Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article

Corporate governance mechanism and performance of insurers in Pakistan

  • This paper aims at investigating the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms (CGM) and the performance of insurers in Pakistan. Major corporate governance theories such as agency theory, resource dependence theory, and stewardship theory are used to address governance mechanisms. Data of listed insurers on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) was collected from annual reports for a period of 12 years from 2007–2018. Pooled OLS is used for analysis purpose, and findings indicate that board composition, ownership concentration, and executive compensation are the most influential internal CGM for the insurers' performance. Board composition and executive compensation are significantly negatively related to all performance measures, but ownership concentration significantly positively impact the performance of insurers in Pakistan. Control variables size and age positively impacts all performance measures while leverage negatively impacts all performance measures. In sum, the regression results of this study indicate that CGM has significant effects on the insurer's performance in Pakistan.

    Citation: Muhammad Junaid, Ye Xue, Muzzammil Wasim Syed, Muhammad Ziaullah, Numair Riffat. Corporate governance mechanism and performance of insurers in Pakistan[J]. Green Finance, 2020, 2(3): 243-262. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020014

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yuhong Huo, Gourav Mandal, Lakshmi Narayan Guin, Santabrata Chakravarty, Renji Han . Allee effect-driven complexity in a spatiotemporal predator-prey system with fear factor. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18820-18860. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023834
    [2] Fang Liu, Yanfei Du . Spatiotemporal dynamics of a diffusive predator-prey model with delay and Allee effect in predator. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 19372-19400. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023857
    [3] Yong Luo . Global existence and stability of the classical solution to a density-dependent prey-predator model with indirect prey-taxis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 6672-6699. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021331
    [4] Tingting Ma, Xinzhu Meng . Global analysis and Hopf-bifurcation in a cross-diffusion prey-predator system with fear effect and predator cannibalism. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 6040-6071. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022282
    [5] Yuxuan Zhang, Xinmiao Rong, Jimin Zhang . A diffusive predator-prey system with prey refuge and predator cannibalism. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(3): 1445-1470. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019070
    [6] Yue Xing, Weihua Jiang, Xun Cao . Multi-stable and spatiotemporal staggered patterns in a predator-prey model with predator-taxis and delay. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18413-18444. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023818
    [7] Juan Ye, Yi Wang, Zhan Jin, Chuanjun Dai, Min Zhao . Dynamics of a predator-prey model with strong Allee effect and nonconstant mortality rate. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(4): 3402-3426. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022157
    [8] Nazanin Zaker, Christina A. Cobbold, Frithjof Lutscher . The effect of landscape fragmentation on Turing-pattern formation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(3): 2506-2537. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022116
    [9] Tingfu Feng, Leyun Wu . Global dynamics and pattern formation for predator-prey system with density-dependent motion. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2296-2320. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023108
    [10] Kalyan Manna, Malay Banerjee . Stability of Hopf-bifurcating limit cycles in a diffusion-driven prey-predator system with Allee effect and time delay. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 2411-2446. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019121
  • This paper aims at investigating the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms (CGM) and the performance of insurers in Pakistan. Major corporate governance theories such as agency theory, resource dependence theory, and stewardship theory are used to address governance mechanisms. Data of listed insurers on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) was collected from annual reports for a period of 12 years from 2007–2018. Pooled OLS is used for analysis purpose, and findings indicate that board composition, ownership concentration, and executive compensation are the most influential internal CGM for the insurers' performance. Board composition and executive compensation are significantly negatively related to all performance measures, but ownership concentration significantly positively impact the performance of insurers in Pakistan. Control variables size and age positively impacts all performance measures while leverage negatively impacts all performance measures. In sum, the regression results of this study indicate that CGM has significant effects on the insurer's performance in Pakistan.




    [1] Abor J, Biekpe N (2007) Corporate governance, ownership structure and performance of SMEs in Ghana: implications for financing opportunities. Corp Governance 7: 288-300. doi: 10.1108/14720700710756562
    [2] Adams R, Mehran H (2003) Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies? Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=387561.
    [3] Adeyele JS, Maiturare MN (2012) Repositioning the Nigerian insurance industry for sustainable development: Risk management perspective. Eur J Bus Manage 4: 22-30.
    [4] Afza T, Asghar A, Kausar MJ (2012) Performance Determinants of General Insurers in Pakistan. Actual Prob Eco 12: 1-7.
    [5] Agrawal A, Knoeber C (1996) Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. J Financ Quant Anal 31: 377-397. doi: 10.2307/2331397
    [6] Akbar M, Hussain S, Ahmad T, et al. (2020) Corporate governance and firm performance in Pakistan: Dynamic panel estimation. Abasyn J Soc Sci 12: 213-230.
    [7] Akbar S, Poletti-Hughes J, El-Faitouri R, et al. (2016) More on the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance in the UK: Evidence from the application of generalized method of moments estimation. Res Int Bus Financ 38: 417-429. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.03.009
    [8] Akita A, Chandan S (2016) Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: evidence from India. Corp Governance 16: 420-436. doi: 10.1108/CG-01-2016-0018
    [9] Akotey JO, Sackey FG, Amoah L, et al. (2013). The financial performance of life insurance companies in Ghana. J Risk Financ 14: 286-302. doi: 10.1108/JRF-11-2012-0081
    [10] Aljamali AY (2012) Factors affecting the financial performance of jordanian insurance companies listed at amman stock exchange. J Manage Res 4: 266-289.
    [11] Al-Saidi M, Al-Shammari B (2015) Ownership concentration, ownership composition and the performance of the Kuwaiti listed non-financial firms. Int J Commer Manage 25: 108-132. doi: 10.1108/IJCOMA-07-2013-0065
    [12] Anderson RC, Mansi SA, Reeb DM (2004) Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. J Accounting Econ 37: 315-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.004
    [13] Arora A, Sharma C (2016) Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: evidence from India. Corp Governance16: 420-436.
    [14] Bakhsh A, Mahmood Z, Iqbal M (2019) Corporate Governance and its impact on Triple Bottom Line: Evidence from Firms Listed with Pakistan Stock Exchange. Pak J Soc Sci 39: 771-784.
    [15] Basuroy S, Gleason KC, Kannan YH (2014) CEO compensation, customer satisfaction, and firm value. Rev Accounting Financ 13: 326-352. doi: 10.1108/RAF-11-2012-0120
    [16] Berkman H, Zou L, Geng S (2009) Corporate governance, profit manipulation and stock return. J Int Bus Econ 9: 132-145.
    [17] Bhat KU, Chen Y, Jebran K, et al. (2018) Corporate governance and firm value: a comparative analysis of state and non-state owned companies in the context of Pakistan. Corp Governance 18: 1196-1206. doi: 10.1108/CG-09-2017-0208
    [18] Brickley MB, Linck JS, Netter JM (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internalcorporate governance. J Financ Econ 105: 581-606. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
    [19] Cheema KUR, Din MS (2013) Impact of corporate governance on performance of firms: A case study of cement industry in Pakistan. J Bus Manage Sci 4: 44-46.
    [20] Coles JW, McWilliams VB, Sen N (2001) An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. J Manage 27: 23-50.
    [21] Dalton DR, Daily CM, Johnson JL, et al. (1999) Number of directors and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Acad Manage J 42: 674-686.
    [22] Doğan M, Yildiz F (2013) The impact of the board of directors' size on the bank's performance: evidence from Turkey. Eur J Bus Manage 5: 130-140.
    [23] Ebid IE (2009) The impact of capital structure choice on firm performance: empirical evidence from Egypt. J Risk Financ 10: 477-487. doi: 10.1108/15265940911001385
    [24] Ehikioya BI (2009) Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: evidence from Nigeria. Corp Governance 9: 231-243. doi: 10.1108/14720700910964307
    [25] Erick TK, Kefah BA, Nyaoga RB (2014) The Relationship between Executive Compensation and Financial Performance of Insurance Companies in Kenya. Res J Financ Accounting 5: 113-122.
    [26] Grace K, Vincent M, Evans A (2018) Corporate governance and performance of financial institutions in Kenya. Acad Strat Manage J 17: 1-7.
    [27] Hermalin B, Weisbach M (2003) Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature. Econ Policy Rev, 9: 7-26. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=794804.
    [28] Huang LY, Hsiao TY, Lai GC, et al. (2007) Does corporate governance and ownership structure influence performance? Evidence from Taiwan life insurance companies. J Insur Issues 30: 123-151.
    [29] Hussain S, Ahmad T, Hassan S (2019) Corporate Governance and Firm Performance using GMM. Int J Inf Bus Manage 11: 300-316.
    [30] Jackling B, Johl S (2009) Board structure and firm performance. Corp Governance 17: 492-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x
    [31] Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76: 323-329.
    [32] Jensen MC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exist, and failure of internal control systems. J Financ 48: 831-880. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
    [33] Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (2010) CEO incentives-It's not how much you pay, but how. J App Corp Financ 22: 64-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00262.x
    [34] Kiel GC, Nicholson GJ (2003) Board composition and corporate performance: how the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corp Governance 11: 189-205. doi: 10.1111/1467-8683.00318
    [35] Klein A (1998) Firm performance and board committee structure. J Law Econ 41: 275-304. doi: 10.1086/467391
    [36] Lee SP, Isa M (2015) Directors' remuneration, governance and performance: the case of Malaysian banks. Manage Financ 41: 26-44.
    [37] Lehmann E, Weigand J (2000) Does governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany. Eur Financ Rev 4: 157-195.
    [38] Liang Q, Xu P, Jiraporn P (2013) Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance. J Bank Financ 37: 2953-2968. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.018
    [39] Lipton M, Lorsch J (1992) A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Bus Lawyer 48: 59-77.
    [40] Li Y (2007) Determinants of banks' profitability and its implication on risk management practices: Panel evidence from the UK in the period 1999-2006. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham: England.
    [41] Pervan M, Kramarić TP (2010) Determinants of insurance companies' profitability in Croatia. Bus Rev Cambridge 16: 209-216.
    [42] Mashayekhi B, Bazaz MS (2008) Corporate governance and firm performance in Iran. J Contemp Accounting Econ 4: 156-172. doi: 10.1016/S1815-5669(10)70033-3
    [43] Murphy KJ, Zábojník J (2004) CEO Pay and Appointments: A Market-Based Explanation for Recent Trends. Am Econ Rev 94: 192-196. doi: 10.1257/0002828041302262
    [44] Nadeem AS, Zongjun W (2012) Effects of corporate governance on capital structure: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Corp Governance 12: 629-641. doi: 10.1108/14720701211275569
    [45] Neville M (2011) The role of boards in small and medium sized firms. Corp Governance 11: 527-540. doi: 10.1108/14720701111176948
    [46] Ozkan N (2007) CEO Compensation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation of UK Panel Data. J Econ Lit 17: 260-285.
    [47] Pervan M, Poposki K, Ćurak M (2013) How Well Insurance Companies in Macedonia Perform. 5th WSEAS Internation Conferance on Applied Economics.
    [48] Pfeffer J (1972) Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: the organization and its environment. Admin Sci Q 17: 218-229. doi: 10.2307/2393956
    [49] Rashid K, Islam S (2013) Corporate governance, complementarities, and the value of a firm in an emerging market: the effect of market imperfections. Corp Governance 17: 70-87. doi: 10.1108/14720701311302422
    [50] Rosentein S, Wyatt JG (1990) Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. J Financ Econ 26: 175-191. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-H
    [51] Rudkin B, Kimani D, Ullah S, et al. (2019) Hide-and-seek in corporate disclosure: evidence from negative corporate incidents. Corp Governance 19: 158-175. doi: 10.1108/CG-05-2018-0164
    [52] Singh S, Tabassum N, Darwish TK, et al. (2018) Corporate governance and Tobin's Q as a measure of organizational performance. Br J Manage 29: 171-190. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12237
    [53] Sheikh NA, Wang Z, Khan S (2013) The impact of internal attributes of corporate governance on firm performance: evidence from Pakistan. Int J Commer Manage 23: 38-55. doi: 10.1108/10569211311301420
    [54] Sheikh NA, Karim S (2015) Effects of Internal Governance Indicators on Performance of Commercial Banks in Pakistan. Pak J Soc Sci 35: 77-90.
    [55] Shiu Y (2004) Determinants of United Kingdom general insurance company performance. Br Actuarial J 10: 1079-1110. doi: 10.1017/S1357321700002968
    [56] Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Financ 52: 737-783. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
    [57] Sun W, Stewart J, Pollard D (2011) Corporate Governance and the Global Financial Crisis: International Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [58] Tam OK, Tan M (2007) Ownership, governance and firm performance in Malaysia. Corp Governance 15: 208-222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00555.x
    [59] Vafeas N (1999) Board meeting frequency and firm performance. J Finance Econ 53: 113-142. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5
    [60] Waheed A, Malik QA (2019) Board characteristics, ownership concentration and firms' performance. South Asian J Bus Stud 8: 146-165. doi: 10.1108/SAJBS-03-2018-0031
    [61] Weisbach M (1988) Outside directors and CEO turnover. J Financ Econ 20: 431-460. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(88)90053-0
    [62] Wiwattanakantang Y (2001) Controlling shareholders and corporate value: evidence from Thailand. Pacific-Basin Financ J 9: 323-362. doi: 10.1016/S0927-538X(01)00022-1
    [63] Xiao Y, Tylecote A, Liu J (2013) Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? The impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies. Res Policy 42: 749-764.
    [64] Yasser QR, Entebang HA, Mansor SA (2011) Corporate governance and firm performance in Pakistan: The case of Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE)-30. J Econ Int Financ 3: 482-491.
    [65] Yermack D (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. J Financ Econ 40: 185-221. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Isam Al-Darabsah, Xianhua Tang, Yuan Yuan, A prey-predator model with migrations and delays, 2016, 21, 1531-3492, 737, 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.737
    2. Dana Contreras Julio, Pablo Aguirre, Allee thresholds and basins of attraction in a predation model with double Allee effect, 2018, 41, 0170-4214, 2699, 10.1002/mma.4774
    3. Manoj Kumar Singh, 2020, 2253, 0094-243X, 020003, 10.1063/5.0019202
    4. Swadesh Pal, S. Ghorai, Malay Banerjee, Effect of kernels on spatio-temporal patterns of a non-local prey-predator model, 2019, 310, 00255564, 96, 10.1016/j.mbs.2019.01.011
    5. Yao Shi, Jianhua Wu, Qian Cao, Analysis on a diffusive multiple Allee effects predator–prey model induced by fear factors, 2021, 59, 14681218, 103249, 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2020.103249
    6. Yexuan Li, Hua Liu, Yumei Wei, Ming Ma, Turing pattern of a reaction-diffusion predator-prey model with weak Allee effect and delay, 2020, 1707, 1742-6588, 012025, 10.1088/1742-6596/1707/1/012025
    7. Feng Rao, Yun Kang, The complex dynamics of a diffusive prey–predator model with an Allee effect in prey, 2016, 28, 1476945X, 123, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.07.001
    8. Xiaoyan Gao, Sadia Ishag, Shengmao Fu, Wanjun Li, Weiming Wang, Bifurcation and Turing pattern formation in a diffusive ratio-dependent predator–prey model with predator harvesting, 2020, 51, 14681218, 102962, 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2019.102962
    9. Kalyan Manna, Swadesh Pal, Malay Banerjee, Analytical and numerical detection of traveling wave and wave-train solutions in a prey–predator model with weak Allee effect, 2020, 100, 0924-090X, 2989, 10.1007/s11071-020-05655-x
    10. Sten Madec, Jérôme Casas, Guy Barles, Christelle Suppo, Bistability induced by generalist natural enemies can reverse pest invasions, 2017, 75, 0303-6812, 543, 10.1007/s00285-017-1093-x
    11. G. Gambino, M. C. Lombardo, M. Sammartino, Cross-diffusion-induced subharmonic spatial resonances in a predator-prey system, 2018, 97, 2470-0045, 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.012220
    12. Kalyan Manna, Malay Banerjee, Stationary, non-stationary and invasive patterns for a prey-predator system with additive Allee effect in prey growth, 2018, 36, 1476945X, 206, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2018.09.001
    13. Yun Kang, Dynamics of a generalized Ricker–Beverton–Holt competition model subject to Allee effects, 2016, 22, 1023-6198, 687, 10.1080/10236198.2015.1135910
    14. Conghui Zhang, Hailong Yuan, Positive Solutions of a Predator–Prey Model with Additive Allee Effect, 2020, 30, 0218-1274, 2050068, 10.1142/S0218127420500686
    15. Kaigang Huang, Yongli Cai, Feng Rao, Shengmao Fu, Weiming Wang, Positive steady states of a density-dependent predator-prey model with diffusion, 2017, 22, 1531-3492, 16, 10.3934/dcdsb.2017209
    16. Yongli Song, Xiaosong Tang, Stability, Steady-State Bifurcations, and Turing Patterns in a Predator-Prey Model with Herd Behavior and Prey-taxis, 2017, 139, 00222526, 371, 10.1111/sapm.12165
    17. Yuri V. Tyutyunov, Deeptajyoti Sen, Lyudmila I. Titova, Malay Banerjee, Predator overcomes the Allee effect due to indirect prey–taxis, 2019, 39, 1476945X, 100772, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100772
    18. Kolade M. Owolabi, Dumitru Baleanu, Emergent patterns in diffusive Turing-like systems with fractional-order operator, 2021, 0941-0643, 10.1007/s00521-021-05917-8
    19. Ye Xuan Li, Hua Liu, Yu Mei Wei, Ming Ma, Gang Ma, Jing Yan Ma, Ljubisa Kocinac, Population Dynamic Study of Prey-Predator Interactions with Weak Allee Effect, Fear Effect, and Delay, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/8095080
    20. Feng Yang, Yongli Song, Stability and spatiotemporal dynamics of a diffusive predator–prey system with generalist predator and nonlocal intraspecific competition, 2022, 194, 03784754, 159, 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.11.013
    21. Naveed Ahmad Khan, Muhammad Sulaiman, Jamel Seidu, Fahad Sameer Alshammari, Chenguang Yang, Mathematical Analysis of the Prey-Predator System with Immigrant Prey Using the Soft Computing Technique, 2022, 2022, 1607-887X, 1, 10.1155/2022/1241761
    22. Manal Alqhtani, Kolade M. Owolabi, Khaled M. Saad, Spatiotemporal (target) patterns in sub-diffusive predator-prey system with the Caputo operator, 2022, 160, 09600779, 112267, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112267
    23. Malay Banerjee, Swadesh Pal, Pranali Roy Chowdhury, Stationary and non-stationary pattern formation over fragmented habitat, 2022, 162, 09600779, 112412, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112412
    24. Yingzi Liu, Zhong Li, Mengxin He, Bifurcation analysis in a Holling-Tanner predator-prey model with strong Allee effect, 2023, 20, 1551-0018, 8632, 10.3934/mbe.2023379
    25. Wenbin Yang, Xin Chang, Hopf bifurcation and Turing patterns for a diffusive predator–prey system with weak Allee effect, 2023, 0035-5038, 10.1007/s11587-023-00824-7
    26. Kalyan Manna, Malay Banerjee, Dynamics of a prey–predator model with reproductive Allee effect for prey and generalist predator, 2024, 0924-090X, 10.1007/s11071-024-09451-9
    27. Kalyan Manna, Swadesh Pal, Malay Banerjee, Effects of spatiotemporal, temporal and spatial nonlocal prey competitions on population distributions for a prey-predator system with generalist predation, 2025, 0, 1531-3492, 0, 10.3934/dcdsb.2025106
    28. R.P. Gupta, Shristi Tiwari, Arun Kumar, The study of non-constant steady states and pattern formation for an interacting population model in a spatial environment, 2025, 229, 03784754, 652, 10.1016/j.matcom.2024.10.022
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5307) PDF downloads(401) Cited by(11)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog