A decision-making strategy to combat CO$ _2 $ emissions using sine trigonometric aggregation operators with cubic bipolar fuzzy input

Anam Habib; Zareen A. Khan; Nimra Jamil; Muhammad Riaz; Anam Habib; Zareen A. Khan; Nimra Jamil; Muhammad Riaz

doi:10.3934/math.2023771

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 7: 15092-15128. doi: 10.3934/math.2023771

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

A decision-making strategy to combat CO $_2$ emissions using sine trigonometric aggregation operators with cubic bipolar fuzzy input

1.
Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
2.
Department of Mathematical Sciences, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia

Received: 26 February 2023 Revised: 26 March 2023 Accepted: 11 April 2023 Published: 23 April 2023
MSC : 03E72, 94D05, 90B50

A cubic bipolar fuzzy set (CBFS) is by far the most efficient model for handling bipolar fuzziness because it carries both single-valued (SV) and interval-valued (Ⅳ) bipolar fuzzy numbers at the same time. The sine trigonometric function possesses two consequential qualities, namely, periodicity and symmetry, both of which are helpful tools for matching decision makers' conjectures. This article aims to integrate the sine function and cubic bipolar fuzzy data. As a result, sine trigonometric operational laws (STOLs) for cubic bipolar fuzzy numbers (CBFNs) are defined in this article. Premised on these laws, a substantial range of aggregation operators (AOs) are introduced. Certain features of these operators, including monotonicity, idempotency, and boundedness, are explored as well. Using the proffered AOs, a novel multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) strategy is developed. An extensive case study of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology has been provided to show the viability of the suggested method. A numerical example is provided to manifest the feasibility of the developed approach. Finally, a comparison study is executed to discuss the efficacy of the novel MCGDM framework.

Keywords:

Citation: Anam Habib, Zareen A. Khan, Nimra Jamil, Muhammad Riaz. A decision-making strategy to combat CO $_2$ emissions using sine trigonometric aggregation operators with cubic bipolar fuzzy input[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15092-15128. doi: 10.3934/math.2023771

Related Papers:

[1]	Dayang Dai, Dabuxilatu Wang . A generalized Liu-type estimator for logistic partial linear regression model with multicollinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11851-11874. doi: 10.3934/math.2023600
[2]	Muhammad Nauman Akram, Muhammad Amin, Ahmed Elhassanein, Muhammad Aman Ullah . A new modified ridge-type estimator for the beta regression model: simulation and application. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 1035-1057. doi: 10.3934/math.2022062
[3]	Sihem Semmar, Omar Fetitah, Mohammed Kadi Attouch, Salah Khardani, Ibrahim M. Almanjahie . A Bernstein polynomial approach of the robust regression. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32409-32441. doi: 10.3934/math.20241554
[4]	Yanting Xiao, Wanying Dong . Robust estimation for varying-coefficient partially linear measurement error model with auxiliary instrumental variables. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18373-18391. doi: 10.3934/math.2023934
[5]	Gaosheng Liu, Yang Bai . Statistical inference in functional semiparametric spatial autoregressive model. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10890-10906. doi: 10.3934/math.2021633
[6]	Juxia Xiao, Ping Yu, Zhongzhan Zhang . Weighted composite asymmetric Huber estimation for partial functional linear models. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7657-7684. doi: 10.3934/math.2022430
[7]	Xin Liang, Xingfa Zhang, Yuan Li, Chunliang Deng . Daily nonparametric ARCH(1) model estimation using intraday high frequency data. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3455-3464. doi: 10.3934/math.2021206
[8]	Emrah Altun, Mustafa Ç. Korkmaz, M. El-Morshedy, M. S. Eliwa . The extended gamma distribution with regression model and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2418-2439. doi: 10.3934/math.2021147
[9]	Muhammad Amin, Saima Afzal, Muhammad Nauman Akram, Abdisalam Hassan Muse, Ahlam H. Tolba, Tahani A. Abushal . Outlier detection in gamma regression using Pearson residuals: Simulation and an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15331-15347. doi: 10.3934/math.2022840
[10]	Zawar Hussain, Atif Akbar, Mohammed M. A. Almazah, A. Y. Al-Rezami, Fuad S. Al-Duais . Diagnostic power of some graphical methods in geometric regression model addressing cervical cancer data. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4057-4075. doi: 10.3934/math.2024198

Abstract

1. Introduction

The field of mathematical analysis that deals with the study of arbitrary order integrals and derivatives is known as fractional calculus. Because of its numerous applications across a wide range of fields, this field has increased in importance and recognition over the past few years. According to researchers, this field is the most effective at identifying anomalous kinetics and has numerous uses in a variety of fields. Ordinary differential equations with fractional derivatives can be used to simulate a variety of issues, including statistical, mathematical, engineering, chemical, and biological issues. Several distinct forms of fractional integrals and derivative operators (see e.g., ^[1,2,3,4]), including Riemann-Liouville, Caputo, Riesz, Hilfer, Hadamard, Erdélyi-Kober, Saigo, Marichev-Saigo-Maeda and others, have been thoroughly investigated by researchers. From an application perspective, we suggest the readers to see the work related to the fractional differential equations presented by ^[5,6,7,8]. In ^[9], the authors studied symmetric and antisymmetric solitons in the defocused saturable nonlinearity and the PT-symmetric potential of the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation. In ^[10], the fractional exponential function approach is used to study a time-fractional Ablowitz-Ladik model, and bright and dark discrete soliton solutions, discrete exponential solutions, and discrete peculiar wave solutions are discovered. In ^[11], the authors presented the rich vector exact solutions for the coupled discrete conformable fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations by taking into account the conformable fractional derivative.

On the other hand, special functions like Gamma, Beta, Mittag-Leffler, et al. play a vital part in the foundation of fractional calculus. Moreover, the Mittag-Leffler function is regarded as the fundamental function in fractional calculus. The Prabhakar fractional operator containing a three-parameter version of the aforementioned function in the kernel. The M-L function has been extensively studied to construct solutions of fractional PDEs, such as dynamical characteristic of analytical fractional solitons for the space-time fractional Fokas-Lenells equation, soliton dynamics based on exact solutions of conformable fractional discrete complex cubic Ginzburg-Landau equation and Abundant fractional soliton solutions of a space-time fractional perturbed Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation by a fractional mapping method, see ^[12,13,14]. Strong generalizations of the univariate and bivariate Mittag-Leffler functions, which are known to be important in fractional calculus, are the multivariate Mittag-Leffler functions.

The well-known one-parameter Mittag-Leffler (M-L) function is defined by ^[15,16] as follows

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{z_1^l}{\Gamma(al+1)}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(a\in\mathbb{C};\Re(a) > 0,z_1\in\mathbb{C}), \end{equation}$

(1.1)

where $\mathbb{C}$ represents the set of complex numbers and $\Re(a)$ denotes the real part of the complex number.

The generalization of (1.1) with two parameters is defined by ^[17,18] as

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a,b}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{z_1^l}{\Gamma(al+b)}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(a,b\in\mathbb{C};\Re(a) > 0,\Re(b) > 0), \end{equation}$

(1.2)

Later on, Agarwal ^[19], Humbert ^[20] and Humbert and Agarwal ^[21] studied the properties and applications of M-L functions. In ^[22], the generalization of (1.1) and (1.2) is defined by

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a,b}^{c}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c)_l}{\Gamma(a l+b)}\frac{z_1^l}{l!}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(a,b,c\in\mathbb{C};\Re(a) > 0,\Re(b) > 0). \end{equation}$

(1.3)

In ^[23], the following generalization of the M-L function is defined by

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a,b}^{c,q}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c)_{lq}}{\Gamma(a l+b)}\frac{z_1^l}{l!}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(a,b,c\in\mathbb{C};\Re(a) > 0,\Re(b) > 0, q > 0). \end{equation}$

(1.4)

In ^[24], Rahman et al. proposed the following generalized of M-L function by

$\begin{align} \varepsilon_{a,b,p}^{c,q,d}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{B_p(c +lq; d-c)(d)_{lq}}{B(c, d-c)\Gamma(a l+b)}\frac{z_1^l}{l!}, \end{align}$

(1.5)

where $a, b, c, d\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(c) > 0, \Re(a) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, q > 0$ and $B_p(x, y) = \int_0^1 t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1}e^{-t-\frac{p}{t}}dt$ is the extension of beta function (see ^[25]).

Gorenflo et al. ^[26] and Haubold et al. ^[27]) studied the various properties of generalized M-L function. In ^[28], a new generalization of M-L function (1.3) is presented by

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a,b,p}^{c}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c;p)_l}{\Gamma(a l+b)}\frac{z_1^l}{l!}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(p\geq0, a,b,c\in\mathbb{C}; , \Re(a) > 0,\Re(b) > 0,), \end{equation}$

(1.6)

where $(\lambda; p)_l$ is the Pochhammer symbol defined by Srivastava et al. ^[29,30] as

$\begin{equation} (\lambda;p)_{\mu} = \begin{cases} \frac{\Gamma_{p}(\lambda+\mu)}{\Gamma(\lambda)}; &(p > 0, \lambda,\mu\in\mathbb{C} )\\ \\ (\lambda)_{\mu}; & (p = 0,\ {\lambda,\mu}\in \mathbb{C}\setminus\{{0}\}.\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \end{cases} \end{equation}$

(1.7)

The researchers examined the developments of these extension, (1.6) and (1.7) and studied their related features and applications. In ^[30], Srivastava et al. proposed the following generalized hypergeometric function

$\begin{equation} _sF_t[(\delta_1; p),\cdots, (\delta_s); (\zeta_1),\cdots, (\zeta_t); z_1] = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(\delta_{1}; p)_l\cdots (\delta_s)_l}{(\zeta_1)_l\cdots (\zeta_t)_l}\ \frac{z_1^l}{l!}\, , \end{equation}$

(1.8)

where $\delta_{j}\in\mathbb{C}$ for j = 1, 2, $\cdots$ , s, $\zeta_{k}\in\mathbb{C}$ for $k = 1, 2, \cdots, t,$ and $\zeta_{k}\neq$ 0, -1, -2, $\cdots$ .

The integral representation of $(\mu; p)_\eta$ is explained by

$\begin{equation} (\mu;p)_{\eta} = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\mu)}\ \int_0^\infty\ s^{\mu+\eta-1}\ e^{-s-\frac{p}{s}} d s, \end{equation}$

(1.9)

where $\Re(\rho) > 0$ and $\Re(\mu+\eta) > 0$ . In particular, the related confluent hypergeometric function $_1F_1$ and the Gauss hypergeometric function $_2F_1$ are given by

$\begin{equation} _2F_1[(\delta_1; p),b;\lambda; z_1] = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(\delta_{1}; p)_l (b)_l}{(\lambda)_l}\ \frac{z_1^l}{l!}\, , \end{equation}$

(1.10)

and

$\begin{equation} _1F_1[(\delta_1; p);\lambda; z_1] = \Phi[(\delta_1; p);\lambda; z_1] = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(\delta_{1}; p)_l}{(\lambda)_l}\ \frac{z_1^l}{l!}\, . \end{equation}$

(1.11)

The expansion of the generalised hypergeometric function $_rF_s$ , which was studied by ^[30], has $r$ numerator and $s$ denominator parameters. Researchers recently developed several extensions of special functions, together with their corresponding characteristics and applications. Using extended beta functions as its foundation, Nisar et al. ^[31], Bohner et al. ^[32] and Rahman et al. ^[33] developed an enlargement of fractional derivative operators.

The multivariate M-L function is defined by ^[34] as follows:

$\begin{align} \mathcal{E}_{(a_j), b}^{(c_j)} (z_1, z_2, \dots, z_j)& = \mathcal{E}_{(a_1, a_2,\dots,a_j), b}^{(c_1, c_2 ,\dots, c_j)} (z_1, z_2, \dots z_j) \\ = & \sum\limits_{m_1, m_2, \dots, m_j = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(c_1)_{m_1}(c_2)_{m_2} \dots (c_j)_{m_j} (z_1)^{m_1} \dots (z_j)^{m_j}}{\Gamma(a_{1}m_1+a_2 m_2+\dots a_j m_j + b)m_1! \dots m_j!}, \end{align}$

(1.12)

where $z_i, a_i, b, c_i \in \mathbb{C}$ ; $i = 1, 2, \ldots, j$ , $\Re{(a_i)} > 0$ , $\Re{(b)} > 0$ and $\Re{(c_i)} > 0$ .

In ^{[35,36,37,38,39]}, the authors have studied various properties and applications of different type of generalized M-L functions. For real (complex) valued functions, the Lebesgue measurable space is defined by

$\begin{equation} \textsf{L}(r,s) = \left\{ \begin{array}{c} h: \|h\|_1 = \int_{r}^{s}|h(x)|dx < \infty \\ \end{array} \right\}. \end{equation}$

(1.13)

The left and right sides fractional integral operators of the Riemann-Liouville type are defined by ^[3,4] as follows:

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h)(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int\limits_{r}^{x}\frac{h(\varrho)}{(x-\varrho)^{1-\lambda}}d\varrho,\; \; \; (x > r), \end{equation}$

(1.14)

and

$\begin{equation*} (\mathfrak{I}_{s-}^{\lambda}h)(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int\limits_{x}^{s}\frac{h(\varrho)}{(\varrho-x)^{1-\lambda}}d\varrho,\; \; \; (x < s), \end{equation*}$

where $h\in \textsf{L}(r, s)$ , $\lambda\in\mathbb{C}$ and $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ .

The left and right sides Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives for the function $h(x)\in \textsf{L}(r, s)$ , $\lambda\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ and $n = [\Re(\lambda)]+1$ are defined in ^[3,4] by

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}h)(x) = (\frac{d}{dx})^n(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{n-\lambda}h)(x) \end{equation}$

(1.15)

and

$\begin{equation*} (\mathfrak{D}_{s-}^{\lambda}h)(x) = (-\frac{d}{dx})^n(\mathfrak{I}_{s-}^{n-\lambda}h)(x), \end{equation*}$

respectively. The generalized differential operator $\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda, v}$ of order $0 < \lambda < 1$ and type $0 < v < 1$ with respect to $x$ can be found in ^[2,4] as

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}h) = \left( \begin{array}{c} \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{v(1-\lambda)}\frac{d}{dx}(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{(1-v)(1-\lambda)}h) \\ \end{array} \right)(x). \end{equation}$

(1.16)

In particular, if $v = 0,$ then (1.16) will lead to the operator $\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}$ defined in (1.15).

We also take into account the aforementioned well-known results.

Theorem 1.1. In ^[40], the following result for the fractional integral is presented by

$\begin{equation} \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}(\varrho-r)^{\eta-1} = \frac{\Gamma(\eta)}{\Gamma(\lambda+\eta)}(x-r)^{\lambda+\eta-1}, \end{equation}$

(1.17)

where $\lambda$ , $\eta\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , $\Re(\eta) > 0$ ,

Theorem 1.2. ^[41] Suppose that the function $h(z)$ has a power series expansion $h(z) = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}k_nz^k$ and it is analytic in the disc $|z| < R$ , then we have the following result

$\begin{equation*} \label{a11} \mathfrak{D}_{z}^{\lambda}\{z^{\eta-1}h(z)\} = \frac{\Gamma(\eta)}{\Gamma(\lambda+\eta)}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{a_n(\eta)_n}{(\lambda+\eta)_n}z^n. \end{equation*}$

Lemma 1.1. (Srivastava and Tomovski ^[42]) Suppose that $x > r$ , $\lambda\in(0, 1)$ , $v\in[0, 1]$ , $\Re(\eta) > 0$ and $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , then we have

$\begin{equation} \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}[(\varrho-r)^{\eta-1}](x) = \frac{\Gamma(\eta)}{\Gamma(\eta-\lambda)}(x-r)^{\eta-\lambda-1}. \end{equation}$

(1.18)

The generalized multivariate M-L function (1.12) is then defined in terms of the modified Pochhammer symbol (1.7) and its different features as well as the accompanying integral operators are examined. This is driven by the aforementioned modifications of special functions.

Motivated by the above results and literature, the paper has the following structure: First, we describe and investigate a novel generalization of the multivariate M-L function using a generalized Pochhammer symbol. Secondly, we offer a few differential and fractional integral formulas for the explored multivariate M-L function. By using the new form of the multivariate M-L function, a new generalization of the fractional integral operator is introduced, and some fundamental characteristics of the operator are discussed.

2. The generalized multivariate of M-L function

We are in a position to present the generalized multivariate M-L function by utilizing the extended Pochhammer symbol in (1.7) as follows:

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j) = \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+a_2l_2+\cdots+c_jl_j+b)}\frac{z_1^{l_1} z_2^{l_2}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

where $a_i, b, c_i\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(a_i) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, , p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ . The special case for $a_1 = 1$ and $l_2 = \cdots = l_j = 0$ in (2.1) can be reduced to extended confluent hypergeometric function (1.11) as follows:

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{1,b;p}^{c_1}(z_1) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(b)} {_1F_1}[(c_1; p);b; z_1] = \frac{1}{\Gamma(b)} \Phi[(c_1; p);b; z_1]. \end{equation}$

(2.2)

In coming results, we demonstrate some fundamental characteristics and integral representations of the generalized multivariate M-L function.

Theorem 2.1. For the multivariate M-L function defined in (2.1), the following relation holds true:

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j) = b \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j) \end{equation}$

(2.3)

$\begin{equation*} +[a_1z_1\frac{d}{dz_1}+\cdots+ a_jz_j\frac{d}{dz_j}] \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,z_j), \end{equation*}$

where $a_i, b, c_i\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(a_i) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, , p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ .

Proof. From (2.1), we have

$\begin{align*} &b \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1,p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,z_j)+[a_1z_1\frac{d}{dz_1}+\cdots+ a_jz_j\frac{d}{dz_j}]\varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,z_j)\\ = &b \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\+&[a_1z_1\frac{d}{dz_1}+\cdots+ a_jz_j\frac{d}{dz_j}]\sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &b \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\+&[a_1z_1 \frac{d}{dz_1}+\cdots +a_jz_j \frac{d}{dz_j}]\sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_jl_j}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &b \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\+&\sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1,p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j} }{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j)\\ = & \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)\ \ (\mbox{using} \ \Gamma(z_1+1) = z_1 \Gamma(z_1))\\ = &\sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1,p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j} }{ \Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &\varepsilon_{(a_j),b,p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j), \end{align*}$

which is the desired result (2.3).

Theorem 2.2. For the generalized multivariate M-L function defined in (1.12), the following relations hold true:

$\begin{equation} \big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m\cdots(\frac{d}{dz_j}\big)^m \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j) = (c_1)_m\cdots(c_j)_m \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+(a_j)m;p}^{(c_j)+m}(z_1,\cdots,z_j), \end{equation}$

(2.4)

and

$\begin{equation} \big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m [z_1^{b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j z_1^{a_j}))] = z_1^{b-m-1} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b-m;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j z_1^{a_j}), \end{equation}$

(2.5)

where $a_i, b, c_i\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(a_i) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, , p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , and $\Re(b-m) > 0$ with $m\in\mathbb{N}.$

Proof. Differentiating (1.12) $m$ times with respect to $z_1, z_2, \cdots, z_j$ respectively, we get

$\begin{align*} & (\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m\cdots(\frac{d}{dz_j}\big)^m \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,z_j) = (\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m\cdots(\frac{d}{dz_j}\big)^m \sum\limits_{l_1 = l_2 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = m}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{l_1!\cdots l_j!\ z_1^{l_1-m}\cdots z_j^{l_j-m}}{(l_1-m)!\cdots(l_j-m)!\ l1!\cdots l_j!}\\ & = \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1+m}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j+m}}{\Gamma(a_1(l_1+m)+\cdots a_j(l_j+m)+b)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\ \ (\mbox{Replacing}\ l_i \ \mbox{by}\ l_i+m) \\ & = \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1)_m\cdots(c_j)_m\ (c_1+m;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j+m)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots a_jl_j+b+(a_1+\cdots+a_j)m)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}. \end{align*}$

Now using $(\lambda; \sigma)_{\mu+p} = (\lambda)_{\mu} (\lambda+\mu; \sigma)_p$ and $(\lambda)_{\mu+p} = (\lambda)_{\mu} (\lambda+\mu)_p$ , we get

$\begin{align*} & (\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m\cdots(\frac{d}{dz_j}\big)^m \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,c_j)\\ = &(c_1)_m \cdots(c_j)_m \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1+m;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots a_jl_j+b+(a_1+\cdots +a_j)m)}\frac{z_1^{l}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ & = (c_1)_m\cdots (c_j)_{m} \ \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+(a_j)m;p}^{(c_j)+m}(z_1,z_2,\cdots, z_j), \end{align*}$

which is the desired result (2.4). Similarly, to prove (2.5), we have

$\begin{align*} &\big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m [z_1^{b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots \varpi_j z_j^{a_j})]\\ = &\big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m z_1^{b-1}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1})^{l_1}\cdots(\varpi_jz_1^{a_j})^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &\big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+ a_jl_j+b)} \frac{z_1^{b-1+a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!} \varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)} \frac{\varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!} \frac{(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1)!}{(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-m-1)!}\ z_1^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-m-1}. \end{align*}$

Differentiating $m$ times and using the relation $l(l-1)! = l!$ , we get

$\begin{align*} &\big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m [z_1^{b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots \varpi_j z_j^{a_j})]\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)} \frac{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-m)}\, \varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j} \, \frac{z_1^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1-m}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!} \\ = & z_1^{b-m-1}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-m)}\frac{(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1})^{l_1}\cdots(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_j})^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &z_1^{b-m-1}\varepsilon_{(a_j),b-m;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j z_1^{a_j}). \end{align*}$

The proof is completed.

Corollary 2.1. The generalized multivariate M-L function has the following integral representations:

$\begin{equation*} \int_{0}^{z_1}t^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 t^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j t^{a_j}) d t = z_1^{b}\varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_jz_1^{a_j}), \end{equation*}$

where $a_i, b, c_i, \varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(a_i) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ .

3. Fractional integral and differential formulas of generalized M-L function

In this section, we present some fractional integration and differentiation formulas of generalized M-L function given in (2.1).

Theorem 3.1. Suppose $x > r\, (r\in\mathbb{R_+} = [0, \infty))$ , $a_i$ , $b$ , $c_i$ , $\varpi\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ and $\Re(c_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ and $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , then the following relations hold true:

$\begin{align} &\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right](x) \\ = &(x-r)^{\lambda+b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_i), b+\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align}$

(3.1)

$\begin{align} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{( c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right](x) \\ = &(x-r)^{b-\lambda-1} \varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}) \end{align}$

(3.2)

and

$\begin{align} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})\right](x) \\ = &(x-r)^{b-\lambda-1} \varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}). \end{align}$

(3.3)

Proof. Consider

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})\right](x)\\ = &\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{r}^{x}\frac{(x-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_j})} {(x-\varrho)^{1-\lambda}}d\varrho\\ = &\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_n}\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\int_{r}^{x}(\varrho-r)^{b+a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j-1}(x-\varrho)^{\lambda-1}d\varrho\\ = &\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_n}\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!} \left( \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[(\varrho-r)^{b+a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j-1}] \right). \end{align*}$

By the use of (1.17), we have

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})\right](x)\\ = &\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_n}\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!} (x-r)^{b+\lambda+a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j-1}. \frac{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+\lambda)}\\ = &(x-r)^{b+\lambda-1}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+\lambda)} \frac{[\varpi_1^{l_1}(x-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(x-r)^{a_jl_j}]}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &(x-r)^{b+\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align*}$

which gives the proof of (3.1).

Next, we have

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right]\\ = &(\frac{d}{dx})^n \left\{ \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{n-\lambda}[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})] \right\}, \end{align*}$

which on using (3.1) takes the following form:

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right] \\ = &(\frac{d}{dx})^n \left\{ (x-r)^{b-\lambda+n-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda+n;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}) \right\}. \end{align*}$

Applying (2.5), we get

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})\right](x) \\ = &\left\{ (x-r)^{\eta-\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots, \varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}) \right\}, \end{align*}$

which gives the proof of (3.2).

To obtain (3.3), we have

$\begin{align*} &\left( \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right] \right)(x)\\ = &\left( \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}\left[\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}\frac{\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}(\varrho-r)^{a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1}\right] \right)(x)\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}\frac{\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ \times&\left( \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}[(\varrho-r)^{a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1}] \right)(x). \end{align*}$

By applying (1.18), we get

$\begin{align*} &\left( \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})] \right)(x)\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}\frac{\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ \times&\frac{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+ a_jl_j+b)}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b-\lambda)}(x-r)^{a_1l_1+ \cdots+a_jl_j+b-\lambda-1}\\ = &(x-r)^{b-\lambda-1}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b-\lambda)}\frac{\varpi^{l_1}(x-r)^{a_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}(x-r)^{a_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &(x-r)^{b-\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi^{l_1}(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi^{l_j}(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align*}$

which completes the required proof.

Remark 3.1. Applying Theorem 3.1 for $p = 0$ , then we obtain the result presented in ^[34].

4. Generalization of fractional integral and its properties

In this section, we define a fractional integral involving newly defined multivariate M-L function and discuss its properties.

Definition 4.1. Let $b, a_i, c_i, \varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(c_i) > 0$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ and $\Re(b) > 0$ and $h\in L(r, s)$ . Then the generalized left and right sided fractional integrals are defined by

$\begin{align} &\left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h\right)(x) = \int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)} (\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})h(\varrho)d\varrho, (x > r) \end{align}$

(4.1)

and

$\begin{align} &\left(\mathfrak{R}_{s-;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h\right)(x) = \int_{x}^{s}(\varrho-x)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)} (\varpi_1(\varrho-x)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-x)^{a_j})h(\varrho)d\varrho, (x < s), \end{align}$

(4.2)

respectively.

Remark 4.1. If we consider $p = 0$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form defined earlier by ^[34]. Similarly, if we consider $p = 0$ and $j = 1$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form defined by ^[22]. If we take $j = 1$ , then the work done in this paper will lead to the work presented by ^[28]. Also, if we consider one of $\varpi_i = 0$ , for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form of the classical operators.

Next, we prove the following properties of integral operator defined in (4.1).

Theorem 4.1. Suppose that $b, a_i, \lambda, c_i, \varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ , $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , $p\geq0$ and $\Re(c_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the following result holds true:

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}] \right) (x) = (x-r)^{\lambda+b-1}\Gamma(\lambda)\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(c_i);p}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}). \end{align*}$

Proof. By the use of definition (4.1), we have

$\begin{equation*} \left( \mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h \right)(x) = \int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})h(\varrho)d\varrho. \end{equation*}$

Therefore, we get

$\begin{align*} &\left( \mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i), b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}] \right) (x) = \int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})d\varrho\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b))}\frac{\varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}} {l_1!\cdots l_j!} \left( \int_{r}^{x}(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}(x-\varrho)^{\lambda+a_1l_1+ \cdots+a_jl_j-1}d\varrho \right)\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b))}\frac{\varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}} {l_1!\cdots l_j!} \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b}[(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}]\\ & = (x-r)^{b+\lambda-1} \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b))} \frac{[\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_jl_j}]}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ \times& \frac{\Gamma(\lambda)\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+\lambda)}\\ = &(x-r)^{b+\lambda-1}\Gamma(\lambda)\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align*}$

which gives the desired proof.

Theorem 4.2. Suppose that $c_i, a_i, b, \varpi_i \in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0,$ $p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the following result holds true:

$\begin{equation*} \|\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}\Phi\|_1\leq K\|\Phi\|_1. \end{equation*}$

Where

$\begin{align*} &K: = (s-r)^{\mathfrak{Re}(b)}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{|(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}|}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)(\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j)}\\ \times&\frac{|\varpi_1^{l_1}(s-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(s-r)^{a_jl_j}|}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}. \end{align*}$

Proof. By the use of (1.13) and (4.1) and by interchanging integration and summation order, we have

$\begin{align*} \|\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i) }\Phi\|_1& = \int\limits_{r}^{s}|\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j}) \Phi(\varrho)d\varrho|dx\\ \leq&\int_{r}^{s}\left[ \int_{\varrho}^{x} (x-\varrho)^{\Re(b)-1}|\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})|dx \right]|\Phi(\varrho)|d\varrho\\ = &\int_{r}^{s}\left[ \int_{0}^{x-\varrho} u^{\Re(b)-1}|\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1 u^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j u^{a_j})|du \right]|\Phi(\varrho)|d\varrho, \end{align*}$

by setting $u = x-\varrho.$ After simplification, we obtain

$\begin{align*} &\|\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}\Phi\|_1\\ \leq&\int_{r}^{s} \Bigr[ \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{|(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}|}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{|\varpi_1^{a_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}|} {l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ \times& \left( \frac{(u)^{\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j}}{(\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j)} \right)_{0}^{s-r} \Bigr] |\Phi(\varrho)|d\varrho. \end{align*}$

It follows that

$\begin{align*} &\|\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}\Phi\|_1\leq \Bigr\{ (s-r)^{\Re(b)} \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{|(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}|}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)(\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j)}\\ \times&\frac{|\varpi_1^{l_1}(s-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(s-r)^{a_jl_j}|}{l_1!\cdots l_j!} \Bigr\} \int\limits_{r}^{s}|\Phi(\varrho)|d\varrho\\ = &K||\Phi||_1, \end{align*}$

where

$\begin{align*} &K = (s-r)^{\mathfrak{Re}(b)}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{|(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}|}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)(\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j)}\\ \times&\frac{|\varpi_1^{l_1}(s-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(s-r)^{a_jl_j}|}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}, \end{align*}$

which gives the desired result.

Corollary 4.1. If we take $a_i, b, c_i, \varpi_i \in \mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ , $\Re(c_i) > 0$ with $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the following result holds true:

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}1\right)(x) = (x-r)^{b}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+1;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}). \end{align*}$

Proof. Consider

$\begin{align*} &\left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}1\right)(x) = \int_{r}^x(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})d\varrho\\ = &\int_{r}^x(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\left(\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{l_1}(x-\varrho)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(x-\varrho)^{a_jl_j}} {\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\right)d\varrho. \end{align*}$

It follows that

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}1\right)(x) & = \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}} {\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!} \int_{r}^x(x-\varrho)^{b+a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j-1}d\varrho\\ = &(x-r)^{b}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{l_1}(x-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(x-r)^{a_jl_j}} {\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &(x-r)^{b}\,\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+1;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align*}$

which gives the desired proof.

Theorem 4.3. The generalized fractional operator can be represented in term of Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals for $c_i$ , $a_i$ , $b$ , $\varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ , $\Re(c_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , $p\geq0$ and $x > r$ as follows:

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h\right)(x) = \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^\infty \frac{\Gamma(c_1+l_1;p)(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{a_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{a_j}} {\Gamma(c_1)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b}h(x). \end{align*}$

Proof. By utilizing (2.1) in (4.1) and then interchanging the order of summation and integration, we have

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h\right)(x)& = \int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)} (\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})h(\varrho)d\varrho\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^\infty\frac{\Gamma(c_1+l_1;p)(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{l_1} (x-\varrho)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j} (x-\varrho)^{a_jl_j}} {\Gamma(c_1)\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!}h(\varrho)d\varrho\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^\infty\frac{\Gamma(c_1+l_1;p)(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{a_jl_j} }{\Gamma(c_1)l_1!\cdots l_j!} \frac{1}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}\\ \times&\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1}h(\varrho)d\varrho\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^\infty\frac{\Gamma(c_1+l_1;p)(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{a_jl_j} }{\Gamma(c_1)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{a_1l_1 +\cdots+a_jl_j+b}h(x), \end{align*}$

which gives the desired proof.

Theorem 4.4. For $\lambda$ , $c_i$ , $a_i$ , $b$ , $\varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ , $\Re(c_i) > 0$ , $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , $p\geq0$ and $x > r$ , then the following result holds true:

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x) = (\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h)(x) = (\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x), \end{equation}$

(4.3)

where $h\in L(r, s)$ .

Proof. By employing (1.14) and (4.1), we have

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x)\\ = &\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{r}^{x}\frac{[(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h)(\varrho)]}{(x-\varrho) ^{1-\lambda}}d\varrho\\ = &\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{\lambda-1} \left[ \int_{r}^{\varrho} (\varrho-u)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-u)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-u)^{a_j})h(u)du \right]d\varrho. \end{align*}$

It follows that

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x) \\ = &\int_{r}^{x} \left[ \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{u}^{x} (x-\varrho)^{\lambda-1}(\varrho-u)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i) }(\varpi_1(\varrho-u)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-u)^{a_j})d\varrho \right]h(u)du. \end{align*}$

By considering $\varrho-u = \theta$ , we get

$\begin{align*} \begin{aligned} &(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x)\\ = &\int_{r}^{x} \left[ \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{0}^{x-u} (x-u-\theta)^{\lambda-1}\theta^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i) } (\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j})d\theta \right]h(u)du\\ = &\int_{r}^{x} \left[ \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{0}^{x-u} \frac{\theta^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j})}{(x-u-\theta)^{1-\lambda}}d\theta \right]h(u)du.\end{aligned} \end{align*}$

Hence, from (1.14) and applying (3.1), we obtain

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x)\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}\left[ \theta^{\lambda+b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j}) \right]h(u)du\\ = &\int_{r}^{x} (x-u)^{\lambda+b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-u)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-u)^{a_j})h(u)du. \end{align*}$

Thus, we have

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x) = \left( \mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h \right)(x). \end{equation}$

(4.4)

Next, consider the right hand side of (4.3) and employing (4.1) to derive the second part, we have

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x)\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j}) [\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h] (\varrho)d\varrho\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})\left( \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int\limits_{r}^{\varrho}\frac{h(u)}{(\varrho-u)^{1-\lambda}}du \right)d\varrho. \end{align*}$

It follows that

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x)\\ = &\int\limits_{r}^{x}\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)} \left[ \int_{u}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}(\varrho-u)^{\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})d\varrho \right] h(u)du. \end{align*}$

By setting $x-\varrho = \theta$ , we get

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x)\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)} \left[ \int_{x-u}^{0}\theta^{b-1}(x-\theta-u)^{\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j}) (-d\theta) \right] h(u)du\\ = &\int\limits_{r}^{x}\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)} \left[ \int_{0}^{x-u}\theta^{b-1}(x-\theta-u)^{\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j})d\theta \right] h(u)du. \end{align*}$

Further, by using (1.14) and applying (3.1), we obtain

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x) = \left( \mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h \right)(x). \end{equation}$

(4.5)

Thus, (4.4) and (4.5) gives the desired proof.

5. Conclusions

Nowadays, the theories are developed very rapidly. The scientists are introducing more advanced and generalized forms of the classical ones. In this present study, we introduced a generalized form of the multivariate M-L function (2.1) by employing the generalized Pochhammer symbol and its properties. By using this more extended form of M-L, we introduced a fractional integral operator and studied some of the basic properties of this operator. The special cases of the main results are if we take $p = 0$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will reduce to the work done by ^[34]. Similarly, if we take $j = 1$ and $p = 0$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will lead to the work done by ^[22]. If we take $j = 1$ , then the work done in this paper will lead to the work presented by ^[28]. Moreover, if we consider one of $\varpi_i = 0$ , for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will reduce to the classical R-L operators. We believe that our proposed operator will be more applicable in the fields of fractional integral inequalities and operator theory.

Acknowledgments

The author T. Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for supporting through TAS research lab. Manar A. Alqudah: Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R14), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[2]	L. A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I, Inform. Sci., 8 (1975), 199–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 doi: 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
[3]	V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 25 (2010), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418 doi: 10.1002/int.20418
[4]	X. D. Peng, Y. Yang, Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 30 (2015), 1133–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21738 doi: 10.1002/int.21738
[5]	K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 20 (1986), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
[6]	R. R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multi-criteria decision making, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 22 (2014), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
[7]	R. R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2017), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
[8]	F. Smarandache, A unifying field in logics, neutrosophy: Neutrosophic probability, set and logic, American Research Press, Rehoboth, DE, USA, 1999, 1–141.
[9]	B. C. Cuong, Picture fuzzy sets, J. Comput. Sci. Cybern., 30 (2014), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032 doi: 10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032
[10]	F. K. Gundogdu, C. Kahraman, Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36 (2019), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181401 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-181401
[11]	X. Gou, Z. Xu, P. Ren, The properties of continuous Pythagorean fuzzy information, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 31 (2016), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21788 doi: 10.1002/int.21788
[12]	X. Gou, Z. Xu, Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets, Inform. Sci., 372 (2016), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.034 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.034
[13]	X. Gou, Z. Xu, H. Liao, F. Herrera, Probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic term set and its use in designing an improved VIKOR method: The application in smart healthcare, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 72 (2021), 2611–2630. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1806741 doi: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1806741
[14]	W. R. Zhang, Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations, A computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis, In: NAFIPS/IFIS/NASA94, Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference of The North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, IEEE, San Antonio, TX, USA, 1994,305–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCF.1994.375115
[15]	W. R. Zhang, (Yin)(Yang) bipolar fuzzy sets, In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, IEEE, Anchorage, AK, USA, 1 (1998), 835–840. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1998.687599
[16]	Y. B. Jun, C. S. Kim, K. O. Yang, Cubic sets, Annal. Fuzzy Math. Inform., 4 (2012), 83–98.
[17]	H. Garg, G. Kaur, Cubic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its fundamental properties, J. Mult.-Valued Log. S., 33 (2019), 507–537.
[18]	H. Garg, G. Kaur, TOPSIS based on nonlinear-programming methodology for solving decision-making problems under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy set environment, Comput. Appl. Math., 38 (2019), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0869-6 doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0869-6
[19]	H. Garg, G. Kaur, Algorithm for solving the decision-making problems based on correlation coefficients under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy information: A case study in watershed hydrological system, Compl. Intell. Syst., 8 (2022), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00339-4 doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00339-4
[20]	S. Z. Abbas, M. S. A. Khan, S. Abdullah, H. Sun, F. Hussain, Cubic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their application to multi-attribute decision making with unknown weight information, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 1529–1544. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-18382 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-18382
[21]	F. Wang, X. Zhao, Prospect-theory and geometric distance measure-based Pythagorean cubic fuzzy multicriteria decision-making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 36 (2021), 4117–4142. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22453 doi: 10.1002/int.22453
[22]	M. Riaz, S. T. Tehrim, Cubic bipolar fuzzy ordered weighted geometric aggregation operators and their application using internal and external cubic bipolar fuzzy data, Comput. Appl. Math., 38 (2019), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0843-3 doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0843-3
[23]	M. Riaz, S. T. Tehrim, Multi-attribute group decision making based on cubic bipolar fuzzy information using averaging aggregation operators, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 2473–2494. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-182751 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-182751
[24]	M. Riaz, S. T. Tehrim, Cubic bipolar fuzzy set with application to multi-criteria group decision making using geometric aggregation operators, Soft Comput., 24 (2020), 16111–16133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04927-3 doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-04927-3
[25]	N. Jan, L. Zedam, T. Mahmood, K. Ullah, Cubic bipolar fuzzy graphs with applications, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 2289–2307. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-182579 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-182579
[26]	N. Jamil, M. Riaz, Bipolar disorder diagnosis with cubic bipolar fuzzy information using TOPSIS and ELECTRE-I, Int. J. Biomath., 15 (2022), 2250030. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524522500309 doi: 10.1142/S1793524522500309
[27]	M. Riaz, N. Jamil, Topological structures on cubic bipolar fuzzy sets with linear assignment model and SIR method for healthcare, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 44 (2023), 1191–1212. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-222224 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-222224
[28]	Z. S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 15 (2007), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678
[29]	Z. S. Xu, R. R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Int. J. Gen. Syst., 35 (2006), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070600574353 doi: 10.1080/03081070600574353
[30]	T. Senapati, G. Chen, R. Mesiar, R. R. Yager, Novel Aczel-Alsina operations-based interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in multiple attribute decision-making process, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 37 (2022), 5059–5081. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22751 doi: 10.1002/int.22751
[31]	T. Senapati, Approaches to multi-attribute decision-making based on picture fuzzy Aczel-Alsina average aggregation operators, Comput. Appl. Math., 41 (2022), 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01742-w doi: 10.1007/s40314-021-01742-w
[32]	C. Tian, J. J. Peng, Z. Q. Zhang, J. Q. Wang, M. Goh, An extended picture fuzzy MULTIMOORA method based on Schweizer-Sklar aggregation operators, Soft Comput., 26 (2022), 3435–3454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06690-5 doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-06690-5
[33]	F. Xiao, J. Wen, W. Pedrycz, Generalized divergence-based decision making method with an application to pattern classification, IEEE T. Knowl. Data Eng., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2022.3177896 doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2022.3177896
[34]	F. Xiao, GIQ: A generalized intelligent quality-based approach for fusing multisource information, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 29 (2021), 2018–2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2991296 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2991296
[35]	F. Xiao, A distance measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to pattern classification problems, IEEE T. Syst. Man. Cyber. Syst., 51 (2021), 3980–3992, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2019.2958635 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2958635
[36]	M. Riaz, M. R. Hashmi, Linear Diophantine fuzzy set and its applications towards multi-attribute decision-making problems, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 5417–5439. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190550 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-190550
[37]	H. Kamaci, D. Marinkovic, S. Petchimuthu, M. Riaz, S. Ashraf, Novel distance-measures-based extended TOPSIS method under linguistic linear Diophantine fuzzy information, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14102140 doi: 10.3390/sym14102140
[38]	M. Akram, Bipolar fuzzy graphs, Inf. Sci., 181 (2011), 5548–5564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.037 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.037
[39]	M. A. Alghamdi, N. O. Alshehri, M. Akram, Multicriteria decision-making methods in bipolar fuzzy environment, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 20 (2018), 2057–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0499-y doi: 10.1007/s40815-018-0499-y
[40]	M. Akram, Shumaiza, M. Arshad, Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis, Comput. Appl. Math., 39 (2020), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0980-8 doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0980-8
[41]	H. Garg, Sine trigonometric operational laws and its based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators for group decision-making process, Artif. Intell. Rev., 54 (2021), 4421–4447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10002-6 doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10002-6
[42]	H. Garg, A novel trigonometric operation-based q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operator and its fundamental properties, Neural Comput. Appl., 32 (2020), 15077–15099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04859-x doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-04859-x
[43]	M. Qiyas, S. Abdullah, Sine trigonometric spherical fuzzy aggregation operators and their application in decision support system, TOPSIS, VIKOR, Korean J. Math., 29 (2021), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.11568/kjm.2021.29.1.137 doi: 10.11568/kjm.2021.29.1.137
[44]	S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, S. Zeng, H. Jin, F. Ghani, Fuzzy decision support modeling for hydrogen power Plant selection based on single valued neutrosophic sine trigonometric aggregation operators, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12020298 doi: 10.3390/sym12020298
[45]	M. W. Lin, C. Huang, Z. S. Xu, R. Chen, Evaluating IoT platforms using integrated probabilistic linguistic MCDM method, IEEE Int. Things J., 7 (2020), 11195–11208. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2997133 doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2997133
[46]	C. Huang, M. W. Lin, Z. S. Xu, Pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA method based on distance measure and score function: Its application in multicriteria decision making process, Knowl. Inform. Syst., 62 (2020), 4373–4406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-020-01491-y doi: 10.1007/s10115-020-01491-y
[47]	M. W. Lin, C. Huang, Z. S. Xu, TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient and entropy measure for linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making, Complexity, 2019 (2019), 6967390. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6967390 doi: 10.1155/2019/6967390
[48]	M. Riaz, D. Pamucar, A. Habib, N. Jamil, Innovative bipolar fuzzy sine trigonometric aggregation operators and SIR method for medical tourism supply chain, Math. Probl. Eng., 2022 (2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4182740 doi: 10.1155/2022/4182740
[49]	C. Jana, M. Pal, J. Q. Wang, Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multiple-attribute decision-making process, J. Amb. Intel. Hum. Comp., 10 (2019), 3533–3549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1076-9 doi: 10.1007/s12652-018-1076-9
[50]	M. Riaz, A. Habib, M. Saqlain, M. S. Yang, Cubic bipolar fuzzy-VIKOR method using new distance and entropy measures and Einstein averaging aggregation operators with application to renewable energy, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2023), 510–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01383-z doi: 10.1007/s40815-022-01383-z
[51]	G. Kaur, H. Garg, Cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, Int. J. Uncert. Quant., 8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018020471 doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018020471

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.1

Metrics

Article views(1630) PDF downloads(63) Cited by(5)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

AIMS Mathematics

A decision-making strategy to combat CO $_2$ emissions using sine trigonometric aggregation operators with cubic bipolar fuzzy input

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The generalized multivariate of M-L function

3. Fractional integral and differential formulas of generalized M-L function

4. Generalization of fractional integral and its properties

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The generalized multivariate of M-L function

3. Fractional integral and differential formulas of generalized M-L function

4. Generalization of fractional integral and its properties

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

AIMS Mathematics

A decision-making strategy to combat CO2 _2 emissions using sine trigonometric aggregation operators with cubic bipolar fuzzy input

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The generalized multivariate of M-L function

3. Fractional integral and differential formulas of generalized M-L function

4. Generalization of fractional integral and its properties

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The generalized multivariate of M-L function

3. Fractional integral and differential formulas of generalized M-L function

4. Generalization of fractional integral and its properties

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

A decision-making strategy to combat CO $_2$ emissions using sine trigonometric aggregation operators with cubic bipolar fuzzy input