Two hand-on workshops on social media apps were conducted for the Year-12 students from two schools, one from a regional city and the other from a remote community, in a computer laboratory on the Rockhampton campus at Central Queensland University before the COVID-19 pandemic. The school in the regional city offered a specialist Digital Technologies Curriculum (DTC) to students in Years 11 & 12 whereas the remote school did not offer a similar DTC to students in Years 11 & 12. Statistical analyses of the students' responses to two casual questions during the workshop indicated that firstly the hands-on activities improved all students' general IT knowledge, and secondly the Year-12 students from the regional city were more determined to undertake tertiary IT education than the students from the remote school. Therefore, it is recommended that a mandatory specialist DTC for students in Years 11 & 12 in ALL schools should be included in the national curriculum in the future. Implications of these findings on improving the participation rate of post-secondary education in Australian regional communities are also discussed in this article. In particular, regional universities can play a unique role in producing "IT allrounders" to meet the needs of the regional communities through collaborations with governments, secondary schools, regional industries and businesses.
Citation: Wei Li, William Guo. Analysing responses of Year-12 students to a hands-on IT workshop: Implications for increasing participation in tertiary IT education in regional Australia[J]. STEM Education, 2023, 3(1): 43-56. doi: 10.3934/steme.2023004
[1] | Muhammad Ajmal, Xiwang Cao, Muhammad Salman, Jia-Bao Liu, Masood Ur Rehman . A special class of triple starlike trees characterized by Laplacian spectrum. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4394-4403. doi: 10.3934/math.2021260 |
[2] | Chang Liu, Jianping Li . Sharp bounds on the zeroth-order general Randić index of trees in terms of domination number. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2529-2542. doi: 10.3934/math.2022142 |
[3] | Tariq A. Alraqad, Igor Ž. Milovanović, Hicham Saber, Akbar Ali, Jaya P. Mazorodze, Adel A. Attiya . Minimum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of trees with a fixed order and/or number of pendent vertices. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3707-3721. doi: 10.3934/math.2024182 |
[4] | Zhen Lin, Ting Zhou, Xiaojing Wang, Lianying Miao . The general Albertson irregularity index of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 25-38. doi: 10.3934/math.2022002 |
[5] | Swathi Shetty, B. R. Rakshith, N. V. Sayinath Udupa . Extremal graphs and bounds for general Gutman index. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30454-30471. doi: 10.3934/math.20241470 |
[6] | Guifu Su, Yue Wu, Xiaowen Qin, Junfeng Du, Weili Guo, Zhenghang Zhang, Lifei Song . Sharp bounds for the general Randić index of graphs with fixed number of vertices and cyclomatic number. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29352-29367. doi: 10.3934/math.20231502 |
[7] | Zenan Du, Lihua You, Hechao Liu, Yufei Huang . The Sombor index and coindex of two-trees. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18982-18994. doi: 10.3934/math.2023967 |
[8] | Kun Wang, Wenjie Ning, Yuheng Song . Extremal values of the modified Sombor index in trees. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 12092-12103. doi: 10.3934/math.2025548 |
[9] | Akbar Ali, Sadia Noureen, Akhlaq A. Bhatti, Abeer M. Albalahi . On optimal molecular trees with respect to Sombor indices. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5369-5390. doi: 10.3934/math.2023270 |
[10] | Shabana Anwar, Muhammad Kamran Jamil, Amal S. Alali, Mehwish Zegham, Aisha Javed . Extremal values of the first reformulated Zagreb index for molecular trees with application to octane isomers. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 289-301. doi: 10.3934/math.2024017 |
Two hand-on workshops on social media apps were conducted for the Year-12 students from two schools, one from a regional city and the other from a remote community, in a computer laboratory on the Rockhampton campus at Central Queensland University before the COVID-19 pandemic. The school in the regional city offered a specialist Digital Technologies Curriculum (DTC) to students in Years 11 & 12 whereas the remote school did not offer a similar DTC to students in Years 11 & 12. Statistical analyses of the students' responses to two casual questions during the workshop indicated that firstly the hands-on activities improved all students' general IT knowledge, and secondly the Year-12 students from the regional city were more determined to undertake tertiary IT education than the students from the remote school. Therefore, it is recommended that a mandatory specialist DTC for students in Years 11 & 12 in ALL schools should be included in the national curriculum in the future. Implications of these findings on improving the participation rate of post-secondary education in Australian regional communities are also discussed in this article. In particular, regional universities can play a unique role in producing "IT allrounders" to meet the needs of the regional communities through collaborations with governments, secondary schools, regional industries and businesses.
Let Hp denote the family of analytic functions of the following form:
φ(x)=xp(1+∞∑j=1bp+jxj), (p∈N={1,2,3,...}), | (1.1) |
which are p-valent (multivalent of order p) in Δ={x∈C:|x|<1} with H1=H and also, the subfamily of H consisting of univalent (one-to-one) functions in Δ is denoted by U. We denote by K and S∗ the usual subclasses of U consisting of functions that are, respectively, bounded turning and starlike in Δ, and have the following geometric inequalities: ℜ{φ′(x)}>0 and ℜ{xφ′(x)/φ(x)}>0. Singh [21] introduced an important subfamily of U denoted by Bα that consists of Bazilevi č functions with the next inequality:
ℜ{xφ′(x)φ(x)[φ(x)x]α}>0, |
for a non-negative real number α. He noted in his work, that the cases α=0 and α=1 correspond to S∗ and K, respectively. In [14], Obradovic introduced and studied the well-known subfamily of non-Bazilevič functions, that is,
Nβ={φ∈H:ℜ{xφ′(x)φ(x)[xφ(x)]β}>0},0<β<1. |
Recently, several research papers have appeared on subfamilies related to Bazilevič functions, non-Bazilevič functions that are sometimes defined by linear operators, and their generalizations (see, for example, [7,20,22,23,24,27,28]).
Let Qk(σ) denote the family of analytic functions g(x) of the form:
g(x)=1+∞∑j=1djxj (x∈Δ), | (1.2) |
satisfying the following inequality
∫2π0|ℜ{g(x)}−σ1−σ|dθ≤kπ, | (1.3) |
where k≥2, 0≤σ<1, and x=reiθ∈Δ. The family Qk(σ) was introduced and studied by Padmanabhan and Parvatham [17]. For σ=0, we obtain the family Qk(0)=Qk that was introduced by Pinchuk [18].
Remark 1. For g(x)∈Qk(σ), we can write
g(x)=12π∫2π01+(1−2σ)xe−is1−xe−isdμ(s) (x∈Δ), | (1.4) |
where μ(s) is a function with bounded variation on [0,2π] such that
∫2π0dμ(s)=2π, ∫2π0|dμ(s)|<kπ. | (1.5) |
Since μ(s) has a bounded variation on [0,2π], we may put μ(s)=A(s)−B(s), where A(s) and B(s) are two non-negative increasing functions on [0,2π] satisfying (1.5). Thus, if we set A(s)=k+24μ1(s) and B(s)=k−24μ2(s), then (1.4) becomes
g(x)=(k+24)12π∫2π01+(1−2σ)xe−is1−xe−isdμ1(s)−(k−24)12π∫2π01+(1−2σ)xe−is1−xe−isdμ2(s). | (1.6) |
Now, using Herglotz-Stieltjes formula for the family Q(σ) of analytic functions with positive real part greater than σ and (1.6), we obtain
g(x)=(k+24)g1(x)−(k−24)g2(x), | (1.7) |
where g1(x),g2(x)∈Q(σ). Also, we have here Q(0)=Q, where Q is the family of analytic functions g(x) in Δ with ℜ{g(x)}>0.
Remark 2. It is well-known from [13] that the family Qk(σ) is a convex set.
Remark 3. For 0≤σ1<σ2<1, we have Qk(σ2)⊂Qk(σ1) (see [6]).
In recent years, researchers have been using the family Qk(σ) of analytic functions associated with bounded boundary rotation in various branches of mathematics very effectively, especially in geometric function theory (GFT). For further developments and discussion about this family, we can obtain selected articles produced by some mathematicians like [1,4,5,8,12,25] and many more.
Now, using the family Qk(σ), we introduce the subfamily BNα,βp,k(λ,σ) of p-valent Bazilevič and non-Bazilevič functions of Hp as the following definition:
Definition 1. A function φ∈Hp is said to be in the subfamily BNα,βp,k(λ,σ) if it satisfies the following condition:
(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β∈Qk(σ), |
which is equivalent to
∫2π0|ℜ{(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β}−σ1−σ|dθ≤kπ, |
where α,β≥0; α+β≥0; λ>0; k≥2; 0≤σ<1; x∈Δ; and all powers are principal ones.
Example 1. Let φ(x):Δ→C be an analytic function given by
φ(x)=xp(1+p(α+β)(1−σ)k[p(α+β)+λ]x)1α−β∈Hp (α≠β). |
Clearly φ(x)∈Hp (with all powers being principal ones). After some calculations, we find that
(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλ[φ(x)xp]α−βxφ′(x)pφ(x)=1+(1−σ)kx. |
Now, if x=reiθ(0≤r<1), then
ℜ{(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β}−σ1−σ=1+krcosθ, |
and
∫2π0|ℜ{(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β}−σ1−σ|dθ=∫2π0(1+krcosθ)dθ=2π≤kπ(k≥2). |
Hence, φ(x) belongs to the subfamily BNα,βp,k(λ,σ), and it is not empty.
By specializing the parameters α, β, λ, p, k, and σ involved in Definition 1, we get the following subfamilies, which were studied in many earlier works:
(ⅰ) For k=2, β=0 and σ=1−L1−M(−1≤M<L≤1), we have BNα,02,p(λ,1−L1−M)=Bαp(λ,L,M)
={φ∈Hp:(1−λ)[φ(x)xp]α+λxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α≺1+Lx1+Mx}, |
where ≺ denotes the usual meaning of subordination, Bαp(λ,L,M) is a subfamily of multivalently Bazilevič functions introduced by Liu [10] and Bαp(1,L,M)=Bαp(L,M)
={φ∈Hp:xφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α≺1+Lx1+Mx}, |
where the subfamily Bαp(L,M) was introduced by Yang [30];
(ⅱ) BNα,02,1(1,1−L1−M)=Bα(L,M)
={φ∈H:xφ′(x)φ(x)[φ(x)x]α≺1+Lx1+Mx}, |
where the subfamily Bα(L,M) was studied by Singh [21] (see also Owa and Obradovic [15]);
(ⅲ) BNα,02,1(1,σ)=Bα(σ)
={φ∈H:ℜ{xφ′(x)φ(x)[φ(x)x]α}>σ}, |
where the family Bα(σ) was considered by Owa [16];
(ⅳ) For k=2, α=0 and σ=1−L1−M(−1≤M<L≤1), we have BN0,β2,p(λ,1−L1−M)=Nβp(λ,L,M)
={φ∈Hp:(1+λ)[xpφ(x)]β−λxφ′(x)pφ(x)[xpφ(x)]β≺1+Lx1+Mx}, |
where Nβp(λ,L,M) is the family of non-Bazilevič multivalent functions introduced by Aouf and Seoudy [3], and Nβ1(λ,L,M)=Nβ(λ,L,M)
={φ∈H:(1+λ)[xφ(x)]β−λxφ′(x)φ(x)[xφ(x)]β≺1+Lx1+Mx}, |
where Nβ(λ,L,M) is the subclass of non-Bazilevič univalent functions defined by Wang et al. [29];
(ⅴ) BN0,β2,1(−1,σ)=Nβ(σ)
={φ∈H:ℜ{xφ′(x)φ(x)[xφ(x)]β}>σ}, |
where Nβ(σ) is the family of non-Bazilevič functions of order σ (see Tuneski and Daus [26]) and Nβ(0)=Nβ
={φ∈H:ℜ{xφ′(x)φ(x)[xφ(x)]β}>0}, |
where Nβ is the family of non-Bazilevič functions (see Obradovic [14]).
Also, we note that
(ⅰ) BNα,0k,p(λ,σ)=Bαk,p(λ,σ)
={φ∈Hp:(1−λ)[φ(x)xp]α+λxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α∈Qk(σ)}, |
and Bαk,1(λ,σ)=Bαk(λ,σ)
={φ∈H:(1−λ)[φ(x)x]α+λxφ′(x)φ(x)[φ(x)x]α∈Qk(σ)}; |
(ⅱ) BN0,βk,p(λ,σ)=Nβk,p(λ,σ)
={φ∈Hp:(1+λ)[xpφ(x)]β−λxφ′(x)pφ(x)[xpφ(x)]β∈Qk(σ)}, |
and Nβk,1(λ,σ)=Nβk(λ,σ)
={φ∈H:(1+λ)[xφ(x)]β−λxφ′(x)φ(x)[xφ(x)]β∈Qk(σ)}; |
(ⅲ) BN1,0k,p(λ,σ)=Bk,p(λ,σ)
={φ∈Hp:(1−λ)φ(x)xp+λφ′(x)pxp−1∈Qk(σ)}, |
and Bk,1(λ,σ)=Bk(λ,σ)
={φ∈H:(1−λ)φ(x)x+λφ′(x)∈Qk(σ)}; |
(ⅳ) BN0,1k,p(λ,σ)=Nk,p(λ,σ)
={φ∈Hp:(1+λ)xpφ(x)−λxp+1φ′(x)pφ2(x)∈Qk(σ)}, |
and Nk,1(λ,σ)=Nk(λ,σ)
={φ∈H:(1+λ)xφ(x)−λx2φ′(x)φ2(x)∈Qk(σ)}; |
(ⅴ) BNα,0k,p(1,σ)=Bαk,p(σ)
={φ∈Hp:xφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α∈Qk(σ)}, |
and Bαk,1(σ)=Bαk(σ)
={φ∈H:xφ′(x)φ(x)[φ(x)x]α∈Qk(σ)}; |
(ⅵ) BN0,βk,p(−1,σ)=Nβk,p(σ)
={φ∈Hp:xφ′(x)pφ(x)[xpφ(x)]β∈Qk(σ)}, |
and Nβk,1(σ)=Nβk(σ)
={φ∈H:xφ′(x)φ(x)[xφ(x)]β∈Qk(σ)}; |
(ⅶ) B0k,p(σ)=Sk,p(σ)
={φ∈Hp:xφ′(x)pφ(x)∈Qk(σ)}, |
and Sk,1(σ)=Sk(σ)
={φ∈H:xφ′(x)φ(x)∈Qk(σ)}. |
To prove our main results, the next lemmas will be required in our investigation.
Lemma 1. [11] Let γ=γ1+iγ2 and δ=δ1+iδ2 and Θ(γ,δ) be a complex-valued function satisfying the next conditions:
(ⅰ) Θ(γ,δ) is continuous in a domain D∈C2.
(ⅱ) (0,1)∈D and Θ(1,0)>0.
(ⅲ) ℜ{Θ(iγ2,δ1)}>0 whenever (iγ2,δ1)∈D and δ1≤−1+γ222.
If g(x) given by (1.2) is analytic in Δ such that (g(x),xg′(x))∈D and ℜ{Θ(g(x),xg′(x))}>0 for x∈Δ, then ℜ{g(x)}>0 in Δ.
Lemma 2. [2, Theorem 5 with p=1] If g(x)∈Qk(σ) is given by (1.2), then
|dj|≤(1−σ)k (j∈N). | (1.8) |
This result is sharp.
Remark 4. For σ=0 in Lemma 2, we get the result for the family Qk obtained by Goswami et al. [9].
In the present article, we have combined Bazilevič and non-Bazilevič analytic functions into a new family BNα,βk,p(λ,σ) associated with a bounded boundary rotation. In the next section, several properties like inclusion results, some connections with the generalized Bernardi-Libera-Livingston integral operator, and the upper bounds for |bp+1| and |bp+2+α−β−12b2p+1| for this family BNα,βk,p(λ,σ) and its special subfamilies are investigated. The motivation of this article is to generalize and improve previously known works.
Theorem 1. If φ∈BNα,βk,p(λ,σ), then
[φ(x)xp]α−β∈Qk(σ1), | (2.1) |
where σ1 is given by
σ1=2p(α+β)σ+λ2p(α+β)+λ. | (2.2) |
Proof. Let φ∈BNα,βk,p(λ,σ) and set
[φ(x)xp]α−β=(1−σ1)g(x)+σ1 (x∈Δ)=(k+24){(1−σ1)g1(x)+σ1}−(k−24){(1−σ1)g2(x)+σ1}, | (2.3) |
where gi(x) is analytic in Δ with gi(0)=1, i=1,2. Differentiating (2.3) with respect to x, we obtain
(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β=(1−σ1)g(x)+σ1+λ(1−σ1)xg′(x)p(α+β)∈Qk(σ), |
this implies that
11−σ{(1−σ1)gi(x)+σ1−σ+λ(1−σ1)xg′i(x)p(α+β)}∈Q (x∈Δ;i=1,2). |
We form the functional Θ(γ,δ) by choosing γ=gi(x), δ=xg′i(x),
Θ(γ,δ)=(1−σ1)γ+σ1−σ+λ(1−σ1)δp(α+β). |
Clearly, the first two conditions of Lemma 1 are satisfied. Now, we verify the condition (ⅲ) of Lemma 1 as follows:
ℜ{Θ(iγ2,δ1)}=σ1−σ+ℜ{λ(1−σ1)δ1p(α+β)}≤σ1−σ−λ(1−σ1)(1+γ22)2p(α+β)=2p(α+β)(σ1−σ)−λ(1−σ1)−λ(1−σ1)γ222p(α+β)=A+Bγ222C, |
where
A=2p(α+β)(σ1−σ)−λ(1−σ1),B=−λ(1−σ1)<0,C=2p(α+β)>0. |
We note that ℜ{Θ(iγ2,δ1)}<0 if and only if A=0, B<0, and C>0, and this gives us
σ1=2p(α+β)σ+λ2p(α+β)+λ. |
Since B=−λ(1−σ1)<0 gives us 0≤σ1<1. Therefore, applying Lemma 1, gi(x)∈Q(i=1,2) and consequently g(x)∈Qk(σ1) for x∈Δ. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.
Putting β=0 in Theorem 1, we obtain the next result.
Corollary 1. If φ∈Bαk,p(λ,σ), then
[φ(x)xp]α∈Qk(σ2), |
where σ2 is given by
σ2=2pαρ+λ2pα+λ. |
Putting α=0 in Theorem 1, we get the following result.
Corollary 2. If φ∈Nβk,p(λ,σ), then
[xpφ(x)]β∈Qk(σ3), |
where σ3 is given by
σ3=2pβρ+λ2pβ+λ. |
Theorem 2. If φ∈BNα,βk,p(λ,σ), then
[φ(x)xp]α−β2∈Qk(σ4), | (2.4) |
where σ4 is given by
σ4=λ+√λ2+4[p(α+β)+λ]p(α+β)σ2[p(α+β)+λ]. | (2.5) |
Proof. Let φ∈BNα,βk,p(λ,σ) and let
[φ(x)xp]α−β=(k4+12)[(1−σ4)g1(x)+σ4]2−(k4+12)[(1−σ4)g1(x)+σ4]2=[(1−σ4)g(x)+σ4]2, | (2.6) |
where gi(x) is analytic in Δ with gi(0)=1, i=1,2. Differentiating both sides of (2.6) with respect to x, we obtain
(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β={[(1−σ4)g(x)+σ4]2+[(1−σ4)g(x)+σ4]2λ(1−σ4)xg′(x)p(α+β)}∈Qk(σ), |
this implies that
11−σ{[(1−σ4)gi(x)+σ4]2+[(1−σ4)gi(x)+σ4]2λ(1−σ4)xg′i(x)p(α+β)−σ}∈Q (i=1,2). |
We form the functional Θ(γ,δ) by choosing γ=gi(x), δ=xg′i(x),
Θ(γ,δ)=[(1−σ4)γ+σ4]2+[(1−σ4)γ+σ4]2λ(1−σ4)δp(α+β)−σ. |
Clearly, the conditions (ⅰ) and (ⅱ) of Lemma 1 are satisfied. Now, we verify the condition (ⅲ) of Lemma 1 as follows:
ℜ{Θ(iγ2,δ1)}=σ24−(1−σ4)2γ22+2λσ4(1−σ4)δ1p(α+β)−σ≤σ24−σ−(1−σ4)2γ22−λσ4(1−σ4)(1+γ22)p(α+β)=A+Bγ222C, |
where
A=p(α+β)(σ24−σ)−λσ4(1−σ4),B=−(1−σ4)(1−σ4+λσ4)<0,C=p(α+β)2>0. |
We note that ℜ{Θ(iγ2,δ1)}<0 if and only if A=0, B<0, and C>0, and this gives us σ4 as given by (2.5), and B<0 gives us 0≤σ4<1. Therefore, applying Lemma 1, gi(x)∈Q (i=1,2), and consequently g(x)∈Qk(σ4) for x∈Δ. This completes the proof of Theorem 2.
Putting β=0 in Theorem 2, we obtain the following.
Corollary 3. If φ∈Bαk,p(λ,σ), then
[φ(x)xp]α2∈Qk(σ5), |
where σ5 is given by
σ5=λ+√λ2+4(pα+λ)ρpα2(pα+λ). |
Putting α=0 in Theorem 2, we obtain the following.
Corollary 4. If φ∈Nβk,p(λ,σ), then
[xpφ(x)]β2∈Qk(σ6), |
where σ6 is given by
σ6=λ+√λ2+4(pβ+λ)ρpβ2(pβ+λ). |
For a function φ∈Hp, the generalized Bernardi-Libera-Livingston integral operator Φp,μ:Hp→Hp, with μ>−p, is given by (see [19])
Φp,μ(φ(x))=μ+pxμx∫0ωμ−1φ(ω)dω (μ>−p). | (2.7) |
It is easy to verify that for all φ∈Hp given by (1.2), we have
x(Φp,μ(φ(x)))′=(μ+p)φ(x)−μΦp,μ(φ(x)). | (2.8) |
Theorem 3. If the function φ∈Hp satisfies the next condition
(1−α−βα+βλ)[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α−β +α−βα+βλφ(x)Φp,μ(φ(x))[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α−β∈Qk(σ), | (2.9) |
with Φp,μ is the integral operator defined by (2.7), then
[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α−β∈Qk(σ7), |
where σ7 is given by
σ7=2(p+μ)(α+β)σ+λ2(p+μ)(α+β)+λ. | (2.10) |
Proof. Let
[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α−β=(k4+12){(1−σ7)g1(x)+σ7}−(k4+12){(1−σ7)g2(x)+σ7}=(1−σ7)g(x)+σ7 (x∈Δ), | (2.11) |
then where gi(x) is analytic in Δ with gi(0)=1, i=1,2. Differentiating (2.11) with respect to x and using (2.8) in the resulting relation, we get
(1−α−βα+βλ)[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α−β +α−βα+βλφ(x)Φp,μ(φ(x))[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α−β=(1−σ7)g(x)+λ(1−σ7)xg′(x)(p+μ)(α+β)∈Qk(σ) (x∈Δ). |
Using the same method we used to prove Theorem 1, the remaining part of this theorem can be derived in a similar way.
Putting β=0 in Theorem 3, we obtain the following.
Corollary 5. If the function φ∈Hp satisfies the next condition
(1−λ)[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α +λφ(x)Φp,μ(φ(x))[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α∈Qk(σ), |
with Φp,μ is defined by (2.7), then
[Φp,μ(φ(x))xp]α∈Qk(σ8), |
where σ8 is given by
σ8=2(p+μ)αρ+λ2(p+μ)α+λ. |
Putting α=0 in Theorem 3, we obtain the following.
Corollary 6. If the function φ∈Hp satisfies the next condition
(1+λ)[xpΦp,μ(φ(x))]β −λφ(x)Φp,μ(φ(x))[xpΦp,μ(φ(x))]β∈Qk(σ), |
with Φp,μ is defined by (2.7), then
[xpΦp,μ(φ(x))]β∈Qk(σ9), |
where σ9 is given by
σ9=2(p+μ)(α+β)σ+λ2(p+μ)(α+β)+λ. |
Theorem 4. If 0≤λ1<λ2, then
BNα,βk,p(λ2,σ)⊂BNα,βk,p(λ1,σ). |
Proof. If we consider an arbitrary function φ∈BNα,βk,p(λ2,σ), then
φ2(x)=(1−α−βα+βλ2)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλ2xφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β∈Qk(σ). |
According to Theorem 1, we have
φ1(x)=[φ(x)xp]α−β∈Qk(σ1), |
where σ1 is given by (2.2). From (2.2), it follows that σ1≥σ, and from Remark 3, we conclude that Qk(σ1)⊂Qk(σ); hence, φ1(x)∈Qk(σ).
A simple computation shows that
(1−α−βα+βλ1)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλ1xφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β=(1−λ1λ2)φ1(x)+λ1λ2φ2(x). | (2.12) |
Since the class Qk(σ) is a convex set (see Remark 2), it follows that the right-hand side of (2.12) belongs to Qk(σ) for 0≤λ1<λ2, which implies that φ∈BNα,βk,p(λ1,σ).
Putting β=0 in Theorem 4, we obtain the following.
Corollary 7. If 0≤λ1<λ2, then
Bαk,p(λ2,σ)⊂Bαk,p(λ1,σ). |
Putting α=0 in Theorem 4, we get the following.
Corollary 8. If 0≤λ1<λ2, then
Nβk,p(λ2,σ)⊂Nβk,p(λ1,σ). |
Theorem 5. If φ∈BNα,βk,p(λ,σ) given by (1.1) with α≠β, p(α+β)+λ≠0 and p(α+β)+2λ≠0, then
|bp+1|≤p|α+β|(1−σ)k|α−β||p(α+β)+λ|, | (2.13) |
and
|bp+2+α−β−12b2p+1|≤p|α+β|(1−σ)k|α−β||p(α+β)+2λ|. | (2.14) |
Proof. If φ∈BNα,βk,p(λ,σ), from Definition 1, we have
(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β=G(x), | (2.15) |
where G(x)∈Qk(σ) is given by
G(x)=1+d1x+d2x2+d3x3+... . | (2.16) |
Since
(1−α−βα+βλ)[φ(x)xp]α−β+α−βα+βλxφ′(x)pφ(x)[φ(x)xp]α−β=1+(α−β)[p(α+β)+λ]p(α+β)bp+1x+(α−β)[p(α+β)+2λ]p(α+β)(bp+2+α−β−12b2p+1)x2+..., | (2.17) |
Comparing the coefficients in (2.15) by using (2.16) and (2.17), we obtain
(α−β)[p(α+β)+λ]p(α+β)bp+1=d1, | (2.18) |
(α−β)[p(α+β)+2λ]p(α+β)(bp+2+α−β−12b2p+1)=d2. | (2.19) |
Therefore,
bp+1=p(α+β)(α−β)[p(α+β)+λ]d1, |
and
bp+2+α−β−12b2p+1=p(α+β)(α−β)[p(α+β)+2λ]d2. |
Our result now follows by an application of Lemma 2. This completes the proof of Theorem 5.
Putting β=0 in Theorem 5, we obtain the following.
Corollary 9. If φ∈Bαk,p(λ,σ) is given by (1.1) with pα+λ≠0 and pα+2λ≠0, then
|bp+1|≤p(1−σ)k|pα+λ|, |
and
|bp+2+α−12b2p+1|≤p(1−σ)k|pα+2λ|. |
Putting k=2 and σ=1−L1−M(−1≤M<L≤1) in Corollary 9, we obtain the following corollary, which improves the result of Liu [10, Theorem 4 with n=1].
Corollary 10. If φ∈Bαp(λ,L,M) is given by (1.1) with pα+λ≠0 and pα+2λ≠0, then
|bp+1|≤2p(L−M)|pα+λ|(1−M), |
and
|bp+2+α−12b2p+1|≤2p(L−M)|pα+2λ|(1−M). |
Putting α=0 in Theorem 5, we get the following.
Corollary 11. If φ∈Nβk(λ,σ) given by (1.1) with pβ+λ≠0 and pβ+2λ≠0, then
|bp+1|≤p(1−σ)k|pβ+λ|, |
and
|bp+2−β+12b2p+1|≤p(1−σ)k|pβ+2λ|. |
Putting k=2 and σ=1−L1−M(−1≤M<L≤1) in Corollary 11, we obtain the following corollary, which improves the result of Aouf and Seoudy [3, Theorem 8 with n=1].
Corollary 12. If φ∈Nβk(λ,L,M) given by (1.1) with pβ+λ≠0 and pβ+2λ≠0, then
|bp+1|≤2p(L−M)|pβ+λ|(1−M), |
and
|bp+2−β+12b2p+1|≤2p(L−M)|pβ+2λ|(1−M). |
In this investigation, we have presented the subfamily BNα,βk,p(λ,σ) of multivalent Bazilevič and non-Bazilevič functions related to bounded boundary rotation. Also, we have computed a number of important properties, including the inclusion results and the upper bounds for the first two Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients for this function subfamily. For different choices of the parameters α, β, λ, p, k, and σ in the above results, we can get the corresponding results for each of the next subfamilies: Bαp(λ,L,M), Bαp(L,M), Bα(L,M), Bα(L,M), Bα(σ), Nβp(λ,L,M), Nβ(λ,L,M), Nβ(σ), Nβ, Bαk,p(λ,σ), Bαk(λ,σ), Nβk,p(λ,σ), Nβk(λ,σ), Bk,p(λ,σ), Bk(λ,σ), Nk,p(λ,σ), Nk(λ,σ), Bαk,p(σ), Bαk(σ), Nβk,p(σ), Nβk(σ), Sk,p(σ), and Sk(σ), which are defined in an introduction section. In addition, this work lays the foundation for future research and encourages researchers to explore more Bazilevič and non-Bazilevič functions involving some linear operators in geometric function theory and related fields.
The authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.
The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors extend their appreciation to Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia, for funding this research work through grant number: 25UQU4350561GSSR01.
This research work was funded by Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia, under grant number: 25UQU4350561GSSR01.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] | Regional Education Expert Advisory Group (REEAG), National Regional, Rural and Remote Tertiary Education Strategy—Final Report. 2019, Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. |
[2] |
Guo, W., Exploratory case study on solving word problems involving triangles by pre-service mathematics teachers in a regional university in Australia. Mathematics, 2022, 10: 3786. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203786 doi: 10.3390/math10203786
![]() |
[3] | Wilson, S., Lyons, T. and Quinn, F., Should I stay or should I go? Rural and remote students in first year university stem courses. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 2013, 23(2): 77–88. |
[4] |
Fraser, S., Beswick, K. and Crowley, S., Responding to the demands of the STEM education agenda: The experiences of primary and secondary teachers from rural, regional and remote Australia. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 2019, 5(1): 40–59. doi: 10.51355/jstem.2019.62
![]() |
[5] |
Murphy, S., Science education success in a rural Australian school: Practices and arrangements contributing to high senior science enrolments and achievement in an isolated rural school. Research in Science Education, 2020, 52: 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09947-5 doi: 10.1007/s11165-020-09947-5
![]() |
[6] |
Allen, K.A., Cordoba, B.G., Parks, A., Arslan, G., Does socioeconomic status moderate the relationship between school belonging and school-related factors in Australia? Child Indicators Research, 2022, 15: 1741–1759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-022-09927-3 doi: 10.1007/s12187-022-09927-3
![]() |
[7] | Courtney, L., Anderson, N., Do rural and regional students in Queensland experience an ICT 'turn-off' in the early high school years? Australian Educational Computing, 2010, 25(2): 7–11. |
[8] |
Vichie, K., Higher education and digital media in regional Australia: The current situation for youth. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 2017, 27(1): 29–42. doi: 10.47381/aijre.v27i1.107
![]() |
[9] | Flack, C.B., Walker, L., Bickerstaff, A., Margetts, C., Socioeconomic disparities in Australian schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020, Melbourne, Australia: Pivot Professional Learning. |
[10] |
Guo, W., Li, W., A workshop on social media apps for Year-10 students: An exploratory case study on digital technology education in regional Australia. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 2022, 12: e202222. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12237 doi: 10.30935/ojcmt/12237
![]() |
[11] | ACARA., The Australian curriculum: Digital technologies (v 8.4) for Years 9 & 10. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Available from: https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/digital-technologies/ |
[12] | Boone, H.N., Boone, D.A., Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 2012, 50(2): Article 2TOT2. |
[13] | Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., Pal, D.K., Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 2015, 7(4): 396–403. |
[14] | Duncan-Howell, J., Digital mismatch: Expectations and realities of digital competency amongst pre-service education students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(5): 827–840. |
[15] |
Considine, G., Zappalà, G., The influence of social and economic disadvantage in the academic performance of school students in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 2002, 38(2): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/144078302128756543. doi: 10.1177/144078302128756543
![]() |
[16] | Queensland Audit Office, Enabling Digital Learning (Report 1: 2021-22). 2021, Brisbane, Australia: The State of Queensland |
[17] |
Gibson, S., Patfield, S., Gore, J.M., Fray, L., Aspiring to higher education in regional and remote Australia: the diverse emotional and material realities shaping young people's futures. Australian Educational Researcher, 2022, 49: 1105–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00463-7 doi: 10.1007/s13384-021-00463-7
![]() |
[18] |
Guo, W., Li, W., Dodd, R., Gide, E., The trifecta for curriculum sustainability in Australian universities. STEM Education, 2021, 1(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2021001 doi: 10.3934/steme.2021001
![]() |