Commentary Special Issues

Saving Women, Saving Families: An Ecological Approach to Optimizing the Health of Women Refugees with S.M.A.R.T Primary Care

  • More than 43 million people worldwide have been forcibly displaced from their homes as a result of conflict and persecution, over 50% of whom are women and 41% are children. The United Nations estimates that two-thirds of the world’s refugees have been in exile for over 5 years, and more than half are in urban environments, as opposed to camps. Therefore, long-term strategies for healthcare in receiving countries are needed. The unique challenges facing refugee women as they seek safe and stable living situations are compelling. A system that optimizes the health of women refugees has significant implications for the rest of the family.

    Citation: J. Nwando Olayiwola, Melanie Raffoul. Saving Women, Saving Families: An Ecological Approach to Optimizing the Health of Women Refugees with S.M.A.R.T Primary Care[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(2): 357-374. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.357

    Related Papers:

    [1] Andrew Brinkley, Hilary McDermot, Fehmidah Munir . Team Sport in the Workplace? A RE-AIM Process Evaluation of ‘Changing the Game’. AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(5): 466-489. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.5.466
    [2] Genevieve N Healy, Ana Goode, Diane Schultz, Donna Lee, Bell Leahy, David W Dunstan, Nicholas D Gilson, Elizabeth G Eakin. . The BeUpstanding ProgramTM: Scaling up the Stand Up Australia Workplace Intervention for Translation into Practice. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(2): 341-347. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.341
    [3] Andrew Brinkley, Josie Freeman, Hilary McDermott, Fehmidah Munir . What are the Facilitators and Obstacles to Participation in Workplace Team Sport? A Qualitative Study. AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(1): 94-126. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.1.94
    [4] Wanda M. Williams, Michelle M. Yore, Melicia C. Whitt-Glover . Estimating physical activity trends among blacks in the United States through examination of four national surveys. AIMS Public Health, 2018, 5(2): 144-157. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.2.144
    [5] Nicola Tecce, Mattia Proganò, Davide Menafra, Annamaria Docimo, Stefano Zarrilli, Roberta Scairati, Anna Lisa Pelosi, Rosario Pivonello, Annamaria Colao . Integrated strategies for type 2 diabetes prevention: The role of diet and exercise. AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(2): 418-450. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025024
    [6] Leapetswe Malete, Lucky Mokgatlhe, Maria Nnyepi, Jose Jackson, Fujun Wen, Maurice Bennink, Gabriel Anabwani, Jerry Makhanda, Ibou Thior, Philemon Lyoka, Lorraine Weatherspoon . Effects of a High Protein Food Supplement on Physical Activity, Motor Performance and Health Related Quality of Life of HIV Infected Botswana Children on Anti-Retroviral Therapy (ART). AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(3): 258-277. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.3.258
    [7] Joyce Lo, Sharan Jaswal, Matthew Yeung, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Ali Bani-Fatemi, Aaron Howe, Amin Yazdani, Basem Gohar, Douglas P. Gross, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia . A systematic review of the literature: Gender-based violence in the construction and natural resources industry. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 654-666. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024033
    [8] Sonia Lippke, Luisa Korte, Vinayak Anand Kumar, Andreas Fach, Tiara Ratz . Health behavior and disease self-management indicators in patients with cardiovascular diseases using a health app: Findings from an RCT. AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(1): 233-258. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025015
    [9] Amy M. Gayman, Jessica Fraser-Thomas, Jamie E. L. Spinney, Rachael C. Stone, Joseph Baker . Leisure-time Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Older People: The Influence of Sport Involvement on Behaviour Patterns in Later Life. AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(2): 171-188. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.2.171
    [10] Felipe Montalva-Valenzuela, Antonio Castillo-Paredes, Claudio Farias-Valenzuela, Oscar Andrades-Ramirez, Yeny Concha-Cisternas, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz . Effects of exercise, physical activity, and sports on physical fitness in adults with Down syndrome: A systematic review. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 577-600. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024029
  • More than 43 million people worldwide have been forcibly displaced from their homes as a result of conflict and persecution, over 50% of whom are women and 41% are children. The United Nations estimates that two-thirds of the world’s refugees have been in exile for over 5 years, and more than half are in urban environments, as opposed to camps. Therefore, long-term strategies for healthcare in receiving countries are needed. The unique challenges facing refugee women as they seek safe and stable living situations are compelling. A system that optimizes the health of women refugees has significant implications for the rest of the family.


    1. Introduction

    Physical inactivity is the fourth leading cause of death worldwide, ahead of obesity [1]. Workplaces are increasingly facilitating extensive periods of sedentary behaviour [2] with studies reporting that over 50% of daytime sitting occurs in the workplace [3].Current Australian PA guidelines recommend 150–300 minutes of moderate-intensity PA per week for health benefits [4], and up to 420 min/wk is recommended for weight loss [5]. Growing evidence suggests workplace PA interventions can be effective in increasing PA behaviours and reducing weight among employees [6,7]. Important elements of successful PA interventions, at least for the short-term, include convenience, exercise guidance, social interaction, on-going monitoring and feedback, counselling and/or education sessions, and programme variety [8,9]. Notwithstanding, there are limited studies comparing different workplace-based environmental approaches to effect PA and health risk factor changes [10].

    The aims of this study were to assess programme adherence, PA compliance, weight loss and other health risk factor changes in previously insufficiently active adults following two types of work-place interventions. The hypothesis was that both intervention arms would result in similar increased PA patterns and improved health profiles.


    2. Materials and Methods

    The workplace interventions were designed to incorporate daily PA in addition to nutrition education in order to encourage more active behaviour, healthy eating practices (results not reported here) and facilitate weight loss and were based primarily on a socio-ecological approach to behaviour change [11]. The after-work group followed a 40-day PA programme that was designed for insufficiently active adults and has been described previously [12,13]. The pilot in-work programme was adapted from the 40-day PA programme. The 40-day PA group-based strategy required participants to attend instructor-led activities three times/week for 6 weeks (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and undertake individual activities on all other days of the week. Participants maintained PA diaries recording their activity patterns including activity time, and average heart rate for all sessions undertaken. Health and fitness testing was conducted before and immediately after the 6-week programme.

    University management fully supported this intervention trial and allowed staff to take time away from their office to participate. Following institutional ethical approval, email and poster advertisements were utilised to recruitment participants from a large university. Respondents received further information and completed the Active Australia PA questionnaire [14].

    Selection criteria:

    Participants had to:

    (1) be "insufficiently active" according to the Active Australia criteria. (< 150 min/wk of weighted PA; where vigorous activity minutes are doubled [14]) and or with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2.

    (2) be willing to participate in either of the 40-day physical activity programs, or act as controls and be placed on a wait list.

    (3) undergo a pre-exercise screening evaluation according to the Sports Medicine Australia (SMA) pre-exercise screening system [15].

    (4) complete basic fitness measures [16].

    Participants were excluded from the study if: (1) they were sufficiently active according to the Active Australia Questionnaire (i.e. > 150 minutes of PA/week) or (2) based on the SMA screening guidelines, they were sent for medical clearance and clearance to participate was not provided.

    Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated using a computer randomised sequence generator on a 1:1 ratio into one of three arms: (1) an after-work group that had 3 × 60 min instructor-led PA sessions each week of the six-week programme that mirrored our previously published group intervention (n = 25) [12]. Sessions were based primarily in the organisation's gymnasium and nearby outdoor playing fields and included a variety of resistance and aerobic-based activities; (2) an in-work group that had 2 × 15 min instructor-led PA periods 3 days/wk at mid-morning and mid-afternoon. Instructors collected participants from their work location and conducted circuit activities incorporating walking/stair-climbing, resistance training and callisthenic exercises (n = 23) for small groups (n ≤ 6 participants) in near-proximity to their office area. When participant numbers < 3 for a group session that session was combined with another in close proximity; or (3) a wait-listed control group (n = 23) who were asked to maintain their usual PA. These participants undertook an after-work intervention following the post-testing. All intervention participants were required to accumulate and record a total of 60min/day PA across the 40-day programme. Participants were encouraged to start their individual PA program with walking and to include elements of the instructor-led sessions as they became more comfortable with the activities. All participants were provided with motivational tips on starting or increasing their daily PA for example: planning and preparing for PA the night before, being active with a friend, family member or pet, and creating motivational music lists to use during activities. Instructor-led sessions started conservatively and progressed in intensity across the duration of the programme (Figure 1).

    Figure 1. 40-day physical activity programme.
    All instructor led exercise sessions were conducted on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. In-work participants undertook 2 × 15 minute sessions during the work day, after-work participants undertook a 60-minute session at the end of the work day.

    The intervention participants were allocated heart rate (HR) monitors and diaries. HR monitors provided immediate feedback on exercise intensity during the sessions and were downloaded weekly for compliance checks with target PA time. Diaries were used to record daily PA types and issues associated with achieving target PA levels. Participants attended three nutrition workshops conducted by a nutritionist. These were based on the Australian Dietary Guidelines [17] and included energy balance, food groups, portion sizes, label reading, and healthy diet maintenance. Participants completed food diaries on two occasions, pre-intervention and week six of the intervention.

    Physical activity patterns and health and fitness variables were evaluated both pre-and post-intervention. PA patterns over the previous week were assessed using the Active Australia Survey (AAS), a 7-day recall questionnaire that measures leisure-time PA participation [14]. Resting blood pressure (Dinamap Pro 100), anthropometric measures of height, weight, waist and hip girths [18], and fasting total cholesterol and glucose using finger-tip blood samples and a Reflotron Plus analyzer (Hoffman La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) were also collected [19]. A submaximal cycle ergometer test was undertaken that involved 3 × 3 minute stages to approximately 75% predicted HRmax [16]. This was used to estimate maximal aerobic fitness (VO2max). The Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee for Flinders University approved the study protocol and all participants gave informed written consent (HREC code 328.12).

    Adherence required attendance at both pre-and post-testing sessions. Compliance was measured using intention to treat in two objective ways: (1) achieving a minimum of 60 min/day of recorded PA; and (2) attendance at the instructor-led sessions. Compliance was also determined using per protocol procedures whereby participants achieved ≥150 minPA/wk immediately post-intervention using the self-reported AAS [14].

    Statistical analysis was performed using Statview software (Abacus Concepts Inc, CA). The study was powered to detect small to moderate effect size differences in fitness and PA patterns based on an alpha level of 5% and 80% power, taking into account an anticipated 10–15% dropout. Population proportion analysis was used to compare adherence among groups. Chi-square was used to assess differences in daily PA compliance. Comparisons in PA and health and fitness changes across study arms were made using repeat-measures ANOVA.


    3. Results

    Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. All were recruited from the university community and consisted of administrative, clerical or academic staff. There were no differences in any variables between groups pre-intervention. Figure 2 outlines the flow of participants from the initial email enquiry through to final physiological testing at follow-up. Participants who declined to commence the intervention or did not return for follow-up were statistically no different to the participants who completed all components of the intervention.

    Table 1. Pre-intervention participant characteristics (mean ± SD).
    After-work
    n = 25
    In-work
    n = 23
    Control
    n = 23
    Age (yr) 48.3 (± 11.2) 46.8 (± 7.9) 44.4 (± 9.3)
    Females n (%) 22 (88%) 21 (91%) 19 (83%)
    Total weighted PA (min/wk) 102 (± 81) 72 (± 92) 63 (± 48)
    Vigorous PA (min/wk) 15 (± 23) 9 (± 18) 5 (± 13)
    Height (cm) 166.3 (± 8.7) 165.6 (± 6.9) 169.8 (± 10.2)
    Weight (kg) 81.8 (± 19.7) 81.9 (± 18.5) 78.2 (± 22.8)
    BMI (kg/m2) 29.7 (± 7.7) 29.6 (± 5.2) 26.8 (± 6.1)
    Waist (cm) 88.9 (± 16.8) 90.8 (± 12.9) 86.3 (± 17.2)
    Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.74 (± 0.9) 5.0 (± 0.6) 4.88 (± 0.8)
    Fasting BGL (mmol/L) 5.54 (± 1.0) 5.38 (± 1.6) 5.53 (± 0.4)
    VO2max (mL/kg/min) 25.1 (± 6.1) 24.1 (± 4.6) 27.8 (± 5.5)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2. Flow diagram of the progress through the phases of the intervention.

    Adherence was 87.0% for control participants compared with 76.0% and 65.2% for after-work and in-work participants, respectively. The adherence rates were not different among the three groups (z < 1.96). Compliance with the 60 min/day PA target was 52.3% and 18.9% for the after-work and in-work participants, respectively (p < 0.001). Attendance at group sessions was higher after-work (70.4%) versus in-work (26.4%), and higher compared to individual sessions (22.3% and 10.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). Using the AAS post-intervention showed ≥ 150 minPA/wk compliance levels were not different between the after-work and in-work completers (89.5% and 80.0%, respectively).

    Table 2 shows pre-post intervention changes in PA, and health and fitness variables. Weighted PA levels increased in both groups. After-work participants increased more than in-work participants, with significantly more vigorous PA. Beneficial changes in BMI and aerobic fitness were significant in both intervention groups. Changes in BMI for the after-work participants were greater relative to controls while fitness improvements for the intervention participants exceeded those for the controls. Weight and glucose improvements were greater for the after-work versus in-work participants and controls. Waist and hip girth reductions were greater for after-work participants versus controls. No other changes were found relative to controls.

    Table 2. Health and fitness changes across the intervention for the three study arms.
    Variable After-work (n = 19) In-work (n = 15) Control (n = 20)
    pre SD post SD Pre-post p pre SD post SD Pre-post p pre SD post SD Pre-post p Intervention × time differences p
    PA total weighted (min/wk) 110 81 705 366 < 0.001 73 96 306 202 < 0.001 69 48 140 131 0.021 < 0.001 1, 2, 3
    Vigorous PA (min/wk) 19 24 213 155 < 0.001 13 20 71 85 0.013 5 13 17 34 0.106 < 0.001 1, 2
    Weight (kg) 78.6 15.4 76.6 15.0 < 0.001 84.7 20.6 84.1 20.3 0.128 79.8 23.5 80.2 23.5 0.246 < 0.001 1, 2, 3
    BMI (kg/m2) 28.0 5.8 27.2 5.5 < 0.001 29.9 5.3 29.6 5.3 0.049 27.2 6.3 27.3 6.3 0.321 < 0.001 2
    Waist girth (cm) 85.9 13.9 82.6 11.5 0.019 91.6 14.5 89.9 13.8 0.064 88.2 17.1 88.3 17.4 0.815 0.031 2
    Hip girth (cm) 107.0 10.1 105.7 9.1 0.013 109.6 10.6 108.6 11.0 0.062 103.7 12 104.0 12.7 0.513 0.046 2
    Systolic BP (mmHg) 121 13 122 15 0.620 120 12 120 9 0.829 123 17 117 15 0.040 0.095
    Diastolic BP (mmHg) 78 8 76 9 0.307 80 9 78 6 0.366 76 10 75 9 0.239 0.970
    Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.85 1.0 4.47 0.9 0.005 5.10 0.6 4.92 0.5 0.096 4.93 0.9 4.71 0.8 0.012 0.364
    Fasting BGL (mmol/L) 5.44 0.8 5.00 0.8 < 0.001 5.00 0.3 4.87 0.3 0.126 5.57 0.4 5.52 0.5 0.517 0.006 1, 2
    VO2max (mL/kg/min) 25.4 5.7 30.3 5.5 < 0.001 23.2 3.7 26.9 3.8 < 0.001 27.9 5.8 28.1 5.9 0.897 0.024 2, 3
    Notes: three study arms: 1 Significant difference between after-work and in-work, 2 Significant difference between after-work and controls, 3 Significant difference between in-work and controls. PA totals are weighted using vigorous minutes × 2.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    4. Discussion

    This study introduced insufficiently active and/or obese adults to PA and nutrition education interventions in the workplace. Comparisons were made between after-work and in-work programmes using outcome measures of adherence, compliance, PA behaviours, weight loss and other health risk factor changes.

    Adherence rates following the six-week intervention were high and similar to our previous intervention [12,13]. This is typical for short-term interventions and higher dropout rates are common as the programme duration increases [20].

    In order to promote weight loss, 60 minutes of daily PA (420 min/wk) is recommended [5], although Australian PA guidelines suggest 150–300min/wk of moderate-intensity PA for general health benefits [4]. Compliance rates in the present study using the 60min/day threshold were almost 3-fold higher for the after-work participants compared to in-work participants. The attendance at the instructor-led sessions was also significantly higher for the after-work participants when compared to the in-work participants. The higher attendance rates for the after-work participants contributed positively to the additional PA patterns. Previous work has suggested that maintaining this level of PA is problematic [9] but an important element of the present study was to directly compare the efficacy of the intervention arms.

    PA interventions using a socio-ecological model incorporate personal, social and environmental constructs that can range along a continuum from personal level factors to macro-environmental influences such as the physical and work environments [11]. There is strong to definitive evidence for the effectiveness of multi-component interventions in the workplace to reduce risk factors for chronic diseases [20]. Of relevance are programmes combining nutrition education and PA, and providing increased opportunity and places for PA such as organised sessions during work time [21,22]. Therefore, such low in-work group attendance was unexpected. Additionally, compliance for the individual daily PA targets for weight loss ( > 60 min/day) was also low for this intervention arm and lower than the after-work group. The total PA change, lower than expected weight loss and lower session attendance for the in-work group suggest the design was inferior to the after-work setting. During post-intervention testing, participants informally reported difficulties attending in-work sessions despite instructors meeting them in or near their office space. Participants described a range of issues such as clashes with scheduled meetings (despite the regular activity timetable), pressing work matters, and perceived problems with hygiene post PA. Despite these issues, compliance with the > 150 min/wk target post-intervention was not different between the intervention arms (89.5 and 80.0%) and is reflected in other important health benefits for those completing the programmes. It appears that in-work participants compensated for the lower attendance rates by additional individual PA at other times although total levels were still significantly lower than the after-work group.

    The rapid and dramatic increases in PA behaviours of between 233 and 595 weighted minutes of PA/wk resulted in health improvements in both intervention groups. However, the additional vigorous activity by the after-work participants is likely to account for the greater weight and anthropometric improvements, and benefits in cholesterol and BGL relative to the in-work group, as others have demonstrated [13,23,24,25]. The aerobic fitness changes for both groups were impressive in such a short period but are typical given the low starting levels and large PA changes [26].

    While it is not possible to determine the precise reasons for the differences in PA behaviour change between groups there are a number of important strategies that may help explain these results. Generally, previous work has shown a range of methodological characteristics, research design and psychological constructs may all impact behaviour change [11,27]. This study combined the following elements to effect behaviour change: providing diaries, education sessions, technological support, pre-post testing, professional guidance and counselling, and improving self-efficacy can increase PA patterns [12,13,27]. Both intervention groups had a similar programme with the exception of the environment and timing of the exercise sessions. The brief nature of the in-work opportunities falls in line with guidelines that encourage people to take every opportunity to be active, even in shorter bouts of 10 minutes [28]. This fails to consider potential barriers such as those identified by our in-work participants including hygiene and disruption to work flow. The after-work approach in the current study overcame these barriers and it may be the same for dedicated sessions before work. This is not to be confused with incidental activity opportunities whereby even shorter breaks between sedentary behaviours, such as using the stairs between floors, walking between offices more often and regular standing breaks, have been shown to be important for health [29].


    5. Limitations

    The major limitations to this study were the relatively small participant numbers in this pilot and the short-term nature of the intervention. It is not known how long these short-term behaviour changes were maintained by the participants and this is an area for further research. Additionally, the potential impact that these PA interventions have on other health related behaviours was not measured. The majority of participants were female (87%) and this is typically seen in PA intervention studies [27]. A sampling protocol would have reduced the gender imbalance however this would have extended the time to recruit beyond the resources available to conduct the study. The results of this study apply to a well-educated, predominantly female, homogenous cohort in terms of socio-demographic indices. Therefore, the generalisability of this type of intervention is unknown in other workplaces.


    6. Conclusions

    In summary, both intervention strategies resulted in positive behaviour changes and associated health benefits. However, for in-work participants, the low attendance at the instructor-led sessions and overall low compliance with the weight loss targets show this was less successful than the after-work design. The results suggest this in-work intervention design is not optimal for weight loss within work places such as a tertiary institution.


    Acknowledgements

    Appreciation is expressed to the participants and research students for their support. The research was funded by a seeding grant from the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University. No funding body had any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.


    Conflict of Interest

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


    [1] United Nations. Refugees, the numbers: Resources for Speakers on Global Issues. 2015. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/briefingpapers/refugees/.
    [2] European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. Health assessment of refugees and migrants in the EU/EEA. 2015. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_food-safety/docs/personal_health_handbook_en.pdf.
    [3] Frances Nicholson, United Nations High Commission for Refugees. Refugee women, survivors, protectors, providers. 2011. Available online from: http://www.unhcr.org.uk/resources/monthly-updates/november-2011-update/refugee-women-survivors-protectors-providers.html.
    [4] Fazel M, Reed R, Panter-Brick C, et al. (2012) Mental health of displaced and refugee children resettled in high-income countries: risk and protective factors. Lancet 379, no. 9812: 266-82.
    [5] Lucas, R. (2005) International migration to the high-income countries: Some consequences for economic development in the sending countries. Are we on track to achieve the Millennium Development Goals: 127-81.
    [6] United Nations High Commission for Refugees. A new beginning: Refugee integration in Europe. 2013. Available from: www.unhcr.org/52403d389.pdf.
    [7] Ager A, Strang A. (2008) Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. J Refug Stud 21(2): 166-91.
    [8] Robinson, V. (1998) Defining and measuring successful refugee integration. In Proceedings of ECRE International conference on Integration of Refugees in Europe, Antwerp November 1998.
    [9] Ager, Alastair, and Alison Strang. Indicators of integration: Final report. Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, 2004.
    [10] Fazel M, Wheeler J, Danesh J. (2005) Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in Western countries: A systematic review. Lancet 365:1309-14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61027-6
    [11] Asgary R, Segar M. (2011) Barriers to healthcare access among refugee asylum seekers. J Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 22:506-522. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0047
    [12] Pollard R, Betts, W, Carroll J, et al. (2014) Integrating primary care with behavioral health with four special populations: children with special needs, people with serious mental illness, refugees, and deaf people. Am Psychol 69(4): 377-87.
    [13] Executive board of the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. 2011. Available online from: http://www.unwomen.org/~/media/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Executive%20Board/EB-2011-AS-UNW-2011-09-StrategicPlan-en.pdf.
    [14] Women, U. N., and UN Global Compact. "Women’s Empowerment Principles: Equality Means Business." New York City: UN Women, 2010.
    [15] The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn, and Child health; Partners in Population and development. Women’s empowerment and gender equality: Promoting women’s empowerment for better health outcomes for women and children. 2013. Available online from: http://www.opml.co.uk/sites/default/files/sb_gender_0.pdf.
    [16] Kishor, S. (2000) Empowerment of women in Egypt and links to the survival and health of their infants. In B.Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes. 119-156. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [17] Kar S, Pascual C, Chickering K. (1999) Empowerment of women for health promotion: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 49(11): 1431-60.
    [18] Costa, D. (2007). Health care of refugee women. Australian Family Physician 36(3): 151.
    [19] Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. (2005) Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 83(3): 457-502.
    [20] World Health Organization. "The World Health Report 2008: Primary health care (now more than ever)." Available online from: http://www.who.int/whr/2008/whr08_en.pdf.
    [21] Declaration of Alma-Ata, 1978. World Health Organization, 2005.
    [22] Redwood-Campbell L, Thind H, Howard M, et al. (2008) Understanding the health of refugee women in host countries: lessons from the Kosovar re-settlement in Canada. Prehospital and Disaster Med 23(04): 322-7.
    [23] Hadle C, Zodhiates A, Sellen D. (2007) Acculturation, economics and food insecurity among refugees resettled in the USA: a case study of West African refugees. Public Health Nutr 10(4): 405-12.
    [24] Pumariega A, Rothe E, Pumariega J. (2005) Mental health of immigrants and refugees. Community Ment Health J 41(5): 581-97.
    [25] O'Hare T, Van Tran T. (1998) Substance abuse among Southeast Asians in the US: Implications for practice and research. Soc Work in Health Care 26 (3): 69-80.
    [26] Wieland M, Weis J, Palmer T, et al. (2012) Physical activity and nutrition among immigrant and refugee women: a community-based participatory research approach. Women's Health 22(2): e225-e232.
    [27] Hynie M, Crooks V, Barragan J. (2011) Immigrant and refugee social networks: determinants and consequences of social support among women newcomers to Canada. Can J Nurs Res 43(4): 26-46.
    [28] Lim S. (2009) Loss of Connections Is Death: Transnational Family Ties Among Sudanese Refugee Families Resettling in the United States. J Cross-Cult Psychol 40, no. 6: 1028-40.
    [29] Muggeridge H, Dona G. (2006) Back Home? Refugees' experiences of their first visit back to their country of origin. J Refug Stud 19(4): 415-32.
    [30] McPherson, M. (2010) ‘I Integrate, Therefore I Am’: Contesting the Normalizing Discourse of Integrationism through Conversations with Refugee Women. J Refug Stud feq040.
    [31] Kennedy J, Seymour D, Hummel B. (1999) A comprehensive refugee health screening program. Public Health Rep 114(5): 469.
    [32] Colic-Peisker V, Walker I. (2003) Human capital, acculturation and social identity: Bosnian refugees in Australia. J Community & Appl Soc Psychol 13, no. 5: 337-60.
    [33] Oxman-Martinez J, Abdool S. (2000) Immigration, women and health in Canada. Can J Public Health 91(5): 394.
    [34] Wrigley, H. (2007). Beyond the life boat: Improving language, citizenship and training services for immigrants and refugees. In A. Belzer (Ed.) Toward defining and improving quality in adult basic education: Issues and challenges. Mahwah, New Jersey, Erlbaum Publishing, 221-239.
    [35] Wolf M, Ly U, Hobart M, Kernic M. (2003) Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. J Fam Violence 18(2):121-9.
    [36] United Nations High Commission for Refugees. News stories: New Delhi police teach refugee women how to take care of themselves. 2012. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/507410439.html.
    [37] Fong, R. (Ed.). (2004). Culturally competent practice with immigrant and refugee children and families. Guilford Press.
    [38] Lurie N, Jung M, Lavizzo-Mourey R. (2005) Disparities and quality improvement: federal policy levers. Health Aff 24(2): 354-64.
    [39] Higgins, Andrew for the New York Times: Norway offers migrants a lesson in how to treat women. 2015. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/20/world/europe/norway-offers-migrants-a-lesson-in-how-to-treat-women.html?_r=1.
    [40] Olayiwola, Willard-Grace, Dube, Hessler, Shunk, Gottlieb (unpublished data, manuscript under review).
    [41] Bachrach D, Pfister H, Wallis K, et al. Addressing patients’ social needs: An emerging business case for provider investment. The Commonwealth Fund. 2014. Available from: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/files/publications/fund-report/2014/may/1749_bachrach_addressing_patients_social_needs_v2.pdf.
    [42] Tipirneni R, Vickery K, Ehlinger, E. (2015) Accountable Communities for Health: Moving From Providing Accountable Care to Creating Health. Ann Fam Med 13(4): 367-9.
    [43] Van Dooren G, Coomans S, Struyven L. (2014) Identifying Policy Innovations increasing Labour Market Resilience and Inclusion of Vulnerable Groups National Report Belgium. INSPIRES Working Paper Series 14: 1-48.
    [44] European Resettlement Network. Belgium Stakeholder Conference on Refugee Resettlement. 2015. Available from: http://www.resettlement.eu/page/belgium-stakeholder-conference-refugee-resettlement-brussels-june-23-2015.
    [45] San Francisco Department of Public Health. Community health equity and promotion: Newcomers Health Program. Available from: https://www.sfdph.org/dph/comupg/oprograms/CHPP/Newcomers/NewcomersStaffSites.asp.
    [46] Heather Knight for SF Gate. Medicine S.F. General provides lifeline to traumatized asylum-seekers. 2011. Available from: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/S-F-General-s-refugee-clinic-a-lifeline-to-care-2366663.php.
    [47] Theo Chang for the White House blog. Making good use of AARA funding: Frank Kiang Medical Center. 2010. Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/08/02/making-good-use-aara-funding-frank-kiang-medical-center.
    [48] Chang K, Jeung J, Pei P, et al. (2014) "Opening Access for Burmese and Karen Immigrant and Refugee Populations in California: A Blueprint for Integrated Health Service Expansion to Emerging Asian Communities." AAPI Nexus: Policy, Pract Community 12(1-2): 225-44.
    [49] Chang K, Pei P, Charlemagne L, et al. The Intersection of Culture and Behavioral Health —— Moving Beyond Language. Community Health Forum Magazine. National Association of Community Health Centers. 2012. Available from: http://www.nachc.com/magazine-article.cfm?MagazineArticleID=228.
    [50] Edberg M, Cleary S, Vyas A. (2011) A trajectory model for understanding and assessing health disparities in Immigrant/Refugee communities. J Immigr Minority Health 13: 576-84. n Canada. Can J Public Health 91(5): 394. doi: 10.1007/s10903-010-9337-5
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mozhdeh Ramezani, Batool Tayefi, Elham Zandian, Neda SoleimanvandiAzar, Narjes Khalili, Soodabeh Hoveidamanesh, Parissa Massahikhaleghi, Zahra Rampisheh, Workplace interventions for increasing physical activity in employees: A systematic review, 2022, 64, 1341-9145, 10.1002/1348-9585.12358
    2. Paige G. Brooker, Sjaan R. Gomersall, Neil A. King, Nicholas F. McMahon, Michael D. Leveritt, How do previously inactive individuals restructure their time to ‘fit in’ morning or evening exercise: a randomized controlled trial, 2022, 0160-7715, 10.1007/s10865-022-00370-x
    3. Paige G. Brooker, Mary E. Jung, Dominic Kelly-Bowers, Veronica Morlotti, Sjaan R. Gomersall, Neil A. King, Michael D. Leveritt, Does the Time-of-Day of Exercise Influence the Total Volume of Exercise? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Objectively Monitored Physical Activity Among Active Individuals, 2021, 18, 1543-3080, 1029, 10.1123/jpah.2020-0802
    4. Tom Brandt, Timo Schinköthe, Annette Schmidt, CrossFit Motivates a 41-Year-Old Obese Man to Change His Lifestyle and Achieve Long-Term Health Improvements: A Case Report, 2023, 8, 2411-5142, 58, 10.3390/jfmk8020058
    5. Elisa Grazioli, Claudia Cerulli, Eliana Tranchita, Elisa Moretti, Caterina Mauri, Marianna Broccatelli, Simona De Bellonia, Beatrice-Aurelia Abalașei, Iulian-Marius Dumitru, Cristina-Elena Moraru, Radu-Mihai Iacob, Sergi Blancafort-Alias, Aimar Intxaurrondo González, Àlex Domingo Riau, Albert Giménez i Sanz, Graciela Inness Ramos, Haci Ahmet Pekel, Mustafa Altunsoy, Secil Ozkan, Asiye Ugras Dikmen, Massimo Sacchetti, Attilio Parisi, Dropout and compliance to physical exercise in menopausal osteopenic women: the European “happy bones” project, 2023, 5, 2624-9367, 10.3389/fspor.2023.1221409
    6. Tom Brandt, Elisabeth Heinz, Yannik Klaaßen, Selina Limbara, Marian Mörsdorf, Timo Schinköthe, Annette Schmidt, The MedXFit-study – CrossFit as a workplace health intervention: a one-year, prospective, controlled, longitudinal, intervention study, 2024, 12, 2296-2565, 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1304721
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(7391) PDF downloads(1162) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog