
Spectra of network related graphs have numerous applications in computer sciences, electrical networks and complex networks to explore structural characterization like stability and strength of these different real-world networks. In present article, our consideration is to compute spectrum based results of generalized prism graph which is well-known planar and polyhedral graph family belongs to the generalized Petersen graphs. Then obtained results are applied to compute some network related quantities like global mean-first passage time, average path length, number of spanning trees, graph energies and spectral radius.
Citation: Ali Raza, Mobeen Munir, Tasawar Abbas, Sayed M Eldin, Ilyas Khan. Spectrum of prism graph and relation with network related quantities[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2634-2647. doi: 10.3934/math.2023137
[1] | Jahfar T K, Chithra A V . Central vertex join and central edge join of two graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7214-7233. doi: 10.3934/math.2020461 |
[2] | Muhammad Ajmal, Xiwang Cao, Muhammad Salman, Jia-Bao Liu, Masood Ur Rehman . A special class of triple starlike trees characterized by Laplacian spectrum. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4394-4403. doi: 10.3934/math.2021260 |
[3] | Alaa Altassan, Muhammad Imran, Bilal Ahmad Rather . On ABC energy and its application to anticancer drugs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21668-21682. doi: 10.3934/math.20231105 |
[4] | Yinzhen Mei, Chengxiao Guo, Mengtian Liu . The bounds of the energy and Laplacian energy of chain graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4847-4859. doi: 10.3934/math.2021284 |
[5] | Zhen Lin . On the sum of the largest Aα-eigenvalues of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15064-15074. doi: 10.3934/math.2022825 |
[6] | Kiki A. Sugeng, Fery Firmansah, Wildan, Bevina D. Handari, Nora Hariadi, Muhammad Imran . Several properties of antiadjacency matrices of directed graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27834-27847. doi: 10.3934/math.20241351 |
[7] | Imrana Kousar, Saima Nazeer, Abid Mahboob, Sana Shahid, Yu-Pei Lv . Numerous graph energies of regular subdivision graph and complete graph. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8466-8476. doi: 10.3934/math.2021491 |
[8] | Bilal A. Rather, Fawad Ali, Nasim Ullah, Al-Sharef Mohammad, Anwarud Din, Sehra . Aα matrix of commuting graphs of non-abelian groups. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15436-15452. doi: 10.3934/math.2022845 |
[9] | Wafaa Fakieh, Amal Alsaluli, Hanaa Alashwali . Laplacian spectrum of the unit graph associated to the ring of integers modulo pq. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4098-4108. doi: 10.3934/math.2024200 |
[10] | Milica Anđelić, Saleem Khan, S. Pirzada . On graphs with a few distinct reciprocal distance Laplacian eigenvalues. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29008-29016. doi: 10.3934/math.20231485 |
Spectra of network related graphs have numerous applications in computer sciences, electrical networks and complex networks to explore structural characterization like stability and strength of these different real-world networks. In present article, our consideration is to compute spectrum based results of generalized prism graph which is well-known planar and polyhedral graph family belongs to the generalized Petersen graphs. Then obtained results are applied to compute some network related quantities like global mean-first passage time, average path length, number of spanning trees, graph energies and spectral radius.
Visualization and network analysis of real world networks including social networks, worldwide web, internet and biological networks is effectual research field during recent years [1,2]. Subjects of control theory nonlinear dynamics, and graph theory are utilized in study of complex networks which makes it more challenging and comprehensive. Depending upon the structural characterization, eigenvalues of a network graph contravene in robustness analysis, electrical networks and vibration theory explains the strength and stability of these networks [3,4]. Modern Scientific fields like theoretical chemistry, communication networks and combinatorial optimization are extensively utilizing numerous distance and degree based eigenvalues [8,9]. The undirected graphs are used to describe different complex networks and models whereas processors and communication links are represented by vertices and edges, respectively. Consider a graph G whose vertices are labeled as 1,2,3,...,n then its adjacency matrix A(G) is defined as
A(G)={1 if νi∼νj,0 if νi≁νj. |
In algebraic graph theory, adjacency matrix has numerous implementations i.e., widely used in computer programs as data structure for representation and manipulating the graphs due to their less storage and faster compilation capability [10,11,12]. The eigenvalues of matrix A(G) are considered as eigenvalues of given graph G and known as the adjacency spectrum of G, denoted by (η1≤η2≤η3≤...≤ηn). The diagonal matrix of vertex degrees is defined as D(G)=diag[dνij] for i=j where dνij denotes degree of certain vertex. Then Laplacian matrix [13] is L(G)=D(G)−A(G) which can be elaborated as
L(G)={ dνij if νi=νj,−1 if νi∼νj, 0 if νi≁νj. |
Numerous implementation of Laplacian spectrum is involved in complex networks to solve theoretical problems, dynamical processes and topological structures explanation [14,15,16]. A large number of results related to Laplacian spectra has calculated in existing literature mentioned in [17,18,19,20,21]. For instance, the second smallest eigenvalue of Laplacian matrix is known as the diameter of a network. The Kirchhoff index of networks can be expressed by the sum of reciprocals of nonzero eigenvalues, and the number of spanning trees of networks can be determined by the product of all nonzero adjacency, Laplacian and signless Laplacian eigenvalues. Additionally, the synchronizability of a network can be determined by the the ratio of the maximum eigenvalue to the smallest nonzero one of its Laplacian matrix [22,23]. Consequently, calculating these spectra is of great interest though determining this analytically is a theoretical challenge. The signless Laplacian matrix, denoted by £(G) and defined as
£(G)={dνij if νi=νj,1 if νi∼νj,0 if νi≁νj. |
is a well-known parameter in algebraic graph theory to describe structure and topology of graphs and numerous results and applications about £(G) are mentioned in [24,25,26,27]. Prism graph Rmn is a famous family in graph theory generated by iterative method taking m-copies of cycle graph Cn and then joining corresponding vertices as described in Figures 1 and 2. It is easy to evaluate that Rmn contains mn number of vertices and (2m−1)n number of edges. Laplacian spectrum of R3n and L(Rmn) are calculated in [2,28], respectively. Motivated by above work, we evaluated and analyzed the adjacency and signless Laplacian spectrum for generalized prism graph Rmn. Then the obtained results are utilized to examine some network related quantities. Some previous results used to evaluate required solutions in this paper are given below:
Definition 1.1. [29] Consider two matrices X and Y then Kronecker product X⊗Y is obtained by replacing ij-entry xij of X by xijY. Some properties of kronecker product are mentioned in following lemmas.
Lemma 1.1. [30] Let W∈Mm,n(F),X∈Mp,q(F),Y∈Mn,k(F),Z∈Mq,r(F) and α∈F then
● (X⊗Y)T=XT⊗YT;
● (X⊗Y)(X′⊗Y′)=XX′⊗YY′;
● α(X⊗Y)=αX⊗Y=X⊗αY.
Consider the path and cycle graph with n vertices, denoted by Pn and Cn. Spectrum of Pn and Cn are calculated in existed literature.
Lemma 1.2. [31] The adjacency eigenvalues of cycle graph Cn are 2cos2πμn where μ=1,2,...,n−1 and adjacency eigenvalues of path graph Pm are 2cosπλn+1 where λ=1,2,...,m.
Let the product of all non-zero eigenvalues of given matrix and sum of reciprocal of obtained eigenvalues are denoted by Amn and Bmn, respectively, that is
Amn=N∏k=1∈i and Bmn=N∑k=11∈i, |
where ∈k(k=1,2,...,N) denotes eigenvalues of given adjacency matrix.
Some generalized results of prism network are evaluated in this section utilizing the edge parcel technique, degree checking strategy, vertex distance schemes, whole of degrees of neighbors technique, vertex adjacency schemes, vertex segment strategy, graph hypothetical devices, combinatorial techniques and expository strategies. In addition, Matlab and Maple are used for mathematical calculations and verification.
Theorem 2.1. Consider the adjacency matrix of generalized prism graph with m copies and vertices in each cycle, denoted by A(Rmn). Then, product of all eigenvalues is
Amn=2m−1∏i=0n∏j=1(cos2πjn+cosπim+1), |
and sum of reciprocal of nonzero eigenvalues is
Bmn=12m−1∑i=0n∑j=1(cos2πjn+cosπim+1)−1. |
Proof. The adjacency matrix of prism graph Rmn is:
A(Rmn)=[A(Cn)fori=jInfori≥1,j=i+1Infori≥2,j=i−1Onelsewhere]m, |
which can be written as
A(Rmn)=[A(Cn)fori=jOnelsewhere]m+[Infori≥1,j=i+1andi≥2,j=i−1Onelsewhere]m. |
Thus by Lemma 1.1,
A(Rmn)=[1fori=jOnelsewhere]m⊗A(Cn)+[1fori≥1,j=i+1andi≥2,j=i−1Onelsewhere]m⊗In, |
where matrix
[1fori≥1,j=i+1andi≥2,j=i−1Onelsewhere]m, |
is adjacency matrix of path graph with m vertices say Pm. Then
A(Rmn)=A(Cn)⊗Im+A(Pm)⊗In. |
Suppose, there exists two matrices P,Q which are invertible and relate with Cn and Pm such that:
(A(Cn))′=P−1A(Cn)P, |
and
(A(Pm))′=Q−1A(Pm)Q, |
diagonal elements of these both upper triangular matrix is:
2cos2πμnand2cosπλm+1withμ=1,2,…,nandλ=0,1,…,m−1. |
And clearly,
(P⊗Q)−1(A(Cn)⊗Im+A(Pm)⊗In)(P⊗Q)=A(Cn)′⊗Im+A(Pm)′⊗In, |
diagonal elements of this upper triangular matrix are defined as
2cos2πμn+2cosπλm+1withμ=1,2,…,nandλ=0,1,…,m−1. |
Consequently, the adjacency eigenvalues for n-prism networks are
2cos2πμn+2cosπλm+1withμ=1,2,…,nandλ=0,1,…,m−1. | (2.1) |
By utilizing the above results, one can get
Amn=m−1∏λ=0n∏μ=1μλ,μ=2m−1∏λ=0n∏μ=1(cos2πμn+cosπλm+1),(λ,μ)≠(0,0) | (2.2) |
and
Bmn=m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1μλ,μ=12m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(cos2πμn+cosπλm+1)−1,(λ,μ)≠(0,0). | (2.3) |
Above theorem gives the exact results for adjacency matrix of generalized prism graph. Utilizing above theorem, we established following corollary for which is classic prism and closely related to results in [2].
Corollary 2.1. Product and sum reciprocal of eigenvalues for Rm3 are given as:
Ag=2m−1∏λ=03∏μ=1(cos2πμ3+cosπλm+1),(λ,μ)≠(0,0) |
and
Bg=12m−1∑λ=03∑μ=1(cos2πμ3+cosπλm+1)−1,(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
Product and reciprocal of sum of eigenvalues obtained from Laplacian matrix L of prism graph along with numerous application in complex networks is explained already in literature [28]. Now we calculate generalized formulae to obtain product and sum of eigenvalues of signless Laplacian matrix £(G) of prism graph in following theorem.
Theorem 2.2. The product and sum of reciprocal nonzero eigenvalues of £(Pm) are
Amn=m−1∏i=0n∏j=1(4+2cos2πjn+2cosπim+1)Bmn=m−1∑i=0n∑j=1(4+2cos2πjn+2cosπim+1)−1. |
Proof. The signless Laplacian matrix of prism graph Rmn is:
£(Rmn)=[£(Cn)fori=jInfori≥1,j=i+1Infori≥2,j=i−1Onelsewhere]m, |
which can be written as
£(Rmn)=[£(Cn)fori=jOnelsewhere]m+[Infori≥1,j=i+1andi≥2,j=i−1Onelsewhere]m. |
Thus by Lemma 1.1
£(Rmn)=[1fori=jOnelsewhere]m⊗£(Cn)+[1fori≥1,j=i+1andi≥2,j=i−1Onelsewhere]m⊗In, |
where matrix
[1fori≥1,j=i+1andi≥2,j=i−1Onelsewhere]m |
is adjacency matrix of path graph with m vertices say Pm. Then
£(Rmn)=£(Cn)⊗Im+£(Pm)⊗In, |
where In denotes the identity matrix of dimension n×n. Actually, there exists invertible matrices P,Q such that the matrices:
(£(Cn))′=P−1£(Cn)P |
and
(£(Pm))′=Q−1£(Pm)Q |
are both upper triangular with diagonal elements
2+2cos2πμnand2+2cos2πλm+1withμ=1,2,…,nandλ=0,1,…,m−1. |
And clearly,
(P⊗Q)−1(£(Cn)⊗Im+£(Pm)⊗In)(P⊗Q)=£(Cn)′⊗Im+£(Pm)′⊗In |
is upper triangular matrix whose diagonal elements are
4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1withμ=1,2,…,nandλ=0,1,…,m−1. |
Consequently, the adjacency eigenvalues for n-prism networks are
4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1withμ=1,2,…,nandλ=0,1,…,m−1. | (2.4) |
By utilizing the above result, one can get
Amn=m−1∏λ=0n∏μ=1μλ,μ=m−1∏λ=0n∏μ=1(4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1),(λ,μ)≠(0,0) | (2.5) |
and
Bmn=m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1μλ,μ=m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1)−1,(λ,μ)≠(0,0). | (2.6) |
Spectral radius, graph energy, Kirchoff index, average path length, global mean first passage time and number of spanning trees are some network related quantities which can be calculated by utilizing above determined results in Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, and capable to enriches and extends the earlier results in literature.
Novel concept of resistance distance was introduced by Randic and Klein [32] in which they considered one unit resistor as an edge and whole resistive network as graph G. In electrical network theory, effective resistance between nodes μ and λ is called resistance distance, denoted by rλμ, can also be computed by ohm's law. Mathematically, the Kirchoff index is
KI(G)=12n∑λ=1n∑μ=1rλμ(G). |
Actually, KI(G) is sum of resistance distances between all vertices pairs in G with numerous applications in graph theory, physics and chemistry. Some recent publications related to Kirchoff index and its applications are cited in [33,34]. Consider a connected graph G of order M with ϵλ non-zero eigenvalues where i=1,2,...,N. Then KI(G) can be defined in terms of eigenvalues as [35]
KI(G)=NN∑λ=21ϵλ. | (3.1) |
Now we compute exact formula for KI(Rmn) utilizing above result as follows:
KI(Rmn)=n∑λ<μrλμ(G)=NmNm∑ϕ=21ϵϕ=Nmm−1∑λ=0n∑μ=11ϵλμ(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
By using the number of vertices of prism graph and results of Theorem 2.1, we evaluate:
KI(Rmn)=mn2m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(cos2πμn+cosπλm+1)−1,(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
Similarly, utilizing signless Laplacian matrix of prism graph Rmn, we obtain kirchoff index as:
KI(Rmn)=mnm−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1)−1. |
A network related important quantity mean-first passage time (Fλμ) is utilized in estimation of transport speed for random walks in complex network systems whereas global mean-first passage time (Fλμ) is used to measure diffusion efficiency which can be calculated by averaging the quantity (Fλμ) over ν origins of particles and (ν−1) possible destinations [36,37].
Fν=1ν(ν−1)∑λ≠μFλμ(ν). | (3.2) |
The commuting time Tλμ between vertices (nodes) λ and μ is calculated as 2Erλμ using previous results given in [14].
Tλμ=Fλμ+Fμλ=2Erλμ, | (3.3) |
where E is size of graph G. Now, utilizing above Eqs (3.2) and (3.3), and discussions, global mean-first passage time for Rmn is:
Fν=2Emνm(νm−1)n∑λ<μrλμ(G)=2Emνm(νm−1)Nm∑ϕ=21ϵϕ=2Emνm(νm−1)m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=11ϵλμ(λ,μ)≠(0,0)=2Emνm(νm−1)m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(cos2πμ3+cosπλm+1)−1(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
Since νm=nm and ϵm=(2m−1), therefore network size νm can be utilized to describe global mean-first passage time.
Fν=2m−1(mn−1)m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(cos2πμ3+cosπλm+1)−1(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
Similarly, utilizing signless Laplacian matrix of prism graph Rmn, we obtain global mean-first passage time such that
Fν=2m−1(mn−1)m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1)−1(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
In computer sciences, interpretation of term "Small world" is very short average path length APL of mostly real world networks. Clustering coefficient, average path length and degree distribution are most robust and prominent measures of network topology. For a graph (or network) G, average number of steps along the shortest path dλμ is average path length (APL), denoted by Dm, which is a measure of the efficiency of mass transport or information on networks among all possible pairs of network nodes [14]. Then APL for Rmn is defined as
Dm(Rmn)=2νm(νm−1)n∑μ<λdλμ(G). | (3.4) |
If we consider an electrical network as complete graph then relation between the shortest paths dλμ(G) and effective resistance rλμ(G) given in reference [38]
rλμ=2dλμ|ν|, | (3.5) |
where |ν| describes the order of complete graph G. We obtain following result from above Eqs (3.4) and (3.5),
Dm(Rmn)=2νm(νm−1)×νm2n∑μ<λrλμ(G)=2νm(νm−1).νm2.νmn∑μ<λ1ϵλμ=νm(νm−1)m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=11ϵλμ(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
By using the number of vertices of prism graph and results of Theorem 2.1, we evaluate:
Dm(Rmn)=mn(mn−1)m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(cos2πμ3+cosπλm+1)−1(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
Similarly, utilizing signless Laplacian matrix of prism graph Rmn, we obtain average path length such that
Dm(Rmn)=mn(mn−1)m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1(4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1)−1(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
The standard random walks, reliability, resistor networks, transport, loop-erased random walks and self-organised criticality are well-known terms in complex networking and closely related to the number of spanning trees (NST) which proves the importance and numerous implementation of NST in various networks [39,40,41,42,43]. The Kirchhoff's Matrix-tree theorem [44,45] "Product of all nonzero eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix of the graph results the number of spanning trees" can be utilized to calculate exact NST of prism graph Rmn denoted by NS(Rmn). Then
NS(Rmn)=∏νmη=2ϵηνm=Amnνm=∏m−1i=0∏nj=1ϵλμνm(λ,μ)≠(0,0)=2mnm−1∏i=0n∏j=1(cos2πjn+cosπim+1)(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
Similarly, utilizing signless Laplacian matrix of prism graph Rmn, we obtain the number of spanning trees such that
NS(Rmn)=1mnm−1∏i=0n∏j=1(4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1)(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
Graph energies EG and spectral radius SR are network topology descriptor dependent upon eigenvalues of graph (network) matrices. Spectral radius has numerous contrivance in vibration theory, theoretical chemistry, combinatorial optimization, and communication networks, robustness analysis and electrical networks [5,6,7]. Graph energies are widely used in Huckle Molecular Orbital theory HMO, protein sequences and as a numerical invariant of chemical structures [46,47]. EG and SR are defined as sum of absolute eigenvalues and the maximum eigenvalue of adjacency matrices, respectively. Thus
EG=Nm∑ϕ=1|ϵϕ|andEG=Nmmaxϕ=1|ϵϕ|. |
Then by using above definitions, adjacency matrix of prism graph Rmn and resuts obtained in Theorem 2.1, we have
EG(Rmn)=N∑ϕ=0|μϕ|=m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1|2(cos2πμn+cosπλm+1)|,(λ,μ)≠(0,0),SR(Rmn)=Nmaxϕ=0μϕ=m−1maxλ=0nmaxμ=12(cos2πμn+cosπλm+1),(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
Similarly, utilizing signless Laplacian matrix of prism graph Rmn, we obtain graph energies and spectral radius such that:
EG(Rmn)=N∑ϕ=0|μϕ|=m−1∑λ=0n∑μ=1|4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1|,(λ,μ)≠(0,0),SR(Rmn)=Nmaxϕ=0μϕ=m−1maxλ=0nmaxμ=1(4+2cos2πμn+2cos2πλm+1),(λ,μ)≠(0,0). |
In this article, we evaluated the exact formulae for adjacency and signless Laplacian spectrum of generalized prism graph utilizing algebraic methodologies. Then applied these evaluated explicit expressions to determine some network related quantities like global mean-first passage time, average path length, number of spanning trees, kirchoff network descriptor, graph energies and spectral radius which are potentially helpful to understand characterizations of different network's topology.
The authors extend their appreciation to the deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (IFP-2020-72).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
S. N. Dorogovtsev, A. V. Goltsev, J. F. F. Mendes, Critical phenomena in complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys., 80 (2008), 1275–1298. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1275 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1275
![]() |
[2] |
Q. Y. Ding, W. G. Sun, F. Y. Chen, Applications of Laplacian spectra on a 3-prism graph, Mod. Phys. Lett., 28 (2014), 1450009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984914500092 doi: 10.1142/S0217984914500092
![]() |
[3] |
J. G. Restrepo, E. Ott, B. R. Hunt, Approximating the largest eigenvalue of network adjacency matrices, Phys. Rev. E, 76 (2007), 056119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.056119 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.056119
![]() |
[4] |
S. K. Dwivedi, S. Jalan, Extreme-value statistics of networks with inhibitory and excitatory couplings, Phys. Rev. E, 87 (2013), 042714. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042714 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042714
![]() |
[5] |
R. Merris, Laplacian matrices of graphs: A survey, Linear Algebra Appl., 97 (1994), 143–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(94)90486-3 doi: 10.1016/0024-3795(94)90486-3
![]() |
[6] | R. Cohen, S. Havlin, Complex networks: Structure, robustness and function, Cambridge University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780356 |
[7] |
M. E. Fisher, On hearing the shape of a drum, J. Comb. Theory, 1 (1996), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9800(66)80008-X doi: 10.1016/S0021-9800(66)80008-X
![]() |
[8] |
I. Gutman, D. Vidovic, D. Stevanovi, Chemical applications of the Laplacian spectrum, VI, On the largest Laplacian eigenvalue of alkanes, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., 67 (2002), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC0206407G doi: 10.2298/JSC0206407G
![]() |
[9] |
B. Mohar, The Laplacian spectrum of graphs in graph theory, Combin. Appl., 2 (1991), 871–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2004.05.005 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.05.005
![]() |
[10] | F. Ameer, M. K. Hanif, R. Talib, M. U. Sarwar, Z. Khan, K. Zulfiqa, et al., Techniques, tools and applications of graph analytic, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 10 (2019). https://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100443 |
[11] | T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, C. Stein, Introduction to algorithms, MIT Press and McGraw-Hill, 12 (2001), 527–531. Available from: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/academic/class/15451-s04/www/Lectures/shortestPaths.pdf. |
[12] | M. T. Goodrich, R. Tamassia, Algorithm design and applications, Wiley, 2015 (2015), 363. |
[13] | A. E. Brouwer, W. H. Haemers, Spectra of graphs, Springer, New York, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1939-6 |
[14] |
B. Y. Hou, H. J. Zhang, L. Liu, Applications of Laplacian spectra for extended Koch networks, Eur. Phys. J., 85 (2012), 30373. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2012-30373-x doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2012-30373-x
![]() |
[15] |
Z. Z. Zhang, H. X. Liu, B. Wu, T. Zou, Spanning trees in a fractal scale-free lattice, Phys. Rev. E, 2011 (2011), 016116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016116 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016116
![]() |
[16] |
J. R. Lee, A. Hussain, A. Fahad, A. Raza, On ev and ve-degree based topological indices of silicon carbides, CMES-Comp. Modell. Eng., 130 (2022), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2022.016836 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2022.016836
![]() |
[17] |
Z. Zhang, Y. Qi, S. Zhou, Y. Lin, J. Guan, Recursive solutions for Laplacian spectra and eigenvectors of a class of growing treelike networks, Phys. Rev. E, 80 (2009), 016104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.016104 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.016104
![]() |
[18] |
Z. Z. Zhang, Y. Qi, S. G. Zhou, S. Y. Gao, J. H. Guan, Explicit determination of mean first-passage time for random walks on deterministic uniform recursive trees, Phys. Rev. E, 81 (2010), 016114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.016114 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.016114
![]() |
[19] |
J. B. Liu, X. F. Pan, Asymptotic incidence energy of lattices, Phys. A, 422 (2015), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.12.006 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.12.006
![]() |
[20] | D. Alghazzawi, A. Raza, U. Munir, S. Ali, Chemical applicability of newly introduced topological invariants and their relation with polycyclic compounds, J. Math., 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5867040 |
[21] |
Z. Cheng, J. Cao, T. Hayat, Cascade of failures in interdependent networks with different average degree, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 25 (2014), 1440006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183114400063 doi: 10.1142/S0129183114400063
![]() |
[22] |
S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, D. U. Hwang, Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep., 424 (2006), 175–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009
![]() |
[23] |
A. Arenas, A. Diaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, C. S. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks, Phys. Rep., 469 (2008), 93–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.002
![]() |
[24] |
N. Abreu, D. M. Cardoso, I. Gutman, E. A. Martins, M. Robbiano, Bounds for the signless Laplacian energy, Linear Algebra Appl., 435 (2011), 2365–2374. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5906801 doi: 10.1155/2016/5906801
![]() |
[25] |
D. Cvetkovic, Signless Laplacians and line graphs, Sci. Math., 131 (2005), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.2298/BMAT0530085C doi: 10.2298/BMAT0530085C
![]() |
[26] |
D. Cvetkovic, S. K. Simić, Towards a spectral theory of graphs based on the signless Laplacian spectra, Publ. I. Math., 85 (2009), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2298/PIM0999019C doi: 10.2298/PIM0999019C
![]() |
[27] |
D. Cvetkovic, S. K. Simić, Towards a spectral theory of graphs based on the signless Laplacian, Appl. Anal. Discr. Math., 4 (2010), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.2298/AADM1000001C doi: 10.2298/AADM1000001C
![]() |
[28] |
J. B. Liu, J. Cao, A. Alofi, A. A. Mazrooei, A. Elaiw, Applications of Laplacian spectra for n-prism networks, Neurocomputing, 198 (2016), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10060206 doi: 10.3390/sym10060206
![]() |
[29] | R. A. Horn, C. R. Johnson, Matrix analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810817 |
[30] | X. Gao, Y. Luo, W. Liu, Resistance distances and the Kirchhoff index in Cayley graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 159 (2011), 2050–2057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2011.06.027 |
[31] | O. Jones, Spectra of simple graphs, Whitman College, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03574-7_1 |
[32] | D. J. Klein, M. Randić, Resistance distances, J. Math. Chem., 12 (1993), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01164627 |
[33] |
M. Q. Owaidat, J. H. Asad, J. M. Khalifeh, Resistance calculation of the decorated centered cubic networks: Applications of the Green's function, Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 28 (2014), 1450252. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984914502522 doi: 10.1142/S0217984914502522
![]() |
[34] |
Z. Zhang, Some physical and chemical indices of clique-inserted lattices, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp., 10 (2013), P10004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2013/10/P10004 doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2013/10/P10004
![]() |
[35] | X. Zhang, A. Raza, A. Fahad, M. K. Jamil, M. A. Chaudhry, Z. Iqbal, On face index of silicon carbides, Discr. Dyn. Nature Soc., 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6048438 |
[36] |
A. Kamińska, T. Srokowski, Mean first passage time for a Markovian jumping process, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 38 (2007), 3119. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0710.2686 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0710.2686
![]() |
[37] |
Z. Z. Zhang, H. X. Liu, B. Wu, S. G. Zhou, Eunmeration of spanning trees in a peseudofractal scale web, Europhys. Lett., 90 (2010), 68002. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/90/68002 doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/90/68002
![]() |
[38] |
I. Lukovits, S. Nikolić, N. Trinajstić, Resistance distance in regular graphs, Int. J. Quant. Chem, 71 (1999), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1999)71 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1999)71
![]() |
[39] |
G. J. Szabó, M. Alava, J. Kertész, Geometry of minimum spanning trees on scalefree networks, Phys. A, 330 (2003), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0405688 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0405688
![]() |
[40] |
Z. H. Wu, L. A. Braunstein, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, Transport in weighted networks: Partition into superhighways and roads, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96 (2006), 148702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.148702 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.148702
![]() |
[41] |
D. Dhar, Theoretical studies of self-organized criticality, Phys. A, 369 (2006), 29–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.004
![]() |
[42] |
D. Dhar, A. Dhar, Distribution of sizes of erased loops for loop-erased random walks, Phys. Rev. E, 55 (1997), 2093. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.55.R2093 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.R2093
![]() |
[43] |
T. Elmar, S. Wagner, Resistance scaling and the number of spanning trees in self-similar lattices, J. Stat. Phys., 142 (2011), 879–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-011-0140-z doi: 10.1007/s10955-011-0140-z
![]() |
[44] |
Z. Z. Zhang, B. Wu, F. Comellas, The number of spanning trees in Apollonian networks, Discrete Appl. Math., 169 (2014), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4271783 doi: 10.1155/2019/4271783
![]() |
[45] | C. Godsil, G. Royle, Algebraic graph theory, graduate texts in mathematics, Springer, New York, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0163-9 |
[46] | E. Huckel, The theory of unsaturated and aromatic compounds, Z. Elektrochem. Angew. Phys. Chem., 42 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341936 |
[47] |
R. Pariser, R. G. Parr, A semi-empirical theory of the electronic spectra and electronic structure of complex unsaturated molecules, J. Chem. Phys., 21 (1953), 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1698929 doi: 10.1063/1.1698929
![]() |
1. | Ali Raza, Mobeen Munir, Muhammad Hussain, Fikadu Tasgera, A Spectrum-Based Approach to Network Analysis Utilizing Laplacian and Signless Laplacian Spectra to Torus Networks, 2024, 12, 2169-3536, 52016, 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3384300 | |
2. | Ali Raza, Muhammad Mobeen Munir, Muhammad Hussain, Optimizing network insights: AI-Driven approaches to circulant graph based on Laplacian spectra, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 095259, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad6bc6 | |
3. | Ali Raza, Muhammad Mobeen Munir, Insights into network properties: spectrum-based analysis with Laplacian and signless Laplacian spectra, 2023, 138, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04441-z | |
4. | Ali Raza, Muhammad Mobeen Munir, Exploring spectrum-based descriptors in pharmacological traits through quantitative structure property (QSPR) analysis, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1348407 | |
5. | Ali Raza, Mishal Ismaeel, Fikadu Tesgera Tolasa, Valency based novel quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) approach for predicting physical properties of polycyclic chemical compounds, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-54962-5 | |
6. | Ali Raza, Muhammad Waheed Rasheed, Abid Mahboob, Mishal Ismaeel, Neighborhood Face Index: A New Quantitative Structure Property Relationship (QSPR) Approach for Predicting Physical Properties of Polycyclic Chemical Compounds, 2024, 124, 0020-7608, 10.1002/qua.27524 | |
7. | Ali Raza, Muhammad Mobeen Munir, Laplacian spectra and structural insights: applications in chemistry and network science, 2025, 11, 2297-4687, 10.3389/fams.2025.1519577 |