Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Function kernels and divisible groupoids

  • In this paper, we introduce the notion of a function kernel which was motivated from the kernel in group theory, and we apply this notion to several algebraic structures, e.g., groups, groupoids, BCK-algebras, semigroups, leftoids. Using the notions of left and right cosets in groupoids, we investigate some relations with function kernels. Moreover, the notion of an idenfunction in groupoids is introduced, which is a generalization of an identity axiom in algebras by functions, and we discuss it with function kernels.

    Citation: Hee Sik Kim, Choonkil Park, Eun Hwa Shim. Function kernels and divisible groupoids[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13563-13572. doi: 10.3934/math.2022749

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hee Sik Kim, J. Neggers, Sun Shin Ahn . A generalization of identities in groupoids by functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16907-16916. doi: 10.3934/math.2022928
    [2] Siriluk Donganont, Sun Shin Ahn, Hee Sik Kim . Several co-associative laws and pre-$ B $-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9332-9341. doi: 10.3934/math.2025431
    [3] Hatice Gülsün Akay . (Co-)fibration of generalized crossed modules. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32782-32796. doi: 10.3934/math.20241568
    [4] In Ho Hwang, Hee Sik Kim, Joseph Neggers . Locally finiteness and convolution products in groupoids. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7350-7358. doi: 10.3934/math.2020470
    [5] Faisal Yousafzai, Muhammad Danish Zia, Mohammed M. Khalaf, Rashad Ismail . A new look of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets in ordered AG-groupoids with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6095-6118. doi: 10.3934/math.2023308
    [6] Hee Sik Kim, J. Neggers, Sun Shin Ahn . Construction of $ BCK $-neighborhood systems in a $ d $-algebra. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9422-9435. doi: 10.3934/math.2021547
    [7] Li He . Composition operators on Hardy-Sobolev spaces with bounded reproducing kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2708-2719. doi: 10.3934/math.2023142
    [8] Abdelaziz Alsubie, Anas Al-Masarwah . MBJ-neutrosophic hyper $ BCK $-ideals in hyper $ BCK $-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6107-6121. doi: 10.3934/math.2021358
    [9] Anas Al-Masarwah, Abd Ghafur Ahmad . Subalgebras of type (α, β) based on m-polar fuzzy points in BCK/BCI-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1035-1049. doi: 10.3934/math.2020072
    [10] Rajab Ali Borzooei, Hee Sik Kim, Young Bae Jun, Sun Shin Ahn . MBJ-neutrosophic subalgebras and filters in $ BE $-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6016-6033. doi: 10.3934/math.2022335
  • In this paper, we introduce the notion of a function kernel which was motivated from the kernel in group theory, and we apply this notion to several algebraic structures, e.g., groups, groupoids, BCK-algebras, semigroups, leftoids. Using the notions of left and right cosets in groupoids, we investigate some relations with function kernels. Moreover, the notion of an idenfunction in groupoids is introduced, which is a generalization of an identity axiom in algebras by functions, and we discuss it with function kernels.



    Bruck [2] discussed the theory of groupoids, loops and quasigroups, and several algebraic structures. Borúvka [1] stated the theory of decompositions of sets and its application to binary systems. Recently, several researchers investigated groupoids, and obtained some interesting results [4,8,10]. The notions of BCK-algebras and BCI-algebras were formulated in 1966 by Imai and Iséki [5], and were studied by many researchers [3,6,11,13].

    Kim and Neggers [7] introduced the notion of Bin(X) of all binary systems (groupoids, algebras) defined on a set X, and showed that it becomes a semigroup under suitable operation.

    For the construction of the quotient group, we introduce the notion of a kernel by using group homomorphisms, and construct left (right) cosets. In this paper, we introduce the notion of right and left function φ-kernels, which was motivated from the kernel in groups, and we apply this notion to several algebraic structures, e.g., groupoids, BCK-algebras, groups, semigroups, leftoids. Moreover, we apply the left and right φ-kernels to the semigroup Bin(X) of all binary systems (groupoids, algebras) defined on X, and investigate some roles of Rφ() and Lφ(). We apply the notion of a kernel in groups will be defined in general algebraic structures, i.e., groupoids, and investigate its roles with left and right cosets.

    Moreover, we introduce the notion of left and right divisible groupoids, and obtain some relations with function kernels. We show that every subgroup of a group is divisible, but the converse need not be true. The identity axiom in groups, semigroups, BCK-algebras and other general algebraic structures plays an important role for developing the theory. Finally, we introduce the notion of an idenfunction by using functions. We investigate some relations between idenfunctions and function kernels. The notions Fρ(,φ) and FRφ() will be discussed with function kernels and KER(,φ). The notion of the idenfunction, which is a generalization of an identity axiom in algebras, will be applied to the notion of function kernels, and obtain some useful results.

    A d-algebra [9,12] is a nonempty set X with a constant 0 and a binary operation "" satisfying the following axioms:

    (I) xx=0,

    (II) 0x=0,

    (III) xy=0 and yx=0 imply x=y for all x,yX.

    A BCK-algebra [3,6,11] is a d-algebra X satisfying the following additional axioms:

    (IV) (xy)(xz))(zy)=0,

    (V) (x(xy))y=0 for all x,y,zX.

    A groupoid (X,) is said to be a left zero semigroup if xy=x for any x,yX, and a groupoid (X,) is said to be a right zero semigroup if xy=y for any x,yX. A groupoid (X,) is said to be a leftoid for f:XX if xy=f(x) for any x,yX. Similarly, a groupoid (X,) is said to be a rightoid for f:XX if xy=f(y) for any x,yX. Note that a left (right, resp.) zero semigroup is a special case of a leftoid (right, resp.) (see [7]).

    Given two groupoids (X,) and (X,), we define a new binary operation by xy:=(xy)(yx) for all x,yX. Then we obtain a new groupoid (X,), i.e., (X,)=(X,)(X,). We denote the collection of all binary systems (groupoid, algebras) defined on X by Bin(X) [7].

    Theorem 2.1. [7] (Bin(X),) is a semigroup and the left zero semigroup is an identity.

    Given a groupoid (X,), i.e., (X,)Bin(X), and a function φ:XY, we define subsets Rφ() and Lφ() as follows:

    Rφ():={tX|φ(xt)=φ(x),xX},
    Lφ():={tX|φ(tx)=φ(x),xX}.

    We call Rφ() the right φ-kernel of a groupoid (X,), and Lφ() the left φ-kernel of a groupoid (X,).

    Example 3.1. Let X:={0,1,2,3} be a groupoid with the following table:

    012300000110112221233330

    If we define a map φ:XX by φ(0)=0, φ(1)=φ(2)=1 and φ(3)=3, then it it easy to see that Rφ()={0,2}, but Lφ()=.

    Example 3.2. Consider BCK-algebras (X,,0) and (Y,,e) with the following tables [11,p. 245]:

    012300000110012210233330eabceeeeeaaeaebbbeeccbae

    If we define a map φ:XY by φ(0)=φ(1)=φ(2)=e and φ(3)=a, then it it easy to see that φ is a BCK-homomorphism and Rφ()={0,1,2}, but Lφ()=.

    Proposition 3.1. If (X,,0) is a BCK-algebra, then 0Rφ() for any map φ:XY.

    Proof. If (X,,0) is a BCK-algebra, then x0=x for all xX. For any map φ:XY, we have φ(x0)=φ(x) for all xX. This shows that 0Rφ().

    Proposition 3.2. If (X,,e) is a group, then eRφ()Lφ() for any map φ:XY.

    Proof. If (X,,e) is a group, then xe=x=ex for all xX. It follows that, for any map φ:XY, φ(xe)=φ(ex)=φ(x) for all xX, proving that eRφ()Lφ().

    Example 3.3. Let R be the set of all real numbers and let "+" be the usual addition on R. Define a map φ:RR by φ(x):=ax+b, where a0, bR. Then Rφ(+)=Lφ(+)={0}. In fact, if uRφ(+), then φ(x+u)=φ(x) for all xR. It follows that a(x+u)+b=ax+b, and hence au=0. Since a0, we obtain u=0. Hence Rφ(+)={0}. Similarly, we have Lφ(+)={0}.

    Proposition 3.3. If φ:(X,,e)(Y,,e) is a group homomorphism, then Ker(φ)=Rφ()=Lφ().

    Proof. If tKer(φ), then φ(t)=e. Given xX, we have φ(xt)=φ(x)φ(t)=φ(x)e=φ(x). This shows that tRφ(). Similarly, we obtain tLφ(). If tRφ(), then φ(xt)=φ(x) for all xX. Since φ is a homomorphism, we obtain φ(x)=φ(xt)=φ(x)φ(t), which shows that φ(t)=e. This proves that tKer(φ). Similarly, we prove that if tLφ(), then tKer(φ).

    Proposition 3.3 shows that the notion of a left (right) φ-kernel is the same as the notion of the kernel in groups.

    Proposition 3.4. If (X,) is a semigroup, then(Rφ(),) is also a semigroup.

    Proof. Since Rφ()X, it is enough to show that (Rφ(),) is a subgroupoid of (X,). If u,tRφ(), then φ(xu)=φ(x), φ(xt)=φ(x) for all xX. Since (X,) is a semigroup, we obtain φ(x(ut))=φ((xu)t)=φ(xu)=φ(x) for all xX, and hence utRφ(). This proves the proposition.

    Let (X,) be a groupoid (not necessarily a semigroup). Given aX, we define a map ra:XX by ra(x):=xa for all xX. The set of all such maps is defined by Rφ(), i.e.,

    Rφ()={ra|φ(ra(x))=φ(x),xX,aX},

    where φ:XY is a map. We obtain the following proposition.

    Proposition 3.5. (Rφ(),) is a semigroup, where "" is the composition of functions.

    Proof. Given a,bRφ() and xX, we have (rarb)(x)=ra(rb(x))=ra(xb)=(xb)a. Since a,bRφ(), we obtain φ(xa)=φ(x), φ(xb)=φ(x) for all xX. It follows that φ((xb)a)=φ(xb)=φ(x) for all xX. Hence, φ(x)=φ((xb)a)=φ((rarb)(x)), which shows that rarbRφ(). Thus, (Rφ(),) is a semigroup.

    Similarly, given aX, we define a map la:XX by la(x):=ax for all xX. The set of all such maps is defined by Lφ(), i.e.,

    Lφ()={la|φ(la(x))=φ(x),xX,aX},

    where φ:XY is a map. We obtain the following proposition.

    Corollary 3.1. (Lφ(),) is a semigroup, where "" is the composition of functions.

    Proposition 3.6. Let φ:(X,)(Y,) be a homomorphism of groupoids. If aRφ() and φ is injective, then ra is an identity function on (X,).

    Proof. Assume that ra is not an identity function on (X,). Then there exists x0X such that ra(x0)x0, i.e., x0ax0. Since φ is injective, we obtain φ(x0a)φ(x0), which means that aRφ(), which is a contradiction.

    Corollary 3.2. Let φ:(X,)(Y,) be a homomorphism of groupoids. If aLφ() and φ is injective, then la is an identity function on (X,).

    Proof. The proof is similar to Proposition 3.6.

    Remark 3.1. It is necessary to give a condition: φ is injective, in Proposition 3.6. The mapping φ in Example 3.2 is a BCK-homomorphism, but not injective, and Rφ()={0,1,2}. Since r2(1)=12=01 and r1(2)=21=12, i.e., r1 and r2 are not an identity function.

    Example 3.4. Let + be the usual addition on R. If we define a map φ:RR by φ(x):=sinx, then Rφ(+)={2nπ|nZ}. In fact, if tRφ(+), then φ(x+t)=φ(x) for all xR, which shows that sin(x+t)=sinx for all xR. Hence, t is a period of sinx, i.e., there exists nZ such that t=2nπ. Since sin(x+2(m±n)π)=sinx, (Rφ(+),+) is a normal subgroup of (R,+), whence it is a kernel of the map ν:(R,+)(R,+)/(Rφ(+),+).

    Proposition 3.7. Let (X,) be a left zero semigroup.

    (i) If φ:XY is any map, then Rφ()=X.

    (ii) If φ:XY is not a constant map, then Lφ()=.

    Proof. (i) Given aX, since (X,) is a left zero semigroup, we have xa=x for all xX. It follows that φ(xa)=φ(x) for all xX. This shows that aRφ().

    (ii) Assume that Lφ(). Then there exists aLφ(), which means that φ(ax)=φ(x) for all xX. Since φ is not a constant function, there exists bX such that ab and φ(a)φ(b). Since (X,) is a left zero semigroup, we have φ(a)=φ(ab)=φ(b)φ(a), which is a contradiction.

    Remark 3.2. Proposition 3.7 (i) does not hold for non-left zero semigroup in general. In fact, we see that (R,+) is not a left zero semigroup and Rφ(+)={2nπ|nZ}R in Example 3.4.

    Theorem 3.1. Let (X,) and (X,) be groupoids and let (X,):=(X,)(X,), i.e., xy=(xy)(yx) for all x,yX. If φ:XY is a mapping, then

    (i) txRφ(),tRφ() implies tRφ();

    (ii)txLφ(),tRφ() implies tRφ();

    (iii)xtLφ(),tLφ() implies tLφ();

    (iv)xtRφ(),tLφ() implies tLφ().

    Proof. (i) If txRφ(),tRφ(), then φ(xt)=φ((xt)(tx))=φ(xt)=φ(x), which shows that tRφ().

    (ii) If txLφ(),tRφ(), then φ(tx)=φ((tx)(xt))=φ(xt)=φ(x), which shows that tRφ().

    (iii) If xtLφ(),tLφ(), then φ(xt)=φ((xt)(tx))=φ(tx)=φ(x), which shows that tLφ().

    (iv) If xtRφ(),tLφ(), then φ(tx)=φ((tx)(xt))=φ(tx)=φ(x), which shows that tLφ().

    Let φ:(X,)(Y,) be a homomorphism of groupoids and let tX. Define a set KER(,φ) by

    KER(,φ):={(x,y)|φ(x)=φ(y)}.

    Given t(X,), we define the right coset ρ(,t) and the left coset λ(,t) respectively by

    ρ(,t):={(xt,x)|xX}

    and

    λ(,t):={(tx,x)|xX}.

    We define two sets RK(,φ) and LK(,φ) as follows:

    RK(,φ):={tX|ρ(,t)KER(,φ)}

    and

    LK(,φ):={tX|λ(,t)KER(,φ)}.

    Proposition 3.8. Given a groupoid (X,), i.e., (X,)Bin(X), and a function φ:XY, we have

    (i)Rφ()=RK(,φ),(ii)Lφ()=LK(,φ).

    Proof. (i) Let tRφ(). If (xt,x)ρ(,t), then φ(xt)=φ(x), i.e., (xt,x)KER(,φ). This shows that ρ(,t)KER(,φ), which means that tRK(,φ). If tRK(,φ), then ρ(,t)KER(,φ). It follows that (xt,x)KER(,φ) for all xX, and hence φ(xt)=φ(x). Hence, tRφ(). This proves that RK(,φ)Rφ().

    (ii) The proof is similar to (i).

    Theorem 3.2. Let R be the set of all real numbers and let "+" be the usual addition on R and let φ:RR be a map. Then

    tRφ(+)ρ(+,t)KER(+,φ)tRρ(+,t).

    Proof. If (α,β)tRφ(+)ρ(+,t), then there exists tRφ(+) such that (α,β)ρ(+,t), and hence α=β+t. Since tRφ(+), we have φ(x+t)=φ(x) for all xR. It follows that φ(α)=φ(β+t)=φ(β), i.e., (α,β)KER(+,φ). Hence, tRφ(+)ρ(+,t)KER(+,φ). If (x,y)KER(+,φ), then φ(x)=φ(y). Let tR such that x=y+t. It follows that (x,y)=(y+t,y)ρ(+,t). Hence, (x,y)tRρ(+,t), proving the theorem.

    A groupoid (X,) is said to be right divisible (resp., left divisible) if for any x,yX, there exists tX such that x=yt (resp., x=ty). Note that (Z,+) is divisible. We take t:=xy for any x,yZ. It follows that x=(xy)+y=t+y.

    Proposition 4.1. If (X,) is a right divisible groupoid, then

    X×X=tXρ(,t).

    Proof. For any (x,y)X×X, there exists tX such that x=yt, since (X,) is right divisible. It follows that (x,y)=(yt,y)ρ(,t), which proves that (x,y)tXρ(,t).

    Given a groupoid (X,), we define a set Tφ() by

    Tφ():={tX|ρ(,t)KER(,φ)}.

    Theorem 4.1. Let (X,) be a right divisible groupoid. If φ:(X,)(Y,) is a homomorphism of groupoids, then

    KER(,φ)tTφ()ρ(,t).

    Proof. If (x,y)KER(,φ), then φ(x)=φ(y). Since (X,) is right divisible, there exists tX such that x=yt. It follows that (x,y)=(yt,y)ρ(,t) and φ(yt)=φ(x)=φ(y). We claim that tTφ(). In fact,

    tTφ()ρ(,t)KER(,φ)yXsuchthat(yt,y)ρ(,t)KER(,φ)φ(yt)=φ(y)holds.

    Hence, (x,y)tTφ()ρ(,t).

    Corollary 4.1. If (X,) is a left divisible groupoid, then

    (i)X×X=tXλ(,t),

    (ii)KER(,φ)tTφ()λ(,t).

    Proof. The proof is similar to Proposition 4.1 and Theorem 4.1.

    Proposition 4.2. If (X,) is a left zero semigroup, then it is left divisible, but not right divisible.

    Proof. Given x,yX, if we let u:=x, then uy=xy=x, since (X,) is a left zero semigroup. Hence, (X,) is left divisible. We claim that (X,) is not a right divisible. Assume (X,) is right divisible. Let xy in X. Then there exists zX such that y=xz. Since (X,) is a left-zero semigroup, we obtain y=xz=x, which is a contradiction.

    Proposition 4.3. If (X,) is a right zero semigroup, then it is right divisible, but not left divisible.

    Proposition 4.4. Let (X,) be a leftoid for φ:XX. If φ is onto, then (X,) is left divisible, but not right divisible.

    Proof. Given x,yX, since φ is onto, there exists uX such that y=φ(u). It follows that y=φ(u)=ux. Hence, (X,) is left divisible. Assume (X,) is right divisible. Let y1y2 in X. Since φ is onto, there exist u1,u2X such that y1=xu1,y2=xu2. Since (X,) is a leftoid for φ, we obtain y1=φ(x)=y2, which is a contradiction.

    Remark 4.1. It is necessary to add the condition, φ is onto, in Proposition 4.4. See the following example.

    Example 4.1. Let R be the set of all real numbers. If we define a map φ:RR by φ(x):=x+1, then it is a bijective function. Define a binary operation "" on R by xy:=φ(x) for all x,yR. Then (R,) is left divisible over φ. In fact, for any yR, if we let u:=y1, then ux=φ(u)=φ(y1)=y for any xR. Define a map ψ:RR by ψ(x):=x2. Given 3,5R, there exists no real number tR such that 3=t5=ψ(t)=t20. This means that (R,) is not left divisible over ψ.

    Proposition 4.5. Let (X,) be a rightoid for φ:XX. If φ is onto, then (X,) is right divisible, but not left divisible.

    Proof. The proof is similar to Proposition 4.4.

    Let (X,) and (Y,) be groupoids. Define maps φ:(X,)(X,) and ψ:(Y,)(Y,). We define a binary operation "" on X×Y by (x,y)(u,v):=(xu,yv) and a map ξ:(X×Y,)(X×Y,) by ξ(x,y):=(φ(x),ψ(y)). We call (X×Y,) a direct product of (X,) and (Y,) with respect to (φ,ψ).

    Theorem 4.2. Let (X×Y,) be a direct product of (X,) and (Y,) with respect to (φ,ψ).If we define a map ξ:(X×Y,)(X×Y,) byξ(x,y):=(φ(x),ψ(y)), then Rφ()×Rψ()=Rξ().

    Proof. If (α,β)Rφ()×Rψ(), then αRφ() and βRψ(), i.e., φ(xα)=φ(x) and ψ(yβ)=ψ(y) for all xX and yY. It follows that

    ξ((x,y)(α,β))=ξ(xα,yβ)=(φ(xα),ψ(yβ))=(φ(x),ψ(y))=ξ(x,y),

    for all (x,y)X×Y. This shows that (α,β)Rξ(). The converse is similar, and we omit it.

    Corollary 4.2. Let (X×Y,) be a direct product of (X,) and (Y,) with respect to (φ,ψ).If we define a map ξ:(X×Y,)(X×Y,) byξ(x,y):=(φ(x),ψ(y)), then Lφ()×Lψ()=Lξ().

    Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 4.2.

    Proposition 4.6. Let (X×Y,) be a direct product of (X,) and (Y,). If (X,) and (Y,) are right (resp., left) divisible, then (X×Y,) is also right (resp., left) divisible.

    Proof. The proof is straightforward.

    Proposition 4.7. Every homomorphic image of a right (resp., left) divisible groupoid is right (resp., left) divisible.

    Proof. Let φ:(X,)(Y,) be an epimorphism of groupoids and let (X,) be a right (resp., left) divisible groupoid. Given x,yY, since φ is onto, there exist a,bX such that x=φ(a),y=φ(b). Since (X,) is right divisible, there exists cX such that a=bc. Hence, φ(a)=φ(bc)=φ(b)φ(c), i.e., x=yφ(c), which shows that (Y,) is right divisible.

    Proposition 4.8. Every subgroup of a group is divisible.

    Proof. Let (X,,e) be a group and let H be a subgroup of X. Given x,yH, we let t:=x1y. Then xt=x(x1y)=(xx1)y=ey=y. Hence, (H,,e) is right divisible. Similarly, we proves that (H,,e) is left divisible.

    In Proposition 4.8, we showed that every subgroup of a group is divisible. But it does not hold for subgroupoids which are not subgroups. Consider a set Uk={k,k+1,k+2,}. It is a subgroupoid of an abelian group Z, but it is not a subgroup of Z. Clearly, it is not divisible, since there exists no element t in Z such that (k+1)+t=k.

    Let (X,) be a groupoid. A map ξ:XX is said to be a right (resp., left) idenfunction of (X,) if xξ(x)=x (resp., ξ(x)x=x) for all xX. If ξ is an identity map, i.e., ξ(x):=e for all xX, then e is an right identity of a groupoid (X,). The notion of an idenfunction is a generalization of an identity axiom in groupoids.

    Example 5.1. Consider a group (Z/(5),). For any xZ/(5), we have x5=x. If we take ξ(x):=x4, then xξ(x)=xx4=x5=x for all xZ/(5). Now, 14=1, 24=16=1, 34=81=1, 44=(1)4=1, 04=0, so that ξ is an idenfunction which is not a constant function. Of course, ξ(x)1 yields an identity element.

    Example 5.2. Define a binary operation "" on R by xy:=2x+3y for all x,yR. Define a map ξ:RR satisfying xξ(x)=x for all xR. Then x=xξ(x)=2x+3ξ(x). It follows that ξ(x)=13x is the right idenfunction of (R,). Assume ψ:RR is a map satisfying ψ(x)x=x for all xR. Then 2ψ(x)+3x=x, and hence ψ(x)=x is the left idenfunction of (R,).

    Given a map φ:(X,)(Y,), we define sets Fρ(,φ) and FRφ() by

    Fρ(,φ):={(xφ(x),x)|xX}

    and

    FRφ():={ψ:XX|φ(xψ(x))=φ(x),xX}.

    We may define Fλ(,φ) and FLφ() for a map φ:XY.

    Let (X,) be a groupoid and let aX. If we define a map δa:XX by δa(x):=a for all xX, then we may identify the map δa with a, i.e., δaa. If a groupoid (X,) has a right identity e, then eFρ(,δe)=ρ(,e).

    Proposition 5.1. If a groupoid (X,) has a right identity e, then eRφ().

    Proof. If e is a right identity of (X,), then xe=x for all xX. It follows that φ(xe)=φ(x) for all xX. This proves that eRφ().

    Proposition 5.2. Let (X,) be a groupoid. If ψ:(X,)(X,) is a right idenfunction of (X,), then ψFRφ() for any map φ:XY.

    Proof. The proof is straightforward.

    Example 5.3. (a) Let R be the set of all real numbers and let "" be the usual multiplication on R. Define a map φ:RR by φ(x):=sinx. Assume ψ:RR satisfies the condition: φ(xψ(x))=φ(x). Then sin(xψ(x))=sinx and hence xψ(x)=x+2n(x)π=x(1+1x2n(x)π) for some n(x)Z with x0. It follows that ψ(x)=1+1x2n(x)πFRφ() for x0.

    (b) Define φ:(R,+)[1,1] by φ(x):=sinx. Assume δ:RR satisfies the condition: φ(x+δ(x))=φ(x). Then sin(x+δ(x))=sinx, and hence we obtain x+δ(x)=x+2n(x)π, i.e., δ(x)=2n(x)πFRφ(+) for some n(x)Z.

    Theorem 5.1. Let (X,) be a groupoid and let φ:XY be a map. Then

    Rφ()FRφ().

    Proof. If aRφ(), then φ(xa)=φ(x) for all xX. If we define a constant map δa:XX by δa(x):=a, then we may identify δaa. It follows that φ(x)=φ(xa)=φ(xδa(x)) for all xX, and hence aδaFRφ().

    Proposition 5.3. Let (X,) be a groupoid and let φ:XY be a map. If ξFRφ(), thenFρ(,ξ)KER(,φ).

    Proof. Since ξFRφ(), if (xξ(x),x)Fρ(,ξ), then φ(xξ(x))=φ(x) for all xX, which proves that (xξ(x),x)KER(,φ).

    Example 5.4. In Example 5.2, we define a map φ(x):=x2 for all xR. We find all functions ξ(x) in FRφ(). If ξ(x)FRφ(), then φ(xξ(x))=φ(x), and hence x2=(2x+3ξ(x))2=4x2+12xξ(x)+9ξ(x)2. It follows that ξ(x)=13x or ξ(x)=x, i.e., FRφ()={13x,x}. Similarly, we obtain FLφ()={2x,x}.

    In this paper, we introduced the notion of a function kernel, in which the idea came from the kernel in group theory. We applied this concept to several algebraic structures, e.g., groupoids, BCK-algebras, semigroups etc. By introducing the notions of left and right divisible groupoids, we discussed some relations between function kernels and divisible groupoids. Finally, we introduced the notion of an idenfunction, which is a generalized identity axiom in several algebraic structures. The notion can be applied to several algebraic structures, e.g., groups, rings, fields and vector spaces in the sequel, since these algebraic structures contain the identity axiom. This approach may open the new door of several algebras in future.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



    [1] O. Borůvka, Foundations of the theory of groupoids and groups, Basel: Springer, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-4121-4
    [2] R. H. Bruck, A survey of binary systems, 3 Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43119-1
    [3] Y. S. Huang, BCI-algebra, Beijing: Science Press, 2006.
    [4] I. H. Hwang, H. S. Kim, J. Neggers, Some implicativities for groupoids and BCK-algebras, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7100973 doi: 10.3390/math7100973
    [5] Y. Imai, K. Iséki, On axiom systems of propositional calculi. XIV, Proc. Japan Acad., 42 (1966), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.3792/pja/1195522169 doi: 10.3792/pja/1195522169
    [6] A. Iorgulescu, Algebras of logic as BCK-algebras, Bucharest: Editura ASE, 2008.
    [7] H. S. Kim, J. Neggers, The semigroups of binary systems and some perspectives, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 45 (2008), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.4134/BKMS.2008.45.4.651 doi: 10.4134/BKMS.2008.45.4.651
    [8] H. S. Kim, J. Neggers, S. S. Ahn, On pre-commutative algebras, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7040336 doi: 10.3390/math7040336
    [9] H. S. Kim, J. Neggers, S. S. Ahn, Construction of BCK-neighborhood systems in a d-algebra, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 9422–9435. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021547 doi: 10.3934/math.2021547
    [10] Y. L. Liu, H. S. Kim, J. Neggers, Some special elements and pseudo inverse functions in groupoids, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020173 doi: 10.3390/math7020173
    [11] J. Meng, Y. B. Jun, BCK-algebras, Seoul: Kyung Moon Sa Co., 1994.
    [12] J. Neggers, H. S. Kim, On d-algebras, Math. Slovaca, 49 (1999), 19–26.
    [13] S. Z. Song, H. S. Kim, Y. B. Jun, Commutative ideals of BCK-algebras and BCI-algebras based on soju structures, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 8567–8584. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021497 doi: 10.3934/math.2021497
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1751) PDF downloads(49) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog