Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Comprehensive assessment of air pollutant and noise emissions at airports across different altitudes

  • We utilized the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standard emission model, refined with adjustments for fuel flow, LTO cycle work mode time, and emission indices, to investigate the environmental footprint of airports at different altitudes. Airports categorized as high (above 5000 ft), medium (1500–5000 ft), and low (below 1500 ft) altitudes were selected to provide a comprehensive representation of the altitude spectrum. The analysis was anchored over the period spanning 2016 to 2017. Emission inventories for air pollutants and noise were computed for these airports, focusing on the LTO (Landing and Take-Off) cycle. Our findings indicated that high altitude airports exhibit the highest NOx emissions, reaching 406.4 t, whereas low altitude airports record the highest noise levels at 73.1 dB. Significant disparities in emission profiles were observed across different phases of the LTO cycle at airports of varying altitudes. Notably, during the climb phase, the types and proportion of NOx emissions at high altitude airports were as high as 71.8%, contrasting with the 45.6% at low altitude airports. Additionally, emissions of gaseous pollutants from major aircrafts, exemplified by the A320 model, escalated with altitude. Specifically, NOx emissions increased from 10.55 kg/cycle at low altitude to 20.48 kg/cycle at high altitude, and CO emissions from 10.88 kg/cycle to 22.89 kg/cycle. A robust correlation between NOx emissions and Lden was identified among airports at different altitudes, with correlation coefficients of 0.96 for low altitude, 0.97 for medium altitude, and 0.93 for high altitude airports. This study delineates the distinct characteristics of air pollutant and noise emissions from airports across altitudes, offering novel insights for the environmental assessment of airport operations.

    Citation: Weizhen Tang, Jie Dai, Zhousheng Huang. Comprehensive assessment of air pollutant and noise emissions at airports across different altitudes[J]. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(3): 292-308. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024013

    Related Papers:

    [1] J. O. Akanni, S. Ajao, S. F. Abimbade, Fatmawati . Dynamical analysis of COVID-19 and tuberculosis co-infection using mathematical modelling approach. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2024, 4(2): 208-229. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2024018
    [2] Yaxin Ren, Yakui Xue . Modeling and optimal control of COVID-19 and malaria co-infection based on vaccination. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2024, 4(3): 316-335. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2024026
    [3] Ihtisham Ul Haq, Nigar Ali, Shabir Ahmad . A fractional mathematical model for COVID-19 outbreak transmission dynamics with the impact of isolation and social distancing. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2022, 2(4): 228-242. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2022022
    [4] Paride O. Lolika, Mlyashimbi Helikumi . Global stability analysis of a COVID-19 epidemic model with incubation delay. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2023, 3(1): 23-38. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2023003
    [5] Ankur Jyoti Kashyap, Arnab Jyoti Bordoloi, Fanitsha Mohan, Anuradha Devi . Dynamical analysis of an anthrax disease model in animals with nonlinear transmission rate. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2023, 3(4): 370-386. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2023030
    [6] Anita T. Kurniawati, Fatmawati, Chidozie W. Chukwu, Windarto, Faishal F. Herdicho . Optimal control of dengue fever model with a logistically growing human population. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2025, 5(1): 48-60. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2025004
    [7] Salma Al-Tuwairqi, Asma Badrah . A qualitative analysis of a model on alpha-synuclein transport and aggregation in neurons. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2023, 3(2): 104-115. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2023010
    [8] Monica Veronica Crankson, Olusegun Olotu, Ayodeji Sunday Afolabi, Afeez Abidemi . Modeling the vaccination control of bacterial meningitis transmission dynamics: a case study. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2023, 3(4): 416-434. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2023033
    [9] Abdul-Fatawu O. Ayembillah, Baba Seidu, C. S. Bornaa . Mathematical modeling of the dynamics of maize streak virus disease (MSVD). Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2022, 2(4): 153-164. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2022016
    [10] Eminugroho Ratna Sari, Nikken Prima Puspita, R. N. Farah . Prevention of dengue virus transmission: insights from host-vector mathematical model. Mathematical Modelling and Control, 2025, 5(2): 131-146. doi: 10.3934/mmc.2025010
  • We utilized the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standard emission model, refined with adjustments for fuel flow, LTO cycle work mode time, and emission indices, to investigate the environmental footprint of airports at different altitudes. Airports categorized as high (above 5000 ft), medium (1500–5000 ft), and low (below 1500 ft) altitudes were selected to provide a comprehensive representation of the altitude spectrum. The analysis was anchored over the period spanning 2016 to 2017. Emission inventories for air pollutants and noise were computed for these airports, focusing on the LTO (Landing and Take-Off) cycle. Our findings indicated that high altitude airports exhibit the highest NOx emissions, reaching 406.4 t, whereas low altitude airports record the highest noise levels at 73.1 dB. Significant disparities in emission profiles were observed across different phases of the LTO cycle at airports of varying altitudes. Notably, during the climb phase, the types and proportion of NOx emissions at high altitude airports were as high as 71.8%, contrasting with the 45.6% at low altitude airports. Additionally, emissions of gaseous pollutants from major aircrafts, exemplified by the A320 model, escalated with altitude. Specifically, NOx emissions increased from 10.55 kg/cycle at low altitude to 20.48 kg/cycle at high altitude, and CO emissions from 10.88 kg/cycle to 22.89 kg/cycle. A robust correlation between NOx emissions and Lden was identified among airports at different altitudes, with correlation coefficients of 0.96 for low altitude, 0.97 for medium altitude, and 0.93 for high altitude airports. This study delineates the distinct characteristics of air pollutant and noise emissions from airports across altitudes, offering novel insights for the environmental assessment of airport operations.



    Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) is a highly contagious and viral disease that spreads easily from person to person through contact [1]. It can also be contracted through respiratory droplets released when an infected person coughs, sneezes, breathes, sings or talks [2]. The common symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, cough, chills, headache, muscles aches, vomiting and diarrhea [3]. Other symptoms include breathing difficulties, loss of speech and in severe cases, pneumonia, stroke and blood clots have been the most common problems in COVID-19 patients [4]. The disease affects most people with high blood pressure, cancer, heart failure, overweight, obesity, liver disease and weakened immune systems [5]. Evidence from literature shows that old age has high risk of serious illness from COVID-19 and the risk increases with age [6].

    The World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a public health problem on 30th January 2020 [7] and a pandemic on 11th March 2020 [7,8]. The first case report of COVID-19 in Tanzania was declared in Arusha before spreading to other parts of the country. Then, on 29th April 2020, the Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children reported a total of 480 confirmed cases and 16 deaths from the disease [9].

    Public health prevention measures, including banning all large gatherings, limiting the number of people attending burials, physical distancing and wearing masks, were implemented all over the world [10]. Unlike other East African countries, Tanzania did not enforce lock-down, and people were allowed to continue with income-generating activities normally [9]. However, health education campaigns on prevention measures, such as wearing masks, hygiene practices, avoiding public gatherings and keeping physical distance, were intensively encouraged through mass media and social media [11]. Despite these prevention measures, vaccination remains the most powerful tool in preventing the spread of COVID-19 in the population [12]. Globally, WHO reported that more than 116,135,492 and 2,581,976 confirmed cases and deaths, respectively, and 249,160,837 vaccine doses have been administrated worldwide, including Tanzania [9,13]. However, the disease still persists in the population and there are several cases of resurgences globally. Understanding the dynamics of COVID-19 and its control strategies is a substantially important in order to minimize the spread of the disease in the community [14,15].

    Mathematical models of disease transmission have been widely studied since the work of Kermack and McKendrick [16], Greenwood and Yule [17], Ross [18], Bernoulli [19], Brownlee [20], Soper [21], Greenwood [22] and also for the details of history in disease modeling (see, [23,24]) and the references therein. Mathematical models with fractional-order differential equations have particulary received greater attention (see, [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]) and are widely used in disease modeling compared to the integer-order derivatives [32,33]. Fractional-order operators are more accurate in modeling dynamical systems than classical operators as fractional-order models allow more degree of freedom [34,35]. It is worth mentioning here that fractional-order operators have more advantages than classical-order operators as fractional-order models adequately capture hereditary properties, long-range interactions and memory effects that exist in many biological systems [32,33,34,35]. In contrast, it has been documented in the literature that models that utilize integer-order derivatives do not adequately capture hereditary properties, and memory effects that exist in many biological systems [33]. Besides, when compared to the classical integer-order models, fractional-order models provide a higher level of precision and give a better fit to the actual data [36].

    Recently, Bushnaq et al. [37], Owusu et al. [38], Ahmed et al. [39], Baba et al. [40], Omame et al. [41] and Aslam et al. [42] utilized the fractional-order derivatives to investigate the effect of memory on COVID-19 disease transmission. Mathematical studies of fractional order differential equations in disease modeling are also found in [43,44,45,46,47,48] and the references therein. For instance, Singh et al. [44] proposed and studied a fractional order model using Atangana-Baleanu Caputo sense to investigate the effect of quarantine on the spread of COVID-19 disease in the population. In conclusion the authors mentioned that quarantine of the infected individuals is effective to minimize the spread of disease in the population. Rehman et al. [43] formulated a fractional order model using the Caputo derivative to investigate the dynamics of COVID-19 and dengue co-infections in the population. The authors simulated the graphs of both COVID-19 and dengue co-infection to compare the results in the sense of Caputo, Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu. From numerical simulations, their results demonstrated that Caputo sense had better results in the form of stability compared to other operators. Anggriani and Beay [47], formulated a mathematical model of COVID-19 to study the impact of self-isolation and hospitalization. The authors performed a global sensitivity analysis of the model using Latin Hypercube sampling and partial correlation coefficient methods. Their results revealed that parameters representing self-isolation and hospitalization have negative relations. Lolika and Mlyashimbi [48] proposed and studied a COVID-19 epidemic model with incubation delay. The authors computed the basic reproduction number and used to establish the conditions for global stability of equilibrium points. Furthermore, the authors concluded that quarantine of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals have an impact on minimizing the spread of COVID-19 in the population.

    Fractional derivatives have many definitions. In this study, we have chosen to utilize the renowned Caputo fractional operator due to the fact that, the ability to use classical initial conditions in the model formulation is the key benefits of the Caputo fractional derivatives compared to other fractional operators [49,50,51,52,53]. It is worthwhile to mention that the Caputo fractional derivative of any constant is zero. Furthermore, the Caputo fractional operator has a singular non-kernel, which is missing in other operators [54,55,56]. Therefore, we proposed and studied a Caputo fractional-order model of COVID-19 disease transmission to assess the effects of vaccination and quarantine in order to minimize the spread of disease in the population.

    The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, the proposed model and its analytical results are presented. Results discussion are provided in Section 3. Finally, the concluding remarks are presented in Section 4.

    Figure 1.  Model flow chart illustrating the dynamics of COVID-19.

    In this section, the Caputo fractional-order derivative has been used to define the model differential equations for COVID-19 transmission. The compartments proposed in this study are used to represent the epidemiological status of each human population. The proposed model consists of six sub-divided compartments: susceptible S(t), exposed E(t), vaccinated V(t), infectious I(t), quarantine Q(t) and recovered R(t) human populations. Thus, the total human population is denoted by N(t) which is, N(t)=S(t)+E(t)+V(t)+Iv(t)+Q(t)+R(t). Throughout the article, variables and parameters are assumed to be none-negative and are defined as follows: Λ and ν1 represent the rate of new recruitment and transition rate from susceptible to vaccinated classes respectively. Thus; ϕ represents the efficacy of vaccination for vaccinated susceptible individuals; 1α denotes the average time humans spend in incubation period; ω represents the rate of quarantine in the population; following successful treatment, I(t) infected humans recover from disease after 1κ days; μ and γ represent the human natural mortality and the transition rate of quarantined people to recovered classes, respectively; d represents the death rate of infected humans. Additionally, it is assumed that once the people become aware of COVID-19 transmission, they change their behavior and take precautions, such as hand-washing, wearing masks, keeping social distances and even quarantining themselves. Thus, the parameter ϵ represents the reduction rate of COVID-19 transmission of susceptible individuals due to health education campaigns. Furthermore, it was assumed that β represents the probability of disease transmission following the successful contact rate σ between infected and susceptible individuals.

    Our assumptions on the dynamics of COVID-19 in this study are illustrated in figure 1 and the corresponding model differential equations are presented in model (2.1):

    {cbDθtS(t)=Λθ(1ϵθ)σθβθS(t)I(t)(νθ1+μθ)S(t),cbDθtV(t)=νθ1S(t)(1ϕq)σθβθI(t)V(t)μθV(t),cbDθtE(t)=(1ϵθ)σθβθI(t)S(t)+(1ϕθ)σθβθI(t)V(t)(αθ+μθ)E(t),cbDθtQ(t)=ωθαθE(t)(γθ+μθ)Q(t),cbDθtI(t)=(1ωθ)αθE(t)(κθ+μθ+dθ)I(t),cbDθtR(t)=γθQ(t)+κθI(t)μθR(t). (2.1)

    We begin by introducing the definition of Caputo fractional derivative and state the related theorems (see, [56,57,58,59]) that we will utilize to derive important results in this work.

    Definition 2.1. Suppose that θ>0,t>b,θ,b,tR, the Caputo fractional derivative is given by:

    cbDθtf(t)1Γ(nθ)tbfn(ξ)(tξ)θ+1ndξ,n1<θ,nN. (2.2)

    Definition 2.2. (Linearity property [56]). Let f(t),g(t):[b,d]R be such that cbDθtf(t) and cbDθtg(t) exist almost everywhere and let c1,c2R. Then, cbDθt(c1f(t))+cbDθt(c2g(t)) exists everywhere, and

    cbDθt(c1f(t)+c2g(t))=c1 cbDqtf(t)+c2 cbDθtg(t). (2.3)

    Definition 2.3. (Caputo derivative of a constant [59]). The fractional derivative for a constant function f(t)=c is zero, that is:

    cbDθtc=0. (2.4)

    Let us consider the following general type of fractional differential equations involving the Caputo derivative:

    cbDθtx(t)=f(t,x(t)),θ(0,1), (2.5)

    with initial condition x0=x(t0).

    Definition 2.4. (see [56]). The constant x is an equilibrium point of the Caputo fractional dynamic system (2.5) if and only if f(t,x)=0.

    In what follows, we present an extension of the Lyapunov direct method for Caputo type fractional order for nonlinear systems [56,60].

    Theorem 2.1. (Uniform Asymptotic Stability [56,60]). Let x be an equilibrium point for the non-autonomous fractional order system (2.5) and ΩRn be a domain containing x. Let L:[0,)×ΩR be a continuously differentiable function such that:

    M1(x)N(t,x(t))M2(x),

    and:

    cbDθtN(t,x(t))M3(x),

    for all q(0,1) and all xΩ, where M1(x), M2(x) and M3(x) are continuous positive definite functions on Ω. Then, the equilibrium point of system (2.5) is uniformly asymptotically stable.

    The following theorem summarizes a lemma proved in [56], where a Volterra-type Lyapunov function is obtained for fractional-order epidemic systems.

    Lemma 2.1. (see [56]. Let x() be a continuous and differentiable function with x(t)R+. Then, for any time instant tb, one has:

    cbDθt(x(t)xxlnx(t)x)(1xx(t)) cbDθtx(t),xR+,θ(0,1).

    Theorem 2.2. For the model (2.1), there exists a unique solution in (0,); however, the solution is always positive for all values of t0 and remains in R6+.

    Proof. From the model (2.1), we first show that

    R6+= {N(t) R6+:N(t)0} is a positive invariant set. Then, we have to demonstrate that each hyper-plane bounding the positive orthant and the vector field points to R6+. Now consider the following: let us assume that there exists a t>t0 such that N(t)=0, and N(t)<0 for t(t,t1), where t1 is sufficiently close to t, if N(t)=0, then we have that,

    cbDθtN(t)Λθ>0. This implies that cbDθtN(t)>0 for all t[t,t1]. The above discussion shows that the three hyper-plane bounding the orthants that is the vector field points to R6+. This shows that all the solutions of the model (2.1) remains positive for all t0.

    Theorem 2.3. Let Φ(t)=N(t) be the unique solution of the model (2.1) for all t0. Then, the solution Φ(t) is bounded above, that is, Φ(t)Ω, where Ω which is the feasible region is defined as,

    Ω={N(t)R6+0N(t)CN.}

    and its interior denoted by int(Ω) is given by,

    int(Ω)={N(t)R6+0N(t)CN}.

    Proof. Here, we prove that the solutions of model (2.1) are bounded for all t0. Biologically, the lowest possible value of each state of model (2.1) is zero. Next, we determine the upper-bound of states. Based on this discussion, it is easy to show that the following condition holds for biological relevance of species. 0N(t)CN. From this condition one gets:

    cbDθtN(t)ΛθμθN(t).

    From the Laplace transformation condition one gets:

    SθL[N(t)]Sθ1N(0)ΛθSμθL[N(t)].

    Collecting the likely terms we have:

    L[N(t)]ΛθS1Sθ+μθ+N(0)Sq1Sθ+μθ=ΛθSθ(1+θ)Sθ+μθ+N(0)Sθ1Sq+μθ.

    Using the inverse Laplace transform we have:

    N(t)L1{pθΛθSθ(1+θ)Sθ+μθ}N(0)L1{Sθ1Sθ+μθ}ΛθtθEq,θ+1(μθ)tθ+N(0)Eθ,1(μθ)tθΛθμθtθEθ,θ+1(μθ)tθ+N(0)Eθ,1(μθ)tθMax{Λθμθ,N(0)}(tθEθ,θ+1(μθ)tθ+Eθ,1(μθ)tθ)=CΓ(1)=CN.

    Where, CN=Max{Λθμθ,N(0)}. Therefore, N(t) is bounded above and this completes the proof.

    Since R(t) does not appear in all the equations in model (2.1), it is sufficient to analyze the solutions of model (2.6) for the behavior of model differential equations (2.1).

    {cbDθtS(t)=Λθ(1ϵθ)σθβθS(t)I(t)(νθ1+μθ)S(t),cbDθtV(t)=νθ1S(t)(1ϕθ)σθβθI(t)V(t)μθV(t),cbDθtE(t)=(1ϵθ)σθβθI(t)S(t)+(1ϕq)σθβθI(t)V(t)(αθ+μθ)E(t),cbDθtQ(t)=ωθαθE(t)(γθ+μθ)Q(t),cbDθtI(t)=(1ωθ)αθE(t)(κθ+μθ+dθ)I(t). (2.6)

    In what follows, we compute the threshold quantity, R0 which determines the power of the disease to spread in the population. The model (2.6) always has a disease-free equilibrium, E0 given by:

    E0:(S0,V0,E0,Q0,I0,R0)=(Λθνθ1+μθ,νθ1Λθμθ(νθ1+μθ),0,0,0).

    Following the next generation matrix approach as used in [31,61], the non-negative matrix F that denotes the generation of new infections and the non-singular matrix V that denotes the disease transfer among compartments evaluated at E0 are defined as follows:

    F=(00(1ϵθ)σθβθS0+(1ϕ)σθβθV0000000), (2.7)
    V=(αθ+μθ00ωθαθγθ+μθ0(1ωθ)αθ0κθ+μθ+dθ). (2.8)

    Therefore, from (2.7) and (2.8) it can easily be verified that the basic reproduction number R0 of model (2.1) is:

    R0=Λθνθ1+μθ(1ωθ)αθαθ+μθ((1ϵθ)σθβθ(κθ+μθ+dθ)+1ϕθκθ+μθ+dθν1μθ).

    The basic reproduction number R0 is defined as the expected number of secondary cases of humans produced in a completely susceptible population by one infected individual during its lifetime as infectious. The terms Λθνθ1+μθ, νθ1μθ1 and (1ωθ)αθαθ+μθ represent the total life span of humans and the average life span of vaccinated and quarantined individuals respectively.

    Our goal in this section is to investigate the global stability of the disease-free equilibrium and the endemic equilibrium of the model (2.6).

    Theorem 2.4. If R0<1, the disease free-equilibrium point of the model (2.1) is locally asymptotically stable and unstable if R0>1.

    Proof. To prove theorem (2.4), we evaluate the Jacobian matrix of the model (2.6) at the disease-free equilibrium and investigate the behavior of eigenvalues. In what follows, the Jacobian matrix of the model (2.6) evaluated at the disease free-equilibrium is given by:

    JDFE=((νθ1+μθ)000(1ϵθ)σθβθS0νθ1μq00(1ϵθ)σθβθV000(αθ+μθ)0(1ϵθ)σθβθS0+(1ϕθ)σθβθV000ωθαθ(γθ+μθ)000(1ωθ)αθ0(κθ+μθ+dθ)). (2.9)

    The first three eigenvalues of matrix (2.9) are λ1=(νθ1+μθ),λθ2=μθ, and λ3=(γθ+μθ) which are non-positive. The remaining two eigenvalues are obtained in the following matrix;

    M=((αθ+μθ)(1ϵθ)σθβθS0+(1ϕθ)σθβθV0(1ωθ)αθκθ+μθ+dθ). (2.10)

    It follows that we find the characteristic polynomial of the matrix (2.10) which is given as follows:

    λ2+(αθ+2μθ+κθ+dθ)λ+(1R0)=0. (2.11)

    Since the coefficients of characteristic polynomial (2.11) are all non-negative for R0<1, we conclude that the disease-free equilibrium E0 of the model (2.2) is locally asymptotically stable and this completes the proof.

    Theorem 2.5. The disease-free equilibrium E0 is globally asymptotically stable if R01, otherwise is unstable.

    Proof. To prove the theorem (2.5), we first evaluate the model (2.6) at the point E0 and this leads to the following model;

    {cbDθtS(t)=S(t)(Λθ(1S(t)1S0)(1ϵθ)βθI(t)),cbDθtV(t)=V(t)(σθνθ1(S(t)V(t)S0V0)(1ν1)σθI(t)),cbDθtE(t)=(1ϵθ)(S0+(S(t)S0))+(1ν1)βθI(t)(V0+(V(t)V0)(αθ+μθ)E(t)),cbDθtQ(t)=ωθαθE(t)(γθ+μθ)Q(t),cbDθtI(t)=(1ωθ)αθE(t)(κθ+μθ+dθ)I(t). (2.12)

    In the followings, we consider the following Lyapunov function:

    L0(t)={S(t)S0S0lnS(t)S0}+{V(t)V0V0lnV(t)V0}+Q(t)+E(t)+(1ωθ)αθ+μθ(1ωθ)αθI(t).

    Taking the derivative of L0(t) along the model (2.12) and making simplifications, one gets:

    cbDθtL0(t)Λθ{2S(t)S0S0S}νθ1S0{1+S(t)S0S(t)S0V0V(t)V(t)V0}{γq+μθ}Q+{{1ωθ}αθ{κθ+μθ+dθ}}{1ωθ}αq{R01}I(t).

    Since all the parameters and variables in system (2.13) are non-negative, it follows that cbDθtL0(t)<0 holds if R0<1. Moreover, cbDθtL0(t)=0 if and only if S(t)=0, V(t)=0, E(t)=0, Q(t)=0, I(t)=0, for all t0. Thus, L0(t) is Lyapunov function on Ω. Using Lasalle Invariance principle [62] it implies that every solution of the system (2.6) approaches the disease-free equilibrium E0 as t. Therefore, we conclude that the disease-free equilibrium of system (2.6) is globally asymptotically stable whenever R01. This completes the proof.

    Theorem 2.6. The Model (2.6) has endemic equilibrium E point which is globally asymptotically stable for R0>1.

    Proof. To prove the theorem (2.6), we consider the following Lyapunov functional:

    L1(t)=A1{S(t)SSlnS(t)S}+A2{V(t)VVlnV(t)V0}+A3{E(t)EElnE(t)E}+A4{Q(t)QQlnQ(t)Q}+A5{I(t)IIlnI(t)I}.

    Differentiating L1(t) one gets the following:

    cbDθtL1(t)A1(1SS)cbDθtS(t)+A2(1VV(t))cbDθtV(t)+A3(1EE(t))cbDθtE(t)+A4(1QQ(t))cbDθtQ(t)+A5(1II(t))cbDθtI(t). (2.13)

    In what follows, we substitute (2.1) in (2.13) and get the following:

    cbDθtL1(t)A1(1SS(t))(Λθ(1ϵθ)σθβθS(t)I(t)(ηθρθ+ϵθ+μθ)S(t))+A2(1VV(t))(νθ1S(t)(1ϕθ)σθβθI(t)V(t)μθV(t))+A3(1EE(t))((1ϕθ)σθβθI(t)S(t)+(1ϕθ)σθβθI(t)V(t)(αθ+μθ)E(t))+A4(1QQ(t))(ωθαθE(t)(γθ+μθ)Q(t))+A5(1II(t))((1ωθ)αθE(t)(κθ+μθ+dθ)I(t)). (2.14)

    Setting the model (2.6) at the endemic equilibrium point,

    {νθ1+μq=ΛθS(1ϵθ)σθβθIμθ=νθ1SV(1ν1)θθβθI(αθ+μθ)=(1ϵθ)σθβθSIE+(1ϕθ)σθIVE,(γθ+μθ)=ωθαθEQ,(κθ+μθ+dθ)=(1ωθ)αθEI. (2.15)

    By substituting (2.15) in (2.14) and solving the constants Ai for i=1,2,...5, one gets the following after simplifications:

    cbDθtL1(t)νθ1S(2S(t)SSS(t))+(1ωθ)αθE(3V(t)VS(t)SS(t)SVV)+(1ϵθ)σθβθ(3S(t)SE(t)EII(t)S(t)SI(t)IEE(t))+(1ϕθ)σθIV(4SS(t)SS(t)VV(t)E(t)EI(t)II(t)IV(t)VEE(t)). (2.16)

    Since the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the geometrical mean, it follows that, from (2.16) we have the following:

    (2S(t)SSS(t))0. (2.17)

    Furthermore, let Φ(z)=1zln(z) for z>0. One can note that Φ(z)0 if and only if z=1. Using the aforementioned properties of Φ(z), from (2.16) one can note that:

    (3V(t)VS(t)SS(t)SVV)=Φ(S(t)SV(t)V)V(t)VS(t)Sln(V(t)V)V(t)V+ln(S(t)S)S(t)S0. (2.18)
    (3S(t)SE(t)EIIS(t)SIIEE(t))=Φ(S(t)SE(t)EII)S(t)SE(t)EII(t)ln(S(t)S)S(t)S+ln(E(t)EII(t))E(t)EII(t)0. (2.19)
    (4SS(t)SS(t)VV(t)E(t)EIII(t)IV(t)VEE(t))=Φ(I(t)IV(t)VEE(t))+Φ(E(t)EII)SS(t)SS(t)VV(t)ln(S(t)S)S(t)S+ln(SS(t)VV(t))SS(t)VV(t)0. (2.20)

    From (2.17), (2.19), (2.18), and (2.20), one can note that cbDθtL1(t)0 whenever R0>1. Therefore, using Lasalle Invariance principle [62], the model (2.1) has a global asymptotically stable equilibrium point for all R01 and this completes the proof.

    In this section, we perform the numerical simulations of the model (2.1) to justify the analytical results. Most of the parameter values that are not available in the literature have been estimated. Additionally, for the simulation initial conditions of the model (2.1), was assumed to be S(0)=900,V(0)=0,E(0)=200,Q(0)=0 and I(0)=2. Using the similar concept in [63], the fractional Adam-Bashforth-Moulton scheme for the model (2.1) has the following form:

    {S(tn+1)=S0+hθΓ(θ+2)fS(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1))+hθΓ(θ+2)nm=0am,n+1fS(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm)),V(tn+1)=V0+hθΓ(θ+2)fV(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1))+hqΓ(θ+2)nm=0am,n+1fV(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm)),E(tn+1)=E0+hθΓ(θ+2)fE(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Eθ(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1))+hθΓ(q+2)nm=0am,n+1fE(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm)),R(tm)I(tn+1)=I0+hθΓ(θ+2)fI(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1))+hθΓ(θ+2)nm=0am,n+1fI(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm)),Q(tn+1)=Q0+hθΓ(θ+2)fQ(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1))+hθΓ(θ+2)nm=0am,n+1fQ(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm)),R(tn+1)=R0+hθΓ(θ+2)fR(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1))+hθΓ(θ+2)nm=0am,n+1fR(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm)). (3.1)

    Where:

    {Sp(tn+1)=S0+1Γθnm=0bm,n+1fS(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm)),R(tm)Vp(tn+1)=V0+1Γθnm=0bm,n+1fV(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm)),R(tm)Ep(tn+1)=E0+1Γθnm=0bm,n+1fE(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm)),R(tm)Ip(tn+1)=I0+1Γθnm=0bm,n+1fI(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm)),R(tm)Qp(tn+1)=Q0+1Γθnm=0bm,n+1fQ(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm)),R(tm)Rp(tn+1)=R0+1Γθnm=0bm,n+1fR(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm)),R(tm). (3.2)

    In what follows we have:

    {fS(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm))=cbDαtS(t),fV(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm))=cbDαtV(t),fE(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm))=cbDαtE(t),fI(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm))=cbDαtI(t),fQ(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm))=cbDαtQ(t),fR(tm,S(tm),V(tm),E(tm),I(tm),Q(tm),R(tm))=cbDαtR(t). (3.3)

    Additionally, the quantities:

    {fS(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1)),fV(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1)),fE(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1)),fI(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1)),fQ(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1)),fR(tn+1,Sp(tn+1),Vp(tn+1),Ep(tn+1),Ip(tn+1),Qp(tn+1),Rp(tn+1)). (3.4)

    are the derivatives from (3.3) at the point tn+1,n=1,2,3,...m..

    Table 1.  Parameters and values.
    Symbol Description Value Units Source
    Λ Per capita human recruitment rate 11826 day 1 [64]
    d Disease induced death rate day 1 0.0413 [9]
    μ Natural death rate day 1 0.2 [9]
    β Force of infections day 1 Fitted
    α Incubation period day 1 0.5171 [65]
    σ Average per capita contact rate day 1 Fitted
    ϕ Efficacy rate of vaccination day 1 0:854 [64]
    ν1 Vaccination rate day 1 0.0313 [65]
    γ Recovery rate day1 0.362 [64]
    ϵ Human awareness rate day1 Vary Assumed
    κ Treatment rate of infected individuals unit-less Vary Assumed
    ω Quarantine rate of suspected humans unit-less Vary Assumed

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this section, the sensitivity analysis of the model (2.1) has been performed to demonstrate the influence of each parameter on the magnitude of the threshold quantity R0. Most of the parameters used in this study have been drawn from literature and some are estimated using reasonable ranges for the purpose of simulation.

    Definition 3.1. (See, [66]) The normalized sensitivity index of R0, which depends on differentiability of parameter, ω is defined as follows:

    ΨR0ω=R0ω×ωR0 (3.5)

    Figure 2 demonstrates the relationship between the basic reproduction number R0 and the model parameters of the model (2.1). Overall, one can note that the model parameters β, γ, σ and Λ have a positive influence on the R0, that is whenever they are increased, the size of R0 increases. On the other-hand, parameters with negative index values have a negative influence on R0, that is, whenever they increased, the value of R0 decreases.

    Figure 2.  Sensitivity analysis of the model (2.1).

    In this section, we use the daily cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan in China as reported in [67] and estimate the parameters (β,σ) that minimize the deviation of real data from prediction of model system (2.1). The main advantage of fractional-order differential equation is that the order of fractional can be any real positive number, so one can choose the one that has best fit of real data to the model and predict the future evolution of the disease in the population. Therefore, in this study, we use both the least squares and Nelder mead algorithm methods as presented in [71] to fit and estimate the parameters (d,β,θ) of the model (2.1). The real data used in this study are daily reported cases as shown in table (2), and the commutative new infections predicted by the model (2.1) is obtained using the equation (3.6)

    cbDθtC(t)=(1ϵ)σθβθI(t)S(t)+(1ϕ)σθβθI(t)V(t) (3.6)
    Table 2.  The daily cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan in China for 23 days as reported in [67].
    Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    Cases 6 12 19 25 31 38 44 60
    Day 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    Cases 80 131 259 3839 469 688 776 1776
    Day 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    Cases 1460 1739 1984 2101 2590 2827 3233

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 3.  Effects of varying (a) rate of treatment of infected humans with COVID-19 modeled by parameter κ on R0, (b) rate of quarantine for suspected individuals with COVID 19 modeled by parameter ω on R0, and (c) rate of vaccination for susceptible individuals modeled by parameter ν1 on R0. One can see that increasing treatment of infected, vaccination of susceptible and quarantine of suspected individuals reduce the spread of COVID 19 disease in the population.
    Figure 4.  Effects of varying (a) rate of incubation period modeled by parameter α on R0, (b) contact rate between susceptible and infected individuals modeled by parameter σ on R0. The results show that increase in the incubation period and contact rate between susceptible and infected individuals, the disease remains persistent in the population.
    Figure 5.  Mesh plot of R0 as the function of treatment and quarantine of individuals. Overall, the results show that both treatment and quarantine of humans have the potential to reduce the spread of COVID-19 disease in the population.
    Figure 6.  Latin hyper sampling of R0 to quarantine rate. The quarantine rate was varied across the possible values.
    Figure 7.  Contour plot of R0 as the function of vaccination rate ν1 and quarantine of suspected humans with COVID-19 disease infection. Overall, one can note that varying both vaccination and quarantine decrease the magnitude of R0. Prior studies also reported similar results (see, [68,69,70]). In particular, they argue that combination of contact tracing, quarantine, and longer duration of vaccine immunity can effectively reduce the spread of COVID-19 in the population. Therefore, it is important to quantify their combined effects in minimize the spread of COVID-19 disease in the population.

    We use the following function to compute the best fitting:

    F:R2(β,σ)R(β,σ) (3.7)

    where β,σ are parameters such that:

    (1) For a given (β,σ), we numerically solve the system (2.1) to get a solution ˆYi(t)=(ˆS,ˆV,ˆE,ˆQ,ˆI,ˆR which is an estimation of daily reported cases Y(t) of COVID-19 from Wuhan in China.

    (2) Set t0=1 (the fitting process starts in day 1) and for t=2,3,...,23, corresponding to daily in where data are available, evaluate the computed numerical solution for I(t); that is., ˆI(1), ˆI(2), ˆI(3),.....,ˆI(23).

    (3) Compute the root mean square (RMSE) of the difference between ˆI(1),ˆIh(2),....,ˆI(23) and real data. This function F returns the root-mean-square error (RMSE) where:

    RMSE=1n23k=1(I(k)ˆI(k))2, (3.8)

    (4) Determine a global minimum for the RMSE using Nelder-Mead algorithm. The function F takes values in R2 and returns a positive real number.

    Using the formula (3.8), we computed the RMSE that measures the closeness of the model prediction to the real data and was found to be 0.1186. This shows that the system (2.1) has a good fit to the daily reported cases of COVID-19. On performing the fitting process we set the following initial conditions S(0)=9999, V(0)=7990, E(0)=10, I(0)=5, Q(0)=5 R(0)=3 and the model parameters are in Table (1). Note that since the fractional-order is any positive real number θ(0,1], one can choose the one that better fits the model to the real data. Based on this assertion, the fractional-order θ were assumed to be 0.59,0.6,0.61,0.62 and 0.63 that had a better fit of model to the real data reported in [67].

    Figure 8.  Model fitting to the real data of COVID-19 cases per day as reported in [67]. The circle line in figures (a) and (b) represent the real data while the smooth line denotes the model prediction at θ=0.59,θ=0.6,θ=0.61 and θ=0.62,θ=0.63. Overall, the results demonstrate that the propose model fits well with the reported cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan in China. Furthermore, the plot of order of the derivatives θ against sum of square errors in Figure (c) has been performed and the results show that the model has good predictions at θ=0.61.
    Figure 9.  Simulations of time series against residuals on reported cases of COVID-19 disease from Wuhan in China. Overall, the results demonstrate that the residuals exhibit random pattern and implying that the proposed model is a good fit to the reported cases of COVID-19 disease from Wuhan in China.
    Figure 10.  Simulation of model (2.1) at R0=0.1052, ω=0.6 and ν1=0.01 to show the convergence of infected and quarantined individuals to the disease free-equilibrium point. Overall, one can note that as the memory effect θ decreases from unit the disease dies out in the population after 20 days.
    Figure 11.  Simulation of model (2.1) to show the solution profiles. Figure (a) and (b) illustrates the simulation of model (2.1) with ν1=0 to show the dynamics of the disease in the population. Overall, one can note that in the absence of vaccination (ν1=0) the COVID-19 disease persists in the population for longer periods before converging to the disease-free equilibrium point compared to that in Figure 10.

    The outbreak of the COVID-19 depends on the close contact between infected and susceptible individuals in the community. Vaccination and quarantine are proposed as the most effective control strategies that minimize the spread of the COVID-19 disease in the population. In this study, a fractional-order model for COVID-19 has been proposed and studied to assess the effects of the aforementioned control strategies. To analyze the model, the important threshold parameter, R0, has been computed to investigate the stability analysis of the steady states of the model. The results from the analysis demonstrated that both the disease-free equilibrium and endemic equilibrium points are globally stable whenever the basic reproduction number is less and greater than unity, respectively. A Normalized sensitivity index of the basic reproduction number was been performed to establish the relationship between the threshold and model parameters. Overall, one can note that model parameters with a positive index increased the disease persistence in the population. Furthermore, to support the analytical results, matlab software was used to simulate the proposed model and the results demonstrated that both vaccination and quarantine have the potential to minimize the spread of disease in the population. In particular, the disease can die out from the population by vaccinating 70 susceptible people and quarantine 60 of suspected individuals. Besides, real data of COVID-19 disease from Wuhan city in China has been used to fit and validate the proposed model. From the numerical findings, it can be deduced70 that the model fits well with reported cases of COVID-19 in China. Additional simulation of the model to assess the effect of memory on the spread of COVID-19 disease has been performed and the results demonstrated that memory effect has an influence on the spread of COVID-19 in the population. In future, the proposed model presented in this study will be improved by incorporating time delay and assessing its effect on the spread of COVID-19 disease in the population.

    All authors are grateful to their respective institutions for the support during preparation of the manuscript. Paride O. Lolika acknowledges the support from the University of Juba, South Sudan.

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    All authors have equal contributions and they read and approved the final version of the paper.



    [1] Dessens O, Kohler M O, Rogers H L, et al. (2014) Aviation and climate change. Transport Policy 34: 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.014
    [2] Chu YP (2013) Impacts of aircraft exhaust emissions on air quality in the vicinity of Shanghai Pudong International Airport. Environ Monit Early Warning 5: 50–52+56. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-6732.2013.04.016 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6732.2013.04.016
    [3] Stettler ME, Eastham S, Barrett SRH (2011) Air quality and public health impacts of UK airports. part l: Emissions. Atmos Environ 45: 5415–5424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.012
    [4] Wilcox LJ, Shine KP, Hoskins BJ (2012) Radiative forcing due to aviation water vapour emissions. Atmos Environ 63: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.072 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.072
    [5] Meister J, Schalcher S, Wunderli JM, et al. (2021) Comparison of the aircraft noise calculation programs sonAIR, FLULA2 and AEDT with noise measurements of single flights. Aerospace 8: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8120388 doi: 10.3390/aerospace8120388
    [6] Ollerhead J, Sharp B (2001) MAGENTA-Assessments of Future Aircraft Noise Policy Options. Aair Space Europe 3: 247–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1290-0958(01)90108-X doi: 10.1016/S1290-0958(01)90108-X
    [7] Mato RR, Mufuruki TS (1999) Noise Pollution Associated with the Operation of the Dar Es Salaam International Airport. Transport Res D-Tr E 4: 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00024-8 doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00024-8
    [8] Xia Q (2012) Aircraft Engine Emission Impact Assessment of Airports on the Atmospheric Environment. Nanjing U Aeronaut Astronaut. https://doi.org/10.7666/d.y1855019 doi: 10.7666/d.y1855019
    [9] Hudda N, Fruin SA (2015) International airport impacts to air quality: size and related properties of large increases in ultrafine particle number concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 50: 3362–3370. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05313 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05313
    [10] Kampa M, Castanas E (2008) Human health effects of air pollution. Environ Pollut 151: 362–367.
    [11] Wasiuk DK, Khan MAH, Shallcross DE, et al. (2016) A commercial aircraft fuel burn and emissions inventory for 2005–2011. Atmosphere 7: 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7060078 doi: 10.3390/atmos7060078
    [12] Cao HL, Miao JH, Miao LY, et al. (2019) Study on the estimation method of daily emission inventory of aircraft engines at the capital airport based on actual flight data. J Environ Sci 39: 2699–2707. https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2019.0048 doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2019.0048
    [13] Li J, Zhao ZQ, Liu XK, et al. (2018) Computational analysis of aircraft emission inventory at Capital International Airport. China Environ Sci 38: 4469–4475. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.12.009 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.12.009
    [14] Xu R, Lang JB, Yang XW, et al. (2016) Establishment of an aircraft emission inventory at the Capital International Airport. China Environ Sci 36: 2554–2560. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2016.08.038 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2016.08.038
    [15] Xu R, Lang JB, Cheng SY, et al. (2017) Inventory of mobile source air pollutant emissions at the Capital International Airport. J Safety Environ 17: 1957–1962. https://doi.org/10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2017.05.065 doi: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2017.05.065
    [16] Wang YN, Sun NX, Feng JH, et al. (2023) Emissions from Beijing Daxing International Airport and their environmental impacts and predictions. J Environ Sci 43: 153–165. https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2022.0426 doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2022.0426
    [17] Li N, Sun Y, Gao Z (2019) Computational analysis of aircraft emission inventory at Pudong International Airport. Aviat Comput Technol 49: 15–19. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-654X.2019.03.004 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-654X.2019.03.004
    [18] Huang QF, Chen GN, Hu DX, et al. (2014) Analysis of air pollutant emissions from aircraft at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport. Environ Monit Manage Technol 26: 57–59. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2009.2014.03.022 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2009.2014.03.022
    [19] Wang RL, Cheng H, Ren HJ, et al. (2018) Inventory of air pollutant emissions from the takeoff and landing (LTO) cycle of civil aircraft in the Yangtze River Delta region. J Environ Sci 38: 4472–4479. https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2018.0262 doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2018.0262
    [20] Han B, Kong WK, Yao TW, et al. (2020) Inventory of air pollutant emissions from aircraft LTO in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei airport cluster. Environ Sci 41: 1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201908199 doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201908199
    [21] Du YY (2022) Prediction and prevention of aircraft noise pollution at Tianjin airport based on INM model. Noise Vib Control 42: 186–190. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2022.02.031 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2022.02.031
    [22] Cheng DL, Yi CJ, Liang ZF (2005) Research on aircraft noise and countermeasures. Noise Vib Control 25: 47–51. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2005.05.016 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2005.05.016
    [23] Mato RR, Mufuruki TS (1999) Noise Pollution Associated with the Operation of the Dar Es Salaam International Airport. Transport Environ 4: 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00024-8 doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00024-8
    [24] International Civil Aviation Organization. 2014. ICAO Environmental Report 2013. International Civil Aviation Organization.
    [25] Wei C, Diao HZ, Han B (2014) Calculation of pollutant emissions from civil aircraft during cruise phase. Science. Technol Eng 14: 122–127. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2014.19.023 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2014.19.023
    [26] The Environment Branch of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2014). ICAO Environmental Report 2013. International Civil Aviation Organization.
    [27] Chandrasekaran N, Guha A (2012) Study of prediction methods for NOx emission from turbofan engines. J Propuls Power 28: 170–180. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34245 doi: 10.2514/1.B34245
    [28] Huang MY, Hu R, Zhang JF, et al. (2020) Calculation and analysis of aircraft exhaust emissions based on fast access logger data. Science. Technol Eng 20: 13502–13507. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.32.060 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.32.060
    [29] Kalivoda MT, Monika K (1998) Methodologies for estimating emissions from air trafficc: future emissions [R]. MEET Project ST-96-SC, 204, Vienna, Austria: Perchtoldsdorf-Vienna, 46–53.
    [30] ISO 20906. 2009. Acoustics-unattended monitoring of aircraft sound in the vicinity of airports.
    [31] Directive EU (2002) Directive 2002/49/EC of the European parliament and the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Off J Eur Commun L 189: 2002.
    [32] Federal Aviation Administration (1983) Noise control and compatibility planning for airports. Advisory circular AC150-5020-1.
    [33] Cao XY, Liu Q, Liu Z, et al. (2022) Assessment of pollutant emissions from the LTO cycle of Chinese civil aviation aircraft. Environ Sci Technol 45: 116–124. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.2303.21.338 doi: 10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.2303.21.338
    [34] Wu ZB (2017) Research on fuel ignition characteristics and combustion enhancement in high altitude environment. University of Science and Technology of China.
    [35] Dai SP, Jia XH, Ding SJ, et al. (2024) Experimental study on the combustion characteristics of small-scale oil pool fire in restricted space in plateau. Fire Sci Technol 43: 161–167. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2024.02.004 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2024.02.004
    [36] Liu QY, Zhu WT, Zhu B, et al. (2021) Study on combustion characteristics of combustible liquids under high plateau airport environment. Fire Sci Technol 40: 613–616. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2021.05.003 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2021.05.003
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ahmed Refaie Ali, Daniyal Ur Rehman, Najeeb Alam Khan, Muhammad Ayaz, Asmat Ara, M. Ijaz Khan, Integrating fractional-order SEI1I2I3QCR model with awareness and non-pharmaceutical interventions for optimal COVID-19 pandemic, 2025, 25, 1471-2288, 10.1186/s12874-024-02452-7
    2. Mohamad Chakroun, Samir Haddad, Wafaa M.R. Shakir, Jinane Sayah, Chadi Kallab, Salah Falou, 2024, Recent Monte Carlo-Based Simulations for Modeling Disease Spread, 979-8-3503-6756-0, 1, 10.1109/ICCA62237.2024.10927993
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(953) PDF downloads(24) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog