Research article Special Issues

Sustainable public procurement and constrained agricultural entrepreneurship

  • This paper analyzes the relevance of green public procurement (GPP) in boosting the transition to more sustainable and innovative regional and localized agrifood systems. Many scholars have emphasized the importance of the GPP in stimulating various positive effects and impacts on the sustainability of agrifood systems. Framed within the context of the sustainable competitiveness of localized agrifood systems, the GPP represents an excellent opportunity for a more sustainable farming sector. If well exploited, it may relaunch smallholder farms' competitiveness on a regional scale. Moreover, the GPP effectively addresses sustainability issues like fighting food insecurity and reducing food waste. The possibility of adhering to these localized modes of food provisioning engenders constrained rural entrepreneurship due to the regulatory system which mandates compliance by the farming sector. The paper provides an empirical analysis of the region Lazio of Italy to evidence the eventual propensity of regional farms and eventual entry barriers. The results of the analysis show, on the one side, high interest primarily within regional organic farms; on the other side, the results evidence that compliance with mandatory regulation and organizational and logistic assets represent the principal limit to exploit this opportunity fully. Consequently, reduced exploitation of this opportunity is translated into a rate of transition to more sustainable regional farming systems.

    Citation: Marcello De Rosa, Annalisa Castelli, Luca Bartoli, Martina Francescone. Sustainable public procurement and constrained agricultural entrepreneurship[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 585-597. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023032

    Related Papers:

    [1] Fulian Yin, Jiahui Lv, Xiaojian Zhang, Xinyu Xia, Jianhong Wu . COVID-19 information propagation dynamics in the Chinese Sina-microblog. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2676-2692. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020146
    [2] Fulian Yin, Xueying Shao, Jianhong Wu . Nearcasting forwarding behaviors and information propagation in Chinese Sina-Microblog. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 5380-5394. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019268
    [3] Fulian Yin, Xinyi Tang, Tongyu Liang, Yanjing Huang, Jianhong Wu . External intervention model with direct and indirect propagation behaviors on social media platforms. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(11): 11380-11398. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022530
    [4] Xiaonan Chen, Suxia Zhang . An SEIR model for information propagation with a hot search effect in complex networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 1251-1273. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023057
    [5] Tinghuai Ma, Hongmei Wang, Yuwei Zhao, Yuan Tian, Najla Al-Nabhan . Topic-based automatic summarization algorithm for Chinese short text. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3582-3600. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020202
    [6] Cheng-Cheng Zhu, Jiang Zhu . Spread trend of COVID-19 epidemic outbreak in China: using exponential attractor method in a spatial heterogeneous SEIQR model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3062-3087. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020174
    [7] Ruirui Han, Zhichang Zhang, Hao Wei, Deyue Yin . Chinese medical event detection based on event frequency distribution ratio and document consistency. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 11063-11080. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023489
    [8] Shan Huang, Khor Teik Huat, Yue Liu . Study on the influence of Chinese traditional culture on corporate environmental responsibility. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 14281-14305. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023639
    [9] Xiaoqing Lu, Jijun Tong, Shudong Xia . Entity relationship extraction from Chinese electronic medical records based on feature augmentation and cascade binary tagging framework. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 1342-1355. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024058
    [10] A. N. Licciardi Jr., L. H. A. Monteiro . A complex network model for a society with socioeconomic classes. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(7): 6731-6742. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022317
  • This paper analyzes the relevance of green public procurement (GPP) in boosting the transition to more sustainable and innovative regional and localized agrifood systems. Many scholars have emphasized the importance of the GPP in stimulating various positive effects and impacts on the sustainability of agrifood systems. Framed within the context of the sustainable competitiveness of localized agrifood systems, the GPP represents an excellent opportunity for a more sustainable farming sector. If well exploited, it may relaunch smallholder farms' competitiveness on a regional scale. Moreover, the GPP effectively addresses sustainability issues like fighting food insecurity and reducing food waste. The possibility of adhering to these localized modes of food provisioning engenders constrained rural entrepreneurship due to the regulatory system which mandates compliance by the farming sector. The paper provides an empirical analysis of the region Lazio of Italy to evidence the eventual propensity of regional farms and eventual entry barriers. The results of the analysis show, on the one side, high interest primarily within regional organic farms; on the other side, the results evidence that compliance with mandatory regulation and organizational and logistic assets represent the principal limit to exploit this opportunity fully. Consequently, reduced exploitation of this opportunity is translated into a rate of transition to more sustainable regional farming systems.



    Like many other social network platforms, in Sina-Microblog as the most popular network in China [1], every user can become both an information receipt to browse news and public opinions timely and an information publisher to disseminate the information quickly. For example, COVID-19 pandemic relevant topics increased exponentially on this platform after the initial outbreak and subsequently after the WHO declared a global pandemic. Figure 1 shows two main ways in which users browse and participate in the dissemination of information. One common way is to contact/expose information and then choose to forward it through the follow-ship over the real network [2,3]. Machine interference is another main way that has a profound impact on effective information dissemination. In this way, the Most Searched Hashtags and Hottest Topics are sorted and listed through AI technologies applied to the attention of real-time hot events. Users can read these hot public opinions that interest them by clicking the list of popular search titles or keywords. However, the listed topics are limited, those users having an additional desire for unlisted information usually look for more information using the searching box. This active search behavior has not yet been captured, to our best knowledge, in most modeling studies, so the users' exposure to information is usually underestimated, the description of information propagation dynamics is incomplete, and the use of such modeling framework as a tool to inform early warnings and rapid response strategies about the spread of information through social network is limited.

    Figure 1.  An illustration of different ways to passively expose and actively search, followed by information dissemination.

    More specifically, based on some similarities between information spreading and infectious disease transmission in terms of dynamic propagation, sub-population proximity in terms of exposure and transmission, and human interventions [4,5,6], classical epidemic models have been adopted and applied to understand information propagation on social platforms [7,8,9]. Depending on the disease presentation and disease progression, classical disease transmission models are typically classified by the compartmentalization of the population into the susceptible-infected (SI) model [10,11], the susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) [12] model, and the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model [13,14], among others. Almost all of these formulations can find their extensions to information propagation. At present, society gradually emerges new propagation phenomena, so that scholars apply these classical infectious disease models to new application scenarios or establish new models to match the situation [15,16], and describe the process of information dissemination. Wang et al. [17] proposed a model considering microblog propagation behaviors based on the SIS model, which is shown to be able to predict forwarding trends and have strong practicalities in the real network. Liu et al. [18] noticed the super-spreading information propagation on tweet and developed a parameterized model termed SAIR by adding a super-spreader state into the classical SIR model. Wang et al. [19] added the activity of users, the credibility of information, and network weights to the classical SIR model. They analyzed the dissemination rate and immunization rate of information dissemination on Weibo according to the total number of different users' comments, reports, and likes at different times. Zhao et al. [20] extended the SEIR model to investigate the propagation dynamics of the information online, and they used the information propagation data from the Digg website to examine the effectiveness. Zhang et al. [21] extended the traditional SEIR model to a susceptible-exposed-trusted-questioned-recovered (SETQR) model. Sang et al. [22] proposed a new information dissemination model called SEIRD to incorporate heterogeneous characteristics and user awareness. In addition, rumors as a special kind of information are the focus of some published studies. Kumar et al. [23] established a SMIR model and introduced the concept of an anti-rumor spreading agent to investigate how to deal with the propagation of false news or rumors. Chen et al. [24], Zhu et al. [25], Choi et al. [26], and Naim et al. [27] also created further mathematical models for the study of rumor propagation.

    In the Chinese Sina-Microblog, users can browse or participate in the propagation in many ways. A previous work [28] proposed a susceptible-forwarding-immune (SFI) model to study the basic information propagation dynamics with consideration of the forwarding behavior. Based on the SFI model, subsequent studies [29,30] considered the cross-transmission of pieces of information and emotional choices of users and respectively, with the developed CT-SFI model and E-SFI model. Active search through keywords is an important way to actively expose and spread information, but this searching behavior has not been captured in the existing modeling studies. Filling in this important gap falls in the scope of our current research. Namely, we seek to make a distinction between active searching and non-active exposure behaviors in modeling the propagation mechanism of COVID-19 related information. In particular, in our proposed proactive susceptible-forwarding-immune dynamics model, we introduce active search factors according to the discussion quantities of COVID-19 topics on the network, with Chinese Sina-Microblog as a case study.

    The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we construct a mathematical model of the information spreading on social networks incorporating proactive search and reactive follow behaviors. In Section 3, we fit the model with the real data of typical topics and analyze trends for each state variable over time. In Section 4, we conduct a parameter sensitivity analysis, suggesting effective intervention strategies for optimal information propagation, and comparing the effects of proactive search and passive exposure behavior on information dissemination. In Section 5, we introduce and calculate some key indices to measure public opinion propagation strength at the early stage of public opinion outbreaks. Section 6 summarizes our conclusions.

    We consider the information transmission on Sina-Microblog, with two supplementary routes for accessing online information simultaneously. According to the propagation process of each information, we classify the relevant Chinese Sina-Microblog users into four distinct states: the proactive susceptible state (SP), in which users are unaware of but susceptible to the Weibo by actively searching on social media; the passive susceptible state (SR), in which users are unaware of but susceptible to the Weibo based on the follow-ship; the forwarding state (F), in which users have been forwarding the Weibo actively to influence other users; the immune state (I), in which users are further divided into two categories: those who have contacted but have no interest in the content of this Weibo subjectively, and those who have already forwarded the Weibo, but no longer forward the Weibo again, and have no more influence on other users.

    Let N denote the total number of users involved in the process of information dissemination, where N is a sufficiently large positive integer. We assume that the susceptible users have at most one forwarding behavior and the users consist of four groups with different states, including the proactive susceptible state SP(t) (SP-state), the passive susceptible state SR(t) (SR-state), the forwarding state F(t) (F-state) and the immune state I(t) (I-state), for any time t0. In particular, the susceptible state (S) is subdivided into the proactive susceptible state (SP) and the passive susceptible state (SR), i.e. SP(t)+SR(t)=S(t). We obtain the following susceptible-forwarding-immune model:

    dSR(t)/dt=βSR(t)F(t), (1)
    dSP(t)/dt=θSP(t)F(t), (2)
    dF(t)/dt=pβSR(t)F(t)+θγSP(t)F(t)αF(t), (3)
    dI(t)/dt=(1p)βSR(t)F(t)+θ(1γ)SP(t)F(t)+αF(t). (4)

    An illustration of this model is given in Figure 2. The definition of parameters is detailed in Table 1.

    Figure 2.  The proactive (search)/passive(exposure)-follow susceptible-forwarding-immune propagation model.
    Table 1.  The definition of parameters.
    Parameter Interpretation
    p The probability that the users in the un-initiative susceptible state will forward the Weibo.
    β The exposure rate that the users in the un-initiative susceptible state will be exposed to the Weibo based on the follow-ship.
    γ The probability that the users in the initiative susceptible state will forward the Weibo.
    θ The exposure rate that the users in the initiative susceptible state will be exposed to the Weibo by actively searching on the social media.
    α The rate at which a user in the F-state becomes the immune state.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In our proposed model, the user's state changes in the forwarding, the direct-immune, and the overtime-immune processes. More specifically, the number of initiative susceptible users is θN, among which θγN will forward the Weibo and θ(1γ)N will not, where 0<γ<1. The number of un-initiative susceptible users is βN, among which pβN will forward the Weibo and (1p)βN will not, where 0<β<1. The probability of a normal user is a proactive susceptible user or a non-active susceptible is SR(t)/N or SP(t)/N, and there areF(t) active forwarding users in total, then dSR(t)/dt=βSR(t)F(t), and dSR(t)/dt=βSR(t)F(t). After a short period (latent), some users in the forwarding state turn into the immune state at a rate of α, where 1/α is the average duration that an F-user remains active in forwarding.

    We denote the number of cumulative forwarding users by C(t) and can compute it according to the proposed model

    C(t)=t0[pβSR(t)F(t)+γθSP(t)F(t)]dt. (5)

    It follows that

    dC(t)/dt=pβSR(t)F(t)+γθSP(t)F(t). (6)

    Since one Weibo is usually posted by a single user, we have the following initial conditions for the model, F0=C0=1, I0=0, SR0+SP0=NF0=N1. Eqs 1, 2 and 6 imply that

    dS(t)/dt=dSP(t)/dt+dSR(t)/dt=βSR(t)F(t)θSP(t)F(t)<0, (7)

    and

    C'(t)=pβSR(t)F(t)+γθSP(t)F(t)>0.

    Therefore, S=limtS(t)>0 and C=limtC(t)<N. Similarly, Eq. (4) implies that I(t) is increasing since I'(t)=(1p)βSR(t)F(t)+θ(1γ)SP(t)F(t)+αF(t) and I=NS.

    The reproduction ratio R0: The reproduction ratio is an important indicator to measure whether the disease may break out during the spread of infectious diseases. Similarly, we define the reproduction ratio R0 to estimate the propagation tendency of a Weibo.

    If the forwarded speed of one Weibo is always less than zero after it was published, i.e.,

    F'(t)=(pβSR0+θγSP0α)F(t)<0. (9)

    Then this Weibo is unlikely to appear in the top search list. Since F(t) is always positive, we rewrite Eq 9 as

    pβSR0+θγSP0α<1. (10)

    Based on the definition of epidemic reproduction ratio, we define the Weibo reproduction ratio

    R0=pβSR0+θγSP0α. (11)

    If R0<1, the forwarded number of one message will decrease and this Weibo will get less and less attention. If R0>1, the message will be forwarded timely and quickly, leading to the outbreak of information. Therefore, the popularity of one Weibo can be determined by the value of R0. The larger R0 is, the faster Weibo will be forwarded. Note the role of proactive search, so classical modeling without considering this proactive search normally leads to underestimating the information outbreak potential.

    In this section, we verify the effectiveness of the proposed proactive SFI model through numerical experiments. The real data is collected from Weibo's Application Programming Interface (API). Table 2 lists the cumulative forwarding number of users of a particular Weibo at different times between 15:00, March 4, 2020 and 14:00, March 5, 2020. This Weibo is about that a Chinese research team found the mutation of COVID-19 and this observation attracts a lot of attention. This Weibo was forwarded by a fraction of users and its forwarding quantity increased slowly at first, and then more users noticed and forwarded this Weibo quickly after about one to two hours, and the forwarding quantity achieved a huge surge after a steady increase period. Finally, the popularity of this Weibo would fade away or be overwritten by other news.

    Table 2.  The cumulative forwarding numbers of a particular Weibo.
    t(h) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    number 4480 8002 10847 12802 14025 14978 15636 16184
    t(h) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    number 16607 16715 16792 16847 16879 16903 16909 16927
    t(h) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    number 16957 17003 17054 17103 17177 17209 17233 17250

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Here we use the LS(Least Square) method to estimate the parameters of the proactive SFI model and the fitted parameters minimize the error function locally so we have added the parameter ranges that are available based on previous research experience through software called DEDiscover within which the fitting was conducted. The cumulative forwarding number is the available data from Weibo, and we set the auxiliary parameter vector as Θ=(β,α,p,θ,γ,SR0,SP0). Let fC(t) be the numerical value of C(t). To discover the optimal data fitting, Θ is set to minimize the following formula:

    LS=Tk=0|fC(tk,Θ)IDk|2. (12)

    where IDk denotes the real number of cumulative forwarding users, tk=k is the sampling time, k=1,2,,16.

    Figure 3 plots the data fitting and simulation results. Figure 3a is the fitting result between the numerically calculated and the actual numbers of cumulative forwarding, which shows the rapid outbreak of this information and it tends to be stable quickly. From the data fitting, our PR-SFI model achieves accurate estimation, and we can estimate unknown parameters. Based on the findings from Figure 3a, we obtain the changes in the number of users in SR state, SP state, F state, and I state as plotted in Figure 3b. We can see from Figure 3b that the number of people in SP and SR states have been declining over time, and the number of people in I state has been rising and tends to be stable finally. The observations match the actual situation and validate the feasibility of our model. In addition, we compute the reproduction ratio of this information R0=5.9190>1, and hence we can expect a rapid outbreak of this information at the beginning of the propagation. Fig.3(a) does confirm this inference.

    Figure 3.  Parameter estimation and numerical simulation results (a) Data fitting to the actual number of C population; (b) The number of users in four different states, SR- state, SP- state, F- state, and I- state.
    Table 3.  Parameter results.
    Estimated Value Min Max
    β 2.3806×104 0 1
    α 0.1013 0 2
    p 0.4039 0 1
    θ 1.0815×104 0 1
    γ 0.3027 0 1
    SR0 8.4089×103 0 1.5×104
    SP0 9.9052×103 0 2.0×104

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    This section analyzes how the parameters in the proactive SFI model influence the information propagation of the COVID-19 topics. To this end, we use the partial rank correlation coefficients (PRCCs) [31] based on 1000 samples under different threshold conditions to evaluate the sensitivity of various input parameters. According to the histogram and scatter diagram of three important indicators R0, Fmax and Cs, we find that when the correlation between Fmax and Cs is positive, the value of the corresponding index will increase with the increase of the value of the parameter. On the contrary, the index will decrease as the parameter decreases.

    Figure 4 shows that parameters β, p, θ, γ, and initial values SR0, SP0 have positive influences on R0, Fmax and Cs, and parameter α has a negative influence on the three indexes. According to the definition of R0 in Eq 11, if we want to let the positive topics of the COVID-19 guide the public opinion, we can achieve it by increasing the value of β, p, θ, γ, SR0 and SP0 and decreasing the value of α. Sc0 and Ss0 are the initial values of the susceptible population, and we can increase these two values by taking advantage of the appeal of opinion leaders and persuading them to participate in the information propagation. Since β is the average exposure rate for a user to contact the information, the increases of SR0 and SP0 lead to the increase of β as well. Besides, we can make the content richer and more interesting to attract users to forward topics and keep them active in forwarding for a longer time to increase the value of parameterp and decrease the value of α. We also can select the information diffusion source with higher network density at the beginning of information release and reduce the network density by truncating key nodes to increase the parameter θ. Correspondingly, if we do not want public opinion to erupt, such as rumor topics of the COVID-19, we can reduce the value of parameter β and S0 by requesting the platform to delete the relevant topics of the rumors about the COVID-19. Then the new reading quantity is decreased and the outbreak of public opinion is controlled from the source.

    Figure 4.  PRCCs results of 0, Fmax and Cs under multi-parameter variation.

    To compare the effects of proactive and non-active behavior on information dissemination, here we focus on the analysis of parameters β, θ, p, and γ. Figure 5 shows the influence of each parameter on the instantaneous number of forwarding users F(t) and the cumulative number of forwarding users C(t).

    Figure 5.  The influence of key parameters on F and C: (a) only β changes; (b) only θ changes; (c) only p changes; (c) only γ changesx.

    By comparing and analyzing Figure 5a, b, parameters β, θ, p, and γ have similar influences on F(t) and C(t). With the increase of these parameters, the instantaneous number of forwarding users F(t) and the cumulative number of forwarding users C(t) shot up. The rate of the outbreak is faster, the peak of the total number of forwarding users F(t) is higher, and the final scale of the cumulative number of forwarding users C(t) is also wider. The difference is that the average contact rate β and the average exposure probability θ are very sensitive, and the experiment is only carried out in a very small range, as shown in Figure 5, although parameters β and θ affect both F(t) and C(t), they have less obvious effects on C(t) than parameters p, γ.

    The purpose of public opinion analysis and prediction is to provide early warnings. The proposed SFI dynamic model makes it possible to analyze public opinions about COVID-19 published on the Sina-Microblog, and then we can make predictions on the key communication index of public opinion as early as possible.

    Parameter estimations are necessary to determine and apply the proposed model. In particular, β and θ can be determined by the network structure, and α can be obtained from the behavior rules of users, so the unknown parameters include p, γ, SR0 and SP0.

    This section carries on numerical experiments with β = 1.3484×104, α=0.1292, θ=3.1943×105, as shown in Figure 6, where the blue star is used for parameter estimation of the real cumulative number of forwarding users, the pink circle is the unknown real cumulative number of forwarding users, black and red solid lines are respectively the predicted cumulative number of forwarding users obtained from parameter estimation and the total amount of users in forwarding state, and the red star indicates the public opinion peak and the corresponding public opinion climax time.

    Figure 6.  Predictive performance of single information propagation proactive SFI dynamic model (only parameters p, γ and initial values SR0 and SP0 are estimated).

    Figure 6 shows the prediction results of single information transmission about the COVID-19 based on the proactive SFI dynamics model. It only shows the results from the beginning of information release to the third hour of data acquisition, and fewer hours are no longer displayed because the prediction performance is too low and has no practical significance. We can see that our model can predict the whole trend of public opinion of the COVID-19, and the prediction performance of each period is good. The early prediction way is a method to exchange prior knowledge for early warning time and effect. To estimate fewer parameters at an earlier time with better prediction performance of the COVID-19, it is necessary to detect the network structure and individual habits in the network in the early stage.

    In this study, we propose a proactive search-passive exposure-reactive susceptible-discussing-immune (PR-SFI) dynamics model considering both proactive search, passive exposure and reactive follow behaviors of users from the Chinese Sina-Microblog. We parametrize, calibrate, and validate our models using real-life data in the network during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our model examines how these two complementary behaviors, proactive search and passive exposure, influence public opinion and information propagation in different stages of the spread of COVID-19 related information. In our numerical experiments, the results of parameter sensitivity analysis and PRCCs show that both proactive search and reactive follow behaviors have effects on the transmission of information and the influence of the forwarding probability γ of proactive search and the exposure rate β of reactive follow are more significant than other parameters. Meanwhile, the model can realize early prediction of public opinion. In summary, we believe we have pointed out an important information access route, proactive research, that has been underestimated in the existing literature and we filled in this gap. As a result, we have initiated the discussion towards developing an important technical tool to accurately predict public opinion spread trends and to provide insights on optimal public health communication strategies during a public health crisis, like the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

    The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: 61801440), the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canada Research Chair Program (JWu), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the High-quality and Cutting-edge Disciplines Construction Project for Universities in Beijing (Internet Information, Communication University of China) and the State Key Laboratory of Media Convergence and Communication, Communication University of China.

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] Gaitán-Cremaschi D, Klerkx L, Aguilar-Gallegos N, et al. (2022) Public food procurement from family farming: A food system and social network perspective. Food Policy 111: 102325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102325 doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102325
    [2] European Union (2016) Buying green! A handbook on green public procurement. Luxembourg.
    [3] Swensson LFJ, Hunter D, Schneider S, et al. (2021) Public food procurement as a game changer for food system transformation. In: FAO, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT and Editora da UFRGS, Public food procurement for sustainable food systems and healthy diets—Volume 1, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb7960en
    [4] FAO (2018) Strengthening sector policies for better food security and nutrition results. Public food procurement, Rome: FAO. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/CA2281EN/ca2281en.pdf.
    [5] Smith J, Andersson G, Gourlay R, et al. (2016) Balancing competing policy demands: The case of sustainable public sector food procurement. J Cleaner Prod 112-Part Ⅰ: 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.065 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.065
    [6] Parsons K, Barling D (2022) Identifying the policy instrument interactions to enable the public procurement of sustainable food. Agriculture 12: 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040506 doi: 10.3390/agriculture12040506
    [7] Sonnino R, Marsden TK (2006) Beyond the divide: Rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. J Econ Geogr 6: 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi006 doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi006
    [8] Oostinide H, van Broekhuizen R (2008) The dynamics of novelty production. In: van der Ploeg JD, Marsden T (Eds.), Unfolding webs, Assen: van Gorcum.
    [9] Avelino F, Wittmayer J, Kemp R, et al. (2014) Game-changers and transformative social innovation. Ecol Soc 22: 41–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26798984
    [10] Jeannerat H, Crevoisier O (2022) From competitiveness to territorial value: Transformative territorial innovation policies and anchoring milieus. Eur Plann Stud 30: 2157–2177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2042208 doi: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2042208
    [11] Cheriet F, Messeghem K, Lagarde V, et al. (2020) Agricultural entrepreneurship: Challenges and perspectives. Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat 19: 13–29.
    [12] Fonte M (2008) Naming Food After Places. Food Relocalisation and Knowledge Dynamics in Rural Development, London: Routledge.
    [13] McElwee G (2008) A taxonomy of entrepreneurial farmers. Int J Entrepreneurship Small Bus 6: 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2008.019139 doi: 10.1504/IJESB.2008.019139
    [14] McElwee G (2005) A Literature review of entrepreneurship in agriculture, Project "Developing entrepreneurial skills of farmers" (ESoF).
    [15] van der Ploeg JD, van Broekhuizen R, Brunori G, et al. (2008) Towards a framework for understanding regional rural development. In: van der Ploeg JD, Marsden T (Eds.), Unfolding webs, Assen: van Gorcum.
    [16] Condor R (2020) Entrepreneurship in agriculture: A literature review. Int J Entrepreneurship Small Bus 40: 516–562. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2020.109013 doi: 10.1504/IJESB.2020.109013
    [17] Gittins P, McElwee G, Lever J (2022) Constrained entrepreneurship in UK agriculture: A Weberian analysis, J Rural Stud 95: 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.021
    [18] McElwee G, Smith R (2015) Researching rural enterprise. In: Fayolle A (Ed.), Handbook of Research On Entrepreneurship. What We Know and What We Need to Know, London: Edward Elgar.
    [19] Blundel R, Lockett N, Wang C (2018) Exploring entrepreneurship, Strathclyde: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    [20] Welter F (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship. Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory Pract 35: 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
    [21] Storper M (1997) Regional Worlds, New York: Guilford.
    [22] Mattas K, Tsakiridou E, Karelakis C, et al. (2022) Strengthening the sustainability of European food chains through quality and procurement policies. Trends Food Sci Technol 120: 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.021 doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.021
    [23] Boltanski L, Thévenot L (1991) Les économies de la grandeur, Paris: Gallimard.
    [24] Marescotti A (2000) Marketing channels, quality hallmarks and the theory of conventions. In: Sylvander B, Barjolle D, Arfini F (Eds.), The socio-economics of origin labelled products in agro-food supply chains: spatial, institutional and co-ordination aspects, Inra, Serie Actes et Communications, Paris, 17-2: 103–122.
    [25] Renting H, Schermer M, Rossi A (2012) Building food democracy: Exploring civic food networks and newly emerging forms of food citizenship. Int J Soc Agric Food 19: 289–307
    [26] Lozano C, Schneider S, Swensson L, et al. (2016) Unfolding matters in public food procurement: Contextualizing lessons and steps forward in school food policy reform. Raizes 36: 17–31. https://doi.org/10.37370/raizes.2016.v36.456 doi: 10.37370/raizes.2016.v36.456
    [27] Swensson LFJ (2016) Collective actions and the access of smallholder farmers to institutional markets: Opportunities and legal challenges in Brazilian institutional food procurement programmes. In: Da Silva C, Mpagalile J, van Rooyen, et al. (Eds.), Enabling more inclusive and efficient food and agricultural systems in Africa: FAO session at the IFAMA World Forum 18 June 2014, Cape Town, South Africa.
    [28] Messeghem K, Cheriet F, Lagarde V, et al. (2020) Agricultural entrepreneurship: Challenges and perspectives. Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat 19: 7–20. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.194.0013 doi: 10.3917/entre.194.0013
    [29] Eckhardt JT, Shane SA (2003) Opportunities and entrepreneurship. J Manage 29: 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900304 doi: 10.1177/014920630302900304
    [30] Kirzner IM (1997) Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. J Econ Lit 35: 60–85.
    [31] Nzembaie KF, Buckley AP (2022) Digital entrepreneurship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [32] OECD (2015) List of indicators of entrepreneurial determinants. In: Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2015, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2015-31-en
    [33] Alsos GA, Carter S, Ljunggren E, et al. (2011) Introduction: Researching entrepreneurship in agriculture and rural development. In: Alsos GA, Carter S, Ljunggren E, et al. (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857933249
    [34] Gaglio CM, Katz JA (2001) The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Bus Econ 16: 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011132102464 doi: 10.1023/A:1011132102464
    [35] Cofré-Bravo G, Klerkx L, Englera A (2019) Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. J Rural Stud 69: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004
    [36] Vecchio Y, Francescone M, Adinolfi F, et al. (2022) "Ambidexterity": Trump card for farm's innovativeness and competitiveness. Br Food J 124: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0264 doi: 10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0264
    [37] Knickel K, Schiller S, von Münchhausen S, et al. (2008) New institutional framework in rural development. In: van der Ploeg JD, Marsden T (Eds.), Unfolding webs, Assen: van Gorcum.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Guo Hong, Ethical Considerations on Some Issues of Medical Artificial Intelligence Applications, 2022, 2582-7367, 10.37191/Mapsci-2582-7367-3(3)-051
    2. Chao Shen, Pengyu He, Zhenyu Song, Yimeng Zhang, Cognitive disparity in online rumor perception: a group analysis during COVID-19, 2024, 24, 1471-2458, 10.1186/s12889-024-20549-y
    3. Jinlong Fu, Yan Song, Yike Feng, Rumor Spreading Model Considering the Roles of Online Social Networks and Information Overload, 2023, 11, 2169-3536, 123947, 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3328396
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2442) PDF downloads(248) Cited by(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog