Citation: Jacob Fosso-Tande, Cody Black, Stephen G. Aller, Lanyuan Lu, Ronald D. Hills Jr. Simulation of lipid-protein interactions with the CgProt force field[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(3): 352-369. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.3.352
[1] | Mohamed Lokman Jalaluddin, Umar Al-Amani Azlan, Mohd Warikh Abd Rashid, Norfauzi Tamin . Effect of sintering temperatures on the physical, structural properties and microstructure of mullite-based ceramics. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(2): 243-255. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024014 |
[2] | Marek Konieczny . Mechanical properties and wear characterization of Al-Mg composites synthesized at different temperatures. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(2): 309-322. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024017 |
[3] | Mohamed Lokman Jalaluddin, Umar Al-Amani Azlan, Mohd Warikh Abd Rashid . A preliminary study of porous ceramics with carbon black contents. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 741-754. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023041 |
[4] | Didar Yeskermessov, Bauyrzhan Rakhadilov, Laila Zhurerova, Akbota Apsezhanova, Zarina Aringozhina, Matthew Booth, Yerkezhan Tabiyeva . Surface modification of coatings based on Ni-Cr-Al by pulsed plasma treatment. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 755-766. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023042 |
[5] | Yernat Kozhakhmetov, Mazhyn Skakov, Wojciech Wieleba, Kurbanbekov Sherzod, Nuriya Mukhamedova . Evolution of intermetallic compounds in Ti-Al-Nb system by the action of mechanoactivation and spark plasma sintering. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(2): 182-191. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.2.182 |
[6] | Bauyrzhan Rakhadilov, Rinat Kussainov, Aisulu Kalitova, Zarina Satbayeva, Aibek Shynarbek . The impact of technological parameters of electrolytic-plasma treatment on the changes in the mechano-tribological properties of steel 45. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(4): 666-683. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024034 |
[7] | Tim Slawik, Anne Günther, Tassilo Moritz, Alexander Michaelis . Co-Sintering behaviour of zirconia-ferritic steel composites. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 1160-1176. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.1160 |
[8] | Marcin Kargul, Marek Konieczny . Copper matrix composites reinforced with steel particles. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(3): 321-342. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021021 |
[9] | Bauyrzhan Rakhadilov, Lyaila Bayatanova, Sherzod Kurbanbekov, Ravil Sulyubayev, Nurdaulet Shektibayev, Nurbol Berdimuratov . Investigation on the effect of technological parameters of electrolyte-plasma cementation method on phase structure and mechanical properties of structural steel 20X. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 934-947. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023050 |
[10] | Giovanni Di Girolamo, Alida Brentari, Emanuele Serra . Some recent findings on the use of SEM-EDS in microstructural characterisation of as-sprayed and thermally aged porous coatings: a short review. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 404-424. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.404 |
Timely and accurate information on crop yields and production at global, national, and regional scales is extremely important for many agriculture applications [1]. At national/regional scale, it can be an input to local authorities to make decisions on food security issues or deciding on subsidies in case of extreme weather conditions such as droughts. At field scale, spatial variability of yields can help to obtain objective information, for example, for farmers to improve management practices and identify yield gaps [2], or for insurance companies to feed this information into insurance models [3,4].
Owing to its coverage, temporal and spatial resolution, remote sensing images from space has always been a powerful tool to develop empirical models for predicting and assessing yields at regional and national scales [5,6,7,8,9,10,11], or assimilating biophysical parameters into crop growth models [12,13,14]. In particular, coarse resolution sensors, e.g. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), SPOT-VEGETATION, thanks to its daily coverage and availability of historical datasets dating back to 1980s–1990s, have extensively been used for building empirical models for crop yield forecasting and assessment. These models connect satellite-derived features, for example vegetation indices (VIs) such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Vegetation Health Index (VHI) and/or biophysical parameters such as Leaf Area Index (LAI), Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR), with reference yield data. For example, Johnson (2016) [5] analyzed efficiency of multiple MODIS land products including NDVI, EVI, LAI, FPAR, and Gross Primary Production (GPP) to assess crop yield at county level in US for ten major agriculture commodities. He found positive correlations of vegetation products against yield for all crops, except rice, and that finer spatial resolution improved the correlations. López-Lozano et al. (2015) [6] investigated the use of the Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (fAPAR) derived from SPOT-VEGETATION at 1 km spatial resolution to assess crop yields (wheat, barley and maize) at province level in Europe. They found high correlations (R2 > 0.6) in water-stressed regions; however, lower correlations (R2 < 0.5) were observed for regions with high yields. Salazar et al. (2007) applied AVHRR-derived VHI to estimate winter wheat yield in Kansas, US, and found high correlations with official statistics for 1982–2004. NDVI, as well as biophysical parameters LAI and fAPAR, also proved to be efficient in predicting winter wheat yields at different scales in Ukraine [15]. In order to overcome some limitations of empirical models in terms of robustness, Becker-Reshef et al. [10] developed a generalized winter wheat yield forecasting model that was calibrated for one region (Kansas, US) and successfully applied for another one (Ukraine) to provide an error of less than 10% that can be suitable for operational context. Adding meteorological data, in particular temperature, has usually had a positive effect on crop yield models reducing the error and improving timeliness [5,6,7]. Though these models are empirical and based on relative simple equations, they perform at the same level, or even better, than more comprehensive crop models that are based on crop growth simulations [8,16]. The reasons for that are: complexity of accounting multiple factors influencing the yield, lack of high-quality data required to calibrate and run such models, and difficulties of upscaling "point" estimates to higher spatial scale [17].
The use of Landsat and Landsat-like 30 m data for crop yield forecasting and assessment has been limited due to its infrequent revisit rate of only 16 days. There have been works fusing Landsat with higher temporal frequency, but spatially coarser, MODIS sensor [18,19], or combining Landsat with biophysical models [20,21]. For example, Lobell et al. (2015) proposed a scalable satellite-based crop yield mapper (SCYM) that is based on training a statistical model from crop simulations and applying the statistical model to Landsat-5/7 images and meteorological data [21]. They achieved on average R2 values of 0.35 and 0.32 for corn and soybeans, respectively, for the large areas in the Midwestern United States. However, these approaches showed varying results in terms of errors and still have limitations constrained by lower frequency of moderate resolution images. With the combined use of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 remote sensing satellites that will enable acquisition of an image every 3–5 days globally, it becomes possible to implement approaches similar to those used for MODIS/AVHRR to develop next generation agriculture products at higher spatial resolution (30 m).
This paper presents one of the first studies to combine Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A imagery for crop yield mapping by downscaling a generalized empirical model developed for MODIS data [7,10]. The model is based on capturing the peak NDVI to correlate with the yield, and growing degree days (GDD) to improve the timeliness of the model. Therefore, the main objectives of the study are: (ⅰ) to assess performance of downscaling the generalized NDVI–based empirical model for winter wheat yield forecasting from coarse spatial resolution to moderate one at 30 m; (ⅱ) to explore the combined use of images acquired by Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A remote sensing satellites for winter crop mapping and winter wheat yield assessment at regional level.
The study was performed for Kirohohradska oblast in Ukraine for 2016 (Figure 1). Ukraine is a top 10 wheat producer in the world. An oblast is a high-level administrative division of the country (there are 24 oblasts in Ukraine and Autonomous Republic of Crimea), and each oblast is further divided into districts. Kirovhradska oblast is located in the central part of Ukraine and composed of 21 districts with geographical area ranging from 65 to 165 thousand ha and cropland area ranging from 27 to 112 thousand ha. The reason for selecting this region is that it is a top 10 wheat producer in Ukraine and because of availability of reference crop yield and harvested area data at district scale for 2016. Winter wheat is one of the major crops in Kirovhradska oblast accounting for 20% of production of all crops in the region. Winter wheat is mainly rain-fed in the region and usually planted in September-October. After dormancy during the winter, it re-emerges early spring reaching maturity by the end of June. Harvest of winter crops is typically undertaken in July.
Reference data on crop yield and harvested area at district level were collected from the Department of Agro-Industry Development of Kirovohrad State Administration (http://apk.kr-admin.gov.ua). The data were made available online as the harvest progressed and were based on farm surveys of all agricultural enterprises (that account of more than 90% of all winter crops production in the region) and samples of household farms the same way as official statistics is collected [22]. The number of samples for surveying small household farms is selected in such a way to target a coefficient of variation of 10%. The final estimates for winter crop yields and areas were available at the end of November and were used as reference in this study. Uncertainty of reference data should not exceed 10% [23].
Remote sensing images acquired by the Operational Land Imager (OLI) instrument aboard Landsat-8 satellite and by the Multi-Spectral Instrument (MSI) aboard Sentinel-2A satellite were used in the study. Landsat-8/OLI captures images of the Earth's surface in 9 spectral bands at 30 m spatial resolution (15 m for panchromatic band) [24] while Sentinel-2A/MSI captures images of the Earth's surface in 13 spectral bands at 10 m, 20 m and 60 m spatial resolution [25]. The main bands that were used in the study are bands 4 (Red) and 5 (NIR) from Landsat-8, and bands 4 (Red) and 8A (NIR) from Sentinel-2A. Band 8A from Sentinel-2A was selected instead of band 8 since spectral response function for band 8A is similar to the Landsat-8's band 5 (Figure 2).
Overall, 51 Landsat-8 and 87 Sentinel-2A scenes were acquired over the study area from March 1, 2016 to July, 31, 2016. Landsat-8 images were downloaded from the USGS's Earth Explorer (Pre-Collection Level 1) and Sentinel-2A images were downloaded from the Copernicus Open Access Hub (SciHub) with baseline processing version ranging from 02.01 to 02.04. Landsat-8 scenes covered the following coordinates (path/row) of the World-wide Reference System (WRS-2): 178/026, 179/026, 179/027, 180/026, 180/027, and 181/026. The tile size of Landsat-8 is approximately 185 km × 180 km. Sentinel-2A scenes covered the following tiles: 35UQQ, 35UQP, 36UUV, 36UUU, 36UVV, 36UVU, 36UWV, and 36UWU. The size of the Sentinel-2A tile is approximately 110 km × 110 km (Figure 3). Dates of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A acquisitions are given in Appendix A.
The Landsat-8/OLI and Sentinel-2A/MSI scenes were atmospherically corrected for surface reflectance using the LaSRC algorithm [26] (Figure 4 and Figure 5) ensuring consistency between these datasets as well as with MODIS data used for building a generalized crop yield model [10,28]. Figure 4 shows an example of true and false color compositions of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A acquired on the same date. A quantitative analysis with performance metrics is presented in Figure 5. On the y-axis, the figure shows NDVI, NIR and red values from Landsat-8 images (used as a reference) with accuracy, precision and uncertainty (Eq. 2–4) being calculated between Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 for each bin.
Cloud and shadow screening for Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A scenes was performed using the Fmask algorithm [27] and inversion residuals from aerosol optical thickness (AOT) estimation [26] (Figure 6). The pixels identified as those with high aerosol content were also masked out. Images from Sentinel-2A/MSI were further converted to 30 m to match spatial resolution of Landsat-8/OLI. Since atmospheric correction for Sentinel-2A was performed at 10 m spatial resolution for all spectral bands, conversion to 30 m was carried out by aggregation (averaging).
It was found that Landsat-8/OLI and Sentinel-2A/MSI exhibit misregistration issues [29]; therefore, additional co-registration was performed to ensure spatial consistency between the datasets [30]. Finally, NDVI was calculated for Landsat-8 scenes using band 5 (near-infra red-NIR) and band 4 (red), and for Sentinel-2A scenes using band 8A (NIR) and band 4 (red) using the following equation [31]: NDVI = (NIR-Red)/(NIR + Red).
We used air temperature derived from the NASA's Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA2) reanalysis data set [32] to compute growing degree days (GDD) for winter wheat. The data are provided on a regular grid that has 576 points in the longitudinal direction and 361 points in the latitudinal direction, corresponding to a resolution of 0.625 × 0.5. We used the time-averaged, two-dimensional data collection (M2SDNXSLV), to extract daily averaged 2-meter air temperature (T2MMEAN). The data sets were extracted from the netCDF format, transformed to the geo-referenced raster, subset for study areas and linearly interpolated to the Landsat 30 m spatial resolution.
Winter wheat yield mapping and assessment at regional scale consists of the two major steps: (ⅰ) winter crop mapping; (ⅱ) yield assessment at 30 m spatial resolution. Figure 7 illustrates all processing steps along with the input datasets. These steps are described in detail in the following sub-sections.
For winter crop mapping, we adopted a previously developed approach for MODIS [33] that allows automatic mapping of winter crops using a priori knowledge on crop calendar and without using reference (ground truth) data. The method is based on per-pixel estimation of the peak NDVI (hereafter referred as the metric) during early spring (or early fall depending on the Earth hemisphere), when winter crops have developed biomass, while other crops (spring and summer) have no biomass in that time period. The calculated metric will have high NDVI values for winter crops and low NDVI values for other crops (Figure 8). Then, the metric is fitted using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) [34] to automatically discriminate different crop types (winter versus others). The GMM is a linear combination of Gaussian distributions that can model any continuous distribution:
p(x)=∑Kk=1πkN(x|μk,∑k), | (1) |
where each Gaussian density N(x|μk,∑k) is called a component of the mixture and has its own mean μk and covariance ∑k; parameters πk are weight (mixing) coefficients with ∑Kk=1πk=1.
Parameters of the GMM model are estimated using an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm that is run for all pixels identified as cropland. In our study, we used a cropland layer derived from the land cover map generated for Ukraine at 30 m spatial resolution [35]. The constraint to utilize cropland pixels only comes from potential confusion with grassland, hay, bulrush that might also have already developed biomass within the indicated time period. The component with the largest mean, i.e. NDVI value, in the obtained GMM model is considered to belong to the winter crop class (Figure 8). Finally, the derived GMM model is applied to all cropland pixels, and a posteriori probability (Eq. 1) of the pixel belonging to the winter crop class is estimated in the final resulting map. Pixels, with the probability larger than 0.5, are considered as winter crops.
Peak NDVI estimated on a per-pixel basis from a stack of Landsat-8/OLI and Sentinel-2A/MSI images from March to June was selected as a primary parameter for assessing winter wheat yield. In multiple studies, the seasonal peak NDVI has been shown to be strongly correlated with yields for a variety of crop types [5,8,9,10]. Since there are no available historical data for combination of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A images to correlate with yield measurements and build a crop yield model at district scale, we used a MODIS-derived winter wheat yield model that was calibrated for US and directly applied for Ukraine [7,10]. More specifically, the model takes advantage of daily MODIS data at Climate Modeling Grid (CMG) scale at 0.05 resolution to capture an NDVI peak and correlate with the yield. However, since proportions of winter wheat are variable within the CMG pixels, the model establishes a generalized relationship between the slope of NDVI against yield and pixel purity [10]: s = 9.61–0.05*m, where m is the winter wheat proportion at CMG scale (from 0 to 100%), and s is the slope such as yield = s*NDVI.
In case of Landsat-8–Sentinel-2A images, we can assume that purity at 30 m level is 100%, i.e. m = 100. Therefore, we obtain the slope of 4.61 to be applied to an NDVI peak calculated from the combination of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A data to map winter wheat yield at 30 m resolution.
Therefore, the MODIS-derived coarse resolution (0.05) winter wheat yield model, that was calibrated for Kansas (US) [10], is downscaled using winter wheat purity as a proxy to derive the slope between the peak NDVI and yield at 30 m resolution. This slope (4.61) is directly applied to the peak NDVI calculated from the stack of Landsat-8–Sentinel-2A images to derive a winter wheat yield map at 30 m resolution. These are used to estimate district-level yields by averaging yields at 30 m resolution over winter crop masks (section 3.1) for each district. In addition to the average, a standard deviation and coefficient of variation (CV), defined as a ratio between the standard deviation and the mean, is estimated as well. The estimated district-level yields are validated using independent reference data (section 2.1) collected at district level in Kirvohradska oblast (Ukraine) in 2016.
To improve peak NDVI estimation, we applied the GDD-based approach developed by Franch et al. GDD is used as a proxy to predict an NDVI peak using historical relationship between NDVI and GDD. GDD is calculated as the average daily maximum (Tmax) and minimum temperatures (Tmin) minus a base temperature (Tbase) GDD=Tmax+Tmin2−Tbase, where, GDD = 0 if [(Tmax + Tmin)/2 < Tbase], and with Tbase= 0. Daily GDD is used to calculate accumulated GDD starting from the biofix date which was set to January, 1. We refer the reader to [7] for the details of this approach.
For comparison of satellite-derived winter crop areas and winter wheat yields with reference datasets at district level, we used the APU analysis metrics [28]:
• accuracy (A) that shows the average bias of the estimates
A=1N∑Ni=1(Pi−Oi), | (2) |
• precision (P) that shows repeatability of the estimates
P=√1N−1∑Ni=1(Pi−Oi−A)2, | (3) |
• uncertainty (U) that is the root mean squared error
P=√1N−1∑Ni=1(Pi−Oi−A)2, | (4) |
• relative uncertainty (rU) normalized by an average of reference values:
rU(%)=U1N∑Ni=1Oi×100%, | (5) |
where P and Oi are computed (from satellites) and observed (from reference) values, respectively.
The GMM approach to winter crop mapping was applied to the peak NDVI calculated for the time period from March 1 to April 6 using a combination of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A, as well as using each of them separately. This was done in order to assess an added value of the combined use of these datasets. The indicated period (March 1 to April 6) was selected in such a way to capture NDVI development of winter crops and avoid confusion with early spring cereals that were planted beginning of March in 2016. Unfortunately, capturing peak NDVI during the emergence in late autumn of the previous year (e.g. during November) usually does not improve mapping of winter crops because of: (ⅰ) considerable cloud cover and unavailability of cloud-free imagery in that time period; (ⅱ) discrepancy of emergence state when much of winter crops have low NDVI. The derived maps were used to calculate the area of winter crops at districts level by pixel-counting. These estimates were compared to reference values and are presented in Table 1 and Figure. 9. The derived winter crop map using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A is illustrated in Figure 10.
Metric | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A |
A | 612 | 1081 | 839 |
P | 1719 | 5061 | 1962 |
U | 1785 | 5056 | 2090 |
rU, % | 11.6 | 32.7 | 13.5 |
R2 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.88 |
Combination of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A allowed us to achieve R2 = 0.9 and relative uncertainty of 11.6% when estimating winter crop areas at district level. When comparing to reference ground measurements, the accuracy of identifying winter wheat fields was 94.1%. It should be noted that these results were achieved in an automatic way utilizing knowledge on crop calendar and without utilizing any ground truth data. The use of Landsat-8 images only did not produce satisfactory results (R2 = 0.64 and relative uncertainty of 32.7%) because of unavailability of cloud-free images early spring especially in the eastern districts of the oblast whereas the use of Sentinel-2A yielded R2 = 0.88 and relative uncertainty of 13.5%. Overall, these results demonstrate the benefits, in a quantitative way, of the combined use of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A satellites comparing to the single-satellite usage.
Comparisons of the estimated winter wheat yields at district level are presented in Table 2 and Figure 11.
No GDD | GDD | |||||
Metric | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A |
A | -0.17 | -0.48 | -0.34 | -0.06 | -0.40 | -0.22 |
P | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
U | 0.31 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 0.38 |
rU, % | 7.7 | 14.3 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 12.5 | 9.6 |
R2 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.24 |
As with winter crop areas, the combination of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A outperformed the single satellite usage in terms of APU metrics and R2. When using either Landsat-8 or Sentinel-2A, the peak NDVI approach underestimated official statistics by -0.48 t/ha and -0.34 t/ha, respectively, while their combination improved accuracy to -0.17 t/ha. In terms of uncertainty, the peak NDVI approach for the Landsat-8–Sentinel-2A combination provided 0.31 t/ha (7.7%) whereas those values were 1.8 times higher for the Landsat-8 usage only (0.57 t/ha, 14.3%) and 1.5 times higher for the Sentinel-2A usage only (0.46 t/ha, 11.5%). These results clearly demonstrate the importance of higher observation frequency achieved with combination of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A satellites comparing to the single use. An example of the map showing spatial variability of estimated winter wheat yields at field scale is show in Figure 12.
The results presented in Figure 11(A) were further analyzed for errors. Overall, the points can be divided into 3 groups. The first group is composed of 3 points (shown in orange) representing districts with official statistics yields values close to 4 t/ha and underestimated by the peak NDVI approach. These districts feature relatively large values of CV of 21% whereas the average CV for all other districts is approximately 13%. The reason for that is smaller number of images available for these districts (mainly in the eastern part) which reduces ability to capture the peak NDVI. The second group (shown in red) is composed of districts with official statistics yields larger than 4 t/ha and the peak-NDVI approach underestimating it. The reason for that is saturation of NDVI occurs and the proposed approach fails to discriminate yield values at this level. Figure 13 shows an example of NDVI time-series from Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A satellites for the districts with reference yields of 4.3 t/ha and 3.4 t/ha, and estimated yields of 4.04 ± 0.40 t/ha and 3.65 ± 0.64 t/ha, respectively, by the peak-NDVI approach. For the district with a higher yield value, NDVI quickly becomes 0.8 on April 29 (day of the year (DOY) 120) and not changing considerably (within 0.8–0.9) during the following days 50 days (until June 18 or DOY = 170). The NDVI values start to decrease when the senescence phase occurs and the crop is eventually harvested. This plot also shows the importance of the integration of both datasets: when using just Sentinel-2A data, we miss the peak.
The third group (shown in green) involves 8 districts with moderate yield values of up to 4 t/ha. The proposed approach is able to explain variations in the winter wheat yield (R2 = 0.8) giving a bias of 0.1 t/ha and uncertainty of U = 0.13 t/ha (3.5%).
Additional experiments were performed to explore the effect of using GDD to predict the peak NDVI. In general, adding GDD improved estimates as, for example for the LC8-S2A case, the relative uncertainty decreased from 7.7% to 6.5% and R2 increased from 0.45 to 0.5. However, adding GDD to the single satellite did not reach the performance of the combined LC8-S2A use without GDD (Table 2). This once again highlights the importance of the more dense time-series of LC8-S2A.
This study attempted to explore the combined use of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A satellites to winter crop mapping and winter wheat yield assessment at regional level. For both problems, the increased frequency of observations from the Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A satellites was critical as it allowed us to achieve better performance comparing to the single satellite usage. For winter crop mapping, we adopted a previously developed approach for MODIS that allowed automatic winter crop mapping taking into account a priori knowledge on crop calendar without utilizing ground reference data. When comparing to official statistics on winter crop harvested areas, this approach gave R2 = 0.9 and relative error of 11.6%. These results are encouraging as with little data inputs (crop calendar and cropland mask) and high temporal resolution of Landsat-8–Sentinel-2A satellites, it would allow the creation of winter crop maps at global scale at 30 m resolution.
For winter wheat yield mapping, we downscaled the generalized empirical model that is based on peak NDVI approach and implemented using MODIS data, and directly applied this model to the Landsat-8–Sentinel-2A images. Overall, the downscaled peak-NDVI approach with combined use of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A images gave uncertainty of 0.31 t/ha (7.7%) and R2 = 0.45 substantially outperforming Landsat-8 only (1.8 times in terms of uncertainty) and Sentinel-2A only (1.5 times). The model was efficient in explaining moderate yield values ( < 4 t/ha) with R2 = 0.8; however, it failed to capture the variance of high yield values (> 4 t/ha) due to NDVI saturation.
Both authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Barrera NP, Zhou M, Robinson CV (2013) The role of lipids in defining membrane protein interactions: Insights from mass spectrometry. Trends Cell Biol 23: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.08.007
![]() |
[2] |
Smith AW (2012) Lipid-protein interactions in biological membranes: A dynamic perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1818: 172-177. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.06.015
![]() |
[3] |
Martinez-Seara H, Rog T, Karttunen M, et al. (2008) Influence of cis double-bond parametrization on lipid membrane properties: How seemingly insignificant details in force-field change even qualitative trends. J Chem Phys 129: 105103. doi: 10.1063/1.2976443
![]() |
[4] |
Ogata K, Nakamura S (2015) Improvement of parameters of the AMBER potential force field for phospholipids for description of thermal phase transitions. J Phys Chem B 119: 9726-9739. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b01656
![]() |
[5] |
Venable RM, Brown FL, Pastor RW (2015) Mechanical properties of lipid bilayers from molecular dynamics simulation. Chem Phys Lipids 192: 60-74. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2015.07.014
![]() |
[6] |
Paloncyova M, Fabre G, DeVane RH, et al. (2014) Benchmarking of force fields for molecule-membrane interactions. J Chem Theory Comput 10: 4143-4151. doi: 10.1021/ct500419b
![]() |
[7] |
Venable RM, Ingolfsson HI, Lerner MG, et al. (2017) Lipid and peptide diffusion in bilayers: The Saffman-Delbruck model and periodic boundary conditions. J Phys Chem B 121: 3443-3457. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09111
![]() |
[8] |
Perilla JR, Goh BC, Cassidy CK, et al. (2015) Molecular dynamics simulations of large macromolecular complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 31: 64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.03.007
![]() |
[9] |
Baaden M, Marrink SJ (2013) Coarse-grain modelling of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23: 878-886. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.09.004
![]() |
[10] |
Hills Jr RD, Brooks III CL (2009) Insights from coarse-grained Go models for protein folding and dynamics. Int J Mol Sci 10: 889-905. doi: 10.3390/ijms10030889
![]() |
[11] |
Hills Jr RD (2014) Balancing bond, nonbond, and Go-like terms in coarse grain simulations of conformational dynamics. Methods Mol Biol 1084: 123-140. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-658-0_7
![]() |
[12] |
Jackson J, Nguyen K, Whitford PC (2015) Exploring the balance between folding and functional dynamics in proteins and RNA. Int J Mol Sci 16: 6868-6889. doi: 10.3390/ijms16046868
![]() |
[13] |
Kmiecik S, Gront D, Kolinski M, et al. (2016) Coarse-grained protein models and their applications. Chem Rev 116: 7898-7936. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00163
![]() |
[14] |
Ramirez CL, Petruk A, Bringas M, et al. (2016) Coarse-grained simulations of heme proteins: Validation and study of large conformational transitions. J Chem Theory Comput 12: 3390-3397. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00278
![]() |
[15] |
De Sancho D, Best RB (2012) Modulation of an IDP binding mechanism and rates by helix propensity and non-native interactions: Association of HIF1alpha with CBP. Mol Biosyst 8: 256-267. doi: 10.1039/C1MB05252G
![]() |
[16] |
Periole X, Cavalli M, Marrink SJ, et al. (2009) Combining an elastic network with a coarse-grained molecular force field: Structure, dynamics, and intermolecular recognition. J Chem Theory Comput 5: 2531-2543. doi: 10.1021/ct9002114
![]() |
[17] |
Shen H, Moustafa IM, Cameron CE, et al. (2012) Exploring the dynamics of four RNA-dependent RNA polymerases by a coarse-grained model. J Phys Chem B 116: 14515-14524. doi: 10.1021/jp302709v
![]() |
[18] |
Dony N, Crowet JM, Joris B, et al. (2013) SAHBNET, an accessible surface-based elastic network: An application to membrane protein. Int J Mol Sci 14: 11510-11526. doi: 10.3390/ijms140611510
![]() |
[19] |
Shimamura T, Weyand S, Beckstein O, et al. (2010) Molecular basis of alternating access membrane transport by the sodium-hydantoin transporter Mhp1. Science 328: 470-473. doi: 10.1126/science.1186303
![]() |
[20] |
Ward AB, Guvench O, Hills Jr RD (2012) Coarse grain lipid-protein molecular interactions and diffusion with MsbA flippase. Proteins 80: 2178-2190. doi: 10.1002/prot.24108
![]() |
[21] |
Prasanna X, Sengupta D, Chattopadhyay A (2016) Cholesterol-dependent conformational plasticity in GPCR dimers. Sci Rep 6: 31858. doi: 10.1038/srep31858
![]() |
[22] |
Poyry S, Vattulainen I (2016) Role of charged lipids in membrane structures: Insight given by simulations. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1858: 2322-2333. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.03.016
![]() |
[23] |
Hedger G, Sansom MS (2016) Lipid interaction sites on channels, transporters and receptors: Recent insights from molecular dynamics simulations. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1858: 2390-2400. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.02.037
![]() |
[24] |
Provasi D, Boz MB, Johnston JM, et al. (2015) Preferred supramolecular organization and dimer interfaces of opioid receptors from simulated self-association. PLOS Comput Biol 11: e1004148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004148
![]() |
[25] |
Kalli AC, Sansom MS, Reithmeier RA (2015) Molecular dynamics simulations of the bacterial UraA H+-uracil symporter in lipid bilayers reveal a closed state and a selective interaction with cardiolipin. PLOS Comput Biol 11: e1004123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004123
![]() |
[26] |
Marrink SJ, Risselada HJ, Yefimov S, et al. (2007) The MARTINI force field: Coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 111: 7812-7824. doi: 10.1021/jp071097f
![]() |
[27] |
de Jong DH, Periole X, Marrink SJ (2012) Dimerization of amino acid side chains: Lessons from the comparison of different force fields. J Chem Theory Comput 8: 1003-1014. doi: 10.1021/ct200599d
![]() |
[28] |
Singh G, Tieleman DP (2011) Using the Wimley-White hydrophobicity scale as a direct quantitative test of force fields: The MARTINI coarse-grained model. J Chem Theory Comput 7: 2316-2324. doi: 10.1021/ct2002623
![]() |
[29] |
Stark AC, Andrews CT, Elcock AH (2013) Toward optimized potential functions for protein-protein interactions in aqueous solutions: Osmotic second virial coefficient calculations using the MARTINI coarse-grained force field. J Chem Theory Comput 9: 4176-4185. doi: 10.1021/ct400008p
![]() |
[30] |
Bereau T, Kremer K (2016) Protein-backbone thermodynamics across the membrane interface. J Phys Chem B 120: 6391-6400. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03682
![]() |
[31] |
Bereau T, Bennett WF, Pfaendtner J, et al. (2015) Folding and insertion thermodynamics of the transmembrane WALP peptide. J Chem Phys 143: 243127. doi: 10.1063/1.4935487
![]() |
[32] | Rodgers JM, Sorensen J, de Meyer FJ, et al. (2012) Understanding the phase behavior of coarse-grained model lipid bilayers through computational calorimetry. J Phys Chem B 116: 1551-1569. |
[33] |
Arnarez C, Uusitalo JJ, Masman MF, et al. (2015) Dry Martini, a coarse-grained force field for lipid membrane simulations with implicit solvent. J Chem Theory Comput 11: 260-275. doi: 10.1021/ct500477k
![]() |
[34] |
Ingolfsson HI, Melo MN, van Eerden FJ, et al. (2014) Lipid organization of the plasma membrane. J Am Chem Soc 136: 14554-14559. doi: 10.1021/ja507832e
![]() |
[35] |
Melo MN, Ingolfsson HI, Marrink SJ (2015) Parameters for Martini sterols and hopanoids based on a virtual-site description. J Chem Phys 143: 243152. doi: 10.1063/1.4937783
![]() |
[36] |
Paloncyova M, Vavrova K, Sovova Z, et al. (2015) Structural changes in ceramide bilayers rationalize increased permeation through stratum corneum models with shorter acyl tails. J Phys Chem B 119: 9811-9819. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05522
![]() |
[37] |
Periole X, Marrink SJ (2013) The Martini coarse-grained force field. Methods Mol Biol 924: 533-565. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-017-5_20
![]() |
[38] |
Marrink SJ, Tieleman DP (2013) Perspective on the Martini model. Chem Soc Rev 42: 6801-6822. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60093a
![]() |
[39] |
Baron R, de Vries AH, Hunenberger PH, et al. (2006) Comparison of atomic-level and coarse-grained models for liquid hydrocarbons from molecular dynamics configurational entropy estimates. J Phys Chem B 110: 8464-8473. doi: 10.1021/jp055888y
![]() |
[40] |
Hills Jr RD, Lu L, Voth GA (2010) Multiscale coarse-graining of the protein energy landscape. PLOS Comput Biol 6: e1000827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000827
![]() |
[41] |
Jia Z, Chen J (2016) Necessity of high-resolution for coarse-grained modeling of flexible proteins. J Comput Chem 37: 1725-1733. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24391
![]() |
[42] |
Miguel V, Perillo MA, Villarreal MA (2016) Improved prediction of bilayer and monolayer properties using a refined BMW-MARTINI force field. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1858: 2903-2910. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.08.016
![]() |
[43] |
Wu Z, Cui Q, Yethiraj A (2010) A new coarse-grained model for water: The importance of electrostatic interactions. J Phys Chem B 114: 10524-10529. doi: 10.1021/jp1019763
![]() |
[44] |
Wu Z, Cui Q, Yethiraj A (2011) A new coarse-grained force field for membrane-peptide simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 7: 3793-3802. doi: 10.1021/ct200593t
![]() |
[45] |
Yesylevskyy SO, Schafer LV, Sengupta D, et al. (2010) Polarizable water model for the coarse-grained MARTINI force field. PLOS Comput Biol 6: e1000810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000810
![]() |
[46] |
de Jong DH, Singh G, Bennett WFD, et al. (2013) Improved parameters for the Martini coarse-grained protein force field. J Chem Theory Comput 9: 687-697. doi: 10.1021/ct300646g
![]() |
[47] |
Lu L, Voth GA (2009) Systematic coarse-graining of a multicomponent lipid bilayer. J Phys Chem B 113: 1501-1510. doi: 10.1021/jp809604k
![]() |
[48] |
Wang ZJ, Deserno M (2010) A systematically coarse-grained solvent-free model for quantitative phospholipid bilayer simulations. J Phys Chem B 114: 11207-11220. doi: 10.1021/jp102543j
![]() |
[49] |
Han W, Schulten K (2012) Further optimization of a hybrid united-atom and coarse-grained force field for folding simulations: Improved backbone hydration and interactions between charged side chains. J Chem Theory Comput 8: 4413-4424. doi: 10.1021/ct300696c
![]() |
[50] |
Han W, Wan CK, Wu YD (2008) Toward a coarse-grained protein model coupled with a coarse-grained solvent model: Solvation free energies of amino acid side chains. J Chem Theory Comput 4: 1891-1901. doi: 10.1021/ct800184c
![]() |
[51] |
Ganesan SJ, Matysiak S (2014) Role of backbone dipole interactions in the formation of secondary and supersecondary structures of proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 10: 2569-2576. doi: 10.1021/ct401087a
![]() |
[52] | Noid WG, Chu JW, Ayton GS, et al. (2008) The multiscale coarse-graining method. I. A rigorous bridge between atomistic and coarse-grained models. J Chem Phys 128: 244114. |
[53] |
Noid WG, Chu JW, Ayton GS, et al. (2007) Multiscale coarse-graining and structural correlations: Connections to liquid-state theory. J Phys Chem B 111: 4116-4127. doi: 10.1021/jp068549t
![]() |
[54] | Pall S, Abraham MJ, Kutzner C, et al. (2015) Tackling exascale software challenges in molecular dynamics simulations with GROMACS. Proc EASC 2015 LNCS 8759: 3-27. |
[55] |
Hills Jr RD, McGlinchey N (2016) Model parameters for simulation of physiological lipids. J Comput Chem 37: 1112-1118. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24324
![]() |
[56] |
Monticelli L, Kandasamy SK, Periole X, et al. (2008) The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: Extension to proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 4: 819-834. doi: 10.1021/ct700324x
![]() |
[57] |
Bond PJ, Wee CL, Sansom MS (2008) Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of the energetics of helix insertion into a lipid bilayer. Biochemistry 47: 11321-11331. doi: 10.1021/bi800642m
![]() |
[58] | Winger M, Trzesniak D, Baron R, et al. (2009) On using a too large integration time step in molecular dynamics simulations of coarse-grained molecular models. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11: 1934-1941. |
[59] | Karanicolas J, Brooks III CL (2002) The origins of asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G. Protein Sci 11: 2351-2361. |
[60] |
Bereau T, Deserno M (2009) Generic coarse-grained model for protein folding and aggregation. J Chem Phys 130: 235106. doi: 10.1063/1.3152842
![]() |
[61] |
Herzog FA, Braun L, Schoen I, et al. (2016) Improved side chain dynamics in MARTINI simulations of protein-lipid interfaces. J Chem Theory Comput 12: 2446-24458. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00122
![]() |
[62] |
Cerutti DS, Duke R, Freddolino PL, et al. (2008) Vulnerability in popular molecular dynamics packages concerning Langevin and Andersen dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 4: 1669-1680. doi: 10.1021/ct8002173
![]() |
[63] |
Bereau T, Wang ZJ, Deserno M (2014) More than the sum of its parts: Coarse-grained peptide-lipid interactions from a simple cross-parametrization. J Chem Phys 140: 115101. doi: 10.1063/1.4867465
![]() |
[64] |
Bond PJ, Holyoake J, Ivetac A, et al. (2007) Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins and peptides. J Struct Biol 157: 593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.10.004
![]() |
[65] |
Kar P, Gopal SM, Cheng YM, et al. (2014) Transferring the PRIMO coarse-grained force field to the membrane environment: Simulations of membrane proteins and helix-helix association. J Chem Theory Comput 10: 3459-3472. doi: 10.1021/ct500443v
![]() |
[66] |
Hall BA, Chetwynd AP, Sansom MS (2011) Exploring peptide-membrane interactions with coarse-grained MD simulations. Biophys J 100: 1940-1948. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.02.041
![]() |
[67] |
Kim T, Im W (2010) Revisiting hydrophobic mismatch with free energy simulation studies of transmembrane helix tilt and rotation. Biophys J 99: 175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.015
![]() |
[68] |
Liu F, Lewis RN, Hodges RS, et al. (2004) Effect of variations in the structure of a polyleucine-based alpha-helical transmembrane peptide on its interaction with phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers. Biophys J 87: 2470-2482. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.046342
![]() |
[69] |
Lear JD, Wasserman ZR, DeGrado WF (1988) Synthetic amphiphilic peptide models for protein ion channels. Science 240: 1177-1181. doi: 10.1126/science.2453923
![]() |
[70] |
Li J, Jaimes KF, Aller SG (2014) Refined structures of mouse P-glycoprotein. Protein Sci 23: 34-46. doi: 10.1002/pro.2387
![]() |
[71] |
Costa JA, Nguyen DA, Leal-Pinto E, et al. (2013) Wicking: A rapid method for manually inserting ion channels into planar lipid bilayers. PLOS ONE 8: e60836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060836
![]() |
[72] |
Javanainen M (2014) Universal method for embedding proteins into complex lipid bilayers for molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 10: 2577-2582. doi: 10.1021/ct500046e
![]() |
[73] |
Daily MD, Olsen BN, Schlesinger PH, et al. (2014) Improved coarse-grained modeling of cholesterol-containing lipid bilayers. J Chem Theory Comput 10: 2137-2150. doi: 10.1021/ct401028g
![]() |
[74] |
Nguyen TH, Liu Z, Moore PB (2013) Molecular dynamics simulations of homo-oligomeric bundles embedded within a lipid bilayer. Biophys J 105: 1569-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.07.053
![]() |
[75] |
Holt A, Koehorst RB, Rutters-Meijneke T, et al. (2009) Tilt and rotation angles of a transmembrane model peptide as studied by fluorescence spectroscopy. Biophys J 97: 2258-2266. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.07.042
![]() |
[76] |
Ozdirekcan S, Etchebest C, Killian JA, et al. (2007) On the orientation of a designed transmembrane peptide: Toward the right tilt angle? J Am Chem Soc 129: 15174-15181. doi: 10.1021/ja073784q
![]() |
[77] |
Moeller A, Lee SC, Tao H, et al. (2015) Distinct conformational spectrum of homologous multidrug ABC transporters. Structure 23: 450-460. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.12.013
![]() |
[78] |
Ward AB, Reyes CL, Yu J, et al. (2007) Flexibility in the ABC transporter MsbA: Alternating access with a twist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 19005-19010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709388104
![]() |
[79] |
Pan L, Aller SG (2015) Equilibrated atomic models of outward-facing P-glycoprotein and effect of ATP binding on structural dynamics. Sci Rep 5: 7880. doi: 10.1038/srep07880
![]() |
[80] |
Loo TW, Clarke DM (2000) Drug-stimulated ATPase activity of human P-glycoprotein is blocked by disulfide cross-linking between the nucleotide-binding sites. J Biol Chem 275: 19435-19438. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000222200
![]() |
[81] |
Urbatsch IL, Gimi K, Wilke-Mounts S, et al. (2001) Cysteines 431 and 1074 are responsible for inhibitory disulfide cross-linking between the two nucleotide-binding sites in human P-glycoprotein. J Biol Chem 276: 26980-26987. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010829200
![]() |
[82] |
East JM, Melville D, Lee AG (1985) Exchange rates and numbers of annular lipids for the calcium and magnesium ion dependent adenosinetriphosphatase. Biochemistry 24: 2615-2623. doi: 10.1021/bi00332a005
![]() |
[83] |
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14: 33-38. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
![]() |
[84] |
Bechara C, Noll A, Morgner N, et al. (2015) A subset of annular lipids is linked to the flippase activity of an ABC transporter. Nat Chem 7: 255-262. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2172
![]() |
[85] |
Aller SG, Yu J, Ward AB, et al. (2009) Structure of P-glycoprotein reveals a molecular basis for poly-specific drug binding. Science 323: 1718-1722. doi: 10.1126/science.1168750
![]() |
[86] |
Habeck M, Haviv H, Katz A, et al. (2015) Stimulation, inhibition, or stabilization of Na,K-ATPase caused by specific lipid interactions at distinct sites. J Biol Chem 290: 4829-4842. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.611384
![]() |
[87] |
Kucerka N, van Oosten B, Pan J, et al. (2015) Molecular structures of fluid phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers obtained from simulation-to-experiment comparisons and experimental scattering density profiles. J Phys Chem B 119: 1947-1956. doi: 10.1021/jp511159q
![]() |
[88] |
Gleason NJ, Vostrikov VV, Greathouse DV, et al. (2013) Buried lysine, but not arginine, titrates and alters transmembrane helix tilt. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 1692-1695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215400110
![]() |
[89] |
Hu Y, Sinha SK, Patel S (2014) Reconciling structural and thermodynamic predictions using all-atom and coarse-grain force fields: The case of charged oligo-arginine translocation into DMPC bilayers. J Phys Chem B 118: 11973-11992. doi: 10.1021/jp504853t
![]() |
[90] |
Sun D, Forsman J, Woodward CE (2015) Evaluating force fields for the computational prediction of ionized arginine and lysine side-chains partitioning into lipid bilayers and octanol. J Chem Theory Comput 11: 1775-1791. doi: 10.1021/ct501063a
![]() |
[91] |
MacCallum JL, Bennett WF, Tieleman DP (2008) Distribution of amino acids in a lipid bilayer from computer simulations. Biophys J 94: 3393-3404. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.112805
![]() |
[92] |
Matalon E, Kaminker I, Zimmermann H, et al. (2013) Topology of the trans-membrane peptide WALP23 in model membranes under negative mismatch conditions. J Phys Chem B 117: 2280-2293. doi: 10.1021/jp310056h
![]() |
[93] |
Clay AT, Lu P, Sharom FJ (2015) Interaction of the p-glycoprotein multidrug transporter with sterols. Biochemistry 54: 6586-6597. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00904
![]() |
1. | Martin Claverie, Junchang Ju, Jeffrey G. Masek, Jennifer L. Dungan, Eric F. Vermote, Jean-Claude Roger, Sergii V. Skakun, Christopher Justice, The Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance data set, 2018, 219, 00344257, 145, 10.1016/j.rse.2018.09.002 | |
2. | Luka Rumora, Mario Miler, Damir Medak, Contemporary comparative assessment of atmospheric correction influence on radiometric indices between Sentinel-2A and Landsat 8 imagery, 2021, 36, 1010-6049, 13, 10.1080/10106049.2019.1590465 | |
3. | Jie Sun, Zulong Lai, Liping Di, Ziheng Sun, Jianbin Tao, Yonglin Shen, Multilevel Deep Learning Network for County-Level Corn Yield Estimation in the U.S. Corn Belt, 2020, 13, 1939-1404, 5048, 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3019046 | |
4. | Shawn D. Donovan, David A. MacLean, Yun Zhang, Michael B. Lavigne, John A. Kershaw, Evaluating annual spruce budworm defoliation using change detection of vegetation indices calculated from satellite hyperspectral imagery, 2021, 253, 00344257, 112204, 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112204 | |
5. | Roya Mourad, Hadi Jaafar, Martha Anderson, Feng Gao, Assessment of Leaf Area Index Models Using Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 Surface Reflectance Data over a Semi-Arid Irrigated Landscape, 2020, 12, 2072-4292, 3121, 10.3390/rs12193121 | |
6. | B. Franch, E.F. Vermote, S. Skakun, J.C. Roger, I. Becker-Reshef, E. Murphy, C. Justice, Remote sensing based yield monitoring: Application to winter wheat in United States and Ukraine, 2019, 76, 03032434, 112, 10.1016/j.jag.2018.11.012 | |
7. | Sarah E. Eichler, Keith L. Kline, Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio, Santiago Lopez-Ridaura, Virginia H. Dale, Rapid appraisal using landscape sustainability indicators for Yaqui Valley, Mexico, 2020, 6, 26659727, 100029, 10.1016/j.indic.2020.100029 | |
8. | Jianxi Huang, Jose L. Gómez-Dans, Hai Huang, Hongyuan Ma, Qingling Wu, Philip E. Lewis, Shunlin Liang, Zhongxin Chen, Jing-Hao Xue, Yantong Wu, Feng Zhao, Jing Wang, Xianhong Xie, Assimilation of remote sensing into crop growth models: Current status and perspectives, 2019, 276-277, 01681923, 107609, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.06.008 | |
9. | Nataliia Kussul, Mykola Lavreniuk, Andrii Kolotii, Sergii Skakun, Olena Rakoid, Leonid Shumilo, A workflow for Sustainable Development Goals indicators assessment based on high-resolution satellite data, 2020, 13, 1753-8947, 309, 10.1080/17538947.2019.1610807 | |
10. | Lilian Niacsu, Lucian Sfica, Adrian Ursu, Pavel Ichim, Diana Elena Bobric, Iuliana Gabriela Breaban, Wind erosion on arable lands, associated with extreme blizzard conditions within the hilly area of Eastern Romania, 2019, 169, 00139351, 86, 10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.008 | |
11. | Merryn L. Hunt, George Alan Blackburn, Luis Carrasco, John W. Redhead, Clare S. Rowland, High resolution wheat yield mapping using Sentinel-2, 2019, 233, 00344257, 111410, 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111410 | |
12. | Ewa Panek, Dariusz Gozdowski, Relationship between MODIS Derived NDVI and Yield of Cereals for Selected European Countries, 2021, 11, 2073-4395, 340, 10.3390/agronomy11020340 | |
13. | Piero Toscano, Annamaria Castrignanò, Salvatore Filippo Di Gennaro, Alessandro Vittorio Vonella, Domenico Ventrella, Alessandro Matese, A Precision Agriculture Approach for Durum Wheat Yield Assessment Using Remote Sensing Data and Yield Mapping, 2019, 9, 2073-4395, 437, 10.3390/agronomy9080437 | |
14. | Xiao-Peng Song, Wenli Huang, Matthew C. Hansen, Peter Potapov, An evaluation of Landsat, Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1 and MODIS data for crop type mapping, 2021, 3, 26660172, 100018, 10.1016/j.srs.2021.100018 | |
15. | Valerie J. Pasquarella, Christopher E. Holden, Curtis E. Woodcock, Improved mapping of forest type using spectral-temporal Landsat features, 2018, 210, 00344257, 193, 10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.064 | |
16. | Laura Piedelobo, David Hernández-López, Rocío Ballesteros, Amal Chakhar, Susana Del Pozo, Diego González-Aguilera, Miguel A. Moreno, Scalable pixel-based crop classification combining Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data time series: Case study of the Duero river basin, 2019, 171, 0308521X, 36, 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.01.005 | |
17. | Yuliia Bilokonska, Hanna Yailymova, Bohdan Yailymov, Andrii Shelestov, Leonid Shumilo, Mykola Lavreniuk, 2020, Losses Assessment for Winter Crops Based on Satellite Data and Fuzzy Logic, 978-1-7281-9960-3, 1, 10.1109/IDAACS-SWS50031.2020.9297059 | |
18. | S. Skakun, B. Franch, E. Vermote, J.-C. Roger, N. Kussul, J. Masek, 2019, The Use of Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Data and Meterological Observations for Winter Wheat Yield Assessment, 978-1-5386-9154-0, 6291, 10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8898245 | |
19. | Zhen Nie, Karen Kie Yan Chan, Bing Xu, Preliminary Evaluation of the Consistency of Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Time Series Products in An Urban Area—An Example in Beijing, China, 2019, 11, 2072-4292, 2957, 10.3390/rs11242957 | |
20. | B. Franch, E. Vermote, S. Skakun, J.-C. Roger, I. Becker-Reshef, C. Justice, 2018, Enhancing Remote Sensing Based Yield Forecasting: Application to Winter Wheat in United States, 978-1-5386-7150-4, 8177, 10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8517604 | |
21. | A. Brook, V. De Micco, G. Battipaglia, A. Erbaggio, G. Ludeno, I. Catapano, A. Bonfante, A smart multiple spatial and temporal resolution system to support precision agriculture from satellite images: Proof of concept on Aglianico vineyard, 2020, 240, 00344257, 111679, 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111679 | |
22. | Qingsheng Liu, 2018, Extraction of Winter Wheat Planting Area in Binzhou-Dongying City Based on the WBSI Images of the Key Growth Phase, 978-1-5386-6642-5, 1, 10.1109/EORSA.2018.8598604 | |
23. | Sergii Skakun, Eric Vermote, Belen Franch, Jean-Claude Roger, Nataliia Kussul, Junchang Ju, Jeffrey Masek, Winter Wheat Yield Assessment from Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Data: Incorporating Surface Reflectance, Through Phenological Fitting, into Regression Yield Models, 2019, 11, 2072-4292, 1768, 10.3390/rs11151768 | |
24. | Ali Nasrallah, Nicolas Baghdadi, Mohammad El Hajj, Talal Darwish, Hatem Belhouchette, Ghaleb Faour, Salem Darwich, Mario Mhawej, Sentinel-1 Data for Winter Wheat Phenology Monitoring and Mapping, 2019, 11, 2072-4292, 2228, 10.3390/rs11192228 | |
25. | S. Skakun, B. Franch, E. Vermote, J.-C. Roger, C. Justice, J. Masek, E. Murphy, 2018, Winter Wheat Yield Assessment Using Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Data, 978-1-5386-7150-4, 5964, 10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8519134 | |
26. | Yuval Sadeh, Xuan Zhu, Karine Chenu, David Dunkerley, Sowing date detection at the field scale using CubeSats remote sensing, 2019, 157, 01681699, 568, 10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.042 | |
27. | V.S. Manivasagam, Gregoriy Kaplan, Offer Rozenstein, Developing Transformation Functions for VENμS and Sentinel-2 Surface Reflectance over Israel, 2019, 11, 2072-4292, 1710, 10.3390/rs11141710 | |
28. | Yang Chen, Tim R. McVicar, Randall J. Donohue, Nikhil Garg, François Waldner, Noboru Ota, Lingtao Li, Roger Lawes, To Blend or Not to Blend? A Framework for Nationwide Landsat–MODIS Data Selection for Crop Yield Prediction, 2020, 12, 2072-4292, 1653, 10.3390/rs12101653 | |
29. | Jie Dong, Yangyang Fu, Jingjing Wang, Haifeng Tian, Shan Fu, Zheng Niu, Wei Han, Yi Zheng, Jianxi Huang, Wenping Yuan, Early-season mapping of winter wheat in China based on Landsat and Sentinel images, 2020, 12, 1866-3516, 3081, 10.5194/essd-12-3081-2020 | |
30. | Jinlong Fan, Xiaoyu Zhang, Chunliang Zhao, Zhihao Qin, Mathilde De Vroey, Pierre Defourny, Evaluation of Crop Type Classification with Different High Resolution Satellite Data Sources, 2021, 13, 2072-4292, 911, 10.3390/rs13050911 | |
31. | Feng Gao, Martha Anderson, Craig Daughtry, David Johnson, Assessing the Variability of Corn and Soybean Yields in Central Iowa Using High Spatiotemporal Resolution Multi-Satellite Imagery, 2018, 10, 2072-4292, 1489, 10.3390/rs10091489 | |
32. | Remy Fieuzal, Vincent Bustillo, David Collado, Gerard Dedieu, Combined Use of Multi-Temporal Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Images for Wheat Yield Estimates at the Intra-Plot Spatial Scale, 2020, 10, 2073-4395, 327, 10.3390/agronomy10030327 | |
33. | Hafez Fathipoor, Hossein Arefi, Reza Shah-Hosseini, Hossein Moghadam, Corn forage yield prediction using unmanned aerial vehicle images at mid-season growth stage, 2019, 13, 1931-3195, 1, 10.1117/1.JRS.13.034503 | |
34. | Jie Sun, Liping Di, Ziheng Sun, Yonglin Shen, Zulong Lai, County-Level Soybean Yield Prediction Using Deep CNN-LSTM Model, 2019, 19, 1424-8220, 4363, 10.3390/s19204363 | |
35. | César Alejandro Berlanga-Robles, Arturo Ruiz-Luna, Assessing seasonal and long-term mangrove canopy variations in Sinaloa, northwest Mexico, based on time series of enhanced vegetation index (EVI) data, 2020, 28, 0923-4861, 229, 10.1007/s11273-020-09709-0 | |
36. | Shi Chen, Lingling Fan, Shefang Liang, Hao Chen, Xiao Sun, Yanan Hu, Zhenhuan Liu, Jing Sun, Peng Yang, Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Northern Limit of Winter Wheat in China Using MODIS Time Series Images, 2020, 12, 2072-4292, 2382, 10.3390/rs12152382 | |
37. | Minh Nguyen, Oscar Baez-Villanueva, Duong Bui, Phong Nguyen, Lars Ribbe, Harmonization of Landsat and Sentinel 2 for Crop Monitoring in Drought Prone Areas: Case Studies of Ninh Thuan (Vietnam) and Bekaa (Lebanon), 2020, 12, 2072-4292, 281, 10.3390/rs12020281 | |
38. | Md. Shahinoor Rahman, Liping Di, Eugene Yu, Chen Zhang, Hossain Mohiuddin, In-Season Major Crop-Type Identification for US Cropland from Landsat Images Using Crop-Rotation Pattern and Progressive Data Classification, 2019, 9, 2077-0472, 17, 10.3390/agriculture9010017 | |
39. | Michel E. D. Chaves, Michelle C. A. Picoli, Ieda D. Sanches, Recent Applications of Landsat 8/OLI and Sentinel-2/MSI for Land Use and Land Cover Mapping: A Systematic Review, 2020, 12, 2072-4292, 3062, 10.3390/rs12183062 | |
40. | Marco A. Zanella, Daniel M. de Queiroz, Domingos S. M. Valente, Francisco de A. de C. Pinto, Nerilson T. Santos, MANAGEMENT CLASS DELIMITATION IN A SOYBEAN CROP USING ORBITAL IMAGES, 2019, 39, 1809-4430, 676, 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v39n5p676-683/2019 | |
41. | Divyesh Varade, Anudeep Sure, Onkar Dikshit, Potential of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A composite for land use land cover analysis, 2019, 34, 1010-6049, 1552, 10.1080/10106049.2018.1497096 | |
42. | Yuanhuizi He, Changlin Wang, Fang Chen, Huicong Jia, Dong Liang, Aqiang Yang, Feature Comparison and Optimization for 30-M Winter Wheat Mapping Based on Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Data Using Random Forest Algorithm, 2019, 11, 2072-4292, 535, 10.3390/rs11050535 | |
43. | Rojalin Tripathy, K. N. Chaudhari, G. D. Bairagi, Om Pal, Rajesh Das, B. K. Bhattacharya, Towards Fine-Scale Yield Prediction of Three Major Crops of India Using Data from Multiple Satellite, 2021, 0255-660X, 10.1007/s12524-021-01361-2 | |
44. | Gebeyehu Abebe, Tsegaye Tadesse, Berhan Gessesse, Combined Use of Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2A Imagery for Improved Sugarcane Yield Estimation in Wonji-Shoa, Ethiopia, 2022, 50, 0255-660X, 143, 10.1007/s12524-021-01466-8 | |
45. | Murat Güven TUĞAÇ, A. Murat ÖZBAYOĞLU, Harun TORUNLAR, Erol KARAKURT, Wheat Yield Prediction with Machine Learning based on MODIS and Landsat NDVI Data at Field Scale, 2022, 9, 2148-9173, 172, 10.30897/ijegeo.1128985 | |
46. | A. D. Prasad, Padma Ganasala, R. Hernández-Guzmán, Farshad Fathian, Remote sensing satellite data and spectral indices: an initial evaluation for the sustainable development of an urban area, 2022, 8, 2363-5037, 10.1007/s40899-022-00607-2 | |
47. | Xiaobin Xu, Chenwei Nie, Xiuliang Jin, Zhenhai Li, Hongchun Zhu, Haigang Xu, Jianwen Wang, Yu Zhao, Haikuan Feng, A comprehensive yield evaluation indicator based on an improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and hyperspectral data, 2021, 270, 03784290, 108204, 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108204 | |
48. | Yiqun Xie, Majid Farhadloo, Ning Guo, Shashi Shekhar, Eric Watkins, Len Kne, Han Bao, Aaron J. Patton, Kevin Morris, NTEP‐DB 1.0: A relational database for the national turfgrass evaluation program, 2022, 14, 2573-1513, 316, 10.1002/its2.76 | |
49. | Yunus KAYA, Nizar POLAT, A linear approach for wheat yield prediction by using different spectral vegetation indices, 2022, 2548-0960, 10.26833/ijeg.1035037 | |
50. | Sidrah Hafeez, Man Sing Wong, Sawaid Abbas, Muhammad Asim, Evaluating Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Data Consistency for High Spatiotemporal Inland and Coastal Water Quality Monitoring, 2022, 14, 2072-4292, 3155, 10.3390/rs14133155 | |
51. | Brahim Benzougagh, Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram, Bouchta El Fellah, Mohamed Mastere, Mohamed El Basri, Ibrahim Ouchen, Driss Sadkaoui, Youssef Bammou, Nassima Moutaoikil, Benson Turyasingura, Mapping of land degradation using spectral angle mapper approach (SAM): the case of Inaouene watershed (Northeast Morocco), 2023, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-023-01711-8 | |
52. | J. L. Pancorbo, M. Alonso-Ayuso, C. Camino, M. D. Raya-Sereno, P. J. Zarco-Tejada, I. Molina, J. L. Gabriel, M. Quemada, Airborne hyperspectral and Sentinel imagery to quantify winter wheat traits through ensemble modeling approaches, 2023, 1385-2256, 10.1007/s11119-023-09990-y | |
53. | Jinlong Fan, Pierre Defourny, Xiaoyu Zhang, Qinghan Dong, Limin Wang, Zhihao Qin, Mathilde De Vroey, Chunliang Zhao, Crop Mapping with Combined Use of European and Chinese Satellite Data, 2021, 13, 2072-4292, 4641, 10.3390/rs13224641 | |
54. | Shengwei Liu, Dailiang Peng, Bing Zhang, Zhengchao Chen, Le Yu, Junjie Chen, Yuhao Pan, Shijun Zheng, Jinkang Hu, Zihang Lou, Yue Chen, Songlin Yang, The Accuracy of Winter Wheat Identification at Different Growth Stages Using Remote Sensing, 2022, 14, 2072-4292, 893, 10.3390/rs14040893 | |
55. | Bing-Bing Goh, Peter King, Rebecca L. Whetton, Sheida Z. Sattari, Nicholas M. Holden, Monitoring winter wheat growth performance at sub-field scale using multitemporal Sentinel-2 imagery, 2022, 115, 15698432, 103124, 10.1016/j.jag.2022.103124 | |
56. | Yue Wang, Zengxiang Zhang, Lijun Zuo, Xiao Wang, Xiaoli Zhao, Feifei Sun, Mapping Crop Distribution Patterns and Changes in China from 2000 to 2015 by Fusing Remote-Sensing, Statistics, and Knowledge-Based Crop Phenology, 2022, 14, 2072-4292, 1800, 10.3390/rs14081800 | |
57. | Akash Goyal, Mohit Kesarwani, N. Neeti, S. Maity, K. Mukesh, V. M. Chowdary, B. Bimal, C. S. Jha, 2022, Chapter 10, 978-3-030-98980-4, 229, 10.1007/978-3-030-98981-1_10 | |
58. | Yingjie Li, Jing Chen, Qingmiao Ma, Hankui K. Zhang, Jane Liu, Evaluation of Sentinel-2A Surface Reflectance Derived Using Sen2Cor in North America, 2018, 11, 1939-1404, 1997, 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2835823 | |
59. | V.S. Manivasagam, Yuval Sadeh, Gregoriy Kaplan, David J. Bonfil, Offer Rozenstein, Studying the Feasibility of Assimilating Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope Imagery into the SAFY Crop Model to Predict Within-Field Wheat Yield, 2021, 13, 2072-4292, 2395, 10.3390/rs13122395 | |
60. | Alberto San Bautista, David Fita, Belén Franch, Sergio Castiñeira-Ibáñez, Patricia Arizo, María José Sánchez-Torres, Inbal Becker-Reshef, Antonio Uris, Constanza Rubio, Crop Monitoring Strategy Based on Remote Sensing Data (Sentinel-2 and Planet), Study Case in a Rice Field after Applying Glycinebetaine, 2022, 12, 2073-4395, 708, 10.3390/agronomy12030708 | |
61. | Shengjie Liu, Zhize Zhou, Huaxiang Ding, Yuanjun Zhong, Qian Shi, Crop Mapping Using Sentinel Full-Year Dual-Polarized SAR Data and a CPU-Optimized Convolutional Neural Network With Two Sampling Strategies, 2021, 14, 1939-1404, 7017, 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3094973 | |
62. | Ruoque Shen, Jie Dong, Wenping Yuan, Wei Han, Tao Ye, Wenzhi Zhao, A 30 m Resolution Distribution Map of Maize for China Based on Landsat and Sentinel Images, 2022, 2022, 2694-1589, 10.34133/2022/9846712 | |
63. | Sam Purkis, Ved Chirayath, Remote Sensing the Ocean Biosphere, 2022, 47, 1543-5938, 823, 10.1146/annurev-environ-112420-013219 | |
64. | Giulia Ronchetti, Giacinto Manfron, Christof J. Weissteiner, Lorenzo Seguini, Luigi Nisini Scacchiafichi, Lorenzo Panarello, Bettina Baruth, Remote sensing crop group-specific indicators to support regional yield forecasting in Europe, 2023, 205, 01681699, 107633, 10.1016/j.compag.2023.107633 | |
65. | Sarchil Hama Qader, Chigozie Edson Utazi, Rhorom Priyatikanto, Peshawa Najmaddin, Emad Omer Hama-Ali, Nabaz R. Khwarahm, Andrew J. Tatem, Jadu Dash, Exploring the use of Sentinel-2 datasets and environmental variables to model wheat crop yield in smallholder arid and semi-arid farming systems, 2023, 869, 00489697, 161716, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161716 | |
66. | Yuan Fang, Linlin Xu, Alexander Wong, David A. Clausi, Multi-Temporal Landsat-8 Images for Retrieval and Broad Scale Mapping of Soil Copper Concentration Using Empirical Models, 2022, 14, 2072-4292, 2311, 10.3390/rs14102311 | |
67. | Stefano Marino, Understanding the spatio-temporal behavior of crop yield, yield components and weed pressure using time series Sentinel-2-data in an organic farming system, 2023, 145, 11610301, 126785, 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126785 | |
68. | Zhou Longfei, Meng Ran, Yu Xing, Liao Yigui, Huang Zehua, Lü Zhengang, Xu Binyuan, Yang Guodong, Peng Shaobing, Xu Le, Improved Yield Prediction of Ratoon Rice Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Multi-Temporal Feature Method, 2023, 30, 16726308, 247, 10.1016/j.rsci.2023.03.008 | |
69. | Tasneem Ahmed, Nashra Javed, Mohammad Faisal, Halima Sadia, 2023, Chapter 27, 978-981-19-7040-5, 345, 10.1007/978-981-19-7041-2_27 | |
70. | Haoming Xia, Xiqing Bian, Li Pan, Rumeng Li, Mapping tea plantation area using phenology algorithm, time-series Sentinel-2 and Landsat images, 2023, 44, 0143-1161, 2826, 10.1080/01431161.2023.2208713 | |
71. | Muh. Jayadi, Asmita Ahmad, 2023, 2704, 0094-243X, 080002, 10.1063/5.0120940 | |
72. | Ruoque Shen, Baihong Pan, Qiongyan Peng, Jie Dong, Xuebing Chen, Xi Zhang, Tao Ye, Jianxi Huang, Wenping Yuan, High-resolution distribution maps of single-season rice in China from 2017 to 2022, 2023, 15, 1866-3516, 3203, 10.5194/essd-15-3203-2023 | |
73. | Haiyang Zhang, Yao Zhang, Kaidi Liu, Shu Lan, Tinyao Gao, Minzan Li, Winter wheat yield prediction using integrated Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 vegetation index time-series data and machine learning algorithms, 2023, 213, 01681699, 108250, 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108250 | |
74. | Bo Yang, Jinglei Wang, Shenglin Li, Xiuqiao Huang, Identifying the Spatio-Temporal Change in Winter Wheat–Summer Maize Planting Structure in the North China Plain between 2001 and 2020, 2023, 13, 2073-4395, 2712, 10.3390/agronomy13112712 | |
75. | Yiqun Wang, Hui Huang, Radu State, Early Crop Mapping Using Dynamic Ecoregion Clustering: A USA-Wide Study, 2023, 15, 2072-4292, 4962, 10.3390/rs15204962 | |
76. | Jorge Celis, Xiangming Xiao, Pradeep Wagle, Jeffrey Basara, Heather McCarthy, Lara Souza, A comparison of moderate and high spatial resolution satellite data for modeling gross primary production and transpiration of native prairie, alfalfa, and winter wheat, 2024, 344, 01681923, 109797, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109797 | |
77. | Jorge Celis, Xiangming Xiao, Paul M. White, Osvaldo M. R. Cabral, Helber C. Freitas, Improved Modeling of Gross Primary Production and Transpiration of Sugarcane Plantations with Time-Series Landsat and Sentinel-2 Images, 2023, 16, 2072-4292, 46, 10.3390/rs16010046 | |
78. | Ilina Kamenova, Milen Chanev, Petar Dimitrov, Lachezar Filchev, Bogdan Bonchev, Liang Zhu, Qinghan Dong, Crop Type Mapping and Winter Wheat Yield Prediction Utilizing Sentinel-2: A Case Study from Upper Thracian Lowland, Bulgaria, 2024, 16, 2072-4292, 1144, 10.3390/rs16071144 | |
79. | Saurabh Srivastava, Tasneem Ahmed, DLCD: Deep learning-based change detection approach to monitor deforestation, 2024, 1863-1703, 10.1007/s11760-024-03140-1 | |
80. | Yifei Liu, Xuehong Chen, Jin Chen, Yunze Zang, Jingyi Wang, Miao Lu, Liang Sun, Qi Dong, Bingwen Qiu, Xiufang Zhu, Long-term (2013–2022) mapping of winter wheat in the North China Plain using Landsat data: classification with optimal zoning strategy, 2024, 2096-4471, 1, 10.1080/20964471.2024.2363552 | |
81. | Mehrtash Manafifard, Jianxi Huang, A comprehensive review on wheat yield prediction Based on remote sensing, 2024, 1573-7721, 10.1007/s11042-024-19820-6 | |
82. | Remy Fieuzal, Vincent Bustillo, David Collado, Gerard Dedieu, 2019, Estimation of Wheat Yields at the Intra-Plot Scale by Combining Multi-Temporal Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Images, 14, 10.3390/IECG2019-06220 | |
83. | Josephine Bukowiecki, Till Rose, Henning Kage, Assessment of the impact of accurate green area index, water regime and harvest index on site-specific wheat yield estimation, 2024, 226, 01681699, 109429, 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109429 | |
84. | Haiyang Zhang, Yao Zhang, Fanghui Tong, Minzan Li, A novel winter wheat yield prediction framework using fused spatial–temporal-spectral (STS) information from Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 via improved Pix2Pix network, 2025, 231, 01681699, 109982, 10.1016/j.compag.2025.109982 | |
85. | Gaoxiang Yang, Xingrong Li, Yuan Xiong, Meng He, Lei Zhang, Chongya Jiang, Xia Yao, Yan Zhu, Weixing Cao, Tao Cheng, Annual winter wheat mapping for unveiling spatiotemporal patterns in China with a knowledge-guided approach and multi-source datasets, 2025, 225, 09242716, 163, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.04.031 | |
86. | М.В. Колодяжный, В.Ф. Попович, Е.А. Дунаева, В.С. Паштецкий, ОСОБЕННОСТИ ПРОВЕДЕНИЯ КЛАССИФИКАЦИИ ЗЕМЕЛЬ СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННОГО НАЗНАЧЕНИЯ НА ОСНОВЕ ДАННЫХ ДИСТАНЦИОННОГО ЗОНДИРОВАНИЯ ЗЕМЛИ , 2025, 20720386, 17, 10.26178/AE.2025.12.48.001 |
Metric | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A |
A | 612 | 1081 | 839 |
P | 1719 | 5061 | 1962 |
U | 1785 | 5056 | 2090 |
rU, % | 11.6 | 32.7 | 13.5 |
R2 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.88 |
No GDD | GDD | |||||
Metric | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A |
A | -0.17 | -0.48 | -0.34 | -0.06 | -0.40 | -0.22 |
P | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
U | 0.31 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 0.38 |
rU, % | 7.7 | 14.3 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 12.5 | 9.6 |
R2 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.24 |
Metric | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A |
A | 612 | 1081 | 839 |
P | 1719 | 5061 | 1962 |
U | 1785 | 5056 | 2090 |
rU, % | 11.6 | 32.7 | 13.5 |
R2 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.88 |
No GDD | GDD | |||||
Metric | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A | LC8-S2A | LC8 | S2A |
A | -0.17 | -0.48 | -0.34 | -0.06 | -0.40 | -0.22 |
P | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
U | 0.31 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 0.38 |
rU, % | 7.7 | 14.3 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 12.5 | 9.6 |
R2 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.24 |