In this study, we empirically investigated the dual impact of green bond issuances on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sovereign Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores. Using a fixed-effects panel regression model for a global sample of countries from 2000 till 2022, we found that green bond issuance is correlated with a significant reduction in GHG emissions in the subsequent years. This negative effect is stronger in countries with higher levels of financial development. Furthermore, we documented a positive impact on sovereign ESG scores, though this effect is more pronounced in lower-income economies and diminishes with a country's development level. Heterogeneity analyses revealed that the credibility signal of external verification is context-dependent: Its value is greatest in markets where credibility is scarce, such as in lower-ESG or less financially developed countries. Our findings highlight that the efficacy of green bonds is not uniform but is critically shaped by a nation's economic structure, financial sophistication, and existing sustainability trajectory. These results offer nuanced policy implications for designing targeted green finance strategies to maximize their environmental and financial returns.
Citation: Urol Berdiev. Green bonds and their effectiveness: Mitigating emissions and enhancing sovereign ESG scores[J]. Green Finance, 2025, 7(4): 748-770. doi: 10.3934/GF.2025028
In this study, we empirically investigated the dual impact of green bond issuances on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sovereign Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores. Using a fixed-effects panel regression model for a global sample of countries from 2000 till 2022, we found that green bond issuance is correlated with a significant reduction in GHG emissions in the subsequent years. This negative effect is stronger in countries with higher levels of financial development. Furthermore, we documented a positive impact on sovereign ESG scores, though this effect is more pronounced in lower-income economies and diminishes with a country's development level. Heterogeneity analyses revealed that the credibility signal of external verification is context-dependent: Its value is greatest in markets where credibility is scarce, such as in lower-ESG or less financially developed countries. Our findings highlight that the efficacy of green bonds is not uniform but is critically shaped by a nation's economic structure, financial sophistication, and existing sustainability trajectory. These results offer nuanced policy implications for designing targeted green finance strategies to maximize their environmental and financial returns.
| [1] |
Al Mamun M, Boubaker S, Nguyen DK (2022) Green finance and decarbonization: Evidence from around the world. Financ Res Lett 46: 102807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102807 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102807
|
| [2] | Alamgir M, Cheng MC (2023) Do green bonds play a role in achieving sustainability? Sustainability 15: 10177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310177 |
| [3] |
Alvi S, Ahmad I, Nawaz SMN, et al. (2025) The role of green finance, energy transition, and digitalization in OECD greenhouse gas emissions. J Clean Prod 518: 145865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145865 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145865
|
| [4] |
Banga J (2019) The green bond market: a potential source of climate finance for developing countries. J Sustain Financ Inv 9: 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2018.1498617 doi: 10.1080/20430795.2018.1498617
|
| [5] |
Baştürk MF (2024) Does Green Finance Reduce Carbon Emissions? Global Evidence Based on System Generalized Method of Moments. Sustainability 16: 8210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188210 doi: 10.3390/su16188210
|
| [6] | Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119: 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588 |
| [7] |
Bhutta US, Tariq A, Farrukh M, et al. (2022) Green bonds for sustainable development: Review of literature on development and impact of green bonds. Technol Forecast Soc Change 175: 121378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121378 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121378
|
| [8] |
Chen X, Rahaman Md A (2022) Green Bond Issuance and Corporate's Environmental Performance: Evidence from China. Front Bus Econ Manage 6. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v6i3.3108 doi: 10.54097/fbem.v6i3.3108
|
| [9] |
Crifo P, Diaye MA, Oueghlissi R (2017) The effect of countries' ESG ratings on their sovereign borrowing costs. Q Rev Econ Financ 66: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.04.011 doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2017.04.011
|
| [10] |
Czech M, Hadaś-Dyduch M, Puszer B (2023) Effectiveness of Green Bonds in Selected CEE Countries: Analysis of Similarities. Risks 11: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11120214 doi: 10.3390/risks11120214
|
| [11] | Dill H (2023) Carbon pricing initiatives and green bonds: are they contributing to the transition to a low-carbon economy? Clim Policy 24: 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2210107 |
| [12] | Fatica S, Panzica R (2021) Green bonds as a tool against climate change? Bus Strateg Environ 30: 2688–2701. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2771 |
| [13] |
Flammer C (2021) Corporate green bonds. J Financ Econ 142: 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
|
| [14] |
Flammer C (2023) Green bonds and carbon emissions. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 39: 752–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grad040 doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grad040
|
| [15] | Ghitti M, Gianfrate G, Lopez-de-Silanes F, et al. (2023) What's in a shade? The market relevance of green bonds' external reviews. Brit Account Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101271 |
| [16] |
Gianfrate G, Peri M (2019) The green advantage: Exploring the convenience of issuing green bonds. J Clean Prod 219: 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.022 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.022
|
| [17] | Gratcheva E, Gurhy B (2024) Sovereign Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investing: Chasing Elusive Sustainability, International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400277054.001 |
| [18] | Gratcheva EM, Emery TL, Wang D (2021) Demystifying Sovereign ESG. SSRN Electronic J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854177 |
| [19] | Kaminker C (2015) Policy Perspectives: Green Bonds - Mobilising the debt capital markets for a low-carbon transition. OECD Publishing, OECD/Bloomberg Philanthropies. |
| [20] | Kwilinski A, Dobrovolska O, Wołowiec T, et al. (2024) Carbon Dioxide, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane: What Types of Greenhouse Gases Are Most Affected by Green Investments and Renewable Energy Development? Energies 17: 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040804 |
| [21] |
Liu S, Qi H, Wan Y (2022) Driving factors behind the development of China's green bond market. J Clean Prod 354: 131705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131705 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131705
|
| [22] | OECD (2020) ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b4f71091-en |
| [23] | Olhoff A, Bataille C, Christensen J, et al. (2024) Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! With a massive gap between rhetoric and reality, countries draft new climate commitments. United Nations Environment Programme. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/46404 |
| [24] |
Ran C, Zhang Y (2023) The driving force of carbon emissions reduction in China: Does green finance work. J Clean Prod 421: 138502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138502 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138502
|
| [25] |
Rannou Y, Boutabba MA, Barneto P (2021) Are Green Bond and Carbon Markets in Europe complements or substitutes? Insights from the activity of power firms. Energy Econ 104: 105651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105651 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105651
|
| [26] |
Reboredo JC (2018) Green bond and financial markets: Co-movement, diversification and price spillover effects. Energy Econ 74: 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.030 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.030
|
| [27] |
Sartzetakis ES (2021) Green bonds as an instrument to finance low carbon transition. Econ Chang Restruct 54: 755–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09266-9 doi: 10.1007/s10644-020-09266-9
|
| [28] |
Sarwar N, Junaid A, Alvi S (2024) Impact of urbanization and human development on ecological footprints in OECD and non-OECD countries. Heliyon 10: e38058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38058 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38058
|
| [29] | Semet R, Roncalli T, Stagnol L (2021) ESG and Sovereign Risk: What is Priced in by the Bond Market and Credit Rating Agencies? SSRN Electronic J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3940945 |
| [30] |
Svirydzenka K (2016) Introducing a New Broad-based Index of Financial Development. IMF Working Papers 16. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513583709.001 doi: 10.5089/9781513583709.001
|
| [31] | Tang DY, Zhang Y (2020) Do shareholders benefit from green bonds? J Corp Financ 61: 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.001 |
| [32] |
Tian Y, Chen S, Dai L (2024) How climate risk drives corporate green innovation: Evidence from China. Financ Res Lett 59: 104762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104762 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104762
|
| [33] |
Tolliver C, Keeley AR, Managi S (2019) Green bonds for the Paris agreement and sustainable development goals. Environ Res Lett 14: 064009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1118 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1118
|
| [34] | Tolliver C, Keeley AR, Managi S (2020) Policy targets behind green bonds for renewable energy: Do climate commitments matter? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 157: 120051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120051 |
| [35] | UNFCCC (2016) The Paris Agreement. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src = TREATY & mtdsg_no = XXVII-7-. |
| [36] | Xu X, Li J (2023) Can green bonds reduce the carbon emissions of cities in China? Econ Lett 226: 111099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111099 |
| [37] |
Yeow KE, Ng SH (2021) The impact of green bonds on corporate environmental and financial performance. Manag Financ 47: 1486–1510. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2020-0481 doi: 10.1108/MF-09-2020-0481
|
| [38] |
Zhang L, Wang Q, Zhang M (2021) Environmental regulation and CO2 emissions: Based on strategic interaction of environmental governance. Ecol Complex 45: 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100893 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100893
|
GF-07-04-028-s001.pdf |
![]() |