Search Advanced

Communications in Analysis and Mechanics

2026, Volume 18, Issue 3: 669-709. doi: 10.3934/cam.2026028
Previous Article Next Article
Research article

Studies on the Rao–Nakra sandwich beam: well-posedness, dynamics, and controllability

  • 1.
    Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Campus Gragoatá, 24210-201, Niterói (RJ), Brazil
  • 2.
    Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, S/N Cidade Universitária, 50740-545, Recife (PE), Brazil
  • 3.
    Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060, Shadadiya, Kuwait
  • 4.
    Escola de Matemática Aplicada, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Praia de Botafogo 190, 22250-900, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil
  • Published: 19 August 2026

  • 35Q74, 35B40, 35Q93, 3C20

  • In this work, we investigate two distinct control-theoretic problems associated with a linear Rao–Nakra-type sandwich beam. The first problem concerns stabilization under time-varying distributed damping and delayed boundary feedback, while the second addresses boundary controllability under dynamical boundary interactions. Both systems consist of three coupled equations that represent the longitudinal displacements of the outer layers and the transverse displacement of the composite beam, all of which are coupled with boundary conditions. In the first problem, time-varying interior damping and static boundary conditions with time-dependent delays are considered. Then, we establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the Cauchy problem associated with the damped system using semigroup theory and a classical result by Kato. Furthermore, employing a Lyapunov-based approach, we prove that the system's energy decays exponentially, despite the presence of time-varying weights and delays. In the second problem, we consider a boundary linear control system with dynamical boundary conditions, and prove its well-posedness. By deriving an observability inequality for the adjoint system and applying the Hilbert Uniqueness Method (HUM), we show that the system is null controllable. A key contribution of this work lies in handling the full three-equation coupled system, which involves a challenging difficulty due to the delayed or dynamical boundary conditions, resolved via appropriately constructed Lyapunov functionals and intermediate observability inequalities.

    Citation: George J. Bautista, Roberto de A. Capistrano–Filho, Boumediene Chentouf, Oscar Sierra Fonseca, Juan Límaco. Studies on the Rao–Nakra sandwich beam: well-posedness, dynamics, and controllability[J]. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2026, 18(3): 669-709. doi: 10.3934/cam.2026028

    Related Papers:

  • In this work, we investigate two distinct control-theoretic problems associated with a linear Rao–Nakra-type sandwich beam. The first problem concerns stabilization under time-varying distributed damping and delayed boundary feedback, while the second addresses boundary controllability under dynamical boundary interactions. Both systems consist of three coupled equations that represent the longitudinal displacements of the outer layers and the transverse displacement of the composite beam, all of which are coupled with boundary conditions. In the first problem, time-varying interior damping and static boundary conditions with time-dependent delays are considered. Then, we establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the Cauchy problem associated with the damped system using semigroup theory and a classical result by Kato. Furthermore, employing a Lyapunov-based approach, we prove that the system's energy decays exponentially, despite the presence of time-varying weights and delays. In the second problem, we consider a boundary linear control system with dynamical boundary conditions, and prove its well-posedness. By deriving an observability inequality for the adjoint system and applying the Hilbert Uniqueness Method (HUM), we show that the system is null controllable. A key contribution of this work lies in handling the full three-equation coupled system, which involves a challenging difficulty due to the delayed or dynamical boundary conditions, resolved via appropriately constructed Lyapunov functionals and intermediate observability inequalities.



    加载中


    [1] Y. V. K. S. Rao, B. C. Nakra, Vibrations of unsymmetrical sandwich beams and plates with viscoelastic cores, J. Sound Vib., 34 (1974), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(74)80315-9 doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(74)80315-9
    [2] S. W. Hansen, R. Rajaram, Riesz basis property and related results for a Rao–Nakra sandwich beam, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Suppl., 2005 (2005), 365–375. Available from: https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/shansen/files/inline-files/HansenS.pdf.
    [3] R. Rajaram, Exact boundary controllability result for a Rao–Nakra sandwich beam, Systems Control Lett., 56 (2007), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2007.03.007 doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2007.03.007
    [4] A. Ö. Özkan, S. W. Hansen, Uniform stabilization of a multilayer Rao–Nakra sandwich beam, Evol. Equ. Control Theory, 2 (2013), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.3934/eect.2013.2.695 doi: 10.3934/eect.2013.2.695
    [5] A. Ö. Özkan, S. W. Hansen, Exact boundary controllability results for a multilayer Rao–Nakra sandwich beam, SIAM J. Control Optim., 52 (2014), 1314–1337. https://doi.org/10.1137/120892994 doi: 10.1137/120892994
    [6] A. Ö. Özkan, Modeling and controlling an active constrained layer beam actuated by two voltage sources with/without magnetic effects, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62 (2017), 6445–6450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2017.2653361 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2017.2653361
    [7] A. Ö. Özkan, Dynamic and electrostatic modeling for a piezoelectric smart composite and related stabilization results, Evol. Equ. Control Theory, 7 (2018), 639–668. https://doi.org/10.3934/eect.2018031 doi: 10.3934/eect.2018031
    [8] Z. Liu, B. Rao, Q. Zhang, Polynomial stability of the Rao–Nakra beam with a single internal viscous damping, J. Differential Equations, 269 (2020), 6125–6162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2020.04.030 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2020.04.030
    [9] Y. Wang, Boundary feedback stabilization of a Rao–Nakra sandwich beam, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1324 (2019), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1324/1/012044 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1324/1/012044
    [10] V. R. Cabanillas, C. A. Raposo, L. Potenciano-Machado, Stability of solutions for a Rao–Nakra sandwich beam model with Kelvin–Voigt damping and time delay, Theor. Appl. Mech., 49 (2022), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.2298/TAM210502006C doi: 10.2298/TAM210502006C
    [11] C. A. Raposo, Rao–Nakra model with internal damping and time delay, Math. Morav., 25 (2021), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.5937/MatMor2102053R doi: 10.5937/MatMor2102053R
    [12] C. A. Raposo, O. P. Vera Villagrán, J. Ferreira, E. Picskin, Rao–Nakra sandwich beam with second sound, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math., 4 (2021), 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100053 doi: 10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100053
    [13] M. Aouadi, Regularity and upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for non-autonomous Rao–Nakra beam, Nonlinearity, 35 (2022), 1773–1809. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ac5098 doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/ac5098
    [14] K. Ammari, V. Komornik, M. Sepúlveda-Cortés, O. Vera-Villagrán, Stability of the Rao–Nakra sandwich beam with a dissipation of fractional derivative type: Theoretical and numerical study, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 48 (2025), 6678–6690. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.10707 doi: 10.1002/mma.10707
    [15] M. Akil, Z. Liu, Stabilization of the generalized Rao–Nakra beam by partial viscous damping, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 1479–1510. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8591 doi: 10.1002/mma.8591
    [16] A. M. Al-Mahdi, M. Noor, M. M. Al-Gharabli, B. Feng, A. Soufyane, Stability analysis for a Rao–Nakra sandwich beam equation with time-varying weights and frictional dampings, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 12570–12587. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024615 doi: 10.3934/math.2024615
    [17] B. Feng, A. Ö. Özkan, Long-time behavior of a nonlinearly damped three-layer Rao–Nakra sandwich beam, Appl. Math. Optim., 87 (2023), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-022-09931-7 doi: 10.1007/s00245-022-09931-7
    [18] S. E. Mukiawa, C. D. Enyi, J. D. Audu, Well-posedness and stability result for a thermoelastic Rao–Nakra beam model, J. Thermal Stresses, 45 (2022), 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495739.2022.2074931 doi: 10.1080/01495739.2022.2074931
    [19] S. E. Mukiawa, Well-posedness and stabilization of a three-layer beam system with Gurtin–Pipkin thermal law, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 28188–28209. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231443 doi: 10.3934/math.20231443
    [20] T. Quispe Méndez, V. Cabanillas Zannini, B. Feng, Asymptotic behavior of the Rao–Nakra sandwich beam model with Kelvin–Voigt damping, Math. Mech. Solids, 29 (2024), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/10812865231180535 doi: 10.1177/10812865231180535
    [21] B. Feng, C. A. Raposo, C. A. Nonato, A. Soufyane, Analysis of exponential stabilization for a Rao–Nakra sandwich beam with time-varying weight and time-varying delay: Multiplier method versus observability, Math. Control Relat. Fields, 13 (2023), 631–663. https://doi.org/10.3934/mcrf.2022011 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2022011
    [22] Z. M. Ali, A. Wehbe, A. Guesmia, Energy decay rate of the generalized Rao–Nakra beam with singular local Kelvin–Voigt damping, Evol. Equ. Control Theory, 13 (2024), 1548–1583. https://doi.org/10.3934/eect.2024039 doi: 10.3934/eect.2024039
    [23] A. Guesmia, On the stability of a linear Cauchy Rao–Nakra sandwich beam under frictional dampings, Taiwanese J. Math., 27 (2023), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.11650/tjm/230502 doi: 10.11650/tjm/230502
    [24] M. M. Al-Gharabli, S. Al-Omari, A. M. Al-Mahdi, Stabilization of a Rao–Nakra sandwich beam system by Coleman–Gurtin thermal law and nonlinear damping of variable-exponent type, J. Math., 2024 (2024), 1615178. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1615178 doi: 10.1155/2024/1615178
    [25] A. Guesmia, Study of the well-posedness and decay rates for Rao–Nakra sandwich beam models subject to a single internal infinite memory and Dirichlet–Neumann boundary conditions, Comput. Appl. Math., 44 (2025), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-024-03033-6 doi: 10.1007/s40314-024-03033-6
    [26] R. G. C. Almeida, M. Sebastião, M. S. Cordeiro, W. R. Oliveira, M. L. Santos, C. A. Raposo, Asymptotic behavior of the Rao–Nakra beam model with localized damping, Contrib. Math., 11 (2025), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.47443/cm.2025.044 doi: 10.47443/cm.2025.044
    [27] M. M. Cavalcanti, B. Feng, V. H. G. Martinez, S. Mansouri, Asymptotic behavior of Rao–Nakra sandwich beam with nonlinear localized damping and source terms, Appl. Math. Optim., 91 (2025), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-024-10218-2 doi: 10.1007/s00245-024-10218-2
    [28] M. M. Freitas, M. L. Santos, C. A. Raposo, A. A. Ramos, J. Ferreira, Blow-up solutions for damped Rao–Nakra beams with source terms, Electron. J. Differential Equations, 39 (2025), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.58997/ejde.2025.39 doi: 10.58997/ejde.2025.39
    [29] T. Kato, Linear evolution equations of "hyperbolic" type, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. I, 17 (1970), 241–258. Available from: https://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/Kato_1970.pdf.
    [30] S. Dolecki, D. L. Russell, A general theory of observation and control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 15 (1977), 185–220. https://doi.org/10.1137/0315015 doi: 10.1137/0315015
    [31] J. L. Lions, Contrôlabilité exacte, perturbations et stabilisation de systèmes distribués: Contrôlabilité exacte, Masson, Paris, 1988.
    [32] J. L. Lions, Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbations for distributed systems, SIAM Rev., 30 (1988), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1137/1030001 doi: 10.1137/1030001
    [33] G. Q. Xu, S. P. Yung, L. K. Li, Stabilization of wave systems with input delay in the boundary control, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 12 (2006), 770–785. https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2006021 doi: 10.1051/cocv:2006021
    [34] S. Nicaise, C. Pignotti, Stability and instability results of the wave equation with a delay term in the boundary or internal feedbacks, SIAM J. Control Optim., 45 (2006), 1561–1585. https://doi.org/10.1137/060648891 doi: 10.1137/060648891
    [35] S. Nicaise, J. Valein, E. Fridman, Stability of the heat and wave equations with boundary time-varying delays, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 2 (2009), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.559 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.559
    [36] R. A. Capistrano–Filho, B. Chentouf, V. H. Gonzalez Martinez, J. R. Muñoz, On the boundary stabilization of the KdV–KdV system with time-dependent delay, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 79 (2024), 104122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2024.104122 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2024.104122
    [37] G. J. Bautista, R. A. Capistrano–Filho, B. Chentouf, O. Sierra Fonseca, Well-posedness and long-time dynamics of a water-waves model with time-varying boundary delay, Asymptot. Anal., 47 (2025), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/09217134251344395 doi: 10.1177/09217134251344395
    [38] A. Pazy, Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations, Springer, New York, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5561-1
    [39] V. R. Cabanillas, T. Quispe, J. Sánchez, Optimal polynomial stability for laminated beams with Kelvin–Voigt damping, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 9578–9601. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8324 doi: 10.1002/mma.8324
    [40] R. A. Capistrano–Filho, F. A. Gallego, A. F. Pazoto, On the well-posedness and large-time behavior of a higher-order Boussinesq system, Nonlinearity, 32 (2019), 1852–1881. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/aafe34 doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/aafe34
    [41] G. J. Bautista, A. F. Pazoto, On the controllability of a Boussinesq system for two-way propagation of dispersive waves, J. Evol. Equ., 20 (2020), 607–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00028-019-00541-5 doi: 10.1007/s00028-019-00541-5
    [42] S. Micu, On the controllability of the linearized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation, SIAM J. Control Optim., 39 (2001), 1677–1696. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012999362499 doi: 10.1137/S0363012999362499
    [43] L. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker's guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces, Bull. Sci. Math., 136 (2012), 521–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulsci.2011.12.004 doi: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2011.12.004
    [44] J. L. Lions, E. Magenes, Problèmes aux limites non homogènes et applications, Vol. 1, Dunod, Paris, 1968.
    [45] E. Zuazua, Exponential decay for the semilinear wave equation with locally distributed damping, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 15 (1990), 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605309908820684 doi: 10.1080/03605309908820684
    [46] J. Simon, Compact sets in the space $L^p(0, T;B)$, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 146 (1987), 65–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01762360 doi: 10.1007/BF01762360
    [47] L. Hörmander, Existence and approximation of solutions of differential equations. In: Linear Partial Differential Operators, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 116 (1969), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30722-9_3
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Communications in Analysis and Mechanics
1.9 2.8

Metrics

Article views(211) PDF downloads(31) Cited by(0)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog