Citation: Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, Garyfallos Arabatzis, Miltiadis Chalikias. Renewables exploitation for energy production and biomass use for electricity generation. A multi-parametric literature-based review[J]. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(5): 762-803. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.5.762
[1] | Théo Lebeaupin, Hafida Sellou, Gyula Timinszky, Sébastien Huet . Chromatin dynamics at DNA breaks: what, how and why?. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 458-475. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.458 |
[2] | Bertrand R. Caré, Pierre-Emmanuel Emeriau, Ruggero Cortini, Jean-Marc Victor . Chromatin epigenomic domain folding: size matters. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 517-530. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.517 |
[3] | Larisa I. Fedoreyeva, Boris F. Vanyushin, Ekaterina N. Baranova . Peptide AEDL alters chromatin conformation via histone binding. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(1): 1-16. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020001 |
[4] | E.N. Baranova, R.M. Sarimov, A.A. Gulevich . Stress induced «railway for pre-ribosome export» structure as a new model for studying eukaryote ribosome biogenesis. AIMS Biophysics, 2019, 6(2): 47-67. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2019.2.47 |
[5] | Vladimir B. Teif, Andrey G. Cherstvy . Chromatin and epigenetics: current biophysical views. AIMS Biophysics, 2016, 3(1): 88-98. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2016.1.88 |
[6] | Claudia Tanja Mierke . Physical role of nuclear and cytoskeletal confinements in cell migration mode selection and switching. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(4): 615-658. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.4.615 |
[7] | Michael J. Hamilton, Matthew D. Young, Silvia Sauer, Ernest Martinez . The interplay of long non-coding RNAs and MYC in cancer. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 794-809. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.794 |
[8] | Raghvendra P Singh, Guillaume Brysbaert, Marc F Lensink, Fabrizio Cleri, Ralf Blossey . Kinetic proofreading of chromatin remodeling: from gene activation to gene repression and back. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 398-411. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.398 |
[9] | Larisa I. Fedoreyeva, Tatiana A. Dilovarova, Boris F. Vanyushin, Inna A. Chaban, Neonila V. Kononenko . Regulation of gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum seedlings by the MKASAA peptide through DNA methylation via the RdDM pathway. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(2): 113-129. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022011 |
[10] | Audrey Lejart, Gilles Salbert, Sébastien Huet . Cytosine hydroxymethylation by TET enzymes: From the control of gene expression to the regulation of DNA repair mechanisms, and back. AIMS Biophysics, 2018, 5(3): 182-193. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2018.3.182 |
Abbreviations
HP1 | Heterochromatin Protein 1 |
PcG proteins | Polycomb group of proteins |
PRC1 | Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 |
PRC2 | Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 |
Pax7 | Paired box protein Pax-7 |
3C | Chromosome Conformantion Capture |
4C | Chromosome Conformantion Capture on Chip |
Hi-C | High resolution Capture |
PRE | Polycomb Response elements |
TAD | Topological Associated Domain |
HOXD | Homeobox protein Hox D |
MET-2 | Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase met-2 |
SET-25 | SET-25 |
NB | Nuclear Body |
FRAP | Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching |
HOX | Homeobox protein Hox |
ESC | Embryonic Stem Cell |
LAD | Lamina Associated Domain |
ASC | Adipose Stem Cell |
Klf4 | Kruppel-like factor 4 |
Oct4 | Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 |
NPC | Neuronal Precursor Cell |
HGPS | Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome |
NPC | Nuclear Pore Complex |
AF | Atrial Fibrillation |
Nup | Nucleoporin |
NAD | Nucleolar Associated Domain |
LIN28A | Protein lin-28 homolog A |
BER | Base Excision Repair |
NER | Nucleotide Excision Repair |
MMR | Mismatch Repair |
DSB | Double Strand Break |
NHEJ | Non Homologous End Joining |
HR | Homologous Recombination |
Ku70 (XRCC6) | X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 6 |
Ku80 (XRCC5) | X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 5 |
DNA-PKcs | DNA-dependent Protein Kinase |
ATM | Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated |
ATR | Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein |
XRCC4 | X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 4 |
RPA | Replication Protein A |
Rad 51 | DNA repair protein RAD51 homolog 1 |
Rad 52 | DNA repair protein RAD52 homolog |
DDR | DNA Damage Response |
53BP1 | Tumor suppressor p53-binding protein 1 |
MRE11 | Meiotic Recombination 11 |
NSB1 | Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein 1 |
ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
NADPH | Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate |
Rb | Retinoblastoma protein |
p53 | Cellular tumor antigen p53 |
NF-kB | Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B |
FoxO | Forkhead box protein O |
HIV-1 | Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 |
In eukaryotic cells, DNA is packaged inside the nucleus through its ordered and repetitive aggregation with histones and is bound by several proteins and RNA molecules: the overall complex of nucleic acids and their associated proteins is known as “chromatin”. The first level of chromatin organization is the nucleosome: four histone proteins; H2A, H2B, H3, H4 surrounded by DNA [1]. Each nucleosome is separated from the next one by a DNA linker, variable in length, which is associated to histone H1 and or its variants [2,3]. These DNA-histones complexes fold in 30 nm fibers. This process is driven in part by the histone H1, which regulates the intranuclear electrostatic balance and by nucleosome repeats which ensure the stabilization of chromatin fibers [4,5,6]. In interphase the chromatin shows different levels of compaction, clearly visible under electron microscopy, that allowed scientists to classify it into euchromatin and heterochromatin, observed for the first time by Emil Heizt (1928) [7].The more decondensed euchromatin is generally enriched with expressed genes (reviewed in [8,9]). In fact, being more accessible, euchromatin favours the binding of transcription factors and RNA polymerase [10] and is correlated to high transcriptional activity [11]. On the other hand, heterochromatin is more condensed, gene-poor and is further divided into “facultative” and “constitutive”. The constitutive heterochromatin includes pericentric and telomeric regions [12,13,14], both critically important for the higher order structure folding and the maintenance of intact chromosomes [8]. The facultative heterochromatin is a repressive environment able to rapidly shift between activated and repressed state through the crosstalk with epigenetic regulators that lead to a chromatin reorganization [8].
Histones are characterized by amino and carboxy-protruding tails that are the target of several modifications, critically important for regulating the balance between activated or repressed genes. These modifications mainly include acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination and sumoylation (reviewed in [15]). Multiple histone modifications can also coexist on the same tail, dictating specific biological readouts [16]. Euchromatin and heterochromatin are distinguishable biochemically by different covalent histone modifications [17] (Figure 1). Euchromatin is enriched with H3 and H4 acetylation and H3K4 methylation [18,19] while facultative heterochromatin is enriched with hypoacetylated histones, H4K20me1, H3K9me2, H3K27me3, H2AK119ub1 (reviewed in [20]). On the other hand, constitutive heterochromatin is marked with H3K9me3 catalyzed by Suv39H [21], which in turn stimulates the recruitment of Heterochromatin Protein 1(HP1) [22], so contributing to form a closed chromatin structure normally associated with a repressive transcriptional state. However, despite this classification, histone marks should not be considered exclusively restricted to specific chromatin compartments because they were also found in other chromatin states. For instance, although H3K9me3 and HP1 are considered key features of heterochromatin, they have also been found in euchromatic region in flies [23,24] and in mammals [25], thus also suggesting their role in reinforcing gene repression in euchromatin.
At the chromatin level, specific epigenetic factors are able to post-translationally modify the histone proteins. Then, specific set of histone modifications generate a chromatin environment that is recognized by specific binding proteins; these, in turn, influence gene expression and other chromatin functions and represent an additional layer of gene regulation complexity. One of the most studied families of epigenetic regulators that include both histone modifiers and chromatin binding proteins are the Polycomb group of proteins (PcG proteins) which act as a repressor of gene expression (reviewed in [26]). PcG proteins aggregate into different complexes. The most studied are Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2) that deposit H2AK119ub and H3K27me3 marks, respectively. The catalytic subunit responsible for the histone signature placement are E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RING1 (Ring 1A/B) for PRC1 and Enhancer of zeste 2 (Ezh2) for PRC2 (reviewed in [27]). A classical, hierarchical model suggests that the PRC2-dependent H3K27me3 signature recruits the PRC1 complex which, through the ubiquitination of H2AK119, inhibits RNA polymerase II-dependent transcriptional elongation [28,29,30]. In recent years, several studies have challenged this model (reviewed in [31]) by showingindependent functions and recruitment mechanisms for PRC1 and PRC2. Thus, it has been demonstrated that PRC1 and PRC2 complexes share only a subset of binding sites [28,32,33] and that there are several PRC1 complexes containing distinct subunits that differ in genomic binding [34]. Moreover, PRC1 can recruit PRC2 [32,35,36] while recruitment of PRC1 and PRC2 can also be mediated by noncoding RNA (reviewed in [37]), specific factors or structures [38,39,40,41] and by their own histone marks [42,43]. These findings suggest that PRC recruitment relies on several alternative mechanisms and that the combination of mechanisms tethering PcG to chromatin is probably locus-specific. The plasticity of the facultative heterochromatin to switch on or off the gene expression through histone modifications is extremely important for lineage commitment, development and cell differentiation, when a proper timing of gene expression is needed [28,44,45]. Most of differentiation genes in mammals are under the control of Polycomb group of proteins [46]. Upon differentiation stimuli, PcG proteins leave lineage specific muscle promoters and bind genes important for stemness maintenance [46]. This dynamics has been extensively shown in muscle differentiation: in muscle stem cells (satellite cells) muscle specific genes are maintained repressed by PcG proteins; at the onset of muscle differentiation PcG proteins are displaced from muscle gene and are relocalized at stemness genes, such as Pax7 (marker of satellite cells), ensuring the correct timing of the muscle differentiation [47,48,49,50,51].
In addition to histone modifications, the chromatin can fold in specific higher order structures that favour the activation or the repression of genes (reviewed in [52]). In particular, structure-mediated gene expression control regards genes that are regulated by a large set of enhancers, insulators or repressors, which are often located at a considerable distance from the target gene. Thus, the establishment of topologically distinct chromatin domains could play a fundamental role in the modulation of gene expression (Figure 1). PcG proteins also exert gene repression by mediating chromatin higher order structures (reviewed in [26,53]). The development of Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) technology [54] and its derivative technologies (reviewed in [55]), such as Chromosome Conformation Capture on chip (4C) [56] and High resolution Capture (Hi-C) [57] shed light on the chromatin contacts occurring in the nucleus allowing the high-through-put mapping of the genome conformation. The use of these technologies has allowed important advances in understanding PcG functions, demonstrating that the coordinated action of PcG proteins is required to mediate the formation of multi-looped structures where all the major PcG targets are gathered together, by cis and trans interactions [58,59,60,61]. This PcG-mediated DNA conformation is cell cycle regulated and fundamental for the maintenance of gene repression [58,59,62,63]. Notably, although PcG recruitment is not conserved from fly to mammals, being mediated in Drosophila by specific DNA sequences called Polycomb Response Elements (PRE) [64], the higher order structures of PcG-regulated genes are similarly organized in multi-loops among different species, thus suggesting a functional role for DNA higher order structures in the control of PcG mediated transcriptional repression.
At the genome wide level, the combination of all DNA-DNA interactions determines the formation of specific macro-domains of active and inactive chromatin, named Topological Associated Domains (TADs) observed in human, in mouse and in Drosophila melanogaster genomes [65,66,67] (Figure 1). TADs are characterized by a central region of high chromatin interactions where reside the tissue-specific genes, surrounded by less-interacting boundary regions enriched of housekeeping genes [52]. Although TADs share a common organization in different cell-types and are partially conserved from human to mouse, suggesting a very stable conformation, they can be subjected to important structural rearrangements. During the mouse hind limb development, the HOXD genes are expressed following specific timing from early genes to later genes; this transition is guided by the reorganization of TADs which allow the switch of HOXD locus interactions from one compartment to another one [68]. This dynamics is required for the formation of an intermediate area that will develop into the wrist.
Another level of chromatin organization is represented by the chromosome position. Several studies have shown that chromosomes are not randomly assembled and packaged in the nucleus, but occupy specific regions called chromosome territories (reviewed in [69]) (Figure 1). The positioning of these “territories” is cell specific and conserved between human and other primates, suggesting a functional role of specific chromosome organization inside the nucleus [52,70,71]. In fact, chromosome territories have an internal structure thought to modulate the accessibility of proteins and consequently regulates the gene expression through its remodeling (reviewed in [72,73]). In particular, it has been shown that within the territories the gene-rich regions are separated from heterochromatin and generally are positioned at the periphery of chromosome territories while gene-poor regions are at the interior of chromosome territories [74,75]. How chromosome territories form and occupy specific regions inside the nucleus is still unclear, but researchers have suggested two different hypothesis. The first suggests that preferential positioning of chromosome territories inside the nucleus is self-organized and guided in part by the interchromatin compartment, which creates channels for the interconnection between the chromosome territories and in part by the content of gene-rich or gene-poor areas of each specific chromosome [72,76,77]. According to this hypothesis chromosome folding within territories should allow that the gene-rich zones (euchromatin) will assume a position compatible with expression, whereas not commonly expressed genes, tissue specific or developmental regulated genes (heterochromatin) will be buried inside the chromosome territories and expressed only after a conformational change [72]. However, some exceptions to this role have been described, showing ubiquitously and tissue-specific genes located within the chromosome territories after their activation, suggesting that the inner region of chromosome territories is not an insurmountable barrier to transcription machinery and transcription factors [74,78]. The second emerging hypothesis supports the involvement of nuclear proteins and nuclear envelope in the chromosome positioning (reviewed in ([76,79]). This hypothesis does not conflict with the first one and could also explain how the chromosome can be oriented in the nuclear space. Thus, even though some progress has been made on the functional role of chromosomal territories in controlling gene expression, there is still a long way to go before discovering the mechanism behind their positioning and assembling inside the nucleus.
Inside the nucleus the coexistence of different environments ensure an additional level of gene transcription regulation (reviewed in [52]). Indeed, chromatin is non-homogenously distributed inside the nucleus, as shown by electron microscopy. In particular, most of the darkly stained chromatin (heterochromatin) is found around the nucleoli or at the nuclear periphery interrupted with euchromatin at nuclear pores (Figure 1). One of the most studied microenvironments is the nuclear periphery directly linked to a repressive transcriptional state (reviewed in [80,81]). Indeed, artificial tethering of a reporter gene to the nuclear periphery favours the establishment of silent chromatin, by mediating the access to local high concentration of repressors and chromatin modifiers, as observed in yeast and human cells (reviewed in [80] and [82,83]). Although endogenous molecular mechanisms driving the periphery localization are still under investigation, a genetic screen in worms revealed that histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation marks target repetitive heterochromatin to the nuclear envelope and that the combined elimination of the genes encoding two histone H3K9 methyl transferase, MET-2 and SET-25, determines the loss of peripheral localization [84]. Interestingly, loss of SET-25 alone de-represses the transgene array, but does not lead to array delocalization, suggesting that H3K9me1 or me2, catalyzed by SET-25, are sufficient to anchor chromatin to the nuclear envelope and that further modification, generating H3K9me3, is necessary for transcriptional repression [84]. In line with and further corroborating these observations, in budding yeast, several highly regulated classes of genes were described as translocating to the nuclear periphery concurrent with their activation (reviewed in [85]). Interestingly, it has been shown that when an inducible active gene is repressed again, its persistent presence at the nuclear periphery allows a rapid reactivation upon stimuli. This process has been described as “transcriptional memory, ” since it allows the cell to “remember” recently activated loci (reviewed in [85]), so suggesting that the nuclear periphery environment can establish an epigenetic memory. Thus, in the nuclear periphery there is an alternation on permissive and non-permissive environment that can influence a given gene’s transcriptional state.
Within the nuclear space the non-uniform spatial distribution of macromolecules gives rise to a formation of a variety of functionally distinct nuclear bodies (NBs), highly dynamic structures formed by protein-protein interactions and having a large impact on gene regulation (reviewed in [86,87]). NBs are nuclear niches, in which machineries responsible for specific nuclear functions, such as transcription (transcriptional factories), replication (replication foci) or repression (repressive bodies) are situated. The presence of NBs implies a non-diffusive transport of factors involved in chromatin regulation. This compartmentalization of nuclear processes avoids the stochastic non-directional transport of nuclear regulators and speeds up the dynamics in the nucleus [87]. The most prominent NB in the nucleus is the nucleolus, responsible of ribosomal RNA transcription (Figure 1). Interestingly the nucleolus has a specific structural organization in three distinct regions that mirror nucleolar functions (reviewed in [86]). An example of epigenetic regulators forming aggregates in the nucleus are again the PcG proteins, forming structures called PcG bodies, often localized close to pericentric heterochromatin [88] (Figure 2). The formation of PcG bodies is mediated by intrinsic [89]
and extrinsic [90] protein-protein interactions. Studies on the kinetics of PcG proteins exchange with the body have revealed that these protein aggregates are very stable and that distinct PcG factors exhibit large variability in their mobilities [91]. In terms of kinetics, three distinguishable components form the foci: fast, slow and an immobile on the time scales of measurements [91]. The slow binding component amplitudes directly correlate with the intensities and sizes of PcG foci, this suggesting that the PcG bodies contain multiple PcG targets. On the other hand, FRAP analysis has revealed that the size and the kinetics inside the foci is mostly slower than PcG complexes localized outside the foci [89,91], suggesting a coordinated overlap between genome higher order structures and PcG proteic compartments. In fact, previous studies revealed that Drosophila Hox clusters co-localize in PcG bodies in the tissue where they are repressed, this nuclear localization being required for efficient silencing [58]. In line with these findings, PcG bodies are clearly distinguishable at the end of early embryogenesis; they progressively increase in size and number during stages 5-11 of late embryogenesis when the transcriptional programs need to be maintained through cell division [92]. Similarly, the mobility of PcG bodies increases at the onset of ESC (Embryonic Stem Cell) differentiation and decreases as differentiation progresses [93]. Further studies of the composition of different PcG foci compartments could shed light on the coordinated functions of PcG complexes.
In spite of all classifications of epigenetic signatures, the epigenome is highly dynamic and can rapidly respond to the environmental stimuli. The occasional presence of repressive marks on the heterochromatin, as in the case of H3K9me3 and HP1 [11], the heterochromatin’s ability to switch from a repressive to an active state (or vice-versa) and recent findings showing that epigenetic repressors can be bound to active transcribed chromatin [94,95] all underline the thin line separating euchromatin from heterochromatin. All these evidence also demonstrate that chromatin cannot be considered a static entity rigorously classified in an active or repressive state, but should be considered dynamic, and that this plasticity is the key for precise gene expression.
The nuclear lamina is a proteinaceous layer tightly associated with the inner nuclear membrane. The main components of the nuclear lamina are the lamin proteins [96], classified as intermediate filament V and further divided in vertebrates into A-type lamins (lamin A and lamin C) and the B-type lamins (lamin B1 and lamin B2) [97,98]. Whereas B-type lamins are ubiquitously expressed and firmly anchored at the nuclear membrane, A-type lamins are mostly absent from early embryos [99,100], developmentally regulated, expressed in lineage-committed progenitor cells and differentiated cells [101,102]. Moreover, A-type lamins are present in both peri-nuclear and nucleoplasmatic compartments [103]. A and B-type lamins, form distinct homopolimers that interweave each other at the inner membrane to create an interconnected plot [104]. One of the lamina’s roles is to maintain nuclear shape and integrity. Indeed, knocking down lamin B1 results in an enlargement of Lamin A and Lamin B2 network and in the formation of nuclear blebs. These alterations are accompanied by a perturbation of epigenetic signatures, as a reduction of H3K9me2 and an increase of H3 acetylation, suggesting that the impairment of the nuclear envelope affects the proper organization of chromatin [104]. Other cellular functions are attributed to the lamins such as transcription, cell cycle regulation, development and differentiation (reviewed in [105]).
The importance of lamins and nuclear lamina as epigenetic regulators is reinforced by the fact that the nuclear lamina interacts with the genome at specific DNA sequences called Lamina Associated Domains (LADs) (Figure 1). These domains show variable lengths from 0.1 to 10 Mb and generally create an environment that maintains genes repressed [106,107] and marked by H3K9me2, H3K9me3 or H3K27me3 [108,109,110,111]. Interestingly, the borders of LADs include promoters that often contain transcription-associated histone modification indicating the transcriptional start site of the activated genes [112]. This characteristic may suggest that LADs define genomic regions in which genes are repressed, neighboured by activated genes. Some LADs are cell-specific, suggesting a possible role in cell identity and differentiation [106,113]. Recently, it has been shown in worms that in a lamin-defective background muscle promoters do not re-localize from the nuclear periphery to a more internal location in differentiating muscle cells [114]; this further indicates that the genome architecture dynamics mediated by Lamin A are necessary for a correct differentiation. This was confirmed by studies in mammals, showing that during the differentiation of adipose stem cells (ASCs) into adipocytes, genes that regulate a specific cell lineage, are released from the lamina while genes that maintain the cell undifferentiated are retained near the nuclear lamina [110]. Similarly, during the differentiation of Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) into neural precursor cells (NPCs), the so named “stemness genes” such as Nanog, Klf4 and Oct4, exhibit significantly increased interactions with the nuclear lamina in NPCs compared to ESCs [115]. In parallel, other LADs, seem to be constitutively associated to the lamina and conserved between species, suggesting a role in the organization of chromosome architecture [106,107]. One possibility is that the presence of these constitutive LADs could help the correct DNA organization (and gene expression) in daughter cells after mitosis, acting as a “bookmarks” of the genome architecture [116]. However, in contrast with this hypothesis, recent evidence has shown that LADs-nuclear lamina interactions are not rigid and fixed domains, but on the contrary, are dynamic and organized in a random manner after cell division; this stochastic organization is related to H3K9me2 and guided in part by Lamin A [108,117]. Moreover, in spite of all the efforts until now to characterize the LADs and the intriguing hypothesis concerning the role of LADs during genome organization, a recent work has questioned some aspects of LADs, asserting that nuclear lamins are not essential for the formation of LADs [118]. Thus it is clear that the research is still far from clearly defining the role of these domains in genome organization and regulation of gene expression.
A-type Lamin proteins, being situated in a strategic position at the interface between the nuclear membrane and chromatin, cover an important role also in mechanotrasduction, the process by which the external mechanical stimuli are converted into biochemical signals inside cells (reviewed in [119]). An intriguing hypothesis suggests that mechanical signals from the extracellular environment can be transmitted physically by the contractile cytoskeleton to the nucleus through the nuclear membrane and the nuclear lamina [120] and then translated into gene expression response through Lamin-mediated distortion of chromatin higher order structure and changes in transcription factor accessibility [121]. Recent findings support this hypothesis, showing that stress, matrix stiffness and the environment act on gene expression by perturbing the Lamin A expression and consequently the lamin A:B ratio. The altered Lamin A content, in turn, influences specific cell lineage determination and differentiation [122].
Mutations in lamin proteins can cause a wide set of diseases, named laminopathies, affecting specific tissues or acting upon multiple types of tissue creating overlapping or systemic phenotypes. Only few mutations in Lamin B have been described as being compatible with life [123,124] so confirming its fundamental role in sustaining the nuclear structure [125,126]. On the other hand, pathology with mutations related to Lamin A are more frequent and give rise to muscular dystrophy, lipodystrophy, neuropathy, cardiomyopathy and HGPS syndrome (Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome) (reviewed in [126]). Many of the laminopathies are characterized by nuclear abnormalities [127,128]. Thus it is reasonable to assume that in these diseases, mutations in lamins or alteration of lamin A:B ratio act on gene expression in different ways: on the one hand by increasing nuclear stress sensitive and improper signalling with an aberrant mechanotrasduction [129] and on the other hand by altering the chromatin organization and modulating gene expression epigenetically. Both these aspects could be involved in the pathogenesis and disease progression [122,129]. Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) is one of the most known and studied diseases belonging to laminopathies and is characterized by a premature aging. In 90% of cases, the disease is caused by a point mutation 1824C > T that activates a cryptic site of splicing creating an immature form of Lamin A/C (called progerin) that accumulates at the nuclear membrane, giving rise to abnormal nuclear shapes (reviewed in [130]). Several epigenetic marks have been found altered in HGPS, such as a reduction of H3K27me3, H3K9me3 and lamina-heterochromatin associations [131,132]. Although it is not clear if these alterations precede the senescent phenotype, it has been proposed that epigenetic dysfunctions and aberrant chromatin higher order structures could play a role in HGPS pathogenesis and progression [131]. This suggests a direct interplay between the alteration of the nuclear membrane and epigenome misregulation. Further confirming the idea that Lamin A/C plays a key role in epigenome regulation, studies on laminopathies have revealed that distinct mutations in Lamin A gene can give rise to the same clinical condition while a single mutation can result in different phenotypes and disease severity [133,134,135], suggesting an involvement of the individual epigenetic background to lamin dependent diseases.In line with this hypothesis, recently we found that Lamin A/C maintains transcriptional repression at muscle-specific genes by sustaining the intranuclear positioning of PcG bodies and the activity of PcG proteins [136]. Lamin A/C depletion does indeed lead to an earlier muscle differentiation onset due to a premature PcG displacement from their targets.
The nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are multi-component protein complexes that form selectively permeable channels through the nuclear envelope, mediating nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of molecules between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (reviewed in [137]). The NPC is composed of multiple copies of nucleoporins. The overall structure of the NPC is highly conserved and displays nucleoporins organized into an eightfold symmetrical ring structures lining the circumference of the pore where they interact with the membrane. Various studies have implicated the NPCs as the binding platform for several highly transcribed housekeeping genes and genes strongly induced by changes in environmental conditions [137] (Figure 1). The presence of several expressed loci in the close proximity of the nuclear pore inspired the gene gating hypothesis, in which active genes are found near nuclear pore complexes to facilitate efficient export of mRNAs from the nucleus [138,139,140]. 3C analysis confirmed this hypothesis showing that some inducible genes are arranged in chromatin loops the ends of which are anchored at the NPC [141]. However, NPCs have also been associated with transcriptional repression [142,143,144,145], suggesting distinctive roles for individual components of the NPC in facilitating both gene activation and repression through its crosstalk with the epigenome. The NPC control of gene transcription is further confirmed by their central role during cell differentiation [38,146,147,148,149,150,151]. Intriguingly, NPC have been also found to be involved in the maintenance of the pluripotency via controlling levels of the pluripotency factors in the nucleus [152,153], underlying functional roles of the NPC in regulating developmental states and transitions. As described above for lamins, also mutations in key components of the NPC have been described to be associated with specific diseases. Thus, inherited cases of a cardiac disorder, the atrial fibrillation (AF), have been mapped to a missense mutation in the human nucleoporin Nup155 [154]. Studies in mice and human have shown that the impairment of Nup155 nuclear localization affects mRNA and protein transport leading to cardiovascular disease. Other studies have shown that mutations in the nucleoporin Nup62 are responsible for the familial form of infantile bilateral striatal necrosis, determining the degeneration of the basal ganglia in humans [155].
Although heterochromatic satellite regions were described near the nucleolus in the 1930s the role of the nucleolus as chromatin organizer is a recent hypothesis. Two independent high-throughput sequencing studies have isolated and sequenced the genomic DNA associated with purified nucleoli [156,157], finding the nucleolar-associated domains (NADs) (Figure 1). These genomic regions are gene poor and enriched for satellite DNA repeats. Interestingly, NAD peaks overlap with previously published LADs [156] and live imaging-based experiments have revealed an exchange between nuclear lamin and nucleolus border after mitosis. These data were confirmed by an independent study done by tracking LADs during the cell cycle [108]. Intriguingly, while Lamin B tends to interact only with LADs at the nuclear periphery, the subfraction of Lamin A that localize in the nucleoplasm preferentially accumulates around the nucleoli [117]. This suggests an interplay between the nucleolus and the nuclear membrane. Taken together these findings suggest that the nucleolus, as well as the nuclear envelope, could be involved in various nuclear functions, including gene transcription and the maintenance of chromatin structure. In line with this hypothesis, two seminal papers have provided insights into independent nucleolar mechanisms regulating pluripotency in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) [158,159]. In the first paper the authors found that the long noncoding RNA, pRNA, determines the progressive condensation of euchromatin into heterochromatin at nucleolus reducing epigenetic plasticity during differentiation [159]. In the second work authors showed that the methylation of the key pluripotency factor LIN28A leads to nucleolar localization and sequestration, preventing LIN28A processing and maintaining stemness programs [158]. These studies support the view that nuclear components are an important scaffold for spatial genome organization, which bears direct relevance to the establishment of cell type specific gene expression programs. Further studies are necessary to elucidate how the nuclear structures work together in a coordinated manner.
In recent years, what is emerging is that, besides the plasticity of the chromatin fundamental for fine-regulated process, the nuclear architecture can also influence important cellular processes and is a hallmark of the healthy cell. Indeed an increasing number of tissue-specific pathologies in humans and tissue-specific phenotypes in model organisms have been described for mutations in a variety of the nuclear architecture components (reviewed in [160]) (Table 1).
NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE COMPONENTS | MUTATIONS | ASSOCIATED DISEASE | REFERENCE |
Lamin A/C | 1824 C Cryptic splice variant at LMNA gene < T | Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) | [130] |
Q6X, R25G/P, R50S/P, R133P, S143F, H222P, R249Q, Y267C, M371K, R377H/L, R453W, W498R, R527P/H, L530P, R644C | Emery Dreifuss Muscular dystrophy (EDMD) | [134] | |
S143P, E161K, R190W/Q, N195K, R377H/L, R644C | Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) | [134] | |
R482W/Q, K486N, R60G, G62G, R133L | Familial Partial Lipodystrophy 2 (FPLD2) | [134] | |
Lamin B1 | Partial duplication of LMNB1 gene | Leukodystrophy (ADLD) | [123] |
Lamin B2 | R215Q, A407T | Acquired Partial Lipodystrophy (APL) | [124] |
Nup155 | R391H | Atrial fibrillation (AF) | [154] |
Nup62 | Q391P | Infatile bilateral striatal necrosis | [155] |
During cancerogenesis the nuclear shape is used as parameter to identify the grade of malignancy (reviewed in [161,162]); in spite of all molecular mechanisms found to be involved in cancer, cyto-pathologists still make their official diagnosis by basing it on nuclear morphological features. Thus, it is possible that a number of different mechanisms involved in cancer progression finally determine the same nuclear abnormalities which in turn have functional consequence. The other view is that the nuclear architecture can drive the chromosomal instability and the aberrant gene expression underlying cancer pathogenesis and progression. In line with this hypothesis, proteomics screening methods for the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer showed an increased expression of Lamin A in higher risk tumours and indicated a link to the progression of the disease and tumor aggressiveness [163]. Moreover, expression of Lamin A in pre-metastatic colon adenocarcinoma cell line determines an increase of spindle-like morphology and motility, two parameters normally associated with metastatic behaviour [164]. Live-imaging studies on a prostatic cancer cell line have confirmed these results, showing unexpected dynamics of the nuclear envelope, with cells showing irregular nuclei and cells showing dynamic interphase deflections of the lamina [165,166]. Intriguingly, these nuclear alterations were not dependent on actin microfilaments or microtubules. Thus the authors suggest that an intranuclear force, possibly chromatin-based, actively deforms the interphase nuclear envelope in a subset of chromosomally unstable cells. On the other hand, it is now well known that cancer cells are strongly influenced by their biomechanical environment (reviewed in [167]). Correspondingly, the nuclear envelope, in particular Lamin A, can influence nuclear mechanical properties [168,169], being at the crossroad between nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton. Taken together such evidence leads to the hypothesis that the nuclear envelope can directly mediate the crosstalk between the tumor environment and the epigenome. Further studies will elucidate if the unique microenvironment of a tumor can influence the epigenome through remodeling of the nuclear architecture and if is possible to counteract tumor progression by reverting nuclear structure abnormalities.
When DNA damage happens, distinct pathways are activated to repair depending on the type of damage [170]. DNA damage involving only one strand is repaired through Base Excision Repair (BER) or Nucleotide excision repair (NER), using undamaged strand as a template for repair [170]. Alternatively, cells activate Mismatch Repair (MMR) that repairs mismatch, deletion or insertion which all occur during recombination or replication [170]. The DNA could also be subjected to the formation of adducts such as alkylation that is toxic for the cell. These lesions are repaired “directly” through DNA repair by reversal of DNA damage [171]. The double strand break (DSB), in mammalian cells are repaired with non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) (reviewed in [172]) (Figure 3). NHEJ doesnot require a homologous template and performing the religation of the DNA ends can be error prone, making errors caused by the end processing [172]. Indeed, during NHEJ, the ends of damaged DNA are recognized and bound by the heterodimer Ku70/Ku80, which in turn recruits DNA-PKcs, stimulating its kinase activity. DNA-PKcs autophosporylates, so phosphorylating histone H2AX(γH2AX). This can be also phosphorylated directly by ATM and or ATR [173], two key sensors for DNA damage, which can activate the checkpoint of DSB repair in distinct manner and timing [174]. These events stimulate the recruitment of other downstream components of the NHEJ pathway including DNA ligase IV that religate the ends with the help of XRCC4 [175]. On the other hand, the homologous recombination (HR) is more accurate than NHEJ and requires a sister chromatid used as a template [170,172] (Figure 3). During homologous recombination, one filament of DNA is processed by several proteins to produce a 3’ overhang that is recognized and bound by RPA. Subsequently, Rad51 and Rad52 bind the single strand of DNA and search the homologous sequence. Then, the DNA/protein complex invades the duplex template and starts the branch migration, forming a displacement loop (D-loop) between the invading 3' overhang strand and the homologous chromosome. A DNA polymerase extends the 3’ end of the invading strand; this changes the D-loop to a Holliday junction. Finally a DNA-Ligase and Resolvase complete the process [176].
Emerging findings have revealed that the DNA repair is another cellular process that can be influenced by the nuclear position. Tethering a DNA sequence containing a double strand break (DSB) at nuclear lamina determines a delay in DNA Damage Response (DDR) and a repression of the homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway, whereas the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is not influenced [177]. On the other hand, the forced localization of the same DNA sequence at nuclear pores did not give the same results, confirming again the difference between the two peripheral compartments. At the genome wide level, gene-rich regions and euchromatin marked by H3K36me3 are preferentially repaired by HR [177,178] while, when damaged, the heterochromatin associated with LADs, characterized by enrichment in A/T repeats undergoes the NHEJ rather than HR [107]. This choice probably is to avoid the genomic instability caused by the recombination of A/T repeats mediated by HR. These observations suggest that the grade of organization, and the state of chromatin in term of condensation and transcribed gene content, could partly regulate the choice of repair pathway after DSB. Parallel studies in yeast have confirmed these findings, further showing that different perinuclear anchorage sites define distinct outcomes on repair, arguing that the spatial segregation of damage at the nuclear envelope participates selectively in the choice of survival pathways [179]. The mobility of the chromatin after the DSB could be an important determinant of different DNA repair choice (reviewed in [180]). In fact through single-particle tracking it has been shown that DSBs move within a larger radius than does its undamaged counterpart [181]. This depends on chromatin remodelers [181,182] and proteins involved in HR pathway [181,183]. However, the chromatin conformational changes and epigenetic signatures involved in these processes need to be elucidated. Intriguingly, Lamin A seems to limit the DSB movement in mammalian cells [184]. This confirms that nuclear lamina, closely associated to heterochromatin, favours the NHEJ and further suggesting that Lamin A and the nuclear lamina can influence the DNA repair choice through regulation of chromatin dynamics and structure. Recently, a role for chromatin structure in DSB repair has been described also at the nucleolus level [185]. When DSB occurs at ribosomal gene (rDNA) buried inside nucleolus a nucleolar re-organization was observed, this allowing the damaged DNA to be relocated at the nucleolar periphery. Reorganization renders rDNA accessible to repair factors normally excluded from nucleoli. Importantly, this chromatin re-organization is thought to predominantly allow the HR repair rather than NHEJ. The exact factors driving this choice remain unknown. One possibility is that the suppression of NHEJ in nucleolar damage is dependent on the acetylation of histone H4 on K16 which inhibits the recognition of H4K20me2 by 53BP1, an important protein that promotes NHEJ [186,187]. These findings further support the view that the “chromatin remodelers” acting on histone modifications and chromatin organization are able to dictate the DNA repair choice, enlarging the roles of chromatin modifiers also in this field [188]. On the other hand, the nuclear components, such as lamins or nucleoporins, probably through their influence on the epigenome, can also determine the DNA repair choice. In line with this idea, Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) patient-derived cells with nuclear shape abnormalities as described above, show DNA repair defects. In particular, HGPS fibroblasts accumulate DNA damage, showing increased levels of the marker of DNA damage such as the phosphorylated histone variant γH2AX and an impaired recruitment on DNA damage of 53BP1, Rad51 [172,173,174], MRE11 and phospho NBS1 [189], key components of HR repair pathway (Figure 4). These findings suggest that both the HR and the NHEJ pathway could be affected in HGPS. It has been proposed that the accumulation of DNA damage in progeria could depend on the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), produced by mitochondria and NADPH oxidases. This leads to oxidative stress possibly due to chromatin alterations [190]. In line with this hypothesis it has been shown that while DNA damage induced by the etoposide could be repaired in progeroid fibroblasts, ROS-induced DSB are unrepairable; this suggests that the accumulation of DNA damage could be mainly due to higher ROS levels in progeroid fibroblasts [191]. In response to oxidative stress, the gene expression is physiologically modulated in order to activate various redox-transcription factors, such as Rb, p53, NF-kB and FoxO (reviewed in [192]), fundamental for the resistance to oxidative stress. Accumulation of farnesylated prelamin A in progeric laminopathies results in increased production of ROS, leading respectively to senescence and apoptosis and to a reduction of antioxidant enzymes [193,194,195](Figure 4); this indicates that, under normal condition, lamins could act as recruiters and/or stabilizers also for antioxidant enzyme [190]. In line with this hypothesis, in Atypical Werner Syndrome, another diseases associated with Lamin A/C mutations [196,197] the level of the antioxidant enzymes is lower than normal [198]. Such evidence underlines the role of lamins as a shield against the ROS and shows that aberrant lamins lead to a lowering of this defence so adding another possible cause to the aging phenotype of laminopathies.
As summarized in this review, the organization of the nucleus and the compartmentalization of chromatin are fundamental for gene expression regulation and, as recent studies show, can both influence specific cellular processes such as DNA repair. Recently, DNA integration has been indicated as another mechanism that could be dependent on the nuclear architecture. Previous studies on Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) have already suggested a preference for an integration within actively expressed chromosomal locations [199]. However it was unclear whether transcription directly or indirectly helps integration (reviewed in [200]). Recently, it has been shown that HIV-1 preferentially integrates in genes localized at the periphery, close to the nuclear pores and characterized by active transcription chromatin marks before viral infection [201]. After integration, the viral DNA needs the activity of the nucleoporin Nup 153 for transcriptional activation while, for replication purposes, it needs the activity of Tpr, also located at the nuclear basket site [201,202]. Overall such evidence promotes a new concept supporting the role of nuclear architecture in HIV integration. Thus it is tempting to speculate that other cellular processes (such as DNA replication, cellular migration or the stress response) can also be dependent on the nuclear architecture and on its influence on epigenome regulation.
We are grateful to Prof. Martin Bennett for “proofreading work” of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Research and University (Futuro in Ricerca RBFR106S1Z_001) and the flagship CNR project (Epigen). Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] | Batel S, Devine-Wright P (2015) Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory. Public Und Sci 24: 311-325. |
[2] | Devine-Wright P (2010) Place attachment and the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies. Chapter 17 In: Psychological Approaches to Sustainability: Current Trends in Theory, Research and Applications. Edited by Victor Corral-Verdugo and Cirilo H. Garcia-Cadena. Nova Science Publishers Eds., 317-336. |
[3] |
Mallett A (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovations: The role of technology cooperation in urban Mexico. Energ Policy 35: 2790-2798. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.008
![]() |
[4] | Groba F, Cao J (2014) Chinese Renewable Energy Technology Exports: The Role of Policy, Innovation and Markets. Environ Resour Econ 60: 243-283. |
[5] |
Sung B, Song WY (2014) How government policies affect the export dynamics of renewable energy technologies: A subsectoral analysis. Energy 69: 843-859. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.082
![]() |
[6] |
Zhang X, Chang S, Eric M (2012) Renewable energy in China: An integrated technology and policy perspective. Energ Policy 51: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.071
![]() |
[7] | Negro SO, Hekkert MP, Smits REHM (2008) Stimulating renewable energy technologies by innovation policy. Sci Public Policy 35: 403-416. |
[8] | Jacobsson S, Lauber V (2006) The politics and policy of energy system transformation - Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energ Policy 34: 256-276. |
[9] |
Tsoutsos TD, Stamboulis YA (2005) The sustainable diffusion of renewable energy technologies as an example of an innovation-focused policy. Technovation 25: 753-761. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.12.003
![]() |
[10] | Buckley JC, Schwarz PM (2003) Renewable energy from gasification of manure: An innovative technology in search of fertile policy. Environ Monit Assess 84: 111-127. |
[11] | Hervás Soriano F, Mulatero F (2011) EU Research and Innovation (R&I) in renewable energies: The role of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan). Energ Policy 39: 3582-3590. |
[12] |
Shen YC, Lin GTR, Li KP, et al. (2010) An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology. Energ Policy 38: 4604-4616. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.016
![]() |
[13] |
Van Alphen K, Kunz HS, Hekkert MP (2008) Policy measures to promote the widespread utilization of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in the Maldives. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12: 1959-1973. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.04.009
![]() |
[14] | Gan J, Smith CT (2006) A comparative analysis of woody biomass and coal for electricity generation under various CO2 emission reductions and taxes. Biomass Bioenerg 30: 296-303. |
[15] |
Sung B, Song WY (2013) Causality between public policies and exports of renewable energy technologies. Energ Policy 55: 95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.063
![]() |
[16] | Garces E, Daim T (2013) An assessment of the impacts of government energy policy on energy technology, innovation, and security: The case of renewable technologies in the US electricity sector. Lect Notes Energ 16: 257-276. |
[17] |
Anderson D (1997) Renewable energy technology and policy for development. Annu Rev Energ Env 22: 187-215. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.22.1.187
![]() |
[18] | Nisar A, Ruiz F, Palacios M (2013) Organisational learning, strategic rigidity and technology adoption: Implications for electric utilities and renewable energy firms. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22: 438-445. |
[19] | García VG, Bartolomé MM (2010) Rural electrification systems based on renewable energy: The social dimensions of an innovative technology. Technol Soc 32: 303-311. |
[20] |
Tsai WT (2005) Current status and development policies on renewable energy technology research in Taiwan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 9: 237-253. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2004.03.003
![]() |
[21] | Abidin NZZ, Ibrahim JB (2015) Embracing renewables - Overcoming integration challenges from Malaysia's utility perspective. 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, PowerTech, 2015: art. no. 7232373. |
[22] | Loiter JM, Norberg-Bohm V (1999) Technology policy and renewable energy: Public roles in the development of new energy technologies. Energ Policy 27: 85-97. |
[23] | Franco A, Salza P (2011) Perspectives for the long-term penetration of new renewables in complex energy systems: The Italian scenario. Environ Dev Sustainability 13: 309-330. |
[24] | Amorim F, Martins MVM, Pereira Da Silva P (2010) A new perspective to account for renewables impacts in Portugal. 7th International Conference on the European Energy Market 2010, EEM 2010: art. no. 5558695. |
[25] |
Suwa A, Jupesta J (2012) Policy innovation for technology diffusion: A case-study of Japanese renewable energy public support programs. Sustainability Sci 7: 185-197. doi: 10.1007/s11625-012-0175-3
![]() |
[26] |
Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG, Vassilev VS (2015) Advantages and disadvantages of composition and properties of biomass in comparison with coal: An overview. Fuel 158: 330-350. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.050
![]() |
[27] | Zandler H, Brenning A, Samimi C (2015) Potential of space-borne hyperspectral data for biomass quantification in an arid environment: Advantages and limitations. Remote Sens 7: 4565-4580. |
[28] | Costa C, Rotsios K, Moshonas G, et al. (2014) Use of multivariate approaches in biomass energy plantation harvesting: Logistics advantages. Agr Eng Int: CIGR Journal May 2014: 71-80. |
[29] | Bick S (2013) Skidding options for biomass operations: From big to small, each alternative has advantages and drawbacks. Northern Logger Timber Processor 62: 30-35. |
[30] | Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK, et al. (2013) An overview of the composition and application of biomass ash.: Part 2. Potential utilisation, technological and ecological advantages and challenges. Fuel 105: 19-39. |
[31] | Talluri S, Subramanian MR, Christopher LP (2012) Advantages of thermophilic hydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass. 2012 AIChE Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings: 1p. |
[32] | Lanning CJ, Fridley JL (2012) Advances in woody biomass drying by taking advantage of surface properties. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012, ASABE 2012, 1: 715-723. |
[33] |
Santos CA, Ferreira ME, Lopes Da Silva T, et al. (2011) A symbiotic gas exchange between bioreactors enhances microalgal biomass and lipid productivities: Taking advantage of complementary nutritional modes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechn 38: 909-917. doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0860-0
![]() |
[34] | Hotchkiss R, Matts D, Riley G (2003) Co-combustion of Biomass with Coal - The Advantages and Disadvantages Compared to Purpose-built Biomass to Energy Plants. VGB PowerTech 83: 80-86. |
[35] |
Fransen B, De Kroon H (2001) Long-term disadvantages of selective root placement: Root proliferation and shoot biomass of two perennial grass species in a 2-year experiment. J Ecol 89: 711-722. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00589.x
![]() |
[36] |
Nishiguchi S, Tabata T (2016) Assessment of social, economic, and environmental aspects of woody biomass energy utilization: Direct burning and wood pellets. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57: 1279-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.213
![]() |
[37] |
Miret C, Chazara P, Montastruc L, et al. (2016) Design of bioethanol green supply chain: Comparison between first and second generation biomass concerning economic, environmental and social criteria. Comput Chem Eng 85: 16-35. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.10.008
![]() |
[38] |
Singh J (2015) Overview of electric power potential of surplus agricultural biomass from economic, social, environmental and technical perspective - A case study of Punjab. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42: 286-297. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.015
![]() |
[39] |
Cambero C, Sowlati T (2014) Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives - A review of literature. Renew Sust Energ Rev 36: 62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.041
![]() |
[40] |
Aylott MJ, Casella E, Farrall K, et al. (2010) Estimating the supply of biomass from short-rotation coppice in England, given social, economic and environmental constraints to land availability. Biofuels 1: 719-727. doi: 10.4155/bfs.10.30
![]() |
[41] |
Haughton AJ, Bond AJ, Lovett AA, et al. (2009) A novel, integrated approach to assessing social, economic and environmental implications of changing rural land-use: A case study of perennial biomass crops. J Appl Ecol 46: 315-322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01623.x
![]() |
[42] |
Fischer SL, Koshland CP, Young JA (2005) Social, economic, and environmental impacts assessment of a village-scale modern biomass energy project in Jilin province, China: local outcomes and lessons learned. Energ Sust Dev 9: 50-59. doi: 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60499-8
![]() |
[43] |
Felker P (1984) Economic, environmental, and social advantages of intensively managed short rotation mesquite (Prosopis spp) biomass energy farms. Biomass 5: 65-77. doi: 10.1016/0144-4565(84)90070-2
![]() |
[44] |
Yilmaz Balaman T, Selim H (2015) A decision model for cost effective design of biomass based green energy supply chains. Bioresource Technol 191: 97-109. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.078
![]() |
[45] | Dillibabu V, Natarajan E (2015) Green energy from biomass gasification. J Chem Pharm Sci 7: 182-185. |
[46] |
Hamzeh Y, Ashori A, Mirzaei B, et al. (2011) Current and potential capabilities of biomass for green energy in Iran. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 4934-4938. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.060
![]() |
[47] |
Bhutto AW, Bazmi AA, Zahedi G (2011) Greener energy: Issues and challenges for Pakistan - Biomass energy prospective. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 3207-3219. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.015
![]() |
[48] | Demirbas T, Demirbas AH (2010) Bioenergy, green energy. biomass and biofuels. Energ Sources 32: 1067-1075. |
[49] | Kaltschmitt M, Thrän D (2009) Biomass-based green energy generation. Chapter 7 In: Sustainable Solutions for Modern Economies. Edited by Martin Kaltschmitt and Daniela Thrän. Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) Green Chemistry Eds., 86-124. |
[50] | Jenner M (2008) Biomass energy outlook: How green is your carbon? BioCycle 49: 41. |
[51] |
Alfonsin V, Suarez A, Urrejola S, Miguez J, Sanchez A (2015) Integration of several renewable energies for internal combustion engine substitution in a commercial sailboat. Int J Hydrogen Energ 40: 6689-6701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.113
![]() |
[52] |
Iniyan S, Suganthi L, Samuel AA (2006) Energy models for commercial energy prediction and substitution of renewable energy sources. Energ Policy 34: 2640-2653. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.11.017
![]() |
[53] | Lombard A, Ferreira SLA (2015) The spatial distribution of renewable energy infrastructure in three particular provinces of South Africa. Bull Geogr 30: 71-85. |
[54] |
Palmas C, Siewert A, von Haaren C (2015) Exploring the decision-space for renewable energy generation to enhance spatial efficiency. Environ Impact Assess Rev 52: 9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.06.005
![]() |
[55] |
Young M (2015) Building the blue economy: The role of marine spatial planning in facilitating offshore renewable energy development. Int J Marine Coastal Law 30: 148-173. doi: 10.1163/15718085-12341339
![]() |
[56] | Güngör-Demirci G (2015) Spatial analysis of renewable energy potential and use in Turkey. J Renew Sust Energ 2015, 7: art. no. 013126. |
[57] |
Campbell MS, Stehfest KM, Votier SC, Hall-Spencer JM (2014) Mapping fisheries for marine spatial planning: Gear-specific vessel monitoring system (VMS), marine conservation and offshore renewable energy. Marine Policy 45: 293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.015
![]() |
[58] |
Karakostas S, Economou D (2014) Enhanced multi-objective optimization algorithm for renewable energy sources: Optimal spatial development of wind farms. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 28: 83-103. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2013.820829
![]() |
[59] |
Wang Q, M’Ikiugu MM, Kinoshita I (2014) A GIS-based approach in support of spatial planning for renewable energy: A case study of Fukushima, Japan. Sustainability 6: 2087-2117. doi: 10.3390/su6042087
![]() |
[60] |
Behringer S, Upmann T (2014) Optimal harvesting of a spatial renewable resource. J Econ Dyn Control 42: 105-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.03.008
![]() |
[61] |
Davies IM, Watret R, Gubbins M (2014) Spatial planning for sustainable marine renewable energy developments in Scotland. Ocean Coastal Manage 99: 72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.013
![]() |
[62] |
Yang C, Ogden JM (2013) Renewable and low carbon hydrogen for California-Modeling the long term evolution of fuel infrastructure using a quasi-spatial TIMES model. Int J Hydrogen Energ 38: 4250-4265. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.195
![]() |
[63] | Baltas AE, Dervos AN (2012) Special framework for the spatial planning & the sustainable development of renewable energy sources. Renew Energ 48: 358-363. |
[64] |
Haller M, Ludig S, Bauer N (2012) Decarbonization scenarios for the EU and MENA power system: Considering spatial distribution and short term dynamics of renewable generation. Energ Policy 47: 282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.069
![]() |
[65] | Katsaprakakis DA, Christakis DG (2016) The exploitation of electricity production projects from Renewable Energy Sources for the social and economic development of remote communities. the case of Greece: An example to avoid. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:341-349. |
[66] | Kyriakopoulos GL, Arabatzis G (2016) Electrical energy storage systems in electricity generation: Energy policies, innovative technologies, and regulatory regimes. Renew Sust Energ Rev 56:1044-1067. |
[67] |
Zografidou E, Petridis K, Arabatzis G, et al. (2016) Optimal design of the renewable energy map of Greece using weighted goal-programming and data envelopment analysis. Comput Oper Res 66: 313-326. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.03.012
![]() |
[68] |
Ntona E, Arabatzis G, Kyriakopoulos GL (2015) Energy saving: Views and attitudes of students in secondary education. Renew Sust Energ Rev 46: 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.033
![]() |
[69] |
Arabatzis G, Petridis K, Galatsidas S, et al. (2013) A demand scenario based fuelwood supply chain: A conceptual model. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25: 687-697. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.030
![]() |
[70] |
Arabatzis G, Malesios Ch (2013) Pro-Environmental attitudes of users and not users of fuelwood in a rural area of Greece. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22: 621-630. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.026
![]() |
[71] | Balaras CA, Dascalaki EG, Droutsa P, et al. (2013) Hellenic renewable energy policies and energy performance of residential buildings using solar collectors for domestic hot water production in Greece. J Renew Sust Energ 5: art. no. 041813. |
[72] | Kyriakopoulos G, Chalikias M (2013) The Investigation of Woodfuels’ Involvement in Green Energy Supply Schemes at Northern Greece: The Model Case of the Thrace Prefecture. Procedia Technol 8: 445-452. |
[73] | Menegaki AN, Gurluk S (2013) Greece & Turkey; assessment and comparison of their renewable energy performance. Int J Energ Econ Policy 3: 367-383. |
[74] | Metaxas A, Tsinisizelis M (2013) The development of renewable energy governance in Greece. Examples of a failed (?) policy. Lecture Notes Energy 23: 155-168. |
[75] |
Mondol JD, Koumpetsos N (2013) Overview of challenges, prospects, environmental impacts and policies for renewable energy and sustainable development in Greece. Renew Sust Energ Rev 23: 431-442. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.041
![]() |
[76] |
Zafirakis D, Chalvatzis K, Kaldellis JK (2013) Socially just support mechanisms for the promotion of renewable energy sources in Greece. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21: 478-493. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.030
![]() |
[77] |
Arabatzis G, Kitikidou K, Tampakis S, et al. (2012) The fuelwood consumption in a rural area of Greece. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16: 6489-6496. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.010
![]() |
[78] | Chalikias Μ, Kyriakopoulos G, Goulionis J, et al. (2012). Investigation of the parameters affecting fuelwoods’ consumption in the Southern Greece region. J Food Agr Environ 10: 885-889. |
[79] |
Kaldellis JK, Kapsali M, Katsanou E (2012) Renewable energy applications in Greece-What is the public attitude? Energ Policy 42: 37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.017
![]() |
[80] | Markatou M (2012) Renewable energy technologies in greece: A patent based approach. Int J Renew Energ Res 2: 718-722. |
[81] | Mourmouris JC, Potolias C, Jacob FG (2012) Evaluation of renewable energy sources exploitation at remote regions, using computing model and multi-criteria analysis: A case-study in samothrace, Greece. Int J Renew Energ Res 2: 307-316. |
[82] |
Tegou LI, Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos DA (2012) A multi-criteria framework for an isolated electricity system design with renewable energy sources in the context of distributed generation: The case study of Lesvos Island, Greece. Int J Green Energ 9: 256-279. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2011.621484
![]() |
[83] | Kolovos K, Kyriakopoulos G, Chalikias M (2011). Co-evaluation of basic woodfuel types used as alternative heating sources to existing energy network. J Environ Protect Ecol 12: 733-742. |
[84] |
Tourkolias C, Mirasgedis S (2011) Quantification and monetization of employment benefits associated with renewable energy technologies in Greece. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 2876-2886. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.027
![]() |
[85] |
Boemi SN, Papadopoulos AM, Karagiannidis A, et al. (2010) Barriers on the propagation of renewable energy sources and sustainable solid waste management practices in Greece. Waste Manage Res 28: 967-976. doi: 10.1177/0734242X10375867
![]() |
[86] | Chalikias M, Kyriakopoulos G, Kolovos K (2010). Environmental sustainability and financial feasibility evaluation of woodfuel biomass used for a potential replacement of conventional space heating sources. Part I: A Greek Case Study. Oper Res 10: 43-56. |
[87] | Kyriakopoulos G (2010) European and international policy interventions of implementing the use of woodfuels in bioenergy sector. A trend analysis and a specific woodfuels’ energy application. Int J Knowl Learn 6: 43-54. |
[88] | Kyriakopoulos G, Kolovos K, Chalikias M (2010) Environmental sustainability and financial feasibility evaluation of woodfuel biomass used for a potential replacement of conventional space heating sources. Part II: A Combined Greek and the nearby Balkan Countries Case Study. Oper Res 10: 57-69. |
[89] |
Kyriakopoulos G (2009) Biomass utilization for energy infrastructure and applications. Int J Soc Humanistic Comput 1: 163-174. doi: 10.1504/IJSHC.2009.031005
![]() |
[90] | Tsiblostefanakis EC, Mantouka KA (2009) Economy efficiency for renewable energy sources in Greece. WSEAS T Bus Econ 6: 42-51. |
[91] |
Zafeiriou E, Arabatzis G, Koutroumanidis T (2011) The fuelwood market in Greece: An empirical approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 3008-3018. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.019
![]() |
[92] |
Xydis G, Koroneos C (2009) Alternative scenarios of the utilisation of renewable energy sources in small prefectures: A case study in lasithi prefecture, Greece. Int J Glob Energ Issues 31: 61-87. doi: 10.1504/IJGEI.2009.021543
![]() |
[93] | Angelis-Dimakis A, Trogadas P, Arampatzis G, et al. (2008) Cost Effectiveness Analysis for Renewable Energy Sources integration in the island of Lemnos, Greece. Proceedings iEMSs 4th Biennial Meeting - International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software: Integrating Sciences and Information Technology for Environmental Assessment and Decision Making - iEMSs 2008: 1215-1222. |
[94] | Lazarou S, Noou K, Siassiakos K, et al. (2008) The impact of renewable energy sources penetration in achieving the energy and environmental policy goals in Greece. WSEAS T Environ Dev 4: 1161-1170. |
[95] |
Tsoutsos T, Papadopoulou E, Katsiri A, et al. (2008) Supporting schemes for renewable energy sources and their impact on reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases in Greece. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12: 1767-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.04.002
![]() |
[96] | Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y, Georgopoulou E, et al. (2002) The role of renewable energy sources within the framework of the Kyoto Protocol: The case of Greece. Renew Sust Energ Rev 6: 249-272. |
[97] | Jäger-Waldau A, Szabó M, Monforti-Ferrario F, et al. (2011) Renewable energy snapshots 2011. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports of European Commission – Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport. Available from: http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/remea/renewable-energy-snapshots-2011. |
[98] | Schenk T, Stokes LC (2013) The power of collaboration: Engaging all parties in renewable energy infrastructure development. IEEE Power Energ Mag 11: 56-65. |
[99] | Sasaki H, Kajikawa Y, Fujisue K, et al. (2010) Detecting the valley of international academic collaboration in renewable energy. IEEM2010 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2010; art. no. 5674434: 99-103. |
[100] |
Chineke TC, Ezike FM (2010) Political will and collaboration for electric power reform through renewable energy in Africa. Energ Policy 38: 678-684. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.004
![]() |
[101] |
Scarlat N, Dallemand JF, Monforti-Ferrario F, et al. (2015) Renewable Energ Policy framework and bioenergy contribution in the European Union - An overview from National Renewable Energy Action Plans and Progress Reports. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51: 969-985. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.062
![]() |
[102] | Scarlat N, Dallemand JF, Banja M (2013) Possible impact of 2020 bioenergy targets on European Union land use. A scenario-based assessment from national renewable energy action plans proposals. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18: 595-606. |
[103] | Pozeb V, Goričanec D, Krope J (2011) European Energ Policy - Directives and action plans. Recent Researches in Geography, Geology, Energy, Environment and Biomedicine. Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS International Conference on EMESEG 2011:107-110. |
[104] |
McKillop A (2012) Europe’s climate energy package must be reformed or abandoned. Energ Environ 23: 837-848. doi: 10.1260/0958-305X.23.5.837
![]() |
[105] | Kulovesi K, Morgera E, Muñoz M (2011) Environmental integration and multi-faceted international dimensions of EU law: Unpacking the EU's 2009 climate and energy package. Common Market Law Rev 48: 829-891. |
[106] | Uusi-Rauva C, Tienari J (2010) On the relative nature of adequate measures: Media representations of the EU energy and climate package. Glob Environ Change 20: 492-501. |
[107] |
Uusi-Rauva C (2010) The EU energy and climate package: A showcase for European environmental leadership? Environ Policy Governance 20: 73-88. doi: 10.1002/eet.535
![]() |
[108] | Vielle M, Moulinier JM, Bernard A (2009) Evaluation of the energy-climate package with the help of gemini-e3 model. Revue de l'Energie 589: 153-173. |
[109] |
Connolly D, Lund H, Mathiesen BV, et al. (2014) Heat roadmap Europe: Combining district heating with heat savings to decarbonise the EU energy system. Energ Policy 65: 475-489. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.035
![]() |
[110] |
Alonso PM, Hewitt R, Pacheco JD, et al. (2016) Losing the roadmap: Renewable energy paralysis in Spain and its implications for the EU low carbon economy. Renew Energ 89: 680-694. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.004
![]() |
[111] | Babonneau F, Haurie A, Vielle M (2014) Assessment of balanced burden-sharing in the 2050 EU climate/energy roadmap: a metamodeling approach. Climatic Change 134: 505-519. |
[112] |
Jonsson DK, Johansson B, Månsson A, et al. (2015) Energy security matters in the EU Energy Roadmap. Energ Strategy Rev 6: 48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2015.03.002
![]() |
[113] |
Turnyanskiy M, Neu R, Albanese R, et al. (2015) European roadmap to the realization of fusion energy: Mission for solution on heat-exhaust systems. Fusion Eng Des 96-97: 361-64. doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.04.041
![]() |
[114] |
Xiong W, Wang Y, Mathiesen BV, et al. (2015) Heat roadmap china: New heat strategy to reduce energy consumption towards 2030. Energy 81: 274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.039
![]() |
[115] |
Odenberger M, Kjärstad J, Johnsson F (2013) Prospects for CCS in the EU energy roadmap to 2050. Energ Procedia 37: 7573-7581. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.701
![]() |
[116] |
Jeffrey H, Sedgwick J, Robinson C (2013) Technology roadmaps: An evaluation of their success in the renewable energy sector. Technol Forecast Soc Change 80: 1015-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.016
![]() |
[117] | Hey C (2012) Low-carbon and energy strategies for the EU. The European commission's roadmaps: A sound agenda for green economy? GAIA 21: 43-47. |
[118] |
McDowall W (2012) Technology roadmaps for transition management: The case of hydrogen energy. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79: 530-542. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.10.002
![]() |
[119] | Wang YD, Chen WM, Park YK (2011) Integrated regional Energ Policy and planning framework: Its application to the evaluation of the renewable roadmap of carbon free Jeju Island in South Korea. Chapter 13 In: Sustainable Systems and Energy Management at the Regional Level: Comparative Approaches. IGI Global Eds.: 236-260. |
[120] |
Gómez A, Zubizarreta J, Dopazo C, et al. (2011) Spanish energy roadmap to 2020: Socioeconomic implications of renewable targets. Energy 36: 1973-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.046
![]() |
[121] |
Amer M, Daim TU (2010) Application of technology roadmaps for renewable energy sector. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77: 1355-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.05.002
![]() |
[122] |
Pang X, Mörtberg U, Brown N (2014) Energy models from a strategic environmental assessment perspective in an EU context - What is missing concerning renewables? Renew Sust Energ Rev 33: 353-362. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.005
![]() |
[123] | Miran W, Nawaz M, Jang J, et al. (2016) Sustainable electricity generation by biodegradation of low-cost lemon peel biomass in a dual chamber microbial fuel cell. Int Biodeter Biodegr 106: 75-79. |
[124] | He H, Zhou M, Yang J, et al. (2014).Simultaneous wastewater treatment, electricity generation and biomass production by an immobilized photosynthetic algal microbial fuel cell. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 37: 873-880. |
[125] | Kondaveeti S, Choi KS, Kakarla R, et al. (2014) Microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus as renewable biomass feedstock for electricity generation in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Front Environ Sci Eng 8: 784-791. |
[126] |
Nishio K, Hashimoto K, Watanabe K (2013) Digestion of algal biomass for electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Biosci Biotech Bioch 77: 670-672. doi: 10.1271/bbb.120833
![]() |
[127] |
Rashid N, Cui YF, Muhammad SUR, et al. (2013) Enhanced electricity generation by using algae biomass and activated sludge in microbial fuel cell. Sci Total Environ 456-457: 91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.067
![]() |
[128] |
Zhang J, Zhang B, Tian C, et al. (2013) Simultaneous sulfide removal and electricity generation with corn stover biomass as co-substrate in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technol 138: 198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.167
![]() |
[129] | Cheng H, Qian Q, Wang X, et al. (2012) Electricity generation from carboxymethyl cellulose biomass: A new application of enzymatic biofuel cells. Electrochim Acta 82: 203-207. |
[130] |
Toonssen R, Woudstra N, Verkooijen AHM (2010) Decentralized generation of electricity with solid oxide fuel cells from centrally converted biomass. Int J Hydrogen Energ 35: 7594-7607. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.006
![]() |
[131] | Wang X, Feng Y, Wang H, et al. (2009) Bioaugmentation for electricity generation from corn stover biomass using microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 43: 6088-6093. |
[132] |
Zhang Y, Min B, Huang L, et al. (2009) Generation of electricity and analysis of microbial communities in wheat straw biomass-powered microbial fuel cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 3389-3395. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02240-08
![]() |
[133] | Macedo WN, Monteiro LG, Corgozinho IM, et al. (2016) Biomass based microturbine system for electricity generation for isolated communities in Amazon region. Renew Energ 91: 323-333. |
[134] | Cerón AMR, Weingärtner S, Kafarov V (2015) Generation of electricity by plant biomass in villages of the Colombian provinces: Chocó, Meta and Putumayo. Chem Eng T 43: 577-582. |
[135] | Umar MS, Jennings P, Urmee T (2014) Sustainable electricity generation from oil palm biomass wastes in Malaysia: An industry survey. Energy 67: 496-505. |
[136] |
Moore S, Durant V, Mabee WE (2013) Determining appropriate feed-in tariff rates to promote biomass-to-electricity generation in Eastern Ontario, Canada. Energ Policy 63: 607-613. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.076
![]() |
[137] |
Rodriguez LC, May B, Herr A, et al. (2011) Biomass assessment and small scale biomass fired electricity generation in the Green Triangle, Australia. Biomass Bioenerg 35: 2589-2599. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.030
![]() |
[138] |
Wei L, To SDF, Pordesimo L, et al. (2011) Evaluation of micro-scale electricity generation cost using biomass-derived synthetic gas through modelling. Int J Energ Res 35: 989-1003. doi: 10.1002/er.1749
![]() |
[139] | Evans A, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2010) Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14: 1419-1427. |
[140] | Nasiri F, Zaccour G (2009) An exploratory game-theoretic analysis of biomass electricity generation supply chain. Energ Policy 37: 4514-4522. |
[141] | Akgul O, Mac Dowell N, Papageorgiou LG, et al. (2014) A mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) supply chain optimisation framework for carbon negative electricity generation using biomass to energy with CCS (BECCS) in the UK. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 28: 189-202. |
[142] |
Favero A, Massetti E (2014) Trade of woody biomass for electricity generation under climate mitigation policy. Resource Energ Econ 36: 166-190. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.005
![]() |
[143] | O’Shaughnessy SM, Deasy MJ, Kinsella CE, et al. (2013) Small scale electricity generation from a portable biomass cookstove: Prototype design and preliminary results. Appl Energ 102: 374-385. |
[144] | Dwivedi P, Bailis R, Carter DR, et al. (2012) A landscape-based approach for assessing spatiotemporal impacts of forest biomass-based electricity generation on the age structure of surrounding forest plantations in the Southern United States. GCB Bioenergy 4: 342-357. |
[145] |
Perilhon C, Alkadee D, Descombes G, et al. (2012) Life cycle assessment applied to electricity generation from renewable biomass. Energy Procedia 18: 165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.028
![]() |
[146] | Shafie SM, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, et al. (2012) A review on electricity generation based on biomass residue in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16: 5879-5889. |
[147] | Basu P, Butler J, Leon MA (2011). Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants. Renew Energy 36: 282-288. |
[148] | Hansson J, Berndes G, Johnsson F, et al. (2009) Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation-An assessment of the potential in EU27. Energ Policy 37: 1444-1455. |
[149] | Berggren M, Ljunggren, E, Johnsson F (2008) Biomass co-firing potentials for electricity generation in Poland-Matching supply and co-firing opportunities. Biomass Bioenerg 32: 865-879. |
[150] |
Panklib T, Prakasvudhisarn C, Khummongkol D (2014) The potential of biomass energy from agricultural residues for small electricity generation in Thailand. Energ Source 36: 803-814. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2010.545809
![]() |
[151] |
Skorek-Osikowska A, Bartela T, Kotowicz J, et al. (2014) The influence of the size of the CHP (combined heat and power) system integrated with a biomass fueled gas generator and piston engine on the thermodynamic and economic effectiveness of electricity and heat generation. Energy 67: 328-340. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.015
![]() |
[152] |
Ruiz JA, Juárez MC, Morales MP, et al. (2013) Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18: 174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.021
![]() |
[153] | Dasappa S (2011) Potential of biomass energy for electricity generation in sub-Saharan Africa. Energ Sust Dev 15: 203-213. |
[154] | Liu X, Farmer M, Capareda S (2011) The Economic Feasibility of Electricity Generation from Biomass on the South Plains of Texas. In: The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization. Edited by Andrew Schmitz, Norbert L. Wilson, Charles B. Moss, David Zilberman. Bentham Eds., 158-169. |
[155] |
Pihl Erik E, Heyne S, Thunman H, et al. (2010) Highly efficient electricity generation from biomass by integration and hybridization with combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants for natural gas. Energy 35: 4042-4052. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.008
![]() |
[156] | Bazmi AA, Zahedi G, Hashim H (2011) Progress and challenges in utilization of palm oil biomass as fuel for decentralized electricity generation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 574-583. |
[157] | Hiloidhari M, Baruah DC (2011) Rice straw residue biomass potential for decentralized electricity generation: A GIS based study in Lakhimpur district of Assam, India. Energ Sust Dev 15: 214-222. |
[158] | Kumar M, Patel SK, Mishra S (2010) Studies on characteristics of some shrubaceous non-woody biomass species and their electricity generation potentials. Energ Source 32: 786-795. |
[159] |
Toonssen R, Woudstra N, Verkooijen AHM (2009) Decentralized generation of electricity from biomass with proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Power Source 194: 456-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.05.044
![]() |
[160] | Liu J, Deng Y (2008) The Biorefinery: Employing Biomass to Relieve Our Dependence on Fossil Sources. Biorefinery J Biobased Mater Bioenerg 2: 97-99. Available from: http://www.biorefineryresearchinstitute.com/biorefinery.php. |
[161] | Anonymous (2010) Biomass – Assessing the Potential in Rural Areas. From: “Assessing Biomass Feasibility” project, which was undertaken as part of the University of Strathclyde’s Sustainable Engineering, MSc in “Energy Systems and the Environment”. Available from: http://www.esru.strath.ac.uk/EandE/Web_sites/09-10/Rural_renewables/Methodology_Specific Consideration_ Biomass_BiomassBoiler.html. |
[162] | Silva AS, Teixeira RSS, Moutta RO, et al. (2013) Sugarcane and Woody Biomass Pretreatments for Ethanol Production. Chapter 3 In: Sustainable Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass - Techniques, Applications and Commercialization. Edited by Anuj K. Chandel and Silvio Silvério da Silva. InTech Eds. 42pp. |
[163] | Fatehi Pedram (2013) Production of Biofuels from Cellulose of Woody Biomass. Chapter 3 In: Cellulose - Biomass Conversion. Edited by Theo van de Ven and John Kadla, InTech Eds. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/cellulose-biomass-conversion/production-of-biofuels-from-cellulose-of-woody-biomass. |
[164] | Dai CC, Tao J, Wang Y, et al. (2010) Research advance and superiority of microdiesel production with biowastes. Afr J Microbiol Res 4: 977-983. |
[165] | Huang J (2015) Pellet Plant Process Flow Chart: Gemco Energy. Available from: http://www.biomass-energy.org/blog/pellet-plant-process-flow-chart.html. |
[166] |
Jin M, Gunawan C, Uppugundla N, et al. (2012) A novel integrated biological process for cellulosic ethanol production featuring high ethanol productivity, enzyme recycling and yeast cells reuse. Energ Environ Sci 5: 7168-7175. doi: 10.1039/c2ee03058f
![]() |
1. | Vladimir B. Teif, Andrey G. Cherstvy, Chromatin and epigenetics: current biophysical views, 2016, 3, 2377-9098, 88, 10.3934/biophy.2016.1.88 | |
2. | F. Marullo, E. Cesarini, L. Antonelli, F. Gregoretti, G. Oliva, C. Lanzuolo, Nucleoplasmic Lamin A/C and Polycomb group of proteins: An evolutionarily conserved interplay, 2016, 7, 1949-1034, 103, 10.1080/19491034.2016.1157675 | |
3. | Federica Marasca, Fabrizia Marullo, Chiara Lanzuolo, 2016, Chapter 15, 978-1-4939-6378-2, 167, 10.1007/978-1-4939-6380-5_15 | |
4. | Andrea Bianchi, Pierluigi Giuseppe Manti, Federica Lucini, Chiara Lanzuolo, Mechanotransduction, nuclear architecture and epigenetics in Emery Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy: tous pour un, un pour tous, 2018, 9, 1949-1034, 321, 10.1080/19491034.2018.1460044 | |
5. | Endre Sebestyén, Fabrizia Marullo, Federica Lucini, Cristiano Petrini, Andrea Bianchi, Sara Valsoni, Ilaria Olivieri, Laura Antonelli, Francesco Gregoretti, Gennaro Oliva, Francesco Ferrari, Chiara Lanzuolo, SAMMY-seq reveals early alteration of heterochromatin and deregulation of bivalent genes in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome, 2020, 11, 2041-1723, 10.1038/s41467-020-20048-9 | |
6. | Austė Kanapeckaitė, Neringa Burokienė, Asta Mažeikienė, Graeme S. Cottrell, Darius Widera, Biophysics is reshaping our perception of the epigenome: from DNA-level to high-throughput studies, 2021, 1, 26670747, 100028, 10.1016/j.bpr.2021.100028 | |
7. | Philina Santarelli, Valentina Rosti, Maria Vivo, Chiara Lanzuolo, 2024, 158, 9780128234358, 375, 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.014 | |
8. | Maria Vivo, Valentina Rosti, Sara Cervone, Chiara Lanzuolo, Chromatin plasticity in mechanotransduction, 2024, 88, 09550674, 102376, 10.1016/j.ceb.2024.102376 |
NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE COMPONENTS | MUTATIONS | ASSOCIATED DISEASE | REFERENCE |
Lamin A/C | 1824 C Cryptic splice variant at LMNA gene < T | Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) | [130] |
Q6X, R25G/P, R50S/P, R133P, S143F, H222P, R249Q, Y267C, M371K, R377H/L, R453W, W498R, R527P/H, L530P, R644C | Emery Dreifuss Muscular dystrophy (EDMD) | [134] | |
S143P, E161K, R190W/Q, N195K, R377H/L, R644C | Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) | [134] | |
R482W/Q, K486N, R60G, G62G, R133L | Familial Partial Lipodystrophy 2 (FPLD2) | [134] | |
Lamin B1 | Partial duplication of LMNB1 gene | Leukodystrophy (ADLD) | [123] |
Lamin B2 | R215Q, A407T | Acquired Partial Lipodystrophy (APL) | [124] |
Nup155 | R391H | Atrial fibrillation (AF) | [154] |
Nup62 | Q391P | Infatile bilateral striatal necrosis | [155] |
NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE COMPONENTS | MUTATIONS | ASSOCIATED DISEASE | REFERENCE |
Lamin A/C | 1824 C Cryptic splice variant at LMNA gene < T | Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) | [130] |
Q6X, R25G/P, R50S/P, R133P, S143F, H222P, R249Q, Y267C, M371K, R377H/L, R453W, W498R, R527P/H, L530P, R644C | Emery Dreifuss Muscular dystrophy (EDMD) | [134] | |
S143P, E161K, R190W/Q, N195K, R377H/L, R644C | Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) | [134] | |
R482W/Q, K486N, R60G, G62G, R133L | Familial Partial Lipodystrophy 2 (FPLD2) | [134] | |
Lamin B1 | Partial duplication of LMNB1 gene | Leukodystrophy (ADLD) | [123] |
Lamin B2 | R215Q, A407T | Acquired Partial Lipodystrophy (APL) | [124] |
Nup155 | R391H | Atrial fibrillation (AF) | [154] |
Nup62 | Q391P | Infatile bilateral striatal necrosis | [155] |