Research article

Export file:

Format

• RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
• BibTex
• Text

Content

• Citation Only
• Citation and Abstract

Two algorithms for a fully coupled and consistently macroscopic PDE-ODEsystem modeling a moving bottleneck on a road

1 Istituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo “M. Picone”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via deiTaurini 19, 00185 - Rome, Italy
2 Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Scienze dell’Informazione e Matematica, Universit`a degli Studidell’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 - Coppito (AQ), Italy
3 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Rutgers University, 311 N 5th Street, Camden, NJ 08102,USA

## Abstract    Full Text(HTML)    Figure/Table    Related pages

In this paper we propose two numerical algorithms to solve a coupled PDE-ODE systemwhich models a slow vehicle (bottleneck) moving on a road together with other cars. The resultingsystem is fully coupled because the dynamics of the slow vehicle depends on the density of cars and,at the same time, it causes a capacity drop in the road, thus limiting the car flux. The first algorithm,based on the Wave Front Tracking method, is suitable for theoretical investigations and convergenceresults. The second one, based on the Godunov scheme, is used for numerical simulations. The caseof multiple bottlenecks is also investigated.
Figure/Table
Supplementary
Article Metrics

Citation: Gabriella Bretti, Emiliano Cristiani, Corrado Lattanzio, Amelio Maurizi, Benedetto Piccoli. Two algorithms for a fully coupled and consistently macroscopic PDE-ODEsystem modeling a moving bottleneck on a road. Mathematics in Engineering, 2018, 1(1): 55-83. doi: 10.3934/Mine.2018.1.55

References

• 1. Andreainov B, Goatin P and Seguin N (2010) Finite volume scheme for locally constrained conservation laws. Numer Math 115: 609–645.
• 2. Aubin JP and Cellina A (1984) Differential inclusions. Volume 264 of Grundlehren Math. Wiss., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
• 3. Aw A and Rascle M (2000) Resurrection of second order models of traffc flow. SIAM J Appl Math 60: 916–938.
• 4. Benzoni-Gavage S and Colombo RM (2003) An n-populations model for traffc flow. Eur J Appl Math 14: 587–612.
• 5. Bressan A (1993) A contractive metric for systems of conservation laws with coinciding shock and rarefaction curves. J Differ Equations 106: 332–366.
• 6. Bressan A (2000) Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws – The One-dimensional Cauchy Problem, Oxford University Press.
• 7. Bressan A, Crasta G and Piccoli B (2000)Well Posedness of the Cauchy Problem for n x n systems of conservation laws. American Mathematical Soc Memoir 694.
• 8. Bressan A and Marson A (1995) A Variational Calculus for Discontinuous Solutions of Systems of Consevation Laws. Commun Part Diff Eq 20: 1491–1552.
• 9. Bressan A and LeFloch PG (1999) Structural stability and regularity of entropy solutions to hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Indiana U Math J 48: 43–84.
• 10. Bretti G, Natalini R and Piccoli B (2006) Numerical approximations of a traffc flow model on networks. Netw Heterog Media 1: 57–84.
• 11. Bretti G and Piccoli B (2008) A tracking algorithm for car paths on road networks. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst 7: 510–531.
• 12. Bretti G, Briani M and Cristiani E (2014) An easy-to-use algorithm for simulating traffc flow on networks: numerical experiments. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser S 7: 379–394.
• 13. Briani M and Cristiani E (2014) An easy-to-use algorithm for simulating traffc flow on networks: theoretical study. Netw Heterog Media 9: 519–552.
• 14. Chitour Y and Piccoli B (2005) Traffc circles and timing of traffc lights for cars flow. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 5: 599–630.
• 15. Coclite GM, Garavello M and Piccoli B (2005) Traffc flow on a road network. SIAM J Math Anal 36: 1862–1886.
• 16. Colombo RM (2002) Hyperbolic phase transitions in traffc flow. SIAM J Appl Math 63: 708–721.
• 17. Colombo RM and Goatin P (2007) A well posed conservation law with a variable unilateral constraint. J Differ Equations 234: 654–675.
• 18. Colombo RM and Marcellini F (2016) A traffc model aware of real time data. Math Mod Meth Appl S 26: 445–467.
• 19. Colombo RM and Marson A (2003) Conservation laws and O.D.E.s. A traffc problem. Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 455–461.
• 20. Delle Monache ML and Goatin P (2014) A front tracking method for a strongly coupled PDE-ODE system with moving density constraints in traffc flow. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser S 7: 435–447.
• 21. Delle Monache ML and Goatin P (2014) Scalar conservation laws with moving constraints arising in traffc flow modeling: An existence result. J Differ Equations 257: 4015–4029.
• 22. Delle Monache ML and Goatin P (2017) Stability estimates for scalar conservation laws with moving flux constraints. Netw Heterog Media 12: 245–258.
• 23. Garavello M, Natalini R, Piccoli B, et al. (2007) Conservation laws with discontinuous flux. Netw Heterog Media 2: 159–179.
• 24. Garavello M and Piccoli B (2006) Traffc Flow on Networks. AIMS Series on Applied Mathematics.
• 25. Gasser I, Lattanzio C and Maurizi A (2013) Vehicular traffc flow dynamics on a bus route. Multiscale Model Sim 11: 925–942.
• 26. Gazis DC and Herman R (1992) The moving and "phantom" bottlenecks. Transport Sci 26: 223–229.
• 27. Godlewski E and Raviart PA (1991) Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Mathématiques & Applications [Mathematics and Applications], 3/4. Ellipses, Paris.
• 28. Godunov SK (1959) A finite difference method for the numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics. Matematicheskii Sbornik 47: 271–290.
• 29. Herty M, Lebacque JP and Moutari S (2009) A novel model for intersections of vehicular traffc flow. Netw Heterog Media 4: 813–826.
• 30. Holden H and Risebro NH (1995) A mathematical model of traffc flow on a network of unidirectional roads. SIAM J Math Anal 26: 999–1017.
• 31. Holden H and Risebro NH (2002) Front Tracking for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. Vol 152. Springer Series on Applied Mathematical Sciences.
• 32. Lattanzio C, Maurizi A and Piccoli B (2011) Moving bottlenecks in car traffc flow: a PDE-ODE coupled model. SIAM J Math Anal 43: 50–67.
• 33. Lattanzio C, Maurizi A and Piccoli B (2010) Modeling and simulation of vehicular traffc flow with moving bottlenecks, In: Pistella F and Spitaleri RM (eds.), Proceedings of MASCOT09, Vol 15 of IMACS Series in Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rome, 181–190.
• 34. Laval JA and Daganzo CF (2006) Lane-changing in traffc streams. Transport Res B-Meth 40: 251–264.
• 35. Lebacque JP (1996) The Godunov scheme and what it means for first order flow models. Transportation and Traffc Theory. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffc Theory, Pergamon, Oxford, 647–677.
• 36. Lebacque JP, Lesort JB and Giorgi F (1998) Introducing buses into first order macroscopic traffc flow models. Transport Res Rec 1644: 70–79.
• 37. Liard T and Piccoli B (2018) Well-posedness for scalar conservation laws with moving flux constraints. Preprint ArXiv: 1801.04814.
• 38. Lighthill MJ and Whitham GB (1955) On kinetic waves. II. Theory of traffc flows on long crowded roads. Proc Roy Soc London Ser A 229: 317–345.
• 39. Newell GF (1988) A moving bottleneck. Transport Res B-Meth 32: 531–537.
• 40. Piacentini G, Goatin P and Ferrara A (2018) Traffc control via moving bottleneck of coordinated vehicles. Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Symposium on Control in Transportation Systems, Savona (Italy), 51: 13–18.
• 41. Richards PI (1956) Shock waves on the highway. Oper Res 4: 42–51.
• 42. Villa S, Goatin P and Chalons C (2017) Moving bottlenecks for the Aw-Rascle-Zhang traffc flow model. Discrete Cont Dyn-B 22: 3921–3952.
• 43. Wong GCK and Wong SC (2002) A multi-class traffc flow model: an extension of LWR model with heterogeneous drivers. Transport Res A-Pol 36: 827–841.