AIMS Geosciences, 2020, 6(1): 54-70. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020005.

Research article

Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Pseudo-3D electrical resistivity tomography imaging of subsurface structure of a sinkhole—A case study in Greene County, Missouri

1 Department of Mining & Geological Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
2 Department of Geosciences and Geological and Petroleum Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA

Conventional 2D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) data were acquired along 16 parallel traverses spaced at 6.1 m (20 ft) intervals across a karst sinkhole site in Greene County Missouri. The acquired ERT data were processed as both 2D data and pseudo-3D data. Based on the correlation with the available core hole control, multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) data and field observations, it is concluded that the subsurface structure of the sinkhole is more reliably imaged on the pseudo-3D dataset than in the 2D dataset. The interpretation results of the pseudo-3D ERT indicated that the sinkhole developed at the intersection of three vertical solution-widened joint sets.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords 2D ERT; Pseudo-3D ERT; MASW; sinkhole; Karst

Citation: Shishay Kidanu, Aleksandra Varnavina, Neil Anderson, Evgeniy Torgashov. Pseudo-3D electrical resistivity tomography imaging of subsurface structure of a sinkhole—A case study in Greene County, Missouri. AIMS Geosciences, 2020, 6(1): 54-70. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020005

References

  • 1. Kaufmann JE (2008) A statistical approach to karst collapse hazard analysis in Missouri. In Sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst, 257-268.
  • 2. Zhou W (2007) Drainage and flooding in karst terranes. Environ Geol 51: 963-973.    
  • 3. Milanovic P (2000) Geological engineering in karst, Zebra Pbl. Co., Beograd.
  • 4. Kidanu ST, Torgashov EV, Varnavina AV, et al. (2016) ERT-based investigation of a sinkhole in Greene County, Missouri. AIMS Geosci 2: 99-115.    
  • 5. Cook JC (1965) Seismic mapping of underground cavities using reflection amplitudes. Geophysics 30: 527-538.    
  • 6. Bishop I, Styles P, Emsley SJ, et al. (1997) The detection of cavities using the microgravity technique: case histories from mining and karstic environments. Geol Soc, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 12: 153-166.    
  • 7. Ballard RF (1983) Cavity Detection and Delineation Research. Report 5. Electromagnetic (Radar) Techniques Applied to Cavity Detection (no. wes/tr/gl-83-1). Army engineer waterways experiment station vicksburg ms geotechnical lab.
  • 8. Annan AP, Cosway SW, Redman JD (1991) Water table detection with ground-penetrating radar. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1991. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 494-496.
  • 9. Carbonel D, Rodríguez V, Gutiérrez F, et al. (2014) Evaluation of trenching, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) for sinkhole characterization. Earth Surf Process Landf 39: 214-227.    
  • 10. Sevil J, Gutiérrez F, Zarroca M, et al. (2017) Sinkhole investigation in an urban area by trenching in combination with GPR, ERT and high precision leveling. Mantled evaporite karst of Zaragoza city, NE Spain. Eng Geol 231: 9-20.
  • 11. Roth MJS, Mackey JR, Mackey C, et al. (2002) A case study of the reliability of multielectrode earth resistivity testing for geotechnical investigations in karst terrains. Eng Geol 65: 225-232.    
  • 12. Zhou W, Beck BF, Adams AL (2002) Effective electrode array in mapping karst hazards in electrical resistivity tomography. Environ Geol 42: 922-928.    
  • 13. Ahmed S, Carpenter PJ (2003) Geophysical response of filled sinkholes, soil pipes and associated bedrock fractures in thinly mantled karst, east-central Illinois. Environ Geol 44: 705-716.    
  • 14. Varnavina AV, Khamzin AK, Kidanu ST, et al. (2019) Geophysical site assessment in karst terrain: A case study from southwestern Missouri. J Appl Geophys 170: 103838.    
  • 15. Giampaolo V, Capozzoli L, Grimaldi S, et al. (2016) Sinkhole risk assessment by ERT: The case study of Sirino Lake (Basilicata, Italy). Geomorphology 253: 1-9.    
  • 16. Samyn K, Mathieu F, Bitri A, et al. (2014) Integrated geophysical approach in assessing karst presence and sinkhole hazard along flood-protection dykes of the Loire River, Orléans, France. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 16.
  • 17. Festa V, Fiore A, Parise M, et al. (2012) Sinkhole evolution in the Apulian karst of southern Italy: a case study, with some considerations on sinkhole hazards. J Cave Karst Stud 74: 137-147.    
  • 18. Yassin RR, Muhammad RF, Taib SH, et al. (2014) Application of ERT and aerial photographs techniques to identify the consequences of sinkholes hazards in constructing housing complexes sites over karstic carbonate bedrock in Perak, peninsular Malaysia. J Geogr Geol 6: 55.
  • 19. Prins C, Thuro K, Krautblatter M, et al. (2019) Testing the effectiveness of an inverse Wenner-Schlumberger array for geoelectrical karst void reconnaissance, on the Swabian Alb high plain, new line Wendlingen-Ulm, southwestern Germany. Eng Geol 249: 71-76.    
  • 20. Lee R, Callahan P, Shelly B, et al. (2010) MASW Survey Identifies Causes of Sink Activity Along I-476 (Blue Route), Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. In GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling & Design, 1350-1359.
  • 21. Debeglia N, Bitri A, Thierry P (2006) Karst investigations using microgravity and MASW; Application to Orléans, France. Near Surf Geophys 4: 215-225.    
  • 22. Ismail A, Anderson N (2012) 2-D and 3-D Resistivity Imaging of Karst Sites in Missouri, USA Resistivity Imaging of Karst Sites. Environ Eng Geosci 18: 281-293.    
  • 23. Pazzi V, Ceccatelli M, Gracchi T, et al. (2018) Assessing subsoil void hazards along a road system using H/V measurements, ERTs and IPTs to support local decision makers. Near Surf Geophys 16: 282-297.
  • 24. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion 1. Geophys Prospect 44: 499-523.    
  • 25. Yi MJ, Kim JH, Song Y, et al. (2001) Three‐dimensional imaging of subsurface structures using resistivity data. Geophys Prospect 49: 483-497.    
  • 26. Chambers J, Ogilvy R, Kuras O, et al. (2002) 3D electrical imaging of known targets at a controlled environmental test site. Environ Geol 41: 690-704.    
  • 27. Papadopoulos NG, Tsourlos P, Tsokas GN, et al. (2006) Two-dimensional and three‐dimensional resistivity imaging in archaeological site investigation. Archaeol Prospect 13: 163-181.    
  • 28. Gharibi M, Bentley LR (2005) Resolution of 3-D electrical resistivity images from inversions of 2-D orthogonal lines. J Environ Eng Geophys 10: 339-349.    
  • 29. Negri S, Leucci G, Mazzone F (2008) High resolution 3D ERT to help GPR data interpretation for researching archaeological items in a geologically complex subsurface. J Appl Geophys 65: 111-120.    
  • 30. Drahor MG, Berge MA, Kurtulmuş TÖ, et al. (2008) Magnetic and electrical resistivity tomography investigations in a Roman legionary camp site (Legio IV Scythica) in Zeugma, Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Archaeol Prospect 15: 159-186.    
  • 31. Aizebeokhai AP, Olayinka AI, Singh VS (2010) Application of 2D and 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging for engineering site investigation in a crystalline basement terrain, southwestern Nigeria. Environ Earth Sci 61: 1481-1492.    
  • 32. Vargemezis G, Tsourlos P, Giannopoulos A, et al. (2015) 3D electrical resistivity tomography technique for the investigation of a construction and demolition waste landfill site. Stud Geophys Geod 59: 461-476.    
  • 33. Fellows LD (1970) Geologic Map of the Galloway Quadrangle, Greene County, Missouri. Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources.
  • 34. Orndorff RC, Weary DJ, Lagueux KM (2016) Geographic Information Systems Analysis of Geologic Controls on the Distribution on Dolines in the Ozarks of South-Central Missouri, USA. Acta Carsol 29.
  • 35. McCracken MH (1971) Structural features of Missouri. Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources.
  • 36. Labuda TZ, Baxter AC (2001) Mapping karst conditions using 2D and 3D resistivity imaging methods. In Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2001. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, GTV1-GTV1.
  • 37. Loke MH (2002) Rapid 2-D Resistivity and IP inversion using the least-squares method, Geoelectrical Imaging 2D and 3D. Geotomo Softw.
  • 38. Tokeshi K, Harutoonian P, Leo CJ, et al. (2013) Use of surface waves for geotechnical engineering applications in Western Sydney. Adv Geosci 35: 37-44.    

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved