Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article Topical Sections

A proteomic analysis of the interactions between poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibers and SH-SY5Y neuronal-like cells

  • Poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) is a biodegradable and biocompatible polymer that has been put forward as a promising material for therapeutic approaches aiming to restore neuronal function. The topographic cues present in PLLA-based scaffolds, defined by the technique used in their preparation, have been shown to play a role on the cellular behavior of adherent cells. Even though this interaction has been shown to influence the regenerative output of the scaffold, there is a lack of studies addressing this response at the proteomic level. Hence, this work focuses on the effect of electrospun PLLA-based nanofibers on the proteome, cellular processes and signaling pathways of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. It also further explores how these molecular mediators might influence cell proliferation and differentiation upon in vitro culture. For that, mass spectrometry followed by bioinformatics analysis was firstly performed and further complemented with Western blot, cell viability and imaging assays. Results show that PLLA nanofibers differentially activate and inhibit specific cellular functions and signaling pathways related to cell division, apoptosis, actin remodeling, among others. These ultimately block cellular proliferation and induce morphological rearrangements through cytoskeleton remodeling, adaptations that turn cells more prone to differentiate. In synthesis, PLLA nanofibers shift the SH-SY5Y cells proteome towards a state more responsive to differentiation-inductive cues such as the retinoic acid. Unveiling cells responses to nanomaterials is an important step to increase the tools available for their manipulation and potentiate their use in neural tissue engineering. Further studies should be performed to compare the effects of other topographic cues on cellular behavior.

    Citation: Ana Marote, Nathalie Barroca, Rui Vitorino, Raquel M. Silva, Maria H.V. Fernandes, Paula M. Vilarinho, Odete A.B. da Cruz e Silva, Sandra I. Vieira. A proteomic analysis of the interactions between poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibers and SH-SY5Y neuronal-like cells[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(4): 661-682. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.4.661

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jin Hwan Do . Genome-wide transcriptional comparison of MPP+ treated human neuroblastoma cells with the state space model. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(4): 440-460. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.4.440
    [2] Davide Lovisolo, Marianna Dionisi, Federico A. Ruffinatti, Carla Distasi . Nanoparticles and potential neurotoxicity: focus on molecular mechanisms. AIMS Molecular Science, 2018, 5(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2018.1.1
    [3] Jade Sternberg, Miriam Wankell, V. Nathan Subramaniam, Lionel W. Hebbard . The functional roles of T-cadherin in mammalian biology. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(1): 62-81. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.1.62
    [4] Carlos Gutierrez-Merino, Dorinda Marques-da-Silva, Sofia Fortalezas, Alejandro K. Samhan-Arias . The critical role of lipid rafts nanodomains in the cross-talk between calcium and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in cerebellar granule neurons apoptosis by extracellular potassium deprivation. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(1): 12-29. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.1.12
    [5] Navid J. Ayon . Features, roles and chiral analyses of proteinogenic amino acids. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(3): 229-268. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020011
    [6] Jin Hwan Do . Apomorphine-induced pathway perturbation in MPP+-treated SH-SY5Y cells. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(3): 271-287. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.3.271
    [7] Abdulrahman Mahmoud Dogara, Ateeq Ahmed Al-Zahrani, Sarwan W. Bradosty, Saber W. Hamad, Aisha Abdullahi Mahmud, Hussain D. Almalki, Mustapha Abdullahi, Abubakar Abdullahi Lema, Hasan Nudin Nur Fatihah . In-vitro biological activity and in-silico studies of some volatile phytochemicals from the ethanol extract of Eugenia uniflora. AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11(3): 303-321. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2024018
    [8] Fatima Al-Hashimi, Salvador J. Diaz-Cano . Multi-target analysis of neoplasms for the evaluation of tumor progression: stochastic approach of biologic processes. AIMS Molecular Science, 2018, 5(1): 14-62. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2018.1.14
    [9] Marco Feligioni, Serena Marcelli, Erin Knock, Urooba Nadeem, Ottavio Arancio, Paul E. Fraser . SUMO modulation of protein aggregation and degradation. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(4): 382-410. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.4.382
    [10] Jian Zou, Fulton T. Crews . Glutamate/NMDA excitotoxicity and HMGB1/TLR4 neuroimmune toxicity converge as components of neurodegeneration. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(2): 77-100. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.2.77
  • Poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) is a biodegradable and biocompatible polymer that has been put forward as a promising material for therapeutic approaches aiming to restore neuronal function. The topographic cues present in PLLA-based scaffolds, defined by the technique used in their preparation, have been shown to play a role on the cellular behavior of adherent cells. Even though this interaction has been shown to influence the regenerative output of the scaffold, there is a lack of studies addressing this response at the proteomic level. Hence, this work focuses on the effect of electrospun PLLA-based nanofibers on the proteome, cellular processes and signaling pathways of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. It also further explores how these molecular mediators might influence cell proliferation and differentiation upon in vitro culture. For that, mass spectrometry followed by bioinformatics analysis was firstly performed and further complemented with Western blot, cell viability and imaging assays. Results show that PLLA nanofibers differentially activate and inhibit specific cellular functions and signaling pathways related to cell division, apoptosis, actin remodeling, among others. These ultimately block cellular proliferation and induce morphological rearrangements through cytoskeleton remodeling, adaptations that turn cells more prone to differentiate. In synthesis, PLLA nanofibers shift the SH-SY5Y cells proteome towards a state more responsive to differentiation-inductive cues such as the retinoic acid. Unveiling cells responses to nanomaterials is an important step to increase the tools available for their manipulation and potentiate their use in neural tissue engineering. Further studies should be performed to compare the effects of other topographic cues on cellular behavior.


    1. Introduction

    Developmentally appropriate genetic signaling depends on internal feedback networks responding to external signals. Recent works have demonstrated that single-cell measurements are key to understanding how these networks respond to external factors because single-cell behavior is rarely normally distributed about a mean value [1,2]. This is partially due to RNA bursting, during which RNA are stochastically produced in the nucleus and after a series of steps arrive in the cytoplasm for translation [1,2]. This spatial separation provides information on the timing of events, even for populations of fixed cells. For example, Neuert et al. measured the single-cell RNA expression of thousands of budding yeasts in response to osmotic shock for multiple genes. Using this dense dataset, they created in silico models that predicted how the internal regulatory networks would respond to new external conditions or genetic perturbations to the network itself [3]. This insight would not be possible using standard ensemble methods because the variability in spatial distribution of RNA and copy number variation in RNA would be lost due to population averaging [1,2,3,4]. This set of techniques provides a powerful tool to image fixed cell populations and infer the temporal sequence of events within a signaling network.

    Vascular development is partially driven by highly proliferative endothelial progenitor cells (EPC). Numerous assays have been utilized to enumerate and isolate EPC by flow cytometry and primary cell culture [5,6,7]. Although conflicting definitions exist in the literature, Critser and Yoder concluded in 2010 that late outgrowth endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFC), which demonstrate the ability for self-renewal and neo-angiogenesis, both in vitro and in animal models, can uniquely be described as progenitors of endothelial cells [6,8]. A key feature of ECFC is tube formation when plated on Matrigel or cross-linked collagen, allowing for the study of in vitro angiogenesis without the need for complicated growth matrices. We previously demonstrated that ECFC are reduced in prematurely born infants that go on to develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and infants born to mothers with preeclampsia [9,10,11]. For prematurely born infants the introduction to room air after birth leads to an increase in environmental oxygen at a developmentally abnormal time.

    One potential regulator of ECFC environmental response to hyperoxia is Thymosin β4 (Tβ4). Cytosolic Tβ4 protein mediates the response of endothelial cells to changes in oxygen environment by modulating the stability of Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1α (HIF-1α). HIF-1α is historically associated with cellular response to hypoxia, not hyperoxia. Recent work has demonstrated a role for HIF-1α in signaling preservation across all changes in oxygen environment, particularly in endothelial cells [12,13,14,15,16]. One key feature of this signaling network is a self-modulating feedback mechanism for Tβ4. Jo et al. demonstrated altered HIF-1α nuclear localization as a function of increasing Tβ4 expression in endothelial cells [12]. Based on these results, we applied high-throughput imaging to determine if changes in the spatial localization of Tβ4 and HIF-1α in ECFC are associated with changes in RNA copy number of vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) at the single-cell level.

    vegf and eNOS are potent pro-proliferation and pro-angiogenesis genes that are associated with many developmental diseases in prematurely born infants [9,17,18,19,20]. Our laboratory previously showed that ECFC derived from the umbilical cord blood of prematurely born infants (pt-ECFC) demonstrated markedly different proliferation in vitro as compared to ECFC derived from the umbilical cord blood of full term birth infants (t-ECFC) [9,10,11]. Based on these results and others, we hypothesized that exposure to hyperoxia introduces a specific environmental signal that blunts pro-proliferation and pro-angiogenesis genetic signaling networks in a sub-population of pt-ECFC. Specifically, we hypothesized that elevated basal cytosolic Tβ4 protein concentration in a subpopulation of pt-ECFC is associated with diminished HIF-1α nuclear localization and diminished early-time (within the first 60 minutes) vegf and eNOS RNA production in response to hyperoxia as compared to t-ECFC.

    To test this hypothesis, we utilized high-throughput single-cell imaging of protein and RNA expression to quantify pt-ECFC and t-ECFC grown in vitro room air and hyperoxia. We quantified Tβ4 and HIF-1α protein expression using immunofluorescence as well as vegf and eNOS RNA expression using single-molecule fluorescence in-situ hybridization (smFISH [21,22]). Because these techniques require cell fixation we were unable to track single-cell temporal correlations. We instead built statistical spatial measures of how independent populations of pt-ECC or t-ECFC respond to either room air or hyperoxia treatment by measuring cell populations across multiple time points and multiple environmental conditions. This allowed us to infer potential casual relationships through statistical analysis.

    We found that pt-ECFC have elevated basal cytosolic Tβ4 as compared to t-ECFC. This was statistically associated with lower HIF-1α nuclear localization. During the first hour of in vitro hyperoxia growth, distinct single-cell populations emerged in pt-ECFC that are not present in t-ECFC. Based on these findings we speculate that this pathway may directly control the pro-angiogenic response of ECFC and propose a set of future experiments.


    2. Materials and Methods


    2.1. Cord blood collection and ECFC isolation

    Cord blood (CB) collection and endothelial colony forming cells (ECFC) were prepared as previously described [23]. CB samples were obtained following informed consent from term (gestational age greater than 37 weeks) and preterm (gestational age less than 36 weeks) infants at the University of Colorado Anschutz Inpatient Pavilion. The Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board approved all protocols. All CB was processed within 24 hours of collection.

    Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were plated on cell culture plates coated with type 1 rat-tail collagen (BD Biosciences; San Jose, CA) at a density of 5 × 106 cells/cm2. Complete EGM-2 medium (Lonza, CC-3612; with 10% fetal bovine serum) was changed daily for seven days. After seven days, media were changed three times per week and ECFC colonies were enumerated on day 14 using light microscopy. To ensure that ECFC were not migrating or being removed during feeding, the removed media from 6 cell wells was re-plated on collagen-coated plates and observed for 14 days. Cells were then collected into cryogenic tubes and frozen under liquid nitrogen until future studies were performed.


    2.2. ECFC in vitro culture

    ECFC were removed from cryo-suspension and studied at passage 3–5 in complete EGM-2 media. Individual #1 cover slips (Corning, 2845-25) were cleaned in ethanol followed by 1 × PBS. ECFC were plated onto coverslips at low density and cultured in either room air with 5% CO2 or 50% O2 with 5% CO2. At 0, 15, 30 or 60 minutes the EGM-2 medium was replaced with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (Sigma, 47608) for 15 minutes, followed by 1 × PBS (Sigma, P5493). All steps were performed within the incubator to ensure a near constant oxygen environment. Following completion of all coverslips, the PBS in each well was exchanged for 70% ethanol (Sigma, 277649).


    2.3. High-throughput single-molecule, single-cell imaging

    Automated imaging was performed using a custom-built microscope, consisting of an Olympus IX71 microscope base, X-Y translation stage (Mad City Labs Microstage), objective piezo (Mad City Labs F200S), oil-immersion 100 × NA1.3 objective (Olympus UPLSAPO 100XO), multi-color LED light source (Lumencor Spectra-X), LED light source specific filter set (Semrock LED-DA/FI/TR/Cy5-4X-A), and a sCMOS camera (Hamamatsu C11400-22CU). Automation and acquisition were performed using MicroManager v1.4 running on a Windows 7 64-bit laptop [24]. Analysis was performed on a computing cluster with 48 cores, 128 gigabytes of RAM, 2 NVidia TITAN GPUs, and hot swappable storage (Titanus Computers). Custom analysis software was used to analyze all data in both ImageJ [19] and MATLAB (Mathworks).

    Fifty image areas, containing at minimum two cells per area, were identified using the automated stage and objective piezo. At each image area, a simple contrast based autofocus routine implemented in MicroManager was used to correct mechanical or thermal drift. Forty axial image planes were acquired at 250 nm spacing, centered around the algorithm selected best focus point. At each focal plane, four independent images were captured, one each for DAPI, Alexa 488, Alexa 561, and Alexa 647 fluorescent labels.


    2.4. Tβ4 and HIF-1α fluorescent labeling

    All fluorescent labeling steps were adapted from previous work by our group and others [20,21,22]. Following overnight permeabilization in 70% ethanol at 4 ℃, coverslips were washed in 2 mL of 1 × PBS at room temperature followed by incubation in blocking buffer (Thermo-Fisher, 37515). Coverslips were incubated in primary antibody (1:100 dilution in 1 × PBS) for Tβ4 (Abcam, ab14335) and HIF-1α (Abcam, ab51608) overnight, washed in 2 mL of 1 × PBS, incubated in secondary antibody (1:100 dilution in 1 × PBS; Abcam, ab175471; Abcam, ab150115) at 37 ℃, and washed in 2 mL of 1 × PBS with 1 drop of pre-mixed DAPI (Life Technologies, R37606).

    The following steps were performed in low light to prevent bleaching. Coverslips were hybridized with 20 μL of GLOX and Phalloidin-Alexa488 (Life Technologies, A22287) for 30 minutes at room temperature and then washed with GLOX buffer for 15 minutes at room temperature. Coverslips were plated on standard microscope slides with 8 μL GLOX plus enzyme (imaging buffer) and nail polish was applied around the coverslip to seal.


    2.5. Tβ4 and HIF-1α image analysis


    2.5.1. GPU-based de-convolution

    Image de-convolution was performed in ImageJ, utilizing software provided by the Butte Group [25], prior to any further image processing steps.


    2.5.2. Cell and nuclei identification

    Custom in-house MATLAB software was utilized to filter and identify individual cells in every image prior to protein analysis [4,26,27]. The user was presented a maximum intensity projection image of the nuclei and actin cytoskeleton fluorescent labels. Each cell was manually circled and recorded until all cells in an image are identified. A watershed algorithm was used to automatically detect the nucleus within each identified cell. Overlapping cells are not included in further data analysis to avoid over-counting. Cell and nuclei outlines are saved as text-files for use later in the analysis.


    2.5.3. Protein detection and quantification

    The basic workflow of protein detection and quantification was: 1. image filtering and 2. corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) calculation. In-house MATLAB and ImageJ software were utilized to median filter and then calculate the CTCF value for every cell. The background for CTCF was independently determined for each image.


    2.6. vegf and eNOS RNA labeling


    2.6.1. Single-molecule fluorescence in-situ hybridization

    All hybridization steps were adapted from previous work by our group and others [4,21,22]. Following the overnight permeabilization, coverslips were washed in 2mL of 10% wash buffer for 30 minutes at 37 ℃. Coverslips were incubated with 20 μL of vegf and eNOS probe solution (1:1:1000 in 10% hybridization buffer) for 8 hours at 37 ℃. Both vegf and eNOS probe sets were designed using both in-house and commercially available probe designing technologies (Biosearch Technologies). Following hybridization, coverslips were washed with 10% wash buffer for 30 minutes at 37 ℃ and then incubated in 10% wash buffer with 1 drop pre-mixed DAPI solution (Life Technologies, R37606) in each well for 30 minutes at 37 ℃. Coverslips were then washed with GLOX buffer for 15 minutes at room temperature.


    2.6.2. Hybridization buffers

    10% wash buffer: 5 mL deionized formamide (Ambion, AM9342), 5 mL 20 × SSC (Ambion, AM9763), 40 mL nuclease-free water (Ambion, AM9932). Hybridization buffer: 1 mL deionized formamide (Ambion, AM9342), 10 mg E. coli tRNA (Roche, 10109541001), 1 mL 20× SSC (Ambion, AM9763), 40 μL ultrapure BSA (Ambion, AM2618), 1 g dextran sulfate (Sigma, D8906-50G), 100 μL of 200mM vanadyl-ribonucleoside complex (Sigma, 94742-1ML), nuclease-free water (Ambion, AM9932) to 10mL total solution. GLOX buffer: 100 μL 1M Tris (Ambion, AM9855G), 1mL 20× SSC (Ambion, AM9763), 400 μL of 10% Glucose, 8.5mL nuclease-free water (Ambion, AM9932).


    2.6.3. Imaging preparation

    The following steps were performed in low light to prevent bleaching. Coverslips were hybridized with 20 μL of GLOX and Phalloidin-Alexa488 (Life Technologies, A22287) for 30 minutes at room temperature and then washed with GLOX buffer for 15 minutes at room temperature. Coverslips were plated on standard microscope slides with 8 μL GLOX plus enzyme (imaging buffer) and nail polish was applied around the coverslip to seal.


    2.6.4. Imaging buffer

    GLOX plus enzyme: 1 μL 3.7 mg/mL Glucose Oxidase (Sigma, G7141), 1 μL Catalase (Sigma, C30), 100 μL GLOX buffer.


    2.7. vegf and eNOS image analysis


    2.7.1. GPU-based de-convolution

    Image de-convolution was performed in ImageJ, utilizing software provided by the Butte Group [25], prior to any further image processing steps.


    2.7.2. Cell and nuclei identification

    FISH-QUANT and custom in-house MATLAB software were utilized to filter and identify individual cells in every image prior to RNA analysis [4,26,27] The user was presented a maximum intensity projection image of the nuclei and actin cytoskeleton fluorescent labels. Each cell was manually circled and recorded until all cells in an image are identified. A watershed algorithm was used to automatically detect the nucleus within each identified cell. Overlapping cells were not included in further data analysis to avoid over-counting. Cell and nuclei outlines are saved as text-files for use later in the analysis.


    2.7.3. RNA detection and quantification

    The basic workflow of RNA detection and quantification was: (1) image filtering, (2) spot pre-detection, (3) spot fitting, (4) non-specific versus specific determination, (5) spot assignment to individual cells, (6) batch processing.

    FISH-QUANT was utilized to identify, fit, and quantify individual RNA labeled using smFISH. The details of FISH-QUANT are described in a prior publication [26]. Background fluorescence is typically due to FISH probes that were either not washed out or non-specifically bound during the labeling procedure [4]. FISH-QUANT utilizes a three-dimensional Gaussian to fit each possible spot and the user must discriminate background from specific binding by manual thresholding of several extracted fit parameters (e.g. lateral fit uncertainty, axial fit uncertainty, amplitude of Gaussian).


    2.8. Statistical analysis of imaging results

    Single-cell protein CTCF and RNA distributions were loaded in MATLAB for statistical analysis. Before further analysis, all measurements were divided by the maximum intensity projection of the measurement's corresponding cell compartment area (nucleus, cytoplasm, or total cell). Area normalized marginal distributions were tested for independence using the two sample Kolmogorov Smirnov (K-S) test implemented in the Statistics Toolbox for MATLAB (null hypothesis rejection at α = 0.05). Area normalized marginal distribution independence were tested at each measured time for a given protein or RNA species for all cell types and growth conditions (population response). Additionally, we tested within each protein or RNA species for a specific cell type and growth condition against measure time points (temporal response). Area normalized multivariate joint distributions were tested for independence using the non-parametric and distribution free multivariate distribution distance tests, implemented in the highdim package for MATLAB (null hypothesis rejection at α = 0.05) [28]. This allowed for direct comparison of the non-Gaussian distributions common in single-cell gene expression imaging experiments using a non-parametric test.


    3. Results


    3.1. Cytosolic basal Tβ4 expression in ECFC

    To begin, we tested if pt-ECFC Tβ4 expression was elevated in multiple primary ECFC cultures. To determine Tβ4 expression, we thawed and prepared individual populations of ECFC from four term and four preterm patients. After three to five passages, we fixed each population and labeled for Tβ4 using immunofluorescence. We assessed protein content using corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) for the nucleus, cytoplasm, and total cell. We normalized CTCF values by the maximum projection area of the feature of interest to limit copy number variability due to cell size.

    Using Tβ4 expression from at least 200 cells per patient we find that cytosolic Tβ4 protein expression is elevated across pt-ECFC (n = 4 patients) as compared to t-ECFC (n = 4 patients) at basal conditions (Figure 1). We found that total cell and nuclear Tβ4 expression are not statistically different.

    Figure 1. Area normalized Tβ4 CTCF values. t-ECFC (200 cells from each patient, 4 patients) had lower expression than pt-ECFC (200 cells from each patient, 4 patients) after thawing and passage (p = 1.1e-11 using two-sample K-S test).

    3.2. Tβ4 protein expression and HIF-1α protein nuclear localization

    After establishing that pt-ECFC have elevated Tβ4, we moved on to test if pt-ECFC display diminished HIF-1α nuclear localization. While nuclear localization is not a perfect indicator of transcription factor activity, it is a requirement for a transcription factor to be in the nucleus to activate a gene network. To determine protein localization, we cultured a mixture population of the four patients used in Figure 1 in room air or hyperoxia (50% O2). At 0, 15, and 30 minutes of growth we fixed and labeled for both Tβ4 and HIF-1α using immunofluorescence. We assessed protein content in the nucleus, cytoplasm, and total cell using CTCF. We normalized CTCF values by the maximum projection area of the feature of interest to limit copy number variability due to cell size.

    We found that HIF-1α nuclear localization was diminished for pt-ECFC grown in vitro room air or hyperoxia (top 2 rows; blue line; Figure 2A). In contrast, we found that HIF-1α nuclear localization was immediate and sustained for t-ECFC grown in vitro room air and hyperoxia (bottom 2 rows; blue line; Figure 2A). We found that there was minimal difference in Tβ4 protein localization for pt-ECFC grown in vitro room air or hyperoxia versus t-ECFC grown in vitro room air or hyperoxia respectively (top 2 rows versus bottom 2 rows; Figure 2B). This suggests that it was the initial increased concentration in Tβ4, or other factors not measured here, that lead to the observed reduction in nuclear HIF-1α localization for pt-ECFC grown in vitro hyperoxia [12].

    Figure 2. (A) HIF-1α and (B) Tβ4 protein expression. Marginal probability distributions for nuclear (blue) and cytosolic (red) protein expression for pt-ECFC (top 2 rows) and t-ECFC grown (bottom 2 rows) in vitro room air (RA) and hyperoxia (HO) for 0, 15, and 30 minutes for HIF-1α and Tβ4. Nuclear localization of HIF-1α was blunted in pt-ECFC as compared to t-ECFC in hyperoxia (p < 0.01 for all time points, K-S test). Additionally, nuclear and cytoplasmic expression for HIF-1α and Tβ4 was different between in vitro room air and hyperoxia for both pt-ECFC and t-ECFC (p < 0.01 for all time points, K-S test). (C) Representative maximum projection image of pt-ECFC grown in vitro hyperoxia (nucleus—magenta; actin—blue; HIF-1α—green; Tβ4—red).

    3.3. vegf and eNOS RNA expression

    One consequence of reduced HIF-1α nuclear localization was a potential reduction in vegf and eNOS RNA production. We utilized the same experimental design as above but instead labeled for RNA transcripts at each time point. We found the pt-ECFC do not begin production of vegf or eNOS RNA in either room air or hyperoxia until 60 minutes (top 2 rows; blue line; Figure 3A and B). In contrast, we found t-ECFC began and sustained vegf and eNOS RNA production almost immediately (bottom 2 rows; blue line; Figure 3A and 3B). This production resulted in increased mature RNA in the cytoplasm by 60 minutes (bottom 2 rows; red line; Figure 3A and 3B).

    Figure 3. (A) vegf and (B) eNOS RNA expression. Marginal probability distributions for nuclear (blue) and cytosolic (red) single-cell RNA expression for pt-ECFC and t-ECFC grown in vitro room air and hyperoxia for 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes for vegf and eNOS. Nuclear vegf RNA production began almost immediately in t-ECFC as compared to pt-ECFC for both in vitro room air and hyperoxia (p < 0.01, K-S test). This production resulted in increased cytosolic vegf RNA at 60 minutes in t-ECFC as compared to pt-ECFC (p < 0.01, K-S test). A similar result was observed for eNOS, however with sustained nuclear expression in t-ECFC through 60 minutes for both in vitro room air and hyperoxia (p < 0.01 except for 60-minute time point, K-S test). The exception was at 60 minutes, where pt-ECFC and t-ECFC eNOS expression were statistically indistinguishable (p > 0.05, K-S test). (C) Representative maximum projection image of t-ECFC grown in vitro hyperoxia (nucleus—magenta; actin—blue; vegf—green; eNOS—red).

    3.4. Protein or RNA expression as a function of nucleus to cytoplasm area ratio

    Based on our above findings that there were differences in Tβ4, HIF-1α, vegf, and eNOS marginal distributions both between pt-ECFC and t-ECFC as well as in vitro room air and hyperoxia growth, we utilized our single-cell dataset to construct multi-dimensional distributions. Based on previous findings that the ratio of nuclear area to cytoplasmic area (N:C ratio) may be a marker of proliferating ECFC [29], we plotted the N:C ratio versus Tβ4 CTCF and HIF-1α CTCF (Figure 4A) and N:C ratio versus vegf RNA transcripts and eNOS RNA transcripts (Figure 4B). Unlike the marginal distributions presented in Figures 23, we utilized the total amount of protein or RNA in each cell to simplify the analysis.

    Figure 4. Multivariate (A) protein (x-axis: Tβ4 CTCF normalized by cell area; y-axis: HIF-1α CTCF normalized by cell area; and z-axis: nuclear to cytoplasm area ratio) and (B) RNA (x-axis: vegf RNA transcripts normalized by cell area; y-axis: eNOS RNA transcripts normalized by cell area; and z-axis: nuclear to cytoplasm area ratio) single-cell distributions at each time point for all conditions.

    This analysis provides a visualization of how the four different cell populations evolved over time, fully leveraging the information within this single-cell dataset. pt-ECFC grown in vitro HO (green) demonstrated different behavior from all other populations for both protein (Figure 4A) and RNA (Figure 4B) (p < 0.01, multi-dimensional distance test). A large heterogeneity in both cell size and protein or RNA expression was also apparent using this analysis, supporting the idea that ensemble measurements may be averaging over several different single cell behaviors, masking these differences.


    4. Discussion

    Our analyses suggested that previous observations of blunted proliferation of pt-ECFC in hyperoxia [9,23] may be due to developmentally appropriate levels of pro-growth proteins, such as Tβ4. These levels were elevated as compared to t-ECFC, most likely due to internal and external factors driving ECFC proliferation. Paradoxically, the release of Tβ4 into the cytosol in response to hyperoxia reduced HIF-1α stability in this high-Tβ4 sub-population [12]. That in turn lead to lowered vegf and eNOS RNA production and the emergence of a less progenitor-like population. The overall results of this network motif matched previous ensemble proliferation measurements, but the details are only observable using single-cell methodologies.

    Because these data were "stop-motion" movies of distinct cell populations, we cannot confirm that those cells with elevated Tβ4 were the same cells that emerged with reduced HIF-1α nuclear localization and subsequent lower vegf and eNOS RNA expression. Future experiments that rely on live-cell fluorescent reporters of Tβ4 and HIF-1α protein followed by smFISH measurement of vegf and eNOS RNA may provide key insight into the temporal evolution of these heterogeneous cell populations.


    5. Conclusion

    In this study, we attempted to address our hypothesis that elevated basal cytosolic Tβ4 protein concentration in a subpopulation of pt-ECFC diminishes early-time (within the first 60 minutes) vegf and eNOS RNA production in response to hyperoxia as compared to t-ECFC. Using single-cell imaging, we found statistical evidence that elevated cytosolic Tβ4 in pt-ECFC were associated with diminished HIF-1α nuclear localization and diminished vegf and eNOS RNA copy number. Our data and analyses, combined with previous studies, suggest that Tβ4 may play a key role in determining ECFC vegf and eNOS response to changes in oxygen environment. Our data additionally suggest a role for HIF-1α, further expanding the scope of this key transcription factor to the ECFC hyperoxia response.


    Acknowledgements

    M.A.A. and D.P.S acknowledge startup funding from the University of Colorado Denver College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. G.J.S. acknowledges funding from the National Institute of Health (NHLBI HL68702). C.D.B. acknowledges funding from the National Institutes of Health (K23 HL121090-01A1).


    Conflict of Interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest.


    [1] Seil JT, Webster TJ (2010) Electrically active nanomaterials as improved neural tissue regeneration scaffolds. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2: 635-647. doi: 10.1002/wnan.109
    [2] Quan Q, Chang B, Meng HY, et al. (2016) Use of electrospinning to construct biomaterials for peripheral nerve regeneration. Rev Neurosci.27: 761-768
    [3] Tian L, Prabhakaran MP, Ramakrishna S (2015) Strategies for regeneration of components of nervous system: scaffolds, cells and biomolecules. Regen Biomater 2: 31-45. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbu017
    [4] Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, et al. (2005) Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26: 2603-2610. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.051
    [5] Wang HB, Mullins ME, Cregg JM, et al. (2009) Creation of highly aligned electrospun poly-L-lactic acid fibers for nerve regeneration applications. J Neural Eng 6: 016001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/1/016001
    [6] Morelli S, Salerno S, Piscioneri A, et al. (2010) Influence of micro-patterned PLLA membranes on outgrowth and orientation of hippocampal neurites. Biomaterials 31: 7000-7011. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.079
    [7] Callahan LA, Xie S, Barker IA, et al. (2013) Directed differentiation and neurite extension of mouse embryonic stem cell on aligned poly(lactide) nanofibers functionalized with YIGSR peptide. Biomaterials 34: 9089-9095. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.028
    [8] Borgens RB (1999) Electrically mediated regeneration and guidance of adult mammalian spinal axons into polymeric channels. Neuroscience 91: 251-264. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00584-3
    [9] Ding Y, Yan Q, Ruan JW, et al. (2009) Electro-acupuncture promotes survival, differentiation of the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells as well as functional recovery in the spinal cord-transected rats. BMC Neurosci 10: 35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-35
    [10] Guo B, Finne-Wistrand A, Albertsson AC (2010) Molecular architecture of electroactive and biodegradable copolymers composed of polylactide and carboxyl-capped aniline trimer. Biomacromolecules 11: 855-863. doi: 10.1021/bm9011248
    [11] Yang F, Murugan R, Ramakrishna S, et al. (2004) Fabrication of nano-structured porous PLLA scaffold intended for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25: 1891-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.062
    [12] Yang IH, Co CC, Ho CC (2011) Controlling neurite outgrowth with patterned substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 97: 451-456.
    [13] Lee YS, Collins G, Arinzeh TL (2011) Neurite extension of primary neurons on electrospun piezoelectric scaffolds. Acta Biomater 7: 3877-3886. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.013
    [14] Lee YS, Arinzeh TL (2012) The influence of piezoelectric scaffolds on neural differentiation of human neural stem/progenitor cells. Tissue Eng Part A 18: 2063-2072. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0540
    [15] He L, Liao S, Quan D, Ma K, et al. (2010) Synergistic effects of electrospun PLLA fiber dimension and pattern on neonatal mouse cerebellum C17.2 stem cells. Acta Biomaterialia 6: 2960-2969.
    [16] Fukada E (2000) History and recent progress in piezoelectric polymers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 47: 1277-1290. doi: 10.1109/58.883516
    [17] Corey JM, Gertz CC, Wang BS, et al. (2008) The design of electrospun PLLA nanofiber scaffolds compatible with serum-free growth of primary motor and sensory neurons. Acta Biomater 4: 863-8675. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.020
    [18] He L, Liao S, Quan D, et al. (2010) Synergistic effects of electrospun PLLA fiber dimension and pattern on neonatal mouse cerebellum C17.2 stem cells. Acta Biomater 6: 2960-2969. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.039
    [19] Evans GR, Brandt K, Widmer MS, et al. (1999) In vivo evaluation of poly(L-lactic acid) porous conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 20: 1109-1115. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00010-1
    [20] Yu Y, Meng D, Man L, et al. (2016) The Interactions Between Aligned Poly(L-Lactic Acid) Nanofibers and SH-SY5Y Cells In Vitro. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 16: 6407-6413. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2016.10883
    [21] da Rocha JF, da Cruz e Silva OA, Vieira SI (2015) Analysis of the amyloid precursor protein role in neuritogenesis reveals a biphasic SH-SY5Y neuronal cell differentiation model. J Neurochem 134: 288-301.
    [22] Koh HS, Yong T, Chan CK, et al. (2008) Enhancement of neurite outgrowth using nano-structured scaffolds coupled with laminin. Biomaterials 29: 3574-3582. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.014
    [23] Pina S, Vieira SI, Rego P, et al. (2010) Biological responses of brushite-forming Zn- and ZnSr- substituted beta-tricalcium phosphate bone cements. Eur Cell Mater 20: 162-177.
    [24] Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, et al. (2005) Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 1265-1272. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500061-MCP200
    [25] Mi H, Thomas P (2009) PANTHER pathway: an ontology-based pathway database coupled with data analysis tools. Methods Mol Biol 563: 123-140. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-175-2_7
    [26] Milacic M, Haw R, Rothfels K, et al. (2012) Annotating cancer variants and anti-cancer therapeutics in reactome. Cancers (Basel) 4: 1180-1211. doi: 10.3390/cancers4041180
    [27] Fabregat A, Sidiropoulos K, Garapati P, et al. (2016) The Reactome pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 44: D481-D487. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1351
    [28] Henriques AG, Vieira SI, Crespo-López ME, et al. (2009) Intracellular sAPP retention in response to Abeta is mapped to cytoskeleton-associated structures. J Neurosci Res 87: 1449-1461. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21959
    [29] Romero-Calvo I, Ocón B, Martínez-Moya P, et al. (2010) Reversible Ponceau staining as a loading control alternative to actin in Western blots. Anal Biochem 401: 318-320. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.02.036
    [30] Nistor G, Poole AJ, Draelos Z, et al. (2016) Human Stem Cell-Derived Skin Progenitors Produce Alpha 2-HS Glycoprotein (Fetuin): A Revolutionary Cosmetic Ingredient. J Drugs Dermatol 15: 583-598.
    [31] Elsas J, Sellhaus B, Herrmann M, et al. (2013) Fetuin-a in the developing brain. Dev Neurobiol 73: 354-369. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22064
    [32] Werbowetski-Ogilvie TE, Agar NY, Waldkircher de Oliveira RM, et al. (2006) Isolation of a natural inhibitor of human malignant glial cell invasion: inter alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 2. Cancer Res 66: 1464-1472. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1913
    [33] Ono S (2007) Mechanism of depolymerization and severing of actin filaments and its significance in cytoskeletal dynamics. Int Rev Cytol 258: 1-82. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(07)58001-0
    [34] Shekhar S, Pernier J, Carlier MF (2016) Regulators of actin filament barbed ends at a glance. J Cell Sci 129: 1085-1091. doi: 10.1242/jcs.179994
    [35] Barlat I, Maurier F, Duchesne M, et al. (1997) A role for Sam68 in cell cycle progression antagonized by a spliced variant within the KH domain. J Biol Chem 272: 3129-3132.
    [36] Tsuji T, Ficarro SB, Jiang W (2006) Essential role of phosphorylation of MCM2 by Cdc7/Dbf4 in the initiation of DNA replication in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell 17: 4459-4472.
    [37] De Vos WH, Houben F, Hoebe RA, et al. (2010) Increased plasticity of the nuclear envelope and hypermobility of telomeres due to the loss of A-type lamins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1800: 448-458.
    [38] Nardella M, Guglielmi L, Musa C, et al. (2015) Down-regulation of the Lamin A/C in neuroblastoma triggers the expansion of tumor initiating cells. Oncotarget 6: 32821-32840.
    [39] Jurica MS, Licklider LJ, Gygi SR, et al. (2002) Purification and characterization of native spliceosomes suitable for three-dimensional structural analysis. RNA 8: 426-439. doi: 10.1017/S1355838202021088
    [40] Weidensdorfer D, Stöhr N, Baude A, et al. (2009) Control of c-myc mRNA stability by IGF2BP1-associated cytoplasmic RNPs. RNA 15: 104-115.
    [41] Nami B, Ghasemi-Dizgah A, Vaseghi A (2016) Overexpression of molecular chaperons GRP78 and GRP94 in CD44(hi)/CD24(lo) breast cancer stem cells. Bioimpacts 6: 105-110. doi: 10.15171/bi.2016.15
    [42] Zhou H, Zhang Y, Fu Y, et al. (2011) Novel mechanism of anti-apoptotic function of 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78): endocrine resistance factor in breast cancer, through release of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) from BCL-2-interacting killer (BIK). J Biol Chem 286: 25687-25696.
    [43] Boulares AH, Yakovlev AG, Ivanova V, et al. (1999) Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage in apoptosis: Caspase 3-resistant PARP mutant increases rates of apoptosis in transfected cells. J Biol Chem 274: 22932-22940.
    [44] Ahel I, Ahel D, Matsusaka T, et al. (2008) Poly(ADP-ribose)-binding zinc finger motifs in DNA repair/checkpoint proteins. Nature 451: 81-85. doi: 10.1038/nature06420
    [45] Moosmann P, Georgiev O, Le Douarin B, et al. (1996) Transcriptional repression by RING finger protein TIF1 beta that interacts with the KRAB repressor domain of KOX1. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 4859-48567. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.24.4859
    [46] Riclet R, Chendeb M, Vonesch JL, et al. (2009) Disruption of the interaction between transcriptional intermediary factor 1{beta} and heterochromatin protein 1 leads to a switch from DNA hyper- to hypomethylation and H3K9 to H3K27 trimethylation on the MEST promoter correlating with gene reactivation. Mol Biol Cell 20: 296-305. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-05-0510
    [47] Shim KS, Lubec G. Drebrin, a dendritic spine protein, is manifold decreased in brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome. Neurosci Lett 324: 209-212.
    [48] Ponuwei GA (2016) A glimpse of the ERM proteins. J Biomed Sci 23: 35. doi: 10.1186/s12929-016-0246-3
    [49] Liu CX, Xu X, Chen XL, et al. (2015) Glutamate promotes neural stem cell proliferation by increasing the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor of astrocytes in vitro. Cell Mol Biol 61: 75-84.
    [50] Semrad TJ, Mack PC (2012) Fibroblast growth factor signaling in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 13: 90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.08.001
    [51] Yano S, Kondo K, Yamaguchi M, et al. (2003) Distribution and function of EGFR in human tissue and the effect of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition. Anticancer Res 23: 3639-3650.
    [52] Mizuguchi Y, Specht S, Isse K, et al. (2015) Breast tumor kinase/protein tyrosine kinase 6 (Brk/PTK6) activity in normal and neoplastic biliary epithelia. J Hepatol 63: 399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.047
    [53] Lee S, Suh GY, Ryter SW, et al. (2016) Regulation and Function of the Nucleotide Binding Domain Leucine-Rich Repeat-Containing Receptor, Pyrin Domain-Containing-3 Inflammasome in Lung Disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 54: 151-160. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0231TR
    [54] Goshima Y, Yamashita N, Nakamura F, et al. (2016) Regulation of dendritic development by Semaphorin 3A through novel intracellular remote signaling. Cell Adh Migr 8: 1-14.
    [55] Mo XM, Xu CY, Kotaki M, et al. (2004) Electrospun P(LLA-CL) nanofiber: a biomimetic extracellular matrix for smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell proliferation. Biomaterials 25: 1883-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.042
    [56] da Silva JS, Dotti CG (2002) Breaking the neuronal sphere: regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in neuritogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 694-704. doi: 10.1038/nrn918
    [57] Siegel G, Agranoff B, Albers R, et al. (1999) Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects 6 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
    [58] Estefanía MM, Ganier O, Hernández P, et al. (2012) DNA replication fading as proliferating cells advance in their commitment to terminal differentiation. Sci Rep 2: 279.
    [59] Tzoneva R, Faucheux N, Groth T (2007) Wettability of substrata controls cell-substrate and cell-cell adhesions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1770: 1538-1547. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.07.008
    [60] Alves NM, Shi J, Oramas E, et al. (2009) Bioinspired superhydrophobic poly(L-lactic acid) surfaces control bone marrow derived cells adhesion and proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res A 91: 480-488.
    [61] Titushkin I, Cho M (2009) Regulation of cell cytoskeleton and membrane mechanics by electric field: role of linker proteins. Biophys J 96: 717-728. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.035
    [62] Wen X, Tresco PA (2006) Effect of filament diameter and extracellular matrix molecule precoating on neurite outgrowth and Schwann cell behavior on multifilament entubulation bridging device in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 76: 626-637.
    [63] Weitzdoerfer R, Fountoulakis M, Lubec G (2001) Aberrant expression of dihydropyrimidinase related proteins-2,-3 and -4 in fetal Down syndrome brain. J Neural Transm Suppl 61: 95-107.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Sara Metwally, Urszula Stachewicz, Surface potential and charges impact on cell responses on biomaterials interfaces for medical applications, 2019, 104, 09284931, 109883, 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109883
    2. Rita Araújo, Tatiana J. Carneiro, Paula Marinho, Marisa Maltez da Costa, Ana Roque, Odete A. B. da Cruz e Silva, Maria Helena Fernandes, Paula M. Vilarinho, Ana M. Gil, NMR metabolomics to study the metabolic response of human osteoblasts to non-poled and poled poly (L-lactic) acid, 2019, 57, 07491581, 919, 10.1002/mrc.4883
    3. Nathalie Barroca, Ana Marote, Sandra I. Vieira, Abílio Almeida, Maria H.V. Fernandes, Paula M. Vilarinho, Odete A.B. da Cruz e Silva, Electrically polarized PLLA nanofibers as neural tissue engineering scaffolds with improved neuritogenesis, 2018, 167, 09277765, 93, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.03.050
    4. Isabel M. Bjørge, Bárbara M. de Sousa, Sónia G. Patrício, Ana Sofia Silva, Liebert P. Nogueira, Lúcia F. Santos, Sandra I. Vieira, Håvard J. Haugen, Clara R. Correia, João F. Mano, Bioengineered Hierarchical Bonelike Compartmentalized Microconstructs Using Nanogrooved Microdiscs, 2022, 14, 1944-8244, 19116, 10.1021/acsami.2c01161
    5. Bárbara M. de Sousa, Clara R. Correia, Jorge A. F. Ferreira, João F. Mano, Edward P. Furlani, Marco P. Soares dos Santos, Sandra I. Vieira, Capacitive interdigitated system of high osteoinductive/conductive performance for personalized acting-sensing implants, 2021, 6, 2057-3995, 10.1038/s41536-021-00184-6
    6. Nick Weir, Bob Stevens, Sarah Wagner, Amanda Miles, Graham Ball, Charlotte Howard, Joseph Chemmarappally, Martin McGinnity, Alan Jeffrey Hargreaves, Chris Tinsley, Aligned Poly-l-lactic Acid Nanofibers Induce Self-Assembly of Primary Cortical Neurons into 3D Cell Clusters, 2022, 8, 2373-9878, 765, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01102
    7. Luís Nascimento, Cristiana Fernandes, Ricardo. M. Silva, Ângela Semitela, Bárbara M. de Sousa, Paula A. A. P. Marques, Sandra I. Vieira, Rui. F. Silva, Nathalie Barroca, Gil Gonçalves, Customizing 3D Structures of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes to Direct Neural Stem Cell Differentiation, 2023, 2192-2640, 10.1002/adhm.202300828
    8. Patrícia D. Correia, Bárbara M. de Sousa, Jesús Chato-Astrain, Joana Paes de Faria, Veronica Estrada, João B. Relvas, Hans W. Müller, Víctor Carriel, Frank Bosse, Sandra I. Vieira, Injury-induced KIF4A neural expression and its role in Schwann cell proliferation suggest a dual function for this kinesin in neural regeneration, 2026, 21, 1673-5374, 1607, 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00232
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(7461) PDF downloads(1202) Cited by(8)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)  /  Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog