Citation: Sarika Amdekar, Avnish Kumar, Vinod Singh. Transcriptional activity of cytokines induced by oral administration of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus in experimental model of arthritis[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(2): 164-174. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.2.164
[1] | Pham Van Viet, Le Van Hieu, Cao Minh Thi . The directed preparation of TiO2 nanotubes film on FTO substrate via hydrothermal method for gas sensing application. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 460-469. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.460 |
[2] | Dong Geun Lee, Hwan Chul Yoo, Eun-Ki Hong, Won-Ju Cho, Jong Tae Park . Device performances and instabilities of the engineered active layer with different film thickness and composition ratios in amorphous InGaZnO thin film transistors. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(5): 596-607. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.5.596 |
[3] | Nhung Thi-Tuyet Hoang, Anh Thi-Kim Tran, Nguyen Van Suc, The-Vinh Nguyen . Antibacterial activities of gel-derived Ag-TiO2-SiO2 nanomaterials under different light irradiation. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 339-348. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.339 |
[4] | Wolfgang Zúñiga-Mera, Sonia Gaona Jurado, Alejandra Isabel Guerrero Duymovic, Claudia Fernanda Villaquirán Raigoza, José Eduardo García . Effect of the incorporation of BiFeO3 on the structural, electrical and magnetic properties of the lead-free Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(5): 792-808. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021048 |
[5] | Raghvendra K Pandey, William A Stapleton, Mohammad Shamsuzzoha, Ivan Sutanto . Voltage biased Varistor-Transistor Hybrid Devices: Properties and Applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(3): 243-259. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.3.243 |
[6] | K.Pandey Raghvendra, A.Stapleto Williamn, Shamsuzzoha Mohammad, Sutanto Ivan . Voltage biased Varistor-Transistor Hybrid Devices: Properties and Applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(3): 243-259. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.243 |
[7] | Ahmed Z. Abdullah, Adawiya J. Haider, Allaa A. Jabbar . Pure TiO2/PSi and TiO2@Ag/PSi structures as controllable sensor for toxic gases. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(4): 522-533. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022031 |
[8] | Etsana Kiros Ashebir, Berhe Tadese Abay, Taame Abraha Berhe . Sustainable A2BⅠBⅢX6 based lead free perovskite solar cells: The challenges and research roadmap for power conversion efficiency improvement. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(4): 712-759. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024036 |
[9] | Wei-Chi Chen, Pin-Yao Chen, Sheng-Hsiung Yang . Solution-processed hybrid light emitting and photovoltaic devices comprising zinc oxide nanorod arrays and tungsten trioxide layers. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 551-560. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.551 |
[10] | Ya-Ting Tsu, Yu-Wen Chen . Preparation of gold-containing binary metal clusters by co-deposition-precipitation method and for hydrogenation of chloronitrobenzene. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 738-754. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.738 |
The physical phenomena of real world can effectively be modeled by making use of the theory of derivatives and integrals of fractional order. In this sense, the nonlinear fractional order evolution equations (NLFEEs) have recently become a burning topic to the researchers for searching their exact traveling wave solutions to depict the physical phenomena due to the nonlinear mechanisms arisen in various fields. The use of nonlinear equations is extensive as the nonlinearity exists everywhere in the world. NLFEEs have been attracted great interest due to their frequent appearance in many applications such as in biology, physics, chemistry, electromagnetic, polymeric materials, neutron point kinetic model, control and vibration, image and signal processing, system identifications, the finance, acoustics and fluid dynamics [1,2,3]. Many researchers have offered different approaches to construct analytic and numerical solutions to NLFEEs as well as NLEEs and put them forward for searching traveling wave solutions, such as the exponential decay law [4], the Ibragimov's nonlocal conservation method [5], the reproducing kernel method [6], the Jacobi elliptic function method [7], the (G′/G)-expansion method and its various modifications [8,9,10,11,12], the Exp-function method [13,14], the sub-equation method [15,16], the first integral method [17,18], the functional variable method [19], the modified trial equation method [20,21], the simplest equation method [22], the Lie group analysis method [23], the fractional characteristic method [24], the auxiliary equation method [25,26], the finite element method [27], the differential transform method [28], the Adomian decomposition method [29,30], the variational iteration method [31], the finite difference method [32], the various homotopy perturbation method [33,34,35,36,37] and the He's variational principle [38] etc. But no method is uniquely appreciable to investigate the exact solutions to all kind of NLFEEs. That is why; it is very much needed to introduce new method. In this study, we implemented recently established effectual and reliable productive method, called the fractional generalized (DαξG/G)-expansion method to construct closed form analytic wave solutions to some NLFEEs in the sense of conformable fractional derivative [39]. The results obtained throughout the article have been compared with those existing in the literature and shown that the achieved solutions are new and much more general. We have finally concluded that the solutions might bring up their importance through the contribution and be recorded in the literature.
A new and simple definition of derivative for fractional order introduced by Khalil et al. [39] is called conformable fractional derivative. This definition is analogous to the ordinary derivative
dψdx=limε→0ψ(x+ε)−ψ(x)ε, |
where ψ(x):[0,∞]→R and x>0. According to this classical definition, d(xn)dx=nxn−1. According to this perception, Khalil has introduced α order fractional derivative of ψas
Tαψ(x)=limε→0ψ(x+εx1−α)−ψ(x)ε , 0<α⩽1. |
If the function ψ is α-differentiable in (0,r) for r>0 and limx→0+Tαψ(x) exists, then the conformable derivative at x=0 is defined as Tαψ(0)=limx→0+Tαψ(x). The conformable integral of ψ is
Irαψ(x)=∫xrψ(t)t1−αdt, r⩾0, 0<α⩽1. |
This integral represents usual Riemann improper integral.
The conformable fractional derivative satisfies the following useful properties [39]:
If the functions u(x) and v(x) are α-differentiable at any pointx>0, for α∈(0,1], then
(a) Tα(au+bv)=aTα(u)+bTα(v) ∀a,b∈R.
(b) Tα(xn)=nxn−α ∀n∈R.
(c) Tα(c)=0, where c is any constant.
(d) Tα(uv)=uTα(v)+vTα(u).
(e) Tα(u/v)=vTα(u)−uTα(v)v2.
(f) if u is differentiable, then Tα(u)(x)=x1−αdudx(x).
Many researchers used this new derivative of fractional order in physical applications due to its convenience, simplicity and usefulness [40,41,42].
Consider a nonlinear partial differential equation of fractional order in the independent variables t,x1,x2,...,xn as
F(u,Dαtu,Dαx1u,Dαx2u,...,Dαxnu,D2αtu,D2αx1u,D2αx2u,...,D2αxnu,...)=0, | (2.2.1) |
where F is a polynomial in u(t,x1,x2,...,xn) and it's various conformable fractional derivatives. The main steps of the fractional generalized (DαξG/G)-expansion method referred as follows:
Step 1: Use the wave transformation
ξ=ξ(t,x1,x2,...,xn),ui=ui(t,x1,x2,...,xn)=Ui(ξ) | (2.2.2) |
to reduce Eq. (2.2.1) to the following ordinary differential equation of fractional order with respect to the variable ξ:
P(U,DαξU,D2αξU,...)=0, | (2.2.3) |
Take anti-derivative of Eq. (2.2.3), if possible, one or more times and the integral constant can be set to zero as soliton solutions are sought.
Step 2: Assume that Eq. (2.2.3) has solution in the form
u(ξ)=n∑i=0ai(d+DαξG/G)i+n∑i=1bi(d+DαξG/G)−i, | (2.2.4) |
where ai(i=0,1,2,...,n), bi(i=1,2,3,...,n) and d are arbitrary constants with at least one of an and bn is nonzero and G=G(ξ) satisfies the auxiliary equation
AGD2αξG−BGDαξG−EG2−C(DαξG)2=0, | (2.2.5) |
where 0<α⩽1 and DαξG(ξ)stands for the conformable fractional derivative G(ξ) of order α with respect to ξ; A,B,C and E are real parameters.
Making use of the transformation G(ξ)=H(η), η=ξα/α, Eq. (2.2.5) turns into the equation
AHH″−BHH′−EH2−C(H′)2=0, | (2.2.6) |
whose solutions are well-known. Utilizing the solutions in Ref. [10] of Eq. (2.2.6) together with the transformation DαξG(ξ)=DαξH(η)=H′(η)Dαξη=H′(η), which can be derived by using conformable fractional derivative, we can easily obtain the following solutions to Eq. (2.2.5):
Family 1: When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ>0,
(DαξG/G)=B2ψ+√Ω2ψC1sinh(√Ωξα2Aα)+C2cosh(√Ωξα2Aα)C1cosh(√Ωξα2Aα)+C2sinh(√Ωξα2Aα) | (2.2.7) |
Family 2: When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ<0,
(DαξG/G)=B2ψ+√−Ω2ψ−C1sin(√−Ωξα2Aα)+C2cos(√−Ωξα2Aα)C1cos(√−Ωξα2Aα)+C2sin(√−Ωξα2Aα) | (2.2.8) |
Family 3: When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ=0,
(DαξG/G)=B2ψ+αC2C1α+C2ξα | (2.2.9) |
Family 4: When B=0, ψ=A−C and Δ=ψE>0,
(DαξG/G)=√ΔψC1sinh(√ΔξαAα)+C2cosh(√ΔξαAα)C1cosh(√ΔξαAα)+C2sinh(√ΔξαAα) | (2.2.10) |
Family 5: When B=0, ψ=A−C and Δ=ψE<0,
(DαξG/G)=√−Δψ−C1sin(√−ΔξαAα)+C2cos(√−ΔξαAα)C1cos(√−ΔξαAα)+C2sin(√−ΔξαAα) | (2.2.11) |
Step 3: Take the homogeneous balance between the highest order linear and nonlinear terms appearing in Eq. (2.2.3) to determine the positive constant n.
Step 4: Using the value of n obtained in step 3, Eq. (2.2.3) along with Eqs. (2.2.4), (2.2.5) makes available polynomials in (d+DαξG/G)n (n=0,1,2,...) and (d+DαξG/G)−n (n=1,2,3,...). Equalize each coefficient of these polynomials to zero yield a system of algebraic equations for ai(i=0,1,2,...), bi(i=1,2,3,...) and d. Solve this system by Maple to obtain the values of ai(i=0,1,2,...), bi(i=1,2,3,...) and d.
Step 5: Eq. (2.2.4) together with Eqs. (2.2.7)–(2.2.11) and the values appeared in step 4 provides traveling wave solutions of the nonlinear evolution equation (2.2.1) in closed form.
In this section, the closed form traveling wave solutions to the suggested equations are examined.
Consider the space time fractional (2+1)-dimensional dispersive long wave equations
∂2αu∂yα∂tα+∂2αv∂x2α+∂α(u(∂αu/∂xα))∂yα=0∂αv∂tα+∂αu∂xα+∂α(uv)∂xα+∂3αu∂x2α∂yα=0}, | (3.1.1) |
where 0<α⩽1; the notation ∂αu∂xα denotes the α-order partial derivative of u with respect to x and the other notations are so. This system of equations was first obtained by Boiti et al. [43] as compatibility condition for a weak Lax pair.
The composite transformation
u(t,x,y)=U(ξ),v(t,x,y)=V(ξ),ξ=k1/αx+l1/αy+w1/αt, | (3.1.2) |
where k, l and w are constants, with the aid of chain rule
DαxU=∂αU∂xα=∂αU∂ξα.∂ξα∂xα=∂αU∂ξα.(∂ξ∂x)α=kDαξU, |
forces Eq. (3.1.1) to take the form
lwD2αξU+k2D2αξV+kl(UD2αξU+(DαξU)2)=0wDαξV+kDαξU+kDαξ(UV)+k2lD3αξU=0} | (3.1.3) |
The positive constant n under the homogeneous balance from Eq. (3.1.3) reduces Eq. (2.2.4) into the form
U(ξ)=a0+a1φ+b1φ−1V(ξ)=c0+c1φ+c2φ2+d1φ−1+d2φ−2}, | (3.1.4) |
where φ=(d+DαξG/G). Eq. (3.1.3) with the aid of Eq. (3.1.4) and Eq. (2.2.5) produces a polynomial in φ. Setting each coefficient of this polynomial to zero gives a set of algebraic equations for the constants in Eq. (3.1.4). Solving these equations by the computational software Maple present the following results:
Set−1:a0=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k},a1=∓2Ak3/2ψ,b1=∓2k3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E),c1=2k2lψA2(2dψ+B),c2=−2A2k2lψ2,d1=2k2lA2(2dψ+B)(d2ψ+Bd−E),c0=−1,d2=−2k2lA2(d2ψ+Bd−E)2 | (3.1.5) |
Set−2:a0=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k},a1=0,b1=∓2k3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E),c1=0,c0=−1A2{2k2lψ(d2ψ+Bd−E)+A2},d1=2k2lA2{(2d2ψ+3Bd−2E)dψ+B2d−BE},c2=0,d2=−2k2lA2{d2ψ(d2ψ+2Bd−2E)+E2+B2d2−2BdE} | (3.1.6) |
Set−3:a0=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k},a1=∓2Ak3/2ψ,b1=0,c1=2k2lψA2(2dψ+B),c0=−1A2{k2lψ(2d2ψ+2Bd−2E)+A2},c2=−2A2k2lψ2,d1=0,d2=0 | (3.1.7) |
Putting Eqs. (3.1.5)–(3.1.6) into Eq. (3.1.4) yields
U1(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓2Ak3/2ψ(d+DαξG/G)∓2k3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E)(d+DαξG/G)−1 | (3.1.8) |
V1(ξ)=−1+2k2lψA2(2dψ+B)(d+DαξG/G)−2A2k2lψ2(d+DαξG/G)2+2k2lA2(2dψ+B)(d2ψ+Bd−E)(d+DαξG/G)−1−2k2lA2(d2ψ+Bd−E)2(d+DαξG/G)−2 | (3.1.9) |
U2(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓2k3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E)(d+DαξG/G) | (3.1.10) |
V2(ξ)=−1A2{2k2lψ(d2ψ+Bd−E)+A2}+2k2lA2{(2d2ψ+3Bd−2E)dψ+B2d−BE}(d+DαξG/G)−1−2k2lA2{d2ψ(d2ψ+2Bd−2E)+E2+B2d2−2BdE}(d+DαξG/G)−2 | (3.1.11) |
U3(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓2Ak3/2ψ(d+DαξG/G) | (3.1.12) |
V3(ξ)=−1A2{k2lψ(2d2ψ+2Bd−2E)+A2}+2k2lψA2(2dψ+B)(d+DαξG/G)−2A2k2lψ2(d+DαξG/G)2 | (3.1.13) |
where ξ=k1/αx+l1/αy+w1/αt.
Eqs. (3.1.8), (3.1.9) together with Eqs. (2.2.7)–(2.2.11) make available the following three types solutions in terms hyperbolic function, trigonometric function and rational function as:
When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ>0,
U11(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓2Ak3/2ψ{d+B2ψ+√Ω2ψC1sinhΦ+C2coshΦC1coshΦ+C2sinhΦ}∓2k3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E){d+B2ψ+√Ω2ψC1sinhΦ+C2coshΦC1coshΦ+C2sinhΦ}−1 | (3.1.14) |
V11(ξ)=−1+2k2lψA2(2dψ+B){d+B2ψ+√Ω2ψC1sinhΦ+C2coshΦC1coshΦ+C2sinhΦ}−2A2k2lψ2{d+B2ψ+√Ω2ψC1sinhΦ+C2coshΦC1coshΦ+C2sinhΦ}2+2k2lA2(2dψ+B)(d2ψ+Bd−E)×{d+B2ψ+√Ω2ψC1sinhΦ+C2coshΦC1coshΦ+C2sinhΦ}−1−2k2lA2(d2ψ+Bd−E)2{d+B2ψ+√Ω2ψC1sinhΦ+C2coshΦC1coshΦ+C2sinhΦ}−2 | (3.1.15) |
where Φ=√Ωξα2Aα.
Since C1 and C2 are arbitrary constants, ifC1≠0 and C2=0, then Eqs. (3.1.14), (3.1.15) become
U11(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓k3/2A{2dψ+B+√Ωtanh√Ωξα2Aα}∓4ψk3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E){2dψ+B+√Ωtanh√Ωξα2Aα}−1 | (3.1.16) |
V11(ξ)=−1+k2lA2(2dψ+B){2dψ+B+√Ωtanh√Ωξα2Aα}−k2l2A2{2dψ+B+√Ωtanh√Ωξα2Aα}2+4ψk2lA2(2dψ+B)(d2ψ+Bd−E)×{2dψ+B+√Ωtanh√Ωξα2Aα}−1−8ψ2k2lA2(d2ψ+Bd−E)2{2dψ+B+√Ωtanh√Ωξα2Aα}−2 | (3.1.17) |
where ξ=k1/αx+l1/αy+w1/αt.
When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ<0
U12(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓k3/2A{2dψ+B+√−Ω−C1sinΦ+C2cosΦC1cosΦ+C2sinΦ}∓4ψk3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E){2dψ+B+√−Ω−C1sinΦ+C2cosΦC1cosΦ+C2sinΦ}−1 | (3.1.18) |
V12(ξ)=−1+k2lA2(2dψ+B){2dψ+B+√−Ω−C1sinΦ+C2cosΦC1cosΦ+C2sinΦ}−k2l2A2{2dψ+B+√−Ω−C1sinΦ+C2cosΦC1cosΦ+C2sinΦ}2+4k2lψA2(2dψ+B)(d2ψ+Bd−E){2dψ+B+√−Ω−C1sinΦ+C2cosΦC1cosΦ+C2sinΦ}−1−8k2lψ2A2(d2ψ+Bd−E)2{2dψ+B+√−Ω−C1sinΦ+C2cosΦC1cosΦ+C2sinΦ}−2 | (3.1.19) |
where Φ=√−Ωξα2Aα.
In particular, if C1≠0 and C2=0, then Eqs. (3.1.18), (3.1.19) are simplified as
U12(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓k3/2A(2dψ+B−√−ΩtanΦ)∓4ψk3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E)(2dψ+B−√−ΩtanΦ)−1 | (3.1.20) |
V12(ξ)=−1+k2lA2(2dψ+B)(2dψ+B−√−ΩtanΦ)−k2l2A2(2dψ+B−√−ΩtanΦ)2+4k2lψA2(2dψ+B)(d2ψ+Bd−E)(2dψ+B−√−ΩtanΦ)−1−8k2lψ2A2(d2ψ+Bd−E)2(2dψ+B−√−ΩtanΦ)−2 | (3.1.21) |
where Φ=√−Ωξα2Aα and ξ=k1/αx+l1/αy+w1/αt.
When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ=0,
U13(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓k3/2A{2dψ+B+2ψαC2C1α+C2ξα}∓4ψk3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E){2dψ+B+2ψαC2C1α+C2ξα}−1 | (3.1.22) |
V13(ξ)=−1+k2lA2(2dψ+B){2dψ+B+2ψαC2C1α+C2ξα}−k2l2A2{2dψ+B+2ψαC2C1α+C2ξα}2+4k2lψA2(2dψ+B)(d2ψ+Bd−E){2dψ+B+2ψαC2C1α+C2ξα}−1−8ψ2k2lA2(d2ψ+Bd−E)2{2dψ+B+2ψαC2C1α+C2ξα}−2 | (3.1.23) |
If C1=0 and C2≠0, then
U13(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{k3(2dψ+B)∓Aw√k}∓k3/2A(2dψ+B+2ψα/ξα)∓4ψk3/2A(d2ψ+Bd−E)(2dψ+B+2ψα/ξα)−1 | (3.1.24) |
V13(ξ)=−1+k2lA2(2dψ+B)(2dψ+B+2ψα/ξα)−k2l2A2(2dψ+B+2ψα/ξα)2+4k2lψA2(2dψ+B)(d2ψ+Bd−E)(2dψ+B+2ψα/ξα)−1−8ψ2k2lA2(d2ψ+Bd−E)2(2dψ+B+2ψα/ξα)−2 | (3.1.25) |
where ξ=k1/αx+l1/αy+w1/αt.
When B=0, ψ=A−C and Δ=ψE>0,
U14(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{2dψk3∓Aw√k}∓2Ak3/2{dψ+√ΔC1sinhL+C2coshLC1coshL+C2sinhL}∓2ψk3/2A(d2ψ−E){dψ+√ΔC1sinhL+C2coshLC1coshL+C2sinhL}−1 | (3.1.26) |
V14(ξ)=−1+4dψk2lA2{dψ+√ΔC1sinhL+C2coshLC1coshL+C2sinhL}−2A2k2l{dψ+√ΔC1sinhL+C2coshLC1coshL+C2sinhL}2+4dk2lψ2A2(d2ψ−E){dψ+√ΔC1sinhL+C2coshLC1coshL+C2sinhL}−1−2ψ2k2lA2(d2ψ−E)2{dψ+√ΔC1sinhL+C2coshLC1coshL+C2sinhL}−2 | (3.1.27) |
Consider the arbitrary constants as C1≠0 and C2=0, then
U14(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{2dψk3∓Aw√k}∓2Ak3/2(dψ+√ΔtanhL)∓2ψk3/2A(d2ψ−E)(dψ+√ΔtanhL)−1 | (3.1.28) |
V14(ξ)=−1+4dψk2lA2(dψ+√ΔtanhL)−2A2k2l(dψ+√ΔtanhL)2+4dψ2k2lA2(d2ψ−E)(dψ+√ΔtanhL)−1−2ψ2k2lA2(d2ψ−E)2(dψ+√ΔtanhL)−2 | (3.1.29) |
where L=√ΔξαAα and ξ=k1/αx+l1/αy+w1/αt.
When B=0, ψ=A−C and Δ=ψE<0,
U15(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{2dψk3∓Aw√k}∓2Ak3/2{dψ+√−Δ−C1sinM+C2cosMC1cosM+C2sinM}∓2k3/2ψA(d2ψ−E){dψ+√−Δ−C1sinM+C2cosMC1cosM+C2sinM}−1 | (3.1.30) |
V15(ξ)=−1+4dψk2lA2{dψ+√−Δ−C1sinM+C2cosMC1cosM+C2sinM}−2A2k2l{dψ+√−Δ−C1sinM+C2cosMC1cosM+C2sinM}2+4dψ2k2lA2(d2ψ−E){dψ+√−Δ−C1sinM+C2cosMC1cosM+C2sinM}−1−2k2lψ2A2(d2ψ−E)2{dψ+√−Δ−C1sinM+C2cosMC1cosM+C2sinM}−2 | (3.1.31) |
For particular case C1≠0 and C2=0,
U15(ξ)=±1Ak3/2{2dψk3∓Aw√k}∓2Ak3/2(dψ−√−ΔtanM)∓2k3/2ψA(d2ψ−E)(dψ−√−ΔtanM)−1 | (3.1.32) |
V15(ξ)=−1+4dψk2lA2(dψ−√−ΔtanM)−2A2k2l(dψ−√−ΔtanM)2+4dψ2k2lA2(d2ψ−E)(dψ−√−ΔtanM)−1−2k2lψ2A2(d2ψ−E)2(dψ−√−ΔtanM)−2 | (3.1.33) |
where M=√−ΔξαAα and ξ=k1/αx+l1/αy+w1/αt.
Following the same procedure as above for Eqs. (3.1.10)–(3.1.13) together with Eqs. (2.2.7)–(2.2.11), we might obtain more general closed form traveling wave solutions to the space time fractional (2+1)-dimensional dispersive long wave equations in terms of hyperbolic function, trigonometric function and rational function. To avoid the disturbance of readers the results have not been recorded here.
Let us consider the (3+1)-dimensional space time fractional mKdV-ZK equation in the form
Dαtu+δu2Dαxu+D3αxu+Dαx(D2αyu)+Dαx(D2αzu)=0, | (3.2.1) |
where 0<α⩽1 and δ is an arbitrary constant. This equation is derived for plasma comprised of cool and hot electrons and a species of fluid ions [44].
Using the fractional composite transformation
u(x,y,z,t)=U(ξ),ξ=l1/αx+m1/αy+n1/αz−ω1/αt, | (3.2.2) |
where l,m,n and ω are non-zero parameters, Eq. (3.2.1) is turned into the ordinary differential equation
−ωDαξU+δlU2DαξU+(l3+lm2+ln2)D3αξU=0. | (3.2.3) |
The anti-derivative of Eq. (3.2.3) with integral constant zero possesses
−ωU+δl3U3+(l3+lm2+ln2)D2αξU=0. | (3.2.4) |
Considering the value of n obtained by homogeneous balance to Eq. (3.2.4), Eq. (2.2.4) takes the form
U(ξ)=a0+a1(d+DαξG/G)+b1(d+DαξG/G)−1, | (3.2.5) |
where at least one of a1 and b1 is non-zero.
Substitute Eq. (3.2.5) with the help of Eq. (2.2.5) into Eq. (3.2.4), we obtain a polynomial in (d+DαξG/G). Equating each term of this polynomial to zero gives a set of algebraic equations for a0,a1,b0,b1,and ω. Solving these equations by Maple gives the following set of solutions:
Set−1:a0=±(2dψ+B)A√3(l2+m2+n2)−2δ,a1=±ψδA√−6δ(l2+m2+n2),b1=0,ω=−l(l2+m2+n2)(4Eψ+B)2A2 | (3.2.6) |
Set−2:a0=±(2dψ+B)2δA√−6δ(l2+m2+n2),ω=−l(l2+m2+n2)(4Eψ+B)2A2,a1=0,b1=∓(d2ψ+Bd−E)δA√−6δ(l2+m2+n2) | (3.2.7) |
Utilizing Eqs. (3.2.6), (3.2.7) into Eq. (3.2.5) yields the following general expressions for solutions:
U1(ξ)=∓√−6δ(l2+m2+n2)2Aδ(B−2ψDαξG/G) | (3.2.8) |
U2(ξ)=±√−6δ(l2+m2+n2)2Aδ{2dψ+B−2(d2ψ+Bd−E)(d+DαξG/G)−1}, | (3.2.9) |
where ξ=l1/αx+m1/αy+n1/αz−{−l(l2+m2+n2)(4Eψ+B)2A2}1/αt.
Eq. (3.2.8) along with Eqs. (2.2.7)–(2.2.11) provides the following solutions in terms of hyperbolic, trigonometric and rational:
When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ>0,
U11(ξ)=±√−6δ(l2+m2+n2)2Aδ√ΩC1sinh(√Ωξα2Aα)+C2cosh(√Ωξα2Aα)C1cosh(√Ωξα2Aα)+C2sinh(√Ωξα2Aα) | (3.2.10) |
The choices for arbitrary constants as C1≠0, C2=0, reduces Eq. (3.2.10) to
U11(ξ)=±√−6δ(l2+m2+n2)2Aδ√Ωtanh(√Ωξα2Aα) | (3.2.11) |
where ξ=l1/αx+m1/αy+n1/αz−{−l(l2+m2+n2)(4Eψ+B)2A2}1/αt.
When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ<0,
U12(ξ)=±√−6δ(l2+m2+n2)2Aδ√−Ω−C1sin(√−Ωξα2Aα)+C2cos(√−Ωξα2Aα)C1cos(√−Ωξα2Aα)+C2sin(√−Ωξα2Aα) | (3.2.12) |
The choices for arbitrary constants as C1≠0, C2=0, reduces Eq. (3.2.12) to
U12(ξ)=∓√−6δ(l2+m2+n2)2Aδ√−Ωtan(√−Ωξα2Aα), | (3.2.13) |
where ξ=l1/αx+m1/αy+n1/αz−{−l(l2+m2+n2)(4Eψ+B)2A2}1/αt.
When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ=0,
U13(ξ)=±ψαC2√−6δ(l2+m2+n2)Aδ(C1α+C2ξα) | (3.2.14) |
In particular, if C1=0, C2≠0, then
U13(ξ)=±ψαAδξα√−6δ(l2+m2+n2) | (3.2.15) |
where ξ=l1/αx+m1/αy+n1/αz−{−l(l2+m2+n2)(4Eψ+B)2A2}1/αt.
When B=0, ψ=A−C and Δ=ψE>0,
U14(ξ)=±√−6Δδ(l2+m2+n2)Aδ{C1sinh(√ΔξαAα)+C2cosh(√ΔξαAα)C1cosh(√ΔξαAα)+C2sinh(√ΔξαAα)} | (3.2.16) |
For C1≠0, C2=0, Eq. (3.2.16) becomes
U14(ξ)=±√−6Δδ(l2+m2+n2)Aδtanh(√ΔξαAα) | (3.2.17) |
where ξ=l1/αx+m1/αy+n1/αz−{−4Eψl(l2+m2+n2)2A2}1/αt.
When B=0, ψ=A−C and Δ=ψE<0,
U15(ξ)=±√6Δδ(l2+m2+n2)Aδ{−C1sin(√−ΔξαAα)+C2cos(√−ΔξαAα)C1cos(√−ΔξαAα)+C2sin(√−ΔξαAα)} | (3.2.18) |
If C1≠0, C2=0, Eq. (3.2.18) becomes
U15(ξ)=∓√6Δδ(l2+m2+n2)Aδtan(√−ΔξαAα) | (3.2.19) |
where ξ=l1/αx+m1/αy+n1/αz−{−4Eψl(l2+m2+n2)2A2}1/αt.
Making use of Eq. (3.2.9) as above will also provide further new and general exact traveling wave solutions in terms of hyperbolic, trigonometric and rational. For convenience of readers we have not record these all solutions in this study. Guner et al. [45] obtained only four solutions by (G′/G)-expansion method where as our applied fractional generalized (DαξG/G)-expansion method has ensured many solutions which are further new and general. To the best of our knowledge, these solutions have not been visible in any earlier study.
The following nonlinear space-time fractional modified regularized long-wave equation is considered to be examined for further exact traveling wave solutions:
Dαtu+δDαxu+τu2Dαxu−ηDαtD2αxu=0,0<α⩽1 | (3.3.1) |
where δ,τand η are constants. This equation proposed by Benjamin et al. to describe approximately the unidirectional propagation of long waves in certain dispersive systems is supposed to be alternative to the modified KdV equation. Eq. (3.3.1) has been modeled to demonstrate some physical phenomena like transverse waves in shallow water and magneto hydrodynamic waves in plasma and photon packets in nonlinear crystals [46,47,48].
The fractional complex transformation
u(x,t)=U(ξ),ξ=x−v1/αt, | (3.3.2) |
reduces Eq. (3.3.1) to the ODE
(δ−v)DαξU+τU2DαξU+vηD3αξU=0 | (3.3.3) |
Integrating Eq. (3.3.3) and setting integral constant to zero gives
(δ−v)U+τ3U3+ηvD2αξU=0 | (3.3.4) |
Taking homogeneous balance between highest order linear term and highest nonlinear term from Eq. (3.3.4) yields n=1 and the solution Eq. (2.2.4) is reduced to
U(ξ)=a0+a1(d+DαξG/G)+b1(d+DαξG/G)−1 | (3.3.5) |
where at least one of a1 and b1 is nonzero.
Eq. (3.3.4) with the help of Eq. (2.2.5) and Eq. (3.3.5) makes a polynomial in (d+DαξG/G). Set each coefficient of this polynomial to zero and obtain a system of equations for a0,a1,b1 and v. Calculating these equations by Maple gives the following solutions:
Set−1:a0=±3lηδ(2dψ+B)√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2),a1=∓6lηδψ√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2),b1=0,v=2lδA22A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2 | (3.3.6) |
Set−2:a0=±3lηδ(2dψ+B)√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2),b1=∓6lηδ(d2ψ+Bd−E)√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2),a1=0,v=2lδA22A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2 | (3.3.7) |
Inserting the values appearing in Eq. (3.3.6) and Eq. (3.3.7) into Eq. (3.3.5) possesses the following expressions for solutions:
U1(ξ)=±3lηδ√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)(B−2ψDαξG/G) | (3.3.8) |
U2(ξ)=±3lηδ(2dψ+B)−2(d2ψ+Bd−E)(d+DαξG/G)−1√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2) | (3.3.9) |
where ξ=x−(2lδA22A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)1/αt.
Eq. (3.3.8) with the help of Eqs. (2.2.7)–(2.2.11) provides the following solutions:
Case 1: When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ>0,
U11(ξ)=∓3lηδ√Ω√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)×C1sinh(√Ωξα2Aα)+C2cosh(√Ωξα2Aα)C1cosh(√Ωξα2Aα)+C2sinh(√Ωξα2Aα) | (3.3.10) |
Since C1 and C2 are arbitrary constants, one may chooseC1≠0, C2=0 and under simplification Eq. (3.3.10) becomes
U11(ξ)=∓3lηδ√Ω√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)×tanh(√Ωξα2Aα) | (3.3.11) |
where ξ=x−(2lδA22A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)1/αt.
Case 2: When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ<0,
U12(ξ)=∓3lηδ√−Ω√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)×−C1sin(√−Ωξα2Aα)+C2cos(√−Ωξα2Aα)C1cos(√−Ωξα2Aα)+C2sin(√−Ωξα2Aα) | (3.3.12) |
In particular, if we choose C1≠0, C2=0, then under simplification Eq. (3.3.12) reduces to
U12(ξ)=±3lηδ√−Ω√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)×tan(√−Ωξα2Aα) | (3.3.13) |
where ξ=x−(2lδA22A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)1/αt.
Case 3: When B≠0, ψ=A−C and Ω=B2+4Eψ=0,
U13(ξ)=∓3lηδ√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)×2ψαC2C1α+C2ξα | (3.3.14) |
If C1=0, C2≠0, Eq. (3.3.14) is simplified to
U13(ξ)=∓6ψαlηδξα√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2) | (3.3.15) |
where ξ=x−(2lδA22A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)1/αt.
Case 4: When B=0, ψ=A−C and Δ=ψE>0,
U14(ξ)=∓6lηδ√Δ√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ)×C1sinh(√ΔξαAα)+C2cosh(√ΔξαAα)C1cosh(√ΔξαAα)+C2sinh(√ΔξαAα) | (3.3.16) |
For particular values of the arbitrary constants as C1≠0, C2=0, Eq. (3.3.16) possesses
U14(ξ)=∓6lηδ√Δ√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ)×tanh(√ΔξαAα) | (3.3.17) |
where ξ=x−(2lδA22A2+4l2ηEψ)1/αt.
Case 5: When B=0, ψ=A−C and Δ=ψE<0,
U15(ξ)=±6lηδ√−Δ√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ)×C1sin(√−ΔξαAα)+C2cos(√−ΔξαAα)C1cos(√−ΔξαAα)+C2sin(√−ΔξαAα) | (3.3.18) |
The choice of the arbitrary constants as C1≠0, C2=0 forces Eq. (3.3.18) to turn into
U15(ξ)=±6lηδ√−Δ√−3τηδ(2A2+4l2ηEψ+l2ηB2)×tan(√−ΔξαAα) | (3.3.19) |
where ξ=x−(2lδA22A2+4l2ηEψ)1/αt.
The obtained solutions in terms of hyperbolic function, trigonometric function and rational function are new and more general. In similar way, much more new and general solutions of the closed form can be constructed by using Eq. (3.3.9) along with Eqs. (2.2.7)–(2.2.11). The solutions obtained by modified simple equation method [49] and the improved fractional Riccati expansion method [50] are only in terms of hyperbolic, where as we achieved those in terms of hyperbolic function, trigonometric function and rational function in explicitly general form. We have not recorded these results to avoid the annoyance of the readers. On comparison, our solutions are general and much more in number than those of [49,50].
The complex physical mechanism of real world can be illustrated by means of graphical representations. The graphs (Figures 1–3) drown for the exact solutions obtained in this study has been appeared in different shape like kink type soliton, bell shape soliton, singular bell shape soliton, anti bell shape soliton, periodic solution, singular periodic solution etc. We have recorded here only few graphs rather than all for making it easily readable.
This article has been put in writing further new and general traveling wave solutions in closed form to the space time fractional (2+1)-dimensional dispersive long wave equations, the (3+1)-dimensional space time fractional mKdV-ZK equation and the space time fractional modified regularized long-wave equation. The solutions have successfully constructed in terms of hyperbolic function, trigonometric function and rational function by the newly established fractional generalized (DαξG/G)-expansion method. To the best of our knowledge, these results are not available in the literature. The obtained solutions might play important roles to analyze the mechanisms of complex physical phenomena of the real world. The performance of the suggested method is highly appreciable for its easiest productive behavior and worthy for revealing rare solutions to more fractional order nonlinear evolution equations. Since each nonlinear equation has its own anomalous characteristic, the future research might be how the suggested method is compatible for revealing the solutions to other fractional nonlinear evolution equations.
All authors have contributed to the manuscript equally. We all discussed the outcomes of the proposed method and approved the final manuscript.
[1] | Arend WP, Dayer JM (1990) Cytokines agonist against rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 30: 305-315. |
[2] |
Gorman CL, Cope AP (2008) Immune-mediated pathways in chronic inflammatory arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 22: 221-238. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2008.01.003
![]() |
[3] | Kasper D, Braunwald E, Fauci A, et al. (1971) Rheumatoid arthritis, in: Lipsky, P.E. Author, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 16th edition, 1968-1977. |
[4] |
Deon D, Ahmed S, Tai K, et al. (2001) Cross-talk between IL-1 and IL-6 signaling pathways in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. J Immunol 167: 5395-5403. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.5395
![]() |
[5] |
Szekanecz Z, Halloran MM, Volin MV, et al. (2000) Temporal expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43: 1266-1277. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200006)43:6<1266::AID-ANR9>3.0.CO;2-P
![]() |
[6] |
Kwon YB, Lee JD, Lee HJ, et al. (2001) Bee venom injection into an acupuncture point reduces arthritis associated edema and nociceptive responses. Pain 90: 271-280. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00412-7
![]() |
[7] | Khem M, Amadi YA (2009) Role of dietary Lactobacilli in gastrointestinal microecology. Am J Clin Nutr 33: 2448-2457. |
[8] |
Singh V, Singh K, Amdekar S, et al. (2009) Innate and specific gut-associated immunity and microbial Interference. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 55: 6-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00497.x
![]() |
[9] | Amdekar S, Dwivedi D, Roy P, et al. (2010) Probiotics: multifarious oral vaccine against infectious traumas. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 57: 299-307. |
[10] |
Amdekar S, Singh V, Singh DD (2011) Probiotic therapy: Immunomodulating approach towards Urinary Tract Infection. Curr Microbiol 63: 484-490. doi: 10.1007/s00284-011-0006-2
![]() |
[11] | Amdekar S, Roy P, Singh V, et al. (2012) Anti-inflammatory activity of Lactobacillus on carrageenan induced paw edema in male Wistar rats. Int J Inflam 2012: 752015. |
[12] |
Remmers EF, Joe B, Griffiths MM, et al. (2002) Modulation of multiple experimental arthritis models by collagen-induced arthritis quantitative trait loci isolated in congenic rat lines. Arthritis Rheum 46: 2225-2234. doi: 10.1002/art.10439
![]() |
[13] | Chamundeeswari D, Vasantha J, Gopalkrishnan S, et al. (2005) Effect of alcoholic extract of Trewia polycarpa roots on Cathepsin D in arthritic rats. Int J Pharmacol Res 89: 51-53. |
[14] |
Shou J, Bull CM, Li L, et al. (2006) Identification of blood biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis by transcript profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the rat collagen induced arthritis model. Arthritis Res Ther 8: 28. doi: 10.1186/ar1883
![]() |
[15] | Tripathi KD (1994) Essentials in medical pharmacology. 4th ed, New Delhi: Jaypee, 2004. |
[16] |
Tak PP, Bresnihan B (2000) The pathogenesis and prevention of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: advances from synovial biopsy and tissue analysis. Arthritis Rheum 43: 2619-2133. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2619::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-V
![]() |
[17] |
Chrubasik JE, Roufogalis BD, Chrubasik S (2007) Evidence of effectiveness of herbal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of painful osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain. Phytother Res 21: 675-683. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2142
![]() |
[18] |
McInnes IB, Schett G (2007) Cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol 7: 429-442. doi: 10.1038/nri2094
![]() |
[19] | Agrawal V, Malviya AN (2008) Cytokine network and is manipulation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Indian Rheumatol Assoc 13: 86-91. |
[20] |
Rioja I, Bush KA, Buckton JB, et al. (2004) Joint cytokine quantification in two rodent arthritis models: kinetics of expression, correlation of mRNA and protein levels and response to prednisolone treatment. Clin Exp Immunol 137: 65-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02499.x
![]() |
[21] |
Cuzzocrea S, Mazzon E, Bevilaqua C, et al. (2000) Cloricromene, a coumarine derivative, protects against collagen-induced arthritis in Lewis rats. Br J Pharmacol 131: 1399-1407. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703695
![]() |
[22] | Yin H, Yu M, Cheng H, et al. (2005) Beta-endorphin prevents collagen induced arthritis by neuroimmuno-regulation pathway. Neuroendocrinol Lett 26: 739-744. |
[23] |
Trushin SA, Pennington KN, Carmona EM, et al. (2003) Protein kinase Calpha (PKCalpha) acts upstream of PK theta to activate IκB kinase and NF-κB in T lymphocytes. Mol Cell Biol 23: 7068-7081. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.19.7068-7081.2003
![]() |
[24] |
Lee J, Lee B, Lee H, et al. (2009) Lactobacillus suntoryeus inhibits pro inflammatory cytokine expression and TLR-4-linked NF-κB activation in experimental colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 24: 231-237. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0618-6
![]() |
[25] |
Pena JA, Versalovic J (2003) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG decreases TNF-alpha production in lipopolysaccharide-activated murine macrophages by a contact-independent mechanism. Cell Microbiol 5: 277-285. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.t01-1-00275.x
![]() |
[26] | te Velde AA, Huijbens RJF, Heije K, et al. (1990) Interleukin-4 (IL-4) inhibits secretion of IL-1-β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and IL-6 by human monocytes. Blood 76: 1392-1397. |
[27] |
Colotta F, Re F, Muzio M (1993) Interleukin-1 type II receptor: a decoy target for IL-1 that is regulated by IL-4. Science 261: 472-475. doi: 10.1126/science.8332913
![]() |
[28] | Cope AP, Gibbons DL, Aderka D (1993) Differential regulation of tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNF-R) by IL-4: upregulation of p55 and p75 TNF-R on synovial joint mononuclear cells. Cytokine 3: 205-208. |
[29] | Scheller J, Ohnesorge N, Rose-John S (2006) Interleukin-6 trans-signalling in chronic inflammation and cancer. Scand J Immunol 63: 321-329. |
[30] |
Khanna D, Sethi G, Ahn KA, et al. (2007) Natural products as a gold mine for arthritis treatment. Curr Opin Pharmacol 7: 344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2007.03.002
![]() |
[31] | Alipour B, Homayouni-Rad A, Vaghef-Mehrabany E, et al. (2014) Effects of Lactobacillus casei supplementation on disease activity and inflammatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Int J Rheum Dis 17: 519-527. |
[32] |
Llana MN, Sarnacki SH, Castaneda MRV et al. (2013) Consumption of Lactobacillus casei Fermented Milk Prevents Salmonella Reactive Arthritis by Modulating IL-23/IL-17 Expression. PLoS One 8: e82588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082588
![]() |
1. | Rajeev Ranjan, Mirko Hansen, Pablo Mendoza Ponce, Lait Abu Saleh, Dietmar Schroeder, Martin Ziegler, Hermann Kohlstedt, Wolfgang H. Krautschneider, 2018, Integration of Double Barrier Memristor Die with Neuron ASIC for Neuromorphic Hardware Learning, 978-1-5386-4881-0, 1, 10.1109/ISCAS.2018.8350996 | |
2. | Finn Zahari, Eduardo Pérez, Mamathamba Kalishettyhalli Mahadevaiah, Hermann Kohlstedt, Christian Wenger, Martin Ziegler, Analogue pattern recognition with stochastic switching binary CMOS-integrated memristive devices, 2020, 10, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-020-71334-x | |
3. | Geoffrey W. Burr, Robert M. Shelby, Abu Sebastian, Sangbum Kim, Seyoung Kim, Severin Sidler, Kumar Virwani, Masatoshi Ishii, Pritish Narayanan, Alessandro Fumarola, Lucas L. Sanches, Irem Boybat, Manuel Le Gallo, Kibong Moon, Jiyoo Woo, Hyunsang Hwang, Yusuf Leblebici, Neuromorphic computing using non-volatile memory, 2017, 2, 2374-6149, 89, 10.1080/23746149.2016.1259585 | |
4. | Chen Wang, Huaqiang Wu, Bin Gao, Teng Zhang, Yuchao Yang, He Qian, Conduction mechanisms, dynamics and stability in ReRAMs, 2018, 187-188, 01679317, 121, 10.1016/j.mee.2017.11.003 | |
5. | Sven Dirkmann, Mirko Hansen, Martin Ziegler, Hermann Kohlstedt, Thomas Mussenbrock, The role of ion transport phenomena in memristive double barrier devices, 2016, 6, 2045-2322, 10.1038/srep35686 | |
6. | Rajeev Ranjan, Pablo Mendoza Ponce, Anirudh Kankuppe, Bibin John, Lait Abu Saleh, Dietmar Schroeder, Wolfgang H. Krautschneider, 2016, Programmable memristor emulator ASIC for biologically inspired memristive learning, 978-1-5090-1288-6, 261, 10.1109/TSP.2016.7760874 | |
7. | Dong Won Kim, Woo Seok Yi, Jin Young Choi, Kei Ashiba, Jong Ung Baek, Han Sol Jun, Jae Joon Kim, Jea Gun Park, Double MgO-Based Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junction for Artificial Neuron, 2020, 14, 1662-453X, 10.3389/fnins.2020.00309 | |
8. | Krishna Kanth Neelisetty, Sebastian Gutsch, Falk von Seggern, Alan Molinari, Alexander Vahl, Xiaoke Mu, Torsten Scherer, Chakravadhanula VS Kiran, Christian Kübel, Electron Beam Effects on Silicon Oxide Films – Structure and Electrical Properties, 2018, 24, 1431-9276, 1810, 10.1017/S1431927618009534 | |
9. | Sagarvarma Sayyaparaju, Md Musabbir Adnan, Sherif Amer, Garrett S. Rose, Device-aware Circuit Design for Robust Memristive Neuromorphic Systems with STDP-based Learning, 2020, 16, 1550-4832, 1, 10.1145/3380969 | |
10. | Mirko Hansen, Finn Zahari, Martin Ziegler, Hermann Kohlstedt, Double-Barrier Memristive Devices for Unsupervised Learning and Pattern Recognition, 2017, 11, 1662-453X, 10.3389/fnins.2017.00091 | |
11. | Mirko Hansen, Finn Zahari, Hermann Kohlstedt, Martin Ziegler, Unsupervised Hebbian learning experimentally realized with analogue memristive crossbar arrays, 2018, 8, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-018-27033-9 | |
12. | Hugh G. Manning, Fabio Niosi, Claudia Gomes da Rocha, Allen T. Bellew, Colin O’Callaghan, Subhajit Biswas, Patrick F. Flowers, Benjamin J. Wiley, Justin D. Holmes, Mauro S. Ferreira, John J. Boland, Emergence of winner-takes-all connectivity paths in random nanowire networks, 2018, 9, 2041-1723, 10.1038/s41467-018-05517-6 | |
13. | Emilio Pérez-Bosch Quesada, Rocío Romero-Zaliz, Eduardo Pérez, Mamathamba Kalishettyhalli Mahadevaiah, John Reuben, Markus Andreas Schubert, Francisco Jiménez-Molinos, Juan Bautista Roldán, Christian Wenger, Toward Reliable Compact Modeling of Multilevel 1T-1R RRAM Devices for Neuromorphic Systems, 2021, 10, 2079-9292, 645, 10.3390/electronics10060645 | |
14. | Sven Dirkmann, Martin Ziegler, Mirko Hansen, Hermann Kohlstedt, Jan Trieschmann, Thomas Mussenbrock, Kinetic simulation of filament growth dynamics in memristive electrochemical metallization devices, 2015, 118, 0021-8979, 214501, 10.1063/1.4936107 | |
15. | Rajeev Ranjan, Alexandros Kyrmanidis, Wolf Lukas Hellweg, Pablo Mendoza Ponce, Lait Abu Saleh, Dietmar Schroeder, Wolfgang H. Krautschneider, 2016, Integrated circuit with memristor emulator array and neuron circuits for neuromorphic pattern recognition, 978-1-5090-1288-6, 265, 10.1109/TSP.2016.7760875 | |
16. | Krishna Kanth Neelisetty, Xiaoke Mu, Sebastian Gutsch, Alexander Vahl, Alan Molinari, Falk von Seggern, Mirko Hansen, Torsten Scherer, Margit Zacharias, Lorenz Kienle, VS Kiran Chakravadhanula, Christian Kübel, Electron Beam Effects on Oxide Thin Films—Structure and Electrical Property Correlations, 2019, 25, 1431-9276, 592, 10.1017/S1431927619000175 | |
17. | Eduardo Pérez, Antonio Javier Pérez-Ávila, Rocío Romero-Zaliz, Mamathamba Kalishettyhalli Mahadevaiah, Emilio Pérez-Bosch Quesada, Juan Bautista Roldán, Francisco Jiménez-Molinos, Christian Wenger, Optimization of Multi-Level Operation in RRAM Arrays for In-Memory Computing, 2021, 10, 2079-9292, 1084, 10.3390/electronics10091084 | |
18. | Sven Dirkmann, Jan Trieschmann, Thomas Mussenbrock, 2024, Chapter 6, 978-3-031-36704-5, 159, 10.1007/978-3-031-36705-2_6 | |
19. | Baki Gökgöz, Fatih Gül, Tolga Aydın, An overview memristor based hardware accelerators for deep neural network, 2024, 36, 1532-0626, 10.1002/cpe.7997 | |
20. | Finn Zahari, Martin Ziegler, Pouya Doerwald, Christian Wenger, Hermann Kohlstedt, 2024, Chapter 2, 978-3-031-36704-5, 43, 10.1007/978-3-031-36705-2_2 |