
The COVID-19 pandemic still gains the attention of many researchers worldwide. Over the past few months, China faced a new wave of this pandemic which increases the risk of its spread to the rest of the world. Therefore, there has become an urgent demand to know the expected behavior of this pandemic in the coming period. In this regard, there are many mathematical models from which we may obtain accurate predictions about the behavior of this pandemic. Such a target may be achieved via updating the mathematical models taking into account the memory effect in the fractional calculus. This paper generalizes the power-law growth model of the COVID-19. The generalized model is investigated using two different definitions in the fractional calculus, mainly, the Caputo fractional derivative and the conformable derivative. The solution of the first-model is determined in a closed series form and the convergence is addressed. At a specific condition, the series transforms to an exact form. In addition, the solution of the second-model is evaluated exactly. The results are applied on eight European countries to predict the behavior/variation of the infected cases. Moreover, some remarks are given about the validity of the results reported in the literature.
Citation: Weam G. Alharbi, Abdullah F. Shater, Abdelhalim Ebaid, Carlo Cattani, Mounirah Areshi, Mohammed M. Jalal, Mohammed K. Alharbi. Communicable disease model in view of fractional calculus[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10033-10048. doi: 10.3934/math.2023508
[1] | Wedad Albalawi, Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Fahim Ud Din, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty . Well-posedness and Ulam-Hyers stability results of solutions to pantograph fractional stochastic differential equations in the sense of conformable derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12375-12398. doi: 10.3934/math.2024605 |
[2] | Tingting Guan, Guotao Wang, Haiyong Xu . Initial boundary value problems for space-time fractional conformable differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5275-5291. doi: 10.3934/math.2021312 |
[3] | Ahu Ercan . Comparative analysis for fractional nonlinear Sturm-Liouville equations with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13325-13343. doi: 10.3934/math.2022736 |
[4] | Farzaneh Alizadeh, Samad Kheybari, Kamyar Hosseini . Exact solutions and conservation laws for the time-fractional nonlinear dirac system: A study of classical and nonclassical lie symmetries. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11757-11782. doi: 10.3934/math.2025532 |
[5] | Nisar Gul, Saima Noor, Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed, Musaad S. Aldhabani, Roman Ullah . Analytical solution of the systems of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations using conformable Laplace transform iterative method. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 1945-1966. doi: 10.3934/math.2025091 |
[6] | Hassan Khan, Umar Farooq, Fairouz Tchier, Qasim Khan, Gurpreet Singh, Poom Kumam, Kanokwan Sitthithakerngkiet . The analytical analysis of fractional order Fokker-Planck equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11919-11941. doi: 10.3934/math.2022665 |
[7] | Karmina K. Ali, Resat Yilmazer . Discrete fractional solutions to the effective mass Schrödinger equation by mean of nabla operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 894-903. doi: 10.3934/math.2020061 |
[8] | Asif Khan, Tayyaba Akram, Arshad Khan, Shabir Ahmad, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Investigation of time fractional nonlinear KdV-Burgers equation under fractional operators with nonsingular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1251-1268. doi: 10.3934/math.2023063 |
[9] | Tareq Eriqat, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad El-Ajou, Ahmad Qazza, Moa'ath N. Oqielat, Ahmad Ghazal . A new analytical algorithm for uncertain fractional differential equations in the fuzzy conformable sense. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9641-9681. doi: 10.3934/math.2024472 |
[10] | Shuqin Zhang, Jie Wang, Lei Hu . On definition of solution of initial value problem for fractional differential equation of variable order. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6845-6867. doi: 10.3934/math.2021401 |
The COVID-19 pandemic still gains the attention of many researchers worldwide. Over the past few months, China faced a new wave of this pandemic which increases the risk of its spread to the rest of the world. Therefore, there has become an urgent demand to know the expected behavior of this pandemic in the coming period. In this regard, there are many mathematical models from which we may obtain accurate predictions about the behavior of this pandemic. Such a target may be achieved via updating the mathematical models taking into account the memory effect in the fractional calculus. This paper generalizes the power-law growth model of the COVID-19. The generalized model is investigated using two different definitions in the fractional calculus, mainly, the Caputo fractional derivative and the conformable derivative. The solution of the first-model is determined in a closed series form and the convergence is addressed. At a specific condition, the series transforms to an exact form. In addition, the solution of the second-model is evaluated exactly. The results are applied on eight European countries to predict the behavior/variation of the infected cases. Moreover, some remarks are given about the validity of the results reported in the literature.
In the past decades, numerous mathematical models have been suggested to explore the progress of various communicable and non-communicable diseases. The literature is rich of many mathematical models of communicable diseases such as Li and Zou [1] (with a spatially continuous domain), Siettos and Russo [2], and Jenness et al. [3]. Beside, the authors [4] analyzed a fractional order model for smoking as a non-communicable disease. Nowadays, the COVID-19 still attracting the interest of many researchers. Several mathematical models have been suggested to describe this pandemic such as Shaikh et al. [5], Abajo [6], Gepreel et al. [7], and Xenikos and Asimakopoulos [8]. In [9], an improved SIR model was formulated to describe the epidemic dynamics of the COVID-19 in China.
On the other hand, several models have been proposed for studying this epidemic in other countries such as India [10,11], Bulgaria[12], Italy [13], and Pakistan[14]. In addition, one can find in [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] another set of mathematical models which have been developed to investigate a number of communicable diseases. Some of the above discussed mathematical models are basically governed by differential equations with integer orders. However, the formulated models using classical derivatives can be generalized by incorporating a non-integer order in view of fractional calculus (FC). The FC has been widely applied in the literature to generalize many scientific problems in different areas of applications, such as the projectile dynamics[24,25], the Ambartsumian equation in astrophysics[26], and the chlorine transport used in water treatment[27]. Other interesting applications of the FC in biology and different fields can be found in [28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
So, the present work focuses on generalizing the dynamic scaling model[8] of the diffusion growth phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Europe. The authors[8] showed that the fatality cases grow follow a power law in all European countries. However, the difference among countries is the value of the power-law exponent. The model describes the observed statistical distribution and contributed to the discussion on basic assumptions for homogeneous mixing or for a network perspective in epidemiological studies of COVID-19. The proposed power-law growth model[8] can be generalized by means of the FC as
C0DαtN(t)=(tτ)γ−1(N∗−N(t)),α∈(0,1], | (1.1) |
where α is the order of the fractional derivative in the Caputo sense C0DαtN(t)=dαNdtα and N=N(t) is the infected cases at the moment t. The magnitude N∗ is an estimation of the total susceptible population where the growth phase of the epidemic in this model is in the limit n<N(t)<N∗, n denotes the fatality cases. For all European countries, the power-law exponent lies in the range 3.5<γ<8. Also, the power-law growth model of COVID-19 can be further generalized using the conformable-derivative (CD). The CD has been utilized in the literature to analyze/generalize some physical/engineering models (see [35,36,37,38]). In this case, the CD-model for COVID-19 is
CD0DαtN(t)=(tτ)γ−1(N∗−N(t)),α∈(0,1]. | (1.2) |
The above two models are subjected to the following initial condition (IC)[8]:
N(0)=0. | (1.3) |
As α→1, i.e., for classical derivative with respect to t, both the CFD-model (1.1) and the CD-model (1.2) reduces to the ordinary/classical version:
dNdt=(tτ)γ−1(N∗−N(t)),N(0)=0. | (1.4) |
The parameter τ introduced in Eqs (1.2) and (1.4) should be larger than all values of t. It has physical meaning of the upper limit in time, where the "memory effect" presumed in the present model is valid[8]. The objective of this work is to obtain the solutions of the present CFD-model and the CD-model for COVID-19. The scenario of the paper is as follows. In Section 2, basic concepts of the CFD and the CD are presented. Section 3 is devoted to determine the solution of the CFD-model in a closed series form. Proof of convergence of such series is addressed in Section 4. Beside, the solution of the CD-model is established in an exact form through Section 5. Properties/behaviors of the solutions for the two models are discussed in Section 6. In addition, some numerical results and various plots will be extracted in Section 7 to reveal the expected future for the diversity of COVID-19. Moreover, the difference in results between the CFD-model and the CD-model is to be explained and interpreted. It will also be shown that the solutions of models (1.1) and (1.2) reduce to the corresponding solution of the classical/ordinary model (1.4) as α→1. Furthermore, the validity of the published solution in[8] for the classical model (1.4) will be examined in Section 7. The paper is concluded in Section 8.
The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order α is defined as[24,26]:
0IαtN(t)=1Γ(α)∫t0N(μ)(t−μ)1−αdμ,α>0,t>0. | (2.1) |
Let α≠0 denotes the order of the derivative in such a way that m−1<α≤m. Then, the Caputo fractional derivative of a function N(t) is defined by[24,26]
C0DαtN(t)=dαN(t)dtα={1Γ(m−α)∫t0(t−μ)m−α−1N(m)(μ)dμ,if m−1<α<m,dmN(t)dtm,if α=m. | (2.2) |
In order to solve physical models, it is required to use effective definitions in the FC so that the physical initial conditions can be implemented. These demands are achieved through the following relation between the fractional operators 0Iαt and C0Dαt:
0Iαt(C0DαtN(t))=N(t)−N(0),α∈(0,1]. | (2.3) |
A fundamental property of the operator 0Iαt is
0Iαttr=Γ(r+1)Γ(r+α+1)tr+α,r≥−1. | (2.4) |
Also, we have
CD0Dαttr=Γ(r+1)Γ(r−α+1)tr−α. | (2.5) |
These properties are essential to construct the solution in a series form when solving fractional differential equations. The CD of arbitrary order α, 0<α≤1, of a function N(t): [0,∞)→R is defined as[35,36,37,38]
CD0DαtN(t)=t1−αdNdt. | (2.6) |
This is also a basic property of the operator CD0Dαt. Usually, it can be used to convert the fractional differential Eq (1.2) into a classical differential equation.
In this section, the solution of the CFD-model (1.1) is determined via a straightforward approach. Let us assume that β=γ−1. Accordingly, the CFD-model (1.1) becomes
C0DαtN(t)=(tτ)β(N∗−N(t)). | (3.1) |
The present approach is mainly based on integrating both sides of Eq (3.1) as follows:
0Iαt(C0DαtN(t))=0Iαt((tτ)βN∗)−0Iαt((tτ)βN(t)), | (3.2) |
which yields
N(t)=N(0)+N∗τβ0Iαt(tβ)−1τβ0Iαt(tβN(t)), | (3.3) |
or
N(t)=N∗T0Iαt(tβ)−1T0Iαt(tβN(t)),T=τβ. | (3.4) |
Let us assume the solution of the last equation in the ADM-series form [39]:
N(t)=∞∑n=0Nn(t). | (3.5) |
The ADM was widely applied to solve various scientific models [40,41,42,43,44,45]. Moreover, the convergence of the ADM has been proven in [46,47]. Implementing the above assumption leads to the recurrence-scheme[39]:
N0(t)=N∗T0Iαt(tβ)=N∗T(Γ(β+1)tβ+αΓ(β+α+1)),Nn(t)=−1T0Iαt(tβNn−1(t)),n≥1. | (3.6) |
For n=1, we have
N1(t)=−1T0Iαt(tβN0(t)),=−N∗T2(Γ(β+1)Γ(β+α+1))0Iαt(t2β+α),=−N∗T2(Γ(β+1)Γ(2β+α+1)Γ(β+α+1)Γ(2β+2α+1))t2β+2α. | (3.7) |
Also, for n=2, one can get
N2(t)=−1T0Iαt(tβN1(t)),=N∗T3(Γ(β+1)Γ(2β+α+1)Γ(β+α+1)Γ(2β+2α+1))0Iαt(t3β+2α),=N∗T3(Γ(β+1)Γ(2β+α+1)Γ(3β+2α+1)Γ(β+α+1)Γ(2β+2α+1)Γ(3β+3α+1))t3β+3α. | (3.8) |
Similarly, we can obtain N3(t) as
N3(t)=−N∗T4(Γ(β+1)Γ(2β+α+1)Γ(3β+2α+1)Γ(4β+3α+1)Γ(β+α+1)Γ(2β+2α+1)Γ(3β+3α+1)Γ(4β+4α+1))t4β+4α. | (3.9) |
Higher order components can be evaluated recurrently, however, a unified formula for all components can be derived. Regarding, the above four components can be rewritten as
N0(t)=N∗T(∏0k=0Γ((k+1)β+kα+1)∏0k=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1)tβ+α), | (3.10) |
N1(t)=−N∗T2(∏1k=0Γ((k+1)β+kα+1)∏1k=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1)t2(β+α)), | (3.11) |
N2(t)=N∗T3(∏2k=0Γ((k+1)β+kα+1)∏2k=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1)t3(β+α)), | (3.12) |
N3(t)=−N∗T3(∏3k=0Γ((k+1)β+kα+1)∏3k=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1)t4(β+α)). | (3.13) |
In view of these expressions, we have the unified formula:
Nn(t)=(−1)nN∗Tn+1(∏nk=0Γ((k+1)β+kα+1)∏nk=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1)t(n+1)(β+α)),n≥0. | (3.14) |
Therefore,
N(t)=N∗∞∑n=0(−1)nTn+1(∏nk=0Γ((k+1)β+kα+1)∏nk=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1)t(n+1)(β+α)), | (3.15) |
i.e.,
N(t)=N∗∞∑n=0((−1)n∏nk=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1−α)∏nk=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1)(tβ+αT)n+1). | (3.16) |
On using T=τβ, the above solution takes the form:
N(t)=N∗∞∑n=0((−1)n∏nk=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1−α)∏nk=0Γ((k+1)(β+α)+1)((tτ)βtα)n+1). | (3.17) |
Inserting β=γ−1 into the last equation, yields
N(t)=N∗∞∑n=0((−1)n∏nk=0Γ((k+1)(γ+α−1)+1−α)∏nk=0Γ((k+1)(γ+α−1)+1)((tτ)γ−1tα)n+1), | (3.18) |
which is a closed form series solution for the CFD-model (1.1). The convergence of this series is to be addressed in the next section. In addition, it will be shown later that the above closed form series solution transforms to a certain function as α→1 (the ordinary version). Furthermore, it reduces to the following exact solution at a specific value of γ=1−α:
N(t)=N∗ταΓ(1−α)1+ταΓ(1−α). | (3.19) |
Moreover, some observations regarding the solution reported in [8] for the model (1.4) will be declared.
Theorem 1. For γ>1, the series solution (3.18) converges for all t∈R.
Proof. Let us rewrite the series solution (3.18) as
N(t)=N∗∞∑n=0ρn(t), | (4.1) |
where
ρn(t)=cnTn+11,cn=(−1)n∏nk=0Γ((k+1)ν+1−α)∏nk=0Γ((k+1)ν+1),ν=γ+α−1,T1=(tτ)γ−1tα. | (4.2) |
Implementing the relation ν=γ+α−1, one can write the coefficients cn in the form:
cn=(−1)n∏nk=0Γ(kν+γ)∏nk=0Γ((k+1)ν+1). | (4.3) |
Applying the ratio test, then
limn→∞|ρn+1(t)ρn(t)|=limn→∞|cn+1cnT1|=|(tτ)γ−1tα|limn→∞|Γ((n+1)ν+γ)Γ((n+2)ν+1)|. | (4.4) |
Since 0<α≤1, then γ−1<ν≤γ. For γ>1, we have
limn→∞|Γ((n+1)ν+γ)Γ((n+2)ν+1)|=0, | (4.5) |
and thus,
limn→∞|ρn+1(t)ρn(t)|=0. | (4.6) |
Therefore, the series solution (3.18) converges for all t∈R such that τ≠0.
In this section, the solution of the CD-model (1.2) is evaluated in exact form. As a first step, the substitution β=γ−1 is used to express the CD-model (1.2) in the form:
CD0DαtN(t)=(tτ)β(N∗−N(t)). | (5.1) |
Employing the definition of the CD in Eq (2.6), then the differential Eq (5.1) becomes
t1−αdNdt=(tτ)β(N∗−N(t)). | (5.2) |
Using the assumption T=τβ, the last equation can be rewritten as
dNdt=tα+β−1T(N∗−N(t)). | (5.3) |
This is a first-order linear differential equation which can be easily solved under the given IC using the separation of variables method. Accordingly, the solution reads
N(t)=N∗[1−e−tα+β(α+β)T], | (5.4) |
i.e.,
N(t)=N∗[1−e−(tτ)βtαα+β]. | (5.5) |
Substituting β=γ−1 leads to
N(t)=N∗[1−e−(tτ)γ−1tαα+γ−1]. | (5.6) |
It is shown in the next section that the solution (5.6) for the CD-model reduces to the corresponding one of the classical/ordinary version (1.4) as α→1.
In this section, we show that the obtained solutions in the previous sections for the CFD-model and the CD-model agree with the result of the ordinary-model as α→1. Let us begin with the solution of the CFD-model when α→1. In this case, we obtain from Eq (3.18) that
N(t)=N∗∞∑n=0((−1)n∏nk=0Γ((k+1)γ)∏nk=0Γ((k+1)γ+1)((tτ)γ−1t)n+1). | (6.1) |
Using the equality:
n∏k=0Γ((k+1)γ+1)=n∏k=0(k+1)γn∏k=0Γ((k+1)γ),=(n+1)!γn+1n∏k=0Γ((k+1)γ), | (6.2) |
into Eq (6.1) with simplification, then
N(t)=N∗∞∑n=0(−1)n((tτ)γt)n+1(n+1)!γn+1, | (6.3) |
which is equivalent to
N(t)=N∗∞∑n=1(−1)n−1((tτ)γt)nn!γn. | (6.4) |
The last equation implies
N(t)=−N∗∞∑n=1−((tτ)γtγ)nn!, | (6.5) |
or
N(t)=N∗[1−e−(tτ)γtγ]. | (6.6) |
In addition, the solution of the CD-model gives, as α→1, the following form:
N(t)=N∗[1−e−(tτ)γ−1tγ], | (6.7) |
which agrees with the expression (6.6). This solution satisfies the initial condition N(0)=0. Beside, it can be easily checked via a direct substitution into the governing Eq (1.4).
Remark. In [8], the authors introduced the expression:
N(t)=N∗[1−e−(tτ)γ1γ], | (6.8) |
as a solution for the classical/ordinary model (1.4). A first sight on this expression, one can find that the exponent in (6.8) is different than ours in (6.6) or (6.7). In fact, the solution reported in [8] missed some terms, beside, it dosen't satisfy the model (1.4).
This section reports some numerical results about the validity, the convergence, and the accuracy of the obtained series solution for the CFD-model. Beside, this section investigates the behaviors of the obtained solutions for the CFD-model and the CD-model for the purpose of comparisons. The data for eight European countries are considered to extract the current results. In [8], the values of γ for eight European countries are estimated as γ=3.6 (Greece), γ=5.2 (Sweden), γ=6.1 (Germany), γ=6.5 (UK), γ=6.7 (Italy), γ=6.8 (France), γ=6.9 (Netherlands), and γ=7.6 (Belgium).
This part of the discussion aims to report some results on the convergence of the series solution (3.18) for the CFD-model (1.1). The m-term approximations of this closed form series solution may be written as
Φm(t)=N∗m−1∑n=0cnTn+11, | (7.1) |
where
cn=(−1)nn∏k=0Γ((k+1)ν+1−α)n∏k=0Γ((k+1)ν+1),ν=γ+α−1,T1=(tτ)γ−1tα. | (7.2) |
Figures 1–4 indicate the convergence of the sequence of the approximations {Φm(t)} at some selected values of m (the number of terms taken to approximate the infected cases N(t)). These figures use the data of the first four European countries listed above. It can be seen that the sequence of the approximations {Φm(t)} converges in the case of Greece (γ=3.6, Figure 1) in the most domain of the first 100 days, however, the convergence rate is better for the other three countries, mainly Sweden (γ=5.2, Figure 2), Germany (γ=6.1, Figure 3), and UK (γ=6.5, Figure 4) in which the convergence includes the whole domain, i.e., t∈[0,100]. A conclusion here is that the convergence rate, for the implemented approximations Φm(t),m=60,64,68,72, is better for those countries with γ-values greater than 3.6. Of course, one can increase the number of terms m to reach the best convergence rate for the eight countries, may be m=100 is adequate to achieve such target. This point is confirmed/discussed in the next section through estimating the residuals of the obtained CDF-solution.
In this section, the accuracy of the series solution for the CFD-model is estimated by means of the residuals given by
REm(t)=N∗|m−1∑n=0(dntν(n+1)−ατ(γ−1)(n+1)+cn(tτ)(γ−1)(n+2)tα(n+1))−(tτ)γ−1|, | (7.3) |
where dn is
dn=cnΓ(ν(n+1)+1)Γ(ν(n+1)+1−α). | (7.4) |
The residuals RE100(t) (m=100) is plotted in Figures 5 and 6 for Greece (γ=3.6) and Sweden (γ=5.2), respectively. It is seen in these figures that the accuracy achieved in Figure 6 is much better than the corresponding accuracy in Figure 5 due to the increase in the value of γ. This conclusion is also confirmed in Figure 7 for the other six countries in which the values of γ are greater than those in Figures 5 and 6. These results reveal that the current approximation using 100 terms of the CDF-solution is sufficient to accurately modeling the number of the infected cases for the considered eight European countries.
In a previous section, the solution of the CD-model was obtained in exact form. This exact solution is easily verified by direct substitution into the governing equation of the CD-model. In addition, the behavior of the exact CD-solution is displayed in Figure 8 for the considered eight countries. Although the behavior of the infected cases N(t) in view of the CD-model looks similar to the CFD-model, the time is doubled so that N(t)→N∗ is satisfied. In addition, Figure 9 shows the impact of the fractional-order α on the variation of the infected cases N(t) for the CD-model at N∗=1000, τ=200, γ=3.6 (Greece). Similar results can be also obtained for the impact of α on the behavior of N(t) for the rest of the European countries. It can be observed that the number of the infected cases increases with increasing the order α of the CD-model.
In this paper, the power-law growth model for COVID-19 was generalized using the Caputo fractional derivative (CFD-model) and the conformable derivative (CD-model). A closed form series solution was determined for the CFD-model. Beside, the convergence of the series solution was proved theoretically. It is shown that the obtained series solution transforms to a certain function as the fractional order tends to unity. In addition, the solution of the CD-model was evaluated in an exact form. The obtained results were invested to predict the number of the infected cases for eight European countries. The behavior/variation of the infected cases was depicted in several plots for the eight European countries and the results were analyzed. It was declared that the solutions of present generalized models reduce to the corresponding solution of the original model as the fractional-order tends to unity. The main advantage of this work is that it gives accurate solution which can be implemented for further comparisons with other COVID-19 models. Finally, the given remarks on the reported in the literature may reflex the effectiveness of the current analysis.
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at University of Tabuk for funding this work through Research Group No. S-1443-0166.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] |
J. Li, X. Zou, Modeling spatial spread of infectious diseases with a spatially continuous domain, Bull. Math. Biol., 71 (2009), 2048–2079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-009-9457-z doi: 10.1007/s11538-009-9457-z
![]() |
[2] |
C. Siettos, L. Russo, Mathematical modeling of infectious disease dynamics, Virulence, 4 (2013), 295–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/viru.24041 doi: 10.4161/viru.24041
![]() |
[3] |
S. Jenness, S. Goodreau, M. Morris, Epimodel: an R package for mathematical modeling of infectious disease over networks, J. Stat. Softw., 84 (2018), 1–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v084.i08 doi: 10.18637/jss.v084.i08
![]() |
[4] |
A. Mahdy, N. Sweilam, M. Higazy, Approximate solution for solving nonlinear fractional order smoking model, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 739–752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.049 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.049
![]() |
[5] |
A. Shaikh, I. Shaikh, K. Nisar, A mathematical model of COVID-19 using fractional derivative: outbreak in India with dynamics of transmission and control, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02834-3 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02834-3
![]() |
[6] | J. De Abajo, Simple mathematics on COVID-19 expansion, MedRxiv, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037663 |
[7] |
K. Gepreel, M. Mohamed, H. Alotaibi, A. Mahdy, Dynamical behaviors of nonlinear Coronavirus (COVID-19) model with numerical studies, CMC-Comput. Mater. Con., 67 (2021), 675–686. http://dx.doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.012200 doi: 10.32604/cmc.2021.012200
![]() |
[8] |
D. Xenikos, A. Asimakopoulos, Power-law growth of the COVID-19 fatality incidents in Europe, Infect. Dis. Model., 6 (2021), 743–750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2021.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2021.05.001
![]() |
[9] |
W. Zhu, S. Shen, An improved SIR model describing the epidemic dynamics of the COVID-19 in China, Results Phys., 25 (2021), 104289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104289 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104289
![]() |
[10] |
K. Sarkar, S. Khajanchi, J. Nieto, Modeling and forecasting the COVID-19 pandemic in India, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 139 (2020), 110049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110049 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110049
![]() |
[11] |
K. Ghosh, A. Ghosh, Study of COVID-19 epidemiological evolution in India with a multi-wave SIR model, Nonlinear Dyn., 109 (2022), 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07471-x doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07471-x
![]() |
[12] |
S. Margenov, N. Popivanov, I. Ugrinova, T. Hristov, Mathematical modeling and short-term forecasting of the COVID-19 epidemic in Bulgaria: SEIRS model with vaccination, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 2570. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10152570 doi: 10.3390/math10152570
![]() |
[13] |
G. Martelloni, G. Martelloni, Modelling the downhill of the Sars-Cov-2 in Italy and a universal forecast of the epidemic in the world, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 139 (2020), 110064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110064 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110064
![]() |
[14] |
P. Naik, M. Yavuz, S. Qureshi, J. Zu, S. Townley, Modeling and analysis of COVID-19 epidemics with treatment in fractional derivatives using real data from Pakistan, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 135 (2020), 795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00819-5 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00819-5
![]() |
[15] |
J. Zhou, S. Salahshour, A. Ahmadian, N. Senu, Modeling the dynamics of COVID-19 using fractal-fractional operator with a case study, Results Phys., 33 (2022), 105103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105103 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105103
![]() |
[16] |
M. Ala'raj, M. Majdalawieh, N. Nizamuddin, Modeling and forecasting of COVID-19 using a hybrid dynamic model based on SEIRD with ARIMA corrections, Infect. Dis. Model., 6 (2021), 98–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2020.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.11.007
![]() |
[17] |
A. Comunian, R. Gaburro, M. Giudici, Inversion of a SIR-based model: a critical analysis about the application to COVID-19 epidemic, Physica D, 413 (2020), 132674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2020.132674 doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2020.132674
![]() |
[18] |
N. Kudryashov, M. Chmykhov, M. Vigdorowitsch, Analytical features of the SIR model and their applications to COVID-19, Appl. Math. Model., 90 (2021), 466–473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.057 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.057
![]() |
[19] |
P. Naik, J. Zu, M. Naik, Stability analysis of a fractional-order cancer model with chaotic dynamics, Int. J. Biomath., 14 (2021), 2150046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793524521500467 doi: 10.1142/S1793524521500467
![]() |
[20] | P. Naik, M. Ghoreishi, J. Zu, Approximate solution of a nonlinear fractional-order HIV model using homotopy analysis method, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mod., 19 (2022), 52–84. |
[21] |
A. Ahmad, M. Farman, P. Naik, N, Zafar, A. Akgul, M. Saleem, Modeling and numerical investigation of fractional-order bovine babesiosis disease, Numer. Meth. Part. D. E., 37 (2021), 1946–1964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/num.22632 doi: 10.1002/num.22632
![]() |
[22] |
M. Ghori, P. Naik, J. Zu, Z. Eskandari, M. Naik, Global dynamics and bifurcation analysis of a fractional-order SEIR epidemic model with saturation incidence rate, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 3665–3688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.8010 doi: 10.1002/mma.8010
![]() |
[23] |
K. Hattaf, M. El Karimi, A. Mohsen, Z. Hajhouji, M. El Younoussi, N. Yousfi, Mathematical modeling and analysis of the dynamics of RNA viruses in presence of immunity and treatment: a case study of SARS-CoV-2, Vaccines, 11 (2023), 201. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020201 doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020201
![]() |
[24] |
A. Ebaid, Analysis of projectile motion in view of the fractional calculus, Appl. Math. Model., 35 (2011), 1231–1239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.08.010
![]() |
[25] |
A. Ebaid, E. El-Zahar, A. Aljohani, B. Salah, M. Krid, J. Tenreiro Machado, Analysis of the two-dimensional fractional projectile motion in view of the experimental data, Nonlinear Dyn., 97 (2019), 1711–1720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05099-y doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-05099-y
![]() |
[26] |
A. Ebaid, C. Cattani, A. Al Juhani1, E. El-Zahar, A novel exact solution for the fractional Ambartsumian equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03235-w doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03235-w
![]() |
[27] |
A. Aljohani, A. Ebaid, E. Algehyne, Y. Mahrous, C. Cattani, H. Al-Jeaid, The Mittag-Leffler function for re-evaluating the chlorine transport model: comparative analysis, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030125 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6030125
![]() |
[28] |
K. Hattaf, On the stability and numerical scheme of fractional differential equations with application to biology, Computation, 10 (2022), 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computation10060097 doi: 10.3390/computation10060097
![]() |
[29] |
K. Hattaf, A new generalized definition of fractional derivative with non-singular kernel, Computation, 8 (2020), 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computation8020049 doi: 10.3390/computation8020049
![]() |
[30] |
O. Arqub, M. Osman, C. Park, J. Lee, H. Alsulami, M. Alhodaly, Development of the reproducing kernel Hilbert space algorithm for numerical pointwise solution of the time-fractional nonlocal reaction-diffusion equation, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 10539–10550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.008 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.008
![]() |
[31] |
O. Arqub, S. Tayebi, D. Baleanu, M. Osman, W. Mahmoud, H. Alsulami, A numerical combined algorithm in cubic B-spline method and finite difference technique for the time-fractional nonlinear diffusion wave equation with reaction and damping terms, Results Phys., 41 (2022), 105912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105912 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105912
![]() |
[32] |
S. Rashid, K. Kubra, S. Sultana, P. Agarwal, M. Osman, An approximate analytical view of physical and biological models in the setting of Caputo operator via Elzaki transform decomposition method, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 413 (2022), 114378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2022.114378 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114378
![]() |
[33] | K. Owolabi, R. Agarwal, E. Pindza, S. Bernstein, M. Osman, Complex Turing patterns in chaotic dynamics of autocatalytic reactions with the Caputo fractional derivative, Neural Comput. Applic., in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08298-2 |
[34] |
C. Park, R. Nuruddeen, K. Ali, L. Muhammad, M. Osman, D. Baleanu, Novel hyperbolic and exponential ansatz methods to the fractional fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equations, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03087-w doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-03087-w
![]() |
[35] |
A. Ebaid, B. Masaedeh, E. El-Zahar, A new fractional model for the falling body problem, Chinese Phys. Lett., 34 (2017), 020201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/34/2/020201 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/34/2/020201
![]() |
[36] |
S. Khaled, E. El-Zahar, A. Ebaid, Solution of Ambartsumian delay differential equation with conformable derivative, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 425. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math7050425 doi: 10.3390/math7050425
![]() |
[37] |
F. Alharbi, D. Baleanu, A. Ebaid, Physical properties of the projectile motion using the conformable derivative, Chinese J. Phys., 58 (2019), 18–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2018.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2018.12.010
![]() |
[38] |
E. Algehyne, E. El-Zahar, F. Alharbi, A. Ebaid, Development of analytical solution for a generalized Ambartsumian equation, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2020), 249–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2020016 doi: 10.3934/math.2020016
![]() |
[39] | G. Adomian, Solving Frontier problems of physics: the decomposition method, Dordrecht: Springer, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8289-6 |
[40] |
A. Wazwaz, Adomian decomposition method for a reliable treatment of the Bratu-type equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 166 (2005), 652–663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.06.059 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.06.059
![]() |
[41] |
H. Bakodah, A. Ebaid, Exact solution of Ambartsumian delay differential equation and comparison with Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari approximate method, Mathematics, 6 (2018), 331. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math6120331 doi: 10.3390/math6120331
![]() |
[42] |
J. Duan, R. Rach, A new modification of the Adomian decomposition method for solving boundary value problems for higher order nonlinear differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2011), 4090–4118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.09.037 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.09.037
![]() |
[43] |
J. Diblík, M. Kúdelcíková, Two classes of positive solutions of first order functional differential equations of delayed type, Nonlinear Anal., 75 (2012), 4807–4820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2012.03.030 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2012.03.030
![]() |
[44] |
S. Bhalekar, J. Patade, An analytical solution of fishers equation using decomposition method, American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 6 (2016), 123–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.ajcam.20160603.01 doi: 10.5923/j.ajcam.20160603.01
![]() |
[45] |
A. Alenazy, A. Ebaid, E. Algehyne, H. Al-Jeaid, Advanced study on the delay differential equation y′(t)=ay(t)+by(ct), Mathematics, 10 (2022), 4302. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10224302 doi: 10.3390/math10224302
![]() |
[46] |
K. Abbaoui, Y. Cherruault, Convergence of Adomian's method applied to nonlinear equations, Math. Comput. Model., 20 (1994), 69–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(94)00163-4 doi: 10.1016/0895-7177(94)00163-4
![]() |
[47] |
Y. Cherruault, G. Adomian, Decomposition methods: a new proof of convergence, Math. Comput. Model., 18 (1993), 103–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(93)90233-O doi: 10.1016/0895-7177(93)90233-O
![]() |
1. | Mei Wang, Baogua Jia, Finite-time stability and uniqueness theorem of solutions of nabla fractional $ (q, h) $-difference equations with non-Lipschitz and nonlinear conditions, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 15132, 10.3934/math.2024734 | |
2. | Svetozar Margenov, Nedyu Popivanov, Iva Ugrinova, Tsvetan Hristov, Differential and Time-Discrete SEIRS Models with Vaccination: Local Stability, Validation and Sensitivity Analysis Using Bulgarian COVID-19 Data, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 2238, 10.3390/math11102238 | |
3. | D. Priyadarsini, P. K. Sahu, M. Routaray, D. Chalishajar, Numerical treatment for time fractional order phytoplankton-toxic phytoplankton-zooplankton system, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 3349, 10.3934/math.2024164 | |
4. | Chinwe Peace Igiri, Samuel Shikaa, Monkeypox Transmission Dynamics Using Fractional Disease Informed Neural Network: A Global and Continental Analysis, 2025, 13, 2169-3536, 77611, 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3559005 |