
Citation: Luciana De Vero, Tommaso Bonciani, Alexandra Verspohl, Francesco Mezzetti, Paolo Giudici. High-glutathione producing yeasts obtained by genetic improvement strategies: a focus on adaptive evolution approaches for novel wine strains[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(2): 155-170. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.155
[1] | Biljana Ilić, Dragica Stojanovic, Gordana Djukic . Green economy: mobilization of international capital for financing projects of renewable energy sources. Green Finance, 2019, 1(2): 94-109. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.2.94 |
[2] | Yuhang Zheng, Shuanglian Chen, Nan Wang . Does financial agglomeration enhance regional green economy development? Evidence from China. Green Finance, 2020, 2(2): 173-196. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020010 |
[3] | Liudmila S. Kabir, Zhanna A. Mingaleva, Ivan D. Rakov . Technological modernization of the national economy as an indicator of green finance: Data analysis on the example of Russia. Green Finance, 2025, 7(1): 146-174. doi: 10.3934/GF.2025006 |
[4] | Xinyu Fu, Yanting Xu . The impact of digital technology on enterprise green innovation: quality or quantity?. Green Finance, 2024, 6(3): 484-517. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024019 |
[5] | Rizwan Ullah Khan, Hina Arif, Noor E Sahar, Arif Ali, Munir A. Abbasi . The role of financial resources in SMEs' financial and environmental performance; the mediating role of green innovation. Green Finance, 2022, 4(1): 36-53. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022002 |
[6] | Mukul Bhatnagar, Sanjay Taneja, Ercan Özen . A wave of green start-ups in India—The study of green finance as a support system for sustainable entrepreneurship. Green Finance, 2022, 4(2): 253-273. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022012 |
[7] | Sa Xu . International comparison of green credit and its enlightenment to China. Green Finance, 2020, 2(1): 75-99. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020005 |
[8] | Xueying Xu, Peng Hou, Yue Liu . The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on the technology innovation of urban green energy: a study based on the panel threshold model. Green Finance, 2022, 4(1): 115-136. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022006 |
[9] | Samuel Asante Gyamerah, Bright Emmanuel Owusu, Ellis Kofi Akwaa-Sekyi . Modelling the mean and volatility spillover between green bond market and renewable energy stock market. Green Finance, 2022, 4(3): 310-328. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022015 |
[10] | Shahinur Rahman, Iqbal Hossain Moral, Mehedi Hassan, Gazi Shakhawat Hossain, Rumana Perveen . A systematic review of green finance in the banking industry: perspectives from a developing country. Green Finance, 2022, 4(3): 347-363. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022017 |
The part of the economy named hidden (shadow) economy presents particular interests for researchers in the last several decades, since it influences significantly the development of the entire economy and reflects several deficiencies of the modern economies, both of big and small countries (Schneider and Buehn, 2018; Novkovska, 2016). Since it is present in all countries (although with different size) it results in escape of huge part of economic effects from the domain of regular economy (Williams and Schneider, 2016). For small countries with weak economy the effect of hidden economy can be particularly harmful, due to the exhaustion of resources required for development of regular economy. Goel et al. (2019) demonstrated using the data for United States for the period 1970–2014 that the hidden economy can spur or retard economic growth of the country, by interacting in different ways with the formal economy. Thus, in the period before the Second World War, hidden economy had notably negative effects on the total economy, while after the Second World War positive effects are observed, attributed to the synergetic effect between regular and hidden economic sector. Symbiotic effect mainly consists in providing of goods and services for workers on hidden market at lower prices, thus reducing the price of the workforce for regular economy. Such an effect under war conditions is suppressed due to the strong control (dominant military economy) separating regular from hidden economy. Therefore, the policies for coping with hidden economy have not to be simply directed to its reduction but also to establishing some kind of symbioticf connection between them. Effect of shadow economy on the total economy is particularly important when countries are exposed to severe external influences (Novkovska, 2016).
Relationship of the hidden economy with various other phenomena has been exhaustively studied by numerous researchers. Particularly important is the link with the taxation burden. In general, high taxes are considered as one of the main generators of hidden economy (Giles and Caragata, 2001). Specifically, it has been shown that progressive taxation leads to an increase of the size of hidden economy (Neck et al., 1989). Therefore, taxation system has to be optimally planned in order to avoid the risk of high participation of the hidden in total economy (Mazhar and Méon, 2017).
As a particularly important issue for modern economy, the link between the shadow and green economy attracts growing interest (Markandya et al., 2013; Smit and Musango, 2015; Mirhosseini et al., 2017). Biswas et al. (2012) studied the link between shadow economy and pollution. Their theoretical model predicts that the harmful effect of shadow economy on environment as monitored by the increase of pollution can be reduced by efficient control of the level of corruption. The model has been tested using panel data from over hundred countries for the period 1995–2005. The issue is also studied in the broader context of sustainable development (Popescu et al., 2018).
It has been affirmed by numerous researchers that energy efficiency policies have to play particularly important role in the transition to green economy (Matraeva et al., 2019; Ringel et al., 2016; Yushchenko and Patel, 2016). Therefore, detailed studies on the energy efficiency if different sectors are expected to appear. Relationship of the hidden economy to the energy efficiency deserves particular attention. Efficient methods appropriate for such studies are to be constructed. In that direction, recently, we have proposed a sophisticated model for determination of the size of shadow economy based on the energy consumption data in conjunction with the data for the size of regular economy (Novkovska and Novkovski, 2018). This model allows extraction of a parameter describing relative efficiency of the sector of hidden economy with respect to the regular one. Based on this method, comparison between hidden economies in Macedonia and Croatia has been done in (Novkovska and Dumičić, 2018). Using the above mentioned model, relative efficiencies of hidden economy for various countries can be determined.
In this work we determine evolution of the hidden economy in the period 1990–2017 using official data for regular economy and electricity consumption for various countries. Comparison of the results is done and the issue of connection between the green and shadow economy is discussed from various aspects.
In this work the sophisticated method of total electricity consumption proposed in (Novkovska and Novkovski, 2018) have been used for the determination of the efficiency of hidden economy. Short presentation of the method is provided below.
Size of the hidden economy (HY) for a given year (t) is determined using following explicit expression:
HY(t)=r(1−(1−HY(0)r)Y(t)Y(0)(E(0)E(t))1/1μμ) | (1) |
where HY(0) is the size of hidden economy in the base year (n = 0), which has to be calculated using appropriate calibration method. The model contains two parameters having specific well defined meaning: μ is the well known elasticity of electricity consumption (E) with respect to GDP (Y) and r is the relative efficiency of the hidden economy with respect to the regular economy. The parameter r is crucial for our analysis, since it reflects the level of efficient use of energy in hidden economy.
Elasticity of electricity consumption (μ) in the simplest model is assumed to be roughly 1. Next improvement of the model consists in using the value of μ from known data for energy consumption and size of regular economy. Since the parameter μ appears in the exponent of the expression (1), the obtained results are rather sensitive to the value of this parameter. Thus, inaccurate determination of the parameter, can lead to excessive oscillations that do not reflect realistic variation of the observed phenomenon. Specifically, elasticity μ in this work has been determined by linear regression model using the expression:
lnE(t)=μlnY(t)+k | (2) |
The second parameter, the relative efficiency of the hidden economy with respect to the regular economy (r), is of particular importance for this study. It provides additional insight into the issue of hidden economy, producing not only a measure of the extent but also a measure of the energy efficiency in the hidden sector. Further, this can be connected to the ecological aspects due to different degradation level of environment in the production of energy required for a unit product in these two sectors of the economy.
In previous works we determined the parameter r and the value of the size of hidden economy in the base year (HY(0)) from the values of HY(t) in two separate years, correspondingly. In this work the calibration method is changed in order to obtain more accurate calibration, reflecting values over a given period for which reliable values obtained by an independent method are available. Such information has been extracted from the work of Schneider and Buehn (2018), where mean values, along with maxima and minima for different countries for the period 1996–2014 are presented. Values of r and HY(0) have been determined using least square method for a combination of deviations of the mean values, maxima and minima, correspondingly, between the results obtained in Schneider and Buehn (2018) and those obtained by the method used min this work. Specifically, for a given set of values of r and HY(0), values of HY(t) for the period 1996–2014 were calculated and their mean value (HYm), maximum (HYmax) and minimum (HYmin) determined. Using mean value (HYm0), maximum (HYmax0) and minimum (HYmin0) from the calibration set, following combination was constructed:
s2=(HYm−HYm0)2+(HYmax−HYmax0)2+(HYmin−HYmin0)2 | (3) |
In the next step, r and HY(0) were varied until obtaining minimum value of s2. Practically, the following procedure is performed. First, a row of values of HY(t) for the considered period (1996–2014) is calculated using a pair of reasonable values for r and HY(0). Second, calculations are repeated with variable HY(0) until obtaining the local minimum (goal s2 = 0). Third, r is varied until obtaining minimum of s2. Second and third step are repated until their variations for a single step decrease below the required estimation error (0.001). Values obtained after the sast step preformed are used as optimum estimated values. Then, using the optimum values of r and HY(0), the values of HY(t) for the entire studied period have been calculated, based on the expression (1). In this way, the calculated values for the size of hidden economy reflect the same general behavior as in (Schneider and Buehn, 2018) but give more detailed information on the fluctuations typical for each separate country and provide information for more larger period. In addition, substantially new information on the relative efficiency of the hidden economy with respect to the regular economy is provided, which has not been previously determined by any other method for estimating hidden economy. In this work we put emphasize on the analysis of parameter r in connection with the green economy issues.
Values of the size of hidden economy (H, relative to the total economy) have been calculated as:
H(t)=HY(t)HY(t)+Y(t) | (4) |
Data used in calculations of the size of hidden economy (H) are those for total electricity consumption (E) and for the size of regular economy (Y) GDP PPP (converted to international dollars using purchasing power parity rates) of the given country taken from World Bank database (Databank) (http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx). Therefore, the initial series of data are harmonized and reliable, thus providing a strong basis for correct determination of the quantities derived from these sets of data. Particular advantage of the method is that analytical expression for determination of H is used instead of linear approximations usually considered in regression models. In addition, number of the variables is small (only two, Y and E) and they are meanings (economic and physical) are well defined and precisely measured and reported by official statistics.
In this work calculations were made for selected economies different in size and in economic development level (Macedonia, Albania, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Israel, Czech Republic, Hungary, Switzerland and United States).
Results for three representative countries of the listed above are shown in Figure 1. Macedonia is an example of developing economy with high extent of hidden economy and its strong variations due to external factors (Novkovska, 2016). Israel represents the case of medium level of hidden economy, while USA is a typical example of low hidden economy participation in the total economy.
Particularly important for this work are values of the parameter r (relative efficiency of the hidden economy with respect to the regular economy). Values of this parameter for the countries covered by this study are shown in Table 1. Values of elasticity of electricity consumption for the same countries (μ) are also shown in the same table. Range of the expected values of r can be settled between 0 and 1. Namely, r is by its nature a positive value (contribution in total GDP by an economic sector). On the other hand, it is not expected hidden sector to be more efficient that the regular one, since it operates using more limited resources than the regular. It is seen that the obtained values (Table 1) cover almost entire range of expected values. Highest value (0.704) is obtained for Croatia, while the lowest one (0.153) is obtained for USA. The lowest value for USA can be easily explained. Namely, in this case regular economy there exhibits exceptionally high productivity and hence efficient use of energy that cannot be approached in hidden economy sector. In Macedonia the high value of 0.618 reflects the fact that the regular economy itself did not efficiently use the energy.
Country | r | μ |
Macedonia | 0.618 | 0.348 |
Albania | 0.413 | 0.884 |
Croatia | 0.704 | 0.477 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.465 | 0.573 |
Israel | 0.444 | 0.867 |
Czech Republic | 0.331 | 0.236 |
Hungary | 0.316 | 0.225 |
Switzerland | 0.142 | 0.276 |
United States | 0.153 | 0.321 |
General feature to be extracted from the Table 1 is that the efficiency of hidden economy (r < 1) is lower than that of the regular economy. Above reflects the fact that only well organized economy of large scale, dominantly present in regular economic sector, can provide conditions for high productivity and efficient use of all resources, particularly energy. In some sense, the obtained figure for the relative efficiency of the hidden economy (r) with respect to the regular economy can represent a measure for general energy efficiency of this sector. Since this value is lower than unity in all studied case, it is to be concluded that the energy efficiency of the hidden sector is lower than that of the regular economy. The above finding raises another issue connected to the presence and extent of the hidden economy – decrease of the efficient use of energy. Thus, the hidden economy not only reduces the state's fiscal revenues, but also decreases the total energy efficiency of the economy as a whole. Therefore, in creating policies aimed to cope with the hidden economy, both aspects—the size and the energy efficiency are to be taken into account.
It is difficult to explain the variations in r, since it reflects the structure of the hidden economy, which is, contrary to the regular, unknown. However, a general feature of this parameter can be elucidated. Namely, it is expected hidden economy to do not follow the development of regular, and hence the value of r is expected to be lower for more developed countries. A general trend in this direction can be observed in Table 1. However, the link being weak, one can conclude that there are multiple factors affecting the estimated values of r, which requires more detailed studies in future on the issue of he efficiency of hidden economy.
First, it is to be concluded that the measures leading to the reduction of hidden economy will also provide significant increase of the efficient use of energy and expectedly various other resources. However, reduction of the extent of hidden economy is process that is going rather slowly. Therefore, in order to accelerate the pace towards the green economy, interventions inside the hidden economy sector are required in order to increase its productivity. Approaches used in (Brown and McGranahan, 2016) for the case of informal economy, can be applied also for the hidden economy, in order to identify solution that would lead to activities conform to the green economy of the future. Particularly useful for the development of green economy, can be the increase of the production of electricity for renewable sources on local level (Bushur et al., 2018). Greener production of electricity on local level is expected not only to decrease the pollution during the electricity production itself, but also by advancing the production facilities and consequently the productivity of shadow sector. This way, conditions for reduction of hidden economy by its accelerated transition to regular one could be provided. Namely, more productive the economic activity becomes, much easily the policy measures for its transfer from hidden to the regular sector can be implemented.
Therefore, interventions in the sector of the hidden economy aiming at greener production of energy appear to be particularly important for the ongoing transition to green economy.
Using sophisticated electricity consumption model for hidden economy, both the evolution of the size of hidden economy and the relative efficiency of the hidden economy (r) with respect to the regular economy for a given economy can be determined using available and easily attainable sets of data. The ratio r varies from one country to another, but in all studied cases its value is lower than unity, indicating that the efficiency of hidden economy is lower than that of regular economy. Therefore, the presence of hidden economy has negative impact on the transition to green economy. Otherwise said, reduction of hidden economy is required in order to progress towards greener production, or shortly—less shadow is more green is. Both reduction of the size of hidden economy and increase of the relative efficiency of the hidden economy with respect to the regular economy are to be attained in order to accelerate the transition to green economy. Measures aiming at attaining greener production of electricity on local and household level have potential to lead to particularly beneficial effects.
The main contribution of this work to the fields of studies of hidden economy and that of green economy is the establishment of a link between the extent of hidden economic activities and outputs, from one hand, and, from the other, the possibilities for further development of green economy. It has been demonstrated that relative efficiency of the hidden economy (r) with respect to the regular economy varies is large interval, meaning that there are significant differences between the countries. Simultaneously, it has been found that the high extent of hidden economy is in connection with low energy efficiency, which suggests that the policies aiming at reduction of hidden economy and that of increase of the energy efficiency have to be established and developed further in coordinated manner.
The work presented in this paper did not receive any funding from any source.
The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] |
Pretorius IS (2000) Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16: 675–729. doi: 10.1002/1097-0061(20000615)16:8<675::AID-YEA585>3.0.CO;2-B
![]() |
[2] |
Giudici P, Solieri L, Pulvirenti A, et al. (2005) Strategies and perspectives for genetic improvement of wine yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66: 622–628. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1784-2
![]() |
[3] | Giudici P, Zambonelli C (1992) Criteri di selezione di lieviti per enologia. Vignevini 9: 29–34 [In Italian]. |
[4] | Rainieri S, Zambonelli C, Tini V, et al. (1998) The enological traits of thermotolerant Saccharomyces Strains. Am J Enol Vitic 49: 319–324. |
[5] | Anderson ME (1998) Glutathione: An overview of biosynthesis and modulation. Chem Biol Interact 111: 1–14. |
[6] | Ganguly D, Srikanth CV, Kumar C, et al. (2003) Why is glutathione (a tripeptide) synthesized by specific enzymes while TSH releasing hormone (TRH or thyroliberin), also a tripeptide, is produced as part of a prohormone protein? IUBMB Life 56: 361–363. |
[7] |
Meister A, Anderson ME (1983) Glutathione. Annu Rev Biochem 52: 711–760. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.003431
![]() |
[8] |
Kritzinger EC, Bauer FF, du Toit WJ (2013) Role of glutathione in winemaking: a review. J Agric Food Chem 61: 269–277. doi: 10.1021/jf303665z
![]() |
[9] |
Oliveira CM, Ferreira ACS, De Freitas V, et al. (2011) Oxidation mechanisms occurring in wines. Food Res Int 44: 1115–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.050
![]() |
[10] |
Sonni F, Clark AC, Prenzler PD, et al. (2011) Antioxidant action of glutathione and the ascorbic acid/glutathione pair in a model white wine. J Agric Food Chem 59: 3940–3949. doi: 10.1021/jf104575w
![]() |
[11] |
Sonni F, Moore EG, Clark AC, et al. (2011) Impact of glutathione on the formation of methylmethine-and carboxymethine-bridged (+)-catechin dimers in a model wine system. J Agric Food Chem 59: 7410–7418. doi: 10.1021/jf200968x
![]() |
[12] | Dubourdieu D, Lavigne V (2004) The role of glutathione on the aromatic evolution of dry white wine. Vinidea.net 2: 1–9. |
[13] | Roussis I, Papadopoulou D, Sakarellos-Daitsiotis M (2009) Protective effect of thiols on wine aroma volatiles. Open Food Sci J 3: 98–102. |
[14] |
Tirelli A, Fracassetti D, De Noni I (2010) Determination of reduced cysteine in oenological cell wall fractions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Agric Food Chem 58: 4565–4570. doi: 10.1021/jf904047u
![]() |
[15] | Park SK, Boulton R, Noble A (2000) Formation of hydrogen sulfide and glutathione during fermentation of white grape musts. Am J Enol Vitic 51: 91–97. |
[16] |
Kritzinger EC, Bauer FF, Du Toit WJ (2013) Influence of yeast strain, extended lees contact and nitrogen supplementation on glutathione concentration in wine. Aust J Grape Wine Res 19: 161–170. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12025
![]() |
[17] | OIV, RESOLUTION OIV-OENO 445-2015, 2015. Available from: http://www.oiv.int/en/technical-standards-and-documents/resolutions-oiv/oenology-resolutions. |
[18] | OIV, RESOLUTION OIV-OENO 446-2015, 2015. Available from: http://www.oiv.int/en/technical-standards-and-documents/resolutions-oiv/oenology-resolutions. |
[19] |
Wegmann-Herr P, Ullrich S, Schmarr HG, et al. (2016) Use of glutathione during white wine production- impact on S-off-flavors and sensory production. BIO Web Conf 7: 2031. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20160702031
![]() |
[20] |
Pozo-Bayón MÁ, Andújar-Ortiz I, Moreno-Arribas MV (2009) Scientific evidences beyond the application of inactive dry yeast preparations in winemaking. Food Res Int 42: 754–761. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.004
![]() |
[21] | Andujar-Ortiz I, Pozo-Bayón MÁ, Moreno-Arribas MV, et al. (2012) Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography–fluorescence detection for the analysis of glutathione and its precursor γ-glutamyl cysteine in wines and model wines supplemented with oenological inactive dry yeast preparations. Food Anal Methods 5: 154–161. |
[22] | Kritzinger E, Stander M, Du Toit W (2013) Assessment of glutathione levels in model solution and grape ferments supplemented with glutathione-enriched inactive dry yeast preparations using a novel UPLC-MS/MS method. Food Addit Contam 30: 37–41. |
[23] |
Elskens M, Jaspers C, Penninckx M (1991) Glutathione as an endogenous sulphur source in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol 137: 637–644. doi: 10.1099/00221287-137-3-637
![]() |
[24] | Thomas D, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1997) Metabolism of sulfur amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 503–532. |
[25] | Mendoza-Cózatl D, Loza-Tavera H, Hernández-Navarro A, et al. (2005) Sulfur assimilation and glutathione metabolism under cadmium stress in yeast, protists and plants. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 653–671. |
[26] | Penninckx MJ (2002) An overview on glutathione in Saccharomyces versus non-conventional yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 2: 295–305. |
[27] |
Suzuki T, Yokoyama A, Tsuji T, et al. (2011) Identification and characterization of genes involved in glutathione production in yeast. J Biosci Bioeng 112: 107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.04.007
![]() |
[28] |
Bourbouloux A, Shahi P, Chakladar A, et al. (2000) Hgt1p, A high affinity glutathione transporter from the yast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 275: 13259–13265. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13259
![]() |
[29] |
Dhaoui M, Auchère F, Blaiseau PL, et al. (2011) Gex1 is a yeast glutathione exchanger that interferes with pH and redox homeostasis. Mol Biol Cell 22: 2054–2067. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-11-0906
![]() |
[30] |
Mehdi K, Penninckx MJ (1997) An important role for glutathione and Υ-glutamyltranspeptidase in the supply of growth requirements during nitrogen starvation of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 143: 1885–1889. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-6-1885
![]() |
[31] |
Grant CM (2001) Role of the glutathione/glutaredoxin and thioredoxin systems in yeast growth and response to stress conditions. Mol Microbiol 39: 533–541. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02283.x
![]() |
[32] |
Izawa S, Inoue Y, Kimura A (1995) Oxidative stress-response in yeast: effect of glutathione on adaptation to hydrogen-peroxide stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 368: 73–76. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00603-7
![]() |
[33] |
Penninckx M (2000) A short review on the role of glutathione in the response of yeasts to nutritional, environmental, and oxidative stresses. Enzyme Microb Technol 26: 737–742. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00165-4
![]() |
[34] |
Mortimer RK (2000) Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. Genome Res 10: 403–409. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.4.403
![]() |
[35] |
Sipiczki M (2011) Diversity, variability and fast adaptive evolution of the wine yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) genome-a review. Ann Microbiol 61: 85–93. doi: 10.1007/s13213-010-0086-4
![]() |
[36] | Romano P, Soli MG, Suzzi G (1983) Procedure for mutagenizing spores of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 156: 907–908. |
[37] |
Rous CV, Snow R, Kunkee RE (1983) Reduction of higher alcohols by fermentation with a leucine-auxotrophic mutant of wine yeast. J Inst Brew 89: 274–278. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1983.tb04185.x
![]() |
[38] | Giudici P, Zinnato A (1983) Influenza dell'uso di mutanti nutrizionali sulla produzione di alcooli superiori. Vignevini 10: 63–65 [In Italian]. |
[39] | Ikeno Y, Tanno K, Omori I, et al. (1977) Glutathione. Japanese Patent Application 52(087): 296. |
[40] | Kono G, Harada M, Sugisaki K, et al. (1977) High glutathione-containing yeast. Japanese Patent Application 52(125): 687. |
[41] | Hamada S, Tanaka H, Sakato K (1986) Process for producing glutathione. United States Patent Application 4(582): 801. |
[42] |
Li Y, Wei G, Chen J (2004) Glutathione: a review on biotechnological production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66: 233–242. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1751-y
![]() |
[43] |
Nisamedtinov I, Kevvai K, Orumets K, et al. (2011) Metabolic changes underlying the higher accumulation of glutathione in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89: 1029–1037. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2946-z
![]() |
[44] |
Steensels J, Snoek T, Meersman E, et al. (2014) Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38: 947–995. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12073
![]() |
[45] |
Zambonelli C, Passarelli P, Rainieri S, et al. (1997) Technological properties and temperature response of interspecific Saccharomyces hybrids. J Sci Food Agric 74: 7–12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199705)74:1<7::AID-JSFA753>3.0.CO;2-X
![]() |
[46] |
Rainieri S, Zambonelli C, Giudici P, et al. (1998) Characterisation of thermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae hybrids. Biotechnol Lett 20: 543–547. doi: 10.1023/A:1005389309527
![]() |
[47] |
Bellon JR, Eglinton JM, Siebert TE, et al. (2011) Newly generated interspecific wine yeast hybrids introduce flavour and aroma diversity to wines. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91: 603–612. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3294-3
![]() |
[48] |
Bonciani T, Solieri L, De Vero L, et al. (2016) Improved wine yeasts by direct mating and selection under stressful fermentative conditions. Eur Food Res Technol 242: 899–910. doi: 10.1007/s00217-015-2596-6
![]() |
[49] | Freese EB, Chu MI, Freese E (1982) Initiation of yeast sporulation by partial carbon, nitrogen, or phosphate deprivation. J Bacteriol 149: 840–851. |
[50] |
Solieri L, Verspohl A, Bonciani T, et al. (2015) Fast method for identifying inter- and intra-species Saccharomyces hybrids in extensive genetic improvement programs based on yeast breeding. J Appl Microbiol 119: 149–161. doi: 10.1111/jam.12827
![]() |
[51] |
Verspohl A, Solieri L, Giudici P (2017) Exploration of genetic and phenotypic diversity within Saccharomyces uvarum for driving strain improvement in winemaking. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101: 2507–2521. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-8008-4
![]() |
[52] |
Krivoruchko A, Siewers V, Nielsen J (2011) Opportunities for yeast metabolic engineering: lessons from synthetic biology. Biotechnol J 6: 262–276. doi: 10.1002/biot.201000308
![]() |
[53] | Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, et al. (1996) Life with 6000 Genes. Science 274 (5287): 546–567. |
[54] |
Pérez-Torrado R, Querol A, Guillamón JM (2015) Genetic improvement of non-GMO wine yeasts: Strategies, advantages and safety. Trends Food Sci Technol 45: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.05.002
![]() |
[55] | Hosiner D, Gerber S, Lichtenberg-Fraté H, et al. (2014) Impact of acute metal stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 9: 1–14. |
[56] |
Collinson LP, Dawes IW (1995) Isolation, characterization and overexpression of the yeast gene, GLR1, encoding glutathione reductase. Gene 156: 123–127. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00026-3
![]() |
[57] |
Grant CM, MacIver FH, Dawes IW (1997) Glutathione synthetase is dispensable for growth under both normal and oxidative stress conditions in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to an accumulation of the dipeptide y-glutamylcysteine. Mol Biol Cell 8: 1699–1707. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.9.1699
![]() |
[58] |
Hara KY, Kiriyama K, Inagaki A, et al. (2012) Improvement of glutathione production by metabolic engineering the sulfate assimilation pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94: 1313–1319. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3841-y
![]() |
[59] |
Ask M, Mapelli V, Höck H, et al. (2013) Engineering glutathione biosynthesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases robustness to inhibitors in pretreated lignocellulosic materials. Microb Cell Fact 12: 87. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-87
![]() |
[60] |
Qiu Z, Deng Z, Tan H, et al. (2015) Engineering the robustness of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by introducing bifunctional glutathione synthase gene. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42: 537–542. doi: 10.1007/s10295-014-1573-6
![]() |
[61] | Sauer U (2001) Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes, In: Metabolic Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 129–169. |
[62] | McBryde C, Gardner JM, De Barros Lopes M, et al. (2006) Generation of novel wine yeast strains by adaptive evolution. Am J Enol Vitic 57: 423–430. |
[63] |
De Vero L, Solieri L, Giudici P (2011) Evolution-based strategy to generate non-genetically modified organisms Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains impaired in sulfate assimilation pathway. Lett Appl Microbiol 53: 572–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03140.x
![]() |
[64] |
Winkler JD, Kao KC (2014) Recent advances in the evolutionary engineering of industrial biocatalysts. Genomics 104: 406–411. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.09.006
![]() |
[65] |
Brown SW, Oliver SG (1982) Isolation of ethanol-tolerant mutants of yeast by continuous selection. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 16: 119–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00500738
![]() |
[66] |
Cakar ZP, Seker UOS, Tamerler C, et al. (2005) Evolutionary engineering of multiple-stress resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 5: 569–578. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.10.010
![]() |
[67] |
Cadière A, Ortiz-Julien A, Camarasa C, et al. (2011) Evolutionary engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with increased in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway. Metab Eng 13: 263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.01.008
![]() |
[68] |
Kutyna DR, Varela C, Stanley GA, et al. (2012) Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93: 1175–1184. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3622-7
![]() |
[69] |
Mezzetti F, De Vero L, Giudici P (2014) Evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains with enhanced glutathione production obtained by an evolution-based strategy. FEMS Yeast Res 14: 977–987. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12186
![]() |
[70] |
Cakar ZP, Turanli-Yildiz B, Alkim C, et al. (2012) Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved industrially important properties. FEMS Yeast Res 12: 171–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00775.x
![]() |
[71] | Cherest H, Davidian J, Benes V, et al. (1997) Molecular characterization of two high affinity sulfate transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet Soc Am 145: 627–635. |
[72] | Tamás MJ, Labarre J, Toledano MB, et al. (2005) Mechanisms of toxic metal tolerance in yeast, In: Tamás M.J., Martinoia E., Molecular biology of metal homeostasis and detoxification: from microbes to man, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 395–454. |
[73] |
Wysocki R, Tamás MJ (2010) How Saccharomyces cerevisiae copes with toxic metals and metalloids. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34: 925–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00217.x
![]() |
[74] |
Zechmann B, Liou LC, Koffler BE, et al. (2011) Subcellular distribution of glutathione and its dynamic changes under oxidative stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 11: 631–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00753.x
![]() |
[75] | Ortiz DF, Kreppel L, Speiser DM, et al. (1992) Heavy metal tolerance in the fission yeast requires an ATP-binding cassette-type vacuolar membrane transporter. EMBO J 11: 3491–3499. |
[76] |
Duncan WS, Jamieson DJ (1996) Glutathione is an important antioxidant molecule in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 141: 207–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08386.x
![]() |
[77] |
Adamis PDB, Panek AD, Eleutherio ECA (2007) Vacuolar compartmentation of the cadmium-glutathione complex protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae from mutagenesis. Toxicol Lett 173: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.06.002
![]() |
[78] |
Patzschke A, Steiger MG, Holz C, et al. (2015) Enhanced glutathione production by evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Biotechnol J 10: 1719–1726. doi: 10.1002/biot.201400809
![]() |
[79] |
Bailey JE, Sburlati A, Hatzimanikatis V, et al. (2002) Inverse metabolic engineering: a strategy for directed genetic engineering of useful phenotypes. Biotechnol Bioeng 79: 568–579. doi: 10.1002/bit.10441
![]() |
[80] |
Rossouw D, Naes T, Bauer FF (2008) Linking gene regulation and the exo-metabolome: a comparative transcriptomics approach to identify genes that impact on the production of volatile aroma compounds in yeast. BMC Genomics 9: 530. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-530
![]() |
[81] | Liti G, Louis EJ (2012) Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. PLoS Genet 8: 1–7. |
[82] |
Fleet GH (2003) Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol 86: 11–22. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00245-9
![]() |
[83] |
Pizarro F, Vargas FA, Agosin E (2007) A systems biology perspective of wine fermentations. Yeast 24: 977–991. doi: 10.1002/yea.1545
![]() |
[84] |
Siezen RJ (2008) Wine genomics. Microb Biotechnol 1: 97–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00030.x
![]() |
1. | Min Hong, Zhenghui Li, Benjamin Drakeford, Do the Green Credit Guidelines Affect Corporate Green Technology Innovation? Empirical Research from China, 2021, 18, 1660-4601, 1682, 10.3390/ijerph18041682 | |
2. | Mantas Svazas, Valentinas Navickas, Yuriy Bilan, László Vasa, The Features of the Shadow Economy Impact’ on Biomass Energy Sector, 2022, 15, 1996-1073, 2932, 10.3390/en15082932 | |
3. | Ruixue Zhang, Yuyan Tang, Yuanxin Zhang, Zeyu Wang, Collaborative relationship discovery in green building technology innovation: Evidence from patents in China's construction industry, 2023, 391, 09596526, 136041, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136041 | |
4. | Xiaoyan Ren, Xiaoqi Qin, Yaning Li, Ye Tian, Impact of the Digital Economy on the Green Transformation of China's Manufacturing Industry, 2023, 31, 1062-7375, 1, 10.4018/JGIM.321179 | |
5. | Ayten Nahide Korkmaz, Meral Uzunöz Altan, A Systematic Literature Review of Sustainable Consumer Behaviours in the Context of Industry 4.0 (I4.0), 2023, 16, 2071-1050, 126, 10.3390/su16010126 | |
6. | Hailei Zhao, Risk Management of Supply Chain Green Finance Based on Sustainable Ecological Environment, 2023, 15, 2071-1050, 7707, 10.3390/su15097707 | |
7. | Wenjie Liu, Yuqing Chen, Peng Zhu, Jinjie Tong, Hai Long, Can carbon reduction policies promote sustainable construction development? Evidence from China’s green building market, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0303149, 10.1371/journal.pone.0303149 | |
8. | Xingwei Li, Jie Yang, Yuhong Yao, Zuoyi Ding, Jiekuo Hao, Wenjun Yin, Qiong Shen, Boosting green technology innovation in China's construction industry: The power of energy-consuming rights trading policy, 2024, 84, 03135926, 410, 10.1016/j.eap.2024.08.029 | |
9. | Xingmin Yin, Dandan Chen, Jianyue Ji, How does environmental regulation influence green technological innovation? Moderating effect of green finance, 2023, 342, 03014797, 118112, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118112 |
Country | r | μ |
Macedonia | 0.618 | 0.348 |
Albania | 0.413 | 0.884 |
Croatia | 0.704 | 0.477 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.465 | 0.573 |
Israel | 0.444 | 0.867 |
Czech Republic | 0.331 | 0.236 |
Hungary | 0.316 | 0.225 |
Switzerland | 0.142 | 0.276 |
United States | 0.153 | 0.321 |