Robust dynamic control algorithm for uncertain powered wheelchairs based on sliding neural network approach

Mohsen Bakouri; Abdullah Alqarni; Sultan Alanazi; Ahmad Alassaf; Ibrahim AlMohimeed; Mohamed Abdelkader Aboamer; Tareq Alqahtani; Mohsen Bakouri; Abdullah Alqarni; Sultan Alanazi; Ahmad Alassaf; Ibrahim AlMohimeed; Mohamed Abdelkader Aboamer; Tareq Alqahtani

doi:10.3934/math.20231373

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 11: 26821-26839. doi: 10.3934/math.20231373

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Robust dynamic control algorithm for uncertain powered wheelchairs based on sliding neural network approach

Department of Medical Equipment Technology, College of Applied Medical Science, Majmaah University, Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia

Received: 23 July 2023 Revised: 31 August 2023 Accepted: 11 September 2023 Published: 20 September 2023
MSC : 68T07, 92B20

The dynamic model of mobile wheelchair technology requires developing and implementing an intelligent control system to improve protection, increasing performance efficiency, and creating precise maneuvering in indoor and outdoor spaces. This work aims to design a robust tracking control algorithm based on a reference model for operating the kinematic model of powered wheelchairs under the variation of system parameters and unknown disturbance signals. The control algorithm was implemented using the pole placement method in combination with the sliding mode control (PP-SMC) approach. The design also adopted a neural network approach to eliminate system uncertainties from perturbations. The designed method utilized the sinewave signal as an essential input signal to the reference model. The stability of a closed-loop control system was achieved by adopting the Goa reaching law. The performance of the proposed tracking control system was evaluated in three scenarios under different conditions. These included assessing the tracking under normal operation conditions, considering the tracking performance by changing the dynamic system's parameters and evaluating the control system in the presence of uncertainties and external disturbances. The findings demonstrated that the proposed control method efficiently tracked the reference signal within a small error based on mean absolute error (MAE) measurements, where the range of MAE was between 0.08 and 0.12 in the presence of uncertainties or perturbations.

Keywords:

dynamic system,
uncertain system,
powered wheelchair, sliding mode control (SMC),
pole placement method,
neural networks approach

Citation: Mohsen Bakouri, Abdullah Alqarni, Sultan Alanazi, Ahmad Alassaf, Ibrahim AlMohimeed, Mohamed Abdelkader Aboamer, Tareq Alqahtani. Robust dynamic control algorithm for uncertain powered wheelchairs based on sliding neural network approach[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26821-26839. doi: 10.3934/math.20231373

Related Papers:

[1]	Dayang Dai, Dabuxilatu Wang . A generalized Liu-type estimator for logistic partial linear regression model with multicollinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11851-11874. doi: 10.3934/math.2023600
[2]	Muhammad Nauman Akram, Muhammad Amin, Ahmed Elhassanein, Muhammad Aman Ullah . A new modified ridge-type estimator for the beta regression model: simulation and application. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 1035-1057. doi: 10.3934/math.2022062
[3]	Sihem Semmar, Omar Fetitah, Mohammed Kadi Attouch, Salah Khardani, Ibrahim M. Almanjahie . A Bernstein polynomial approach of the robust regression. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32409-32441. doi: 10.3934/math.20241554
[4]	Yanting Xiao, Wanying Dong . Robust estimation for varying-coefficient partially linear measurement error model with auxiliary instrumental variables. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18373-18391. doi: 10.3934/math.2023934
[5]	Gaosheng Liu, Yang Bai . Statistical inference in functional semiparametric spatial autoregressive model. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10890-10906. doi: 10.3934/math.2021633
[6]	Juxia Xiao, Ping Yu, Zhongzhan Zhang . Weighted composite asymmetric Huber estimation for partial functional linear models. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7657-7684. doi: 10.3934/math.2022430
[7]	Xin Liang, Xingfa Zhang, Yuan Li, Chunliang Deng . Daily nonparametric ARCH(1) model estimation using intraday high frequency data. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3455-3464. doi: 10.3934/math.2021206
[8]	Emrah Altun, Mustafa Ç. Korkmaz, M. El-Morshedy, M. S. Eliwa . The extended gamma distribution with regression model and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2418-2439. doi: 10.3934/math.2021147
[9]	Muhammad Amin, Saima Afzal, Muhammad Nauman Akram, Abdisalam Hassan Muse, Ahlam H. Tolba, Tahani A. Abushal . Outlier detection in gamma regression using Pearson residuals: Simulation and an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15331-15347. doi: 10.3934/math.2022840
[10]	Zawar Hussain, Atif Akbar, Mohammed M. A. Almazah, A. Y. Al-Rezami, Fuad S. Al-Duais . Diagnostic power of some graphical methods in geometric regression model addressing cervical cancer data. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 4057-4075. doi: 10.3934/math.2024198

Abstract

1. Introduction

The field of mathematical analysis that deals with the study of arbitrary order integrals and derivatives is known as fractional calculus. Because of its numerous applications across a wide range of fields, this field has increased in importance and recognition over the past few years. According to researchers, this field is the most effective at identifying anomalous kinetics and has numerous uses in a variety of fields. Ordinary differential equations with fractional derivatives can be used to simulate a variety of issues, including statistical, mathematical, engineering, chemical, and biological issues. Several distinct forms of fractional integrals and derivative operators (see e.g., ^[1,2,3,4]), including Riemann-Liouville, Caputo, Riesz, Hilfer, Hadamard, Erdélyi-Kober, Saigo, Marichev-Saigo-Maeda and others, have been thoroughly investigated by researchers. From an application perspective, we suggest the readers to see the work related to the fractional differential equations presented by ^[5,6,7,8]. In ^[9], the authors studied symmetric and antisymmetric solitons in the defocused saturable nonlinearity and the PT-symmetric potential of the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation. In ^[10], the fractional exponential function approach is used to study a time-fractional Ablowitz-Ladik model, and bright and dark discrete soliton solutions, discrete exponential solutions, and discrete peculiar wave solutions are discovered. In ^[11], the authors presented the rich vector exact solutions for the coupled discrete conformable fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations by taking into account the conformable fractional derivative.

On the other hand, special functions like Gamma, Beta, Mittag-Leffler, et al. play a vital part in the foundation of fractional calculus. Moreover, the Mittag-Leffler function is regarded as the fundamental function in fractional calculus. The Prabhakar fractional operator containing a three-parameter version of the aforementioned function in the kernel. The M-L function has been extensively studied to construct solutions of fractional PDEs, such as dynamical characteristic of analytical fractional solitons for the space-time fractional Fokas-Lenells equation, soliton dynamics based on exact solutions of conformable fractional discrete complex cubic Ginzburg-Landau equation and Abundant fractional soliton solutions of a space-time fractional perturbed Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation by a fractional mapping method, see ^[12,13,14]. Strong generalizations of the univariate and bivariate Mittag-Leffler functions, which are known to be important in fractional calculus, are the multivariate Mittag-Leffler functions.

The well-known one-parameter Mittag-Leffler (M-L) function is defined by ^[15,16] as follows

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{z_1^l}{\Gamma(al+1)}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(a\in\mathbb{C};\Re(a) > 0,z_1\in\mathbb{C}), \end{equation}$

(1.1)

where $\mathbb{C}$ represents the set of complex numbers and $\Re(a)$ denotes the real part of the complex number.

The generalization of (1.1) with two parameters is defined by ^[17,18] as

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a,b}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{z_1^l}{\Gamma(al+b)}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(a,b\in\mathbb{C};\Re(a) > 0,\Re(b) > 0), \end{equation}$

(1.2)

Later on, Agarwal ^[19], Humbert ^[20] and Humbert and Agarwal ^[21] studied the properties and applications of M-L functions. In ^[22], the generalization of (1.1) and (1.2) is defined by

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a,b}^{c}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c)_l}{\Gamma(a l+b)}\frac{z_1^l}{l!}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(a,b,c\in\mathbb{C};\Re(a) > 0,\Re(b) > 0). \end{equation}$

(1.3)

In ^[23], the following generalization of the M-L function is defined by

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a,b}^{c,q}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c)_{lq}}{\Gamma(a l+b)}\frac{z_1^l}{l!}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(a,b,c\in\mathbb{C};\Re(a) > 0,\Re(b) > 0, q > 0). \end{equation}$

(1.4)

In ^[24], Rahman et al. proposed the following generalized of M-L function by

$\begin{align} \varepsilon_{a,b,p}^{c,q,d}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{B_p(c +lq; d-c)(d)_{lq}}{B(c, d-c)\Gamma(a l+b)}\frac{z_1^l}{l!}, \end{align}$

(1.5)

where $a, b, c, d\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(c) > 0, \Re(a) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, q > 0$ and $B_p(x, y) = \int_0^1 t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1}e^{-t-\frac{p}{t}}dt$ is the extension of beta function (see ^[25]).

Gorenflo et al. ^[26] and Haubold et al. ^[27]) studied the various properties of generalized M-L function. In ^[28], a new generalization of M-L function (1.3) is presented by

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{a,b,p}^{c}(z_1) = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c;p)_l}{\Gamma(a l+b)}\frac{z_1^l}{l!}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(p\geq0, a,b,c\in\mathbb{C}; , \Re(a) > 0,\Re(b) > 0,), \end{equation}$

(1.6)

where $(\lambda; p)_l$ is the Pochhammer symbol defined by Srivastava et al. ^[29,30] as

$\begin{equation} (\lambda;p)_{\mu} = \begin{cases} \frac{\Gamma_{p}(\lambda+\mu)}{\Gamma(\lambda)}; &(p > 0, \lambda,\mu\in\mathbb{C} )\\ \\ (\lambda)_{\mu}; & (p = 0,\ {\lambda,\mu}\in \mathbb{C}\setminus\{{0}\}.\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \end{cases} \end{equation}$

(1.7)

The researchers examined the developments of these extension, (1.6) and (1.7) and studied their related features and applications. In ^[30], Srivastava et al. proposed the following generalized hypergeometric function

$\begin{equation} _sF_t[(\delta_1; p),\cdots, (\delta_s); (\zeta_1),\cdots, (\zeta_t); z_1] = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(\delta_{1}; p)_l\cdots (\delta_s)_l}{(\zeta_1)_l\cdots (\zeta_t)_l}\ \frac{z_1^l}{l!}\, , \end{equation}$

(1.8)

where $\delta_{j}\in\mathbb{C}$ for j = 1, 2, $\cdots$ , s, $\zeta_{k}\in\mathbb{C}$ for $k = 1, 2, \cdots, t,$ and $\zeta_{k}\neq$ 0, -1, -2, $\cdots$ .

The integral representation of $(\mu; p)_\eta$ is explained by

$\begin{equation} (\mu;p)_{\eta} = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\mu)}\ \int_0^\infty\ s^{\mu+\eta-1}\ e^{-s-\frac{p}{s}} d s, \end{equation}$

(1.9)

where $\Re(\rho) > 0$ and $\Re(\mu+\eta) > 0$ . In particular, the related confluent hypergeometric function $_1F_1$ and the Gauss hypergeometric function $_2F_1$ are given by

$\begin{equation} _2F_1[(\delta_1; p),b;\lambda; z_1] = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(\delta_{1}; p)_l (b)_l}{(\lambda)_l}\ \frac{z_1^l}{l!}\, , \end{equation}$

(1.10)

and

$\begin{equation} _1F_1[(\delta_1; p);\lambda; z_1] = \Phi[(\delta_1; p);\lambda; z_1] = \sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(\delta_{1}; p)_l}{(\lambda)_l}\ \frac{z_1^l}{l!}\, . \end{equation}$

(1.11)

The expansion of the generalised hypergeometric function $_rF_s$ , which was studied by ^[30], has $r$ numerator and $s$ denominator parameters. Researchers recently developed several extensions of special functions, together with their corresponding characteristics and applications. Using extended beta functions as its foundation, Nisar et al. ^[31], Bohner et al. ^[32] and Rahman et al. ^[33] developed an enlargement of fractional derivative operators.

The multivariate M-L function is defined by ^[34] as follows:

$\begin{align} \mathcal{E}_{(a_j), b}^{(c_j)} (z_1, z_2, \dots, z_j)& = \mathcal{E}_{(a_1, a_2,\dots,a_j), b}^{(c_1, c_2 ,\dots, c_j)} (z_1, z_2, \dots z_j) \\ = & \sum\limits_{m_1, m_2, \dots, m_j = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(c_1)_{m_1}(c_2)_{m_2} \dots (c_j)_{m_j} (z_1)^{m_1} \dots (z_j)^{m_j}}{\Gamma(a_{1}m_1+a_2 m_2+\dots a_j m_j + b)m_1! \dots m_j!}, \end{align}$

(1.12)

where $z_i, a_i, b, c_i \in \mathbb{C}$ ; $i = 1, 2, \ldots, j$ , $\Re{(a_i)} > 0$ , $\Re{(b)} > 0$ and $\Re{(c_i)} > 0$ .

In ^{[35,36,37,38,39]}, the authors have studied various properties and applications of different type of generalized M-L functions. For real (complex) valued functions, the Lebesgue measurable space is defined by

$\begin{equation} \textsf{L}(r,s) = \left\{ \begin{array}{c} h: \|h\|_1 = \int_{r}^{s}|h(x)|dx < \infty \\ \end{array} \right\}. \end{equation}$

(1.13)

The left and right sides fractional integral operators of the Riemann-Liouville type are defined by ^[3,4] as follows:

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h)(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int\limits_{r}^{x}\frac{h(\varrho)}{(x-\varrho)^{1-\lambda}}d\varrho,\; \; \; (x > r), \end{equation}$

(1.14)

and

$\begin{equation*} (\mathfrak{I}_{s-}^{\lambda}h)(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int\limits_{x}^{s}\frac{h(\varrho)}{(\varrho-x)^{1-\lambda}}d\varrho,\; \; \; (x < s), \end{equation*}$

where $h\in \textsf{L}(r, s)$ , $\lambda\in\mathbb{C}$ and $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ .

The left and right sides Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives for the function $h(x)\in \textsf{L}(r, s)$ , $\lambda\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ and $n = [\Re(\lambda)]+1$ are defined in ^[3,4] by

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}h)(x) = (\frac{d}{dx})^n(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{n-\lambda}h)(x) \end{equation}$

(1.15)

and

$\begin{equation*} (\mathfrak{D}_{s-}^{\lambda}h)(x) = (-\frac{d}{dx})^n(\mathfrak{I}_{s-}^{n-\lambda}h)(x), \end{equation*}$

respectively. The generalized differential operator $\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda, v}$ of order $0 < \lambda < 1$ and type $0 < v < 1$ with respect to $x$ can be found in ^[2,4] as

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}h) = \left( \begin{array}{c} \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{v(1-\lambda)}\frac{d}{dx}(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{(1-v)(1-\lambda)}h) \\ \end{array} \right)(x). \end{equation}$

(1.16)

In particular, if $v = 0,$ then (1.16) will lead to the operator $\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}$ defined in (1.15).

We also take into account the aforementioned well-known results.

Theorem 1.1. In ^[40], the following result for the fractional integral is presented by

$\begin{equation} \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}(\varrho-r)^{\eta-1} = \frac{\Gamma(\eta)}{\Gamma(\lambda+\eta)}(x-r)^{\lambda+\eta-1}, \end{equation}$

(1.17)

where $\lambda$ , $\eta\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , $\Re(\eta) > 0$ ,

Theorem 1.2. ^[41] Suppose that the function $h(z)$ has a power series expansion $h(z) = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}k_nz^k$ and it is analytic in the disc $|z| < R$ , then we have the following result

$\begin{equation*} \label{a11} \mathfrak{D}_{z}^{\lambda}\{z^{\eta-1}h(z)\} = \frac{\Gamma(\eta)}{\Gamma(\lambda+\eta)}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{a_n(\eta)_n}{(\lambda+\eta)_n}z^n. \end{equation*}$

Lemma 1.1. (Srivastava and Tomovski ^[42]) Suppose that $x > r$ , $\lambda\in(0, 1)$ , $v\in[0, 1]$ , $\Re(\eta) > 0$ and $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , then we have

$\begin{equation} \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}[(\varrho-r)^{\eta-1}](x) = \frac{\Gamma(\eta)}{\Gamma(\eta-\lambda)}(x-r)^{\eta-\lambda-1}. \end{equation}$

(1.18)

The generalized multivariate M-L function (1.12) is then defined in terms of the modified Pochhammer symbol (1.7) and its different features as well as the accompanying integral operators are examined. This is driven by the aforementioned modifications of special functions.

Motivated by the above results and literature, the paper has the following structure: First, we describe and investigate a novel generalization of the multivariate M-L function using a generalized Pochhammer symbol. Secondly, we offer a few differential and fractional integral formulas for the explored multivariate M-L function. By using the new form of the multivariate M-L function, a new generalization of the fractional integral operator is introduced, and some fundamental characteristics of the operator are discussed.

2. The generalized multivariate of M-L function

We are in a position to present the generalized multivariate M-L function by utilizing the extended Pochhammer symbol in (1.7) as follows:

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j) = \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+a_2l_2+\cdots+c_jl_j+b)}\frac{z_1^{l_1} z_2^{l_2}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

where $a_i, b, c_i\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(a_i) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, , p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ . The special case for $a_1 = 1$ and $l_2 = \cdots = l_j = 0$ in (2.1) can be reduced to extended confluent hypergeometric function (1.11) as follows:

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{1,b;p}^{c_1}(z_1) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(b)} {_1F_1}[(c_1; p);b; z_1] = \frac{1}{\Gamma(b)} \Phi[(c_1; p);b; z_1]. \end{equation}$

(2.2)

In coming results, we demonstrate some fundamental characteristics and integral representations of the generalized multivariate M-L function.

Theorem 2.1. For the multivariate M-L function defined in (2.1), the following relation holds true:

$\begin{equation} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j) = b \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j) \end{equation}$

(2.3)

$\begin{equation*} +[a_1z_1\frac{d}{dz_1}+\cdots+ a_jz_j\frac{d}{dz_j}] \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,z_j), \end{equation*}$

where $a_i, b, c_i\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(a_i) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, , p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ .

Proof. From (2.1), we have

$\begin{align*} &b \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1,p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,z_j)+[a_1z_1\frac{d}{dz_1}+\cdots+ a_jz_j\frac{d}{dz_j}]\varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,z_j)\\ = &b \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\+&[a_1z_1\frac{d}{dz_1}+\cdots+ a_jz_j\frac{d}{dz_j}]\sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &b \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\+&[a_1z_1 \frac{d}{dz_1}+\cdots +a_jz_j \frac{d}{dz_j}]\sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_jl_j}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &b \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\+&\sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1,p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j} }{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j)\\ = & \sum\limits_{l_1,\cdots,l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{ (c_1,p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+1)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)\ \ (\mbox{using} \ \Gamma(z_1+1) = z_1 \Gamma(z_1))\\ = &\sum\limits_{l = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1,p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j} }{ \Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &\varepsilon_{(a_j),b,p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j), \end{align*}$

which is the desired result (2.3).

Theorem 2.2. For the generalized multivariate M-L function defined in (1.12), the following relations hold true:

$\begin{equation} \big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m\cdots(\frac{d}{dz_j}\big)^m \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_j) = (c_1)_m\cdots(c_j)_m \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+(a_j)m;p}^{(c_j)+m}(z_1,\cdots,z_j), \end{equation}$

(2.4)

and

$\begin{equation} \big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m [z_1^{b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j z_1^{a_j}))] = z_1^{b-m-1} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b-m;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j z_1^{a_j}), \end{equation}$

(2.5)

where $a_i, b, c_i\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(a_i) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, , p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , and $\Re(b-m) > 0$ with $m\in\mathbb{N}.$

Proof. Differentiating (1.12) $m$ times with respect to $z_1, z_2, \cdots, z_j$ respectively, we get

$\begin{align*} & (\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m\cdots(\frac{d}{dz_j}\big)^m \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,z_j) = (\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m\cdots(\frac{d}{dz_j}\big)^m \sum\limits_{l_1 = l_2 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = m}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{l_1!\cdots l_j!\ z_1^{l_1-m}\cdots z_j^{l_j-m}}{(l_1-m)!\cdots(l_j-m)!\ l1!\cdots l_j!}\\ & = \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1+m}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j+m}}{\Gamma(a_1(l_1+m)+\cdots a_j(l_j+m)+b)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\ \ (\mbox{Replacing}\ l_i \ \mbox{by}\ l_i+m) \\ & = \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1)_m\cdots(c_j)_m\ (c_1+m;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j+m)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots a_jl_j+b+(a_1+\cdots+a_j)m)}\frac{z_1^{l_1}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}. \end{align*}$

Now using $(\lambda; \sigma)_{\mu+p} = (\lambda)_{\mu} (\lambda+\mu; \sigma)_p$ and $(\lambda)_{\mu+p} = (\lambda)_{\mu} (\lambda+\mu)_p$ , we get

$\begin{align*} & (\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m\cdots(\frac{d}{dz_j}\big)^m \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(z_1,\cdots,c_j)\\ = &(c_1)_m \cdots(c_j)_m \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1+m;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots a_jl_j+b+(a_1+\cdots +a_j)m)}\frac{z_1^{l}\cdots z_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ & = (c_1)_m\cdots (c_j)_{m} \ \varepsilon_{(a_j),b+(a_j)m;p}^{(c_j)+m}(z_1,z_2,\cdots, z_j), \end{align*}$

which is the desired result (2.4). Similarly, to prove (2.5), we have

$\begin{align*} &\big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m [z_1^{b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots \varpi_j z_j^{a_j})]\\ = &\big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m z_1^{b-1}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1})^{l_1}\cdots(\varpi_jz_1^{a_j})^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &\big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+ a_jl_j+b)} \frac{z_1^{b-1+a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!} \varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)} \frac{\varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!} \frac{(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1)!}{(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-m-1)!}\ z_1^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-m-1}. \end{align*}$

Differentiating $m$ times and using the relation $l(l-1)! = l!$ , we get

$\begin{align*} &\big(\frac{d}{dz_1}\big)^m [z_1^{b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots \varpi_j z_j^{a_j})]\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)} \frac{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-m)}\, \varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j} \, \frac{z_1^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1-m}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!} \\ = & z_1^{b-m-1}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-m)}\frac{(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1})^{l_1}\cdots(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_j})^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &z_1^{b-m-1}\varepsilon_{(a_j),b-m;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j z_1^{a_j}). \end{align*}$

The proof is completed.

Corollary 2.1. The generalized multivariate M-L function has the following integral representations:

$\begin{equation*} \int_{0}^{z_1}t^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 t^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j t^{a_j}) d t = z_1^{b}\varepsilon_{(a_j),b+1;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1 z_1^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_jz_1^{a_j}), \end{equation*}$

where $a_i, b, c_i, \varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}; \Re(a_i) > 0, \Re(b) > 0, p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ .

3. Fractional integral and differential formulas of generalized M-L function

In this section, we present some fractional integration and differentiation formulas of generalized M-L function given in (2.1).

Theorem 3.1. Suppose $x > r\, (r\in\mathbb{R_+} = [0, \infty))$ , $a_i$ , $b$ , $c_i$ , $\varpi\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ and $\Re(c_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ and $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , then the following relations hold true:

$\begin{align} &\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_j),b;p}^{(c_j)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right](x) \\ = &(x-r)^{\lambda+b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_i), b+\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align}$

(3.1)

$\begin{align} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{( c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right](x) \\ = &(x-r)^{b-\lambda-1} \varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}) \end{align}$

(3.2)

and

$\begin{align} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})\right](x) \\ = &(x-r)^{b-\lambda-1} \varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}). \end{align}$

(3.3)

Proof. Consider

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})\right](x)\\ = &\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{r}^{x}\frac{(x-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_j})} {(x-\varrho)^{1-\lambda}}d\varrho\\ = &\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_n}\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\int_{r}^{x}(\varrho-r)^{b+a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j-1}(x-\varrho)^{\lambda-1}d\varrho\\ = &\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_n}\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!} \left( \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[(\varrho-r)^{b+a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j-1}] \right). \end{align*}$

By the use of (1.17), we have

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})\right](x)\\ = &\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_n}\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!} (x-r)^{b+\lambda+a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j-1}. \frac{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+\lambda)}\\ = &(x-r)^{b+\lambda-1}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+\lambda)} \frac{[\varpi_1^{l_1}(x-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(x-r)^{a_jl_j}]}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &(x-r)^{b+\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align*}$

which gives the proof of (3.1).

Next, we have

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right]\\ = &(\frac{d}{dx})^n \left\{ \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{n-\lambda}[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})] \right\}, \end{align*}$

which on using (3.1) takes the following form:

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right] \\ = &(\frac{d}{dx})^n \left\{ (x-r)^{b-\lambda+n-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda+n;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}) \right\}. \end{align*}$

Applying (2.5), we get

$\begin{align*} &\mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})\right](x) \\ = &\left\{ (x-r)^{\eta-\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots, \varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}) \right\}, \end{align*}$

which gives the proof of (3.2).

To obtain (3.3), we have

$\begin{align*} &\left( \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}\left[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})\right] \right)(x)\\ = &\left( \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}\left[\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}\frac{\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}(\varrho-r)^{a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1}\right] \right)(x)\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}\frac{\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ \times&\left( \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}[(\varrho-r)^{a_1 l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1}] \right)(x). \end{align*}$

By applying (1.18), we get

$\begin{align*} &\left( \mathfrak{D}_{r+}^{\lambda,v}[(\varrho-r)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-r)^{a_j})] \right)(x)\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}\frac{\varpi^{l_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ \times&\frac{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+ a_jl_j+b)}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b-\lambda)}(x-r)^{a_1l_1+ \cdots+a_jl_j+b-\lambda-1}\\ = &(x-r)^{b-\lambda-1}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p,v)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b-\lambda)}\frac{\varpi^{l_1}(x-r)^{a_1}\cdots\varpi^{l_j}(x-r)^{a_j}}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &(x-r)^{b-\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b-\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi^{l_1}(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi^{l_j}(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align*}$

which completes the required proof.

Remark 3.1. Applying Theorem 3.1 for $p = 0$ , then we obtain the result presented in ^[34].

4. Generalization of fractional integral and its properties

In this section, we define a fractional integral involving newly defined multivariate M-L function and discuss its properties.

Definition 4.1. Let $b, a_i, c_i, \varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(c_i) > 0$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ and $\Re(b) > 0$ and $h\in L(r, s)$ . Then the generalized left and right sided fractional integrals are defined by

$\begin{align} &\left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h\right)(x) = \int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)} (\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})h(\varrho)d\varrho, (x > r) \end{align}$

(4.1)

and

$\begin{align} &\left(\mathfrak{R}_{s-;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h\right)(x) = \int_{x}^{s}(\varrho-x)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)} (\varpi_1(\varrho-x)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-x)^{a_j})h(\varrho)d\varrho, (x < s), \end{align}$

(4.2)

respectively.

Remark 4.1. If we consider $p = 0$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form defined earlier by ^[34]. Similarly, if we consider $p = 0$ and $j = 1$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form defined by ^[22]. If we take $j = 1$ , then the work done in this paper will lead to the work presented by ^[28]. Also, if we consider one of $\varpi_i = 0$ , for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form of the classical operators.

Next, we prove the following properties of integral operator defined in (4.1).

Theorem 4.1. Suppose that $b, a_i, \lambda, c_i, \varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ , $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , $p\geq0$ and $\Re(c_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the following result holds true:

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}] \right) (x) = (x-r)^{\lambda+b-1}\Gamma(\lambda)\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(c_i);p}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}). \end{align*}$

Proof. By the use of definition (4.1), we have

$\begin{equation*} \left( \mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h \right)(x) = \int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})h(\varrho)d\varrho. \end{equation*}$

Therefore, we get

$\begin{align*} &\left( \mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i), b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}] \right) (x) = \int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})d\varrho\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b))}\frac{\varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}} {l_1!\cdots l_j!} \left( \int_{r}^{x}(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}(x-\varrho)^{\lambda+a_1l_1+ \cdots+a_jl_j-1}d\varrho \right)\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b))}\frac{\varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}} {l_1!\cdots l_j!} \mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b}[(\varrho-r)^{\lambda-1}]\\ & = (x-r)^{b+\lambda-1} \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b))} \frac{[\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_jl_j}]}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ \times& \frac{\Gamma(\lambda)\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b+\lambda)}\\ = &(x-r)^{b+\lambda-1}\Gamma(\lambda)\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align*}$

which gives the desired proof.

Theorem 4.2. Suppose that $c_i, a_i, b, \varpi_i \in\mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0,$ $p\geq0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the following result holds true:

$\begin{equation*} \|\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}\Phi\|_1\leq K\|\Phi\|_1. \end{equation*}$

Where

$\begin{align*} &K: = (s-r)^{\mathfrak{Re}(b)}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{|(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}|}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)(\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j)}\\ \times&\frac{|\varpi_1^{l_1}(s-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(s-r)^{a_jl_j}|}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}. \end{align*}$

Proof. By the use of (1.13) and (4.1) and by interchanging integration and summation order, we have

$\begin{align*} \|\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i) }\Phi\|_1& = \int\limits_{r}^{s}|\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1} \varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j}) \Phi(\varrho)d\varrho|dx\\ \leq&\int_{r}^{s}\left[ \int_{\varrho}^{x} (x-\varrho)^{\Re(b)-1}|\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})|dx \right]|\Phi(\varrho)|d\varrho\\ = &\int_{r}^{s}\left[ \int_{0}^{x-\varrho} u^{\Re(b)-1}|\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1 u^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j u^{a_j})|du \right]|\Phi(\varrho)|d\varrho, \end{align*}$

by setting $u = x-\varrho.$ After simplification, we obtain

$\begin{align*} &\|\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}\Phi\|_1\\ \leq&\int_{r}^{s} \Bigr[ \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{|(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}|}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)}\frac{|\varpi_1^{a_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}|} {l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ \times& \left( \frac{(u)^{\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j}}{(\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j)} \right)_{0}^{s-r} \Bigr] |\Phi(\varrho)|d\varrho. \end{align*}$

It follows that

$\begin{align*} &\|\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}\Phi\|_1\leq \Bigr\{ (s-r)^{\Re(b)} \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{|(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}|}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)(\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j)}\\ \times&\frac{|\varpi_1^{l_1}(s-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(s-r)^{a_jl_j}|}{l_1!\cdots l_j!} \Bigr\} \int\limits_{r}^{s}|\Phi(\varrho)|d\varrho\\ = &K||\Phi||_1, \end{align*}$

where

$\begin{align*} &K = (s-r)^{\mathfrak{Re}(b)}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{|(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}|}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)(\Re(b)+\Re(a_1)l_1+\cdots+\Re(a_j)l_j)}\\ \times&\frac{|\varpi_1^{l_1}(s-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(s-r)^{a_jl_j}|}{l_1!\cdots l_j!}, \end{align*}$

which gives the desired result.

Corollary 4.1. If we take $a_i, b, c_i, \varpi_i \in \mathbb{C}$ , $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ , $\Re(c_i) > 0$ with $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the following result holds true:

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}1\right)(x) = (x-r)^{b}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+1;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}). \end{align*}$

Proof. Consider

$\begin{align*} &\left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}1\right)(x) = \int_{r}^x(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j})d\varrho\\ = &\int_{r}^x(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\left(\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{l_1}(x-\varrho)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(x-\varrho)^{a_jl_j}} {\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\right)d\varrho. \end{align*}$

It follows that

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}1\right)(x) & = \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}} {\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!} \int_{r}^x(x-\varrho)^{b+a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j-1}d\varrho\\ = &(x-r)^{b}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(c_1;p)_{l_1}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{l_1}(x-r)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j}(x-r)^{a_jl_j}} {\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\\ = &(x-r)^{b}\,\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+1;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-r)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-r)^{a_j}), \end{align*}$

which gives the desired proof.

Theorem 4.3. The generalized fractional operator can be represented in term of Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals for $c_i$ , $a_i$ , $b$ , $\varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ , $\Re(c_i) > 0$ for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , $p\geq0$ and $x > r$ as follows:

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h\right)(x) = \sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^\infty \frac{\Gamma(c_1+l_1;p)(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{a_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{a_j}} {\Gamma(c_1)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b}h(x). \end{align*}$

Proof. By utilizing (2.1) in (4.1) and then interchanging the order of summation and integration, we have

$\begin{align*} \left(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h\right)(x)& = \int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)} (\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})h(\varrho)d\varrho\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^\infty\frac{\Gamma(c_1+l_1;p)(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{l_1} (x-\varrho)^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{l_j} (x-\varrho)^{a_jl_j}} {\Gamma(c_1)\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b)l_1!\cdots l_j!}h(\varrho)d\varrho\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^\infty\frac{\Gamma(c_1+l_1;p)(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{a_jl_j} }{\Gamma(c_1)l_1!\cdots l_j!} \frac{1}{\Gamma(a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j +b)}\\ \times&\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{a_1l_1+\cdots+a_jl_j+b-1}h(\varrho)d\varrho\\ = &\sum\limits_{l_1 = \cdots = l_j = 0}^\infty\frac{\Gamma(c_1+l_1;p)(c_2)_{l_2}\cdots(c_j)_{l_j}\varpi_1^{a_1l_1}\cdots\varpi_j^{a_jl_j} }{\Gamma(c_1)l_1!\cdots l_j!}\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{a_1l_1 +\cdots+a_jl_j+b}h(x), \end{align*}$

which gives the desired proof.

Theorem 4.4. For $\lambda$ , $c_i$ , $a_i$ , $b$ , $\varpi_i\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\Re(a_i) > 0$ , $\Re(b) > 0$ , $\Re(c_i) > 0$ , $\Re(\lambda) > 0$ , for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , $p\geq0$ and $x > r$ , then the following result holds true:

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x) = (\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h)(x) = (\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x), \end{equation}$

(4.3)

where $h\in L(r, s)$ .

Proof. By employing (1.14) and (4.1), we have

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x)\\ = &\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{r}^{x}\frac{[(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h)(\varrho)]}{(x-\varrho) ^{1-\lambda}}d\varrho\\ = &\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{\lambda-1} \left[ \int_{r}^{\varrho} (\varrho-u)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(\varrho-u)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-u)^{a_j})h(u)du \right]d\varrho. \end{align*}$

It follows that

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x) \\ = &\int_{r}^{x} \left[ \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{u}^{x} (x-\varrho)^{\lambda-1}(\varrho-u)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i) }(\varpi_1(\varrho-u)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(\varrho-u)^{a_j})d\varrho \right]h(u)du. \end{align*}$

By considering $\varrho-u = \theta$ , we get

$\begin{align*} \begin{aligned} &(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x)\\ = &\int_{r}^{x} \left[ \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{0}^{x-u} (x-u-\theta)^{\lambda-1}\theta^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i) } (\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j})d\theta \right]h(u)du\\ = &\int_{r}^{x} \left[ \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{0}^{x-u} \frac{\theta^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j})}{(x-u-\theta)^{1-\lambda}}d\theta \right]h(u)du.\end{aligned} \end{align*}$

Hence, from (1.14) and applying (3.1), we obtain

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x)\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}\left[ \theta^{\lambda+b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j}) \right]h(u)du\\ = &\int_{r}^{x} (x-u)^{\lambda+b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-u)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-u)^{a_j})h(u)du. \end{align*}$

Thus, we have

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}[\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h])(x) = \left( \mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h \right)(x). \end{equation}$

(4.4)

Next, consider the right hand side of (4.3) and employing (4.1) to derive the second part, we have

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x)\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j}) [\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h] (\varrho)d\varrho\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})\left( \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int\limits_{r}^{\varrho}\frac{h(u)}{(\varrho-u)^{1-\lambda}}du \right)d\varrho. \end{align*}$

It follows that

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x)\\ = &\int\limits_{r}^{x}\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)} \left[ \int_{u}^{x}(x-\varrho)^{b-1}(\varrho-u)^{\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1(x-\varrho)^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j(x-\varrho)^{a_j})d\varrho \right] h(u)du. \end{align*}$

By setting $x-\varrho = \theta$ , we get

$\begin{align*} &(\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x)\\ = &\int_{r}^{x}\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)} \left[ \int_{x-u}^{0}\theta^{b-1}(x-\theta-u)^{\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j}) (-d\theta) \right] h(u)du\\ = &\int\limits_{r}^{x}\frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)} \left[ \int_{0}^{x-u}\theta^{b-1}(x-\theta-u)^{\lambda-1}\varepsilon_{(a_i),b;p}^{(c_i)}(\varpi_1\theta^{a_1},\cdots,\varpi_j\theta^{a_j})d\theta \right] h(u)du. \end{align*}$

Further, by using (1.14) and applying (3.1), we obtain

$\begin{equation} (\mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b;p}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}[\mathfrak{I}_{r+}^{\lambda}h])(x) = \left( \mathfrak{R}_{r+;(a_i),b+\lambda}^{(\varpi_i);(c_i)}h \right)(x). \end{equation}$

(4.5)

Thus, (4.4) and (4.5) gives the desired proof.

5. Conclusions

Nowadays, the theories are developed very rapidly. The scientists are introducing more advanced and generalized forms of the classical ones. In this present study, we introduced a generalized form of the multivariate M-L function (2.1) by employing the generalized Pochhammer symbol and its properties. By using this more extended form of M-L, we introduced a fractional integral operator and studied some of the basic properties of this operator. The special cases of the main results are if we take $p = 0$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will reduce to the work done by ^[34]. Similarly, if we take $j = 1$ and $p = 0$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will lead to the work done by ^[22]. If we take $j = 1$ , then the work done in this paper will lead to the work presented by ^[28]. Moreover, if we consider one of $\varpi_i = 0$ , for $i = 1, 2, \cdots, j$ , then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will reduce to the classical R-L operators. We believe that our proposed operator will be more applicable in the fields of fractional integral inequalities and operator theory.

Acknowledgments

The author T. Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for supporting through TAS research lab. Manar A. Alqudah: Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R14), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	A. Kaur, Wheelchair control for disabled patients using EMG/EOG based human machine interface: a review, J. Med. Eng. Technol., 45 (2021), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2020.1853838 doi: 10.1080/03091902.2020.1853838
[2]	M. Callejas-Cuervo, A. X. González-Cely, T. Bastos-Filho, Control systems and electronic instrumentation applied to autonomy in wheelchair mobility: the state of the art, Sensors, 20 (2020), 6326. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216326 doi: 10.3390/s20216326
[3]	M. Bakouri, M. Alsehaimi, H. F. Ismail, K. Alshareef, A. Ganoun, A. Alqahtani, et al., Steering a robotic wheelchair based on voice recognition system using convolutional neural networks, Electronics, 11 (2022), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11010168 doi: 10.3390/electronics11010168
[4]	M. Bakouri, Development of voice control algorithm for robotic wheelchair using NIN and LSTM models, Comput. Mater. Continua, 1 (2022), 2441–2456. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.025106 doi: 10.32604/cmc.2022.025106
[5]	H. Y. Ryu, J. S. Kwon, J. H. Lim, A. H. Kim, S. J. Baek, J. W. Kim, Development of an autonomous driving smart wheelchair for the physically weak, Appl. Sci., 12 (2021), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010377 doi: 10.3390/app12010377
[6]	P. S. Yadav, V. Agrawal, J. C. Mohanta, M. D. F. Ahmed, A robust sliding mode control of mecanum wheel-chair for trajectory tracking, Mater. Today, 56 (2022), 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.398 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.398
[7]	L. Teng, M. A. Gull, S. Bai, PD-based fuzzy sliding mode control of a wheelchair exoskeleton robot, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 25 (2020), 2546–2555. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2020.2983520 doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2020.2983520
[8]	A. A. Aly, M. T. Vu, F. F. El-Sousy, K. H. Hsia, A. Alotaibi, G. Mousa, et al., Adaptive neural network-based fixed-time tracking controller for disabilities exoskeleton wheelchair robotic system, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 3853. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203853 doi: 10.3390/math10203853
[9]	G. Feng, T. M. Guerra, L. Busoniu, A. T. Nguyen, S. Mohammad, Robust observer-based tracking control under actuator constraints for power-assisted wheelchairs, Control Eng. Pract., 109 (2021), 104716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104716 doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104716
[10]	F. Cao, X. Wang, J. Shi, Robust H-infinity control of intelligent autonomous navigation wheelchair, 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSN.2013.106 doi: 10.1109/MSN.2013.106
[11]	M. Mohammed, B. Abdelmadjid, B. Djamila, A fuzzy logic controller for electric powered wheelchair based on lagrange model, 2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAEE47123.2019.9014838 doi: 10.1109/ICAEE47123.2019.9014838
[12]	A. A. Jorge, L. A. M. Riascos, P. E. Miyagi, Modelling and control strategies for a motorized wheelchair with hybrid locomotion systems, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 43 (2021), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02730-7 doi: 10.1007/s40430-020-02730-7
[13]	D. Sanders, G. Tewkesbury, M. Haddad, P. Kyberd, S. Zhou, M. Langner, Control of a semi-autonomous powered wheelchair, J. Phys., 2224 (2022), 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2224/1/012098 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2224/1/012098
[14]	H. Wang, B. Salatin, G. G. Grindle, D. Ding, R. A. Cooper, Real-time model based electrical powered wheelchair control. Med. Eng. Phys., 31 (2009), 1244–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.08.002
[15]	H. Seki, N. Tanohata, Fuzzy control for electric power-assisted wheelchair driving on disturbance roads, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 42 (2012), 1624–1632. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2212008 doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2212008
[16]	V. Sankardoss, P. Geethanjali, Design and low-cost implementation of an electric wheelchair control, IETE J. Res., 67 (2021), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2019.1565951 doi: 10.1080/03772063.2019.1565951
[17]	A. A. Aly, K. H. Hsia, F. F. M. El-Sousy, S. Mobayen, A. Alotaibi, G. Mousa, et al., Adaptive neural backstepping control approach for tracker design of wheelchair upper-limb exoskeleton robot system, Mathematics., 10 (2022), 4198. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224198 doi: 10.3390/math10224198
[18]	F. N. Martins, W. C. Celeste, R. Carelli, M. Sarcinelli-Filho, T. F. Bastos-Filho, An adaptive dynamic controller for autonomous mobile robot trajectory tracking, Control Eng. Pract., 16 (2008), 1354–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.03.004 doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.03.004
[19]	Z. Zhang, M. Leibold, D. Wollherr. Integral sliding-mode observer-based disturbance estimation for euler-lagrangian systems, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 28 (2019), 2377–2389. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2019.2945904 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2019.2945904
[20]	J. H. Wilkinson, F. L. Bauer, C. Reinsch, Linear algebra, Springer, 2013.
[21]	W. Gao, Y. Wang, A. Homaifa, Discrete-time variable structure control systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 42 (1995), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/41.370376 doi: 10.1109/41.370376
[22]	S. Mobayen, K. A. Alattas, A. Fekih, F. F. El-Sousy, M. Bakouri, Barrier function-based adaptive nonsingular sliding mode control of disturbed nonlinear systems: a linear matrix inequality approach, Chaos Solitons Fract., 157 (2022), 111918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111918 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111918
[23]	J. Wang, P. Zhu, B. He, G. Deng, C. Zhang, X. Huang, An adaptive neural sliding mode control with ESO for uncertain nonlinear systems, Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., 19 (2021), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0972-x doi: 10.1007/s12555-019-0972-x
[24]	M. Ajay, P. Srinivas, L. Netam, AI and IoT-based intelligent automation in robotics, Wiley Online Library, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119711230.ch16
[25]	C. R. Teeneti, U. Pratik, G. R. Philips, A. Azad, M. Greig, R. Zane, et al., System-level approach to designing a smart wireless charging system for power wheelchairs, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 57 (2021), 5128–5144. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2021.3093843 doi: 10.1109/TIA.2021.3093843
[26]	K. Bai, H. Yan, K. M. Lee, Robust control of a spherical motor in moving frame, Mechatronics, 75 (2021), 102548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102548 doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102548
[27]	S. Zhang, W. Wang, Z. Xu, D. Shang, M. Yin, Adaptive sliding mode robust control of manipulator driven by tendon-sheath based on HJI theory, Meas. Control, 55 (2022), 684–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940211067176 doi: 10.1177/00202940211067176
[28]	C. S. Teodorescu, B. Zhang, T. Carlson, A stochastic control strategy for safely driving a powered wheelchair, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53 (2020), 10148–10153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2741 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2741
[29]	T. N. Nguyen, S. W. Su, H. T. Nguyen, Robust neuro-sliding mode multivariable control strategy for powered wheelchairs, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 19 (2010), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2069104 doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2069104
[30]	S. Zhang, F. Cao, C. Li, Y. Ming, Robust H∞ fuzzy logic control of intelligent electrically powered wheelchair, 2019 IEEE 4th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAEAC47372.2019.8997953
[31]	A. Al-Mahturi, F. Santoso, M. A. Garratt, S. G. Anavatti, A novel evolving type-2 fuzzy system for controlling a mobile robot under large uncertainties, Robotics, 12 (2023), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12020040 doi: 10.3390/robotics12020040
[32]	C. De La Cruz, T. F. Bastos, R. Carelli, Adaptive motion control law of a robotic wheelchair, Control Eng. Pract., 9 (2011), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2010.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2010.10.004
[33]	J. X. Zhang, G. H. Yang, Fault-tolerant fixed-time trajectory tracking control of autonomous surface vessels with specified accuracy, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 67 (2019), 4889–4899. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2931242 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2931242
[34]	J. X. Zhang, T. Chai, Singularity-free continuous adaptive control of uncertain underactuated surface vessels with prescribed performance, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern: Syst., 52 (2021), 5646–5655. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.3129798 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2021.3129798
[35]	J. X. Zhang, T. Yang, T. Chai, Neural network control of underactuated surface vehicles with prescribed trajectory tracking performance, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 52 (2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3223666 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3223666

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)