
Citation: Declan P. McKernan. Toll-like receptors and immune cell crosstalk in the intestinal epithelium[J]. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2019, 3(1): 13-31. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2019.1.13
[1] | Jehad Shaikhali, Gunnar Wingsle . Redox-regulated transcription in plants: Emerging concepts. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(3): 301-338. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.3.301 |
[2] | Laura Serna . Crosstalk among hormones and signaling networks during stomatal development in Arabidopsis hypocotyls. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(4): 550-559. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.4.550 |
[3] | Andrew V. Nguyen, Yuan-Yuan Wu, Elaine Y. Lin . The regulatory function of sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling axis on regulatory T cells in colorectal cancer. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 1(1): 34-47. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.1.34 |
[4] | Song-Tao Liu, Hang Zhang . The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC): looking back and forth after 15 years. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(4): 597-634. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.4.597 |
[5] | Fumiaki Uchiumi, Makoto Fujikawa, Satoru Miyazaki, Sei-ichi Tanuma . Implication of bidirectional promoters containing duplicated GGAA motifs of mitochondrial function-associated genes. AIMS Molecular Science, 2014, 1(1): 1-26. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2013.1.1 |
[6] | Joanne L. Hopper, Natasha Begum, Laura Smith, Thomas A. Hughes . The role of PSMD9 in human disease: future clinical and therapeutic implications. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(4): 476-484. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.4.476 |
[7] | Zhepeng Wang, Aiwu Lu . Cartilage type IIB procollagen NH2-propeptide, PIIBNP, inhibits angiogenesis. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(4): 291-300. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021022 |
[8] | Karen E. Livermore, Jennifer Munkley, David J. Elliott . Androgen receptor and prostate cancer. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(2): 280-299. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.2.280 |
[9] | Yutaka Takihara, Ryuji Otani, Takuro Ishii, Shunsuke Takaoka, Yuki Nakano, Kaori Inoue, Steven Larsen, Yoko Ogino, Masashi Asai, Sei-ichi Tanuma, Fumiaki Uchiumi . Characterization of the human IDH1 gene promoter. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(3): 186-204. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023013 |
[10] | Jin-Yih Low, Helen D. Nicholson . The up-stream regulation of polymerase-1 and transcript release factor(PTRF/Cavin-1) in prostate cancer: an epigenetic analysis. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(3): 466-478. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.3.466 |
Based on the biosynthetic pathway, the plant specialized metabolites can be clustered into three categories including the terpenes, phenylpropanoids, and nitrogen-containing compounds [1]. In phenolics compound group, flavonoid is a well-known subetaoup characterizing by a C6-C3-C6 carbon framework in chemical structure. More than 6000 flavonoid compounds were isolated and the number actually continues increasing [2]. A number of in vivo and in vitro studies have evidenced the biological functions of plant flavonoids in humans and other animals. These natural compounds have positive effects with respect to anti-oxidation, anti-cell proliferation, apoptosis stimulation, anti-inflammation, anti-angiogenesis, anti-invasiveness, and the induction of cell differentiation [3],[4]. In addition, in vivo studies have demonstrated the positive roles of flavonoids in the prevention of several kinds of cancer in the colon, skin, and lungs [3],[5]. In plants, anthocyanins were found to function in UV protection, plant defense system, and pollinator attraction [6]. Besides, anthocyanins are a well-known natural antioxidant in cells and this implies that anthocyanins positively functions in plant response to abiotic stress conditions [7]–[12]. Moreover, anthocyanins are naturally presences in and responsible for the characteristic color of various fruits such as blueberry, cranberry, and strawberry. Therefore, the anthocyanins accumulation can determine the quality as well as the commercial value of these fruits.
Basically, anthocyanins are synthesized through the phenylpropanoid pathway via a number of steps catalyzed by various cytosolic enzymes. These enzymes were found to weakly associate with the cytoplasmic face of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and membranes [13],[14]. Moreover, some of these are also present in various organelles such as vacuoles, plastids, and nuclei [15]–[18]. For example, chalcone synthase (CHS) is a key enzyme of the flavonoids pathway and it is found in the plastids and nuclei [16],[17]. Many lines of evidence suggest that anthocyanins biosynthesis is stimulated by different environmental factors such as light, temperature, and biotic and abiotic stress conditions [19]–[23].
Anthocyanins can be considered as a product of the general phenylpropanoid pathway [24]. The general phenylpropanoid pathway starts from an essential amino acid (i.e., L-Phenylalanine), which contains a single benzene ring. The L-Phenylalanine is transformed into p-coumaroyl-CoA via three steps catalyzed by phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), and 4-coumarate CoA ligase (4CL). Besides, another amino acid (i.e., L-tyrosine) can also be converted into p-coumaric acid, a precursor of p-coumaroyl-CoA, by a reaction catalyzed by tyrosine ammonia lyase (TAL). A condensation reaction between one molecule of p-coumaroyl-CoA and three molecules of malonyl-CoA is catalyzed by chalcone synthase (CHS/TT4) to produce chalcone [25],[26]. Next, chalcone isomerase (CHI/TT5) catalyzes the production of a colorless flavanone (i.e., naringenin) from chalcone. Next, flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H/TT6) uses the substrate (naringenin) to produce dihydrokaempferol. This dihydrokaempferol can also be hydroxylated on the 3′ position of the benzene ring to generate dihydroquercetin by a reaction catalyzed by F3′H/TT7. From these two dihydroflavonols (dihydrokaempferol and dihydroquercetin), the colored anthocyanidins (unstable pigments) can be synthesized by two reactions catalyzed by dihydroflavonol reductase (DFR/TT3) and leucoanthocyanidin oxidase (LDOX). In detail, DFR converts each dihydroflavonol to the colorless compound (leucocyanidin). Afterwards, LDOX catalyzes the oxidation reactions producing the colored anthocyanidins. Depending on the pH and other factors, the colored anthocyanidins can reflect light wavelengths corresponding to red, orange, or purple colors. These unstable colored anthocyanidins can then be converted to stable compounds by glycosylation catalyzed by UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyl transferase (UF3GT). In the final step, cyanidin-3-glucoside can be methylated by methyltransferases (MTs) [25],[26].
MYB is a large eukaryotic gene family that contributes diverse functions to these organisms. Based on the number of imperfect repeat motifs in the MYB domain, the MYB gene family is classified into five groups: R1R2R3R4 MYB, R1R2R3 MYB, R2R3 MYB, single repeat MYB, and MYB-like type [27]–[29]. Every MYB protein contains a DNA MYB-binding domain [30] and a highly diverse C-terminal region. The C-terminal domain mediates interactions of MYB transcription factors with other regulatory proteins [31]–[33]. Several MYB proteins are known to control many aspects of plant specialized metabolism, including anthocyanins biosynthesis [34]. Genetic and molecular research in Arabidopsis and other plant species have revealed that many MYB transcription factors are master regulators and directly regulate the expression of most of the structural genes encoding enzymes involved in the anthocyanins biosynthetic pathway. As we mentioned in the previous part, the anthocyanins biosynthesis starts from the step condensing p-coumaroyl-CoA and three molecules of malonyl-CoA in a reaction catalyzed by a key enzyme, CHS. Based on the reduction of pigments (because of lack of proanthocyanidins) in the seed coat (the seeds have yellow instead of dark brown color), the Arabidopsis mutants of different genes involved in the anthocyanins biosynthesis were firstly isolated around three decades ago [35],[36]. Since the mutants were selected based on the seed coat (transparent testa) phenotype, they were named “tt” [35],[37]. In Arabidopsis, several anthocyanins biosynthesis enzymes such as CHS, CHI, F3H, and DFR are only encoded by a single gene for each. Therefore, the changes in these genes expression can directly alter the anthocyanins accumulation in plants [21],[38]. Various environmental factors including light, temperature, and stress conditions can tightly regulate the expression of these genes and subsequently influence the anthocyanins accumulation in Arabidopsis [19]–[23]. These environmental factors can be received by various plant receptors and the signals are transferred to downstream transcription factors which can directly or indirectly regulate the expression of anthocyanins biosynthesis genes. For instance, different light conditions (blue, UV-A, and UV-B) and temperature were found to control the CHS expression via several photoreceptors and transcription factors [21],[23],[39],[40].
In brief, the anthocyanins biosynthesis includes two main steps (early and late steps) (Figure 1). The early step is involved in the flavonoids biosynthesis (both anthocyanins and flavonols) while the late step is more specific to anthocyanins biosynthesis (Figure 1). Several R2R3-MYB transcription factors, including MYB11, MYB12, and MYB111, have been evidenced as activators of early genes such as CHS, CHI, and F3H which are responsible for both anthocyanins and flavonols biosynthesis [34],[41]. These MYB transcription factors belong to subetaoup 7 of Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB gene family and seem to work redundantly in the regulation of early gene expression [34]. While MYB11, MYB12, and MYB111 can work in regulating CHS, CHI, and F3H transcription independently from the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) partner [34],[41], expression levels of late stage genes, DFR and LDOX, are regulated by the MBW (MYB/bHLH/WD40) complex, which is comprised of three transcription factors, PRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYANIN PIGMENT 1 (PAP1), TRANSPARENT TESTA 8 (TT8), and TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA 1 (TTG1) (Figure 1). PAP1 or AtMYB75 is an R2R3-MYB transcription factor and the ectopic expression of this PAP1 gene can lead to over-production of anthocyanins in Arabidopsis plants [42]. TTG1 is a WD40 repeat transcription factor functioning in anthocyanins accumulation and post-embryonic development in Arabidopsis [35],[43],[44]. The basic/helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein, TT8, is known to form a ternary protein complex (MBW) with PAP1 and TTG1 to activate the expression of late stage genes [45],[46]. The TT8 and PAP1 can work as DNA-binding proteins and somehow they can reciprocally regulate the binding and transcriptional activities [46]. The TTG1 was found to be important for the MBW complex activity and it is hypothesized to function in the prevention of other negative regulators [46]. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of these complex components has not been fully understood. In fact, in the Arabidopsis activation-tagging line pap1-D, the overexpression of PAP1 leads to upregulate of DFR and LDOX transcription, whereas the overexpression of TTG1 in TTG1-overexpression transgenic plants does not [42],[43]. In addition to positive regulators, several repressors have been reported, for example MYB-like 2 (MYBL2) and SQUAMOSAL PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 9 (SPL9), which can interfere with the formation of the MBW complex under various conditions [47]–[49]. Nguyen et al. (2015) found that the overexpression of MYB-like Domain (MYBD) gene can increase the anthocyanins accumulation in Arabidopsis [21]. This study showed that HY5 can activate the expression of MYBD and this MYBD transcription factor directly binds to the promoter of MYBL2 and suppresses the transcription of this gene resulting in the upregulation of late stage genes such as DFR and LDOX [21]. Besides, HY5 and PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 3 (PIF3) transcription factors were investigated to act as direct regulators of genes involved in this biosynthetic pathway (i.e., CHS, CHI, and PAP1) [50]–[52].
For the past several decades, the biological functions of anthocyanins have been widely studied and found to play many important roles in plants. Because anthocyanins can adsorb in the UV spectra, they may function as sunscreens, impart various colors to plant organs (i.e., flowers, fruits, and other vegetative tissues), and display high antioxidant activities in stressed plant cells [53],[54]. Therefore, anthocyanins biosynthesis is precisely regulated by various environmental effects including light and temperature.
The Arabidopsis seedlings grown under reduced light cannot produce as much anthocyanins as normal seedlings exposed to more intense light [55]. In fact, photosynthesis has been shown to play a role in regulating anthocyanins biosynthesis. In the photosynthetic electron transfer (PET) chain, the redox conditions of the plastoquinone (PQ) pool control anthocyanins biosynthesis genes in cooperation with ethylene and carbohydrates [56]. Moreover, anthocyanins biosynthesis was found to be regulated by light in terms of duration, quality, and quantity [57]. High intensity light was shown to increase anthocyanins accumulation in comparison to plants exposed to lower light intensities [47]. Different light wavelengths have different effects on anthocyanins biosynthesis [58]–[62]. The quantity of anthocyanins accumulation in many kinds of fruits, such as blueberry, cranberry, and strawberry can determine their quality and commercial value. Many studies have been conducted on the important functions of light during this process [58]–[62]. Among the different colors of light, blue light has been shown to be the most effective in increasing anthocyanins accumulation [59],[61]. Around 20 years ago, Saure performed experiments on apples and showed that anthocyanins levels were strongly impacted by both the quantity and quality of light [58]. In this experiment, Saure found that blue-violet and UV light resulted in stronger effects than far red on anthocyanins production in apples [58]. In addition, a study on strawberry also reported that that blue light played a higher inductive role in anthocyanins accumulation in comparison to green and red light during fruit development and in postharvest fruits [60],[62]. These studies provided important and interesting observations that can be applied to increase the quality of agricultural products.
Ambient temperature also plays a role in the regulation of anthocyanins biosynthesis. In Arabidopsis, anthocyanins accumulation significantly increased after treatment under cold conditions (4°C) while the high temperature was shown to repress the anthocyanins biosynthesis [23],[63]. The same effect of temperature was also observed in grape berry skins [64],[65]. In experiments conducted by Mori et al. (2005), the temperature was reduced at night time (15°C) resulting in an increase of anthocyanins accumulation in the skin of berries in comparison to a high temperature (30°C) treatment at night time [64]. Increases in anthocyanins levels in response to low temperatures were caused by induction of structural gene expression and activation of enzymes involved in anthocyanins biosynthesis [64].
The hy5 mutant was first identified a few decades ago it is now well-known that HY5 basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor which plays a diverse function in plant growth and development [66],[67]. HY5 has been characterized to function in the regulation of different developmental processes (including photomorphogenesis, anthocyanins biosynthesis, cell elongation, and chloroplast development) and this transcription factor is considered as a central regulator which integrates various signaling pathways in the plant cells [66]–[68]. This transcription factor has been documented as a downstream worker of different light photoreceptors such as phytochromes, cryptochromes, and UV-B photoreceptors [66]–[69]. It is well-known that CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENIC1 (COP1) and SUPPRESSOR OF PHYA-105 (SPA) proteins can comprise an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex which is a major repressor of photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis [70]–[72]. In downstream of the light signaling pathway, the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex (COP1/SPA) was found to be able to interact directly with and regulate HY5 protein stability in the nucleus [69],[73],[74]. Generally, the COP1/SPA complex is negatively regulated by the light signal. The activities of the COP1/SPA complex can be repressed by the direct interaction with the light-activated photoreceptors which can trigger the nuclear exclusion of COP1, disrupt the COP1-SPA interaction, and even promote SPA protein degradation [72]. In the absence of light, COP1/SPA is localized in the nucleus and can directly interact with HY5 to induce its ubiquitin-mediated degradation whereas the light can translocate the COP1 to the cytosol leading to the high accumulation of HY5 protein in the nucleus [72],[74]. On the other hand, high temperature is known to positively regulate the COP1 protein [75]. The high temperature was found to trigger the nuclear import of COP1 [76]. However, the underlying mechanism is still unknown [75],[76]. These indicate that light and high temperature signals differently regulate the HY5 protein stability via their different effects on the COP1 function (Figure 2).
HY5 has been evidenced to function as a transcriptional activator or repressor [21],[22],[50],[52],[67],[69],[77]–[79]. However, a previous study showed that HY5 protein does not contain an activation or repression domain [69]. Therefore, it was hypothesized that HY5 regulates the transcription of its targets relied on its DNA-binding activity and other interacting partners [80]. Recently, based on the functional characterizations of activator-domain and repressor-domain fused HY5 proteins (HY5-VP6 and HY5-SRDX, respectively), Burko et al. (2020) found that the primary activity of HY5 is a transcriptional activator and this function depends on other partners [79]. Previous studies found that HY5 can directly bind to and activate both early and late biosynthesis genes including CHS, DFR, LDOX, and UF3GT [50],[78]. Besides, HY5 was also found to be a direct transcriptional regulator of several regulatory genes such as MYB12, MYB111, PAP1, MYBD, and MYBL2 [21],[22],[52],[77]. HY5 may act as a light-cytokinin integrator to activate the expression of MYBD which subsequently regulate the anthocyanins accumulation in Arabidopsis plant [21]. On the other hand, Wang et al. (2016) found that HY5 functions as a repressor of MYBL2 transcription under light-growth conditions [22]. Moreover, HY5 was also characterized as a positive regulator of a micro RNA, microRNA858a (miR858a), which can increase the anthocyanins accumulation via direct inhibition of MYBL2 translation [22]. Recently, a study has shown that high ambient temperature can attenuate the anthocyanins biosynthesis via a mechanism involved in HY5 and COP1 [23]. This study found that the high temperature conditions promote the COP1-mediated degradation of the HY5 proteins and this result in the reduction of transcript levels of both early and late anthocyanins biosynthesis genes [23]. Overall, the HY5 transcription factor could be considered as a central integrator of light and temperature signaling pathways in the regulation of anthocyanins biosynthesis (Figure 2).
A number of studies on anthocyanins have clarified its biosynthetic pathway, its biochemical characteristics, and its biological functions in plants as well as its contribution to human health. Since its important functions, the biosynthesis of anthocyanins is influenced by many environmental factors including light and temperature. It is interesting that HY5 can directly or indirectly regulate the anthocyanins biosynthesis in response to light and temperature conditions. This indicates that HY5 is an important transcription factor functioning in the regulation of anthocyanins biosynthesis which could provide great potential for future applications in agriculture production.
[1] |
McKernan DP and Egan LJ (2015) The intestinal epithelial cell cycle: uncovering its 'cryptic' nature. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 31: 124–129. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000154
![]() |
[2] |
Gunther C, Neumann H, Neurath MF, et al. (2013) Apoptosis, necrosis and necroptosis: cell death regulation in the intestinal epithelium. Gut 62: 1062–1071. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301364
![]() |
[3] |
Kurashima Y and Kiyono H (2017) Mucosal ecological network of epithelium and immune cells for gut homeostasis and tissue healing. Annu Rev Immunol 35: 119–147. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052424
![]() |
[4] |
Donaldson GP, Lee SM and Mazmanian SK (2016) Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 20–32. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3552
![]() |
[5] |
Belkaid Y and Harrison OJ (2017) Homeostatic Immunity and the microbiota. Immunity 46: 562–576. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.008
![]() |
[6] |
Farache J, Zigmond E, Shakhar G, et al. (2013) Contributions of dendritic cells and macrophages to intestinal homeostasis and immune defense. Immunol Cell Biol 91: 232–239. doi: 10.1038/icb.2012.79
![]() |
[7] |
Van Kaer L and Olivares-Villagomez D (2018) Development, homeostasis, and functions of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. J Immunol 200: 2235–2244. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701704
![]() |
[8] |
Melody YZ, Cisalpino D, Varadarajan S, et al. (2016) Gut microbiota-induced immunoglobulin g controls systemic infection by symbiotic bacteria and pathogens. Immunity 44: 647–658. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.006
![]() |
[9] |
Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, et al. (2004) Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 118: 229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.002
![]() |
[10] |
Oppong GO, Rapsinski GJ, Newman TN, et al. (2013) Epithelial cells augment barrier function via activation of the Toll-like receptor 2/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway upon recognition of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium curli fibrils in the gut. Infect Immun 81: 478–486. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00453-12
![]() |
[11] |
Deshmukh HS, Liu Y, Menkiti OR, et al. (2014) The microbiota regulates neutrophil homeostasis and host resistance to Escherichia coli K1 sepsis in neonatal mice. Nat Med 20: 524–530. doi: 10.1038/nm.3542
![]() |
[12] |
Habtezion A, Nguyen LP, Hadeiba H, et al. (2016) Leukocyte trafficking to the small intestine and colon. Gastroenterology 150: 340–354. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.046
![]() |
[13] |
Abreu MT (2010) Toll-like receptor signalling in the intestinal epithelium: how bacterial recognition shapes intestinal function. Nat Rev Immunol 10: 131–144. doi: 10.1038/nri2707
![]() |
[14] | Allaire JM, Crowley SM, Law HT, et al. (2018)The intestinal epithelium: Central coordinator of mucosal immunity. Trends Immunol. |
[15] |
Pott J and Hornef M (2012) Innate immune signalling at the intestinal epithelium in homeostasis and disease. EMBO Rep 13: 684–698. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.96
![]() |
[16] |
Hennessy C and McKernan DP (2016) Epigenetics and innate immunity: the 'unTolld' story. Immunol Cell Biol 94: 631–639. doi: 10.1038/icb.2016.24
![]() |
[17] |
Yu S and Gao N (2015) Compartmentalizing intestinal epithelial cell toll-like receptors for immune surveillance. Cell Mol Life Sci 72: 3343–3353. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1931-1
![]() |
[18] |
Martini E, Krug SM, Siegmund B, et al. (2017) Mend your fences: the epithelial barrier and its relationship with mucosal immunity in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 4: 33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.03.007
![]() |
[19] |
Netea MG, Wijmenga C and O'Neill LA (2012) Genetic variation in Toll-like receptors and disease susceptibility. Nat Immunol 13: 535–542. doi: 10.1038/ni.2284
![]() |
[20] |
Sommer F, Nookaew I, Sommer N, et al. (2015) Site-specific programming of the host epithelial transcriptome by the gut microbiota. Genome Biol 16: 62. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0614-4
![]() |
[21] | Cario E (2018) Barrier-protective function of intestinal epithelial Toll-like receptor 2. Mucosal Immunol 1: S62–S66. |
[22] |
Cario E, Gerken G and Podolsky DK (2007) Toll-like receptor 2 controls mucosal inflammation by regulating epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology 132: 1359–1374. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.056
![]() |
[23] |
Cario E, Gerken G and Podolsky DK (2004) Toll-like receptor 2 enhances ZO-1-associated intestinal epithelial barrier integrity via protein kinase C. Gastroenterology 127: 224–238. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.015
![]() |
[24] |
Li Y (2017) Retinoic acid facilitates Toll-Like Receptor 4 expression to improve intestinal barrier function through retinoic acid receptor beta. Cell Physiol Biochem 42: 1390–1406. doi: 10.1159/000479203
![]() |
[25] |
Ey B, Eyking A, Gerken G, et al. (2009) TLR2 mediates gap junctional intercellular communication through connexin-43 in intestinal epithelial barrier injury. J Biol Chem 284: 22332–22343. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M901619200
![]() |
[26] |
Brun P, Maria CG and Marsela Q, et al. (2013) Toll-like receptor 2 regulates intestinal inflammation by controlling integrity of the enteric nervous system. Gastroenterology 145: 1323–1333. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.047
![]() |
[27] |
Nighot M, Al-Sadi R, Guo S, et al. (2017) Lipopolysaccharide-induced increase in intestinal epithelial tight permeability is mediated by Toll-Like receptor 4/myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) activation of myosin light chain kinase expression. Am J Pathol 187: 2698–2710. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.08.005
![]() |
[28] |
Podolsky DK, Gerken G, Eyking A, et al. (2009) Colitis-associated variant of TLR2 causes impaired mucosal repair because of TFF3 deficiency. Gastroenterology 137: 209–220. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.03.007
![]() |
[29] |
Lin N, Xu LF and Sun M (2013) The protective effect of trefoil factor 3 on the intestinal tight junction barrier is mediated by toll-like receptor 2 via a PI3K/Akt dependent mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 440: 143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.049
![]() |
[30] |
Birchenough GMH, Nystrom EEL, Johansson MEV, et al. (2016) A sentinel goblet cell guards the colonic crypt by triggering Nlrp6-dependent Muc2 secretion. Science 352: 1535–1542. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7419
![]() |
[31] |
Johansson MEV, Phillipson M, Petersson J, et al. (2008) The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 15064–15069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803124105
![]() |
[32] |
Vaishnava S, Behrendt CL, Ismail AS, et al. (2008) Paneth cells directly sense gut commensals and maintain homeostasis at the intestinal host-microbial interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 20858–20863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808723105
![]() |
[33] |
Vora P, Youdim A, Thomas LS, et al. (2004) Beta-defensin-2 expression is regulated by TLR signaling in intestinal epithelial cells. J Immunol 173: 5398–5405. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5398
![]() |
[34] |
Rumio C, Sommariva M, Sfondrini L, et al. (2012) Induction of Paneth cell degranulation by orally administered Toll-like receptor ligands. J Cell Physiol 227: 1107–1113. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22830
![]() |
[35] |
Kinnebrew M, Buffie C, Diehl G, et al. (2012) Interleukin 23 production by intestinal CD103(+)CD11b(+) dendritic cells in response to bacterial flagellin enhances mucosal innate immune defense. Immunity 36: 276–287. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.011
![]() |
[36] |
Ta A, Thakur BK, Dutta P, et al. (2017) Double-stranded RNA induces cathelicidin expression in the intestinal epithelial cells through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase C ζ -Sp1 pathway and ameliorates shigellosis in mice. Cellular Signalling 35: 140–153. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.03.016
![]() |
[37] |
Marin M, Holani R, Shah CB, et al. (2017) Cathelicidin modulates synthesis of Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) 4 and 9 in colonic epithelium. Mol Immunol 91: 249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.09.011
![]() |
[38] |
Bhinder G, Stahl M, Sham HP, et al. (2014) Intestinal epithelium-specific MyD88 signaling impacts host susceptibility to infectious colitis by promoting protective goblet cell and antimicrobial responses. Infect Immun 82: 3753–3763. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02045-14
![]() |
[39] |
Friedrich C, Mamareli P, Thiemann S, et al. (2017) MyD88 signaling in dendritic cells and the intestinal epithelium controls immunity against intestinal infection with C. rodentium. PLoS Pathog 13: e1006357. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006357
![]() |
[40] |
Macpherson AJ and Uhr T (2004) Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria. Science 303: 1662–1665. doi: 10.1126/science.1091334
![]() |
[41] |
Akira N, Alexis V, Mikako M, et al. (2018) IgA regulates the composition and metabolic function of gut microbiota by promoting symbiosis between bacteria. J Exp Med 215: 2019–2034. doi: 10.1084/jem.20180427
![]() |
[42] |
Bruno MEC, Frantz AL, Rogier EW, et al. (2011) Regulation of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor by the classical and alternative NF-kappaB pathways in intestinal epithelial cells. Mucosal Immunol 4: 468–478. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.8
![]() |
[43] |
Schneeman TA, Bruno MEC, Schjerven H, et al. (2005) Regulation of the polymeric Ig receptor by signaling through TLRs 3 and 4: linking innate and adaptive immune responses. J Immunol 175: 376–384. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.1.376
![]() |
[44] |
Bogunovic M, Shaival HD, Tilstra JS, et al. (2007) Enteroendocrine cells express functional Toll-like receptors. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292: G1770–G1783. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00249.2006
![]() |
[45] |
Palazzo M, Balsari A, Rossini A, et al. (2007) Activation of enteroendocrine cells via TLRs induces hormone, chemokine, and defensin secretion. J Immunol 178: 4296–4303. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.7.4296
![]() |
[46] |
Selleri S, Palazzo M, Deola S, et al. (2008) Induction of pro-inflammatory programs in enteroendocrine cells by the Toll-like receptor agonists flagellin and bacterial LPS. Int Immunol 20: 961–970. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn055
![]() |
[47] | Larraufie P, Doré J, Lapaque N, et al. (2017) TLR ligands and butyrate increase Pyy expression through two distinct but inter-regulated pathways. Cell Microbiol 19. |
[48] |
Lotz M (2006) Postnatal acquisition of endotoxin tolerance in intestinal epithelial cells. J Exp Med 203: 973–984. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050625
![]() |
[49] |
Wittkopf N, Neurath MF and Becker C (2014) Immune-epithelial crosstalk at the intestinal surface. J Gastroenterol 49: 375–387. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0929-4
![]() |
[50] |
Tomishige K, Yamazaki O, Chen Y, et al. (2005) Acute induction of human IL-8 production by intestinal epithelium triggers neutrophil infiltration without mucosal injury. Gut 54: 1565–1572. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.061168
![]() |
[51] | Schuerer-Maly CC (1994) Colonic epithelial cell lines as a source of interleukin-8: stimulation by inflammatory cytokines and bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Immunology 81: 85–91. |
[52] |
Fukata M, Michelsen KS, Eri R, et al. (2005) Toll-like receptor-4 is required for intestinal response to epithelial injury and limiting bacterial translocation in a murine model of acute colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 288: G1055–G1065. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00328.2004
![]() |
[53] |
Lebeis SL, Bommarius B, Parkos CA, et al. (2007) TLR signaling mediated by MyD88 is required for a protective innate immune response by neutrophils to Citrobacter rodentium. J Immunol 179: 566–577. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.566
![]() |
[54] |
Sitaraman SV, Merlin D, Wang L, et al. (2001) Neutrophil-epithelial crosstalk at the intestinal lumenal surface mediated by reciprocal secretion of adenosine and IL-6. J Clin Invest 107: 861–869. doi: 10.1172/JCI11783
![]() |
[55] |
Sierro F, Dubois B, Coste A, et al. (2001) Flagellin stimulation of intestinal epithelial cells triggers CCL20-mediated migration of dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 13722–13727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.241308598
![]() |
[56] |
Maaser C, Schoeppner S, Kucharzik T, et al. (2001) Colonic epithelial cells induce endothelial cell expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 by a NF-kappaB-dependent mechanism. Clin Exp Immunol 124: 208–213. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01541.x
![]() |
[57] |
Huang GT, Eckmann L, Savidge TC, et al. (1996) Infection of human intestinal epithelial cells with invasive bacteria upregulates apical intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM)-1) expression and neutrophil adhesion. J Clin Invest 98: 572–583. doi: 10.1172/JCI118825
![]() |
[58] |
Neal MD, Leaphart C, Levy R, et al. (2006) Enterocyte TLR4 mediates phagocytosis and translocation of bacteria across the intestinal barrier. J Immunol 176: 3070–3079. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.5.3070
![]() |
[59] |
Kivit SD, Hoffen EV, Korthagen N, et al. (2011) Apical TLR ligation of intestinal epithelial cells drives a Th1-polarized regulatory or inflammatory type effector response in vitro. Immunobiology 216: 518–527. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.08.005
![]() |
[60] |
Hyun J, Romero L, Riveron R, et al. (2015) Human intestinal epithelial cells express interleukin-10 through Toll-like receptor 4-mediated epithelial-macrophage crosstalk. J Innate Immun 7: 87–101. doi: 10.1159/000365417
![]() |
[61] |
Costanza A, Barbara V, Patrizia P, et al. (2017) Direct and Intestinal Epithelial Cell-Mediated Effects of TLR8 Triggering on Human Dendritic Cells, CD14(+)CD16(+) Monocytes and gammadelta T Lymphocytes. Front Immunol 8: 1813. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01813
![]() |
[62] |
Al-Ghadban S, Kaissi S, Homaidan FR, et al. (2016) Cross-talk between intestinal epithelial cells and immune cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Sci Rep 6: 29783. doi: 10.1038/srep29783
![]() |
[63] | Jin B, Sun T, Yu XH, et al. (2012) The effects of TLR activation on T-cell development and differentiation. Clin Dev Immunol 2012: 836485. |
[64] |
Chieppa M, Rescigno M, Huang AYC, et al. (2006) Dynamic imaging of dendritic cell extension into the small bowel lumen in response to epithelial cell TLR engagement. J Exp Med 203: 2841–2852. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061884
![]() |
[65] |
Farache J, Julia I, Koren I, et al. (2013) Luminal bacteria recruit CD103+ dendritic cells into the intestinal epithelium to sample bacterial antigens for presentation. Immunity 38: 581–595. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.01.009
![]() |
[66] | Zeuthen LH, Fink LN, and Frokiaer H (2008) Epithelial cells prime the immune response to an array of gut-derived commensals towards a tolerogenic phenotype through distinct actions of thymic stromal lymphopoietin and transforming growth factor-beta. Immunology 123: 197–208. |
[67] |
Iliev ID, Spadoni I, Mileti E, et al. (2009) Human intestinal epithelial cells promote the differentiation of tolerogenic dendritic cells. Gut 58: 1481–1489. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.175166
![]() |
[68] |
Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Salucci V, et al. (2005) Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 6: 507–514. doi: 10.1038/ni1192
![]() |
[69] |
Shan M, Gentile M, Yeiser JR, et al. (2013) Mucus enhances gut homeostasis and oral tolerance by delivering immunoregulatory signals. Science 342: 447–453. doi: 10.1126/science.1237910
![]() |
[70] |
Villablanca EJ, Wang S, Calisto JD, et al. (2011) MyD88 and retinoic acid signaling pathways interact to modulate gastrointestinal activities of dendritic cells. Gastroenterology 141: 176–185. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.010
![]() |
[71] |
Wang S, Villablanca E, De Calisto J, et al. (2011) MyD88-dependent TLR1/2 signals educate dendritic cells with gut-specific imprinting properties. J Immunol 187: 141–150. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003740
![]() |
[72] |
de Kivit S (2017) Galectin-9 produced by intestinal epithelial cells enhances aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in dendritic cells in a PI3K- and p38-dependent manner. J Innate Immun 9: 609–620. doi: 10.1159/000479817
![]() |
[73] |
Dillon SM, Rogers LM, Howe R, et al. (2010) Human intestinal lamina propria CD1c+ dendritic cells display an activated phenotype at steady state and produce IL-23 in response to TLR7/8 stimulation. J Immunol 184: 6612–6621. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000041
![]() |
[74] |
Monteleone I, Platt A, Jaensson E, et al. (2008) IL-10-dependent partial refractoriness to Toll-like receptor stimulation modulates gut mucosal dendritic cell function. Eur J Immunol 38: 1533–1547. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737909
![]() |
[75] |
Kaneko M, Mizunuma T, Takimoto H, et al. (2004) Development of TCR alpha beta CD8 alpha alpha intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes is promoted by interleukin-15-producing epithelial cells constitutively stimulated by gram-negative bacteria via TLR4. Biol Pharm Bull 27: 883–889. doi: 10.1248/bpb.27.883
![]() |
[76] |
Yu Q, Tang C, Xun S, et al. (2006) MyD88-dependent signaling for IL-15 production plays an important role in maintenance of CD8 alpha alpha TCR alpha beta and TCR gamma delta intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. J Immunol 176: 6180–6185. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6180
![]() |
[77] |
Edelblum KL, Shen L, Weber CR, et al. (2012) Dynamic migration of gammadelta intraepithelial lymphocytes requires occludin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 7097–7102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112519109
![]() |
[78] |
Edelblum KL, Singh G, Odenwald MA, et al. (2015) Gammadelta intraepithelial lymphocyte migration limits transepithelial pathogen invasion and systemic disease in mice. Gastroenterology 148: 1417–1426. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.053
![]() |
[79] |
Ismail AS, Singh G, Odenwald MA, et al. (2011) Gammadelta intraepithelial lymphocytes are essential mediators of host-microbial homeostasis at the intestinal mucosal surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 8743–8748. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019574108
![]() |
[80] |
Konijnenburg DPHV, Reis BS, Pedicord VA, et al. (2017) Intestinal epithelial and intraepithelial T cell crosstalk mediates a dynamic response to infection. Cell 171: 783–794 e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.046
![]() |
[81] |
Yin PJ, Kun W, Zhu JZ, et al. (2017) TLR2/TLR4 activation induces Tregs and suppresses intestinal inflammation caused by Fusobacterium nucleatum in vivo. PLoS One 12: e0186179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186179
![]() |
[82] |
Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Shima T, et al. (2011) Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species. Science 331: 337–341. doi: 10.1126/science.1198469
![]() |
[83] |
Rivas MN, Koh YT, Chen A, et al. (2012) MyD88 is critically involved in immune tolerance breakdown at environmental interfaces of Foxp3-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 122: 1933–1947. doi: 10.1172/JCI40591
![]() |
[84] |
Ivanov II, Atarashi K, Manel N, et al. (2009) Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 139: 485–498. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.033
![]() |
[85] |
Walker CR, Isabelle H, Dalton JE, et al. (2013) Intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte-enterocyte crosstalk regulates production of bactericidal angiogenin 4 by Paneth cells upon microbial challenge. PLoS One 8: e84553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084553
![]() |
[86] |
Xu W, He B, Chiu A, et al. (2007) Epithelial cells trigger frontline immunoglobulin class switching through a pathway regulated by the inhibitor SLPI. Nat Immunol 8: 294–303. doi: 10.1038/ni1434
![]() |
[87] |
He B, Xu W, Santini PA, et al. (2007) Intestinal bacteria trigger T cell-independent immunoglobulin A(2) class switching by inducing epithelial-cell secretion of the cytokine APRIL. Immunity 26: 812–826. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.014
![]() |
[88] |
Shang L, Fukata M, Thirunarayanan N, et al. (2008) Toll-like receptor signaling in small intestinal epithelium promotes B-cell recruitment and IgA production in lamina propria. Gastroenterology 135: 529–538. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.020
![]() |
[89] |
Oh JZ, Ravindran R, Chassaing B, et al. (2014) TLR5-mediated sensing of gut microbiota is necessary for antibody responses to seasonal influenza vaccination. Immunity 41: 478–492. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.08.009
![]() |
[90] |
Kamdar K, Johnson AMF, Chac D, et al. (2018) Innate recognition of the microbiota by tlr1 promotes epithelial homeostasis and prevents chronic inflammation. J Immunol 201: 230–242. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701216
![]() |
[91] |
Chassaing B, Ley RE and Gewirtz AT (2014) Intestinal epithelial cell toll-like receptor 5 regulates the intestinal microbiota to prevent low-grade inflammation and metabolic syndrome in mice. Gastroenterology 147: 1363–77 e17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.033
![]() |
[92] |
Lee J, Mo JH, Katakura K, et al. (2006) Maintenance of colonic homeostasis by distinctive apical TLR9 signalling in intestinal epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1327–1336. doi: 10.1038/ncb1500
![]() |
[93] |
Sodhi CP, Neal MD, Siggers R, et al. (2012) Intestinal epithelial Toll-like receptor 4 regulates goblet cell development and is required for necrotizing enterocolitis in mice. Gastroenterology 143: 708–718 e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.053
![]() |
[94] |
Frantz AL, Rogier EW, Weber CR, et al. (2012) Targeted deletion of MyD88 in intestinal epithelial cells results in compromised antibacterial immunity associated with downregulation of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor, mucin-2, and antibacterial peptides. Mucosal Immunol 5: 501–512. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.23
![]() |
[95] |
Mowat AM and Agace WW (2014) Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 14: 667–685. doi: 10.1038/nri3738
![]() |
[96] |
Agace WW and McCoy KD (2017) Regionalized development and maintenance of the intestinal adaptive immune landscape. Immunity 46: 532–548. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.004
![]() |
[97] |
Price AE (2018) A map of Toll-like receptor expression in the intestinal epithelium reveals distinct spatial, cell type-specific, and temporal patterns. Immunity 49: 560–575 e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.016
![]() |
[98] |
Abreu MT, Vora P, Faure E, et al. (2001) Decreased expression of Toll-like receptor-4 and MD-2 correlates with intestinal epithelial cell protection against dysregulated proinflammatory gene expression in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol 167: 1609–1616. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1609
![]() |
[99] | Sabharwal H, Cichon C, Tobias AÖ, et al. (2016) Interleukin-8, CXCL1, and MicroRNA miR-146a responses to probiotic escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and Enteropathogenic E. coli in Human Intestinal Epithelial T84 and Monocytic THP-1 Cells after Apical or Basolateral Infection. Infect Immun 84: 2482–2492. |
[100] |
Cario E and Podolsky DK (2000) Differential alteration in intestinal epithelial cell expression of toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) and TLR4 in inflammatory bowel disease. Infect Immun 68: 7010–7017. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.12.7010-7017.2000
![]() |
[101] |
Abreu MT, Arnold ET, Thomas LS, et al. (2002) TLR4 and MD-2 expression is regulated by immune-mediated signals in human intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 277: 20431–20437. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110333200
![]() |
[102] |
Mueller T, Terada T, Rosenberg IM, et al. (2006) Th2 cytokines down-regulate TLR expression and function in human intestinal epithelial cells. J Immunol 176: 5805–5814. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.5805
![]() |
[103] |
Suzuki M, Hisamatsu T and Podolsky DK (2003) Gamma interferon augments the intracellular pathway for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) recognition in human intestinal epithelial cells through coordinated up-regulation of LPS uptake and expression of the intracellular Toll-like receptor 4-MD-2 complex. Infect Immun 71: 3503–3511. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3503-3511.2003
![]() |
[104] |
Mukherji A, Kobiita A, Ye T, et al. (2013) Homeostasis in intestinal epithelium is orchestrated by the circadian clock and microbiota cues transduced by TLRs. Cell 153: 812–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.020
![]() |
[105] |
Yang X, Gao XC, Liu J, et al. (2017) Effect of EPEC endotoxin and bifidobacteria on intestinal barrier function through modulation of toll-like receptor 2 and toll-like receptor 4 expression in intestinal epithelial cell-18. World J Gastroenterol 23: 4744–4751. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i26.4744
![]() |
[106] |
Iraporda C, Errea A, Romanin DE, et al. (2015) Lactate and short chain fatty acids produced by microbial fermentation downregulate proinflammatory responses in intestinal epithelial cells and myeloid cells. Immunobiology 220: 1161–9. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.06.004
![]() |
[107] |
Chang PV, Hao L, Offermanns S, et al. (2014) The microbial metabolite butyrate regulates intestinal macrophage function via histone deacetylase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 2247–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322269111
![]() |
[108] |
Lebouder E, Rey-Nores JE, Raby AC, et al. (2006) Modulation of neonatal microbial recognition: TLR-mediated innate immune responses are specifically and differentially modulated by human milk. J Immunol 176: 3742–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.6.3742
![]() |
[109] |
Venkatesh M, Mukherjee S, Wang HW, et al. (2014) Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and Toll-like receptor 4. Immunity 41: 296–310. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.014
![]() |
[110] |
Bansal T, Alaniz RC, Wood TK, et al. (2010) The bacterial signal indole increases epithelial-cell tight-junction resistance and attenuates indicators of inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 228–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906112107
![]() |
1. | Prisca Meyer, Bram Van de Poel, Barbara De Coninck, UV-B light and its application potential to reduce disease and pest incidence in crops, 2021, 8, 2662-6810, 10.1038/s41438-021-00629-5 | |
2. | Radomír Pech, Adriana Volná, Lena Hunt, Martin Bartas, Jiří Červeň, Petr Pečinka, Vladimír Špunda, Jakub Nezval, Regulation of Phenolic Compound Production by Light Varying in Spectral Quality and Total Irradiance, 2022, 23, 1422-0067, 6533, 10.3390/ijms23126533 | |
3. | Chunqing Liu, Xueqin Yao, Guangqing Li, Lei Huang, Chenghong Liu, Zhujie Xie, Development of Novel Markers and Creation of Non-Anthocyanin and Anthocyanin-Rich Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) Cultivars, 2022, 12, 2076-3417, 6267, 10.3390/app12126267 | |
4. | Adriana Volná, Jiří Červeň, Jakub Nezval, Radomír Pech, Vladimír Špunda, Bridging the Gap: From Photoperception to the Transcription Control of Genes Related to the Production of Phenolic Compounds, 2024, 25, 1422-0067, 7066, 10.3390/ijms25137066 | |
5. | Lei Luo, Jos Molthoff, Qiang Li, Ying Liu, Shuangxia Luo, Na Li, Shuxin Xuan, Yanhua Wang, Shuxing Shen, Arnaud G. Bovy, Jianjun Zhao, Xueping Chen, Identification of candidate genes associated with less-photosensitive anthocyanin phenotype using an EMS mutant (pind) in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.), 2023, 14, 1664-462X, 10.3389/fpls.2023.1282661 | |
6. | Xinxing Zhu, Lin Liu, Liyun Yang, Fei Ma, Ting Yang, Jing Fu, Hongchang Cui, ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 promotes root growth by maintaining redox homeostasis and repressing oxidative stress response, 2025, 197, 0032-0889, 10.1093/plphys/kiaf036 | |
7. | Ahmad Shah Ahmadzai, Chunmei Hu, Changwei Zhang, Ying Li, Mechanisms of anthocyanin-mediated salt stress alleviation and cellular homeostasis in plants, 2025, 0167-6903, 10.1007/s10725-025-01298-3 | |
8. | Mei Zhou, Lijia Zeng, Fan Li, Chunlian Jin, Jungang Zhu, Xue Yong, Mengxi Wu, Beibei Jiang, Yin Jia, Huijuan Yuan, Jihua Wang, Yuanzhi Pan, Transcriptomic Profiling of Heat-Treated Oriental Lily Reveals LhERF109 as a Positive Regulator of Anthocyanin Accumulation, 2025, 15, 2073-4395, 1071, 10.3390/agronomy15051071 |