Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

The entropy weak solution to a nonlinear shallow water wave equation including the Degasperis-Procesi model

  • A nonlinear model, which characterizes motions of shallow water waves and includes the famous Degasperis-Procesi equation, is considered. The essential step is the derivation of the L2(R) uniform bound of solutions for the nonlinear model if its initial value belongs to space L2(R). Utilizing the bounded property leads to several estimates about its solutions. The viscous approximation technique is employed to establish the well-posedness of entropy weak solutions.

    Citation: Mingming Li, Shaoyong Lai. The entropy weak solution to a nonlinear shallow water wave equation including the Degasperis-Procesi model[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1772-1782. doi: 10.3934/math.2024086

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jin Hong, Shaoyong Lai . Blow-up to a shallow water wave model including the Degasperis-Procesi equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25409-25421. doi: 10.3934/math.20231296
    [2] Muhammad Shakeel, Amna Mumtaz, Abdul Manan, Marouan Kouki, Nehad Ali Shah . Soliton solutions of the nonlinear dynamics in the Boussinesq equation with bifurcation analysis and chaos. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 10626-10649. doi: 10.3934/math.2025484
    [3] Mohammad Alqudah, Safyan Mukhtar, Haifa A. Alyousef, Sherif M. E. Ismaeel, S. A. El-Tantawy, Fazal Ghani . Probing the diversity of soliton phenomena within conformable Estevez-Mansfield-Clarkson equation in shallow water. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21212-21238. doi: 10.3934/math.20241030
    [4] Abdulhamed Alsisi . The powerful closed form technique for the modified equal width equation with numerical simulation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11071-11085. doi: 10.3934/math.2025502
    [5] Chenchen Lu, Lin Chen, Shaoyong Lai . Local well-posedness and blow-up criterion to a nonlinear shallow water wave equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1199-1210. doi: 10.3934/math.2024059
    [6] Mina M. Fahim, Hamdy M. Ahmed, K. A. Dib, M. Elsaid Ramadan, Islam Samir . Constructing the soliton wave structure and stability analysis to generalized Calogero–Bogoyavlenskii–Schiff equation using improved simple equation method. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11052-11070. doi: 10.3934/math.2025501
    [7] Yousef Jawarneh, Humaira Yasmin, Ali M. Mahnashi . A new solitary wave solution of the fractional phenomena Bogoyavlenskii equation via Bäcklund transformation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35308-35325. doi: 10.3934/math.20241678
    [8] Mostafa M. A. Khater, S. H. Alfalqi, J. F. Alzaidi, Samir A. Salama, Fuzhang Wang . Plenty of wave solutions to the ill-posed Boussinesq dynamic wave equation under shallow water beneath gravity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 54-81. doi: 10.3934/math.2022004
    [9] Gulnur Yel, Haci Mehmet Baskonus, Wei Gao . New dark-bright soliton in the shallow water wave model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 4027-4044. doi: 10.3934/math.2020259
    [10] Faeza Lafta Hasan, Mohamed A. Abdoon, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad Qazza, Dalal Khalid Almutairi . Exploring analytical results for (2+1) dimensional breaking soliton equation and stochastic fractional Broer-Kaup system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11622-11643. doi: 10.3934/math.2024570
  • A nonlinear model, which characterizes motions of shallow water waves and includes the famous Degasperis-Procesi equation, is considered. The essential step is the derivation of the L2(R) uniform bound of solutions for the nonlinear model if its initial value belongs to space L2(R). Utilizing the bounded property leads to several estimates about its solutions. The viscous approximation technique is employed to establish the well-posedness of entropy weak solutions.



    This work focuses on the investigation of the equation

    vtvtxx+mvvx=3αvxvxx+αvvxxx, (1.1)

    where constants α>0 and m>0. Equation (1.1) describes the motion of shallow water waves in certain sense [8]. In fact, the dydrodynamical equations derived in [8] includes Eq (1.1) as a special model.

    If m=4 and α=1, Eq (1.1) is turned into the Degasperis-Procesi (DP) model [12].

    vtvtxx+4vvx=3vxvxx+vvxxx. (1.2)

    Degasperis et al. [13] construct a Lax pair to prove the integrability of DP model and obtain two infinite sequences of conserved quantities. The global weak solutions, global strong solutions and wave breaking conditions for (1.2) are studied within certain functional classes in [14,22,31]. The well-posedness and large time asymptotic features of the periodic entropy (discontinuous) solutions for Eq (1.2) is considered in [3]. Coclite and Karlsen [4] investigate entropy solutions to the DP model in the spaces L1(R)BV and L2(R)L4(R), respectively. The bounded solutions in L1(R)L(R) and discontinuous solutions are discussed in [5]. As the DP and Camassa-Holm (CH[2]) equations possess similar dynamical properties, here we mention several works about the CH model. The wave breaking for nonlinear equations including the CH model is discovered in Constantin [7,9]. Many dynamical results about the Camassa-Holm type models are derived and summarized in [1,10,11,15,16,23,24,25,28,33]. Guo et al. [17] consider the dynamical properties of the CH type models with high order nonlinear terms (also see [18,19,30,32]). Lai and Wu [21] study the existence of local solutions for a nonlinear model including the CH and DP model if initial data satisfy certain assumptions.

    For model (1.1) endowed with initial value v(0,x)=v0(x)L2(R), we derive that

    c1v0L2(R)≤∥v(t,)L2(R)c2v0L2(R), (1.3)

    in which c1>0 and c2>0 are constants.

    The motivation of this work comes from the job in Coclite and Karlsen [5], in which the existence, uniqueness, stability of entropy solutions of DP equation are proved in L1(R)L(R). Under the condition v0(x) belonging to L1(R)L(R), we investigate the shallow water wave (or generalized DP) equation (1.1) and prove its well-posedness of entropy (discontinuous) solutions. The novelty element in our job is that we establish inequality (1.3), namely, the L2(R) uniform bound of solution v(t,x). The methods and ideas utilized in this work come from those presented in Coclite and Karlsen [4,5].

    The organization of our work is that section two provides several lemmas about the viscous approximations of Eq (1.1) and section three gives our main result and its proof.

    We define the smooth function λ(x) such that λ(x)0 for any xR, λ(x)=0 if |x|1 and λ(x)dx=1. For 0<ε<14, let λε(x)=1ε14λ(xε14) and v0,ε=λεv0=Rλε(xz,z)v0(z)dz. Provided that v0Hs(R) (s0), we conclude that v0,εC.

    For conciseness, we employ c to represent arbitrary positive constants, which do not depend on ε and t. Let Lp=Lp(R),1p.

    Several properties of function v0,ε are summarized in the following conclusion.

    Lemma 2.1. [21] Assume 1p<. Then

    {v0,εv0inLp(ε0),v0,εL≤∥v0L,v0,εL1≤∥v0L1,v0,εLpcv0Lp.

    Provided that (t,x)R+×R, the initial value problem for Eq (1.1) is written in the form

    {tv3txxv+mvxv=3αxv2xxv+αv3xxxv,v(0,x)=v0(x). (2.1)

    Consider the viscous approximations of system (2.1)

    {tvε3txxvε+mvεxvε=3αxvε2xxvε+αvε3xxxvε+ε2xxvεε4xxxxvε,vε(0,x)=v0,ε(x). (2.2)

    Using the operator Λ2=(12x2)1, we obtain that problem (2.2) becomes

    {tvε+α2x(v2ε)+xHε=ε2xxvε,Hε(t,x)=mα2Λ2v2ε,vε(0,x)=v0,ε(x), (2.3)

    in which

    Hε(t,x)=mα4Re|xζ|v2ε(t,ζ)dζ. (2.4)

    Lemma 2.2. Let v0Hs(R), s0 and 0<ε<14. Then problem (2.3) has a unique global smooth solution vε(t,x) belonging to C([0,);Hs(R)).

    Proof. Utilizing the Theorem 2.3 in [6] completes the proof directly.

    The following lemma, which illustrates the L2(R) uniform bound of solutions for problem (2.3), takes a key role to discuss the dynamical features of entropy solutions in L1(R)L(R) for Eq (1.1).

    Lemma 2.3. Provided that v0L2(R) and vε satisfies (2.3), α>0 and m>0, then

    c1v0L2(R)≤∥vε(t,)L2(R)c2v0L2(R), (2.5)
    εt0xvε(τ,)2L2(R)dτc3v02L2(R), (2.6)

    in which constants c1>0, c2>0 and c3>0 does not depend on ε and t.

    Proof. Set hε=(mα2xx)1vε. We have

    mαhε2xxhε=vε. (2.7)

    Utilizing (hε2xxhε) to multiply the first equation in (2.3) arises

    Rtvε(hε2xxhε)dxεR2xxvε(hε2xxhε)dx=αRvεxvε(hε2xxhε)dxRxHε(t,x)(hε2xxhε)dx. (2.8)

    From (2.8), we have

    Rtvε(hε2xxhε)dxεR2xxvε(hε2xxhε)dx=R(mαthε3txxhε)(hε2xxhε)dxεR(mα2xxhε4xxxxhε)(hε2xxhε)dx=R(mαhεthεhε3txxhεmαthε2xxhε+2xxhε3txxhε)dxεR(mαhε2xxhεmα(2xxhε)2hε4xxxxhε+2xxhε4xxxxhε)dx=R(mαhεthε(mα+1)hε3txxhε+2xxhε3txxhε)dxεR(mαhε2xxhε(mα+1)hε4xxxxhε+2xxhε4xxxxhε)dx=R(mαhεthε+(mα+1)xhε2txhε+2xxhε3txxhε)dxεR(mαxhεxhε(mα+1)2xxhε2xxhε3xxxhε3xxxhε)dx=12ddtR(mαh2ε+(mα+1)(xhε)2+(2xxhε)2)dx+εR(mα(xhε)2+(mα+1)(2xxhε)2+(3xxxhε)2)dx, (2.9)

    in which we have utilized integration by parts.

    For the right side in (2.8), making use of (2.7) and integration by parts gives rise to

    αRvεxvε(hε2xxhε)dxRxHε(t,x)(hε2xxhε)dx=αRvεxvε(hε2xxhε)dx+R(Hε2xxHε)(t,x)xhεdx=αRvεxvε(hε2xxhε)dx+mα2Rv2εxhεdx=α2Rx(v2ε)2xxhεdx+m2Rv2εxhεdx=α2Rx(v2ε)[mαhεvε]dx+m2Rv2εxhεdx=α2Rv2εxvεdx=0. (2.10)

    From (2.8)–(2.10), we derive that

    mαhε2L2+(mα+1)xhε2L2+2xxhε2L2+2εt0(mαxhε2L2+(mα+1)2xxhε2L2+3xxxhε2L2)dτ=mαhε(0,)2L2+(mα+1)xhε(0,)2L2+2xxhε(0,)2L2. (2.11)

    Utilizing (2.7) yields

    vε(t,)2L2(R)=R(2xxhε+mαhε)2dx=R(2xxhε)2dx2mαRhε2xxhεdx+m2α2Rh2εdx=R(2xxhε)2dx+2mαR(xhε)2dx+m2α2Rh2εdx=m2α2hε2+2mαxhε2+2xxhε2. (2.12)

    We utilize the definition of the norm L2(R), the right side of (2.11) and the left side of (2.12). From (2.11), (2.12) and Lemma 2.1, we derive that there exist constants c1>0 and c2>0 to guarantee that

    c1v0L2(R)≤∥vεL2(R)c2v0L2(R). (2.13)

    From (2.11), we have

    εt0xvε2L2dτεct0(mαxhε2L2+(mα+1)2xxhε2L2+3xxxhε2L2)dτεc(hε(0,)2L2+xhε(0,)2L2+2xxhε(0,)2L2)cv0,ε2L2cv02L2. (2.14)

    Applying (2.13) and (2.14) directly derives (2.5) and (2.6).

    We give several estimates about the nonlocal term Hε(t,x) by applying Lemma 2.3.

    Lemma 2.4. If v0L2(R), then

    HεL,xHεLcv02L2, (2.15)
    Hε(t,)L1,xHε(t,)L1,2xxHε(t,)L1cv02L2. (2.16)

    Proof. Utilizing the expressions

    Hε(t,x)=mα4Re|xζ|v2ε(t,ζ)dζ,xHε(t,x)=mα4Re|xζ|sign(ζx)v2ε(t,ζ)dζ

    and Lemma 2.3, we complete the proof of (2.15). Noting that

    R|Hε(t,x)|dx,R|xHε(t,x)|dxcR(Re|xζ|dx)v2εdζcv2L2cv02L2

    and 2xxHε=Hεmα2v2ε, we finish the proof of (2.16).

    Lemma 2.5. Provided that v0Ł1(R)L(R) and vε satisfies (2.3), Then the inequality

    vε(t,)L≤∥v0L+ctv02L2 (2.17)

    holds for any t0.

    Proof. From problem (2.3), we have

    tvε+αvεxvεε2xxvε=xHε. (2.18)

    Using Lemma 2.4 yields

    xHεL(R)cv02L2.

    Considering the function A(t)=∥v0L(R)+ctv02L2 arises

    dAdt=cv02L2.

    From Lemma 2.1, we acquire v0,εL(R)A(0). Utilizing the comparison principle for parabolic equation (2.18) deduces that (2.17) holds.

    Employing Lemmas 2.3, 2.4 and the approaches utilized in [4,5], we have the conclusion.

    Lemma 2.6. Suppose t[0,T] and v0Ł1(R)L(R). Then

    vεL1(R)≤∥v0L1(R)+ctv2L2(R), (2.19)
    xvε(t,x)1t+MT, (2.20)

    in which the constant MT depends on T.

    Since the proofs to inequalities (2.19) and (2.20) are very analogous to those of Lemma 2.5 in Coclite [4] and Lemma 6 in [5], respectively, we omit their proofs.

    Let ΩT=[0,T]×R and Ω=[0,)×R. According to the definitions of weak solutions in [4,5], we state the following concepts.

    Definition 2.1. Provided that the following two assumptions hold,

    (a) vL(R+;L2(R)),

    (b) tv+α2x(v2)+xH(t,x)=0 in D(Ω), namely, g(t,x)Cc(Ω),

    Ω(vtg+αv22xgxH(t,x)g)dxdt+Rv0(x)g(0,x)dx=0, (2.21)

    then function v is called a weak solution of system (2.1).

    Definition 2.2. Assume that the following three assumptions hold.

    (a) v satisfies Definition 2.1,

    (b) v belongs to L(ΩT),

    (c) Entropy θ(v)C2(R) is a convex function with entropy flux q satisfying q(v)=αθ(v)v and

    tθ(v)+xq(v)+θ(v)xH0inD(Ω),

    namely, g(t,x)Cc(Ω),g(t,x)0

    Ω(θ(v)tg+q(v)xgθ(v)xHg)dxdt+Rθ(v0(x))g(0,x)dx0, (2.22)

    Then v is called an entropy weak solution of system (2.1).

    Remark 1. Utilizing the arguments in [4,5], for any constant kR, we choose θ(v)=|vk| and q(v):=α2sign(vk)(v2k2), which are the Kruzkov entropies/entrop fluxes to satisfy (2.22). The assumptions (a) and (b) in Definition 2.2 guarantee that (2.22) makes sense (see Kruˇzkov [20]). Based on the statement in [4,20], we state that the entropy formulation (2.22) contains the weak formulation (2.21).

    The entropy weak solutions for Eq (2.1) are usually discontinuous. However, it possesses the following L1(R) property, illustrating that the entropy solution for Eq (1.1) is unique.

    Theorem 3.1. (L1-stability) For any T>0, suppose that v1(t,x) and v2(t,x) are two entropy weak solutions of problem (5) with initial data v01,v02L1(R)L(R), respectively. Then

    v1(t,)v2(t,)L1(R)eCTt|v01(x)v02(x)|dx, (3.1)

    in which CT depends on v01,v02 and T.

    Utilizing the device of doubling the space variable in Kruˇzkov [20] or some statements in [4,5], we can prove inequality (3.1). Here, we omit its proof.

    We let vεn denote any subsequence of vε (ε0). The existence of vε is ensured by Lemma 2.2. The compensated compactness methods in [27,29] shall be employed to handle with the problem of strong convergence for vεn.

    Lemma 3.1. [27] Suppose that a family of functions {vε}ε>0 satisfy

    vεLCT.

    For an arbitrary convex function θC2(R) and for q(v)=βvθ(v) (constant β>0), let the sequence

    {tθ(vε)+xq(vε)}ε>0

    be compact in H1loc((0,)×R). Then there exists vL((0,T)×R) to ensure that

    vεnvinLploc((0,)×R),

    where 1p<.

    Lemma 3.2. [26] Suppose a bounded open subset ΩRn, n2. Let distribution sequence {Kn}n=1 be bounded in W1,(Ω) and satisfy

    Kn=K(1)n+K(2)n,

    in which {K(1)n}n=1 belongs to a compact subset of H1loc(Ω) and {K(2)n}n=1 belongs to a bounded subset of L1loc(Ω). Then {Kn}n=1 belongs to a compact subset of H1loc(Ω).

    Lemma 3.3. Suppose v0L1(R)L(R) and vε satisfies system (2.3). For a subsequence {vεn}n=1 of {vε}ε>0, an arbitrary T>0 and 1p<, then there has a limit function

    vL(R+;L2(R))L((0,T);LL1(R)) (3.2)

    to ensure that

    vεnvinLp((0,T]×R). (3.3)

    Proof. Assume that θ:RR and q(v)=αθ(v)v are defined in Definition 2.2. We set

    tθ(vε)+xq(vε)=K(1)ε+K(2)ε,

    where

    {K(1)ε=ε2xxθ(vε),K(2)ε=εθ(vε)(xvε)2+θ(vε)xHε(t,x).

    We require that

    {K(1)ε0inH1(ΩT),K(2)εis uniformly bounded inL1(ΩT). (3.4)

    Utilizing Lemmas 2.3, 2.4 and 2.6 yields

    {ε2xxθ(vε)H1(R+×R)εcθLv0L2(R)0,εθ(vε)(xvε)2∥≤cθL(R)v0L2(R),θ(vε)L1((0,T)×R)cθL(R)v0L2(R),

    which leads to (3.4). Employing Remark 1, Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, for 1p<, we deduce that there must have a subsequence vεn,n=1,2,3, and v satisfying (3.2) to guarantee that

    vεnva.e inΩ,vεnvinLploc(Ω). (3.5)

    From Lemmas 2.5 and 2.6, combining (3.5), we obtain (3.3).

    Lemma 3.4. Assume v0L1(R)L(R) and vε solves system (2.3). Let {εn}n=1 and v be stated in Lemma 3.3. For an arbitrary T>0 and 1p<, then there has a function H satisfying

    HεnHinLp([0,T);W1,p(R)).

    The procedures to prove Lemma 3.4 are analogous to that of Lemma 9 in [5]. Its proof is omitted here.

    Theorem 3.2. Suppose that v0L1(R)L(R). Then system (2.1) has only one entropy weak solution.

    Proof. Provided that g(t,x)Cc(R+×R), we deduce from (2.21) that

    R+R(vεtg+α2v2εxgxHεg+εvε2xxg)dxdt+Rv0,εg(0,x)dx=0.

    We conclude that in the sense of Definition 2.1, v in Lemma 3.3 is a weak solution to system (2.1). It needs to confirm that the weak function v obeys the entropy inequalities in the sense of Definition 2.2. Let q(v)=αvθ(v). Provided that θC2(R) is a convex function, we utilize the convexity of θ and system (2.3) to obtain

    tθ(vε)+xq(vε)+θ(vε)xHε=ε2xxθ(vε)εθ(vε)(xvε)2ε2xxθ(vε).

    Therefore, from Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4 and the above the entropy inequality, we establish the existence of entropy solutions. Utilizing Theorem 3.1, we have the uniqueness. The proof is finished.

    In this work, we investigate a nonlinear shallow water wave equation, which includes the famous Degasperis-Procesi equation. Firstly, we derive that the viscous solutions are uniformly bounded in L2(R) space. Secondly, several estimates about the viscous solutions are established under the condition that the initial value belongs to space L2(R)Ł(R). Finally, we prove that the existence and uniqueness of entropy weak solutions the nonlinear equation in the space L2(R)Ł(R).

    The authors declare they have not used any Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    Thanks are given to the reviewers for their valuable comments, which lead to the meaningful improvement of this work.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] A. Bressan, A. Constantin, Global conservative solutions of the Camassa-Holm equation, Arch. Ration. Mech. An., 183 (2007), 215–239. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-006-0010-z doi: 10.1007/s00205-006-0010-z
    [2] R. Camassa, D. D. Holm, An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71 (1993), 1661–1664. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1661 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1661
    [3] G. M. Coclite, K. H. Karlsen, Periodic solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation: Well-posedness and asymptotics, J. Funct. Anal., 268 (2015), 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2014.11.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2014.11.008
    [4] G. M. Coclite, K. H. Karlsen, On the well-posedness of the Degasperis-Procesi equation, J. Funct. Anal., 233 (2006), 60–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2005.07.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2005.07.008
    [5] G. M. Coclite, K. H. Karlsen, Bounded solutions for the Degasperis-Procesi equation, Boll. Unione Mat. Ital., 9 (2008), 439–453.
    [6] G. M. Coclite, H. Holden, K. H. Karlsen, Wellposedness for a parabolic-elliptic system, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst., 13 (2005), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2005.13.659 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.659
    [7] A. Constantin, J. Escher, Wave breaking for nonlinear nonlocal shallow water equations, Acta Math., 181 (1998), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392586 doi: 10.1007/BF02392586
    [8] A. Constantin, D. Lannes, The hydrodynamical relevance of the Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. An., 192 (2009), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-008-0128-2 doi: 10.1007/s00205-008-0128-2
    [9] A. Constantin, J. Escher, Well-posedness, global existence and blowup phenomena for a periodic quasi-linear hyperbolic equation, Commun. Pur. Appl. Math., 51 (1998), 475–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199805)51:5<475::AID-CPA2>3.0.CO;2-5 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199805)51:5<475::AID-CPA2>3.0.CO;2-5
    [10] A. Constantin, On the scattering problem for the Camassa-Holm equation, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 457 (2001), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2000.0701 doi: 10.1098/rspa.2000.0701
    [11] A. Constantin, R. I. Ivanov, J. Lenells, Inverse scattering transform for the Degasperis-Procesi equation, Nonlinearity, 23 (2010), 2559–2575. http://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/23/10/012 doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/23/10/012
    [12] A. Degasperis, M. Procesi, Asymptotic integrability, In: Symmetry and Perturbation Theory (A. Degasperis and G. Gaeta, eds.), World Scientific, Singapore, 1 (1999), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812833037
    [13] A. Degasperis, D. D. Holm, A. N. W. Hone, Integrable and non-integrable equations with peakons, World Scientific Publishing, 2003, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812704467_0005
    [14] J. Escher, Y. Liu, Z. Y. Yin, Global weak solutions and blow-up structure for the Degasperis-Procesi equation, J. Funct. Anal., 241 (2006), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2006.03.022 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2006.03.022
    [15] I. L. Freire, Conserved quantities, continuation and compactly supported solutions of some shallow water models, J. Phys. A-Math. Theor., 54 (2020), 015207. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abc9a2 doi: 10.1088/1751-8121/abc9a2
    [16] G. L. Gui, Y. Liu, P. J. Olver, C. Z. Qu, Wave-breaking and peakons for a modified Camassa-Holm equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 319 (2013), 731–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1566-0 doi: 10.1007/s00220-012-1566-0
    [17] Z. G. Guo, X. G. Li, C. Xu, Some properties of solutions to the Camassa-Holm-type equation with higher-order nonlinearities, J. Nonlinear Sci., 28 (2018), 1901–1914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-018-9469-7 doi: 10.1007/s00332-018-9469-7
    [18] A. A. Himonas, C. Holliman, The Cauchy problem for a generalized Camassa-Holm equation, Adv. Differential Equ., 19 (2014), 161–200. https://doi.org/10.57262/ade/1384278135 doi: 10.57262/ade/1384278135
    [19] A. A. Himonas, C. Holliman, C. Kenig, Construction of 2-peakon solutions and ill-posedness for the Novikov equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 50 (2018), 2968–3006. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1151201 doi: 10.1137/17M1151201
    [20] S. N. Kruˇzkov, First order quasilinear equations in several independent variables, Math. USSR-Sb., 10 (1970), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1970v010n02ABEH002156 doi: 10.1070/SM1970v010n02ABEH002156
    [21] S. Y. Lai, Y. H. Wu, A model containing both the Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 374 (2011), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.09.012
    [22] Y. Liu, Z. Y. Yin, Global existence and blow-up phenomena for the Degasperis-Procesi equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 267 (2006), 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-006-0082-5 doi: 10.1007/s00220-006-0082-5
    [23] H. Lundmark, J. Szmigielski, Multi-peakon solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation, Inverse Probl., 19 (2003), 1241–1245. http://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/19/6/001 doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/19/6/001
    [24] F. Y. Ma, Y. Liu, C. Z. Qu, Wave-breaking phenomena for the nonlocal Whitham-type equations, J. Differ. Equations, 261 (2016), 6029–6054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2016.08.027 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.08.027
    [25] Y. Matsuno, Multisoliton solutions of the Deagsperis-Procesi equation and their peakon limit, Inverse Probl., 21 (2005), 1553–1570. http://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/21/5/004 doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/21/5/004
    [26] F. Murat, L injection du cˆone positif de H1 dans W1,q est compacte pour tout q<2, J. Math. Pures Appl., 60 (1981), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263209808701214 doi: 10.1080/00263209808701214
    [27] M. E. Schonbek, Convergence of solutions to nonlinear dispersive equations, Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 7 (1982), 959–1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605308208820242 doi: 10.1080/03605308208820242
    [28] P. L. Silva, I. L. Freire, Existence, persistence, and continuation of solutions for a generalized 0-Holm-Staley equation, J. Differ. Equations, 320 (2022), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.02.058 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2022.02.058
    [29] L. Tartar, Compensated compactness and applications to partial differential equations, In: Heriot-Watt Symposium, Nonlinear analysis and mechanics, Pitman Boston, Mass., IV, 1979.
    [30] K. Yan, Wave breaking and global existence for a family of peakon equations with high order nonlinearity, Nonlinear Anal. Real, 45 (2019), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2018.07.032 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2018.07.032
    [31] Z. Yin, On the Cauchy problem for an integrable equation with peakon solutions, Illinois J. Math., 47 (2003), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1215/ijm/1258138186 doi: 10.1215/ijm/1258138186
    [32] S. Zhou, C. Mu, The properties of solutions for a generalized b-family equation with peakons, J. Nonlinear Sci., 23 (2013), 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-013-9171-8 doi: 10.1007/s00332-013-9171-8
    [33] Y. Zhou, On solutions to the Holm-Staley b-family of equations, Nonlinearity, 23 (2010), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/23/2/008 doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/23/2/008
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1574) PDF downloads(62) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog