Research note

Stray dogs as carriers of E. coli resistant strains for the retracted and re-emerged antibiotic colistin, based on the mcr-1 gene presence

  • Received: 30 July 2024 Revised: 03 November 2024 Accepted: 11 November 2024 Published: 18 November 2024
  • Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is becoming a major problem for animal and human health. Reports of resistance to colistin, an antibiotic that is considered a last resort drug against resistant Gram-negative bacteria, have been increasing over the last years. Among the different mechanisms that cause AMR to colistin, the mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) gene has been reported as responsible for the increased incidence in animals and humans since 2015. There are ten recognized distinct variants of this gene in bacteria isolated from animals, humans, food, and the environment. Companion animals could have a role in human infection by pathogenic and resistant E. coli strains as they share the same environment and are in close contact with humans. Considering this, our aim was to investigate antimicrobial resistance in companion domestic and stray dogs in Western Macedonia, Greece. Our results revealed that of the 43 individual fecal samples examined, 16% of them hosted the mcr-1 gene, all of which were isolated from stray dogs. Our results suggested that companion dogs and stray dogs can serve as reservoirs for colistin-resistant E. coli strains.

    Citation: Ioannis Tsakmakidis, Anastasia Parisi, Dimitrios K. Papadopoulos, Maria V. Alvanou, Konstantinos V. Papageorgiou, Evanthia Petridou, Ioannis A. Giantsis. Stray dogs as carriers of E. coli resistant strains for the retracted and re-emerged antibiotic colistin, based on the mcr-1 gene presence[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(4): 367-378. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024022

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jin Hwan Do . Genome-wide transcriptional comparison of MPP+ treated human neuroblastoma cells with the state space model. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(4): 440-460. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.4.440
    [2] Anna Kapambwe Bwalya, Robinson Mugasiali Irekwa, Amos Mbugua, Matthew Mutinda Munyao, Peter Kipkemboi Rotich, Tonny Teya Nyandwaro, Caroline Wangui Njoroge, Anne Wanjiru Mwangi, Joanne Jepkemei Yego, Shahiid Kiyaga, Samson Muuo Nzou . Investigation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in MRPA and AQP-1 genes of Leishmania donovani as resistance markers in visceral leishmaniasis in Kenya. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(2): 149-160. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021011
    [3] Sarmishta Mukhopadhyay, Sayak Ganguli, Santanu Chakrabarti . Shigella pathogenesis: molecular and computational insights. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(2): 99-121. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020007
    [4] Yutaka Takihara, Ryuji Otani, Takuro Ishii, Shunsuke Takaoka, Yuki Nakano, Kaori Inoue, Steven Larsen, Yoko Ogino, Masashi Asai, Sei-ichi Tanuma, Fumiaki Uchiumi . Characterization of the human IDH1 gene promoter. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(3): 186-204. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023013
    [5] Viviana Imbua Levi Enoka, Gideon Mutie Kikuvi, Perpetual Wangui Ndung'u . Effect of garlic and onion extract chitosan nanoparticles on selected intestinal bacterial flora in indigenous rainbow rooster chicken in Kenya. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(2): 98-116. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021008
    [6] Madhan Srinivasamurthy, Nagaraj Kakanahalli, Shreeshail V. Benakanal . A truncation mutation in the L1CAM gene in a child with hydrocephalus. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(4): 223-232. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021017
    [7] Kui Wang, Zhifang Yang, Xiaohui Chen, Shunxiao Liu, Xiang Li, Liuhao Wang, Hao Yu, Hongwei Zhang . Characterization and analysis of myosin gene family in the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). AIMS Molecular Science, 2022, 9(2): 91-106. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2022006
    [8] Irene Mwongeli Waita, Atunga Nyachieo, Daniel Chai, Samson Muuo, Naomi Maina, Daniel Kariuki, Cleophas M. Kyama . Differential expression and functional analysis of micro RNAs in Papio anubis induced with endometriosis for early detection of the disease. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(4): 305-327. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020015
    [9] Praveen Kumar Neela, Rajeshwari B.V, Mahamad Irfanulla Khan, Shahistha Parveen Dasnadi, Gosla Srinivas Reddy, Akhter Husain, Vasavi Mohan . Genetic influences on non-syndromic cleft lip palate: The impact of BMP4, RUNX2, PAX7, and TGFB3 allelic variations. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(4): 322-329. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024019
    [10] Irene M. Waita, Atunga Nyachieo, Daniel Chai, Samson Muuo, Naomi Maina, Daniel Kariuki, Cleophas M. Kyama . Genetic polymorphisms in eostrogen and progesterone receptor genes in Papio anubis induced with endometriosis during early stage of the disease. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(1): 86-97. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021007
  • Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is becoming a major problem for animal and human health. Reports of resistance to colistin, an antibiotic that is considered a last resort drug against resistant Gram-negative bacteria, have been increasing over the last years. Among the different mechanisms that cause AMR to colistin, the mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) gene has been reported as responsible for the increased incidence in animals and humans since 2015. There are ten recognized distinct variants of this gene in bacteria isolated from animals, humans, food, and the environment. Companion animals could have a role in human infection by pathogenic and resistant E. coli strains as they share the same environment and are in close contact with humans. Considering this, our aim was to investigate antimicrobial resistance in companion domestic and stray dogs in Western Macedonia, Greece. Our results revealed that of the 43 individual fecal samples examined, 16% of them hosted the mcr-1 gene, all of which were isolated from stray dogs. Our results suggested that companion dogs and stray dogs can serve as reservoirs for colistin-resistant E. coli strains.



    Colistin is an antimicrobial agent of the polymyxin antibiotic class, discovered in 1947 in Japan. It is produced by strains of the Gram-positive bacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa, known also as Bacillus polymyxa [1]. There are five, chemically distinct, polymixins belonging to this class: A, B, C, D, and E. Among them, only polymyxin B and polymyxin E (colistin) are used in clinical procedures [2]. Colistin has been used since the 1950s to treat often life-threatening human infections caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria, like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and other pathogens of the Enterobacteriaceae family, having an excellent bactericidal activity on various types of infections [3],[4]. There are two forms available for clinical use, colistin methanesulfonate sodium (CMS), for parenteral administration and colistin sulfate (CS), administered orally or in topical formulations [5],[6]. Moreover, colistin has been used extensively for years in veterinary medicine not only against Enterobacteriaceae infections but also as a growth promoter and as a protective agent in animal production [7],[8].

    Due to reported side effects, mostly nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, the clinical use of polymyxin antibiotics during the 1970s was significantly reduced and resulted in almost complete abandonment in the 1980s [9]. Over the last years, the incidence of resistant Gram-negative bacteria pathogens to available antimicrobial agents and the lack of new antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections have renewed interest in old antibiotics [10]. This emergence of MDR bacterial infections appeared as a result of excessive use of antibiotics in both human and animal medicine, posing a threat to healthcare systems worldwide [11]. Consequently, since the 1990s, polymyxin antibiotics, due to the restricted of possible alternatives and with an improved safety profile, have been considered as last-resort antibiotics, and although retracted in some countries, they have been re-emerged for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections [12],[13]. Even though αantimicrobial resistance (AMR) to colistin was considered rare or incidental, extensive use of colistin has led to increased reports of colistin resistance [14],[15]. AMR to colistin appears due to different mechanisms. The initial reports were about resistance due to chromosomal mutations. The fact that this form of chromosomal acquired resistance to colistin did not expand rapidly among bacterial populations, it has resulted in a restricted clinical impact and a minor public health concern [16]. However, in 2015, the first report in China of a plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene in E. coli that appeared to spread quickly among different bacterial populations was provided. The gene that was recognized as responsible for this resistance to colistin, was the mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) gene [17],[18].

    Ten distinct variants of the mcr gene (mcr 1-10) have been recognized in various bacteria isolated from humans, animals, food, and the environment [19]. Among mcr genes, mcr-1, which was the first one that was isolated, appears to be the most frequently detected in more than 60 countries worldwide [20]. Bacterial hosts of these genes, are mainly bacilli of the Enterobacteriaceae family, such as E. coli (mcr 1,2,3), Salmonella enterica (mcr 4,5,9), K. pneumoniae (mcr 7,8), Enterobacter cloacae complex (mcr-9), and Enterobacter roggenkampii (mcr-10), with the exception of the mcr-3 gene, which is frequently detected in Aeromonas spp., and mcr-6 gene, which is mainly detected in Moraxella spp. [21]. These genes code for transferases that alter the structure of the outer cell membrane of Gram-negative bacilli, a membrane that provides the microorganisms with additional protection, blocking antibiotics from accessing their target. This modification of the cell membrane is responsible for the development of colistin resistance [22],[23].

    E. coli, as the principal carrier of mcr genes, and, due to the ability to transfer easily between various host species, is of great importance for the transferable colistin resistance [24]. E. coli is one of the most common Gram-negative bacteria worldwide, being a principal microorganism of the gut microbiota of many animal hosts and humans [25]. However, despite the fact that most of the bacterial strains are commensal, there are strains that can cause intestinal or extra intestinal infections in humans, like infections of the urinary tract and the nervous system [26]. Intestinal pathogenic E. coli strains are classified into six pathotypes: Enteropathogenic (EPEC), enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC), enterotoxigenic (ETEC), enteroinvasive (EIEC), enteroaggregative (EAEC), and diffusely-adherent (DAEC) [27]. Extraintestinal pathogenic strains, on the other hand, are known under the name ExPEC [28]. Regarding phylogenetic classification of E. coli strains, there were initially four major groups: A, B1, B2, and D [29]. Additional groups have been added i.e., C, E, F, and G, along with one clade, I [30]. Among them, groups B2 and D are associated with the ExPEC strains and E, with the enterohemorrhagic Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157: H7 being probably the most common E. coli pathogenic strain that causes illness in humans [31],[32].

    Humans may be infected by various pathogenic and resistant E. coli strains from farm animals [33][35]. A particular role in this infection may be played by pets, specifically stray dogs that have been abandoned and can act as bridge vectors [36][38]. In line with the general increase in the number of dogs occurring in urban and peri-urban areas, an increased number of unsuitable owners who lack the ability or even desire to care for their pets is also observed [39],[40]. According to the 2023 annual report of the European pet food industry (FEDIAF), in Europe there are 340 million pet animals. Among them, the dog population is around 104 million. In Greece, there are 657.000 pet dogs, and 21% of households own at least one dog [41]. Close contact with companion animals and pet dogs, mostly due to poor or insufficient management of their waste, is considered a potential transmission route of resistant E. coli strains between them and humans [42],[43].

    For this reason, various actions take place for the control of stray dogs in different countries. One of the most common actions organized by the local authorities for the control of the stray dogs' populations is the Trapping-Neutering-Return (TNR) technique [44]. In Greece, there are few municipalities that implement programs for the management of stray dogs within their administrative boundaries (collection, electronic tagging, sterilization, efforts to adopt or return them to their natural environment), with expenses partially covered by the Ministry of Rural Development and Food (Official Government Gazette 5732/Β/28-12-2020/KYA2654/356295). Yet, hundreds of thousands of stray dogs are reported in several parts of the country, mostly accounting for the abandonment of domestic dogs [45], representing a major public health problem due to pathogen transmission [46].

    Hence, monitoring AMR in E. coli strains that come from companion animals is of great importance in the context of preventing further AMR development, an effort that has become a high priority worldwide [47]. However, to our best knowledge, there are no published data about resistant E coli strains in pet animals/dogs in Greece. With this in mind, we aim to investigate the antibiotic resistance in a rural area with a high number of farm animal facilities in Western Macedonia, Greece.

    Stray dogs (N = 24) were trapped in the Florina peri-urban area (Western Macedonia, Greece) in the frame of the TNR program organized by the Municipality of Florina and brought to the veterinary clinic. Feces from 19 companion domestic dogs were also added in the analysis with a signed license by their owners. For stray dogs, folding dog traps and hunting snare traps were set and placed in the semi-mountainous peripheral region of Florina, in close proximity to sheep farms. Trapped animals were kept in captivity for no more than 24 h, as traps were checked on a daily basis. Trappings and collections were performed throughout the year, except for January, when the temperature is very low. Moreover, samples were collected with the help of owners, who kindly provided the feces in plastic bags. All animal manipulations were performed in compliance with the Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes as well as with the Responsibilities of pet handlers (5-4039/2012) and approved by the Regular Meeting of the Municipal Council of Florina (Proceeding 30/24-10-2023).

    All isolates originated from the animals' natural intestinal flora, and for stray dogs, apart from the stress, were in good health. No antibiotic treatment had been administered in any of the dogs investigated.

    The ISO 16649-2:2001 method was applied for the culture of fecal samples in combination with indole and oxydase tests. Samples were embedded in Tryptone Bile X-glucuronide in agar (TBX; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), followed by incubation at 44 °C for 24 h or more; samples for E. coli were determined based on the blue or green coloration of the plate. Further, resistance to antibiotics applying the Kirby-Bauer agar Diffusion Method was carried out, and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin was determined for all isolates.

    DNA extraction was performed using the NucleoSpin Microbial DNA Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer's recommended protocol. The presence of two major mcr genes (mcr-1 and mcr-2) was investigated in the isolates of E. coli following the amplification procedures as described in Xexaki et al. [32]. Reactions were carried out using the FastGene Taq 2X Ready Mix (NIPPON Genetics, Europe), in total volumes of 20 µL, composed of 10 µL 2X Ready Mix, 0.6 pmol of each primer pair (mcr-1F - mcr-1R and mcr-2F - mcr-2R), and ultrapure water up to volume of 20 µL. The PCR conditions were 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 36 cycles for 30 sec at 95 °C, 40 sec at 55 °C, and 45 sec at 72 °C, with an additional final extension step for 5 min at 72 °C. Positive samples, successfully amplified after depiction in agarose gel electrophoresis, were sequenced in both directions in an ABI-Prism 3730XL automatic sequencer, and after alignment in the software MEGA version 7 [48], the validity of the sequences was confirmed in the BLAST tool of NCBI website.

    A chi square test (χ2) test was carried out to estimate the significant differences between the stray dogs and the companion ones concerning antibiotic resistance at the genetic level. The software version SPSS 22.0 was utilized for all performed tests.

    Ε. coli was identified in all fecal samples examined. No positive sample for either of the two genes was found in domestic companion dogs (Table 1). On the other hand, the mcr-1 gene was detected in seven stray dogs, supporting a statistically significant difference in stray dogs in contrast to domestic ones (Table 1). MIC test results were in total agreement with molecular analyses, inferring identical positivism rates, as shown in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Prevalence of mcr genes in the dogs investigated. The asterisk indicates statistical significance. Numerical values in parentheses indicate the % proportion of the gene.
    gene mcr-1 mcr-2
    Stray dogs 7 (29.2%)* 0
    Domestic dogs 0 0
    Total 7 (16.2%) 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    On a global scale, AMR is becoming one of the most urgent public health concerns, and though it is a natural phenomenon of the bacterial evolution process, it is largely facilitated by excessive antimicrobial drug use in humans and animals. Around 700.000 people die every year, and it is estimated that by 2050, 10 million people will die annually due to AMR infections [49],[50].

    In human medicine, antimicrobials are used to treat various infections, which, in many cases, save lives. These drugs are also used in animals (farm and companion animals). In animal production, they are used not only to treat infections but also to promote productivity. It has been estimated that, on a global scale, 73% of traded antimicrobials are used in farm animals [51],[52]. On the other hand, the treatment of companion animals with antimicrobial drugs, including those that are also licensed for use in human medicine, is often excessive and frequently occurs without proper bacterial identification and susceptibility testing [53][55].

    Among drug-resistant pathogens, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized Gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae, as high priority AMR pathogens [56]. The WHO has also pointed out that E. coli constitutes a representative indicator of AMR since it harbors several resistance genes [50]. Furthermore, a major public health concern is the ability of E. coli to acquire and transfer resistant genes to other pathogens that share the same environment [57]. This raises the possibility of transmissions of resistant E. coli strains between animals and humans through various pathways, such as direct contact, contact with animal feces, or food consumption [57],[58].

    Until the end of 2015, the mechanisms related to the development of colistin resistance, without any proof for horizontal transfer, were the chromosomal mutations [59]. In 2016, the first report of a colistin resistance mechanism due to the plasmid-mediated mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1) gene in E. coli strains in China was provided [8]. After its initial isolation in E. coli strains from food-producing animals, raw meat, and humans [17], the mcr-1 gene spread to various countries worldwide and has been isolated since in different bacteria, mainly from in Enterobacteriaceae family, from people, wild and domestic animals, meat, vegetables, river water, and sewage. The mcr-1 gene is known to provide adequate resistance against colistin and can spread rapidly by horizontal transfer, constituting a serious public health problem [60]. Companion animals (dogs and cats) have been gaining interest as a potential reservoir and a transmission pathway of resistance to humans, as the close contact between them and humans and the home environment favors transmission [61]. Moreover, these animals harbor bacteria resistant to most of the commonly used antibiotics in veterinary medicine and require the use of polymyxins for treatment, including hospital-associated pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius, vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE), and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae [61],[62].

    As for the mcr-1 gene being more predominant in animals than humans, it shows a high potential for zoonotic transmission [59]. However, knowledge is limited concerning the extent this transmission occurs and the associated risk factors and transmission routes among companion animals and humans [63]. However, there are a few studies providing relative data on the epidemiology of the mcr-1 gene in companion animals. Detection of mcr-1 genes from these animals has been reported in China, where Zhang et al. [54] suggested that mcr-1 positive E. coli strains can be transferred between companion animals and humans. In another study conducted in China, Lei et al. (2017) reported the presence of the mcr-1 gene in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and Enterobacter aerogenes strains isolated from companion animals and proposed that there was a possibility of transmission Enterobacteriaceae strains carrying this gene between companion animals and humans, posing a potential risk to public health [64]. In Ecuador, Loayza et al. [24] demonstrated the presence of the mcr-1 gene in E. coli from companion animals. Moreover, these animals were sharing the same environment with a child diagnosed with a peritoneal infection by mcr-1- positive E. coli strains, a fact that led to the suggestion of a potential dissemination of the mcr-1 gene in E. coli strains from different animals. In a study in Brazil, Kobs et al. [65] identified mcr-1 positive isolates of E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter spp. from companion animals, proposing potential dissemination of resistance to polymyxins to the environment and humans.

    In this study, we assessed the frequency of mcr-1 positive E. coli strains in dogs from a rural area in Greece. These dogs were presented to a veterinary clinic in the city of Florina for the performance of a routine surgical procedure (ovariohysterectomy/castration) under a dog population management program that takes place annually. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of mcr-1 gene positive E. coli strains in dogs in Greece. So far, the presence of the mcr-1 gene in E. coli strains has been reported in farmed broilers and laying hens in Greece [32].

    Our results revealed that of the 43 samples examined, 16% of them were hosting the mcr-1 gene, all of which were isolated from stray dogs. Of the 43 dogs, 19 were owned and 24 were stray/feral dogs. Interestingly, all the mcr-1 positive E. coli strains were found in the fecal samples collected from stray dogs. Stray dogs usually freely roam in a wide range of several kilometers searching for food, having a notable impact on public health, wild, and livestock animals [66]. The stray dogs mostly feed on wastes (human food and animal carcasses) and household scraps and they hunt wild and domestic animals, like rabbits and sheep [67]. It must be noted that more than 70% of all dog populations on a global scale are categorized as stray or free-ranging, and a considerable number of these dogs were previous owned dogs that were abandoned by their owners [67],[68]. Apart from that, pet owned dogs in many cases consume commercial dog food, and as it has been shown in studies that dogs consuming commercial food have a lower prevalence of mcr-1 positive E. coli strains compared to dogs that consume home-made food [69]. Moreover, most mcr-1 positive E. coli strains are found in livestock animals' fecal samples, mainly pigs and broiler chickens [8],[70]. In contrast with stray dogs, owned dogs potentially have minimal or no contact with these animals [64], and it has been suggested in previous research that farm animals are the source of mcr genes in sick pet dogs that had not received previous colistin treatment [21],[59]. In addition, a fact that must been taken under consideration is that manure from these farm animals should be considered a possible source of antibiotic residues or mcr-1 positive E. coli strains, contributing thus to their potential environmental dissemination [70]. In Florina, there are no reports of mcr-1 positive E. coli isolates. Interestingly though, in a previous research study conducted in poultry farms from various areas of Greece, the mcr-1 gene was found in broilers' E. coli strains originating from the Regions of Epirus and Central Macedonia [32]. These geographical areas are adjacent to the Region of Western Macedonia, where Florina is located. In that way, stray dogs can potentially participate in the dissemination of various diseases to other animals or humans by fecal shedding of pathogens and environmental contamination (soil or water), acting as reservoirs for several zoonotic pathogens and for mcr-1 positive E. coli strains [69]. Thus, stray dogs can be considered a potential reservoir and source of colistin-resistant bacteria, with the risk of their spreading to humans being facilitated through their feces [71]. In addition, as the mcr-1 gene can spread quickly through horizontal transfer, and as E. coli has been classified by the WHO among the bacteria species that can be responsible for human health crises with an increasing antimicrobial resistance, the importance of colistin resistance in stray dogs is becoming a problem with serious public health implications [60],[72].

    It should be noted that our study was conducted in a geographical region exploring only dogs, which constitutes a limitation. Moreover, no phenotypic resistance tests for other antibiotics were performed on bacteria. Nevertheless, it can be inferred that living in the same environment and consuming similar food has an impact on both human and dog gut microbiome to a greater extent from cases when dogs feed on commercial food, suggesting that the presence of mcr-1 positive bacteria has an increased possibility of dissemination among dogs and humans [73]. This fact combined with the roaming and feeding patterns of stray dogs could be a possible explanation of our results. In addition, the surgical procedure of ovariohysterectomy/castration in dogs can potentially have a cofounding effect, as hormonal and behavior changes due to this procedure can potentially influence colonization of mcr-1 positive bacteria and have a general impact on the composition and diversity of dog's gut microbiota [73]. It is proposed that more extensive studies would be beneficial, with the addition of more geographical areas of the country and other companion animals (cats, rabbits etc.), as well as humans interacting in the same environment with these animals to more comprehensively explore this issue.

    AMR is becoming a worldwide emerging problem for animal and public health, mainly due to the wrong and extensive use of antibiotics in both food and companion animals. This phenomenon has also resulted in the selection and transmission of resistant bacteria among animals or animals and humans. Resistance to colistin in the past was not considered a serious problem until reports of the plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene in E. coli strains emerged, a gene that shows that it can spread rapidly among bacterial populations. The existence in the same environment and the close contact of companion animals with humans could provide favorable conditions for such transmissions. Our results suggest that companion dogs and stray dogs can serve as reservoirs for colistin-resistant E. coli strains, possibly due to their roaming and feeding pattens, among others, causing the epidemiology of the mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) gene to be more complex. Providing this data, for the first time in Greece, we emphasize that additional research on this topic is necessary.



    Author contributions



    Conceptual idea: A. Parisi; E. Petridou; I. A. Giantsis; Sample collection: A. Parisi; M. V. Alvanou; Data analysis and interpretation: I. Tsakmakidis; D. K. Papadopoulos; K. Papageorgiou; Writing and editing: I. Tsakmakidis; M. V. Alvanou; K. Papageorgiou; E. Petridou, I. A. Giantsis.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Brink AJ, Richards GA, Colombo G, et al. (2014) Multicomponent antibiotic substances produced by fermentation: Implications for regulatory authorities, critically ill patients and generics. Int J Antimicrob Ag 43: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.06.013
    [2] Poirel L, Jayol A, Nordmann P (2017) Polymyxins: Antibacterial activity, susceptibility testing, and resistance mechanisms encoded by plasmids or chromosomes. Clin Microbiol Rev 30: 557-596. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00064-16
    [3] Kaye KSK, Pogue JMP, Tran TB, et al. (2016) Agents of last resort: Polymyxin resistance. Infect Dis Clin N Am 30: 391-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.005
    [4] Mohapatra SS, Dwibedy SK, Padhy I (2021) Polymyxins, the last-resort antibiotics: Mode of action, resistance emergence, and potential solutions. J Biosci 46: 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-021-00209-8
    [5] Andrade FF, Silva D, Rodrigues A, et al. (2020) Colistin update on its mechanism of action and resistance, present and future challenges. Microorganisms 8: 1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111716
    [6] Li B, Yin F, Zhao X, et al. (2020) Colistin resistance gene mcr-1 mediates cell permeability and resistance to hydrophobic antibiotics. Front Microbiol 10: 3015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03015
    [7] Rhouma M, Beaudry F, Letellier A (2016) Resistance to colistin: What is the fate for this antibiotic in pig production?. Int J Antimicrob Agents 48: 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.008
    [8] Gharaibeh MH, Shatnawi SQ (2019) An overview of colistin resistance, mobilized colistin resistance genes dissemination, global responses, and the alternatives to colistin: A review. Vet World 12: 1735-1746. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1735-1746
    [9] El-Sayed Ahmed MAE, Zhong LL, Shen C, et al. (2020) Colistin and its role in the Era of antibiotic resistance: An extended review (2000–2019). Emerg Microbes Infect 9: 868-885. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1754133
    [10] Gurjar M (2015) Colistin for lung infection: An update. J Intensive Care 3: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-015-0072-9
    [11] Abd El-Baky RM, Masoud SM, Mohamed DS, et al. (2020) Prevalence and some possible mechanisms of colistin resistance among multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Drug Resist 2020: 323-332. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S238811
    [12] Falagas ME, Rafailidis PI, Matthaiou DK (2010) Resistance to polymyxins: Mechanisms, frequency and treatment options. Drug Resist Update 13: 132-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2010.05.002
    [13] Kempf I, Jouy E, Chauvin C (2016) Colistin use and colistin resistance in bacteria from animals. Int J Antimicrob Ag 48: 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.09.016
    [14] Osei Sekyere J, Govinden U, Bester LA, et al. (2016) Colistin and tigecycline resistance in carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria: Emerging resistance mechanisms and detection methods. J Appl Microbiol 121: 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13169
    [15] Son SJ, Huang R, Squire CJ, et al. (2019) MCR-1: A promising target for structure-based design of inhibitors to tackle polymyxin resistance. Drug Discov Today 24: 206-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.07.004
    [16] MacNair CR, Stokes JM, Carfrae LA, et al. (2018) Overcoming mcr-1 mediated colistin resistance with colistin in combination with other antibiotics. Nat Commun 9: 458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02875-z
    [17] Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, et al. (2016) Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis 16: 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7
    [18] Hamame A, Davoust B, Hasnaoui B, et al. (2022) Screening of colistin-resistant bacteria in livestock animals from France. Vet Res 53: 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-022-01113-1
    [19] Hussein NH, Al-Kadmy IMS, Taha BM, et al. (2021) Mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes from 1 to 10: A comprehensive review. Mol Biol Rep 48: 2897-2907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06307-y
    [20] Ling Z, Yin W, Shen Z, et al. (2020) Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-9. J Antimicrob Chemoth 75: 3087-3095. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa205
    [21] Liu JH, Liu YY, Shen YB, et al. (2024) Plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance genes: mcr. Trends Microbiol 32: 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2023.10.006
    [22] Schwarz S, Johnson AP (2016) Transferable resistance to colistin: A new but old threat. J Antimicrob Chemoth 71: 2066-2070. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw274
    [23] El Ouazzani ZEB, Benaicha H, Reklaoui L, et al. (2024) First detection of colistin resistance encoding gene mcr-1 in clinical enterobacteriaceae isolates in Morocco. Iran J Med Microbiol 18: 33-40. https://doi.org/10.30699/ijmm.18.1.33
    [24] Loayza-Villa F, Salinas L, Tijet N, et al. (2020) Diverse Escherichia coli lineages from domestic animals carrying colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in an Ecuadorian household. J Glob Antimicrob Re 22: 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2019.12.002
    [25] Pormohammad A, Nasiri MJ, Azimi T (2019) Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli strains simultaneously isolated from humans, animals, food, and the environment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Drug Resist 12: 1181-1197. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S201324
    [26] Khairy RM, Mohamed ES, Abdel Ghany HM, et al. (2019) Phylogenic classification and virulence genes profiles of uropathogenic E. coli and diarrhegenic E. coli strains isolated from community acquired infections. Plos One 14: e0222441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222441
    [27] Aguirre-Sánchez JR, Valdez-Torres JB, Del Campo NC, et al. (2022) Phylogenetic group and virulence profile classification in Escherichia coli from distinct isolation sources in Mexico. Infect Genet Evol 106: 105380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105380
    [28] Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HLT (2004) Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro818
    [29] Chakraborty A, Saralaya V, Adhikari P, et al. (2015) Characterization of Escherichia coli phylogenetic groups associated with extraintestinal infections in south indian oopulation. Ann Med Health Sci Res 5: 241-246. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.160192
    [30] Lemlem M, Aklilu E, Mohamed M, et al. (2023) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of colistin-resistant Escherichia Coli with mcr-4, mcr-5, mcr-6, and mcr-9 genes from broiler chicken and farm environment. BMC Microbiol 23: 392. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-03118-y
    [31] Lim JY, Yoon JW, Hovde CJ (2010) A brief overview of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and its plasmid O157. (2010). J Microbiol Biotechnol 20: 5-14. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.0908.08007
    [32] Xexaki A, Papadopoulos DK, Alvanou MV, et al. (2023) Prevalence of antibiotic resistant E. coli strains isolated from farmed broilers and hens in Greece, based on phenotypic and molecular analyses. Sustainability 15: 9421. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129421
    [33] Bélanger L, Garenaux A, Harel J, et al. (2011) Escherichia coli from animal reservoirs as a potential source of human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli. FEMS Immunol Med Mic 62: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00797.x
    [34] Persad AK, LeJeune JT (2014) Animal reservoirs of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr 2: EHEC-0027-2014. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.EHEC-0027-2014
    [35] Mulder AC, van de Kassteele J, Heederik D, et al. (2020) Spatial effects of livestock farming on human infections with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in small but densely populated regions: The case of the Netherlands. GeoHealth 4: e2020GH000276. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000276
    [36] Marchetti L, Buldain D, Castillo LC, et al. (2021) Pet and stray dogs as reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli. Int J Microbiol 2021: 6664557. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6664557
    [37] Hata A, Fujitani N, Ono F, et al. (2022) Surveillance of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in Sheltered dogs in the Kanto Region of Japan. Sci Rep 12: 773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04435-w
    [38] Sun L, Meng N, Wang Z, et al. (2022) Genomic characterization of ESBL/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in stray dogs sheltered in Yangzhou, China. Infect Drug Resist 15: 7741-7750. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S397872
    [39] Powell L, Reinhard C, Satriale D, et al. (2021) Characterizing unsuccessful animal adoptions: Age and breed predict the likelihood of return, reasons for return and post-return outcomes. Sci Rep 11: 8018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87649-2
    [40] Guenther KM (2023) Understanding the durable myth of the “Irresponsible Pet Owner”. Contexts 22: 32-37.
    [41] FEDIAFAnnual-report: Facts and figures 2022 (2023). https://europeanpetfood.comingsoon.site/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/FEDIAF_Annual-Report_2023_Facts-Figures.pdf
    [42] Albán MV, Núñez EJ, Zurita J, et al. (2020) Canines with different pathologies as carriers of diverse lineages of Escherichia coli harbouring mcr-1 and clinically relevant β-lactamases in central Ecuador. J Glob Antimicrob Re 22: 182-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.05.017
    [43] Zheng HH, Yu C, Tang XY, et al. (2023) Isolation, identification and antimicrobial resistance analysis of canine oral and intestinal Escherichia coli resistant to colistin. Int J Mol. Sci 24: 13428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713428
    [44] Dalla Villa P, Kahn S, Stuardo L, et al. (2010) Free-roaming dog control among OIE-member countries. Prev Vet Med 97: 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.001
    [45] Zorgios.The problem of the increase of stray dogs in Marathonas (in Greek). Official Government Gazette 5732/Β/28-12-2020/KYA2654/356295 (2020) .
    [46] Giantsis IA, Beleri S, Balatsos G, et al. (2021) Sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) population dynamics and natural Leishmania infections in Attica region, Greece. J Med Entomol 58: 480-485. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa158
    [47] Tong YC, Zhang YN, Li PC, et al. (2023) Detection of antibiotic-resistant canine origin Escherichia coli and the synergistic effect of magnolol in reducing the resistance of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Front Vet Sci 10: 1104812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1104812
    [48] Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33: 1870-1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
    [49] O'Neill J (2016) Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations. The review on antimicrobial resistance . Available from: https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf
    [50] Lencina FA, Bertona M, Stegmayer MA, et al. (2024) Prevalence of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli in foods and food-producing animals through the food chain: A worldwide systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 10: e26579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26579
    [51] Tiseo K, Huber L, Gilbert M, et al. (2020) Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics 9: 918. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120918
    [52] Zhao C, Wang Y, Mulchandani R, et al. (2024) Global surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in food animals using priority drugs maps. Nat Commun 15: 763. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45111-7
    [53] Sterneberg-van der Maaten T, Turner D, Van Tilburg J, et al. (2016) Benefits and risks for people and livestock of keeping companion animals: Searching for a healthy balance. J Comp Pathol 155: S8-S17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2015.06.007
    [54] Zhang XF, Doi Y, Huang X, et al. (2016) Possible transmission of mcr-1-Harboring Escherichia coli between companion animals and human. Emerg Infect Dis 22: 1679-1681. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2209.160464
    [55] Bhat AH (2021) Bacterial zoonoses transmitted by household pets and as reservoirs of antimicrobial resistant bacteria. Microb Pathogenesis 155: 104891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104891
    [56] Humphrey M, Larrouy-Maumus GJ, Furniss RCD, et al. (2021) Colistin resistance in Escherichia coli confers protection of the cytoplasmic but not outer membrane from the polymyxin antibiotic. Microbiology 167: 001104. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001104
    [57] Poirel L, Madec J, Lupo A, et al. (2018) Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectrum 6: ARBA-0026-2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.arba-0026-2017
    [58] Puvača N, de Llanos Frutos R (2021) Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from humans and pet animals. Antibiotics 10: 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010069
    [59] Hamame A, Davoust B, Cherak Z, et al. (2022) Mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes in cats and dogs and their zoonotic transmission risks. Pathogens 11: 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11060698
    [60] Menezes J, Moreira da Silva J, Frosini SM, et al. (2022) mcr-1 colistin resistance gene sharing between Escherichia coli from cohabiting dogs and humans, Lisbon, Portugal, 2018 to 2020. Euro Surveill 27: 2101144. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.44.2101144
    [61] Caneschi A, Bardhi A, Barbarossa A, et al. (2023) The use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine, a complex phenomenon: A narrative review. Antibiotics 12: 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030487
    [62] Pomba C, Rantala M, Greko C, et al. (2017) Public health risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer from companion animals. J Antimicrob Chemoth 72: 957-968. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw481
    [63] Joosten P, Ceccarelli D, Odent E, et al. (2020) Antimicrobial usage and resistance in companion animals: A cross-sectional study in Three European Countries. Antibiotics 9: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9020087
    [64] Lei L, Wang Y, Schwarz S, et al. (2017) mcr-1 in Enterobacteriaceae from Companion Animals, Beijing, China, 2012-2016. Emerg Infect Dis 23: 710-711. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2304.161732
    [65] Kobs VC, Valdez RE, de Medeiros F, et al. (2020) mcr-1-carrying Enterobacteriaceae isolated from companion animals in Brazil. Pesq Vet Bras 40: 690-695. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6635
    [66] Smith LM, Quinnell RJ, Goold C, et al. (2022) Assessing the impact of free-roaming dog population management through systems modelling. Sci Rep 12: 11452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15049-1
    [67] Dănilă G, Simioniuc V, Duduman ML (2023) Research on the Ethology and diet of the stray dog population in the areas bordering the municipality of Suceava, Romania. Vet Sci 10: 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10030188
    [68] Abdulkarim A, Bin Goriman Khan MAK, Aklilu E (2021) Stray animal population control: methods, public health concern, ethics, and animal welfare issues. World's Vet J 11: 319-326. https://doi.org/10.54203/scil.2021.wvj44
    [69] Lei L, Wang Y, He J, et al. (2021) Prevalence and risk analysis of mobile colistin resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes carriage in pet dogs and their owners: a population based cross-sectional study. Emerg Microbes Infect 10: 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.1882884
    [70] Lima T, Loureiro D, Henriques A, et al. (2022) Occurrence and biological cost of mcr-1-carrying plasmids co-harbouring beta-lactamase resistance genes in zoonotic pathogens from intensive animal production. Antibiotics 11: 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101356
    [71] Ortega-Paredes D, Haro M, Leoro-Garzón P, et al. (2019) Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from canine faeces in a public park in Quito, Ecuador. J Glob Antimicrob Re 18: 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2019.04.002
    [72] Buranasinsup S, Wiratsudakul A, Chantong B, et al. (2023) Prevalence and characterization of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from veterinary staff, pets, and pet owners in Thailand. J Infect Public Health 16: 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.11.006
    [73] Gill GS, Singh BB, Dhand NK, et al. (2022) Stray dogs and public health: Population estimation in Punjab, India. Vet Sci 9: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9020075
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Manel MERRADI, Fatma Zohra CHEBAANI, Nouzha HELEILI, Maria V. ALVANOU, A. Ioannis GIANTSIS, Plasmid mediated colistin resistance in ESBL producing Enterobacterales based on both phenotypic and molecular analysis in companion and farm animals from Algeria, 2025, 01479571, 102342, 10.1016/j.cimid.2025.102342
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(878) PDF downloads(44) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog