Jleli and Samet introduced the notion of F-metric space as a generalization of traditional metric space and proved Banach contraction principle in the setting of these generalized metric spaces. The aim of this article is to utilize F-metric space and establish some common α-fuzzy fixed point theorems for rational (β-ϕ)-contractive conditions. Our results extend, generalize and unify some well-known results in the literature. As application of our main result, we discuss the solution of fuzzy integrodifferential equations in the setting of a generalized Hukuhara derivative.
Citation: Amer Hassan Albargi, Jamshaid Ahmad. Fixed point results of fuzzy mappings with applications[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11572-11588. doi: 10.3934/math.2023586
[1] | Zhao Xiaoqing, Yi Yuan . Square-free numbers in the intersection of Lehmer set and Piatetski-Shapiro sequence. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 33591-33609. doi: 10.3934/math.20241603 |
[2] | Yanbo Song . On two sums related to the Lehmer problem over short intervals. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 11723-11732. doi: 10.3934/math.2021681 |
[3] | Bingzhou Chen, Jiagui Luo . On the Diophantine equations x2−Dy2=−1 and x2−Dy2=4. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(4): 1170-1180. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.4.1170 |
[4] | Jinyun Qi, Zhefeng Xu . Almost primes in generalized Piatetski-Shapiro sequences. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14154-14162. doi: 10.3934/math.2022780 |
[5] | Yukai Shen . kth powers in a generalization of Piatetski-Shapiro sequences. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22411-22418. doi: 10.3934/math.20231143 |
[6] | Zhenjiang Pan, Zhengang Wu . The inverses of tails of the generalized Riemann zeta function within the range of integers. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28558-28568. doi: 10.3934/math.20231461 |
[7] | Mingxuan Zhong, Tianping Zhang . Partitions into three generalized D. H. Lehmer numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4021-4031. doi: 10.3934/math.2024196 |
[8] | Jinmin Yu, Renjie Yuan, Tingting Wang . The fourth power mean value of one kind two-term exponential sums. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17045-17060. doi: 10.3934/math.2022937 |
[9] | Wenpeng Zhang, Jiafan Zhang . The hybrid power mean of some special character sums of polynomials and two-term exponential sums modulo p. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10989-11004. doi: 10.3934/math.2021638 |
[10] | Guangwei Hu, Huixue Lao, Huimin Pan . High power sums of Fourier coefficients of holomorphic cusp forms and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25166-25183. doi: 10.3934/math.20241227 |
Jleli and Samet introduced the notion of F-metric space as a generalization of traditional metric space and proved Banach contraction principle in the setting of these generalized metric spaces. The aim of this article is to utilize F-metric space and establish some common α-fuzzy fixed point theorems for rational (β-ϕ)-contractive conditions. Our results extend, generalize and unify some well-known results in the literature. As application of our main result, we discuss the solution of fuzzy integrodifferential equations in the setting of a generalized Hukuhara derivative.
Let q be a positive integer. For each integer a with 1⩽a<q,(a,q)=1, we know that there exists one and only one ˉa with 1⩽ˉa<q such that aˉa≡1(q). Let r(q) be the number of integers a with 1⩽a<q for which a and ˉa are of opposite parity.
D. H. Lehmer (see [1]) posed the problem to investigate a nontrivial estimation for r(q) when q is an odd prime. Zhang [2,3] gave some asymptotic formulas for r(q), one of which reads as follows:
r(q)=12ϕ(q)+O(q12d2(q)log2q). |
Zhang [4] generalized the problem over short intervals and proved that
∑a≤Na∈R(q)1=12Nϕ(q)q−1+O(q12d2(q)log2q), |
where
R(q):={a:1⩽a⩽q,(a,q)=1,2∤a+ˉa}. |
Let n⩾2 be a fixed positive integer, q⩾3 and c be two integers with (n,q)=(c,q)=1. Let 0<δ1,δ2≤1. Lu and Yi [5] studied the Lehmer problem in the sense of short intervals as
rn(δ1,δ2,c;q):=∑a⩽δ1q∑ˉa⩽δ2qaˉa≡cmodqn∤a+ˉa1, |
and obtained an interesting asymptotic formula,
rn(δ1,δ2,c;q)=(1−n−1)δ1δ2ϕ(q)+O(q12d6(q)log2q). |
Liu and Zhang [6] r-th residues and roots, and obtained two interesting mean value formulas. Guo and Yi [7] found the Lehmer problem also has good distribution properties on Beatty sequences. For fixed real numbers α and β, the associated non-homogeneous Beatty sequence is the sequence of integers defined by
Bα,β:=(⌊αn+β⌋)∞n=1, |
where ⌊t⌋ denotes the integer part of any t∈R. Such sequences are also called generalized arithmetic progressions. If α is irrational, it follows from a classical exponential sum estimate of Vinogradov [8] that Bα,β contains infinitely many prime numbers; in fact, one has the asymptotic estimate
#{ prime p⩽x:p∈Bα,β}∼α−1π(x) as x→∞ |
where π(x) is the prime counting function.
We define type τ=τ(α) for any irrational number α by the following definition:
τ:=sup{t∈R:lim infn→∞nt‖ |
Based on the results obtained, we consider the high-dimensional Lehmer problem related to Beatty sequences over incomplete intervals in this paper. That is,
r_{n}\left(\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots ,\delta_{k}, c, \alpha, \beta ; q\right): = \mathop {\sum\limits_{{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}} { \cdots \sum\limits_{{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}} {} } }\limits_{\scriptstyle {x_{1} \cdots x_{k} \equiv c\bmod q } \atop {\scriptstyle {x_{1}, \cdots x_{k-1} \in B_{\alpha,\beta}} \atop \scriptstyle {n \nmid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}}}} 1,(0 < \delta_{1}, \delta_{2},\cdots, \delta_{k} \leq 1), |
and where k = 2, we get the result of [7].
By using the properties of Beatty sequences and the estimates for hyper Kloosterman sums, we obtain the following result.
Theorem 1.1. Let k \geq 2 be a fixed positive integer, q\geq n^{3} and c be two integers with (n, q) = (c, q) = 1 , and \delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots, \delta_{k} be real numbers satisfying 0 < \delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots, \delta_{k} \leq 1 . Let \alpha > 1 be an irrational number of finite type. Then, we have the following asymptotic formula:
r_{n}\left(\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots ,\delta_{k}, c, \alpha, \beta ; q\right) = \left(1-n^{-1}\right) \alpha^{-(k-1)} \delta_{1} \delta_{2} \cdots \delta_{k}\phi^{k-1}(q)+O(q^{k-1-\frac{1}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon} ), |
where \phi(\cdot) is the Euler function, \varepsilon is a sufficiently small positive number, and the implied constant only depends on n .
Notation. In this paper, we denote by \lfloor t\rfloor and \{t\} the integral part and the fractional part of t , respectively. As is customary, we put
\mathbf{e}(t): = e^{2 \pi i t} \quad \text { and } \quad\{t\}: = t-\lfloor t\rfloor . |
The notation \|t\| is used to denote the distance from the real number t to the nearest integer; that is,
\|t\|: = \min \limits_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}|t-n| . |
Let \chi^{0} be the principal character modulo q . The letter p always denotes a prime. Throughout the paper, \varepsilon always denotes an arbitrarily small positive constant, which may not be the same at different occurrences; the implied constants in symbols O, \ll and \gg may depend (where obvious) on the parameters \alpha, n, \varepsilon but are absolute otherwise. For given functions F and G , the notations F \ll G , G \gg F and F = O(G) are all equivalent to the statement that the inequality |F| \leqslant \mathcal{C}|G| holds with some constant \mathcal{C} > 0 .
To complete the proof of the theorem, we need the following several definitions and lemmas.
Definition 2.1. For an arbitrary set \mathcal{S} , we use \mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{S}} to denote its indicator function:
\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{S}}(n): = \begin{cases}1 & { if } \;n \in \mathcal{S}, \\ 0 & { if }\; n \notin \mathcal{S} .\end{cases} |
We use \mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta} to denote the characteristic function of numbers in a Beatty sequence:
\mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(n): = \begin{cases}1 & { if } \;n \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta}, \\ 0 & { if }\; n \notin \mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta}.\end{cases} |
Lemma 2.2. Let a, q be integers, \delta \in(0, 1) be a real number, \theta be a rational number. Let \alpha be an irrational number of finite type \tau and H = q^{\varepsilon} > 0 . We have
\sum\limits_{\scriptstyle {a \le \delta q} \atop \scriptstyle{a \in {{\cal B}_{\alpha ,\beta }}}} ' 1 = \alpha^{-1} \delta \phi(q)+O\left((\phi(q))^{\frac{\tau}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}\right), |
and
\sum\limits_{\substack{a \leqslant \delta q \\ a \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha, \beta}}} \mathbf{e}(\theta a) = \alpha^{-1} \sum\limits_{a \leqslant \delta_1 q} \mathbf{e}(\theta a)+O\left(\|\theta\|^{-1} q^{-\varepsilon}+q^{\varepsilon}\right). |
Taking
H = \|\theta\|^{-\frac{1}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}, |
we have
\sum\limits_{\substack{a \leqslant \delta q \\ a \in B_{\alpha, \beta}}} \mathbf{e}(\theta a) = \alpha^{-1} \sum\limits_{a \leqslant \delta_1 q} \mathbf{e}(\theta a)+O\left(\|\theta\|^{-\left(\frac{\tau}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon\right)}\right) . |
Proof. This is Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 2.5 of [7].
Lemma 2.3. Let
\mathbf{Kl}(r_{1},r_{2},\cdots,r_{k};q) = \sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant q-1} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k-1} \leqslant q-1} \mathbf{e}\left(\frac {r_{1}x_{1}+\cdots+r_{k-1}x_{k-1}+ r_{k}\overline{x_{1} \cdots x_{k-1}}}{p}\right). |
Then
\mathbf{Kl}(r_{1},r_{2},\cdots,r_{k};q) \ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}} k^{\omega(q)}\left(r_{1}, r_{k}, q\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \cdots\left(r_{k-1}, r_{k}, q\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} |
where (a, b, c) is the greatest common divisor of a, b and c .
Proof. See [9].
Lemma 2.4. Assume that U is a positive real number, K is a positive integer and that a and b are two real numbers. If
a = \frac{s}{r}+\frac{\theta}{r^{2}}, \quad(r, s) = 1, r \geq 1,|\theta| \leq 1, |
then
\sum\limits_{k \leqslant K} \min (U, \frac{1}{\|a k+b\|}) \ll (\frac{K}{r}+1 )(U+r \log r). |
Proof. The proof is given in [10].
We begin by the definition
r_{n}\left(\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \cdots ,\delta_{k}, c, \alpha, \beta ; q\right) = S_{1}-S_{2}, |
where
S_{1}: = \mathop {\sum\limits_{{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}} { \cdots \sum\limits_{{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}} {} } }\limits_{\scriptstyle {x_{1} \cdots x_{k} \equiv c\bmod q } \atop {\scriptstyle {x_{1}, \cdots x_{k-1} \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha,\beta}} }} 1, |
and
S_{2}: = \mathop {\sum\limits_{{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}} { \cdots \sum\limits_{{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}} {} } }\limits_{\scriptstyle{x_{1} \cdots x_{k} \equiv c\bmod q }\atop {\scriptstyle{x_{1}, \cdots x_{k-1} \in \mathcal{B}_{\alpha,\beta}}\atop \scriptstyle{n \mid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}}}} 1. |
By the Definition 2.1, Lemma 2.2 and congruence properties, we have
\begin{aligned} S_{1}& = \mathop{\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}}_{x_{1} \cdots x_{k} \equiv c\bmod q }\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right)\\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \sum\limits_{\chi \bmod q}\chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k}) \chi(\overline c)\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} \left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right)\\ & = S_{11}+S_{12}, \end{aligned} |
where
\begin{align*} S_{11}: = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\mathop{ {\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \mathop{ {\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right), \end{align*} |
and
S_{12}: = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \bmod q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c) \left(\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k}) \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} ( x_{1}) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right). |
For S_{2} , it follows that
\begin{aligned} S_{2}& = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}}_{n \mid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}} \sum\limits_{\chi \bmod q}\chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k}) \chi(\overline c)\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} \left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right)\\ & = S_{21}+S_{22}, \end{aligned} |
where
\begin{align*} S_{21}: = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \mathop{\mathop{ {\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \cdots \mathop{ {\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} }_{n \mid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right), \end{align*} |
and
\begin{align*} S_{22}: = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \bmod q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c) \mathop{{\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}} \cdots {\sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}}}_{n \mid x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}} \chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k-1}) \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} \left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1}\right) . \end{align*} |
From the classical bound
\sum \limits_{a \le \delta q}' 1 = \delta \phi(q)+O\left(d(q)\right) |
and Lemma 2.2, we have
\begin{align} S_{11}& = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right) \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}1\right) \\ & = \left(\delta_{k}+O\left(\frac{d(q)}{\phi(q)}\right)\right)\prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left( \alpha^{-1} \delta_{i} \phi(q)+O\left((\phi(q))^{\frac{\tau}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}\right)\right) \\ & = \alpha^{-(k-1)}\phi^{k-1}(q)\prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1} \delta_{i}+O\left(q^{k-1-\frac{1}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}\right). \end{align} | (3.1) |
From Lemma 2.2, we obtain
\begin{align} S_{21}& = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right)\left(\mathop{\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q}}_{n \mid x_{k}+(x_{1}+ \cdots +x_{k-1})}1\right) \\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right) \left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q }}_{x_{k} \equiv-(x_{1}+ \cdots +x_{k-1}) \bmod n} \sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid(x_{k}, q)}} \mu(d)\right)\\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right)\left( \sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q}} \mu(d) \mathop{\mathop{\sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k}q}}_{d \mid x_{k}}}_{x_{k} \equiv-(x_{1}+ \cdots +x_{k-1})\bmod n} 1 \right) \\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)} \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{1} )\right) \cdots \left(\mathop{{\sum}^{\prime}}_{x_{k-1} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}( x_{k-1} )\right)\left( \sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q}} \mu(d) \left( \frac{\delta_{k}q}{nd}+O(1)\right)\right) \\ & = \frac{1}{\phi(q)}\left(\frac{\delta_{k}\phi(q)}{n}+O\left(d(q)\right) \right)\prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left( \alpha^{-1} \delta_{i} \phi(q)+O\left((\phi(q))^{\frac{\tau}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon}\right)\right)\\ & = \alpha^{-(k-1)}n^{-1}\phi^{k-1}(q)\prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1} \delta_{i}+O (q^{k-1-\frac{1}{\tau+1}+\varepsilon} ). \end{align} | (3.2) |
By the properties of exponential sums,
\begin{align} S_{22} = &\frac{1}{n \phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c) \left({\sum\limits_{x_{1} \leqslant \delta_{1} q}}\cdots {\sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k-1} q}}\chi(x_{1}) \cdots \chi(x_{k}) \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta} \left( x_{1} \right) \cdots \mathbf{1}_{\alpha,\beta}\left( x_{k-1} \right)\right) \\ &\times \left(\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n}\mathbf{e}(\frac{x_{1}+\cdots+x_{k}}{n}l) \right)\\ = &\frac{1}{n \phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c)\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n} \prod \limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left( \sum\limits_{x_{i} \leqslant \delta_{i} q}\mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(x_{i}) \chi(x_{i}) \mathbf{e}(\frac{x_{i}}{n} l)\right)\left( \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \chi(x_{k}) \mathbf{e} (\frac{x_{k}}{n} l)\right). \end{align} | (3.3) |
Let
G(r, \chi): = \sum\limits_{h = 1}^{q} \chi(h) \mathbf{e} (\frac{r h}{q} ) |
be the Gauss sum, and we know that for \chi \neq \chi_{0} ,
\chi(x_{i}) = \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q} G(r, \chi) \mathbf{e} (-\frac{x_{i} r}{q} ) = \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q-1} G(r, \chi) \mathbf{e} (-\frac{x_{i} r}{q} ), |
and
\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r}{q} \neq 0 |
for 1 \leqslant l \leqslant n, 1 \leqslant r \leqslant q-1 and (n, q) = 1 .
Therefore,
\begin{equation} \sum\limits_{x_{k} \leqslant \delta_{k} q} \chi(x_{k}) \mathbf{e} (\frac{x_{k}}{n} l ) = \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{h})-1}, \end{equation} | (3.4) |
where
f(\delta, l, r ; n, p): = 1-\mathbf{e}\left( (\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r}{q} )\lfloor\delta q\rfloor\right) |
and
\left|f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)\right| \leqslant 2. |
For x_{i}(1\leqslant i \leqslant k-1) , using Lemma 2.2, we also have
\begin{align} & \sum\limits_{x_{i} \leqslant \delta_{i} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(x_{i}) \chi(x_{i}) \mathbf{e} (\frac{x_{i}}{n} l ) \\ = & \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{x_{i} \leqslant \delta_{i} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(x_{i}) \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \mathbf{e}\left( (\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q} ) x_{i}\right) \\ = & \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \sum\limits_{x_{i} \leqslant \delta_{i} q} \mathbf{1}_{\alpha, \beta}(x_{i}) \mathbf{e}\left( (\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q} ) x_{i}\right) \\ = & \frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \left(\alpha^{-1}\sum\limits_{a \leqslant \delta_{i} q} \mathbf{e}\left( (\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q} ) x_{i}\right)+O\left(\frac{q^{-\varepsilon}}{\|\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q}\|} +q^{\varepsilon}\right)\right) \\ = &\frac{1}{q \alpha} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \left(\frac{f\left(\delta_{i} , l, r_{i} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{i}}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )-1}+O\left(\frac{q^{-\varepsilon}}{\|\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q}\|} +q^{\varepsilon}\right)\right) . \end{align} | (3.5) |
Let
\begin{align} S_{23}& = \frac{1}{n \phi(q)} \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c)\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1} \left(\frac{1}{q \alpha} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{i}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{i}, l, r_{i} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{i}}{q}-\frac{l}{n})-1}\right)\left(\frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e}(\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{n})-1}\right) \\ & = \frac{1}{n \phi(q) q^{k} \alpha^{k-1}} \sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\sum\limits_{r_{1} = 1}^{q-1}\cdots \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} \frac{f\left(\delta_{1} , l, r_{1} ; n, q\right)\cdots f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\left(\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{1}}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )-1\right)\cdots \left(\mathbf{e} (\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )-1\right)} \\ &\times \mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}} \chi(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right). \end{align} | (3.6) |
From the definition of Gauss sum and Lemma 2.3, we know that
\begin{align} &\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}\chi(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right)\\ = &\sum\limits_{h_{1} = 1}^{q-1}\cdots \sum\limits_{h_{k} = 1}^{q-1}\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod}q}\chi(\overline c)\chi(h_{1})\cdots \chi(h_{k})\mathbf{e} ( \frac{r_{1}h_{1}+\cdots +r_{k}h_{k}}{q} )\\ = &\phi(q)\mathop{\sum\limits_{h_{1} = 1}^{q-1}\cdots \sum\limits_{h_{k} = 1}^{q-1}}_{h_{1} \cdots h_{k} \equiv c \bmod q}\mathbf{e} ( \frac{r_{1}h_{1}+ \cdots +r_{k}h_{k}}{q} )\\ = &\phi(q)\sum\limits_{h_{1} = 1}^{q-1}\cdots \sum\limits_{h_{k} = 1}^{q-1}\mathbf{e} ( \frac{r_{1}h_{1}+ \cdots r_{k-1}h_{k-1}+r_{k}c\overline{h_{1} \cdots h_{k-1}}}{q} )\\ = &\phi(q) \mathbf{Kl}(r_{1},r_{2},\cdots,r_{k}c;q) \\ \ll& \phi(q) q^{\frac{k-1}{2}} k^{\omega(q)}\left(r_{1}, r_{k}c, q\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \cdots\left(r_{k-1}, r_{k}c, q\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ \ll&\phi(q) q^{\frac{k-1}{2}} k^{\omega(q)}\left(r_{1}, q\right) \cdots\left(r_{k}, q\right). \end{align} | (3.7) |
By Mobius inversion, we get
G(r, \chi_{0}) = \sum\limits_{h = 1}^{q}' \mathbf{e} (\frac{r h}{q} ) = \mu\left(\frac{q}{(r, q)}\right) \frac{\varphi(q)}{\varphi(q /(r, q))} \ll(r, q), |
and
\chi_{0}(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi_{0}\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi_{0}\right) \ll\left(r_{1}, q\right) \cdots\left(r_{k}, q\right). |
Hence,
\begin{align} &\mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}}_{\chi \neq \chi_{0}}\chi(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right)\\ = &\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q}\chi(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right)-\chi_{0}(\overline c)G\left(r_{1}, \chi_{0}\right)\cdots G\left(r_{k}, \chi_{0}\right)\\ \ll&\phi(q) q^{\frac{k-1}{2}} k^{\omega(q)}\left(r_{1}, q\right) \cdots\left(r_{k}, q\right). \end{align} | (3.8) |
From (3.8) we may deduce the following result:
\begin{align} S_{23}&\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q-1} \frac{(r,q)}{\left|\mathbf{e} (\frac{r}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )-1\right|}\right)^{k}\\ &\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q-1} \frac{(r,q)}{\left|\sin \pi (\frac{r}{q}-\frac{l}{n} )\right|}\right)^{k}\\ &\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{r = 1}^{q-1} \frac{(r,q)}{\|\frac{r}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|}\right)^{k}\\ & = \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{d \mid q}}_{d < q }\mathop{\sum\limits_{r \leq q-1}}_{(r,q) = d }\frac{d}{\|\frac{r}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|}\right)^{k }\\ & = \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{d \mid q}}_{d < q }d\mathop{\sum\limits_{m \leq\frac{q-1}{d} }}_{(m,q) = 1}\frac{1}{\|\frac{md}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|}\right)^{k }\\ & = \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{d \mid q}}_{d < q }d\sum\limits_{k \mid q}\mu(k)\sum\limits_{m \leq\frac{q-1}{kd} }\frac{1}{\|\frac{mkd}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|}\right)^{k }. \end{align} |
It is easy to see
\|\frac{mkd}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\| = \|\frac{mkn-l(q/d)}{(q/d)n}\| \geq \frac{1}{(q/d)n}, |
and we obtain
S_{23}\ll\frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n \phi(q) q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\mathop{\sum\limits_{d \mid q\\{d < q }}}d\sum\limits_{k \mid q}\sum\limits_{m \leq\frac{q-1}{kd} }\min (\frac{qn}{d},\frac{1}{\|\frac{mkd}{q}-\frac{l}{n}\|} )\right)^{k }. |
Let k d / q = h_{0} / q_{0} , where q_{0} \geq 1, \left(h_{0}, q_{0}\right) = 1 , and we will easily obtain q /(k d) \leq q_{0} \leq q / d . By using Lemma 2.4, we have
\begin{align} S_{23}&\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q \\ d < q}} d \sum\limits_{k \mid q}\left(\frac{(q-1) /(k d)}{q_{0}}+1\right) (\frac{q n}{d}+q_{0} \log q_{0} )\right)^{k}\\ &\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}}{n q^{\frac{k+1}{2}} \alpha^{k-1}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n}\left(\sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q \\ d < q}} d \sum\limits_{k \mid q}\left(\frac{(q-1) /(k d)}{q/(kd)}+1\right) (\frac{q n}{d}+\frac{q}{d} \log \frac{q}{d} )\right)^{k}\\ &\ll \frac{k^{\omega(q)}q^{\frac{k-1}{2}}}{ \alpha^{k-1}}\left(\sum\limits_{\substack{d \mid q \\ d < q}} \sum\limits_{k \mid q}n+\log q\right)^{k}\\ &\ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}}d^{2k}(q)(\log q+n)^{k}. \end{align} |
Let
S_{24}: = \frac{q^{(k-1)(-\varepsilon)}}{n \phi(q)}\mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q\\{\chi \neq \chi_{0}}} }\chi(\overline c)\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left(\frac{1}{q \alpha} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G(r_{i}, \chi)\frac{1}{\|\frac{l}{n}-\frac{r_{i}}{q}\|} \right) \left(\frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e}(\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{n})-1}\right) |
and
S_{25}: = \frac{q^{(k-1)(\varepsilon)}}{n \phi(q)}\mathop{\sum\limits_{\chi \mathrm{mod} q\\{\chi \neq \chi_{0}}}} \chi(\overline c)\sum \limits_{l = 1}^{n}\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}\left(\frac{1}{q \alpha} \sum\limits_{r_{i} = 1}^{q-1} G(r_{i}, \chi) \right) \left(\frac{1}{q} \sum\limits_{r_{k} = 1}^{q-1} G\left(r_{k}, \chi\right) \frac{f\left(\delta_{k}, l, r_{k} ; n, q\right)}{\mathbf{e}(\frac{r_{k}}{q}-\frac{l}{n})-1}\right). |
By the same argument of S_{23} , it follows that
S_{24} \ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}-\varepsilon}d^{2k}(q)(\log q+n)^{k}, |
S_{25} \ll q^{\frac{k-3}{2}+\varepsilon}(\log q+n). |
Since n\ll q^{\frac{1}{3}} , we have
\begin{equation} S_{25} \ll S_{24} \ll S_{23} \ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}+\varepsilon}n^{k}\ll q^{k-2+\varepsilon}. \end{equation} | (3.9) |
Taking n = 1 , we get
\begin{equation} S_{12}\ll q^{\frac{k-1}{2}+\varepsilon}. \end{equation} | (3.10) |
With (3.1), (3.2), (3.9) and (3.10), the proof is complete.
This paper considers the high-dimensional Lehmer problem related to Beatty sequences over incomplete intervals. And we give an asymptotic formula by the properties of Beatty sequences and the estimates for hyper Kloosterman sums.
This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation No. 12271422 of China. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the referee for very helpful and detailed comments.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] | S. Banach, Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux equations integrals, Fund. Math., 3 (1922), 133–181. |
[2] |
L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
![]() |
[3] |
S. Heilpern, Fuzzy mappings and fixed point theorem, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 83 (1981), 566–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(81)90141-4 doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(81)90141-4
![]() |
[4] | V. D. Estruch, A. Vidal, A note on fixed fuzzy points for fuzzy mappings, Rend. Istit. Mat. Univ. Trieste, 32 (2001), 39–45. |
[5] |
B. Bede, S. G. Gal, Generalizations of the differentiability of fuzzy-number-valued functions with applications to fuzzy differential equations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 151 (2005), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.001
![]() |
[6] |
Y. Chalco-Cano, H. Roman-Flores, Some remarks on fuzzy differential equations via differential inclusions, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 230 (2013), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2013.04.017 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2013.04.017
![]() |
[7] |
O. Kaleva, Fuzzy differential equations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 24 (1987), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(87)90029-7 doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(87)90029-7
![]() |
[8] |
S. Seikkala, On the fuzzy initial value problem, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 24 (1987), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(87)90030-3 doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(87)90030-3
![]() |
[9] |
P. V. Subrahmanyam, S. K. Sudarsanam, A note on fuzzy Volterra integral equations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 81 (1996), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00180-8 doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00180-8
![]() |
[10] |
E. J. Villamizar-Roa, V. Angulo-Castillo, Y. Chalco-Cano, Existence of solutions to fuzzy differential equations with generalized Hukuhara derivative via contractive-like mapping principles, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 265 (2015), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.07.015 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2014.07.015
![]() |
[11] | M. Hukuhara, Integration des applications mesurables dont la Valeur est un compact convexe, Funkc. Ekvacioj, 10 (1967), 205–223. |
[12] |
M. L. Puri, D. A. Ralescu, Fuzzy random variables, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 114 (1986), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(86)90093-4 doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(86)90093-4
![]() |
[13] | P. Diamond, P. Kloeden, Metric spaces of fuzzy sets: theory and applications, World Scientific, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1142/2326 |
[14] |
A. Azam, I. Beg, Common fixed points of fuzzy maps, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 1331–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.11.011 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.11.011
![]() |
[15] |
M. Rashid, A. Azam, N. Mehmood, L-fuzzy fixed points theorems for L-fuzzy mappings via \beta _{F_{L}}-admissible pair, Sci. World J., 2014 (2014), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/853032 doi: 10.1155/2014/853032
![]() |
[16] |
M. Rashid, M. A. Kutbi, A. Azam, Coincidence theorems via alpha cuts of L-fuzzy sets with applications, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2014 (2014), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2014-212 doi: 10.1186/1687-1812-2014-212
![]() |
[17] |
M. Jleli, B. Samet, On a new generalization of metric spaces, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 20 (2018), 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-018-0606-6 doi: 10.1007/s11784-018-0606-6
![]() |
[18] |
L. A. Alnaser, J. Ahmad, D. Lateef, H. A. Fouad, New fixed point theorems with applications to non-linear neutral differential equations, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050602 doi: 10.3390/sym11050602
![]() |
[19] |
S. A. Al-Mezel, J. Ahmad, G. Marino, Fixed point theorems for generalized (\alpha \beta -\psi )-contractions in \mathcal{F} -metric spaces with applications, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8040584 doi: 10.3390/math8040584
![]() |
[20] |
M. Alansari, S. S. Mohammed, A. Azam, Fuzzy fixed point results in \mathcal{F}-metric spaces with applications, J. Funct. Spaces, 2020 (2020), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5142815 doi: 10.1155/2020/5142815
![]() |
[21] |
B. Samet, C. Vetro, P. Vetro, Fixed point theorem for \alpha -\psi -contractive type mappings, Nonlinear Anal., 75 (2012), 2154–2165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.10.014 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.10.014
![]() |
[22] | V. Berinde, Contractii generalizate si aplicatii, Baie Mare, Romania: Cub Press, 1997. |
[23] | I. A. Rus, Generalized contractions and applications, Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Cluj University Press, 2001. |