Nowadays, the treatment for bone damage remains a significant challenge. As a result, the development of bioactive three-dimensional scaffolds for bone regeneration has become a key area of study within tissue engineering. This research is focused on the evaluation of the properties of Chitosan (Ch)/Polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds with the Mytilus californiensis protein by Thermally Induced Phase Separation (TIPS). This study used the extrapalleal fluid protein from Mytilus californiensis because it increases biological processes that support bone regeneration. Two methodologies were used for the scaffolds functionalization: (I) an immersion process in a solution with the protein and (II) the protein direct addition during the scaffold synthesis. The scaffolds were analyzed by Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Mechanical Compression test to determine the composition, morphology, and mechanical properties of each material. In vitro analysis of biodegradation, bioactivity, and biocompatibility were also performed. The scaffolds with the protein added directly presented superior properties in the tests of bioactivity and cellular proliferation, making these composites attractive for the area of bone regeneration.
Citation: Miguel-Angel Rojas-Yañez, Claudia-Alejandra Rodríguez-González, Santos-Adriana Martel-Estrada, Laura-Elizabeth Valencia-Gómez, Claudia-Lucia Vargas-Requena, Juan-Francisco Hernández-Paz, María-Concepción Chavarría-Gaytán, Imelda Olivas-Armendáriz. Composite scaffolds of chitosan/polycaprolactone functionalized with protein of Mytilus californiensis for bone tissue regeneration[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(3): 344-358. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022021
[1] | Margarida Camarinha . A natural 4th-order generalization of the geodesic problem. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3396-3412. doi: 10.3934/era.2024157 |
[2] | Shanshan Liu, Abdenacer Makhlouf, Lina Song . The full cohomology, abelian extensions and formal deformations of Hom-pre-Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 2748-2773. doi: 10.3934/era.2022141 |
[3] | Frédéric Campana . Algebraicity of foliations on complex projective manifolds, applications. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(4): 1187-1208. doi: 10.3934/era.2022063 |
[4] | Neşet Deniz Turgay . On the mod p Steenrod algebra and the Leibniz-Hopf algebra. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 951-959. doi: 10.3934/era.2020050 |
[5] | Qiang Li, Lili Ma . 1-parameter formal deformations and abelian extensions of Lie color triple systems. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(7): 2524-2539. doi: 10.3934/era.2022129 |
[6] | Kailash C. Misra, Sutida Patlertsin, Suchada Pongprasert, Thitarie Rungratgasame . On derivations of Leibniz algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(7): 4715-4722. doi: 10.3934/era.2024214 |
[7] | Yizheng Li, Dingguo Wang . Lie algebras with differential operators of any weights. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1195-1211. doi: 10.3934/era.2023061 |
[8] | Wen Teng, Xiansheng Dai . Nonabelian embedding tensors on 3-Lie algebras and 3-Leibniz-Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1367-1383. doi: 10.3934/era.2025063 |
[9] | Hongliang Chang, Yin Chen, Runxuan Zhang . A generalization on derivations of Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(3): 2457-2473. doi: 10.3934/era.2020124 |
[10] | Hye Jeang Hwang, Gwang Hui Kim . Superstability of the p-power-radical functional equation related to sine function equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6347-6362. doi: 10.3934/era.2023321 |
Nowadays, the treatment for bone damage remains a significant challenge. As a result, the development of bioactive three-dimensional scaffolds for bone regeneration has become a key area of study within tissue engineering. This research is focused on the evaluation of the properties of Chitosan (Ch)/Polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds with the Mytilus californiensis protein by Thermally Induced Phase Separation (TIPS). This study used the extrapalleal fluid protein from Mytilus californiensis because it increases biological processes that support bone regeneration. Two methodologies were used for the scaffolds functionalization: (I) an immersion process in a solution with the protein and (II) the protein direct addition during the scaffold synthesis. The scaffolds were analyzed by Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Mechanical Compression test to determine the composition, morphology, and mechanical properties of each material. In vitro analysis of biodegradation, bioactivity, and biocompatibility were also performed. The scaffolds with the protein added directly presented superior properties in the tests of bioactivity and cellular proliferation, making these composites attractive for the area of bone regeneration.
Dubrovin [1] invented the notion of Frobenius manifolds in order to give geometrical expressions associated with WDVV equations. In 1999, Hertling and Manin [2] introduced the concept of F-manifolds as a relaxation of the conditions of Frobenius manifolds. Inspired by the investigation of describing F-manifolds algebraically, Dotsenko [3] defined F-manifold algebras in 2019 to relate operad F-manifold algebras to operad pre-Lie algebras. By definition, an F-manifold algebra is a triple (F,⋅,[,]) satisfying the following Hertling–Manin relation:
Hx1⋅x2(x3,x4)=x1⋅Hx2(x3,x4)+x2⋅Hx1(x3,x4), ∀x1,x2,x3,x4∈F, |
where (F,⋅) is a commutative associative algebra, (F,[,]) is a Lie algebra, and Hx1(x2,x3)=[x1,x2⋅x3]−[x1,x2]⋅x3−x2⋅[x1,x3].
A vector space F admitting a linear map ⋅ is called a pre-Lie algebra if the following holds:
(x1⋅x2)⋅x3−x1⋅(x2⋅x3)=(x2⋅x1)⋅x3−x2⋅(x1⋅x3), ∀x1,x2,x3∈F. |
In recent years, pre-Lie algebras have attracted a great deal of attention in many areas of mathematics and physics (see [4,5,6,7] and so on).
Liu et al. [8] introduced the concept of pre-F-manifold algebras. Note that these algebras allow us to construct F-manifold algebras. They also studied representations of F-manifold algebras and constructed many other examples of these algebras. The definition of super F-manifold algebras and related categories was stated by Cruz Morales et al. [9]. Chen et al. [10] discussed the classification of three-dimensional F-manifold algebras over the complex field C, which was based on the results of the classifications of low-dimensional commutative associative algebras and low-dimensional Lie algebras. Recently, the concept of Hom-F-manifold algebras and their properties have been given by Ben Hassine et al. [11].
In this paper, we provide the concepts of an F-manifold color algebra and a pre-F-manifold color algebra, respectively. We extend some properties of F-manifold algebras that were obtained in [8] to the color case. In Section 2, we summarize some concepts of Lie color algebras, pre-Lie color algebras, and representations of χ-commutative associative algebras and Lie color algebras, respectively. In Section 3, we provide the concept of an F-manifold color algebra and then study its representation. The concept of a coherence F-manifold color algebra is also introduced, and it follows that an F-manifold color algebra admitting a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form is a coherence F-manifold color algebra. The concept of pre-F-manifold color algebras is defined in Section 4, and using these algebras, one can construct F-manifold color algebras.
Throughout this paper, we assume that k is a field with char k=0 and all vector spaces are finite dimensional over k.
A preprint of this paper was posted on arXiv [12].
The concept of a Lie color algebra was introduced in [13] and systematically studied in [14]. Since then, Lie color algebras have been studied from different aspects: Lie color ideals [15], generalized derivations [16], representations [17,18], T∗-extensions of Lie color algebras [19,20] and hom-Lie color algebras [21], cohomology groups [22] and the color left-symmetric structures on Lie color algebras [23]. In this section, we collect some basic definitions that will be needed in the remainder of the paper. In the following, we assume that G is an abelian group and denote k∖{0} by k∗.
Definition 2.1. A skew-symmetric bicharacter is a map χ:G×G→k∗ satisfying
(i) χ(g1,g2)=χ(g2,g1)−1,
(ii) χ(g1,g2)χ(g1,g3)=χ(g1,g2+g3),
(iii) χ(g1,g3)χ(g2,g3)=χ(g1+g2,g3),
for all g1,g2,g3∈G.
By the definition, it is obvious that for anya∈G, we have χ(a,0)=χ(0,a)=1 and χ(a,a)=±1.
Definition 2.2. A pre-Lie color algebra is the G-graded vector space
F=⨁g∈GFg |
with a bilinear multiplication operation ⋅ satisfying
1) Fg1⋅Fg2⊆Fg1+g2,
2) (x1⋅x2)⋅x3−x1⋅(x2⋅x3)=χ(g1,g2)((x2⋅x1)⋅x3−x2⋅(x1⋅x3)),
for all x1∈Fg1,x2∈Fg2,x3∈Fg3, and g1,g2,g3∈G.
Definition 2.3. A Lie color algebra is the G-graded vector space
F=⨁g∈GFg |
with a bilinear multiplication [,] satisfying
(i) [Fg1,Fg2]⊆Fg1+g2,
(ii) [x1,x2]=−χ(g1,g2)[x2,x1],
(iii) χ(g3,g1)[x1,[x2,x3]]+χ(g1,g2)[x2,[x3,x1]]+χ(g2,g3)[x3,[x1,x2]]=0,
for all x1∈Fg1,x2∈Fg2,x3∈Fg3, and g1,g2,g3∈G.
Remark Given a pre-Lie algebra (F,⋅), if we define the bracket [x1,x2]=x1⋅x2−x2⋅x1, then (F,[,]) becomes a Lie algebra. Similarly, one has a pre-Lie color algebra's version, that is to say, a pre-Lie color algebra (A,⋅,χ) with the bracket [x1,x2]=x1⋅x2−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅x1 becomes a Lie color algebra.
Let the vector space F be G-graded. An element x∈F is called homogeneous with degree g∈G if x∈Fg. In the rest of this paper, for any x1∈Fg1,x2∈Fg2,x3∈Fg3, we will write χ(x1,x2) instead of χ(g1,g2), χ(x1+x2,x3) instead of χ(g1+g2,g3), and so on. Furthermore, when we write the skew-symmetric bicharacter χ(x1,x2), it is always assumed that the elements x1 and x2 are both homogeneous.
For a χ-commutative associative algebra (F,⋅,χ), we mean that (F,⋅) is a G-graded associative algebra with the following χ-commutativity:
x1⋅x2=χ(x1,x2)x2⋅x1 |
for all x1∈Fg1 and x2∈Fg2.
Now, we assume that the vector space V is G-graded. A representation (V,μ) of the algebra (F,⋅,χ) is a linear map μ:F⟶Endk(V)G:=⨁g∈GEndk(V)g satisfying
μ(x2)v∈Vg1+g2, μ(x2⋅x3)=μ(x2)∘μ(x3) |
for all v∈Vg1,x2∈Fg2,x3∈Fg3, where Endk(V)g:={f∈Endk(V)|f(Vh)⊆Vh+g}. Given a Lie color algebra (F,[,],χ), its representation (V,ρ) is a linear map ρ:F⟶Endk(V)G satisfying
ρ(x2)v∈Vg1+g2, ρ([x2,x3])=ρ(x2)∘ρ(x3)−χ(x2,x3)ρ(x3)∘ρ(x2) |
for all v∈Vg1,x2∈Fg2,x3∈Fg3.
The dual space V∗=⨁g∈GV∗g is also G-graded, where
V∗g1={ξ∈V∗|ξ(x)=0,g2≠−g1,∀x∈Vg2,g2∈G}. |
Define a linear map μ∗:F⟶Endk(V∗)G satisfying
μ∗(x1)ξ∈V∗g1+g3, ⟨μ∗(x1)ξ,v⟩=−χ(x1,ξ)⟨ξ,μ(x1)v⟩ |
for all x1∈Fg1,v∈Vg2,ξ∈V∗g3.
It is easy to see that
1) If (V,μ) is one representation of the algebra (F,⋅,χ), then (V∗,−μ∗) is also its representation;
2) If (V,μ) is one representation of the algebra (F,[,],χ), then (V∗,μ∗) is also its representation.
The concept of F-manifold color algebras is presented, and some results in [8] to the color case are established.
Definition 3.1. Let (F,[,],χ) be a Lie color algebra and (F,⋅,χ) be a χ-commutative associative algebra. A quadruple (F,⋅,[,],χ) is called an F-manifold color algebra if the following holds for any homogeneous element x1,x2,x3,x4∈F,
Hx1⋅x2(x3,x4)=x1⋅Hx2(x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2⋅Hx1(x3,x4), | (3.1) |
where Hx1(x2,x3) is the color Leibnizator given by
Hx1(x2,x3)=[x1,x2⋅x3]−[x1,x2]⋅x3−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅[x1,x3]. | (3.2) |
Remark It is noticed that if we set G={0} and χ(0,0)=1, then (F,⋅,[,],χ) is exactly an F-manifold algebra.
Definition 3.2. Let (F,⋅,[,],χ) be an F-manifold color algebra, (V,μ) be a representation of the algebra (F,⋅,χ), and (V,ρ) be a representation of the algebra (F,[,],χ). A representation of (F,⋅,[,],χ) is a triple (V,ρ,μ) if the following holds for any homogeneous element x1,x2,x3∈F,
M1(x1⋅x2,x3)=μ(x1)M1(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)M1(x1,x3),μ(Hx1(x2,x3))=χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)μ(x1)−μ(x1)M2(x2,x3), |
where the linear maps M1 and M2 from F⊗F to Endk(V)G are given by
M1(x1,x2)=ρ(x1)μ(x2)−χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)−μ([x1,x2]), | (3.3) |
M2(x1,x2)=μ(x1)ρ(x2)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)−ρ(x1⋅x2). | (3.4) |
Example 3.1. Let (F,⋅,[,],χ) be an F-manifold color algebra. We have that (F,ad,L) is a representation of (F,⋅,[,],χ), where ad:F⟶Endk(F)G is given by
adx1x2=[x1,x2] |
and the left multiplication operator L:F⟶Endk(F)G is given by
Lx1x2=x1⋅x2 |
for any homogeneous element x1,x2∈F.
Proof. Note that (F,L) is a representation of the algebra (F,⋅,χ) and (F,ad) is a representation of the algebra (F,[,],χ).
Now, for any homogeneous element x1,x2,x3,x4∈F, we obtain
M1(x1,x2)x3=(adx1Lx2−χ(x1,x2)Lx2adx1−L[x1,x2])x3=[x1,x2⋅x3]−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅[x1,x3]−[x1,x2]⋅x3=Hx1(x2,x3). |
Thus
Hx1⋅x2(x3,x4)=x1⋅Hx2(x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2⋅Hx1(x3,x4) |
implies the equation
M1(x1⋅x2,x3)x4=Lx1M1(x2,x3)x4+χ(x1,x2)Lx2M1(x1,x3)x4. |
On the other hand, we obtain
M2(x2,x3)x4=(Lx2adx3+χ(x2,x3)Lx3adx2−adx2⋅x3)x4=x2⋅[x3,x4]+χ(x2,x3)x3⋅[x2,x4]−[x2⋅x3,x4]=−χ(x3,x4)x2⋅[x4,x3]−χ(x2,x4)χ(x3,x4)[x4,x2]⋅x3+χ(x2+x3,x4)[x4,x2⋅x3]=χ(x2+x3,x4)([x4,x2⋅x3]−[x4,x2]⋅x3−χ(x4,x2)x2⋅[x4,x3])=χ(x2+x3,x4)Hx4(x2,x3). |
Thus
χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)Lx1x4−Lx1M2(x2,x3)x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)(x1⋅x4)−x⋅M2(x2,x3)x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2+x3,x1+x4)Hx1⋅x4(x2,x3)−χ(x2+x3,x4)x1⋅Hx4(x2,x3)=χ(x2+x3,x4){Hx1⋅x4(x2,x3)−x⋅Hx4(x2,x3)}=χ(x2+x3,x4)χ(x1,x4)x4⋅Hx1(x2,x3)=χ(x1+x2+x3,x4)x4⋅Hx1(x2,x3)=Hx1(x2,x3)⋅x4. |
Hence, the proof is completed.
Let (V,ρ,μ) be a representation of the F-manifold color algebra (F,⋅,[,],χ). Note that F⊕V is a G-graded vector space. In the following, if we write x+v∈F⊕V as a homogeneous element for x∈F,v∈V, it means that x and v are of the same degree as x+v. Now assume that x1+v1 and x2+v2 are both homogeneous elements in F⊕V. Define
[x1+v1,x2+v2]ρ=[x1,x2]+ρ(x1)v2−χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)v1. |
Then we obtain that (F⊕V,[,]ρ,χ) is a Lie color algebra. Moreover, define
(x1+v1)⋅μ(x2+v2)=x1⋅x2+μ(x1)v2+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)v1. |
It is easy to see that (F⊕V,⋅μ,χ) is a χ-commutative associative algebra. In fact, we have
Proposition 3.2. With the above notations, (F⊕V,⋅μ,[,]ρ,χ) is an F-manifold color algebra.
Proof. It is sufficient to check that the relation in Definition 3.1 holds.
For any homogeneous element x1+v1,x2+v2,x3+v3∈F⊕V, we have
Hx1+v1(x2+v2,x3+v3)=[x1+v1,(x2+v2)⋅μ(x3+v3)]ρ−[x1+v1,x2+v2]ρ⋅μ(x3+v3)−χ(x1,x2)(x2+v2)⋅μ[x1+v1,x3+v3]ρ=[x1,x2⋅x3]+ρ(x1){μ(x2)v3+χ(x2,x3)μ(x3)v2}−χ(x1,x2+x3)ρ(x2⋅x3)v1−I−II. |
where
I={[x1,x2]+ρ(x1)v3−χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)v1}⋅μ(x3+v3)=[x1,x2]⋅x3+μ([x1,x2])v3+χ(x1+x2,x3)μ(x3){ρ(x1)v2−χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)v1}, |
and
II=χ(x1,x2)(x2+v2)⋅μ{[x1,x3]+ρ(x1)v3−χ(x1,x3)ρ(x3)v1}=χ(x1,x2){x2⋅[x1,x3]+μ(x2)(ρ(x1)v3−χ(x1,x3)ρ(x3)v1)+χ(x2,x1+x3)μ([x1,x3])v2}. |
Thus
Hx1+v1(x2+v2,x3+v3)=Hx1(x2,x3)+{ρ(x1)μ(x2)−μ([x1,x2])−χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)}v3+{χ(x2,x3)ρ(x1)μ(x3)−χ(x1+x2,x3)μ(x3)ρ(x1)−χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+x3)μ([x1,x3])}v2+{−χ(x1,x2+x3)ρ(x2⋅x3)+χ(x1+x2,x3)χ(x1,x2)μ(x3)ρ(x2)+χ(x1,x2)χ(x1,x3)μ(x2)ρ(x3)}v1=Hx1(x2,x3)+M1(x1,x2)v3+χ(x2,x3)M1(x1,x3)v2+χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)v1. |
Hence, for any homogeneous element x4+v4∈F⊕V, we have
H(x1+v1)⋅μ(x2+v2)(x3+v3,x4+v4)=Hx1⋅x2+μ(x1)v2+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)v1(x3+v3,x4+v4)=Hx1⋅x2(x3,x4)+M1(x1⋅x2,x3)v4+χ(x3,x4)M1(x1⋅x2,x4)v3+χ(x1+x2,x3+x4)M2(x3,x4)(μ(x1)v2+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)v1). |
On the other hand
(x1+v1)⋅μHx2+v2(x3+v3,x4+v4)=(x1+v1)⋅μ{Hx2(x3,x4)+M1(x2,x3)v4+χ(x3,x4)M1(x2,x4)v3+χ(x2,x3+x4)M2(x3,x4)v2}=x1⋅Hx2(x3,x4)+μ(x1){M1(x2,x3)v4+χ(x3,x4)M1(x2,x4)v3+χ(x2,x3+x4)M2(x3,x4)v2}+χ(x1,x2+x3+x4)μ(Hx2(x3,x4))v1, |
and
χ(x1,x2)(x2+v2)⋅μHx1+v1(x3+v3,x4+v4)=χ(x1,x2){x2⋅Hx1(x3,x4)+μ(x2){M1(x1,x3)v4+χ(x3,x4)M1(x1,x4)v3+χ(x1,x3+x4)M2(x3,x4)v1}+χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)μ(Hx1(x3,x4))v2}. |
Thus
(x1+v1)⋅μHx2+v2(x3+v3,x4+v4)+χ(x1,x2)(x2+v2)⋅μHx1+v1(x3+v3,x4+v4)=x1⋅Hx2(x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2⋅Hx1(x3,x4)+{μ(x1)M1(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)(M1(x1,x3))}v4+{χ(x3,x4)μ(x1)M1(x2,x4)+χ(x1,x2)χ(x3,x4)μ(x2)M1(x1,x4)}v3+{χ(x2,x3+x4)μ(x1)M2(x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)μ(Hx1(x3,x4))}v2+χ(x1,x2+x3+x4){μ(x2)M2(x3,x4)+μ(Hx2(x3,x4))}v1=H(x1+v1)⋅μ(x2+v2)(x3+v3,x4+v4), |
which satisfies the relation in Definition 3.1. Hence, the conclusion follows immediately.
It is noticed that, given a representation (V,ρ,μ) of an F-manifold algebra, Liu, Sheng, and Bai [8] asserted that (V∗,ρ∗,−μ∗) may not be its representation. Now, assume that (F,⋅,[,],χ) is an F-manifold color algebra, together with a representation (V,μ) of the algebra (F,⋅,χ) and a representation (V,ρ) of the algebra (F,[,],χ). In order to prove the following proposition associated with an F-manifold color algebra, we need to define the linear map M3 from F⊗F to Endk(V)G by
M3(x1,x2)=−χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)μ(x1)−ρ(x1)μ(x2)+ρ(x1⋅x2), |
and the linear maps M∗1,M∗2 from F⊗F to Endk(V∗)G by
M∗1(x1,x2)=−ρ∗(x1)μ∗(x2)+χ(x1,x2)μ∗(x2)ρ∗(x1)+μ∗([x1,x2]),M∗2(x1,x2)=−μ∗(x1)ρ∗(x2)−χ(x1,x2)μ∗(x2)ρ∗(x1)−ρ∗(x1⋅x2) |
for any homogeneous element x1,x2∈F.
Proposition 3.3. With the above notations, assume that for any homogeneous element x1,x2,x3∈F, the following holds:
M1(x1⋅x2,x3)=χ(x1,x2+x3)M1(x2,x3)μ(x1)+χ(x2,x3)M1(x1,x3)μ(x2),μ(Hx1(x2,x3))=−χ(x1,x2+x3)M3(x2,x3)μ(x1)+μ(x1)M3(x2,x3). |
Then (V∗,ρ∗,−μ∗) is a representation of (F,⋅,[,],χ).
Proof. Suppose that x1,x2,x3∈F,v∈V,ξ∈V∗ are all homogeneous elements. First, we claim the following two identities:
⟨M∗1(x1,x2)(ξ),v⟩=⟨ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ)M1(x1,x2)v⟩;⟨M∗2(x1,x2)(ξ),v⟩=⟨ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ)M3(x1,x2)v⟩. |
The claims follow from some direct calculations, respectively:
⟨M∗1(x1,x2)(ξ),v⟩=⟨(−ρ∗(x1)μ∗(x2)+χ(x1,x2)μ∗(x2)ρ∗(x1)+μ∗([x1,x2]))ξ,v⟩=χ(x1,x2+ξ)⟨μ∗(x2)ξ,ρ(x1)v⟩−χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+ξ)⟨(ρ∗(x1)ξ,μ(x2)v⟩−χ(x1+x2,ξ)⟨ξ,μ([x1,x2])v⟩=−χ(x1,x2)χ(x1+x2,ξ)⟨ξ,μ(x2)ρ(x1)v⟩+χ(x2,ξ)χ(x1,ξ)⟨ξ,ρ(x1)μ(x2)v⟩−χ(x1+x2,ξ)⟨ξ,μ([x1,x2])v⟩=⟨ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ){−χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)+ρ(x1)μ(x2)−μ([x1,x2])}v⟩=⟨ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ)M1(x1,x2)v⟩, |
and
⟨M∗2(x1,x2)(ξ),v⟩=⟨{−μ∗(x1)ρ∗(x2)−χ(x1,x2)μ∗(x2)ρ∗(x1)−ρ∗(x1⋅x2)}ξ,v⟩=−χ(x1,x2+ξ)χ(x2,ξ)⟨ξ,ρ(x2)μ(x1)v⟩−χ(x2,ξ)χ(x1,ξ)⟨ξ,ρ(x1)μ(x2)v⟩+χ(x1+x2,ξ)⟨ξ,ρ(x1⋅x2)v⟩=⟨ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ){−χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)μ(x1)−ρ(x1)μ(x2)+ρ(x1⋅x2)}v⟩=⟨ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ)M3(x1,x2)v⟩. |
With the above identities, we have
⟨{M∗1(x1⋅x2,x3)+μ∗(x1)M∗1(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2)μ∗(x2)M∗1(x1,x3)}ξ,v⟩=⟨ξ,χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)M1(x1⋅x2,x3)v⟩−χ(x1,x2+x3+ξ)χ(x2+x3,ξ)⟨ξ,M1(x2,x3)μ(x1)v⟩−χ(x1+x3,ξ)χ(x2,x3+ξ)⟨ξ,M1(x1,x3)μ(x2)v⟩=χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)⟨ξ,{M1(x1⋅x2,x3)−χ(x1,x2+x3)M1(x2,x3)μ(x1)−χ(x2,x3)M1(x1,x3)μ(x2)}v⟩=0, |
and
⟨{−μ∗(Hx1(x2,x3))+χ(x1,x2+x3)M∗2(x2,x3)μ∗(x1)−μ∗(x1)M∗2(x2,x3)}ξ,v⟩=χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)⟨ξ,μ(Hx1(x2,x3))v⟩+χ(x1,x2+z)χ(x2+x3,x1+ξ)⟨μ∗(x1)ξ,M3(x2,x3)v⟩+χ(x1,x2+x3+ξ)⟨M∗2(x2,x3)ξ,μ(x1)v⟩=χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)⟨ξ,μ(Hx1(x2,x3))v⟩−χ(x2+x3,ξ)χ(x,ξ)⟨ξ,μ(x1)M3(x2,x3)v⟩+χ(x,x2+x3+ξ)χ(x2+x3,ξ)⟨ξ,M3(x2,x3)μ(x1)v⟩=χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)⟨ξ,{μ(Hx1(x2,x3))−μ(x1)M3(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2+x3)M3(x2,x3)μ(x1)}v⟩=0. |
Therefore, the conclusion follows immediately from the hypothesis and Definition 3.2.
Given an F-manifold color algebra (F,⋅,[,],χ), we define the linear map T from F⊗F to Endk(F)G by
T(x1,x2)(x3)=−χ(x1,x2)[x2,x1⋅x3]−[x1,x2⋅x3]+[x1⋅x2,x3] |
for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3∈F.
Definition 3.3. An F-manifold color algebra (F,⋅,[,],χ) is called a coherence one if for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3,x4∈F, the following hold:
Hx1⋅x2(x3,x4)=χ(x1,x2+x3)Hx2(x3,x1⋅x4)+χ(x2,x3)Hx1(x3,x2⋅x4),Hx1(x2,x3)x4=−χ(x1,x2+x3)T(x2,x3)(x1⋅x4)+x1T(x2,x3)(x4). |
Proposition 3.4. Assume that (,) is a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form on the F-manifold color algebra (F,⋅,[,],χ) satisfying
(x1⋅x2,x3)=(x1,x2⋅x3) and ([x1,x2],x3)=(x1,[x2,x3]) |
for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3∈F. Then (F,⋅,[,],χ) is a coherence F-manifold color algebra.
Proof. First, we prove that
(Hx1(x2,x3),x4)=χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,Hx1(x2,x4)) |
for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3,x4∈F.
In fact, we obtain
(Hx1(x2,x3),x4)=([x1,x2⋅x3]−[x1,x2]⋅x3−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅[x1,x3],x4)=−χ(x1,x2+x3)([x2⋅x3,x1],x4)−χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,[x1,x2]⋅x4)−χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+x3)([x1,x3],x2⋅x4)=−χ(x1,x2+x3)(x2⋅x3,[x1,x4])−χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,[x1,x2]⋅x4)+χ(x2,x3)χ(x1,x3)(x3,[x1,x2⋅x4])=−χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2,x3)(x3,x2⋅[x1,x4])−χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,[x1,x2]⋅x4)+χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,[x1,x2⋅x4])=χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅[x1,x4]−[x1,x2]⋅x4+[x1,x2⋅x4])=χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,Hx1(x2,x4)). |
By the above relation, for every homogeneous element x1,x2,x3,w1,w2∈F, we have
(Hx1⋅x2(x3,w1)−χ(x1,x2+x3)Hx2(x3,x1⋅w1)−χ(x2,x3)Hx1(x3,x2⋅w1),w2)=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1⋅x2(x3,w2))−χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2+x3,x1+w1)(x1⋅w1,Hx2(x3,w2))−χ(x2,x3)χ(x1+x3,x2+w1)(x2⋅w1,Hx1(x3,w2))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1⋅x2(x3,w2))−χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2+x3,x1+w1)χ(x1,w1)(w1,x1⋅Hx2(x3,w2))−χ(x2,x3)χ(x1+x3,x2+w1)χ(x2,w1)(w1,x2⋅Hx1(x3,w2))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1⋅x2(x3,w2))−χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,x1⋅Hx2(x3,w2))−χ(x2,x3)χ(x1+x3,x2)χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,x2⋅Hx1(x3,w2))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1⋅x2(x3,w2))−χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,x1⋅Hx2(x3,w2))−χ(x1,x2)χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,x2⋅Hx1(x3,w2))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1⋅x2(x3,w2)−x1⋅Hx2(x3,w2)−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅Hx1(x3,w2))=0. |
We claim the following identity:
(T(x2,x3)(w1),w2)=χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,Hw2(x2,x3)). |
In fact, we have
(T(x2,x3)(w1),w2)=(−χ(x2,x3)[x3,x2⋅w1]−[x2,x3⋅w1]+[x2⋅x3,w1],w2)=χ(x2,x3)χ(x3,x2+w1)(x2⋅w1,[x3,w2])+χ(x2,x3+w1)(x3⋅w1,[x2,w2])−χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,[x2⋅x3,w2])=χ(x3,w1)χ(x2,w1)(w1,x2⋅[x3,w2])+χ(x2,x3+w1)χ(x3,w1)(w1,x3⋅[x2,w2])−χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,[x2⋅x3,w2])=χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,x2⋅[x3,w2])+χ(x2+x3,w1)χ(x2,x3)(w1,x3⋅[x2,w2])−χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,[x2⋅x3,w2])=χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,x2⋅[x3,w2]+χ(x2,x3)x3⋅[x2,w2]−[x2⋅x3,w2])=χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,χ(x2+x3,w2)Hw2(x2,x3))=χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,Hw2(x2,x3)). |
With the above identity, we have
(Hx1(x2,x3)⋅w1+χ(x1,x2+x3)T(x2,x3)(x1⋅w1)−x1⋅T(x2,x3)(w1),w2)=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2+x3,x1+w1+w2)(x1⋅w1,Hw2(x2,x3))−χ(x1,x2+x3+w1)(T(x2,x3)w1,x1⋅w2)=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2)+χ(x1,w1)χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,x1⋅Hw2(x2,x3))−χ(x1,x2+x3+w1)χ(x2+x3,x+w1+w2)(w1,Hx1⋅w2(x2,x3))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2)+χ(x1,w1)χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,x1⋅Hw2(x2,x3))−χ(x1,w1)χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,Hx1⋅w2(x2,x3))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2+χ(x2+x3,w2)x1⋅Hw2(x2,x3)−χ(x2+x3,w2)Hx1⋅w2(x2,x3))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2+χ(x2+x3,w2)x1⋅Hw2(x2,x3)−(Hx1(x2,x3)w2+χ(x2+x3,w2)x1⋅Hw2(x2,x3)))=0. |
Then, according to the assumption that the symmetric bilinear form (,) is non-degenerate, the conclusion is obtained.
The concept of pre-F-manifold color algebras is presented in this section, and using these algebras we construct F-manifold color algebras.
Definition 4.1. Let the vector space F be G-graded and ∙ be a bilinear multiplication operator on F. A triple (F,∙,χ) is called a Zinbiel color algebra if the following hold:
(i) Fg1∙Fg2⊆Fg1+g2,
(ii) x1∙(x2∙x3)=(x1∙x2)∙x3+χ(x1,x2)(x2∙x1)∙x3,
for any homogeneous elements x1∈Fg1,x2∈Fg2,x3∈Fg3, and g1,g2,g3∈G.
Given a Zinbiel color algebra (F,∙,χ), define
x1⋅x2=x1∙x2+χ(x1,x2)x2∙x1, | (4.1) |
for any homogeneous elements x1,x2∈F. Then it is not difficult to see that the algebra (F,⋅,χ) is both χ-commutative and associative.
Define a linear map L:F⟶Endk(F)G by
Lx1x2=x1∙x2, | (4.2) |
for any homogeneous elements x1,x2∈F. Then one has the following result.
Lemma 4.1. With the above notations, (F,L) is a representation of (F,⋅,χ).
Proof. According to the definition of L, we get
Lx1⋅x2x3=(x1⋅x2)∙x3=(x1∙x2+χ(x1,x2)(x2∙x1))∙x3=x1∙(x2∙x3)=Lx1Lx2x3. |
Thus, the proof follows.
Let (F,∙,χ) be a Zinbiel color algebra and (F,∗,χ) be a pre-Lie color algebra. For any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3∈F, define two linear maps Q1,Q2:F⊗F⊗F⟶F by
Q1(x1,x2,x3)=x1∗(x2∙x3)−χ(x1,x2)x2∙(x1∗x3)−[x1,x2]∙x3,Q2(x1,x2,x3)=x1∙(x2∗x3)+χ(x1,x2)x2∙(x1∗x3)−(x1⋅x2)∗x3, |
where the operation ⋅ is given by (4.1) and the bracket [,] is given by
[x1,x2]=x1∗x2−χ(x1,x2)x2∗x1. | (4.3) |
Definition 4.2. With the above notations, (F,∙,∗,χ) is called a pre-F-manifold color algebra if the following hold
(Q1(x1,x2,x3)+χ(x2,x3)Q1(x1,x3,x2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1))∙x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1∙x4)−x1∙Q2(x2,x3,x4), |
Q1(x1⋅x2,x3,x4)=x1∙Q1(x2,x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2∙Q1(x1,x3,x4) |
for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3,x4∈F.
Since (F,[,],χ) is a Lie color algebra, it is known that (F,L) is a representation of (F,[,],χ) if one defines the linear map L:F⟶Endk(F)G by
Lx1x2=x1∗x2, | (4.4) |
for any homogeneous elements x1,x2∈F.
Theorem 4.2. Suppose that (F,∙,∗,χ) is a pre-F-manifold color algebra; then
(1) (F,⋅,[,],χ) is an F-manifold color algebra, where the operation ⋅ is given by (4.1) and the bracket [,] is given by (4.3);
(2) (F;L,L) is a representation of (F,⋅,[,],χ), where the map L is given by (4.4) and the map L is given by (4.2).
Proof. (1) It is known that (F,[,],χ) is a Lie color algebra and (F,⋅,χ) is a χ-commutative associative algebra. Thus, we only need to prove that the relation in Definition 3.1 is satisfied.
Assume that x1,x2,x3,x4∈F are all homogeneous elements. We claim the following identity:
Hx1(x2,x3)=Q1(x1,x2,x3)+χ(x2,x3)Q1(x1,x3,x2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1). | (4.5) |
In fact, we have
Hx1(x2,x3)=[x1,x2⋅x3]−[x1,x2]⋅x3−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅[x1,x3]=x1∗(x2⋅x3)−χ(x1,x2+x3)(x2⋅x3)∗x1−[x1,x2]∙x3−χ(x+x2,x3)x3∙[x1,x2]−χ(x1,x2){x2∙[x1,x3]+χ(x2,x1+x3)[x1,x3]∙x2}=x1∗(x2∙x3)−χ(x1,x2)x2∙(x1∗x3)−[x1,x2]∙x3+χ(x2,x3){x1∗(x3∙x2)−χ(x1,x3)x3∙(x1∗x2)−[x1,x3]∙x2}+χ(x1,x2+x3){x2∙(x3∗x1)+χ(x2,x3)x3∙(x2∗x1)−(x2⋅x3)∗x1}=Q1(x1,x2,x3)+χ(x2,x3)Q1(x1,x3,x2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1). |
With the above identity, we obtain
Hx1⋅x2(x3,x4)−x1⋅Hx2(x3,x4)−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅Hx1(x3,x4)=Q1(x1⋅x2,x3,x4)+χ(x3,x4)Q1(x1⋅x2,x4,x3)+χ(x1+x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1⋅x2)−x1⋅{Q1(x2,x3,x4)+χ(x3,x4)Q1(x2,x4,x3)+χ(x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x2)}−χ(x1,x2)x2⋅{Q1(x1,x3,x4)+χ(x3,x4)Q1(x1,x4,x3)+χ(x1,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1)}={Q1(x1⋅x2,x3,x4)−x1∙Q1(x2,x3,x4)−χ(x1,x2)x2∙Q1(x1,x3,x4)}+{χ(x3,x4)Q1(x1⋅x2,x4,x3)−χ(x3,x4)x1∙Q1(x2,x4,x3)−χ(x1,x2)χ(x3,x4)x2∙Q1(x1,x4,x3)}+{χ(x1+x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1∙x2)−χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)Q1(x1,x3,x4)∙x2−χ(x1,x2)χ(x3,x4)χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)Q1(x1,x4,x3)∙x2−χ(x1,x2)χ(x1,x3+x4)χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1)∙x2−χ(x2,x3+x4)x1∙Q2(x3,x4,x2)}+{χ(x1+x2,x3+x4)χ(x1,x2)Q2(x3,x4,x2∙x1)−χ(x1,x2+x3+x4)Q1(x2,x3,x4)∙x1−χ(x3,x4)χ(x1,x2+x3+x4)Q1(x2,x4,x3)∙x1−χ(x2,x3+x4)χ(x1,x3+x4+x2)Q2(x3,x4,x2)∙x1−χ(x1,x2)χ(x1,x3+x4)x2∙Q2(x3,x4,x1)}=χ(x1+x2,x3+x4){Q2(x3,x4,x1∙x2)−χ(x3+x4,x1)Q1(x1,x3,x4)∙x2−χ(x3,x4)χ(x3+x4,x1)Q1(x1,x4,x3)∙x2−Q2(x3,x4,x1)∙x2−χ(x3+x4,x1)x1∙Q2(x3,x4,x2)}+χ(x1,x2+x3+x4){χ(x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x2∙x1)−Q1(x2,x3,x4)∙x1−χ(x3,x4)Q1(x2,x4,x3)∙x1−χ(x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x2)∙x1−x2∙Q2(x3,x4,x1)}=χ(x2,x3+x4){χ(x1,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1∙x2)−Q1(x1,x3,x4)∙x2−χ(x3,x4)Q1(x1,x4,x3)∙x2−χ(x1,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1)∙x2−x1∙Q2(x3,x4,x2)}=0. |
Hence, (F,⋅,[,],χ) is an F-manifold color algebra.
(2) It is known that (F,L) is a representation of the Lie color algebra (F,[,],χ). According to Lemma 4.1, (F,L) is a representation of the χ-commutative associative algebra (F,⋅,χ). Define the linear map M4 from F⊗F to Endk(F)G by
M4(x1,x2)=Lx1Lx2−χ(x1,x2)Lx2Lx1−L[x1,x2]. |
Thus Q1(x1,x2,x3)=M4(x1,x2)(x3), and the equation
Q1(x1⋅x2,x3,x4)=x1∙Q1(x2,x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2∙Q1(x1,x3,x4) |
implies
M4(x1⋅x2,x3)=Lx1M4(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2)Lx2M4(x1,x3). |
On the other hand, define the linear map M5 from F⊗F to Endk(F)G by
M5(x1,x2)=Lx1Lx2+χ(x1,x2)Lx2Lx1−Lx1⋅x2. |
Thus Q2(x1,x2,x3)=M5(x1,x2)(x3). Combining (4.5), the equation
(Q1(x1,x2,x3)+χ(x2,x3)Q1(x1,x3,x2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1))∙x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1∙x4)−x1∙Q2(x2,x3,x4) |
implies
LHx1(x2,x3)=χ(x1,x2+x3)M5(x2,x3)Lx1−Lx1M5(x2,x3). |
Hence, the proof is completed.
An F-manifold is "locally" an F-manifold algebra. We generalize the definition of an F-manifold algebra by introducing an F-manifold color algebra and study its representation theory. Then we provide the concept of a coherence F-manifold color algebra and obtain that an F-manifold color algebra admitting a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form is a coherence F-manifold color algebra. The concept of a pre-F-manifold color algebra is also defined, and with the help of these algebras, one can construct F-manifold color algebras.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This work was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515011739) and the Basic Research Joint Funding Project of University and Guangzhou City under Grant 202201020103.
The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
Su X, Wang T, Guo S (2021) Applications of 3D printed bone tissue engineering scaffolds in the stem cell field. Regen Ther 16: 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2021.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2021.01.007
![]() |
[2] |
Safari B, Aghanejad A, Roshangar L, et al. (2020) Osteogenic effects of the bioactive small molecules and minerals in the scaffold-based bone tissue engineering. Colloid Surface B 198: 111462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111462 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111462
![]() |
[3] |
Xia P, Zhang K, Yan S, et al. (2021) Biomimetic, biodegradable, and osteoinductive Microgels with open porous structure and excellent injectability for construction of microtissues for bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng J 414: 128714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128714 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128714
![]() |
[4] |
Prasad A (2021) State of art review on bioabsorbable polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today Proc 44: 1391-1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.622 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.622
![]() |
[5] |
Ma C, Wang H, Chi Y, et al. (2021) Preparation of oriented collagen fiber scaffolds and its application in bone tissue engineering. Appl Mater Today 22: 100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100902 doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100902
![]() |
[6] |
Park J, Lee SJ, Jung TG, et al. (2021) Surface modification of a three-dimensional polycaprolactone scaffold by polydopamine, biomineralization, and BMP-2 immobilization for potential bone tissue applications. Colloids Surf B 199: 111528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111528 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111528
![]() |
[7] |
Kundu K, Afshar A, Katti DR, et al. (2020) Composite nanoclay-hydroxyapatite-polymer fiber scaffolds for bone tissue engineering manufactured using pressurized gyration. Compos Sci Technol 202: 108598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108598 doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108598
![]() |
[8] |
Shaabani A, Sedghi R, Motasadizadeh H, et al. (2021) Self-healable conductive polyurethane with the body temperature‐responsive shape memory for bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng J 411: 128449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128449 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128449
![]() |
[9] |
Wang L, Lu R, Hou J, et al. (2020) Application of injectable silk fibroin/graphene oxide hydrogel combined with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf A 604: 125318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125318 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125318
![]() |
[10] |
Wuriantika MI, Utomo J, Nurhuda M, et al. (2021) Nanostructure, porosity and tensile strength of PVA/Hydroxyapatite composite nanofiber for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today Proc 44: 3203-3206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.438 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.438
![]() |
[11] |
Pandit A, Indurkar A, Deshpande C, et al. (2021) A systematic review of physical techniques for chitosan degradation. Carbohydr Polym 2: 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100033 doi: 10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100033
![]() |
[12] |
Madni A, Kousar R, Naeem N, et al. (2021) Recent advancements in applications of chitosan-based biomaterials for skin tissue engineering. J Bioresour Bioprod 6: 128714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2021.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jobab.2021.01.002
![]() |
[13] |
Li J, Zhuang S (2020) Antibacterial activity of chitosan and its derivatives and their interaction mechanism with bacteria: Current state and perspectives. Eur Polym J 138: 109984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109984 doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109984
![]() |
[14] |
Bulbul YE, Uzunoglu T, Dilsiz N, et al. (2020) Investigation of nanomechanical and morphological properties of silane-modified halloysite clay nanotubes reinforced polycaprolactone bio-composite nanofibers by atomic force microscopy. Polym Test 92: 106877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106877 doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106877
![]() |
[15] |
Voniatis C, Barczikai D, Gyulai G, et al. (2021) Fabrication and characterisation of electrospun Polycaprolactone/Polysuccinimide composite meshes. J Mol Liq 323: 115094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115094 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115094
![]() |
[16] |
Zhao YQ, Yang JH, Ding X, et al. (2020) Polycaprolactone/polysaccharide functional composites for low-temperature fused deposition modelling. Bioact Mater 5: 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.006 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.006
![]() |
[17] | Jaramillo-Martínez S, Vargas-Requena C, Rodríguez-Gónzalez C, et al. (2019) Effect of extrapallial protein of Mytilus californianus on the process of in vitro biomineralization of chitosan scaffolds. Heliyon 5: e02252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02252 |
[18] |
Urbanek O, Sajkiewicz P, Pierini F (2017) The effect of polarity in the electrospinning process on PCL/chitosan nanofibres' structure, properties and efficiency of surface modification. Polymer 124: 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.064 doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.064
![]() |
[19] |
Zhang C, Zhai T, Turng LS, et al. (2015) Morphological, mechanical, and crystallization behavior of polylactide/polycaprolactone blends compatibilized by L-lactide/caprolactone copolymer. Ind Eng Chem Res 54: 9505-9511. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02134 doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02134
![]() |
[20] |
Sarasam A, Madihally SV (2005) Characterization of chitosan—polycaprolactone blends for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 26: 5500-5508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.071 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.071
![]() |
[21] | Fabian H, Mä ntele W (2006) Infrared spectroscopy of proteins, Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy, 1 Ed., New York: Wiley Online Library. |
[22] |
Fadaie M, Mirzaei E, Geramizadeh B, et al. (2018) Incorporation of nanofibrillated chitosan into electrospun PCL nanofibers makes scaffolds with enhanced mechanical and biological properties. Carbohydr Polym 199: 628-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.061 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.061
![]() |
[23] |
Martel-Estrada SA, Olivas-Armendáriz I, Santos-Rodríguez E, et al. (2014) Evaluation of in vitro bioactivity of Chitosan/Mimosa tenuiflora composites. Mater Lett 119: 146-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.004
![]() |
[24] |
Wang F, Guo Y, Lv R, et al. (2020) Development of nano-tricalcium phosphate/polycaprolactone/platelet-rich plasma biocomposite for bone defect regeneration. Arab J Chem 13: 7160-7169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.07.021 doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.07.021
![]() |
[25] |
Bil M, Hipś I, Mrówka P, et al. (2020) Studies on enzymatic degradation of multifunctional composite consisting of chitosan microspheres and shape memory polyurethane matrix. Polym Degrad Stab 182: 109392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109392 doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109392
![]() |
[26] |
Houreh AB, Masaeli E, Nasr-Esfahani MH (2021) Chitosan/polycaprolactone multilayer hydrogel: A sustained Kartogenindelivery model for cartilage regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 177: 589-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.122 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.122
![]() |
[27] |
Ureña J, Tsipas S, Jiménez-Morales A, et al. (2018) In-vitro study of the bioactivity and cytotoxicity response of Ti surfaces modified by Nb and Mo diffusion treatments. Surf Coat Technol 335: 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.12.009 doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.12.009
![]() |
[28] | Choong CSN, Triffitt JT (2005) Improved bone cellular activity through the use of calcium phosphate coated polymeric scaffolds. Bone 36: S103-S479. |
[29] |
Bayrak GK, Demirtaş TT, Gümüşderelioğlu M (2012) Microwave-induced biomimetic approach for hydroxyapatite coatings of chitosan scaffolds. Carbohydr Polym 157: 803-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.016 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.016
![]() |
[30] | Chavira GNJ (2012) Evaluación de la capacidad de la proteína del fluido extrapalial de Mytilus Edulis de coordinar calcio[Dissertation]. Autonomous University of Ciudad Juárez (In Mexico). |
[31] |
Saravanan S, Leena RS, Selvamurugan N (2016) Chitosan based biocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 93: 1354-1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.112 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.112
![]() |
[32] |
Xu Z, Zhao F, Chen H, et al. (2019) Nutritional properties and osteogenic activity of enzymatic hydrolysates of proteins from the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Food Funct 10: 7745-7754. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9FO01656B doi: 10.1039/C9FO01656B
![]() |
[33] |
Xu Z, Fan F, Chen H, et al. (2021) Absorption and transport of a Mytilus edulis-derived peptide with the function of preventing osteoporosis. Food Funct 12: 2102-2111. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0FO02353A doi: 10.1039/D0FO02353A
![]() |
[34] |
He B, Zhao J, Ou Y, et al. (2018) Biofunctionalized peptide nanofiber-based composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Mat Sci Eng C 90: 728-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.063 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.063
![]() |
[35] | Guasco Herrera C, Chávez Servín JL, Ferriz Martínez RA, et al. (2014) Poliaminas: pequeños gigantes de la regulación metabólica. REB 33: 51-57. |
[36] |
Roque J, Molera J, Vendrell-Saz M, et al. (2004) Crystal size distributions of induced calcium carbonate crystals in polyaspartic acid and Mytilus edulis acidic organic proteins aqueous solutions. J Cryst Growth 262: 543-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.10.052 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.10.052
![]() |
[37] |
Hyung JH, Ahn CB, Je JY (2018) Blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) protein hydrolysate promotes mouse mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into osteoblasts through up-regulation of bone morphogenetic protein. Food Chem 242: 156-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.043 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.043
![]() |