Decision science has a wide range of applications in daily life. Decision information is usually incomplete and partially reliable. In the fuzzy set theory, Z-numbers are introduced to handle this situation because they contain the restriction and reliability components, which complement the impaired information. The ranking of Z-numbers is a challenging task since they are composed of pairs of fuzzy numbers. In this research, the vectorial distance and spread of Z-numbers were proposed synergically, in which the vectorial distance measures how much the fuzzy numbers are apart from the origin, which was set as a relative point, and their spreads over a horizontal axis. Furthermore, a ranking method based on the convex compound was proposed to combine the restriction and reliability components of Z-numbers. The proposed ranking method was validated using several empirical examples and a comparative analysis was conducted. The application of the proposed ranking method in decision-making was illustrated via the development of the Analytic Hierarchy Process-Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (AHP-WASPAS) model to solve the prioritization of public services for the implementation of Industry 4.0 tools. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed model and the results showed that the proposed model has improved its consistency from 66.67% of the existing model to 83.33%. This research leads to a future direction of the application of ranking based on the vectorial distance and spread in multi-criteria decision-making methods, which use Z-numbers as linguistic values.
Citation: Nik Muhammad Farhan Hakim Nik Badrul Alam, Ku Muhammad Naim Ku Khalif, Nor Izzati Jaini. Synergic ranking of fuzzy Z-numbers based on vectorial distance and spread for application in decision-making[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11057-11083. doi: 10.3934/math.2023560
[1] | Yiyuan Qian, Haiming Song, Xiaoshen Wang, Kai Zhang . Primal-dual active-set method for solving the unilateral pricing problem of American better-of options on two assets. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(1): 90-115. doi: 10.3934/era.2022005 |
[2] | Raúl M. Falcón, Víctor Álvarez, José Andrés Armario, María Dolores Frau, Félix Gudiel, María Belén Güemes . A computational approach to analyze the Hadamard quasigroup product. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(6): 3245-3263. doi: 10.3934/era.2023164 |
[3] | Xianfei Hui, Baiqing Sun, Indranil SenGupta, Yan Zhou, Hui Jiang . Stochastic volatility modeling of high-frequency CSI 300 index and dynamic jump prediction driven by machine learning. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1365-1386. doi: 10.3934/era.2023070 |
[4] | Zhaoyong Huang . On the C-flatness and injectivity of character modules. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 2899-2910. doi: 10.3934/era.2022147 |
[5] | Abdelkader Lamamri, Mohammed Hachama . Approximate solution of the shortest path problem with resource constraints and applications to vehicle routing problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 615-632. doi: 10.3934/era.2023030 |
[6] | Kaiyu Zhang . Sobolev estimates and inverse Hölder estimates on a class of non-divergence variation-inequality problem arising in American option pricing. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 5975-5987. doi: 10.3934/era.2024277 |
[7] | Xingyan Fei, Yanchuang Hou, Yuting Ding . Modeling and analysis of carbon emission-absorption model associated with urbanization process of China. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 985-1003. doi: 10.3934/era.2023049 |
[8] | Jicheng Li, Beibei Liu, Hao-Tian Wu, Yongjian Hu, Chang-Tsun Li . Jointly learning and training: using style diversification to improve domain generalization for deepfake detection. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 1973-1997. doi: 10.3934/era.2024090 |
[9] | Yanxia Sun, Tianze Xu, Jing Wang, Jinke Wang . DST-Net: Dual self-integrated transformer network for semi-supervised segmentation of optic disc and optic cup in fundus image. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(4): 2216-2245. doi: 10.3934/era.2025097 |
[10] | Mingtao Cui, Min Pan, Jie Wang, Pengjie Li . A parameterized level set method for structural topology optimization based on reaction diffusion equation and fuzzy PID control algorithm. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(7): 2568-2599. doi: 10.3934/era.2022132 |
Decision science has a wide range of applications in daily life. Decision information is usually incomplete and partially reliable. In the fuzzy set theory, Z-numbers are introduced to handle this situation because they contain the restriction and reliability components, which complement the impaired information. The ranking of Z-numbers is a challenging task since they are composed of pairs of fuzzy numbers. In this research, the vectorial distance and spread of Z-numbers were proposed synergically, in which the vectorial distance measures how much the fuzzy numbers are apart from the origin, which was set as a relative point, and their spreads over a horizontal axis. Furthermore, a ranking method based on the convex compound was proposed to combine the restriction and reliability components of Z-numbers. The proposed ranking method was validated using several empirical examples and a comparative analysis was conducted. The application of the proposed ranking method in decision-making was illustrated via the development of the Analytic Hierarchy Process-Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (AHP-WASPAS) model to solve the prioritization of public services for the implementation of Industry 4.0 tools. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed model and the results showed that the proposed model has improved its consistency from 66.67% of the existing model to 83.33%. This research leads to a future direction of the application of ranking based on the vectorial distance and spread in multi-criteria decision-making methods, which use Z-numbers as linguistic values.
The theory of inequalities of convex functions is part of the general subject of convexity since a convex function is one whose epigraph is a convex set. Nonetheless it is a theory important per se, which touches almost all branches of mathematics. Probably, the first topic who make necessary the encounter with this theory is the graphical analysis. With this occasion we learn on the second derivative test of convexity, a powerful tool in recognizing convexity. Then comes the problem of finding the extremal values of functions of several variables and the use of Hessian as a higher dimensional generalization of the second derivative. Passing to optimization problems in infinite dimensional spaces is the next step, but despite the technical sophistication in handling such problems, the basic ideas are pretty similar with those underlying the one variable case.
The objective of this paper is to present the fractional Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities in generalized forms. We start from the integral operators containing generalized Mittag-Leffler function defined by Prabhaker in [25].
Definition 1.1. Let σ,τ,ρ be positive real numbers and ω∈R. Then the generalized fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler function ϵρσ,τ,ω,a+f and ϵρσ,τ,ω,b−f for a real valued continuous function f are defined by:
(ϵρσ,τ,ω,a+f)(x)=∫xa(x−t)τ−1Eρσ,τ(ω(x−t)σ)f(t)dt, | (1.1) |
(ϵρσ,τ,ω,b−f)(x)=∫bx(t−x)τ−1Eρσ,τ(ω(t−x)σ)f(t)dt, | (1.2) |
where the function Eρσ,τ(t) is the generalized Mittag-Leffler function; Eρσ,τ(t)=∑∞n=0(ρ)ntnΓ(σn+τ)n! and (ρ)n=Γ(ρ+n)Γ(ρ).
Fractional integral operators associated with generalized Mittag-Leffler function play a vital role in fractional calculus. Different fractional integral operators have different types of properties and these integral operators may be singular or non-singular depending upon their kernels. For example, the global Riemann Liouville integral is a singular integral operator but the singularity is integrable. Some new models [2,7] have been designed due to the non-singularity of their defining integrals. Fractional integral operators are useful in the generalization of classical mathematical concepts. Fractional integral operators are very fruitful in obtaining fascinating and glorious results, for example fractional order systems and fractional differential equations are used in physical and mathematical phenomena. Many inequalities like Hadamard are studied in the context of fractional calculus operators, see [1,6,8,20,28].
After the existence of Prabhaker fractional integral operators, the researchers began to think in this direction and consequently they further generalized and extended these operators in different ways for instance see [14,18,23,29], and references therein. By using the Mittag-Leffler function these fractional integral operators are generalized by many authors. In [27] Salim and Faraj defined the following fractional integral operators involving an extended Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel.
Definition 1.2. Let σ,τ,k,δ,ρ be positive real numbers and ω∈R. Then the generalized fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler function ϵρ,r,kσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f and ϵρ,r,kσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f for a real valued continuous function f are defined by:
(ϵρ,r,kσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f)(x)=∫xa(x−t)τ−1Eρ,r,kσ,τ,δ(ω(x−t)σ)f(t)dt, | (1.3) |
(ϵρ,r,kσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f)(x)=∫bx(t−x)τ−1Eρ,r,kσ,τ,δ(ω(t−x)σ)f(t)dt, | (1.4) |
where the function Eρ,r,kσ,τ,δ(t) is the generalized Mittag-Leffler function; Eρ,r,kσ,τ,δ(t)=∑∞n=0(ρ)kntnΓ(σn+τ)(r)δn and (ρ)kn=Γ(ρ+kn)Γ(ρ).
Further fractional integral operators containing an extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function in their kernels are defined as follows:
Definition 1.3. [18] Let ω,τ,δ,ρ,c∈C, p,σ,r≥0 and 0<k≤r+σ. Let f∈L1[a,b] and x∈[a,b]. Then the generalized fractional integral operators ϵρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f and ϵρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f are defined by:
(ϵρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f)(x;p)=∫xa(x−t)τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(x−t)σ;p)f(t)dt, | (1.5) |
(ϵρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f)(x;p)=∫bx(t−x)τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(t−x)σ;p)f(t)dt, | (1.6) |
where
Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(t;p)=∞∑n=0βp(ρ+nk,c−ρ)(c)nktnβ(ρ,c−ρ)Γ(σn+τ)(δ)nr, | (1.7) |
is the extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function.
Recently, Farid et al. defined a unified integral operator in [14] (see also [22]) as follows:
Definition 1.4. Let f,g:[a,b]→R, 0<a<b be the functions such that f be positive and f∈L1[a,b] and g be a differentiable and strictly increasing. Also let ϕx be an increasing function on [a,∞) and ω,τ,δ,ρ,c∈C, ℜ(τ),ℜ(δ)>0, ℜ(c)>ℜ(ρ)>0 with p≥0, σ,r>0 and 0<k≤r+σ. Then for x∈[a,b] the integral operators (gFϕ,ρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f) and (gFϕ,ρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f) are defined by:
(gFϕ,ρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f)(x;p)=∫xaϕ(g(x)−g(t))g(x)−g(t)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(x)−g(t))σ;p)f(t)d(g(t)), | (1.8) |
(gFϕ,ρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f)(x;p)=∫bxϕ(g(t)−g(x))g(t)−g(x)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(t)−g(x))σ;p)f(t)d(g(t)). | (1.9) |
The following definition of generalized fractional integral operator containing extended Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel can be extracted by setting ϕ(x)=xτ in Definition 1.4.
Definition 1.5. Let f,g:[a,b]→R, 0<a<b be the functions such that f be positive and f∈L1[a,b] and g be a differentiable and strictly increasing. Also let ω,τ,δ,ρ,c∈C, ℜ(τ),ℜ(δ)>0, ℜ(c)>ℜ(ρ)>0 with p≥0, σ,r>0 and 0<k≤r+σ. Then for x∈[a,b] the integral operators are defined by:
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f)(x;p)=∫xa(g(x)−g(t))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(x)−g(t))σ;p)f(t)d(g(t)), | (1.10) |
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f)(x;p)=∫bx(g(t)−g(x))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(t)−g(x))σ;p)f(t)d(g(t)). | (1.11) |
The following remark provides some connection of Definition 1.5 with already known operators:
Remark 1. (ⅰ) If we take p=0 and g(x)=x in equation (1.10), then it reduces to the fractional integral operators defined by Salim and Faraj in [27].
(ⅱ) If we take δ=r=1 and g(x)=x in (1.10), then it reduces to the fractional integral operators gΥρ,1,k,cσ,τ,1,ω,a+ and gΥρ,1,k,cσ,τ,1,ω,b− containing generalized Mittag-Leffler function Eρ,1,k,cσ,τ,1(t;p) defined by Rahman et al. in [26].
(ⅲ) If we set p=0,δ=r=1 and g(x)=x in (1.10), then it reduces to integral operators containing extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function introduced by Srivastava and Tomovski in [29].
(ⅳ) If we take p=0,δ=r=k=1 and g(x)=x, (1.10) reduces to integral operators defined by Prabhaker in [25] containing generalized Mittag-Leffler function.
(ⅴ) For p=ω=0 and g(x)=x in (1.10), then generalized fractional integral operators gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+ and gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b− reduce to Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators.
Our aim in this paper is to establish Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for generalized fractional integral operators containing extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function for a monotone increasing function via m-convex functions.
More than a hundred years ago, the mathematicians introduced the convexity and they established a lot of inequalities for the class of convex functions. The convex functions are playing a significant and a tremendous role in fractional calculus. Convexity has been widely employed in many branches of mathematics, for instance, in mathematical analysis, optimization theory, function theory, functional analysis and so on. Recently, many authors and researchers have given their attention to the generalizations, extensions, refinements of convex functions in multi-directions.
Definition 1.6. A function f:[a,b]→R is said to be convex if
f(tx+(1−t)y)≤tf(x)+(1−t)f(y) |
holds for all x,y∈[a,b] and t∈[0,1].
The m-convex function is a close generalization of convex function and its concept was introduced by Toader [30].
Definition 1.7. A function f:[0,b]→R, b>0 is said to be m-convex if for all x,y∈[0,b] and t∈[0,1]
f(tx+m(1−t)y)≤tf(x)+m(1−t)f(y) |
holds for m∈[0,1].
If we take m=1, we get the definition for convex function. An m-convex function need not be a convex function.
Example 1. [24] A function f:[0,∞)→R defined by f(x)=x4−5x3+9x2−5x is 1617-convex but it is not m-convex for m∈(1617,1].
A lot of results and inequalities pertaining to convex, m-convex and related functions have been produced (see, [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and references therein). Many fractional integral inequalities like Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard are very important and researchers have produced their generalizations and refinements (see, [5] and references therein). Fractional inequalities have many applications, for instance, the most fruitful ones are used in establishing uniqueness of solutions of fractional boundary value problems and fractional partial differential equations. For instance the following Hadamard inequality is given in [21]:
Theorem 1.8. Let f:[0,∞)→R, be positive real function. Let a,b∈[0,∞) with a<mb and f∈L1[a,mb]. If f is m-convex on [a,mb], then the following inequalities for the extended generalized fractional integrals hold:
f(a+mb2)(ϵω′,ρ,r,k,ca+,σ,τ,δ1)(mb;p)≤(ϵω′,ρ,r,k,ca+,σ,τ,δf)(mb;p)+mτ+1(ϵmσω′,ρ,r,k,cb−,σ,τ,δf)(am;p)2≤mτ+12[f(a)−m2f(am2)mb−a(ϵmσω′,ρ,r,k,cb−,σ,τ+1,δ1)(am;p)+(f(b)+mf(am2))(ϵmσω′,ρ,r,k,cb−,σ,τ,δ1)(am;p)],ω′=ω(mb−a)σ. |
In the upcoming section we will derive the Hadamard inequality for m-convex functions by means of fractional integrals (1.10) and (1.11). This version of the Hadamard inequality gives at once the Hadamard inequalities quoted in Section 2. Further we will establish the Fejér-Hadamard inequality for these operators of m-convex functions which will provide the corresponding inequalities proved in [31]. Moreover in Section 3 by establishing two identities error estimations of the Hadamard and the Fejér-Hadamard inequalities are obtained.
Theorem 2.1. Let f,g:[a,b]→R, 0<a<b, Range (g) ⊂[a,b], be the functions such that f be positive and f∈L1[a,b], g be differentiable and strictly increasing. If f be m-convex m∈(0,1] and g(a)<mg(b), then the following inequalities for fractional operators (1.10) and (1.11) hold:
f(g(a)+mg(b)2)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+1)(g−1(mg(b));p)≤(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+(f∘g))(g−1(mg(b));p)+mτ+1(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−(f∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p)2≤mτ+12[f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2)mg(b)−g(a)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ+1,δ,mσω′,b−1)(g−1(g(a)m);p)+(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−1)(g−1(g(a)m);p)],ω′=ω(mg(b)−g(a))σ. |
Proof. By definition of m-convex function f, we have
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)≤f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))+mf(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m). | (2.1) |
Further from (2.1), one can obtain the following integral inequality:
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)dt≤∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))dt+m∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)dt. | (2.2) |
Setting g(x)=tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b) and g(y)=tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m in (2.2), we get the following inequality:
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+1)(g−1(mg(b));p)≤(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+(f∘g))(g−1(mg(b));p)+mτ+1(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−(f∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p). | (2.3) |
Also by using the m-convexity of f, one can has
f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))+mf(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)≤m(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))+(f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2))t. | (2.4) |
This leads to the following integral inequality:
∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))dt+m∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)dt≤m(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)dt+(f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2))∫10tτEρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)dt. | (2.5) |
Again by setting g(x)=tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b), g(y)=tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m in (2.5) and after calculation, we get
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+(f∘g))(g−1(mg(b));p)+mτ+1(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−(f∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤mτ+1(f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2)mg(b)−g(a)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ+1,δ,mσω′,b−1)(g−1(g(a)m);p)+(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−1)(g−1(g(a)m);p)). | (2.6) |
Combining (2.3) and (2.6) we get the desired result.
Remark 2. ● In Theorem 2.1, if we put m=1, we get [31,Theorem 3.1]
● In Theorem 2.1, if we put g=I, we get [21,Theorem 3.1].
The following theorem gives the Fejér-Hadamard inequality for m-convex functions.
Theorem 2.2. Let f,g,h:[a,b]→R, 0<a<b, Range (g), be the functions such that f be positive and f∈L1[a,b], g be a differentiable and strictly increasing and h be integrable and non-negative. If f is m-convex, m∈(0,1], g(a)<mg(b) and g(a)+mg(b)−mg(x)=g(x), then the following inequalities for fractional operator (1.11) hold:
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,mb−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤(1+m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−(f∘g)(h∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2)(g(b)−g(a)m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p)+m(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p),ω′=ω(g(b)−g(a)m)σ. |
Proof. Multiplying both sides of (2.1) by 2tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p) and integrating on [0,1], we get
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)∫10tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)dt≤∫10tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))dt+m∫10tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)dt. | (2.7) |
Setting g(x)=tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m and also using g(a)+mg(b)−mg(x)=g(x) the following inequality is obtained:
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤(1+m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−(f∘g)(h∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p). | (2.8) |
Multiplying both sides of inequality (2.4) with tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p) and integrating on [0,1], then setting g(x)=tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m and also using g(a)+mg(b)−mg(x)=g(x) we have
(1+m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−(f∘g)(h∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤(f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2))g((b)−g(a)m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p)+m(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p). | (2.9) |
Combining (2.8) and (2.9) we get the desired result.
Remark 3. ● In Theorem 2.2, if we put m=1, then we get [31,Theorem 3.2].
● In Theorem 2.2, if we put g=I and p=0, then we get results of [3].
● In Theorem 2.2, if we put g=I, then we get results of [4].
To find error estimates first we prove the following two lemmas.
Lemma 3.1. Let f,g:[a,mb]→R, 0<a<mb, Range (g) ⊂[a,mb] be the functions such that f be positive and f∘g∈L1[a,mb] and g be a differentiable and strictly increasing. Also if f(g(x))=f(g(a)+g(mb)−g(x)), then the following equality for fractional operators (1.10) and (1.11) holds:
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)=(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−f∘g)(a;p)=(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−f∘g)(a;p)2. | (3.1) |
Proof. By Definition 1.5 of the generalized fractional integral operator containing extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function, we have
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)=∫mba(g(mb)−g(x))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(x))σ;p)f(g(x))d(g(x)). | (3.2) |
Replacing g(x) by g(a)+g(mb)−g(x) in (3.2) and using f(g(x))=f(g(a)+g(mb)−g(x)), we have
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)=∫mba(g(x)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(x)−g(a))σ;p)f(g(x))d(g(x)). |
This implies
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)=(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−f∘g)(a;p). | (3.3) |
By adding (3.2) and (3.3), we get (3.1).
Lemma 3.2. Let f,g,h:[a,mb]→R, 0<a<mb, Range (g), Range (h) ⊂[a,mb] be the functions such that f be positive and f∘g,h∘g∈L1[a,mb], g be a differentiable and strictly increasing and h be non-negative and continuous. If f′∘g∈L1[a,mb] and h(g(t))=h(g(a)+g(mb)−g(t)), then the following equality for the generalized fractional integral operators (1.10) and (1.11) holds:
f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)] | (3.4) |
−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]=∫mba[∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫mbt(g(s)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(s)−g(a))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]f′(g(t))d(g(t)). |
Proof. To prove the lemma, we have
∫mba[∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]f′(g(t))d(g(t))=f(g(mb))∫mba(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫mba((g(mb)−g(t))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(t))σ;p))f(g(t))h(g(t))d(g(t))=f(g(mb))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)−(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p). |
By using Lemma 3.1, we have
∫mba[∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]f′(g(t))d(g(t))=f(g(mb))2[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)](gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p). |
In the same way we have
∫mba[−∫mbt(g(s)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(s)−g(a))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]f′(g(t))d(g(t))=f(g(a))2[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)](gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p). |
By adding (3.5) and (3.5), we get (3.4).
By using Lemma 3.2, we prove the following theorem.
Theorem 3.3. Let f,g,h:[a,mb]→R, 0<a<mb, Range (g), Range (h) ⊂[a,mb] be the functions such that f be positive and (f∘g)′∈L1[a,mb], where g be a differentiable and strictly increasing and h be non-negative and continuous. Also let h(g(t))=h(g(a)+g(mb)−g(t)) and |(f∘g)′| is m-convex on [a,b]. Then for k<r+ℜ(σ), the following inequality for fractional integral operators (1.10) and (1.11) holds:
|f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∥h∥∞M(g(mb)−g(a))τ+1τ(τ+1)(1−Ω)[|f′(g(a))+mf′(g(b))|], | (3.5) |
where ∥h∥∞=supt∈[a,mb]|h(t)| and
Ω=1τ+2[{(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}+{(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}]
−τ+1τ+2[{(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}+{(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}]
−(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))+(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1.
Proof. Using Lemma 3.2, we have
|(f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2)[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∫mba|[∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫mbt(g(s)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(s)−g(a))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]||f′(g(t))|d(g(t)). | (3.6) |
Using the m-convexity of |(f∘g)′| on [a,b], we have
|f′(g(t))|≤g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|,t∈[a,b]. | (3.7) |
If we replace g(s) by g(a)+g(mb)−g(s) and using h(g(s))=h(g(a)+g(mb)−g(s)), t′=g−1(g(a)+g(mb)−g(t)), in second integral in the followings, we get
|∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫mbt(g(s)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(s)−g(a))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))|=|−∫at(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫t′a(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))|=|∫t′t(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))| |
≤{∫t′t|(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))|d(g(s)),t∈[a,a+mb2] ∫tt′|(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))|d(g(s)),t∈[a+mb2,mb]. | (3.8) |
By (3.6)–(3.8) and using absolute convergence of extended Mittag-Leffler function, we have
|f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2((gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p))−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∫a+mb2a(∫a+mb−ta|(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))|d(g(s)))×(g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|)d(g(t))+∫mba+mb2(∫ta+mb−t|(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))|d(g(s)))×(g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|)d(g(t))≤∥h∥∞Mτ(g(mb)−g(a))[∫a+mb2a((g(mb)−g(t))τ−(g(t)−g(a))τ)(g(mb)−g(t))|f′(g(a))|d(g(t))+m∫a+mb2a((g(mb)−g(t))τ−(g(t)−g(a))τ)m(g(t)−g(a))|f′(g(b))|d(g(t))+∫mba+mb2((g(t)−g(a))τ−(g(mb)−g(t))τ)(g(mb)−g(t))|f′(g(a))|d(g(t))+m∫mba+mb2((g(t)−g(a))τ−(g(mb)−g(t))τ)m(g(t)−g(a))|f′(g(b))|d(g(t))]. | (3.9) |
After some calculations, we get
∫a+mb2a((g(mb)−g(t))τ−(g(t)−g(a))τ)(g(mb)−g(t))d(g(t))=∫mba+mb2((g(t)−g(a))τ−(g(mb)−g(t))τ)(g(t)−g(a))d(g(t))=(g(mb)−g(a))τ+2τ+2−(g(mb)−g(a+mb2))τ+2τ+2−(g(a+mb2)−g(a))τ+1τ+1(g(mb)−g(a+mb2))−(g(a+mb2)−g(a))τ+2(τ+1)(τ+2), |
and
∫a+mb2a((g(mb)−g(t))τ−(g(t)−g(a))τ)(g(t)−g(a))d(g(t))=∫mba+mb2((g(t)−g(a))τ−(g(mb)−g(t))τ)(g(mb)−g(t))d(g(t))=−(g(a+mb2)−g(a))τ+1τ+1(g(mb)−g(a+mb2))+(g(mb)−g(a))τ+2(τ+1)(τ+2)−(g(a+mb2)−g(a))τ+2(τ+1)(τ+2)−(g(mb)−g(a+mb2))τ+2τ+2. |
Using the above evaluations of integrals in (3.9), we get the required inequality (3.5).
Remark 4. ● In Theorem 3.3, if we put m=1, then we get [31,Theorem]
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put g=I and p=0, then we get [3,Theorem 2.3].
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put g=I, p=0 and m=1, then we get [19,Theorem 2.3].
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put g=I, then we get [4,Theorem].
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put g=I, m=1, then we get [16,Theorem 2.3].
● In Theorem 3.3, for ω=p=0, g=I and h=1 along with τ=m=1, then we get [9,Theorem 2.2].
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put ω=p=0, g=I and h=1 with m=1, then we get [28,Theorem 3].
Theorem 3.4. Let f,g,h:[a,mb]→R, 0<a<mb, Range (g), Range (h) ⊂[a,mb] be the functions such that f be positive, (f∘g)′∈L1[a,mb], g be a differentiable and strictly increasing and h be continuous. Also let h(g(t))=h(g(a)+g(mb)−g(t)) and |(f∘g)′|q1, q1≥1 is m-convex. Then for k<r+ℜ(σ), the following inequality for fractional integral operators (1.10) and (1.11) holds:
|(f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2)[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∥h∥∞M(g(mb)−g(a))τ+1τ(τ+1)((1−Ψ)1p1(1−Ω)1q1)(|f′(g(a))|q1+m|f′(g(b))|q12)1q1, | (3.10) |
where ∥h∥∞=supt∈[a,mb]|h(t)|, 1p1+1q1=1,
Ψ=(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1+(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1 and
Ω=1τ+2[{(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}+{(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}]
−τ+1τ+2[{(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}+{(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}]
−(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))+(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1.
Proof. Using Lemma 3.2, power mean inequality, (3.8) and m-convexity of |(f∘g)′|q1 respectively, we have
|(f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2)[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤[∫mba|∫a+mb−tt(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))|d(g(t))]1−1q1[∫mba|∫a+mb−tt(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))||f′(g(t))|q1]1q1. | (3.11) |
Since |(f∘g)′|q1 is m-convex on [a,b], we have
|f′(g(t))|q1≤g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|q1+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|q1. | (3.12) |
Using ∥h∥∞=supt∈[a,mb]|h(t)|, and absolute convergence of extended Mittag-Leffler function, inequality (3.11) becomes
|(f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2)[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∥h∥1−1q1∞M1−1q1[∫a+mb2a(∫a+mb−tt(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1d(g(s)))d(g(t))+∫ba+mb2(∫ta+mb−t(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1d(g(s)))d(g(t))]1−1q1×∥h∥1q1∞M1q1[∫a+mb2a(∫a+mb−tt(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1d(g(s)))×(g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|q1+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|q1)d(g(t))+∫ba+mb2(∫ta+mb−t(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1d(g(s)))×(g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a)))|q1+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|q1)d(g(t))]1q1. |
After integrating and simplifying above inequality, we get (3.10).
Remark 5. ● In Theorem 3.4, if we put m=1, then we get [31,Theorem].
● In Theorem 3.4, if we put g=I and p=0, then we get [3,Theorem 2.6].
● In Theorem 3.4, if we put g=I, p=0 and m=1, then we get [19,Theorem 2.6].
● In Theorem 3.4, if we put g=I, then we get [4,Theorem].
● In Theorem 3.4, if we put g=I, m=1, then we get [16,Theorem 2.5].
This work provides the Hadamard and the Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for generalized extended fractional integral operators involving monotonically increasing function. These inequalities are obtained by using m-convex function which give results for convex function in particular. The presented results are generalizations of several fractional integral inequalities which are directly connected, consequently the well-known published results are quoted in remarks.
1. The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11971142, 11871202, 61673169, 11701176, 11626101, 11601485).
2. This work was sponsored in part by National key research and development projects of China (2017YFB1300502).
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] | R. A. Aliev, B. G. Guirimov, O. H. Huseynov, R. R. Aliyev, A consistency-driven approach to construction of Z-number-valued pairwise comparison matrices, Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst., 18 (2021), 37–49. |
[2] |
L. A. Zadeh, A note on Z-numbers, Inf. Sci., 181 (2011), 2923–2932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022
![]() |
[3] |
M. Abdullahi, T. Ahmad, V. Ramachandran, A review on some arithmetic concepts of Z-number and its application to real-world problems, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 19 (2020), 1091–1122. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020300025 doi: 10.1142/S0219622020300025
![]() |
[4] |
A. M. Nuriyev, Fuzzy MCDM models for selection of the tourism development site: The case of Azerbaijan, F1000Res., 11 (2022), 310. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109709.1 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.109709.1
![]() |
[5] |
L. M. Zeinalova, A Z-number valued analytical hierarchy process, Chem. Technol. Control Manag., 2018 (2018), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.34920/2018.4-5.88-94 doi: 10.34920/2018.4-5.88-94
![]() |
[6] |
K. M. N. K. Khalif, A. Gegov, A. S. A. Bakar, Z-TOPSIS approach for performance assessment using fuzzy similarity, IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2017.8015458 doi: 10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2017.8015458
![]() |
[7] | L. A. Gardashova, Z-number based TOPSIS method in multi-criteria decision making, Springer, Cham, 896 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04164-9_10 |
[8] |
W. C. J. Hsu, J. J. H. Liou, H. W. Lo, A group decision-making approach for exploring trends in the development of the healthcare industry in Taiwan, Decis. Support Syst., 141 (2021), 113447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113447 doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113447
![]() |
[9] |
D. Sergi, U. I. Sari, Prioritization of public services for digitalization using fuzzy Z-AHP and fuzzy Z-WASPAS, Complex Intell. Syst., 7 (2021), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00239-z doi: 10.1007/s40747-020-00239-z
![]() |
[10] | D. Božanić, D. Tešić, A. Milić, Multicriteria decision making model with Z-numbers based on FUCOM and MABAC model, Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., 3 (2020) 19–36, https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003019d |
[11] | W. N. A. W. Azman, N. Zamri, S. S. Abas, A hybrid method with fuzzy VIKOR and Z-numbers for decision making problems, In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2022, 35–45. |
[12] |
R. Zhu, Q. Liu, C. Huang, B. Kang, Z-ACM : An approximate calculation method of Z-numbers for large data sets based on kernel density estimation and its application in decision-making, Inf. Sci., 610 (2022), 440–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.171 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.171
![]() |
[13] |
Z. Liu, W. Wang, D. Wang, P. Liu, A modified ELECTRE II method with double attitude parameters based on linguistic Z-number and its application for third-party reverse logistics provider selection, Appl. Intell., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03315-8 doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03315-8
![]() |
[14] |
S. Rahmati, M. H. Mahdavi, S. J. Ghoushchi, H. Tomaskova, G. Haseli, Assessment and prioritize risk factors of financial measurement of management control system for production companies using a hybrid Z-SWARA and Z-WASPAS with FMEA method: A meta-analysis, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020253 doi: 10.3390/math10020253
![]() |
[15] |
N. Tüysüz, C. Kahraman, CODAS method using Z-fuzzy numbers, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 38 (2020), 1649–1662. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-182733 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-182733
![]() |
[16] | B. Kang, D. Wei, Y. Li, Y. Deng, A method of converting Z-number to classical fuzzy number, J. Inf. Comput. Sci., 9 (2012), 703–709. |
[17] |
R. A. Aliev, A. V. V. Alizadeh, O. H. H. Huseynov, The arithmetic of discrete Z-numbers, Inf. Sci., 290 (2015), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.024 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.024
![]() |
[18] |
R. A. A. Aliev, O. H. H. Huseynov, L. M. M. Zeinalova, The arithmetic of continuous Z-numbers, Inf. Sci., 373 (2016), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.078 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.078
![]() |
[19] |
R. A. Aliev, O. H. Huseynov, R. R. Aliyev, A sum of a large number of Z-numbers, Procedia Comput. Sci., 120 (2017), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.205 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.205
![]() |
[20] |
A. S. A. Bakar, A. Gegov, Multi-Layer decision methodology for ranking Z-numbers, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 8 (2015), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2015.1017371 doi: 10.1080/18756891.2015.1017371
![]() |
[21] |
W. Jiang, C. Xie, Y. Luo, Y. Tang, Ranking Z-numbers with an improved ranking method for generalized fuzzy numbers, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 32 (2017), 1931–1943. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-16139 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-16139
![]() |
[22] | D. Mohamad, S. A. Shaharani, N. H. Kamis, Ordering of Z-numbers, AIP Conf. Proc., 2017, 1870. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995881 |
[23] | M. Farzam, M. A. Kermani, T. Allahviranloo, M. J. S. Belaghi, A new method for ranking of Z-numbers based on magnitude value, In Progress in Intelligent Decision Science, Springer, Cham, 2021,841–850. |
[24] |
R. Chutia, Ranking of Z-numbers based on value and ambiguity at levels of decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22301 doi: 10.1002/int.22301
![]() |
[25] |
Q. Zhang, D. Sun, Some notes on possibilistic variances of generalized trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 3720–3740. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021221 doi: 10.3934/math.2021221
![]() |
[26] | F. Bilgin, M. Alci, A review on ranking of Z-numbers, J. Comput. Sci. Res., 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.30564/jcsr.v4i2.4499 |
[27] |
S. Ezadi, T. Allahviranloo, New multi-layer method for Z-number ranking using hyperbolic tangent function and convex combination, Intell. Autom. Soft Comput., 24 (2018), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2017.1367146 doi: 10.1080/10798587.2017.1367146
![]() |
[28] |
S. Ezadi, T. Allahviranloo, S. Mohammadi, Two new methods for ranking of Z-numbers based on sigmoid function and sign method, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 33 (2018), 1476–1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21987 doi: 10.1002/int.21987
![]() |
[29] |
Y. Li, D. Pelusi, Y. Deng, K. H. Cheong, Relative entropy of Z-numbers, Inf. Sci., 581 (2021), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.08.077 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.08.077
![]() |
[30] |
E. S. Lee, R. J. Li, Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events, Comput. Math. Appl., 15 (1988), 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(88)90124-1 doi: 10.1016/0898-1221(88)90124-1
![]() |
[31] | K. Al-Subhi, Application of the AHP in project management, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 19 (2001), 19–27. |
[32] | H. Cheemakurthy, K. Garme, Fuzzy AHP-based design performance index for evaluation of ferries, Sustainability, 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063680 |
[33] |
P. Wang, P. Liu, F. Chiclana, Multi-stage consistency optimization algorithm for decision making with incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relation, Inf. Sci., 556 (2021), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.10.004
![]() |
[34] |
P. Liu, Y. Li, P. Wang, Consistency threshold- and score function-based multi-attribute decision-making with Q-rung orthopair fuzzy preference relations, Inf. Sci., 618 (2022), 356–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.122 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.122
![]() |
[35] |
P. Liu, P. Wang, W. Pedrycz, Consistency- and consensus-based group decision-making method with incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 29 (2021), 2565–2579. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3003501 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3003501
![]() |
[36] |
P. Liu, Y. Li, P. Wang, Opinion dynamics and minimum adjustment-driven consensus model for multi-criteria large-scale group decision making under a novel social trust propagation mechanism, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 31 (2022), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3186172 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3186172
![]() |
[37] |
P. Liu, K. Zhang, P. Wang, F. Wang, A clustering- and maximum consensus-based model for social network large-scale group decision making with linguistic distribution, Inf. Sci., 602 (2022), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.038 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.038
![]() |
1. | Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Mujahid Abbas, Yu-Ming Chu, Quantum Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for functions with convex absolute values of second qb-derivatives, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03163-1 | |
2. | Muhammad Aamir Ali, Yu-Ming Chu, Hüseyin Budak, Abdullah Akkurt, Hüseyin Yıldırım, Manzoor Ahmed Zahid, Quantum variant of Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities for the mappings of two variables, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03195-7 | |
3. | Humaira Kalsoom, Muhammad Idrees, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Uzair Awan, Yu-Ming Chu, Some New (p1p2,q1q2)-Estimates of Ostrowski-type integral inequalities via n-polynomials s-type convexity, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 7122, 10.3934/math.2020456 | |
4. | Artion Kashuri, Sajid Iqbal, Saad Ihsan Butt, Jamshed Nasir, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Thabet Abdeljawad, Basil K. Papadopoulos, Trapezium-Type Inequalities for k -Fractional Integral via New Exponential-Type Convexity and Their Applications, 2020, 2020, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2020/8672710 | |
5. | Thabet Abdeljawad, Saima Rashid, A. A. El-Deeb, Zakia Hammouch, Yu-Ming Chu, Certain new weighted estimates proposing generalized proportional fractional operator in another sense, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02935-z | |
6. | Thabet Abdeljawad, Saima Rashid, Zakia Hammouch, İmdat İşcan, Yu-Ming Chu, Some new Simpson-type inequalities for generalized p-convex function on fractal sets with applications, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02955-9 | |
7. | Tie-Hong Zhao, Zai-Yin He, Yu-Ming Chu, On some refinements for inequalities involving zero-balanced hypergeometric function, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6479, 10.3934/math.2020418 | |
8. | Xiaoli Qiang, Abid Mahboob, Yu-Ming Chu, Jiabin Zuo, Numerical Approximation of Fractional-Order Volterra Integrodifferential Equation, 2020, 2020, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2020/8875792 | |
9. | Imran Abbas Baloch, Aqeel Ahmad Mughal, Yu-Ming Chu, Absar Ul Haq, Manuel De La Sen, A variant of Jensen-type inequality and related results for harmonic convex functions, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6404, 10.3934/math.2020412 | |
10. | Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Yu-Ming Chu, Nazia Jahangir, Huma Akhtar, Chahn Yong Jung, On Generalized Strongly p-Convex Functions of Higher Order, 2020, 2020, 2314-4629, 1, 10.1155/2020/8381431 | |
11. | Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Farhat Safdar, Yu-Ming Chu, New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6874, 10.3934/math.2020441 | |
12. | Muhammad Uzair Awan, Sadia Talib, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Yu-Ming Chu, A new q-integral identity and estimation of its bounds involving generalized exponentially μ-preinvex functions, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03036-7 | |
13. | Xiaobin Wang, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Kiran Naseem Aslam, Xingxing Wu, Tong Zhou, Sunil Kumar, On Caputo–Fabrizio Fractional Integral Inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard Type for Modified h -Convex Functions, 2020, 2020, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2020/8829140 | |
14. | Jian Wang, Ayesha Jamal, Xuemei Li, Kamal Shah, Numerical Solution of Fractional-Order Fredholm Integrodifferential Equation in the Sense of Atangana–Baleanu Derivative, 2021, 2021, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2021/6662808 | |
15. | Saad Ihsan Butt, Muhammad Umar, Saima Rashid, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Yu-Ming Chu, New Hermite–Jensen–Mercer-type inequalities via k-fractional integrals, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03093-y | |
16. | Shu-Bo Chen, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Rehana Ashraf, Yu-Ming Chu, A new approach on fractional calculus and probability density function, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 7041, 10.3934/math.2020451 | |
17. | Xi-Fan Huang, Miao-Kun Wang, Hao Shao, Yi-Fan Zhao, Yu-Ming Chu, Monotonicity properties and bounds for the complete p-elliptic integrals, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 7071, 10.3934/math.2020453 | |
18. | Lei Chen, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Muhammad Sajid Zahoor, Rahat Bano, Xiaolong Qin, Some Inequalities Related to Interval-Valued η h -Convex Functions, 2021, 2021, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2021/6617074 | |
19. | Qi Li, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Peiyu Yan, Muhammad Sajid Zahoor, Muhammad Imran, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, On Strongly Convex Functions via Caputo–Fabrizio-Type Fractional Integral and Some Applications, 2021, 2021, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2021/6625597 | |
20. | Lanxin Chen, Junxian Zhang, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Imran Ahmed, Shumaila Waheed, Lishuang Pan, Fractional integral inequalities for h-convex functions via Caputo-Fabrizio operator, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 6377, 10.3934/math.2021374 | |
21. | Haoliang Fu, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Waqas Nazeer, Mamoona Ghafoor, Peigen Li, On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for n-polynomial convex stochastic processes, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 6322, 10.3934/math.2021371 | |
22. | Slavko Simić, Bandar Bin-Mohsin, Some generalizations of the Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality, 2021, 2021, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-021-02605-y | |
23. | Wengui Yang, Certain New Chebyshev and Grüss-Type Inequalities for Unified Fractional Integral Operators via an Extended Generalized Mittag-Leffler Function, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 182, 10.3390/fractalfract6040182 | |
24. | Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Mohammed M. Al-Shomrani, Abdullahi Yusuf, The generalization of Hermite-Hadamard type Inequality with exp-convexity involving non-singular fractional operator, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 7040, 10.3934/math.2022392 | |
25. | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Sana Sajid, Muhammad Sajid Zahoor, Artion Kashuri, Hermite–Jensen–Mercer-Type Inequalities via Caputo–Fabrizio Fractional Integral for h-Convex Function, 2021, 5, 2504-3110, 269, 10.3390/fractalfract5040269 | |
26. | Yan Zhao, M. Shoaib Saleem, Shahid Mehmood, Zabidin Salleh, Sibel Yalçın, On Extended Convex Functions via Incomplete Gamma Functions, 2021, 2021, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2021/1924242 | |
27. | Chahn Yong Jung, Ghulam Farid, Hafsa Yasmeen, Yu-Pei Lv, Josip Pečarić, Refinements of some fractional integral inequalities for refined (α,h−m)-convex function, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-021-03544-0 | |
28. | WENGUI YANG, CERTAIN NEW WEIGHTED YOUNG- AND PÓLYA–SZEGÖ-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR UNIFIED FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL OPERATORS VIA AN EXTENDED GENERALIZED MITTAG-LEFFLER FUNCTION WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 30, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X22501067 | |
29. | Kamsing Nonlaopon, Ghulam Farid, Ammara Nosheen, Muhammad Yussouf, Ebenezer Bonyah, Mawardi Bahri, New Generalized Riemann–Liouville Fractional Integral Versions of Hadamard and Fejér–Hadamard Inequalities, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/8173785 | |
30. | Ghulam Farid, Muhammad Yussouf, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Fejér–Hadamard Type Inequalities for (α, h-m)-p-Convex Functions via Extended Generalized Fractional Integrals, 2021, 5, 2504-3110, 253, 10.3390/fractalfract5040253 | |
31. | Wenyan Jia, Muhammad Yussouf, Ghulam Farid, Khuram Ali Khan, Rafael Morales, Hadamard and Fejér–Hadamard Inequalities for α , h − m − p -Convex Functions via Riemann–Liouville Fractional Integrals, 2021, 2021, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2021/9945114 | |
32. | Aqeel Ahmad Mughal, Deeba Afzal, Thabet Abdeljawad, Aiman Mukheimer, Imran Abbas Baloch, Refined estimates and generalization of some recent results with applications, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 10728, 10.3934/math.2021623 | |
33. | Waewta Luangboon, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Jessada Tariboon, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Simpson- and Newton-Type Inequalities for Convex Functions via (p,q)-Calculus, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 1338, 10.3390/math9121338 | |
34. | Xue Wang, Absar ul Haq, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Sami Ullah Zakir, Mohsan Raza, The Strong Convex Functions and Related Inequalities, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/4056201 | |
35. | Muhammad Samraiz, Maria Malik, Kanwal Saeed, Saima Naheed, Sina Etemad, Manuel De la Sen, Shahram Rezapour, A Study on the Modified Form of Riemann-Type Fractional Inequalities via Convex Functions and Related Applications, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2682, 10.3390/sym14122682 | |
36. | Muzammil Mukhtar, Muhammad Yaqoob, Muhammad Samraiz, Iram Shabbir, Sina Etemad, Manuel De la Sen, Shahram Rezapour, Novel Mean-Type Inequalities via Generalized Riemann-Type Fractional Integral for Composite Convex Functions: Some Special Examples, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 479, 10.3390/sym15020479 | |
37. | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muzammil Mukhtar, Iram Shabbir, Muhammad Samraiz, Muhammad Yaqoob, On Fractional Integral Inequalities of Riemann Type for Composite Convex Functions and Applications, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 345, 10.3390/fractalfract7050345 | |
38. | Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Yasser Elmasry, Ebenezer Bonyah, Artion Kashuri, Gauhar Rahman, Çetin Yildiz, A. Hussain, On Novel Fractional Integral and Differential Operators and Their Properties, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/4165363 | |
39. | Iqra Nayab, Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Faisal Zahoor, Muath Awadalla, Abd Elmotaleb A. M. A. Elamin, Novel fractional inequalities measured by Prabhakar fuzzy fractional operators pertaining to fuzzy convexities and preinvexities, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 17696, 10.3934/math.2024860 | |
40. | HUMAIRA KALSOOM, ZAREEN A. KHAN, NEW INEQUALITIES OF HERMITE–HADAMARD TYPE FOR n-POLYNOMIAL s-TYPE CONVEX STOCHASTIC PROCESSES, 2023, 31, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X23401953 | |
41. | Wali Haider, Abdul Mateen, Hüseyin Budak, Asia Shehzadi, Loredana Ciurdariu, Novel Fractional Boole’s-Type Integral Inequalities via Caputo Fractional Operator and Their Implications in Numerical Analysis, 2025, 13, 2227-7390, 551, 10.3390/math13040551 | |
42. | Moquddsa Zahra, Muhammad Ashraf, Ghulam Farid, Nawab Hussain, Fractional Hadamard-type inequalities for refined (α, h-m)-p-convex functions and their consequences, 2024, 38, 0354-5180, 5463, 10.2298/FIL2415463Z |