Citation: Claudia Tanja Mierke. Physical role of nuclear and cytoskeletal confinements in cell migration mode selection and switching[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(4): 615-658. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.4.615
[1] | Wen-Tien Tsai . Green finance for mitigating greenhouse gases and promoting renewable energy development: Case study in Taiwan. Green Finance, 2024, 6(2): 249-264. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024010 |
[2] | Ali Omidkar, Razieh Es'haghian, Hua Song . Developing a machine learning model for fast economic optimization of solar power plants using the hybrid method of firefly and genetic algorithms, case study: optimizing solar thermal collector in Calgary, Alberta. Green Finance, 2024, 6(4): 698-727. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024027 |
[3] | Ana Ramos, Filipa Magalhães, Diogo Neves, Nelson Gonçalves, António Baptista, Teresa Mata, Nuno Correia . Wind energy sustainability in Europe—A review of knowledge gaps, opportunities and circular strategies. Green Finance, 2023, 5(4): 562-602. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023022 |
[4] | Yoram Krozer . Financing of the global shift to renewable energy and energy efficiency. Green Finance, 2019, 1(3): 264-278. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.3.264 |
[5] | Reinhard Haas, Amela Ajanovic, Jasmine Ramsebner, Theresia Perger, Jaroslav Knápek, Jan W. Bleyl . Financing the future infrastructure of sustainable energy systems. Green Finance, 2021, 3(1): 90-118. doi: 10.3934/GF.2021006 |
[6] | Mihaela Onofrei, Bogdan Narcis Fîrțescu, Florin Oprea, Dana Claudia Cojocaru . The effects of environmental patents on renewable energy consumption. Green Finance, 2024, 6(4): 630-648. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024024 |
[7] | Alexander Ryota Keeley, Shunsuke Managi . The importance of financial cost for renewable energy projects: economic viability assessment of renewable hybrid mini-grid systems in Indonesia. Green Finance, 2019, 1(2): 139-155. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.2.139 |
[8] | Kalomoira Zisopoulou, Dionysia Panagoulia . Solar Power: A new mathematical definition and theoretical proof it is a Green Public Good. Green Finance, 2019, 1(3): 312-327. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.3.312 |
[9] | Biljana Ilić, Dragica Stojanovic, Gordana Djukic . Green economy: mobilization of international capital for financing projects of renewable energy sources. Green Finance, 2019, 1(2): 94-109. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.2.94 |
[10] | Laura Grumann, Mara Madaleno, Elisabete Vieira . The green finance dilemma: No impact without risk – a multiple case study on renewable energy investments. Green Finance, 2024, 6(3): 457-483. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024018 |
Mercury is an element that exists naturally within the Earth's crust and is constantly cycled into and out of different locations in the environment, due to both natural processes and human activities [1,2]. Industrial processes, including the burning of coal and production of metals, are the maincontributors to anthropogenic mercury release into the atmosphere, with an estimated 65% of air emissions originating in Asian countries, primarily China [1]. Due to atmospheric circulation trends, large amounts of mercury are deposited into terrestrial and aquatic environments at Arctic latitudes, a process which may be exacerbated by the increasing effects of global climate change [2,3,4].
Several species of mercury exist within the environment, and may interconvert through reactions catalyzed either chemically (in the environment) or biologically (within organisms). Atmospheric mercury released through industrial processes generally exists in its elemental form, Hg0 [1,2,3,4], while ionized inorganic mercury (Hg2+) and so-called "organic" mercury (e.g., methylmercury, HgCH3+) are the forms most often encountered in the human environment. The latter is typically formed through methylation of inorganic mercury by microorganisms living in aquatic and wetland environments [2]. Eventually both forms enter the human food system.
Methylmercury (MeHg) is unique among the mercury species in its ability to bioaccumulate and biomagnify within aquatic food webs. Predatory fish, which tend to occupy higher trophic levels within these systems, often contain MeHg at concentrations higher than those found in the surrounding environment. Consumption of predatory fish as food thus represents the most common source of MeHg exposure both to humans and to wildlife [5]. Given the increased concentrations of mercury in the environment at northern latitudes, exposure to MeHg is therefore of great concern to native communities, including Alaska Natives, who rely on predatory fish as a staple food in their subsistence-based diets [5,6,7].
Much of the current knowledge of MeHg's detrimental health effects has arisen from observation of accidental catastrophic release of MeHg into the environment, such as in Minamata, Japan in the 1960s [7,8]. Observation of patients following such incidents has shown that acute exposure to high concentrations of MeHg can cause severe negative impacts on the brain and nervous system, causing damage both in exposed adults and in fetuses exposed in utero. MeHg, unlike inorganic ionic mercury species, is capable of easily crossing the human placenta, which in part has led to increased concern about MeHg exposure to the developing embryo and fetus [7]. Effects of more chronic low-level MeHg exposure are less well understood, but neurodevelopmental and neurological damage in general appear to be associated with such exposure [9]. The MeHg molecule itself has a high affinity for thiol groups, and is able to covalently associate with accessible thiol groups on proteins, particularly those found in cysteine residues. Such modification is known as "S-mercuration", and is thought to provide the basis for the cytotoxic and neurotoxic effects of MeHg in vivo, though the precise biochemical mechanisms by which this occurs are still not entirely clear [8].
While considerable focus has been directed toward effects of MeHg exposure in the brain and in cultured neurons, less research exists examining possible effects on other organs or cell types. Epidemiological studies have examined possible effects of MeHg on diabetes and metabolic dysfunction, and while some results have indicated a correlation between MeHg and eventual development of diabetes [13], others have shown no significant correlation between exposure to MeHg and diabetes in patients living in a MeHg-contaminated area [14]. A study in 2013 [15] examined interactions between diabetes and MeHg toxicity, concluding that diabetic animals experienced more pronounced toxic effects from MeHg than metabolically normal animals, providing evidence of a role for MeHg in metabolic dysfunction.
Studies by Barnes, Hanlon and Kircher [16] and Barnes and Kircher [17] provide the only results to date on the effects of exposure of adipocytes to mercury compounds, though the mercury species used in these studies was inorganic mercury (Hg2+), which is less relevant to human health than MeHg, for reasons mentioned above. Regardless, their studies showed a significant effect on the ability of pre-adipocytes in culture to differentiate into mature adipocytes, as well as some effect on insulin signaling in these cells, which again provides a basis for further exploration of mercury species as potential modulators of metabolic processes in adipocytes.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a signaling protein central to the process of angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vasculature in tissue. Given that the proper function of adipose tissue may also be sensitive to changes in vascularization, VEGF recently has become a molecule of interest in conditions affecting cell signaling processes in adipose tissue and adipocytes, including diabetes and obesity [18,19,20,21]. So far, however, the consequences and possible origins of increased VEGF expression in adipose tissue, as well as possible connections to metabolic dysfunction, remain unknown.
Since no literature currently exists examining the effects of low-level MeHg exposure on adipocytes, hypotheses developed for this study were largelyexploratory in nature. In this study the following hypotheses were addressed:
• Exposure to MeHg increases secretion of VEGF by pre-adipocytes (3T3-L1 cell line) in culture in a concentration-dependent manner
• Exposure to MeHg causes increased cytotoxicity in adipocytes in culture (3T3-L1 cell line) in a concentration-dependent manner, leading to reduced VEGF in media.
Our results suggest that MeHg is toxic to 3T3-L1 cells during the later stages of differentiation and MeHg elevates VEGF secretion after the 3T3-cells have differentiated into mature fat storage cells.
3T3-L1 cells are a line of adherent pre-adipose mouse fibroblasts that is widely used as a model for studying adipocytes; adipogenesis as observed in these cells is accepted in the research community as a faithful representation of human adipogenesis [22,23]. As pre-adipocytes, the cells in this line are genetically "committed" to transformation into adipocytes, but have not yet received the chemical signals necessary to differentiate them into mature cells.
3T3-L1 adipocytes (ATCC) were cultured from frozen/thawed cells according to the protocol provided [24] in 12-well flat-bottom cell culture plates (BD Falcon) containing 2 mL of liquid medium per well. Cells were incubated in a humidified incubator with 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) at 37 °C.
Four distinct cell populations, grouped according to differentiation status and MeHg exposure time, were used in these experiments. A visualdepiction of the names and characteristics of these populations is presented in Figure 1. Within each cell population, four different MeHg concentrations (0-200 ng/mL; described below) were used in order to determine whether observed effects on each population were dependent on MeHg exposure concentration.
For those populations undergoing differentiation (populations "1" and "3" in Figure 1), cultures were grown to confluence using Growth Medium (DMEM; 10% calf serum; 1% pencillin/streptomycin), followed by incubation with Growth Medium for two further days past confluence to initiate contact inhibition. At this point, cells wereswitched to Differentiation Medium (Growth Medium + IBMX, dexamethasone, and insulin). Incubation with Differentiation Medium continued for two days, with medium changed every 24 hours. Cells were then switched to Insulin Medium (Growth Medium + insulin) for two days, with medium again changed every 24 hours.
Finally, cells were incubated with Maintenance Medium (DMEM; 10% fetal bovine serum; 1% penicillin/streptomycin) for 10 days to maturity. Cell populations not undergoing differentiation (populations "2" and "4" in Figure 1) were grown to confluence similarly to the differentiating populations, but were given Growth Medium for Days 2 and 3 rather than Differentiation Medium. These populations were then given Insulin Medium and Maintenance Medium alongside the differentiating cells in the following days. The overall differentiation protocol is summarized in simplified form in Table 1.
Exposure to MeHg occurred either throughout the entire differentiation period, beginning at confluence (Populations "1" and "2" in Figure 1) or only during the final three days of the differentiation/maturation process (Populations "3" and "4" in Figure 1).
Day Name | Procedure/Medium Used |
Grow cells to confluence in Growth Medium; replace medium every 2-3 days | |
Cells are confluent | |
Add Growth Medium; incubate 24 hours | |
Day 1 | Change Growth Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 2 | Add Differentiation Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 3 | Change Differentiation Medium, incubate 24 hours |
Day 4 | Add Insulin Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 5 | Change Insulin Medium, incubate 24 hours |
Day 6-20 | Add Maintenance Medium; incubate and change every 24 hours for 8-15 days until cells are mature |
Cells were viewed under an AMD EVOS Core digital inverted light microscope, and images were captured using the microscope software beginning after the first 24-hour incubation in Growth Medium (Day 1). Cells were imaged immediately prior to changing cell media; because of this, "Day 1" images represent the appearance of the cells after 24 hours of incubation with Growth Medium, "Day 2" images show cells after 24 hours in Differentiation Medium, and so on.
Upon each cell medium replacement, 1 mL of old media was collected from each well, saved in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, labeled according to the scheme above ("Day 1" for media collected after 24 hours in Growth Medium, etc.) and stored at −20 °C until analysis.
Methylmercury (MeHg) stock solution was obtained at 1000 ppm in H2O (Alfa Aesar), and 1.4 mL were added to a 1.4 mL aliquot of medium to create a MeHg/medium solution of 1 ppm (1000 ng/mL). Appropriate amounts of this solution were added to each culture plate well to obtain the desired concentration in 2 mL of medium. Fresh MeHg/medium solution was made each day immediately prior to addition to cells, and solutions were discarded as hazardous waste after use.
Concentrations of MeHg in the media used were designed to approximate total mercury at levels that would be considered slightly elevated (25 ng/mL), elevated (100 ng/mL), and very elevated (200 ng/mL) in human blood [25]. Individual cell cultures were either treated from Day 1 (during differentiation) or for several days after reaching maturity (post-differentiation).
Appropriate personal protective equipment was used at all times when working with MeHg solutions. Precautions included the use of Silver Shield gloves, along with an additional outer nitrile glove, whenever concentrated MeHg stocks were opened, as well as lab coats and a chemical safety hood. All mercury-containing liquid or solid wastes, including cell media, Eppendorf tubes, and pipet tips, were disposed of as hazardous waste according to local regulations.
The LDH assay makes use of the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which under normal conditions is present within the cytoplasm of many different cell types, and is not normally secreted or released outside the plasma membrane of the cell. The LDH assay is a common means of assaying cytotoxicity, and so is generally performed using a commercially available kit. The LDH kit used in these experiments was the Pierce LDH Cytotoxicity Assay, which provides its own protocol, described briefly below.
Media samples were thawed at room temperature (RT) and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes to precipitate any cell debris. 50 mL of cell medium supernatant were added to wells of a96-well clear flat-bottom plate (BD Falcon) in duplicate. LDH positive control from the kit was added to 1 well, and cell-free differentiation media to another well as a blank. Each well then received 50 mL of LDH reaction mix containing assay buffer and LDH substrate, a molecule that reacts with active LDH enzyme to form a red-colored product. Samples were incubated with reaction mix for 30 minutes at RT in the dark, and absorbance was read at 490 nm in a BioTek Synergy HT plate reader using Gen5 software.
The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a sensitive quantitative assay used to determine concentrations of particular proteins within a mixture or biological sample. The assay is based on the principle that antibodies bind with highspecificity to a particular antigen. ELISA is widely used both for research and for clinical diagnostics, and exists in several different forms, the most common of which is known as the sandwich ELISA.
Media samples were thawed at RT and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes to precipitate any cell debris. Cell medium supernatants from each MeHg condition were added to wells of the anti-VEGF coated microplate provided with the ELISA kit. A VEGF standard curve was created using VEGF standard supplied with the kit in a concentration range of 0-2000 pg/mL; media samples were diluted 1/2 prior to their addition to the plate in order to generate values that would fall within this standard curve. The plate was incubated for 2 hours at room temperature on a plate shaker, then rinsed five times using wash buffer. Antibody conjugate was then added to each well and the plate was incubated for 2 hours at room temperature on a plate shaker. Wells were again washed five times with wash buffer. Color reagent was added, and the plate was incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark without shaking. Stop solution was added to quench the color reaction, generating a yellow color; absorbance was read at 450 nm in a BioTek Synergy HT plate reader using Gen5 software.
For statistical analyses of effects on differentiating cells, cell populations were grouped according to stage of differentiation: Differentiation (Days 2 and 3, when differentiating cells were grown in Differentiation Medium), Insulin (Days 4 and 5, when differentiating cells were grown in Insulin Medium), Maintenance (Days 6-8) and Maturity (Days 10-12). Cell populations exposed to different concentrations of MeHg within each time group were compared with the unexposed population (0 ng/mL) to determine whether MeHg had any significant effect on LDH activity or VEGF secretion at any particular stage of differentiation. Cell populations that did not undergo differentiation, or that were exposed to MeHg only at the end of the differentiation process were analyzed as a single group for each population, rather than dividing into groups based on differentiation stage.
Data collected from the LDH assay and VEGF ELISA was analyzed and plotted using GraphPad Prism software. Analyses comparing two groups of data (e.g., exposure with MeHg vs. no exposure) used a Student's t-test, with resulting p values less than 0.05 considered significant. Analyses comparing multiple exposure conditions for a single exposure stage (e.g., exposure to 25 ng/mL, 100 ng/mL, and 200 ng/mL MeHg for the Differentiation stage) were performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Bonferroni post-test comparing all pairs of columns. Resulting p values were considered significant if less than or equal to 0.05, very significant if less than or equal to 0.01, highly significant if less than or equal to 0.001, and extremely significant if less than or equal to 0.0001.
Observation of morphological changes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes in culture revealed that morphological changes are dependent on several different factors, including cell differentiation status, concentration of MeHg exposure, and time of MeHgexposure.
Differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into mature adipocytes results in changes in cell morphology that are easily visible when viewing cells under a light microscope. Figure 2 shows untreated healthy confluent cells immediately prior to initiation of differentiation, i.e., immediately prior to addition of Differentiation Medium for the first time (Day 1) and mature cells after the differentiation process was complete (Day 14). Cells are notably more rounded and contain visible lipid vesicles indicative of successful differentiation (Figure 2B).
Addition of MeHg to cell culture media over a period of several days resulted in additional significant visible changes to morphology of the cells, not attributable simply to processes of cell differentiation. Changes included a decrease in cell size and reduction in confluence (Figure 3J; 3L), indicative of cellular stress and/or toxicity.
Figure 3 shows a detailed comparison of cells during the first seven days of the differentiation process, both unexposed cells (0 ng/mL) and cells exposed at the highest MeHg concentration (200 ng/mL MeHg). Images shown were taken at 24-hour intervals immediately before changing cell media. These changes only occurred at MeHg concentrations at the higher end of the tested range (100, 200 ng/mL); the incubation time required before seeing changes was positively related to MeHg concentration.
At Day 8 of exposure to 200 ng/mL MeHg, the cells were found clumped together and detached from the culture dish (not shown) indicating that the toxicity of MeHg had led to complete cell death.
A similar pattern of morphology change and cell death was seen in the cells exposed to 100 ng/mL MeHg, though cell detachment did not occur until Day 10 of exposure. Figure 4 shows a comparison of unexposed cells and 100 ng/mL MeHg-exposed cells at Day 10, after initiation of differentiation. The unexposed cells clearly show developing lipid vesicles, while the 100 ng/mL MeHg cells are shown detaching from the surface of the culture plate. A few developing lipid vesicles are nonetheless visible in the exposed cells as well, indicating that cell morphology changes associated with the differentiation process may still be occurring to some extent in spite of cytotoxicity.
Cells exposed to 25 ng/mL MeHg throughout differentiation showed no noticeable difference in morphology to exposed cells at Day 14, with no visible decrease in cell size or detachment from the culture plate (Figure 2). Qualitative observation of the number of lipid vesicles present suggests fewer in the exposed cells, which may be due to natural variation in vesicle number and will need to be further evaluated quantitatively to determine if a true effect of 25 ng/mL MeHg on lipid storage is occurring. Nonetheless, the lack of overall morphological changes to the cells suggests that cytotoxicity of 25 ng/mL MeHg is less than that of 100 ng/mL or 200 ng/mL MeHg at 14 days of exposure.
An additional subset of cells were either exposed to no MeHg or to the highest concentration of 200 ng/mL, and were not differentiated: media used for these cells were Growth Medium for Days 1-6, and Maintenance Medium for all subsequent days. Thus these cells were not exposed to IBMX/dexamethasone and did not experience the significant change in morphology associated with differentiation. Cells unexposed to MeHg did not experience any noticeable change in morphology over the course of the 14-day exposure; they maintained the morphology associated with undifferentiated pre-adipocytes. Cells exposed to 200 ng/mL MeHg experienced morphological changes similar to those seen in the differentiating adipocytes exposed the same MeHg conditions, although complete detachment from the culture plate took approximately 1 day longer to occur.
Additional cell populations were differentiated and allowed to reach near-maturity without any exposure to MeHg, at which point they were then exposed to 0, 25, 100 or 200 ng/mL MeHg in order to determine effects of MeHg exposure on already-differentiated adipocytes. No significant differences in morphology are seen after exposure.
Quantification of cytotoxicity using the LDH assay revealed that toxicity of MeHg exposure on adipocytes is dependent on several different factors, including concentration of exposure, time of exposure, and cell differentiation status. Results for each condition are detailed below.
Differentiating pre-adipocytes (Population "1" in Figure 1) were exposed to different MeHg concentrations beginning at confluence, and cytotoxicity was determined using the LDH assay performed on media collected every 24 hours of exposure during each stage of differentiation. Samples from the Differentiation stage were collected on Days 2 and 3, the Insulin stage on Days 4 and 5, and the Maintenance Stage at Days 6 and 8. Cytotoxicity was quantified using absorbance of each sample at 490 nm following the LDH assay, a measurement which represents LDH activity and presence in the cell media.
The results showed a significant increase in LDH in the media, indicating increased cytotoxicity, in the 100 and 200 ng/mL MeHg cell population during the Insulin stage on (Days 4 and 5) which then decreases in the 200 ng/mL population during the Maintenance stage (Figure 5a). LDH concentration in the 100 ng/mL MeHg population remains elevated, indicating that an exposure concentration of 100 ng/mL requires a longer exposure time in order to cause maximum cytotoxic effects. Notably, no significant cytotoxicity was seen in the cells exposed to 25 ng/mL MeHg during any differentiation stage, which agrees with the observations of cell morphology that showed no differences in cell death between unexposed cells and 25ng/mL-exposed cells at the conclusion of differentiation.
Two separate populations of cells, either unexposed to MeHg or exposed to 200 ng/mL MeHg, were not exposed to Differentiation Medium and thus retained their pre-adipocyte phenotype (Figure 1, Population "2"). Media were collected from these cells every 24 hours over 14 days; the LDH assay was performed on media from Day 3 to Day 5 (n = 4) to determine total cytotoxicity (Figure 5b).
Results show no significant difference (p = 0.526) in cytotoxicity between unexposed and MeHg-exposed cells between Days 3 and 5 of exposure, a time period in which significant differences in cytotoxicity were seen between unexposed and MeHg-exposed cells undergoing differentiation. This indicates that cytotoxicity of MeHg is different in 3T3-L1 cells depending on the cells' differentiation status.
Adipocytes that had been allowed to differentiate to maturity while unexposed to MeHg during differentiation were either unexposed or exposed to 25, 100, or 200 ng/mL MeHg for three days starting at Day 12 after initiation of differentiation. Media were collected every 24 hours, and results for the LDH assay for all samples within the three-day time period were analyzed. No significant cytotoxicity was seen in cells exposed to any of the MeHg concentrations within the three-day exposure period as compared to control during Maintenance Period.
Quantification of VEGF in cell media established that, as in the case of cytotoxicity, secretion of VEGF by cells exposed to MeHg isdependent on concentration of MeHg, time of exposure, as well as cell maturity and differentiation status.
Differentiating pre-adipocytes were exposed to different MeHg concentrations beginning at confluence. VEGF secretion was determined using a VEGF ELISA performed on media collected after each period of 24 hours of exposure during each stage of differentiation. Samples from the Differentiation stage were collected on Days 2 and 3, the Insulin stage on Days 4 and 5, the Maintenance Stage at Days 6 and 8, and the Maturity stage at Days 10 and 12. Concentration results from this assay represent VEGF concentrations in 2 mL of cell media produced by a confluent layer of adipocytes in each well of a 12-well plate.
Results indicate elevated VEGF secretion in all cells (both those unexposed to MeHg, and those exposed at any concentration of MeHg) during the Differentiation stage. This is likely associated with cells' exposure to IBMX and dexamethasone rather than any function of MeHg concentration (see Section 3.6).
During the Differentiation stage, no significant differences are seen in VEGF secretion between cells exposed to any concentration of MeHg and unexposed cells. At the Maintenance and Maturity stages, VEGF secretion at the higher MeHgconcentrations (100 and 200 ng/mL) decreases significantly to below the concentrations found in unexposed and 25 ng/mL-exposed cells. This is likely due to increased cytotoxicity at higher concentrations leading to fewer viable cells being present. Exposure of cells to 25 ng/mL MeHg did not result in a significantly greater or lower secretion of VEGF at any stage of differentiation, including Maintenance and Maturity.
Our initial experiments using control 3T3-L1 cells indicated that exposure to IBMX/dexamethasone in Differentiation Medium may cause elevated VEGF secretion even without exposure to MeHg [data not shown]. VEGF secretion from the non-differentiating cells (unexposed to IBMX/dexamethasone) was assayed in order to determine whether MeHg itself had any effect on VEGF secretion. Two separate populations of cells, either unexposed to MeHg or exposed to 200ng/mL MeHg, were not exposed to Differentiation Medium and thus retained their pre-adipocyte phenotype. Media were collected from these cells every 24 hours over 14 days. Results from the undifferentiated cells (n = 4 for each exposure group) showed no significant difference in VEGF secretion between Days 1 and 4, indicating that MeHg itself does not cause an increase in VEGF secretion independently of the increase caused by Differentiation Medium.
Cells that had been allowed to differentiate to-maturity while unexposed to MeHg during differentiation were either unexposed or exposed to 200 ng/mL MeHg for three days starting at Day 12 after initiation of differentiation (Figure 6).
Cells exposed to the two higher MeHg concentrations (100 and 200 ng/mL), however, showed a significant increase in VEGF secretion compared to unexposed mature cells. No significant difference was seen in VEGF secretion from cells exposed to 25 ng/mL MeHg during the three-day period as compared to any other exposure group. These results, in conjunction with the lack of significant changes in VEGF secretion in differentiating cells indicate that effects of MeHg exposure on 3T3-L1 cells is dependent on concentration of MeHg and on differentiation status of the cells themselves.
Cells that were both undifferentiated and unexposed to MeHg for 12 days were exposed either to no MeHg or to 200 ng/mL MeHg for three days to assess VEGF secretion. Results showed no significant difference between exposed and unexposed cells, further confirming that effects of MeHg on VEGF secretion are dependent on the differentiation status and/or maturity of the adipocytes at the time they are exposed to MeHg.
Many of the laboratory-based studies published thus far on the health effects of MeHg exposure have focused on detrimental effects to the central nervous system, often with an emphasis on exposure to the developing fetus, as these are considered the critical target organ and most susceptible subpopulation, respectively [31]. In general, these studies have examined effects occurring at relatively high exposure levels not typical in most human populations. Though the nervous system is still considered the critical target organ, elevated levels of blood MeHg can cause toxic impacts on other cell types such as adipose tissue. Though several epidemiological and animal studies have addressed this possibility, few in vitro studies up to now have explored the details of such toxicity. Our experiments report the effects of MeHg exposure to adipocytes in vitro, and are one of only a few studies showing the cytotoxic effects of longer-term (>48 hours), low-level MeHg exposure (<200 ng/mL) on non-neuronal cell types in culture.
Our results showed that the cytotoxic effects of MeHg on differentiating adipocytes are dependent on MeHg concentration as well as the time of the exposure. Higher MeHg concentration levels of normal exposures produced maximum cytotoxic effects in shorter time. MeHg concentrations of 100 ng/mL and 200 ng/mL showed significant cytotoxicity beginning at approximately 4-5 days of exposure, during the stage at which they are exposed to Insulin Medium in their differentiation process. Morphological examination of these cells shows the majority of the population undergoing cell death and detaching from the culture dish by Day 9 (for 200 ng/mL exposure) and Day 11 (for 100 ng/mL exposure).
Many cell culture toxicity designs assess cytotoxicity after a much shorter exposure time, often 48 hours. Such experiments would have missed the cytotoxic effects of exposure to concentrations between 100-200 ng/mL, whose effects are not apparent until Day 4 and later. The lower concentrations, however, also produced a delayed cytotoxic response. This could potentially impact the severity or treatment of longer-term diseases, including those involved in metabolic syndrome.
Our experiments do not show any significant cytotoxic effects after exposure to 25 ng/mL MeHg at any stage of differentiation, up to Day 8 (the Maintenance stage). However, it is unknown whether further exposure may have led to toxic effects. As stated above, future studies of MeHg toxicity in cell culture should account for time of longer times of exposure in determining whether or not cytotoxic effects are occurring at very low MeHg concentrations.
The toxicity of 200 ng/mL MeHg exposure was not limited to adipocytes undergoing differentiation. Comparison of the morphological changes in non-differentiating vs. differentiating adipocytes exposed to 200 ng/mL MeHg saw similar reduction in cell size and detachment from the culture plate with a slightly longer (~1 day) incubation in the undifferentiated cells as compared to the differentiating ones. Further experiments will need to be performed in order to clarify this effect. One explanation could be that the process of differentiation itself exerts some stresses on the cells that lessen their ability to tolerate the toxic effects of the MeHg exposure.
Our results represent the first report examining effects of MeHg exposure on adipocytes in cell culture on the secretion of VEGF from adipocytes. VEGF, while long known as a target in development of cancer therapies, has only in recent years been recognized for a possible role in metabolic dysfunctions such as diabetes and obesity. While its precise role in the development of these disorders has not yet been fully elucidated, studies have shown that VEGF may significantly affect metabolic status of an organism when overexpressed or absent in adipose tissue [26,27]. Compounds that affect secretion of VEGF from adipose tissue may represent possible avenues for understanding the mechanisms of metabolic disease.
Adipocyte cells, regardless of MeHg exposure, experienced elevated VEGF secretion during the Differentiation stage. This elevation is likely due to the effects of the compounds in the Differentiation Medium itself, namely IBMX and dexamethasone. Dexamethasone is known to increase production of cAMP; whereas, exposure to IBMX has been shown to increase VEGF secretion, even in healthy cells [28]. For this reason, cell populations were evaluated for VEGF secretion beginning at Day 2 (the Differentiation stage) so confounding effects of exposure to Differentiation Medium could be discounted. The non-differentiating cells (cells not exposed to IBMX/dexamethasone) did not experience a significant increase in VEGF secretion upon treatment with MeHg. This suggests that MeHg exposure has no significant effect on VEGF secretion in non-differentiating cells. At the higher MeHg concentrations used (100 ng/mL and 200 ng/mL), VEGF secretion drops off significantly after the Insulin stage, which is presumably due to cytotoxicity and cell death rather than a specific effect of MeHg.
Exposure at 25 ng/mL did not cause any significant change in VEGF secretion as compared to control during any stage of exposure. During Maintenance and Maturity, the 25 ng/mL-treated cells appeared to produce a similar pattern ofsecretion to the unexposed cells but at a slightly lower level; further replicate experiments will need to be performed at this exposure level at a similar exposure duration in order to determine whether this is a significant physiological effect due to MeHg or whether it falls within a normal range of variation. Because this level of exposure was not associated with significant toxicity to the cells, a decrease in VEGF secretion could represent a potentially interesting sub-lethal effect to the cells that would be worth exploring experimentally in further detail.
Additional future directions of this research should include examination of production of molecular markers specific to mature adipocytes (e.g., C/EBPα; PPARγ) [28] in order to determine MeHg's possible effects on the differentiation process in general, and whether MeHg causes inhibition of adipogenesis through pathways not directly related to cytotoxicity.
This study used levels of MeHg in cell media meant to represent concentrations that would realistically be found in blood, either consistently or transiently, of humans consuming MeHg-containing fish. The results showed that these MeHg concentrations are capable of causing changes in the structure and function of adipose cells, providing preliminary evidence that MeHg causes physiological effects in organs other than the brain and nervous system. While the effects of MeHg on cultured adipose cells as observed in this study were significant, particularly with regard to cytotoxic effects, their relevance with regard to MeHg exposure in a whole organism remains to be determined. Direct exposure of cells to MeHg, as in these experiments, are a first step in understanding specific toxic effects of MeHg in vivo.
All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
Work reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under three linked awards number RL5GM118990, TL4 GM 118992 and 1UL1GM118991. The work is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health.
[1] |
Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WCW (2012) Size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14: 1–16. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124
![]() |
[2] |
Egeblad M, Nakasone ES, Werb Z (2010) Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. Dev Cell 18: 884–901. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.05.012
![]() |
[3] |
Mierke CT (2014) The fundamental role of mechanical properties in the progression of cancer disease and inflammation. Rep Prog Phys 77: 076602. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/7/076602
![]() |
[4] |
Piktel E, Niemirowicz K, Wątek M, et al. (2016) Recent insights in nanotechnology-based drugs and formulations designed for effective anti-cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol 14: 39. doi: 10.1186/s12951-016-0193-x
![]() |
[5] | Braun J, Tzschätzsch H, Körting C, et al. (2017) A compact 0.5 T MR elastography device and its application for studying viscoelasticity changes in biological tissues during progressive formalin fixation. Magn Reson Med. In press. |
[6] | Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, et al. (2017) Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7: 1301–1329. |
[7] |
Mierke CT, Fischer T, Puder S, et al. (2017) Focal adhesion kinase activity is required for actomyosin contractility-based invasion of cells into dense 3D matrices. Sci Rep 7: 42780. doi: 10.1038/srep42780
![]() |
[8] | Jolly MK, Boareto M, Huang B, et al. (2015) Implications of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype in metastasis. Front Oncol 5: 00155. |
[9] |
Jolly MK, Tripathi SC, Jia D, et al. (2016) Stability of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype. Oncotarget 7: 27067–27084. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8166
![]() |
[10] |
Jolly MK, Ware KE, Gilja S, et al. (2017) EMT and MET: necessary or permissive for metastasis? Mol Oncol 11: 755–769. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12083
![]() |
[11] |
Thiery JP (2002) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 442–454. doi: 10.1038/nrc822
![]() |
[12] |
Wolf K, Friedl P (2003) Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 362–374. doi: 10.1038/nrc1075
![]() |
[13] |
Friedl P, Gilmour D (2009) Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 10: 445–457. doi: 10.1038/nrm2720
![]() |
[14] |
Friedl P, Wolf K (2003) Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 362–374. doi: 10.1038/nrc1075
![]() |
[15] |
Driscoll MK, Danuser G (2015) Quantifying modes of 3D cell migration. Trends Cell Biol 25: 749–759. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.09.010
![]() |
[16] | Abercrombie M, Heaysman JEM, Pegrum SM (1971) The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res 67: 359–367. |
[17] |
Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, et al. (2003) Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302: 1704–1709. doi: 10.1126/science.1092053
![]() |
[18] |
Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF (1996) Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84: 359–369. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81280-5
![]() |
[19] |
Huttenlocher A, Sandborg RR, Horwitz AF (1995) Adhesion in cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7: 697–706. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80112-X
![]() |
[20] |
Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD (2009) Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 21–33. doi: 10.1038/nrm2593
![]() |
[21] |
Wilson CA, Tsuchida MA, Allen GM, et al. (2010) Myosin II contributes to cell-scale actin network treadmilling through network disassembly. Nature 465: 373–377. doi: 10.1038/nature08994
![]() |
[22] |
Reymann AC, Boujemaa-Paterski R, Martiel JL, et al. (2012) Actin network architecture can determine myosin motor activity. Science 336: 1310–1314. doi: 10.1126/science.1221708
![]() |
[23] |
Petrie RJ, Yamada KM (2015) Fibroblasts lead the way: a unified view of three-dimensional cell motility. Trends Cell Biol 25: 666–674. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.013
![]() |
[24] |
Tozluoğlu M, Tournier AL, Jenkins RP, et al. (2013) Matrix geometry determines optimal cancer cell migration strategy and modulates response to interventions. Nat Cell Biol 15: 751–764. doi: 10.1038/ncb2775
![]() |
[25] |
Mierke CT, Rösel D, Fabry B, et al. (2008) Contractile forces in tumor cell migration. Eur J Cell Biol 87: 669–676. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.01.002
![]() |
[26] |
Wolf K, Mazo I, Leung H, et al. (2003) Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration: mesenchymal-amoeboid transition after blocking of pericellular proteolysis. J Cell Biol 160: 267–277. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200209006
![]() |
[27] |
Sahai E, Marshall CJ (2003) Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis. Nat Cell Biol 5: 711–719. doi: 10.1038/ncb1019
![]() |
[28] |
Sanz-Moreno V, Gadea G, Ahn J, et al. (2008) Rac activation and inactivation control plasticity of tumor cell movement. Cell 135: 510–523. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.043
![]() |
[29] |
Neilson MP, Veltman DM, van Haastert PJ, et al. (2011) Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour. PLoS Biol 9: e1000618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000618
![]() |
[30] |
Bagorda A, Parent CA (2008) Eukaryotic chemotaxis at a glance. J Cell Sci 121: 2621–2624. doi: 10.1242/jcs.018077
![]() |
[31] |
Rorth P (2011) Whence directionality: guidance mechanisms in solitary and collective cell migration. Dev Cell 20: 9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.12.014
![]() |
[32] |
Mierke CT, Frey B, Fellner M, et al. (2011) Integrin α5β1 facilitates cancer cell invasion through enhanced contractile forces. J Cell Sci 124: 369–383. doi: 10.1242/jcs.071985
![]() |
[33] | Huttenlocher A, Horwitz AR (2011) Integrins in cell migration. CSH Perspect Biol 3: a005074. |
[34] |
Hung WC, Chen SH, Paul CD, et al. (2013) Distinct signaling mechanisms regulate migration in unconfined versus confined spaces. J Cell Biol 202: 807–824. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201302132
![]() |
[35] |
Hung WC, Yang JR, Yankaskas CL, et al. (2016) Confinement sensing and signal optimization via Piezo1/PKA and Myosin II pathways. Cell Rep 15: 1430–1441. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.035
![]() |
[36] |
Liu YJ, Le BM, Lautenschlaeger F, et al. (2015) Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell 160: 659–672. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.007
![]() |
[37] |
Beadle C, Assanah MC, Monzo P, et al. (2008) The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain. Mol Biol Cell 19: 3357–3368. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-03-0319
![]() |
[38] |
Jacobelli J, Friedman RS, Conti MA, et al. (2010) Confinement-optimized three-dimensional T cell amoeboid motility is modulated via myosin IIA-regulated adhesions. Nat Immunol 11: 953–961. doi: 10.1038/ni.1936
![]() |
[39] |
Han J, Rose DM, Woodside DG, et al. (2003) Integrin alpha 4 beta 1-dependent T cell migration requires both phosphorylation of the alpha 4 cytoplasmic domain to regulate the reversible binding to paxillin. J Biol Chem 278: 34845–34853. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304691200
![]() |
[40] |
Charras G, Sahai E (2014) Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15: 813–824. doi: 10.1038/nrm3897
![]() |
[41] |
Bergert M, Erzberger A, Desai RA, et al. (2015) Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration. Nat Cell Biol 17: 524–529. doi: 10.1038/ncb3134
![]() |
[42] |
Raman PS, Paul CD, Stroka KM (2013) Probing cll traction forces in confined microenvironments. Lab Chip 13: 4599–4607. doi: 10.1039/c3lc50802a
![]() |
[43] |
Wolenski RS (1995) Regulation of calmodulin-binding myosins. Trends Cell Biol 5: 310–316. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)89053-4
![]() |
[44] |
Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV (2003) Ca2+ sensitivity of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II: Modulate by G proteins, kinases, and myosin phosphate. Physiol Rev 83: 1325–1358. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00023.2003
![]() |
[45] | Abercrombie M, Heaysman JEM, Pegrum SM (1970) The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture: I. Movements of the leading edge. Exp Cell Res 59: 393–398. |
[46] | Bard JB, Hay ED (1975) The behavior of fibroblasts from the developing avian cornea. Morphology and movement in situ and in vitro. J Cell Biol 67: 400–418. |
[47] |
Weiger MC, Wang CC, Krajcovic M, et al. (2009) Spontaneous phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling dynamics drive spreading and random migration of fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 122: 313–323. doi: 10.1242/jcs.037564
![]() |
[48] |
Kraynov VS, Chamberlain C, Bokoch GM, et al. (2000) Localized Rac activation dynamics visualized in living cells. Science 290: 333–337. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5490.333
![]() |
[49] |
Nalbant P, Hodgson L, Kraynov V, et al. (2004) Activation of endogenous Cdc42 visualized in living cells. Science 305: 1615–1619. doi: 10.1126/science.1100367
![]() |
[50] |
Svitkina TM, Borisy GG (1999) Arp2/3 complex and actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin in dendritic organization and treadmilling of actin filament array in lamellipodia. J Cell Biol 145: 1009–1026. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.5.1009
![]() |
[51] |
Small JV (1981) Organization of actin in the leading edge of cultured cells: influence of osmium tetroxide and dehydration on the ultrastructure of actin meshworks. J Cell Biol 91: 695–705. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.695
![]() |
[52] |
Zaidel-Bar R, Ballestrem C, Kam Z, et al. (2003) Early molecular events in the assembly of matrix adhesions at the leading edge of migrating cells. J Cell Sci 116: 4605–4613. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00792
![]() |
[53] |
Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K (1996) Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 133: 1403–1415. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.6.1403
![]() |
[54] |
Gupton SL, Eisenmann K, Alberts AS, et al. (2007) mDia2 regulates actin and focal adhesion dynamics and organization in the lamella for efficient epithelial cell migration. J Cell Sci 120: 3475–3487. doi: 10.1242/jcs.006049
![]() |
[55] |
Chen WT (1981) Mechanism of retraction of the trailing edge during fibroblast movement. J Cell Biol 90: 187–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.187
![]() |
[56] |
Vicente-Manzanares M, Koach MA, Whitmore L, et al. (2008) Segregation and activation of myosin IIB creates a rear in migrating cells. J Cell Biol 183: 543–554. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806030
![]() |
[57] |
Bergmann JE, Kupfer A, Singer SJ (1983) Membrane insertion at the leading-edge of motile fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 1367–1371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.5.1367
![]() |
[58] |
Osmani N, Peglion F, Chavrier P, et al. (2010) Cdc42 localization and cell polarity depend on membrane traffic. J Cell Biol 191: 1261–1269. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201003091
![]() |
[59] |
Gomes ER, Jani S, Gundersen GG (2005) Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 121: 451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.022
![]() |
[60] |
Petrie RJ, Yamada KM (2012) At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration. J Cell Sci 125: 5917–5926. doi: 10.1242/jcs.093732
![]() |
[61] |
Petrie RJ, Gavara N, Chadwick RS, et al. (2012) Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration. J Cell Biol 197: 439–455. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201201124
![]() |
[62] | Charras G, Paluch E (2008) Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 730–736. |
[63] |
Lämmermann T, Bader BL, Monkley SJ, et al. (2008) Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453: 51–55. doi: 10.1038/nature06887
![]() |
[64] |
Sanchez T, Chen DT, DeCamp SJ, et al. (2012) Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter. Nature 491: 431–434. doi: 10.1038/nature11591
![]() |
[65] |
Ruprecht V, Wieser S, Callan-Jones A, et al. (2015) Cortical contractility triggers a stochastic switch to fast amoeboid cell motility. Cell 160: 673–685. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.008
![]() |
[66] |
Davidson PM, Denais C, Bakshi MC, et al. (2014) Nuclear deformability constitutes a rate-limiting step during cell migration in 3-D environments. Cell Mol Bioeng 7: 293–306. doi: 10.1007/s12195-014-0342-y
![]() |
[67] |
Harada T, Swift J, Irianto J, et al. (2014) Nuclear lamin stiffness is a barrier to 3D migration, but softness can limit survival. J Cell Biol 204: 669–682. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201308029
![]() |
[68] |
Wolf K, Lindert MT, Krause M, et al. (2013) Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J Cell Biol 201: 1069–1084. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201210152
![]() |
[69] |
Bernards R, Weinberg RA (2002) Metastasis genes: A progression puzzle. Nature 418: 823. doi: 10.1038/418823a
![]() |
[70] |
Heasman SJ, Ridley AJ (2008) Mammalian Rho GTPases: new insights into their functions from in vivo studies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 690–701. doi: 10.1038/nrm2476
![]() |
[71] |
Ladwein M, Rottner K (2008) On the Rho'd: the regulation of membrane protrusions by Rho-GTPases. FEBS Lett 582: 2066–2074. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.033
![]() |
[72] |
Aspenström P, Fransson A, Saras J (2004) Rho GTPases have diverse effects on the organization of the actin filament system. Biochem J 377: 327–337. doi: 10.1042/bj20031041
![]() |
[73] |
Ridley AJ, Paterson HF, Johnston CL, et al. (1992) The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell 70: 401–410. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90164-8
![]() |
[74] |
Nobes CD, Hall A (1995) Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell 81: 53–62. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90370-4
![]() |
[75] |
Monypenny J, Zicha D, Higashida C, et al. (2009) Cdc42 and Rac family GTPases regulate mode and speed but not direction of primary fibroblast migration during platelet-derived growth factor-dependent chemotaxis. Mol Cell Biol 29: 2730–2747. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01285-08
![]() |
[76] |
Krugmann S, Jordens I, Gevaert K, et al. (2001) Cdc42 induces filopodia by promoting the formation of an IRSp53: Mena complex. Curr Biol 11: 1645–1655. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00506-1
![]() |
[77] |
Jaffe AB, Hall A (2002) Rho GTPases in transformation and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res 84: 57–80. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(02)84003-9
![]() |
[78] |
Hall A (1998) Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279: 509–514. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.509
![]() |
[79] |
Allen WE, Zicha D, Ridley AJ, et al. (1998) A role for Cdc42 in macrophage chemotaxis. J Cell Biol 141: 1147–1157. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.5.1147
![]() |
[80] |
Nobes CD, Hall A (1999) Rho GTPases control polarity, protrusion, and adhesion during cell movement. J Cell Biol 144: 1235–1244. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1235
![]() |
[81] |
Amano M, Chihara K, Kimura K, et al. (1997) Formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions enhanced by Rho-kinase. Science 275: 1308–1311. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5304.1308
![]() |
[82] |
Watanabe N, Kato T, Fujita A, et al. (1999) Cooperation between mDia1 and ROCK in Rho-induced actin reorganization. Nat Cell Biol 1: 136–143. doi: 10.1038/11056
![]() |
[83] |
Cox EA, Sastry SK, Huttenlocher A (2001) Integrin-mediated adhesion regulates cell polarity and membrane protrusion through the Rho family of GTPases. Mol Biol Cell 12: 265–277. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.2.265
![]() |
[84] |
Fukata M, Kaibuchi K (2001) Rho-family GTPases in Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 2: 887–897. doi: 10.1038/35103068
![]() |
[85] |
Doyle AD, Wang FW, Matsumoto K, et al. (2009) One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J Cell Biol 184: 481–490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810041
![]() |
[86] |
Even-Ram S, Doyle AD, Conti MA, et al. (2007) Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin-microtubule crosstalk. Nat Cell Biol 9: 299–309. doi: 10.1038/ncb1540
![]() |
[87] |
Zhong C, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Brown J, et al. (1998) Rho-mediated contractility exposes a cryptic site in fibronectin and induces fibronectin matrix assembly. J Cell Biol 141: 539–551. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.2.539
![]() |
[88] |
Arthur WT, Burridge K (2001) RhoA inactivation by p190RhoGAP regulates cell spreading and migration by promoting membrane protrusion and polarity. Mol Biol Cell 12: 2711–2720. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.9.2711
![]() |
[89] | Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K (1994) Tyrosine phosphorylation is involved in reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in response to serum or LPA stimulation. J Cell Sci 107: 3643–3654. |
[90] |
Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, et al. (2008) Contact guidance mediated three-dimensional cell migration is regulated by Rho/ROCK-dependent matrix reorganization. Biophys J 95: 5374–5384. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.133116
![]() |
[91] |
Riching KM, Cox BL, Salick MR, et al. (2014) 3D collagen alignment limits protrusions to enhance breast cancer cell persistence. Biophys J 107: 2546–2558. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.035
![]() |
[92] |
Thomas DG, Yenepalli A, Denais CM, et al. (2015) Non-muscle myosin IIB is critical for nuclear translocation during 3D invasion. J Cell Biol 210: 583–594. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201502039
![]() |
[93] | Paul CD, Mistriotis P, Konstantopoulos K (2017) Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces. Nat Rev Cancer 17: 131–140. |
[94] |
Lombardi ML, Jaalouk DE, Shanahan CM, et al. (2011) The interaction between nesprins and sun proteins at the nuclear envelope is critical for force transmission between the nucleus and cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem 286: 26743–26753. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.233700
![]() |
[95] |
Mierke CT, Zitterbart DP, Kollmannsberger P, et al. (2008) Breakdown of the endothelial barrier function in tumor cell transmigration. Biophys J 94: 2832–2846. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.113613
![]() |
[96] | Eddy RJ, Pierini LM, Matsumura F, et al. (2000) Ca2+-dependent myosin II activation is required for uropod retraction during neutrophil migration. J Cell Sci 113: 1287–1298. |
[97] |
Poincloux R, Collin O, Lizárraga F, et al. (2011) Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D Matrigel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 1943–1948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010396108
![]() |
[98] |
Olins AL, Hoang TV, Zwerger M, et al. (2009) The LINC-less granulocyte nucleus. Eur J Cell Biol 88: 203–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.10.001
![]() |
[99] |
Machacek M, Hodgson L, Welch C, et al. (2009) Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion. Nature 461: 99–103. doi: 10.1038/nature08242
![]() |
[100] |
Das T, Safferling K, Rausch S, et al. (2015) A molecular mechanotransduction pathway regulates collective migration of epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol 17: 276–287. doi: 10.1038/ncb3115
![]() |
[101] |
Yi CL, Troutman S, Fera D, et al. (2011) A tight junction-associated merlin-angiomotin complex mediates Merlin's regulation of mitogenic signaling and tumor suppressive functions. Cancer Cell 19: 527–540. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.02.017
![]() |
[102] |
Ramel D, Wang XB, Laflamme C, et al. (2013) Rab11 regulates cell-cell communication during collective cell movements. Nat Cell Biol 15: 317–324. doi: 10.1038/ncb2681
![]() |
[103] |
Gaggioli C, Hooper S, Hidalgo-Carcedo C, et al. (2007) Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat Cell Biol 9: 1392–1400. doi: 10.1038/ncb1658
![]() |
[104] |
Wang XB, He L, Wu YI, et al. (2010) Light-mediated activation reveals a key role for Rac in collective guidance of cell movement in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 12: 591–597. doi: 10.1038/ncb2061
![]() |
[105] |
Hidalgo-Carcedo C, Hooper S, Chaudhry SI, et al. (2011) Collective cell migration requires suppression of actomyosin at cell-cell contacts mediated by DDR1 and the cell polarity regulators Par3 and Par6. Nat Cell Biol 13: 49–58. doi: 10.1038/ncb2133
![]() |
[106] |
Ng MR, Besser A, Danuser G, et al. (2012) Substrate stiffness regulates cadherin-dependent colle cadherin-dependent collective migration through myosin-II contractility. J Cell Biol 199: 545–563. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201207148
![]() |
[107] |
Reffay M, Parrini MC, Cochet-Escartin O, et al. (2014) Interplay of RhoA and mechanical forces in collective cell migration driven by leader cells. Nat Cell Biol 16: 217–223. doi: 10.1038/ncb2917
![]() |
[108] |
Peglion F, Llense F, Etienne-Manneville S (2014) Adherens junction treadmilling during collective migration. Nat Cell Biol 16: 639–651. doi: 10.1038/ncb2985
![]() |
[109] |
Raupach C, Zitterbart DP, Mierke CT, et al. (2007) Stress fluctuations and motion of cytoskeletal-bound markers. Phys Rev E 76: 011918. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.011918
![]() |
[110] |
Tambe DT, Hardin CC, Angelini TE, et al. (2011) Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces. Nat Mater 10: 469–475. doi: 10.1038/nmat3025
![]() |
[111] |
Trepat X, Wasserman MR, Angelini TE, et al. (2009) Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat Phys 5: 426–430. doi: 10.1038/nphys1269
![]() |
[112] |
Jaffe AB, Hall A (2005) Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21: 247–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.150721
![]() |
[113] |
Schmidt A, Hall A (2002) Guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rho GTPases: turning on the switch. Gene Dev 16: 1587–1609. doi: 10.1101/gad.1003302
![]() |
[114] |
Otani T, Ichii T, Aono S, et al. (2006) Cdc42 GEF Tuba regulates the junctional configuration of simple epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 175: 135–146. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200605012
![]() |
[115] |
Harris KP, Tepass U (2010) Cdc42 and vesicle trafficking in polarized cells. Traffic 11: 1272–1279. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01102.x
![]() |
[116] |
Citi S, Spadaro D, Schneider Y, et al. (2011) Regulation of small GTPases at epithelial cell-cell junctions. Mol Membr Biol 28: 427–444. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2011.603101
![]() |
[117] |
Rohatgi R, Ho HY, Kirschner MW (2000) Mechanism of N-WASP activation by CDC42 and phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate. J Cell Biol 150: 117–120. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.6.F117
![]() |
[118] |
Hall A (2005) Rho GTPases and the control of cell behaviour. Biochem Soc Trans 33: 891–895. doi: 10.1042/BST0330891
![]() |
[119] |
Aspenström P, Richnau N, Johansson AS (2006) The diaphanous-related formin DAAM1 collaborates with the Rho GTPases RhoA and Cdc42, CIP4 and Src in regulating cell morphogenesis and actin dynamics. Exp Cell Res 312: 2180–2194. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.03.013
![]() |
[120] |
Aspenstrom P (1997) A Cdc42 target protein with homology to the non-kinase domain of FER has a potential role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton. Curr Biol 7: 479–487. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00219-3
![]() |
[121] |
Tian L, Nelson DL, Stewart DM (2000) Cdc42-interacting protein 4 mediates binding of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein to microtubules. J Biol Chem 275: 7854–7861. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7854
![]() |
[122] |
Yanai M, Kenyon CM, Butler JP, et al. (1996) Intracellular pressure is a motive force for cell motion in Amoeba proteus. Cell Motil Cytoskel 33: 22–29. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1996)33:1<22::AID-CM3>3.0.CO;2-K
![]() |
[123] | Petrie RJ, Koo H (2014) Direct measurement of intracellular pressure. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 63: 12–19. |
[124] |
Petrie RJ, Koo H, Yamada KM (2014) Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 345: 1062–1065. doi: 10.1126/science.1256965
![]() |
[125] |
Stroka KM, Jiang H, Chen SH, et al. (2014) Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments. Cell 157: 611–623. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.052
![]() |
[126] |
Chartier L, Rankin LL, Allen RE, et al. (1991) Calyculin-A increases the level of protein phosphorylation and changes the shape of 3T3 fibroblasts. Cell Motil Cytoskel 18: 26–40. doi: 10.1002/cm.970180104
![]() |
[127] |
Goldman R, Goldman A, Green K, et al. (1985) Intermediate filaments: possible functions as cytoskeletal connecting links between the nucleus and the cell surface. Ann NY Acad Sci 455: 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb50400.x
![]() |
[128] |
Lehto VP, Virtanen I, Kurki P (1978) Intermediate filaments anchor the nuclei in nuclear monolayers of cultured human fibroblasts. Nature 272: 175–177. doi: 10.1038/272175a0
![]() |
[129] |
Janmey PA, Euteneuer U, Traub P, et al. (1991) Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. J Cell Biol 113: 155–160. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.1.155
![]() |
[130] |
Deguchi S, Ohashi T, Sato M (2006) Tensile properties of single stress fibers isolated from cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biomech 39: 2603–2610. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.08.026
![]() |
[131] |
Dupin I, Sakamoto Y, Etienne-Manneville S (2011) Cytoplasmic intermediate filaments mediate actin-driven positioning of the nucleus. J Cell Sci 124: 865–872. doi: 10.1242/jcs.076356
![]() |
[132] |
Petrie RJ, Harlin HM, Korsak LIT, et al. (2017) Activating the nuclear piston mechanism of 3D migration in tumor cells. J Cell Biol 216: 93–100. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201605097
![]() |
[133] | Sung BH, Ketova T, Hoshino D, et al. (2004) Directional cell movement through tissues is controlled by exosome secretion. Nat Commun 6: 7164. |
[134] |
Gundersen GG, Bulinski JC (1988) Selective stabilization of microtubules oriented toward the direction of cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 5946–5950. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.5946
![]() |
[135] |
Kupfer A, Louvard D, Singer SJ (1982) Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center in cultured fibroblasts at the edge of an experimental wound. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 2603–2607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2603
![]() |
[136] | Vasiliev JM, Gelfand IM, Domnina LV, et al. (1970) Effect of colcemid on the locomotory behaviour of fibroblasts. J Embryol Exp Morphol 24: 625–640. |
[137] | Wu C, Asokan SB, Berginski ME, et al. (2012) Arp2/3 is critical for lamellipodia and response to extracellular matrix cues but is dispensable for chemotaxis. Cell 148: 973–987. |
[138] |
Wu YI, Frey D, Lungu OI, et al. (2009) A genetically encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells. Nature 461: 104–108. doi: 10.1038/nature08241
![]() |
[139] |
Welf ES, Ahmed S, Johnson HE, et al. (2012) Migrating fibroblasts reorient directionality by a metastable, PI3K-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol 197: 105–114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201108152
![]() |
[140] |
Giannone G, Dubin-Thaler BJ, Döbereiner HG, et al. (2004) Periodic lamellipodial contractions correlate with rearward actin waves. Cell 116: 431–443. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00058-3
![]() |
[141] |
Ponti A, Machacek M, Gupton SL, et al. (2004) Two distinct actin networks drive the protrusion of migrating cells. Science 305: 1782–1786. doi: 10.1126/science.1100533
![]() |
[142] |
Friedl P, Wolf K (2009) Proteolytic interstitial cell migration: a five-step process. Cancer Metastasis Rev 28: 129–135. doi: 10.1007/s10555-008-9174-3
![]() |
[143] |
Danen EH, van Rheenen J, Franken W, et al. (2005) Integrins control motile strategy through a Rho-cofilin pathway. J Cell Biol 169: 515–526. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200412081
![]() |
[144] |
Doyle AD, Kutys ML, Conti MA, et al. (2012) Micro-environmental control of cell migration-myosin IIA is required for efficient migration in fibrillar environments through control of cell adhesion dynamics. J Cell Sci 125: 2244–2256. doi: 10.1242/jcs.098806
![]() |
[145] |
Lämmermann T, Sixt M (2009) Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21: 636–644. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.05.003
![]() |
[146] |
Renkawitz J, Schumann K, Weber M, et al. (2009) Adaptive force transmission in amoeboid cell migration. Nat Cell Biol 11: 1438–1443. doi: 10.1038/ncb1992
![]() |
[147] |
Charras GT, Yarrow JC, Horton MA, et al. (2005) Non-equilibration of hydrostatic pressure in blebbing cells. Nature 435: 365–369. doi: 10.1038/nature03550
![]() |
[148] |
Bergert M, Chandradoss SD, Desai RA, et al. (2012) Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 14434–14439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207968109
![]() |
[149] |
Petrie RJ, Yamada KM (2016) Multiple mechanisms of 3D migration: The origins of plasticity. Curr Opin Cell Biol 42: 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.025
![]() |
[150] |
Doyle AD, Carvajal N, Jin A, et al. (2015) Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions. Nat Commun 6: 8720. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9720
![]() |
[151] |
Ray U, Roy SS, Chowdhury SR (2017) Lysophosphatidic acid promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer cells by repressing SIRT1. Cell Physiol Biochem 41: 795–805. doi: 10.1159/000458744
![]() |
[152] |
Vincent T, Neve EP, Johnson JR, et al. (2009) A SNAIL1-SMAD3/4 transcriptional repressor complex promotes TGF-beta mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Cell Biol 11: 943–950. doi: 10.1038/ncb1905
![]() |
[153] |
Huang YL, Tung CK, Zheng A, et al. (2015) Interstitial flows promote amoeboid over mesenchymal motility of breast cancer cells revealed by a three dimensional microfluidic model. Integr Biol 7: 1402–1411. doi: 10.1039/C5IB00115C
![]() |
[154] |
Laurent VM, Fodil R, Cañadas P, et al. (2003) Partitioning of cortical and deep cytoskeleton responses from transient magnetic bead twisting. Ann Biomed Eng 31: 1263–1278. doi: 10.1114/1.1616932
![]() |
[155] |
Laevsky G, Knecht DA (2003) Cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin II is a major contributor to cortical integrity and cell motility in restrictive environments. J Cell Sci 116: 3761–3770. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00684
![]() |
[156] |
Small JV, Rottner K, Kaverina I, et al. (1998) Assembling an actin cytoskeleton for cell attachment and movement. Biochim Biophys Acta 1404: 271–281. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4889(98)00080-9
![]() |
[157] |
Tojkander S, Gateva G, Lappalainen P (2012) Actin stress fibers-assembly, dynamics and biological roles. J Cell Sci 125: 1855–1864. doi: 10.1242/jcs.098087
![]() |
[158] |
Vallenius T (2013) Actin stress fibre subtypes in mesenchymal-migrating cells. Open Biol 3: 130001. doi: 10.1098/rsob.130001
![]() |
[159] |
Kassianidou E, Kumar S (2015) A biomechanical perspective on stress fiber structure and function. Biochim Biophys Acta 1853: 3065–3074. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.04.006
![]() |
[160] |
Klimova Z, Braborec V, Maninova M, et al. (2016) Symmetry breaking in spreading RAT2 fibroblasts requires the MAPK/ERK pathway scaffold RACK1 that integrates FAK, p190A- RhoGAP and ERK2 signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1863: 2189–2200. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.05.013
![]() |
[161] |
Vicente-Manzanares M, Newell-Litwa K, Bachir AI, et al. (2011) Myosin IIA/IIB restrict adhesive and protrusive signaling to generate front-back polarity in migrating cells. J Cell Biol 193: 381–396. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201012159
![]() |
[162] |
Prager-Khoutorsky M, Lichtenstein A, Krishnan R, et al. (2011) Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing. Nat Cell Biol 13: 1457–1465. doi: 10.1038/ncb2370
![]() |
[163] |
Iwanicki MP, Vomastek T, Tilghman RW, et al. (2008) FAK, PDZ-RhoGEF and ROCKII cooperate to regulate adhesion movement and trailing-edge retraction in fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 121: 895–905. doi: 10.1242/jcs.020941
![]() |
[164] |
Kumar S, Maxwell IZ, Heisterkamp A, et al. (2006) Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. Biophys J 90: 3762– 3773. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.071506
![]() |
[165] |
Pellegrin S, Mellor H (2007) Actin stress fibres. J Cell Sci 120: 3491–3499. doi: 10.1242/jcs.018473
![]() |
[166] | Mierke CT, Sauer F, Grosser S, et al. (2017) The two faces of enhanced stroma: Stroma acts as a tumor promoter and a steric obstacle. NMR Biomed. In press. |
[167] |
Fischer T, Wilharm N, Hayn A, et al. (2017) Matrix and cellular mechanical properties are the driving factors for facilitating human cancer cell motility into 3D engineered matrices. Converg Sci Phys Oncol 3: 044003. doi: 10.1088/2057-1739/aa8bbb
![]() |
[168] |
Oakes PW, Beckham Y, Stricker J, et al. (2012) Tension is required but not sufficient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress fiber template. J Cell Biol 196: 363–374. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201107042
![]() |
[169] |
Kovac B, Teo JL, Makela TP, et al. (2013) Assembly of non-contractile dorsal stress fibers requires alpha-actinin-1 and Rac1 in migrating and spreading cells. J Cell Sci 126: 263–273. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115063
![]() |
[170] |
Feng Y, Ngu H, Alford SK, et al. (2013) Alpha-actinin1 and 4 tyrosine phosphorylation is critical for stress fiber establishment, maintenance and focal adhesion maturation. Exp Cell Res 319: 1124–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.02.009
![]() |
[171] |
Hotulainen P, Lappalainen P (2006) Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells. J Cell Biol 173: 383–394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200511093
![]() |
[172] |
Burnette DT, Shao L, Ott C, et al. (2014) A contractile and counterbalancing adhesion system controls the 3D shape of crawling cells. J Cell Biol 205: 83–96. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201311104
![]() |
[173] |
Tojkander S, Gateva G, Schevzov G, et al. (2011) A molecular pathway for myosin II recruitment to stress fibers. Curr Biol 21: 539–550. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.007
![]() |
[174] |
Gunning PW, Hardeman EC, Lappalainen P, et al. (2015) Tropomyosin-master regulator of actin filament function in the cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 128: 2965–2974. doi: 10.1242/jcs.172502
![]() |
[175] |
Blanchoin L, Boujemaa-Paterski R, Sykes C, et al. (2014) Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility. Physiol Rev 94: 235–263. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2013
![]() |
[176] |
Khatau SB, Hale CM, Stewart-Hutchinson PJ, et al. (2009) A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 19017–19022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908686106
![]() |
[177] |
Krause M, te Riet J, Wolf K (2013) Probing the compressibility of tumor cell nuclei by combined atomic force-confocal microscopy. Phys Biol 10: 065002. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/6/065002
![]() |
[178] |
Thiam HR, Vargas P, Carpi N, et al. (2016) Perinuclear Arp2/3-driven actin polymerization enables nuclear deformation to facilitate cell migration through complex environments. Nat Commun 7: 10997. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10997
![]() |
[179] |
Kim DH, Cho S, Wirtz D (2014) Tight coupling between nucleus and cell migration through the perinuclear actin cap. J Cell Sci 127: 2528–2541. doi: 10.1242/jcs.144345
![]() |
[180] |
Gundersen GG, Worman HJ (2013) Nuclear positioning. Cell 152: 1376–1389. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.031
![]() |
[181] |
Maninova M, Vomastek T (2016) Dorsal stress fibers, transverse actin arcs, and perinuclear actin fibers form an interconnected network that induces nuclear movement in polarizing fibroblasts. FEBS J 283: 3676–3693. doi: 10.1111/febs.13836
![]() |
[182] |
Luxton GWG, Gundersen GG (2011) Orientation and function of the nuclear-centrosomal axis during cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23: 579–588. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.08.001
![]() |
[183] |
Dupin I, Etienne-Manneville S (2011) Nuclear positioning: mechanisms and functions. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 43: 1698–707. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.09.004
![]() |
[184] |
Isermann P, Lammerding J (2013) Nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction in health and disease. Curr Biol 23: R1113–R1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.009
![]() |
[185] |
Luxton GW, Gomes ER, Folker ES, et al. (2010) Linear arrays of nuclear envelope proteins harness retrograde actin flow for nuclear movement. Science 329: 956–959. doi: 10.1126/science.1189072
![]() |
[186] | Steinbock FA, Wiche G (1999) Plectin: a cytolinker by design. Biol Chem 380: 151–158. |
[187] |
Mierke CT, Kollmannsberger P, Zitterbart DP, et al. (2008) Mechano-coupling and regulation of contractility by the vinculin tail domain. Biophys J 94: 661–670. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.108472
![]() |
[188] |
Mierke CT (2013) Phagocytized beads reduce the α5β1 integrin facilitated invasiveness of cancer cells by regulating cellular stiffness. Cell Biochem Biophys 66: 599–622. doi: 10.1007/s12013-012-9506-3
![]() |
[189] |
Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE (1997) Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 849–854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.849
![]() |
[190] |
Brosig M, Ferralli J, Gelman L, et al. (2010) Interfering with the connection between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton affects nuclear rotation, mechanotransduction and myogenesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 42: 1717–1728. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.07.001
![]() |
[191] |
Levy JR, Holzbaur ELF (2008) Dynein drives nuclear rotation during forward progression of motile fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 121: 3187–3195. doi: 10.1242/jcs.033878
![]() |
[192] |
Vicente-Manzanares M, Zareno J, Whitmore L, et al. (2007) Regulation of protrusion, adhesion dynamics, and polarity by myosins IIA and IIB in migrating cells. J Cell Biol 176: 573–580. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200612043
![]() |
[193] |
Kim DH, Chambliss AB, Wirtz D (2013) The multi-faceted role of the actin cap in cellular mechanosensation and mechanotransduction. Soft Matter 9: 5516–5523. doi: 10.1039/c3sm50798j
![]() |
[194] |
Kim DH, Khatau SB, Feng YF, et al. (2012) Actin cap associated focal adhesions and their distinct role in cellular mechanosensing. Sci Rep 2: 555. doi: 10.1038/srep00555
![]() |
[195] |
Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA (2011) A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 331: 1559–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.1203543
![]() |
[196] |
Gupta GP, Massague J (2006) Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell 127: 679–695. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001
![]() |
[197] |
Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, et al. (2009) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139: 871–890. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007
![]() |
[198] |
Wirtz D, Konstantopoulos K, Searson PC (2011) The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 512–522. doi: 10.1038/nrc3080
![]() |
[199] |
Starr DA, Fridolfsson HN (2010) Interactions between nuclei and the cytoskeleton are mediated by SUN-KASH nuclear-envelope bridges. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 26: 421–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104037
![]() |
[200] |
Nagayama K, Yamazaki S, Yahiro Y, et al. (2014) Estimation of the mechanical connection between apical stress fibers and the nucleus in vascular smooth muscle cells cultured on a substrate. J Biomech 47: 1422–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.042
![]() |
[201] |
Vishavkarma R, Raghavan S, Kuyyamudi C, et al. (2014) Role of actin filaments in correlating nuclear shape and cell spreading. PLoS One 9: e107895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107895
![]() |
[202] |
Chambliss AB, Khatau SB, Erdenberger N, et al. (2013) The LINC-anchored actin cap connects the extracellular milieu to the nucleus for ultrafast mechanotransduction. Sci Rep 3: 1087. doi: 10.1038/srep01087
![]() |
[203] |
Lin HH, Lin HK, Lin IH, et al. (2015) Mechanical phenotype of cancer cells: cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing. Oncotarget 6: 20946–20958. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4173
![]() |
[204] |
Tamiello C, Bouten CV, Baaijens FP (2015) Competition between cap and basal actin fiber orientation in cells subjected to contact guidance and cyclic strain. Sci Rep 5: 8752. doi: 10.1038/srep08752
![]() |
[205] | Berg HC (1993) Random Walks in Biology, Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
[206] |
Köppen M, Fernandez BG, Carvalho L, et al. (2006) Coordinated cell-shape changes control epithelial movement in zebrafish and Drosophila. Development 133: 2671–2681. doi: 10.1242/dev.02439
![]() |
[207] |
Bretscher MS (2008) On the shape of migrating cells-a 'front-to-back' model. J Cell Sci 121: 2625–2628. doi: 10.1242/jcs.031120
![]() |
[208] |
Horwitz R, Webb D (2003) Cell migration. Curr Biol 13: R756–R759. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.014
![]() |
[209] | Morris NR (2000) Nuclear migration. From fungi to the mammalian brain. J Cell Biol 148: 1097–1102. |
[210] |
Petrie R, Doyle AD, Yamada KM (2009) Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 538–549. doi: 10.1038/nrm2729
![]() |
[211] |
Cadot B, Gache V, Vasyutina E, et al. (2012) Nuclear movement during myotube formation is microtubule and dynein dependent and is regulated by Cdc42, Par6 and Par3. EMBO Rep 13: 741–749. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.89
![]() |
[212] | Lee JSH, Chang MI, Tseng Y, et al. (2005) Cdc42 mediates nucleus movement and MTOC polarization in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts under mechanical shear stress. Mol Biol Cell 16: 871–880. |
[213] |
Umeshima H, Hirano T, Kengaku M (2007) Microtubule-based nuclear movement occurs independently of centrosome positioning in migrating neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16182–16187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708047104
![]() |
[214] |
Wilson MH, Holzbaur EL (2012) Opposing microtubule motors drive robust nuclear dynamics in developing muscle cells. J Cell Sci 125: 4158–4169. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108688
![]() |
[215] |
Li R, Gundersen GG (2008) Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 860–873. doi: 10.1038/nrm2522
![]() |
[216] |
Ostlund C, Folker ES, Choi JC, et al. (2009) Dynamics and molecular interactions of linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex proteins. J Cell Sci 122: 4099–4108. doi: 10.1242/jcs.057075
![]() |
[217] |
Khatau SB, Bloom RJ, Bajpai S, et al. (2012) The distinct roles of the nucleus and nucleus-cytoskeleton connections in three-dimensional cell migration. Sci Rep 2: 488. doi: 10.1038/srep00488
![]() |
[218] |
Maninova M, Caslavsky J, Vomastek T (2017) The assembly and function of perinuclear actin cap in migrating cells. Protoplasma 254: 1207–1218. doi: 10.1007/s00709-017-1077-0
![]() |
[219] |
Gay O, Gilquin B, Nakamura F, et al. (2011) RefilinB (FAM101B) targets FilaminA to organize perinuclear actin networks and regulates nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 11464–11469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104211108
![]() |
[220] |
Capell BC, Collins FS (2006) Human laminopathies: nuclei gone genetically awry. Nat Rev Genet 7: 940–952. doi: 10.1038/nrg1906
![]() |
[221] |
Khatau SB, Kim DH, Hale CM, et al. (2010) The perinuclear actin cap in health and disease. Nucleus 1: 337–342. doi: 10.4161/nucl.1.4.12331
![]() |
[222] |
Mogilner A, Keren K (2009) The shape of motile cells. Curr Biol 19: R762–R771. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.053
![]() |
[223] |
Maninova M, Iwanicki MP, Vomastek T (2014) Emerging role for nuclear rotation and orientation in cell migration. Cell Adh Migr 8: 42–48. doi: 10.4161/cam.27761
![]() |
[224] | Watanabe N, Sekine T, Takagi M, et al. (2005) Deficiency in chromosome congression by the inhibition of Plk1 polo box domain-dependent recognition. J Biol Chem 284: 2344–2353. |
[225] |
Chung CY, Lee S, Briscoe C, et al. (2000) Role of Rac in controlling the actin cytoskeleton and chemotaxis in motile cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 5225–5230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5225
![]() |
[226] |
Danowski BA, Khodjakov A, Wadsworth P (2001) Centrosome behavior in motile HGF-treated PtK2 cells expressing GFP-gamma tubulin. Cell Motil Cytoskel 50: 59–68. doi: 10.1002/cm.1041
![]() |
[227] |
Desai RA, Gopal SB, Chen S, et al. (2013) Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary versus collective cell migration. J R Soc Interface 10: 20130717. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0717
![]() |
[228] |
Niu MY, Mills JC, Nachmias VT (1997) Development of polarity in human erythroleukemia cells: roles of membrane ruffling and the centrosome. Cell Motil Cytoskel 36: 203–215. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)36:3<203::AID-CM1>3.0.CO;2-8
![]() |
[229] |
Pouthas F, Girard P, Lecaudey V, et al. (2008) In migrating cells, the Golgi complex and the position of the centrosome depend on geometrical constraints of the substratum. J Cell Sci 121: 2406–2414. doi: 10.1242/jcs.026849
![]() |
[230] |
Ueda M, Gräf R, MacWilliams HK, et al. (1997) Centrosome positioning and directionality of cell movements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 9674–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9674
![]() |
[231] |
Yvon AM, Walker JW, Danowski B, et al. (2002) Centrosome reorientation in wound-edge cells is cell type specific. Mol Biol Cell 13: 1871–1880. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-11-0539
![]() |
[232] |
Jiang X, Bruzewicz DA, Wong AP, et al. (2005) Directing cell migration with asymmetric micropatterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 975–978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408954102
![]() |
[233] |
Hale CM, Chen WC, Khatau SB, et al. (2011) SMRT analysis of MTOC and nuclear positioning reveals the role of EB1 and LIC1 in single-cell polarization. J Cell Sci 124: 4267–4285. doi: 10.1242/jcs.091231
![]() |
[234] |
Denais CM, Gilbert RM, Isermann P, et al. (2016) Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration. Science 352: 353–358. doi: 10.1126/science.aad7297
![]() |
[235] |
Raab M, Gentili M, de Belly H, et al. (2016) ESCRT III repairs nuclear envelope ruptures during cell migration to limit DNA damage and cell death. Science 352: 359–362. doi: 10.1126/science.aad7611
![]() |
[236] |
Irianto J, Xia Y, Pfeifer CR, et al. (2017) DNA damage follows repair factor depletion and portends genome variation in cancer cells after pore migration. Curr Biol 27: 210–223. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.049
![]() |
[237] |
LeBerre M, Aubertin J, Piel M (2012) Fine control of nuclear confinement identifies a threshold deformation leading to lamina rupture and induction of specific genes. Integr Biol 4: 1406–1414. doi: 10.1039/c2ib20056b
![]() |
[238] |
Hatch EM, Hetzer MW (2016) Nuclear envelope rupture is induced by actin-based nucleus confinement. J Cell Biol 215: 27–36. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201603053
![]() |
[239] |
Skau CT, Fischer RS, Gurel P, et al. (2016) FMN2 makes perinuclear actin to protect nuclei during confined migration and promote metastasis. Cell 167: 1571–1585. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.023
![]() |
1. | D. Hemanand, Nilamadhab Mishra, G. Premalatha, Dinesh Mavaluru, Amit Vajpayee, Sumit Kushwaha, Kibebe Sahile, Vijay Kumar, Applications of Intelligent Model to Analyze the Green Finance for Environmental Development in the Context of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 2022, 1687-5273, 1, 10.1155/2022/2977824 | |
2. | Junhong Qu, Xiaoli Hao, Digital Economy, Financial Development, and Energy Poverty Based on Mediating Effects and a Spatial Autocorrelation Model, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 9206, 10.3390/su14159206 | |
3. | Yun Liu, Meng Liu, Gege Wang, Lulu Zhao, Pan An, Effect of Environmental Regulation on High-quality Economic Development in China—An Empirical Analysis Based on Dynamic Spatial Durbin Model, 2021, 28, 0944-1344, 54661, 10.1007/s11356-021-13780-2 | |
4. | Muhammad Azam, Muhammad Haroon, Saeed ur Rahman, Hammad Ali, Muhammad Irfan Chani, 2024, Chapter 2, 978-3-031-65755-9, 19, 10.1007/978-3-031-65756-6_2 | |
5. | Xialing Sun, Zheng Meng, Xuchao Zhang, Jiaxi Wu, The role of institutional quality in the nexus between green financing and sustainable development, 2025, 73, 02755319, 102531, 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102531 | |
6. | Qiao Zeng, Caixia Li, Cosimo Magazzino, Impact of green energy production for sustainable economic growth and green economic recovery, 2024, 10, 24058440, e36643, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36643 | |
7. | Nura Garba, Bashir Abdulrahman, Renewable Energy Sources, Sustainability and Environmental Protection: A Review, 2024, 2, 2786-7447, 449, 10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(2).39 | |
8. | Minqiang Zhang, Jia Hou, Yishu Liu, Achieving development goals via digital government strategies for a sustainable digital economy that integrate natural resource governance and energy security, 2025, 101, 03014207, 105330, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105330 | |
9. | Yu Han, Xiaopan Li, Yu Zhang, Nang Goi, Balancing economic growth and ecological sustainability: Factors affecting the development of renewable energy in developing countries, 2025, 116, 03603199, 601, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.277 | |
10. | Yuwen Wu, Liu Ziqi, Are advancements in renewable energy technologies being driven by the digital economy and financial structure? An overview of the key eight nations, 2025, 59, 2211467X, 101679, 10.1016/j.esr.2025.101679 | |
11. | Yunsheng Ruan, Wenqing Wang, Muhammad Abubakar, Nazeer Ahmad, Global Economic Resilience: Developing Green Growth Strategies, Renewable Energy Integration, and Environmental Economics for Sustainability, 2025, 09601481, 123341, 10.1016/j.renene.2025.123341 | |
12. | Junyi Cao, The role of green financing in promoting environmental accountability and corporate growth through ESG integration, 2025, 90, 1572-9893, 10.1007/s10708-025-11406-5 |
Day Name | Procedure/Medium Used |
Grow cells to confluence in Growth Medium; replace medium every 2-3 days | |
Cells are confluent | |
Add Growth Medium; incubate 24 hours | |
Day 1 | Change Growth Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 2 | Add Differentiation Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 3 | Change Differentiation Medium, incubate 24 hours |
Day 4 | Add Insulin Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 5 | Change Insulin Medium, incubate 24 hours |
Day 6-20 | Add Maintenance Medium; incubate and change every 24 hours for 8-15 days until cells are mature |
Day Name | Procedure/Medium Used |
Grow cells to confluence in Growth Medium; replace medium every 2-3 days | |
Cells are confluent | |
Add Growth Medium; incubate 24 hours | |
Day 1 | Change Growth Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 2 | Add Differentiation Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 3 | Change Differentiation Medium, incubate 24 hours |
Day 4 | Add Insulin Medium; incubate 24 hours |
Day 5 | Change Insulin Medium, incubate 24 hours |
Day 6-20 | Add Maintenance Medium; incubate and change every 24 hours for 8-15 days until cells are mature |