Research article Special Issues

Diesel exhaust pollution: chemical monitoring and cytotoxicity assessment

  • Diesel engines are a significant source of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) which may cause adverse health effects on the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems. There is little consistency between many studies to establish which engine parameter is a key factor to determine the toxicity of diesel exhaust. The aim of this study was to correlate engine operating systems with cytotoxicity using human cells. A dynamic direct exposure system containing human cells grown at the air liquid interface (ALI) was employed to expose human derived cells to diesel exhaust emitted under a range of engine loads. To determine correlation between engine load and cytotoxicity, concentrations of NOx and carbon (organic and elemental) were measured. Comparison between filtered and unfiltered exhaust was also made. To assess cytotoxicity and determine mechanisms responsible for toxic effects, various bioassays measuring a range of endpoints were used including: cell metabolism (MTS), cell energy production (ATP) and cell lysosome integrity (NRU). The human cells selected in this study were lung (A549) and liver (HepG2) derived cells to detect if observed cytotoxicity was basal (i.e. affect all cell types) or organ-specific. Results showed that NOx gas concentrations increased as engine load increased which resulted in significant cytotoxicity to both A549 and HepG2 cells. In contrast carbon measurements remained relatively constant across loads with no observable significant difference in cytotoxicity by filtering diesel exhaust. This result suggests that the gaseous component of diesel exhaust may contribute higher cytotoxicity than the particulate component. Post exposure incubation was an important factor to consider as only gaseous components of diesel exhaust exhibited observable immediate effects. Our findings suggest engine torque as a reliable indicator of cytotoxicity on human cells. The advantages of the dynamic direct exposure method include a more realistic representation of human respiratory toxicity and modularity which would allow for the analyses of pollution other than diesel exhaust.

    Citation: Lucky Joeng, Shahnaz Bakand, Amanda Hayes. Diesel exhaust pollution: chemical monitoring and cytotoxicity assessment[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 718-736. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.718

    Related Papers:

    [1] Patrick Wanjiru, Nancy Karuri, Paul Wanyeki, Paul Kioni, Josephat Tanui . Numerical simulation of the effect of diluents on NOx formation in methane and methyl formate fuels in counter flow diffusion flame. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(2): 140-152. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020008
    [2] K. Wayne Forsythe, Cameron Hare, Amy J. Buckland, Richard R. Shaker, Joseph M. Aversa, Stephen J. Swales, Michael W. MacDonald . Assessing fine particulate matter concentrations and trends in southern Ontario, Canada, 2003–2012. AIMS Environmental Science, 2018, 5(1): 35-46. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2018.1.35
    [3] Carolyn Payus, Siti Irbah Anuar, Fuei Pien Chee, Muhammad Izzuddin Rumaling, Agoes Soegianto . 2019 Southeast Asia Transboundary Haze and its Influence on Particulate Matter Variations: A Case Study in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(4): 547-558. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023031
    [4] Jordan Finch, Daniel W. Riggs, Timothy E. O’Toole, C. Arden Pope III , Aruni Bhatnagar, Daniel J. Conklin . Acute exposure to air pollution is associated with novel changes in blood levels of endothelin-1 and circulating angiogenic cells in young, healthy adults. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(4): 265-276. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.4.265
    [5] Suwimon Kanchanasuta, Sirapong Sooktawee, Natthaya Bunplod, Aduldech Patpai, Nirun Piemyai, Ratchatawan Ketwang . Analysis of short-term air quality monitoring data in a coastal area. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(6): 517-531. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021033
    [6] Winai Meesang, Erawan Baothong, Aphichat Srichat, Sawai Mattapha, Wiwat Kaensa, Pathomsorn Juthakanok, Wipaporn Kitisriworaphan, Kanda Saosoong . Effectiveness of the genus Riccia (Marchantiophyta: Ricciaceae) as a biofilter for particulate matter adsorption from air pollution. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(1): 157-177. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023009
    [7] Maja Radziemska, Agnieszka Bęś, Zygmunt M. Gusiatin, Jerzy Jeznach, Zbigniew Mazur, Martin Brtnický . Novel combined amendments for sustainable remediation of the Pb-contaminated soil. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020001
    [8] Pasquale Avino, Maurizio Manigrasso . Ozone formation in relation with combustion processes in highly populated urban areas. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 764-781. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.764
    [9] Getachew A. Adnew, Carl Meusinger, Nicolai Bork, Michael Gallus, Mildrid Kyte, Vitalijs Rodins, Thomas Rosenørn, Matthew S. Johnson . Gas-phase advanced oxidation as an integrated air pollution control technique. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(1): 141-158. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.1.141
    [10] Suprava Ranjan Laha, Binod Kumar Pattanayak, Saumendra Pattnaik . Advancement of Environmental Monitoring System Using IoT and Sensor: A Comprehensive Analysis. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(6): 771-800. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022044
  • Diesel engines are a significant source of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) which may cause adverse health effects on the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems. There is little consistency between many studies to establish which engine parameter is a key factor to determine the toxicity of diesel exhaust. The aim of this study was to correlate engine operating systems with cytotoxicity using human cells. A dynamic direct exposure system containing human cells grown at the air liquid interface (ALI) was employed to expose human derived cells to diesel exhaust emitted under a range of engine loads. To determine correlation between engine load and cytotoxicity, concentrations of NOx and carbon (organic and elemental) were measured. Comparison between filtered and unfiltered exhaust was also made. To assess cytotoxicity and determine mechanisms responsible for toxic effects, various bioassays measuring a range of endpoints were used including: cell metabolism (MTS), cell energy production (ATP) and cell lysosome integrity (NRU). The human cells selected in this study were lung (A549) and liver (HepG2) derived cells to detect if observed cytotoxicity was basal (i.e. affect all cell types) or organ-specific. Results showed that NOx gas concentrations increased as engine load increased which resulted in significant cytotoxicity to both A549 and HepG2 cells. In contrast carbon measurements remained relatively constant across loads with no observable significant difference in cytotoxicity by filtering diesel exhaust. This result suggests that the gaseous component of diesel exhaust may contribute higher cytotoxicity than the particulate component. Post exposure incubation was an important factor to consider as only gaseous components of diesel exhaust exhibited observable immediate effects. Our findings suggest engine torque as a reliable indicator of cytotoxicity on human cells. The advantages of the dynamic direct exposure method include a more realistic representation of human respiratory toxicity and modularity which would allow for the analyses of pollution other than diesel exhaust.


    1. Introduction

    Air pollution is a major health concern where clinical and epidemiological studies suggest adverse effects on the cardiovascular [1,2,3,4,5,6] and pulmonary systems [7,8,9] including increased variance in heart rate, airway inflammation and asthma induced reactions. The adverse health effects are increased with closer proximity to the pollution source such as urban traffic dwellers and industrial workplace environments [10,11] such that long term exposure to air pollution may reduce life expectancy [12,13].

    Air pollution consists of gaseous and particulate matter (PM) components. The gaseous components include oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and various polyaromatic hydrocarbons. The PM components are categorised in terms of aerodynamic diameter size e.g. 10 µm and smaller (PM10) and 2.5 µm and smaller (PM2.5). PM research is popular due to the uncertainty around which size of PM may cause the most adverse health effect [14,15]. Additionally, considering the small size distribution, PM may translocate via the alveoli of the lungs into the cardiovascular circulatory system [16], resulting in a potential causality link between air pollution and cardiovascular effects.

    Despite clinical and epidemiological study findings suggesting a link between air pollution and morbidity, the toxicity mechanisms of air pollution are not well understood. Animal based (in-vivo) studies have been traditionally used to determine the toxicity mechanisms. In-vivo studies using mice have suggested exposure to diesel exhaust during gestation may affect its offspring [17,18] and liver and kidney may be affected by diesel exhaust particles as well [19,20,21].

    Growing concerns such as cross-species correlation error, ethical consideration [22,23] and low throughput [24] have encouraged human cell based (in-vitro) studies to be developed. In-vitro based studies allow the utilisation of a wide range of human based cellular systems such as the pulmonary type II epithelial (A549) cell line to model the human pulmonary system [25]. To further simulate the environment of living cells, various techniques are available which allow cells to be simultaneously exposed to pollutants e.g. cigarette smoke, nanoparticles and dust whilst receiving nutrients to maintain viability [26,27,28].

    To date, a number of in-vitro based studies have employed direct and indirect sampling of diesel exhaust. Indirect sampling involves using substitute chemicals such as 3-nitrobenzonthrone to represent a component of diesel exhaust [29,30] or purifying diesel exhaust particles to obtain the required component [31,32,33]. Direct sampling requires access to a diesel engine which could be achieved by adapting the techniques employed in comparing biodiesel blend quality. The technique involves fixing one or more variables (typically engine speed and load) and comparing fuel consumption [34], exhaust particle size distribution [35], exhaust particle concentration [36] and/or gaseous pollutant concentrations [37,38,39]. Noting the techniques in generating the exhaust, it can be integrated into a modular system in which the exhaust generation system is independent of the in-vitro exposure system.

    The concentration of diesel exhaust emission varies under different engine loads. At higher loads, diesel engines have the tendency to emit higher NOx (nitrogen oxides) levels due to higher temperatures of combustion within the combustion chamber [40,41]. The higher combustion temperature simultaneously decreases concentration of other gasses e.g. CO (carbon monoxide) due to higher CO2 (carbon dioxide) conversion. In addition, higher engine speed reduces the size distribution of emitted particulates [42], however as temperature decreases down the exhaust line, separate particulates agglomerate into chains of particles [43], therefore when measured, an exhaust particulate may exhibit a larger mean size compared to more recently formed particulates.

    In this study, a biphasic cell culture system was utilised to allow human cells to be simultaneously exposed to diesel exhaust on their apex side whilst receiving nutrients from the basal lateral side (as previously developed by our research group) to simulate the human respiratory system while the diesel exhaust was generated under fixed settings [44,45]. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between operating conditions, resulting exhaust and induced cytotoxicity.

    2. Materials and Methods

    2.1. Generation of diesel exhaust

    A laboratory based 6700cc inline six-cylinder diesel engine (169 kW; 825 Nm at 1600 rpm; Volvo) was used. The engine was coupled to an eddy current dynamometer to allow fixture of engine speed and load. The diesel fuel was purchased from a commercial fuel station (Vortex premium diesel; CALTEX), which complied with Australian Standard 3570-1998 [46] as listed in Table 1.

    Table 1. Australian Standard 3570 on diesel fuel specification
    CALTEX Vortex Premium Diesel AS3570 Requirement
    Density at 15 °C 0.82‒0.87 kg/L 0.83 kg/L
    Min Cetane Number 50 45
    Max Sulphur Content (by mass) 0.5% < 10 ppm
    Energy density N/A 35.9 MJ/L or 43.3 MJ/kg
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The diesel engine was switched on and set to idle setting for a 15 mins stabilisation period before the target cells were exposed to the diesel exhaust. Following the stabilisation period the exhaust was delivered to the dynamic direct exposure chambers using negative pressure pumps (SKC Inc, USA) calibrated at a very low flow rate (≤ 37.5 mL/min). Cells were exposed to unfiltered and filtered exhaust allowing for a comparison in cytotoxicity contribution by the gaseous and particulate component of diesel exhaust. Filtration was performed using a polycarbonate membrane filter (37 mm diameter; 0.4 µm pore; SKC, USA).

    2.2. Monitoring and analysis of exhaust emissions

    2.2.1. NOx measurement

    NOx concentration was measured with a high precision nitrogen oxide analyzer (EC9841AS; Ecotech, Australia). The sampling was performed by a vacuum pump capable of 1 L/min at 67 kPa, a scrubber was utilised to remove excess O3 and prevent damage to the pump.

    2.2.2. Organic and elemental carbon measurement

    For carbon content measurement, exhaust was sampled at 2.5 L/min flow for 15 mins on polycarbonate filters (37 mm in diameter; 0.4 µm pores) mounted on a three-piece cassette (SKC, USA). The filters were then analysed using the NIOSH 5040 principle to determine organic and elemental carbon content concentration.

    2.3. In-vitro exposure

    2.3.1. Cell types and culture conditions

    Human pulmonary type II-like epithelial cells (A549) and human derived liver cells (HepG2) were cultured in sterile, vented 75 cm2 cell culture flasks with Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium: Ham’s F12 nutrient mixture (DMEM/F12; Gibco, USA) supplemented with 5% (v/v) newborn calf serum (NCS; Gibco, USA) and 1% (v/v) antibiotic solution containing: 10,000 units of penicillin, 10, 000 µg of streptomycin, and 29.2 mg of L-glutamine/mL (Gibco, USA). Cultured cells were kept at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.

    Cells were grown on porous membranes (0.4 µm) in Snapwell inserts. Snapwell inserts are a modified Transwell culture insert with a 12 mm diameter, providing 1.12 cm2 growth surface area (clear polyester snapwellTM insert, Corning) supported by a detachable ring placed in a six well culture plate. To seed cells, supplemented media was added to the bottom and top parts of the membrane wells (bottom: 2 mL, top: 0.5 mL) and plates incubated for 1 hr at 37 °C to improve cell attachment. Confluent cell layers were removed using an enzyme method (0.5% trypsin-EDTA; Gibco, USA), centrifuged for 5 min and re-suspended in supplemented culture media. Afterwards, the supplemented media on the top part was replaced with supplemented media containing 30 × 104 cells (except background control wells) and plates incubated for 24 hrs to allow cell attachment to the membrane.

    2.3.2. Dynamic direct exposure system

    Cell attachment was verified using a light microscope. Upon verification of confluence (75‒80%), medium was removed from the top and bottom membrane. The membrane was washed with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS; Gibco, USA) and transferred into the dynamic exposure chambers (Harvard Apparatus Inc, USA) for direct exposure to diesel exhaust. The bottom part of the chamber was filled with serum-free media supplemented with antibiotics (1% v/v) maintained at 37 °Cusing heat blocks. This allowed the simultaneous exposure to diesel exhaust whilst receiving nutrients from the basal side, simulating conditions of living organisms.

    2.3.3. Sampling pump and rotameter

    A sampling pump (Aircheck© 2000; SKC; USA) was connected in series with a constant pressure controller (CPC; SKC; USA) and a rotameter (FR2000; Key Instruments; USA) was utilised to sample diesel exhaust as illustrated in Figure 1. Sampling for in-vitro exposure was performed at 37.5 mL/min. This was the maximum flow which caused no significant decrease to cell viability [45].

    Figure 1. Diesel exhaust dynamic direct exposure and sampling system.

    2.4. Cytotoxicity endpoints

    To assess cytotoxicity of diesel exhaust, in-vitro bioassays were utilised to measure various biological endpoints following 0 and 24 hrs post exposure incubation.

    2.4.1. MTS-tetrazolium salt assay

    The Promega CellTiter® 96 AQueous Non-Radioactive Cell Prolioferation Assay was used to measure toxicity of the diesel exhaust by determining the number of viable cells in culture [47]. The MTS assay works on the basis of the viable cells’ ability to convert soluble tetrazolium salt into a formazan product. The MTS reagent was mixed with an electron coupling agent PMS (phenazine methosulfate; Sigma, USA) to allow faster bioreduction and faster production of the formazan product [48].

    Following post-exposure incubation, the media from both the bottom and top part of the membrane were replaced with fresh media supplemented with serum in both bottom (2 mL) and top parts (0.4 mL) of the membrane. The MTS reagent was then added to the top part of the membrane (0.1 mL), the membranes were then incubated at 37 °C for 1 hr. Aliquots of 100 µL were then transferred to a 96 well plate with 3‒4 replicates and the absorbance levels were recorded at 492 nm using a multiplate reader (Multiskan Ascent, Thermo Laboratories, Finland) against controls.

    2.4.2. NRU—neutral red uptake

    The NRU assay measured the ability of viable cells to incorporate and bind neutral red (a supravital and weakly cationic dye) which penetrates all membranes and accumulates intracellularly in lysosomes [49]. Before usage the NRU solution was centrifuged at 1500×g and the supernatant was filter sterilised (0.22 µm).

    Following post-exposure incubation, the media from the bottom part of the membrane was replaced with fresh media (2 mL), NRU solution was added to the top part (0.5 mL) and the plate was incubated for 3 hrs at 37 °C. The media was removed from the bottom and top parts of the membrane and fixative solution was added (0.5 mL) to the top part of the membrane for no more than 30 secs. Top and bottom parts of the membrane were then immediately washed with HBSS, afterwards the solubilisation solution was added (0.5 mL) to the top part of the membrane. The plate was then shaken for 10 mins using an orbital mixer (Ratek Instruments, Australia), aliquots of 100 µL were transferred into the 96 well plate in 34 replicates and the absorbance was recorded at 540 nm with a microtiter plate reader (Multiskan Ascent, Thermo Laboratories, Finland) against controls.

    2.4.3. ATP—Adenosine Triphosphate

    The cellular ATP content of cells was determined using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. CellTiter-Glow Reagent induces cell lysis and generation of luminescence, which is proportional to the cellular ATP content of cells. The luminescence is then read using a luminometer.

    Following the post exposure incubation period, media from the top part of the membrane was replaced with fresh media (0.25 mL) and CellTiter-Glo (0.25 mL). The plate was then left at room temperature for 10 mins and then shaken using an orbital mixer (Ratek Instruments, Australia). Aliquots of 100 µL were transferred into a 96-well opaque walled microtiter plate with 3‒4 replicates and luminescence was recorded using a luminometer (Berthold Detection Systems, Germany).

    2.5. Controls

    Controls included an IC100 control (0% cell viability; media only) used for background and incubated at 37 °C during the exposure time and an IC0 control (100% cell viability; cells only) used for reference and incubated at 37 °C during the exposure time. In addition, the ICair control (clean air exposure) was a supplementary verification that cell viability had not been adversely affected by the physical flow of the sample air. Similarly to exhaust exposed cells, IC0 cells were grown on a membrane and exposed to clean synthetic air (filtered with 0.2 µm porous membrane), with the airflow set at the same rate as the exhaust exposed cells [45].

    2.6. Statistical analysis

    Statistical analyses were performed using Prism (GraphPad; USA). Results of the experiments were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD). One-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons were used to compare and determine significance of difference between average cell viability of control cells and exposed cells. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. In addition, coefficient of determination (r2) was calculated between cell viability and NOx level.

    3. Results

    3.1. Chemical monitoring

    3.1.1. NOx measurement

    The results of NOx measurements and its components (NO and NO2) are presented in Table 2 and Figure 2, each data point represents an average of two readings (expressed as mean ± S. D), each reading was recorded 1 min after the exhaust stabilisation period.

    Table 2. NOx gas concentration measurements
    Engine load (% of max torque) NOx concentration (ppm ± S. D)
    0 94.50 ± 3.82
    25 299.65 ± 39.39
    50 631.80 ± 71.28
    75 891.90 ± 139.72
    100 1044.70 ± 163.63
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2. Concentration of NO, NO2 and NOX (ppm) generated under various loads.


    3.1.2. Elemental, organic and total carbon measurement

    The elemental, organic and total carbon measurements are displayed in Figure 3. Each data point was an average of three samples and was expressed as mean ± S. D.

    Figure 3. Concentration of carbon content (µg/m3) including organic carbon, elemental carbon and total carbon.

    3.2. In-vitro toxicity assessment

    A549 cells were chosen as the lung cellular model to determine any difference in response between various endpoints using MTS, NRU and ATP in-vitro assays. In comparing cytotoxicity between filtered and unfiltered exhaust, two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons were performed between cells exposed to control and unfiltered diesel exhaust. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. In each figure, “Control” denotes exposed cells to control air only, “Filtered” denotes exposed cells to filtered exhaust; “Unfiltered” denotes exposed cells to unfiltered exhaust.

    3.2.1. Optimisation of exposure period

    The optimal exposure period was defined as the number of minutes to induce at least 50% of cell death due to the exposure of exhaust from the diesel engine running at 50% of maximum torque (1600 rpm). In-vitro bioassays including: MTS, NRU and ATP after 0 hrs post exposure incubation were used to assess cell viability. These results for A549 cells are shown in Figure 4. A significant cell viability reduction was observed from 7.5 mins onwards and below 50% following 15 mins exposure hence it was determined as the optimal exposure time in this study.

    Figure 4. Time course for cytotoxicity analysis of unfiltered diesel exhaust for MTS, NRU and ATP assays; * indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01.

    3.2.2. Significance of load on cell viability

    One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to detect any significant difference in cell viability made by increasing the engine load. Cell viability was determined using MTS, NRU and ATP in-vitro assays, after 0 hrs post exposure incubation. Results are presented in Figure 5. ANOVA detected a significance difference caused by increasing engine load (% of max torque), therefore this was set as variable in further experimentations (p < 0.05).

    Figure 5. Cytotoxicity of diesel exhaust on A549 cells following 0 hrs post-exposure incubation for MTS and NRU assays; * denotes p < 0.05 and ** denotes p < 0.01.

    3.2.3. Effect of post exposure incubation

    Two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons was performed to detect any significant difference in cell viability made by increasing post-exposure incubation time. Cell viability was determined using MTS and NRU in-vitro assays after 0 and 24 hrs post exposure incubation (PEI). Results on cell viability after exposure to unfiltered exhaust across various engine loads are shown in Figure 6. ANOVA detected no significant difference caused by longer post exposure incubation.

    Figure 6. Effect of post exposure incubation time on cell viability.


    3.2.4. Effect of exhaust filtration

    Cell viability of A549 and HepG2 cells were compared so to determine the effect of filtering diesel exhaust on cell viability. Results of cell viability after exposure to either filtered or unfiltered exhaust across various engine loads are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8. Cell viability was determined using the MTS and NRU in-vitro assays after the 24 hrs post-exposure incubation period. In comparing cytotoxicity between filtered and unfiltered exhaust, two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons were made between the two observations: Cells exposed to control air and filtered diesel exhaust; Cells exposed to control air and unfiltered diesel exhaust. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

    Figure 7. Cytotoxicity of diesel exhaust on A549 cells with MTS and NRU assays following 24 hrs post exposure incubation; * denotes p < 0.05 and ** denotes p < 0.01.
    Figure 8. Cytotoxicity of diesel exhaust on HepG2 cells with MTS and NRU assays following 24 hrs post exposure incubation; * denotes p < 0.05 and ** denotes p < 0.01.

    3.2.5. Correlation between NOx level and cell viability

    Coefficient of determination (r2) between cell viability and measured NOx level were calculated. Results are presented in Table 3.

    Table 3. Correlation coefficient between cell viability and NOx level
    Cell line PEI time (hrs) Assay Correlated with Exhaust R2
    A549 0 MTS NOx Unfiltered 0.88
    A549 0 NRU NOx Unfiltered 0.90
    A549 0 ATP NOx Unfiltered 0.83
    A549 24 MTS NOx Filtered 0.83
    A549 24 NRU NOx Filtered 0.82
    A549 24 MTS NOx Unfiltered 0.82
    A549 24 NRU NOx Unfiltered 0.98
    HepG2 24 MTS NOx Filtered 0.85
    HepG2 24 NRU NOx Filtered 0.88
    HepG2 24 MTS NOx Unfiltered 0.95
    HepG2 24 NRU NOx Unfiltered 0.96
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    4. Discussion

    The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between operating conditions, resulting diesel exhaust and cytotoxicity induced by integrating the chemical and toxicity assessment. For chemical analysis, NOx and carbon content of exhaust were measured as diesel exhaust contributes greatly to NOx and PM pollution [50], while for toxicity analysis cell viability was determined using a range of bio-assays including MTS, NRU and ATP. For exhaust generation, engine load was defined as a percentage of the maximum torque the engine could generate. This was chosen as previous studies have demonstrated a decrease in cell viability with engine load increase and only a small decrease with increasing engine speed [36,51,52]. The dynamic direct exposure method was used where human cells (A549 and HepG2) grown on a porous air/liquid membrane, allowed for the simultaneous exposure of cells to exhaust whilst receiving nutrients which closely resembles conditions in living organisms.

    Carbon content analysis results did not suggest any significant correlation between load and carbon emission. However, emission of other particulates such as particulate bound transition metals have been observed in other studies although, it may depend more on metal content of the fuel, and results are mixed as to whether there is an increase or decrease of emission [45,52,53]. The NOx emission level correlates strongly with engine load as shown in Figure2, since NOx emission correlates with increasing engine speed as well [54], heat release rate is the main factor, which in turn is attributable to timing of the fuel injection [55,56].

    To detect any immediate effect of diesel exhaust on cell viability, comparisons were made between 0 and 24 hrs post exposure incubation. The two-way ANOVA analysis showed no significant difference in cell viability with both MTS and NRU assays for A549 and HepG2 cells. The results indicate diesel exhaust to cause mainly immediate effects, therefore 0 hrs post-exposure incubation may be more appropriate for in-vitro testing of diesel exhaust. This observation also supports the view that in-vitro tests are more suitable for short-term exposures, which is desirable when developing a rapid test method [57,58]. However, other studies have demonstrated with exposing A549 cells to silver nanoparticles that the nanoparticles entered vesicular structures of cells only after 24 hrs post exposure incubation, meanwhile other endpoints such as LDH activities did not differ between 4 and 24 hrs post exposure incubation [59,60]. Therefore post exposure incubation time should be considered depending on the pollutant tested. Gaseous components tend to cause immediate effects whilst particulate components exhibit non-immediate effects.

    Following a regression analysis of NOx emission levels and cell cytotoxicity, a significant correlation (r2 > 0.8) was observed between cytotoxicity of filtered exhaust and NOx levels as listed in Table 3. This result indicates that the gas component of exhaust such as NOx levels causes the greatest cytotoxic effects rather than the particulate component of the diesel exhaust. However, since NOx formation depends on peak temperature and in turn depends on cylinder pressure generated, these variables may exhibit better correlation with cell toxicity. The reduction in cell viability indicated by MTS, NRU and ATP assays suggest cytotoxicity effects on cell metabolism, lysosome integrity and energy production. As the effects are observable throughout two different cell lines (A549 and HepG2), diesel exhaust caused basal cytotoxic effects.

    For future research, since NOx level heavily depends on combustion temperature of fuel, calculation/measurement of heat release rate of fuel combustion is recommended to see if it exhibits more significant correlation with decreasing cell viability. It is expected that r2 between cell viability and combustion temperature to be similar to r2 between cell viability and NOx level. In addition, more biological endpoints can be tested to correlate DNA damage with engine load, which has been observed on cells exposed to components and whole exhaust on various cell types including A549 and HepG2 [61,62,63,64,65].

    5. Conclusion

    In conclusion, the obtained results of this study suggest that the gaseous component of diesel exhaust induces greater cytotoxicity following short term exposures as exhaust filtration caused no significant difference in cytotoxicity. These results also indicate that the evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of particulate matter may require longer exposure times to be fully understood. To determine which gaseous component causes the greatest cytotoxicity, gas monitors capable of measuring multiple gaseous compounds should be employed. However as NOx correlates strongest with engine load, it is most likely to be one of the most cytotoxic gas components of diesel exhaust. For engine setting, engine load (torque) is a more reliable operating parameter to set as it strongly correlates with gaseous emission. In addition, the dynamic direct exposure method, in parallel with chemical analysis of exhaust has the potential to be implemented for further toxicity studies. The main advantage of this method is a more realistic representation of human respiratory toxicity by exposing human target cells to an air pollution source using a dynamic direct exposure method at the air liquid interface that simultaneously allows for exposure whilst maintaining cellular viability. Due to modularity of system, this method can be adapted to analyse pollution other than diesel exhaust.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was supported by the Vice Chancellor’s Appeal Scholarship (L. Joeng) from University of New South Wales. The NIOSH 5040 analysis was performed by Mr Gary Mace of Coal Services Health, Australia. The authors would like to thank Mr Vince Carnevale for his technical assistance.

    Conflict of interest:

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Bauer M, Moebus S, Möhlenkamp S, et al. (2010) Urban Particulate Matter Air Pollution Is Associated With Subclinical Atherosclerosis: Results From the HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56: 1803-1808. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.065
    [2] Glantz SA (2002) Air pollution as a cause of heart diseaseTime for action*. J Am Coll Cardiol 39: 943-945. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01709-6
    [3] Krishnan RM, Adar SD, Szpiro AA, et al. Vascular Responses to Long- and Short-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter: MESA Air (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution). J Am Coll Cardiol 60: 2158-2166.
    [4] Peters A (2005) Particulate matter and heart disease: Evidence from epidemiological studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207: 477-482. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.030
    [5] Pope CA, 3rd, Renlund DG, Kfoury AG, et al. (2008) Relation of heart failure hospitalization to exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Am J Cardiol 102: 1230-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.044
    [6] Shrey K, Suchit A, Deepika D, et al. (2011) Air pollutants: the key stages in the pathway towards the development of cardiovascular disorders. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 31: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2010.09.002
    [7] Bernstein JA, Alexis N, Barnes C, et al. (2004) Health effects of air pollution. J Allergy Clin Immun 114: 1116-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.030
    [8] Ghio AJ, Smith CB, Madden MC (2012) Diesel exhaust particles and airway inflammation. Curr Opin Pulm Med 18: 144-150. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834f0e2a
    [9] Kunzli N, Kaiser R, Medina S, et al. (2000) Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment. Lancet 356: 795-801. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02653-2
    [10] McEntee JC, Ogneva-Himmelberger Y (2008) Diesel particulate matter, lung cancer, and asthma incidences along major traffic corridors in MA, USA: A GIS analysis. Health Place 14: 817-828. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.01.002
    [11] Hoek G, Brunekreef B, Goldbohm S, et al. (2002) Association between mortality and indicators of traffic-related air pollution in the Netherlands: a cohort study. Lancet 360: 1203-1209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11280-3
    [12] Beelen R, Hoek G, van den Brandt PA, et al. (2008) Long-Term Effects of Traffic-Related Air Pollution on Mortality in a Dutch Cohort (NLCS-AIR Study). Environ Health Persp 116: 196-202. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10614
    [13] Kampa M, Castanas E (2008) Human health effects of air pollution. Environ Pollut 151: 362-367. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012
    [14] Autrup H (2010) Ambient Air Pollution and Adverse Health Effects. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2: 7333-7338. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.089
    [15] Englert N (2004) Fine particles and human health--a review of epidemiological studies. Toxicol Lett 149: 235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.035
    [16] Simkhovich BZ, Kleinman MT, Kloner RA (2008) Air Pollution and Cardiovascular InjuryEpidemiology, Toxicology, and Mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol 52: 719-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.029
    [17] Yokota S, Moriya N, Iwata M, et al. (2013) Exposure to diesel exhaust during fetal period affects behavior and neurotransmitters in male offspring mice. J Toxicol Sci 38: 13-23. doi: 10.2131/jts.38.13
    [18] Ema M, Naya M, Horimoto M, et al. (2013) Developmental toxicity of diesel exhaust: A review of studies in experimental animals. Reprod Toxicol 42: 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.06.074
    [19] Folkmann JK, Risom L, Hansen CS, et al. (2007) Oxidatively damaged DNA and inflammation in the liver of dyslipidemic ApoE-/- mice exposed to diesel exhaust particles. Toxicology 237: 134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.05.009
    [20] Danielsen PH, Risom L, Wallin H, et al. (2008) DNA damage in rats after a single oral exposure to diesel exhaust particles. Mut Res 637: 49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.06.011
    [21] Nemmar A, Al-Salam S, Zia S, et al. (2010) Time-course effects of systemically administered diesel exhaust particles in rats. Toxicol Lett 194: 58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.02.001
    [22] Nicoll CS, Russell SM (1992) Animal rights, animal research, and human obligations. Mol Cell Neurosci 3: 271-277. doi: 10.1016/1044-7431(92)90023-U
    [23] Tee LBG, Davies DS, Seddon CE, et al. (1987) Species differences in the hepatotoxicity of paracetamol are due to differences in the rate of conversion to its cytotoxic metabolite. Biochem Pharmacol 36: 1041-1052. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(87)90412-6
    [24] Valerio Jr LG, Arvidson KB, Chanderbhan RF, et al. (2007) Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 222: 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.03.012
    [25] Roggen EL, Soni NK, Verheyen GR (2006) Respiratory immunotoxicity: An in vitro assessment. Toxicol In Vitro 20: 1249-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2006.03.009
    [26] Fröhlich E, Salar-Behzadi S (2014) Toxicological Assessment of Inhaled Nanoparticles: Role of in Vivo, ex Vivo, in Vitro, and in Silico Studies. Int J Mol Sci 15: 4795-4822. doi: 10.3390/ijms15034795
    [27] Steinritz D, Möhle N, Pohl C, et al. (2013) Use of the Cultex® Radial Flow System as an in vitro exposure method to assess acute pulmonary toxicity of fine dusts and nanoparticles with special focus on the intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility. Chem Biol Interact 206: 479-490. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2013.05.001
    [28] Thorne D, Adamson J (2013) A review of in vitro cigarette smoke exposure systems. Exp Toxicol Pathol 65: 1183-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2013.06.001
    [29] Kawanishi M, Kanno T, Nishida H, et al. (2013) Translesion DNA synthesis across various DNA adducts produced by 3-nitrobenzanthrone in Escherichia coli. Mut Res 754: 32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.04.001
    [30] Bömmel H, Haake M, Luft P, et al. (2003) The diesel exhaust component pyrene induces expression of IL-8 but not of eotaxin. Int Immunopharmacol 3: 1371-1379. doi: 10.1016/S1567-5769(03)00135-8
    [31] Shima H, Koike E, Shinohara R, et al. (2006) Oxidative Ability and Toxicity of n-Hexane Insoluble Fraction of Diesel Exhaust Particles. Toxicol Sci 91: 218-226. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj119
    [32] Courter LA, Luch A, Musafia-Jeknic T, et al. (2008) The influence of diesel exhaust on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced DNA damage, gene expression, and tumor initiation in Sencar mice in vivo. Cancer Lett 265: 135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.017
    [33] Koike E, Kobayashi T (2005) Organic extract of diesel exhaust particles stimulates expression of Ia and costimulatory molecules associated with antigen presentation in rat peripheral blood monocytes but not in alveolar macrophages. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 209: 277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.017
    [34] Saei Moghaddam M, Zarringhalam Moghaddam A (2014) Performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a CI engine fueled with diesel-nitrogenated additives. Chem Eng Res Des 92: 720-726. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.01.009
    [35] Young LH, Liou YJ, Cheng MT, et al. (2012) Effects of biodiesel, engine load and diesel particulate filter on nonvolatile particle number size distributions in heavy-duty diesel engine exhaust. J Hazard Mater 199-200: 282-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.014
    [36] Zhang Z-H, Balasubramanian R (2014) Influence of butanol–diesel blends on particulate emissions of a non-road diesel engine. Fuel 118: 130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.059
    [37] Koc AB, Abdullah M (2013) Performance and NOx emissions of a diesel engine fueled with biodiesel-diesel-water nanoemulsions. Fuel Process Technol 109: 70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.09.039
    [38] Ong HC, Masjuki HH, Mahlia TMI, et al. (2014) Engine performance and emissions using Jatropha curcas, Ceiba pentandra and Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel in a CI diesel engine. Energy 69: 427-445. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.035
    [39] Labeckas G, Slavinskas S (2009) Study of exhaust emissions of direct injection diesel engine operating on ethanol, petrol and rapeseed oil blends. Energ Convers Manage 50: 802-812. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.09.026
    [40] Boubel RW, Fox DL, Turner DB, et al. (1994) Fundamentals of Air Pollution. San Diego: Academic Press
    [41] Challen B, Baranescu R (1999) Diesel engine reference book. Oxford, England; Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann
    [42] Shi JP, Harrison RM, Brear F (1999) Particle size distribution from a modern heavy duty diesel engine. Sci Total Environ 235: 305-317. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00214-4
    [43] Stevenson R (1982) The morphology and crystallography of diesel particulate emissions. Carbon 20: 359-365. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(82)90033-1
    [44] Hayes AJ, Bakand S (2014) Toxicological perspectives of inhaled therapeutics and nanoparticles. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 10: 933-947. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2014.916276
    [45] Joeng L, Hayes A, Bakand S (2013) Validation of the Dynamic Direct Exposure Method for Toxicity Testing of Diesel Exhaust In Vitro. ISRN Toxicol 2013: 11.
    [46] Standards Australia (1998) AS 3570 - 1998: Automotive diesel fuel. In: Australia S, editor.
    [47] Promega (2007) CellTiter-Glo(R) Luminescent Cell Viability Assay Technical Bulletin, TB288 Promega Corporation. Madison, USA.
    [48] Goodwin CJ, Holt SJ, Downes S, et al. (1995) Microculture tetrazolium assays: a comparison between two new tetrazolium salts, XTT and MTS. J Immunol Methods 179: 95-103. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)00277-4
    [49] Borenfreund E, Puerner JA (1985) Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol Lett 24: 119-124. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(85)90046-3
    [50] Kagawa J (2002) Health effects of diesel exhaust emissions--a mixture of air pollutants of worldwide concern. Toxicology 181-182: 349-353. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00461-4
    [51] Knebel JW, Ritter D, Aufderheide M (2002) Exposure of human lung cells to native diesel motor exhaust-- development of an optimized in vitro test strategy. Toxicol In Vitro 16: 185-192. doi: 10.1016/S0887-2333(01)00110-2
    [52] Betha R, Pavagadhi S, Sethu S, et al. (2012) Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of airborne particulate matter emitted from stationary engine fuelled with diesel and waste cooking oil-derived biodiesel. Atmos Environ 61: 23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.086
    [53] Sharma M, Agarwal AK, Bharathi KVL (2005) Characterization of exhaust particulates from diesel engine. Atmos Environ 39: 3023-3028. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.047
    [54] El_Kassaby M, Nemit_allah MA (2013) Studying the effect of compression ratio on an engine fueled with waste oil produced biodiesel/diesel fuel. Alex Eng J 52: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2012.11.007
    [55] Szybist JP, Boehman AL, Taylor JD, et al. (2005) Evaluation of formulation strategies to eliminate the biodiesel NOx effect. Fuel Process Technol 86: 1109-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.11.006
    [56] Hellier P, Ladommatos N, Yusaf T (2015) The influence of straight vegetable oil fatty acid composition on compression ignition combustion and emissions. Fuel 143: 131-143. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.021
    [57] Ponsoda X, Jover R, Núñez C, et al. (1995) Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of 10 chemicals in human and rat hepatocytes and in cell lines: Correlation between in vitro data and human lethal concentration. Toxicol In Vitro 9: 959-966. doi: 10.1016/0887-2333(95)00053-4
    [58] Zhang X, Yang F, Xu C, et al. (2008) Cytotoxicity evaluation of three pairs of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) enantiomers on Hep G2 cell. Toxicol In Vitro 22: 1520-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.05.006
    [59] Herzog F, Clift MJD, Piccapietra F, et al. (2013) Exposure of silver-nanoparticles and silver-ions to lung cells in vitro at the air-liquid interface. Part Fibre Toxicol 10: 11. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-10-11
    [60] Barkhordari A, Barzegar S, Hekmatimoghaddam H, et al. (2014) The Toxic Effects of Silver Nanoparticles on Blood Mononuclear Cells. Int J Occup Environ Med 5: 164-168.
    [61] Chen R-M, Chou MW, Ueng T-H (2000) Induction of cytochrome P450 1A1 in human hepatoma HepG2 cells by 6-nitrochrysene. Toxicol Lett 117: 69-77. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(00)00242-3
    [62] Durga M, Nathiya S, Rajasekar A, et al. (2014) Effects of ultrafine petrol exhaust particles on cytotoxicity, oxidative stress generation, DNA damage and inflammation in human A549 lung cells and murine RAW 264.7 macrophages. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 38: 518-530. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.08.003
    [63] Tang M, Li Q, Xiao L, et al. (2012) Toxicity effects of short term diesel exhaust particles exposure to human small airway epithelial cells (SAECs) and human lung carcinoma epithelial cells (A549). Toxicol Lett 215: 181-192. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.10.016
    [64] Xiao M, Helsing AV, Lynch PM, et al. (2014) DNA damage caused by inorganic particulate matter on Raji and HepG2 cell lines exposed to ultraviolet radiation. Mut Res 771: 6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.06.004
    [65] Lamy E, Kassie F, Gminski R, et al. (2004) 3-Nitrobenzanthrone (3-NBA) induced micronucleus formation and DNA damage in human hepatoma (HepG2) cells. Toxicol Lett 146: 103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.07.001
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. H.M. Mahmudul, M.G. Rasul, D. Akbar, R. Narayanan, M. Mofijur, A comprehensive review of the recent development and challenges of a solar-assisted biodigester system, 2021, 753, 00489697, 141920, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141920
    2. H.M. Mahmudul, M.G. Rasul, D. Akbar, R. Narayanan, M. Mofijur, Food waste as a source of sustainable energy: Technical, economical, environmental and regulatory feasibility analysis, 2022, 166, 13640321, 112577, 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112577
    3. Célia A. Alves, Marlene Soares, Daniela Figueiredo, Helena Oliveira, Effects of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and plasticisers from different traffic sources on the human alveolar epithelial cell line A549, 2023, 13522310, 119736, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119736
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(7331) PDF downloads(1386) Cited by(3)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(11)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog