Citation: Sreemita Majumdar, Song-Tao Liu. Cell division symmetry control and cancer stem cells[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(2): 82-101. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020006
[1] | Christopher A Birt . Food and Agriculture Policy in Europe. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 131-140. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.131 |
[2] | Mario Coccia, Igor Benati . Negative effects of high public debt on health systems facing pandemic crisis: Lessons from COVID-19 in Europe to prepare for future emergencies. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 477-498. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024024 |
[3] | Terri Rebmann, Kristin D. Wilson, Travis Loux, Ayesha Z. Iqbal, Eleanor B. Peters, Olivia Peavler . Outcomes, Approaches, and Challenges to Developing and Passing a Countywide Mandatory Vaccination Policy: St. Louis County’s Experience with Hepatitis A Vaccine for Food Service Personnel. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 116-130. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.116 |
[4] | Gareth Morgan . Does Utilitarian Policy such as Smoking Cessation Lend Support to Wider Aspirin Use?. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(2): 223-226. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.2.223 |
[5] | Helen Mary Haines, Opie Cynthia, David Pierce, Lisa Bourke . Notwithstanding High Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity, Smoking Remains the Most Important Factor in Poor Self-rated Health and Hospital Use in an Australian Regional Community. AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(4): 402-417. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.4.402 |
[6] | Stefano Campostrini, David McQueen, Anne Taylor, Alison Daly . World Alliance for Risk Factor Surveillance White Paper on Surveillance and Health Promotion. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(1): 10-26. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.1.10 |
[7] | Wanda Martin, Bernie Pauly, Marjorie MacDonald . Situational Analysis for Complex Systems: Methodological Development in Public Health Research. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 94-109. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.94 |
[8] | Gareth Morgan . Prophylactic aspirin and public. AIMS Public Health, 2014, 1(1): 1-8. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2013.1.1 |
[9] | Dreaves Hilary A . How Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) Help Us to Select the Public Health Policies Most Likely to Maximise Health Gain, on the Basis of Best Public Health Science. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(2): 235-241. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.235 |
[10] | Mehreen Tariq, Margaret Haworth-Brockman, Seyed M Moghadas . Ten years of Pan-InfORM: modelling research for public health in Canada. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(2): 265-274. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021020 |
The modern concept of environment protection is based on the continuous monitoring of air, soil, water pollution and permanent control of solar radiation that reaches the earth surface. The growth of ozone hole results in higher doses of Ultra Violet (UV) irradiation and increases the demand for sensitive UV photodetectors, which can distinguish the real UV signal from solar background radiation. In the widely used Si UV detectors, this problem is solved by utilizing Wood’s optical filters, which complicates its design and increases the cost. In contrast to this, the UV detectors based on Wide Band Gap (WBG) semiconductors with energy gaps higher then ~4.5 eV have an intrinsic solar blindness as they are insensitive to sunlight with energies less than the ban gap value [1,2,3,4]. Such UV detectors are of utmost importance also for the space and sun exploration, flame analysis, missile tracking systems, space flight security, photocatalytic CO2 reduction, chemical and biological analysis, power electronics, electric vehicles, high energy lasers etc. [5,6,7,8].
Indium germinate - In2Ge2O7, with the band gap of Eg = 4.3 eV, is a promising and valuable material not only for luminescent devices [8,9], sensors [10] and thermoelectric generators [11,12], but also for solar-blind UV photodetectors. Due to very low dark current, such detectors can work not only without optical cut-off filters, but also without heavy cooling systems [3,4,13].
Group III nitrides (AlN and GaN) and their ternary and quaternary compounds with each other and InN, are considered to be the most promising WBG materials for the development of high-performance devices, including UV photodetectors. They have many advantages such as the ideal spectral selectivity with wide direct band gaps from the deep UV to the infrared region, high breakdown field, high thermal and chemical stability, radiation hardness and expected high responsivity. However, formation of stoichiometric single crystalline nitrides is a complicated task, which was solved for GaN by Nakamura, Akasaki and Amano (2014Nobel Prize in physics) after ~20 years of technological investigation. Indium nitride with low defect concentration was produced only in the beginning of this century and its true band gap value was established to be ~0.7 eV.
The development of new, effective methods for the synthesis of nitride materials is an important technological issue and the objective of this paper addresses this challenge.
The application of one dimensional (1D) nanostructures instead of thin films and bulk materials have significantly improved the performance of devices due to the unique surface related and quantum confinement features, together with an increased light absorption and ability to realize axial and radial homo- and hetero- p-n junction within a single nanowire. The growth temperature of such nanomaterials should be kept sufficiently low to prevent the formation of thermal stresses in the substrate, redistribution of impurities and degradation of p-n junctions. From the other hand, the growth technology should utilize highly active precursors to provide formation of stoichiometric and structurally perfect nanomaterials. It should be also taken into account that the structure and morphology of NWs can be greatly influenced by the source materials and precursor species [14,15,16].
In this paper, we describe the development of low temperature growth technology for producing oxide and nitride wide band gap semiconductor 1D nanostructures (In2Ge2O7 Eg = 4.3 eV, Ge3N4 Eg = 3.9 eV). The technology is based on the application of active gaseous precursors formed after thermal decomposition of hydrazine vapor. One purpose of this work was also to investigate the nature of precursors and chemical processes that provide the growth of 1D nanostructures in hydrazine vapor.
The growth of nanowires was performed in the glass vacuum system with 50 mm diameter vertical quartz reactor. The smallampoule with hydrazine was connected with the reactor through the glass valve. The temperature of hydrazine was kept close to 20 ℃. The system was evacuated down to 2 × 10−5 Torr using a rotary and glass diffusion pumps. The external resistive furnace (400W) was attached to the bottom of the reactor. Its temperature was controlled by k-type thermocouple. The hydrazine-hydrate was purified by distillation and the water content in it was evaluated using the refractometer. The details of technology and precursor formation are considered in the following section.
The morphology and structure of NWs were studied using FEI Quanta FEG 600 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Philips CM200 FEG Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). XRD data were taken on a Shimadzu XRD-6000 diffractometer.
The low temperature facile synthesis of nitride materials needs the application of spontaneous chemical reactions with negative Gibbs free energies and high kinetic factors. Nitrogen molecule with its very hard triple bond is useless for nitride formation unless it is dissociated or ionized to form atomic nitrogen or N+ ion. The utilization of ammonia lowers the synthetic temperature, however, it is still sufficiently high with average value close to 1000 ℃.
Hydrazine (N2H4) based technology attracted our attention because in the early work of S.Vashioka [17] it was reported that the rate of Si3N4 film deposition in hydrazine was increased by 50 times as compared with the synthesis in ammonia. This was explained by a high concentration of active NH2 radicals in the products formed after thermal decomposition of hydrazine. Besides, it was established that at the surfaces of semiconductors the decomposition of hydrazine proceeds as a very fast chain reaction with a high pre-exponential factor of 1013s−1 [18]. In spite of these advantages the application of hydrazine vapor and its flows for producing microelectronic materials and nanostructures was not popular due to the explosive nature and toxicity of N2H4. From the other hand, different very active radicals (NH2, NH, atomic nitrogen and hydrogen) are produced during the pyrolysis of hydrazine, until the final stabile products - N2, H2 and NH3 are formed [19,20,21]. These radicals offer a special opportunity to decrease the synthetic temperature of different materials including nano-dimensional structures, as discussed in the following sections.
It should be noted that after purification of hydrazine hydrate, approximately 3mol.% of water still remained in the hydrazine and served as oxidants for producing volatile suboxides. Considering the gas phase precursors formed afterthermal decomposition of N2H4 + 3mol.%H2O it becomes clear that reducing, oxidizing and nitride forming species are simultaneously presented in the reactor. This leads to the variety of competitive paths for the chemical synthesis of nanomaterials. Depending on the source material and process temperature different pure materials and compounds can be produced including oxides, nitrides and oxinitrides. In our previous work we used a piece of crystalline InP as a source and demonstrated that in hydrazine vapor pure, crystalline InP nanowires can be synthesized on Si substrate, despite the presence of oxidizing and nitride forming precursors [22]. The possible reason lies in the very high value of negative Gibbs free energy (−904 kJ/mol at 400 ℃) and increased kinetic factor for the chemical reaction that produces InP from In2O and P precursors, instead of Indium oxide or nitride formation. In the considered process of InP nanowire growth, oxygen manifests itself only in producing volatile In2O soboxides that provide the indium mass transfer to Si substrate.
In this work we used crystalline, unpolished, solid Ge and In sources for producing nanowires. The only possible volatile species, which are able to perform the mass transfer from source to substrate and subsequent growth of nanowires are volatile GeO and In2O suboxides. In our oxygen deficient atmosphere they can be produced onto the source surfaces after dissociative adsorption of water molecules or after reduction of existing native oxide layers with H2, H, NH and NH2 species.
The experimental setup with vertical, tubular quartz reactor was first evaporated down to 2 × 10−5 Torr, then isolated from the vacuum system and filled with hydrazine vapor up to its saturated pressure of ~10 Torr. The solid source material was placed on the bottom of the reactor (hot zone) and heated by an external resistive furnace. The substrate (Si and glass) were placed on a tubular quartz spacer at 3-20mm above the source (cold zone) and heated by the convective heat transfer from the same furnace. The temperature of the substrates was regulated by changing the source-substrate distance.
For the growth of Ge3N4 nanowires the Ge source was placed on the bottom of a reactor and Si substrate was located at 3 mm above it. The source was annealed in hydrazine vapor for 1 hour in the temperature range of 400-550 ℃, and the corresponding substrate temperature range was 380-530 ℃.
It should be emphasized that during the growth process Ge3N4 nanowires were produced both on source and Si substrate surfaces. However, their morphologies, composition and growth mechanisms were quite different. In our previous work [23] we presented some results concerning the growth of Ge3N4 nanowires on the surface of Ge source without considering the growth processes at the Si substrate surface, which was placed above the source. It was established that the first step in the growth of NWs on Ge source is a formation of GeOx clusters, followed by the appearance of molten Ge self catalyst droplets. At 500 ℃ α-Ge3N4 nanowires started to grow on Ge source surface. They were produced through the self-catalyzed Vapor-Liquid-Solid (VLS) mechanism using GeO vapor and nitride forming precursors, produced after pyrolytic decomposition of hydrazine. The minimum diameter of nanowires was 7 nm, while their lengths exceeded tens of micrometers. Figure 1 represents SEM and TEM images of Ge3N4 nanowires. They confirm the Ge catalyst-assisted growth of single crystalline α-Ge3N4 nanowires. It should be noted that Ge catalyst was also successfully used for producing different nanowires including SiO2, Al2O3, ZnO, GaN [24,25,26,27].
At elevated temperatures close to 520 ℃ the growth mechanism was changed to Vapor-Solid one and α-Ge3N4 nanobelts were produced instead of nanowires with circular diameters (Figure 2). Some of them had thicknesses close to few atomic layers, while their lengths reach tens of micrometers.
The morphology of grown 1D nanostructures strongly depended on the growth temperature. At higher temperatures close to 580 ℃ the large, micrometer sized crystalline blocks of Ge3N4 were produced, however, they still preserved the elongated shapes (Figure 3).
More detailed information about precursors, their activity and chemical reactions involved in the synthesis of nanowires were obtained after analysis of nanomaterials produced during the condensation of GeO molecules on the Si substrate and their interaction with hydrazine decomposition products. The elemental mappings of nanomaterials synthesized on Si surface at different temperatures are presented below in Figures 4-6.
The microdroplets and linear, chain-like structures were observed in material grown at 480 ℃. The whole product consisted mainly of Ge (Figure 4 b). The formation of germanium nitride or oxide was not observed (Figure 4 c, d), indicating that GeO vapor was effectively reduced to Ge by hydrazine decomposition products. The absence of a surface covering thin film proves that the droplets and chains were formed after surface diffusion and coalescence of adatoms. The micrometer sizes of material suggest that the flux of Ge molecules was sufficiently dense. Probably, at early stage of growth, when sizes of first clusters were within few nanometers, they were molten nanodroplets due to well known Gibbs-Thomson effect. As the sizes grew, the temperature was insufficient to keep them in liquid state and the spherical shape was changed to irregular one observed in Figure 4. The origin of driving force that arranges the droplets in a chain-like structure is unknown. XRD spectra of materials that were scrapped off the Si surface did not reveal any presence of crystalline Ge. The absence of crystallites may be caused by insufficient substrate temperature, and partly by a relatively high level of oxygen and nitrogen impurities in Ge droplets.
At increased temperature (500 ℃) the VLS grown Ge3N4 nanowires with facetted edges appear at the Si surface along with Ge chains (Figure 5). The produced 1D Ge3N4 structures we denote as nanowires, but in reality they are microwires because their diameters have micrometer sizes. The nanowires were grown through the Ge self-catalyzed VLS mechanism, because the tips are clearly seen in Ge related map (Figure 5b), but they disappear in nitrogen map (Figure 5c). The nanowire bodies consist of Ge and nitrogen. At this temperature the conversion of GeO molecules to Ge3N4 starts due to chemical reactions with nitrogen precursors. However the temperature is insufficient to transform all GeO molecules into nitride. As a result, a part of them is still reduced to Ge forming chains and droplets (Figure 5b).
Only germanium nitride was produced at Si surface at 520 ℃, as it is evidenced in Figure 6. No free Ge was found (Figure 6b, c). Grown nitrides have faceted edges indicating their crystalline structure. The formation of crystalline α-Ge3N4 phase (JCPDS: 11-69) was also confirmed by XRD pattern in Figure 6 d, which was obtained after scrapping the material off the Si substrate.
The most striking feature of these experiments is the absence of oxides at the Si surface in spite of the presence of water and traces of O2, which appear due to the oxygen inleakage. To explain this phenomenon we have calculated the Gibbs free energies for two sets of competitive chemical reactions. The first set was representing the processes of GeO oxidation and formation of stabile stoichiometric GeO2, while the second set was describing the reduction of GeO to pure Ge in hydrazine decomposition products.
Chemical reactions presented below were calculated at 500 ℃ and they have a tentative nature because they were evaluated at atmospheric pressure, while the initial pressure in our experiments was 10 Torr. The sign of ΔG determines only whether or not a chemical reaction will occur. The negative signs of ΔG in the equations listed below indicate that these reactions may take place spontaneously. The real amount of synthesized material and the process dynamics depends on the reaction kinetics (i.e. on the rates of chemical processes), which were not evaluated in our experiments. However, the kinetic factors are often more important than thermodynamics in the non-equilibrium systems [28]. In these calculations GeO was considered to be in an adsorbed state.
The formation of germanium dioxide (GeO2) through the reaction of GeO with water has a low Gibbs energy (−75 kJ/mol). The synthesis of GeO2 through the reaction of GeO with O2 has sufficiently higher negative free energy:
GeO + 0.5O2(g) = GeO2 △G= -280 kJ/mol | (1) |
GeO2 can be formed also through the reaction:
2GeO=Ge+GeO2 △G= -218 kJ/mol | (2) |
The Gibbs energies for the reduction of Ge from GeO using H2 and atomic hydrogen were calculated to be −57 and −414 kJ/mol respectively.
Even more gain in energy may be obtained when Ge is reduced from GeO using NH2 and NH species:
GeO+NH2(g)=Ge+H2O(g)+0.5N2(g) △G= -274 kJ/mol | (3) |
GeO + 2NH(g) = Ge + H2O(g) + N2(g) △G= -778 kJ/mol | (4) |
By comparing these reactions with that of GeO2 formation (1) and (2) it can be seen that reactions, which produce Ge are energetically mostly favorable. The considerable amount of Ge, which was synthesized on Si at 480 ℃ (Figure 4) indicates that the reducing reactions have also a high kinetic factors and at this temperature they prevail over oxidation or nitride forming processes.
The syntheses of germanium nitride from existing precursors are other very favorable reactions:
3GeO+4NH3(g)=Ge3N4+3H2O(g) +3H2(g) △G= -469 kJ/mol | (5) |
3GeO+4NH2(g)=Ge3N4+3H2O(g)+H2(g) △G= -1196 kJ/mol | (6) |
3GeO+4NH(g)+H2(g)= Ge3N4 + 3H2O(g) △G= -1774 kJ/mol | (7) |
These reactions may have low kinetic factors at 480 ℃, however at 500 ℃ they can proceed together with Ge reduction. As a result of these two processes the germanium chains and nitride wires may appear simultaneously and coexist at the Si surface (Figure 5). We suppose that some of small liquid Ge nanoparticles, produced at the initial stage of GeO reduction, may serve as catalyst droplets for the VLS growth of Ge3N4 nanowires. The nanowires are tapered with diameters increasing toward the self-catalyst tips. It is well known that the rate limiting factor in VLS growth is a process of solidification and crystal formation at the liquid catalyst - solid interface. It seems that the amount of molecules, which leave the catalyst by solidification, is lower than the amount of gaseous molecules that enter the catalyst. This leads to the increase of catalyst diameter with time and observed tapering.
The increase of temperature up to 520 ℃ causes the prevalence of reactions (5)-(7) and formation of pure germanium nitride microcrystals and crystalline 1D linear structures (Figure 6). All this material is produced through the Vapor-Solid route by direct formation of Ge3N4 seeds from GeO and nitrogen precursors.
It should be emphasized that there are only two publications describing the growth of Ge3N4 nanowires [29,30]. In both publications the synthesis was performed at 850 °C in an ammonia flow. In contrast to this, our hydrazine based technology enables the production of Ge3N4 nanowires at 500 ℃, which is by 350 ℃ lower than that, reported in [29,30]. Besides, the Ge3N4 nanowires are grown without any flow of reagent gases, using only a closed vacuum system with static hydrazine pressure (~10 Torr). The presented data prove a high activity of hydrazine decomposition products and the ability to develop hydrazine based low temperature and simple technology for the growth of nitride nanowires.
As we saw in the previous section, Ge3N4 nanostructues were growing on both, the Ge source and Si substrate placed above it. In contrast to this, nanowires were growing only on the Si substrate when In+Ge source was used.
Some preliminary information on the composition of possible reaction products can be obtained by analyzing the thermo-chemical data of existing precursors and expected chemical reactions. The morphology and composition of nanostructures was strongly influenced by growth temperature.
When comparing indium III oxide (In2O3) and germanium dioxide GeO2, it becomes clear that In2O3 is more stabile, as its dissociation energy per oxygen atom (466 kJ/mol) is greater than that for GeO2 (403 kJ/mol). It means that In or In2O will take oxygen from GeO or GeO2 reducing them to pure Ge. The example of one of such reactions is presented below:
In2O(g)+2GeO=In2O3+2Ge △G= -286 kJ/mol | (8) |
Besides, the gaseous In2O can readily form In III oxide through the reaction:
3In2O(g) =In2O3+4In △G= -403 kJ/mol | (9) |
The last reaction can produce pure indium droplets which may serve as sinks for In2O3 and arriving gaseous In2O molecules i.e. they may serve as molten In catalysts providing the VLS growth of In2O3 nanowires.
Figure 7 presents tapered In2O3 nanowires grown on Si at 400 ℃ through the VLS mechanism (source temperature 430 ℃). As it was found in the previous section, this temperature is insufficient for the effective sublimation of GeO molecules. However, the flux of In2O molecules is quite intense because they form tapered nanowires with micrometer sized In catalyst tips. Near the bottom of nanowires, at the points where they are anchored to Si surface, their diameters are quite small and do not exceed several tens of nanometers. The diameters gradually increase towards the catalysts, reaching micrometer sizes near the tips. Some of the catalysts merge during the growth. After coalescence, a single nanowire with unified single catalyst was growing instead of two nanowires (Figure 7d).
The growth of In2O3 nanowires with indium self catalysts was proved by XRD spectrum (JCPDS: 65-3170) presented in Figure 7c. The formation of Ge or crystalline indium was not observed.
The SEM image and elemental mapping of In2O3 nanowires are shown in Figure 8. The spherical catalyst tips can be clearly resolved in indium related image shown in Figure 8b. However, in the same points, which are indicated by white arrows in the oxygen related map (Figure 8d), the catalysts are absent. It shows that the catalyst mainly consists of pure indium.
The increase of substrate temperature up to 420-440 ℃ causes the appearance and subsequent growth of Ge related peaks in XRD pattern (Figure 9). These peaks appear together with In2O3 related peaks, which are also increasing with temperature. As it was found in previous section, for the single Ge source the lowest temperature for the formation of Ge on the silicon substrate was estimated to be 480 ℃ (Figure 4). The ease of formation of crystalline Ge at 420-440 ℃ in case of GeO and In2O codeposition, can be attributed to the additional reduction of GeO through the reaction (8) and other reactions between GeO, In and In2O precursors. As a result, at elevated temperatures the amount of reduced Ge increases in case of combined In+Ge source, in comparison with a single germanium source. The SEM image in Figure 10 demonstrates that Ge nanowires are growing through the VS process because they have no catalyst tips, while In2O3 nanowires are still forming by the VLS mechanism, but they are less tapered.
The whole chemistry of the growth process was changed when the substrate temperature reached 450 ℃. The nanowires grown at this temperature were scrapped off the substrate and analyzed using powder XRD technique. The pure monoclinic In2Ge2O7 (JCPDS: 82-0846) and wurtzite InN(JCRDS: 50-1239)phases were the only crystalline materials that were detected on XRD pattern (Figure 11). TEM and SEM images of In2Ge2O7 nanowires with attached InN nanocristals are shown in Figure 12. The selected area electron diffractions confirm the synthesis of monoclinic In2Ge2O7 and wurtzite InN (Figure 12b, c).
The formation of indium nitride in hydrazine-based technology is thermodynamically favorable, because the reactions of In2O with N2H4 decomposition products (ammonia, NH2 and NH) have negative Gibbs energies, with a highest value of DG = −347 kJ/mol for the reaction of In2O with nitrogen monohydride. In addition to In2O, indium III oxide - In2O3 can also form indium nitride after reaction with NH2 and NH (Gibbs energies −119 and −263 kJ/mol respectively).
Generally speaking the growth of InN is a challenging task because the equilibrium vapor pressure of nitrogen over InN is quite high and therefore needs the application of low growth temperatures. According to the literature, due to very high activities of ionized precursors, the lowest growth temperatures for InN nanostructures (400-450 ℃) were achieved when applying the plasma-assisted technologies. For example, the indium nitrides with best electronic properties were produced on GaN and AlN buffer layers using plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy [31,32,33].
In the most commonly used technologies (chemical vapor deposition, UV-assisted growth, vapor phase epitaxy etc.), which utilize unionized vapor, InN can be produced only at temperatures beginning from 500 ℃ [34,35,36]. In these processes the morphology of InN nanostructures mostly depends on the growth temperature, evolving from quantum dot sized nanoparticles formed at 500 ℃, to nanorods grown at 700 ℃ [37]. As it is evidenced in Figure 11, in the hydrazine-based technology InN nanoparticles are produced at 450 ℃. This growth temperature is low in comparison with other techniques which use unionized vapor, proving once again that the hydrazine decomposition products have a high activity.
The absence of reliable thermochemical data on In2Ge2O7 makes it difficult to determine the possible chemical pathways for the synthesis of indium germinates in our experiments. In2Ge2O7 nanostructures are more frequently produced by carbon-assisted thermal evaporation of In2O3/GeO2, In2O3/Geor In/GeO2 powders at temperatures close to 1000 ℃ in the hot zone, and 600 ℃ or higher in the cold zone where synthesis takes the place [38,39,40,41,42]. As it was shown, the onset of crystalline In2Ge2O7 formation in our technology is close to 450 ℃. This temperature is by 100-150 ℃ lower than the growth temperatures reported in literature. The lowering of synthetic temperature in hydrazine-based technology can be again explained by a high activity of N2H4 decomposition p roducts.
It should be noted that In2Ge2O7 decomposes at and above 700 ℃ [43,44]. As a result, the gaseous phase of O2 and GeO evolve, causing the enrichment of material with In2O3. According to this, when pure In and Ge powders were evaporated in O2+Ar flow, the monoclinic In2Ge2O7 was formed at 700 ℃, while at elevated temperatures the Ge doped cubic In2O3 was produced [9].
In2Ge2O7 nanowires grown by hydrazine-based technology have monoclinic (T-type) structure, as shown in Figure 12 e. Usually, the same monoclinic In2Ge2O7 nanomaterials are synthesized and studied in most of experimental works, because a high pressure is needed for the formation of more stabile cubic In2Ge2O7 [45,46].
The low-temperature technology was developed for the growth of 1D nanostructures, which implies the evaporation of solid sources in the vapor of hydrazine decomposition products at a pressure of 10 Torr. Hydrazine was diluted with water (3 mol.%), which served for producing volatile suboxides on the source surfaces and their subsequent transfer to the substrate, located in the cold zone of a quartz reactor.
α-Ge3N4 nanowires and nanobelts were produced directly on Ge source surface at 500 and 520 ℃ respectively. After condensation of volatile GeO suboxides onto Si substrate placed in the cold-zone (480 ℃), the chain like non-crystalline Ge microstructures and droplets were produced due to the reduction of GeO in hydrazine vapor. Further increase of Si temperature up to 500 ℃ caused the formation of a mixture of Ge chains and tapered α-Ge3N4 nanowires grown through the self-catalyzed VLS method. At 520 ℃, only crystalline germanium nitride was produced on Si substrate. The growth temperature of Ge3N4 micro- and nanostructures in hydrazine vapor was reduced by 350 ℃ in comparison with data, presented in literature.
Annealing of Ge+In source in hydrazine vapor at 400 ℃ caused the formation of tapered In2O3 nanowires on the Si substrate. The increase of temperature up to 450 ℃ caused dramatic changes in process chemistry. As a result, the nanowires of wide gap In2Ge2O7 with attached InN nanocrystals were produced on Si substrate. The growth temperatures of both, In2Ge2O7 and InN nanostructures were by 50-150 ℃ lower than that, reported in the literature.
The decrease of nitride and oxide nanowire growth temperatures in the developed hydrazine-based technology can be explained by a high activity of products, formed after pyrolytic decomposition of hydrazine. We suppose that in spite of low lifetime of active NH and NH2 radicals, they play a pivotal role in the synthesis of nitrides, reduction of oxides and formation of volatile molecules. Together with other hydrazine decomposition products, they provide means for lowering the nanostructure growth temperature. The results of this work clearly show that the hydrazine-based technology can serve as a platform for the development of low-temperature technologies, which will be aimed at the growth of different nitride and oxide nanomaterials, including wide bandgap nanostructures.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this paper.
[1] |
Morrison SJ, Kimble J (2006) Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer. Nature 441: 1068-1074. doi: 10.1038/nature04956
![]() |
[2] |
Ge Y, Fuchs E (2018) Stretching the limits: from homeostasis to stem cell plasticity in wound healing and cancer. Nat Rev Genet 19: 311-325. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2018.9
![]() |
[3] |
Yousefi M, Li L, Lengner CJ (2017) Hierarchy and Plasticity in the Intestinal Stem Cell Compartment. Trends Cell Biol 27: 753-764. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.06.006
![]() |
[4] |
Tetteh PW, Farin HF, Clevers H (2015) Plasticity within stem cell hierarchies in mammalian epithelia. Trends Cell Biol 25: 100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.09.003
![]() |
[5] |
Losick VP, Morris LX, Fox DT, et al. (2011) Drosophila stem cell niches: a decade of discovery suggests a unified view of stem cell regulation. Dev Cell 21: 159-171. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.018
![]() |
[6] |
Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, et al. (2001) Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 414: 105-111. doi: 10.1038/35102167
![]() |
[7] |
Bajaj J, Diaz E, Reya T (2020) Stem cells in cancer initiation and progression. J Cell Biol 219: e201911053. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201911053
![]() |
[8] |
Greaves M, Maley CC (2012) Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature 481: 306-313. doi: 10.1038/nature10762
![]() |
[9] |
Brooks MD, Burness ML, Wicha MS (2015) Therapeutic Implications of Cellular Heterogeneity and Plasticity in Breast Cancer. Cell Stem Cell 17: 260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.08.014
![]() |
[10] |
Kreso A, Dick JE (2014) Evolution of the cancer stem cell model. Cell Stem Cell 14: 275-291. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.006
![]() |
[11] |
Ye X, Weinberg RA (2015) Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity: A Central Regulator of Cancer Progression. Trends Cell Biol 25: 675-686. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.012
![]() |
[12] |
Najafi M, Mortezaee K, Ahadi R (2019) Cancer stem cell (a)symmetry & plasticity: Tumorigenesis and therapy relevance. Life Sci 231: 116520. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.05.076
![]() |
[13] | Lee G, Hall RR, Ahmed AU (2016) Cancer Stem Cells: Cellular Plasticity, Niche, and its Clinical Relevance. J Stem Cell Res Ther 6: 363. |
[14] |
Skrypek N, Goossens S, De Smedt E, et al. (2017) Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition: Epigenetic Reprogramming Driving Cellular Plasticity. Trends Genet 33: 943-959. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.08.004
![]() |
[15] |
Hung KF, Yang T, Kao SY (2019) Cancer stem cell theory: Are we moving past the mist? J Chin Med Assoc 82: 814-818. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000186
![]() |
[16] |
Batlle E, Clevers H (2017) Cancer stem cells revisited. Nat Med 23: 1124-1134. doi: 10.1038/nm.4409
![]() |
[17] |
Horvitz HR, Herskowitz I (1992) Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: two Bs or not two Bs, that is the question. Cell 68: 237-255. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90468-R
![]() |
[18] |
Knoblich JA (2001) Asymmetric cell division during animal development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 11-20. doi: 10.1038/35048085
![]() |
[19] |
Venkei ZG, Yamashita YM (2018) Emerging mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. J Cell Biol 217: 3785-3795. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201807037
![]() |
[20] |
Neumuller RA, Knoblich JA (2009) Dividing cellular asymmetry: asymmetric cell division and its implications for stem cells and cancer. Genes Dev 23: 2675-2699. doi: 10.1101/gad.1850809
![]() |
[21] |
Lechler T, Fuchs E (2005) Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin. Nature 437: 275-280. doi: 10.1038/nature03922
![]() |
[22] |
Cabernard C, Doe CQ (2009) Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila. Developmental Cell 17: 134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.009
![]() |
[23] |
Yamashita YM, Jones DL, Fuller MT (2003) Orientation of Asymmetric Stem Cell Division by the APC Tumor Suppressor and Centrosome. Science 301: 1547. doi: 10.1126/science.1087795
![]() |
[24] |
Santoro A, Vlachou T, Carminati M, et al. (2016) Molecular mechanisms of asymmetric divisions in mammary stem cells. EMBO Rep 17: 1700-1720. doi: 10.15252/embr.201643021
![]() |
[25] |
Knoblich JA (2008) Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. Cell 132: 583-597. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.007
![]() |
[26] |
Morin X, Bellaiche Y (2011) Mitotic spindle orientation in asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions during animal development. Dev Cell 21: 102-119. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.012
![]() |
[27] |
Rhyu MS, Jan LY, Jan YN (1994) Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells. Cell 76: 477-491. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90112-0
![]() |
[28] |
Guo M, Jan LY, Jan YN (1996) Control of daughter cell fates during asymmetric division: interaction of Numb and Notch. Neuron 17: 27-41. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80278-0
![]() |
[29] |
Wirtz-Peitz F, Nishimura T, Knoblich JA (2008) Linking cell cycle to asymmetric division: Aurora-A phosphorylates the Par complex to regulate Numb localization. Cell 135: 161-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.049
![]() |
[30] |
Campanale JP, Sun TY, Montell DJ (2017) Development and dynamics of cell polarity at a glance. J Cell Sci 130: 1201-1207. doi: 10.1242/jcs.188599
![]() |
[31] |
Doe CQ, Bowerman B (2001) Asymmetric cell division: fly neuroblast meets worm zygote. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13: 68-75. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00176-9
![]() |
[32] |
Loyer N, Januschke J (2020) Where does asymmetry come from? Illustrating principles of polarity and asymmetry establishment in Drosophila neuroblasts. Curr Opin Cell Biol 62: 70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.07.018
![]() |
[33] |
Johnston CA, Hirono K, Prehoda KE, et al. (2009) Identification of an Aurora-A/PinsLINKER/Dlg spindle orientation pathway using induced cell polarity in S2 cells. Cell 138: 1150-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.041
![]() |
[34] |
Cabernard C, Prehoda KE, Doe CQ (2010) A spindle-independent cleavage furrow positioning pathway. Nature 467: 91-94. doi: 10.1038/nature09334
![]() |
[35] |
Gateff E (1978) Malignant neoplasms of genetic origin in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 200: 1448-1459. doi: 10.1126/science.96525
![]() |
[36] |
Caussinus E, Gonzalez C (2005) Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 37: 1125-1129. doi: 10.1038/ng1632
![]() |
[37] |
Wang H, Somers GW, Bashirullah A, et al. (2006) Aurora-A acts as a tumor suppressor and regulates self-renewal of Drosophila neuroblasts. Genes Dev 20: 3453-3463. doi: 10.1101/gad.1487506
![]() |
[38] |
Betschinger J, Mechtler K, Knoblich JA (2006) Asymmetric segregation of the tumor suppressor brat regulates self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells. Cell 124: 1241-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.038
![]() |
[39] |
Seldin L, Macara I (2017) Epithelial spindle orientation diversities and uncertainties: recent developments and lingering questions. F1000Res 6: 984. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11370.1
![]() |
[40] |
McCaffrey LM, Montalbano J, Mihai C, et al. (2012) Loss of the Par3 polarity protein promotes breast tumorigenesis and metastasis. Cancer Cell 22: 601-614. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.10.003
![]() |
[41] |
Zen K, Yasui K, Gen Y, et al. (2009) Defective expression of polarity protein PAR-3 gene (PARD3) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 28: 2910-2918. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.148
![]() |
[42] |
McCaffrey LM, Macara IG (2009) The Par3/aPKC interaction is essential for end bud remodeling and progenitor differentiation during mammary gland morphogenesis. Genes Dev 23: 1450-1460. doi: 10.1101/gad.1795909
![]() |
[43] |
Huang L, Muthuswamy SK (2010) Polarity protein alterations in carcinoma: a focus on emerging roles for polarity regulators. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20: 41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.12.001
![]() |
[44] |
Lee DF, Su J, Ang YS, et al. (2012) Regulation of embryonic and induced pluripotency by aurora kinase-p53 signaling. Cell Stem Cell 11: 179-194. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.020
![]() |
[45] |
Zhou H, Kuang J, Zhong L, et al. (1998) Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation. Nat Genet 20: 189-193. doi: 10.1038/2496
![]() |
[46] |
Willems E, Dedobbeleer M, Digregorio M, et al. (2018) The functional diversity of Aurora kinases: a comprehensive review. Cell Div 13: 7. doi: 10.1186/s13008-018-0040-6
![]() |
[47] |
Sasai K, Parant JM, Brandt ME, et al. (2008) Targeted disruption of Aurora A causes abnormal mitotic spindle assembly, chromosome misalignment and embryonic lethality. Oncogene 27: 4122-4127. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.47
![]() |
[48] |
di Pietro F, Echard A, Morin X (2016) Regulation of mitotic spindle orientation: an integrated view. EMBO Rep 17: 1106-1130. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642292
![]() |
[49] |
Mukherjee S, Kong J, Brat DJ (2015) Cancer stem cell division: when the rules of asymmetry are broken. Stem Cells Dev 24: 405-416. doi: 10.1089/scd.2014.0442
![]() |
[50] |
Li HS, Wang D, Shen Q, et al. (2003) Inactivation of Numb and Numblike in embryonic dorsal forebrain impairs neurogenesis and disrupts cortical morphogenesis. Neuron 40: 1105-1118. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00755-4
![]() |
[51] |
Garcia-Heredia JM, Verdugo Sivianes EM, Lucena-Cacace A, et al. (2016) Numb-like (NumbL) downregulation increases tumorigenicity, cancer stem cell-like properties and resistance to chemotherapy. Oncotarget 7: 63611-63628. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11553
![]() |
[52] |
Tosoni D, Zecchini S, Coazzoli M, et al. (2015) The Numb/p53 circuitry couples replicative self-renewal and tumor suppression in mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 211: 845-862. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201505037
![]() |
[53] |
Lapidot T, Sirard C, Vormoor J, et al. (1994) A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 367: 645-648. doi: 10.1038/367645a0
![]() |
[54] |
Bonnet D, Dick JE (1997) Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 3: 730-737. doi: 10.1038/nm0797-730
![]() |
[55] |
Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, et al. (2003) Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 3983-3988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530291100
![]() |
[56] | Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, et al. (2003) Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 63: 5821-5828. |
[57] |
Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, et al. (2003) In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev 17: 1253-1270. doi: 10.1101/gad.1061803
![]() |
[58] |
Reynolds BA, Weiss S (1996) Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev Biol 175: 1-13. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0090
![]() |
[59] |
Lanzkron SM, Collector MI, Sharkis SJ (1999) Hematopoietic stem cell tracking in vivo: a comparison of short-term and long-term repopulating cells. Blood 93: 1916-1921. doi: 10.1182/blood.V93.6.1916.406k15_1916_1921
![]() |
[60] |
Pece S, Tosoni D, Confalonieri S, et al. (2010) Biological and molecular heterogeneity of breast cancers correlates with their cancer stem cell content. Cell 140: 62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.007
![]() |
[61] | Moore N, Lyle S (2011) Quiescent, slow-cycling stem cell populations in cancer: a review of the evidence and discussion of significance. J Oncol Article ID 396076. |
[62] |
Bu P, Chen KY, Lipkin SM, et al. (2013) Asymmetric division: a marker for cancer stem cells in early stage tumors? Oncotarget 4: 950-951. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1029
![]() |
[63] |
Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, et al. (2007) ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell 1: 555-567. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.014
![]() |
[64] |
Greve B, Kelsch R, Spaniol K, et al. (2012) Flow cytometry in cancer stem cell analysis and separation. Cytometry A 81: 284-293. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22022
![]() |
[65] |
Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, et al. (2008) The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 133: 704-715. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027
![]() |
[66] |
Bu P, Chen KY, Chen JH, et al. (2013) A microRNA miR-34a-regulated bimodal switch targets Notch in colon cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 12: 602-615. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.03.002
![]() |
[67] |
Chen G, Kong J, Tucker-Burden C, et al. (2014) Human Brat ortholog TRIM3 is a tumor suppressor that regulates asymmetric cell division in glioblastoma. Cancer Res 74: 4536-4548. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3703
![]() |
[68] |
Clarke MF, Dick JE, Dirks PB, et al. (2006) Cancer stem cells--perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 66: 9339-9344. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3126
![]() |
[69] |
Till JE, Mc CE (1961) A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res 14: 213-222. doi: 10.2307/3570892
![]() |
[70] |
Quintana E, Shackleton M, Sabel MS, et al. (2008) Efficient tumour formation by single human melanoma cells. Nature 456: 593-598. doi: 10.1038/nature07567
![]() |
[71] |
Post Y, Clevers H (2019) Defining Adult Stem Cell Function at Its Simplest: The Ability to Replace Lost Cells through Mitosis. Cell Stem Cell 25: 174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.07.002
![]() |
[72] |
Bailey PC, Lee RM, Vitolo MI, et al. (2018) Single-Cell Tracking of Breast Cancer Cells Enables Prediction of Sphere Formation from Early Cell Divisions. iScience 8: 29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.015
![]() |
[73] |
Korkaya H, Liu S, Wicha MS (2011) Breast cancer stem cells, cytokine networks, and the tumor microenvironment. J Clin Invest 121: 3804-3809. doi: 10.1172/JCI57099
![]() |
[74] |
Kiel MJ, Yilmaz OH, Iwashita T, et al. (2005) SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121: 1109-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.026
![]() |
[75] |
Kunisaki Y, Bruns I, Scheiermann C, et al. (2013) Arteriolar niches maintain haematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Nature 502: 637-643. doi: 10.1038/nature12612
![]() |
[76] |
Snippert HJ, van der Flier LG, Sato T, et al. (2010) Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143: 134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.016
![]() |
[77] |
Lopez-Garcia C, Klein AM, Simons BD, et al. (2010) Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Science 330: 822-825. doi: 10.1126/science.1196236
![]() |
[78] |
Wang R, Chadalavada K, Wilshire J, et al. (2010) Glioblastoma stem-like cells give rise to tumour endothelium. Nature 468: 829-833. doi: 10.1038/nature09624
![]() |
[79] |
Tominaga K, Minato H, Murayama T, et al. (2019) Semaphorin signaling via MICAL3 induces symmetric cell division to expand breast cancer stem-like cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116: 625-630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806851116
![]() |
[80] |
Huang S, Law P, Francis K, et al. (1999) Symmetry of initial cell divisions among primitive hematopoietic progenitors is independent of ontogenic age and regulatory molecules. Blood 94: 2595-2604. doi: 10.1182/blood.V94.8.2595.420k37_2595_2604
![]() |
[81] |
Braun KM, Watt FM (2004) Epidermal label-retaining cells: background and recent applications. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 9: 196-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1087-0024.2004.09313.x
![]() |
[82] |
Bickenbach JR, Mackenzie IC (1984) Identification and localization of label-retaining cells in hamster epithelia. J Invest Dermatol 82: 618-622. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12261460
![]() |
[83] |
Kusumbe AP, Bapat SA (2009) Cancer stem cells and aneuploid populations within developing tumors are the major determinants of tumor dormancy. Cancer Res 69: 9245-9253. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2802
![]() |
[84] |
Dey-Guha I, Wolfer A, Yeh AC, et al. (2011) Asymmetric cancer cell division regulated by AKT. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 12845-12850. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109632108
![]() |
[85] |
Bajaj J, Zimdahl B, Reya T (2015) Fearful symmetry: subversion of asymmetric division in cancer development and progression. Cancer Res 75: 792-797. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2750
![]() |
[86] |
Gattinoni L, Speiser DE, Lichterfeld M, et al. (2017) T memory stem cells in health and disease. Nature Med 23: 18-27. doi: 10.1038/nm.4241
![]() |
[87] |
Ciocca ML, Barnett BE, Burkhardt JK, et al. (2012) Cutting edge: Asymmetric memory T cell division in response to rechallenge. J Immunol 188: 4145-4148. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200176
![]() |
[88] |
Schmidt JM, Panzilius E, Bartsch HS, et al. (2015) Stem-cell-like properties and epithelial plasticity arise as stable traits after transient Twist1 activation. Cell Rep 10: 131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.032
![]() |
[89] |
Kroger C, Afeyan A, Mraz J, et al. (2019) Acquisition of a hybrid E/M state is essential for tumorigenicity of basal breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116: 7353-7362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812876116
![]() |
[90] |
Ye X, Tam WL, Shibue T, et al. (2015) Distinct EMT programs control normal mammary stem cells and tumour-initiating cells. Nature 525: 256-260. doi: 10.1038/nature14897
![]() |
[91] |
Dongre A, Weinberg RA (2019) New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20: 69-84. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0080-4
![]() |
[92] |
Kreso A, O'Brien CA, van Galen P, et al. (2013) Variable clonal repopulation dynamics influence chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer. Science 339: 543-548. doi: 10.1126/science.1227670
![]() |
[93] | Zhu Y, Luo M, Brooks M, et al. (2014) Biological and clinical significance of cancer stem cell plasticity. Clin Transl Med 3: 32. |
[94] |
Jasnos L, Aksoy FB, Hersi HM, et al. (2013) Identifying division symmetry of mouse embryonic stem cells: negative impact of DNA methyltransferases on symmetric self-renewal. Stem Cell Rep 1: 360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.08.005
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1. | Haoyu Wang, Hongkun Huang, Teng Ma, Hao Qiang, Preparation of Zn2GeO4 semiconductor and its performance of UV detection, 2025, 09253467, 116968, 10.1016/j.optmat.2025.116968 |