Research article Special Issues

Critical analysis of electrohysterographic methods for continuous monitoring of intrauterine pressure

  • Monitoring the progression of uterine activity provides important prognostic information during pregnancy and delivery. Currently, uterine activity monitoring relies on direct or indirect mechanical measurements of intrauterine pressure (IUP), which are unsuitable for continuous long-term observation. The electrohysterogram (EHG) provides a non-invasive alternative to the existing methods and is suitable for long-term ambulatory use. Several published state-of-the-art methods for EHG-based IUP estimation are here discussed, analyzed, optimized, and compared. By means of parameter space exploration, key parameters of the methods are evaluated for their relevance and optimal values. We have optimized all methods towards higher IUP estimation accuracy and lower computational complexity. Their accuracy was compared with the gold standard accuracy of internally measured IUP. Their computational complexity was compared based on the required number of multiplications per second (MPS). Significant reductions in computational complexity have been obtained for all published algorithms, while improving IUP estimation accuracy. A correlation coefficient of 0.72 can be obtained using fewer than 120 MPS. We conclude that long-term ambulatory monitoring of uterine activity is possible using EHG-based methods. Furthermore, the choice of a base method for IUP estimation is less important than the correct selection of electrode positions, filter parameters, and postprocessing methods. The presented review of state-of-the-art methods and applied optimizations show that long-term ambulatory IUP monitoring is feasible using EHG measurements.

    Citation: M. J. Rooijakkers, C. Rabotti, S. G. Oei, M. Mischi. Critical analysis of electrohysterographic methods for continuous monitoring of intrauterine pressure[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3019-3039. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020171

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mark Kei Fong Wong, Hao Hei, Si Zhou Lim, Eddie Yin-Kwee Ng . Applied machine learning for blood pressure estimation using a small, real-world electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram dataset. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 975-997. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023045
    [2] Meiyuan Du, Chi Zhang, Sheng Xie, Fang Pu, Da Zhang, Deyu Li . Investigation on aortic hemodynamics based on physics-informed neural network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 11545-11567. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023512
    [3] Nannan Long, Yongxiang Lei, Lianhua Peng, Ping Xu, Ping Mao . A scoping review on monitoring mental health using smart wearable devices. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 7899-7919. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022369
    [4] Tyson Loudon, Stephen Pankavich . Mathematical analysis and dynamic active subspaces for a long term model of HIV. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(3): 709-733. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017040
    [5] Mazhar Ali Dootio, Abdullah Lakhan, Ali Hassan Sodhro, Tor Morten Groenli, Narmeen Zakaria Bawany, Samrat Kumar . Secure and failure hybrid delay enabled a lightweight RPC and SHDS schemes in Industry 4.0 aware IIoHT enabled fog computing. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(1): 513-536. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022024
    [6] Scott R. Pope, Laura M. Ellwein, Cheryl L. Zapata, Vera Novak, C. T. Kelley, Mette S. Olufsen . Estimation and identification of parameters in a lumped cerebrovascular model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2009, 6(1): 93-115. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.93
    [7] Xiang Liu, Min Tian, Jie Zhou, Jinyan Liang . An efficient coverage method for SEMWSNs based on adaptive chaotic Gaussian variant snake optimization algorithm. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3191-3215. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023150
    [8] Fengjuan Liu, Binbin Qu, Lili Wang, Yahui Xu, Xiufa Peng, Chunling Zhang, Dexiang Xu . Effect of selective sleep deprivation on heart rate variability in post-90s healthy volunteers. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 13851-13860. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022645
    [9] Phung Cong Phi Khanh, Duc-Tan Tran, Van Tu Duong, Nguyen Hong Thinh, Duc-Nghia Tran . The new design of cows' behavior classifier based on acceleration data and proposed feature set. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 2760-2780. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020151
    [10] Aftab Ahmed, Javed I. Siddique . The effect of magnetic field on flow induced-deformation in absorbing porous tissues. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(2): 603-618. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019029
  • Monitoring the progression of uterine activity provides important prognostic information during pregnancy and delivery. Currently, uterine activity monitoring relies on direct or indirect mechanical measurements of intrauterine pressure (IUP), which are unsuitable for continuous long-term observation. The electrohysterogram (EHG) provides a non-invasive alternative to the existing methods and is suitable for long-term ambulatory use. Several published state-of-the-art methods for EHG-based IUP estimation are here discussed, analyzed, optimized, and compared. By means of parameter space exploration, key parameters of the methods are evaluated for their relevance and optimal values. We have optimized all methods towards higher IUP estimation accuracy and lower computational complexity. Their accuracy was compared with the gold standard accuracy of internally measured IUP. Their computational complexity was compared based on the required number of multiplications per second (MPS). Significant reductions in computational complexity have been obtained for all published algorithms, while improving IUP estimation accuracy. A correlation coefficient of 0.72 can be obtained using fewer than 120 MPS. We conclude that long-term ambulatory monitoring of uterine activity is possible using EHG-based methods. Furthermore, the choice of a base method for IUP estimation is less important than the correct selection of electrode positions, filter parameters, and postprocessing methods. The presented review of state-of-the-art methods and applied optimizations show that long-term ambulatory IUP monitoring is feasible using EHG measurements.



    Preterm birth is a major problem in obstetrics, associated with a great majority of perinatal mortality and over half of perinatal and long-term morbidity [1,2]. Additionally, over the last couple of decades a significant increase in the worldwide preterm birth rate is visible [3,4]. Early prediction of the onset of preterm delivery by accurate pregnancy monitoring is crucial for prevention of preterm birth [5]. Early notification of problems allows physicians to intervene in a timely manner by prescribing rest, progesterone supplements, or tocolytic drugs. These treatments can in turn result in a significant reduction of preterm birth rates [5,6].

    Insight into the time to delivery could be obtained by tracking the progression of uterine activity during pregnancy, by determining the frequency, duration, and amplitude of uterine contractions [7]. Accurate monitoring of the intrauterine pressure (IUP), which increases as a result of increased uterine activity, is a prerequisite for reliable contraction detection and analysis of additional parameters extracted from the EHG. When continuously measured over a prolonged period of time, the frequency, duration, and amplitude of uterine contractions can be used to reliably predict preterm delivery and prevent preterm birth throughout the last months of pregnancy; to this end ambulatory monitoring is required [8,9,10,11].

    In clinical practice, the IUP is generally monitored by either indirect or direct measurement. The most widely used indirect method is external tocography, which measures the deformation of the abdominal surface using a tocodynamometer, a strain gauge transducer placed on the abdomen. External tocography can be used throughout pregnancy and delivery, as it is non-invasive. Deriving the IUP estimate from an indirect mechanical measure, however, is unreliable in obese patients and very susceptible to movement artifacts [12,13]. Patients must therefore remain steady during measurements, as movements affect the accuracy of the estimated amplitude, duration, and frequency of contractions. Movement artifacts can result in a low sensitivity and specificity, hampering accurate estimation of the uterine activity and the progression of pregnancy, and therefore making tocodynamometry unsuitable for long-term and ambulatory measurements.

    A direct, quantitative measurement of the IUP can be obtained by placing an IUP catheter (IUPC) in direct contact with the amniotic fluid. The obtained IUP signal is accurate and currently serves as the gold-standard measurement. However, IUPC measurement requires rupture of the amniotic membranes and is thus performed only during delivery. Additionally, the use of an IUPC increases the risk of infections and can damage the uterus or the fetus [14,15]. Therefore, an IUPC should only be employed during delivery in complicated deliveries that require labor induction or augmentation [16].

    Alternative methods for non-invasive uterine activity monitoring based on the electrohysterogram (EHG) are being developed for clinical use [17]. These EHG-based methods use the bio-electrical signals generated during contraction in the uterine muscle, or myometrium [18]. Myometrial cells can generate action potentials or can be excited by action potentials generated by a neighboring cell, resulting in propagation of action potentials through the myometrium. Propagation of action potentials through an adequate number of cells causes contraction of the uterine muscle and, consequently, an increase in IUP. The propagation of action potentials is reflected in the spectral properties of the EHG signal, whereas the number of cells involved in the contraction is proportional to the amplitude of the EHG signal [19]. Therefore, the EHG can be used to estimate the IUP increase associated with each contraction, providing essential information on uterine activity [20,21]. Additionally, the EHG can potentially indicate time to delivery, since the electrical resistance between the myometrial cells is relatively high during pregnancy, while at term low-resistance paths form, leading to effective contractions [10,22]. The use of abdominal electrodes makes the EHG technique non-invasive and, therefore, suitable for long-term uterine observation throughout pregnancy; it allows reliable measurements in obese patients and is less susceptible to movement artifacts than external tocography [23,24].

    Various EHG based methods have been proposed to analyze the relation between electrical and mechanical activity of the uterus, comprising statistical approaches [25], filtering techniques [26,27,28,29,30,31,32], fast Fourier transform, and wavelet transform-based methods [23,33,34,35,36], as well as evaluation of nonlinear connectivity [9]. However, only recent studies have focused on EHG analysis as an alternative method for quantitative IUP estimation [28,29,32,35].

    Jezewski et al. used the root mean square (RMS) value of the EHG to estimate the uterine contraction pattern and compared it to a simultaneously recorded external tocogram [27,28]. A high correlation between the two signals was obtained, showing that the EHG could provide a reliable estimator for the the frequency of contractions. Skowronski et al. proposed an optimal linear filtering method using the EHG signal magnitude after low-pass filtering, followed by a Wiener filter, which showed a good resemblance to the simultaneously measured IUPC signal [29]. However, the method is unsuitable for long-term ambulatory measurements, because the Wiener filter requires a reference IUPC signal recorded during a 10 minute initialization period. Rabotti et al. used a spectrogram-based technique to obtain an IUP estimate that showed a high correlation with the simultaneously measured IUPC signal [35]. The method mimics the physiologic phenomena underlying the generation and propagation of action potentials, applying frequency compensation by scaling all spectrogram frequency bands relative to their central frequency. In addition, a second-order model was used to compensate for the influence of muscle fatigue and differences in electrical conductivity and contractile efficiency between individuals. Rooijakkers et al. proposed the use of the Teager energy (TE) operator after band-pass filtering to estimate the IUP using frequency compensation [32], retaining the original units of measurement in accordance with standard EMG force estimation [37]. This resulted in a higher correlation with the simultaneously measured IUPC signal compared to other algorithms from the literature, at a reduced computational complexity.

    The aim of this paper is to determine the best composite method for EHG-based IUP estimation in an ambulatory setting by exploring the full design-parameter space defined by state-of-the-art algorithms from the literature. To this end, the defining parameters of all the algorithms are identified and, after determining the influence of these parameters, an optimal combination is selected for improved IUP estimation accuracy and reduced computational complexity, respectively.

    The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the recently published IUP estimation algorithms that allow for quantitative IUP estimation and describes their most defining parameters. In section 3, a set of quality measures is defined to determine both the estimation accuracy and computational complexity. Various techniques used to optimize each method for long-term EHG-based IUP estimation are provided in section 4. Section 5 presents the dataset of abdominal EHG measurements with simultaneous IUPC recordings that was used for validation. Section 6 shows the influence of the various defining parameters and compares the accuracy and complexity results for all algorithms before and after optimization. Finally, section 7 and section 8 contain the discussion and conclusion based on the obtained results.

    Rooijakkers et al. proposed the use of the TE operator to calculate a frequency-weighed EHG-based estimate of the IUP [32]. As a first step, the input signal is downsampled to 4 Hz after applying an anti-aliasing filter at 2 Hz to reduce the algorithm's computational complexity. Before IUP estimation, the influence of respiration artifacts and morphological changes of the ECG is reduced by band-pass filtering to obtain a clean EHG signal. The low and high cut-off frequencies of this filter were defined at fmin=0.3Hz and fmax=0.8Hz [32,38], respectively, providing the filtered EHG signal xf[n], where n indicates the sample index. The instantaneous energy of the EHG signal Φ[n] uses the TE operator in its most basic form in the discrete time domain [39,40] and is defined as

    Φ[n]=xf[n]2xf[n+1]xf[n1]. (2.1)

    The resulting signal Φ[n] spans only three consecutive samples of xf to calculate the instantaneous energy of the EHG signal, providing an excellent time resolution. The TE is proportional to both the square of the signal amplitude and the square of its frequency, and hence calculates the frequency-weighted energy of the EHG signal. Finally, the moving average of Φ[n] is calculated over a 30-second interval, after which the square root is taken to obtain the TE-based IUP estimate (IUPTE), defined as

    IUPTE[n]=1M+M/2m=M/2Φ[xf[m+n]], (2.2)

    with, M30s, where the actual number of samples M depends on the used sampling frequency fs. The resulting IUPTE provides a physiology-based frequency-weighed energy estimate while retaining the original units of measurement in line with standard EMG force estimation [32,37].

    Rabotti et al. proposed the use of the spectrogram to calculate the frequency-weighed energy of the EHG signal as an estimate of the IUP [35]. First, the time-frequency representation of the EHG signal ρ[n,f] is calculated based on the squared magnitude of the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) with a Hamming window w[m] of 70-second length defined as

    ρ[n,f]=|+m=x[m]w[mn]ej2πfm|2. (2.3)

    The unnormalized first statistical moment Ψ[n] is calculated by scaling ρ[n,f] for each frequency interval in the range [fmin=0.3Hz,fmax=0.8Hz] by its mean frequency f, as described by

    Ψ[n]=fmaxfminfρ[n,f]. (2.4)

    By multiplying the in-band frequency intervals, which results in a band-pass filtering effect, Ψ[n] uses the simultaneous change of both the frequency- and amplitude-related features of the EHG signal to determine the IUP wave estimate. Finally, a second-order polynomial model is used to improve the similarity between the between the first statistical moment of the EHG and the IUP reference.

    Jezewski et al. proposed a RMS-based IUP estimation algorithm, in which the EHG is first band-pass filtered between fmin=0.05Hz and fmax=5Hz, resulting in the filtered signal xf[n] [27,28]. Next, an initial IUP estimate ^IUPRMS is calculated as

    ^IUPRMS[n]=n+M/2m=nM/2xf[m+n]2w[m]+M/2m=M/2w[m], (2.5)

    where w[m] is a Hamming window, which is used to smooth the estimate and reduce edge effects; M60s is the length of the Hamming window dependent on fs; and n is incremented in 3-second steps. Therefore, the resulting signal ^IUPRMS[n] has a sampling frequency of 1/3Hz. Finally, ^IUPRMS[n] is resampled to the original sampling frequency, yielding the RMS IUP estimate IUPRMS[n].

    Skowronski et al. proposed a method for IUP estimation based on rectification of the EHG signal [29], in which the EHG signal is first normalized to have zero mean and unity variance. Next, the EHG signal is low-pass-filtered with cut-off frequency fmax=2Hz, down-sampled to a sampling frequency of 4 Hz, and rectified to obtain a first approximation of the energy in the EHG signal. After low-pass filtering with a cut-off frequency of 0.1Hz to smooth the EHG energy signal, the signal is further downsampled to 0.2Hz, resulting in the absolute-value-based IUP estimate IUPABS. Finally, a Wiener filter W(n) is used to better predict the IUP from the EHG signal. The Wiener filter coefficients are obtained by reducing the error signal e(n)=d(n)IUPABS(n)W(n) in 10-minute signal segments for each patient in a mean-squared sense. Here, d(n) is the reference IUPC signal, and is the convolution operator.

    Quality measures need to be defined to allow comparison of the performance of the various algorithms and to determine the optimization options for each one.

    Two different measures are used to determine the accuracy of estimating the IUP for the various algorithms. Pearson's correlation coefficient r gives a measure of similarity in shape between the estimated and reference IUP waveforms. It is defined as

    r=Ni=1(xi¯x)(yi¯y)Ni=1(xi¯x)2Ni=1(yi¯y)2, (3.1)

    with x being the IUP estimate, y the IUPC signal, ¯x and ¯y their respective means, and N the total number of samples in the signal. The correlation coefficient r is in the range 1r1, where a higher value defines a better similarity in shape between the two waveforms. The root-mean-square error (RMSE), which is defined as

    RMSE=Ni=1(yixi)2N, (3.2)

    depends not only on similarity in shape but is also influenced by scaling factors and baseline offset. Before comparison, the basal tone of the IUP estimates are removed using the method described in [28], and their amplitudes are scaled to best match the IUPC signal. Additionally, the IUP estimate for each patient is shifted by a delay τ to compensate for the delay between the increase in bioelectrical activity and the resulting pressure increase in the uterus [18]. For each recording, the delay τ is obtained by maximizing r between x and ˉx, where τ is in the range of 0 s to 15 s.

    The average number of multiplications per sample (MPS) is used as a measure of computational complexity. All operations that are more complex than a multiplication, such as division or square root, can be represented by a number of multiplications. Both division and square root have a complexity in the order of O[n], where n is the accuracy of a value in number of bits. Assuming an accuracy of 16 bits for both numerator and denominator, a division and square root are substituted by 9 and 17 multiplications, respectively [41]. All simple operations, such as addition, subtraction, or bit-shift, are estimated but not used in the analysis. The STFT can be represented as a sliding fixed-length window for which at each position a fast Fourier transform (FFT) is calculated. When the length of the STFT window N is restricted to powers of 2, the number of multiplications of an FFT is in the order of O[(N/2)log2(N)] [42,49]. With a window length N=2048 samples, as required for the 70 s window defined by Rabotti et al., 8194 multiplications are needed to obtain the STFT for a single position of the sliding window [43].

    In an effort to determine the optimal method for EHG-based IUP estimation in an ambulatory setting, each of the algorithms presented in the previous section was implemented and optimized for improved IUP estimation accuracy and reduced computational complexity. To this end, the design parameters of each algorithm were selected, as presented in Table 1. Their influence on each algorithm was determined based on the definition of each parameter as given below. Finally, each algorithm was optimized for improved IUP estimation accuracy by maximizing the correlation coefficient r between the estimated IUP and the IUPC signal, as described in section 3.

    Table 1.  Comparison of IUP estimation algorithms based on their most distinctive parameters.
    Rooijakkers et al. Teager energy Rabotti et al. spectrogram Jezewski et al. root-mean square Skowronski et al. absolute value
    Input fs 20 Hz 20 Hz 20 Hz 200 Hz
    Preprocessing Normalization
    Filtering band [0.30.8Hz] [0.30.8Hz] [0.055.0Hz] [02.0Hz]
    Frequency comp. intrinsic multiply bands
    IUP smoothing 30 s mean 70 s Hanning 60 s Hamming 0.1 Hz LP filter
    Postprocessing 1st order model 2nd order model 1st order model Wiener filter
    Output fs 4 Hz 20 Hz 20 Hz 0.2 Hz

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Only Skowronski et al. propose a preprocessing step other than filtering, which consists in normalization of the signal. However, it should be noted that this step assumes the entire signal segment to be available before analysis, which is not feasible in a real-time ambulatory setting. Therefore, normalization was omitted from the analysis performed in this paper.

    Only part of the frequency spectrum of abdominally recorded biopotential measurements contains information pertaining to EHG signals. In these measurements, neither the upper nor the lower limit of EHG signals is exactly defined, and it can vary with the measurement method and electrode placement [33,44,45]. Furthermore, various additional signals and artifacts interfering with the EHG signal might negatively influence the accuracy of IUP estimation. These factors have resulted in filters with cut-off frequencies ranging from fmin=00.5 Hz and fmax=0.85 Hz [18,28,29,35,38,44,45,46] for a high-pass and low-pass filter, respectively. Optimizing the cut-off frequencies of the band-pass filter used for preprocessing was therefore performed in the 0 Hz to 5 Hz frequency range. Additionally, the influence of both the filter type and order on the optimal location of the cut-off frequencies was investigated.

    The methods of Jezewski et al. and Skowronski et al. have a flat frequency response, whereas the methods of Rabotti et al. and Rooijakkers et al. use frequency compensation to mimic the physiological frequency dependence of the EHG signal, to obtain a more accurate IUP estimate. All methods were tested with and without frequency compensation to determine its influence.

    A differentiator can be used to implement a frequency corrective filter for both the RMS- and modulus-based methods, as it introduces a frequency dependence defined by ˙y(t)=fy(t) [26,35]. This ideal differentiator can be closely approximated using alternative digital differentiation techniques [47]. The spectrogram-based method already contains frequency compensation, which is easily removed by omitting the multiplication with f in (2.4) to obtain a result with a flat frequency response. Due to the intrinsic frequency weighing of the TE operator, no IUP estimate without frequency compensation can be computed for the method proposed by Rooijakkers et al.

    The presented IUP estimation methods either use a low-pass filter or apply a convolution with a window to smooth the final IUP estimate. For each method, we optimized the low-pass cut-off frequency as well as the shape (square or Hamming window) and length M of the averaging window. The spectrogram-based method of Rabotti et al. intrinsically contains a smoothing window as part of the STFT operation and, low-pass filtering was therefore omitted.

    Both Jezewski et al. and Rooijakkers et al. apply a first-order model to linearly scale the IUP estimate amplitude. Rabotti et al. applies a second-order model that allows for non-linear amplitude scaling. Skowronski et al. propose the use of a Wiener filter to create an improved IUP estimate. It should be noted that, as no IUPC reference signal is available in ambulatory measurements, the latter postprocessing method is not directly applicable on a per-patient basis in a long-term ambulatory setting.

    For a fair comparison of the computational complexity of the algorithms presented in section 2, all algorithms were optimized for reduced computational complexity using a few basic methods. This reduction of the complexity was performed with minimal impact on the obtained estimation accuracy by limiting any single optimization to a maximum relative decrease in IUP estimation accuracy of 1%. As some of the optimizations are algorithm-specific, not all of them were applied in all cases.

    The most straight-forward method to reduce the computational complexity of the algorithms is sample-rate reduction, or decimation, which utilizes a low-pass filter before downsampling to avoid aliasing. The complexity of all operations is reduced after decimation, but an overhead is introduced due to the required filtering step. Polyphase filters can be used to combine downsampling and filtering during decimation. This solution results in a reduction in filter complexity up to the decimation factor with respect to straight-forward decimation[48,49].

    The complexity of all the filters can be reduced by lowering the filter order, i.e. support width, or filter type. Changing the filter order affects the amount of retained out-of-band energy, which has a direct impact on the optimal cut-off frequencies. Therefore, the cut-off frequencies are adjusted to keep an optimal IUP estimation accuracy. IIR filters can be used instead of FIR filters to reduce the computational complexity at the cost of possible instability and non-linear phase distortion. Additionally, staged FIR filters can be used with a downsampling step in between to reduce complexity. A significant reduction in support width of the frequency compensation filter can be obtained without negative effects by reducing the relative magnitude error within the frequency band of interest only [47,50].

    Various optimizations can be applied to the STFT calculation used in the spectrogram-based method. The overlap of consecutive STFT windows can be reduced from a maximum overlap of N1 samples, as proposed by Rabotti et al., to N/2 samples, reducing the number of multiplications by a factor of N1N/2 [35]. This results in an implicit downsampling of the signal dependent on both overlap factor and window length, and might reduce the estimation accuracy. Additionally, using a rectangular window in the STFT of the spectrogram-based IUP estimation reduces the STFT to an FFT, with a complexity of O[N], as described in [42].

    Finally, various low-level optimizations can be applied to reduce the algorithm complexity. Sliding windows were implemented such that all multiplications by a single value are performed only once. In case of a symmetrical window, this reduces the number of multiplications by a factor of 2. For a square window or moving average, the computational load is reduced to a single addition, subtraction, and multiplication for each sample. Also, all multiplications and divisions by a power of 2 are replaced by a bit-shift operation. Finally, all divisions by a constant K are replaced by a multiplication with a precalculated value ˆK=1/K.

    Both the complexity measure in section 3.2 and the foregoing optimization steps assume integer calculations with a reduced word-length of 16 bits. Such calculations slightly influence the algorithm output accuracy due to (1) feature truncation and (2) variable truncation [51]. These effects, in addition to the high-level optimizations for reduced computational complexity may reduce the IUP estimation accuracy.

    The same dataset as described by Rabotti et al. [35] was used for validation of the proposed algorithms. This dataset contains 21 measurements taken on nine women during labor at full gestation. All women signed an informed consent form. Recordings were made using four active unipolar electrodes configured as a diamond on the abdomen, with a ground and reference electrode placed on one side, as shown in Figure 1 [35]. The measured signals were bipolarized to eliminate a large portion of the noise affecting the EHG, the most important of which are maternal ECG, some movement artifacts, and electromagnetic noise [52]. Two bipolar leads L1 and L2 were obtained from the recorded signals in a horizontal and vertical direction, respectively. All electrodes, which were contact Ag-AgCl electrodes, were placed on the abdomen after skin preparation with a mildly abrasive paste to reduce skin impedance. The IUP was simultaneously measured by a Koala M1333A IUPC (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands), which had been medically prescribed for insertion in the patient's uterine cavity. The EHG and IUP were both recorded at 1 kHz with a 20-bit discretization resolution using an M-PAQ (Maastricht Instruments B.V., The Netherlands). A subset of 17 recordings from seven patients was selected based on the requirements that the reference IUPC recorded a clear IUP waveform and that the EHG signal should not contain any significant measurement artifacts, e.g., due to broken wires or poor contacts. All recordings from a single patient were considered as one measurement, resulting in seven measurements ranging from 26 to 138 minutes with a total length of approximately 8 hours and 42 min.

    Figure 1.  Electrode configuration used for IUP measurements consisting of 4 electrodes from which the two bipolar leads L1 and L2 are derived (Modified from [32]).

    Both the EHG and IUPC signal were preprocessed prior to comparative analysis. The IUPC signal, which is adopted as the gold standard reference, was cleaned to minimize spikes caused by movement artifacts, using a non-causal centered median filter with a length of 5 s [28]. Both bipolar EHG signals as well as the IUPC signal were downsampled to 20 Hz using a Kaiser anti-aliasing filter at 8 Hz with a support width of 1 s. This is possible because all EHG signals are present in the 0.1 Hz to 5.0 Hz frequency band [18,38,44,45]. The peak spectral energy of the EHG occurs in the 0.42 Hz to 0.78 Hz range, depending on gestational age [33]. Figure 2 shows a recording segment with the reference IUPC signal as well as the recorded EHG signal.

    Figure 2.  Example signal segment the IUPC signal (scaled) and the EHG signals for bipolar leads L1 and L2, respectively.

    The algorithms from the literature were first compared prior to optimization for IUP estimation accuracy. The correlation coefficient r and RMSE as well as their standard deviations are given in Figure 3 for the horizontal (L1) and vertical (L2) channels, respectively. Figure 4 shows an example of the IUP estimation results for each of the compared algorithms and a reference IUPC signal.

    Figure 3.  Comparison of the IUP estimate accuracy by RMSE a) and r b) for the algorithms as described in the literature.
    Figure 4.  Example segment of the IUP estimates by each of the compared algorithm for both bi-polar leads with the IUPC reference signal: (a) Teager energy, (b) Spectrogram, (c) RMS energy, and (d) absolute value base IUP estimate.

    After optimization, the algorithms were again compared on IUP estimation accuracy, the results of which are shown in Figure 5. Fractional results for the number of multiplications are possible due to changes in the sampling rate as part of the algorithms.

    Figure 5.  Comparison of the IUP-estimate accuracy for the algorithms after accuracy optimization. (a) and (b) show r and the RMSE for the algorithms before optimization for reduced computational complexity, where an * indicates a significant (p0.01) improvement over the original. (c) and (d) show these metrics after this optimization.

    Table 2 shows the computational complexity of the various algorithms at different stages. Because the optimizations for improved accuracy result in different parameter settings for each lead, the resulting computational complexity of an algorithm might differ between leads. The subsequent results were obtained using the absolute-value-based method, as it slightly outperforms the other methods after optimization.

    Table 2.  Comparison of the computational complexity in MPS of the algorithms in various stages of optimization.
    Original Opt. accuracy Opt. complexity
    L1 & L2 L1 L2 L1 L2
    TE [32] 145.8 1654 1876 115.6 118.4
    Spectrogram [35] 8251 8235 8424 284.4 286.6
    RMS [28] 1183 2251 2387 123.6 131.1
    ABS [29] 141.1 2149 2345 112.1 116.1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Figure 6 shows the correlation coefficient r of the estimated IUP with the IUPC as a function of the frequency, where the frequency indicates the center of the band-pass filter used. The cut-off frequencies of the band-pass filter are set at ±20% of the center frequency, which is selected as a trade-off between filter support width and frequency specificity to evaluate the effect of the local frequency content on the IUP estimate. This allows for an analysis of the optimal filtering frequencies that takes into account the influence of both the EHG signal and that of noise and artifacts. It is clear from Figure 6 that the signal quality of L2 is better than that of L1 for all patients. Therefore, all further results are given for L2 only.

    Figure 6.  (a) and (b) show the correlation coefficient r as a function of the band-pass filter's center frequency for L1 and L2, respectively. A single gray trace is shown for every patient, while the dashed line indicates r for patient 2 showing the influence of the maternal heart rate above 1 Hz and respiration below 0.3 Hz on the IUP estimation accuracy. Additionally, the average over the whole dataset for both L1 and L2 is shown by a bold black line.

    Figure 7 shows the influence of applying frequency compensation to the IUP estimation quality as a function of the low- and high-pass filter cut-off frequencies. The effect of the frequency compensation is clearly observable, as the IUP estimation quality is no longer affected by low-frequency noise, while the high-frequency noise of the ECG and other sources has a larger impact.

    Figure 7.  IUP estimation quality of L2 as a function of the filter's LP and HP cut-off frequency in case frequency compensation (a) was applied or (b) was omitted.

    Figure 8 shows the influence of the choice of smoothing function on the IUP estimation quality. It can be observed that a smooth window allows for a slightly better IUP estimation than a square window or a low-order IIR filter.

    Figure 8.  Influence of the choice of smoothing method on IUP estimation accuracy for L2, comparing Hamming and square windows of various lengths with an IIR low-pass filter of different orders and 3-dB cut-off frequencies. The 3dB cut-off frequency of the filters is defined in Hz (1/s).

    Table 3 shows the parameters used for each of the algorithms after optimization for maximum IUP estimation accuracy and reduced computational complexity, respectively. The parameters shown for all algorithms are for lead L2, as it has proven to provide a significantly more accurate IUP estimation at a comparable complexity compared to L1.

    Table 3.  Parameters for optimized IUP estimation accuracy and computational complexity.
    Rooijakkers et al. Teager energy Rabotti et al. spectrogram Jezewski et al. root-mean square Skowronski et al. absolute value
    Optimized for improved IUP estimation accuracy
    Filtering band [0.150.8Hz] [0.30.8Hz] [0.250.9Hz] [0.10.8Hz]
    Filter order 600-tap FIR 1300-tap FFT 360-tap FIR 800-tap FIR
    Frequency comp. yes yes yes yes
    IUP smoothing 55 s Hamming 65 s Hamming 60 s Hamming 40 s Hamming
    Postprocessing 2nd order model 2nd order model 2nd order model 2nd order model
    Output fs 20 Hz 20 Hz 20 Hz 20 Hz
    Optimized for reduced computational complexity
    Filtering band [0.150.8Hz] [0.30.8Hz] [0.250.9Hz] [0.10.8Hz]
    Filter order 3rd order IIR 128-tap FFT 2nd order IIR 3rd order IIR
    Frequency comp. yes yes yes yes
    IUP smoothing 30 s mean 40 s mean 33 s mean 27 s mean
    Postprocessing 2nd order model 2nd order model 2nd order model 2nd order model
    Output fs 1.25 Hz 1.25 Hz 1.25 Hz 1.25 Hz

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Accurate continuous monitoring of the uterine activity is crucial for early prediction of the onset of preterm labor and prevention of preterm birth. Various non-invasive EHG-based IUP estimators have previously been presented allowing for contraction detection and analysis of additional parameters extracted from the EHG.

    Four state-of-the-art methods for EHG-based IUP estimation are discussed in this paper and compared on IUP estimation accuracy and computational complexity to determine their applicability in a truly continuous ambulatory monitoring setting. We have defined the characteristic parameters of all methods and determined their influence on IUP estimation accuracy and computational complexity. All methods were optimized within their design space to improve their accuracy with respect to the simultaneously recorded IUPC signal and reduce their complexity.

    To optimize the filter parameters, the influence of each frequency component in the EHG on the IUP estimation accuracy was determined. As previously reported, the EHG signal is present from 0.05 Hz to beyond 5 Hz with a varying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [18]. However, the signal above 1.2 Hz is typically strongly distorted due to the presence of the maternal ECG modulated by maternal breathing. This modulation is visible as amplitude and shape changes in the maternal ECG in phase with maternal breathing. Especially in a horizontal bipolar lead, in which the maternal ECG is most prominent [32], the effect of the first few harmonics of the ECG are clearly visible as dips in the IUP estimation accuracy in Figure 6. The accuracy of all signals below 0.3 Hz drops due to the presence of non-stationary noise sources, like maternal breathing, electrical activity of other smooth muscles, fetal activity, and baseline wander. For most patients, a spectral region is visible between 0.3 Hz and 1.2 Hz allowing for accurate IUP estimation. However, since no clear general filtering boundary can be defined, a 3rd order IIR filter was sufficient for all methods as both high- and low-pass filter. Because of the smaller contribution of the breathing artifacts and maternal ECG in the vertical measurement channel, and possibly due to a more prominent downward propagation direction of action potentials through the myometrium during delivery [53,54], the vertical bipolar lead in general allows for a more accurate IUP estimation.

    The influence of applying frequency compensation to mimic the physiological phenomena underling the generation and propagation of action potentials was also investigated [35,32]. It reduces the influence of low-frequency noise in favor of higher frequencies, which in the presence of a prominent maternal ECG results in a strong reduction in IUP estimation accuracy above 1.2 Hz. For all base methods, applying frequency compensation resulted in a small increase of r (± 1%) while reducing the optimal cut-off frequencies of the band-pass filter. This has the added advantage that the sample rate can be further decreased, reducing the computational complexity.

    We obtained the best IUP estimation accuracy using a smoothing window, although the difference is not statistically significant compared to the other smoothing methods proposed in the literature. The length of the applied window or the order and cut-off frequency of the applied window, however, clearly affect the accuracy and complexity of the IUP estimate. In a low-complexity algorithm it is therefore beneficial to apply a square window or low-order low-pass filter, significantly reducing the computational complexity. Finally, the choice of a simple postprocessing method can significantly influence the accuracy of the IUP estimate without adding much complexity; for instance, simple non-linear scaling can improve the correlation coefficient with the IUPC signal by as much as 10%.

    The choice of sampling frequency has no significant impact on IUP estimation quality. However, it has a big impact on the computational complexity, because the complexity of various parts of the IUP estimation algorithms are O[N2]. Therefore, reducing the sampling frequency at every point during IUP estimation is paramount, and can be done without significant negative effects on estimation accuracy. Reducing the sample rate is the largest contributor to reduction of complexity for all algorithms, especially when applying polyphase filters for downsampling, reducing the complexity by a factor 4 to 8 depending on the base method.

    After our reduction of the computational complexity of each algorithm with a minimal loss of accuracy, the absolute-value-based method was found to provide both the highest IUP estimation accuracy and the lowest computational complexity. However, the difference with the other algorithms under evaluation is not significant in either accuracy or complexity. We can therefore conclude that the choice of a base method for IUP estimation is not as important as a correct choice of the filter cut-off frequencies, which strongly depend on the types of noise and artifacts present in the recordings. Additional parameters which can markedly improve the estimation accuracy are the order of the applied smoothing method, and non-linear postprocessing.

    All of the analyzes performed in this paper envision a long-term continuous ambulatory monitoring environment, which in many cases will consist in measuring many days or weeks before delivery. Therefore, only single channel bi-polar EHG derivations were used to limit the computational complexity in estimating the IUP. Even so, as mentioned previously, only recordings made during delivery were used, because this is the only period in which a gold standard reference signal can be obtained. The signals which we would observe in an ambulatory setting might, therefore, be different in a number of ways compared to those in the used dataset. The EHG signal amplitude would be lower, with active bursts of uterine activity spaced further apart, shorter, less periodic, and with lower-frequency content [22,38]. Additionally, movement artifacts would play a more prominent role as patients are not limited in their movement. Any algorithm used earlier during pregnancy should therefore account for the changes in signal characteristics by adjusting the parameters of filtering interval, smoothing filter and postprocessing accordingly.

    Apart from optimizations for use earlier during pregnancy, which would require acquisition of additional annotated data earlier in pregnancy, further improvement of the IUP estimation quality can possibly be obtained. This can consist in dynamic removal or suppression of the maternal ECG or its first harmonics, which would allow for use of a wider frequency band in estimating the IUP and is applicable throughout pregnancy. However, additional processing can possibly increase the computational complexity, and care should be taken to keep the overall complexity as low as possible to allow for long-term continuous monitoring.

    Accurate IUP estimation and reliable contraction detection are possible using abdominal EHG recordings. When continuously measured throughout the last months of pregnancy, EHG recordings can be used to predict preterm delivery in an effort to prevent preterm birth. Based on state-of-the-art methods from the literature, a design space exploration was performed to evaluate these methods on their suitability for continuous IUP monitoring. This resulted in an improved set of methods with a higher correlation with the simultaneously measured IUPC signal at a reduced computational complexity. We can conclude from the obtained results that a correct choice of the filter cut-off frequencies, the order of the applied smoothing, and the postprocessing method, based on the signal characteristics, is more important than the base energy estimation method. Although only by a small margin, the optimized absolute-value-based method was found to provide both the highest IUP estimation accuracy (r=0.72) and lowest computational complexity (112.1 MPS). Because of its low computational complexity, it would be possible to obtain a continuous IUP estimate over a prolonged period of time in an ambulatory setting using this method. We can therefore conclude that long-term ambulatory monitoring of the uterine activity is possible using EHG-based methods.

    This work was supported by the Dutch technology foundation STW and the NWO(TTW) HTSM grant 14663 (EWAM).

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] D. R. Mattison, K. Damus, E. Fiore, J. Petrini, C. Alter, Preterm delivery: A public health perspective, Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol., 15 (2001), 7-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00004.x
    [2] R. L. Goldberg, E. M. McClure, Preterm Birth: Prevention and Management, John Wiley & Sons, (2010), 22-38.
    [3] R. L Goldenberg, J. F. Culhane, J. D. Iams, R. Romero, Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth, The Lancet, 371 (2008), 75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4
    [4] H. Blencowe, S. Cousens, M. Z. Oestergaard, D. Chou, A. B. Moller, R. Narwal, et al., National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: A systematic analysis and implications, The Lancet, 379 (2012), 2162-2172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4
    [5] K. Flood, F. D. Malone, Prevention of preterm birth, Semin. Fetal Neonat. Med., 17 (2012), 58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2011.08.001
    [6] M. J. Corwin, S. M. Mou, S. G. Sunderji, S. Gall, H. How, V. Patel, et al., Multicenter randomized clinical trial of home uterine activity monitoring: Pregnancy outcomes for all women randomized, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 175 (1996), 1281-1285. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70041-8
    [7] D. L. Bentley, J. L. Bentley, D. L. Watson, R. A. Welch, R. W. Martin, K. S. Gookin, et al., Relationship of uterine contractility to preterm labor, Obstet. Gynecol., 76 (1990), 36S-38S.
    [8] M. Lucovnik, R. J. Kuon, L. R. Chambliss, W. L. Maner, S. Q. Shi, L. Shi, et al., Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 90 (2011), 150-157. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01031.x
    [9] A. Diab, M. Hassan, C. Marque, B. Karlsson, Quantitative performance analysis of four methods of evaluating signal nonlinearity: Application to uterine emg signals, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6346113.
    [10] H. de Lau, C. Rabotti, N. Haazen, S. G. Oei, M. Mischi, Towards improving uterine electrical activity modelling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor, Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 92 (2013), 1323-1326. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12233
    [11] H. de Lau, K. T. Yang, C. Rabotti, M. Vlemminx, G.Bajlekov, M. Mischi, et al., Toward a new modality for detecting a uterine rupture: electrohysterogram propagation analysis during trial of labor after cesarean, J. Matern. Fetal Neonat. Med., 30 (2017), 574-579. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1178227
    [12] A. Ray, A. Hildreth, U. I. Esen, Morbid obesity and intra-partum care, J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 28 (2008), 301-304. doi: 10.1080/01443610802042548
    [13] A. M. Miles, M. Monga, K. S. Richeson, Correlation of external and internal monitoring of uterine activity in a cohort of term patients, Am. J. Perinatol., 18 (2001), 137-140. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14522
    [14] K. M. Rood, Complications associated with insertion of intrauterine pressure catheters: An unusual case of uterine hypertonicity and uterine perforation resulting in fetal distress after insertion of an intrauterine pressure catheter, Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012 (2012).
    [15] L. M. Harper, A. L. Shanks, M. G. Tuuli, K. A. Roehl, A. G. Cahill, The risks and benefits of internal monitors in laboring patients, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 209 (2013), 38.e1-38.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.001
    [16] R. E. Garfield, H. Maul, W. Maner, C. Fittkow, G. Olson, L. Shi, et al., Uterine electromyography and light-induced fluorescence in the management of term and preterm labor, J. Soc. Gynecol. Invest., 9 (2002), 265-275. doi: 10.1177/107155760200900503
    [17] A. J. Wolfberg. The future of fetal monitoring, Rev. Obstet. Gynecol., 5 (2012), e132-e136.
    [18] D. Devedeux, C. Marque, S. Mansour, G. Germain, J. Duchêne, Uterine electromyography: a critical review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 169 (1993), 1636-1653. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90456-S
    [19] J. Duchene, D. Devedeux, S. Mansour, C. Marque, Analyzing uterine EM: Tracking instantaneous burst frequency, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., 14 (1995), 125-132. doi: 10.1109/51.376749
    [20] R. E. Garfield, W. L. Maner, Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions, in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, Academic Press, (2007), 289-295.
    [21] T. Y. Euliano, M. T. Nguyen, S. Darmanjian, S. P. McGorray, N. Euliano, A. Onkala, et al., Monitoring uterine activity during labor: A comparison of 3 methods, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 208 (2013), 66.e1-66.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.873
    [22] R. E. Garfield, G. Saade, C. Buhimschi, I. Buhimschi, L. Shi, S. Q. Shi, et al., Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour, Hum. Reprod. Update, 4 (1998), 673-695. doi: 10.1093/humupd/4.5.673
    [23] H. Eswaran, J. D. Wilson, P. Murphy, H. Preissl, C. L. Lowery, Application of wavelet transform to uterine electromyographic signals recorded using abdominal surface electrodes, J. Matern. Fetal Neonat. Med., 11 (2002), 158-166. doi: 10.1080/jmf.11.3.158.166
    [24] T. Y. Euliano, M. T. Nguyen, D. Marossero, R. K. Edwards, Monitoring contractions in obese parturients: Electrohysterography compared with traditional monitoring, Obstet. Gynecol., 109 (2007), 1136-1140. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000258799.24496.93
    [25] K. Horoba, S. Graczyk, J. Jezewski, A. Gacek, J. Wrobel, Statistical approach to analysis of electrohysterographic signal, 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and the 1999 Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society, 1999. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/804042/.
    [26] J. Ramondt, C. Kooten, A. Verhoeff, H. C. S. Wallenburg, Computer analysis of mechanical and electrical uterine activity, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 24 (1986), 351-355. doi: 10.1007/BF02442687
    [27] K. Horoba, J. Jezewski, J. Wrobel, S. Graczyk, In Algorithm for detection of uterine contractions from electrohysterogram, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2001. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1017198.
    [28] J. Jezewski, K. Horoba, A. Matonia, J. Wrobel, Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach, Physiol. Meas., 26 (2005), 753-767. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/5/014
    [29] M. D. Skowronski, J. G. Harris, D. E. Marossero, R. K. Edwards, T. Y. Euliano, Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 53 (2006), 1983-1989. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2006.877104
    [30] B. C. Jacod, E. Ma. Graatsma, E. V. Hagen, G. H. A. Visser, A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour, J. Matern. Fetal Neonat. Med., 23 (2010), 17-22.
    [31] J. Reinhard, B. R. HGill, S. Schiermeier, H. Löser, L. M. Niedballa, E. Haarmann, et al., Uterine activity monitoring during labour - a multi-centre, blinder two-way trial of external tocodynamometry against electrohysteragraphy, Z. Geburtsh. Neonatol., 215 (2011), 199-204. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291210
    [32] M. J. Rooijakkers, C. Rabotti, S. G. Oei, R. M. Aarts, M. Mischi, Low-complexity intrauterine pressure estimation using the Teager energy operator on electrohysterographic recordings, Physiol. Meas., 35 (2014), 1215-1228. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/7/1215
    [33] C. Buhimschi, M. B. Boyle, R. E. Garfield, Electrical activity of the human uterus during pregnancy as recorded from the abdominal surface, Obstet. Gynecol., 90 (1997), 102-111. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)83837-9
    [34] S. Snowden, N. A. B. Simpson, J. J. Walker, A digital system for recording the electrical activity of the uterus, Physiol. Meas., 22 (2001), 673. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/22/4/303
    [35] C. Rabotti1, M. Mischi1, J. O. E. H. van Laar, G. S. Oei, J. W. M. Bergmans, Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals, Physiol. Meas., 29 (2008), 829-841. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/7/011
    [36] M. O. Diab, B. Moslem, M. Khalil, C. Marque, Classification of uterine EMG signals by using normalized wavelet packet energy, 2012 16th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, 2012. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6196443/.
    [37] R. Merletti, P. J. Parker, Electromyography: Physiology, engineering and non-invasive applications, John Wiley & Sons, (2004).
    [38] C. Marque, J. M. G. Duchene, S. Leclercq, G. S. Panczer, J. Chaumont, Uterine ehg processing for obstetrical monitoring, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 12 (1986), 1182-1187.
    [39] J. F. Kaiser, On a simple algorithm to calculate the 'energy' of a signal, International conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/115702/.
    [40] J. F. Kaiser, Some useful properties of Teager's energy operators, 1993 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 1993. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/319457.
    [41] A. D. Robison, N-bit unsigned division via n-bit multiply-add, 17th IEEE Symposium on Computer Arithmetic, 2005. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1467632.
    [42] B. Farhang-Boroujeny, Y. C. Lim, A comment on the computational complexity of sliding FFT, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Ⅱ Analog Digit. Signal Process., 39 (1992), 875-876. doi: 10.1109/82.208583
    [43] M. Vetterli, H. J. Nussbaumer, Simple FFT and DCT algorithms with reduced number of operations, Signal Process., 6 (1984), 267-278. doi: 10.1016/0165-1684(84)90059-8
    [44] H. Leman, C. Marque, and J. Gondry, Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 46 (1999), 1222-1229. doi: 10.1109/10.790499
    [45] W. L. Maner, R. E. Garfield, H. Maul, G. Olson, G. Saade, Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography, Obstet. Gynecol., 101 (2003), 1254-1260.
    [46] M. J. Rooijakkers, S. Song, C. Rabotti, S. G. Oei, J. W. M. Bergmans, E. Cantatore, et al., Influence of electrode placement on signal quality for ambulatory pregnancy monitoring, Comput. Math. Methods Med., 2014 (2014).
    [47] L. Rabiner, K. Steiglitz, The design of wide-band recursive and nonrecursive digital differentiators, IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust., 18 (1970), 204-209. doi: 10.1109/TAU.1970.1162090
    [48] M. G. Bellanger, G. Bonnerot, M. Coudreuse, Digital filtering by polyphase network: Application to sample-rate alteration and filter banks, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 24 (1976), 109-114. doi: 10.1109/TASSP.1976.1162788
    [49] J. G. Proakis, D. G. Manolakis, Digital signal processing: Principles, algorithms, and applications. in Pearson Education India, 2001.
    [50] A. T. Bahill, J. S. Kallman, J. E. Lieberman, Frequency limitations of the two-point central difference differentiation algorithm, Biol. Cybern., 45 (1982), 1-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00387207
    [51] L. Rabiner, B. Gold, C. McGonegal, An approach to the approximation problem for nonrecursive digital filters, IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust., 18 (1970), 83-106. doi: 10.1109/TAU.1970.1162092
    [52] S. Graczyk, J. Jezewski, J. Wrobel, A. Gacek. Abdominal electrohysterogram data acquisition problems and their source of origin, Proceedings of the First Regional Conference, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society and 14th Conference of the Biomedical Engineering Society of India, 1995. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/511701/.
    [53] G. Wolfs, H. Rottinghuis, Electrical and mechanical activity of the human uterus during labour, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 208 (1970), 373-385.
    [54] J. G. Planes, J. P. Morucci, H. Grandjean, R. Favretto, External recording and processing of fast electrical activity of the uterus in human parturition, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 22 (1984), 585-591 doi: 10.1007/BF02443874
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Amy S. Garrett, Shawn A. Means, Mathias W. Roesler, Kiara J. W. Miller, Leo K. Cheng, Alys R. Clark, Modeling and experimental approaches for elucidating multi-scale uterine smooth muscle electro- and mechano-physiology: A review, 2022, 13, 1664-042X, 10.3389/fphys.2022.1017649
    2. Jinshan Xu, Zhenqin Chen, Hangxiao Lou, Guojiang Shen, Alain Pumir, Review on EHG signal analysis and its application in preterm diagnosis, 2022, 71, 17468094, 103231, 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103231
    3. Zhenqin Chen, Mengying Wang, Meiyu Zhang, Wei Huang, Yan Feng, Jinshan Xu, Automatic detection and characterization of uterine contraction using Electrohysterography, 2024, 90, 17468094, 105840, 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105840
    4. Amy S. Garrett, Mathias W. Roesler, Omkar N. Athavale, Peng Du, Shawn A. Means, Alys R. Clark, Leo K. Cheng, Multichannel mapping of in vivo rat uterine myometrium exhibits both high and low frequency electrical activity in non-pregnancy, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-57734-3
    5. José Javier Reyes-Lagos, Eric Alonso Abarca-Castro, Claudia Ivette Ledesma-Ramírez, Adriana Cristina Pliego-Carrillo, Guadalupe Dorantes-Méndez, Araceli Espinosa-Guerrero, Recurrence quantification analysis of uterine vectormyometriogram reveals differences between normal-weight and overweight parturient women, 2024, 45, 0967-3334, 095006, 10.1088/1361-6579/ad7777
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5018) PDF downloads(369) Cited by(5)

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog