Review Special Issues

Cu-based mutlinary sulfide nanomaterials for photocatalytic applications

  • Due to their environmentally benign elemental components, suitable bandgap and high absorption coefficient in the visible-light range, Cu-based multinary sulfides exhibit excellent photocatalytic properties. Moreover, the adjustable atomic structure and unique electronic state of Cu-based multinary sulfide semiconductors can boost their ability to absorb visible light. In this review, we provide a summary of recent progress in photocatalytic applications of Cu-based multinary sulfide nanomaterials, including Cu-based ternary sulfides (CuInS2, CuIn5S8, Cu3SnS4, CuFeS2, etc.) and Cu-based quaternary sulfides (CuZnInS, Cu2ZnSnS4, CuZnGaS, CuInGaS, etc.). We start with a review of the bandgap alignments of Cu-based ternary sulfides and Cu-based quaternary sulfides, which are the key factors for the photocatalytic activity of semiconductor photocatalysts. Then, we discuss the advancements in photocatalytic applications of Cu-based multinary sulfide photocatalysts, including photocatalytic H2 production, CO2 reduction, organic synthesis and degradation of pollutants and photoelectrochemical H2 production. Finally, we end this review with a summary of the current challenges and opportunities of Cu-based multinary sulfides in future studies.

    Citation: Liang Wu. Cu-based mutlinary sulfide nanomaterials for photocatalytic applications[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 909-933. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023049

    Related Papers:

    [1] Evangelos Karagiannis, Dimitra Papadaki, Margarita N. Assimakopoulos . Circular self-cleaning building materials and fabrics using dual doped TiO2 nanomaterials. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(4): 534-553. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022032
    [2] Khang Duy Vu Nguyen, Khoa Dang Nguyen Vo . Magnetite nanoparticles-TiO2 nanoparticles-graphene oxide nanocomposite: Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic degradation for Rhodamine-B dye. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(3): 288-301. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.3.288
    [3] Nhung Thi-Tuyet Hoang, Anh Thi-Kim Tran, Nguyen Van Suc, The-Vinh Nguyen . Antibacterial activities of gel-derived Ag-TiO2-SiO2 nanomaterials under different light irradiation. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 339-348. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.339
    [4] Akira Nishimura, Ryuki Toyoda, Daichi Tatematsu, Masafumi Hirota, Akira Koshio, Fumio Kokai, Eric Hu . Optimum reductants ratio for CO2 reduction by overlapped Cu/TiO2. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(2): 214-233. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.2.214
    [5] Kah Hon Leong, Azrina Abd Aziz, Yee Li Kang, Sheau Wei Goh, Kulhar Vijay Singh, Lan Ching Sim, Pichiah Saravanan . Synergized mechanistic and solar photocatalysis features of N-TiO2 functionalised activated carbon. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 800-813. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.800
    [6] Ririn Cahyanti, Sumari Sumari, Fauziatul Fajaroh, Muhammad Roy Asrori, Yana Fajar Prakasa . Fe-TiO2/zeolite H-A photocatalyst for degradation of waste dye (methylene blue) under UV irradiation. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(1): 40-54. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023003
    [7] Carlos N. Kabengele, Giresse N. Kasiama, Etienne M. Ngoyi, Clement L. Inkoto, Juvenal M. Bete, Philippe B. Babady, Damien S. T. Tshibangu, Dorothée D. Tshilanda, Hercule M. Kalele, Pius T. Mpiana, Koto-Te-Nyiwa Ngbolua . Biogenic synthesis, characterization and effects of Mn-CuO composite nanocatalysts on Methylene blue photodegradation and Human erythrocytes. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(2): 356-369. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023019
    [8] Hung Nguyen Manh, Oanh Le Thi Mai, Chung Pham Do, Mai Vu Thanh, Anh Nguyen Thi Diep, Dao La Bich, Hang Lam Thi, Duyen Pham Thi, Minh Nguyen Van . Effect of monobasic/dibasic phosphate salts on the crystallinity, physical properties and photocatalytic performance of Ag3PO4 material. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(5): 770-784. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022047
    [9] Julien G. Mahy, Stéphanie D. Lambert, Jérémy Geens, Alain Daniel, David Wicky, Catherine Archambeau, Benoît Heinrichs . Large scale production of photocatalytic TiO2 coating for volatile organic compound (VOC) air remediation. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(5): 945-956. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.5.945
    [10] David Jishiashvili, Zeinab Shiolashvili, Archil Chirakadze, Alexander Jishiashvili, Nino Makhatadze, Kakha Gorgadze . Development of low temperature technology for the growth of wide band gap semiconductor nanowires. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 470-485. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.470
  • Due to their environmentally benign elemental components, suitable bandgap and high absorption coefficient in the visible-light range, Cu-based multinary sulfides exhibit excellent photocatalytic properties. Moreover, the adjustable atomic structure and unique electronic state of Cu-based multinary sulfide semiconductors can boost their ability to absorb visible light. In this review, we provide a summary of recent progress in photocatalytic applications of Cu-based multinary sulfide nanomaterials, including Cu-based ternary sulfides (CuInS2, CuIn5S8, Cu3SnS4, CuFeS2, etc.) and Cu-based quaternary sulfides (CuZnInS, Cu2ZnSnS4, CuZnGaS, CuInGaS, etc.). We start with a review of the bandgap alignments of Cu-based ternary sulfides and Cu-based quaternary sulfides, which are the key factors for the photocatalytic activity of semiconductor photocatalysts. Then, we discuss the advancements in photocatalytic applications of Cu-based multinary sulfide photocatalysts, including photocatalytic H2 production, CO2 reduction, organic synthesis and degradation of pollutants and photoelectrochemical H2 production. Finally, we end this review with a summary of the current challenges and opportunities of Cu-based multinary sulfides in future studies.



    The demand for energy is increasing with the development of industrialization and information technology. Otherwise, the use of fossil fuels will emit a large amount of carbon dioxide and give rise to environmental pollution. Therefore, how to use new technology and materials to solve the increasingly tense energy crisis and severe environmental problems has become a hot spot in material and chemistry research fields. Solar energy is the most abundant and clean green energy.

    Photocatalysis using solar energy is an appealing technology to address the energy crisis and environmental problems [1,2,3,4,5]. The photocatalytic reaction is generally divided into three steps. (Ⅰ) Photocatalysts absorb light to produce both excited holes and electrons. (Ⅱ) The holes and electrons transfer to the surface of the photocatalyst. (Ⅲ) The surface carriers participate in the redox reaction [6]. Specifically, semiconductor photocatalysts stir up the electrons in the valance band (VB) to the conduction band (CB) to produce hole-electron pairs [7,8,9]. Subsequently, the photogenerated carriers are separated and diffused from the bulk to the surface of the photocatalyst. Obviously, the light absorption efficiency, the charge separation and diffusion efficiency and the redox reaction efficiency are the three key parameters for determining the conversion efficiency of the photocatalytic reaction [10,11,12,13]. Therefore, the most important issue in photocatalysis is designing photocatalysts from the above three aspects to achieve high conversion efficiency.

    Semiconductor nanomaterials have attracted extensive attentions due to the special properties stemming from the quantum effect [14,15,16]. As the size is less than the exciton Bohr radius, the electron density of the semiconductor nanomaterials will be discontinuous, and the carrier will have a spatial limiting effect and cause a change in the band structure [17,18,19]. On the other hand, the huge surface area of semiconductor nanomaterials will bring ignored surface effects. The tunable bandgaps and special surface effect of semiconductor nanomaterials will bring novel optical and electronic properties, rendering them as promising candidates for photocatalytic applications [20,21,22].

    To date, a series of semiconductor nanomaterials have been developed as photocatalysts, such as metal oxides (TiO2, ZnO, WO3, etc.), metal chalcogenides (CdS, CdSe, etc.) and polymers [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Among the most widely investigated semiconductor photocatalysts, Cu-based multinary sulfide (CMS) nanomaterials have attracted wide interest in various photocatalytic applications due to their suitable and tunable bandgap, high absorption coefficient, environmental benign elemental components, unique electronic state and adjustable atomic structure [30,31,32,33,34]. CMSs are inorganic compounds consisting of at least two metal elements. The band structure of these CMSs can be conveniently adjusted through metal element alloying, then optimizing their photocatalytic performances [35,36,37,38]. The diversity of metal elements in CMSs will bring different crystal structures and allow precise control of the reactive atomic arrangement on the surface to construct specific active sites for diversified photocatalytic reactions [39,40,41,42]. At the same time, the differential charge distribution of diverse elements will result in microcosmic polarization and lead to a built-in electric field, which is beneficial for the effective separation of photogenerated holes and electrons [43,44]. Due to these specialties, CMS nanomaterials exhibit excellent performance in photocatalytic H2 production, CO2 reduction, organic synthesis, photoelectrochemical (PEC) H2 production, and so on [45,46,47,48,49].

    In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview on recent research of CMS nanomaterials in photocatalytic applications. We focus on the most researched CMSs, namely Cu-based ternary and quaternary sulfide nanomaterials. We first introduce the bandgap alignments of Cu-based ternary sulfides (CuInS2, CuIn5S8, Cu3SnS4, etc.) and Cu-based quaternary sulfides (CuZnInS, Cu2ZnSnS4, CuInGaS, etc.), which are the key factors for the photocatalytic activity of semiconductor photocatalysts. Subsequently, we provide a summary of recent progress in the photocatalytic applications of Cu-based ternary sulfides and Cu-based quaternary sulfide nanomaterials, focusing on photocatalytic H2 production, CO2 reduction, organic synthesis, degradation of pollutants and PEC H2 production. Finally, we also summarize the current challenges and opportunities of Cu-based multinary sulfides in future studies.

    To date, the developed CMS nanomaterials mainly focused on Cu-based ternary and quaternary sulfides (Figure 1). This section will introduce the bandgap alignments of Cu-based ternary (CuInS2, CuIn5S8, Cu3SnS4, CuFeS2, etc.) and quaternary sulfides (CuZnInS, Cu2ZnSnS4, CuZnGaS, CuInGaS, etc.) in detail.

    Figure 1.  Schematic illustration of the photocatalytic applications of Cu-based ternary and quaternary sulfide nanomaterials.

    Cu-based ternary sulfides are ZnS-derived compounds produced by replacing Zn atoms with Cu cations and trivalent/tetravalent cations (e.g., In, Ga, Sn, Ge, Fe, etc.) [50,51]. Cu-Ⅲ-S compounds (Ⅲ = In, Ga) preferentially crystallize in a diamond-like structure inherited from ZnS. For example, the stoichiometric formula CuInS2 (CIS) exhibits a stable chalcopyrite structure at room temperature and a metastable wurtzite structure at high temperature [52]. The tolerance of cation off-stoichiometry allows Cu-Ⅲ-S chalcopyrite compounds to introduce different cation ratios, producing nonstoichiometric ternary sulfides, such as CuIn3S5, CuIn5S8, and CuIn11S17 [53,54]. Moreover, the off-stoichiometry effect usually has great influences on the band structures, optical properties and crystal structures of Cu-Ⅲ-S compounds. The bandgaps of CuInS2 and CuIn5S8 are 1.5 and 2.06 eV, respectively [55,56]. In addition, the VB and CB positions of CuInS2 are also different from these of CuIn5S8 (Figure 2). The bandgap will change from 1.5 to 2.35 eV when the In cation is replaced by a Ga cation (Figure 2) [57].

    Figure 2.  Band position of representative Cu-based ternary and quaternary sulfide semiconductors.

    The most reported Cu-Ⅳ-S compounds are stoichiometry Cu2SnS3 (CTS) and Cu2GeS3, which generally crystallize in zinc-blende, orthorhombic and wurtzite structures [58,59]. Similar to Cu-In-S compounds, tolerating cation off-stoichiometry usually leads to nonstoichiometric ternary sulfides, such as, Cu3SnS4, Cu4SnS4, and Cu2Sn3S7 [60,61]. The different cation ratios will lead to different bandgap alignments of Cu-Sn-S compounds. For example, the bandgaps of Cu2SnS3 and Cu3SnS4 are 0.91 and 1.67 eV, respectively, and possess different VB and CB positions (Figure 2) [62,63]. Cu2GeS3 with a monoclinic structure has a bandgap of 1.49 eV (Figure 2) [34]. In addition to the above Cu-Ⅳ-S compounds, CuFeS2 (CFS), obtained by replacing Zn atoms with Cu cations and Fe cations, is another well-studied ternary sulfide [64,65,66]. The special band structures and high visible-light absorption efficiency favor the utilization of Cu-based ternary sulfides in photocatalytic H2 production, CO2 reduction, organic synthesis and pollutant removal.

    Cu-based quaternary sulfides have attracted extensive research interests in photocatalytic applications as fascinating and promising nanomaterials. Many types of Cu-based quaternary sulfides have been designed and synthesized via regulation of metal types and ratios, such as Cu-Ⅱ-Ⅵ-S compounds obtained via successive replacement of the In atoms in CuInS2 with Ⅱ and Ⅵ atoms obeying the octet rule [44], and Cu-Ⅱ-Ⅴ-S compounds obtained via partially replacing of the In atoms in CuInS2 with Ⅱ atoms [35,67]. As far back as 1950, scientists designed quaternary chalcogenide via cation substitution [68]. A series of Cu-based quaternary sulfides have been synthesized for photocatalytic applications in recent decades, such as Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS), CuZnInS (CZIS), Cu2CdSnS4 (CCTS), Cu2ZnGeS4 (CZGS), and CuGaInS (CGIS) [69,70,71,72,73]. As the most researched quaternary chalcogenide, CZTS is an n-type semiconductor with a bandgap of 1.5 eV [31], which can absorb all visible light for photocatalytic applications. In addition, the other Cu-based quaternary sulfides also have suitable bandgaps for visible-light absorption, namely CuZn4InS6 with a bandgap of 2.23 eV, CZGS with a bandgap of 2.11 eV and CGIS with a bandgap of 1.82 eV (Figure 2) [39,40,74,75]. Due to their special band structures, high visible-light absorption efficiency and tunable surface atomic arrangements, Cu-based quaternary sulfides are widely used for photocatalytic H2 production, organic synthesis, degradation of pollutants and PEC H2 evolution.

    Hydrogen energy is a kind of secondary energy with abundant sources and wide applications. However, almost no elementary hydrogen exists on Earth. Hydrogen can be produced by the decomposition of hydrogen-containing materials. Water is the most abundant hydrogen-containing compound on Earth, so water splitting is an efficient and sustainable method for hydrogen production. Photocatalytic hydrogen production is a green and sustainable hydrogen production program. In photocatalytic overall water splitting, water molecules are split into hydrogen and oxygen on the surface of photocatalysts under irradiation [8,79,80].

    To date, various kinds of CMSs have been used for solar-to-hydrogen production. Kudo and coauthors first used CZIS powder for photocatalytic H2 evolution from aqueous solutions containing K2SO3 and K2S under visible-light irradiation [67]. With the development of nanotechnology, CMS nanomaterials have been designed and synthesized for solar-driven hydrogen production [81,82,83,84]. For example, Wu and coauthors reported the synthesis of CIS quantum dots (QDs) via an aqueous synthetic approach, which exhibited excellent photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performances [84]. Ning and coauthors successfully prepared water soluble CZIS QDs for photocatalytic hydrogen production (Figure 3). The CIZS QDs passivated by glutathione ligands are highly stable in aqueous conditions (Figure 3a) and show significant energy conversion efficiency in the visible and near-infrared regions with an external quantum efficiency (EQE) of ~1.5% at 650 nm (Figure 3b), which is the highest EQE reported in the near-infrared region [76]. In addition, many strategies have been used to improve the photocatalytic hydrogen production performances of CMS QDs. For instant, Pt and Au co-catalysts have been loaded on the surface of CZTS nanocrystals to significantly improve the photocatalytic H2 evolution performances [31,82,85,86]. Heterojunctions and homojunctions are designed in CZTS to promote the separation of photogenerated charges and then optimize their photocatalytic performances [43,87,88,89].

    Figure 3.  (a, b) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) image and photocatalytic H2 evolution properties of 0D CZIS nanocrystals (Reproduced from Ref. [76] with permission). (c, d) TEM image and photocatalytic H2 evolution properties of 1D CZIS nanorods (Reproduced from Ref. [77] with permission). (e, f) TEM image and photocatalytic H2 evolution properties of 2D CZIS nanobelts [40]. (g, h) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image and photocatalytic H2 evolution properties of 3D Cu3SnS4 flower-like microspheres (Reproduced from Ref. [78] with permission).

    One-dimensional (1D) nanostructures exhibit novel physicochemical properties brought about by changes in dimension, size and composition [90,91,92]. In particular, the continuity of charge transport brings out the unique advantages of 1D materials in photocatalytic and photoelectronic applications. Various types of 1D semiconductor nanomaterials have been developed for photocatalytic hydrogen production [26,93,94]. Han and coauthors have successfully synthesized wurtzite CZIS nanorods using a one-pot non-injection method for solar-to-hydrogen production (Figure 3c) [32,77]. Subsequently, Pt and Pd4S nanoparticles were decorated on the tips of CZIS nanorods to improve their photocatalytic performances. The Pt and Pd4S cocatalysts can accelerate charge separation and act as active sites for hydrogen production, resulting in remarkably improved photocatalytic performance (Figure 3d). Low-cost and noble-metal-free 1D CZTS nanofibers also exhibit excellent photocatalytic hydrogen production performance under visible-light irradiation [95].

    Due to the solo ability of confinement of electrons in their layer, two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials possess special optical and electronic properties. In addition, 2D semiconductor nanomaterials can reduce the recombination rate and shorten the migration distance of photogenerated carriers. The layered structure facilitates the light absorption process even at low flux density, and the photogenerated carriers are only required to transfer a very small distance. Moreover, the large surface area of 2D nanomaterials favors surface reactions. Thus, 2D semiconductor nanomaterials are widely used for solar-to-hydrogen production [96,97,98,99]. Wang and coauthor first reported the synthesis of graphene-like CZTS nanosheets using a facile template-free approach [100]. The synthesized CZTS nanosheets with a thickness of ca. 2–3 nm exhibited high activity and stability for solar-to-hydrogen production without loading cocatalysts. Note that the 2D structure can expose the highest active facet. We first used first-principle-density functional theory calculations to explore the reaction Gibbs energy (ΔGH) of the (0001), (1010) and (1011) facets of wurtzite CZIS, finding that the (0001) facet has the smallest binding strength to atomic hydrogen. We then designed a simple colloidal method to synthesize single crystalline wurtzite CZIS nanobelts (NBs) exposing the (0001) facet assisted with oleylamine and 1-dodecanethiol (Figure 3e). The synthesized CZIS nanobelt photocatalysts show excellent photocatalytic performances under visible-light irradiation without cocatalyst (Figure 3f) [40]. Furthermore, we doped phosphorus into 2D single crystalline CZIS sulfide nanobelts to reduce the recombination rate and increase the electric conductivity of photogenerated carriers, enabling significantly improved photocatalytic H2 evolution performance [39].

    In addition, three-dimensional (3D) CMSs have also been developed as photocatalysts for solar-to-hydrogen production. Xie and coauthors have constructed monodisperse CIS hierarchical microarchitectures for photocatalytic hydrogen production [101]. The obtained monodisperse CIS hierarchical photocatalyst showed an average hydrogen production rate of 59.4 µmol h−1 g−1 under visible light irradiation. Qian and coauthors successfully synthesized 3D-hierarchical Cu3SnS4 flower-like microspheres via a solvothermal process (Figure 3g) [78]. The bandgap of the obtained Cu3SnS4 microspheres is 1.38 eV, which is suitable for UV and near-IR light absorption. The 3D Cu3SnS4 photocatalysts without cocatalyst show good photocatalytic activity with a H2 evolution rate of 1.1 mmol h−1 g−1 (Figure 3h). 3D Cu-based quaternary sulfides also exhibit excellent photocatalytic hydrogen production performances, such as CZIS hollow microspheres and hollow sub-microspheres [102,103].

    Photoelectrochemical water splitting provides a promising strategy to convert solar energy into hydrogen [106,107,108]. Previously, many common photovoltaic materials such as CdTe, TiO2 and Si were successfully used to fabricate photoelectrodes for PEC solar water splitting and obtained significant results [109,110,111]. However, the toxicity of Cd in CdTe, the narrow light absorption range and the high energy fabrication process of Si limited their large-scale applications in PEC water splitting. Thus, scientists are searching for high-efficiency, low-cost and wide light absorption materials for PEC applications. Copper-based multinary chalcogenides such as CIS, Cu(InGa)Se2 (CIGSe), and CZTS have been used as potential photocathode materials due to their excellent photovoltaic performances and suitable conduction band positions for water reduction [48,112,113,114,115,116,117]. For example, the CIGSe/CdS/ZnO photocathode exhibited excellent PEC performance with a current upping to 32.5 mA cm−2 at 0 VRHE [118]. Then, CMS nanomaterials were also used to fabricate photoelectrodes for PEC applications with the development of nanotechnology [119,120,121].

    Guo and coauthors fabricated CZTS photoelectrode using colloidal CZTS nanocrystals via electrophoretic deposition. The obtained CZTS photoelectrode exhibited composition-dependent PEC hydrogen production performances [122]. The (Cu2Sn)0.45Zn1.65S3 photocathode has the highest photocurrent with an incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of 3.9% at 600 nm, which is higher than previously reported results of CZTS photocathodes [123]. Similarly, the CZIS photoelectrode fabricated by 2D CZIS nanoplates also showed a cathodic photocurrent [124]. Moon and coauthors synthesized chalcopyrite CIS nanorod arrays as photoelectrodes for PEC hydrogen production via anodic aluminum oxide template-assisted growth. The CIS nanorod arrays showed an obvious cathodic photocurrent response without co-catalyst loading [125]. Zhang and coauthors reported the synthesis of chalcopyrite CIS nanosheet-constructed nanowire arrays (NCNAs) (Figure 4a). The PEC properties of these NCNAs were investigated using a three-electrode system with a reference electrode of Ag/AgCl and counter electrode of a Pt mesh in a 1.0 M KCl aqueous solution. The CIS NCNA photocathode exhibited not only enhanced PEC performance, but also improved PEC stability (Figure 4b) [104]. Many strategies have been developed to improve the PEC performances of CMS photoelectrodes. For example, Sivula and coauthors used CdS, ZnSe and CdSe buffer layers to modify the surface of CZTS nanocrystal photocathodes to enhance the PEC performance [126]. Pradhan and coauthors integrated Au on CIS nanocrystals to improve the PEC performance of CIS nanoplates [127]. The exciton−plasmon coupling in the 0D−2D dot−disk Au-CIS heterostructures leads to a higher photocurrent with efficient production of H2.

    Figure 4.  (a) TEM, selected area electron diffraction (SAED) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of CIS nanosheet-constructed nanowires. (b) Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves and intensity-time (I-t) curves (at 0 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)) of the pristine Cu2S nanowire arrays and CIS nanosheet-constructed nanowire arrays under simulated solar illumination (Reproduced from Ref. [104] with permission). (c) A schematic and SEM images of the ZnO/CZTS photoanode. (d) LSV, ABPE, chopped LSV and I-t (at 1.23 V versus RHE) curves of the three photoanodes of ZnO/CZTSSe, ZnO/CZTS and ZnO (Reproduced from Ref. [105] with permission).

    Among the widely used PEC materials, some wide-bandgap metal oxides (such as ZnO and TiO2) are promising stable, efficient and inexpensive anode materials for efficient PEC hydrogen production [128,129]. However, the large bandgaps of metal oxides limit the absorption of visible light, thus reducing the solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency. Sensitization using QDs, especially CMS CDs, is one of the most promising strategies to expand the light absorption range of metal oxides, mainly due to the suitable bandgap of CMS QDs [130,131,132,133]. Teng and coauthors used colloidal CIS CDs as sensitizers for TiO2 photoelectrodes [134]. The CIS-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrodes exhibited a maximum conversion efficiency of 1.9% at +0.23 V bias. Wang and coauthors used CZIS CDs to sensitize TiO2 photoelectrodes. The obtained CZIS/TiO2 photoelectrodes showed composition-dependent performances with a maximum photocurrent density of 3.7 mA cm−2 [135]. In addition, 2D CZIS nanosheet-sensitized TiO2 nanorods can also boost their solar water splitting performance [136]. Xu and coauthors studied the PEC performance of CZTS-sensitized ZnO nanorod photoanodes in detail. CZTS/ZnO photoanodes are fabricated by spin-coating CZTS nanocrystals on ZnO arrays (Figure 4c). The ZnO/CZTSSe photoelectrode showed excellent PEC performances with a photocurrent density of 6.38 mA cm−2 at 1.23 VRHE and an optimal applied bias photon-to-current efficiency (ABPE) of 2.8% at a bias of 0.60 V (Figure 4d) [105].

    Excessive CO2 emissions have led to greenhouse effects and several serious environmental problems. Converting CO2 into hydrocarbon fuels is a promising approach to lower the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere and can also reduce the dependence on fossil fuels. Inspired by the photosynthesis of plants, photocatalytic CO2 reduction to hydrocarbon fuels using solar energy is an attractive method for CO2 conversion and can mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. A series of photocatalysts have been explored for photocatalytic CO2 reduction, such as metal oxides, metal nitrides, and metal sulfides [137,138,139,140]. Among them, metal sulfides are excellent catalysts for photocatalytic or PEC CO2 reduction because the S 3p orbital occupies the less positive VB, which promote metal sulfides with a wider photoresponse range and higher carrier concentration, and sulfur has light-effective mass carriers [141,142]. CMS semiconductors with a narrow bandgap and excellent light absorption abilities have been widely studied for photocatalytic and PEC CO2 reduction [143,144,145,146].

    Furthermore, the large specific surface area of CMS nanomaterials could bring a huge number of reactive sites, thus leading to excellent photocatalytic performance. For example, single-phase Cu3SnS4 with a bandgap of 1.76 eV is a robust photocatalyst that can selectively reduce CO2 into CH4 via a photocatalytic reaction [147]. The Cu3SnS4 photocatalyst exhibited a remarkable CH4 production rate of 14 μmol g−1 h−1 with 80% selectivity without a cocatalyst or scavenger. To improve the activity and selectivity of the Cu3SnS4 photocatalyst, Yu and coauthors constructed S vacancies in Cu3SnS4 nanocrystals to introduce Cu(Ⅰ) and Sn(Ⅱ), which can effectively suppress the recombination of electrons and holes and improve their selectivity and reactivity [62]. The as-prepared S-vacancy Cu3SnS4 nanocrystals exhibited a CH4 evolution rate of 22.65 μmol g−1 h−1 with a selectivity of 83.1%, without any cocatalyst or scavenger. Similarly, Xie and coauthors engineered S vacancies in Cu5InS8 single-unit-cells to improve the selectivity of photocatalytic CO2 reduction (Figure 5ad) [55]. The existence of S vacancies not only reduce the overall activation energy barrier (Figure 5a), but also transform the endoergic protonation process to an exoergic reaction step (Figure 5cd), which can change the reaction pathway to improve the selectivity of CH4. The obtained S-vacancy CuIn5S8 (Vs-CuIn5S8) single-unit-cell layers exhibited a CH4 evolution rate of 8.7 μmol g−1 h−1 with a near 100% selectivity in the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (Figure 5b). Wang and coauthors constructed CuxInS5-CuySe S-scheme heterostructures to enhance the reactivity of photocatalytic CO2 reduction [148]. The obtained S-scheme heterostructures showed a near 100% selectivity for photocatalytic CO2 reduction to methanol, with a rate of 5.250 μmol g−1 h−1. In addition, Cu-based ternary and quaternary sulfide QDs are usually used as photosensitizers for photocatalytic CO2 reduction assisted by molecular catalysts [46,149,150]. For example, Weiss and coauthors used CIS colloidal QDs as photosensitizers for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO in pure water [46]. The photocatalysts exhibited excellent photoreduction performances with a turnover number of 72484−84101, a quantum yield of 0.96%–3.39%, and a CO selectivity of 99%.

    Figure 5.  (a) Bandgap alignments of CuIn5S8 and Vs-CuIn5S8 single-unit-cell layers. (b) Photocatalytic CO2 reduction performances of CuIn5S8 (blue bars) and Vs-CuIn5S8 (red bars) single-unit-cell layers. (c, d) Free energy diagrams of CO2 photoreduction to CH4 for the Vs-CuIn5S8 and pristine CuIn5S8 single-unit-cell layers (Reproduced from Ref. [55] with permission).

    Photocatalytic organic synthesis is not only an attractive strategy enabling direct solar energy to chemical energy conversion, but it also provides a promising alternative to traditional high-energy chemical synthesis. Photocatalysts can absorb solar light to produce electrons and holes, thereby promoting chemical reactions on the surface of photocatalysts. A series of classic reactions, such as alcohol oxidation, hydrogenation, aerobic coupling and epoxidation have been achieved via photocatalytic reactions. Note that, the photocatalyst is essential for the photocatalytic reaction. CMSs are widely used for photocatalytic organic synthesis, such as PEC methylcyclohexane synthesis and PEC ammonia synthesis [47,152].

    The development of nanotechnology promotes the preferable use of CMS nanomaterials for photocatalytic organic synthesis. For example, chalcopyrite CFS nanocrystals with a tetragonal structure show obvious localized surface plasmon resonance at 2.4 eV, which relaxes through nonradiative damping, thus generating hot holes or electrons and heat. In addition, due to their strong coordination preference of Fe–S units for organics and hydrogen atoms, CFS nanocrystals could be used as an attractive plasmonic photocatalyst for photocatalytic synthesis [151,153]. Zbořil and coauthors used CFS nanocrystals as plasmonic photocatalysts for the selective hydrogenation of nitroaromatics (Figure 6ae) [151]. Under solar light irradiation, the CFS nanocrystals work through the synthetic action of photothermal effects and hot holes. The CFS nanocrystal catalysts exhibited a higher production rate than other top-rated photo and thermal catalysts. Importantly, these plasmonic catalysts can be reused many times. Sun and coauthors used S-doped biochar-supported CIS QD-sensitized Bi2MoO6 hierarchical flowers as photocatalysts for efficient photocatalytic biorefineries [154]. The obtained photocatalyst exhibited a xylonic acid yield of 86.59% under visible light irradiation. Chen and coauthors constructed a CIS modified polymeric carbon nitride S-scheme photocatalyst for H2O2 synthesis [155]. The optimized S-scheme photocatalyst showed a H2O2 yield of 1247.6 μmol L−1 h−1 with an apparent quantum yield (AQY) of 16.0% at 420 nm.

    Figure 6.  (a) Photocatalytic reduction of nitrobenzene (NB) using CFS nanocrystals. (b) Photocatalytic reduction of NB for different reaction times. (c) Photocatalytic reduction of NB with different amounts of NB and catalysts. (d, e) Photocatalytic aniline yield at controlled temperature or light [151].

    A pollutant-free environment is a fundamental need of human beings. A variety of pollutants effect living organisms. To solve these problems, the exploration of catalysts for the photocatalytic degradation of these pollutants using solar energy is necessary [156,157]. Semiconductor photocatalysis is an economical and effective strategy to remove pollutants. Metal oxide semiconductors are the most commonly used photocatalysts for photocatalytic pollutant removal [158,159]. Meanwhile, the greatest disadvantage of these photocatalysts is their wide bandgap which limits the absorption of visible light. CMS is a promising candidate for metal oxide due to its wide light absorption range [49,160,161,162].

    Under visible light irradiation, CMS photocatalysts absorb light to produce hole-electron pairs. Then, the electrons and holes migrate to the surface of the photocatalysts. Finally, the hole-electron pairs format different reactive oxygen species via a series of redox reactions, which are the dominant active species in the photooxidation of pollutants (Figure 7a). CTS flower-like architectures show obvious photocatalytic activity for photodegradation of methylene blue [163]. CZTS nanoparticles with a size of 2–5 nm was used for the photocatalytic degradation of industrial waste and organic pollutants in water [49]. The efficiency of CZTS nanoparticles was 75% for industrial waste and 98.4% for organic pollutants under sunlight (Figure 7b, c). Deka and coauthors also used surfactant-free hydrophilic CZTS nanoparticles as photocatalysts for the photoreduction of Cr(Ⅳ) into nontoxic Cr(Ⅲ) [164]. The high catalytic performance of the as-prepared CZTS NPs under visible light irradiation is attributed to the size, surface charge and electronic effect of the CZTS nanoparticles.

    Figure 7.  (a) Photocatalytic pollutant removal mechanism of CZTS. (b, c) Absorption spectra for CZTS (organic pollutants) in sunlight and with lens [49].

    Due to their suitable bandgap, adjustable atomic structure, unique electronic state, and outstanding optoelectronic properties, CMS nanomaterials are widely used in the field of photocatalysis and show exciting photocatalytic performances. This review provides a summary of recent progress on the photocatalytic applications of Cu-based ternary and quaternary sulfide nanomaterials, such as photocatalytic H2 production, CO2 reduction, organic synthesis, pollutant removal and PEC H2 production.

    Although remarkable progress has been made in the photocatalytic applications of Cu-based ternary and quaternary sulfide nanomaterials, there is a series of challenges that merit further investigation. First, the photocatalytic performances of current CMS nanomaterials are deficient for feasible scale applications. It is necessary to develop other CMS nanomaterials with novel structural features and electronic properties for photocatalytic applications. Additionally, engineering strategies should be developed to improve the photocatalytic performances of CMS nanomaterials, such as surface and defect engineering, element doping, cocatalyst loading, crystal structure engineering, and homojunction and heterojunction construction. Second, it is necessary to study the detailed photocatalytic mechanisms of how the CMS photocatalysts work using in situ methods, such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS), Raman spectroscopy, and HRTEM. Deep exploration of the intrinsic mechanism of CMS photocatalysts will be beneficial for rational photocatalyst design to obtain higher photocatalytic activity. Third, the theoretical study of the CMS photocatalysis process is insufficient. Due to the surface atomic reconstruction and dynamic exciton behavior during the photocatalytic reaction, it is significant to use time-dependent density functional theory calculations to explore the excited-state chemistry. Furthermore, in situ characterizations assisted by calculations will provide deep insights into the relationship between atomic arrangements and photocatalytic properties. Fourth, the main products are CH4 and CO for the photocatalytic CO2 reduction of CMS nanomaterials. However, it is difficult to obtain high value-added C2+ products. Finally, hole-generated photocorrosion is a general problem for the metal sulfide photocatalysts. Further efforts should be made to develop other means of addressing the stability problems coming from photocorrosion.

    The author declares that no Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools were used in the creation of this article.

    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grants 2021YFA0715700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 22101271).

    The author declares no conflict of interest.



    [1] Parvulescu VI, Epron F, Garcia H, et al. (2021) Recent progress and prospects in catalytic water treatment. Chem Rev 122: 2981–3121. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00527 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00527
    [2] Wang Q, Domen K (2020) Particulate photocatalysts for light-driven water splitting: Mechanisms, challenges, and design strategies. Chem Rev 120: 919–985. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00201 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00201
    [3] Rahman MZ, Edvinsson T, Gascon J (2022) Hole utilization in solar hydrogen production. Nat Rev Chem 6: 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00366-w doi: 10.1038/s41570-022-00366-w
    [4] Zhou P, Luo M, Guo S (2022) Optimizing the semiconductor-metal-single-atom interaction for photocatalytic reactivity. Nat Rev Chem 6: 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00434-1 doi: 10.1038/s41570-022-00434-1
    [5] Sokol KP, Andrei V (2022) Automated synthesis and characterization techniques for solar fuel production. Nat Rev Mater 7: 251–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00432-1 doi: 10.1038/s41578-022-00432-1
    [6] Chen S, Takata T, Domen K (2017) Particulate photocatalysts for overall water splitting. Nat Rev Mater 2: 17050. http://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.50 doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.50
    [7] Chang K, Hai X, Ye JH (2016) Transition metal disulfides as noble-metal-alternative co-catalysts for solar hydrogen production. Adv Energy Mater 6: 1502555. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502555 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201502555
    [8] Wang F, Li Q, Xu D (2017) Recent progress in semiconductor-based nanocomposite photocatalysts for solar-to-chemical energy conversion. Adv Energy Mater 7: 1700529. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700529 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700529
    [9] Fu CF, Wu X, Yang J (2018) Material design for photocatalytic water splitting from a theoretical perspective. Adv Mater 30: e1802106. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201802106 doi: 10.1002/adma.201802106
    [10] Li H, Zhou Y, Tu W, et al. (2015) State-of-the-art progress in diverse heterostructured photocatalysts toward promoting photocatalytic performance. Adv Funct Mater 25: 998–1013. http://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201401636 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201401636
    [11] Sun X, Zhang X, Xie Y (2020) Surface defects in two-dimensional photocatalysts for efficient organic synthesis. Matter 2: 842–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.02.006 doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.02.006
    [12] Fan W, Zhang Q, Wang Y (2014) Semiconductor-based nanocomposites for photocatalytic H2 production and CO2 conversion. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15: 2632–2649. http://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP43524A doi: 10.1039/C2CP43524A
    [13] Zhang N, Gao C, Xiong Y (2019) Defect engineering: A versatile tool for tuning the activation of key molecules in photocatalytic reactions. J Energy Chem 37: 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2018.09.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.09.010
    [14] Talapin DV, Lee JS, Kovalenko MV, et al. (2010) Prospects of colloidal nanocrystals for electronic and optoelectronic applications. Chem Rev 110: 389–458. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900137k doi: 10.1021/cr900137k
    [15] Savage KJ, Hawkeye MM, Esteban R, et al. (2012) Revealing the quantum regime in tunnelling plasmonics. Nature 491: 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11653 doi: 10.1038/nature11653
    [16] Meinardi F, Ehrenberg S, Dhamo L, et al. (2017) Highly efficient luminescent solar concentrators based on earth-abundant indirect-bandgap silicon quantum dots. Nature Photon 11: 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.5 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.5
    [17] Smith AM, Mohs AM, Nie S (2019) Tuning the optical and electronic properties of colloidal nanocrystals by lattice strain. Nature Nanotech 4: 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.360 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.360
    [18] Oh N, Kim BH, Cho SY, et al. (2017) Double-heterojunction nanorod light-responsive LEDs for display applications. Science 355: 616–619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2038 doi: 10.1126/science.aal2038
    [19] Du J, Singh R, Fedin I, et al. (2020) Spectroscopic insights into high defect tolerance of Zn: CuInSe2 quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. Nat Energy 5: 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0617-6 doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0617-6
    [20] Chen R, Ren Z, Liang Y, et al. (2022) Spatiotemporal imaging of charge transfer in photocatalyst particles. Nature 610: 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05183-1 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05183-1
    [21] Zhou P, Navid IA, Ma Y, et al. (2023) Solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of more than 9% in photocatalytic water splitting. Nature 613: 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05399-1 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05399-1
    [22] Chen X, Liu L, Yu PY, et al. (2011) Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science 331: 746–750. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200448 doi: 10.1126/science.1200448
    [23] Lotfi S, Fischer K, Schulze A, et al. (2022) Photocatalytic degradation of steroid hormone micropollutants by TiO2-coated polyethersulfone membranes in a continuous flow-through process. Nature Nanotech 17: 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01074-8 doi: 10.1038/s41565-022-01074-8
    [24] Song S, Song H, Li L, et al. (2021) A selective Au-ZnO/TiO2 hybrid photocatalyst for oxidative coupling of methane to ethane with dioxygen. Nat Catal 4: 1032–1042. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00708-9 doi: 10.1038/s41929-021-00708-9
    [25] Lin R, Wan J, Xiong Y, et al. (2018) Quantitative study of charge carrier dynamics in well-defined WO3 nanowires and nanosheets: Insight into the crystal facet effect in photocatalysis. J Am Chem Soc 140: 9078–9082. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b05293 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b05293
    [26] Simon T, Bouchonville N, Berr MJ, et al. (2014) Redox shuttle mechanism enhances photocatalytic H2 generation on Ni-decorated CdS nanorods. Nat Mater 13: 1013–1018. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4049 doi: 10.1038/nmat4049
    [27] Han Z, Qiu F, Eisenberg R, et al. (2012) Robust photogeneration of H2 in water using semiconductor nanocrystals and a nickel catalyst. Science 338: 1321–1324. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227775 doi: 10.1126/science.1227775
    [28] Lin L, Lin Z, Zhang J, et al. (2020) Molecular-level insights on the reactive facet of carbon nitride single crystals photocatalysing overall water splitting. Nat Catal 3: 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0476-3 doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-0476-3
    [29] Takata T, Jiang J, Sakata Y, et al. (2020) Photocatalytic water splitting with a quantum efficiency of almost unity. Nature 581: 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2278-9 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2278-9
    [30] Regulacio MD, Han MY (2016) Multinary Ⅰ-Ⅲ-Ⅵ2 and Ⅰ2-Ⅱ-Ⅳ-Ⅵ4 semiconductor nanostructures for photocatalytic applications. Acc Chem Res 49: 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00535 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00535
    [31] Ha E, Lee LY, Wang J, et al. (2014) Significant enhancement in photocatalytic reduction of water to hydrogen by Au/Cu2ZnSnS4 nanostructure. Adv Mater 26: 3496–3500. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400243 doi: 10.1002/adma.201400243
    [32] Ye C, Regulacio MD, Lim SH, et al. (2012) Alloyed (ZnS)x(CuInS2)(1−x) semiconductor nanorods: Synthesis, bandgap tuning and photocatalytic properties. Chem Eur J 18: 11258–11263. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201201626 doi: 10.1002/chem.201201626
    [33] Li H, Li WJ, Li W, et al. (2020) Engineering crystal phase of polytypic CuInS2 nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance. Nano Res 13: 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-2665-4 doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-2665-4
    [34] Kageshima Y, Shiga S, Ode T, et al. (2021) Photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution from water over Cu2SnxGe1–xS3 particles. J Am Chem Soc 143: 5698–5708. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c12140 doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c12140
    [35] Fan FJ, Wu L, Yu SH (2013) Energetic Ⅰ–Ⅲ–Ⅵ2 and Ⅰ2–Ⅱ–Ⅳ–Ⅵ4 nanocrystals: Synthesis, photovoltaic and thermoelectric applications. Energy Environ Sci 7: 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE41437J doi: 10.1039/C3EE41437J
    [36] Chang ZX, Zhou WH, Kou DX, et al. (2014) Phase-dependent photocatalytic H2 evolution of copper zinc tin sulfide under visible light. Chem Commun 50: 12726–12729. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc05654j doi: 10.1039/c4cc05654j
    [37] Liu Q, Zhao Z, Lin Y, et al. (2011) Alloyed (ZnS)x(Cu2SnS3)1−x and (CuInS2)x(Cu2SnS3)1−x nanocrystals with arbitrary composition and broad tunable band gaps. Chem Commun 47: 964–966. http://doi.org/10.1039/C0CC03560B doi: 10.1039/C0CC03560B
    [38] Tan L, Liu Y, Mao B, et al. (2018) Effective bandgap narrowing of Cu-In-Zn-S quantum dots for photocatalytic H2 production via cocatalyst-alleviated charge recombination. Inorg Chem Front 5: 258–265. http://doi.org/10.1039/C7QI00607A doi: 10.1039/C7QI00607A
    [39] Wu L, Su F, Liu T, et al. (2022) Phosphorus-doped single-crystalline quaternary sulfide nanobelts enable efficient visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J Am Chem Soc 144: 20620–20629. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07313 doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c07313
    [40] Wu L, Wang Q, Zhuang TT, et al. (2020) Single crystalline quaternary sulfide nanobelts for efficient solar-to-hydrogen conversion. Nat Commun 11: 5194. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18679-z doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18679-z
    [41] Li Y, Wang Y, Pattengale B, et al. (2017) High-index faceted CuFeS2 nanosheets with enhanced behavior for boosting hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 9: 9230–9237. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR03182C doi: 10.1039/C7NR03182C
    [42] Zhang X, Xu Y, Zhang J, et al. (2018) Synthesis of wurtzite Cu2ZnSnS4 nanosheets with exposed high-energy (002) facets for fabrication of efficient Pt-free solar cell counter electrodes. Sci Rep 8: 248. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18631-0 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18631-0
    [43] Wu L, Wang Q, Zhuang TT, et al. (2022) A library of polytypic copper-based quaternary sulfide nanocrystals enables efficient solar-to-hydrogen conversion. Nat Commun 13: 5414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33065-7 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33065-7
    [44] Chen SY, Gong XG, Walsh A, et al. (2009) Electronic structure and stability of quaternary chalcogenide semiconductors derived from cation cross-substitution of Ⅱ-Ⅵ and Ⅰ-Ⅲ-Ⅵ2 compounds. Phys Rev B 79: 165211. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.165211 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.165211
    [45] Ozel F, Aslan E, Istanbullu B, et al. (2016) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution based on Cu2ZnSnS4, Cu2NiSnS4 and Cu2CoSnS4 nanocrystals. Appl Catal B-Environ 198: 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.053 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.053
    [46] Arcudi F, Đorđević L, Nagasing B, et al. (2021) Quantum dot-sensitized photoreduction of CO2 in water with turnover number > 80,000. J Am Chem Soc 143: 18131–18138. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c06961 doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c06961
    [47] Wang P, Minegishi T, Ma G, et al. (2012) Photoelectrochemical conversion of toluene to methylcyclohexane as an organic hydride by Cu2ZnSnS4-based photoelectrode assemblies. J Am Chem Soc 134: 2469–2472. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja209869k doi: 10.1021/ja209869k
    [48] Huang DW, Wang K, Yu L, et al. (2018) Over 1% efficient unbiased stable solar water splitting based on a sprayed Cu2ZnSnS4 photocathode protected by a HfO2 photocorrosion-resistant film. Acs Energy Lett 3: 1875–1881. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01005 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01005
    [49] Semalti P, Sharma V, Sharma SN (2021) A novel method of water remediation of organic pollutants and industrial wastes by solution-route processed CZTS nanocrystals. J Materiomics 7: 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2021.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.04.005
    [50] Akkerman QA, Genovese A, George C, et al. (2015) From binary Cu2S to ternary Cu-In-S and quaternary Cu-In-Zn-S nanocrystals with tunable composition via partial cation exchange. ACS Nano 9: 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn505786d doi: 10.1021/nn505786d
    [51] De Trizio L, Li H, Casu A, et al. (2014) Sn cation valency dependence in cation exchange reactions involving Cu2−xSe nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 136: 16277–16284. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja508161c doi: 10.1021/ja508161c
    [52] Pan D, An L, Sun Z, et al. (2018) Synthesis of Cu−In−S ternary nanocrystals with tunable structure and composition. J Am Chem Soc 130: 5620–5621. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja711027j doi: 10.1021/ja711027j
    [53] Akkari FC, Abdelkader D, Gallas B, et al. (2017) Ellipsometric characterization and optical anisotropy of nanostructured CuIn3S5 and CuIn5S8 thin films. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 71: 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.07.023 doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2017.07.023
    [54] Khemiri N, Kanzari M (2010) Comparative study of structural and morphological properties of CuIn3S5 and CuIn7S11 materials. Nucl Instrum Meth B 268: 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.175 doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.175
    [55] Li XD, Sun YF, Xu JQ, et al. (2019) Selective visible-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction to CH4 mediated by atomically thin CuIn5S8 layers. Nat Energy 4: 690–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0431-1 doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0431-1
    [56] Ng C, Yun JH, Tan HL, et al. (2018) A dual-electrolyte system for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation using CuInS2-In2O3-TiO2 nanotube array thin film. Sci China Mater 61: 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-017-9237-2 doi: 10.1007/s40843-017-9237-2
    [57] Xu W, Xie ZZ, Han WJ, et al. (2022) Rational design of interfacial energy level matching for CuGaS2 based photocatalysts over hydrogen evolution reaction. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47: 11853–11862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.209 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.209
    [58] Ghorpade UV, Suryawanshi MP, Shin SW, et al. (2016) Colloidal wurtzite Cu2SnS3 (CTS) nanocrystals and their applications in solar cells. Chem Mater 28: 3308–3317. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00176 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00176
    [59] Jathar SB, Rondiya SR, Jadhav YA, et al. (2021) Ternary Cu2SnS3: Synthesis, structure, photoelectrochemical activity, and heterojunction band offset and alignment. Chem Mater 33: 1983–1993. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03223 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03223
    [60] Yi LX, Wang D, Gao MY (2012) Synthesis of Cu3SnS4 nanocrystals and nanosheets by using Cu31S16 as seeds. CrystEngComm 14: 401–404. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1ce06153d doi: 10.1039/C1ce06153d
    [61] Lin J, Lim JM, Youn DH, et al. (2019) Cu4SnS4-rich nanomaterials for thin-film lithium batteries with enhanced conversion reaction. ACS Nano 13: 10671–10681. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b05029 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05029
    [62] Wang J, Bo T, Shao B, et al. (2021) Effect of S vacancy in Cu3SnS4 on high selectivity and activity of photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Appl Catal B-Environ 297: 120498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120498 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120498
    [63] Kamemoto S, Matsuda Y, Takahashi M, et al. (2022) Photocatalytic water splitting on Cu2SnS3 photoelectrode: Effects of Cu/Sn composite ratio on the photoelectrochemical performance. Catal Today 411–412: 113820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2022.06.035 doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2022.06.035
    [64] An X, Kays JC, Lightcap IV, et al. (2022) Wavelength-dependent bifunctional plasmonic photocatalysis in Au/chalcopyrite hybrid nanostructures. ACS Nano 16: 6813–6824. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c01706 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c01706
    [65] Sugathan A, Bhattacharyya B, Kishore VVR, et al. (2018) Why does CuFeS2 resemble gold? J Phys Chem Lett 9: 696–701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03190 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03190
    [66] Bhattacharyya B, Pandey A (2016) CuFeS2 quantum dots and highly luminescent CuFeS2 based core/shell structures: Synthesis, tunability, and photophysics. J Am Chem Soc 138: 10207–10213. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b04981 doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04981
    [67] Tsuji I, Kato H, Kobayashi H, et al. (2005) Photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible-light irradiation over band-structure-controlled (CuIn)xZn2(1−x)S2 solid solutions. J Phys Chem B 109: 7323–7329. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp044722e doi: 10.1021/jp044722e
    [68] Goodman CHL (1958) The prediction of semiconducting properties in inorganic compounds. J Phys Chem Solids 6: 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(58)90050-7 doi: 10.1016/0022-3697(58)90050-7
    [69] Yan C, Huang J, Sun K, et al. (2018) Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells with over 10% power conversion efficiency enabled by heterojunction heat treatment. Nat Energy 3: 764–772. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0206-0 doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0206-0
    [70] De Trizio L, Prato M, Genovese A, et al. (2012) Strongly fluorescent quaternary Cu–In–Zn–S nanocrystals prepared from Cu1−xInS2 nanocrystals by partial cation exchange. Chem Mater 24: 2400–2406. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm301211e doi: 10.1021/cm301211e
    [71] Cui Y, Wang G, Pan D (2012) Synthesis and photoresponse of novel Cu2CdSnS4 semiconductor nanorods. J Mater Chem 22: 12471. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm32034g doi: 10.1039/c2jm32034g
    [72] Ikeda S, Fujikawa S, Harada T, et al. (2019) Photocathode characteristics of a spray-deposited Cu2ZnGeS4 thin film for CO2 reduction in a CO2-saturated aqueous solution. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2: 6911–6918. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b01418 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01418
    [73] Singh A, Singh A, Ciston J, et al. (2015) Synergistic role of dopants on the morphology of alloyed copper chalcogenide nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 137: 6464–6467. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b02880 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02880
    [74] Huang S, He Q, Zai J, et al. (2015) The role of Mott–Schottky heterojunctions in PtCo–Cu2ZnGeS4 as counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Commun 51: 8950–8953. http://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC02584B doi: 10.1039/C5CC02584B
    [75] Septina W, Gunawan, Ikeda S, et al. (2015) Photosplitting of water from wide-gap Cu(In, Ga)S2 thin films modified with a CdS layer and Pt nanoparticles for a high-onset-potential photocathode. J Phys Chem C 119: 8576–8583. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02068 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02068
    [76] Liu XY, Zhang G, Chen H, et al. (2017) Efficient defect-controlled photocatalytic hydrogen generation based on near-infrared Cu-In-Zn-S quantum dots. Nano Res 11: 1379–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1752-7 doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1752-7
    [77] Ye C, Regulacio MD, Lim SH, et al. (2015) Alloyed ZnS-CuInS2 semiconductor nanorods and their nanoscale heterostructures for visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem Eur J 21: 9514–9519. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201500781 doi: 10.1002/chem.201500781
    [78] Chen FK, Zai JT, Xu M, et al. (2013) 3D-hierarchical Cu3SnS4 flowerlike microspheres: Controlled synthesis, formation mechanism and photocatalytic activity for H2 evolution from water. J Mater Chem A 1: 4316–4323. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3ta01491f doi: 10.1039/C3ta01491f
    [79] Zhang P, Wang T, Chang X, et al. (2016) Effective charge carrier utilization in photocatalytic conversions. Acc Chem Res 49: 911–921. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00036 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00036
    [80] Wei Y, Yang N, Huang K, et al. (2020) Steering hollow multishelled structures in photocatalysis: Optimizing surface and mass transport. Adv Mater 32: e2002556. http://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002556 doi: 10.1002/adma.202002556
    [81] Chen Q, Liu Y, Gu X, et al. (2022) Carbon dots mediated charge sinking effect for boosting hydrogen evolution in Cu-In-Zn-S QDs/MoS2 photocatalysts. Appl Catal B-Environ 301: 120755. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120755 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120755
    [82] Yu X, Shavel A, An X, et al. (2014) Cu2ZnSnS4-Pt and Cu2ZnSnS4-Au heterostructured nanoparticles for photocatalytic water splitting and pollutant degradation. J Am Chem Soc 136: 9236–9239. http://doi.org/10.1021/ja502076b doi: 10.1021/ja502076b
    [83] Ali N, Tsega TT, Cao Y, et al. (2021) Copper vacancy activated plasmonic Cu3−xSnS4 for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation: Broad solar absorption, efficient charge separation and decreased HER overpotential. Nano Res 14: 3358–3364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3604-8 doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-3604-8
    [84] Fan XB, Yu S, Zhan F, et al. (2017) Nonstoichiometric CuxInyS quantum dots for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ChemSusChem 10: 4833–4838. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201701950 doi: 10.1002/cssc.201701950
    [85] Yu X, An X, Genç A, et al. (2015) Cu2ZnSnS4–PtM (M = Co, Ni) nanoheterostructures for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J Phys Chem C 119: 21882–21888. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06199 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06199
    [86] Lin T, Yang T, Cai Y, et al. (2023) Transformation-optics-designed plasmonic singularities for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution at metal/semiconductor interfaces. Nano Lett 23: 5288–5296. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01287 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01287
    [87] Jiang F, Pan B, You D, et al. (2016) Visible light photocatalytic H2-production activity of epitaxial Cu2ZnSnS4/ZnS heterojunction. Catal Commun 85: 39–43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.07.017 doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2016.07.017
    [88] Yuan M, Wang JL, Zhou WH, et al. (2017) Cu2ZnSnS4-CdS heterostructured nanocrystals for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Catal Sci Technol 7: 3980–3984. http://doi.org/10.1039/c7cy01360d doi: 10.1039/c7cy01360d
    [89] Yuan M, Zhou WH, Kou DX, et al. (2018) Cu2ZnSnS4 decorated CdS nanorods for enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43: 20408–20416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.161 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.161
    [90] Zhuang TT, Yu P, Fan FJ, et al. (2014) Controlled synthesis of kinked ultrathin ZnS nanorods/nanowires triggered by chloride ions: A case study. Small 10: 1394–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201302656 doi: 10.1002/smll.201302656
    [91] Li Y, Zhuang TT, Fan F, et al. (2018) Pulsed axial epitaxy of colloidal quantum dots in nanowires enables facet-selective passivation. Nat Commun 9: 4947. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07422-4 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07422-4
    [92] Li M, Zhao Z, Cheng T, et al. (2016) Ultrafine jagged platinum nanowires enable ultrahigh mass activity for the oxygen reduction reaction. Science 354: 1414–1419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9050 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf9050
    [93] Chen D, Zhang H, Li Y, et al. (2018) Spontaneous formation of noble- and heavy-metal-free alloyed semiconductor quantum rods for efficient photocatalysis. Adv Mater 30: e1803351. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201803351 doi: 10.1002/adma.201803351
    [94] Zhang Z, Wu Q, Johnson G, et al. (2019) Generalized synthetic strategy for transition-metal-doped brookite-phase TiO2 nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 141: 16548–16552. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b06389 doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b06389
    [95] Gonce MK, Aslan E, Ozel F, et al. (2016) Dye-sensitized Cu2XSnS4 (X = Zn, Ni, Fe, Co, and Mn) nanofibers for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ChemSusChem 9: 600–605. http://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201501661 doi: 10.1002/cssc.201501661
    [96] Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Lin M, et al. (2015) Monolayered Bi2WO6 nanosheets mimicking heterojunction interface with open surfaces for photocatalysis. Nat Commun 6: 8340. http://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9340 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9340
    [97] Tian B, Tian B, Smith B, et al. (2018) Facile bottom-up synthesis of partially oxidized black phosphorus nanosheets as metal-free photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115: 4345–4350. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800069115 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800069115
    [98] Nishioka S, Hojo K, Xiao L, et al. (2022) Surface-modified, dye-sensitized niobate nanosheets enabling an efficient solar-driven Z-scheme for overall water splitting. Sci Adv 8: eadc9115. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adc9115 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adc9115
    [99] Ganguly P, Harb M, Cao Z, et al. (2019) 2D Nanomaterials for photocatalytic hydrogen production. ACS Energy Lett 4: 1687–1709. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00940 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00940
    [100] Wang L, Wang W, Sun S (2012) A simple template-free synthesis of ultrathin Cu2ZnSnS4 nanosheets for highly stable photocatalytic H2 evolution. J Mater Chem 22: 6553–6555. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm16515e doi: 10.1039/c2jm16515e
    [101] Zheng L, Xu Y, Song Y, et al. (2009) Nearly monodisperse CuInS2 hierarchical microarchitectures for photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light. Inorg Chem 48: 4003–4009. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic802399f doi: 10.1021/ic802399f
    [102] Huang Y, Chen J, Zou W, et al. (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution efficiency using hollow microspheres of (CuIn)xZn2(1−x)S2 solid solutions. Dalton Trans 44: 10991–10996. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5dt01269d doi: 10.1039/c5dt01269d
    [103] Chen Y, Qin Z, Guo X, et al. (2016) One-step hydrothermal synthesis of (CuIn)0.2Zn1.6S2 hollow sub-microspheres for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41: 1524–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.087 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.087
    [104] Li M, Zhao RJ, Su YJ, et al. (2016) Hierarchically CuInS2 nanosheet-constructed nanowire arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv Mater Interfaces 3: 1600494. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201600494 doi: 10.1002/admi.201600494
    [105] Xu J, Hu Z, Zhang J, et al. (2017) Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSn(S1−xSex)4 nanocrystals: Room-temperature synthesis and efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Mater Chem A 5: 25230–25236. http://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA06628G doi: 10.1039/C7TA06628G
    [106] Han Z, Eisenberg R (2014) Fuel from water: The photochemical generation of hydrogen from water. Acc Chem Res 47: 2537–2544. http://doi.org/10.1021/ar5001605 doi: 10.1021/ar5001605
    [107] Teitsworth TS, Hill DJ, Litvin SR, et al. (2023) Water splitting with silicon p–i–n superlattices suspended in solution. Nature 614: 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05549-5 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05549-5
    [108] Li Z, Li R, Jing H, et al. (2023) Blocking the reverse reactions of overall water splitting on a Rh/GaN–ZnO photocatalyst modified with Al2O3. Nat Catal 6: 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00907-y doi: 10.1038/s41929-022-00907-y
    [109] Zhang JH, Zhang M, Dong YY, et al. (2022) CdTe/CdSe-sensitized photocathode coupling with Ni-substituted polyoxometalate catalyst for photoelectrochemical generation of hydrogen. Nano Res 15: 1347–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3663-x doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-3663-x
    [110] Lee S, Ji L, De Palma AC, et al. (2021) Scalable, highly stable Si-based metal-insulator-semiconductor photoanodes for water oxidation fabricated using thin-film reactions and electrodeposition. Nat Commun 12: 3982. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24229-y doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24229-y
    [111] Cheng F, Lin G, Hu X, et al. (2019) Porous single-crystalline titanium dioxide at 2 cm scale delivering enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Nat Commun 10: 3618. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11623-w doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11623-w
    [112] Liu Z, Lu X, Chen D (2018) Photoelectrochemical water splitting of CuInS2 photocathode collaborative modified with separated catalysts based on efficient photogenerated electron–hole separation. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 6: 10289–10294. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01607 doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01607
    [113] Kaneko H, Minegishi T, Nakabayashi M, et al. (2016) Enhanced hydrogen evolution under simulated sunlight from neutral electrolytes on (ZnSe)0.85(CuIn0.7Ga0.3Se2)0.15 photocathodes prepared by a bilayer method. Angew Chem Int Ed 55: 15329–15333. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201609202 doi: 10.1002/anie.201609202
    [114] Tay YF, Kaneko H, Chiam SY, et al. (2018) Solution-processed Cd-substituted CZTS photocathode for efficient solar hydrogen evolution from neutral water. Joule 2: 537–548. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.012 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.012
    [115] Guo P, Xiao Y, Mo R, et al. (2023) Coherent-twinning-enhanced solar water splitting in thin-film Cu2ZnSnS4 photocathodes. ACS Energy Lett 8: 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02626 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02626
    [116] Yan C, Sun K, Huang J, et al. (2017) Beyond 11% efficient sulfide kesterite Cu2ZnxCd1–xSnS4 solar cell: Effects of cadmium alloying. ACS Energy Lett 2: 930–936. http://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00129 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00129
    [117] Yang W, Oh Y, Kim J, et al. (2016) Molecular chemistry-controlled hybrid ink-derived efficient Cu2ZnSnS4 photocathodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Energy Lett 1: 1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00453 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00453
    [118] Mali MG, Yoon H, Joshi BN, et al. (2015) Enhanced photoelectrochemical solar water splitting using a platinum-decorated CIGS/CdS/ZnO photocathode. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7: 21619–21625. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b07267 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b07267
    [119] Sun W, Ye Y, You Y, et al. (2018) A top-down synthesis of wurtzite Cu2SnS3 nanocrystals for efficient photoelectrochemical performance. J Mater Chem A 6: 8221–8226. http://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA00851E doi: 10.1039/C8TA00851E
    [120] Li M, Zhao R, Su Y, et al. (2017) Synthesis of CuInS2 nanowire arrays via solution transformation of Cu2S self-template for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Appl Catal B-Environ 203: 715–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.051 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.051
    [121] Nishi H, Kuwabata S, Torimoto T (2013) Composition-dependent photoelectrochemical properties of nonstoichiometric Cu2ZnSnS4 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 117: 21055–21063. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp405008m doi: 10.1021/jp405008m
    [122] Chen Y, Chuang CH, Lin KC, et al. (2014) Synthesis and photoelectrochemical properties of (Cu2Sn)xZn3(1–x)S3 nanocrystal films. J Phys Chem C 118: 11954–11963. http://doi.org/10.1021/jp500270d doi: 10.1021/jp500270d
    [123] Yokoyama D, Minegishi T, Jimbo K, et al. (2010) H2 evolution from water on modified Cu2ZnSnS4 photoelectrode under solar light. Appl Phy Express 3: 101202. https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.3.101202 doi: 10.1143/APEX.3.101202
    [124] Wu XJ, Huang X, Qi X, et al. (2014) Copper-based ternary and quaternary semiconductor nanoplates: Templated synthesis, characterization, and photoelectrochemical properties. Angew Chem Int Ed 53: 8929–8933. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201403655 doi: 10.1002/anie.201403655
    [125] Yang W, Oh Y, Kim J, et al. Photoelectrochemical properties of vertically aligned CuInS2 nanorod arrays prepared via template-assisted growth and transfer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8: 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b09241 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b09241
    [126] Guijarro N, Prevot MS, Sivula K (2014) Enhancing the charge separation in nanocrystalline Cu2ZnSnS4 photocathodes for photoelectrochemical application: The role of surface modifications. J Phys Chem Lett 5: 3902–3908. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz501996s doi: 10.1021/jz501996s
    [127] Patra BK, Khilari S, Pradhan D, et al. (2016) Hybrid dot–disk Au-CuInS2 nanostructures as active photocathode for efficient evolution of hydrogen from water. Chem Mater 28: 4358–4366. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01357 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01357
    [128] Hu Y, Pan Y, Wang Z, et al. Lattice distortion induced internal electric field in TiO2 photoelectrode for efficient charge separation and transfer. Nat Commun 11: 2129. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15993-4 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15993-4
    [129] Kang Z, Si H, Zhang S, et al. (2019) Interface engineering for modulation of charge carrier behavior in ZnO photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv Funct Mater 29: 1808032. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201808032 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201808032
    [130] You YM, Tong X, Channa AI, et al. (2022) Tailoring the optoelectronic properties of eco-friendly CuGaS2/ZnSe core/shell quantum dots for boosted photoelectrochemical solar hydrogen production. Ecomat 4: e12206. https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.12206 doi: 10.1002/eom2.12206
    [131] Channa AI, Tong X, Xu JY, et al. (2019) Tailored near-infrared-emitting colloidal heterostructured quantum dots with enhanced visible light absorption for high performance photoelectrochemical cells. J Mater Chem A 7: 10225–10230. http://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA01052A doi: 10.1039/C9TA01052A
    [132] Wang R, Xu X, Zhang Y, et al. (2015) Functionalized ZnO@TiO2 nanorod array film loaded with ZnIn0.25Cu0.02S1.395 solid-solution: Synthesis, characterization and enhanced visible light driven water splitting. Nanoscale 7: 11082–11092. http://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR02127H doi: 10.1039/C5NR02127H
    [133] Wu HL, Li XB, Tung CH, et al. (2018) Recent advances in sensitized photocathodes: From molecular dyes to semiconducting quantum dots. Adv Sci 5: 1700684. http://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700684 doi: 10.1002/advs.201700684
    [134] Li TL, Teng H (2010) Solution synthesis of high-quality CuInS2 quantum dots as sensitizers for TiO2 photoelectrodes. J Mater Chem 20: 3656–3664. https://doi.org/10.1039/b927279h doi: 10.1039/b927279h
    [135] Liu C, Tong X, Channa AI, et al. (2021) Tuning the composition of heavy metal-free quaternary quantum dots for improved photoelectrochemical performance. J Mater Chem A 9: 5825–5832. http://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA11481B doi: 10.1039/D0TA11481B
    [136] Liu Q, Cao F, Wu F, et al. (2016) Partial ion exchange derived 2D Cu–Zn–In–S nanosheets as sensitizers of 1D TiO2 nanorods for boosting solar water splitting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8: 26235–26243. http://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b08648 doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b08648
    [137] Jiang Z, Xu X, Ma Y, et al. (2020) Filling metal-organic framework mesopores with TiO2 for CO2 photoreduction. Nature 586: 549–554. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2738-2 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2738-2
    [138] Loh JYY, Kherani NP, Ozin GA (2021) Persistent CO2 photocatalysis for solar fuels in the dark. Nat Sustain 4: 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00681-y doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00681-y
    [139] Gao W, Li S, He H, et al. (2021) Vacancy-defect modulated pathway of photoreduction of CO2 on single atomically thin AgInP2S6 sheets into olefiant gas. Nat Commun 12: 4747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25068-7 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25068-7
    [140] Li K, Peng B, Peng T (2016) Recent advances in heterogeneous photocatalytic CO2 conversion to solar fuels. ACS Catal 6: 7485–7527. http://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b02089 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02089
    [141] Zhou M, Wang S, Yang P, et al. (2018) Boron carbon nitride semiconductors decorated with CdS nanoparticles for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. ACS Catal 8: 4928–4936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b00104 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00104
    [142] Pang H, Meng X, Li P, et al. (2019) Cation vacancy-initiated CO2 photoreduction over ZnS for efficient formate production. ACS Energy Lett 4: 1387–1393. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00711 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00711
    [143] Yang Z, Yang J, Ji H, et al. (2022) Construction of S–Co–S internal electron transport bridges in Co-doped CuInS2 for enhancing photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Mater Today Chem 26: 101078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101078 doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101078
    [144] Kong Y, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. (2021) Unveiling the selectivity of CO2 reduction on Cu2ZnSnS4: The effect of exposed termination. J Phys Chem C 125: 24967–24973. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08013 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08013
    [145] Yoshida T, Yamaguchi A, Umezawa N, et al. (2018) Photocatalytic CO2 reduction using a pristine Cu2ZnSnS4 film electrode under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem C 122: 21695–21702. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04241 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04241
    [146] Zhou S, Sun K, Huang J, et al. (2021) Accelerating electron-transfer and tuning product selectivity through surficial vacancy engineering on CZTS/CdS for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction. Small 17: e2100496. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202100496 doi: 10.1002/smll.202100496
    [147] Sharma N, Das T, Kumar S, et al. (2019) Photocatalytic activation and reduction of CO2 to CH4 over single phase nano Cu3SnS4: Acombined experimental and theoretical study. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2: 5677–5685. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b00813 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b00813
    [148] Zhao H, Duan J, Zhang Z, et al. (2022) S‐scheme heterojunction and defect site engineering on CuxIn5S8−Cu2−ySe for highly efficient photoreduction of CO2 to methanol. ChemCatChem 14: e202101733. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202101733 doi: 10.1002/cctc.202101733
    [149] Lian S, Kodaimati MS, Dolzhnikov DS, et al. (2017) Powering a CO2 reduction catalyst with visible light through multiple sub-picosecond electron transfers from a quantum dot. J Am Chem Soc 139: 8931–8938. http://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b03134 doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03134
    [150] Wang L, Zhang Z, Guan R, et al. (2022) Synergistic CO2 reduction and tetracycline degradation by CuInZnS-Ti3C2Tx in one photoredox cycle. Nano Res 15: 8010–8018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4661-3 doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-4661-3
    [151] Cheruvathoor Poulose A, Zoppellaro G, Konidakis I, et al. (2022) Fast and selective reduction of nitroarenes under visible light with an earth-abundant plasmonic photocatalyst. Nat Nanotechnol 17: 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01087-3 doi: 10.1038/s41565-022-01087-3
    [152] Zhou S, Sun K, Toe CY, et al. (2022) Engineering a kesterite-based photocathode for photoelectrochemical ammonia synthesis from NOx reduction. Adv Mater 34: e2201670. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202201670 doi: 10.1002/adma.202201670
    [153] Xu X, Tang D, Cai J, et al. (2019) Heterogeneous activation of peroxymonocarbonate by chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) for efficient degradation of 2, 4-dichlorophenol in simulated groundwater. Appl Catal B-Environ 251: 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.080 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.080
    [154] Liu K, Cui R, Liu Z, et al. (2023) Fractional thermal reduction of CuInS2 quantum dot-sensitized Bi2MoO6 hierarchical flowers on S-doped biochar for dual Z-scheme/Mott–Schottky heterojunction construction: A strategy for efficient photocatalytic biorefineries. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 11: 5400–5407. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c06572 doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c06572
    [155] Zhang Y, Chen X, Ye Y, et al. (2023) Photocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction over copper-indium-sulfide modified polymeric carbon nitride S-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst. J Catal 419: 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2023.01.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2023.01.021
    [156] Delekar SD, Dhodamani AG, More KV, et al. (2018) Structural and optical properties of nanocrystalline TiO2 with multiwalled carbon nanotubes and its photovoltaic studies using Ru(Ⅱ) sensitizers. ACS Omega 3:2743–2756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01316 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01316
    [157] Patil MS, Deshmukh PS, Dhodamani GA, et al. (2017) Different strategies for modification of titanium dioxide as heterogeneous catalyst in chemical transformations. Curr Org Chem 21: 821–833. http://doi.org/10.2174/1385272820666161013151816 doi: 10.2174/1385272820666161013151816
    [158] Hunge YM, Yadav AA, Kulkarni SB, et al. (2018) A multifunctional ZnO thin film based devices for photoelectrocatalytic degradation of terephthalic acid and CO2 gas sensing applications. Sens Actuators B Chem 274: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.117 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.117
    [159] Wei Z, Liang F, Liu Y, et al. (2017) Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of phenol-containing wastewater by TiO2/g-C3N4 hybrid heterostructure thin film. Appl Catal B-Environ 201: 600–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.003
    [160] Semalti P, Sharma V, Sharma SN (2022) A solution-route processed multicomponent Cu2ZnSn(S1−xSex)4 nanocrystals: A potential low-cost photocatalyst. J Clean Prod 365: 132750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132750 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132750
    [161] Zheng XL, Yang YJ, Liu YH, et al. (2022) Fundamentals and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution applications of quaternary chalcogenide semiconductor: Cu2ZnSnS4. Rare Met 41: 2153–2168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-021-01955-2 doi: 10.1007/s12598-021-01955-2
    [162] Hunge YM, Yadav AA, Liu S, et al. (2019) Sonochemical synthesis of CZTS photocatalyst for photocatalytic degradation of phthalic acid. Ultrason Sonochem 56: 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.04.003
    [163] Tan Y, Lin ZQ, Ren WH, et al. (2012) Facile solvothermal synthesis of Cu2SnS3 architectures and their visible-light-driven photocatalytic properties. Mater Lett 89: 240–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.08.117 doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.08.117
    [164] Kush P, Deori K, Kumar A, et al. (2015) Efficient hydrogen/oxygen evolution and photocatalytic dye degradation and reduction of aqueous Cr(vi) by surfactant free hydrophilic Cu2ZnSnS4 nanoparticles. J Mater Chem A 3: 8098–8106. http://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06551D doi: 10.1039/C4TA06551D
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2022) PDF downloads(77) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog