Research article Topical Sections

Identification of temperature regulated factors of Campylobacter jejuni and their potential roles in virulence

  • Campylobacter jejuni is the major cause of bacterial gastroenteritis in man, while it is generally regarded as a commensal of the avian gut. Consumption and handling of contaminated poultry meat products are major risk factors for human infection. The body temperature in man (37 °C) and chickens (42 °C) differ markedly, and differential gene regulation and protein expression at different temperatures may in part explain the behaviour in the two hosts. We performed proteomics analyses with C. jejuni cells grown at 37 °C and 42 °C. Time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q-Tof) analysis was carried out after samples were digested with the Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) method and peptides were fractionated by strong anion exchanges. Differentially regulated proteins were identified by Mascot and Scaffold analyses. Triple quadrupole (QQQ) mass spectrometer analysis confirmed that a total of 33 proteins were differentially regulated between 37 °C and 42 °C. Several upregulated proteins were selected for their corresponding gene knock-out mutants to be tested for their virulence in the Galleria mellonella model. To correlate with other tissue/animal models, the GADH mutant was selected for its reduced ability to colonize chickens. At 37 °C, the mutants of outer membrane protein Omp50 and Chaperone GroEL significantly increased virulence; while at 42 °C, the mutants of YceI, Omp50, and GADH reduced virulence against Galleria mellonella compared with the wild type strains. The results of current and previous studies indicate that GADH is a virulent factor in G. mellonella and a colonization factor in chickens. The workflow of this study may prove a new way to identify stress related virulent factors. The implications of these findings are discussed for pathogenesis in the model and other hosts.

    Citation: Yue Tang, Shaun Cawthraw, Mary C. Bagnall, Adriana J. Gielbert, Martin J. Woodward, Liljana Petrovska. Identification of temperature regulated factors of Campylobacter jejuni and their potential roles in virulence[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 885-898. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.885

    Related Papers:

    [1] Bindu Subhadra, Man Hwan Oh, Chul Hee Choi . Quorum sensing in Acinetobacter: with special emphasis on antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation and quorum quenching. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(1): 27-41. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.1.27
    [2] Neda Askari, Hassan Momtaz, Elahe Tajbakhsh . Acinetobacter baumannii in sheep, goat, and camel raw meat: virulence and antibiotic resistance pattern. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 272-284. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.272
    [3] Jessica Bannon, Mohammad Melebari, Cleso Jordao Jr, Carlos G Leon-Velarde, Keith Warriner . Incidence of Top 6 shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli within two Ontario beef processing facilities: Challenges in screening and confirmation testing. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 278-291. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.278
    [4] Jan-Peter Hildebrandt . Pore-forming virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus destabilize epithelial barriers-effects of alpha-toxin in the early phases of airway infection. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 11-36. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.11
    [5] Liang Wang, Zuobin Zhu, Huimin Qian, Ying Li, Ying Chen, Ping Ma, Bing Gu . Comparative genome analysis of 15 clinical Shigella flexneri strains regarding virulence and antibiotic resistance. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 205-222. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.205
    [6] Thomas Bintsis . Foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 529-563. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.529
    [7] Temitayo O. Olowomofe, J. O. Oluyege, B.I. Aderiye, O. A. Oluwole . Degradation of poly aromatic fractions of crude oil and detection of catabolic genes in hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria isolated from Agbabu bitumen sediments in Ondo State. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 308-323. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.308
    [8] Agni Hadjilouka, Konstantinos Nikolidakis, Spiros Paramithiotis, Eleftherios H. Drosinos . Effect of co-culture with enterocinogenic E. faecium on L. monocytogenes key virulence gene expression. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 359-371. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.359
    [9] Liliana Galia, Marco Ligozzi, Anna Bertoncelli, Annarita Mazzariol . Real-time PCR assay for detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Panton-Valentine Leucocidin and Methicillin Resistance directly from clinical samples. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(2): 138-146. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.2.138
    [10] Itziar Chapartegui-González, María Lázaro-Díez, Santiago Redondo-Salvo, Elena Amaro-Prellezo, Estefanía Esteban-Rodríguez, José Ramos-Vivas . Biofilm formation in Hafnia alvei HUMV-5920, a human isolate. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(4): 412-421. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.4.412
  • Campylobacter jejuni is the major cause of bacterial gastroenteritis in man, while it is generally regarded as a commensal of the avian gut. Consumption and handling of contaminated poultry meat products are major risk factors for human infection. The body temperature in man (37 °C) and chickens (42 °C) differ markedly, and differential gene regulation and protein expression at different temperatures may in part explain the behaviour in the two hosts. We performed proteomics analyses with C. jejuni cells grown at 37 °C and 42 °C. Time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q-Tof) analysis was carried out after samples were digested with the Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) method and peptides were fractionated by strong anion exchanges. Differentially regulated proteins were identified by Mascot and Scaffold analyses. Triple quadrupole (QQQ) mass spectrometer analysis confirmed that a total of 33 proteins were differentially regulated between 37 °C and 42 °C. Several upregulated proteins were selected for their corresponding gene knock-out mutants to be tested for their virulence in the Galleria mellonella model. To correlate with other tissue/animal models, the GADH mutant was selected for its reduced ability to colonize chickens. At 37 °C, the mutants of outer membrane protein Omp50 and Chaperone GroEL significantly increased virulence; while at 42 °C, the mutants of YceI, Omp50, and GADH reduced virulence against Galleria mellonella compared with the wild type strains. The results of current and previous studies indicate that GADH is a virulent factor in G. mellonella and a colonization factor in chickens. The workflow of this study may prove a new way to identify stress related virulent factors. The implications of these findings are discussed for pathogenesis in the model and other hosts.


    1. Introduction

    Campylobacter jejuni is a small, curved, Gram-negative bacterium that is the major cause of bacterial gastroenteritis in much of the world, including the UK [1]. It has generally been regarded as a commensal of the chicken gut [2,3,4], although it is known to induce pro-inflammatory responses [5] and recent data suggests it may induce strong inflammatory responses and cause diarrhoea in some commercial broiler breeds [6]. Consumption and handling of contaminated poultry meat products are thought to be major risk factors for human infection [4,7], reportedly responsible for up to 80% of human campylobacteriosis cases [8]. Campylobacter jejuni is classified as one of the thermophilic campylobacters due to its ability to grow at higher temperatures than non-thermophilic species. This characteristic is reflected in its association with avian species where body temperatures are elevated (typically 39–42 ℃) compared to those in mammals [9]. C. jejuni can be regularly isolated from a large range of pet and livestock animals but seems particularly to thrive in the caeca of poultry, where it can rapidly reach high numbers (typically 107–109 cfu/g) from an infective dose as low as 50 cfu [10]. This is in marked contrast to what is seen in immunologically naive humans, where typically exposure is followed fairly rapidly by severe gastroenteritis. In most cases the disease is self-limiting with illness lasting 5–14 days, although a number of severe sequelae, such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome, are also associated with infection [11].

    Changes in temperature are known to affect expression of bacterial heat shock proteins (HSP). Several HSPs have been identified in C. jejuni, including the Lon, GroESL, DnaJ, DnaK and ClpB proteins [12,13,14,15,16]. The DnaJ protein has also been identified as a virulence factor in C. jejuni as a dnaJ mutant was unable to colonize chickens [16]. The genome of C. jejuni lacks a σ32 homologue that regulates expression of HSPs in E. coli [17] but contains two homologues to known heat shock response regulators: HcrA and HspR.

    Thus understanding the biology of C. jejuni in human and chicken hosts should potentially aid the development of targeted intervention strategies. There are many differences between birds and humans, but one obvious difference is the higher body temperature of birds. It is probable that this temperature difference will be associated with differential regulation of genes that may encode proteins required for survival at the higher temperature or pathogenesis in humans. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to identify temperature responsive proteins that could play a role in host adaptation and virulence by performing Q-Tof mass spectrometry on C. jejuni grown at 37 and 42 ℃. In addition, several mutants were selected according to their higher protein expression at 42 ℃ as potential virulence factors in the Galleria (wax worm) model.


    2. Materials and Method


    2.1. Bacterial strains and growth methods

    All strains were stored at –80 ℃ in 1% (w/v) proteose peptone water containing 10% (v/v) glycerol until required. Strains were routinely grown from frozen stocks on 10% (v/v) sheep blood agar plates containing Skirrow's Campylobacter Selective Supplement (Oxoid) [18] at 42 ℃ in a microaerobic atmosphere [5% (v/v) N2, 7.5% (v/v) CO2, 7.5% (v/v) O2]. A loopful of overnight culture was placed into a biphasic Mueller-Hinton agar/broth and incubated in a microaerobic incubator at either 37 ℃ or 42 ℃ as previously described [19]. To ensure cells were recovered at similar stages of growth at each temperature bacterial growth was monitored by spectroscopy (OD 600 nm), with cells recovered by centrifugation when OD 600 was 0.6 (approx 18 hours for growth at 42 ℃ and 24 hours for 37 ℃). All bacterial strains and mutants used in this study are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1. Campylobacter jejuni strains used for proteomics and virulence tests.
    Strain Relevant characteristics Source/reference
    11168-GS Wild type APHA [20]
    Cj420 11168-GS ∆ YceI Campylobacter Resource Centre of LSHTM
    Cj117C 11168-GS ∆ Omp50 Campylobacter Resource Centre of LSHTM
    Cj414 11168-GS ∆ GADH Campylobacter Resource Centre of LSHTM
    Cj1221 11168-GS ∆ GroEL Campylobacter Resource Centre of LSHTM
    11168-O Wild type APHA [21]
    Cj0289C 11168-O ∆ Peb3 APHA
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    2.2. Protein extraction

    Bacterial cells were recovered from the broth phase by centrifugation (5,000 × g for 10 min) and washed twice in sterile PBS. Cells were resuspended and disrupted by sonication (3 × 10 s) and cell-free extracts were recovered by centrifugation at 14,000 g for 10 min at 4 ℃. Protein contents were determined by Coomassie Plus™ Protein Assay Reagent (Thermo Scientific) with BSA as the standard according to the Manufacturer's instructions.


    2.3. Proteolytic digestion with trypsin and peptide fractionation by strong anion exchanges (SAX)

    Digestion of the extracted proteins was carried out as described previously [22] according to the instructions of the Fasp Protein Digestion Kit which is based on filtering out undesirable substances during the sample preparations (Protein discovery, US). In brief, 0.4 mg of total protein resuspended in 30 μl UPX™ Universal Protein Extraction was heated at 99 ℃ for 10 min. Urea Sample Solution (200 μl) was mixed with protein samples in the Spin Filters and the filters were spun at 14,000 g for 15 min. The flow-through was discarded. A Volume of 10 μl 10× Iodoacetamide Solution and 90 μl Urea Sample Solution were added to the filters and mixed by vortexing for 1 min. The filters were kept in the dark for 20 min at room temperature before centrifuged at 14,000 g for 10 min. The Spin Filters were centrifuged again for 15 min after adding 100 μl Urea Sample Solution and this step was repeated twice. The flow through was discarded. Ammonium Bicarbonate Solution (100 μl) was added to the filters and the filters were centrifuged at 14,000 g for 10 min; this step was also repeated twice. Trypsin (5 μg, Promega, UK) in 100 μl Ammonium Bicabonate Solution was added to the filter. The mixture was vortexed and incubated at 37 ℃ for 18 hours. The filter was transferred to a fresh tube before peptides were collected at 14,000 g for 10 min. The collection of peptides was repeated after adding 100 μl Ammonium Bicabonate Solution to the filter. Finally, 100 μl 0.5 M NaCl was added and peptides were collected again. The peptide concentration was measured by NanoDrop 1000 (Thermo Scientific, USA) at 280 nm. Peptides were fractionated by strong anion exchange columns and fractionated peptides desalted using C18 columns as described previously [22].


    2.4. LC-MS/MS analysis, spectrum identification and spectrum counting

    The desalted peptide samples were analysed using a 1200 Series nano LC connected via a chipcube interface to a 6520 Q-ToF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, UK). In brief, peptide samples (1 μg in 0.1% formic acid) were injected for LC-MS/MS analysis with a 120-min gradient from 3% (vol/vol) acetonitrile-0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid to 40% (vol/vol) acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid and from 3% (vol/vol) acetonitrile-0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid to 75% (vol/vol) acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid by using a high-capacity (160-nl) 150-mm C18 chip (Agilent Technologies, UK). The mass spectrometer was operated with mass ranges of 250 to 2,000 m/z for MS and 50 to 2,000 m/z for MS/MS at a constant flow rate of 500 nl/min. Acquisition rates were 3 spectra/s for MS and 5.01 spectra/s for MS/MS, and the mass reference was 922.009798 m/z. Mass accuracy was better than 2-ppm for MS and 5-ppm for MS/MS, and mass resolution was up to 20,000. Proteins were identified by Mascot (Version 2.3, Matrix, UK) from the NCBI non-redundant (nr) database (Release date: 28-03-2011) as described previously [23]. Identified proteins were quantified by spectral counting, using Scaffold (Version 2.6, Proteome Software, USA). The software was used to identify differentially expressed proteins using the t test with P value of less than 0.05 after normalization.


    2.5. Peptide spectral library and analysis with Skyline

    The Skyline software was used to find transitions for QQQ analysis and to quantify peptides/proteins after QQQ analysis. A spectral library was built using the Q-Tof data. For each differentially expressed protein, two peptides were selected for quantitation and each peptide was represented with three transitions, broken down products of the peptide. The transition list was exported to provide Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM), also called SRM (Selected Reaction Monitoring) information for QQQ mass spectrometry.

    After QQQ runs the data were analysed with Skyline to identify retention times for each peptide. Once found, the information such as retention times was added to the transition list for QQQ mass spectrometry to run in dynamic MRM (dMRM) mode. The results of dMRM runs were analysed in Skyline to produce a quantity for each transition at a given retention time.


    2.6. QQQ mass spectrometry quantification to validate

    The peptide samples prepared with the FASP method were analysed using a 1200 Series nano LC connected to a 6410 QQQ mass spectrometer via a chipcube interface (Agilent Technologies, UK). Peptide samples (1 µg in 0.1% formic acid) were injected for LC-MS/MS analysis with a 10 minute gradient from 3% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid to 100% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid using a Large Capacity Chip (160 nl) 150 mm C-18 (Agilent Technologies, UK).


    2.7. Anova analysis with DanteR v1.01

    DanteR (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, US) is a R-based software package for omics data analysis [24]. The quantity of each transition was imported to DanteR from Skyline. The data were first quantile normalized. An Anova filter was applied to find statistically different transitions between 37 ℃ and 42 ℃. The P value was set at 0.05.


    2.8. Galleria survival tests

    G. mellonella larvae were purchased from LiveFood UK and maintained on wood chips at 15 ℃. The infection of larvae was carried out as previously described [19,25]. Briefly, 10 µl of inoculum containing 1.0 × 106 cfu of the selected strains grown at either 37 ℃ or 42 ℃ were injected into the top right pro-leg of each larva using a Hamilton® syringe. Larvae were incubated at 37 ℃ and survival determined 24 hours post-infection. Untreated and PBS injected controls were also included. Ten larvae were used in each experimental group and all experiments were carried out at least three times. Insects (including Galleria mellonella) are not covered by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 so no ethical approval is needed.


    3. Results


    3.1. Identification of proteins differentially expressed between 37 ℃ and 42 ℃

    Proteins extracted from C. jejuni 11168-GS bacterial cells grown either at 37 ℃ or 42 ℃ were trypsin digested and fractionated by strong anion exchange columns and subsequently analysed using a Q-Tof mass spectrometer. The protein lists were produced by Mascot. A total of 65 proteins were identified by Scaffold as differentially expressed when grown at 37 ℃ and 42 ℃ (Figure S1 and Table S1). Of these, 25 were upregulated and 35 were downregulated at 42 ℃ compared to expression at 37 ℃ and the maximal increase was 48.2 fold for PEB3 and the maximal decrease was 25.3 fold for cytochrome c1 subunit. At 42 ℃, five chaperons, GroES, GroEL, Dnak, HSP90 and HtrA were up-regulated in expression (Table S1).

    The differentially regulated proteins were validated using a QQQ mass spectrometer. MRM detection on a QQQ mass spectrometer provides sensitivity and selectivity for targeted peptides in a complex sample and also offers high precision in quantitation [26,27]. Two peptides from each protein were selected for the analysis and each peptide was represented by three transitions. Six of the 12 proteins initially selected for the validation purpose using QQQ were found to be truly differentially expressed. They were 50S ribosomal protein L17, molecular chaperone DnaK, Gluconate 2-dehydrogenase subunit 3, major outer membrane protein, major antigenic peptide PEB3 and major antigenic peptide PEB4; whereas flagellin, heat shock protein 90, methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein, DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta' chain and F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta were found false positives. This indicated that potentially half of the 65 identified proteins could be false positives. To eliminate all false positives, all 65 differentially expressed proteins were quantified by the QQQ. A total of 33 proteins were found to be truly differentially regulated (Table 2). Seventeen proteins including 4 chaperone proteins: GroEL, GroES, DnaK and HtrA were up-regulated at 42 ℃; while 16 proteins down-regulated including some ribosomal proteins and elongation factors. The maximum increase was 2.91 fold for a putative periplasmic protein; whereas the maximal decrease was 3.69 fold for putative cytochrome C551 peroxidase (Table 2).

    Table 2. Campylobacter jejuni proteins differentially regulated between 37 ℃ and 42 ℃.
    Protein ID Protein name Fold change at 42 ℃ P value
    gi|283954725 putative periplasmic protein 2.91 1.8E–02
    gi|121612867 outer membrane protein Omp50 2.45 1.4E–02
    gi|148926221 Chaperone GroEL 2.37 2.0E–02
    gi|153952133 chaperone GroES 2.17 2.2E–02
    gi|121612292 cytochrome c family protein 1.97 2.0E–02
    gi|218561951 major antigenic peptide PEB3 1.96 4.8E–02
    gi|86149030 Gluconate 2-dehydrogenase subunit 3 1.80 2.3E–02
    gi|121613084 Chaperone DnaK 1.76 6.0E–03
    gi|121613042 Chaperone HtrA 1.75 4.7E–02
    gi|157414715 YceI 1.55 8.0E–03
    gi|86150312 methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 1.51 5.0E–03
    gi|86149130 3-oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase 1.51 4.0E–03
    gi|86149619 thioredoxin 1.44 3.9E–02
    gi|153952118 nonheme iron-containing ferritin ftn 1.42 4.1E–02
    gi|118475164 uridylate kinase 1.38 4.3E–02
    gi|121612116 pyridine nucleotide-disulphide oxidoreductase protein 1.34 4.2E–02
    gi|118474190 Aconitate hydratase 2 1.28 2.1E–02
    gi|153951800 50S ribosomal protein L17 –1.20 3.7E–02
    gi|57237529 50S ribosomal protein L1 –1.20 4.1E–02
    gi|148925859 DNA-directed RNA polymerase alpha chain –1.25 4.3E–02
    gi|218562794 30S ribosomal protein S2 –1.27 4.7E–02
    gi|283955736 ribosomal protein L25 –1.33 2.0E–02
    gi|148925693 Tungstate ABC transporter –1.37 3.0E–02
    gi|218563293 50S ribosomal protein L3 –1.38 3.1E–02
    gi|153951395 cytochrome c553 –1.38 2.0E–02
    gi|218562793 elongation factor Ts –1.44 4.0E–02
    gi|315638136 elongation factor P –1.45 1.3E–03
    gi|148926260 Ni/Fe-hydrogenase large subunit –1.48 2.7E–02
    gi|283955870 putative MCP-type signal transduction protein –1.60 4.9E–02
    gi|205356748 periplasmic nitrate reductase –1.70 3.0E–02
    gi|15741879 major antigenic peptide PEB4 –1.80 9.0E–03
    gi|218562936 putative methyltransferase –2.17 1.0E–03
    gi|157414655 putative cytochrome C551 peroxidase –3.69 8.0E–03
    Note: APHA, Animal and Plant Health Agency; LSHTM, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3.2. Virulence tests for mutants with the Galleria larvae

    To test the hypothesis that thermal stress affects bacterial virulence, previously generated Ycel, Omp50, GADH, PEB3 and GroEL knock-out mutants in C. jejuni 11168 or 11168-O parental background strain were used to infect larvae of G. mellonella. To correlate results from other tissue/animal models, the GADH mutant was chosen as one of strains for its reduced ability to colonize chickens [28].

    Larval survival was recorded following challenge with WT1 (C. jejuni 11168-GS) and corresponding Ycel, Omp50, GADH and GroEL mutants or WT2 (C. jejuni 11168-O) and PEB3 mutant. The survival rate of Galleria larvae injected with WT1 of C. jejuni cultured at 37 ℃ was 83% after 24 hours, and survival rates of the larvae injected with the Ycel, Omp50, GADH and GroEL mutants were 80, 50, 93 and 6.7% respectively (Figure 1). The reduced survival of the larvae infected with the Omp50 and GroEL mutants was statistically significant: P = 0.0075 for Omp50 and P = 0.0005 for GroEL, suggesting that both mutants were more virulent in this model than the wild type parent strain (Figure 1).

    Figure 1. G. mellonella survival following challenge with C. jejuni wild type and knock-out mutants cultured at 37 ℃ (black) or 42 ℃ (grey) with C. jejuni doses of 106 CFU/ml. Scored 24 hours post-infection. WT1,11168-GS; WT2,11168-O. The t test was carried out to compare the mutants with their parents. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

    The survival of larvae injected with WT1 cultured at 42 ℃ was significantly reduced compared to those injected with bacteria grown at 37 ℃, 83.3% versus 23.3% (P = 0.0022), indicating the upregulation of virulence associated factors at 42 ℃. The survival rates of larvae injected with Ycel, Omp50, GADH and GroEL mutants were 86.7, 83.3, 90 and 10%, respectively at 42 ℃ (Figure 1). Compared to the parental wild type strain, these rates were significantly increased for YceI (P = 0.0026), Omp50 (P = 0.024) and GADH (P = 0.0032), suggesting that they play a role in virulence against G. mellonella as without them the larvae survived better (Figure 1).


    4. Conclusion

    In this study we applied quantitative proteomics to identify differentially expressed proteins in C. jejuni 11168 grown at 37 ℃ and 42 ℃ and to assess their potential role in host adaptation and fitness using G. mellonella as a surrogate in vivo model. The temperatures of 42 ℃ and 37 ℃ were chosen as representative of those in the intestines of chicken and humans respectively. The filter of Scaffold programme was set to identify as true positive samples with the P value less than 0.05. It is unclear from which steps the errors were generated, as when the two protein lists compiled using Q-Tof and QQQ were compared (Table 2 and Table S1), no patterns emerged. Some large fold change proteins, such as ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase (~25 fold), were subsequently found to be false positives; whereas some small fold change proteins, such as thioredoxin (1.2 fold) true positives by QQQ. The same is true for the P values. 50S ribosomal protein L9 with a small P value (P = 7.7E–04) was subsequently found a false positive; while YceI with a large P value (P = 0.049) a true positive. The false positives could come from Scaffold analysis or from Q-Tof or even Mascot as each step might produce some errors.

    Similarly, the protein quantities were different in the protein lists produced by Q-Tof/Scaffold or QQQ/Skyline analyses. The Q-Tof/Mascot/Scaffold system identified differentially expressed between 1.2 and 48.2 fold for some of the proteins such as thioredoxin and Peb3 respectively; whereas the QQQ/Skyline system between 1.2 and 3.7 fold for 50S ribosomal protein L17 and putative cytochrome C551 peroxidase respectively. It is thought that a 3.7 fold change is more realistic than a 48.2 fold change for proteins. From this study we concluded that a validation step is crucial to test the reliability of data sets of protein profiling.

    Several chaperone proteins, Dnak, GroES, GroEL and HtrA (Table 2) were found differentially upregulated at 42 ℃ consistent with previous studies [29,30,31,32]. The list of differentially regulated proteins identified in this study bears little resemblance to that reported in another proteomics study [33]. In this study, we used Q-Tof to get an initial list of differentially regulated proteins and then validated all of them with QQQ. Therefore, the methodology may be superior to a 2D gel only method as although the aims were similar, the methodologies used in the two studies are very different. One of the key issues of proteomic studies is solubilisation of samples. In our previous studies we found the Fasp method could identify many membrane proteins [22]. Our findings were in agreement with a gene expression study of C. jejuni [29] and other studies, such as the expression of heat shock genes in Clostridium acetobutylicum [30] and heat shock responses in E. coli and Lactobacillus plantarum [31,32]. Five ribosomal proteins together with elongation factors Ts and P were downregulated at 42 ℃ (Table 2). The reduction of ribosomal proteins was also observed in a C. jejuni gene expression study where the author reasoned that a brief growth arrest allowed the cell to reshuffle energy devoted to an increased expression of genes involved in protective response and adaptation from 37 ℃ to 42 ℃ within a short interval [29]. However, in this study, cells were grown overnight at 42 ℃, an optimal growth temperature [34]. Therefore, other explanations should be sought. For example, at 42 ℃ the cell may be more efficient so that there is no need to produce as many ribosomal proteins.

    Infection models for C. jejuni include the ferret diarrhoeal model, colostrum-deprived piglet model and chick colonisation model [35,36]. However, issues such as reproducibility, cost, ease of use, breeding and specialised training limit the use of these models [37]. We used the Galleria larvae (waxworms) as a model to determine potential roles in virulence for selected proteins identified in this study. The G. mellonela infection model has been reported previously for the study of Campylobacter [38] and also for the study of virulence factors in a number of other bacterial spp, including Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Cryptococcus neoformans [39,40,41,42,43]. Furthermore, the model is also used to look at innate immune responses to pathogens since this branch of immunity is evolutionarily conserved amongst eukaryotes (unlike adaptive responses) so the innate antimicrobial responses in Galleria have similarities to those in higher organisms including man [44,45]. Different degrees of attenuation were observed using the Galleria model when several knock-out mutants of C. jejuni 11168H in genes encoding potential virulence factors, such as LOS and cytolethal distending toxin [25]. The C. jejuni transcriptional regulator Cj1556 was found important for bacterial survival in Caco-2 human intestinal epithelial cells and J774A. A mouse macrophages and a mutant showed reduced virulence in G. mellonella [46]. Recently, Humphrey and co-workers found that a poultry isolate 13126 (sequence type 21) showed the greatest levels of extra-intestinal spread to the liver and is significantly more invasive than other isolates in human intestinal epithelial cells and gave the highest mortality in the Galleria infection model [47].

    For the virulence test, it was expected to show more virulence towards Galleria at 37 ℃ to explain that the bacterium is seemingly a commensal at 42 ℃ in poultry and can cause severe gastroenteritis in human at 37 ℃. However, the results were such that the wild type bacterium (WT1) was more virulent at 42 ℃ and several heat induced proteins, such as YceI, Omp50 and GADH were implicated in the virulence induction as the deletion mutants of those corresponding genes were less virulence at 42 ℃ compared with WT1 (Figure 1). In this study, at 37 ℃ both Omp50 and GroEL mutants killed more Galleria than the wild type parent strain. Although the reason for this is unclear, one possibility is that these proteins act as signals of infection to the Galleria. Initiation of insect (innate) immune responses begins with binding of pattern recognition proteins/receptors to conserved domains (pathogen-associated molecular patterns-PAMPs) located on the pathogen [48]. It is known that some members of the HSP family, including hsp60 (the eukaryotic homolog of GroEL), can stimulate the innate immune system directly [49]. Furthermore, bacterial GroELs are known to be antigenic in vertebrates [48,49,50], including C. jejuni infection in humans [50]. Thus it may be that C. jejuni lacking these proteins are not recognised as readily as wild-type bacteria resulting in delayed or decreased innate antimicrobial responses by the Galleria, so more larvae are killed. Further studies are needed to elucidate the roles (if any) of these in insect immunity, and whether a loss of other bacterial features involved in innate immune activation, e.g. flagella [51], would also lead to increased virulence in the model.

    Of the three proteins described as virulence factors in this study (Figure 1), Omp50 is a pore-forming protein and sequence alignment shows weak identity with the major outer-membrane protein (MOMP) [52]. Its gene expression in C. jejuni is temperature-dependent and omp50::lacZ fusions showed that growth temperature control occurred at the transcriptional level [53].

    Gluconate dehydrogenase (GADH) converts D-gluconate to 2-keto-D-gluconate. However, C. jejuni lacks an Entner-Doudoroff pathway so it cannot catabolize gluconate. It uses gluconate as an electron donor through GADH [28]. In C. jejuni, GADH is heat-induced and required for full colonization of avian but not mammalian hosts [28]. In this study, we also identified GADH as a heat responsive protein required for virulence in Galleria larvae.

    The expression of YceI was induced at 42 ℃ (Table 2) and the mutant grown at that temperature displayed reduced virulence against Galleria (Figure 1). These properties are an addition to a long list of functions for this relatively unknown protein. YceI is a 22 kDa putative periplasmic protein which in E. coli binds to lipid [54] and in Thermus thermophilus to polyisoprenoid [55]. The protein crystal structure obtained at 2.9 Å resolution of C. jejuni YceI shows that it forms a dimer and binds to sulphate ion [56]. In Helicobacter pylori, YceI is secreted and is involved in adaptation to an acidic environment [57]. Other stress related functions include the induction of YceI by high pH and osmotic stresses [54,58]. Thus, Ycel may be considered a general stress responsive protein. Some researchers suggest that YceI resembles "danger" infochemicals whose increased production by a bacterial subpopulation, becoming more resistant to bactericidal antibiotics, communicates a higher level of resistance to more sensitive members of the population of the same or different species [59].

    In conclusion, a number of heat responsive proteins were identified by a Q-Tof mass spectrometer and subsequently confirmed by a QQQ mass spectrometer. Several knock-out mutants of heat-induced genes were selected to test in a virulence model. From these, Omp50, GADH and YceI were identified as virulence factors at 42 ℃ in the Galleria infection system. More studies are needed to determine if the Galleria infection model for C. jejuni can replace other tissue/animal models for identifying colonisation factors and virulence factors of vertebrates. The workflow developed in this study may prove a new way to identify stress related virulent factors.


    Acknowledgments

    We would like to thank Drs Andrey Karlyshev, Ozan Gundogdu and Prof. Brendan Wren of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Campylobacter Resource Centre for supplying C. jejuni 11168 mutant strains. The work was supported by funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 222633.


    Conflict of Interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    [1] Silva J, Leite D, Fernandes M, et al. (2011) Campylobacter spp. as a foodborne pathogen: A review. Front Microbiol 2: 200.
    [2] van Vliet AH, Ketley JM (2001) Pathogenesis of enteric Campylobacter infection. J Appl Microbiol: 45S–56S.
    [3] Backert S, Boehm M, Wessler S, et al. (2013) Transmigration route of Campylobacter jejuni across polarized intestinal epithelial cells: paracellular, transcellular or both? Cell Commun Signal 11: 72. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-11-72
    [4] Hermans D, Deun KV, Martel A, et al. (2011) Colonization factors of Campylobacter jejuni in the chicken gut. Vet Res 42: 82. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-82
    [5] Smith CK, Abuoun M, Cawthraw SA, et al. (2008) Campylobacter colonization of the chicken induces a proinflammatory response in mucosal tissues. FEMS Immunol Med Mic 54: 114–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00458.x
    [6] Humphrey S, Chaloner G, Kemmett K, et al. (2014) Campylobacter jejuni is not merely a commensal in commercial broiler chickens and affects bird welfare. Mbio 5: e01364.
    [7] Berrang ME, Buhr RJ, Cason JA, et al. (2001) Broiler carcass contamination with Campylobacter from feces during defeathering. J Food Protect 64: 2063–2066. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-64.12.2063
    [8] European Food Safety A (2010) Scientific opinion on quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU. EFSA J 8: 1437. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1437
    [9] Skirrow MB, Benjamin J (1980) '1001' Campylobacters: cultural characteristics of intestinal campylobacters from man and animals. J Hyg 85: 427–442. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400063506
    [10] Cawthraw SA, Wassenaar TM, Ayling R, et al. (1996) Increased colonization potential of Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 after passage through chickens and its implication on the rate of transmission within flocks. Epidemiol Infect 117: 213–215. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800001333
    [11] van Doorn PA, Ruts L, Jacobs BC (2008) Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol 7: 939–950. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70215-1
    [12] Thies FL, Hartung HP, Giegerich G (1998) Cloning and expression of the Campylobacter jejuni lon gene detected by RNA arbitrarily primed PCR. FEMS Microbiol Lett 165: 329–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13165.x
    [13] Thies FL, Karch H, Hartung HP, et al. (1999) Cloning and expression of the dnaK gene of Campylobacter jejuni and antigenicity of heat shock protein 70. Infect Immun 67: 1194–1200.
    [14] Thies FL, Karch H, Hartung HP, et al. (1999) The ClpB protein from Campylobacter jejuni: molecular characterization of the encoding gene and antigenicity of the recombinant protein. Gene 230: 61–67. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00054-2
    [15] Thies FL, Weishaupt A, Karch H, et al. (1999) Cloning, sequencing and molecular analysis of the Campylobacter jejuni groESL bicistronic operon. Microbiology 145: 89–98. doi: 10.1099/13500872-145-1-89
    [16] Konkel ME, Kim BJ, Klena JD, et al. (1998) Characterization of the thermal stress response of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun 66: 3666–3672.
    [17] Bukau B (1993) Regulation of the Escherichia coli heat-shock response. Mol Microbiol 9: 671–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01727.x
    [18] Skirrow MB (1977) Campylobacter enteritis: a "new" disease. Brit Med J 2: 9–11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6078.9
    [19] Senior NJ, Bagnall MC, Champion OL, et al. (2011) Galleria mellonella as an infection model for Campylobacter jejuni virulence. J Med Microbiol 60: 661–669. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.026658-0
    [20] Parkhill J, Wren BW, Mungall K, et al. (2000) The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature 403: 665–668. doi: 10.1038/35001088
    [21] Gaynor EC, Cawthraw S, Manning G, et al. (2004) The genome-sequenced variant of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168 and the original clonal clinical isolate differ markedly in colonization, gene expression, and virulence-associated phenotypes. J Bacteriol 186: 503–517. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.2.503-517.2004
    [22] Tang Y, Underwood A, Gielbert A, et al. (2014) Metaproteomics analysis reveals the adaptation process for the chicken gut microbiota. Appl Environ Microb 80: 478–485. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02472-13
    [23] Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Mann M (2009) Combination of FASP and StageTip-based fractionation allows in-depth analysis of the hippocampal membrane proteome. J Proteome Res 8: 5674–5678. doi: 10.1021/pr900748n
    [24] Polpitiya AD, Qian WJ, Jaitly N, et al. (2008) DAnTE: a statistical tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data. Bioinformatics 24: 1556–1558. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn217
    [25] Champion OL, Karlyshev AV, Senior NJ, et al. (2010) Insect infection model for Campylobacter jejuni reveals that O-methyl phosphoramidate has insecticidal activity. J Infect Dis 201: 776–782.
    [26] Atashpaz-Gargari E, Braga-Neto UM, Dougherty ER (2014) Modeling and systematic analysis of biomarker validation using selected reaction monitoring. Eurasip J Bioinform Syst Biol 2014: 17. doi: 10.1186/s13637-014-0017-y
    [27] Mermelekas G, Vlahou A, Zoidakis J (2015) SRM/MRM targeted proteomics as a tool for biomarker validation and absolute quantification in human urine. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 15: 1441–1454. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2015.1093937
    [28] Pajaniappan M, Hall JE, Cawthraw SA, et al. (2008) A temperature-regulated Campylobacter jejuni gluconate dehydrogenase is involved in respiration-dependent energy conservation and chicken colonization. Mol Microbiol 68: 474–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06161.x
    [29] Stintzi A (2003) Gene expression profile of Campylobacter jejuni in response to growth temperature variation. J Bacteriol 185: 2009–2016. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.6.2009-2016.2003
    [30] Bahl H, Muller H, Behrens S, et al. (1995) Expression of heat shock genes in Clostridium acetobutylicum. FEMS Microbiol Rev 17: 341–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1995.tb00217.x
    [31] Arsene F, Tomoyasu T, Bukau B (2000) The heat shock response of Escherichia coli. Int J Food Microbiol 55: 3–9. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00206-3
    [32] De AM, Di CR, Huet C, et al. (2004) Heat shock response in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microb 70: 1336–1346. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1336-1346.2004
    [33] Zhang MJ, Xiao D, Zhao F, et al. (2009) Comparative proteomic analysis of Campylobacter jejuni cultured at 37 °C and 42 °C. Jpn J Infect Dis 62: 356–361.
    [34] Fonseca BB, Rossi DA, Maia CA, et al. (2014) Characterization of the virulence, growth temperature and antibiotic resistance of the Campylobacter jejuni IAL 2383 strain isolated from humans. Braz J Microbiol 45: 271–274. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822014000100039
    [35] Babakhani FK, Joens LA (1993) Primary swine intestinal cells as a model for studying Campylobacter jejuni invasiveness. Infect Immun 61: 2723–2726.
    [36] Fox JG, Ackerman JI, Taylor N, et al. (1987) Campylobacter jejuni infection in the ferret: an animal model of human campylobacteriosis. Am J Vet Res 48: 85–90.
    [37] Newell DG (2001) Animal models of Campylobacter jejuni colonization and disease and the lessons to be learned from similar Helicobacter pylori models. Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol: 57S–67S.
    [38] McLaughlin SD, Walker AW, Churcher C, et al. (2010) The bacteriology of pouchitis: a molecular phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. Ann Surg 252: 90–98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e3dc8b
    [39] Viegas SC, Mil-Homens D, Fialho AM, et al. (2013) The virulence of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium in the insect model galleria mellonella is impaired by mutations in RNase E and RNase III. Appl Environ Microb 79: 6124–6133. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02044-13
    [40] Chadwick JS, Caldwell SS, Chadwick P (1990) Adherence patterns and virulence for Galleria mellonella larvae of isolates of Serratia marcescens. J Invertebr Pathol 55: 133–134. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(90)90044-7
    [41] Purves J, Cockayne A, Moody PC, et al. (2010) Comparison of the regulation, metabolic functions, and roles in virulence of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase homologues gapA and gapB in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 78: 5223–5232. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00762-10
    [42] Jander G, Rahme LG, Ausubel FM (2000) Positive correlation between virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants in mice and insects. J Bacteriol 182: 3843–3845. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.13.3843-3845.2000
    [43] Mylonakis E, Moreno R, El Khoury JB, et al. (2005) Galleria mellonella as a model system to study Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis. Infect Immun 73: 3842–3850. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.3842-3850.2005
    [44] Kimbrell DA, Beutler B (2001) The evolution and genetics of innate immunity. Nat Rev Genet 2: 256–267. doi: 10.1038/35066006
    [45] Kavanagh K, Reeves EP (2004) Exploiting the potential of insects for in vivo pathogenicity testing of microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28: 101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.09.002
    [46] Gundogdu O, Mills DC, Elmi A, et al. (2011) The Campylobacter jejuni transcriptional regulator Cj1556 plays a role in the oxidative and aerobic stress response and is important for bacterial survival in vivo. J Bacteriol 193: 4238–4249. doi: 10.1128/JB.05189-11
    [47] Humphrey S, Lacharme-Lora L, Chaloner G, et al. (2015) Heterogeneity in the infection biology of Campylobacter jejuni isolates in three infection models reveals an invasive and virulent phenotype in a ST21 isolate from poultry. PLoS One 10: e0141182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141182
    [48] Tsakas S, Marmaras VJ (2010) Insect immunity and its signalling: an overview. ISJ-Invert Surviv J 7: 228–238.
    [49] Wallin RP, Lundqvist A, More SH, et al. (2002) Heat-shock proteins as activators of the innate immune system. Trends Immunol 23: 130–135. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4906(01)02168-8
    [50] Fujimoto S, Fujita M (1999) Serum antibody level against GroEL type heat-shock protein of Campylobacter jejuni in patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome. Microbiol Immunol 43: 241–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1999.tb02399.x
    [51] Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O (2006) Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124: 783–801. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015
    [52] Bolla JM, De E, Dorez A, et al. (2000) Purification, characterization and sequence analysis of Omp50,a new porin isolated from Campylobacter jejuni. Biochem J 352: 637–643. doi: 10.1042/bj3520637
    [53] Dedieu L, Pages JM, Bolla JM (2008) The omp50 gene is transcriptionally controlled by a temperature-dependent mechanism conserved among thermophilic Campylobacter species. Res Microbiol 159: 270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.03.002
    [54] Stancik LM, Stancik DM, Schmidt B, et al. (2002) pH-dependent expression of periplasmic proteins and amino acid catabolism in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184: 4246–4258. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.15.4246-4258.2002
    [55] Handa N, Terada T, Doi-Katayama Y, et al. (2005) Crystal structure of a novel polyisoprenoid-binding protein from Thermus thermophilus HB8. Protein Sci 14: 1004–1010. doi: 10.1110/ps.041183305
    [56] Patskovsky Y, Ramagopal U, Almo SC (2005) Crystal structure of campylobacter jejuni ycei periplasmic protein. NCBI Molecular Modeling Database (MMDB).
    [57] Sisinni L, Cendron L, Favaro G, et al. (2010) Helicobacter pylori acidic stress response factor HP1286 is a YceI homolog with new binding specificity. FEBS J 277: 1896–1905. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07612.x
    [58] Weber A, Kogl SA, Jung K (2006) Time-dependent proteome alterations under osmotic stress during aerobic and anaerobic growth in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 188: 7165–7175. doi: 10.1128/JB.00508-06
    [59] El-Halfawy OM, Valvano MA (2013) Chemical communication of antibiotic resistance by a highly resistant subpopulation of bacterial cells. PLoS One 8: e68874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068874
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Marija Begić, Djuro Josić, Biofilm formation and extracellular microvesicles—The way of foodborne pathogens toward resistance, 2020, 41, 0173-0835, 1718, 10.1002/elps.202000106
    2. Nayyer Taheri, Maria Fällman, Sun Nyunt Wai, Anna Fahlgren, Accumulation of virulence-associated proteins in Campylobacter jejuni Outer Membrane Vesicles at human body temperature, 2019, 195, 18743919, 33, 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.01.005
    3. Se-Hun Kim, Ramachandran Chelliah, Sudha Rani Ramakrishnan, Ayyappasamy Sudalaiyadum Perumal, Woo-Suk Bang, Momna Rubab, Eric Banan-Mwine Daliri, Kaliyan Barathikannan, Fazle Elahi, Eunji Park, Hyeon Yeong Jo, Su-Bin Hwang, Deog Hwan Oh, Review on Stress Tolerance in Campylobacter jejuni, 2021, 10, 2235-2988, 10.3389/fcimb.2020.596570
    4. Anna M. Banaś, Katarzyna M. Bocian-Ostrzycka, Stanisław Dunin-Horkawicz, Jan Ludwiczak, Piotr Wilk, Marta Orlikowska, Agnieszka Wyszyńska, Maria Dąbrowska, Maciej Plichta, Marta Spodzieja, Marta A. Polańska, Agata Malinowska, Elżbieta Katarzyna Jagusztyn-Krynicka, Interplay between DsbA1, DsbA2 and C8J_1298 Periplasmic Oxidoreductases of Campylobacter jejuni and Their Impact on Bacterial Physiology and Pathogenesis, 2021, 22, 1422-0067, 13451, 10.3390/ijms222413451
    5. Sicun Fan, Derek Foster, Shaohua Zhao, Sampa Mukherjee, Yesha Shrestha, Cameron Parsons, Sophia Kathariou, Genomic Analysis Reveals That Isolation Temperature on Selective Media Introduces Genetic Variation in Campylobacter jejuni from Bovine Feces, 2022, 11, 2076-0817, 678, 10.3390/pathogens11060678
    6. Zahra Omole, Nick Dorrell, Abdi Elmi, Fauzy Nasher, Ozan Gundogdu, Brendan W. Wren, Pathogenicity and virulence of Campylobacter jejuni : What do we really know? , 2024, 15, 2150-5594, 10.1080/21505594.2024.2436060
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5138) PDF downloads(1147) Cited by(6)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog