public health in North African countries [20]. Although detailed statistics specific to the studied area could not be identified, the existing research suggests that the incidence of campylobacteriosis in the general population appears to be high. Campylobacteriosis is a zoonotic disease prevalent among humans in North Africa and is related to various factors, including the standard of living and habits, sanitation practices, and the availability of contaminated food and water [21]. The warm climate prevalent in many North African countries may also contribute to the survival and spread of Campylobacter. Strategies used in the diagnosis and monitoring of campylobacteriosis and the surveillance systems in each of the North African countries differ, impacting the accuracy of the reported cases. Moreover, low awareness, oversight, and misidentification may also contribute to the further ambiguity regarding the true burden of the disease in the region.
Efforts to combat campylobacteriosis in the North African region include adopting structural and educational strategies in food hygiene, augmenting sanitation facilities, and sensitizing the medical practitioners and general public [22,23]. A disjointed effort between health authorities, research institutions, and international organizations is necessary for the development of prevention and control strategies due to the peculiarities of the North African region. Campylobacteriosis is a major cause of gastrointestinal disease, and more studies and surveillance are needed to elucidate the disease profile in North Africa, to assess the risk factors, to develop specific points of control measures, and to reduce the impact of this disease in the area.
Campylobacter spp. mostly manifests the risks of passing from infected animals or animal products to humans or animals and other environments [21,24]. Despite the difficulties in pinpointing specific exposure routes of Campylobacter infections, current and emerging studies indicate poultry meat and products as the primary vehicles [25,26,27]. Another UK study compared wild and domestic ducks and discovered differences in the genotypes of C. jejuni regarding domestic ducks as a source of campylobacteriosis [28]. In the same way, poultry products are considered the main reason for C. jejuni contaminations in Brazil. Wild birds in Malaysia brought C. jejuni into different environments, and cats or dogs with C. jejuni gastrointestinal issues also spread the bacteria [24,29,30]. In Italy, the risk of campylobacteriosis from pets, notably dogs, is increasing, as supported by molecular evidence linking human and pet strains [31]. Campylobacter spp. can be transmitted to humans through both direct and indirect means, with direct transmission commonly occurring among professionals with close animal contact, such as veterinarians and butchers [32] (Figure 1). The primary sources of infection are believed to be meat, milk, and water [24,29]. Despite being labor-intensive and costly, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) remains the most effective approach for genotyping C. jejuni isolates and understanding the epidemiological connections between them.
In North Africa, there is a rising apprehension regarding Campylobacter spp. infections in humans, predominantly attributable to C. jejuni and C. coli [20]. Given the impact of urbanization, dietary shifts, and population growth on exposure, grasping the origins of transmission is essential to implement efficient public health interventions. Tackling these origins is imperative for averting and controlling Campylobacter spp. infections in the North African region, underscoring campylobacteriosis as a notable public health issue [1].
Research in Algeria has primarily focused on chicken meat as a reservoir of Campylobacter spp. Baali et al. [17] found high levels of C. jejuni in East Algerian chicken meat, while Benamar et al. [33] and Messad et al. [34] detected Campylobacter spp. in poultry across Algiers. In Egypt, chicken products have been linked to human campylobacteriosis, with El-Naenaeey et al., [35] Barakat et al., and Abd El-Tawab et al. [36] identifying Campylobacter spp. in poultry. Sayed et al. found C. jejuni and C. coli in pigeon and turkey meats. Studies by Zeinhom et al., [37] Barakat et al., [38] and El-Zamkan and Abdel Hameed [39] confirmed these pathogens in dairy products. In Morocco, Campylobacter spp. were found in chicken, raw milk, and beef by El Baaboua et al. [40] and Jouahri et al. [41]. In Tunisia, Campylobacter spp. were detected in chicken, turkey, and eggs by Béjaoui et al. [42], Gharbi et al. [43], and Jribi et al [44]. Libyan research on Campylobacter spp. is limited (Table 1).
Country | Tested Food Samples (Total Number) | Campylobacter spp. %* | C. jejuni % | C. coli % | Other Species | References |
Algeria | Chicken meats (n = 204) | 86.2 | ND** | ND | ND | [33] |
Kebab (n = 96) | 38 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 240) | 55 | 56.8 | 2.3 | 40.9 | [17] | |
Chicken meats (n = 100) | 80 | ND | ND | ND | [34] | |
Egypt | Pigeon meat (n = 100) | 16 | 9 | 7 | ND | [45] |
Pigeon liver (n = 100) | 17 | 4 | 13 | ND | ||
Turkey meat (n = 100) | 12 | 4 | 8 | ND | ||
Turkey liver (n = 100) | 19 | 8 | 11 | ND | ||
Chickens (n = 195) | 86.2 | 59.5 | 26.7 | ND | [35] | |
Breast meat (n = 40) | 75 | 55 | 20 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 47) | 83 | 70.2 | 12.8 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | [37] | |
Talaga cheese (n = 50) | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
Feta cheese (n = 50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Kareish cheese (n = 50) | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
Turkey meats (n = 30) | 20 | 13.3 | 6.7 | ND | [46] | |
Liver (n = 30) | 27 | 20 | 10 | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 547) | 37.8 | ND | ND | ND | [38] | |
Liver (n = 127) | 37 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 274) | 5.1 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Cheese (n = 180) | 7.8 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Yoghurt (n = 193) | 13.9 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken Liver (n = 70) | 27 | 68.4 | 31.6 | C. lari (0) | [47] | |
Chicken breast (n = 70) | 7.1 | 100 | 0 | C. lari (0) | ||
Chicken thigh (n = 70) | 14 | 50 | 40 | C. lari (10) | ||
Raw milk (n = 52) | 11 | 33.3 | 66.7 | C. lari (0) | ||
Kariesh cheese (n = 40) | 8 | 66.7 | 33.3 | C. lari (0) | ||
Yoghurt (n = 30) | 0 | 0 | 0 | C. lari (0) | ||
Broiler (n = 101) | 16.8 | ND | 4 | ND | [48] | |
Slaughterhouses (n = 104) | 24 | ND | 3.9 | ND | ||
Fresh chicken meat products (n = 30) | 53 | 46.7 | 46.7 | ND | [49] | |
Frozen chicken meat products (n = 30) | 53 | 46.7 | 40 | ND | ||
Chicken burger (n = 15) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken nuggets (n = 15) | 13 | 13.3 | 13.3 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | 22 | 20 | 20 | ND | [39] | |
Kareish cheese (n = 50) | 34 | 14 | 14 | ND | ||
Yoghurt (n = 50) | 18 | 8 | 8 | ND | ||
Skin (n = 39) | 31 | 12.8 | 17.9 | C. lari (17.9), C. hyointestinal (0) | [36] | |
Thigh meat (n = 39) | 39 | 17.9 | 20.5 | C. lari (20.5), C. hyointestinal (1) | ||
Breast meat (n = 39) | 41 | 33.3 | 5.1 | C. lari (5.1), C. hyointestinal (2.7) | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | ND | 4 | ND | ND | [50] | |
Laban Rayeb (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Stored Domiati cheese (n = 39) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Fresh Domiati cheese (n = 38) | ND | 11 | ND | ND | ||
Zabady (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Ras cheese (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Kariesh cheese (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Morocco | Raw milk (n = 61) | ND | 1.6 | 0 | ND | [40] |
Beef (n = 16) | ND | 0 | 6.3 | ND | ||
Minced meat (n = 38) | ND | 5.6 | 7.9 | ND | ||
Eggs (n = 44) | ND | 0 | 0 | ND | ||
Breast and minced meat (n = 60) | ND | 6.7 | 50 | ND | ||
Chicken thigh (n = 48) | ND | 6.6 | 50 | ND | ||
Chicken wings (n = 23) | ND | 4.3 | 60.9 | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 39) | ND | 5.1 | 38.5 | ND | ||
Poultry (n = 140) | 73 | ND | ND | ND | [51] | |
Broiler (n = 105) | 71.4 | ND | 40 | ND | [52] | |
Raw poultry meat (n = 50) | 62 | ND | ND | ND | [41] | |
Tunisia | Chicken meats (n = 257) | 18.7 | 68.7 | 31.2 | ND | [42] |
Eggs (n = 86) | 26 | 81.8 | 18.2 | ND | [43] | |
Broiler chickens (n = 590) | 22.4 | ND | ND | ND | [53] | |
Chicken meat (n = 149) | 26.8 | 16.1 | 3.4 | ND | [44] | |
Turkey meat (n = 101) | 23.7 | 13.8 | 1.9 | ND | ||
* The percentage (%) of Campylobacter species is calculated from the positive samples (isolated target bacteria). ** ND: Not determined. |
These findings underscore the need for the necessary steps to improve and ensure proper storage and handling practices in the poultry market to address Campylobacter spp. connection to poultry products, with a major emphasis on the enforcement of food safety. Based on the findings, the research highlights the need to analyze the Campylobacter pathogen in food safety protocols to improve safety standards in North African countries.
These curved-rod-shape bacteria include Arcobacter butzleri, A. cryaerophilus, Helicobacter bilis, and H. canis, and have been known to cause gastroenteritis in humans in recent studies [54,55]. Nevertheless, C. jejuni is still the leading causative agent for gastroenteritis in the developed world [56]. The disease caused by Campylobacter is a serious public health concern, especially during the summer, in many European countries [32]. People who handle animals or animal products, such as veterinarians, farmers, poultry workers, and individuals who work in abattoirs or butcheries, also have a higher risk of getting infected due to occupational exposure [21].
In Egypt, as documented by Zeinhom et al. [37], a study was conducted on 53 individuals with gastrointestinal symptoms who visited an outpatient clinic between January and June 2019. The research revealed that among the analyzed human stool samples, 21 (39.6%) tested positive for C. jejuni. Of these, 12 (48%) patients experienced diarrhea, while 9 (32.1%) did not show any diarrheal symptoms. Additionally, the isolates from human stool samples demonstrated notable resistances to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline, with resistance rates of 70%, 60%, and 70%, respectively. In another study by Lobna et al. [47], samples were collected from 128 human stool swabs obtained from patients with gastroenteritis symptoms from Toukh Central Hospital in Toukh city, Kalyoubia, Egypt. Campylobacter spp. were isolated from 26 human stool samples (20.3%). Among these isolates, 22 (84.6%) were identified as C. jejuni and 4 (15.3%) as C. coli. In a separate outbreak investigation in Cairo, Egypt, by Ghoneim et al. [57], 75 stool samples were collected from individuals with diarrhea, leading to the identification of thirteen C. jejuni isolates (17.33%).
El-Naenaeey et al. [35] collected 44 human stool samples from gastroenteritis patients in Zagazig City, Egypt, from March 2017 to September 2019, isolating Campylobacter spp. from 91% of the samples. The highest isolation rates were for C. jejuni (73%) and C. coli (18%), with all isolates resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin, and erythromycin. Abushahba et al. [48] found Campylobacter spp. in 22 of 80 samples (28%) from Assiut University Hospital, with C. coli in 5% of the samples and an absence of C. jejuni. Abdelhady et al. [58] found a 34.8% (15/43) prevalence rate for the Campylobacter genus in 43 stool swabs from children at Assuit University Children's Hospital, identifying C. coli at 33.3% (5/15), C. jejuni at 6.7% (1/15), and mixed infections at 6.7% (1/15). El-Tawab et al. [36] found a 5.3% prevalence rate for Campylobacter spp. in 246 stool swabs from Al-Ahrar public hospital, with 10 cases of C. jejuni and 3 cases of C. coli.
In Morocco, as reported by Baaboua et al. [40], a study conducted between July 2015 and June 2018 involved six stool samples from patients with diarrhea in Northern Morocco, where only one sample tested positive for C. jejuni. No studies on patients with diarrhea have been conducted in Algeria, Libya, and Tunisia.
Surveys conducted in Egypt depicted elevated rates of Campylobacter, particularly C. jejuni infection, among individuals with diarrheal symptoms. Zeinhom et al. [37] found out that 40% of stool samples were positive for C. jejuni, where a notable portion of patients experienced diarrhea. These isolates exhibited a high resistance to common antibiotics, reflecting a concerning trend. Similarly, other studies corroborate widespread Campylobacter infections in Egypt. Conversely, Baaboua et al. [40] observed a lower prevalence of C. jejuni in patients with diarrhea in Northern Morocco, suggesting the possibility of other pathogens causing diarrheal illnesses in Morocco. Limited research of the Algerian, Libyan, or Tunisian populations highlighted the knowledge deficit concerning Campylobacter distribution in North African countries; therefore, there is a necessity for future related exploration for a healthy population consequence (Table 2).
Location | Sample Size | Campylobacter spp. %* | C. jejuni %** | C. coli %** | Confirmation Methods | References |
Egypt (Beni-Suef) | 53 | 40 | ND*** | ND | PCR technique | [37] |
Egypt (Kalyoubia) | 128 | 20.3 | 85 | 15 | Biochemical tests | [47] |
Egypt (Cairo) | 75 | 17 | ND | ND | PCR technique | [57] |
Egypt (Sharkia Governorate) | 100 | ND | 30 | ND | PCR technique | [14] |
Egypt (Zagazig City) | 44 | 91 | 73 | 18 | PCR technique | [35] |
Egypt (Giza) | 40 | ND | 92.5 | 7.5 | PCR technique | [38] |
Egypt (Assiut) | 80 | 28 | 0 | 5 | PCR technique | [48] |
Egypt (Assuit) | 43 | 11 | 7 | 33 | PCR technique | [58] |
Egypt (Zagazig City) | 246 | 5.3 | 77 | 23 | PCR technique | [36] |
Morocco (Northern) | 6 | 17 | 100 | 0 | PCR technique | [40] |
* The isolation rate was calculated from the total number of the examined samples ** The isolation rate of each species was calculated from the total number of the isolated Campylobacters spp. *** ND: Not determined. |
The term "virulence genes" typically refers to genes within microorganisms, such as bacteria, that impact their ability to cause disease and adapt to challenging environmental conditions. These genes are closely associated with the microorganism's pathogenicity and its capacity to thrive and cause infections within a host organism [6]. In the case of bacteria like Campylobacter spp., which are known to cause foodborne illnesses in humans, virulence stress genes may include those involved in processes such as bacterial adhesion to host cells, tissue invasion, and an evasion of the host's immune defenses. Additionally, these genes may contribute to the microorganism's ability to withstand adverse conditions, such as temperature fluctuations or acidic environments, encountered during infection or in external settings [59]. Researching virulence stress genes is crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying bacterial pathogenesis and survival across different environments. Identifying and characterizing these genes can provide insights into microbial pathogenicity and potentially inform the development of treatments or preventive strategies against infections.
Virulence genes such as cadF and flpA code for fibronectin-binding proteins, which help the bacterium firmly adhere to the cells of the small intestinal epithelia. Adherence is very important because it marks the initial point in the process of colonization and infection [60]. These easily identifiable proteins allow the bacteria to adhere to the inner lining of the host's cells and effectively avoid being washed out of the gastrointestinal tract [61]. ciaB is a member of the Campylobacter invasion antigen (Cia) protein subfamily and plays a role in the invasion of epithelial cells. The bacteria require invasion into the epithelial cells totranslocate across the intestinal barrier and cause further disease and subsequent systemic spread[62]. Cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) genes cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC form the subunits of CDT that induce host cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. This leads to cell death and tissue damage which, in a way, are responsible for the symptoms associated with gastroenteritis such as diarrhea and inflammation [63]. The flaA and flaB genes are responsible for the motor flagellin proteins that enable motion. Motility is crucial for the movement of Campylobacter in the mucous layers of the gastrointestinal tract to facilitate colonization and diffusiveness [64].
Genes involved in overcoming stress htrA encode a serine protease that is useful in the degradation of misfolded proteins and is useful in protein refolding under stress. This aids the bacterium to live under heat shock and oxidative stress, which are realities in the host organism [65]. clpB encodes a molecular chaperone that disaggregates and refolds proteins damaged by stress. This gene helps in surviving heat and osmotic stress, and hence helps in carrying out various functions within a cell during an infection [66]. sodB encodes superoxide dismutase, which is an enzyme that neutralizes reactive oxygen species. This helps the bacteria avoid oxidative stress, which is inflicted by the host immune system, and thus retains a foothold in the host. Other adaptations include katA, which encodes catalase that decomposes hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen, which subsequently helps the bacterium to resist the host's immune system [67].
Even though there are differences in the primary roles of virulence and stress response genes in Campylobacter, there are instances where both are connected. For example, the ability to adhere to host cells and transgress their membranes (regulated by genes such as cadF and ciaB) not only helps bacteria cause disease, but also puts them in an environment that triggers a powerful immune response [63]. In such conditions, stress response genes such as htrA and sodB are found to play an important role in helping the bacteria to survive. Furthermore, it was established that some stress response mechanisms could promote survival in a way that is beneficial to pathogens [67]. For instance, while sodB and katA help the detoxification of reactive oxygen species to save the bacteria, they may also decrease local inflammatory reactions, which may otherwise hinder colonization and persistence. Campylobacter possesses an impressive inventory of virulence factors and stress response genes to facilitate infection, subvert/intrude the host defenses, and survive in harsh conditions within the host. These genes are genetically controlled, may exist analogously, and are linked; this makes the bacterial pathogenicity and survival strategies intricate [60].
In Egypt, as reported by Abdelhady et al. [58], they investigated the presence and expression levels of flaA, cadF, and cdtB genes. Among the 8 C. coli isolates, flaA, cadF, and cdtB genes were detected in 25%, 12.5%, and 75% of cases, respectively. Conversely, the single C. jejuni isolate expressed only cadF and cdtB genes, while the flaA gene remained undetectable. According to the research conducted by Ammar et al. [14], 25 isolates of C. jejuni were analyzed to detect three vital virulence genes pivotal for C. jejuni's pathogenicity: flaA, virB11, and wlaN. Out of the 25 isolates examined, 13 (52%) were positive for the virB11 gene, 9 (36%) for the wlaN gene, and all 25 (100%) for the flaA gene. In a separate investigation conducted in Egypt by Barakat et al. [38], the virulence profile of 302 Campylobacter isolates was examined. The findings revealed that all strains carried the cadF gene (100%), while the cdtB gene was detected in 284 out of the 302 isolates (94%). Specifically, 282 out of 285 (98.94%) of the C. jejuni isolates and 2 out of 17 (11.76%) of the C. coli isolates tested positive for the cdtB gene. Saif et al. [68] conducted an analysis of 90 C. jejuni isolates obtained from retail chicken using WGSF technology to identify the Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) of the isolates. This revealed 36 sequence types distributed across 15 clonal complexes (CCs). At the sequence type (ST) level, five types (ST-48, ST-21, ST-50, ST-464, and ST-122) were predominant, collectively representing 41.1% (37/90) of the isolates. Additionally, one novel ST (ST-10073) was identified. These findings highlight the significant role of retail chicken in transmitting campylobacteriosis to humans in Egypt, thus offering valuable insights to guide national control measures. Zeinhom et al. [37] detected the virulent cadF and cdtA genes in all the 40 C. jejuni isolates, where 21 isolates were obtained from human stool and 19 were obtained from raw milk. As milk and dairy products are important sources of contamination, reducing the level of C. jejuni in them will lower the risk to consumers.
In Tunisia, Béjaoui et al. [42] found a high prevalence of virulence genes in Campylobacter strains, with an average of six genes per strain. The most commonly detected genes were cadF, flaA, cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC, with all strains (100%) testing positive for flaA and cadF. Genes related to cytotoxin production were notably prevalent, especially in C. coli, where all the isolates tested positive for the three cdt genes. In the C. jejuni isolates, cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC genes were also widespread, with proportions of 88% (n = 29/33), 73% (n = 24/33), and 76% (n = 25/33), respectively. The ceuE gene, which is responsible for encoding the enterochelin uptake substrate-binding protein involved in iron acquisition, was carried by 93.9% (n = 31/33) of C. jejuni isolates and 33.3% (n = 5/15) of C. coli. virB11, primarily involved in cell invasion, was detected in 36.4% of C. jejuni (n = 12/33) and 40% of C. coli (n = 6/15) isolates. The cgtB and wlaN genes, which encode a β-1, 3-galactosyltransferase enzyme associated with triggering Guillain-Barré syndrome, were also investigated, with the cgtB gene found in 21.2% (n = 7/33) of the C. jejuni isolates, while none of the strains carried the wlaN gene. Regarding the virulence patterns, 10 different virulotypes were identified, with the most prevalent combination being "flaA, cadF, cdtA, cdtB, cdtC, ceuE" detected in 13 isolates, followed by combinations such as "flaA, cadF, cdtA, cdtB, cdtC" and "flaA, cadF, cdtA, cdtB, cdtC, ceuE, virB11." Additionally, it was noted that the C. jejuni strains exhibited a statistically higher percentage of virulence genes (63.7% carried six or more genes; p < 0.05) compared to C. coli (only 46.7% carried six genes).
In a separate study conducted in the northern region of Tunisia by Gharbi et al. [69], a total of 177 Campylobacter isolates obtained from layer hens and eggs (124 C. jejuni and 53 C. coli) underwent examination to determine their virulotype. All 177 isolates (100%) were found to carry the flaA, cadF, ciaB, and cdt genes, with the racR gene closely following at 161 (90.9%). Similar findings were observed in the analysis of the 124 C. jejuni isolates, where all the isolates (100%) possessed the flaA, cadF, ciaB, and cdt genes, followed by dnaJ at 119 (95.9%) and ceuE at 115 (92.74%). No notable differences in the prevalence of the most common virulence genes were observed among C. coli isolates, as all of them contained the flaA, cadF, racR, ciaB, and cdt genes, with the pldA gene detected in 51 (96.22%) isolates. However, a significant difference was noted regarding the ceuE gene, which was absent in all C. coli isolates, though highly prevalent in the C. jejuni isolates (92.74%).
Another study conducted in Tunisia by Jribi et al. [70] provided additional insights into the pathogenic mechanisms of Campylobacter disease, focusing on 37 C. jejuni and 8 C. coli isolates. It studied the prevalence of essential virulence-associated genes such as flaA, cadF, iamA, and virB11 and the genes for CDT (cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC) among the strains isolated from poultry. The research provided an understanding of the various virulence markers of the Campylobacter strains that have been tested in this research study. At first, the research focused on genes that are linked to CDT, which is a toxin responsible for inducing cell cycle arrest and the eventual of cell death in sensitive eukaryotic cells. Activation of CDT synthesis required the expression of three toxin genes (cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC). Evaluations using PCR demonstrated that 86%, 42%, and 51% of the isolates harbored the cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC genes, respectively, with 31% of Campylobacter isolates containing all three toxin subunit genes simultaneously (Table 3).
Country | Source | Isolates | Gene or ST | C. coli (%) | C. jejuni (%) | References |
Egypt | Poultry | C. jejuni (n = 1) | flaA | 25 | (0) | [58] |
C. coli (n = 8) | cadF | 12.5 | 100 | |||
cdtB | 75 | 100 | ||||
Human (100) and broiler chicken | C. jejuni (n = 25) | flaA | ND* | 100 | [14] | |
virB11 | ND | 52 | ||||
wlaN | ND | 36 | ||||
Humans and foods of animal | C. jejuni (n = 285) | cadF | 100 | 0 | [38] | |
C. coli (n = 17) | cdtB | 11.76 | 98.94 | |||
Human | C. jejuni (n = 90) | ST-48 | ND | 100 | [68] | |
ST-21 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-50 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-464 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-122 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-10073 | ND | 100 | ||||
Raw milk, cheese, and human stool samples | C. jejuni (n = 40) | cadF | ND | 100 | [37] | |
cdtA | ND | 100 | ||||
Tunisia | Chicken meats | C. jejuni (n = 33 | flaA | 100 | 100 | [42] |
C. coli (n = 15) | cadF | 100 | 100 | |||
cdtA | 0 | 88 | ||||
cdtB | 0 | 72.7 | ||||
cdtC | 0 | 75.7 | ||||
ceuE | 33.3 | 93.9 | ||||
virB11 | 40 | 36.4 | ||||
cgtB | 0 | 21.2 | ||||
wlaN | 0 | 0 | ||||
Layer hens and eggs | C. jejuni (n = 124) | flaA | 100 | 100 | [69] | |
C. coli (n = 53) | cadF | 100 | 100 | |||
ciaB | 100 | 100 | ||||
cdt | 100 | 100 | ||||
racR | 0 | 90.9 | ||||
dnaJ | 0 | 95.9 | ||||
ceuE | 0 | 92.74 | ||||
pldA | 96.22 | 0 | ||||
Poultry and poultry products | C. jejuni (n = 37) | flaA | 0 | 100 | [70] | |
C. coli (n = 8) | cadF | 0 | 100 | |||
iamA | 0 | 0 | ||||
virB11 | 0 | 0 | ||||
cdtA | 0 | 86.66 | ||||
cdtB | 0 | 42.22 | ||||
cdtC | 0 | 51.11 | ||||
* ND: Not determined. |
Studies performed in Egypt and Tunisia help in understanding the distribution of virulence genes and the transmission dynamics of Campylobacter. Studies conducted in Egypt by Abdelhady et al. [58], Ammar et al. [14], Barakat et al. [38], and Saif et al. [68] revealed different gene expression profiles and sequence types of the Campylobacter isolates obtained from poultry and retail chicken. Hence, these studies support the view that poultry is the main source of Campylobacter and emphasize the urgent need for rigorous control measures. Similarly, research carried out in Tunisia by Béjaoui et al. [42] and Gharbi et al. [69] examined the virulence factors and genetic characterization of Campylobacter strains obtained from poultry. The high incidence of virulence genes in C. jejuni and C. coli is an indication of the potential risk posed by contaminated poultry products to public health. Surprisingly, there were no studies identified from Algeria, Libya, or Morocco that revealed a gap in understanding the epidemiology of Campylobacter in North African countries. Further studies in these areas are crucial to compare the current knowledge about the prevalence, pathogenicity, and transmission patterns of Campylobacter and to establish effective measures to reduce the effect of this pathogen on public health.
The most investigated and pathogenically known species is C. jejuni within this genus; the identified antibiotic sensitivities include macrolides such as erythromycin, which are commonly used for its treatment, and quinolones such as ciprofloxacin [71]. Although Campylobacter enteritis commonly resolves without intervention, erythromycin or ciprofloxacin are preferred when antibiotic therapy is necessary. Nevertheless, Campylobacter resistance to antibiotics was recently observed and is increasing; in addition, different resistance patterns are detected worldwide [71,72]. There is a growing apprehension that the extended use of antibiotics in the context of veterinary practices and poultry production may augment the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter spp. Some of these strains could further be passed on to humans through the food chain [71,73].
Baali et al. [17] in Eastern Algeria studied 612 isolates obtained from chickens to analyze antimicrobial resistance. They reported that each strain showed resistance to ampicillin and amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid, and all the strains were sensitive to gentamicin resistance. Notably, the resistance patterns were high, with erythromycin at 83. 3% and tetracycline at 66. 2%. Furthermore, the resistance patterns showed moderate resistance to two antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (46. 7%) and chloramphenicol (52. 6%). In a different study that took place in Algiers, Messad et al. [34] evaluated the antimicrobial resistance patterns of 263 Campylobacter isolates obtained from numerous poultry farms and abattoirs. The authors reported that all the isolated strains were resistant to nalidixic acid, but sensitive to gentamicin and chloramphenicol. Additionally, 83.7% (n = 220) of the strains showed resistance to both tetracycline and ciprofloxacin, 75.3% (n = 198) to ampicillin, 46.8% (n = 123) to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and 21.7% (n = 57) to erythromycin.
In Egypt, Ammar et al. [14] conducted a study on 113 C. jejuni isolates gathered from both human (30) and chicken (83) sources to assess antimicrobial resistance. They found that all the examined isolates displayed complete resistance to both erythromycin and ampicillin (100% each). Additionally, the majority of C. jejuni isolates showed resistance to tetracycline (90.3%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (82.3%), and nalidixic acid (80.5%). Conversely, high rates of susceptibility were observed to gentamicin (69.9%), followed by kanamycin (67.3%) and norfloxacin (59.3%). Additionally, the authors observed no statistically significant differences in the resistance profiles among C. jejuni isolates obtained from the combined chicken and human samples, nor between different chicken samples, regarding the tested antimicrobials (p > 0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was noted in the resistance profile to nalidixic acid between the C. jejuni isolates from chicken cloacal swabs and the human stool samples (p = 0.016). Regarding the antimicrobial resistance patterns among C. jejuni isolates from various sources, it was found that the resistance rates to tetracycline, nalidixic acid, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were more prevalent among the isolates from both chicken (91.6%, 83.1%, and 79.5%, respectively) and human (86.7%, 73.3%, and 90%, respectively) origins. Notably, all examined C. jejuni isolates were multidrug resistant (MDR), with 96.5% of the analyzed isolates showing resistance to five or more antimicrobial agents, and 25 C. jejuni isolates being resistant to 8 or 9 antimicrobials (22.1%).
According to another investigation in Egypt by El-Naenaeey et al. [35], an evaluation of the antimicrobial resistance among 247 Campylobacter isolates against 22 different antimicrobial agents revealed complete resistance in all isolates (100%) to ampicillin, amoxicillin, and erythromycin. Furthermore, the analysis indicated notably high resistance rates against trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (99%), clindamycin (97%), cephalothin (97%), azithromycin (91%), and nalidixic acid (90%). Additionally, a majority of Campylobacter isolates exhibited resistance to aztreonam (82%), doxycycline (81%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (81%), cefepime (81%), chloramphenicol (80%), colistin (76%), and linezolid (73%). Conversely, the findings indicated lower resistance rates for amikacin, imipenem, and cefoxitin against the tested isolates (29%, 32%, and 48%, respectively). (Top of Form)
In a study conducted in Kalyoubia, Egypt, on 19 C. jejuni isolates obtained from various sources to assess antimicrobial resistance, the researchers investigated the susceptibility of the isolated C. jejuni strains. The results revealed that C. jejuni showed resistance to ampicillin (21%), cephalothin (95%), oxytetracycline (63%), erythromycin (53%), nalidixic acid (64%), and gentamicin (5%) [47].
In Morocco, according to a study by Asmai et al. [52], an assessment of antimicrobial resistance was conducted among 42 C. coli isolates obtained from broilers in the Marrakesh Safi region. All strains exhibited resistance to one or more antimicrobial agents. The percentage of strains resistant to various antimicrobials, in descending order, was as follows: ampicillin (95%), erythromycin and tetracycline (93%), and ciprofloxacin (86%). The lowest resistance was observed for gentamicin (7%). MDR, which is defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories, was evident among the resistant isolates. Specifically, 42 (100%) were resistant to more than 2 classes of antibiotics, and 40 isolates (95%) displayed resistance to ≥3 drugs.
Baaboua et al. [40] carried out a separate study to assess antimicrobial resistance among 108 C. jejuni isolates and 22 C. coli isolates gathered from various food samples in Northern Morocco. The findings indicated that all isolates were nearly entirely susceptible to colistin and florfenicol across the four categories of specimens. Furthermore, there was a notably high level of susceptibility to gentamicin, streptomycin, and erythromycin, with C. jejuni exhibiting a higher proportion compared to C. coli. The resistance analysis revealed a complete resistance among the C. jejuni and C. coli strains to cephalothin, followed by a high percentage of resistance to aztreonam, enrofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, oxolinic acid, nalidixic acid, flumequine, and tetracycline across cattle, turkey, and various samples, particularly in broiler specimens for both species. Moreover, the study noted a widespread presence of multidrug-resistant Campylobacter, especially in C. jejuni (over 72%), predominantly in broiler chicken samples, across antibiotic categories including cephalosporin, penicillin, monobactam, quinolone, fluoroquinolone, sulfamide, and tetracycline. Es-soucratti et al. [51] observed the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance among C. jejuni isolates from poultry in Casablanca-Settat, Morocco. All isolates (41) exhibited resistance to tetracycline, with a notably high resistance observed against erythromycin (97%), ampicillin (85%), and fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) (77%). Resistance to gentamicin was observed to a lesser extent, at 12.0%. Similar resistance rates were also noted for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (61.4%).
In Tunisia, according to findings by Béjaoui et al. [42], an examination of antimicrobial resistance was conducted on 48 Campylobacter isolates obtained from chicken meats. All isolates displayed resistance to tetracycline, with only one strain showing susceptibility to erythromycin. Resistance to ampicillin was observed in 83% of the isolates, whereas a higher susceptibility was seen towards amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, with 77% of isolates being susceptible. The resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, and chloramphenicol were recorded at 73%, 85.4%, and 75%, respectively. Additionally, thirteen strains (27%) exhibited resistance to gentamicin.
In Northern Tunisia, Gharbi et al. [53] investigated the prevalence of antibiotic resistance patterns among 91 C. jejuni and 41 C. coli isolates obtained from broiler chickens. They found that all isolates were resistant to tetracycline and erythromycin, with very high resistance observed against ciprofloxacin (98.9% and 100%) and chloramphenicol (84% and 100%) for C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively. Additionally, resistance rates were observed for ampicillin (74% and 34%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (53% and 34%), nalidixic acid (57% and 22%), and gentamicin (14% and 10%) for C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively. The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in C. jejuni and C. coli isolated from broiler chickens in Tunisia was investigated. Among resistant isolates of C. jejuni and C. coli, the rates of antimicrobial resistance genes were as follows: tet(O), which encodes a ribosomal protection protein that confers tetracycline resistance, was present in 100% (91/91) and 80% (33/41) of the isolates, respectively; cmeB, which encodes an efflux pump that contributes to multidrug resistance, was found in 80% (73/91) and 100% (41/41) of the isolates, respectively; and blaOXA-61, which encodes a beta-lactamase that provides resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, was detected in 81% (54/67) and 93% (13/14) of the isolates, respectively. Notably, the aphA-3 gene, which encodes an aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme that provides resistance to aminoglycosides, was not detected in any isolate [62].
Gharbi et al. [43] observed a significantly high resistance among 106 C. jejuni and 49 C. coli isolates collected from eggs and laying hens in the North-East region of Tunisia. All isolates exhibited resistance to tetracycline, erythromycin, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and chloramphenicol. Notably, there was a high resistance rate (85.8%) among strains against ampicillin, with 98% of C. coli and 80% of C. jejuni being resistant. The percentage of isolates resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was 43% in C. coli compared to 18% in C. jejuni. The lowest rate of resistance was observed for gentamicin, with 1.9% among the C. jejuni isolates and 0% among the C. coli isolates.
Campylobacter spp. presents a significant risk for transmission from infected animals or animal-derived products to humans, animals, and the environment. Recent research highlighted poultry products as a primary reservoir, with domestic poultry implicated in various regions worldwide. In North Africa, there is a growing concern regarding Campylobacter spp. infections in humans, primarily associated with C. jejuni and C. coli. Poultry, including chicken meat and eggs, emerges as a major source of these infections, as evidenced by studies conducted across Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia. Poultry is the leading animal reservoir for C. jejuni infections that are associated with gastroenteritis illness globally. Poultry and poultry products, especially chickens, are the primary source of C. jejuni. Previous research has established that well over half the retail poultry products are likely to harbor Campylobacter [20]. The main ways through which the disease spreads to man are via ingestion of poultry products that are not well cooked or through direct contact between poultry products and humans via food handlers contaminated poultry products. Campylobacter is among the primary causative agents of bacterial diarrhea worldwide. C. jejuni is the most frequent isolate from patients affected by campylobacteriosis among all the Campylobacter species [32]. C. jejuni is especially well adapted to colonizing poultry; this is why this pathogen is found more commonly in poultry than other Campylobacter species. This adaptation helps it flourish in human infections, primarily due to the high rates of poultry meat consumption [27]. Moreover, studies showed the possibility that dairy products and other meats may also contribute to Campylobacter spp. transmission. Other ways the bacteria can spdread to humans include direct contact with infected animals, fecal matter, and contaminated food products or water, or coming across other environmental sources containing the bacteria. The dynamic and reciprocal relationship between population density, eating patterns, and food consumption in North Africa needs unique and specific public health approaches to prevent the effects of campylobacteriosis.
The threat of campylobacteriosis in North Africa is considerable due to its impact on public health and the fact that C. jejuni is the main cause of gastroenteritis. Several research studies performed in Egypt provided evidence of the high rates of Campylobacter spp. among individuals with gastrointestinal symptoms and that poultry could be a probable source of infection. Similarly, studies conducted in Tunisia enriched the knowledge of the common occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in human stool samples, and emphasized the need for comprehensive surveillance and control measures. Nonetheless, there were a few studies conducted in Algeria, Libya, and Morocco that underscored the gaps in understanding Campylobacter epidemiology in these regions, warranting further investigation to inform effective public health interventions.
The identification of virulence factors among Campylobacter spp. is important to understand the pathogenesis and capacity of bacteria to survive and persist. In Egypt and Tunisia, several scholars researched many virulence genes that were associated with Campylobacter pathogenicity, including adhesins, invasins, toxin production, and immune evasion. The determination of the virulence genes enhances the understanding of the risks associated with Campylobacter strains originating from poultry to human health. Moreover, the high genetic variation confirmed with the Campylobacter isolates reinforces the need for more surveillance and monitoring to identify virulence factors and create relevant control measures.
The spread of the antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter strains raises a potential concern in public health as it increases the difficulties in the effective treatments of Campylobacter infections. Investigations in various North African countries such as Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia have shown that Campylobacter isolates from chicken and human clinical specimens display strong resistances to antibiotics frequently employed in poultry production and human practices. This is further supported by the fact that resistance against several classes of antibiotics points towards the need for the appropriate use of antibiotics in vet practices and food animal production. It is necessary to enhance the tubules of surveillance and implement the principles of antimicrobial stewardship to tackle the emergence of Campylobacter antibiotic resistance and maintain the effectiveness of antimicrobial drugs for future generations.
In conclusion, this systematic review underlines the need to conduct further research and study of all the routes whereby Campylobacter transmits to humans in the North African nations. Frequent molecular studies from these countries have shown the factors of the pathogenicity of Campylobacter, which point towards the importance of such findings for the application of prevention and control measures. Overall, these results portray the complexity of Campylobacter infections within the area. Furthermore, the review of antibiotics stresses the need for effective monitoring, the proper use of antibiotics, and combined approaches in the fight against the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter. Preventing approaches play a significant role in maintaining an individuals' health and ensuring the proper treatment strategy for Campylobacter infections. Collectively, dealing with these challenges aims to achieve the common goal of improving the overall condition of health and safety in North African countries.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The author declare that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
I am deeply thankful to my family for their unwavering support during this research. I dedicate this work to the souls of my beloved mother, Siham Taha Salim Hamed, my beloved aunt, Somia Taha Salim Hamed, and my beloved uncles, Salim Taha Salim Hamed and Abdul Hamid Ibrahim Mohamed Elnohi.
[1] |
EFSA (2022) The European Union One Health 2021 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J 20: e07666. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7666 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7666
![]() |
[2] |
EFSA, ECDC (2022) The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2019–2020. EFSA J 20: e07209. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7209 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7209
![]() |
[3] |
EFSA (2019) The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFSA Journal 17: e05926. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926
![]() |
[4] |
Tack DM, Ray L, Griffin PM, et al. (2020) Preliminary incidence and trends of infections with pathogens transmitted commonly through food—Foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2016–2019. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69: 509–514. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6917a1 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6917a1
![]() |
[5] | WHO (2015) WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases: Foodborne Disease Bur‐ den Epidemiology Reference Group 2007–2015. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
[6] |
Mohamed M-YI, Habib I (2023) Pathogenic E. coli in the food chain across the Arab countries: A descriptive review. Foods 12: 3726. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12203726 doi: 10.3390/foods12203726
![]() |
[7] |
Rafei R, Hawli M, Osman M, et al. (2020) Distribution of EMM types and macrolide resistance determinants among group A Streptococci in the Middle East and North Africa region. J Global Antimicrob Resist 22: 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.005
![]() |
[8] |
Paré G, Trudel MC, Jaana M, et al. (2015) Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Inf Manage 52: 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
![]() |
[9] |
Mohamed M-YI, Habib I, Khalifa HO (2024) Salmonella in the food chain within the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. AIMS Microbiol 10: 468–488. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2024023 doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024023
![]() |
[10] |
Butzler JP (2004) Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity. Clin Microbiol Infect 10: 868–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00983.x doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00983.x
![]() |
[11] |
Chon JW, Seo KH, Kim B, et al. (2020) Advanced methods for isolating from and confirming Campylobacter spp. in milk and dairy products: Review. J Dairy Sci Biotechnol 38: 121–133. https://doi.org/10.22424/jdsb.2020.38.3.121 doi: 10.22424/jdsb.2020.38.3.121
![]() |
[12] |
Parker CT, Cooper KK, Schiaffino F, et al. (2021) Genomic characterization of Campylobacter jejuni adapted to the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) host. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11: 607747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.607747 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.607747
![]() |
[13] |
Silva MF, Pereira G, Carneiro C, et al. (2020) Campylobacter portucalensis sp. nov., a new species of Campylobacter isolated from the preputial mucosa of bulls. PLoS One 15: e0227500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227500 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227500
![]() |
[14] |
Ammar AM, El-Naenaeey E-SY, El-Malt RMS, et al. (2021) Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, virulence and genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni with a special reference to the anti-virulence potential of eugenol and beta-resorcylic acid on some multi-drug resistant isolates in Egypt. Animals 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010003 doi: 10.3390/ani11010003
![]() |
[15] | Martora F, Pagliuca C, Della Pepa ME, et al. (2020) Campylobacter jejuni bacteremia in Italian pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Report of two cases. New Microbiol 43: 1121–7138. |
[16] |
Zhang XH, Ahmad W, Zhu XY, et al. (2021) Viable but nonculturable bacteria and their resuscitation: implications for cultivating uncultured marine microorganisms. Mar Life Sci Technol 3: 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-020-00041-3 doi: 10.1007/s42995-020-00041-3
![]() |
[17] |
Baali M, Lounis M, Al Amir HL, et al. (2020) Prevalence, seasonality, and antimicrobial resistance of thermotolerant Campylobacter isolated from broiler farms and slaughterhouses in East Algeria. Vet World 13: 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.1221-1228 doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1221-1228
![]() |
[18] | Pires SM, Devleesschauwer B (2021) Estimates of global disease burden associated with foodborne pathogens. Foodborne Infections and Intoxications, Elsevier, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819519-2.00020-7 |
[19] |
Senok A, Yousif A, Mazi W, et al. (2007) Pattern of antibiotic susceptibility in Campylobacter jejuni isolates of human and poultry origin. Jpn J Infect Dis 60: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2007.1 doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2007.1
![]() |
[20] |
Habib I, Mohamed MYI, Khan M (2021) Current state of Salmonella, Campylobacter and listeria in the food chain across the Arab countries: A descriptive review. Foods 10: 2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102369 doi: 10.3390/foods10102369
![]() |
[21] | Habib I, Mohamed MYI (2022) Foodborne infections in the Middle East. Food Safety in the Middle East, Elsevier, 71–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822417-5.00005-2 |
[22] |
Ibrahim Mohamed MY (2021) Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in foodborne bacteria (Campylobacter and E. coli): A food safety issue and public health hazard. Nutri Food Sci Int J 11: 555801. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822417-5.00005-2 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822417-5.00005-2
![]() |
[23] |
Mohamed M-YI, Abu J, Abdul-Aziz S, et al. (2021) Public health significance of Campylobacter jejuni. J Biosci Med (Irvine) 09: 100–112. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2021.98009 doi: 10.4236/jbm.2021.98009
![]() |
[24] |
Mohamed M-YI, Abu J, Abdul-Aziz S, et al. (2019) Occurrence of antibiotic resistant C. jejuni and E. coli in wild birds, chickens, environment and humans from Orang Asli Villages in Sungai Siput, Perak, Malaysia. Am J Anim Vet Sci 14: 158–169. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2019.158.169 doi: 10.3844/ajavsp.2019.158.169
![]() |
[25] |
Amjad M, Zia U-U-R (2023) Poultry as A Source and Reservoir for Campylobacteriosis. Eur J Vet Med 3: 11–17. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejvetmed.2023.3.1.87 doi: 10.24018/ejvetmed.2023.3.1.87
![]() |
[26] |
Habib I, Ibrahim Mohamed MY, Ghazawi A, et al. (2023) Genomic characterization of molecular markers associated with antimicrobial resistance and virulence of the prevalent Campylobacter coli isolated from retail chicken meat in the United Arab Emirates. Curr Res Food Sci 6: 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100434 doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100434
![]() |
[27] |
Mohamed M-YI, Abu J, Aziz SA, et al. (2022) Occurrence of antibiotic resistant C. jejuni and E. coli in wild birds, chickens, humans, and the environment in Malay villages, Kedah, Malaysia. Vet Med (Praha) 67: 298–308. https://doi.org/10.17221/102/2021-VETMED doi: 10.17221/102/2021-VETMED
![]() |
[28] |
Colles FM, Ali JS, Sheppard SK, et al. (2011) Campylobacter populations in wild and domesticated Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Environ Microbiol Rep 3: 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00265.x doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00265.x
![]() |
[29] |
Cribb DM, Varrone L, Wallace RL, et al. (2022) Risk factors for campylobacteriosis in Australia: Outcomes of a 2018–2019 case-control study. BMC Infect Dis 22: 586. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07553-6 doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07553-6
![]() |
[30] |
Mohamed M-YI, Abdul-Aziz S, Jalila A, et al. (2019) Occurrence of antibiotic resistant Campylobacter in wild birds and poultry. Malays J Microbiol 15: 143–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.21161/mjm.180096 doi: 10.21161/mjm.180096
![]() |
[31] |
Gras LM, Smid JH, Wagenaar JA, et al. (2013) Increased risk for Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli infection of pet origin in dog owners and evidence for genetic association between strains causing infection in humans and their pets. Epidemiol Infect 141: 2526–2535. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268813000356 doi: 10.1017/S0950268813000356
![]() |
[32] | Mohamed M-Y-I (2021) Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry meats. Nov Res Sci 8: 1–3. |
[33] |
Benamar I, Nauta M, Cherif-Antar A, et al. (2021) Quantitative risk assessment of Campylobacter in döner kebab consumed in the west of Algeria. Microb Risk Anal 19: 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2021.100172 doi: 10.1016/j.mran.2021.100172
![]() |
[34] |
Messad S, Hamdi T-M, Bouhamed R, et al. (2014) Frequency of contamination and antimicrobial resistance of thermotolerant Campylobacter isolated from some broiler farms and slaughterhouses in the region of Algiers. Food Control 40: 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.016 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.016
![]() |
[35] |
El-Naenaeey E, Abd El-Hamid M, Khalifa E (2021) Prevalence and antibiotic resistanc patterns of Campylobacter species isolated from different sources in Eygpt. J Microbiol, Biotechnol Food Sci 10: e3723. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.3723 doi: 10.15414/jmbfs.3723
![]() |
[36] |
Abd El-Tawab AA, Ammar AM, Ahmed HA, et al. (2015) Bacteriological and molecular identification of Campylobacter species in chickens and humans, at Zagazig City, Egypt. Benha Vet Med J 28: 17–26. https://doi.org/10.21608/bvmj.2015.32523 doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2015.32523
![]() |
[37] |
Zeinhom MMA, Abdel-Latef GK, Corke H (2021) Prevalence, characterization, and control of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from raw milk, cheese, and human stool samples in Beni-Suef governorate, Egypt. Foodborne Pathog Dis 18: 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2020.2895 doi: 10.1089/fpd.2020.2895
![]() |
[38] |
Barakat AMA, Abd El-Razik KA, Elfadaly HA, et al. (2020) Prevalence, molecular detection, and virulence gene profiles of Campylobacter species in humans and foods of animal origin. Vet World 13: 1430–1438. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.1430-1438 doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1430-1438
![]() |
[39] |
El-Zamkan MA, Abdel Hameed KG (2016) Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in raw milk and some dairy products. Vet World 9: 1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.1147-1151 doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1147-1151
![]() |
[40] |
El Baaboua A, El Maadoudi M, Bouyahya A, et al. (2021) Prevalence and antimicrobial profiling of Campylobacter spp. isolated from meats, animal, and human feces in Northern of Morocco. Int J Food Microbiol 349: 109202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109202 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109202
![]() |
[41] | Jouahri M, Asehraou A, Karib H, et al. (2007) Prevalence and control of thermo‐tolerant Campylobacter species in raw poultry meat in Morocco. Meso Prvi Hrvat Časopis Mesu 9: 262–267. |
[42] |
Béjaoui A, Gharbi M, Bitri S, et al. (2022) Virulence profiling, multidrug resistance and molecular mechanisms of Campylobacter strains from chicken carcasses in Tunisia. Antibiotics 11: 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070830 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070830
![]() |
[43] |
Gharbi M, Béjaoui A, Ben Hamda C, et al. (2022) Campylobacter spp. in eggs and laying hens in the North-East of Tunisia: High prevalence and multidrug-resistance phenotypes. Vet Sci 9: 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9030108 doi: 10.3390/vetsci9030108
![]() |
[44] |
Jribi H, Sellami H, Mariam S, et al. (2017) Isolation and identification of Campylobacter spp. from poultry and poultry by-products in Tunisia by conventional culture method and multiplex real-time PCR. J Food Prot 80: 1623–1627. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-321 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-321
![]() |
[45] |
Sayed ASM, Ibrahim AI, Sobhy MM, et al. (2023) Circulation of thermophilic Campylobacter in pigeons, turkeys, and humans at live bird markets in Egypt. Front Vet Sci 10: 1150077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1150077 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1150077
![]() |
[46] |
Khalil MR, Amira AM, Kafafy MH, et al. (2020) Molecular characterization of Campylobacter species from Turkeys flocks in delta governments. Assiut Vet Med J 66: 111–117. https://doi.org/10.21608/avmj.2020.167255 doi: 10.21608/avmj.2020.167255
![]() |
[47] |
Lobna MAS, Nashwa OKh, Barakat AMA, et al. (2019) Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from chicken, some animal products and human in Kalyoubia, Egypt, with special reference to its viability. Benha Vet Med J 36: 156–163. https://doi.org/10.21608/bvmj.2019.103407 doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2019.103407
![]() |
[48] |
Abushahba MF, Ahmed SO, Ibrahim AA, et al. (2018) Prevalence of zoonotic species of Campylobacter in broiler chicken and humans in Assiut governorate, Egypt. Approaches Poult Dairy Vet Sci 3: 260–268. https://doi.org/10.31031/APDV.2018.03.000568 doi: 10.31031/APDV.2018.03.000568
![]() |
[49] | Abd El-Aziz DM, Abd-Allah SMS (2016) Incidence of Campylobacter species in wholesale chicken carcasses and chicken meat products in Assiut city, Egypt. Int Food Res J 24: 2660–2665. |
[50] |
El-Sharoud WM (2009) Prevalence and survival of Campylobacter in Egyptian dairy products. Food Research International 42: 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.01.009
![]() |
[51] |
Es-Soucratti K, Hammoumi A, Bouchrif B, et al. (2020) Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from poultry in Casablanca-Settat, Morocco. Ital J Food Saf 9: 54–59. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2020.8692 doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2020.8692
![]() |
[52] |
Asmai R, Karraouan B, Es-Soucratti K, et al. (2020) Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter coli isolated from broiler farms in the Marrakesh Safi region, Morocco. Vet World 13: 1892–1897. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.1892-1897 doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1892-1897
![]() |
[53] |
Gharbi M, Béjaoui A, Ben Hamda C, et al. (2018) Prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns of Campylobacter spp. isolated from broiler chickens in the North of Tunisia. Biomed Res Int 2018: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7943786 doi: 10.1155/2018/7943786
![]() |
[54] |
Brückner V, Fiebiger U, Ignatius R, et al. (2020) Characterization of Arcobacter strains isolated from human stool samples: Results from the prospective German prevalence study Arcopath. Gut Pathog 12: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-019-0344-3 doi: 10.1186/s13099-019-0344-3
![]() |
[55] |
Mihevc M, Koren Krajnc M, Bombek Ihan M, et al. (2021) Helicobacter canis bacteraemia in a rheumatoid arthritis patient treated with tofacitinib: Case report and literature review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 20: 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00426-x doi: 10.1186/s12941-021-00426-x
![]() |
[56] |
Eryıldız C, Şakru N, Tabakçıoğlu K, et al. (2022) Molecular identification of Campylobacter species isolated from patients with gastroenteritis in Edirne, Turkey. Cyprus J Med Sci 7: 623–627. https://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2022.2021-164 doi: 10.4274/cjms.2022.2021-164
![]() |
[57] |
Ghoneim NH, Abdel-Moein KA-A, Barakat AMAK, et al. (2021) Isolation and molecular characterization of Campylobacter jejuni from chicken and human stool samples in Egypt. Food Sci Technol 41: 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.01620 doi: 10.1590/fst.01620
![]() |
[58] | Abdelhady HAS, Hussein AAA, Amen O, et al. (2024) Genetic diversity, virulence profile of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry and human in Assiut governorate, Egypt. J Adv Vet Res 14: 193–197. |
[59] |
Lopes GV, Ramires T, Kleinubing NR, et al. (2021) Virulence factors of foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Microb Pathog 161: 105265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105265 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105265
![]() |
[60] |
Talukdar PK, Negretti NM, Turner KL, et al. (2020) Molecular dissection of the Campylobacter jejuni CadF and FlpA virulence proteins in binding to host cell fibronectin. Microorganisms 8: 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030389 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030389
![]() |
[61] |
Jakee JE, Ata NS, Hakim AS, et al. (2015) Prevalence of virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter species isolated from chicken in Egypt. Asian J Poult Sci 9: 250–261. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2015.250.261 doi: 10.3923/ajpsaj.2015.250.261
![]() |
[62] |
Gharbi M, Béjaoui A, Ben Hamda C, et al. (2022) Distribution of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from broiler chickens in Tunisia. J Microbiol, Immunol Infect 55: 1273–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2021.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.07.001
![]() |
[63] |
Nahar N, Rashid R Bin (2018) Genotypic analysis of the virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in Campylobacter species in silico. J Bioanal Biomed 10: 13–23. https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-593X.1000199 doi: 10.4172/1948-593X.1000199
![]() |
[64] |
Eryildiz C, Tabakcioglu K, Kuyucuklu G, et al. (2020) Investigation of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of Campylobacter isolates from patients in a tertiary hospital in Edirne, Turkey. Indian J Med Microbiol 38: 157–161. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_20_78 doi: 10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_20_78
![]() |
[65] | Tegtmeyer N, Sharafutdinov I, Harrer A, et al. (2021) Campylobacter virulence factors and molecular host-pathogen interactions, Fighting Campylobacter Infections. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 169–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65481-8_7 |
[66] |
Alam A, Bröms JE, Kumar R, et al. (2021) The role of ClpB in bacterial stress responses and virulence. Front Mol Biosci 8: 668910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.668910 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.668910
![]() |
[67] |
Koolman L, Whyte P, Burgess C, et al. (2015) Distribution of virulence-associated genes in a selection of Campylobacter isolates. Foodborne Pathog Dis 12: 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2014.1883 doi: 10.1089/fpd.2014.1883
![]() |
[68] |
Saif NA, Cobo‐Díaz JF, Elserafy M, et al. (2022) A pilot study revealing host‐associated genetic signatures for source attribution of sporadic Campylobacter jejuni infection in Egypt. Transbound Emerg Dis 69: 1847–1861. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14165 doi: 10.1111/tbed.14165
![]() |
[69] |
Gharbi M, Kamoun S, Hkimi C, et al. (2022) Relationships between virulence genes and antibiotic resistance phenotypes/genotypes in Campylobacter spp. isolated from layer hens and eggs in the North of Tunisia: Statistical and computational insights. Foods 11: 3554. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223554 doi: 10.3390/foods11223554
![]() |
[70] |
Jribi H, Sellami H, Hassena A Ben, et al. (2017) Prevalence of putative virulence genes in Campylobacter and Arcobacter species isolated from poultry and poultry by-products in Tunisia. J Food Prot 80: 1705–1710. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-509 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-509
![]() |
[71] |
Dias TS, Panzenhagen P, Figueira ADA, et al. (2023) Genomic characterisation of Campylobacter jejuni Cj26: A high-level ciprofloxacin/erythromycin-resistant strain isolated from a poultry carcass in southern Brazil. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 34: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2023.05.009 doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.05.009
![]() |
[72] |
Gao F, Tu L, Chen M, et al. (2023) Erythromycin resistance of clinical Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Shanghai, China. Front Microbiol 14: 1145581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2023.05.009 doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.05.009
![]() |
[73] |
Mohamed M-YI, Abu J, Zakaria Z, et al. (2022) Multi-drug resistant pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from wild birds, chicken, and the environment in Malaysia. Antibiotics 11: 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101275 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101275
![]() |
1. | Mohamed-Yousif Ibrahim Mohamed, Hazim O. Khalifa, Ihab Habib, Food Pathways of Salmonella and Its Ability to Cause Gastroenteritis in North Africa, 2025, 14, 2304-8158, 253, 10.3390/foods14020253 | |
2. | Mohamed-Yousif Ibrahim Mohamed, Ihab Habib, Listeria monocytogenes in food products, and its virulence in North Africa, 2025, 10, 2471-2086, 97, 10.3934/agrfood.2025006 | |
3. | Mohamed-Yousif Ibrahim Mohamed, Hazim O. Khalifa, Ihab Habib, The role of virulence genes in Campylobacter pathogenicity: a perspective from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, 2025, 15, 2235-2988, 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1584835 |
Country | Tested Food Samples (Total Number) | Campylobacter spp. %* | C. jejuni % | C. coli % | Other Species | References |
Algeria | Chicken meats (n = 204) | 86.2 | ND** | ND | ND | [33] |
Kebab (n = 96) | 38 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 240) | 55 | 56.8 | 2.3 | 40.9 | [17] | |
Chicken meats (n = 100) | 80 | ND | ND | ND | [34] | |
Egypt | Pigeon meat (n = 100) | 16 | 9 | 7 | ND | [45] |
Pigeon liver (n = 100) | 17 | 4 | 13 | ND | ||
Turkey meat (n = 100) | 12 | 4 | 8 | ND | ||
Turkey liver (n = 100) | 19 | 8 | 11 | ND | ||
Chickens (n = 195) | 86.2 | 59.5 | 26.7 | ND | [35] | |
Breast meat (n = 40) | 75 | 55 | 20 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 47) | 83 | 70.2 | 12.8 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | [37] | |
Talaga cheese (n = 50) | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
Feta cheese (n = 50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Kareish cheese (n = 50) | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
Turkey meats (n = 30) | 20 | 13.3 | 6.7 | ND | [46] | |
Liver (n = 30) | 27 | 20 | 10 | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 547) | 37.8 | ND | ND | ND | [38] | |
Liver (n = 127) | 37 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 274) | 5.1 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Cheese (n = 180) | 7.8 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Yoghurt (n = 193) | 13.9 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken Liver (n = 70) | 27 | 68.4 | 31.6 | C. lari (0) | [47] | |
Chicken breast (n = 70) | 7.1 | 100 | 0 | C. lari (0) | ||
Chicken thigh (n = 70) | 14 | 50 | 40 | C. lari (10) | ||
Raw milk (n = 52) | 11 | 33.3 | 66.7 | C. lari (0) | ||
Kariesh cheese (n = 40) | 8 | 66.7 | 33.3 | C. lari (0) | ||
Yoghurt (n = 30) | 0 | 0 | 0 | C. lari (0) | ||
Broiler (n = 101) | 16.8 | ND | 4 | ND | [48] | |
Slaughterhouses (n = 104) | 24 | ND | 3.9 | ND | ||
Fresh chicken meat products (n = 30) | 53 | 46.7 | 46.7 | ND | [49] | |
Frozen chicken meat products (n = 30) | 53 | 46.7 | 40 | ND | ||
Chicken burger (n = 15) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken nuggets (n = 15) | 13 | 13.3 | 13.3 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | 22 | 20 | 20 | ND | [39] | |
Kareish cheese (n = 50) | 34 | 14 | 14 | ND | ||
Yoghurt (n = 50) | 18 | 8 | 8 | ND | ||
Skin (n = 39) | 31 | 12.8 | 17.9 | C. lari (17.9), C. hyointestinal (0) | [36] | |
Thigh meat (n = 39) | 39 | 17.9 | 20.5 | C. lari (20.5), C. hyointestinal (1) | ||
Breast meat (n = 39) | 41 | 33.3 | 5.1 | C. lari (5.1), C. hyointestinal (2.7) | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | ND | 4 | ND | ND | [50] | |
Laban Rayeb (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Stored Domiati cheese (n = 39) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Fresh Domiati cheese (n = 38) | ND | 11 | ND | ND | ||
Zabady (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Ras cheese (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Kariesh cheese (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Morocco | Raw milk (n = 61) | ND | 1.6 | 0 | ND | [40] |
Beef (n = 16) | ND | 0 | 6.3 | ND | ||
Minced meat (n = 38) | ND | 5.6 | 7.9 | ND | ||
Eggs (n = 44) | ND | 0 | 0 | ND | ||
Breast and minced meat (n = 60) | ND | 6.7 | 50 | ND | ||
Chicken thigh (n = 48) | ND | 6.6 | 50 | ND | ||
Chicken wings (n = 23) | ND | 4.3 | 60.9 | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 39) | ND | 5.1 | 38.5 | ND | ||
Poultry (n = 140) | 73 | ND | ND | ND | [51] | |
Broiler (n = 105) | 71.4 | ND | 40 | ND | [52] | |
Raw poultry meat (n = 50) | 62 | ND | ND | ND | [41] | |
Tunisia | Chicken meats (n = 257) | 18.7 | 68.7 | 31.2 | ND | [42] |
Eggs (n = 86) | 26 | 81.8 | 18.2 | ND | [43] | |
Broiler chickens (n = 590) | 22.4 | ND | ND | ND | [53] | |
Chicken meat (n = 149) | 26.8 | 16.1 | 3.4 | ND | [44] | |
Turkey meat (n = 101) | 23.7 | 13.8 | 1.9 | ND | ||
* The percentage (%) of Campylobacter species is calculated from the positive samples (isolated target bacteria). ** ND: Not determined. |
Location | Sample Size | Campylobacter spp. %* | C. jejuni %** | C. coli %** | Confirmation Methods | References |
Egypt (Beni-Suef) | 53 | 40 | ND*** | ND | PCR technique | [37] |
Egypt (Kalyoubia) | 128 | 20.3 | 85 | 15 | Biochemical tests | [47] |
Egypt (Cairo) | 75 | 17 | ND | ND | PCR technique | [57] |
Egypt (Sharkia Governorate) | 100 | ND | 30 | ND | PCR technique | [14] |
Egypt (Zagazig City) | 44 | 91 | 73 | 18 | PCR technique | [35] |
Egypt (Giza) | 40 | ND | 92.5 | 7.5 | PCR technique | [38] |
Egypt (Assiut) | 80 | 28 | 0 | 5 | PCR technique | [48] |
Egypt (Assuit) | 43 | 11 | 7 | 33 | PCR technique | [58] |
Egypt (Zagazig City) | 246 | 5.3 | 77 | 23 | PCR technique | [36] |
Morocco (Northern) | 6 | 17 | 100 | 0 | PCR technique | [40] |
* The isolation rate was calculated from the total number of the examined samples ** The isolation rate of each species was calculated from the total number of the isolated Campylobacters spp. *** ND: Not determined. |
Country | Source | Isolates | Gene or ST | C. coli (%) | C. jejuni (%) | References |
Egypt | Poultry | C. jejuni (n = 1) | flaA | 25 | (0) | [58] |
C. coli (n = 8) | cadF | 12.5 | 100 | |||
cdtB | 75 | 100 | ||||
Human (100) and broiler chicken | C. jejuni (n = 25) | flaA | ND* | 100 | [14] | |
virB11 | ND | 52 | ||||
wlaN | ND | 36 | ||||
Humans and foods of animal | C. jejuni (n = 285) | cadF | 100 | 0 | [38] | |
C. coli (n = 17) | cdtB | 11.76 | 98.94 | |||
Human | C. jejuni (n = 90) | ST-48 | ND | 100 | [68] | |
ST-21 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-50 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-464 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-122 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-10073 | ND | 100 | ||||
Raw milk, cheese, and human stool samples | C. jejuni (n = 40) | cadF | ND | 100 | [37] | |
cdtA | ND | 100 | ||||
Tunisia | Chicken meats | C. jejuni (n = 33 | flaA | 100 | 100 | [42] |
C. coli (n = 15) | cadF | 100 | 100 | |||
cdtA | 0 | 88 | ||||
cdtB | 0 | 72.7 | ||||
cdtC | 0 | 75.7 | ||||
ceuE | 33.3 | 93.9 | ||||
virB11 | 40 | 36.4 | ||||
cgtB | 0 | 21.2 | ||||
wlaN | 0 | 0 | ||||
Layer hens and eggs | C. jejuni (n = 124) | flaA | 100 | 100 | [69] | |
C. coli (n = 53) | cadF | 100 | 100 | |||
ciaB | 100 | 100 | ||||
cdt | 100 | 100 | ||||
racR | 0 | 90.9 | ||||
dnaJ | 0 | 95.9 | ||||
ceuE | 0 | 92.74 | ||||
pldA | 96.22 | 0 | ||||
Poultry and poultry products | C. jejuni (n = 37) | flaA | 0 | 100 | [70] | |
C. coli (n = 8) | cadF | 0 | 100 | |||
iamA | 0 | 0 | ||||
virB11 | 0 | 0 | ||||
cdtA | 0 | 86.66 | ||||
cdtB | 0 | 42.22 | ||||
cdtC | 0 | 51.11 | ||||
* ND: Not determined. |
Country | Tested Food Samples (Total Number) | Campylobacter spp. %* | C. jejuni % | C. coli % | Other Species | References |
Algeria | Chicken meats (n = 204) | 86.2 | ND** | ND | ND | [33] |
Kebab (n = 96) | 38 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 240) | 55 | 56.8 | 2.3 | 40.9 | [17] | |
Chicken meats (n = 100) | 80 | ND | ND | ND | [34] | |
Egypt | Pigeon meat (n = 100) | 16 | 9 | 7 | ND | [45] |
Pigeon liver (n = 100) | 17 | 4 | 13 | ND | ||
Turkey meat (n = 100) | 12 | 4 | 8 | ND | ||
Turkey liver (n = 100) | 19 | 8 | 11 | ND | ||
Chickens (n = 195) | 86.2 | 59.5 | 26.7 | ND | [35] | |
Breast meat (n = 40) | 75 | 55 | 20 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 47) | 83 | 70.2 | 12.8 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | [37] | |
Talaga cheese (n = 50) | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
Feta cheese (n = 50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Kareish cheese (n = 50) | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
Turkey meats (n = 30) | 20 | 13.3 | 6.7 | ND | [46] | |
Liver (n = 30) | 27 | 20 | 10 | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 547) | 37.8 | ND | ND | ND | [38] | |
Liver (n = 127) | 37 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 274) | 5.1 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Cheese (n = 180) | 7.8 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Yoghurt (n = 193) | 13.9 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken Liver (n = 70) | 27 | 68.4 | 31.6 | C. lari (0) | [47] | |
Chicken breast (n = 70) | 7.1 | 100 | 0 | C. lari (0) | ||
Chicken thigh (n = 70) | 14 | 50 | 40 | C. lari (10) | ||
Raw milk (n = 52) | 11 | 33.3 | 66.7 | C. lari (0) | ||
Kariesh cheese (n = 40) | 8 | 66.7 | 33.3 | C. lari (0) | ||
Yoghurt (n = 30) | 0 | 0 | 0 | C. lari (0) | ||
Broiler (n = 101) | 16.8 | ND | 4 | ND | [48] | |
Slaughterhouses (n = 104) | 24 | ND | 3.9 | ND | ||
Fresh chicken meat products (n = 30) | 53 | 46.7 | 46.7 | ND | [49] | |
Frozen chicken meat products (n = 30) | 53 | 46.7 | 40 | ND | ||
Chicken burger (n = 15) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Chicken nuggets (n = 15) | 13 | 13.3 | 13.3 | ND | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | 22 | 20 | 20 | ND | [39] | |
Kareish cheese (n = 50) | 34 | 14 | 14 | ND | ||
Yoghurt (n = 50) | 18 | 8 | 8 | ND | ||
Skin (n = 39) | 31 | 12.8 | 17.9 | C. lari (17.9), C. hyointestinal (0) | [36] | |
Thigh meat (n = 39) | 39 | 17.9 | 20.5 | C. lari (20.5), C. hyointestinal (1) | ||
Breast meat (n = 39) | 41 | 33.3 | 5.1 | C. lari (5.1), C. hyointestinal (2.7) | ||
Raw milk (n = 50) | ND | 4 | ND | ND | [50] | |
Laban Rayeb (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Stored Domiati cheese (n = 39) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Fresh Domiati cheese (n = 38) | ND | 11 | ND | ND | ||
Zabady (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Ras cheese (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Kariesh cheese (n = 25) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Morocco | Raw milk (n = 61) | ND | 1.6 | 0 | ND | [40] |
Beef (n = 16) | ND | 0 | 6.3 | ND | ||
Minced meat (n = 38) | ND | 5.6 | 7.9 | ND | ||
Eggs (n = 44) | ND | 0 | 0 | ND | ||
Breast and minced meat (n = 60) | ND | 6.7 | 50 | ND | ||
Chicken thigh (n = 48) | ND | 6.6 | 50 | ND | ||
Chicken wings (n = 23) | ND | 4.3 | 60.9 | ND | ||
Chicken meats (n = 39) | ND | 5.1 | 38.5 | ND | ||
Poultry (n = 140) | 73 | ND | ND | ND | [51] | |
Broiler (n = 105) | 71.4 | ND | 40 | ND | [52] | |
Raw poultry meat (n = 50) | 62 | ND | ND | ND | [41] | |
Tunisia | Chicken meats (n = 257) | 18.7 | 68.7 | 31.2 | ND | [42] |
Eggs (n = 86) | 26 | 81.8 | 18.2 | ND | [43] | |
Broiler chickens (n = 590) | 22.4 | ND | ND | ND | [53] | |
Chicken meat (n = 149) | 26.8 | 16.1 | 3.4 | ND | [44] | |
Turkey meat (n = 101) | 23.7 | 13.8 | 1.9 | ND | ||
* The percentage (%) of Campylobacter species is calculated from the positive samples (isolated target bacteria). ** ND: Not determined. |
Location | Sample Size | Campylobacter spp. %* | C. jejuni %** | C. coli %** | Confirmation Methods | References |
Egypt (Beni-Suef) | 53 | 40 | ND*** | ND | PCR technique | [37] |
Egypt (Kalyoubia) | 128 | 20.3 | 85 | 15 | Biochemical tests | [47] |
Egypt (Cairo) | 75 | 17 | ND | ND | PCR technique | [57] |
Egypt (Sharkia Governorate) | 100 | ND | 30 | ND | PCR technique | [14] |
Egypt (Zagazig City) | 44 | 91 | 73 | 18 | PCR technique | [35] |
Egypt (Giza) | 40 | ND | 92.5 | 7.5 | PCR technique | [38] |
Egypt (Assiut) | 80 | 28 | 0 | 5 | PCR technique | [48] |
Egypt (Assuit) | 43 | 11 | 7 | 33 | PCR technique | [58] |
Egypt (Zagazig City) | 246 | 5.3 | 77 | 23 | PCR technique | [36] |
Morocco (Northern) | 6 | 17 | 100 | 0 | PCR technique | [40] |
* The isolation rate was calculated from the total number of the examined samples ** The isolation rate of each species was calculated from the total number of the isolated Campylobacters spp. *** ND: Not determined. |
Country | Source | Isolates | Gene or ST | C. coli (%) | C. jejuni (%) | References |
Egypt | Poultry | C. jejuni (n = 1) | flaA | 25 | (0) | [58] |
C. coli (n = 8) | cadF | 12.5 | 100 | |||
cdtB | 75 | 100 | ||||
Human (100) and broiler chicken | C. jejuni (n = 25) | flaA | ND* | 100 | [14] | |
virB11 | ND | 52 | ||||
wlaN | ND | 36 | ||||
Humans and foods of animal | C. jejuni (n = 285) | cadF | 100 | 0 | [38] | |
C. coli (n = 17) | cdtB | 11.76 | 98.94 | |||
Human | C. jejuni (n = 90) | ST-48 | ND | 100 | [68] | |
ST-21 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-50 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-464 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-122 | ND | 100 | ||||
ST-10073 | ND | 100 | ||||
Raw milk, cheese, and human stool samples | C. jejuni (n = 40) | cadF | ND | 100 | [37] | |
cdtA | ND | 100 | ||||
Tunisia | Chicken meats | C. jejuni (n = 33 | flaA | 100 | 100 | [42] |
C. coli (n = 15) | cadF | 100 | 100 | |||
cdtA | 0 | 88 | ||||
cdtB | 0 | 72.7 | ||||
cdtC | 0 | 75.7 | ||||
ceuE | 33.3 | 93.9 | ||||
virB11 | 40 | 36.4 | ||||
cgtB | 0 | 21.2 | ||||
wlaN | 0 | 0 | ||||
Layer hens and eggs | C. jejuni (n = 124) | flaA | 100 | 100 | [69] | |
C. coli (n = 53) | cadF | 100 | 100 | |||
ciaB | 100 | 100 | ||||
cdt | 100 | 100 | ||||
racR | 0 | 90.9 | ||||
dnaJ | 0 | 95.9 | ||||
ceuE | 0 | 92.74 | ||||
pldA | 96.22 | 0 | ||||
Poultry and poultry products | C. jejuni (n = 37) | flaA | 0 | 100 | [70] | |
C. coli (n = 8) | cadF | 0 | 100 | |||
iamA | 0 | 0 | ||||
virB11 | 0 | 0 | ||||
cdtA | 0 | 86.66 | ||||
cdtB | 0 | 42.22 | ||||
cdtC | 0 | 51.11 | ||||
* ND: Not determined. |