Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of recycled aluminium matrix reinforced with rice husk ash

Olatunji P Abolusoro; Moshibudi Caroline Khoathane; Washington Washington; Olatunji P Abolusoro; Moshibudi Caroline Khoathane; Washington Washington

doi:10.3934/matersci.2024044

AIMS Materials Science

2024, Volume 11, Issue 5: 918-934. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024044

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of recycled aluminium matrix reinforced with rice husk ash

1.
Department of Chemical, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, Gauteng Province, South Africa
2.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Kwara state, Nigeria

Received: 27 June 2024 Revised: 14 September 2024 Accepted: 23 September 2024 Published: 12 October 2024

This study used rice husk ash to reinforce recycled aluminium waste cans matrix through stir casting technique to produce a composite. The rice husk ash was added to the aluminium matrix in 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%. Mechanical and microstructural analyses were carried out on the composites. The tensile strength of the composite increases at 5 wt% addition of reinforcement and increases further to reach a maximum of 121.6 MPa at 10 wt% addition. The tensile value then dropped at 15 wt% and reduced further at the 20 wt% particulate addition. A similar trend was observed for the impact strength with the maximum value of 81.5 J occurring at 10 wt% addition before declining at the higher percentages of reinforcement. The hardness of the composites continues to increase as the percentage of the rice husk addition rises leading to the highest Brinell hardness number (BHN) of 74.5 occurring at the highest percentage of rice husk ash addition. The density of the composites decreases as the wt% addition of the reinforcement increases giving the lowest density value of 2.46 g/cm³ at 20 wt% addition. The microstructures exhibited uniformity in the dispersion of the reinforcement into the aluminium matrix, although little particulate agglomeration could be noticed at higher percentages of rice husk addition. This study provides a significant boost to the attainment of lightweight materials in the automobile and other allied industries. The improvement in the mechanical properties and the lower density of the composites attained in this study are vital factors considered in material selection and design for lightweight engineering applications.

Keywords:

Citation: Olatunji P Abolusoro, Moshibudi Caroline Khoathane, Washington Washington. Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of recycled aluminium matrix reinforced with rice husk ash[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(5): 918-934. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024044

Related Papers:

[1]	Xuyang Cao, Qinglong Wang, Jie Liu . Hopf bifurcation in a predator-prey model under fuzzy parameters involving prey refuge and fear effects. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23945-23970. doi: 10.3934/math.20241164
[2]	Yu-ting Wu, Heng-you Lan, Chang-jiang Liu . On implicit coupled systems of fuzzy fractional delay differential equations with triangular fuzzy functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3741-3760. doi: 10.3934/math.2021222
[3]	Weili Kong, Yuanfu Shao . The effects of fear and delay on a predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin functional response and stage structure for predator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29260-29289. doi: 10.3934/math.20231498
[4]	Naveed Iqbal, Imran Khan, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . The fuzzy fractional acoustic waves model in terms of the Caputo-Fabrizio operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1770-1783. doi: 10.3934/math.2023091
[5]	Jagdev Singh, Behzad Ghanbari, Ved Prakash Dubey, Devendra Kumar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Fractional dynamics and computational analysis of food chain model with disease in intermediate predator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17089-17121. doi: 10.3934/math.2024830
[6]	Anil Kumar, Muslim Malik, Mohammad Sajid, Dumitru Baleanu . Existence of local and global solutions to fractional order fuzzy delay differential equation with non-instantaneous impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2348-2369. doi: 10.3934/math.2022133
[7]	Chuanfu Chai, Yuanfu Shao, Yaping Wang . Analysis of a Holling-type IV stochastic prey-predator system with anti-predatory behavior and Lévy noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21033-21054. doi: 10.3934/math.20231071
[8]	Binfeng Xie, Na Zhang . Influence of fear effect on a Holling type III prey-predator system with the prey refuge. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1811-1830. doi: 10.3934/math.2022104
[9]	Kimun Ryu, Wonlyul Ko . Stability and bifurcations in a delayed predator-prey system with prey-taxis and hunting cooperation functional response. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(6): 12808-12840. doi: 10.3934/math.2025576
[10]	Wei Ou, Changjin Xu, Qingyi Cui, Yicheng Pang, Zixin Liu, Jianwei Shen, Muhammad Zafarullah Baber, Muhammad Farman, Shabir Ahmad . Hopf bifurcation exploration and control technique in a predator-prey system incorporating delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1622-1651. doi: 10.3934/math.2024080

Abstract

1. Introduction

In convex functions theory, Hermite-Hadamard inequality is very important which was discovered by C. Hermite and J. Hadamard independently (see, also ^[1], and [2,p.137])

$\begin{equation} \mathcal{F}\left( \frac{\pi _{1}+\pi _{2}}{2}\right) \leq \frac{1}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\int \limits_{\pi _{1}}^{\pi _{2}}\mathcal{F}(\varkappa )d\varkappa \leq \frac{\mathcal{F}\left( \pi _{1}\right) +\mathcal{F}\left( \pi _{2}\right) }{2}, \end{equation}$

(1.1)

where $\; \mathcal{F}$ is a convex function. In the case of concave mappings, the above inequality is satisfied in reverse order.

Over the last twenty years, numerous studies have focused on obtaining trapezoid and midpoint type inequalities which give bounds for the right-hand side and left-hand side of the inequality (1.1), respectively. For example, the authors first obtained trapezoid and midpoint type inequalities for convex functions in ^[3] and in ^[4], respectively. In ^[5], Sarikaya et al. obtained the inequalities (1.1) for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and the authors also proved some corresponding trapezoid type inequalities for fractional integrals. Iqbal et al. presented some fractional midpoint type inequalities for convex functions in ^[6]. Sarikaya and Ertuğral ^[7] introduced the notions of generalized fractional integrals and proved some Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for convex functions. In ^[8], Budak et al. used the generalized fractional integrals to prove Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for twice differentiable convex functions. After that, the authors used generalized fractional integrals and proved the different variants of integral inequalities in ^{[9,10,11,12,13,14]}.

On the other hand, İşcan ^[15] defined the following class of functions called harmonically convex functions:

If the mapping $\; \mathcal{F}:I\subset \mathbb{R} \backslash \left \{ 0\right \} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ satisfies the inequality

$\begin{equation*} \; \mathcal{F}\left( \frac{1}{\frac{\sigma }{\varkappa }+\frac{1-\sigma }{y}} \right) \leq \sigma \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) +\left( 1-\sigma \right) \mathcal{F}\left( y\right) , \end{equation*}$

for all $\varkappa, y\in I$ and $\; \sigma \in \left[ 0, 1\right]$ , then $\; \mathcal{F}$ is called harmonically convex function. In the case of harmonically concave mappings, the above inequality is satisfied in reverse order.

It is worth noting that the harmonic feature has been important in a variety of disciplines in pure and applied sciences. The authors explore the significance of the harmonic mean in Asian stock company ^[16]. Harmonic methods are used in electric circuit theory, which is interesting. The overall resistance of a set of parallel resistors is just half of the entire resistors' harmonic mean. If $r_{1}$ and $r_{2}$ are the resistances of two parallel resistors, the total resistance may be calculated using the following formula:

$\begin{equation*} r_{\sigma } = \frac{r_{1}r_{2}}{r_{1}+r_{2}} = \frac{1}{2}\mathcal{H}\left( r_{1},r_{2}\right), \end{equation*}$

which is the half of the harmonic mean.

The harmonic mean, according to Noor ^[17], is also important in the creation of parallel algorithms for solving nonlinear problems. Several researchers have proposed iterative approaches for solving linear and nonlinear systems of equations using harmonic means and harmonically convex functions.

Several research articles have recently been published on various generalizations of integral inequalities using various approaches. For example, İşcan established some new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions and trapezoid type inequalities for this class of functions in ^[15]. In ^[18], İ şcan and Wu established Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions via Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. They also proved some fractional trapezoid type inequalities for mapping whose derivatives in absolute value are harmonically convex. İşcan proved Ostrowski type integral inequalities for harmonically $s$ -convex functions in ^[19] and in ^[20], Chen gave an extension of fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions. Kunt et al. ^[21] and Set et al. ^[22] used the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and proved Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions. In ^[23], Șanlı proved several fractional midpoint type inequalities utilizing differentiable convex functions. The authors used the generalized fractional integrals and proved Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions in ^[24,25]. Mohsen et al. ^[26] used the $h$ - harmonically convexity to prove some new Ostrowski type inequalities and in ^[27], Akhtar et al. proved a new variant of Ostrowski inequalities for harmonically convex functions. In the literature there are several papers on the inequalities for harmonically convex functions. For some recent developments in integral inequalities and harmonically convexity, one can consult ^[28,29,30].

Inspired by the ongoing studies, we use the generalized fractional integrals to develop some new Ostrowski type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions. We also show that the newly developed inequalities are extensions of some previously known inequalities.

The following is the structure of this paper: Section 2 provides a brief overview of the fractional calculus as well as other related studies in this field. In Section 3, we establish Ostrowski type inequalities for differentiable functions. The relationship between the findings reported here and similar findings in the literature are also taken into account. We discuss the special cases of newly established inequalities in Section 4 and obtain several new Ostrowski type inequalities. We give some applications to special means of real numbers in Section 5. Section 6 concludes with some recommendations for future research.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we recall some basic concepts of fractional integrals and related integral inequalities.

Definition 2.1. ^[7] The left and right-sided generalized fractional integrals given as follows:

$\begin{equation} _{\pi _{1}+}I_{\varphi }\mathcal{F}(\varkappa ) = \int \limits_{\pi _{1}}^{\varkappa }\frac{\varphi \left( \varkappa -\sigma \right) }{\varkappa -\sigma }\mathcal{F}(\sigma )d\sigma ,\ \ \varkappa > \pi _{1}, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

$\begin{equation} _{\pi _{2}-}I_{\varphi }\mathcal{F}(\varkappa ) = \int \limits_{\varkappa }^{\pi _{2}}\frac{\varphi \left( \sigma -\varkappa \right) }{\sigma -\varkappa }\mathcal{F}(\sigma )d\sigma ,\ \ \varkappa < \pi _{2}, \end{equation}$

(2.2)

where the function $\varphi :[0, \infty)\rightarrow \lbrack 0, \infty)$ satisfies $\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\varphi (\sigma)}{\sigma }d\sigma < \infty.$ For the details about the genrarlized fractional integrals, one can consult ^[7].

The most important feature of the generalized fractional integrals is that they generalize some types of fractional integrals such as Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, $k$ -Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, Katugampola fractional integrals, conformable fractional integral, Hadamard fractional integrals, etc. Few important special cases of the integral operators (2.1) and (2.2) are mentioned below.

i) Taking $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \sigma,$ the operators (2.1) and (2.2) reduces to the classical Riemann integrals as follows:

$\begin{equation*} I_{_{\pi _{1}^{+}}}\mathcal{F}(\varkappa ) = \int_{\pi _{1}}^{\varkappa } \mathcal{F}(\sigma )d\sigma ,\; \; \; \varkappa > \pi _{1}, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} I_{\pi _{2}^{-}}\mathcal{F}(\varkappa ) = \int_{\varkappa }^{\pi _{2}}\mathcal{ F}(\sigma )d\sigma ,\ \ \varkappa < \pi _{2}. \end{equation*}$

ii) Taking $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \frac{\sigma ^{\alpha } }{\Gamma \left(\alpha \right) },$ the operators (2.1) and (2.2) reduces to the well-known Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals as follows:

$\begin{equation*} J_{_{\pi _{1}^{+}}}^{\alpha }\mathcal{F}(\varkappa ) = \frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) }\int_{\pi _{1}}^{\varkappa }\left( \varkappa -\sigma \right) ^{\alpha -1}\mathcal{F}(\sigma )d\sigma ,\ \ \varkappa > \pi _{1}, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} J_{\pi _{2}^{-}}^{\alpha }\mathcal{F}(\varkappa ) = \frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) }\int_{\varkappa }^{\pi _{2}}\left( \sigma -\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha -1}\mathcal{F}(\sigma )d\sigma ,\ \ \varkappa < \pi _{2}. \end{equation*}$

iii) Taking $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \frac{\sigma ^{\frac{ \alpha }{k}}}{k\Gamma _{k}\left(\alpha \right) },$ the operators (2.1) and (2.2) reduces to the well-known $k$ –Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals as follows:

$\begin{equation*} J_{\pi _{1}+}^{\alpha ,k}\mathcal{F}(\varkappa ) = \frac{1}{k\Gamma _{k}\left( \alpha \right) }\int_{\pi _{1}}^{\varkappa }\left( \varkappa -\sigma \right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}-1}F(\sigma )d\sigma ,\ \ \varkappa > \pi _{1}, \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} J_{\pi _{2}-}^{\alpha ,k}\mathcal{F}(\varkappa ) = \frac{1}{k\Gamma _{k}\left( \alpha \right) }\int_{\varkappa }^{\pi _{2}}\left( \sigma -\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}-1}\mathcal{F}(\sigma )d\sigma ,\ \ \varkappa < \pi _{2}, \end{equation*}$

where

$\begin{equation*} \Gamma _{k}\left( \alpha \right) = \int_{0}^{\infty }\sigma ^{\alpha -1}e^{- \frac{\sigma ^{k}}{k}}d\sigma ,\ \ \ \mathcal{R}(\alpha ) > 0 \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} \Gamma _{k}\left( \alpha \right) = k^{\frac{\alpha }{k}-1}\Gamma \left( \frac{ \alpha }{k}\right) ,\ \ \mathcal{R}(\alpha ) > 0;\,k > 0. \end{equation*}$

Recently, Zhao et al. used the generalized fractional integrals and proved the following Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities.

Theorem 2.2. ^[25] For any harmonically convex mapping, the following inequalityholds:

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathcal{F}\left( \frac{2\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{1}+\pi _{2}}\right) &\leq & \frac{1}{2\Phi \left( 1\right) }\left \{ J_{\frac{1}{\pi _{1}}-}^{\alpha }( \mathcal{F}\circ g)\left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) +J_{\frac{1}{\pi _{2}} +}^{\alpha }(\mathcal{F}\circ g)\left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}}\right) \right \} \\ &\leq &\frac{\mathcal{F}(\pi _{1})+\mathcal{F}(\pi _{2})}{2}, \end{eqnarray}$

(2.3)

where $g(\varkappa) = \frac{1}{\varkappa }$ and $\Phi \left(\sigma\right) = \int_{0}^{\sigma }\frac{\varphi \left(\frac{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}{\pi_{1}\pi _{2}}s \right) }{s }ds < +\infty.$

Remark 2.3. It is obvious that if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \sigma$ in inequality (2.3), then we obtain the following inequality of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality (see, ^[15]):

$\begin{equation*} \; \mathcal{F}\left( \frac{2\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{1}+\pi _{2}}\right) \leq \frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\int_{\pi _{1}}^{\pi _{2}}\mathcal{ F}\left( \varkappa \right) d\varkappa \leq \frac{\mathcal{F}\left( \pi _{1}\right) +\; \mathcal{F}\left( \pi _{2}\right) }{2}. \end{equation*}$

Remark 2.4. It is obvious that if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \frac{\sigma ^{\alpha }}{\Gamma \left(\alpha \right) }$ in inequality (2.3), then we obtain the following inequality of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals (see, ^[18]):

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}\left( \frac{2\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{1}+\pi _{2}}\right) &\leq & \frac{\Gamma (\alpha +1)}{2}\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}} \right) ^{\alpha }\left \{ J_{\frac{1}{\pi _{1}}-}^{\alpha }(\mathcal{F}\circ g)\left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) +J_{\frac{1}{\pi _{2}}+}^{\alpha }( \mathcal{F}\circ g)\left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}}\right) \right \} \\ &\leq &\frac{\mathcal{F}(\pi _{1})+\mathcal{F}(\pi _{2})}{2}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Remark 2.5. It is obvious that if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \frac{\sigma ^{ \frac{\alpha }{k}}}{k\Gamma _{k}\left(\alpha \right) }$ in inequality (2.3), then we obtain the following inequality of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for $k$ -Riemann Liouville fractional integrals (see, ^[25]):

$\begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}\left( \frac{2\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{1}+\pi _{2}}\right) &\leq & \frac{k\Gamma _{k}(\alpha +k)}{2}\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}\left \{ J_{\frac{1}{\pi _{1}}-}^{\alpha ,k}( \mathcal{F}\circ g)\left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) +J_{\frac{1}{\pi _{2}} +}^{\alpha ,k}(\mathcal{F}\circ g)\left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}}\right) \right \} \\ &\leq &\frac{\mathcal{F}(\pi _{1})+\mathcal{F}(\pi _{2})}{2}. \end{eqnarray*}$

3. Main results

In this section, we prove some new Ostrowski type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions via the generalized fractional integrals. For brevity, we give the following special functions:

(1) The Beta function:

$\begin{equation*} \beta (\varkappa ,y) = \frac{\Gamma (\varkappa )\Gamma (y)}{\Gamma (\varkappa +y)} = \int_{0}^{1}\sigma ^{\varkappa -1}(1-\sigma )^{y-1}d\sigma ,\text{ } \varkappa ,y > 0. \end{equation*}$

(2) The hypergeometric function:

$\begin{equation*} _{2}F_{1}(\pi _{1},\pi _{2};c;z) = \frac{1}{\beta (\pi _{2},\; c-\pi _{2})} \int_{0}^{1}\sigma ^{\pi _{2}-1}(1-\sigma )^{c-\pi _{2}-1}(1-z\sigma )^{-\alpha }d\sigma ,{ \ }c > \pi _{2} > 0,{ \ }\left \vert z\right \vert < 1. \end{equation*}$

Lemma 3.1. Let $\mathcal{F}:I = \left[ \pi _{1}, \pi _{2}\right] \subseteq(0, +\infty)\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a differentiable function on $I^{\circ }$ such that $\mathcal{F}^{^{\prime }}\in L\left([\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}]\right).$ Then, the following generalized fractional integrals identity holds for all $\varkappa \in\left(\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}\right)$ :

$\begin{eqnarray} &&\pi _{1}\varkappa \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) \int_{0}^{1}\frac{ \Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ &&-\varkappa \pi _{2}\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) \int_{0}^{1}\frac{ \Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ & = &(\Delta \left( 1\right) +\Lambda (1))\mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) - \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }+}I_{\varphi }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}}\right) +\; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }-}I_{\varphi }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) \right] , \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

where the mappings $\Delta$ and $\Lambda$ are defined as:

$\begin{equation*} \Delta \left( \sigma \right) = \int_{0}^{\sigma }\frac{\varphi \left( \frac{ \varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa }s\right) }{s}ds < +\infty, \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} \Lambda \left( \sigma \right) = \int_{0}^{\sigma }\frac{\varphi \left( \frac{ \pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa }s\right) }{s}ds < +\infty . \end{equation*}$

Proof. Consider

(3.2)

From fundamentals of integrations, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} I_{1} & = &\pi _{1}\varkappa \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) \int_{0}^{1} \frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ & = &\int_{0}^{1}\Delta \left( \sigma \right) d\mathcal{F}\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ & = &\Delta \left( 1\right) \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\int_{0}^{1} \frac{\varphi \left( \frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) }{\pi _{1}\varkappa }\sigma \right) }{\sigma }\mathcal{F}\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ & = &\Delta \left( 1\right) \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\; _{\frac{1}{ \varkappa }+}I_{\varphi }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{ \pi _{1}}\right) . \end{eqnarray*}$

Similarly, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} I_{2} & = &\varkappa \pi _{2}\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) \int_{0}^{1} \frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ & = &-\Lambda \left( 1\right) \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) +\; _{\frac{1}{ \varkappa }-}I_{\varphi }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{ \pi _{2}}\right) . \end{eqnarray*}$

Thus, we obtain the required identity (3.1) by using the calculated values of $I_{1}$ and $I_{2}$ in (3.2).

Remark 3.2. If we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \sigma$ in Lemma 3.1, then we obtain the following equality:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\left \{ \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{2}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{ \pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa } \right) d\sigma \right. \\ &&\left. -\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{2}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma }{ \left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}} \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \right \} \\ & = &\mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\int_{\pi _{1}}^{\pi _{2}}\frac{\mathcal{F}\left( u\right) }{u^{2}}du. \end{eqnarray*}$

This is proved by İşcan in [19,Lemma 2.1].

Remark 3.3. In Lemma 3.1, if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \frac{\sigma ^{\alpha }}{\Gamma \left(\alpha \right) }$ , then we have the following equality for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{\alpha +1}}{\left( \pi _{1}\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha -1}}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma ^{\alpha }}{ \left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}} \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ &&-\frac{\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha +1}}{\left( \varkappa \pi _{2}\right) ^{\alpha -1}}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma ^{\alpha }}{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\mathcal{F} ^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ & = &\left[ \left( \frac{\varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa }\right) ^{\alpha }+\left( \frac{\pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa }\right) ^{\alpha }\right] \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) \\ &&-\Gamma \left( \alpha +1\right) \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }+}J^{\alpha }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}}\right) +\; _{\frac{ 1}{\varkappa }-}J^{\alpha }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{ \pi _{2}}\right) \right] . \end{eqnarray*}$

This is proved by İşcan in ^[31].

Corollary 3.4. In Lemma 3.1, if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \frac{\sigma ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{k\Gamma \left(\alpha \right) },$ then we have thefollowing new equality for $k$ -Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{\frac{\alpha +k}{k}}}{\left( \pi _{1}\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha -k}{k}}}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma ^{ \frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ &&-\frac{\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha +k}{k}}}{\left( \varkappa \pi _{2}\right) ^{\frac{\alpha -k}{k}}}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma ^{ \frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) d\sigma \\ & = &\left[ \left( \frac{\varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa }\right) ^{ \frac{\alpha }{k}}+\left( \frac{\pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa } \right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}\right] \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) \\ &&-\Gamma _{k}\left( \alpha +k\right) \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa } +}J^{\alpha ,k}\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}} \right) +\; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }-}J^{\alpha ,k}\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) \right] . \end{eqnarray*}$

Theorem 3.5. We assume that the conditions of Lemma 3.1 are valid $.$ If $\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{^{\prime }}\right \vert ^{q}$ is harmonicallyconvex on $[\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}]$ for some $q\geq 1$ , then the followinginequality holds for the generalized fractional integrals:

where

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Theta _{1} & = &\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma , \\ \Theta _{2} & = &\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma \Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{ \left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}} d\sigma , \\ \Theta _{3} & = &\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\left( 1-\sigma \right) \Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma ,\\ \Theta _{4} & = &\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma , \\ \Theta _{5} & = &\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma \Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{ \left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}} d\sigma , \end{eqnarray*}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Theta _{6} & = &\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\left( 1-\sigma \right) \Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma . \end{eqnarray*}$

Proof. Taking absolute in Lemma 3.1 and then applying the well known power mean inequality, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert (\Delta \left( 1\right) +\Lambda (1))\mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }+}I_{\varphi }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}}\right) +\; _{\frac{1}{ \varkappa }-}I_{\varphi }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{ \pi _{2}}\right) \right] \right \vert \\ &\leq &\pi _{1}\varkappa \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) \int_{0}^{1}\frac{ \Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{ \pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa } \right) \right \vert d\sigma \\ &&+\pi _{2}\varkappa \left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) \int_{0}^{1}\frac{ \Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{ \pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa } \right) \right \vert d\sigma \\ &\leq &\pi _{1}\varkappa \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) \left( \int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma \right) ^{1- \frac{1}{q}} \\ &&\times \left( \int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) \right \vert ^{q}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1 }{q}} \\ &&+\pi _{2}\varkappa \left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) \left( \int_{0}^{1} \frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma \right) ^{1-\frac{1}{q}} \\ &&\times \left( \int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) \right \vert ^{q}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1 }{q}}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Now from harmonically convexity of $\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\right \vert ^{q}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left( \int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma \right) ^{1- \frac{1}{q}}\left( \int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) \right \vert ^{q}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1 }{q}} \\ &\leq &\Theta _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma \Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma +\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\left( 1-\sigma \right) \Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ & = &\Theta _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \Theta _{2}\left \vert \mathcal{F} ^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\Theta _{3}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\right) ^{\frac{1 }{q}}. \end{eqnarray*}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left( \int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma \right) ^{1- \frac{1}{q}}\left( \int_{0}^{1}\frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) \right \vert ^{q}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1 }{q}} \\ &\leq &\Theta _{4}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\sigma \Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma +\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\left( 1-\sigma \right) \Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ & = &\Theta _{4}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \Theta _{5}\left \vert \mathcal{F} ^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\Theta _{6}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\right) ^{\frac{1 }{q}}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Thus, the proof is completed.

Remark 3.6. In Theorem 3.5, if we assume $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \sigma$ , then we have the following Ostrowski type inequalities:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{ \pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\int_{\pi _{1}}^{\pi _{2}}\frac{\mathcal{F}\left( u\right) }{u^{2}}du\right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\left \{ \chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1 }{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa \right) \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,1,1\right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,1,1\right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right. \\ &&\left. +\chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa \right) \left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,1,1\right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,1,1\right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\right) ^{\frac{1 }{q}}\right \} , \end{eqnarray*}$

where

$\begin{eqnarray*} \chi _{1}\left( \upsilon ,\varkappa \right) & = &\frac{1}{\varkappa -\nu } \left[ \frac{1}{\upsilon }-\frac{\ln \varkappa -\ln \upsilon }{\varkappa -\upsilon }\right] , \\ \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) & = &\frac{\beta \left( \mu +2,1\right) }{\varkappa ^{2\upsilon }}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2\upsilon ,\mu +2;\mu +3;1-\frac{\pi _{1}}{\varkappa }\right) , \\ \chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) & = &\frac{\beta \left( \mu +1,1\right) }{\varkappa ^{2\upsilon }}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2\upsilon ,\mu +1;\mu +3;1-\frac{\pi _{1}}{\varkappa }\right) , \\ \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) & = &\frac{\beta \left( 1,\mu +2\right) }{\pi _{2}^{2\upsilon }}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2\upsilon ,1;\mu +3;1-\frac{\varkappa }{\pi _{2}}\right) , \\ \chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) & = &\frac{\beta \left( 2,\mu +1\right) }{\pi _{2}^{2\upsilon }}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2\upsilon ,2;\mu +3;1-\frac{\varkappa }{\pi _{2}}\right) . \end{eqnarray*}$

This is proved by İşcan in [,Theorem 2.4 for $s = 1$ ].

Corollary 3.7. In Theorem 3.5, if we set $\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime}\left(\varkappa \right) \right \vert \leq M$ , $\varkappa \in \left[ \pi_{1}, \pi _{2}\right],$ then we obtain the following Ostrowski typeinequality for generalized fractional integrals:

Remark 3.8. In Theorem 3.5, if we set $\varphi (\sigma) = \frac{\sigma ^{\alpha }}{\Gamma (\alpha)}$ , then we obtain the following Ostrowski type inequality for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \left[ \left( \frac{\varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa } \right) ^{\alpha }+\left( \frac{\pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa } \right) ^{\alpha }\right] \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) \right. \\ &&\left. +\Gamma \left( \alpha +1\right) \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa } +}J^{\alpha }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}} \right) +\; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }-}J^{\alpha }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) \right] \right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{\alpha +1}}{\left( \pi _{1}\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha -1}}\Omega _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \left( \Omega _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\Omega _{4}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ &&+\frac{\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha +1}}{\left( \pi _{2}\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha -1}}\Omega _{2}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \left( \Omega _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\Omega _{6}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}, \end{eqnarray*}$

where

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Omega _{1}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) & = &\varkappa ^{-2}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2,\alpha +1;\alpha +2;1-\frac{\pi _{1}}{\varkappa } \right) , \\ \Omega _{2}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) & = &\pi _{2}^{-2}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2,1;\alpha +2;1-\frac{\varkappa }{\pi _{2}}\right) \\ \Omega _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) & = &\frac{\beta \left( \alpha +2,1\right) }{\varkappa ^{2}}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2,\alpha +2;\alpha +3;1- \frac{\pi _{1}}{\varkappa }\right) , \\ \Omega _{4}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) & = &\Omega _{1}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) -\Omega _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) , \\ \Omega _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) & = &\frac{\beta \left( 1,\alpha +2\right) }{\pi _{2}^{2}}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2,1;\alpha +3;1-\frac{ \varkappa }{\pi _{2}}\right) , \\ \Omega _{6}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) & = &\Omega _{2}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) -\Omega _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) . \end{eqnarray*}$

This is proved by İşcan in ^[31].

Corollary 3.9. In Theorem 3.5, if we set $\varphi (\sigma) = \frac{\sigma ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{k\Gamma _{k}(\alpha)}$ , then we obtain the followingnew Ostrowski type inequality for $k$ -Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \left[ \left( \frac{\varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa } \right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}+\left( \frac{\pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa }\right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}\right] \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) \right. \\ &&\left. +\Gamma _{k}\left( \alpha +k\right) \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa } +}J^{\alpha ,k}\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}} \right) +\; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }-}J^{\alpha ,k}\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) \right] \right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{\frac{\alpha +k}{k}}}{ \left( \pi _{1}\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha -k}{k}}}\Omega _{1}^{1-\frac{ 1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \left( \Omega _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \left \vert \mathcal{F }^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\Omega _{4}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ &&+\frac{\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha +k}{k}}}{\left( \pi _{2}\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha -k}{k}}}\Omega _{2}^{1-\frac{1}{q} }\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \left( \Omega _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \left \vert \mathcal{F }^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\Omega _{6}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}, \end{eqnarray*}$

where

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Omega _{1}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) & = &\varkappa ^{-2}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2,\frac{\alpha }{k}+1;\frac{\alpha }{k}+2;1-\frac{\pi _{1}}{\varkappa }\right) , \\ \Omega _{2}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) & = &\pi _{2}^{-2}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2,1;\frac{\alpha }{k}+2;1-\frac{\varkappa }{\pi _{2}}\right) \\ \Omega _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) & = &\frac{ \beta \left( \frac{\alpha }{k}+2,1\right) }{\varkappa ^{2}}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2,\frac{\alpha }{k}+2;\frac{\alpha }{k}+3;1-\frac{\pi _{1}}{\varkappa } \right) , \\ \Omega _{4}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) & = &\Omega _{1}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) -\Omega _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) , \\ \Omega _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) & = &\frac{ \beta \left( 1,\frac{\alpha }{k}+2\right) }{\pi _{2}^{2}}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2,1;\frac{\alpha }{k}+3;1-\frac{\varkappa }{\pi _{2}}\right) , \\ \Omega _{6}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) & = &\Omega _{2}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) -\Omega _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) . \end{eqnarray*}$

Theorem 3.10. We assume that the conditions of Lemma 3.1 are valid $.$ If $\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{^{\prime }}\right \vert ^{q}$ is harmonicallyconvex on $[\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}]$ for some $q > 1$ , then the followinginequality holds for the generalized fractional integrals:

where $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q} = 1$ and

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Theta _{7} & = &\int_{0}^{1}\left( \frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{ \left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}} \right) ^{p}d\sigma , \\ \Theta _{8} & = &\int_{0}^{1}\left( \frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{ \left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}} \right) ^{p}d\sigma . \end{eqnarray*}$

Proof. From Lemma 3.1 and applying well-known Hölder's inequality, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert (\Delta \left( 1\right) +\Lambda (1))\mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }+}I_{\varphi }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}}\right) +\; _{\frac{1}{ \varkappa }-}I_{\varphi }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{ \pi _{2}}\right) \right] \right \vert \\ &\leq &\pi _{1}\varkappa \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) \int_{0}^{1}\frac{ \Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{ \pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa } \right) \right \vert d\sigma \\ &&+\pi _{2}\varkappa \left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) \int_{0}^{1}\frac{ \Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{ \pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa } \right) \right \vert d\sigma \\ &\leq &\pi _{1}\varkappa \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) \left( \int_{0}^{1}\left( \frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\right) ^{p}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \int_{0}^{1}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) \right \vert ^{q}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ &&+\pi _{2}\varkappa \left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) \left( \int_{0}^{1}\left( \frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\right) ^{p}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \int_{0}^{1}\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) \right \vert ^{q}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Now from harmonically convexity of $\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\right \vert ^{q}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left( \int_{0}^{1}\left( \frac{\Delta \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\right) ^{p}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \int_{0}^{1}\left \vert \mathcal{F} ^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{1}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{1}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) \right \vert ^{q}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ &\leq &\Theta _{7}^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}\int_{0}^{1}\sigma d\sigma +\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\int_{0}^{1}\left( 1-\sigma \right) d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ & = &\Theta _{7}^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \frac{\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}}{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}. \end{eqnarray*}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left( \int_{0}^{1}\left( \frac{\Lambda \left( \sigma \right) }{\left( \sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa \right) ^{2}}\right) ^{p}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \int_{0}^{1}\left \vert \mathcal{F} ^{\prime }\left( \frac{\pi _{2}\varkappa }{\sigma \pi _{2}+\left( 1-\sigma \right) \varkappa }\right) \right \vert ^{q}d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ &\leq &\Theta _{8}^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}\int_{0}^{1}\sigma d\sigma +\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q}\int_{0}^{1}\left( 1-\sigma \right) d\sigma \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ & = &\Theta _{8}^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \frac{\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q}}{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Thus, the proof is completed.

Remark 3.11. In Theorem 3.10, if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \sigma$ , then we obtain the following Ostrowski type inequality:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{ \pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\int_{\pi _{1}}^{\pi _{2}}\frac{\mathcal{F}\left( u\right) }{u^{2}}du\right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\left \{ \left( \chi _{2}^{\ast }\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) \right) ^{\frac{ 1}{p}}\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{2}\left( \frac{\left \vert \mathcal{ F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\left \vert \mathcal{F} ^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}}{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q} }\right. \\ &&\left. +\left( \chi _{4}^{\ast }\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{2}\left( \frac{\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q} }{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right \} , \end{eqnarray*}$

where

$\begin{eqnarray*} \chi _{2}^{\ast }\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) & = &\frac{ \beta \left( \mu +1,1\right) }{\varkappa ^{2\upsilon }}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2\upsilon ,\mu +1;\mu +2;1-\frac{\pi _{1}}{\varkappa }\right) , \\ \chi _{4}^{\ast }\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) & = &\frac{ \beta \left( 1,\mu +1\right) }{\pi _{2}^{2\upsilon }}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2\upsilon ,1;\mu +2;1-\frac{\varkappa }{\pi _{2}}\right) . \end{eqnarray*}$

This is proved by İşcan in [,Theorem 2.6 for $s = 1$ ].

Corollary 3.12. In Theorem 3.5, if we set $\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime}\left(\varkappa \right) \right \vert \leq M$ , $\varkappa \in \left[ \pi_{1}, \pi _{2}\right],$ then we obtain the following Ostrowski typeinequality for generalized fractional integrals:

Remark 3.13. In Theorem 3.10, if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \frac{\sigma ^{\alpha }}{\Gamma \left(\alpha \right) }$ , then we obtain the following Ostrowski type inequalities for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \left[ \left( \frac{\varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa } \right) ^{\alpha }+\left( \frac{\pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa } \right) ^{\alpha }\right] \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) \right. \\ &&\left. +\Gamma \left( \alpha +1\right) \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa } +}J^{\alpha }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}} \right) +\; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }-}J^{\alpha }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) \right] \right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{\alpha +1}}{\left( \pi _{1}\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha -1}}\Omega _{7}^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha ,p\right) \left( \frac{\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q}}{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ &&+\frac{\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha +1}}{\left( \pi _{2}\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha -1}}\Omega _{7}^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha ,p\right) \left( \frac{\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q}}{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}, \end{eqnarray*}$

where

$\begin{equation*} \Omega _{7}\left( \upsilon ,\varkappa ,\alpha ,p\right) = \frac{\varkappa ^{-2}}{\alpha p+1}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2p,\alpha p+1;\alpha p+2;1-\frac{\upsilon }{\varkappa }\right) . \end{equation*}$

This is proved by İşcan in ^[31].

Corollary 3.14. In Theorem 3.5, if we set $\varphi (\sigma) = \frac{\sigma ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{k\Gamma _{k}(\alpha)}$ , then we obtain the followingnew Ostrowski type inequality for $k$ -Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \left[ \left( \frac{\varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa } \right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}+\left( \frac{\pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa }\right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}\right] \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) \right. \\ &&\left. +\Gamma _{k}\left( \alpha +k\right) \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa } +}J^{\alpha ,k}\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}} \right) +\; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }-}J^{\alpha ,k}\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) \right] \right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{\frac{\alpha +k}{k}}}{ \left( \pi _{1}\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha -k}{k}}}\Omega _{7}^{\frac{1 }{p}}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k},p\right) \left( \frac{ \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{1}\right) \right \vert ^{q} }{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}} \\ &&+\frac{\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha +k}{k}}}{\left( \pi _{2}\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha -k}{k}}}\Omega _{7}^{\frac{1}{p} }\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k},p\right) \left( \frac{ \left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \varkappa \right) \right \vert ^{q}+\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\left( \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert ^{q} }{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}, \end{eqnarray*}$

where

$\begin{equation*} \Omega _{7}\left( \upsilon ,\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k},p\right) = \frac{ k\varkappa ^{-2}}{\alpha p+k}\; _{2}F_{1}\left( 2p,\frac{\alpha p+k}{k};\frac{ \alpha p+2k}{k};1-\frac{\upsilon }{\varkappa }\right) . \end{equation*}$

4. Some special cases

In this section, we discuss more special cases of the results proved in the last section.

Remark 4.1. In Corollary 3.7, if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \sigma$ , then we obtain the following Ostrowski type inequality:

$\begin{eqnarray} &&\left \vert \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{ \pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\int_{\pi _{1}}^{\pi _{2}}\frac{\mathcal{F}\left( u\right) }{u^{2}}du\right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{M\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\left \{ \chi _{1}^{1-\frac{ 1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa \right) \left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,1,1\right) +\chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right. \\ &&\left. +\chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa \right) \left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,1,1\right) +\chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1 }{q}}\right \} . \end{eqnarray}$

(4.1)

This is proved by İşcan in [,Corollary 2.3 for $s = 1$ ].

Remark 4.2. In Corollary 3.7, if we set $\varphi (\sigma) = \frac{\sigma ^{\alpha } }{\Gamma (\alpha)}$ , then we obtain the following Ostrowski type inequality for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \left[ \left( \frac{\varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa } \right) ^{\alpha }+\left( \frac{\pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa } \right) ^{\alpha }\right] \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) \right. \\ &&\left. +\Gamma \left( \alpha +1\right) \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa } +}J^{\alpha }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}} \right) +\; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }-}J^{\alpha }\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) \right] \right \vert \\ &\leq &M\left[ \frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{\alpha +1}}{\left( \pi _{1}\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha -1}}\Omega _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \left( \Omega _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) +\Omega _{4}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right. \\ &&\left. +\frac{\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha +1}}{\left( \pi _{2}\varkappa \right) ^{\alpha -1}}\Omega _{2}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \left( \Omega _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) +\Omega _{6}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\alpha \right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right] . \end{eqnarray*}$

This is proved by İşcan in ^[31].

Remark 4.3. In Corollary 3.7, if we set $\varphi (\sigma) = \frac{\sigma ^{\frac{ \alpha }{k}}}{k\Gamma _{k}(\alpha)}$ , then we obtain the following new Ostrowski type inequality for $k$ -Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \left[ \left( \frac{\varkappa -\pi _{1}}{\pi _{1}\varkappa } \right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}+\left( \frac{\pi _{2}-\varkappa }{\pi _{2}\varkappa }\right) ^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}\right] \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) \right. \\ &&\left. +\Gamma _{k}\left( \alpha +k\right) \left[ \; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa } +}J^{\alpha ,k}\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{1}} \right) +\; _{\frac{1}{\varkappa }-}J^{\alpha ,k}\left( \mathcal{F}\circ g\right) \left( \frac{1}{\pi _{2}}\right) \right] \right \vert \\ &\leq &M\left[ \frac{\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{\frac{\alpha +k}{k}} }{\left( \pi _{1}\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha -k}{k}}}\Omega _{1}^{1- \frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \left( \Omega _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) +\Omega _{4}\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q} }\right. \\ &&\left. +\frac{\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha +k}{k}}}{ \left( \pi _{2}\varkappa \right) ^{\frac{\alpha -k}{k}}}\Omega _{2}^{1-\frac{ 1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \left( \Omega _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) +\Omega _{6}\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\frac{\alpha }{k}\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right] . \end{eqnarray*}$

Remark 4.4. In Corollary 3.12, if we set $\varphi \left(\sigma \right) = \sigma$ , then we obtain the following Ostrowski type inequality:

$\begin{eqnarray} &&\left \vert \mathcal{F}\left( \varkappa \right) -\frac{\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{ \pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\int_{\pi _{1}}^{\pi _{2}}\frac{\mathcal{F}\left( u\right) }{u^{2}}du\right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{M\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}}\left \{ \left( \chi _{2}^{\ast }\left( \pi _{1},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) \right) ^{\frac{ 1}{p}}\left( \varkappa -\pi _{1}\right) ^{2}+\left( \chi _{4}^{\ast }\left( \pi _{2},\varkappa ,\upsilon ,\mu \right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left( \pi _{2}-\varkappa \right) ^{2}\right \} . \end{eqnarray}$

(4.2)

This is proved by İşcan in [,Corollary 2.5 for $s = 1$ ].

Remark 4.5. In Corollary 3.12, if we set $\varphi (\sigma) = \frac{\sigma ^{\alpha } }{\Gamma (\alpha)}$ , then we obtain the following Ostrowski type inequality for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

This is proved by İşcan in ^[31].

Remark 4.6. In Corollary 3.12, if we set $\varphi (\sigma) = \frac{\sigma ^{\frac{ \alpha }{k}}}{k\Gamma _{k}(\alpha)}$ , then we obtain the following new Ostrowski type inequality for $k$ -Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals:

Remark 4.7. If we set $q = 1$ in Theorem 3.5 and Corollaries 3.7–3.14, then we obtain some new Ostrowski type inequlities for the harmonically convexity of $\left \vert \mathcal{F}^{\prime }\right \vert.$ Moreover, for different choices of $\varphi$ in the generalized fractional integrals, one can obtain several Ostrowski type inequalities via Katugampola fractional integrals, conformable fractional integral, Hadamard fractional integrals, etc.

5. Applications to special means

For arbitrary positive numbers $\; \pi _{1}, \; \pi _{2} \; (\; \pi _{1}\neq \; \pi _{2})$ , we consider the means as follows:

(1) The arithmatic mean

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{A = A}(\; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}) = \frac{\; \pi _{1}+\; \pi _{2}}{2}. \end{equation*}$

(2) The geometric mean

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{G = G}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) = \sqrt{\; \pi _{1}\; \pi _{2}}. \end{equation*}$

(3) The harmonic means

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{H = H}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) = \frac{2\; \pi _{1}\; \pi _{2}}{ \; \pi _{1}+\; \pi _{2}}. \end{equation*}$

(4) The logarithmic mean

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{L = L}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) = \frac{\; \pi _{2}-\; \pi _{1}}{ \ln \; \pi _{2}-\ln \; \pi _{1}}. \end{equation*}$

(5) The generalize logarithmic mean

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{L}_{p} = \mathcal{L}_{p}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) = \left[ \frac{\; \pi _{2}-\; \pi _{1}}{\left( \; \pi _{2}-\; \pi _{1}\right) \left( p+1\right) }\right] ^{\frac{1}{p}},\; p\in \mathbb{R} \backslash \left \{ -1,0\right \} . \end{equation*}$

(6) The identric mean

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{I = I}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) = \left \{ \begin{array}{c} \frac{1}{e}\left( \frac{\; \pi _{2}}{\; \pi _{1}}\right) ^{\frac{1}{\; \pi _{2}-\; \pi _{1}}},\text{ if }\; \pi _{1}\neq \; \pi _{2}, \\ \; \pi _{1},{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text{ if } }\; \pi _{1} = \; \pi _{2}, \end{array} \right. \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2} > 0. \end{equation*}$

These means are often employed in numerical approximations and other fields. However, the following straightforward relationship has been stated in the literature.

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{H\leq G\leq L\leq I\leq A}. \end{equation*}$

Proposition 5.1. For $\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}\in \left(0, \infty \right)$ with $\pi _{1} < \pi _{2}$ , then the following inequality holds:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) -\frac{\mathcal{G} ^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }{\mathcal{L}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }\right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{M\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \left( \pi _{2}-\pi _{1}\right) }{4} \\ &&\times \left \{ \chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{A} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1}, \mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q} }\right. \\ &&\left. +\chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{A} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2}, \mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q} }\right \} . \end{eqnarray*}$

Proof. The inequality (4.1) with $\varkappa = \frac{\pi _{1}+\pi _{2}}{2}$ for mapping $\mathcal{F}:\left(0, \infty \right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ , $\mathcal{F}\left(\varkappa \right) = \varkappa$ leads to this conclusion.

Proposition 5.2. For $\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}\in \left(0, \infty \right)$ with $\pi _{1} < \pi _{2}$ , then the following inequality holds:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) -\frac{\mathcal{G} ^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }{\mathcal{L}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }\right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{M\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}} \\ &&\times \left \{ \chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \frac{\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) -\pi _{1}^{2}}{2\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }\right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right. \\ &&\left. +\chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \frac{\pi _{2}^{2}-\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }{2\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) } \right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right \} . \end{eqnarray*}$

Proof. The inequality (4.1) with $\varkappa = \frac{2\pi _{1}\pi _{2}}{\pi _{1}+\pi _{2}}$ for mapping $\mathcal{F}:\left(0, \infty \right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ , $\mathcal{F}\left(\varkappa \right) = \varkappa$ leads to this conclusion.

Proposition 5.3. For $\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}\in \left(0, \infty \right)$ with $\pi _{1} < \pi _{2}$ , then the following inequality holds:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \mathcal{A}^{p+2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) -\mathcal{G} ^{2}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \mathcal{L}_{p}^{p}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{M\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \left( \pi _{2}-\pi _{1}\right) }{4} \\ &&\times \left \{ \chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{A} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1}, \mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q} }\right. \\ &&\left. +\chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{A} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2}, \mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q} }\right \} . \end{eqnarray*}$

Proposition 5.4. For $\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}\in \left(0, \infty \right)$ with $\pi _{1} < \pi _{2}$ , then the following inequality holds:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \mathcal{H}^{p+2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) -\mathcal{G} ^{2}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \mathcal{L}_{p}^{p}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{M\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}} \\ &&\times \left \{ \chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \frac{\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) -\pi _{1}^{2}}{2\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }\right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right. \\ &&\left. +\chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \frac{\pi _{2}^{2}-\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }{2\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) } \right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right \} . \end{eqnarray*}$

Proposition 5.5. For $\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}\in \left(0, \infty \right)$ with $\pi _{1} < \pi _{2}$ , then the following inequality holds:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \mathcal{A}^{2}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \ln \left( \mathcal{A}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \right) -\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \ln \left( \mathcal{I}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \right) \right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{M\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \left( \pi _{2}-\pi _{1}\right) }{4} \\ &&\times \left \{ \chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{A} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1}, \mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q} }\right. \\ &&\left. +\chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{A} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2}, \mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q} }\right \} . \end{eqnarray*}$

Proposition 5.6. For $\pi _{1}, \pi _{2}\in \left(0, \infty \right)$ with $\pi _{1} < \pi _{2}$ , then the following inequality holds:

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&\left \vert \mathcal{H}^{2}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \ln \left( \mathcal{H}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \right) -\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \ln \left( \mathcal{I}\left( \; \pi _{1},\; \pi _{2}\right) \right) \right \vert \\ &\leq &\frac{M\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }{\pi _{2}-\pi _{1}} \\ &&\times \left \{ \chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \frac{\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) -\pi _{1}^{2}}{2\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }\right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{2}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{3}\left( \pi _{1},\mathcal{H} \left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right. \\ &&\left. +\chi _{1}^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) \right) \left( \frac{\pi _{2}^{2}-\mathcal{G}^{2}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) }{2\mathcal{A}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) } \right) ^{2}\left( \chi _{4}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) +\chi _{5}\left( \pi _{2},\mathcal{H}\left( \pi _{1},\pi _{2}\right) ,1,1\right) \right) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\right \} . \end{eqnarray*}$

Conclusions

In this paper, we have proved several new Ostrowski type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions via the generalized fractional integrals. Moreover, we have proved that the established inequalities are the extensions of some existing inequalities in the literature. It is an interesting and new problem that the upcoming researchers can offer similar inequalities for different type of harmonically and co-ordinated harmonically convexity.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok. Contract No. KMUTNB-63-KNOW-22.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	Patel M, Pardhi B, Chopara S, et al. (2008) Lightweight composite materials for automotive—A review. IRJET 5: 41–47. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340646173_Lightweight_Composite_Materials_for_Automotive_-A_Review.
[2]	Jones RM (2015) Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2 Eds., New York: CRC Press, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498711067
[3]	Ikubanni PP, Oki M, Adeleke AA (2020) A review of ceramic/bio-based hybrid reinforced aluminium matrix composites. Cogent Eng 7: 1727167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1727167 doi: 10.1080/23311916.2020.1727167
[4]	Abolusoro OP, Akinlabi ET (2019) Wear and corrosion in friction stir welding of aluminium alloys—An overview. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev 9: 967–982. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333356596_Wear_and_Corrosion_Behaviour_of_Friction_Stir_Welded_Aluminium_Alloys-An_Overview.
[5]	Shoag MD, Rahman MF (2021) Using recycling aluminum cans as composite materials aluminum fiber. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 943: 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/943/1/012028 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/943/1/012028
[6]	Sharma AK, Bhandari R, Pinca-Bretotean C (2020) A systematic overview on fabrication aspects and methods of aluminium metal matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 45: 4133–4138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.899 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.899
[7]	Bahrami N, Soltani N, Pech-Canul MI, et al. (2016) Development of metal-matrix composites from industrial/agricultural waste materials and their derivatives. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46: 143–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.1077067 doi: 10.1080/10643389.2015.1077067
[8]	Kulkarni PP, Siddeswarappa B, Kariyappla SHK (2019) A survey on effect of agro-waste ash as reinforcement on aluminium base metal matrix composites. Open J Compos Mater 9: 12–26. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2019.93019 doi: 10.4236/ojcm.2019.93019
[9]	Olufunmilayo OJ, Kunle OB (2019) Agricultural waste as a reinforcement particulate for Al metal matrix composites (AMMCs). Rev MDPI Fibers 7: 7–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib7040033 doi: 10.3390/fib7040033
[10]	Jagannath V, Harish K (2019) Fly ash, rice husk ash as reinforcement with aluminium metal matrix composite: A review of technique, parameter and outcome. ICAPIE 2019: 953–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8542-5_84 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-8542-5_84
[11]	Yekinni AA, Durowoju MO, Agunsoye JO, et al. (2019) Automotive application of hybrid composites of aluminium alloy matrix: A review of rice husk ash-based reinforcements. Int J Compos Mater 9: 44–52. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.cmaterials.20190902.03 doi: 10.5923/j.cmaterials.20190902.03
[12]	Priyank D, Amit S (2022) Aluminum metal matrix composites reinforced with rice husk ash: A review. Mater Today Proc 62: 4194–4201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.711 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.711
[13]	Alanemea KK, Adewale TM (2013) Influence of rice husk ash–silicon carbide weight ratio on the mechanical behavior of Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix hybrid composite. Tribol Indust 35: 163–172. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281891199_Influence_of_Rice_Husk_Ash_-_Silicon_Carbide_Weight_Ratios_on_the_Mechanical_behaviour_of_Al-Mg-Si_Alloy_Matrix_Hybrid_Composites.
[14]	Masoumeh K, Naser F, Pech-Canul MI, et al. (2024) Rice husk at a glance: From agro-industrial to modern applications. Rice Sci 31: 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2023.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2023.08.005
[15]	Gadve RD, Trivedi Y, Sangal VK, et al. (2023) Utilization of rice husk ash as an effective reinforcement in polyether sulfone-based composites for printed circuit board. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 34: 1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-11367-w doi: 10.1007/s10854-023-11367-w
[16]	Mohd Joharudin NF, Abdul Latif N, Mustapa MS, et al. (2019) Effect of amorphous silica by rice husk ash on physical properties and microstructures of recycled aluminium chip AA7075. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 50: 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201800229 doi: 10.1002/mawe.201800229
[17]	Ziada M, Erdem S, González-Lezcano AR, et al. (2023) Influence of various fibers on the physico-mechanical properties of a sustainable geopolymer mortar-based on metakaolin and slag. Eng Sci Technol Int J 46: 101501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2023.101501 doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2023.101501
[18]	Abolusoro OP, Orah AM, Yusuf AS, et al. (2023) Investigation of the energy capabilities of selected agricultural wastes in a fluidized-bed combustor. 2023 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Sustainable Development Goals (SEB-SDG). https://doi.org/10.1109/SEB-SDG57117.2023.10124555
[19]	Saravanan SD, Kumar MS (2013) Effect of mechanical properties on rice husk ash reinforced aluminium alloy (AlSi10Mg) matrix composites. Proc Eng 64: 1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.232 doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.232
[20]	Seikh Z, Sekh M, Kunar S, et al. (2022) Rice husk ash reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites: A review. Mat Sci Forum 1070: 55–70. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-u8s016 doi: 10.4028/p-u8s016
[21]	Darekar VS, Kulthe MG, Goyal A, et al. (2024) Rice husk ash: Effective reinforcement for epoxy-based composites for electronic applications. J Electron Mater 53: 1344–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-023-10835-7 doi: 10.1007/s11664-023-10835-7
[22]	Pratapa RY, Lakshmi NK, Kedar MM, et al. (2023) Characterisation of Al-6061-T6 metal matrix composites reinforced with rice husk ash and Bakelite powder. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.570
[23]	Vasamsetti S, Dumpala L, Subbarao VV (2022) Effect of nano-rice husk ash reinforcement on the hardness of Al6061 using Taguchi method, In: Narasimham GSVL, Babu AV, Reddy SS, et al. Innovations in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7282-8_62
[24]	Prasad DS, Rama KA (2011) Production and mechanical properties of A356.2/RHA composites. Int J of Adv Sci and Tech 33: 51–58. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284651427_Production_and_Mechanical_Properties_of_A3562_RHA_Composites#fullTextFileContent.
[25]	ASTM (2015) Designation: B557−15 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing Wrought and Cast Aluminum—ASTM International. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1520/B0557-15.2
[26]	ASTM E10-18 (2017) Standard Test Method for Brinell Hardness of Metallic Materials. Available from: https://www.astm.org/e0010-15a.html.
[27]	ASTM International Standard E23 of the year 2007. Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials.
[28]	Omoniyi P, Adekunle A, Ibitoye S, et al. (2022) Mechanical and microstructural evaluation of aluminium matrix composite reinforced with wood particles. J King Saud Univ–Eng Sci 34: 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2021.01.006
[29]	Aigbodion VS, Hassan SB, Dauda ET, et al. (2010) The development of mathematical model for the prediction of ageing behaviour for Al-Cu-Mg/bagasse ash particulate composites. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 9: 907–917. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2010.910066 doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2010.910066
[30]	Hamouda AMS, Sulaiman S, Vijayaram TR, et al. (2007) Processing and characterization of particulate reinforced aluminium silicon matrix composite. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 2: 11–16. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40542990_Processing_and_characterisation_of_particulate_reinforced_aluminium_silicon_matrix_composite.
[31]	Aigbodion VS, Hassan SB, Dauda ET, et al. (2011) Experimental study of ageing behaviour of Al-Cu-Mg/bagasse ash particulate composites. Tribol Indust 33: 28–35. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267979145_Experimental_Study_of_Ageing_Behaviour_of_Al-Cu-MgBagasse_Ash_Particulate_Composites.
[32]	Neelima DC, Mahesh V, Selvaraj N (2011) Mechanical characterization of aluminium silicon carbide composite. Int J Appl Eng Res 1: 793–799. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid = 606668.
[33]	Abdulwahab M, Umaru OB, Bawa MA, et al. (2017) Microstructural and thermal study of Al-Si-Mg/melon shell ash particulate composite. Results Phys 7: 947–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.02.016 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.02.016
[34]	Suleiman IY, Salihu SA, Mohammed TA (2018) Investigation of mechanical, microstructure, and wear behaviours of Al-12%Si/reinforced with melon shell ash particulates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97: 4137–4144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2157-9 doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-2157-9
[35]	Usman AM, Raji A, Waziri NH, et al. (2014) Aluminium alloy-rice husk ash composites production and analysis. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol 25: 84–98. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287933106_Aluminium_alloy_-_rice_husk_ash_composites_production_and_analysis
[36]	Aigbodion VS (2012) Development of Al-Si-Fe/rice husk ash particulate composites synthesis by double stir casting method. Usak Univ J Mat Sci 2: 187–197. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uujms/issue/13552/164155
[37]	Shanmughasundaram P, Subramanian R, Prabhu G (2011) Some studies on aluminium-fly ash composites fabricated by two-step stir casting method. Eur J Sci Res 63: 204–218. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267263404_Some_Studies_on_Aluminium_-_Fly_Ash_Composites_Fabricated_by_Two_Step_Stir_Casting_Method#fullTextFileContent.
[38]	Lingaraju D, Sreekanth GV (2014) Rice husk ash reinforced in aluminium matrix nanocomposite: A review. J Basic Appl Eng Res 1: 35–40. http://www.krishisanskriti.org/jbaer.html
[39]	Prasad DS, Krishna AR (2010) Fabrication and characterization of A356.2 RHA composite. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2: 7603–7608. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285254345_Fabrication_and_Characterization_of_A3562-Rice_Husk_Ash_Composite_using_Stir_casting_technique.
[40]	Prasad DS, Krishna AR (2011) Production and mechanical properties of A356.2 RHA composite. Int J Adv Sci Technol 33: 51–58. Available from: http://article.nadiapub.com/IJAST/vol33/5.pdf.
[41]	Omoniyi P, Abolusoro O, Olorunpomi O, et al. (2022) Corrosion properties of aluminum alloy reinforced with wood particles. J Compos Sci 6: 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6070189 doi: 10.3390/jcs6070189
[42]	Alaneme KK, Akintunde IB, Olubambi PA, et al. (2013) Fabrication characteristics and mechanical behaviour of rice husk ash–alumina reinforced Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix hybrid composites. J Mater Res Technol 2: 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.03.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.03.012

This article has been cited by:

1.	Abdelkader Moumen, Ramsha Shafqat, Azmat Ullah Khan Niazi, Nuttapol Pakkaranang, Mdi Begum Jeelani, Kiran Saleem, A study of the time fractional Navier-Stokes equations for vertical flow, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 8702, 10.3934/math.2023437
2.	Abdelkader Moumen, Ramsha Shafqat, Zakia Hammouch, Azmat Ullah Khan Niazi, Mdi Begum Jeelani, Stability results for fractional integral pantograph differential equations involving two Caputo operators, 2022, 8, 2473-6988, 6009, 10.3934/math.2023303
3.	Kinda Abuasbeh, Ramsha Shafqat, Heng Liu, Fractional Brownian Motion for a System of Fuzzy Fractional Stochastic Differential Equation, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/3559035
4.	Abdelkader Moumen, Ramsha Shafqat, Ammar Alsinai, Hamid Boulares, Murat Cancan, Mdi Begum Jeelani, Analysis of fractional stochastic evolution equations by using Hilfer derivative of finite approximate controllability, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 16094, 10.3934/math.2023821
5.	Abdelkader Moumen, Ammar Alsinai, Ramsha Shafqat, Nafisa A. Albasheir, Mohammed Alhagyan, Ameni Gargouri, Mohammed M. A. Almazah, Controllability of fractional stochastic evolution inclusion via Hilfer derivative of fixed point theory, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 19892, 10.3934/math.20231014
6.	Aziz El Ghazouani, M’hamed Elomari, Said Melliani, Existence, uniqueness, and UH-stability results for nonlinear fuzzy fractional Volterra–Fredholm integro-differential equations, 2025, 2752-2334, 10.1515/jncds-2024-0019

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)