Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Low-frequency relationship between money growth and inflation in Turkey

  • Received: 01 January 2020 Accepted: 17 February 2020 Published: 20 February 2020
  • JEL Codes: E31, E51, C49

  • This paper examines the long-run and medium-run predictive relationship between money growth and inflation in Turkey for the period 1986m1–2018m12, using frequency-domain methods. For the full sample, the measures of spectral coherence and gain spectrum suggest a one-to-one relationship, and the frequency domain decomposition of the Granger causality test indicates a bidirectional predictive relationship between the two variables at zero frequency. As suggested by the wavelet coherence, we also analyzed the two subperiods before and after 2006 separately. Our results suggest that while both variables have predictive power for each other in the second subperiod, only money growth helps predict inflation in the first one. In order to prevent spurious results, the analysis is rerun in a multivariate Vector Autoregression (VAR) system, where output growth, interest rate, exchange rate growth, and domestic debt growth are included as additional variables. We observe that while money growth has predictive power for inflation in the first subperiod, this relationship disappears in the second one. We argue that the change in the relationship between the two variables at low frequencies after 2006 is primarily a result of the decrease in fiscal dominance of the government, the CBRT's switch to the inflation targeting regime, and the CBRT's "unconventional monetary policy framework".

    Citation: Huseyin Tastan, Sercin Sahin. Low-frequency relationship between money growth and inflation in Turkey[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2020, 4(1): 91-120. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2020005

    Related Papers:

    [1] Margarida Camarinha . A natural 4th-order generalization of the geodesic problem. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3396-3412. doi: 10.3934/era.2024157
    [2] Shanshan Liu, Abdenacer Makhlouf, Lina Song . The full cohomology, abelian extensions and formal deformations of Hom-pre-Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 2748-2773. doi: 10.3934/era.2022141
    [3] Frédéric Campana . Algebraicity of foliations on complex projective manifolds, applications. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(4): 1187-1208. doi: 10.3934/era.2022063
    [4] Neşet Deniz Turgay . On the mod p Steenrod algebra and the Leibniz-Hopf algebra. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 951-959. doi: 10.3934/era.2020050
    [5] Qiang Li, Lili Ma . 1-parameter formal deformations and abelian extensions of Lie color triple systems. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(7): 2524-2539. doi: 10.3934/era.2022129
    [6] Kailash C. Misra, Sutida Patlertsin, Suchada Pongprasert, Thitarie Rungratgasame . On derivations of Leibniz algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(7): 4715-4722. doi: 10.3934/era.2024214
    [7] Yizheng Li, Dingguo Wang . Lie algebras with differential operators of any weights. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1195-1211. doi: 10.3934/era.2023061
    [8] Wen Teng, Xiansheng Dai . Nonabelian embedding tensors on 3-Lie algebras and 3-Leibniz-Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1367-1383. doi: 10.3934/era.2025063
    [9] Hongliang Chang, Yin Chen, Runxuan Zhang . A generalization on derivations of Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(3): 2457-2473. doi: 10.3934/era.2020124
    [10] Hye Jeang Hwang, Gwang Hui Kim . Superstability of the p-power-radical functional equation related to sine function equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6347-6362. doi: 10.3934/era.2023321
  • This paper examines the long-run and medium-run predictive relationship between money growth and inflation in Turkey for the period 1986m1–2018m12, using frequency-domain methods. For the full sample, the measures of spectral coherence and gain spectrum suggest a one-to-one relationship, and the frequency domain decomposition of the Granger causality test indicates a bidirectional predictive relationship between the two variables at zero frequency. As suggested by the wavelet coherence, we also analyzed the two subperiods before and after 2006 separately. Our results suggest that while both variables have predictive power for each other in the second subperiod, only money growth helps predict inflation in the first one. In order to prevent spurious results, the analysis is rerun in a multivariate Vector Autoregression (VAR) system, where output growth, interest rate, exchange rate growth, and domestic debt growth are included as additional variables. We observe that while money growth has predictive power for inflation in the first subperiod, this relationship disappears in the second one. We argue that the change in the relationship between the two variables at low frequencies after 2006 is primarily a result of the decrease in fiscal dominance of the government, the CBRT's switch to the inflation targeting regime, and the CBRT's "unconventional monetary policy framework".


    Dubrovin [1] invented the notion of Frobenius manifolds in order to give geometrical expressions associated with WDVV equations. In 1999, Hertling and Manin [2] introduced the concept of F-manifolds as a relaxation of the conditions of Frobenius manifolds. Inspired by the investigation of describing F-manifolds algebraically, Dotsenko [3] defined F-manifold algebras in 2019 to relate operad F-manifold algebras to operad pre-Lie algebras. By definition, an F-manifold algebra is a triple (F,,[,]) satisfying the following Hertling–Manin relation:

    Hx1x2(x3,x4)=x1Hx2(x3,x4)+x2Hx1(x3,x4),   x1,x2,x3,x4F,

    where (F,) is a commutative associative algebra, (F,[,]) is a Lie algebra, and Hx1(x2,x3)=[x1,x2x3][x1,x2]x3x2[x1,x3].

    A vector space F admitting a linear map is called a pre-Lie algebra if the following holds:

    (x1x2)x3x1(x2x3)=(x2x1)x3x2(x1x3),   x1,x2,x3F.

    In recent years, pre-Lie algebras have attracted a great deal of attention in many areas of mathematics and physics (see [4,5,6,7] and so on).

    Liu et al. [8] introduced the concept of pre-F-manifold algebras. Note that these algebras allow us to construct F-manifold algebras. They also studied representations of F-manifold algebras and constructed many other examples of these algebras. The definition of super F-manifold algebras and related categories was stated by Cruz Morales et al. [9]. Chen et al. [10] discussed the classification of three-dimensional F-manifold algebras over the complex field C, which was based on the results of the classifications of low-dimensional commutative associative algebras and low-dimensional Lie algebras. Recently, the concept of Hom-F-manifold algebras and their properties have been given by Ben Hassine et al. [11].

    In this paper, we provide the concepts of an F-manifold color algebra and a pre-F-manifold color algebra, respectively. We extend some properties of F-manifold algebras that were obtained in [8] to the color case. In Section 2, we summarize some concepts of Lie color algebras, pre-Lie color algebras, and representations of χ-commutative associative algebras and Lie color algebras, respectively. In Section 3, we provide the concept of an F-manifold color algebra and then study its representation. The concept of a coherence F-manifold color algebra is also introduced, and it follows that an F-manifold color algebra admitting a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form is a coherence F-manifold color algebra. The concept of pre-F-manifold color algebras is defined in Section 4, and using these algebras, one can construct F-manifold color algebras.

    Throughout this paper, we assume that k is a field with char k=0 and all vector spaces are finite dimensional over k.

    A preprint of this paper was posted on arXiv [12].

    The concept of a Lie color algebra was introduced in [13] and systematically studied in [14]. Since then, Lie color algebras have been studied from different aspects: Lie color ideals [15], generalized derivations [16], representations [17,18], T-extensions of Lie color algebras [19,20] and hom-Lie color algebras [21], cohomology groups [22] and the color left-symmetric structures on Lie color algebras [23]. In this section, we collect some basic definitions that will be needed in the remainder of the paper. In the following, we assume that G is an abelian group and denote k{0} by k.

    Definition 2.1. A skew-symmetric bicharacter is a map χ:G×Gk satisfying

    (i) χ(g1,g2)=χ(g2,g1)1,

    (ii) χ(g1,g2)χ(g1,g3)=χ(g1,g2+g3),

    (iii) χ(g1,g3)χ(g2,g3)=χ(g1+g2,g3),

    for all g1,g2,g3G.

    By the definition, it is obvious that for anyaG, we have χ(a,0)=χ(0,a)=1 and χ(a,a)=±1.

    Definition 2.2. A pre-Lie color algebra is the G-graded vector space

    F=gGFg

    with a bilinear multiplication operation satisfying

    1) Fg1Fg2Fg1+g2,

    2) (x1x2)x3x1(x2x3)=χ(g1,g2)((x2x1)x3x2(x1x3)),

    for all x1Fg1,x2Fg2,x3Fg3, and g1,g2,g3G.

    Definition 2.3. A Lie color algebra is the G-graded vector space

    F=gGFg

    with a bilinear multiplication [,] satisfying

    (i) [Fg1,Fg2]Fg1+g2,

    (ii) [x1,x2]=χ(g1,g2)[x2,x1],

    (iii) χ(g3,g1)[x1,[x2,x3]]+χ(g1,g2)[x2,[x3,x1]]+χ(g2,g3)[x3,[x1,x2]]=0,

    for all x1Fg1,x2Fg2,x3Fg3, and g1,g2,g3G.

    Remark Given a pre-Lie algebra (F,), if we define the bracket [x1,x2]=x1x2x2x1, then (F,[,]) becomes a Lie algebra. Similarly, one has a pre-Lie color algebra's version, that is to say, a pre-Lie color algebra (A,,χ) with the bracket [x1,x2]=x1x2χ(x1,x2)x2x1 becomes a Lie color algebra.

    Let the vector space F be G-graded. An element xF is called homogeneous with degree gG if xFg. In the rest of this paper, for any x1Fg1,x2Fg2,x3Fg3, we will write χ(x1,x2) instead of χ(g1,g2), χ(x1+x2,x3) instead of χ(g1+g2,g3), and so on. Furthermore, when we write the skew-symmetric bicharacter χ(x1,x2), it is always assumed that the elements x1 and x2 are both homogeneous.

    For a χ-commutative associative algebra (F,,χ), we mean that (F,) is a G-graded associative algebra with the following χ-commutativity:

    x1x2=χ(x1,x2)x2x1

    for all x1Fg1 and x2Fg2.

    Now, we assume that the vector space V is G-graded. A representation (V,μ) of the algebra (F,,χ) is a linear map μ:FEndk(V)G:=gGEndk(V)g satisfying

    μ(x2)vVg1+g2,    μ(x2x3)=μ(x2)μ(x3)

    for all vVg1,x2Fg2,x3Fg3, where Endk(V)g:={fEndk(V)|f(Vh)Vh+g}. Given a Lie color algebra (F,[,],χ), its representation (V,ρ) is a linear map ρ:FEndk(V)G satisfying

    ρ(x2)vVg1+g2,    ρ([x2,x3])=ρ(x2)ρ(x3)χ(x2,x3)ρ(x3)ρ(x2)

    for all vVg1,x2Fg2,x3Fg3.

    The dual space V=gGVg is also G-graded, where

    Vg1={ξV|ξ(x)=0,g2g1,xVg2,g2G}.

    Define a linear map μ:FEndk(V)G satisfying

    μ(x1)ξVg1+g3,    μ(x1)ξ,v=χ(x1,ξ)ξ,μ(x1)v

    for all x1Fg1,vVg2,ξVg3.

    It is easy to see that

    1) If (V,μ) is one representation of the algebra (F,,χ), then (V,μ) is also its representation;

    2) If (V,μ) is one representation of the algebra (F,[,],χ), then (V,μ) is also its representation.

    The concept of F-manifold color algebras is presented, and some results in [8] to the color case are established.

    Definition 3.1. Let (F,[,],χ) be a Lie color algebra and (F,,χ) be a χ-commutative associative algebra. A quadruple (F,,[,],χ) is called an F-manifold color algebra if the following holds for any homogeneous element x1,x2,x3,x4F,

    Hx1x2(x3,x4)=x1Hx2(x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2Hx1(x3,x4), (3.1)

    where Hx1(x2,x3) is the color Leibnizator given by

    Hx1(x2,x3)=[x1,x2x3][x1,x2]x3χ(x1,x2)x2[x1,x3]. (3.2)

    Remark It is noticed that if we set G={0} and χ(0,0)=1, then (F,,[,],χ) is exactly an F-manifold algebra.

    Definition 3.2. Let (F,,[,],χ) be an F-manifold color algebra, (V,μ) be a representation of the algebra (F,,χ), and (V,ρ) be a representation of the algebra (F,[,],χ). A representation of (F,,[,],χ) is a triple (V,ρ,μ) if the following holds for any homogeneous element x1,x2,x3F,

    M1(x1x2,x3)=μ(x1)M1(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)M1(x1,x3),μ(Hx1(x2,x3))=χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)μ(x1)μ(x1)M2(x2,x3),

    where the linear maps M1 and M2 from FF to Endk(V)G are given by

    M1(x1,x2)=ρ(x1)μ(x2)χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)μ([x1,x2]), (3.3)
    M2(x1,x2)=μ(x1)ρ(x2)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)ρ(x1x2). (3.4)

    Example 3.1. Let (F,,[,],χ) be an F-manifold color algebra. We have that (F,ad,L) is a representation of (F,,[,],χ), where ad:FEndk(F)G is given by

    adx1x2=[x1,x2]

    and the left multiplication operator L:FEndk(F)G is given by

    Lx1x2=x1x2

    for any homogeneous element x1,x2F.

    Proof. Note that (F,L) is a representation of the algebra (F,,χ) and (F,ad) is a representation of the algebra (F,[,],χ).

    Now, for any homogeneous element x1,x2,x3,x4F, we obtain

    M1(x1,x2)x3=(adx1Lx2χ(x1,x2)Lx2adx1L[x1,x2])x3=[x1,x2x3]χ(x1,x2)x2[x1,x3][x1,x2]x3=Hx1(x2,x3).

    Thus

    Hx1x2(x3,x4)=x1Hx2(x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2Hx1(x3,x4)

    implies the equation

    M1(x1x2,x3)x4=Lx1M1(x2,x3)x4+χ(x1,x2)Lx2M1(x1,x3)x4.

    On the other hand, we obtain

    M2(x2,x3)x4=(Lx2adx3+χ(x2,x3)Lx3adx2adx2x3)x4=x2[x3,x4]+χ(x2,x3)x3[x2,x4][x2x3,x4]=χ(x3,x4)x2[x4,x3]χ(x2,x4)χ(x3,x4)[x4,x2]x3+χ(x2+x3,x4)[x4,x2x3]=χ(x2+x3,x4)([x4,x2x3][x4,x2]x3χ(x4,x2)x2[x4,x3])=χ(x2+x3,x4)Hx4(x2,x3).

    Thus

    χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)Lx1x4Lx1M2(x2,x3)x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)(x1x4)xM2(x2,x3)x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2+x3,x1+x4)Hx1x4(x2,x3)χ(x2+x3,x4)x1Hx4(x2,x3)=χ(x2+x3,x4){Hx1x4(x2,x3)xHx4(x2,x3)}=χ(x2+x3,x4)χ(x1,x4)x4Hx1(x2,x3)=χ(x1+x2+x3,x4)x4Hx1(x2,x3)=Hx1(x2,x3)x4.

    Hence, the proof is completed.

    Let (V,ρ,μ) be a representation of the F-manifold color algebra (F,,[,],χ). Note that FV is a G-graded vector space. In the following, if we write x+vFV as a homogeneous element for xF,vV, it means that x and v are of the same degree as x+v. Now assume that x1+v1 and x2+v2 are both homogeneous elements in FV. Define

    [x1+v1,x2+v2]ρ=[x1,x2]+ρ(x1)v2χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)v1.

    Then we obtain that (FV,[,]ρ,χ) is a Lie color algebra. Moreover, define

    (x1+v1)μ(x2+v2)=x1x2+μ(x1)v2+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)v1.

    It is easy to see that (FV,μ,χ) is a χ-commutative associative algebra. In fact, we have

    Proposition 3.2. With the above notations, (FV,μ,[,]ρ,χ) is an F-manifold color algebra.

    Proof. It is sufficient to check that the relation in Definition 3.1 holds.

    For any homogeneous element x1+v1,x2+v2,x3+v3FV, we have

    Hx1+v1(x2+v2,x3+v3)=[x1+v1,(x2+v2)μ(x3+v3)]ρ[x1+v1,x2+v2]ρμ(x3+v3)χ(x1,x2)(x2+v2)μ[x1+v1,x3+v3]ρ=[x1,x2x3]+ρ(x1){μ(x2)v3+χ(x2,x3)μ(x3)v2}χ(x1,x2+x3)ρ(x2x3)v1III.

    where

    I={[x1,x2]+ρ(x1)v3χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)v1}μ(x3+v3)=[x1,x2]x3+μ([x1,x2])v3+χ(x1+x2,x3)μ(x3){ρ(x1)v2χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)v1},

    and

    II=χ(x1,x2)(x2+v2)μ{[x1,x3]+ρ(x1)v3χ(x1,x3)ρ(x3)v1}=χ(x1,x2){x2[x1,x3]+μ(x2)(ρ(x1)v3χ(x1,x3)ρ(x3)v1)+χ(x2,x1+x3)μ([x1,x3])v2}.

    Thus

    Hx1+v1(x2+v2,x3+v3)=Hx1(x2,x3)+{ρ(x1)μ(x2)μ([x1,x2])χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)}v3+{χ(x2,x3)ρ(x1)μ(x3)χ(x1+x2,x3)μ(x3)ρ(x1)χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+x3)μ([x1,x3])}v2+{χ(x1,x2+x3)ρ(x2x3)+χ(x1+x2,x3)χ(x1,x2)μ(x3)ρ(x2)+χ(x1,x2)χ(x1,x3)μ(x2)ρ(x3)}v1=Hx1(x2,x3)+M1(x1,x2)v3+χ(x2,x3)M1(x1,x3)v2+χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)v1.

    Hence, for any homogeneous element x4+v4FV, we have

    H(x1+v1)μ(x2+v2)(x3+v3,x4+v4)=Hx1x2+μ(x1)v2+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)v1(x3+v3,x4+v4)=Hx1x2(x3,x4)+M1(x1x2,x3)v4+χ(x3,x4)M1(x1x2,x4)v3+χ(x1+x2,x3+x4)M2(x3,x4)(μ(x1)v2+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)v1).

    On the other hand

    (x1+v1)μHx2+v2(x3+v3,x4+v4)=(x1+v1)μ{Hx2(x3,x4)+M1(x2,x3)v4+χ(x3,x4)M1(x2,x4)v3+χ(x2,x3+x4)M2(x3,x4)v2}=x1Hx2(x3,x4)+μ(x1){M1(x2,x3)v4+χ(x3,x4)M1(x2,x4)v3+χ(x2,x3+x4)M2(x3,x4)v2}+χ(x1,x2+x3+x4)μ(Hx2(x3,x4))v1,

    and

    χ(x1,x2)(x2+v2)μHx1+v1(x3+v3,x4+v4)=χ(x1,x2){x2Hx1(x3,x4)+μ(x2){M1(x1,x3)v4+χ(x3,x4)M1(x1,x4)v3+χ(x1,x3+x4)M2(x3,x4)v1}+χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)μ(Hx1(x3,x4))v2}.

    Thus

    (x1+v1)μHx2+v2(x3+v3,x4+v4)+χ(x1,x2)(x2+v2)μHx1+v1(x3+v3,x4+v4)=x1Hx2(x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2Hx1(x3,x4)+{μ(x1)M1(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)(M1(x1,x3))}v4+{χ(x3,x4)μ(x1)M1(x2,x4)+χ(x1,x2)χ(x3,x4)μ(x2)M1(x1,x4)}v3+{χ(x2,x3+x4)μ(x1)M2(x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)μ(Hx1(x3,x4))}v2+χ(x1,x2+x3+x4){μ(x2)M2(x3,x4)+μ(Hx2(x3,x4))}v1=H(x1+v1)μ(x2+v2)(x3+v3,x4+v4),

    which satisfies the relation in Definition 3.1. Hence, the conclusion follows immediately.

    It is noticed that, given a representation (V,ρ,μ) of an F-manifold algebra, Liu, Sheng, and Bai [8] asserted that (V,ρ,μ) may not be its representation. Now, assume that (F,,[,],χ) is an F-manifold color algebra, together with a representation (V,μ) of the algebra (F,,χ) and a representation (V,ρ) of the algebra (F,[,],χ). In order to prove the following proposition associated with an F-manifold color algebra, we need to define the linear map M3 from FF to Endk(V)G by

    M3(x1,x2)=χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)μ(x1)ρ(x1)μ(x2)+ρ(x1x2),

    and the linear maps M1,M2 from FF to Endk(V)G by

    M1(x1,x2)=ρ(x1)μ(x2)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)+μ([x1,x2]),M2(x1,x2)=μ(x1)ρ(x2)χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)ρ(x1x2)

    for any homogeneous element x1,x2F.

    Proposition 3.3. With the above notations, assume that for any homogeneous element x1,x2,x3F, the following holds:

    M1(x1x2,x3)=χ(x1,x2+x3)M1(x2,x3)μ(x1)+χ(x2,x3)M1(x1,x3)μ(x2),μ(Hx1(x2,x3))=χ(x1,x2+x3)M3(x2,x3)μ(x1)+μ(x1)M3(x2,x3).

    Then (V,ρ,μ) is a representation of (F,,[,],χ).

    Proof. Suppose that x1,x2,x3F,vV,ξV are all homogeneous elements. First, we claim the following two identities:

    M1(x1,x2)(ξ),v=ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ)M1(x1,x2)v;M2(x1,x2)(ξ),v=ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ)M3(x1,x2)v.

    The claims follow from some direct calculations, respectively:

    M1(x1,x2)(ξ),v=(ρ(x1)μ(x2)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)+μ([x1,x2]))ξ,v=χ(x1,x2+ξ)μ(x2)ξ,ρ(x1)vχ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+ξ)(ρ(x1)ξ,μ(x2)vχ(x1+x2,ξ)ξ,μ([x1,x2])v=χ(x1,x2)χ(x1+x2,ξ)ξ,μ(x2)ρ(x1)v+χ(x2,ξ)χ(x1,ξ)ξ,ρ(x1)μ(x2)vχ(x1+x2,ξ)ξ,μ([x1,x2])v=ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ){χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)+ρ(x1)μ(x2)μ([x1,x2])}v=ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ)M1(x1,x2)v,

    and

    M2(x1,x2)(ξ),v={μ(x1)ρ(x2)χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)ρ(x1)ρ(x1x2)}ξ,v=χ(x1,x2+ξ)χ(x2,ξ)ξ,ρ(x2)μ(x1)vχ(x2,ξ)χ(x1,ξ)ξ,ρ(x1)μ(x2)v+χ(x1+x2,ξ)ξ,ρ(x1x2)v=ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ){χ(x1,x2)ρ(x2)μ(x1)ρ(x1)μ(x2)+ρ(x1x2)}v=ξ,χ(x1+x2,ξ)M3(x1,x2)v.

    With the above identities, we have

    {M1(x1x2,x3)+μ(x1)M1(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2)μ(x2)M1(x1,x3)}ξ,v=ξ,χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)M1(x1x2,x3)vχ(x1,x2+x3+ξ)χ(x2+x3,ξ)ξ,M1(x2,x3)μ(x1)vχ(x1+x3,ξ)χ(x2,x3+ξ)ξ,M1(x1,x3)μ(x2)v=χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)ξ,{M1(x1x2,x3)χ(x1,x2+x3)M1(x2,x3)μ(x1)χ(x2,x3)M1(x1,x3)μ(x2)}v=0,

    and

    {μ(Hx1(x2,x3))+χ(x1,x2+x3)M2(x2,x3)μ(x1)μ(x1)M2(x2,x3)}ξ,v=χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)ξ,μ(Hx1(x2,x3))v+χ(x1,x2+z)χ(x2+x3,x1+ξ)μ(x1)ξ,M3(x2,x3)v+χ(x1,x2+x3+ξ)M2(x2,x3)ξ,μ(x1)v=χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)ξ,μ(Hx1(x2,x3))vχ(x2+x3,ξ)χ(x,ξ)ξ,μ(x1)M3(x2,x3)v+χ(x,x2+x3+ξ)χ(x2+x3,ξ)ξ,M3(x2,x3)μ(x1)v=χ(x1+x2+x3,ξ)ξ,{μ(Hx1(x2,x3))μ(x1)M3(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2+x3)M3(x2,x3)μ(x1)}v=0.

    Therefore, the conclusion follows immediately from the hypothesis and Definition 3.2.

    Given an F-manifold color algebra (F,,[,],χ), we define the linear map T from FF to Endk(F)G by

    T(x1,x2)(x3)=χ(x1,x2)[x2,x1x3][x1,x2x3]+[x1x2,x3]

    for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3F.

    Definition 3.3. An F-manifold color algebra (F,,[,],χ) is called a coherence one if for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3,x4F, the following hold:

    Hx1x2(x3,x4)=χ(x1,x2+x3)Hx2(x3,x1x4)+χ(x2,x3)Hx1(x3,x2x4),Hx1(x2,x3)x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)T(x2,x3)(x1x4)+x1T(x2,x3)(x4).

    Proposition 3.4. Assume that (,) is a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form on the F-manifold color algebra (F,,[,],χ) satisfying

    (x1x2,x3)=(x1,x2x3)  and  ([x1,x2],x3)=(x1,[x2,x3])

    for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3F. Then (F,,[,],χ) is a coherence F-manifold color algebra.

    Proof. First, we prove that

    (Hx1(x2,x3),x4)=χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,Hx1(x2,x4))

    for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3,x4F.

    In fact, we obtain

    (Hx1(x2,x3),x4)=([x1,x2x3][x1,x2]x3χ(x1,x2)x2[x1,x3],x4)=χ(x1,x2+x3)([x2x3,x1],x4)χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,[x1,x2]x4)χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+x3)([x1,x3],x2x4)=χ(x1,x2+x3)(x2x3,[x1,x4])χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,[x1,x2]x4)+χ(x2,x3)χ(x1,x3)(x3,[x1,x2x4])=χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2,x3)(x3,x2[x1,x4])χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,[x1,x2]x4)+χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,[x1,x2x4])=χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,χ(x1,x2)x2[x1,x4][x1,x2]x4+[x1,x2x4])=χ(x1+x2,x3)(x3,Hx1(x2,x4)).

    By the above relation, for every homogeneous element x1,x2,x3,w1,w2F, we have

    (Hx1x2(x3,w1)χ(x1,x2+x3)Hx2(x3,x1w1)χ(x2,x3)Hx1(x3,x2w1),w2)=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1x2(x3,w2))χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2+x3,x1+w1)(x1w1,Hx2(x3,w2))χ(x2,x3)χ(x1+x3,x2+w1)(x2w1,Hx1(x3,w2))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1x2(x3,w2))χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2+x3,x1+w1)χ(x1,w1)(w1,x1Hx2(x3,w2))χ(x2,x3)χ(x1+x3,x2+w1)χ(x2,w1)(w1,x2Hx1(x3,w2))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1x2(x3,w2))χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,x1Hx2(x3,w2))χ(x2,x3)χ(x1+x3,x2)χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,x2Hx1(x3,w2))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1x2(x3,w2))χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,x1Hx2(x3,w2))χ(x1,x2)χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,x2Hx1(x3,w2))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1x2(x3,w2)x1Hx2(x3,w2)χ(x1,x2)x2Hx1(x3,w2))=0.

    We claim the following identity:

    (T(x2,x3)(w1),w2)=χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,Hw2(x2,x3)).

    In fact, we have

    (T(x2,x3)(w1),w2)=(χ(x2,x3)[x3,x2w1][x2,x3w1]+[x2x3,w1],w2)=χ(x2,x3)χ(x3,x2+w1)(x2w1,[x3,w2])+χ(x2,x3+w1)(x3w1,[x2,w2])χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,[x2x3,w2])=χ(x3,w1)χ(x2,w1)(w1,x2[x3,w2])+χ(x2,x3+w1)χ(x3,w1)(w1,x3[x2,w2])χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,[x2x3,w2])=χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,x2[x3,w2])+χ(x2+x3,w1)χ(x2,x3)(w1,x3[x2,w2])χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,[x2x3,w2])=χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,x2[x3,w2]+χ(x2,x3)x3[x2,w2][x2x3,w2])=χ(x2+x3,w1)(w1,χ(x2+x3,w2)Hw2(x2,x3))=χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,Hw2(x2,x3)).

    With the above identity, we have

    (Hx1(x2,x3)w1+χ(x1,x2+x3)T(x2,x3)(x1w1)x1T(x2,x3)(w1),w2)=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)χ(x2+x3,x1+w1+w2)(x1w1,Hw2(x2,x3))χ(x1,x2+x3+w1)(T(x2,x3)w1,x1w2)=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2)+χ(x1,w1)χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,x1Hw2(x2,x3))χ(x1,x2+x3+w1)χ(x2+x3,x+w1+w2)(w1,Hx1w2(x2,x3))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2)+χ(x1,w1)χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,x1Hw2(x2,x3))χ(x1,w1)χ(x2+x3,w1+w2)(w1,Hx1w2(x2,x3))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2+χ(x2+x3,w2)x1Hw2(x2,x3)χ(x2+x3,w2)Hx1w2(x2,x3))=χ(x1+x2+x3,w1)(w1,Hx1(x2,x3)w2+χ(x2+x3,w2)x1Hw2(x2,x3)(Hx1(x2,x3)w2+χ(x2+x3,w2)x1Hw2(x2,x3)))=0.

    Then, according to the assumption that the symmetric bilinear form (,) is non-degenerate, the conclusion is obtained.

    The concept of pre-F-manifold color algebras is presented in this section, and using these algebras we construct F-manifold color algebras.

    Definition 4.1. Let the vector space F be G-graded and be a bilinear multiplication operator on F. A triple (F,,χ) is called a Zinbiel color algebra if the following hold:

    (i) Fg1Fg2Fg1+g2,

    (ii) x1(x2x3)=(x1x2)x3+χ(x1,x2)(x2x1)x3,

    for any homogeneous elements x1Fg1,x2Fg2,x3Fg3, and g1,g2,g3G.

    Given a Zinbiel color algebra (F,,χ), define

    x1x2=x1x2+χ(x1,x2)x2x1, (4.1)

    for any homogeneous elements x1,x2F. Then it is not difficult to see that the algebra (F,,χ) is both χ-commutative and associative.

    Define a linear map L:FEndk(F)G by

    Lx1x2=x1x2, (4.2)

    for any homogeneous elements x1,x2F. Then one has the following result.

    Lemma 4.1. With the above notations, (F,L) is a representation of (F,,χ).

    Proof. According to the definition of L, we get

    Lx1x2x3=(x1x2)x3=(x1x2+χ(x1,x2)(x2x1))x3=x1(x2x3)=Lx1Lx2x3.

    Thus, the proof follows.

    Let (F,,χ) be a Zinbiel color algebra and (F,,χ) be a pre-Lie color algebra. For any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3F, define two linear maps Q1,Q2:FFFF by

    Q1(x1,x2,x3)=x1(x2x3)χ(x1,x2)x2(x1x3)[x1,x2]x3,Q2(x1,x2,x3)=x1(x2x3)+χ(x1,x2)x2(x1x3)(x1x2)x3,

    where the operation is given by (4.1) and the bracket [,] is given by

    [x1,x2]=x1x2χ(x1,x2)x2x1. (4.3)

    Definition 4.2. With the above notations, (F,,,χ) is called a pre-F-manifold color algebra if the following hold

    (Q1(x1,x2,x3)+χ(x2,x3)Q1(x1,x3,x2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1))x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1x4)x1Q2(x2,x3,x4),
    Q1(x1x2,x3,x4)=x1Q1(x2,x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2Q1(x1,x3,x4)

    for any homogeneous elements x1,x2,x3,x4F.

    Since (F,[,],χ) is a Lie color algebra, it is known that (F,L) is a representation of (F,[,],χ) if one defines the linear map L:FEndk(F)G by

    Lx1x2=x1x2, (4.4)

    for any homogeneous elements x1,x2F.

    Theorem 4.2. Suppose that (F,,,χ) is a pre-F-manifold color algebra; then

    (1) (F,,[,],χ) is an F-manifold color algebra, where the operation is given by (4.1) and the bracket [,] is given by (4.3);

    (2) (F;L,L) is a representation of (F,,[,],χ), where the map L is given by (4.4) and the map L is given by (4.2).

    Proof. (1) It is known that (F,[,],χ) is a Lie color algebra and (F,,χ) is a χ-commutative associative algebra. Thus, we only need to prove that the relation in Definition 3.1 is satisfied.

    Assume that x1,x2,x3,x4F are all homogeneous elements. We claim the following identity:

    Hx1(x2,x3)=Q1(x1,x2,x3)+χ(x2,x3)Q1(x1,x3,x2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1). (4.5)

    In fact, we have

    Hx1(x2,x3)=[x1,x2x3][x1,x2]x3χ(x1,x2)x2[x1,x3]=x1(x2x3)χ(x1,x2+x3)(x2x3)x1[x1,x2]x3χ(x+x2,x3)x3[x1,x2]χ(x1,x2){x2[x1,x3]+χ(x2,x1+x3)[x1,x3]x2}=x1(x2x3)χ(x1,x2)x2(x1x3)[x1,x2]x3+χ(x2,x3){x1(x3x2)χ(x1,x3)x3(x1x2)[x1,x3]x2}+χ(x1,x2+x3){x2(x3x1)+χ(x2,x3)x3(x2x1)(x2x3)x1}=Q1(x1,x2,x3)+χ(x2,x3)Q1(x1,x3,x2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1).

    With the above identity, we obtain

    Hx1x2(x3,x4)x1Hx2(x3,x4)χ(x1,x2)x2Hx1(x3,x4)=Q1(x1x2,x3,x4)+χ(x3,x4)Q1(x1x2,x4,x3)+χ(x1+x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1x2)x1{Q1(x2,x3,x4)+χ(x3,x4)Q1(x2,x4,x3)+χ(x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x2)}χ(x1,x2)x2{Q1(x1,x3,x4)+χ(x3,x4)Q1(x1,x4,x3)+χ(x1,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1)}={Q1(x1x2,x3,x4)x1Q1(x2,x3,x4)χ(x1,x2)x2Q1(x1,x3,x4)}+{χ(x3,x4)Q1(x1x2,x4,x3)χ(x3,x4)x1Q1(x2,x4,x3)χ(x1,x2)χ(x3,x4)x2Q1(x1,x4,x3)}+{χ(x1+x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1x2)χ(x1,x2)χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)Q1(x1,x3,x4)x2χ(x1,x2)χ(x3,x4)χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)Q1(x1,x4,x3)x2χ(x1,x2)χ(x1,x3+x4)χ(x2,x1+x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1)x2χ(x2,x3+x4)x1Q2(x3,x4,x2)}+{χ(x1+x2,x3+x4)χ(x1,x2)Q2(x3,x4,x2x1)χ(x1,x2+x3+x4)Q1(x2,x3,x4)x1χ(x3,x4)χ(x1,x2+x3+x4)Q1(x2,x4,x3)x1χ(x2,x3+x4)χ(x1,x3+x4+x2)Q2(x3,x4,x2)x1χ(x1,x2)χ(x1,x3+x4)x2Q2(x3,x4,x1)}=χ(x1+x2,x3+x4){Q2(x3,x4,x1x2)χ(x3+x4,x1)Q1(x1,x3,x4)x2χ(x3,x4)χ(x3+x4,x1)Q1(x1,x4,x3)x2Q2(x3,x4,x1)x2χ(x3+x4,x1)x1Q2(x3,x4,x2)}+χ(x1,x2+x3+x4){χ(x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x2x1)Q1(x2,x3,x4)x1χ(x3,x4)Q1(x2,x4,x3)x1χ(x2,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x2)x1x2Q2(x3,x4,x1)}=χ(x2,x3+x4){χ(x1,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1x2)Q1(x1,x3,x4)x2χ(x3,x4)Q1(x1,x4,x3)x2χ(x1,x3+x4)Q2(x3,x4,x1)x2x1Q2(x3,x4,x2)}=0.

    Hence, (F,,[,],χ) is an F-manifold color algebra.

    (2) It is known that (F,L) is a representation of the Lie color algebra (F,[,],χ). According to Lemma 4.1, (F,L) is a representation of the χ-commutative associative algebra (F,,χ). Define the linear map M4 from FF to Endk(F)G by

    M4(x1,x2)=Lx1Lx2χ(x1,x2)Lx2Lx1L[x1,x2].

    Thus Q1(x1,x2,x3)=M4(x1,x2)(x3), and the equation

    Q1(x1x2,x3,x4)=x1Q1(x2,x3,x4)+χ(x1,x2)x2Q1(x1,x3,x4)

    implies

    M4(x1x2,x3)=Lx1M4(x2,x3)+χ(x1,x2)Lx2M4(x1,x3).

    On the other hand, define the linear map M5 from FF to Endk(F)G by

    M5(x1,x2)=Lx1Lx2+χ(x1,x2)Lx2Lx1Lx1x2.

    Thus Q2(x1,x2,x3)=M5(x1,x2)(x3). Combining (4.5), the equation

    (Q1(x1,x2,x3)+χ(x2,x3)Q1(x1,x3,x2)+χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1))x4=χ(x1,x2+x3)Q2(x2,x3,x1x4)x1Q2(x2,x3,x4)

    implies

    LHx1(x2,x3)=χ(x1,x2+x3)M5(x2,x3)Lx1Lx1M5(x2,x3).

    Hence, the proof is completed.

    An F-manifold is "locally" an F-manifold algebra. We generalize the definition of an F-manifold algebra by introducing an F-manifold color algebra and study its representation theory. Then we provide the concept of a coherence F-manifold color algebra and obtain that an F-manifold color algebra admitting a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form is a coherence F-manifold color algebra. The concept of a pre-F-manifold color algebra is also defined, and with the help of these algebras, one can construct F-manifold color algebras.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This work was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515011739) and the Basic Research Joint Funding Project of University and Guangzhou City under Grant 202201020103.

    The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.



    [1] Agenor P, Bayraktar N (2008) Contracting models of the phillips curve: Empirical estimates for middle income countries. Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series No: 094.
    [2] Akcay OC, Alper CE, Ozmucur S (1996) Budget deficit, money supply and inflation: Evidence from low and high frequency data for turkey. Bogazici University Department of Economics Research Papers ISS/EC-1996-12.
    [3] Assenmacher-Wesche K, Gerlach S (2008a) Interpreting euro area inflation at high and low frequencies. Eur Econ Rev 52: 964-986.
    [4] Assenmacher-Wesche K, Gerlach S (2008b) Money growth, output gaps and inflation at low and high frequency: Spectral estimates for switzerland. J Econ Dyn Control 32: 411-435.
    [5] Baser-Andic S, Kucuk H, Ogunc F (2014) Inflation dynamics in turkey: In pursuit of a domestic cost measure. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Working Papers No.14/20.
    [6] Bastav L (2015) Turkish inflation dynamics: New keynesian phillips curve (2000-2013). Iktisat Isletme ve Finans 30: 57-80.
    [7] Beck G, Wieland V (2010) Money in monetary policy design: Monetary cross-checking in the newkeynesian model. ECB Working Papers No.1191.
    [8] Bloomfield P (2000) Fourier Analysis of Time Series (1st ed. ed.), John Wiley and Sons.
    [9] Breitung J, Candelon B (2006) Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach. J Econometrics 132: 363-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.004
    [10] Breitung J, Schreiber S (2018) Assessing causality and delay within a frequency band. Econometrics Stat 6: 57-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2017.04.005
    [11] Catik A, Martin C (2008) Relative price variability and the phillips curve: Evidence from turkey. Ege University Working Papers in Economics No:08/07.
    [12] Celasun O (2006) Sticky inflation and the real effects of exchange rate based stabilization. J Int Econ 70: 115-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.05.014
    [13] Cespedes L, Ochoa M, Soto C (2005) The new keynesian phillips curve in an emerging market economy: The case of chile. Central Bank of Chile Working Paper No:355.
    [14] DeGrauwe P, Polan M (2005) Is inflation always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon? Scand J Econ 107: 239-259. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00406.x
    [15] ECB (1999) The stability-oriented monetary policy strategy of the eurosystem. ECB Monthly Bulletin January, 39-50.
    [16] ECB (2003) The outcome of the ecb's evaluation of its monetary policy strategy. ECB Monthly Bulletin June, 79-92.
    [17] Eichler M (2007) Granger causality and path diagrams for multivariate time series. J Econometrics 137: 334-353. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.06.032
    [18] Enders W, Lee J (2012) The flexible fourier form and dickey-fuller type unit root tests. Econ Lett 117: 196-199. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
    [19] Friedman M (1963) Inflation: Causes and Consequences, New York: Asia Publishing House.
    [20] Friedman M, Schwartz AJ (1983) Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom: Their Relations to Income, Prices, and Interest Rates, University of Chicago Press.
    [21] Gali J, Gertler M (1999) Inflation dynamics: A structural econometrics analysis. J Monetary Econ 44: 195-222. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00023-9
    [22] Gal J, Gertler M, Lopez-Salido J (2001) European inflation dynamics. Eur Econ Rev 45: 1237-1270. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00105-7
    [23] Gallegati M, Giri F, Fratianni MU (2019) Money growth and inflation: International historical evidence on high inflation episodes for developed countries. Bank Finland Res Discussion Pap 1.
    [24] Gerlach S (2002) The ecb's two pillars. Mimeo.
    [25] Gerlach-Kristen P (2006) A two-pillar phillips curve for switzerland. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper No 36/2004.
    [26] Geweke J (1982) Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc 77: 424-438.
    [27] Geweke J (1984) Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J Am Stat Assoc 79: 907-915. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1984.10477110
    [28] Granger C (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424-438. doi: 10.2307/1912791
    [29] Hosoya Y (1991) The decomposition and measurement of the interdependence between second-order stationary processes. Probab Theory Relat Fields 88: 429-444. doi: 10.1007/BF01192551
    [30] Hosoya Y (2001) Elimination of third-series effect and defining partial measures of causality. J Time Ser Anal 22: 537-554. doi: 10.1111/1467-9892.00240
    [31] Jaeger A (2003) The ecb's money pillar: An assessment. IMF Working Paper WP/03/82.
    [32] Janssen N, Nolan C, Thomas R (2002) Money, debt and prices in the united kingdom, 1705?1996. Economica 69: 461-479.
    [33] Jiang C, Chang T, Li XL (2015) Money growth and inflation in china: New evidence from a wavelet analysis. Int Rev Econ Financ 33: 249-261. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2014.10.005
    [34] Jordan T, Peytrignet M, Rich G (2001) The role of m3 in the policy analysis of the swiss national bank. Monetary Analysis: Tools and Applications 2001: 47-62.
    [35] Kara H (2015) Interest rate corridor and the monetary policy stance. TCMB Research Notes in Economics, No:2015-13.
    [36] Karaçimen E (2014) Financialization in turkey: The case of consumer debt. J Balkan Near Eastern Stud 16: 161-180. doi: 10.1080/19448953.2014.910393
    [37] Lim CH, Papi L (1997) An econometric analysis of the determinants of inflation in turkey. IMF Working Paper WP/97/10.
    [38] Lucas R (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1: 19-46. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2231(76)80003-6
    [39] Lucas R (1980) Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money. Am Econ Rev 70: 1005-1014.
    [40] McCallum B (1984) On low-frequency estimates of long-run relationships in macroeconomics. J Monetary Econ 14: 3-14. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(84)90023-0
    [41] Nelson E (2003) The future of monetary aggregates in monetary policy analysis. J Monetary Econ 50: 1029-1059. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00063-1
    [42] Neumann M (2003) The european central bank's first pillar reassessed. University of Bonn.
    [43] Neumann M, Greiber C (2004) Inflation and core money growth in the euro area. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper No 36/2004.
    [44] Phillips A (1958) The relation beteen unemployment and the rate of chage in money wages in the united kingdom, 1861-1957. Economica 25: 283-299.
    [45] Ramos-Francia M, Torres A (2008) Inflation dynamics in mexico: A characterization using the new phillips curve North Am J Econ Financ 19: 274-289.
    [46] Rehman M (2010) Money-inflation relationship: Band spectrum analysis approach. Pak J Appl Econ 20: 67-76.
    [47] Roberts J (1995) New keynesian economics and the phillips curve. J Money Credit Bank 27: 975-984. doi: 10.2307/2077783
    [48] Rua A (2012) Money growth and inflation in the euro area: A time-frequency view. Oxford Bulletin Econ Stat 74: 875-885. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00680.x
    [49] Samuelson P, Solow R (1960) Analytical aspects of anti-inflation policy. Am Econ Rev 50: 177-194.
    [50] Sasongko G, Huruta AD (2018) Monetary policy and the causality between inflation and money supply in indonesia. Bus Theory Pract 19: 80-87. doi: 10.3846/btp.2018.09
    [51] Saz G (2011) The turkish phillips curve experience and the new keynesian phillips curve: A conceptualization and application of a novel measure for marginal costs. Int J Financ Econ 63.
    [52] Schreiber S (2009) Low-frequency determinants of inflation in the euro area. IMK-Macroeconomic Policy Institute Working paper-6/2009.
    [53] Su CW, Fan JJ, Chang HL, et al. (2016) Is there causal relationship between money supply growth and inflation in china? evidence from quantity theory of money. Rev Dev Econ 20: 702-719.
    [54] Svensson L (2002) Monetary policy in times of low inflation. In: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    [55] Tastan H (2015) Testing for spectral granger causality. Stata J 15: 1157-1166. doi: 10.1177/1536867X1501500411
    [56] Taylor J (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 195-204. doi: 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L
    [57] Tekin-Koru A, Ozmen E (2003) Budget deficits, money growth and inflation: The turkish evidence. AppL Econ 35: 591-596. doi: 10.1080/0003684022000025440
    [58] Teles P, Uhlig H, Valle e Azevedo J (2016) Is quantity theory still alive? Econ J 126: 442-464. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12336
    [59] Terzi N (2015) Financial inclusion and turkey. Acad J Interdiscip Stud 4: 269.
    [60] Us V (2004) Inflation dynamics and monetary policy strategy: Some prospects for the turkish economy. J Policy Model 26: 1003-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.07.001
    [61] von Hagen J, Hofmann B (2003) Monetary policy orientation in times of low inflation. Conference on Monetary Policy under Low Inflation, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    [62] Whiteman C (1984) Lucas on the quantity theory: hypothesis testing without theory. Am Econ Rev 74: 742-749.
    [63] Yazgan ME, Yilmazkuday H (2005) Inflation dynamics of turkey: A structural estimation. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econometrics 9: 1-13.
    [64] Yildirim N, Tastan H (2012) Capital flows and economic growth across spectral frequencies: Evidence from turkey. Panoeconomicus 4: 441-462. doi: 10.2298/PAN1204441Y
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5963) PDF downloads(610) Cited by(10)

Figures and Tables

Figures(15)  /  Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog