In this paper, we study the existence of square-mean asymptotically almost periodic mild solutions for a class of second order nonautonomous stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert spaces. By using the principle of Banach contractive mapping principle, the existence and uniqueness of square-mean asymptotically almost periodic mild solutions of the equation are obtained. To illustrate the abstract result, a concrete example is given.
Citation: Jinghuai Liu, Litao Zhang. Square-mean asymptotically almost periodic solutions of second order nonautonomous stochastic evolution equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5040-5052. doi: 10.3934/math.2021298
[1] | Ramkumar Kasinathan, Ravikumar Kasinathan, Dumitru Baleanu, Anguraj Annamalai . Well posedness of second-order impulsive fractional neutral stochastic differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9222-9235. doi: 10.3934/math.2021536 |
[2] | Ping Zhu . Dynamics of the positive almost periodic solution to a class of recruitment delayed model on time scales. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 7292-7309. doi: 10.3934/math.2023367 |
[3] | Sivajiganesan Sivasankar, Ramalingam Udhayakumar, Abd Elmotaleb A.M.A. Elamin, R. Samidurai, Sina Etemad, Muath Awadalla . Attractive solutions for Hilfer fractional neutral stochastic integro-differential equations with almost sectorial operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11486-11510. doi: 10.3934/math.2024564 |
[4] | Xin Liu, Yongqi Hou . Almost automorphic solutions for mean-field SDEs driven by Lévy noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11159-11183. doi: 10.3934/math.2025506 |
[5] | Lulu Ren, JinRong Wang, Michal Fečkan . Periodic mild solutions of impulsive fractional evolution equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 497-506. doi: 10.3934/math.2020033 |
[6] | Hassan Ranjbar, Leila Torkzadeh, Dumitru Baleanu, Kazem Nouri . Simulating systems of Itô SDEs with split-step $ (\alpha, \beta) $-Milstein scheme. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2576-2590. doi: 10.3934/math.2023133 |
[7] | Ramzi May, Chokri Mnasri, Mounir Elloumi . Asymptotic for a second order evolution equation with damping and regularizing terms. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 4901-4914. doi: 10.3934/math.2021287 |
[8] | Xin Liu, Yan Wang . Averaging principle on infinite intervals for stochastic ordinary differential equations with Lévy noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5316-5350. doi: 10.3934/math.2021314 |
[9] | Qi Shao, Yongkun Li . Almost periodic solutions for Clifford-valued stochastic shunting inhibitory cellular neural networks with mixed delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 13439-13461. doi: 10.3934/math.2024655 |
[10] | Zainab Alsheekhhussain, Ahmed Gamal Ibrahim, Rabie A. Ramadan . Existence of $ S $-asymptotically $ \omega $-periodic solutions for non-instantaneous impulsive semilinear differential equations and inclusions of fractional order $ 1 < \alpha < 2 $. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 76-101. doi: 10.3934/math.2023004 |
In this paper, we study the existence of square-mean asymptotically almost periodic mild solutions for a class of second order nonautonomous stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert spaces. By using the principle of Banach contractive mapping principle, the existence and uniqueness of square-mean asymptotically almost periodic mild solutions of the equation are obtained. To illustrate the abstract result, a concrete example is given.
The concept of asymptotically almost periodicity was introduced by Fréchet [1] in the early 1940s. The study of almost periodic solutions and asymptotically almost periodic solutions of differential equations have become a hot spot in the qualitative theory of differential equations [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Huang [13] established the asymptotically almost periodic solutions of the delayed Nicholson-type system involving patch structure
x′i(t)=−aii(t)xi(t)+n∑j=1,j≠iaij(t)xj(t)+m∑j=1βij(t)xi(t−τij(t))e−γij(t)xi(t−τij(t)). |
with weaker conditions.
In recent years, some scholars have established the asymptotic almost periodic theories in probability to study stochastic processes. These theories have good applications prospect in statistics, mathematical physics, mechanics and mathematical biology. Cao [14] studied the asymptotically almost periodic solutions of first order stochastic functional differential equation
dx(t)=(Ax(t)+F(t,x(t),xt))dt+G(t,x(t),xt)dW(t), t∈R |
Where A:D(A)⊂L2(P,H)→L2(P,H) generates strongly continuous semigroups {T(t)}t≥0. W(t) is a Q-Wiener process with covariance operator Q whose value is taken on L2(P,H).
Liu [15] studied the asymptotically almost periodic mild solutions for the class of stochastic functional differential equations
dx(t)=(A(t)x(t)+F(t,x(t),xt))dt+G(t,x(t),xt)dW(t), t∈R |
where A(t):D(A)⊂L2(P,H)→L2(P,H) can display the center flow. W(t) is a certain Q-Wiener process with covariance operator Q whose value is taken on L2(P,H).
On the other hand, the second order stochastic differential equation is the correct model of continuous time, which can be used to explain the synthesis process of making it into continuous time. McKibben [16] first established the second order damped functional stochastic evolution equation. In addition, McKibben [17] studied the existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for a class of second order neutral stochastic evolution equations with finite delay. Since then, it has attracted people's attention in many literatures, such as [18,19,20,21,22]. The existence of solutions for the second order abstract Cauchy problem is closely related to the concept of cosine function. Research on abstract second order differential equations controlled by evolutionary operators {U(t,s):t,s∈J} was developed by Kozak. Kozak [23] has proved that homogeneous equation
u″(t)=A(t)u(t), t∈J |
with
u(s)=x,u′(s)=y |
exists a mild solution u(t)=−∂∂sU(t,s)x+U(t,s)y+∫tsU(t,ξ)f(ξ)dξ.
Various methods for determining the existence of evolution operators generated by the family of {A(t):t∈J} can be found in references [24,25]. It is a better way to study the second order differential system directly instead of transforming it into the first order system.
Recently, Ren [26] established the existence and uniqueness of mild solutions to the following second order nonautonomous neutral stochastic evolution equations with infinite delay, which are driven by standard cylindrical Wiener process and independent cylindrical fractional Brownian motion.
d[y′(t)−f(t,yt)]=[A(t)y(t)dt+g(t,yt)]dt+h(t,yt)dW(t)+σ(t)dBHQ(t), t∈I=[0,T] |
and
y0=ϕ∈B,y′(0)=ξ. |
The existence of asymptotically almost periodic solutions for second order nonautonomous stochastic evolution equations is an untreated topic. Under the stimulation of these works and certain conditions, and by using the Banach contraction mapping principle and the evolution operator theory, this paper established the existence and uniqueness of square-mean asymptotically almost periodic mild solutions to the following second order nonautonomous stochastic evolution equations
dx′(t)=A(t)x(t)dt+F(t,x(t))dt+G(t,x(t))dW(t), t∈R+=[0,+∞) | (1.1) |
with
x(0)=x0,x′(0)=x1 | (1.2) |
in a real separable Hilbert space, where {A(t)}t≥0 is a family of linear closed operators from X into X that generate an evolution operators {U(t,s)}t,s≥0, and {W(t)}t≥0 is a Q-Wiener process. Here F, G are appropriate functions specified later.
The structure of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the concepts of evolution operator, square mean asymptotically almost periodic stochastic process, and give some properties and Lemmas of them. In Section 3, we obtain the existence and uniqueness of the square-mean asymptotically almost periodic mild solution for the second order nonautonomous stochastic evolution equation. In Section 4, we give an example to illustrate our main results.
In this section, we give some definitions, basic properties and Lemmas, which will be used in the sequel. As in [5,6,7,8,9,10,27,28,29], two real separable Hilbert spaces are represented by (H,‖⋅‖,⟨⋅,⋅⟩) and (K,‖⋅‖K,⟨⋅,⋅⟩). Denote the complete probability space by (Ω,F,P). The symbol L2(P,H) denotes the spatial variable x of all random variables with the value of H, such that
E‖x‖2=∫Ω‖x‖2dP<∞. |
For x∈L2(P,H), let
‖x‖2=(∫Ω‖x‖2dP)12. |
Then it is a Banach space equipped with the norm ‖⋅‖2.
Definition 2.1 (see [5]) A stochastic process x:R→L2(P,H) is said to be continuous in the square-mean sense if
limt→sE‖x(t)−x(s)‖2=0, for all s∈R. |
Definition 2.2 (see [5]) Let x:R→L2(P,H) be continuous in the square-mean sense. x is said to be square-mean almost periodic if for each ε>0, there exists l(ε)>0 such that any interval of length l(ε) contains at least a number τ for which
supt∈RE‖x(t+τ)−x(t)‖2<ε. |
The collection of all such functions will be denoted by AP(L2(P,H)). AP(L2(P,H)) is a Banach space when it is equipped with the norm ‖x‖∞=supt∈R(E‖x(t)‖2)12.
Definition 2.3 (see [5]) A continuous function f:R×L2(P,H)→L2(P,H), (t,x)→f(t,x) which is jointly continuous, is said to be square-mean almost periodic in t∈R uniformly for all x∈K, where K is compact subset of L2(P,H), if for any ε>0, there exists l(ε,K)>0 such that any interval of length l(ε,K) contains at least a number τ for which
supt∈RE‖f(t+τ,x)−f(t,x)‖2<ε |
for each stochastic process x:R→K.
The set of all these functions is represented by AP(R×L2(P,H),L2(P,H)).
The notation C0(R+,L2(P,H)) denotes the set of all continuous stochastic processes φ from R+ into L2(P,H), such that limt→+∞E‖φ(t)‖2=0. Similarly, we use C0(R+×L2(P,H),L2(P,H)) to denote the space of all continuous functions ϕ:R+×L2(P,H)→L2(P,H) such that limt→+∞E‖ϕ(t,x)‖2=0, uniformly for x in any compact subset of L2(P,H).
Definition 2.4 (see [14]) A stochastic process f:R+→L2(P,H) is said to be square-mean asymptotically almost periodic if it can be decomposed as f=g+h, where g is square-mean almost periodic function and h∈C0(R+,L2(P,H)).
By AAP(R+,L2(P,H)) we denote the collection of all such functions.
Definition 2.5 (see [14]) A stochastic process f:R+×L2(P,H)→L2(P,H) is said to be square-mean asymptotically almost periodic in t, uniformly for x in compact subset K of L2(P,H), if it can be decomposed as f=g+h, where g is square-mean almost periodic function and h∈C0(R+×L2(P,H),L2(P,H)).
Denote by AAP(R+×L2(P,H),L2(P,H)) the collection of all such functions.
The following Lemma generalizes Theorem 5 of [2]. It can be proved in an analogous way.
Lemma 2.6 A continuous function f:R+→L2(P,H) is square-mean asymptotically almost periodic if and only if, for every ε>0, there exists L(ε,E‖f‖2,L2(P,H))>0 and a relatively dense subset of R+, denoted by T(ε,E‖f‖2,L2(P,H)), such that E‖f(t+τ)−f(t)‖2<ε for every t≥L(ε,E‖f‖2,L2(P,H)) and every τ∈T(ε,E‖f‖2,L2(P,H)).
The following Lemmas can be obtained directly from [14].
Lemma 2.7 (AAP(R+,L2(P,H)),‖⋅‖∞) is a Banach space with the norm given by
‖x‖∞=supt∈R+‖x(t)‖2=supt∈R+(E‖x(t)‖2)12. |
Let K⊂L2(P,H). We denote by CK(R+×L2(P,H),L2(P,H)) the set of all the functions f:R+×L2(P,H)→L2(P,H) satisfying f(t,⋅) is uniformly continuous on L2(P,H) uniformly for t∈R+.
Lemma 2.8 Let x∈AAP(R+,L2(P,H)) and f∈AAP(R+×L2(P,H),L2(P,H))∩CK(R+×L2(P,H),L2(P,H)) with K=¯{x(t),t∈R+}. Then f(t,x(t))∈AAP(R+,L2(P,H)).
This concept of evolution operator has been developed by Kozak [23], recentley used by Henríquez et al. [24,25] and Ren [26].
Definition 2.9 The familly {U(t,s)}t,s≥0 is said to be an evolution operator generated by the {A(t)}t≥0 if the following conditions hold:
(A1) for each x∈X the map (t,s)→U(t,s)x is continuously differentiable and
(a) for each t∈R+, U(t,t)=0;
(b) for all t,s∈R+, ∂∂tU(t,s)x|t=s=x and ∂∂sU(t,s)x|t=s=−x.
(A2) for all t,s∈R+, if x∈D(A(t)), then ∂∂sU(t,s)x∈D(A(t)), the map (t,s)→U(t,s)x is of class C2 and
(a) ∂2∂t2U(t,s)x=A(t)U(t,s)x;
(b) ∂2∂s2U(t,s)x=U(t,s)A(s)x;
(c) ∂2∂s∂tU(t,s)x|t=s=0.
(A3) for all t,s∈R+, if x∈D(A(t)), then ∂∂sU(t,s)x∈D(A(t)), there exist ∂3∂t2∂sU(t,s)x, ∂3∂s2∂tU(t,s)x and
(a) ∂3∂t2∂sU(t,s)x=A(t)∂∂sU(t,s)x. Moreover, the map (t,s)→A(t)∂∂sU(t,s)x is continuous;
(b) ∂3∂s2∂tU(t,s)x=∂∂tU(t,s)A(s)x.
In this section, we suppose that the following assumptions hold:
(H1) The evolution operator {U(t,s)}t,s≥0 generated by A(t) satisfies the following conditions:
(1) There exists constants M0,M1>0 such that
‖U(t,s)‖≤M0e−δ(t−s),‖∂∂sU(t,s)‖≤M1e−δ(t−s) |
for all t≥s≥0 and δ>0.
(2) For each ε1>0, there exists constant l(ε1)>0, such that every interval of length l(ε1) contains a constant τ with the property that
‖U(t+τ,s+τ)−U(t,s)‖≤ε1e−δ(t−s). |
for all t,s∈R+, where δ>0 is the constant required in (1).
(H2) The functions F,G:R+×L2(P,H)→L2(P,H) satisfy the following conditions:
(1) F,G∈AAP(R+×L2(P,H),L2(P,H)) and F(t,⋅), G(t,⋅) are uniformly continuous in every bounded subset K⊂L2(P,H) uniformly for t∈R+;
(2) there exist constants LF,LG>0 such that
E‖F(t,x)−F(t,y)‖2≤LFE‖x−y‖2, |
E‖G(t,x)−G(t,y)‖2≤LGE‖x−y‖2, |
for all x,y∈K and t∈R+.
Definition 3.1 An Ft-adapted continuous stochastic process x(t) is called a mild solution to problems (1.1) and (1.2) if the following hold:
(1) x0, x1 satisfying ‖x0‖2<∞, ‖x1‖2<∞;
(2) the stochastic integral equation satisfied
x(t)=−∂∂sU(t,0)x0+U(t,0)x1+∫t0U(t,s)F(s,x(s))ds+∫t0U(t,s)G(s,x(s))dW(s) | (3.1) |
for all t∈R+.
Lemma 3.2 Assume that (H1) is satisfied. If v:R+→L2(P,H) is square-mean asymptotically almost periodic, then the function
u(t)=∫t0U(t,s)v(s)ds,t∈R+ |
is square-mean asymptotically almost periodic.
Proof Let ε>0 be given and T(δ24ε,E‖v‖2,L2(P,H)), L=L(δ24ε,E‖v‖2,L2(P,H)) be as in Lemma 2.6. Let L1>0 and 16M20δ2e−2δ(L1−L)E‖v‖2<ε4. For t≥L+L1 and τ∈T(δ24ε,E‖v‖2,L2(P,H)), by using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, one has
E‖u(t+τ)−u(t)‖2=E‖∫t+τ0U(t+τ,s)v(s)ds−∫t0U(t,s)v(s)ds‖2=E‖∫τ0U(t+τ,s)v(s)ds+∫L0U(t+τ,s+τ)(v(s+τ)−v(s))ds+∫tLU(t+τ,s+τ)(v(s+τ)−v(s))ds+∫t0(U(t+τ,s+τ)−U(t,s))v(s)ds‖2≤4E(∫τ0‖U(t+τ,s)v(s)‖ds)2+4E(∫L0‖U(t+τ,s+τ)(v(s+τ)−v(s))‖ds)2+4E(∫tL‖U(t+τ,s+τ)(v(s+τ)−v(s))‖ds)2+4E(∫t0‖(U(t+τ,s+τ)−U(t,s))v(s)‖ds)2≤4M20E(∫τ0e−δ(t+τ−s)‖v(s)‖ds)2+4M20E(∫L0e−δ(t−s)‖v(s+τ)−v(s)‖ds)2+4M20E(∫tLe−δ(t−s)‖v(s+τ)−v(s)‖ds)2+4ε21E(∫t0e−δ(t−s)‖v(s)‖ds)2≤4M20(∫τ0e−δ(t+τ−s)ds)2E‖v‖2+16M20(∫L0e−δ(t−s)ds)2E‖v‖2+4M20(∫tLe−δ(t−s)ds)2E‖v(t+τ)−v(t)‖2+4ε21(∫t0e−δ(t−s)ds)2E‖v‖2≤4M20δ2e−2δtE‖v‖2+16M20δ2e−2δ(t−L)E‖v‖2+4M20δ2ε+4ε21δ2E‖v‖2 |
and hence
E‖u(t+τ)−u(t)‖2<ε. |
Therefore, by Lemma 2.6, u(t)∈AAP(R+,L2(P,H)). This completes the proof.
Lemma 3.3 Assume that (H1) is satisfied. If v:R+→L2(P,H) is square-mean asymptotically almost periodic, then the function
w(t)=∫t0U(t,s)v(s)dW(s),t∈R+ |
is square-mean asymptotically almost periodic.
Proof Let ε>0 be given and T(δ4ε,E‖v‖2,L2(P,H)), L=L(δ4ε,E‖v‖2,L2(P,H)) be as in Lemma 2.6. Let L1>0 and 8M20δe−2δ(L1−L)E‖v‖2<ε4. Let ˜W(s)=W(s+τ)−W(τ) for each s≥0. Note that ˜W is also a Brownian motion and has the same distribution as W. By using Itô's isometry identity [27] and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have
E‖w(t+τ)−w(t)‖2=E‖∫t+τ0U(t+τ,s)v(s)dW(s)−∫t0U(t,s)v(s)dW(s)‖2=E‖∫τ0U(t+τ,s)v(s)d˜W(s)+∫L0U(t+τ,s+τ)(v(s+τ)−v(s))d˜W(s)+∫tLU(t+τ,s+τ)(v(s+τ)−v(s))d˜W(s)+∫t0(U(t+τ,s+τ)−U(t,s))v(s)d˜W(s)‖2≤4E∫τ0‖U(t+τ,s)‖‖v(s)‖2ds+4E∫L0‖U(t+τ,s+τ)‖‖(v(s+τ)−v(s))‖2ds+4E∫tL‖U(t+τ,s+τ)‖‖(v(s+τ)−v(s))‖2ds+4E∫t0‖(U(t+τ,s+τ)−U(t,s))‖‖v(s)‖2ds≤4M20∫τ0e−2δ(t+τ−s)E‖v(s)‖2ds+4M20∫L0e−2δ(t−s)E‖v(s+τ)−v(s))‖2ds+4M20∫tLe−2δ(t−s)E‖v(s+τ)−v(s))‖2ds+4ε21∫t0e−2δ(t−s)E‖v(s)‖2ds≤2M20δe−2δtE‖v‖2+8M20δe−2δ(t−L)E‖v‖2+2M20δε+2ε21δE‖v‖2. |
For t≥L(δ4ε,E‖v‖2,L2(P,H))+L1, τ∈T(δ4ε,E‖v‖2,L2(P,H)), we obtain
E‖w(t+τ)−w(t)‖2<ε. |
Therefore, by Lemma 2.6, w(t)∈AAP(R+,L2(P,H)). This completes the proof.
Theorem 3.4 Assume that assumptions (H1)-(H3) hold. If M0√(2LFδ2+LGδ)<1, the stochastic differential equations (1.1) and (1.2) have a unique square-mean asymptotically almost periodic mild solution.
Proof Define the operator Γ:AAP(R+,L2(P,H))→AAP(R+,L2(P,H)) by
(Γx)(t)=−∂∂sU(t,0)x0+U(t,0)x1+∫t0U(t,s)F(s,x(s))ds+∫t0U(t,s)G(s,x(s))dW(s)=−∂∂sU(t,0)x0+U(t,0)x1+(Γ1x)(t)+(Γ2x)(t), |
where (Γ1x)(t)=∫t0U(t,s)F(s,x(s))ds, (Γ2x)(t)=∫t0U(t,s)G(s,x(s))dW(s).
We need to prove that Γ is well defined that is Γ(AAP(R+,L2(P,H)))⊂AAP(R+,L2(P,H)).
From previous assumptions of {U(t,s)}t,s≥0, one can easily see that
E‖−∂∂sU(t,0)x0+U(t,0)x1‖2≤2E‖−∂∂sU(t,0)x0‖2+2E‖U(t,0)x1‖2≤2M21e−2δtE‖x0‖2+2M20e−2δtE‖x1‖2. |
then we get
limt→+∞E‖−∂∂sU(t,0)x0+U(t,0)x1‖2=0, |
that is −∂∂sU(t,0)x0+U(t,0)x1∈C0(R+,L2(P,H)).
Let x∈AAP(R+,L2(P,H)). By (H2) and Lemma 2.8, the function F(t,x(t)) and G(t,x(t)) belongs to AAP(R+,L2(P,H)).
By Lemma 3.2 and 3.3, Γ maps AAP(R+,L2(P,H)) into itself. To complete the proof, it suffices to prove that Γ has a fixed point. Clearly, we get
E‖(Γx)(t)−(Γy)(t)‖2=E‖(Γ1x)(t)−(Γ1y)(t)+(Γ2x)(t)−(Γ2y)(t)‖2≤2E‖(Γ1x)(t)−(Γ1y)(t)‖2+2E‖(Γ2x)(t)−(Γ2y)(t)‖2=2E‖∫t0U(t,s)[F(s,x(s))−F(s,y(s))]dW(s)‖2+2E‖∫t0U(t,s)[G(s,x(s))−G(s,y(s))]dW(s)‖2≤2M20E(∫t0e−δ(t−s)‖F(s,x(s))−F(s,y(s))‖ds)2+2E(‖∫t0U(t,s)[G(s,x(s))−G(s,y(s))]dW(s)‖)2. |
We evaluate the first term of the right-hand side as follows:
E(∫t0e−δ(t−s)‖F(s,x(s))−F(s,y(s))‖ds)2≤E[(∫t0e−δ(t−s)ds)(∫t0e−δ(t−s)‖F(s,x(s))−F(s,y(s))‖2ds)]≤(∫t0e−δ(t−s)ds)(∫t0e−δ(t−s)E‖F(s,x(s))−F(s,y(s))‖2ds)≤LF(∫t0e−δ(t−s)ds)(∫t0e−δ(t−s)E‖x(s)−y(s)‖2ds)≤LF(∫t0e−δ(t−s)ds)2supt≥0E‖x(t)−y(t)‖2≤LF(∫∞0e−δ(t−s)ds)2supt≥0E‖x(t)−y(t)‖2≤LFδ2supt≥0E‖x(t)−y(t)‖2. |
As to the second term, we use again an estimate on the Itô's integral established in [27] to obtain:
E(‖∫t0U(t,s)[G(s,x(s))−G(s,y(s))]dW(s)‖)2≤E(∫t0‖U(t,s)‖‖G(s,x(s))−G(s,y(s))‖2ds)≤M20∫t0e−2δ(t−s)E‖G(s,x(s))−G(s,y(s))‖2ds≤M20LG(∫t0e−2δ(t−s)ds)supt≥0E‖x(t)−y(t)‖2≤M20LG(∫∞0e−2δ(t−s)ds)supt≥0E‖x(t)−y(t)‖2≤M20LG2δsupt≥0E‖x(t)−y(t)‖2. |
So, we have
E‖(Γx)(t)−(Γy)(t)‖2≤M20(2LFδ2+LGδ)supt≥0E‖x(t)−y(t)‖2, |
that is
‖(Γx)(t)−(Γy)(t)‖22≤M20(2LFδ2+LGδ)supt≥0‖x(t)−y(t)‖22. | (3.2) |
Note that
supt≥0‖x(t)−y(t)‖22≤(supt≥0‖x(t)−y(t)‖2)2. | (3.3) |
Hence, by (3.2) and (3.3), for t≥0, we obtain
‖(Γx)(t)−(Γy)(t)‖2≤M0√(2LFδ2+LGδ)‖x(t)−y(t)‖∞. |
Therefore, we get
‖(Γx)(t)−(Γy)(t)‖∞≤M0√(2LFδ2+LGδ)‖x(t)−y(t)‖∞ |
which implies that Γ is a contraction mapping by M0√(2LFδ2+LGδ)<1. So by the Banach contraction mapping principle, we conclude that there exists a unique fixed point x(⋅) for Γ∈AAP(R+,L2(P,H)), such that Γx=x, that is
(Γx)(t)=−∂∂sU(t,0)x0+U(t,0)x1+∫t0U(t,s)F(s,x(s))ds+∫t0U(t,s)G(s,x(s))dW(s), |
for t≥0. This completes the proof.
To complete this work, we apply the previous results to consider the following second-order stochastic partial equation
∂2z(t,ξ)∂t2=(∂2z(t,ξ)∂ξ2+a(t)∂z(t,ξ)∂ξ)∂t+f(t,z(t,ξ))∂t+g(t,z(t,ξ))dW(t), t≥0, ξ∈[0,π] | (4.1) |
with
z(t,0)=z(t,π)=0, t≥0 | (4.2) |
and
z(0,ξ)=z0(ξ),∂∂tz(0,ξ)=z1(ξ), ξ∈[0,π], | (4.3) |
where W is a Q-Wiener process with TrQ<∞ and f, g are appropriate functions.
Take H=L2([0,π]) equipped with its natural topology. The operator A(t)=A+B(t), where A is defined by Az=d2z(ξ)dξ2, with D(A)={z∈H:z(0)=z(π)} and B(t)z=a(t)dz(ξ)dξ. The spectrum of A consists of the eigenvalues −n2 for n∈N, with associated eigenvectors en(ξ)=1√2πeinξ,n∈N. Furthermore, the set {en:n∈N} is an orthonormal basis of H. In particular, Ax=∞∑n=1−n2⟨x,en⟩en, x∈D(A). It is well known that A generates a cosine function C(t) on H, defined by
C(t)x=∞∑n=1cos(nt)⟨x,en⟩en,t∈R, |
with associated sine function
S(t)x=t⟨x,e0⟩e0+∞∑n=1sin(nt)n⟨x,en⟩en,t∈R. |
It is clear that ‖C(t)‖≤1. It is easy to see that A(t)=A+B(t) is a closed linear operator, and U(t,s):H→H is well defined and satisfies the condition of Definition 2.9. We refer to [24] for more details.
Let z(t)(ξ)=z(t,ξ). Define F:[0,π]×H→H, G:[0,π]×H→L2(H) by F(t,z)(⋅)=f(t,z(t,⋅)) and G(t,z)(⋅)=g(t,z(t,⋅)). Therefore, the above system can be be written in the following abstract form:
dz′(t)=A(t)z(t)dt+F(t,z(t))dt+G(t,z(t))dW(t), t∈R+=[0,+∞) | (4.4) |
with
z(0)=z0,z′(0)=z1. | (4.5) |
Assume that U(t,s), F and G satisfy the conditions of Theorem 3.4. Then the above system has a unique square-mean asymptotically almost periodic solutions.
This paper established the existence and uniqueness of square-mean asymptotically almost periodic mild solutions for a class of second order nonautonomous stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert spaces. The results are based on the properties of evolution operators and the Lipschitz condition. However, if we generalize the results to the second order nonautonomous neutral stochastic evolution equations with infinite delay or not, can we get similar results? This is an interesting and meaningful work. In the future, we will study these problems. Also, we will study the asymptotically almost periodic mild solutions of other types of second order nonautonomous stochastic differential equations.
The authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers and editors for their very useful suggestions and comments, which have improved our manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11226337) and Basic Research Projects of Key Scientific Research Projects Plan in Henan Higher Education Institutions (No.20zx003).
We confirm that we have no conflict of interest.
[1] | H. Bohr, Almost periodic functions, New York: Chelsea Publishing Company, 1947. |
[2] | S. Zaidman, Almost-periodic functions in abstract spaces, Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 1985. |
[3] |
E. Hernández, M. L. Pelicer, Asymptotically almost periodic and almost periodic solutions for partial neutral differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 18 (2005), 1265-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2005.02.015
![]() |
[4] | T. Diagana, H. Henriquez, E. Hernández, Asymptotically almost periodic solutions to some classes of second-order functional differential equations, Differ. Integral Equ., 21 (2008), 575-600. |
[5] |
P. Bezandry, T. Diagana, Existence of almost periodic solutions to some stochastic differential equations, Appl. Anal., 86 (2007), 819-827. doi: 10.1080/00036810701397788
![]() |
[6] | P. Bezandry, T. Diagan, Almost periodic stochastic processes, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2011. |
[7] | T. Diagan, Almost automorphic type and almost periodic type functions in abstract spaces, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2013. |
[8] |
Y. Chang, R. Ma, Z. Zhao, Almost periodic solutions to a stochastic differential equation in Hilbert spaces, Results Math., 63 (2013), 435-449. doi: 10.1007/s00025-011-0207-9
![]() |
[9] |
K. X. Li, Square-mean almost periodic solutions to some stochastic evolution equations, Acta. Math. Sin., English Ser., 30 (2014), 881-898. doi: 10.1007/s10114-013-1109-4
![]() |
[10] |
J. Cao, Z. Huang, Asymptotic almost periodicity of stochastic evolution equations, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 42 (2019), 2295-2332. doi: 10.1007/s40840-018-0604-2
![]() |
[11] |
C. Huang, L. Yang, J. Cao, Asymptotic behavior for a class of population dynamics, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 3378-3390. doi: 10.3934/math.2020218
![]() |
[12] |
C. Qian, Y. Hu, Novel stability criteria on nonlinear density-dependent mortality Nicholsons blowflies systems in asymptotically almost periodic environments, J. Inequal. Appl., 2020 (2020), 1-18. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2265-6
![]() |
[13] |
C. Huang, J. Wang, L. Huang, Asymptotically almost periodicity of delayed Nicholson-type system involving patch structure, Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1-17. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2438-0
![]() |
[14] | J. Cao, Q. Yang, Z. Huang, Q. Liu, Asymptotically almost periodic solutions of stochastic functional differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2011), 1499-1511. |
[15] | A. Liu, Y. Liu, Q. Liu, Asymptotically almost periodic solutions for a class of stochastic functional differential equations, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 353-370. |
[16] | M. A. McKibben, Second-order damped functional stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert space, Dyn. Syst. Appl., 12 (2003), 467-487. |
[17] |
M. A. McKibben, Second-order neutral stochastic evolution equations with heredity, J. Appl. Math. Stoch. Anal., 2004 (2004), 177-192. doi: 10.1155/S1048953304309020
![]() |
[18] |
M. A. McKibben, M. Webster, Abstract functional second-order stochastic evolution equations with applications, Afrika Mat., 28 (2017), 755-780. doi: 10.1007/s13370-017-0480-1
![]() |
[19] |
V. Vijayakumar, Approximate controllability for a class of second-order stochastic evolution inclusions of Clarkes subdifferential type, Results Math., 73 (2018), 1-23. doi: 10.1007/s00025-018-0773-1
![]() |
[20] | P. Balasubramaniam, J. Park, Nonlocal Cauchy problem for second order stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert spaces, Dyn. Syst. Appl., 16 (2007), 713-728. |
[21] |
H. Huang, Z. Wu, L. Hu, Z. Wei, L. Wang, Existence and controllability of second-order neutral impulsive stochastic evolution integrodifferential equations with state-dependent delay, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 20 (2018), 1-27. doi: 10.1007/s11784-018-0489-6
![]() |
[22] | R. Dhayal, M. Malik, S. Abbas, A. Debbouche, Optimal controls for second-order stochastic differential equations driven by mixed-fractional Brownian motion with impulses, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 4107-4124. |
[23] |
H. R. Henríquez, Existence of solutions of non-autonomous second order functional differential equations with infinite delay, Nonlinear Anal., 74 (2011), 3333-3352. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.02.010
![]() |
[24] | M. Kozak, A fundamental solution of a second-order differential equation in a Banach space, Univ. Iagel. Acta Math., 32 (1995), 275-289. |
[25] |
H. R. Henríquez, V. Poblete, J. C. Pozo, Mild solutions of non-autonomous second order problems with nonlocal initial conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 412 (2014), 1064-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.10.086
![]() |
[26] | Y. Ren, T. Hou, R. Sakthivel, X. Cheng, A note on the second-order non-autonomous neutral stochastic evolution equations with infinite delay under Caratheodory conditions, Appl. Math. Comput., 232 (2014), 658-665. |
[27] | G. Da Prato, J. Zabczyk, Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992. |
[28] |
A. Ichikawa, Stability of semilinear stochastic evolution equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 90 (1982), 12-44. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(82)90041-5
![]() |
[29] | B. Øksendal, Stochastic differential equations: an introduction with applications, 6Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003. |