
Citation: Yan’e Wang , Zhiguo Wang, Chengxia Lei. Asymptotic profile of endemic equilibrium to a diffusive epidemic model with saturated incidence rate[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 3885-3913. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019192
[1] | Yuanfu Shao . Dynamics and optimal harvesting of a stochastic predator-prey system with regime switching, S-type distributed time delays and Lévy jumps. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4068-4093. doi: 10.3934/math.2022225 |
[2] | Xiaodong Wang, Kai Wang, Zhidong Teng . Global dynamics and density function in a class of stochastic SVI epidemic models with Lévy jumps and nonlinear incidence. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2829-2855. doi: 10.3934/math.2023148 |
[3] | Shuo Ma, Jiangman Li, Qiang Li, Ruonan Liu . Adaptive exponential synchronization of impulsive coupled neutral stochastic neural networks with Lévy noise and probabilistic delays under non-Lipschitz conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24912-24933. doi: 10.3934/math.20241214 |
[4] | Zhengwen Yin, Yuanshun Tan . Threshold dynamics of stochastic SIRSW infectious disease model with multiparameter perturbation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 33467-33492. doi: 10.3934/math.20241597 |
[5] | Tian Xu, Ailong Wu . Stabilization of nonlinear hybrid stochastic time-delay neural networks with Lévy noise using discrete-time feedback control. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27080-27101. doi: 10.3934/math.20241317 |
[6] | Yassine Sabbar, Aeshah A. Raezah . Modeling mosquito-borne disease dynamics via stochastic differential equations and generalized tempered stable distribution. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22454-22485. doi: 10.3934/math.20241092 |
[7] | Chuanfu Chai, Yuanfu Shao, Yaping Wang . Analysis of a Holling-type IV stochastic prey-predator system with anti-predatory behavior and Lévy noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21033-21054. doi: 10.3934/math.20231071 |
[8] | Yassine Sabbar, Aeshah A. Raezah, Mohammed Moumni . Enhancing epidemic modeling: exploring heavy-tailed dynamics with the generalized tempered stable distribution. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29496-29528. doi: 10.3934/math.20241429 |
[9] | Hong Qiu, Yanzhang Huo, Tianhui Ma . Dynamical analysis of a stochastic hybrid predator-prey model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and Lévy jumps. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14492-14512. doi: 10.3934/math.2022799 |
[10] | Yassine Sabbar, Aeshah A. Raezah . Threshold analysis of an algae-zooplankton model incorporating general interaction rates and nonlinear independent stochastic components. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18211-18235. doi: 10.3934/math.2024889 |
In the last few decades, an outstanding advancement has been witnessed in nonlinear sciences and engineering fields. Many scientists showed keen interest in finding the exact and numerical solutions for the nonlinear PDEs. Numerous techniques were devised in this regard which includes the GERFM method [1], modified variational iteration algorithm-II [3], enhanced (G′G)-expansion method [4], the direct algebraic method [5], the extended trial equation method [6], the generalized fractional integral conditions method [7], the modified simple equation method [8], the Monch's theorem method [9], the extended modified mapping method [10], the reductive perturbation method [11], the new probability transformation method [12] and the differential transformation method [13]. In future work for more related extensions or generalizations of the results these references may be very helpful [2,32,33,34,35,36].
The time fractional derivatives in the fractional reaction-diffusion model describes the process relating to the physical phenomena, physically known as the historical dependence. The space fractional derivative explains the path dependence and global correlation properties of physical processes, that is, the global dependence. The reaction diffusion equation has a dynamic role in dissipative dynamical systems as studied by various biologists [38], scientists and engineers [14]. The nonlinear form of this model has found a number of applications in numerous branches of biology, physics and chemistry [14,15]. This model has also been useful for other areas of science and effectively generalized by employing the theory of fractional calculus, for instance see [15,16]. Diffusion-wave equations involving Caputo's derivative [17,18], Riemann-Liouville derivatives [19] have been discussed by various researchers. Anomalous dispersion equations can be explained by fractional derivative [20]. An extensive variety of exact methods which have been applied for exact solutions of the fractional nonlinear reaction diffusion equation, for example see [14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and references there in.
To interpret numerous physical phenomena in some special fields of science and engineering, nonlinear evolution equations are extensively used as models especially in solid-state physics and plasma physics. Finding the exact solutions of NLEEs is a key role in the study of these physical phenomena [39]. A lot of research work has been carried out during the past decades for evaluating the exact and numerical solutions of many nonlinear evolution equations. Among them are homotopy analysis method [21], modified exp-function method [22], (G′G)-expansion method [23], exp-function method [24], homotopy perturbation method [25], Jacobi elliptic function method [26], sub equation function method [27], kudryashov method [28], and so on.We can be expressed the exact solutions of FPDE via exp (−φ(η)).
(φ′(η))=exp(−φ(η))+μ exp(φ(η))+λ | (1.1) |
The article is arranged as follows: Section 1 represents the introduction of the article. In section 2, we have explained the Caputo's fractional derivative. In section 3, we have interpreted the exp (−φ(η))-expansion method. In section 4, we use this method to explore the reaction-diffusion model. In section 5 and 6, graphical representation and physical interpretation are explained. In section 7 and 8, we have interpreted the results, discussions and conclusion.
Property 1: [29] A function f(x,t),where x>0 is considered as Cα. Here α∈R, if ∃ a R and (p>α), such that
f(x)=xpf1(x) | (1.2) |
f1(x)∈C[0,∞).Where f1(x)∈C[0,∞) |
Property2: [29] A function f(x,t), where x>0 is considered to be in space Cmα. Here m∈N∪{0}, if f(m)∈Cα.
Iμtf(x,t)=1Γ(μ)∫t0(t−T)μ−1f(x,T)dT, t>0. | (1.3) |
Property3: [29] Suppose f∈Cα and α≥−1, then the Riemann Liouville integral μ, where μ>0 is given by
Property4: [29] A fractional Caputo derivative of f with respect to t, where f∈Cm−1, m∈N∪{0},is given as
Dμtf(x,t)=∂m∂tmf(x,t), μ=m | (1.4) |
=Im−μt∂m∂tmf(x,t),m−1≤μ<m | (1.5) |
Note that
IμtDμtf(x,t)=f(x,t)−m−1∑k=0∂k f∂tk(x,0)tkk!, m−1<μ≤m, m∈N | (1.6) |
Iμttν=Γ(ν+1)Γ(μ+ν+1)tμ+ν. | (1.7) |
Consider the fractional partial differential equation,
φ(u,Dαtu,ux,uxx,D2αtu,Dαtux,…)=0,t>0,x∈R,0≤α≤1, | (1.8) |
where Dαtu, Dαxu, Dαxxu are derivatives, u(η)=u(x,t). For solving Eq 1.8, we follow:
Step 1: Using a transformation, we get,
η=x±VtαΓ(1+α),u=u(η), | (1.9) |
where constant V is a nonzero. By substituting Eq 1.9 in Eq 1.8 yields ODE:
φ(u,±Vu′,ku′,V2u′′,k2u′′,…)=0. | (1.10) |
Step 2: Assuming the traveling wave solution
u(η)=M∑n=0an(e−φ(η))n, | (1.11) |
where φ(η) satisfies the following equation:
φ′(η)=e−φ(η)+λ+μeφ(η) | (1.12) |
φ′′(η)=−λe−φ(η)−e−2φ(η)+μλeφ(η)+μ2e2φ(η), |
where prime indicates derivative w.r.t.η. The solutions of Eq 1.12 are written in the form of different cases.
Class1: when μ≠0 and λ2−4μ>0, we have
φ(η)=ln{12μ(−λ−λtanh(λ2(c1+η)))}. | (1.13) |
where λ=√(−4μ+λ2)
Class 2: when, μ≠0 and λ2−4μ<0, we have
φ(η)=ln{12μ(−λ+λtan(λ2(c1+η)))}. | (1.14) |
where, λ=√(−4μ+λ2)
Class 3: when, λ≠0,μ=0 and λ2−4μ>0, we have
φ(η)=−ln{λ−1+exp(λ(k+η)) } |
φ(η)=−ln{λ−1+exp(λ(k+η)) }.
Class 4: when, λ,μ≠0 and λ2−4μ=0, we have
φ(η)=ln{2(2+λ(k+η))(λ2(η+k))}. |
Class 5: when, λ,μ=0 and λ2−4μ=0, we have
φ(η)=[ln{η+k}], | (1.15) |
Step 3: Using the homogeneous balancing principal, in (10), we attain M. In view of Eq (11), Eq (10) and Eq (12), we obtain a system of equations with these parameters, a_n, λ,μ. We substitute the values in Eq (11) and Eq (12) and obtained the results of Eq (8).
Suppose the reaction-diffusion equation is,
D2αtu+δuxx+βu+γu3=0,0<α≤1, | (2.1) |
where δ, β and γ are parameters without zero, setting, δ=a, β=b and γ=c and changing Eq 2.1 into an ODE.
V2u′′+au′′+bu+cu3=0, | (2.2) |
where prime represents the derivative w. r. t. η.With the help of balancing principal, u′′ and u3, we attain, M=1.
Rewriting the solution of Eq 2.2 we get,
u(η)=[a0+a1(exp(−φ(η)))], | (2.3) |
where a0, a1≠0 are constants, while λ,μ are some constants.
Substituting u,u′′ and u3 in Eq 2.2, we get the solution sets as.
Solution set 1
λ=0, C=C,V=−12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)μ,a0=0, a1=√cbμc |
Substituting in Eq 2.3, we get,
u(η)=a1(exp(−φ(η))), | (2.4) |
Substituting all the five classes in Eq 2.4, we get the solutions.
Class 1: When, λ2−4μ>0 and μ≠0,
v1=−12√cbμ tanh(12(12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)tαμΓ(α+1)+x)√−4μ)√−4μcμ |
Class 2: When, λ2−4μ<0 and μ≠0,
v2=12√cbμ tan(12(12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)tαμΓ(α+1)+x)√4√μ)√4c√μ | (2.5) |
Solution set 2:
{λ=0,C=C, V=12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)μ,a0=0, a1=−√cbμc} |
Substituting in Eq 2.3, we get,
u(η)=a1(exp(−φ(η))), | (2.6) |
Substituting equations 1.13 and 1.14 in Eq 2.6, we get the solutions.
Class 1: When, μ≠0 and λ2−4μ>0,
v3=12√cbμ tanh(12(−12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)tαμΓ(α+1)+x)√−4μ)√−4μcμ | (2.7) |
Class 2: When, μ≠0 and λ2−4μ<0,
v4=−12√cbμ tan(12(−12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)tαμΓ(α+1)+x)√4√μ)√4c√μ | (2.8) |
Solution Set 3
{λ=λ, C=C, V=√−(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)λ2−4μ, a0=bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b, a1=−2√−c(λ2−4μ)b μc(λ2−4μ)} |
Substituting in Eq 2.3, we get,
u(η)=a1(exp(−φ(η)))+a0, | (2.9) |
Substituting equations 1.13 to 1.15 in Eq 2.9, we get the solutions.
Class 1: When, μ≠0 and−4μ+λ2>0,
v5=−bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b−1c(λ2−4μ)(√c(λ2−4μ)b(−λ−tanh(12(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)√λ2−4μ)√λ2−4μ)) | (2.10) |
Class 2: When, μ≠0 and−4μ+λ2<0,
v6=−bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b−(√c(λ2−4μ)b(−λ+tan(12(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)√−λ2+4μ)√−λ2+4μ)) | (2.11) |
Class 3: When λ≠0, −4μ+λ2>0 and μ=0,
v7=−bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b−2√c(λ2−4μ)bμ(eλ(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)−1)c(λ2−4μ)λ | (2.12) |
Class 4: When, λ≠0, μ=0 and −4μ+λ2=0,
v8=−bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b+2√c(λ2−4μ)bμ(2λ(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)+2)c(λ2−4μ)λ2(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x) | (2.13) |
Case 5: When, λ=0, μ=0 and −4μ+λ2=0,
v9=bλ√−c(λ2−4μ)b−2c(λ2−4μ)(√−c(λ2−4μ)b μ(−√−(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)) | (2.14) |
Physical interpretation
With some free parameters the proposed technique provides solitary wave solutions. By setting the specific parameters we have explained the miscellaneous wave solutions. In this study, we would explain the physical interpretation of the solutions for reaction-diffusion equation taking solution v1 for μ=20λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c=−11α=1, shows the solitary wave solution in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows Soliton wave solution with paremeters μ=910λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c=−11α=.5. Figures 3, 4 and 7 interprets the singular kink solution of v3,v4, v7 for μ=.010λ=1b=.11a=10a1= 12 c=−11α=.1,μ=.0010λ=−991b=11a=10a1=102c=−1α= .1, μ=20λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c=−11α=.25. Finally kink wave results have been obtained from v5,v6, v8 by setting the parameters, μ=3.0λ=1b=11a=10a1= 12 c=−11α=0.001,μ=2.0λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c= -11 α=0.001,μ=20λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c=−11α=0.01, which is presented in Figures 5, 6 and 8. The solutions gained in this article have been checked by putting them back into the original equation and found correct. From the above obtained results we have many potential applications in fluid mechanics, quantum field theory, plasma physics and nonlinear optics.
When
μ=20, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=1 |
When
μ=910, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=1 |
When
μ=.010, λ=1, b=.11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.1 |
When
μ=.0010, λ=−991, b=11, a=10,a1=102,c=−11,α=.1 |
When
μ=3.0, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.001 |
When
μ=2.0, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.001 |
When
μ=20, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.25 |
When
μ=20, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.01 |
If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ in the obtaining solution v2 and v3 in this article is equal to u5 and u1 for case 5 respectively found in [31] see Table 1.
Attained Results | [31] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) | (i) The solution u1 is as u1=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√rξ) | (ii) The solution u5 is as u5=√βγtan(√rξ) |
If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ, in the obtaining solution v2 and v4 in this article is equal to u and u for c1≠0,c2=0,λ=0 and μ>0 in [23] see Table 2.
Attained Results | [23] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μξ) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μξ) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
If we set b=β,c=γ in the obtaining solution v2 and v4 are equal to v9 and v9 for λ=0 and μ is positive in v9 found in [32] see Table 3.
Attained Results | [32] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μη) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v4 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μη) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
If we set b=−β,c=γ and η=ξ in the obtaining solution v2 and v4 in this article are equal to u2 and u2 for k>0,β>0 and our v1 and v3 are equal to u4 and u4 for k<0,β<0 respectively founded in [30] see Table 4.
Attained Results | [30] results |
(i) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√−βγtan(√kξ) | (i) The solution u2 is as u1=±√−βγtan(√kξ) |
(ii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v2=−√βγtan(√kξ) | (ii) The solution u2 is as u2=±√βγtan(√kξ) |
(iii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v1 becomes v1=−√−βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iii) The solution u4 is as u4=±√−βγtanh(√−kξ) |
(iv) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v4=−√βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iv) The solution u4 is as u4=±√βγtanh(√−kξ) |
In the current paper, we explore that the proposed method is effective and capable to find exact solutions of reaction-diffusion equation. The obtained solutions indicate that the suggested method is direct, constructive and simple. The proposed technique can be implemented to the other NLPDEs of fractional order to establish new reliable solutions. The exact solutions are different and new along with different values of parameters. The reduction in the magnitude of computational part and the consistency of the technique give a broader applicability to the technique. The reaction diffusion equation has a dynamic role in dissipative dynamical systems as studied by various biologists, scientists and engineers. This model has found a number of applications in biology, physics (neutron diffusi0n theory), ecology and chemistry. It has also been claimed that reaction-diffusion processes have crucial basis for procedures associated to morphogenesis in biology and may even be connected to skin pigmentation and animal coats. Other applications of this model contain spread of epidemics, ecological invasions, wound healing and tumors growth. Another aim for the consideration in reaction-diffusion systems is that although they are nonlinear partial differential equations, there are often visions for an analytical treatment. My main contribution is programming and comparisons.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] | L. J. S. Allen, B. M. Bolker, Y. Lou, et al., A generalization of the Kermack–McKendrick deterministic epidemic model, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 21 (2008), 1–20. |
[2] | F. Brauer and C. Castillo-Ch'avez, Mathematical models in population biology and epidemiology,Springer, 2001. |
[3] | R. S. Cantrell and C. Cosner, Spatial Ecology via Reaction–Diffusion Equations, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Chichester, UK, 2003. |
[4] | R. Cui, K.-Y. Lam and Y. Lou, Dynamics and asymptotic profiles of steady states of an epidemic model in advective environments, J. Differ. Equations, 263 (2017), 2343–2373. |
[5] | R. Cui and Y. Lou, A spatial SIS model in advective heterogeneous environments, J. Differ. Equations, 261 (2016), 3305–3343. |
[6] | V. Capasso and G. Serio, A generalization of the Kermack–McKendrick deterministic epidemic model, Math. Biosci., 42 (1978), 41–61. |
[7] | K. Deng and Y. Wu, Dynamics of an SIS epidemic reaction–diffusion model, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 146 (2016), 929–946. |
[8] | J.Ge, K.I.Kim, Z.Lin, etal., ASISreaction-diffusion-advectionmodelinalow-riskandhigh-risk domain, J. Differ. Equations, 259 (2015), 5486–5509. |
[9] | J. Ge, L. Lin and L. Zhang, A diffusive SIS epidemic model incorporating the media coverage impact in the heterogeneous environment, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser B, 22 (2017), 2763–2776. |
[10] | W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, 115 (1927), 700–721. |
[11] | K. Kousuke, H. Matsuzawa and R. Peng, Concentration profile of endemic equilibrium of a reaction-diffusion-advection SIS epidemic model, Calc. Var. Part. D. E., 56 (2017), 112. |
[12] | A. Lahrouz and L. Omari, Extinction and stationary distribution of a stochastic SIRS epidemic model with non-linear incidence, Stat. Probabil. Lett., 83 (2013), 960–968. |
[13] | C. Lei, Z. Lin and Q. Zhang, The spreading front of invasive species in favorable habitat or unfavorable habitat, J. Differ. Equations, 257 (2014), 145–166. |
[14] | B. Li, H. Li and Y. Tong, Analysis on a diffusive SIS epidemic model with logistic source, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 68 (2017), 96. |
[15] | H. Li, R. Peng and F.-B. Wang, Varying total population enhances disease persistence: Qualitative analysis on a diffusive SIS epidemic model, J. Differ. Equations, 262 (2017), 885–913. |
[16] | H. Li, R. Peng and F.-B. Wang, On a diffusive susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic model with mass action mechanism and birth-death effect: analysis, simulations, and comparison with other mechanisms, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 78 (2018), 2129–2153. |
[17] | C.-S. Lin, W.-W. Ni and I. Takagi, Large amplitude stationary solutions to a chemotaxis system, J. Differ. Equations, 72 (1988), 1–27. |
[18] | Y. Lou and W.-M. Ni, Diffusion, self-diffusion and cross-diffusion, J. Differ. Equations, 131 (1996), 79–131. |
[19] | X. Meng, S. Zhao, T. Feng, et al., Dynamics of a novel nonlinear stochastic SIS epidemic model with double epidemic hypothesis, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 433 (2016), 227–242. |
[20] | R. Peng, Asymptotic profiles of the positive steady state for an SIS epidemic reaction–diffusion model. Part I, J. Differ. Equations, 247 (4) (2009), 1096–1119. |
[21] | R. Peng and S. Liu, Global stability of the steady states of an SIS epidemic reaction–diffusion model, Nonlinear Anal., 71 (4) (2009), 239–247. |
[22] | R. Peng and F. Yi, Asymptotic profile of the positive steady state for an SIS epidemic reaction–diffusion model: effects of epidemic risk and population movement, Phys. D, 259 (2013), 8–25. |
[23] | R. Peng and X.-Q. Zhao, A reaction–diffusion SIS epidemic model in a time–periodic environment, Nonlinearity, 25 (2012), 1451–1471. |
[24] | X. Wen, J. Ji and B. Li, Asymptotic profiles of the endemic equilibrium to a diffusive SIS epidemic model with mass action infection mechanism, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 458 (2018), 715–729. |
[25] | Y. Wu and X. Zou, Asymptotic profiles of steady states for a diffusive SIS epidemic model with mass action infection mechanism, J. Differ. Equations, 261 (2016), 4424–4447. |
[26] | R. Xu and Z. Ma, Global stability of a SIR epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate and time delay, Nonlinear Anal., 10 (2009), 3175–3189. |
[27] | F. Zhang, Z. Jin and G. Sun, Bifurcation analysis of a delayed epidemic model, Appl. Math. Comput., 216 (2010), 753–767. |
Attained Results | [31] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) | (i) The solution u1 is as u1=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√rξ) | (ii) The solution u5 is as u5=√βγtan(√rξ) |
Attained Results | [23] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μξ) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μξ) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
Attained Results | [32] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μη) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v4 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μη) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
Attained Results | [30] results |
(i) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√−βγtan(√kξ) | (i) The solution u2 is as u1=±√−βγtan(√kξ) |
(ii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v2=−√βγtan(√kξ) | (ii) The solution u2 is as u2=±√βγtan(√kξ) |
(iii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v1 becomes v1=−√−βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iii) The solution u4 is as u4=±√−βγtanh(√−kξ) |
(iv) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v4=−√βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iv) The solution u4 is as u4=±√βγtanh(√−kξ) |
Attained Results | [31] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) | (i) The solution u1 is as u1=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√rξ) | (ii) The solution u5 is as u5=√βγtan(√rξ) |
Attained Results | [23] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μξ) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μξ) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
Attained Results | [32] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μη) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v4 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μη) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
Attained Results | [30] results |
(i) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√−βγtan(√kξ) | (i) The solution u2 is as u1=±√−βγtan(√kξ) |
(ii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v2=−√βγtan(√kξ) | (ii) The solution u2 is as u2=±√βγtan(√kξ) |
(iii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v1 becomes v1=−√−βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iii) The solution u4 is as u4=±√−βγtanh(√−kξ) |
(iv) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v4=−√βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iv) The solution u4 is as u4=±√βγtanh(√−kξ) |