Citation: Joshua D. Klein, Amanda Firmansyah, Nurhaya Panga, Waffa Abu-Aklin, Miriam Dekalo-Keren, Tanya Gefen, Ronit Kohen, Yonit Raz Shalev, Nativ Dudai, Lea Mazor. Seed treatments with essential oils protect radish seedlings against drought[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(4): 345-353. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.4.345
[1] | Yenni, Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim, Rosimah Nulit, Siti Zaharah Sakimin . Influence of drought stress on growth, biochemical changes and leaf gas exchange of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) in Indonesia. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(1): 37-60. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022003 |
[2] | Rasyid Sukifto, Rosimah Nulit, Yap Chee Kong, Noorhazira Sidek, Siti Nuratiqah Mahadi, Nurfatiha Mustafa, Roslinda A. Razak . Enhancing germination and early seedling growth of Malaysian indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) using hormonal priming with gibberellic acid (GA3). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 649-665. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.649 |
[3] | Tuan Syaripah Najihah, Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim, A'fifah Abd Razak, Rosimah Nulit, Puteri Edaroyati Megat Wahab . Effects of water stress on the growth, physiology and biochemical properties of oil palm seedlings. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(4): 854-868. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.4.854 |
[4] | Nubia Amaya Olivas, Cindy Villalba Bejarano, Guillermo Ayala Soto, Miriam Zermeño Ortega, Fabiola Sandoval Salas, Esteban Sánchez Chávez, Leon Hernández Ochoa . Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of essential oils of Origanum dictamnus from Mexico. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 387-394. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.387 |
[5] | Panagiota Kazai, Christos Noulas, Ebrahim Khah, Dimitrios Vlachostergios . Yield and seed quality parameters of common bean cultivars grown under water and heat stress field conditions. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(2): 285-302. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.285 |
[6] | Fereshteh Shabani Soltanmoradi, Shahram Sedaghathoor . Antioxidant capacity and pigment synthesis of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) as influenced by benzyladenine and epibrassinolide. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(2): 109-119. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.2.109 |
[7] | Konrad Wojciech Nowak, Paweł Mielnik, Monika Sięda, Izabela Staniszewska, Anna Bieniek . The effect of ultrasound treatment on the extraction of lycopene and β-carotene from cherry silverberry fruits. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 247-254. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021016 |
[8] | W. Mupangwa, I. Nyagumbo, E. Mutsamba . Effect of different mulching materials on maize growth and yield in conservation agriculture systems of sub-humid Zimbabwe. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(2): 239-253. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.2.239 |
[9] | Ahmad Rifqi Fauzi, Ahmad Junaedi, Iskandar Lubis, Munif Ghulamahdi, Hajrial Aswidinnoor, Jun-Ichi Sakagami . Evaluation of rice genotypes on seed attributes and agronomic performance for developing direct-seeded cultivar. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(1): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022001 |
[10] | Stefano Puccio, Anna Perrone, Giuseppe Sortino, Giuseppe Gianguzzi, Carla Gentile, Vittorio Farina . Yield, pomological characteristics, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in mediterranean climate. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(3): 592-603. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.592 |
Establishment of seedlings of economic crops is often reduced if there is not a steady supply of water. Rainfall and temperatures over the next 10–100 years are predicted to shift to drier and warmer climate conditions, which will further exacerbate the establishment of the majority of the economic crops that are currently produced [1]. Breeding for abiotic stress resistance in crops is effective but time-consuming. Seed treatments to induce abiotic stress will permit continued use of current genotypes, or at least provide a stop-gap while plant breeders develop new stress-resistant varieties.
Seed treatments to induce abiotic stress resistance have been reviewed extensively [2,3]. Soaking, coating directly or with slow-release formulations of various chemicals, use of water-absorbing and water-resisting coatings—all have been attempted as means to induce stress resistance. Solid matrix priming, also known as matriconditioning, is a relatively recent development in seed treatments. It has been used to protect against cold stress during germination, to reduce the variability in emergence, and to supply plant growth regulating bacteria to the seed [3,4,5]. The matrix itself can range from granulated minerals (shale or clay) to available plant by-products such as rice husks or sawdust [4,5].
Essential oils (EO) from plants are increasingly used instead of synthetic chemicals to protect plant and animal products against biotic and abiotic stresses. Thymol and carvacrol have germicidal effects against fungi and bacteria, and also act as antioxidants, thus protecting sensitive membranes from damage during abiotic or biotic stresses [6,7]. However, treating seeds with excessively-high concentrations of EO can reduce germination and damage surviving seedlings [8]. Similar results are found with growth regulators, where the optimal concentration must be determined to avoid abnormal germination and development [9].
We hypothesized that seed treatments with compounds that strengthen membranes and enhance antioxidative activity by plants could protect radish seedlings against drought. Matriconditioning seeds with plant extracts that contain essential oils to induce drought resistance in seedlings has not been reported previously. Our objective was to compare standard imbibition and matriconditioning as means for treating radish seeds with EO from two chemotypes (carvacrol and thymol) of za'atar (Origanum syriacum), as well as extracts from the residue remaining after essential oils have been steam-distilled from harvested oregano. The latter oregano natural product (ONP) retains bioactive compounds [10]. We also treated the seeds with Moddus (trinexapac-ethyl, TE), an inhibitor of gibberellin synthesis that can induce drought resistance [11].
Seed treatment. Radish seeds (Raphanus raphanistrum subsp. sativus, cv. Varda) were obtained from the Official Israel Seed Testing Laboratory. Seeds were imbibed in solutions as described below for 2 hours at room temperature (20–23 ℃) or were matriconditioned with solutions for two days at 15 ℃ in sawdust obtained from a local carpenter shop at a ratio of 3:1:3 seed: matrix: solution [5]. Seeds were then air-dried to their original weight.
Treatment solutions. Seeds were treated with 0.5% (v/v) aqueous extracts from carvacrol and thymol chemotypes of Origanum syriacum, 0.5 or 5% (v/v) solutions of oregano natural product (ONP, Bakto Flavours, Inc.), or 0.15% (375 ppm active ingredient) or 0.3% (750 ppm a.i.) Moddus (Syngenta brand of trinexapac-ethyl). The Oregano syriacum chemotypes had respectively 70% carvacrol, 0% thymol or 40% thymol and 20% carvacrol in their essential oil fractions, while the ONP had no carvacrol or thymol, but did have bioactive phenols and antioxidative activity [10].
Treated seeds (four replicates of 20 seeds each) were germinated for seven days at 20 ℃ on Anchor germination paper, after which germination was categorized and calculated as percent normal or abnormal. Fungus-infected seeds were counted for calculation of percent total infection. Separate replicate was sown on MTMB and MFS media to check for specific (Xanthomonis campestris) or non-specific bacterial infection, respectively.
Seeds were also sown in 150 ml pots with a 20:80 peat: sand mix, and grown in a 20 ℃ chamber under fluorescent grow-lights with a 16 h: 8 h light: dark regime. Each treatment was replicated in four pots. Five seeds were sown per pot. Percent emergence was calculated after seven days. After emergence, seedlings were thinned to three plants/ pot. At 15 days after emergence, the thickness of the first true leaf was measured with a digital caliper. Discs 1 cm diameter were cut from the first true (avoiding the main veins), weighed, and placed in the dark at room temperature for 24–48 hours in methanol to determine chlorophyll and carotenoids/xanthophylls or in methanol-1% HCl to determine anthocyanins [12,13]. The methanol extract was also used to determine antioxidant activity in the leaf [14]. A 40 µL aliquot of methanol extract was added to 960 µL of DPPH (2, 2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) solution, incubated for 20 minutes, and read at 517 nm. The results were expressed on a mm2 basis as the difference in absorbance between blank (methanol only) and sample. Specific weight (mg/mm2) was calculated from the weight of the 1-cm diameter (0.79 mm2) discs.
After three weeks of growth, total drought was imposed for 6 days. At the end of that time, the second true leaf was taken for measurement of relative water content. Leaves were weighed, floated for two hours on deionized water in a petri dish, blotted and reweighed, and then dried overnight at 85 ℃ before final weighing. Relative water content was calculated as [(fresh weight – dry weight) ÷ (turgid weight– dry weight)]. Discs 1 cm diameter were cut from the third true leaves (avoiding the main veins), weighed, and placed in 2 ml of deionized water in sealed vials for 6 hours at room temperature. The vials were then shaken to mix the contents, and the electrical conductivity (ion efflux) of the solution was measured with a Cyberscan CON 110 meter (Eutech Instruments). Ion efflux was expressed as µS/mg/hr. The vials with the tissue discs were then frozen at –20 ℃ for 12–18 hours to rupture the plant cells, allowed to come to room temperature, and percent of total ion leakage was measured as initial efflux (before freezing)/ final efflux (after freezing and thawing).
After the drought period, plants were watered for a further 6 days, whereupon the number of revived (turgid) plants were counted to calculate % survival after drought. The above-ground portion of each plant was weighed, dried for 18 hours at 85 ℃, and reweighed to determine the percent dry weight.
All data were analyzed as a factorial design by ANOVA [15] and means separated by LSD. Main variables were seed treatment (matriconditioning vs soaking), while secondary variables were the seed treatment compounds. With the exception of percent total infection, there were no main effect differences between matriconditioning and soaking treatments. Significant differences between seed treatment compounds are indicated by different letters within columns, while significant interactions at the seed treatment X compound level are indicated by asterisks.
Germination and emergence. Normal germination greater than 85% (the lowest commercially acceptable percentage) was observed in all treated seeds except those exposed to carvacrol and trinexapac-ethyl (TE, Moddus) (Table 1). The lower concentration of TE reduced germination more than the higher, a paradoxical situation that has been observed with other hormonally-regulated phenomena [16,17]. However, the higher concentration of TE caused the greatest amount of abnormal germination, which included deformed roots or stunted shoots. Emergence of seedlings in pots generally paralleled the results obtained with germination on paper (Table 1), but tended to be greater. This is probably because germination was measured after six days, while emergence was determined after 14 days. The greatest incidence of fungal infection was observed in control and ONP treatments, with both thymol and carvacrol extracts causing a significant reduction in infection, as has been reported [18]. The reduction in fungal infection resulting from TE treatment was surprising, but may be due to fungitoxic effects of the low pH of TE solutions (as indicated in the Material Safety Data Sheet for TE). Infection by Xanthomonas capestris was similar to controls (3000 cfu) in all solution treatments except thymol and carvacrol, which completely suppressed bacterial growth (data not shown). Matriconditioning did not cause significant changes in results compared with priming in solution, with the exception of fungal and bacterial infections, which were considerably increased in all treatments based on plant extracts. Both rice husk and sawdust matrix material turned out to harbor fungal contaminants (mostly Rhizopus and Pennicillium) and non-specific bacteria, which were significantly (rice husk) or totally (sawdust) suppressed by two days heating at 100 ℃ (Figure 1). Rice husk was also a physically difficult material to work with in treating small seeds such as radish. We therefore used heat-treated sawdust for matriconditioning seeds that were sown in pots for the growth and drought experiment.
Treatment material | Normal germination (%) | Abnormal germination (%) | Total germination (%) | Total Infection (%) | Emergence (%) | |||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 95.0a | 88.3a | 1.7a | 5.0a | 96.7a | 93.3a | 48.3a | 43.3b | 100a | 100a |
ONP 0.1% | 90.0a | 96.7a | 5.0a | 1.7a | 95.0a | 98.3a | 36.7ab | 83.3a* | 95a | 95a |
ONP 5.0% | 96.7a | 95.0a | 3.3a | 5.0a | 100.0a | 100.0a | 46.7a | 73.3a* | 100a | 100a |
Thymol | 88.3a | 90.0a | 5.0a | 8.3ab | 93.3a | 98.3a | 18.3c | 78.3a* | 100a | 100a |
Carvacrol | 60.0b | 96.7a* | 16.7b | 3.3a | 76.7b | 100.0a | 26.7bc | 68.3a* | 70b | 100a* |
TE 0.15% | 8.3d | 6.7b | 5.0a | 8.3ab | 13.3d | 15.0b | 16.7c | 36.7b | 40c | 60b |
TE 0.3% | 20.0c | 0.0b | 20.0b | 15.0b | 40.0c | 15.0b* | 20.0c | 25.0b | 45bc | 35c |
Leaf structure. Leaf thickness and specific area were both enhanced in plants that grew from seeds treated with TE (Table 2), while ONP 0.1 and carvacrol only enhanced specific area. TE treatments lead to increased thickness of the epidermal layer of leaves by inducing wax and cutin formation [19,20]. There was no correlation between leaf thickness and weight per cm2. Exogenous applications of carvacrol and phenol-containing compounds such as ONP can change the fatty-acid structure of plant tissues [21], in addition to inducing suberization of xylem tissues [22]. Strengthening membranes and water-retention capability of tissues might partially account for enhanced specific weight in the absence of increased leaf thickness, although this would be an epigenetic effect on the plant resulting from the original seed treatment.
Treatment material | Leaf thickness (µm) | Specific area (mg/cm2) | ||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 175 a | 175a | 11.3a | 14.6a |
ONP 0.1% | 175 | 183a | 19.9b | 17.5a |
ONP 5.0% | 191ab | 193ab | 15.5ab | 18.0a |
Thymol | 176 a | 175a | 17.1ab | 13.4a |
Carvacrol | 180 ab | 181a | 56.0d | 15.2a |
TE 0.15% | 197 bc | 210 c | 30.4c | 24.2b |
TE 0.3% | 211 c | 205bc | 29.8c | 39.2c* |
Drought survival. Soaking seeds in all solutions except ONP 0.1% resulted in an average seedling survival rate of more than 70% (Table 3), compared with 19% for untreated seeds. In contrast, matriconditioning enhanced seedling survival only with thymol and carvacrol extracts. However, fresh weight of surviving seedlings was enhanced in comparison with control only in plants grown from TE-and ONP 0.1% solution-primed seeds. Matriconditioning was effective in enhancing seedling fresh weight only in the TE 0.3% treatment. In parallel with enhanced seedling fresh weight, % seedling dry weight was 25–50% less in plants from solution-primed seeds in comparison with control, while matriconditioning decreased % dry weight only in the TE 0.3% treatment. Solution priming was therefore more effective in preserving the relative capacity of the seedling to retain moisture. This is further highlighted by the more than 100% increase compared with controls in relative water content in plants from seeds solution-primed with thymol, carvacrol and TE. Matriconditioning was similarly effective only with TE treatments. Membrane permeability, which correlates with plant water loss or a decrease in plant fresh weight, was measured by ion efflux and total percent ion leakage. The two measurements provided parallel results, in which almost all treatments resulted in substantial decreases in membrane permeability compared to controls. However, there was no correlation between measurements of membrane permeability and relative water content, plant fresh weight or percent survival.
Treatment material | Survival (%) | Fresh weight (mg) | Dry weight (%) | Relative water content (%) | Ion efflux(µS/mg/hr) | Ion leakage (%) | ||||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 19 a | 33 a | 133 a | 209 a | 34a | 22a | 26a | 40a | 5.11a | 1.88a* | 67a | 52a |
ONP 0.1% | 25 a | 11 a | 330 b | 336 a | 17b | 16ab | 43ab | 46a | 0.19b | 0.18b | 31ab | 21b |
ONP 5.0% | 70 b | 20 a* | 274 ab | 376 a | 18b | 11ab | 37ab | 31a | 0.26b | 0.24b | 34ab | 14b |
Thymol | 80 b | 76 b | 302 ab | 218 a | 11b | 21ab | 48b | 32a | 0.27b | 0.17b | 15b | 19b |
Carva-crol | 69 b | 70 b | 242 a | 272 a | 6b | 18ab | 76c | 36a* | 0.11b | 0.36b | 11b | 16b |
TE 0.15% | 67 b | 53 a | 397 bc | 347 a | 8b | 13ab | 69bc | 57ab | 0.09b | 0.42b | 8b | 23b |
TE 0.3% | 75 b | 45 a* | 557 c | 817 b* | 9b | 5b | 50bc | 67b | 0.14b | 0.13b | 19b | 19b |
Pigments. Chlorophyll concentration was enhanced by the higher TE concentration in solution priming and by all ONP and thymol treatments (Table 4). Carotenoid concentrations were enhanced by TE 0.3% in solution, by thymol in matriconditioning, and by ONP in both solution and matrix priming (Table 4). Both chlorophyll a/b and carotenoid/ chlorophyll ratios are considered indicators of abiotic stress resistance [23,24]. The chlorophyll a/b ratio did not vary between treatments, nor did it correlate with any direct or indirect measurement of drought resistance: neither % plant survival nor relative water content nor membrane permeability (data not shown). Similar lacks of correlation have been reported for other crops such as pearl millet [25] and oil palm [26], among others. The carotenoid/chlorophyll ratio of many treatments was greater than that of controls (Table 4), but it, too, did not correlate with measurements of drought resistance (data not shown), as others have found [26]. Anthocyanin concentration of plants from treated seeds was different from control only in the case of ONP 0.1% from solution. Although anthocyanins are considered to be sources of antioxidant activity [27], there was no correlation with DPPH reduction (Table 4). Antioxidant activity did not vary in tissues from matriconditioned seeds, and rose above control levels only in thymol and TE 0.15% solution-primed seeds (Table 4).
Treatment material | Total chlorophyll (µmol/mm2) | Carotenoid (µmol/mm2) | Carotenoid/Chlorophyll ratio | Anthocyanin (nmol/mm2) | Antioxidant activity (units/mm2) | |||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 26.0a | 27.0a | 1.91a | 1.78a | 0.07a | 0.07a | 7.33 | 7.24 | 30.6a | 40.4* |
ONP 0.1% | 32.7b | 30.9b | 2.57a | 3.30b | 0.08a | 0.11b* | 8.38 | 7.92 | 41.1ab | 47.1 |
ONP 5.0% | 31.4b | 34.2b | 3.53b | 4.09b | 0.11b | 0.12b | 8.01 | 8.88 | 39.2a | 47.7 |
Thymol | 29.7b | 31.8b | 2.19a | 3.75b | 0.07a | 0.12b* | 7.82 | 8.26 | 53.1b | 51.6 |
Carvacrol | 27.9ab | 28.6ab | 2.81a | 2.04a | 0.10b | 0.07a* | 7.76 | 7.66 | 31.8a | 39.2 |
TE 0.15% | 27.0ab | 26.7a | 2.52a | 2.08a | 0.09ab | 0.08a | 7.33 | 7.32 | 48.8b | 42 |
TE 0.3% | 29.7b | 28.9ab | 3.74b | 2.58a | 0.12a | 0.09ab* | 8.13 ns | 7.53ns | 35.7a | 43.3ns |
Not only was the material used in matriconditioning a source of pathogen infection (which can be mitigated by a time-consuming but necessary heat treatment of the substrate; Figure 1), the method itself did not enhance drought resistance, nor did it enhance physiological parameters to the same extent as solution priming. All the seed treatment compounds enhanced seedling survival after drought, compared to control (Table 2), although TE reduced overall germination (Table 1). Even in the absence of the highly bioactive EOs thymol and carvacrol, extracts from oregano residue still had biostimulatory activity to induce drought resistance. The physiological basis for increased drought resistance in seedlings from primed seeds is still unclear. Certain seed treatments, especially carvacrol and trinexapac-ethyl, caused enhanced pigmentation and increased antioxidative activity, but these protective mechanisms were not consistently correlated with the seedling's ability to recover from drought, as exemplified by leaf relative water content and membrane permeability. Although both carvacrol and TE treatments reduced final emergence, sowing a certain percentage more of treated seeds in drought-prone regions could compensate for this reduction, since the extra amount of treated seed would be less expensive than resowing the entire field in the event of drought.
We thank Dr. Daphna Havkin-Frenkel of Bakto Flavors for the gift of Oregano Natural Product (ONP).
We thank Steve Stein for initiating this international collaboration and for his unstinting support. Contribution 172017 from Volcani Center-Agricultural Research Organization.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] | Knight H, Knight MR (2001) Abiotic stress signaling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends Plant Sci 6: 262-267. |
[2] |
Paparella S, Araújo SS, Rossi G, et al. (2015) Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Rep 34: 1281-1293. doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1784-y
![]() |
[3] | Taylor AG, Allen PS, Bennett MA, et al. (1998) Seed enhancements. Seed Sci Res 8: 245-256. |
[4] |
Taylor AG, Klein DE, Whitlow TH (1988) SMP: Solid matrix priming of seeds. Sci Hortic 37: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(88)90146-X
![]() |
[5] | Ilyas S (2006) Seed treatments using matriconditioning to improve vegetable seed quality. J Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian J Agron) 34: 124-132. |
[6] | De Azeredo GA, Stamford TL, Nunes PC, et al. (2011) Combined application of essential oils from Origanum vulgare L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L. to inhibit bacteria and autochthonous microflora associated with minimally processed vegetables. Food Res Int 44: 1541-1548. |
[7] |
Ye X, Ling T, Xue Y, et al. (2016) Thymol mitigates cadmium stress by regulating glutathione levels and reactive oxygen species homeostasis in tobacco seedlings. Molecules 21: 1339-1353. doi: 10.3390/molecules21101339
![]() |
[8] |
Martino LD, Mancini E, Almeida LFRD, et al. (2010) The antigerminative activity of twenty-seven monoterpenes. Molecules 15: 6630-6637. doi: 10.3390/molecules15096630
![]() |
[9] | Arteca RN (2013) Plant growth substances: principles and applications. Springer Science & Business Media. |
[10] | Havkin-Frenkel D, Bakto Natural Preservatives Llc (2017) Recovery of residual plant components after distillation of essential oils. U.S. Patent 9,572,849 [P]. |
[11] | Rademacher W (2016) Chemical regulators of gibberellin status and their application in plant production. Ann Plant Rev 49: 359-404. |
[12] |
Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzimol 148: 350-382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
![]() |
[13] |
Stafford HA (1966) Regulatory mechanisms in anthocyanin biosynthesis in first internodes of Sorghum vulgare: effect of presumed inhibitors of protein synthesis. Plant Physiol 41: 953-961. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.6.953
![]() |
[14] | Molyneux P (2004) The use of the stable free radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) for estimating antioxidant activity. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 26: 211-219. |
[15] | Rorden C (2007) Available from: http://www.cabiatl.com/mricro/ezanova/ |
[16] | Aharoni N (1989) Interrelationship between ethylene and growth regulators in the senescence of lettuce leaf discs. J Plant Growth Regul 8: 309-317. |
[17] |
Klein JD, Shalev YR, Cohen S, et al. (2016) Postharvest handling of "etrog" citron (Citrus medica, L.) fruit. Isr J Plant Sci 63: 64-75. doi: 10.1080/07929978.2016.1159409
![]() |
[18] |
Horvathova E, Navarova J, Galova E, et al. (2014) Assessment of antioxidative, chelating, and DNA-protective effects of selected essential oil components (eugenol, carvacrol, thymol, borneol, eucalyptol) of plants and intact Rosmarinus officinalis oil. J Agric Food Chem 62: 6632-6639. doi: 10.1021/jf501006y
![]() |
[19] | Heckman NL, Horst GL, Gaussoin RE (2001) Influence of trinexapac-ethyl on specific leaf weight and chlorophyll content of Poa pratensis. Int Turfgrass Soc Res J 9: 287-290. |
[20] | Phavaphutanon L, Hebbe Y, Cohen S, et al. (2004) Trinexapac-ethyl and paclobutrazol protect against drought in hot pepper plants. HortScience 39: 897. |
[21] | Martín JA, Solla A, García-Vallejo MC, et al. (2012) Chemical changes in Ulmus minor xylem tissue after salicylic acid or carvacrol treatments are associated with enhanced resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytochem 83: 104-109. |
[22] |
Martín JA, Solla A, Domingues MR, et al. (2008) Exogenous phenol increase resistance of Ulmus minor to Dutch elm disease through formation of suberin-like compounds on xylem tissues. Environ Exp Bot 64:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.05.004
![]() |
[23] |
Gitelson AA, Gamon JA, Solovchenko A (2017) Multiple drivers of seasonal change in PRI: Implications for photosynthesis 1. Leaf level. Remote Sens Environ 191: 110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.014
![]() |
[24] |
Todaka D, Zhao Y, Yoshida T (2017) Temporal and spatial changes in gene expression, metabolite accumulation and phytohormone content in rice seedlings grown under drought stress conditions. Plant J 90: 61-78. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13468
![]() |
[25] |
Ashraf M, Ahmad A, McNeilly T (2001) Growth and photosynthetic characteristics in pearl millet under water stress and different potassium supply. Photosynthetica 39: 389-394. doi: 10.1023/A:1015182310754
![]() |
[26] |
Silva PA, Oliveira IV, Rodrigues KC (2016) Leaf gas exchange and multiple enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant strategies related to drought tolerance in two oil palm hybrids. Trees 30: 203-214. doi: 10.1007/s00468-015-1289-x
![]() |
[27] | Kähkönen MP, Heinonen M (2003) Antioxidant activity of anthocyanins and their aglycons. J Agric Food Chem 51: 28-633. |
1. | Danny Ginzburg, Joshua D. Klein, 2019, Chapter 12, 978-3-030-27422-1, 257, 10.1007/978-3-030-27423-8_12 | |
2. | Simran Rani, Pradeep Kumar, Pooja Suneja, Biotechnological interventions for inducing abiotic stress tolerance in crops, 2021, 27, 23524073, 100315, 10.1016/j.plgene.2021.100315 | |
3. | Serine Soudani, César Poza-Carrión, Noelia De la Cruz Gómez, Azucena González-Coloma, María Fé Andrés, Marta Berrocal-Lobo, Essential Oils Prime Epigenetic and Metabolomic Changes in Tomato Defense Against Fusarium oxysporum, 2022, 13, 1664-462X, 10.3389/fpls.2022.804104 |
Treatment material | Normal germination (%) | Abnormal germination (%) | Total germination (%) | Total Infection (%) | Emergence (%) | |||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 95.0a | 88.3a | 1.7a | 5.0a | 96.7a | 93.3a | 48.3a | 43.3b | 100a | 100a |
ONP 0.1% | 90.0a | 96.7a | 5.0a | 1.7a | 95.0a | 98.3a | 36.7ab | 83.3a* | 95a | 95a |
ONP 5.0% | 96.7a | 95.0a | 3.3a | 5.0a | 100.0a | 100.0a | 46.7a | 73.3a* | 100a | 100a |
Thymol | 88.3a | 90.0a | 5.0a | 8.3ab | 93.3a | 98.3a | 18.3c | 78.3a* | 100a | 100a |
Carvacrol | 60.0b | 96.7a* | 16.7b | 3.3a | 76.7b | 100.0a | 26.7bc | 68.3a* | 70b | 100a* |
TE 0.15% | 8.3d | 6.7b | 5.0a | 8.3ab | 13.3d | 15.0b | 16.7c | 36.7b | 40c | 60b |
TE 0.3% | 20.0c | 0.0b | 20.0b | 15.0b | 40.0c | 15.0b* | 20.0c | 25.0b | 45bc | 35c |
Treatment material | Leaf thickness (µm) | Specific area (mg/cm2) | ||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 175 a | 175a | 11.3a | 14.6a |
ONP 0.1% | 175 | 183a | 19.9b | 17.5a |
ONP 5.0% | 191ab | 193ab | 15.5ab | 18.0a |
Thymol | 176 a | 175a | 17.1ab | 13.4a |
Carvacrol | 180 ab | 181a | 56.0d | 15.2a |
TE 0.15% | 197 bc | 210 c | 30.4c | 24.2b |
TE 0.3% | 211 c | 205bc | 29.8c | 39.2c* |
Treatment material | Survival (%) | Fresh weight (mg) | Dry weight (%) | Relative water content (%) | Ion efflux(µS/mg/hr) | Ion leakage (%) | ||||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 19 a | 33 a | 133 a | 209 a | 34a | 22a | 26a | 40a | 5.11a | 1.88a* | 67a | 52a |
ONP 0.1% | 25 a | 11 a | 330 b | 336 a | 17b | 16ab | 43ab | 46a | 0.19b | 0.18b | 31ab | 21b |
ONP 5.0% | 70 b | 20 a* | 274 ab | 376 a | 18b | 11ab | 37ab | 31a | 0.26b | 0.24b | 34ab | 14b |
Thymol | 80 b | 76 b | 302 ab | 218 a | 11b | 21ab | 48b | 32a | 0.27b | 0.17b | 15b | 19b |
Carva-crol | 69 b | 70 b | 242 a | 272 a | 6b | 18ab | 76c | 36a* | 0.11b | 0.36b | 11b | 16b |
TE 0.15% | 67 b | 53 a | 397 bc | 347 a | 8b | 13ab | 69bc | 57ab | 0.09b | 0.42b | 8b | 23b |
TE 0.3% | 75 b | 45 a* | 557 c | 817 b* | 9b | 5b | 50bc | 67b | 0.14b | 0.13b | 19b | 19b |
Treatment material | Total chlorophyll (µmol/mm2) | Carotenoid (µmol/mm2) | Carotenoid/Chlorophyll ratio | Anthocyanin (nmol/mm2) | Antioxidant activity (units/mm2) | |||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 26.0a | 27.0a | 1.91a | 1.78a | 0.07a | 0.07a | 7.33 | 7.24 | 30.6a | 40.4* |
ONP 0.1% | 32.7b | 30.9b | 2.57a | 3.30b | 0.08a | 0.11b* | 8.38 | 7.92 | 41.1ab | 47.1 |
ONP 5.0% | 31.4b | 34.2b | 3.53b | 4.09b | 0.11b | 0.12b | 8.01 | 8.88 | 39.2a | 47.7 |
Thymol | 29.7b | 31.8b | 2.19a | 3.75b | 0.07a | 0.12b* | 7.82 | 8.26 | 53.1b | 51.6 |
Carvacrol | 27.9ab | 28.6ab | 2.81a | 2.04a | 0.10b | 0.07a* | 7.76 | 7.66 | 31.8a | 39.2 |
TE 0.15% | 27.0ab | 26.7a | 2.52a | 2.08a | 0.09ab | 0.08a | 7.33 | 7.32 | 48.8b | 42 |
TE 0.3% | 29.7b | 28.9ab | 3.74b | 2.58a | 0.12a | 0.09ab* | 8.13 ns | 7.53ns | 35.7a | 43.3ns |
Treatment material | Normal germination (%) | Abnormal germination (%) | Total germination (%) | Total Infection (%) | Emergence (%) | |||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 95.0a | 88.3a | 1.7a | 5.0a | 96.7a | 93.3a | 48.3a | 43.3b | 100a | 100a |
ONP 0.1% | 90.0a | 96.7a | 5.0a | 1.7a | 95.0a | 98.3a | 36.7ab | 83.3a* | 95a | 95a |
ONP 5.0% | 96.7a | 95.0a | 3.3a | 5.0a | 100.0a | 100.0a | 46.7a | 73.3a* | 100a | 100a |
Thymol | 88.3a | 90.0a | 5.0a | 8.3ab | 93.3a | 98.3a | 18.3c | 78.3a* | 100a | 100a |
Carvacrol | 60.0b | 96.7a* | 16.7b | 3.3a | 76.7b | 100.0a | 26.7bc | 68.3a* | 70b | 100a* |
TE 0.15% | 8.3d | 6.7b | 5.0a | 8.3ab | 13.3d | 15.0b | 16.7c | 36.7b | 40c | 60b |
TE 0.3% | 20.0c | 0.0b | 20.0b | 15.0b | 40.0c | 15.0b* | 20.0c | 25.0b | 45bc | 35c |
Treatment material | Leaf thickness (µm) | Specific area (mg/cm2) | ||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 175 a | 175a | 11.3a | 14.6a |
ONP 0.1% | 175 | 183a | 19.9b | 17.5a |
ONP 5.0% | 191ab | 193ab | 15.5ab | 18.0a |
Thymol | 176 a | 175a | 17.1ab | 13.4a |
Carvacrol | 180 ab | 181a | 56.0d | 15.2a |
TE 0.15% | 197 bc | 210 c | 30.4c | 24.2b |
TE 0.3% | 211 c | 205bc | 29.8c | 39.2c* |
Treatment material | Survival (%) | Fresh weight (mg) | Dry weight (%) | Relative water content (%) | Ion efflux(µS/mg/hr) | Ion leakage (%) | ||||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 19 a | 33 a | 133 a | 209 a | 34a | 22a | 26a | 40a | 5.11a | 1.88a* | 67a | 52a |
ONP 0.1% | 25 a | 11 a | 330 b | 336 a | 17b | 16ab | 43ab | 46a | 0.19b | 0.18b | 31ab | 21b |
ONP 5.0% | 70 b | 20 a* | 274 ab | 376 a | 18b | 11ab | 37ab | 31a | 0.26b | 0.24b | 34ab | 14b |
Thymol | 80 b | 76 b | 302 ab | 218 a | 11b | 21ab | 48b | 32a | 0.27b | 0.17b | 15b | 19b |
Carva-crol | 69 b | 70 b | 242 a | 272 a | 6b | 18ab | 76c | 36a* | 0.11b | 0.36b | 11b | 16b |
TE 0.15% | 67 b | 53 a | 397 bc | 347 a | 8b | 13ab | 69bc | 57ab | 0.09b | 0.42b | 8b | 23b |
TE 0.3% | 75 b | 45 a* | 557 c | 817 b* | 9b | 5b | 50bc | 67b | 0.14b | 0.13b | 19b | 19b |
Treatment material | Total chlorophyll (µmol/mm2) | Carotenoid (µmol/mm2) | Carotenoid/Chlorophyll ratio | Anthocyanin (nmol/mm2) | Antioxidant activity (units/mm2) | |||||
Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | Solution | Matrix | |
Water | 26.0a | 27.0a | 1.91a | 1.78a | 0.07a | 0.07a | 7.33 | 7.24 | 30.6a | 40.4* |
ONP 0.1% | 32.7b | 30.9b | 2.57a | 3.30b | 0.08a | 0.11b* | 8.38 | 7.92 | 41.1ab | 47.1 |
ONP 5.0% | 31.4b | 34.2b | 3.53b | 4.09b | 0.11b | 0.12b | 8.01 | 8.88 | 39.2a | 47.7 |
Thymol | 29.7b | 31.8b | 2.19a | 3.75b | 0.07a | 0.12b* | 7.82 | 8.26 | 53.1b | 51.6 |
Carvacrol | 27.9ab | 28.6ab | 2.81a | 2.04a | 0.10b | 0.07a* | 7.76 | 7.66 | 31.8a | 39.2 |
TE 0.15% | 27.0ab | 26.7a | 2.52a | 2.08a | 0.09ab | 0.08a | 7.33 | 7.32 | 48.8b | 42 |
TE 0.3% | 29.7b | 28.9ab | 3.74b | 2.58a | 0.12a | 0.09ab* | 8.13 ns | 7.53ns | 35.7a | 43.3ns |