
New digital technologies, like in other fields, have revolutionized the health care field and orthodontic practice in the 21st century. They can assist the health care professionals in working more efficiently by saving time and improving patient care. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and 3D printing technology are useful for improving diagnosis and treatment planning, creating algorithms and manufacturing customized orthodontic appliances. AI accomplishes the task of human beings with the help of machines and technology. In orthodontics, AI-based models have been used for diagnosis, treatment planning, clinical decision-making and prognosis prediction. It minimizes the required workforce and speeds up the diagnosis and treatment procedure. In addition, the 3D printing technology is used to fabricate study models, clear aligner models, surgical guides for inserting mini-implants, clear aligners, lingual appliances, wires components for removable appliances and occlusal splints. This paper is a review of the future and scope of AI and 3D printing technology in orthodontics.
Citation: Mahamad Irfanulla Khan, Laxmikanth SM, Tarika Gopal, Praveen Kumar Neela. Artificial intelligence and 3D printing technology in orthodontics: future and scope[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(3): 182-197. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022016
[1] | Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Adeeba Haider, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Muhammad Shoaib . Intelligent computing knacks for infected media and time delay impacts on dynamical behaviors and control measures of rumor-spreading model. AIMS Biophysics, 2024, 11(1): 1-17. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2024001 |
[2] | James C.L. Chow . Applications of artificial intelligence, mathematical modeling and simulation in medical biophysics. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(1): 121-123. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021009 |
[3] | Praveen Kumar Neela, Prathyusha Dasari, Pavan Kumar Mamillapalli, Mahamad Irfanulla Khan A N, Udayini Monica, Naresh Mangalapu, Shahistha Parveen Dasnadi . Advancement in orthodontic bonding: comparing 1-second and 5-second light emitting diode (LED) curing lights. AIMS Biophysics, 2024, 11(3): 370-377. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2024020 |
[4] | Michael Worcester, Shayan Nejad, Pratyasha Mishra, Quintin Meyers, Melissa Gomez, Thomas Kuhlman . A low-cost stage-top incubation device for live human cell imaging using rapid prototyping methods. AIMS Biophysics, 2025, 12(2): 164-173. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2025010 |
[5] | Dina Falah Noori Al-Sabak, Leila Sadeghi, Gholamreza Dehghan . Predicting the correlation between neurological abnormalities and thyroid dysfunction using artificial neural networks. AIMS Biophysics, 2024, 11(4): 403-426. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2024022 |
[6] | Khadija Maqbool, Hira Mehboob, Abdul Majeed Siddiqui . Impact of viscosity on creeping viscous fluid flow through a permeable slit: a study for the artificial kidneys. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(4): 308-329. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022026 |
[7] | Swarnava Biswas, Debajit Sen, Dinesh Bhatia, Pranjal Phukan, Moumita Mukherjee . Chest X-Ray image and pathological data based artificial intelligence enabled dual diagnostic method for multi-stage classification of COVID-19 patients. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(4): 346-371. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021028 |
[8] | Soumyajit Podder, Abhishek Mallick, Sudipta Das, Kartik Sau, Arijit Roy . Accurate diagnosis of liver diseases through the application of deep convolutional neural network on biopsy images. AIMS Biophysics, 2023, 10(4): 453-481. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2023026 |
[9] | Soumyajit Podder, Somnath Bhattacharjee, Arijit Roy . An efficient method of detection of COVID-19 using Mask R-CNN on chest X-Ray images. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(3): 281-290. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021022 |
[10] | Mary Jane Beilby, Sabah Al Khazaaly . Re-modeling Chara action potential: II. The action potential form under salinity stress. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(2): 298-315. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.2.298 |
New digital technologies, like in other fields, have revolutionized the health care field and orthodontic practice in the 21st century. They can assist the health care professionals in working more efficiently by saving time and improving patient care. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and 3D printing technology are useful for improving diagnosis and treatment planning, creating algorithms and manufacturing customized orthodontic appliances. AI accomplishes the task of human beings with the help of machines and technology. In orthodontics, AI-based models have been used for diagnosis, treatment planning, clinical decision-making and prognosis prediction. It minimizes the required workforce and speeds up the diagnosis and treatment procedure. In addition, the 3D printing technology is used to fabricate study models, clear aligner models, surgical guides for inserting mini-implants, clear aligners, lingual appliances, wires components for removable appliances and occlusal splints. This paper is a review of the future and scope of AI and 3D printing technology in orthodontics.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a general term coined during a Dartmouth summer research project [1]. AI is the study of an equipment/machine that senses its environment and takes measures to increase its chances of reaching its objectives [2],[3]. AI accomplishes the task of human beings with the help of machines and technology [4],[5]. AI is currently being applied in health care, the automobile industry, economics, video games, smartphones, etc. [6].
Orthodontics is a branch of dentistry that focuses on diagnosing malocclusions and other irregularities of the dentofacial region and preventing and correcting them. So, it deals with the parameters applied to biological systems. AI applications such as machine learning, artificial neural networks (ANNs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and deep learning (DL) are used for diagnosis and treatment planning, the prognosis of malocclusion in orthodontics with high accuracy, and to reduce human error [5],[7]. In addition, AI can document and send data to clinicians faster and more efficiently than humans [8].
Three-dimensional (3D) printing, which is also known as additive manufacturing (AM), is a fabrication procedure that empowers the layer-by-layer development of 3D objects from the computer-aided design (CAD) data [9]. The final product is obtained by the union of multiple subunits, instead of via the subtraction of the material. This concept helps lower the consumption of raw materials and provide high-quality products [10],[11]. The advantages of AM include lower time cost, reduced financial costs, less human interaction and the creation of a product with any complex shape [12]. In orthodontics, 3D printing technology is used to fabricate study models, clear aligner models, surgical guides for inserting mini-implants, clear aligners, lingual appliances, wires components for removable appliances and occlusal splints [13].
Digital technology, like as in other fields, has revolutionized the orthodontic practice of the 21st century. With the advances in 3D imaging techniques, 3D printing and AI technology, the orthodontist can improve diagnosis and treatment planning, and create algorithms for the manufacture of customized orthodontic appliances. This article is a review of the scope of AI and 3D printing technology in orthodontics.
AI is a science concerned with the computational understanding of intelligent behavior and creating artifacts that demonstrate it. AI permits accurate patient examination, organization of the clinical data and treatment planning [14],[15]. AI technology works by imitating human intelligence through a machine that can think and act rationally. Many subfields of AI that have been commonly used in different areas, mainly biological and medical diagnostics, including machine learning, ANNs, CNNs and DL. Some of these subfields of AI have been widely used in various sectors, primarily in biological and medical diagnostics [16]. Machine learning combines factual and probabilistic tools, and the machines learn from past models and progress their activities when new information is presented [17]. ANNs are numerical computing models that can re-enact human brain processes and accomplish different tasks like classification, estimation, design acknowledgment, picture coordination, chance forecasting and memory simulation [18],[19].
New digital technologies have revolutionized the orthodontic practice. They can assist the health care professionals with working more efficiently by saving time and in improving patient care. AI-based models have been used in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, clinical decision-making and prognosis prediction. It minimizes the required human resources and speeds up the diagnosis and treatment procedure [20],[21].
Year | Article | Applications | AI technology | Reference |
2010 | Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment | Extraction and non-extraction therapy in orthodontics | Machine learning through a 2-layer neural network | [22] |
2016 | New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning | Extraction and non-extraction therapy in orthodontics | Machine learning through a 2-layer neural network | [23] |
2017 | Moving towards precision orthodontics: an evolving paradigm shift in the planning and delivery of customized orthodontic therapy | Diagnosis and treatment planning | Fuzzy logic software was used for the diagnosis and treatment planning | [24] |
2017 | Use of automated learning techniques for predicting mandibular morphology in skeletal classes I, II, and III | Mandibular morphology | An ANN with unidirectional and basic elements of support vector regression and support vector machines were used | [25] |
2019 | Artificial intelligent model with neural network machine learning for the diagnosis of orthognathic surgery | Orthognathic surgery | Neural network machine learning with various cephalometric software programs | [26] |
2019 | A computer-assisted optimization approach for orthognathic surgery planning | Orthognathic surgery | Neural network machine learning with various cephalometric software programs | [27] |
2019 | Facial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial-intelligence-based scoring and conventional rater groups | Cleft patients and facial attractiveness | An algorithm consisting of a face detector and CNNs with visual cortex/vision processing was used | [28] |
2019 | Deep learning and artificial intelligence for the determination of the cervical vertebra maturation degree from lateral radiography | Growth and development determination using cervical vertebrae | CNN and ANN methods, models and algorithms were used | [29] |
2019 | Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics | Growth and development determination using cervical vertebrae | CNN and ANN with DL methods were implemented | [30] |
2019 | Minimally invasive approach for diagnosing TMJ osteoarthritis | Temporomandibular disorders | Deep convoluted neural network | [31] |
2019 | Compliance monitoring via a Bluetooth-enabled retainer: a prospective clinical pilot study | Orthodontic retention | AI with micro-sensor scanning was used | [32] |
2020 | Automated detection of TMJ osteoarthritis based on artificial intelligence | Temporomandibular disorders | AI with a region of interest | [33] |
2021 | A review of the use of artificial intelligence in orthodontics | Diagnosis and treatment planning | Fuzzy logic software was used for the diagnosis and treatment planning | [34] |
2021 | Determination of growth and development periods in orthodontics with artificial neural network | Growth prediction | ANN models were based on cervical vertebrae algorithms like scaled conjugate gradient back propagation and tan-sigmoid transfer function | [35] |
2021 | Orthodontic retention: What's on the horizon? | Orthodontic retention | Smartphone-enabled temperature sensor was incorporated | [36] |
AI plays an important role in orthodontics, and it is thought to have the most promising future in diagnosis and treatment planning. Hence, the present paper was purposed to review the following applications of AI technology in orthodontics (Figure 1 and Table 1).
Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics involve the data obtained from clinical examinations, photographs, radiographs and study models. All of these investigations involve operator skills and patient cooperation. AI facilitates the preparation of patients' diagnostic records and helps to understand the etiology of malocclusion [34]. AI converts the patient information to suit a natural language processing-based of AI system, which stores the patient data and problems list in the order of their treatment priority [24],[37]. The AI-based treatment prioritization models can obtain high-performance feature vectors for a more precise treatment plan.
Cephalometry is the measurement of facial and skull bones and the soft tissue profile, and it is important for diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. Cephalometric tracing can be done manually or by using computer software [38],[39]. Manual cephalometric tracing is time-consuming, and there is a risk of human error in the landmark identification and measurement of the cephalometric parameters. The major errors in manual tracing tend to involve radiograph unpredictability in the landmark identification and measurements [40],[41]. Using computers for cephalometric tracing helps to save time by reducing manual errors and increasing the diagnostic value of the cephalometric analysis [42]. Existing literature shows that AI-based automated cephalometric tracing has a high success rate (over 90%) when applied for the differential diagnosis of cephalometric landmarks using computerized cephalometric software and web-based software [43],[44].
To overcome these human errors and increase time efficiency, AI can identify cephalometric landmarks via a DL method. The You Only Look Once algorithm is an AI-based systems for identifying cephalometric landmarks [45].
Orthodontic extraction is a major and important decision that significantly impacts the prognosis and outcome of the treatment. It is based on the orthodontist's clinical experience and expertise, and the correctness of the diagnostic test results [46]. AI technology based on an ANN algorithm produced impressive results, ranging from 80% to 92% accuracy, and it was proved to be a useful tool for extraction decision-making. This can be additional support for clinicians with relatively less clinical experience [23]. Literature reviews showed that the success rate of the AI models was 93% for the diagnosis of extraction or non-extraction therapy, and 84% for the selection of extraction patterns [22].
The growth and development rate of the face is important for achieving good orthodontic therapy, as they play a crucial role in the treatment of skeletal discrepancies associated with growth spurts and physiological facial growth [35]. The ANN has been created to be comparable to the biological structure of the human brain, and it mimics the way nerve cells work in the human brain. The hand-wrist and lateral cephalometric radiographs (for cervical vertebrae) are commonly used to predict growth and development. Using ANN algorithms, AI technology accurately determines the growth and development rate based on hand-wrist radiographs and the cervical vertebrae.
AI has tremendous potential for application in the diagnosis of dentofacial deformities and treatment planning of orthognathic surgeries. A CNN algorithm revealed that orthognathic surgery significantly improved most patients' profiles and facial attractiveness [26]. AI intervenes at various levels to optimize the data acquisition, processing and pre-analysis of maxillofacial imagery [47]. AI systems facilitate diagnostic precision for orthognathic surgeries, treatment planning using 3D models (3D printing of surgical splints) and enhanced therapeutic follow-up and image superimposition [27],[48]. The use of AI in intraoral scanner software allows faster and more efficient data procurement, which results in higher-quality images with lower radiation and is thus beneficial for the 3D reconstructions of images [49].
Although AI has not been broadly connected to assessing facial attractiveness, it enables the single-face image assessment of attractiveness based on the attractiveness of facial attributes and combinations [50]. Using a CNN trained on large data and mirroring relevant opinions may be useful for objectively and reproducibly interpreting facial appearance [51]. One of the most obvious advantages of a single AI-based score would be eliminating the variability and subjectivity associated with flexible panel-based ratings. The AI-based results are comparable, but they require further improvement and refinement to distinguish facial cleft features, which negatively impact the human perception of attractiveness [28],[52].
Machine learning algorithms are also used to build predictive models with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). SNPs are the most common type of genetic variation among people. Therefore, machine learning methods such as the support vector machine, logistic regression, naive Bayesian classification, random forests, the k-nearest neighbor method, decision trees and ANN-based methods are used to evaluate the genetic risk assessment in cleft lip and palate etiology [53].
The mandible plays a key role in decisions for occlusion, treatment planning and growth prediction applications in orthodontics because its morphology influences facial aesthetics. In addition, identification of the mandibular morphology becomes important in forensic dentistry when a facial reconstruction is performed, as in the case of a missing person whose mandibular bone has been lost [54]. In the absence of the mandible, AI has significant potential in mandibular prediction because ANN can be used in the facial reconstruction [25].
In orthodontics, the right treatment timing and jawbone growth and development are important for successful treatment. The stages of growth can be studied by using the cervical vertebra maturation (CVM) stages [29]. AI technology, such as CNN and DL methods, models and algorithms, can be used to determine CVM stages. AI algorithms such as k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, decision trees, ANNs, support vector machines, random forests and logistic regression are available for CVM determination [30].
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders constitute the second-most common musculoskeletal condition; they cause pain and disability and affect approximately 5% to 12% of the population. Using a deep neural network model, AI can aid in automatically detecting TMJ osteoarthritis (TMJOA) [33]. It might as well be used to help clinicians diagnose and decide on the treatment of TMJOA. In the future, an AI model that incorporates data other than images, such as signs, symptoms and patient demographic data, would tremendously increase diagnostic accuracy [31]. Furthermore, AI-based TMJ images shed light on the clinical phenotypes of TMJOA and their possible links to etiologic factors such as biomarkers, genetic variations and immunologic responses.
After the active phase of orthodontic treatment, retainers are passive orthodontic appliances that maintain and stabilize the position of teeth. AI can help with retention monitoring, the fabrication of different types of retainer materials and the digital workflow to design customized retainers. AI-based DentalMonitoring (Paris, France) software has been introduced to monitor the retention protocol, including factors such as stability, retainer adjustment problems and oral hygiene maintenance. This software makes use of intraoral photographs captured by patients' smartphones. This is useful for the clinician, as it reduces the chair time and preferences for patients and motivates patients to maintain and follow the instructions on using the retainer [32],[36],[55].
Advances in digital technologies made it possible to fabricate retainers by using a digital workflow. An intraoral scan of the dentition can be used to plan the customized nickel-titanium retainer digitally. It is then precision-manufactured by using a CAD-Computer aided manufacturing (CAM) process, ensuring a close fit to the palatal and lingual surfaces of the teeth [56]. The clear plastic retainers were fabricated using 3D-printed models created from intraoral scans, and they are just as the accurate as retainers made using traditional impressions [57],[58].
Three-dimensional printing technology, also known as AM, is constructed by the addition of a material layer-by-layer in a specific pattern using a CAD/CAM design [59]. Charles Hull invented 3D printing, and the standard tessellation language (STL), or stereolithography, is the most commonly used file format for editing and preparing objects for 3D printing [60]. Additive techniques enable the creation of complex and difficult structures and geometries with undercuts or hollows that would be impossible to create using traditional methods [61],[62].
Year | Article | Applications | 3D printing technology | Reference |
2003 | Customized brackets and arch wires for lingual orthodontic treatment | Custom-made lingual orthodontic brackets, wires | An optical 3D scanner was used | [63] |
2006 | Rapid prototyping as a tool for diagnosis and treatment planning for maxillary canine impaction | Maxillary canine impaction diagnosis and treatment planning | Computed tomography (CT) scanning with rapid prototyping software to construct 3D models was used | [64] |
2008 | Herbst appliance in lingual orthodontics | Custom-made lingual orthodontic brackets, wires | An optical 3D scanner with STL was used | [65] |
2012 | Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic review | Surgical guides for the placement of orthodontic mini-screws and miniplates | Stereolithography with CAD/CAM drill guide was used | [66] |
2013 | A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study | Occlusal splints | A laser-based AM technique was used | [67] |
2014 | Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer | Customized orthodontic retainers | DICOM images with selective laser sintering | [68] |
2017 | Developing customized dental miniscrew surgical template from thermoplastic polymer material using image superimposition, CAD system, and 3D Printing | Surgical guides for the placement of orthodontic mini-screws and miniplates | Stereolithography with CAD/CAM drill guide was used | [69] |
2020 | Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models | Orthodontic study models | 3D printing and liquid polyjet photopolymer were used | [70] |
2020 | Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tailored mobile application in increasing the duration of wear of thermoplastic retainers: a randomized controlled trial | Approaches to enhance removable retainer wear | A micro-electronic sensor was used to evaluate the wear of the clear plastic retainer | [55] |
2021 | Removable retention: enhancing adherence and the remit of shared decision-making | Removable orthodontic retainers | Shared decision-making and motivational interviewing were used for removable orthodontic retainers | [71] |
Advantages of 3D printing include accuracy, high-quality production, full integration with a digital workflow (utilization of intraoral scanners and digital models), reduced manufacturing costs, ability to detect and repair scanned faults before model printing, smaller required manual workforce and cost savings on materials. The disadvantages include a large required initial capital investment for the purchase of the 3D printer and post-processing hardware, the need for staff training to master new skills, the need to process the scan file and manipulate the digital models before printing, the post-print washing and curing phases and the need for an update of health practices and the safety guidelines for the handling and storage of new materials [72].
Advances in 3D printing technology have been explored for automobiles, aviation, aerospace, science and medicine. Various materials, such as gypsum, metal alloys, glass, carbon fiber, resins, organic materials, living cells and tissues, can be used to print objects with 3D printers. Some of the materials mentioned above have widespread applications in dentistry and orthodontics.
Three-dimensional printing applications in orthodontics (Figure 2 and Table 2) include the fabrication of diagnostic and working orthodontic study models, surgical templates and guides for the placement of mini-implants, clear aligners and lingual appliances, as well as wire components for removable appliances and occlusal splints [73].
Three-dimensional printing can fabricate orthodontic study models owing to its accuracy, visualization and accessibility [70],[74]. It can convert a digital, virtual dental model of a patient's dentition into a physical model, skipping the conventional steps of impression-taking and model casting [75]. The 3D-printed models are useful for fabricating removable orthodontic appliances, expansion appliances, indirect bonding trays and thermoplastic aligners [76].
Several removable orthodontic appliances and other appliances such as the activator and sleep apnea devices are manufactured using 3D printing technology. With the advancement of 3D printing, the Hawley retainer can be fabricated using an intraoral scanner, eliminating the need for conventional impression-taking and pouring study models [71],[77]. At present, 3D printing technology allows the manufacture of wire components, such as labial bows and clasps, as well as the incorporation of these parts into the base plate of the appliance. Another important use of 3D printing is the fabrication of custom-made soft silicone removable appliances [78]. Although the literature mentioned earlier and appliances are only case reports, they demonstrate the potential of 3D printing applications in orthodontics. The procedures described by the article authors must be evaluated, particularly regarding costs, workflow, accuracy and clinical efficiency.
Maxillary canine impaction is one of the most common dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Identifying the correct location and angulation is crucial for the success of treatment. The 3D printing of an anatomical model created from computed tomography images of an impacted maxillary canine allows clinicians to thoroughly assess and visualize the anatomy, localization of the impacted tooth and surgical exposure procedure of the impacted tooth [64].
Lingual orthodontic brackets can be manufactured using 3D printing. The digital design enables customization of the in-out, angulation and bracket torque for an individual bracket prescription created for each patient. Wiechmann et al. [63] presented 3D printing to make wax designs of lingual brackets, permitting customization of the bracket design. Making thicker and amplified bracket bases on maxillary teeth, as well as starting with the molars and mandibular canines to make those brackets as groups, was part of the digital design of lingual orthodontic brackets. Exact prototyping of the planned machine is required and can be accomplished with 3D printing technology, allowing customized fixed functional treatment in conjunction with lingual orthodontic treatment [65].
Occlusal splints are used to treat temporomandibular disorders. The occlusal splints prepared from the 3D printing were more accurate as the best fit for the patients. In addition, the printing preparation is very reproducible and faster, and it significantly reduces fabrication time relative to that for the conventional fabrication method of splints [67]. One advantage of AM is that it allows one to print a large number of individual splints in a short period using modern digital technology, thereby eliminating manual working phases in a dental laboratory. This could reduce costs, technician working time and chair-side time in the coming years.
Miniplates and orthodontic mini-screws are used in a variety of orthodontic treatment procedures, including those for the intrusion of molars, the correction of open bite, molar distalization and maxillary impaction or protraction [66]. Hence, accurate placement of these mini-screws and miniplates in patients is critical for the success of treatment. The material utilized to construct surgical guides should be firm and sufficient to stay stable during the mini-implant insertion procedure. Three-dimensional-printed surgical guides have become progressively popular because they offer orthodontists a safe and simple method of placing mini-implants [69],[79]. They provide custom-made adaptation, accuracy and precision for the placement of the final position of the miniplate, as well as the utmost surface contact between the bone and the miniplate, stability and a lower risk of miniplate failure [80]–[82].
Three-dimensional printing opens a new avenue in orthodontics to fabricate custom-made removable retainers. The procedure incorporates cutting-edge technologies such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), CAD and 3D printing. The first step is to use CBCT to scan the patient's dentition and create a 3D model of the patient's dentition. The retainer is virtually designed after importing the 3D model into dedicated software, and it is possible to print a clear plastic retainer directly by using an additive 3D printing process [68],[83].
AI and 3D printing technology have revolutionized oral health care and the orthodontic practice by addressing the weaknesses of conventional diagnosis and treatment planning procedures. With AI-based algorithms, orthodontists can better diagnose and plan treatment, whereas 3D printing helps manufacture customized orthodontic appliances with precision.
AI and 3D printing can solve various clinical problems, improve diagnosis, clinical decision-making and prediction of failures, as well as reduce the chair side time, bypass various extra steps of conventional methods and provide quality treatment with accuracy and precision. There is fascinating literature evidence that AI and 3D printing broaden the scope of state-of-the-art technology in orthodontics and can play a crucial role in sufficiently aiding practicing clinicians in delivering health care in the 21st century.
[1] | Negnevitsky M (2011) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems. Canada: Pearson Education. |
[2] | Khanna S (2010) Artificial intelligence: contemporary applications and future compass. Int Dent J 60: 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1922/IDJ_2422Khanna04 |
[3] | Deshmukh SV (2018) Artificial intelligence in dentistry. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 10: 47-48. https://doi.org/10.4103/jicdro.jicdro_17_18 |
[4] | Scerri M, Grech V (2020) Artificial intelligence in medicine. Early Hum Dev 20: 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105017 |
[5] | Ahmed N, Abbasi MS, Zuberi F, et al. (2021) Artificial intelligence techniques: analysis, application, and outcome in dentistry—a systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2021: 9751564. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9751564 |
[6] | Hung HC, Wang YC, Wang YC (2020) Applications of artificial intelligence in orthodontics. Taiwan J Orthod 32: 85-92. https://doi.org/10.38209/2708-2636.1005 |
[7] | Bichu YM, Hansa I, Bichu AY, et al. (2021) Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review. Prog Orthod 22: 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00361-9 |
[8] | Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J (2020) Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res 99: 769-774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520915714 |
[9] | Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012: 208760. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760 |
[10] | Andonović V, Vrtanoski G (2010) Growing rapid prototyping as a technology in dental medicine. Mech Eng Sci J 29: 31-39. |
[11] | Beguma Z, Chhedat P (2014) Rapid prototyping—when virtual meets reality rapid prototyping—virtuelltrifftrealität. Int J Comput Dent 17: 297-306. |
[12] | Hofmann M (2014) 3D printing gets a boost and opportunities with polymer materials. ACS Macro Lett 3: 382-386. https://doi.org/10.1021/mz4006556 |
[13] | Mahamood S, Khader MA, Ali H (2016) Applications of 3-D printing in orthodontics: a review. Int J Sci Stud 3: 267-270. https://doi.org/10.17354/ijss/2016/99 |
[14] | Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. (2017) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present, and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2: 230-243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101 |
[15] | Leonardi R, Giordano D, Maiorana F (2009) An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images. J Biomed Biotechnol 2009: 717102. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/717102 |
[16] | Schwendicke F, Golla T, Dreher M, et al. (2019) Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: a scoping review. J Dent 91: 103226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103226 |
[17] | Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, et al. (2016) Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm. Int J Comput Ass Rad 11: 1297-1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1334-7 |
[18] | Brickley MR, Shepherd JP, Armstrong RA (1998) Neural networks: a new technique for development of decision support systems in dentistry. J Dent 26: 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00027-4 |
[19] | Katne T, Kanaparthi A, Gotoor S, et al. (2019) Artificial intelligence: demystifying dentistry—the future and beyond. Int J Contemp Med SurgRadiol 4: D6-D9. http://dx.doi.org/10.21276/ijcmsr.2019.4.4.2 |
[20] | Faber J, Faber C, Faber P (2019) Artificial intelligence in orthodontics. APOS Trends Orthod 9: 201-205. https://doi.org/10.25259/APOS_123_2019 |
[21] | Auconi P, Caldarelli G, Scala A, et al. (2011) A network approach to orthodontic diagnosis. Orthod Craniofac Res 14: 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01523.x |
[22] | Xie X, Wang L, Wang A (2010) Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 80: 262-266. https://doi.org/10.2319/111608-588.1 |
[23] | Jung SK, Kim TW (2016) New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning. Am J Orthod Dentofac 149: 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.030 |
[24] | Jheon AH, Oberoi S, Solem RC, et al. (2017) Moving towards precision orthodontics: an evolving paradigm shift in the planning and delivery of customized orthodontic therapy. Orthod Craniofac Res 20: 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12171 |
[25] | Niño-Sandoval TC, Pérez SVG, González FA, et al. (2017) Use of automated learning techniques for predicting mandibular morphology in skeletal class I, II and III. Forensic Sci Int 281: 187.e1-187.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.10.004 |
[26] | Choi HI, Jung SK, Baek SH, et al. (2019) Artificial intelligent model with neural network machine learning for the diagnosis of orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 30: 1986-1989. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005650 |
[27] | Weichel F, Eisenmann U, Richter S, et al. (2019) A computer-assisted optimization approach for orthognathic surgery planning. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 5: 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2019-0011 |
[28] | Patcas R, Timofte R, Volokitin A, et al. (2019) Facial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial-intelligence-based scoring and conventional rater groups. Eur J Orthodont 41: 428-433. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz007 |
[29] | Makaremi M, Lacaule C, Mohammad-Djafari A (2019) Deep learning and artificial intelligence for the determination of the cervical vertebra maturation degree from lateral radiography. Entropy 21: 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21121222 |
[30] | Kök H, Acilar AM, İzgi MS (2019) Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics. Prog Orthod 20: 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0295-8 |
[31] | Shoukri B, Prieto JC, Ruellas A, et al. (2019) Minimally invasive approach for diagnosing TMJ osteoarthritis. J Dent Res 98: 1103-1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519865187 |
[32] | Castle E, Chung P, Behfar MH, et al. (2019) Compliance monitoring via a Bluetooth-enabled retainer: a prospective clinical pilot study. Orthod Craniofac Res 22: 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12263 |
[33] | Lee KS, Kwak HJ, Oh JM, et al. (2020) Automated detection of TMJ osteoarthritis based on artificial intelligence. J Dent Res 99: 1363-1367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520936950 |
[34] | Akdeniz S, Tosun ME (2021) A review of the use of artificial intelligence in orthodontics. J Exp Clin Med 38: 157-162. https://doi.org/10.52142/omujecm.38.si.dent.13 |
[35] | Kök H, Izgi MS, Acilar AM (2021) Determination of growth and development periods in orthodontics with artificial neural network. Orthod Craniofac Res 24: 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12443 |
[36] | Littlewood SJ, Dalci O, Dolce C, et al. (2021) Orthodontic retention: What's on the horizon? Brit Dent J 230: 760-764. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2937-8 |
[37] | Jung SK, Kim TW (2016) New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning. Am J Orthod Dentofac 149: 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.030 |
[38] | Hutton TJ, Cunningham S, Hammond P (2000) An evaluation of active shape models for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Eur J Orthodont 22: 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.5.499 |
[39] | Tanikawa C, Yagi M, Takada K (2009) Automated cephalometry: System performance reliability using landmark-dependent criteria. Angle Orthod 79: 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.2319/092908-508R.1 |
[40] | Montúfar J, Romero M, Scougall-Vilchis RJ (2018) Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections. Am J Orthod Dentofac 153: 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.028 |
[41] | Lee H, Tajmir S, Lee J, et al. (2017) Fully automated deep learning system for bone age assessment. J Digit Imaging 30: 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9955-8 |
[42] | Kunz F, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Zeman F, et al. (2020) Artificial intelligence in orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 81: 52-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00203-8 |
[43] | Nishimoto S, Sotsuka Y, Kawai K, et al. (2019) Personal computer-based cephalometric landmark detection with deep learning, using cephalograms on the internet. J Craniofac Surg 30: 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004901 |
[44] | Hwang HW, Park JH, Moon JH, et al. (2020) Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: Part 2—Might it be better than human? Angle Orthod 90: 69-76. https://doi.org/10.2319/022019-129.1 |
[45] | Park JH, Hwang HW, Moon JH, et al. (2019) Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: Part 1—Comparisons between the latest deep-learning methods YOLOV3 and SSD. Angle Orthod 89: 903-909. https://doi.org/10.2319/022019-127.1 |
[46] | Ribarevski R, Vig P, Vig KD, et al. (1996) Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisions. Eur J Orthodont 18: 77-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/18.1.77 |
[47] | Bouletreau P, Makaremi M, Ibrahim B, et al. (2019) Artificial intelligence: applications in orthognathic surgery. J Stomatol Oral Maxi 120: 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.001 |
[48] | Pascal E, Majoufre C, Bondaz M, et al. (2018) Current status of surgical planning and transfer methods in orthognathic surgery. J Stomatol Oral Maxi 119: 245-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2018.02.001 |
[49] | Cevidanes LHS, Bailey LJ, Tucker Jr GR, et al. (2005) Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Rad 34: 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/17102411 |
[50] | Yu X, Liu B, Pei Y, et al. (2014) Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion: a machine-learning technique employing Procrustes. Angle Orthod 84: 410-416. https://doi.org/10.2319/071513-516.1 |
[51] | Patcas R, Bernini DAJ, Volokitin A, et al. (2019) Applying artificial intelligence to assess the impact of orthognathic treatment on facial attractiveness and estimated age. Int J Oral Max Surg 48: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.07.010 |
[52] | Harrar H, Myers S, Ghanem AM (2018) Art or science? An evidence-based approach to human facial beauty a quantitative analysis towards an informed clinical aesthetic practice. Aesthet Plast Surg 42: 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1032-7 |
[53] | Zhang SJ, Meng P, Zhang J, et al. (2018) Machine learning models for genetic risk assessment of infants with non-syndromic orofacial cleft. Genom Proteom Bioinf 16: 354-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2018.07.005 |
[54] | Prescher A, Meyers A, von Keyserlingk DG (2005) Neural net applied to anthropological material: a methodical study on the human nasal skeleton. Ann Anat 187: 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2005.01.003 |
[55] | Al-Moghrabi D, Pandis N, McLaughlin K, et al. (2020) Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tailored mobile application in increasing the duration of wear of thermoplastic retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthodont 42: 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz088 |
[56] | Cole D, Bencharit S, Carrico CK, et al. (2019) Evaluation of fit for 3D-printed retainers compared with thermoform retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofac 155: 592-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.011 |
[57] | Dietrich CA, Ender A, Baumgartner S, et al. (2017) A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies. Angle Orthod 87: 782-787. https://doi.org/10.2319/01091-727.1 |
[58] | Mohd Tahir N, Wan Hassan WN, Saub R (2019) Comparing retainers constructed on conventional stone models and on 3D printed models: a randomized crossover clinical study. Eur J Orthodont 41: 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy063 |
[59] | Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. (2017) Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 117: 10212-10290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 |
[60] | Dodziuk H (2016) Applications of 3D printing in healthcare. Kardiochir Torakochi 13: 283-293. https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2016.62625 |
[61] | Bhargav A, Sanjairaj V, Rosa V, et al. (2018) Applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: a review. J Biomed Mater Res B 106: 2058-2064. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33961 |
[62] | Liaw CY, Guvendiren M (2017) Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine. Biofabrication 9: 024102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7279 |
[63] | Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A, et al. (2003) Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac 124: 593-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.008 |
[64] | Faber J, Berto PM, Quaresma M (2006) Rapid prototyping as a tool for diagnosis and treatment planning for maxillary canine impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofac 129: 583-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.015 |
[65] | Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R, Hohoff A (2008) Herbst appliance in lingual orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac 134: 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.015 |
[66] | Tsui WK, Chua HDP, Cheung LK (2012) Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic review. Int J Oral Max Surg 41: 1427-1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.05.011 |
[67] | Salmi M, Paloheimo KS, Tuomi J, et al. (2013) A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study. J R Soc Interface 10: 20130203. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0203 |
[68] | Nasef AA, El-Beialy AR, Mostafa YA (2014) Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofac 146: 394-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.025 |
[69] | Wang YT, Yu JH, Lo LJ, et al. (2017) Developing customized dental miniscrew surgical template from thermoplastic polymer material using image superimposition, CAD system, and 3D printing. Biomed Res Int 2017: 1906197. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1906197 |
[70] | Sherman SL, Kadioglu O, Currier GF, et al. (2020) Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models. Am J Orthod Dentofac 157: 422-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.012 |
[71] | Al-Moghrabi D, Barber S, Fleming PS (2021) Removable retention: enhancing adherence and the remit of shared decision-making. Brit Dent J 230: 765-769. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2951-x |
[72] | Cousley RRJ (2020) Introducing 3D printing in your orthodontic practice. J Orthod 47: 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312520936704 |
[73] | Bartkowiak T, Walkowiak-Śliziuk A (2018) 3D printing technology in orthodontics—review of current applications. J Stomatol 71: 356-364. https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2018.83410 |
[74] | Lee KY, Cho JW, Chang NY, et al. (2015) Accuracy of three-dimensional printing for manufacturing replica teeth. Korean J Orthod 45: 217-225. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.217 |
[75] | Kim SY, Shin YS, Jung HD, et al. (2018) Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofac 153: 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.025 |
[76] | Martorelli M, Gerbino S, Giudice M, et al. (2013) A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater 29: e1-e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.011 |
[77] | Al Mortadi N, Eggbeer D, Lewis J, et al. (2012) CAD/CAM/AM applications in the manufacture of dental appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac 142: 727-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.023 |
[78] | Salmi M, Tuomi J, Sirkkanen R, et al. (2012) Rapid tooling method for soft customized removable oral appliances. Open Dent J 6: 85-89. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601206010085 |
[79] | Antoszewska J, Papadopoulos MA, Park HS, et al. (2009) Five-year experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: a retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates. Am J Orthod Dentofac 136: 158.e1-158.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.032 |
[80] | Liu H, Liu DX, Wang G, et al. (2010) Accuracy of surgical positioning of orthodontic miniscrews with a computer-aided design and manufacturing template. Am J Orthod Dentofac 137: 728.e1-728.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.025 |
[81] | Hourfar J, Kanavakis G, Goellner P, et al. (2014) Fully customized placement of orthodontic miniplates: a novel clinical technique. Head Face Med 10: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-14 |
[82] | Neumeister A, Schulz L, Glodecki C (2017) Investigations on the accuracy of 3D-printed drill guides for dental implantology Untersuchungen zur Genauigkeit 3-D-gedruckter Bohrschablonen für die dentale Implantologie. Int J Comput Dent 20: 35-51. |
[83] | Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, et al. (2017) Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng 2017: 8427595. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8427595 |
1. | Logeshwaran A, Renold Elsen, Sunita Nayak, Artificial Intelligence-Based 3D Printing Strategies for Bone Scaffold Fabrication and Its Application in Preclinical and Clinical Investigations, 2024, 10, 2373-9878, 677, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01368 | |
2. | Juraj Tomášik, Márton Zsoldos, Ľubica Oravcová, Michaela Lifková, Gabriela Pavleová, Martin Strunga, Andrej Thurzo, AI and Face-Driven Orthodontics: A Scoping Review of Digital Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment Planning, 2024, 5, 2673-2688, 158, 10.3390/ai5010009 | |
3. | Pablo Ramiro Bravo Medina, Celia María Pulgarin Fernández, Ronald Roossevelt Ramos Montiel, Inteligencia artificial en diagnóstico, pronóstico y planificación del tratamiento de alteraciones de la región cráneo-cérvico maxilofacial en ortodoncia. Revisión de la literatura, 2023, 6, 2697-3391, 63, 10.33262/anatomiadigital.v6i1.2.2515 | |
4. | Ivan Palinkas, Eleonora Desnica, Jasmina Pekez, Aleksandar Rajic, Milan Rackov, 2024, Chapter 22, 978-3-031-51493-7, 259, 10.1007/978-3-031-51494-4_22 | |
5. | Chenyang Niu, Dongwen Li, Yujia Zhang, Yunkai Wang, Shangbo Ning, Gang Zhao, Zhihui Ye, Yu Kong, Donghong Yang, Prospects for 3D-printing of clear aligners—a narrative review, 2024, 11, 2296-8016, 10.3389/fmats.2024.1438660 | |
6. | Tamer M. Hamdy, How Artificial Inelegance Is Transforming Aesthetic Dentistry: A Review, 2024, 11, 2196-3002, 95, 10.1007/s40496-024-00372-5 | |
7. | Marcel Paľovčík, Juraj Tomášik, Márton Zsoldos, Andrej Thurzo, 3D-Printed Accessories and Auxiliaries in Orthodontic Treatment, 2024, 15, 2076-3417, 78, 10.3390/app15010078 |
Year | Article | Applications | AI technology | Reference |
2010 | Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment | Extraction and non-extraction therapy in orthodontics | Machine learning through a 2-layer neural network | [22] |
2016 | New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning | Extraction and non-extraction therapy in orthodontics | Machine learning through a 2-layer neural network | [23] |
2017 | Moving towards precision orthodontics: an evolving paradigm shift in the planning and delivery of customized orthodontic therapy | Diagnosis and treatment planning | Fuzzy logic software was used for the diagnosis and treatment planning | [24] |
2017 | Use of automated learning techniques for predicting mandibular morphology in skeletal classes I, II, and III | Mandibular morphology | An ANN with unidirectional and basic elements of support vector regression and support vector machines were used | [25] |
2019 | Artificial intelligent model with neural network machine learning for the diagnosis of orthognathic surgery | Orthognathic surgery | Neural network machine learning with various cephalometric software programs | [26] |
2019 | A computer-assisted optimization approach for orthognathic surgery planning | Orthognathic surgery | Neural network machine learning with various cephalometric software programs | [27] |
2019 | Facial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial-intelligence-based scoring and conventional rater groups | Cleft patients and facial attractiveness | An algorithm consisting of a face detector and CNNs with visual cortex/vision processing was used | [28] |
2019 | Deep learning and artificial intelligence for the determination of the cervical vertebra maturation degree from lateral radiography | Growth and development determination using cervical vertebrae | CNN and ANN methods, models and algorithms were used | [29] |
2019 | Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics | Growth and development determination using cervical vertebrae | CNN and ANN with DL methods were implemented | [30] |
2019 | Minimally invasive approach for diagnosing TMJ osteoarthritis | Temporomandibular disorders | Deep convoluted neural network | [31] |
2019 | Compliance monitoring via a Bluetooth-enabled retainer: a prospective clinical pilot study | Orthodontic retention | AI with micro-sensor scanning was used | [32] |
2020 | Automated detection of TMJ osteoarthritis based on artificial intelligence | Temporomandibular disorders | AI with a region of interest | [33] |
2021 | A review of the use of artificial intelligence in orthodontics | Diagnosis and treatment planning | Fuzzy logic software was used for the diagnosis and treatment planning | [34] |
2021 | Determination of growth and development periods in orthodontics with artificial neural network | Growth prediction | ANN models were based on cervical vertebrae algorithms like scaled conjugate gradient back propagation and tan-sigmoid transfer function | [35] |
2021 | Orthodontic retention: What's on the horizon? | Orthodontic retention | Smartphone-enabled temperature sensor was incorporated | [36] |
Year | Article | Applications | 3D printing technology | Reference |
2003 | Customized brackets and arch wires for lingual orthodontic treatment | Custom-made lingual orthodontic brackets, wires | An optical 3D scanner was used | [63] |
2006 | Rapid prototyping as a tool for diagnosis and treatment planning for maxillary canine impaction | Maxillary canine impaction diagnosis and treatment planning | Computed tomography (CT) scanning with rapid prototyping software to construct 3D models was used | [64] |
2008 | Herbst appliance in lingual orthodontics | Custom-made lingual orthodontic brackets, wires | An optical 3D scanner with STL was used | [65] |
2012 | Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic review | Surgical guides for the placement of orthodontic mini-screws and miniplates | Stereolithography with CAD/CAM drill guide was used | [66] |
2013 | A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study | Occlusal splints | A laser-based AM technique was used | [67] |
2014 | Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer | Customized orthodontic retainers | DICOM images with selective laser sintering | [68] |
2017 | Developing customized dental miniscrew surgical template from thermoplastic polymer material using image superimposition, CAD system, and 3D Printing | Surgical guides for the placement of orthodontic mini-screws and miniplates | Stereolithography with CAD/CAM drill guide was used | [69] |
2020 | Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models | Orthodontic study models | 3D printing and liquid polyjet photopolymer were used | [70] |
2020 | Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tailored mobile application in increasing the duration of wear of thermoplastic retainers: a randomized controlled trial | Approaches to enhance removable retainer wear | A micro-electronic sensor was used to evaluate the wear of the clear plastic retainer | [55] |
2021 | Removable retention: enhancing adherence and the remit of shared decision-making | Removable orthodontic retainers | Shared decision-making and motivational interviewing were used for removable orthodontic retainers | [71] |
Year | Article | Applications | AI technology | Reference |
2010 | Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment | Extraction and non-extraction therapy in orthodontics | Machine learning through a 2-layer neural network | [22] |
2016 | New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning | Extraction and non-extraction therapy in orthodontics | Machine learning through a 2-layer neural network | [23] |
2017 | Moving towards precision orthodontics: an evolving paradigm shift in the planning and delivery of customized orthodontic therapy | Diagnosis and treatment planning | Fuzzy logic software was used for the diagnosis and treatment planning | [24] |
2017 | Use of automated learning techniques for predicting mandibular morphology in skeletal classes I, II, and III | Mandibular morphology | An ANN with unidirectional and basic elements of support vector regression and support vector machines were used | [25] |
2019 | Artificial intelligent model with neural network machine learning for the diagnosis of orthognathic surgery | Orthognathic surgery | Neural network machine learning with various cephalometric software programs | [26] |
2019 | A computer-assisted optimization approach for orthognathic surgery planning | Orthognathic surgery | Neural network machine learning with various cephalometric software programs | [27] |
2019 | Facial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial-intelligence-based scoring and conventional rater groups | Cleft patients and facial attractiveness | An algorithm consisting of a face detector and CNNs with visual cortex/vision processing was used | [28] |
2019 | Deep learning and artificial intelligence for the determination of the cervical vertebra maturation degree from lateral radiography | Growth and development determination using cervical vertebrae | CNN and ANN methods, models and algorithms were used | [29] |
2019 | Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics | Growth and development determination using cervical vertebrae | CNN and ANN with DL methods were implemented | [30] |
2019 | Minimally invasive approach for diagnosing TMJ osteoarthritis | Temporomandibular disorders | Deep convoluted neural network | [31] |
2019 | Compliance monitoring via a Bluetooth-enabled retainer: a prospective clinical pilot study | Orthodontic retention | AI with micro-sensor scanning was used | [32] |
2020 | Automated detection of TMJ osteoarthritis based on artificial intelligence | Temporomandibular disorders | AI with a region of interest | [33] |
2021 | A review of the use of artificial intelligence in orthodontics | Diagnosis and treatment planning | Fuzzy logic software was used for the diagnosis and treatment planning | [34] |
2021 | Determination of growth and development periods in orthodontics with artificial neural network | Growth prediction | ANN models were based on cervical vertebrae algorithms like scaled conjugate gradient back propagation and tan-sigmoid transfer function | [35] |
2021 | Orthodontic retention: What's on the horizon? | Orthodontic retention | Smartphone-enabled temperature sensor was incorporated | [36] |
Year | Article | Applications | 3D printing technology | Reference |
2003 | Customized brackets and arch wires for lingual orthodontic treatment | Custom-made lingual orthodontic brackets, wires | An optical 3D scanner was used | [63] |
2006 | Rapid prototyping as a tool for diagnosis and treatment planning for maxillary canine impaction | Maxillary canine impaction diagnosis and treatment planning | Computed tomography (CT) scanning with rapid prototyping software to construct 3D models was used | [64] |
2008 | Herbst appliance in lingual orthodontics | Custom-made lingual orthodontic brackets, wires | An optical 3D scanner with STL was used | [65] |
2012 | Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic review | Surgical guides for the placement of orthodontic mini-screws and miniplates | Stereolithography with CAD/CAM drill guide was used | [66] |
2013 | A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study | Occlusal splints | A laser-based AM technique was used | [67] |
2014 | Virtual techniques for designing and fabricating a retainer | Customized orthodontic retainers | DICOM images with selective laser sintering | [68] |
2017 | Developing customized dental miniscrew surgical template from thermoplastic polymer material using image superimposition, CAD system, and 3D Printing | Surgical guides for the placement of orthodontic mini-screws and miniplates | Stereolithography with CAD/CAM drill guide was used | [69] |
2020 | Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models | Orthodontic study models | 3D printing and liquid polyjet photopolymer were used | [70] |
2020 | Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tailored mobile application in increasing the duration of wear of thermoplastic retainers: a randomized controlled trial | Approaches to enhance removable retainer wear | A micro-electronic sensor was used to evaluate the wear of the clear plastic retainer | [55] |
2021 | Removable retention: enhancing adherence and the remit of shared decision-making | Removable orthodontic retainers | Shared decision-making and motivational interviewing were used for removable orthodontic retainers | [71] |