Research article

L-norm minimum distance estimation for stochastic differential equations driven by small fractional Lévy noise

  • Received: 16 August 2022 Revised: 13 October 2022 Accepted: 19 October 2022 Published: 27 October 2022
  • MSC : 60H10, 62F12

  • This paper is concerned with L-norm minimum distance estimation for stochastic differential equations driven by small fractional Lévy noise. By applying the Gronwall-Bellman lemma, Chebyshev's inequality and Taylor's formula, the minimum distance estimator is established and the consistency and asymptotic distribution of the estimator are derived when a small dispersion coefficient ε0.

    Citation: Huiping Jiao, Xiao Zhang, Chao Wei. L-norm minimum distance estimation for stochastic differential equations driven by small fractional Lévy noise[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2083-2092. doi: 10.3934/math.2023107

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jiangrui Ding, Chao Wei . Parameter estimation for discretely observed Cox–Ingersoll–Ross model driven by fractional Lévy processes. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 12168-12184. doi: 10.3934/math.2023613
    [2] Tian Xu, Ailong Wu . Stabilization of nonlinear hybrid stochastic time-delay neural networks with Lévy noise using discrete-time feedback control. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27080-27101. doi: 10.3934/math.20241317
    [3] Yifei Wang, Haibo Gu, Ruya An . Averaging principle for space-fractional stochastic partial differential equations driven by Lévy white noise and fractional Brownian motion. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9013-9033. doi: 10.3934/math.2025414
    [4] Jingjing Yang, Jianqiu Lu . Stabilization in distribution of hybrid stochastic differential delay equations with Lévy noise by discrete-time state feedback controls. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3457-3483. doi: 10.3934/math.2025160
    [5] Boubaker Smii . Markov random fields model and applications to image processing. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4459-4471. doi: 10.3934/math.2022248
    [6] Chao Wei . Parameter estimation for partially observed stochastic differential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12952-12961. doi: 10.3934/math.2022717
    [7] Xin Liu, Yan Wang . Averaging principle on infinite intervals for stochastic ordinary differential equations with Lévy noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5316-5350. doi: 10.3934/math.2021314
    [8] Danhua He, Liguang Xu . Boundedness analysis of non-autonomous stochastic differential systems with Lévy noise and mixed delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6169-6182. doi: 10.3934/math.2020396
    [9] Abdul Samad, Imran Siddique, Fahd Jarad . Meshfree numerical integration for some challenging multi-term fractional order PDEs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14249-14269. doi: 10.3934/math.2022785
    [10] Xin Liu, Yongqi Hou . Almost automorphic solutions for mean-field SDEs driven by Lévy noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11159-11183. doi: 10.3934/math.2025506
  • This paper is concerned with L-norm minimum distance estimation for stochastic differential equations driven by small fractional Lévy noise. By applying the Gronwall-Bellman lemma, Chebyshev's inequality and Taylor's formula, the minimum distance estimator is established and the consistency and asymptotic distribution of the estimator are derived when a small dispersion coefficient ε0.



    Almost all systems are affected by noise and exhibit certain random characteristics. Therefore, it is reasonable and interesting to use random systems to model actual systems. When modeling or optimizing a stochastic system, due to the complexity of the internal structure and the uncertainty of the external environment, parameters of the system are unknown. It is necessary to use theoretical tools to estimate the parameters of the system. In the past few years, some authors studied the parameter estimation problem for stochastic models ([1,2]). For example, Ji et al. ([3]) considered the parameter estimation problems of two-input single-output Hammerstein finite impulse response systems. Prakasa Rao ([4]) discussed estimation of parameters for models governed by a stochastic differential equation driven by a mixed fractional Brownian motion with Gaussian random effects based on discrete observations. Wang et al. ([5]) studied the parameter estimation issues of a class of multivariate output-error systems. Xu et al. ([6]) investigated the problem of parameter estimation for frequency response signals. When the system is observed partially, Wei ([7]) analyzed state and parameter estimation for nonlinear stochastic systems by applying extended Kalman filtering. Wei ([8]) discussed the strong consistency and asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator for partially observed stochastic differential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion. Zhang and Ding ([9]) designed a state filter for a time-delay state-space system with unknown parameters from noisy observation information. The parameter estimation for diffusion processes with small noise is well developed as well ([10,11,12]).

    In practical applications, most of the system noise is non-Gaussian. Non-Gaussian noise can more accurately reflect the practical random perturbation. Therefore, fractional Lévy noise, as a kind of important non-Gaussian noise, has attracted many authors' attention ([13,14]). For instance, Bishwal ([15]) analyzed the quasi-likelihood estimator of the drift parameter in the stochastic partial differential equations driven by a cylindrical fractional Lévy process when the process is observed at the arrival times of a Poisson process. Prakasa Rao ([16]) discussed nonparametric estimation of the linear multiplier in a trend coefficient in models governed by a stochastic differential equation driven by a fractional Lévy process with small noise. Xu et al. ([17]) used an integral transform method to investigate an averaging principle for fractional stochastic differential equations with Lévy motion. Yang ([18]) studied the existence and uniqueness of (weighted pseudo) almost automorphic solutions in distribution for fractional stochastic differential equations driven by Lévy noise.

    The minimum distance methodology can be applied to the estimation of locally stationary moving average processes. This novel approach allows for the analysis of time series data exhibiting non-stationary behavior. The main advantages of this method are that it does not depend on the distribution of the process, can handle missing data and is computationally efficient. Some authors studied minimum distance estimation and use the method to estimate the parameter for stochastic differential equations. For example, Chen et al. ([19]) derived new estimators for the generalized Pareto distribution by the minimum distance estimation and the M-estimation in the linear regression. Hajargasht and Griffiths ([20]) described the efficient methods of estimation and inference based on two data generating mechanisms and derived several results useful for comparing the two methods of inference. Vicuna et al. ([21]) investigated some large sample properties of the new estimator, established its consistency and asymptotic normality. Although minimum distance estimation has been used by some authors to study parameter estimation problem, the stochastic differential equations are driven by Gaussian noise. As Non-Gaussian noise can more accurately reflect the practical random perturbation. Moreover, the financial empirical research showed that volatility in financial asset prices shows long-range dependence and self-similarity and the fractional Lévy noise could be used to exhibit these properties. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the stochastic system driven by fractional Lévy noise. Inspired by the aforementioned works, in this paper, we consider L-norm minimum distance estimation for stochastic differential equations driven by small fractional Lévy noise. The minimum distance estimator is established, the consistency and asymptotic distribution of the estimator are derived when a small dispersion coefficient ε0.

    The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we define the minimum distance estimator and give some assumptions. In Section 3, we give some lemmas and derive the consistency and asymptotic distribution of the estimator. The conclusion is given in Section 4.

    Definition 1. ([22]) Let L=(L(t))tR be a zero-mean two sided Lévy process with E[L(1)2]< and without a Brownian component. For fractional integration parameter d(0,12), a stochastic process

    Ldt:=1Γ(d+1)[(ts)d+(s)d+]L(ds),tR,

    is called a fractional Lévy process, where x+=x0.

    In this paper, we consider the following stochastic differential equations driven by small Lévy noise:

    {dXt=f(Xt,θ)dt+εdLdt,t[0,T],X0=x0, (2.1)

    where θΘ is an unknown parameter, Θ is an open bounded set in Rd, d1, ε(0,1].

    Let Pεθ be the probability measure induced by the process {Xt,0tT}.

    Let xt(θ) be the solution of the differential equation:

    dxt=f(xt,θ)dt,t[0,T]. (2.2)

    Suppose the following conditions hold:

    Assumption 1. |f(x,θ)|K(1+|x|) for all t[0,T] where K>0 is constant.

    Assumption 2. |f(x,θ)f(y,θ)|K1(|xy|) for all t[0,T] where K1>0 is constant.

    Assumption 3. For any η>0, a(η)=inf|θθ0|ηsup0tT|xt(θ)xt(θ0)|>0, where θ0 is the true value of the parameter, xt(θ) is the solution of (2.2).

    Remark 1. It is known that under the Assumptions 1–2, there exists a unique solution of (2.1).

    Define the minimum distance estimator

    θε=argminθΘsup0tT|Xtxt(θ)|. (2.3)

    Before giving the theorems, we need to establish some preliminary results.

    Lemma 1. ([22]) Let |f|,|g|H, H is the completion of L1(R)L2(R) with respect to the norm ||g||2H=E[L2(1)]R(Idg)2(u)du. Then,

    E[Rf(s)dLdsRg(s)dLds]=Γ(12d)E[L2(1)]Γ(d)Γ(1d)RRf(t)g(s)|ts|2d1dsdt.

    Lemma 2. ([22]) For any 0<b2b1a1, 0<b2a2a1, and b1b2=a1a2, there exists a constant C only depend on r and d, such that

    |b1b2a1a2er(u+v)|uv|2d1dudv|{C|er(a1+b1)er(a2+b2)||a1b2|2d,ifr0,C|a1b2|2d,ifr=0,

    where r denotes a constant and d is the fractional integration parameter of fractional Lévy process.

    Lemma 3. ([23]) (Gronwall-Bellman lemma) Let c0, c1 and c2 be nonnegative constants, μ(t) be a nonnegative bounded function and ν(t) be a nonnegative integrable function on [0,1] such that

    μ(t)c0+c1t0ν(s)μ(s)ds+c2t0ν(s)[s0μ(t)dK(t)]ds,

    where K() is a nondecreasing right continuous function with 0K(s)1. Then

    μ(t)c0exp{(c1+c2)t0ν(s)ds},0t1.

    In the following theorem, the consistency of the minimum distance estimator is proved.

    Theorem 1. Under Assumptions 1-3, when ε0,

    Pεθ0(|θεθ0|η)2CT2dK1εeTa(η).

    Proof. Note that

    Xtxt(θ0)=t0(f(Xs,θ0)f(xs,θ0))ds+εLdt. (3.1)

    Then,

    |Xtxt(θ0)|=|t0(f(Xs,θ0)f(xs,θ0))ds+εLdt|t0|f(Xs,θ0)f(xs,θ0)|ds+ε|Ldt|.

    By using the Gronwall-Bellman lemma and Assumption 2, it can be checked that

    sup0tT|Xtxt(θ0)|K1εeTsup0tT|Ldt|. (3.2)

    Let be the uniform norm and

    G0=G0(η)={ω:inf|θθ0|<ηXx(θ)<inf|θθ0|ηXx(θ)}. (3.3)

    Thus, for all ωG0, the minimum distance estimator θε{θ:|θθ0|<η}.

    Since

    inf|θθ0|<ηx(θ)x(θ0)=0, (3.4)

    together with (3.2) and Lemmas 1–2, we can obtain that

    Pεθ0(|θεθ0|>η)=Pεθ0(Gc0)Pεθ0(inf|θθ0|<η(Xx(θ0)+x(θ)x(θ0))inf|θθ0|η(x(θ)x(θ0)Xx(θ0)))Pεθ0(Xx(θ0)a(η)K1εeTsup0tT|Ldt|)P(2K1εeTsup0tT|Ldt|a(η))P(sup0tT|Lt|a(η)2K1εeT).

    Applying Chebyshev's inequality, we have

    Pεθ0(|θεθ0|>η)Esup0tT|Ldt|2K1εeTa(η)2CT2dK1εeTa(η),

    where C is a constant and d is the fractional integration parameter of fractional Lévy process.

    The proof is complete.

    Remark 2. When ε0, it is easy to check that θεPθ0.

    We consider a special case to investigate the limit distribution of ε1(θεθ0).

    We suppose that

    f(Xt,θ)=M(Xt,θ)+t0N(Xs,θ)ds, (3.5)

    where M(x,θ) and N(x,θ) have two continuous bounded derivatives with respect to x and θ.

    Let ˙xt(θ) denotes the vector of derivatives of xt(θ) with respect to θ. It can be checked that the derivative exists.

    It is supposed that

    infθΘinf|e|=1sup0tT(e,˙xt(θ)˙xt(θ)Te)>0, (3.6)

    where e is a unit vector in Rd and (,) denotes the inner product.

    We introduce a stochastic differential equation:

    {dX(1)t=[Mx(Xt,θ)X(1)t+t0Nx(Xs,θ)X(1)sds]dt+dLdt,t[0,T],X(1)0=0, (3.7)

    where Mx and Nx are the derivatives of M(x,θ) and N(x,θ) with respect to x.

    Define ζ=ζ(θ0) by the relation

    X(1)(ζ,˙x(θ0))=infμRdX(1)(μ,˙x(θ0)). (3.8)

    It is assumed that (3.8) has a unique solution ζ with probability one.

    Theorem 2. Under Assumptions 1–3, when ε0,

    ε1(θεθ0)dζ.

    Proof. Let

    η=ηε=ελε0, (3.9)

    where λε when ε0.

    Note that |θεθ0|<ηε whenever ωG0.

    Let

    H(μ)=sup0tT|xt(θ0+μ)xt(θ0)|2. (3.10)

    It is obvious that

    sup0tT|xt(θ0+μ)xt(θ0)(μ,˙xt(θ0))|=O(|μ|2). (3.11)

    Define

    k0=inf|e|=1sup0tT(e,˙xt(θ)˙xt(θ)Te), (3.12)

    then k0>0.

    Hence, there exists a neighborhood V of zero such that

    infμVH(μ)|μ|212k0, (3.13)

    and for μV

    H(μ)12k0|μ|2. (3.14)

    According to Assumption 3, we have H(μ)>0 for μV. Thus, for all μΘ{θ0}, there exists k>0 such that

    H(μ)k|μ|2. (3.15)

    Then, we obtain

    inf|μ|>ηεsup0tT|xt(θ0+μ)xt(θ0)|2kη2ε. (3.16)

    Thus,

    a(η)kηε. (3.17)

    Together with (3.17) and Theorem 1, when ε0, we have

    Pεθ0(|θεθ0|ηε)2CT2dK1εeTkηε=2CT2dK1eTkλε0.

    Let θ=θ0+εμ, we have

    ε1Xx(θ)=Xx(θ0)εx(θ)x(θ0)ε=x(1)(μ,˙x(θ0))(x(θ0+εμ)x(θ0)ε(μ,˙x(θ0)))+(Xx(θ0)εx(1)).

    Applying Taylor's formula, we have

    sup0tT|xt(θ0+εμ)xt(θ0)ε(μ,˙xt(θ0))|=sup0tT|(μ,(˙xt(θ0)˙xt(θ0)))||μ|sup0tT|˙xt(θ0)˙xt(θ0)|Cε|μ|2,

    where C is a constant.

    Thus, we have

    sup|μ|λεsup0tT|xt(θ0+εμ)xt(θ0)ε(μ,˙xt(θ0))|Cελ2ε. (3.18)

    Then, we obtain

    |Xtxt(θ0)εx(1)t|=|t0[fη(Xt,θ0)fη(xt,θ0)εMx(xη,θ0)x(1)ηη0Nx(xh,θ0)x(1)hdh]dη|t0|M(Xs,θ0)M(xs,θ0)εMx(xs,θ0)x(1)s|ds+t0s0|N(Xs,θ0)N(Xη,θ0)εNx(xη,θ0)x(1)η|dηdst0|Mx(˜Xs,θ0)(Xsxs)εMx(xs,θ0)x(1)s|ds+t0s0|Nx(ˆXη,θ0)(Xηxη)εNx(xη,θ0)x(1)η|dηdst0|Mx(˜Xs,θ0)|(Xsxs)εx(1)s|ds+t0|Mx(˜Xs,θ0)Mx(xs,θ0)||x(1)s|ds+t0s0|Nx(ˆXη,θ0)|(Xηxη)εx(1)η|dηds+t0s0|Nx(ˆXη,θ0)Nx(xη,θ0)||x(1)η|dηdsL1t0|(Xsxs(θ0))εx(1)s|ds+L2t0s0|(Xηxη(θ0))εx(1)η|dηds+L3εsup0tT|Ldt|sup0tT|x(1)t|,

    where L1, L2, L3 are positive constants.

    Then, we have

    sup0tT|Xtxt(θ0)εx(1)t|Cεsup0tT|Ldt|2. (3.19)

    Therefore,

    sup|μ|<λεsup0tT|Xtxt(θ0+εμ)ε(x(1)t(μ,˙xt(θ0)))|sup|μ|<λεsup0tT{|Xtxt(θ0)εx(1)t|+|xt(θ0+εμ)xt(θ0)ε(μ,˙xt(θ0))|}Cεsup0tT|Ldt|2+Cελ2ε.

    When ε0 and ελ2ε0, we have

    sup|μ|<λεXx(θ0+εμ)εx(1)(μ,˙x(θ0))dζ. (3.20)

    The proof is complete.

    The aim of this paper is to study L-norm minimum distance estimation for stochastic differential equations driven by small fractional Lévy noise. The consistency and asymptotic distribution of the estimator have been investigated by applying the Gronwall-Bellman lemma, Chebyshev's inequality and Taylor's formula. Further research topics will include minimum distance estimation for partially observed stochastic differential equations driven by small fractional Lévy noise.

    This work was supported in part by the key research projects of universities under Grant 22A110001.

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.



    [1] Y. Hu, D. Nualart, H. Zhou, Drift parameter estimation for nonlinear stochastic differential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion, Stochastics, 91 (2019), 1067–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442508.2018.1563606 doi: 10.1080/17442508.2018.1563606
    [2] Z. Liu, Generalized moment estimation for uncertain differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 392 (2021), 125724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125724 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125724
    [3] Y. Ji, X. Jiang, L. Wan, Hierarchical least squares parameter estimation algorithm for two-input Hammerstein finite impulse response systems, J. Franklin Inst., 357 (2020), 5019–5032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.03.027 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.03.027
    [4] B. L. S. Prakasa Rao, Parametric inference for stochastic differential equations driven by a mixed fractional Brownian motion with random effects based on discrete observations, Stoch. Anal. Appl., 40 (2022), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2021.1902352 doi: 10.1080/07362994.2021.1902352
    [5] Y. Wang, F. Ding, M. Wu, Recursive parameter estimation algorithm for multivariate output-error systems, J. Franklin Inst., 355 (2018), 5163–5181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.04.013 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.04.013
    [6] L. Xu, W. Xiong, A. Alsaedi, T. Hayat, Hierarchical parameter estimation for the frequency response based on the dynamical window data, Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., 16 (2018), 1756–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-017-0482-7 doi: 10.1007/s12555-017-0482-7
    [7] C. Wei, Estimation for incomplete information stochastic systems from discrete observations, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2019 (2019), 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2169-2 doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2169-2
    [8] C. Wei, Parameter estimation for partially observed stochastic differential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 12952–12961. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022717 doi: 10.3934/math.2022717
    [9] X. Zhang, F. Ding, Adaptive parameter estimation for a general dynamical system with unknown states, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 30 (2020), 1351–1372. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4819 doi: 10.1002/rnc.4819
    [10] F. Ding, L. Xu, F. E. Alsaadi, T. Hayat, Iterative parameter identification for pseudo-linear systems with ARMA noise using the filtering technique, IET Control Theory Appl., 12 (2018), 892–899. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0821 doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0821
    [11] M. Li, X. Liu, The least squares based iterative algorithms for parameter estimation of a bilinear system with autoregressive noise using the data filtering technique, Signal Process., 147 (2018), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.01.012 doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.01.012
    [12] C. Wei, Estimation for the discretely observed Cox-Ingersoll-Ross model driven by small symmetrical stable noises, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12030327 doi: 10.3390/sym12030327
    [13] B. L. S. Prakasa Rao, Nonparametric estimation of trend for stochastic differential equations driven by fractional Levy process, J. Stat. Theory Pract., 15 (2021), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-020-00138-z doi: 10.1007/s42519-020-00138-z
    [14] G. Shen, Q. Wang, X. Yin, Parameter estimation for the discretely observed Vasicek model with small fractional Lévy noise, Acta Math. Sin. English Ser., 36 (2020), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-020-9121-y doi: 10.1007/s10114-020-9121-y
    [15] J. P. N. Bishwal, Quasi-likelihood estimation in fractional Lévy SPDEs from Poisson sampling, European Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 2 (2022), 15. https://doi.org/10.28924/ada/ma.2.15 doi: 10.28924/ada/ma.2.15
    [16] B. L. S. Prakasa Rao, Nonparametric estimation of linear multiplier for stochastic differential equations driven by fractional Lévy process with small noise, Bulletin of informatics and cybernetics, 52 (2020), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5109/4150376 doi: 10.5109/4150376
    [17] W. Xu, J. Duan, W. Xu, An averaging principle for fractional stochastic differential equations with Lévy noise, Chaos, 30 (2020), 083126. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010551 doi: 10.1063/5.0010551
    [18] M. Yang, (Weighted pseudo) almost automorphic solutions in distribution for fractional stochastic differential equations driven by lévy noise, Filomat, 35 (2021), 2403–2424. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2107403Y doi: 10.2298/FIL2107403Y
    [19] P. Chen, Z. Ye, X. Zhao, Minimum distance estimation for the generalized pareto distribution, Technometrics, 59 (2017), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2016.1270857 doi: 10.1080/00401706.2016.1270857
    [20] G. Hajargasht, W. E. Griffiths, Minimum distance estimation of parametric Lorenz curves based on grouped data, Economet. Rev., 39 (2020), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2019.1630077 doi: 10.1080/07474938.2019.1630077
    [21] M. I. Vicuna, W. Palma, R. Olea, Minimum distance estimation of locally stationary moving average processes, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 140 (2019), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2019.05.005 doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2019.05.005
    [22] T. Marquardt, Fractional Lévy processes with an application to long memory moving average processes, Bernoulli, 12 (2006), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.3150/bj/1165269152 doi: 10.3150/bj/1165269152
    [23] R. S. Liptser, A. N. Shiryayev, Statistics of random processes I, New York: Springer, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1665-8
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1541) PDF downloads(69) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog