Research article

Chemical and structural characterization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) seed protein isolate as a potential therapeutic agent

  • Received: 18 October 2024 Revised: 18 March 2025 Accepted: 01 April 2025 Published: 22 May 2025
  • Okra seed protein isolate (OSPI) has garnered increasing interest due to its bioactive potential and nutritional value. This research focused on analyzing the structural characteristics and molecular composition of OSPI to evaluate its potential therapeutic applications. The amino acid profile revealed a diverse range of amino acids, with leucine (6.56 g/100 g), glutamic acid (14.46 g/100 g), and arginine (9.42 g/100 g) identified as the most abundant. Hydrophobic amino acids (31.39 g/100 g) along with branched-chain amino acids (14.24 g/100 g) further underscore their bioactivity, particularly in immune modulation and cancer therapy. Protein solubility analysis indicated optimal solubility (91.86%) at pH 9, a key factor influencing bioavailability. The molecular weight profile identified polypeptide bands corresponding to 2S albumins, known for their antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties. FTIR and XRD analyses highlighted the presence of α-helical and β-sheet structures, contributing to OSPI's functional stability. Additionally, OSPI exhibited an amorphous nature, which is beneficial for pharmaceutical applications due to enhanced bioavailability. Particle size analysis demonstrated a monomodal distribution, with OSPI displaying the smallest size (0.144 ± 0.1 µm), indicative of improved drug delivery potential. Collectively, these findings emphasize OSPI's therapeutic potential, particularly in disease prevention and treatment, supporting its potential application in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries.

    Citation: Letisha Maistry, Abe Shegro Gerrano, John Mellem. Chemical and structural characterization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) seed protein isolate as a potential therapeutic agent[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(2): 353-370. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025018

    Related Papers:

    [1] Dalva Paulus, Sintieli Borges Ferreira, Dislaine Becker . Preservation and post-harvest quality of okra using low density polyethylene. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 321-336. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021020
    [2] Anthony Temitope Idowu, Oluwakemi Osarumwense Igiehon, Ademola Ezekiel Adekoya, Solomon Idowu . Dates palm fruits: A review of their nutritional components, bioactivities and functional food applications. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 734-755. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.734
    [3] Luciano Cavani, Alja Margon, Luigi Sciubba, Claudio Ciavatta, Claudio Marzadori . What we talk about when we talk about protein hydrolyzate-based biostimulants. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(3): 221-232. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.3.221
    [4] Julliane Destro de Lima, Wesley Ribeiro Rivadavea, Sydney Antonio Frehner Kavalco, Affonso Celso Gonçalves Junior, Ana Daniela Lopes, Glacy Jaqueline da Silva . Chemical and nutritional characterization of bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(4): 932-944. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021056
    [5] Yeon Ju Lee, Jong Hyuk Kim, Ju Hyeon Ha, Ha Yeon Nam, Il Rae Rho . Effects of nitrogen topdressing fertilization on yield and quality in soybeans. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 1004-1026. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024054
    [6] Johan Sukweenadhi, Eloqui Viectorica Wiranata, Ida Bagus Made Artadana, Kang-Se Chang . Isolation and in vitro screening of plant growth promoting bacteria from rhizosphere and root tissues of potato tuber (Solanum tuberosum L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(4): 1028-1037. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023055
    [7] Lenin O. Nevárez-Prado, Nubia Amaya-Olivas, Alejandro Sustaita-Rodriguez, Jesús Rodríguez-Zapién, Erick Zúñiga-Rodríguez, María Cordova-Lozoya, Antonio García-Triana, Fabiola Sandoval-Salas, León Hernández-Ochoa . Chemical composition and toxicity of extracts of Fouquieria splendens against Artemia salina. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 357-369. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022023
    [8] Badreddine Belhadi, Rachid Souilah, Redha Ould-Kiar, Mohamed Yousfi, Djaafar Djabali, Boubekeur Nadjemi . Effects of phenotype and wet milling procedures on the starch isolation from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) grains. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(2): 448-461. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021026
    [9] Usman Pato, Yusmarini Yusuf, Emma Riftyan, Evy Rossi, Agrina . Comparison of probiotic properties between free cells and encapsulated cells of Limosilactobacillus fermentum InaCC B1295. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 483-499. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024028
    [10] Pamela Venegas, Elena Villacrés, María Quelal, and María Morales . Evaluation of the nutritional and functional properties of germinated quinoa and its protein isolate. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(2): 337-352. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025017
  • Okra seed protein isolate (OSPI) has garnered increasing interest due to its bioactive potential and nutritional value. This research focused on analyzing the structural characteristics and molecular composition of OSPI to evaluate its potential therapeutic applications. The amino acid profile revealed a diverse range of amino acids, with leucine (6.56 g/100 g), glutamic acid (14.46 g/100 g), and arginine (9.42 g/100 g) identified as the most abundant. Hydrophobic amino acids (31.39 g/100 g) along with branched-chain amino acids (14.24 g/100 g) further underscore their bioactivity, particularly in immune modulation and cancer therapy. Protein solubility analysis indicated optimal solubility (91.86%) at pH 9, a key factor influencing bioavailability. The molecular weight profile identified polypeptide bands corresponding to 2S albumins, known for their antimicrobial and immunomodulatory properties. FTIR and XRD analyses highlighted the presence of α-helical and β-sheet structures, contributing to OSPI's functional stability. Additionally, OSPI exhibited an amorphous nature, which is beneficial for pharmaceutical applications due to enhanced bioavailability. Particle size analysis demonstrated a monomodal distribution, with OSPI displaying the smallest size (0.144 ± 0.1 µm), indicative of improved drug delivery potential. Collectively, these findings emphasize OSPI's therapeutic potential, particularly in disease prevention and treatment, supporting its potential application in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries.



    Proteins are fundamental macronutrients that serve as building blocks of life, contributing significantly to the integrity and biological processes of organisms across humans, plants, and animals [1]. They regulate physiological pH, act as signaling molecules and hormones, are critical components of enzymes involved in metabolic pathways, support the immune system, serve as bioactive agents, and are integral to disease prevention [1]. Moreover, the functionality of proteins is affected by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic elements, including amino acid composition, protein structure, molecular size, extraction parameters, pH, and surface characteristics such as solubility. [2]. Proteins are macromolecules consisting of a linear sequence of amino acids linked by peptide bonds, influencing protein quality [3]. Plant-based proteins, in particular, exhibit distinct amino acid profiles, each contributing unique characteristics and potential health benefits. Plant-derived protein sources are becoming increasingly popular due to their environmental sustainability and cost-effectiveness [1].

    This growing interest in plant proteins extends to their therapeutic potential [4]. Plant proteins have numerous health benefits, particularly in cancer treatments, where they demonstrate excellent tissue penetration, target selectivity, and minimal toxicity owing to their amino acid composition [5]. These proteins provide the essential amino acids our bodies need to repair tissues and synthesize enzymes, hormones, and other vital molecules [6]. Beyond their structural functions, plant proteins are instrumental in reducing the risk of numerous health conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer [7,8]. The bioactivity of amino acids and peptides, influenced by factors like hydrophobicity and molecular charge, plays a fundamental role in determining their effectiveness in targeting specific diseases [9].

    Plant proteins are derived from various sources, including legumes, pulses, vegetables, nuts, and oilseeds, such as chickpeas, Bambara groundnuts, and soybeans. According to [10], certain vegetables can also serve as natural therapeutic agents capable of treating a range of diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension. Abelmoschus esculentus, commonly known as okra or lady's finger, is a well-known angiosperm producing edible seed pods. Native to Africa but now grown commercially worldwide, okra thrives in warm temperate climates across tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, Asia, and America [11]. As a member of the Malvaceae family, okra has long been valued for its nutritional content and medicinal potential [11].

    Historically, okra has served multiple purposes, including acting as a cooling agent, an appetizer, an astringent, and an aphrodisiac [12]. Furthermore, okra has traditionally been used to treat chronic dysentery and gonorrhea [13]. Okra seeds are rich in bioactive compounds, including proteins, and provide a wealth of fundamental vitamins and minerals, including vitamins C and potassium, vital for preserving wellness and immune function [14]. Okra has also proven effective in alleviating chronic illnesses such as diabetes [14]. Pharmacologically, okra demonstrates antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, with its polysaccharides, polyphenols, and flavonoids exhibiting both antioxidant and antifatigue activities in vivo and in vitro [14]. These compounds have increased the scavenging rates of free radicals, superoxide, and DPPH radicals and enhanced swimming endurance in test subjects (rat model) [15,16]. Okra seeds, aqueous extracts, and polysaccharides have also shown in vitro antidiabetic potential, decreasing α-glucosidase and α-amylase activities [17].

    Moreover, okra polysaccharides demonstrate hypolipidemic activities, reducing cholesterol absorption and binding to bile acids [18], while methanol extracts of okra seeds display antibacterial and antifungal properties [19]. Additionally, ethanol extracts of okra and quercetin have shown in vitro immunomodulatory activity by decreasing reactive oxygen species and reducing microglial activation [20], along with okra polysaccharides having exhibited antitumor activity, enhancing phagocytosis in RAW264.7 cells [21]. Moreover, lectins from okra seeds have been reported to increase the expression of key genes such as P21, caspase 3, and caspase 9 involved in apoptosis [22]. While extensive research has explored the role of okra polysaccharides, polyphenols, and flavonoids in mitigating chronic diseases, the therapeutic potential of the okra seed protein isolate has yet to be discerned, despite it being a rich source of bioactive proteins.

    Okra seeds (ARC-okra24), sourced from the Agricultural Research Council (ARC), were milled to produce okra flour (OF). The resultant flour was sieved (250 μm) and defatted using hexane (1:5 w/v). The defatted okra flour (DOF) was subsequently utilized in the preparation of okra seed protein isolate (OSPI) with minor modifications, according to [23]. The DOF was mixed with distilled water (dH2O) (1:15 w/v) and stirred for 10 min. Then, the slurry's pH was adjusted to 10 using 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The slurry was stirred for 2 h, followed by centrifugation (10, 000 × g, 30 min). The resulting supernatant was adjusted to pH 4.5 using 1 M hydrochloric acid (HCL) and centrifuged (10, 000 × g, 30 min). The pellet obtained was resuspended in dH2O and adjusted to pH 7 using 1 M NaOH. The sample was stored at −80℃ for 24 h before lyophilization.

    The protein content of OSPI was assessed using the Bradford protein assay, whereas the crude protein content of DOF was determined via the Kjeldahl method, applying a conversion factor of N × 5.30 [24]. The protein yield was then calculated using the following equation:

    Protein yield(%)=Protein content of isolate(%)Protein content of defatted flour(%)Protein content of isolate(%)×100. (1)

    Protein solubility was evaluated according to [25] with slight variations. In brief, 10 mg of the sample was dissolved in 10 mL of dH2O, and the pH was adjusted between 3 and 9 using 0.01 M NaOH or 0.01 M HCl. The suspension was vortexed (2 min, room temperature) and centrifuged (8000 × g, 15 min). The protein content in the supernatant was quantified using the Bradford method [24], and protein solubility was calculated using the following equation:

    Protein solubility(%)=Total amount of protein in supernatantTotal amount of protein in the sample×100. (2)

    The amino acid profiles of the samples were analyzed in accordance with [26], using a Waters Acquity ultra-performance liquid chromatograph (UPLC). Amino acids were quantified either as free amino acids or after protein hydrolysis. Free amino acids were analyzed by injecting 1 µL of the sample into the mobile phase, which carried the derivatized amino acids onto a Waters UltraTag C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm × 1.7 µm) kept at 60℃. Protein hydrolysis was carried out through acid digestion with 6 M HCl. MassLynx software was used for instrument control and data acquisition.

    Gel electrophoresis was used to determine the molecular weights of OSPI and OF under reducing and non-reducing conditions following the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 20 mL of Bolt™ MES SDS running buffer (20×) was diluted with 380 mL of deionized water and poured into the SureLock Tandem Midi Gel Tank. An Invitrogen™ precast gel (4%–12%) was placed in the tank. To prepare the samples, 10 mg of each was dissolved in 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4). Then, each sample (10 µL) was combined with 10 µL of Bolt™ LDS sample buffer (4×), and the volume was adjusted to 40 µL. For reducing conditions, 4 µL of Bolt™ reducing agent (10×) was added. The samples were heated (70℃, 10 min), and 15 µL was pipetted into each well. The Spectra™ Multicolor Broad Range Protein Ladder (10–260 kDa) was used as the molecular weight standard.

    The secondary structure of the samples was examined using an Agilent Cary 630 Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR) with a diamond-attenuated total reflectance (ATR) module, based on the method outlined by [27]. A resolution of 8 cm⁻¹ across a range of 4000–650 cm⁻¹ with 32 cycles of data collection was used.

    XRD analysis of the samples was performed at the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance powder X-ray diffractometer. The diffractometer was set to a tube current of 40 mA and a 45 kV generator voltage, following the modified method of [28], with some modifications. A fixed divergence slit (0.38 mm) and a copper anode were utilized.

    The particle size and zeta potential were determined using a Litesizer DLS 500 (Anton Paar) fitted with Kalliope software. Before evaluation, samples (1 mg/mL) were hydrated in dH2O for 1 h. The analysis was conducted at 25℃ with a solvent refractive index of 1.33 with minor modifications [29].

    Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to analyze the microstructure (JEOL 2100 HRTEM, Japan) of OSPI at the Electron Microscopy Unit [University of KwaZulu Natal (UDW Campus)] as described by [30].

    Analyses were conducted in triplicate, and the results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance for values with p < 0.0001 was established by means of a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), performed with GraphPad Prism 10 version 10.4.1 (627) for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

    Amino acids (AAs) are the fundamental building blocks of life, playing a crucial role in maintaining optimal bodily function. They serve as precursors to secondary metabolic molecules with significant biological importance [31]. Amino acids can be classified as essential, which the body requires but cannot synthesize, non-essential, which the body can produce, and conditional, which are not crucial unless during illness [32,33]. Table 1 depicts the overall amino acid composition of the flours, which is lower than that of the protein isolate, likely due to the higher purity of the OSPI. Moreover, the protein isolate is higher than the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) recommendation, indicating its potential as a valuable nutritional source.

    Table 1.  Amino acid profile of okra seed flour (OF), defatted okra flour (DOF), and okra seed protein isolate (OSPI) (g/100 g).
    Amino acid OF DOF OSPI FAO recommendationa
    Essential AA Histidine 0.73 1.05 2.16 1.9
    Threonine 1.14 1.62 2.52 1.4
    Lysine 2.35 3.24 4.45 -
    Methionine 0.74 1.01 3.06 -
    Valine 1.82 2.67 4.59 3.5
    Isoleucine 1.06 1.61 3.09 2.8
    Leucine 2.47 3.69 6.56 6.6
    Phenylalanine 1.48 2.31 4.12 -
    Total essential AA 11.79 17.2 30.55 -
    Non-essential AA Serine 1.64 2.36 4.05 -
    Arginine 3.59 5.24 9.42 -
    Glycine 1.77 2.57 3.63 -
    Aspartic acid 3.83 4.81 7.56 -
    Glutamic acid 6.35 8.43 14.46 -
    Alanine 1.56 2.18 3.48 -
    Proline 1.34 1.98 3.11 -
    Tyrosine 1.12 1.58 3.38 -
    Total non-essential AA 21.20 29.15 49.09 -
    Total amino acids 32.99 46.35 79.64 -
    Phenylalanine + tyrosine (AAA) 2.60 3.89 7.50 6.3
    Methionine (SCAA) 0.74 1.01 3.06 2.5
    Isoleucine + leucine + valine (BCAA) 5.35 7.97 14.24 -
    Fischer's ratio (BCAA/AAA) 2.06 2.05 1.90 -
    Basic 6.67 9.53 16.03 -
    Acidic 10.18 13.24 22.02 -
    Hydrophobic 11.59 17.03 31.39 -
    Hydrophilic 2.78 3.98 6.57 -
    Note: OF: okra flour; DOF: defatted okra flour; OSPI: okra seed protein isolate; AAA: aromatic amino acids; SCAA: sulfur-containing amino acids; BCAA: branched amino acids; basic: lysine, arginine, and histidine; acidic: aspartic and glutamic acid; hydrophobic: alanine, valine, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, proline, and methionine; hydrophilic: serine and threonine a [40].

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Leucine, known for enhancing muscle protein synthesis, is the principal essential amino acid in the samples, with OSPI showing the highest content at 6.56 g/100 g. This is slightly higher than a previous study's okra protein isolates and hydrolysate levels [34]. Moreover, among the non-essential amino acids, glutamic acid (14.46 g/100 g), which may include glutamine and arginine (9.42 g/100 g), was prominent in OSPI, aligning with the results found by [34] and [23]. Glutamine and arginine are also conditional amino acids essential in regulating immune response and neurotransmission, improving endothelial function, and preventing cardiovascular disease [35]. In addition, [36] elucidated that arginine could penetrate and disrupt cell membranes, leading to cytotoxic effects in cancer cells, further emphasizing the therapeutic potential of OSPI. Furthermore, aspartic acid, which may include asparagine, was notably present at 7.56 g/100 g. [37] also attributed antiproliferative activity in tumor cells to a combination of aspartic and glutamic acids. These findings highlight the potential of OSPI in disease prevention, particularly in cancer therapy.

    OSPI also exhibited a significantly high content of hydrophobic amino acids (HAAs), totaling 31.39 g/100 g, consistent with the findings of [34] for okra protein isolate and hydrolysate. [38] noted that food-derived HAAs could facilitate immunomodulatory activity and enhance the specificity of target cells for potential anticancer therapeutics, further underscoring the therapeutic potential of OSPI. Moreover, proteins with higher levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) compared to aromatic amino acids (AAAs) are beneficial for health, with applications in antitumor activity and liver damage repair [39]. OSPI exhibited a BCAA content of 14.24 g/100 g, almost double that of the AAA content, emphasizing its pharmaceutical potential. The presence of these significant amino acids, combined with the high HAA content, suggests the bioactive potential of OSPI for therapeutic applications.

    The molecular weight of proteins is crucial in determining their bioavailability and bioactivity [34], as the size of the bioactive peptides within proteins influences their bioavailability [41]. Under non-reducing conditions, the samples exhibited three prominent high-intensity polypeptide bands (Figure 1) around 55, 64, and 75 kDa (lanes 1 and 2). The 55 and 64 kDa bands correspond to vicilin (7S globulin) subunits, which are predominantly found in legume proteins and have been observed in protein isolates from Bambara groundnut and hyacinth beans [29,42]. The protein band around 75 kDa represents convicilin, the α-subunit of vicilin [29].

    Figure 1.  Molecular weight profile of okra samples.
    Note: Lane 1: okra seed flour (OF); Lane 3: okra seed protein isolate (OSPI) (non-reducing). Lane 2: okra seed flour (OF); Lane 4: okra seed protein isolate (OSPI) (reducing). M: marker.

    The low-molecular-weight bands for the samples (lanes 1 and 2) between 10 and 20 kDa, which are associated with basic legumin (11S globulins), were observed under non-reducing conditions. The polypeptide band at 20 kDa corresponds to studies conducted by [42] and [29] for hyacinth bean and Bambara groundnut protein isolates, respectively. Moreover, nanoparticles derived from legumin and vicilin proteins of fava beans have shown promise as encapsulation materials for nutraceutical compounds, demonstrating biocompatibility with CaCo-2 cells and efficient nutrient delivery [43]. This highlights the potential of legumin and vicilin as effective drug delivery carriers, further supporting the therapeutic potential of OSPI, as both proteins are abundant in OSPI and serve as rich sources of bioactive peptides.

    However, [44] inferred that protein bands < 20 kDa correspond to 2S albumins. 2S albumins are low-molecular-weight proteins characterized by a high concentration of glutamine, arginine, and asparagine [45]; the predominant amino acids present in OSPI are associated with numerous health benefits, as previously stated. Additionally, 2S albumins exhibit numerous biological advantages, such as being an antibacterial agent that can limit and prevent pathogenic bacteria's progression in humans [46]. In a study by [47], 2S albumins derived from sesame seeds demonstrated strong inhibitory effects against Klebsiella species, a gram-negative bacterium responsible for pneumonia and other infectious diseases. The biological activities exhibited by 2S albumins suggest significant potential for development as antibiotic agents [45]. Therefore, the presence of 2S albumins in OSPI underscores its potential in therapeutics.

    Under reducing conditions, lanes 3 and 4 revealed fewer polypeptide bands with a downward shift, which were observed with a band at 14 kDa absent. This suggests the presence of disulfide bonds in the non-reduced state of the samples [42]. A polypeptide band at 48 kDa is observed in both OF and OSPI under reducing conditions, corresponding to the β-conglycinin subunit present in soybean protein isolates [48]. This subunit has been demonstrated to decrease cholesterol levels and influence obesity, highlighting the therapeutic potential of OSPI [49]. Moreover, the protein isolate denotes a band of 9 kDa under reducing conditions. In a previous study [48], protein fractions between 5 and 10 kDa and > 10 kDa from germinated soybean protein exhibited high potency in inhibiting the proliferation of CaCo-2 cells. Furthermore, soybean peptides with molecular weights > 10 kDa effectively inhibited breast and cervical cancer growth [50]. The protein bands at 9, 10, and > 10 kDa in OSPI highlight its potential for application as a pharmaceutical agent. Additionally, no significant differences can be observed between OF and OSPI under both conditions.

    The solubility of proteins aids in determining their functionality and can be impacted by pH and amino acid composition [2]. Poor solubility can affect the bioavailability of proteins and its therapeutic efficiency. As depicted in Figure 2, both flours showed no significant differences within the pH range of 3–9. Overall, the protein solubility of the flours increased at each pH unit, exhibiting the highest solubility in the alkaline region, except DOF at pH 9 (74.52%). The protein isolate exhibits a similar trend to the flours, showing the highest solubility (91.86%) among the samples at pH 9. Additionally, OSPI was shown to be the least soluble at pH 5 near the isoelectric point. This is likely due to protein precipitation caused by the absence of a net charge on the molecules and can also indicate variations in the surface structure of proteins [4,51]. Moreover, comparable findings were discerned for sunflower protein isolate, which was insoluble between pH 4 and 5.5 and gradually increased to pH 7 [52]. A study on four soybean cultivars was comparable to the results achieved for OSPI, exhibiting minimum solubility around pH 5 [51]. According to [53] and [51], the low solubility of proteins near the isoelectric point could indicate β-conglycinin found in soybean protein. Moreover, as established in the molecular weight profile, β-conglycinin was identified in OSPI with potential health benefits. Thus, the low solubility of OSPI near pH 5, corresponding to the β-conglycinin subunit, further emphasizes its therapeutic potential. The amino acid composition of samples differs, therefore displaying varying degrees of solubility as the different charged groups (polar and non-polar) affect the solubility of the samples [54], as indicated by the deviation in results.

    Figure 2.  Effect of pH on the solubility of okra flour (OF), defatted flour (DOF), and okra seed protein isolate (OSPI).
    Note: Data denotes mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Values with the same superscript letters are not significantly different (p < 0.0001).

    The high solubility of OSPI suggests increased bioavailability for its application as a potential therapeutic agent. This potential is underscored by a study conducted by [55] in which a widely used chemotherapeutic agent, docetaxel (DTX), was combined with soy protein isolate (SPI). The results indicated that the inclusion of SPI notably improved the solubility of DTX within a pH range of 7–10 [55]. Furthermore, the DTX-SPI suspension indicated a systolic delivery, which, in turn, supplemented the cell cytotoxicity against A549 cells (lung cancer). This study not only validates the high solubility of OSPI but also highlights its ability as a delivery and pharmaceutical agent against diseases such as cancer, particularly given its high solubility at an alkaline pH.

    The FTIR spectra (Figure 3) depict no significant shifts in wavenumbers among the samples. Protein-containing samples display nine distinct spectral lines within the absorption range of approximately 200–3300 cm⁻¹ [56]. These bands result from various oscillatory modes of the amide groups present in peptide bonds and are classified as amides A, B, and Ⅰ–Ⅶ. Various characteristic peaks related to proteins were observed. The peak at 1636.30131 cm-1 for the flours and protein isolate indicates amide Ⅰ, corresponding to results achieved by [44] for quinoa protein. The amide Ⅰ band is primarily associated with the stretching vibrations of C = O bonds in the peptide backbone and is widely recognized as the most sensitive and commonly used band for analyzing protein secondary structures [56]. Moreover, the proportion of each protein secondary structure can be determined by examining the area under the peaks in the original spectra, which are ascribed to specific structural components [56]. The amide Ⅰ peak is positioned between 1628 and 1642 cm-1 on the infrared spectrum, which is typically attributed to β-sheet structures [56,57].

    Figure 3.  FTIR spectra of okra seed flour (OF), defatted okra flour (DOF), and okra seed protein isolate (OSPI).

    Amide Ⅱ is usually denoted in the region of ∼1500 to ∼1550 cm–1, as described by [44] and [27], respectively. Thus, the bands found at 1543.11786 cm–1 in the flours and 1524.48118 cm–1 in the protein isolate link to results of quinoa protein [44] and in pulse proteins such as chickpeas [27]. An estimated peak fitting proposes that the flours are positioned within the range of 1540–1545 cm–1, suggesting an association to α-helical structures, while the protein isolate is located between 1520 and 1525 cm−1, correlating to β-sheet secondary configurations [56,58].

    Additionally, identifying protein secondary structure bands is further challenged by the absorption of amino acid side chains within the protein [56]. This absorption overlaps with the amide Ⅰ and Ⅱ bands, accounting for approximately 10%–20% of the total absorption in these regions for globular proteins [56,59]. Furthermore, [56] elucidated that aromatic amino acid side chains also influence the spectrum in the amide Ⅰ and Ⅱ regions; in particular, amides Ⅰ and Ⅱ lie closest to arginine at 1633 cm−1 on the spectra and are associated with C = N symmetric stretching. As previously mentioned, arginine was one of the primary amino acids in OSPI and presented numerous associated therapeutic benefits. Thus, identifying amide bands further emphasizes the potential of OSPI as a therapeutic agent.

    A peak at 1233.74882 cm–1 was noted in OF and at 1230.02149 cm–1 in DOF and OSPI. These band frequencies allude to amide Ⅲ, similar to quinoa protein at ∼1200 cm−1 [44]. Moreover, [27] showed that lentil protein amide Ⅲ lays between 1232 and 1470 cm-1, representing C-H, CH2, and CH3 bends of sulfur-containing amino acids SAA. C-H, CH2, and CH3 stretches were identified as lentil proteins in all samples at 2922.23286 cm–1. These stretches were observed between 2826 and 2995 cm–1, signifying SAA [27]. Whilst the peak at 2922–23286 cm–1 reflected in all the samples, OF showed a long, narrow peak, whereas the peak in DOF appeared shorter and more stretched, and OSPI emerged flatter and more expansive. In addition, a broad peak attributed to amide A was observed in all samples. OF was depicted at 3276–32996 cm–1, and a slight shift in wavenumber to 3272–60262 cm–1 denoted DOF and OSPI. These results correlate with quinoa protein (amide A: 3270–3310 cm–1) [44].

    The size of a crystal influences the diffraction angle (2θ) and intensity [28]. Moreover, these factors are crucial for understanding potential conformational changes within protein structures and their interactions with other molecules [28]. Smaller crystals produce lower diffraction intensities and broader diffraction angles [28]. The diffraction peak around 7° indicates crystalline region Ⅰ, while the peak shoulder near 2θ = 19° represents crystalline region Ⅱ (Figure 4) [28]. These peaks are comparable to alfalfa and sunflower protein isolates in which the broad band around 2θ = 20° was ascribed to the amorphous nature of the protein [28,60]. This thus suggests that the peak at 2θ = 19° in OSPI could indicate the amorphous nature of OSPI. According to [61], proteins with amorphous structures benefit therapeutics as they offer a higher dissolution rate and enhanced bioavailability for drug development, suggesting that OSPI could serve as a promising pharmaceutical agent. Additionally, the differences in peak intensity may result from the varying interactions between protein molecules and polyphenols [28].

    Figure 4.  X-ray diffractogram of okra seed flour (OF), defatted okra flour (DOF), and okra seed protein isolate (OSPI).

    The prominent diffraction peaks in both regions Ⅰ and Ⅱ correspond to the reflections of 7S (α-helix) and 11S (β-sheet) globulins, respectively, within the polypeptide chain structure, as identified by gel electrophoresis [62]. Furthermore, OSPI displayed a minor peak around 81°, similar to soybean protein isolate, which has previously shown an affinity for vitamin D encapsulation [63], further highlighting the therapeutic potential of OSPI. Additionally, the minor peak shows low intensity and a broad angle, which alludes to OSPI being smaller in size.

    The polydispersity index (PDI) indicates particle size distribution and uniformity [64]. PDI values of 0.1–0.25 denote a narrow distribution of particles, while a broad distribution is indicated by values greater than 0.5 [64]. OF and OSPI were shown to have PDI values of 2.2 and 2.7, respectively, aligning with a wide distribution. DOF showed a PDI value of 0.22, corresponding to a narrower distribution, suggesting particle monodispersity. Moreover, [65] highlighted that particle size and PDI could impact drug delivery, cellular uptake, and encapsulation efficiency, directly affecting therapeutic outcomes. As shown in Figure 5A, the samples depicted a monomodal distribution. OSPI appeared the smallest at 0.144 ± 0.1 µm, compared to OF and DOF, which reflected at 0.433 ± 0.2 µm and 1.37 ± 0.1 µm, respectively. The small size of OSPI suggests its potential as a long-circulating carrier, ideal for drug delivery to tumors, while OF and DOF are better suited for transdermal and intravenous administration, respectively [65]. The applications mentioned above emphasize the pharmacological potential of OSPI.

    Figure 5.  Particle size (A) and Zeta potential (B) of okra seed flour (OF), defatted okra flour (DOF), and okra seed protein isolate (OSPI).

    The zeta potential, which represents the surface charge of a protein, is a vital factor in its stability, functionality, and interactions within biological systems. Understanding this property for therapeutic applications is essential, as it influences protein behavior, including solubility, aggregation tendency, and interactions with cells or tissues [66]. A zeta potential above ± 30 mV is typically considered stable [67]. As illustrated in Figure 5B, OSPI exhibited the highest stability with a zeta potential of −29.7 ± 2.6 mV, compared to OF and DOF, which had zeta potentials of −27.5 ± 1.1 mV and −25.0 ± 0.6 mV, respectively. The zeta potential of OSPI was similar to that of soybean protein, as reported by [51]. Moreover, [68] noted that exosome-like nanovesicles derived from plants, with surface charges of −14.8 mV and −15.2 mV, proved effective as encapsulation materials for therapeutic drug delivery to human cells. This suggests that OSPI, with its higher stability, could be efficiently utilized in drug delivery applications.

    Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can be used to identify and characterize the microstructure of proteins [69]. Figure 6 depicts the TEM of the flours and protein isolate particles. OF and DOF had median sizes of 12.2 nm and 9.9 nm, respectively, while OSPI showed an average size of 17.2 nm. The hydrodynamic diameter obtained from particle size analysis showed an inverse correlation with the TEM analysis, which revealed smaller sizes. The smaller sizes observed by TEM could be attributed to differences in sample state during analysis [30], as the particle size samples are hydrated, potentially increasing the average particle size. The particle sizes suggest that these samples could be suitable for drug delivery via the reticuloendothelial system, allowing for deposition in various organs throughout the body [65]. Furthermore, the particles displayed a near-spherical shape with a smooth surface, which are key characteristics contributing to effective drug delivery [70], owing to OSPI's potential in therapeutics.

    Figure 6.  TEM micrographs of (A) okra seed flour (OF), (B) defatted okra flour (DOF), and (C) okra seed protein isolate (OSPI).

    Although okra seed protein isolate (OSPI) exhibits promising therapeutic potential, there are limitations to the research. This research fundamentally focuses on in vitro analyses, which may not fully replicate in vivo conditions, hypothetically limiting the direct clinical applicability of the results. Additionally, factors such as protein solubility, bioavailability, and stability under physiological conditions require further investigation to ensure effective therapeutic delivery. The presence of hydrophobic amino acids and low-molecular-weight peptides suggests potential bioactivity; however, their specific mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics remain to be elucidated. Future research should explore in vitro and in vivo validation using cell culture and animal models to confirm the therapeutic efficacy of OSPI. Furthermore, exploring the synergistic effects of OSPI with other bioactive compounds for enhanced solubility and bioavailability, possibly through nanocarrier systems, could improve its pharmaceutical applications.

    This study highlights the therapeutic potential of okra seed protein isolate (OSPI), emphasizing its rich amino acid composition, structural properties, and bioactive potential. OSPI exhibited an essential amino acid profile higher than FAO recommendations, with notable leucine, glutamic acid, arginine, and hydrophobic amino acid content. These amino acids contribute to immune regulation, neurotransmission, cardiovascular health, and anticancer activity, reinforcing OSPI's potential for disease prevention and treatment. The study also confirmed OSPI's high solubility, particularly in alkaline conditions, which enhances its bioavailability and functional properties. Electrophoresis revealed the presence of 7S and 11S globulins, along with 2S albumins, known for their antibacterial and immunomodulatory properties. Additionally, FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of key amide bands associated with secondary protein structures. At the same time, XRD data indicated an amorphous nature beneficial for pharmaceutical applications due to increased dissolution and bioavailability. The small particle size and monodispersity of OSPI suggest its suitability for drug delivery systems, while its polydispersity index (PDI) indicates the potential for encapsulation efficiency. These findings collectively underscore OSPI's potential as a functional protein with applications in therapeutic formulations, particularly in cancer treatment, antimicrobial agents, and nutraceuticals. Further studies on its bioactivity in complex biological systems could pave the way for its integration into the pharmaceutical and functional food industries.

    Letisha Maistry: Writing-original draft, Data curation, Formal analysis; Abe Shegro Gerrano: Writing-review and editing manuscript, Supervision; John Mellem: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing-review and editing manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors would like to acknowledge the Durban University of Technology (Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa) and the National Research Foundation [Grant # 735336] for support.

    All authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Kumar M, Tomar M, Punia S, et al. (2022) Plant-based proteins and their multifaceted industrial applications. LWT 154: 112620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112620 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112620
    [2] Li C, Yang J, Yao L, et al. (2020) Characterisation, physicochemical and functional properties of protein isolates from Amygdalus pedunculata pall seeds. Food Chem 311: 125888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125888 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125888
    [3] Sim SYJ, Srv A, Chiang JH, et al. (2021) Plant proteins for future foods: A roadmap. Foods 10: 1967. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081967 doi: 10.3390/foods10081967
    [4] Tan M, Nawaz MA, Buckow R (2023) Functional and food application of plant proteins–a review. Food Rev Int 39: 2428–2456. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.1955918 doi: 10.1080/87559129.2021.1955918
    [5] Bhutia SK, Panda PK, Sinha N, et al. (2019) Plant lectins in cancer therapeutics: Targeting apoptosis and autophagy-dependent cell death. Pharmacol Res 144: 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2019.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.04.001
    [6] Tomar M, Bhardwaj R, Kumar M, et al. (2021) Nutritional composition patterns and application of multivariate analysis to evaluate indigenous Pearl millet ((Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) germplasm. J Food Compos Anal 103: 104086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104086 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104086
    [7] Ansori ANM (2021) A mini-review of the medicinal properties of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus l.) and potential benefit against SARS-CoV-2. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 15: 852–856.
    [8] Shahnaz T, Fawole AO, Adeyanju AA, et al. (2024) Food proteins as functional ingredients in the management of chronic diseases: A concise review. Nutrients 16: 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142323 doi: 10.3390/nu16142323
    [9] Peighambardoust SH, Karami Z, Pateiro M, et al. (2021) A review on health-promoting, biological, and functional aspects of bioactive peptides in food applications. Biomolecules 11: 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050631 doi: 10.3390/biom11050631
    [10] Bonciu E (2020) Aspects of the involvement of biotechnology in functional food and nutraceuticals. Available from: https://agronomyjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/2020/issue_2/Art43.pdf.
    [11] Ofori J, Tortoe C, Agbenorhevi JK (2020) Physicochemical and functional properties of dried okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) seed flour. Food Sci Nutr 8: 4291–4296. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1725 doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1725
    [12] Elkhalifa AEO, Alshammari E, Adnan M, et al. (2021) Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) as a potential dietary medicine with nutraceutical importance for sustainable health applications. Molecules 26: 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030696 doi: 10.3390/molecules26030696
    [13] Esmaeilzadeh D, Razavi BM, Hosseinzadeh H (2020) Effect of Abelmoschus esculentus (okra) on metabolic syndrome: A review. Phytother Res 34: 2192–2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6679 doi: 10.1002/ptr.6679
    [14] Liu Y, Qi J, Luo J, et al. (2021) Okra in food field: nutritional value, health benefits and effects of processing methods on quality. Food Rev Int 37: 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2019.1695833 doi: 10.1080/87559129.2019.1695833
    [15] Gao H, Zhang W, Wang B, et al. (2018) Purification, characterization and anti-fatigue activity of polysaccharide fractions from okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Food & Function 9: 1088–1101. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2018/fo/c7fo01821e
    [16] Xia F, Zhong Y, Li M, et al. (2015) Antioxidant and anti-fatigue constituents of okra. Nutrients 7: 8846-8858.. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7105435 doi: 10.3390/nu7105435
    [17] Yuan Q, Lin S, Fu Y, et al. (2019) Effects of extraction methods on the physicochemical characteristics and biological activities of polysaccharides from okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Int J Bio Macromol127: 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.042 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.042
    [18] Kahlon T, Chapman M, Smith G (2007) In vitro binding of bile acids by okra, beets, asparagus, eggplant, turnips, green beans, carrots, and cauliflower. Food Chem 103: 676–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.056 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.056
    [19] Petropoulos S, Fernandes A, Barros L, et al. (2017) The chemical composition, nutritional value and antimicrobial properties of Abelmoschus esculentus seeds. Food Funct 8: 4733–4743. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2017/fo/c7fo01446e
    [20] Mairuae N, Cheepsunthorn P, Cheepsunthorn CL, et al. (2017) Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus Linn) inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory mediators in BV2 microglial cells. Trop J Pharm Res 16: 1285–1292. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v16i6.11 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i6.11
    [21] Zheng W, Zhao T, Feng W, et al. (2014) Purification, characterization and immunomodulating activity of a polysaccharide from flowers of Abelmoschus esculentus. Carbohyd Polym 106: 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.079 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.079
    [22] Monte LG, Santi-Gadelha T, Reis LB, et al. (2014) Lectin of Abelmoschus esculentus (okra) promotes selective antitumor effects in human breast cancer cells. Biotechnol Lett 36: 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-013-1382-4 doi: 10.1007/s10529-013-1382-4
    [23] Nnamezie AA, Famuwagun AA, Gbadamosi SO (2021) Characterization of okra seed flours, protein concentrate, protein isolate and enzymatic hydrolysates. Food Prod, Process Nutr 3: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-021-00059-9 doi: 10.1186/s43014-021-00059-9
    [24] Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
    [25] Chen Z, Wang J, Liu W, et al. (2017) Physicochemical characterization, antioxidant and anticancer activities of proteins from four legume species. J Food Sci Technol 54: 964–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2390-x doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2390-x
    [26] Wheat TE, Grumbach ES, Mazzeo JR (2008) UPLC amino acid analysis solution. Available from: https://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/720001683en.pdf.
    [27] Madurapperumage A, Johnson N, Thavarajah P, et al. (2022) Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) as a high‐throughput phenotyping tool for quantifying protein quality in pulse crops. Plant Phenome J 5: e20047. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppj2.20047 doi: 10.1002/ppj2.20047
    [28] Sahni P, Sharma S, Surasani VKR (2020) Influence of processing and pH on amino acid profile, morphology, electrophoretic pattern, bioactive potential and functional characteristics of alfalfa protein isolates. Food Chem 333: 127503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127503 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127503
    [29] Alabi OO, Annor GA, Amonsou EO (2023) Effect of cold plasma-activated water on the physicochemical and functional properties of Bambara groundnut globulin. Food Struct 36: 100321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foostr.2023.100321 doi: 10.1016/j.foostr.2023.100321
    [30] Du C, Wang Z, Zheng Z (2023) The preparation of plant-based milk substitutes with antioxidant properties using soybean protein isolate and curcumin composite nanoparticles. LWT 182: 114780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114780 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114780
    [31] Ling Z-N, Jiang Y-F, Ru J-N, et al. (2023) Amino acid metabolism in health and disease. Signal Transduct Tar Ther 8: 345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01569-3 doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01569-3
    [32] Ahmed N, Ali A, Riaz S, et al. (2021) Vegetable proteins: Nutritional value, sustainability, and future perspectives. Veg Crops-Health Benefits Cultiv: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101126 doi: 10.5772/intechopen.101126
    [33] Akbay B, Omarova Z, Trofimov A, et al. (2024) Double-Edge Effects of Leucine on Cancer Cells. Biomolecules 14: 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14111401 doi: 10.3390/biom14111401
    [34] Ijarotimi OS, Akinola-Ige AO, Oluwajuyitan TD (2023) Okra seeds proteins: Amino acid profile, free radical scavenging activities and inhibition of diabetes and hypertensive converting enzymes indices. Meas: Food 11: 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meafoo.2023.100101 doi: 10.1016/j.meafoo.2023.100101
    [35] Chen J, Cui L, Lu S, et al. (2024) Amino acid metabolism in tumor biology and therapy. Cell Death Dis 15: 42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06435-w doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-06435-w
    [36] Dai Y, Cai X, Shi W, et al. (2017) Pro-apoptotic cationic host defense peptides rich in lysine or arginine to reverse drug resistance by disrupting tumor cell membrane. Amino Acids 49: 1601–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2453-y doi: 10.1007/s00726-017-2453-y
    [37] Yamaguchi Y, Yamamoto K, Sato Y, et al. (2016) Combination of aspartic acid and glutamic acid inhibits tumor cell proliferation. Biomed Res 37: 153–159. https://doi.org/10.2220/biomedres.37.153 doi: 10.2220/biomedres.37.153
    [38] Chalamaiah M, Yu W, Wu J (2018) Immunomodulatory and anticancer protein hydrolysates (peptides) from food proteins: A review. Food Chem 245: 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.087 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.087
    [39] Wang Z, Zhang X, Wang L, et al. (2024) High Fischer ratio oligopeptides in food: sources, functions and application prospects. J Future Foods 4: 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.06.003
    [40] FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) Energy and protein requirements, report of the joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. Technical Report series No. 724. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=FAO%2FWHO%2FUNU+%281985%29+Energy+and+protein+requirements%2C+report+of+the+joint+FAO%2FWHO%2FUNU+expert+consultation.Technical+Report+series+No.+724.+Geneva%2C+Switzerland%3A+FAO%2C+WHO+and+the+United+Nations+University. & btnG = .
    [41] Patil PJ, Usman M, Zhang C, et al. (2022) An updated review on food-derived bioactive peptides: Focus on the regulatory requirements, safety, and bioavailability. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 21: 1732–1776. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12911 doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12911
    [42] Naiker TS, Baijnath H, Amonsou EO, et al. (2020) Effect of steaming and dehydration on the nutritional quality and functional properties of protein isolates produced from Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet (hyacinth bean). J Food Process Preserv 44: e14334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14334 doi: 10.1111/jfpp.14334
    [43] Fang C, Kanemaru K, Carvalho WSP, et al. (2024) Self-assembled poloxamer-legumin/vicilin nanoparticles for the nanoencapsulation and controlled release of folic acid. Int J Bio Macromol 268: 131646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131646 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131646
    [44] Antonia V, Vera A, Manuel V, et al. (2019) Conformational and physicochemical properties of quinoa proteins affected by different conditions of high-intensity ultrasound treatments. Ultrason Sonochem 51: 186–196. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30377080
    [45] Souza PFN (2020) The forgotten 2S albumin proteins: Importance, structure, and biotechnological application in agriculture and human health. Int J Bio Macromol 164: 4638–4649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.049 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.049
    [46] Laxminarayan R, Duse A, Wattal C, et al. (2013) Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect Dis 13: 1057–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9
    [47] Maria-Neto S, Honorato RV, Costa FT, et al. (2011) Bactericidal Activity Identified in 2S Albumin from Sesame Seeds and In silico Studies of Structure–Function Relations. Protein J 30: 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-011-9337-x doi: 10.1007/s10930-011-9337-x
    [48] González-Montoya M, Hernández-Ledesma B, Silván JM, et al. (2018) Peptides derived from in vitro gastrointestinal digestion of germinated soybean proteins inhibit human colon cancer cells proliferation and inflammation. Food Chem 242: 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.035 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.035
    [49] Hu S, Liu C, Liu X (2023) The beneficial effects of soybean proteins and peptides on chronic diseases. Nutrients 15: 1811. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/8/1811
    [50] Marcela G-M, Eva R-G, Del Carmen R-RM, et al. (2016) Evaluation of the antioxidant and antiproliferative effects of three peptide fractions of germinated soybeans on breast and cervical cancer cell lines. Plant Foods Human Nutr 71: 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-016-0568-z doi: 10.1007/s11130-016-0568-z
    [51] Chen J, Liu G, Pantalone V, et al. (2020) Physicochemical properties of proteins extracted from four new Tennessee soybean lines. J Agric Food Res 2: 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100022 doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100022
    [52] Ivanova P, Chalova V, Koleva L, et al. (2013) Amino acid composition and solubility of proteins isolated from sunflower meal produced in Bulgaria. Int Food Res J 20: 2995–3000.
    [53] Yagasaki K, Takagi T, Sakai M, et al. (1997) Biochemical characterization of soybean protein consisting of different subunits of glycinin. J Agric Food Chem 45: 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9604394 doi: 10.1021/jf9604394
    [54] Mir NA, Riar CS, Singh S (2019) Effect of pH and holding time on the characteristics of protein isolates from Chenopodium seeds and study of their amino acid profile and scoring. Food Chem 272: 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.048 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.048
    [55] Zhang L, Xiao Q, Wang Y, et al. (2017) Denatured protein-coated docetaxel nanoparticles: Alterable drug state and cytosolic delivery. Int J Pharm 523: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.026 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.026
    [56] Sadat A, Joye IJ (2020) Peak fitting applied to fourier transform infrared and raman spectroscopic analysis of proteins. Appl Sci 10: 5918. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175918 doi: 10.3390/app10175918
    [57] Krimm S, Bandekar J (1986) Vibrational spectroscopy and conformation of peptides, polypeptides, and proteins. Adv Protein Chem 38: 181–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60528-8 doi: 10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60528-8
    [58] Aboul-eneın Y, Bunacıu A, Fleschın S (2014) Evaluation of the protein secondary structures using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Gazi Univ J Sci 27: 637–644. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gujs/issue/7430/97685
    [59] Kong J, Yu S (2007) Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis of Protein Secondary Structures. Acta Bioch Bioph Sin 39: 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7270.2007.00320.x doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2007.00320.x
    [60] Malik MA, Sharma HK, Saini CS (2016) Effect of removal of phenolic compounds on structural and thermal properties of sunflower protein isolate. J Food Sci Technol 53: 3455–3464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2320-y doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2320-y
    [61] Aitipamula S, Vangala VR (2017) X-ray crystallography and its role in understanding the physicochemical properties of pharmaceutical cocrystals. J Indian Inst Sci 97: 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-017-0026-4 doi: 10.1007/s41745-017-0026-4
    [62] Jhan F, Gani A, Noor N, et al. (2021) Nanoreduction of millet proteins: Effect on structural and functional properties. ACS Food Sci Technol 1: 1418–1427. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.1c00132
    [63] Khan WA, Butt MS, Pasha I, et al. (2020) Microencapsulation of vitamin D in protein matrices: In vitro release and storage stability. J Food Meas Charact 14: 1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-019-00366-3 doi: 10.1007/s11694-019-00366-3
    [64] Hoseini B, Jaafari MR, Golabpour A, et al. (2023) Application of ensemble machine learning approach to assess the factors affecting size and polydispersity index of liposomal nanoparticles. Sci Rep 13: 18012. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43689-4 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43689-4
    [65] Danaei M, Dehghankhold M, Ataei S, et al. (2018) Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics 10: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10020057 doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10020057
    [66] Németh Z, Csóka I, Semnani Jazani R, et al. (2022) Quality by design-driven zeta potential optimisation study of liposomes with charge imparting membrane additives. Pharmaceutics 14: 1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091798 doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091798
    [67] Thakur P, Sonawane SS, Sonawane SH, et al. (2020) Nanofluids-based delivery system, encapsulation of nanoparticles for stability to make stable nanofluids, In: Encapsulation of Active Molecules and their Delivery System, Elsevier, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819363-1.00009-0
    [68] You JY, Kang SJ, Rhee WJ (2021) Isolation of cabbage exosome-like nanovesicles and investigation of their biological activities in human cells. Bioact Mater 6: 4321–4332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.023 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.023
    [69] Sung JJ, Pardeshi NN, Mulder AM, et al. (2015) Transmission electron microscopy as an orthogonal method to characterize protein aggregates. J Pharm Sci 104: 750–759.
    [70] Priscila Laiz Z, Soraia P, Sofia D, et al. (2023) Zein nanoparticles as oral carrier for mometasone furoate delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res 13: 2948–2959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-023-01367-y doi: 10.1007/s13346-023-01367-y
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(203) PDF downloads(31) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog