Review Special Issues

The use of biomonitoring equivalents for interpreting blood concentrations in population studies: a case for polychlorinated biphenyls

  • A number of exposure guideline values for environmental contaminants are established by various agencies for risk assessment purposes. Biomonitoring equivalents are conversions of external guideline values to internal doses, against which biomonitoring data can be directly compared. Several biomonitoring equivalents have been developed for the interpretation of blood concentrations of environmental contaminants, but none has yet been developed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In this paper, we describe information needed to develop biomonitoring equivalents for PCBs and discuss anticipated challenges. We provide a broad overview of PCB absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, PCB guideline values, and PCB pharmacokinetic modeling efforts in animals and humans. We also provide strategies to address anticipated challenges in deriving biomonitoring equivalents for this complex contaminant. Biomonitoring equivalents will be useful for the interpretation of the PCB biomonitoring data that is currently available for populations around the globe through national surveys and research of specific populations.

    Citation: Kavita Singh, Andy Nong, Mark Feeley, Hing Man Chan. The use of biomonitoring equivalents for interpreting blood concentrations in population studies: a case for polychlorinated biphenyls[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(1): 21-41. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.1.21

    Related Papers:

    [1] Peter Mochungong, Jiping Zhu . DDTs, PCBs and PBDEs contamination in Africa, Latin America and South-southeast Asia—a review. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(2): 374-399. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.2.374
    [2] Fernanda P. Maciel, Joshua M. Peschel . A GIS-based tool for bioaccumulation risk analysis and its application to study polychlorinated biphenyls in the Great Lakes. AIMS Environmental Science, 2018, 5(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2018.1.1
    [3] Guillermo Burillo-Putze, Luis D. Boada, Luis Alberto Henríquez-Hernández, Patricio Navarro, Manuel Zumbado, María Almeida-González, Ana Isabel Dominguez-Bencomo, María Camacho, Octavio P. Luzardo . Monitoring serum PCB levels in the adult population of the Canary Islands (Spain). AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(2): 345-352. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.2.345
    [4] Judy Choi, Thit Aarøe Mørck, Anke Joas, Lisbeth E. Knudsen . Major national human biomonitoring programs in chemical exposure assessment. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 782-802. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.782
    [5] Herve Aloysius, Daniel Desaulniers, Stelvio M. Bandiera . Evaluating toxic endpoints of exposure to a commercial PCB mixture: an in vivo laboratory study. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(2): 314-332. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.2.314
    [6] P. U. Singare, J.P. Shirodkar . Persistent and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the north-western coastal marine environment of India. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(2): 169-189. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021012
    [7] Anna Mainka, Barbara Kozielska . Assessment of the BTEX concentrations and health risk in urban nursery schools in Gliwice, Poland. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(4): 858-870. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.4.858
    [8] Akekawat Vitheepradit, Taeng-On Prommi . Microplastics in surface water and tissue of white leg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in a cultured pond in Nakhon Pathom Province, Central Thailand. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(4): 478-503. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023027
    [9] Lars Carlsen . A posetic based assessment of atmospheric VOCs. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(3): 403-416. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.3.403
    [10] Cohen Ang'u, Nzioka John Muthama, Mwanthi Alexander Mutuku, Mutembei Henry M'IKiugu . Carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide patterns associated with changes in energy use during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kenya. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(3): 244-259. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022017
  • A number of exposure guideline values for environmental contaminants are established by various agencies for risk assessment purposes. Biomonitoring equivalents are conversions of external guideline values to internal doses, against which biomonitoring data can be directly compared. Several biomonitoring equivalents have been developed for the interpretation of blood concentrations of environmental contaminants, but none has yet been developed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In this paper, we describe information needed to develop biomonitoring equivalents for PCBs and discuss anticipated challenges. We provide a broad overview of PCB absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, PCB guideline values, and PCB pharmacokinetic modeling efforts in animals and humans. We also provide strategies to address anticipated challenges in deriving biomonitoring equivalents for this complex contaminant. Biomonitoring equivalents will be useful for the interpretation of the PCB biomonitoring data that is currently available for populations around the globe through national surveys and research of specific populations.


    Abbreviations:

    ADME = absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion
    ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
    BMD = benchmark dose
    CHMS = Canadian Health Measures Survey
    DDE = dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene
    DDT = dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
    GerES = German Environmental Survey
    LOAEL = lowest observed adverse effect level
    MRL = minimum risk level
    NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
    NOAEL = no observed adverse effect level
    PBDE = polybrominated diphenyl ether
    PBPK = physiologically-based pharmacokinetic
    PCB = polychlorinated biphenyl
    PCDD = polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
    PCDF = polychlorinated dibenzofurans
    RfC = reference concentration
    RfD = reference dose
    TCDD = tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
    TDI = tolerable daily intake

    1. Introduction

    Guideline values for environmental contaminants describe exposure thresholds likely to have minimal risk of adverse effects in humans. The Environmental Protection Agency, for example, uses the concept of reference dose (RfD) or reference concentration (RfC), which are estimates of daily oral or inhalational exposures, respectively, in humans that are likely to have no adverse non-cancer effects over a lifetime. These estimates take into consideration effects of chemicals on sensitive human subpopulations [1, 2]. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) defines minimum risk level (MRL) of acute (1 ‒ 14 days), intermediate (15 ‒ 364 days), or chronic duration (1 year or longer) to describe oral and inhalational exposures without risk for adverse non-cancer effects [3]. Tolerable daily intakes (TDI) are used by Health Canada to describe oral exposures without adverse non-cancer effects over a lifetime [4]. Guideline values are often derived by applying uncertainty factors to estimates of no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL), lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) or benchmark dose (BMD) from toxicological studies in animals. Uncertainty factors may account for uncertainties in extrapolating from animal data to humans, extrapolating from a LOAEL to a NOAEL, length of exposure (e.g. from acute to chronic), and variation among human populations [5].

    The magnitude of internal exposure has often been inferred based on estimates of external intake. While this method provides a rough estimate of exposure it may not be representative of the dose that ultimately arrives in the bloodstream or at target organs where toxicity occurs [6]. Chemicals are known to undergo processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion—these pharmacokinetic processes will transform the external dose into a chemical-specific internal dose, which is the true parameter of interest in characterizing risk. A biomonitoring equivalent is the conversion of an external guideline value, such as a RfD, MRL, or TDI, to an internal dose against which biomonitoring data can be directly compared [7, 8]. Biomonitoring equivalents have been developed for several environmental contaminants, such as polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) -99 [9], dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (p, p’-DDE) and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) [10], toluene [11], hexachlorobenzene [12], and 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid [13].

    To our knowledge, biomonitoring equivalents have not yet been developed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a ubiquitous class of environmental contaminant. Levels of PCBs have been measured in human populations around the world. In a risk assessment context, biomonitoring equivalents for PCBs could more accurately guide the interpretation of the available human biomonitoring data. Polychlorinated biphenyls contain up to 209 congeners and each congener has different chemical properties, such as biological half-life. Therefore, the development of biomonitoring equivalents for PCBs is a challenge. In this paper we provide a broad overview of the information needed to develop biomonitoring equivalents for PCBs. We begin by describing background information and worldwide PCB biomonitoring data, followed by a summary of ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) processes, external guideline values, and pharmacokinetic modeling studies of PCBs in animals and humans. Lastly, we present some strategies to address anticipated research challenges in the development of biomonitoring equivalents for this complex contaminant.

    2. Background on polychlorinated biphenyls

    Although the production, use, and trade of PCBs was prohibited under the Stockholm Convention since 2004 [14] and international production stopped since 1993 [15], these chemicals persist in air, water, soil, biota, and human tissues. PCBs are synthetic materials that were produced for coolant and lubricant properties in electrical equipment, such as capacitors and transformers, and in plasticizers, oils, inks, paints, adhesives, and waxes [15]. Breivik et al. estimated that total global production of PCBs amounted to about 1.3 million tons, of which greater than 70 percent were tri-, tetra-, and pentachlorinated homologues [16]. About half of this production came from the United States and nearly all consumption occurred in the Northern hemisphere [16].

    Individual PCB congeners vary in the degree and position of chlorine atoms, resulting in 209 possible congeners. The industrial manufacture of PCBs was mostly in the form of complex commercial PCB mixtures defined by degree of chlorination patterns, such as Aroclors in the United States, Kanechlors in Japan, and Clophens in Germany. The number and positioning of chlorine atoms on the biphenyl ring will determine potential for atmospheric volatilization, environmental degradation, bioaccumulation, and metabolism. Generally, the higher chlorinated PCB congeners are more resistant to environmental breakdown and bioaccumulate in biota [5]. In addition, the positioning of the chlorine atoms will determine toxic effects. Dioxin-like congeners, for example, have a coplanar structure with no or maximum of one chlorine atom in the ortho positions. These congeners act through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and cause toxicity similar to 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) [17].

    Exposure to PCBs has been shown to have many adverse effects in wildlife and humans and, therefore, their persistence in the environment is of high concern. Most effects in humans have been observed in the settings of occupational exposures or poisoning incidents and include increase in liver enzymes, gastrointestinal symptoms, increased thyroid gland volume and risk for goiter, upper respiratory tract symptoms, joint pain, skin irritation and chloracne, hematological and immunological effects, neurological effects, reproductive effects, and cancer [5]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified PCBs as Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans [18].

    3. Worldwide biomonitoring data

    PCB biomonitoring data for children, adolescents, and adults are available from several countries through national surveys, such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the United States, the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS), and the German Environmental Survey (GerES). Table 1 presents data from United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, Spain, and Belgium. In addition, monitoring of PCBs in remote populations, such as the Inuit, has been conducted [20, 21]. Table 2 shows the sum of PCB congeners detected in breast milk samples around the world. Biomonitoring equivalents could be used to interpret this worldwide PCB biomonitoring data.

    Table 1. Worldwide biomonitoring data.
    Abbreviations: AM = arithmetic mean; CHIS = Catalan Health Interview Survey; CHMS = Canadian Health Measures Survey; CI = confidence interval; FLEHS = Flemish Environment and Health Survey; GerES = German Environmental Survey; GM = geometric mean; IHS = Inuit Health Survey; NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; PCB = polychlorinated biphenyl; w. b. = whole blood
    * Data for PCB-138, PCB-153, and PCB-180 stratified by age groups presented in Aylward et al. [69].
    Country Population Sample Size Congener(s) Level Source
    United States NHANES: 12+ years (2003-2004) 1896 PCB-153 GM (95% CI) (ng/g lipid):
    19.8 (18.8, 20.9)
    [21]
    Canada CHMS: 20-79 years (2007-2009) 1666 PCB-118 GM (95% CI) (ng/g lipid):
    4.43 (3.78, 5.20)
    [22]
    PCB-138 10.13 (8.92, 11.51)
    PCB-146 2.02 (1.76, 2.32)
    PCB-153 18.31 (15.83, 21.16)
    PCB-156 2.64 (2.40, 2.92)
    PCB-163 3.22 (2.85, 3.65)
    PCB-170 4.60 (4.09, 5.17)
    PCB-180 15.21 (13.52, 17.11)
    PCB-187 3.72 (3.21, 4.31)
    PCB-194 2.91 (2.59, 3.29)
    PCB-201 2.60 (2.33, 2.89)
    PCB-203 2.25 (2.04, 2.47)
    Canada Adult IHS: 18+ years (2007-2008) 2162 ∑PCB GM (95% CI) (ng/g lipid): 409 (389, 430) [20]
    Australia Pooled samples:
    61+ years (2011-2012)
    4 pools of 100 samples PCB-138 AM (95% CI) (ng/g lipid): 13.4 (11.0, 15.7) [69]
    PCB-153 18.9 (16.9, 20.9)
    PCB-180 18.5 (15.3, 21.6)
    Germany GerES: 18-69 years (1998) 2823 PCB-138 GM (95% CI) (μg/L w. b. ): 0.42 (0.41, 0.43) [70]
    2818 PCB-153 0.68 (0.66, 0.70)
    2822 PCB-180 0.44 (0.42, 0.45)
    Spain (Catalonia) CHIS: 18-74 years
    (2001-2002)
    919 PCB-118 GM (range) (ng/g lipid):
    17.4 (0.7, 465.0)
    [71]
    PCB-138 63.5 (0.7, 1829.7)
    PCB-153 91.2 (0.7, 1912.1)
    PCB-180 75.1 (2.6, 2047.2)
    Belgium (Flanders) FLEHS: newborns (2002-2003) 1051 PCB-118 GM (95% CI) (ng/g lipid): 10.5 (10.1, 11) [72]
    1054 PCB-138 15.3 (14.6, 16.2)
    1065 PCB-153 25.9 (24.5, 27.5)
    1050 PCB-170 7.7 (7.5, 8.0)
    1071 PCB-180 20.4 (19.5, 21.3)
    FLEHS: adolescents (2002-2006) 1645 ∑PCB GM (95% CI) (ng/g lipid): 68.0 (66.0 , 70.0) [73]
    FLEHS: 50-65 years (2002-2006) 1530 ∑PCB 333.0 (325.0, 341.0)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2. Worldwide biomonitoring data—breast milk (∑PCB).
    Abbreviations: PCB = polychlorinated biphenyl; SD = standard deviation.
    Country Population Sample Size Level
    (ng/g lipid)
    Source
    Canada National Canadian Study (1992) 497 Mean: 238 [5]
    Canada (Northern) Women from Keewatin (1996-1997) 12 Mean: 247 [5]
    United States
    —Akwesasne
    Mohawk women residing near three hazardous waste sites (1991-1992) 40 Mean: 254 [5]
    United States
    (rural New York)
    Caucasian women (1991-1992) 45 Mean: 318 [5]
    United States
    (New York)
    Women residing in counties adjacent to Lake Ontario(1991-1993) 213 Mean: 271 [5]
    Sweden National Sweden Study (1992) 380 Mean: 380 [5]
    Finland (urban) Women giving birth in a maternity clinic in Helsinki (1992-1994) 20 Mean: 296 [5]
    Finland (rural) Women giving birth in a maternity clinic in Kuopio (1992-1993) 64 Mean: 198 [5]
    Germany Women 27-31 years, primiparous 14 Median: 450 [5, 74]
    Croatia Women nursing hospitalized children
    (1994-1995)
    45 Median: 212 [5]
    Russia (industrialized) Women from Murmansk (1993) 15 Mean: 429.4 [5]
    Russia (industrialized) Women from Monchegorsk (1993) 15 Mean: 490.5 [5]
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    4. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME)

    The ATSDR contains comprehensive data on the ADME of PCB congeners in animals and humans. The information described in this section comes mostly from that report [5, 22]. The primary route of human exposure to PCBs is through oral ingestion from contaminated foods, drinking water, and breast milk. Other minor routes of exposure are inhalational and dermal absorption [22]. PCBs are lipophilic chemicals and, therefore, absorption from the gastrointestinal tract to blood lipids occurs passively. Once PCBs are absorbed they distribute preferentially to adipose tissue and liver where they may remain for years. Commonly detected congeners in human tissues are PCB-138, 153, and 180 [22].

    PCBs can be metabolized by cytochrome P450 isozymes to polar metabolites which can then undergo phase 2 metabolism by conjugation with glutathione and glucuronic acid. Arene oxides of PCBs are formed by CYP 1A1, CYP 1A2, CYP 2B1, CYP 2B2, and CYP 3A and are transformed to hydroxylated aromatic compounds or methylsulfonyl metabolites. The rate of metabolism decreases with higher chlorinated congeners. Phenolic metabolites predominate, although other metabolites such as trans-dihydrodiols, polyhydroxylated congeners, and methyl ether derivatives may also be formed. Hydroxylated metabolites accumulate in lung, liver, and kidneys. Due to metabolism of parent compounds and selective retention of certain congeners in body tissues (e.g. PCB-153), the original mixture of PCBs ingested will not be the same as the congeners subsequently detected in serum, adipose, and breast milk.

    PCBs are primarily eliminated in feces as parent form and as metabolites in urine and bile. Elimination half-lives vary greatly depending on congener; for example, half-life for PCB-28 is estimated at 1.4 years whereas the half-life for PCB-163 is more than 20 years. Other congeners have been found to have infinite half-lives, indicating repeated exposures or absence of decline over the experimental duration.

    5. Guideline values

    Guideline values for PCBs were collected from sources of the World Health Organization, European and North American jurisdictions (e.g. French Food Safety Agency, Health Canada, Environmental Protection Agency), and occupational organizations (e.g. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) (Tables 3 and Table 4) [5, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. The reference values pertain to total PCBs, total non-dioxin like PCBs, dioxin-like PCBs, or PCB mixtures (e.g. Aroclor 1254) and ingestion through food, water or breast milk. The maximum reference value for ingestion is 5 µg/kg/day based on toxic effects of Phenochlor-DP6 in rats (CSHPF 1991). More recent sources have lowered ingestion references values, ranging from a low of 0.01 µg/kg/day for seven PCB indicators in food (AFSSA 2007) to a high of 0.13 μg/kg/day for total non-dioxin like PCBs (Health Canada 2010). For dioxins, a reference value of 2.33 pg TEQ/kg/day has been specified by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA 2001). A theoretical TDI for dioxin-like PCBs is 1.63 pg TEQ/kg/day, given that these PCBs constitute 70% of dioxin mixtures [29]. The European Food Safety Authority 2005 indicated benchmark dose lower confidence limits in breast milk of 0.63-0.71 µg/g lipid for total PCBs based on cognitive outcomes in children exposed prenatally and 65 pg TEQ/g lipid for dioxin-like PCBs, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF) based on neurological and immune effects with perinatal exposures. Three occupational reference standards for inhalational and dermal exposures were identified for Aroclor 1242 and Aroclor 1254 of either 0.5 mg/m3 or 1 mg/m3.

    Table 3. Non-occupational PCB reference values.
    Abbreviations: AFSSA = French Food Safety Agency; ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; BMD = benchmark dose; BMDL = benchmark dose lower confidence limit; CSHPF = French High Council for Public Hygiene; DL-PCBs = dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls; EFSA = European Food Safety Authority; EPA = Environmental Protection Agency; JECFA = Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives; MRL = minimal risk level; NDL-PCBs = non dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls; PCB = polychlorinated biphenyl; PCDD = polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins; PCDF = polychlorinated dibenzofurans; RfD = reference dose (oral); TDI = tolerable daily intake; TEQ = toxic equivalent; WHO = World Health Organization.
    Source Route of Exposure Reference Value
    AFSSA 2013 All Critical Concentration Threshold (vulnerable populations - pregnant women, women of child-bearing age, lactating women, and children under 3 years of age): 0.7 µg total PCB/g plasma lipids (rest of population):
    1.8 µg total PCB/g plasma lipids
    Health Canada 2010 Ingestion TDI (total NDL-PCBs): 0.13 μg/kg/d
    AFSSA 2007 Ingestion TDI: 0.01 µg/kg/d (PCB indicators in food)
    WHO 2003 Ingestion TDI: 0.02 µg/kg/d (Aroclor 1254)
    JECFA 2001 Ingestion TDI (dioxins): 2.33 pg TEQ/kg/d Theoretical TDI for DL-PCBs (based on 70% of dioxin mixture): 1.63 pg TEQ/kg/d
    EPA 2000 Ingestion RfD Aroclor 1254: 0.02 µg/kg/d Aroclor 1016: 0.07 µg/kg/d Aroclor: 1248: not verifiable
    ATSDR 2000 Ingestion MRL (intermediate duration): 0.03 μg/kg/d MRL (chronic duration): 0.02 μg/kg/d (Aroclor 1254)
    CSHPF 1991 Ingestion TDI: 5 µg/kg/d (Phenochlor-DP6)
    EFSA 2005 Ingestion (breast milk) BMD: 0.94-1.05 µg total PCB/g lipid BMDL: 0.63-0.71 µg/g lipid
    EFSA 2005 Ingestion (breast milk) BMDL (PCDD/PCDF/PCB TEQ): 65 pg TEQ/g lipid
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4. Occupational PCB reference values.
    Abbreviations: ACGIH = American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; Cl = chlorine; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; OSHA = Occupational Safety and Health Administration; PEL = permissible exposure level; REL = recommended exposure limit; TLV = threshold limit value.
    Source Route of Exposure Reference Standard
    NIOSH 2000 Inhalation REL (10-hour) Chlorodiphenyl (42% or 54% Cl): 1 µg/m3
    ACGIH 1998 Inhalation, dermal TLV (8 hour) Aroclor 1242: 1 mg/m3 Aroclor 1254: 0.5 mg/m3
    OSHA 1998 Inhalation, dermal PEL (8-hours) Aroclor 1242: 1 mg/m3 Aroclor 1254: 0.5 mg/m3
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    6. Pharmacokinetic modeling

    The conversion of an external PCB reference value to a corresponding internal dose requires the use of a pharmacokinetic model that describes the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of a chemical in the body. The model description can vary from simple relationship between dose exposure and internal metrics to highly complex structures with saturable processes. The level of detail in the model structure will depend on the quality and quantity of data available.

    6.1. Modeling in animals

    Several pharmacokinetic modeling studies of PCBs have been conducted in wildlife species, such as marine mammals, birds, and polar bears [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39]. Pharmacokinetic modeling of PCBs has also been carried out in experimental animals, such as rats, mice and fish [40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49] and in swine and sheep [49]. PCB-153 has been most commonly modeled, although some work has also been done with other congeners and with PCB mixtures, such as Aroclor 1242, 1254, and 1260. One study focused on dioxin-like PCBs and their transfer from feed and soils to eggs of laying hens [50].

    Models of various complexities have been developed with the simplest using a single compartment model that represented the whole organism [48]. In the single compartment model, bioaccumulation and elimination of Aroclor 1254 was studied in striped bass and parameters for absorption rate constant and elimination rate constant were estimated. Several studies employed a two-compartment model to represent, for example, blubber and rest of body in pilot whales [30], gut and rest of body in ringed seal [33], central and fat in laying hens [50], and yolk + albumen and embryo in herring gulls [36]. The most complex scheme was a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that incorporated multiple compartments to represent lungs, blood, perfused adipose, deep adipose, bone, brain, muscle, kidney, liver, and intestine in East Greenland polar bears [38]. A risk quotient analysis was conducted by estimating critical body residues of many contaminants, including PCBs, based on reproductive endpoints and then comparing observed contaminant levels measured in polar bears with the critical body residues to determine the proportion at risk for reproductive toxicity [38]. Other studies introduced greater complexity by modeling pregnancy, birth, and lactational processes in females [35] and incorporating time-dependent variations in pharmacokinetic parameters [38, 43, 46, 52].

    The pharmacokinetic models were used to estimate lifetime exposure and bioaccumulation [31, 32, 33, 36, 37, 52], influence of blubber temperature gradients on PCB concentrations [33], mother-offspring transfer of PCBs [35, 36, 41], protein binding [39], interactions between congeners [41, 43], and the effect of chlorine position on PCB kinetic behaviour [43].

    6.2. Modeling in humans

    Pharmacokinetic modeling of PCBs has been conducted in pregnant women [52], lactating women [54, 55, 56], infants and children [57, 58, 59], women with breast cancer [60, 61], Inuit [56, 58, 59, 62, 63, 64]workers in a contaminated building [64], and general populations [66, 67, 68, 69](Table 5). As with animal modeling studies, the human pharmacokinetic models varied in complexity from simple one-compartment models [55, 63, 66, 68, 69], two-compartment models representing maternal and fetal lipids or liver and fat [53, 64], to a 22 compartment model in lactating women [53]. The most commonly modeled congener was PCB-153, although other congeners, such as PCB-28, PCB-99, PCB-138, PCB-180, and PCB-199 were also examined. In breast cancer studies, pharmacokinetic models were used to estimate lifetime exposure or exposure during susceptible time windows, which may more accurately represent exposures at the time of cancer diagnosis [60, 61]. Similarly, pharmacokinetic modeling was used to simulate exposures during specific time periods (i.e. prenatal, lactational, postnatal) and their association with mental and psychomotor development or behaviour in infants and children [57, 58].

    Table 5. Pharmacokinetic modeling of PCBs in humans.
    Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GI = gastrointestinal; hBCF = human bioconcentration factor; HQ = hazard quotient; NOC = non-ortho coplanar; PBPK = physiologically-based pharmacokinetic; PCB = polychlorinated biphenyl; PCDD = polychlorinated dibenzodioxin; PCDF = polychlorinated dibenzofuran; POP = persistent organic pollutant; UK = United Kingdom.
    Population Model Purpose Congener Methods Compartment Selected Results Reference
    Pregnancy
    Pregnant women Influence of pharmacokinetics on the association between prenatal PCB-153 exposure and reduced birthweight PCB-153 Monte Carlo simulations run on model and simulated data used in linear regression analyses to estimate association between PCB-153 and birthweight n = 2 Maternal lipids Fetal lipids Model validated with observed data in 10 pregnant women Association was confounded by effects of gestational weight gain [52]
    Lactation
    Italian women To estimate exposure scenarios PCB-138 PCB-153 PCB-180 PBPK Model: Food was only source of exposure considered n = 22 Model adequately predicted observed results for PCB-153 and PCB-180, but not for PCB-138 [53]
    Mother-infant birth cohort from Slovakia To use longitudinal measurements in development of exposure metrics PCB-153 System type model n = 1 Fat PCB body burden was associated with duration of breast feeding in most children [54]
    Women (25-year old) Population-scale lactational model PCB-153 PBPK Model: Derived from a model in pregnant and lactating mice Reverse dosimetry to estimate PCB intake in Canadian Inuit n = 5 Liver Fat Mammary tissue Blood Rest of body Flow-limited Model predicted human biomonitoring data of milk content from all over the world Estimated intake in Canadian Inuit
    0.294 µg/hr/kg—this intake generated milk levels similar to those reported
    [55]
    Infants and Children
    Spanish children To investigate if lactational exposure is associated with effects on mental and psychomotor development; To compare with prenatal exposure PCB-153 PBPK Model: To simulate prenatal and postnatal PCB-153 exposure Association between simulated PCB-153 concentrations and mental/psychomotor scores estimated with linear regression model Same as Verner 2009 [58] No association found between postnatal exposure and mental or psychomotor scores Prenatal exposure was associated with worse mental and psychomotor score [56]
    Inuit infants from Arctic Quebec To simulate PCB levels during specific pre- and postnatal periods and assess association with infant behaviour PCB-153 PBPK Model: To simulate prenatal and postnatal PCB-153 exposure Association between simulated PCB-153 concentrations and behavioural measures estimated with linear regression model Same as Verner 2009 [58] Pre- and postnatal exposures associated with inattention and increased activity at 11 months of age—inattention related to prenatal exposure and activity with postnatal exposure Strongest association during 4th month of life [57]
    Mothers and infants—validation with data from Nunavik population Development of a generic PBPK for POPs to estimate infant exposure through placental transfer and breast feeding PCB-138 PCB-153 PCB-180 PBPK Model: Absorption assumed to be 100% and direct input to liver Mother: n = 9 Liver Brain Fat Richly-perfused Poorly-perfused Mammary tissue Uterus Placenta Fetus Infant: n = 5 Liver Fat Richly-perfused Poorly-perfused Brain Model predicted observed concentrations in mothers and infants from a Northern Quebec Inuit population [58]
    Women with Breast Cancer
    French women To estimate lifetime pharmacokinetic profile of PCB-153 and compare with levels measured at the time of breast cancer diagnosis PCB-153 PBPK Model: Exposure via oral intake, assuming complete bioavailability from GI tract and direct input to liver Area under lipid-adjusted blood concentration vs. time curve for each decade (proxy for total internal exposure) compared with measured concentrations Same as Verner 2008 [60] Single point PCB levels measured at time of diagnosis do not fully represent early-life exposures [59]
    Women in general To estimate lifetime POP blood/tissue exposure during any time window of susceptibility for breast cancer (from 0-55 years of age) PCB-153 PCB-180 PBPK Model: Exposure via oral intake, assuming complete bioavailability from GI tract and direct input to liver To simulate exposures throughout life, compartment size, blood flow, and biochemical properties change as a function of age, body weight, body height, and pregnancy periods n = 9 Fetus Placenta Uterine tissue Brain Fat Richly-perfused Slowly-perfused Liver Mammary tissue—all perfused by blood circulation Lactation periods and weight profile had greatest impact on lifetime pharmacokinetic profile [60]
    Inuit
    Greenlandic Inuit To estimate fate of POPs in liver, blood, muscle, fat tissue PCB-99 PCB-153 PBPK Model: General model for POPs Based on model by Cahill (2003) PCB-99 estimated mean: Blood—0.03 ng/g Fat—5.3 ng/g Liver—0.3 ng/g Muscle—0.2 ng/g PCB-153 estimated mean: Blood—1.4 ng/g Fat—313 ng/g Liver—18 ng/g Muscle—13 ng/g [61]
    Inuit To estimate human lifetime health risks using pharmacokinetic modeling PCB-153 Pharmacokinetic Model: PCB-153 concentration in total body lipid modelled as a function of age and calendar time Three life stages—prenatal exposure, postnatal exposure, lifetime exposure Non-cancer (HQ) and cancer risks estimated n = 1 Fat HQ > 1 between 1955-1987 for 90th population percentile and during 1956-1984 for 50th population percentile Cancer risk ranged from
    4.6 × 10− 5 to 1.8 × 10− 6 for 90th percentile and
    3.6 × 10− 5 to 1.4 × 10− 10 for 50th percentile with upper bound slope factor
    [62]
    Inuit
    (Arctic Quebec)
    To estimate daily intake dose based on milk fat content and compare with reference intake PCB-153 Non-ortho PCBs (PCB-77, 126, 169) Modeling and comparison with reference intake Based on model by Carrier (1991)c n = 2 Liver Fat Estimated daily intake: PCB-153: 0.04 µg/kg/d PCDD/PCDF/NOC PCB: 7 × 10− 6 µg/kg/d Calculated PCB-153 exceeds acceptable daily intake [63]
    Workers
    Contaminated building To develop pharmacokinetic model for degradation in adult humans based on data from workers in a contaminated building PCB-28 PCB-52 Model—first order elimination kinetics:
    yt = yo (1 − e− kt)
    N/A Estimated half-lives: PCB-28: 2.18 (95% CI: 1.91-2.54) y PCB-52:
    3.95 (95% CI: 3.55-4.45) y
    [64]
    General Populations
    General To estimate chemical half-lives PCB-199 Whole body primary biotransformation half-life (HLB) estimated from whole body total elimination half-life (HLT) using a one-compartment model n = 1 Half-life of 83 000 days calculated Low rates of predicted passive chemical elimination (HLB approximates HLT) [65]
    General To develop a generic model that estimates bioaccumulative potential of a chemical (hBCF) PCB-77 PCB-80 PCB-136 PCB-153 PCB-155 PBPK Model: Assumed 100% intestinal absorption n = 4 Absorption compartment Portal vein Systemic compartment Liver Model was validated for several chemicals by comparing model simulations with literature human data and PBPK model results [66]
    General To estimate intrinsic human elimination half-lives of PCBs (i.e. correcting for body weight and ongoing exposure) using population data PCB-28 PCB-52 PCB-105 PCB-118 PCB-138 PCB-153 PCB-170 PCB-180 PCB-187 PBPK Model: Described changes in body concentrations as function of age and calendar time (incorporated age-dependent growth of body and lipid mass, age- and body-weight dependent dietary intake) Derived from Ritter 2009 [75] n = 1 Intrinsic half-lives derived e.g. PCB-153: 14.4 y PCB-170: 15.5 y PCB-180: 11.5 y Distinction is needed between apparent and intrinsic half-lives [67]
    General To model POPs burden and clearance throughout a lifetime, taking into account changes in age, body composition, and environmental concentrations PCB-101 Simple model with an age-dependent function allowing for growth in body fat and subsequent compound dilution with age n = 1 Fat Model reconstructed lifetime exposure in UK population born between 1920 and 1980 [68]
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The modeling studies conducted for Inuit estimated PCB-153 intake through breast milk using reverse dosimetry [55], simulation of PCB-153 prenatal and postnatal exposures [57], infant exposure to PCB-138, 153, and 180 through placental transfer and breast feeding [58], fate of PCB-99 and PCB-153 in blood and other tissues using a generic PBPK model [61], estimation of PCB-153 cancer risk based on prenatal, postnatal, and lifetime exposures [62], and estimation of daily intake doses of PCB-77, PCB-126, PCB-153, and PCB-169 with comparison to a reference value [63].

    7. Addressing challenges for the development of biomonitoring equivalents

    The development of biomonitoring equivalents using pharmacokinetic modeling is complex for PCBs because of the presence of multiple congeners with different pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties. In addition, there are multiple pathways of exposure (e.g. ingestion, inhalation, dermal absorption, placental and lactational transfer), species differences in kinetics, and adverse endpoints which must be taken into consideration when modeling PCB pharmacokinetics.

    The following is a list of procedural steps that needed to be followed to develop useful biomonitoring equivalents based on existing information:

    1. Deciding which congeners to model: A list of PCB congeners that are abundant in biota and/or have high potential for toxicity, are shown in Box 1. These congeners fall under five homologue groups (i.e. tri-, tetra-, penta-, hexa-, and hepta-). Prioritization should be given to developing biomonitoring equivalents for these congeners as they are most relevant for risk assessments.

    Box 1. Abundant and/or toxic PCB congeners.
    PCB-28 (2, 4, 4I trichlorobiphenyl) PCB-105 (2, 3, 3I, 4, 4I pentachlorobiphenyl) PCB-156 (2, 3, 3I, 4, 4I, 5 hexachlorobiphenyl)
    PCB-52 (2, 2I, 5, 5I tetrachlorobiphenyl) PCB-118 (2, 3I, 4, 4I, 5 pentachlorobiphenyl) PCB-163 (2, 3, 3I, 4I, 5, 6 hexachlorobiphenyl)
    PCB-74 (2, 4, 4I, 5 tetrachlorobiphenyl) PCB-125 (2I, 3, 4, 5, 6I pentachlorobiphenyl) PCB-168 (2, 3I, 4, 4I, 5I, 6 hexachlorobiphenyl)
    PCB-77 (3, 3I, 4, 4I tetrachlorobiphenyl) PCB-126 (3, 3I, 4, 4I, 5 pentachlorobiphenyl) PCB-169 (3, 3I, 4, 4I, 5, 5I hexachlorobiphenyl)
    PCB-100 (2, 2I, 4, 4I, 6 pentachlorobiphenyl) PCB-128 (2, 2I, 3, 3I, 4, 4I hexachlorobiphenyl) PCB-170 (2, 2I, 3, 3I, 4, 4I, 5 heptachlorobiphenyl)
    PCB-101 (2, 2I, 4, 5, 5I pentachlorobiphenyl) PCB-138 (2, 2I, 3, 4, 4I, 5I hexachlorobiphenyl) PCB-180 (2, 2I, 3, 4, 4I, 5, 5I heptachlorobophenyl)
    PCB-104 (2, 2I, 4, 6, 6I pentachlorobiphenyl) PCB-153 (2, 2I, 4, 4I, 5, 5I hexachlorobiphenyl) PCB-190 (2, 3, 3I, 4, 4I, 5, 6 heptachlorobiphenyl)

    2. Choosing a guidance value: As described in Tables 3 and Table 4, different organizations have formulated various guideline values based mostly on mixtures of PCB congeners rather than individual congeners. Therefore, it will be necessary to make assumptions about the constitution of these mixtures so that biomonitoring equivalents for individual congeners can be derived.

    3. Parameterization of pharmacokinetic models: A full PBPK model requires input of several parameters. Where possible, these parameters should be based on human data to minimize species differences. However, in the absence of such data, animal data or theoretical structural equations, both of which introduce greater degrees of uncertainty in the models, can be used. The ATSDR contains data on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of PCB congeners as described previously [5, 22]. In addition, Parham et al. devised structural regression formula to calculate blood-adipose partition coefficients and metabolic rates for any of the 209 congeners based on structural characteristics [66, 67]. An important component of the modeling process will be to evaluate and transparently declare the confidence in the inputted parameters.

    4. Minimizing complex scenarios: Depending on the research question, initial modeling attempts should focus on the most common routes of exposure. In general populations, ingestion of contaminated foods will be the primary exposure pathway. For lactating women, elimination of PCBs through breast milk should additionally be considered.

    8. Conclusion

    Biomonitoring equivalents for PCBs will be useful from a risk assessment standpoint because they can be used to interpret the biomonitoring data collected from populations around the globe. The percentage within and exceeding guidance values can be calculated for full survey samples, as well as for sensitive sub-populations, such as children, pregnant women, women of childbearing age and the elderly. These comparisons will help to contextualize the results of biomonitoring surveys and provide evidence on which to base public health interventions for the percentage of the population exceeding guidelines. In this paper we have reviewed key information and challenges for deriving biomonitoring equivalents for PCBs. Modelers, environmental epidemiologists, and risk assessors can make use of this information to evaluate worldwide PCB biomonitoring data and develop international guidelines.

    Acknowledgments

    We would like to thank Stella Chen for assisting with literature acquisition, organization, and data retrieval. We also acknowledge support from the Northern Contaminants Program (NCP), Canada Research Chair, and Health Canada.

    Conflict of interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Terminology Sevices. Available from: http://ofmpub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/termreg/home/overview/home.do.
    [2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook Glossary of Terms, 2011. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ncea/efh/report.html.
    [3] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxic Substances Portal. Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs), 2014. Available from: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls/index.asp.
    [4] Health Canada.Health-Based Tolerable Daily Intakes/Concentrations and Tumorigenic Doses/Concentrations for Priority Substances, 1996. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/contaminants/hbct-jact/index-eng.php.
    [5] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2000) Toxicological profile for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
    [6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Approaches for the Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models and Supporting Data in Risk Assessment. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC; EPA/600/R-05/043F, 2006. Available from: National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, and online at http://epa.gov/ncea.
    [7] Hays SM, Becker RA, Leung HW, et al. (2007) Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 47: 96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.08.004
    [8] Hays SM, Aylward LL, LaKind JS, et al. (2008) Guidelines for the derivation of biomonitoring equivalents: report from the biomonitoring equivalents expert workshop. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51: S4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.004
    [9] Krishnan K, Adamou T, Aylward LL, et al. (2011) Biomonitoring equivalents for 2,2',4,4',5-pentabromodiphenylether (PBDE-99). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 60: 165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.011
    [10] Kirman CR, Aylward LL, Hays SM, et al. (2011) Biomonitoring equivalents for DDT/DDE. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 60: 172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.012
    [11] Aylward LL, Barton HA, Hays SM. (2008) Biomonitoring Equivalents (BE) dossier for toluene (CAS No. 108-88-3). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51: S27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.009
    [12] Aylward LL, Hays SM, Gagné M, et al. (2010) Biomonitoring equivalents for hexachlorobenzene. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58: 25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.003
    [13] Aylward LL, Hays SM. (2008) Biomonitoring Equivalents (BE) dossier for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (CAS No. 94-75-7). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51: S37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.006
    [14] Porta M, Zumeta E. (2002) Implementing the Stockholm Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Occup Environ Med 59: 651-653. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.10.651
    [15] Breivik K, Alcock R, Li YF, et al. (2004) Primary sources of selected POPs: regional and global scale emission inventories. Environ Pollut 128: 3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.08.031
    [16] Breivik K, Sweetman A, Pacyna JM, et al. (2002) Towards a global historical emission inventory for selected PCB congeners—a mass balance approach 1. Global production and consumption. Sci Total Environ 290: 181-198.
    [17] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2003) Non-dioxin-like PCBs: Effects and consideration in ecological risk assessment. Experimental Toxicology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development (NCEA-C-1340. ERASC-003. June).
    [18] IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC Monographs volumes 1 to 42. Supplement 7, 1987. Available from: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/suppl7/index.php.
    [19] Van Oostdam J, Donaldson SG, Feeley M, et al. (2005) Human health implications of environmental contaminants in Arctic Canada: a review. Sci Total Environ  351-352: 165-246.
    [20] Laird BD, Goncharov AB, Chan HM. (2013) Body burden of metals and persistent organic pollutants among Inuit in the Canadian Arctic. Environ Int 59: 33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.05.010
    [21] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2011) Addendum to the Toxicological profile for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
    [22] Health Canada. Report on Human Biomonitoring of Environmental Chemicals in Canada, 2010. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/contaminants/chms-ecms/section8-eng.php#n8_3.
    [23] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Aroclor 1016 (CASRN 12674-11-2), 1993. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0462.htm.
    [24] Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Meeting (67th : 2006 : Rome, Italy) Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants : sixty-seventh report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, 2007. Available from: http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/jecfa/reports/trs940.pdf.
    [25] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 86-111, 1986. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/86-111/.
    [26] French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES). What are the critical blood concentration levels for PCBs?, 2013. Available from: https://www.anses.fr/en/content/what-are-critical-blood-concentration-levels-pcbs.
    [27] Health Canada. Part II: Health Canada Toxicological Reference Values (TRVs) and Chemical-Specific Factors, Version 2.0, 2010.
    [28] European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the Commission related to the presence of non dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in feed and food, 2005. Available from: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/284.htm.
    [29] French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES). Opinion of the French Food Safety Agency on the establishment of relevant maximum levels for non dioxin-like polychlorobiphenyls (NDL-PCB) in some foodstuffs, 2007. Available from: https://www.anses.fr/sites/default/files/documents/RCCP2006sa0305EN.pdf.
    [30] Weijs L, Roach AC, Yang RSH, et al. (2014) Lifetime PCB 153 bioaccumulation and pharmacokinetics in pilot whales: Bayesian population PBPK modeling and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. Chemosphere 94: 91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.019
    [31] Weijs L, Covaci A, Yang RSH, et al. (2011) A non-invasive approach to study lifetime exposure and bioaccumulation of PCBs in protected marine mammals: PBPK modeling in harbor porpoises. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 256: 136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.07.020
    [32] Weijs L, Yang RSH, Covaci A, et al. (2010) Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for lifetime exposure to PCB 153 in male and female harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena): model development and evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 44: 7023-7030. doi: 10.1021/es101688h
    [33] Czub G, McLachlan MS. (2007) Influence of the temperature gradient in blubber on the bioaccumulation of persistent lipophilic organic chemicals in seals. Environ Toxicol Chem 26: 1600-1605. doi: 10.1897/06-548R.1
    [34] Klanjscek T, Nisbet RM, Caswell H, et al. (2007) A model for energetics and bioaccumulation in marine mammals with applications to the right whale. Ecol Appl 17: 2233-2250. doi: 10.1890/06-0426.1
    [35] Hickie B, Mackay D, De Koning J. (1999) Lifetime pharmacokinetic model for hydrophobic contaminants in marine mammals. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 2622-2633. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620181132
    [36] Drouillard KG, Norstrom RJ, Fox GA, et al. (2003) Development and validation of a herring gull embryo toxicokinetic model for PCBs. Ecotoxicology 12: 55-68. doi: 10.1023/A:1022588913171
    [37] Drouillard KG, Fernie KJ, Smits JE, et al. (2001) Bioaccumulation and toxicokinetics of 42 polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in American kestrels (Falco sparverius). Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 2514-2522. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620201117
    [38] Sonne C, Gustavson K, Rigét FF, et al. (2009) Reproductive performance in East Greenland polar bears (Ursus maritimus) may be affected by organohalogen contaminants as shown by physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling. Chemosphere 77: 1558-1568. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.09.044
    [39] Lohitnavy M, Lu Y, Lohitnavy O, et al. (2008) A possible role of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2) in hepatic excretion of PCB126, an environmental contaminant: PBPK/PD modeling. Toxicol Sci 104: 27-39. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn026
    [40] Lee SK, Ou YC, Andersen ME, et al. (2007) A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for lactational transfer of PCB 153 with or without PCB 126 in mice. Arch Toxicol 81: 101-111. doi: 10.1007/s00204-006-0130-0
    [41] Emond C, Charbonneau M, Krishnan K. (2005) Physiologically based modeling of the accumulation in plasma and tissue lipids of a mixture of PCB congeners in female Sprague-Dawley rats. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 68: 1393-1412. doi: 10.1080/15287390590956551
    [42] Lee SK, Ou YC, Yang RSH. (2002) Comparison of pharmacokinetic interactions and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of PCB 153 and PCB 126 in nonpregnant mice, lactating mice, and suckling pups. Toxicol Sci 65: 26-34. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/65.1.26
    [43] Tuey D, Matthews B. (1977) Pharmacokinetics of 3,3',5,5'-tetrachlorobiphenyl in the male rat. Drug Metab Dispos 5: 444-450.
    [44] Lutz R, Dedrick R, Matthews H, et al. (1977) A preliminary pharmacokinetic model for several chlorinated biphenyls in the rat. Drug Metab Dispos 5: 386-396.
    [45] Nichols JW, Fitzsimmons PN, Whiteman FW, et al. (2004) A physiologically based toxicokinetic model for dietary uptake of hydrophobic organic compounds by fish I. Feeding studies with 2,2',5,5'-tetrachlorobiphenyl. Toxicol Sci 77: 206-218.
    [46] Karara A, Mcfarland V. (1992) A pharmacokinetic analysis of the uptake of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by golden shiners. Environ Toxicol Chem 11: 315-320. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620110305
    [47] Kulkarni MG, Karara AH. (1990) A pharmacokinetic model for the disposition of polychlorinated biphenyls ( PCBs ) in channel catfish. Aquat Toxicol 16: 141-150. doi: 10.1016/0166-445X(90)90083-2
    [48] Pizza JC, Connor JMO. (1983) PCB dynamics in Hudson River striped bass II. Accumulation from dietary sources. Aquat Toxicol 3: 313-327.
    [49] Borchard RE, Hansen LG, Huber WG, et al. (1974) Pharmacokinetics of Aroclor 1254 components after intravenous administration to swine and sheep. Arch Environ Contam 2: 179-192. doi: 10.1007/BF01975471
    [50] Van Eijkeren JCH, Zeilmaker MJ, Kan CA, et al. (2006) A toxicokinetic model for the carry-over of dioxins and PCBs from feed and soil to eggs. Food Addit Contam 23: 509-517. doi: 10.1080/02652030500512045
    [51] Yu KN, Lam PKS, Cheung CCC, et al. (2002) Mathematical modeling of PCB bioaccumulation in Perna viridis. Mar Pollut Bull 45: 332-338. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00099-1
    [52] Verner M, Mcdougall R, Glynn A, et al. (2013) Is the relationship between prenatal exposure to PCB-153 and decreased birth weight attributable to pharmacokinetics? Environ Health Perspect 121: 1219-1225.
    [53] Ulaszewska MM, Ciffroy P, Tahraoui F, et al. (2012) Interpreting PCB levels in breast milk using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to reconstruct the dynamic exposure of Italian women. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 22: 601-609. doi: 10.1038/jes.2012.36
    [54] Trnovec T, Dedík L, Jusko TA, et al. (2011) Assessment of exposure to PCB 153 from breast feeding and normal food intake in individual children using a system approach model. Chemosphere 85: 1687-1693. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.09.013
    [55] Redding LE, Sohn MD, McKone TE, et al. (2008) Population physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for the human lactational transfer of PCB-153 with consideration of worldwide human biomonitoring results. Environ Health Perspect 116: 1629-1634. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11519
    [56] Gascon M, Verner MA, Guxens M, et al. (2013) Evaluating the neurotoxic effects of lactational exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in Spanish children. Neurotoxicology 34: 9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.10.006
    [57] Verner MA, Plusquellec P, Muckle G, et al. (2010) Alteration of infant attention and activity by polychlorinated biphenyls: unravelling critical windows of susceptibility using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Neurotoxicology 31: 424-431. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.05.011
    [58] Verner MA, Ayotte P, Muckle G, et al. (2009) A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for the assessment of infant exposure to persistent organic pollutants in epidemiologic studies. Environ Health Perspect 117: 481-487. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800047
    [59] Verner MA, Bachelet D, McDougall R, et al. (2011) A case study addressing the reliability of polychlorinated biphenyl levels measured at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in representing early-life exposure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20: 281-286. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0992
    [60] Verner MA, Charbonneau M, López-Carrillo L, et al. (2008) Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of persistent organic pollutants for lifetime exposure assessment: a new tool in breast cancer epidemiologic studies. Environ Health Perspect 116: 886-892. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10917
    [61] Sonne C, Gustavson K, Rigét FF, et al. (2014) Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of POPs in Greenlanders. Environ Int 64: 91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.12.006
    [62] Abass K, Huusko A, Nieminen P, et al. (2013) Estimation of health risk by using toxicokinetic modelling: a case study of polychlorinated biphenyl PCB153. J Hazard Mater 261: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.011
    [63] Ayotte P, Dewailly E, Bruneau S, et al. (1995) Arctic air pollution and human health: what effects should be expected? Sci Total Environ 160-161: 529-537. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04387-G
    [64] Broding HC, Schettgen T, Göen T, et al. (2007) Development and verification of a toxicokinetic model of polychlorinated biphenyl elimination in persons working in a contaminated building. Chemosphere 68: 1427-1434. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.014
    [65] Arnot JA, Brown TN, Wania F. (2014) Estimating screening-level organic chemical half-lives in humans. Environ Sci Technol 48: 723-730. doi: 10.1021/es4029414
    [66] Tonnelier A, Coecke S, Zaldívar JM. (2012) Screening of chemicals for human bioaccumulative potential with a physiologically based toxicokinetic model. Arch Toxicol 86: 393-403. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0768-0
    [67] Ritter R, Scheringer M, MacLeod M, et al. (2011) Intrinsic human elimination half-lives of polychlorinated biphenyls derived from the temporal evolution of cross-sectional biomonitoring data from the United Kingdom. Environ Health Perspect 119: 225-231.
    [68] Alcock RE, Sweetman AJ, Juan CY, et al. (2000) A generic model of human lifetime exposure to persistent organic contaminants: development and application to PCB-101. Environ Pollut 110: 253-265. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00298-5
    [69] Aylward LL, Green E, Porta M, et al. (2014) Population variation in biomonitoring data for persistent organic pollutants (POPs): an examination of multiple population-based datasets for application to Australian pooled biomonitoring data. Environ Int 68: 127-138. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.026
    [70] Becker K, Kaus S, Krause C, et al. (2002) German Environmental Survey 1998 (GerES III): Environmental pollutants in blood of the German population. Int J Hyg Environ Health 205: 297-308. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00155
    [71] Porta M, Gasull M, Puigdomènech E, et al. (2010) Distribution of blood concentrations of persistent organic pollutants in a representative sample of the population of Catalonia. Environ Int 36: 655-664. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.04.013
    [72] Koppen G, Den Hond E, Nelen V, et al. (2009) Organochlorine and heavy metals in newborns: Results from the Flemish Environment and Health Survey (FLEHS 2002-2006). Environ Int 35: 1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.05.002
    [73] Schoeters G, Den Hond E, Colles A, et al. (2012) Concept of the Flemish human biomonitoring programme. Int J Hyg Environ Health 215: 102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.11.006
    [74] Schade G, Heinzow BU. (1998) Organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in human milk of mothers living in northern Germany: Current extent of contamination , time trend from 1986 to 1997 and factors that influence the levels of contamination. Sci Total Environ 215: 31-39. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00008-4
    [75] Ritter R, Scheringer M, MacLeod M, et al. (2009) A multi-individual pharmacokinetic model framework for interpreting time trends of persistent chemicals in human populations: application to a postban situation. Environ Health Perspect 117: 1280-1286. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900648
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Boris Santiago Avila, Carolina Ramírez, Eliana Tellez-Ávila, Human Biomonitoring of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in the Breast Milk of Colombian Mothers, 2022, 109, 0007-4861, 526, 10.1007/s00128-022-03577-5
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(14736) PDF downloads(1023) Cited by(1)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog