Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Instability analysis and geometric perturbation theory to a mutual beneficial interaction between species with a higher order operator

  • Received: 28 March 2022 Revised: 24 June 2022 Accepted: 11 July 2022 Published: 22 July 2022
  • MSC : 35K92, 35K91, 35K55

  • The higher order diffusion can be understood as a generalization to the classical fickian diffusion. To account for such generalization, the Landau-Ginzburg free energy concept is applied leading to a fourth order spatial operator. This kind of diffusion induces a set of instabilities in the proximity of the critical points raising difficulties to study the convergence of Travelling Waves (TW) solutions. This paper aims at introducing a system of two species driven by a mutual interaction towards prospering and with a logistic term in their respective reactions. Previous to any analytical finding of TW solutions, the instabilities of such solutions are studied. Afterwards, the Geometric Perturbation Theory is applied to provide means to search for a linearized hyperbolic manifold in the proximity of the equilibrium points. The homotopy graphs for each of the flows to the hyperbolic manifolds are provided, so that analytical solutions can be obtained in the proximity of the critical points. Additionally, the set of eigenvalues in the homotopy graphs tend to cluster and synchronize for increasing values of the TW-speed.

    Citation: José Luis Díaz Palencia, Abraham Otero. Instability analysis and geometric perturbation theory to a mutual beneficial interaction between species with a higher order operator[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17210-17224. doi: 10.3934/math.2022947

    Related Papers:

    [1] Lucrezia Cossetti . Bounds on eigenvalues of perturbed Lamé operators with complex potentials. Mathematics in Engineering, 2022, 4(5): 1-29. doi: 10.3934/mine.2022037
    [2] Eleonora Cinti, Roberto Ognibene, Berardo Ruffini . A quantitative stability inequality for fractional capacities. Mathematics in Engineering, 2022, 4(5): 1-28. doi: 10.3934/mine.2022044
    [3] Luz Roncal . Hardy type inequalities for the fractional relativistic operator. Mathematics in Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 1-16. doi: 10.3934/mine.2022018
    [4] Fernando Farroni, Gioconda Moscariello, Gabriella Zecca . Lewy-Stampacchia inequality for noncoercive parabolic obstacle problems. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023071
    [5] Maurizio Garrione . Beams with an intermediate pier: Spectral properties, asymmetry and stability. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(2): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021016
    [6] Federico Cluni, Vittorio Gusella, Dimitri Mugnai, Edoardo Proietti Lippi, Patrizia Pucci . A mixed operator approach to peridynamics. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(5): 1-22. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023082
    [7] Pier Domenico Lamberti, Michele Zaccaron . Spectral stability of the curlcurl operator via uniform Gaffney inequalities on perturbed electromagnetic cavities. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 1-31. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023018
    [8] Alessia E. Kogoj, Ermanno Lanconelli, Enrico Priola . Harnack inequality and Liouville-type theorems for Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Kolmogorov operators. Mathematics in Engineering, 2020, 2(4): 680-697. doi: 10.3934/mine.2020031
    [9] Serena Dipierro, Giovanni Giacomin, Enrico Valdinoci . The fractional Malmheden theorem. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 1-28. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023024
    [10] Biagio Cassano, Lucrezia Cossetti, Luca Fanelli . Spectral enclosures for the damped elastic wave equation. Mathematics in Engineering, 2022, 4(6): 1-10. doi: 10.3934/mine.2022052
  • The higher order diffusion can be understood as a generalization to the classical fickian diffusion. To account for such generalization, the Landau-Ginzburg free energy concept is applied leading to a fourth order spatial operator. This kind of diffusion induces a set of instabilities in the proximity of the critical points raising difficulties to study the convergence of Travelling Waves (TW) solutions. This paper aims at introducing a system of two species driven by a mutual interaction towards prospering and with a logistic term in their respective reactions. Previous to any analytical finding of TW solutions, the instabilities of such solutions are studied. Afterwards, the Geometric Perturbation Theory is applied to provide means to search for a linearized hyperbolic manifold in the proximity of the equilibrium points. The homotopy graphs for each of the flows to the hyperbolic manifolds are provided, so that analytical solutions can be obtained in the proximity of the critical points. Additionally, the set of eigenvalues in the homotopy graphs tend to cluster and synchronize for increasing values of the TW-speed.



    Let R and R+ denote the sets of all real numbers and nonnegative real numbers respectively, N the set of all positive integers and ¯A the closure and ¯coA the convex hull closure of A. Additionally, Ξ denotes a Banach space, Ω={Λ:Λ, bounded, closed and convex subset of Ξ}, B(Ξ)={Λ:Λ is bounded subset of Ξ}, kerm={ΛB(Ξ):m(Λ)=0} be the kernel of function m:B(Ξ)R+.

    Fixed point theory has been developed in two directions. One deals with contraction mappings on metric spaces, Banach contraction principle being the first important result in this direction. In the second direction, continuous operators are dealt with convex and compact subsets of a Banach space. Brouwer's fixed point theorem and its infinite dimensional form, Schuader's fixed point theorems are the two important theorems in this second direction. In this paper, Fix(Υ) denotes a set of fixed points of a mapping Υ in Λ.

    Theorem 1.1 (Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem).[2] Every continuous mapping from the unit ball of Rn into itself has a fixed point.

    Theorem 1.2 (Schauder's Fixed Point Theorem).[15] Let Υ:ΛΛ a compact continuous operator, where ΛΩ. Then Fix(Υ).

    In Brouwer's and Schuader's fixed point theorems, compactness of the space under consideration is required as a whole or as a part. However, later the requirement of the compactness was relaxed by making use of the notion of a measure of noncompactness (in short MNC). Using the notion of MNC, the following theorem was proved by Darbo [5].

    Theorem 1.3. [5] Let ΛΩ and Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function. If there exists k[0,1) such that

    m(Υ(Λ0))km(Λ0),

    where Λ0Λ and m is MNC defined on Ξ. Then Fix(Υ).

    It generalizes the renowned Schuader fixed point result and includes the existence portion of Banach contraction principle. In the sequel many extensions and generalizations of Darbo's theorem came into existence.

    The Banach principle has been improved and extended by several researchers (see [7,13,14,16]). Jleli and Samet [7] introduced the notion of θ-contractions and gave a generalization of the Banach contraction principle in generalized metric spaces, where θ:(0,)(1,) is such that:

    (θ1) θ is non-decreasing;

    (θ2) for every sequence {κj}(0,), we have

    limjθ(κj)=1limjκj=0+;

    (θ3) there exists L(0,) and (0,1) such that

    limκ0+θ(κ)1κ=L.

    Khojasteh et al. [9] introduced the concept of Z-contraction using simulation functions and established fixed point results for such contractions. Isik et al. [6] defined almost Z-contractions and presented fixed point theorems for such contractions. Cho [3] introduced the notion of L-contractions, and proved fixed point results under such contraction in generalized metric spaces. Using specific form of Z and L, we can deduce other known existing contractions. For some results concerning Z-contractions and its generalizations we refer the reader to [3] and the references cited therein. In particular, Chen and Tang [4] generalized Z-contraction with Zm-contraction and established Darbo type fixed point results.

    The aim of the present work is two fold. First we prove fixed point theorems under generalized Zm-contraction and then we prove fixed point results under Darbo type Lm-contraction in Banach spaces. It is interesting to see that several existing results in fixed point theory can be concluded from our main results. Furthermore, as an application of our results, we have proved the existence of solution to the Caputo fractional Volterra–Fredholm integro-differential equation

    cDμ(ϰ)=g(ϰ)+λ1ϰ0J1(ϰ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϰ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt,

    under boundary conditions:

    aμ(0)+bμ(T)=1Γ()T0(Tt)1J3(ϰ,t)dt,

    where (0,1], cD is the Caputo fractional derivative, λ1,λ2 are parameters, and a,b>0 are real constants, μ,g:[0,T]R, J1,J2,J3:[0,T]×[0,T]R and ξ1,ξ2:[0,T]×RR are continuous functions. For the validity of existence result we construct an example.

    In this section, we recall some definitions and results which are further considered in the next sections, allowing us to present the results. The concept of MNC was introduced in [1] as follows:

    Definition 2.1. [1] A map m:B(Ξ)R+ is MNC in Ξ if for all Λ1,Λ2B(Ξ) it satisfies the following conditions:

    (i) kerm and relatively compact in Ξ;

    (ii) Λ1Λ2  m(Λ1)m(Λ2);

    (iii) m(¯Λ1)=m(Λ1);

    (iv) m(¯coΛ1)=m(Λ1);

    (v) m(ηΛ1+(1η)Λ2)ηm(Λ1)+(1η)m(Λ2) η[0,1];

    (vi) if {Λn} is a sequence of closed sets in B(Ξ) with Λn+1Λn, nN and limn+m(Λn)=0, then Λ=+n=1Λn.

    The Kuratowski MNC [11] is the function m:B(Ξ)R+ defined by

    m(K)=inf{ε>0:Kni=1Si,SiΞ,diam(Si)<ε},

    where diam(S) is the diameter of S.

    Khojasteh et al. [9] introduced the concept of Z-contraction using simulation functions as follows:

    Definition 2.2. A function Z:R+×R+R is simulation if:

    (Z1) Z(0,0)=0;

    (Z2) Z(κ1,κ2)<κ2κ1, for all κ1,κ2>0;

    (Z3) if {κn} and {κn} are two sequences in (0,) such that limκnn=limκnn>0, then

    limZ(κn,κn)n<0.

    Roldán-López-de-Hierro et al. [12] slightly modified the Definition 2.2 of [9] as follows.

    Definition 2.3. A mapping Z:R+×R+R is simulation if:

    (Z1) Z(0,0)=0;

    (Z2) Z(κ1,κ2)<κ2κ1, for all κ1,κ2>0;

    (Z3) if {κn}, {κn} are sequences in (0,) such that limκnn=limκnn>0 and κn<κn, then

    limZ(κn,κn)n<0.

    Every simulation function in the original Definition 2.2 is also a simulation function in the sense of Definition 2.3, but the converse is not true, see for instance [12]. Note that Z={Z:Z is a simulation function in the sense of Definition 2.3}. The following are some examples of simulation functions.

    Example 2.4. The mapping Z:R+×R+R defined by:

    1. Z(κ1,κ2)=κ2f(κ1)κ1, for all κ1,κ2R+, where f:R+R+ is a lower semi-continuous function such that f1(0)={0},

    2. Z(κ1,κ2)=κ2φ(κ1)κ1, for all κ1,κ2R+, where φ:R+R+ is a continuous function such that φ(κ1)={0}κ1=0,

    3. Z(κ1,κ2)=κ2(κ2)κ1, for all κ1,κ2R+, where :R+R+ is a function such that lim supnr+ (κ1)<1,

    4. Z(κ1,κ2)=ϕ(κ2)κ1, for all κ1,κ2R+, where ϕ:R+R+ is an upper semi-continuous function such that ϕ(κ1)<κ1, for all κ1>0 and ϕ(0)=0,

    5. Z(κ1,κ2)=κ2κ10λ(x)dx, for all κ1,κ2R+, where λ:R+R+ is a function such that ϵ0λ(x)dx exists and ϵ0λ(x)dx>ϵ, for every ϵ>0,

    6. Z(κ1,κ2)=κ2κ2+1κ1, for all κ1,κ2R+,

    are simulation functions.

    Cho [3] introduced the notion of L-simulation function as follows:

    Definition 2.5. An L-simulation function is a function L:[1,)×[1,)R satisfying the following conditions:

    (L1) L(1,1)=1;

    (L2) L(κ1,κ2)<κ2κ1, for all κ1,κ2>1;

    (L3) if {κn} and {κn} are two sequences in (1,) such that limκnn=limκnn>1 and κn<κn, then

    limL(κn,κn)n<1.

    Note that L(1,1)<1, for all t>1.

    Example 2.6. The functions Lb,Lw:[1,)×[1,)R defined by

    1. Lb(κ1,κ2)=κn2κ1, for all κ1,κ21, where n(0,1);

    2. Lw(κ1,κ2)=κ2κ1ϕ(κ2) κ1,κ21, where ϕ:[1,)[1,) is lower semicontinuous and nondecreasing with ϕ1({1})=1,

    are L-simulation functions.

    Definition 2.7. [8] A continuous non-decreasing function ϕ:R+R+ such that φ(t)=0 if and only if t=0 is called an altering distance function.

    In this section, we obtain the results on generalized Zm-contraction. First we give the following definition.

    Definition 3.1. Let ΛΩ. A self-mapping Υ on Λ is called generalized Zm-contraction if there exists ZZ such that

    Z(m(Υ(Λ1)),Δ(Λ1,Λ2))0, (3.1)

    where Λ1 and Λ2 are subsets of Λ, m(Λ1),m(Υ(Λ1)),m(Υ(Λ2))>0, m is MNC defined in Ξ and

    Δ(Λ1,Λ2)=max{m(Λ1),m(Υ(Λ1)),m(Υ(Λ2)),12m(Υ(Λ1)Υ(Λ2))}.

    Using the notion of Zm-contraction, we establish the main result of this section.

    Theorem 3.2. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function, where ΛΩ. Assume that there exists ZZ such that Z non-decreasing function and Υ is a generalized Zm-contraction. Then Fix(Υ).

    Proof. Define a sequence {Λn}n=0 such that

    Λ0=Λ and  Λn=¯co(ΥΛn1), for all  nN. (3.2)

    We need to prove that Λn+1Λn and ΥΛnΛn, for all nN. For proof of the first inclusion, we use induction. If n=1, then by (3.2), we have Λ0=Λ and Λ1=¯co(ΥΛ0)Λ0. Next, assume that ΛnΛn1, then ¯co(Υ(Λn))¯co(Υ(Λn1)), using (3.2), we get the first inclusion

    Λn+1Λn. (3.3)

    To obtained the second inclusion, using the inclusion (3.3) we have

    ΥΛn¯co(ΥΛn)=Λn+1Λn. (3.4)

    Thus Λn+1Λn and ΥΛnΛn,nN.

    Now, we discuss two cases, depending on the values of m. If we consider m as a non-negative integer with m(Λm)=0, then Λm is a compact set and hence by Theorem 1.2, Υ has a fixed point in ΛmΛ. Instead, assume that m(Λn)>0, nN. Then on setting Λ1=Λn+1 and Λ2=Λn in contraction (3.1), we have

    Z(m(Υ(Λn+1)),Δ(Λn+1,Λn))0, (3.5)

    where

    Δ(Λn,Λn+1)=max{m(Λn),m(Υ(Λn)),m(Υ(Λn+1)),12m(Υ(Λn)Υ(Λn+1))}max{m(Λn),m(Λn),m(Λn+1),12m(ΛnΛn+1)}=max{m(Λn),m(Λn),m(Λn+1),12m(Λn)}=m(Λn),

    that is,

    Δ(Λn,Λn+1)m(Λn). (3.6)

    Using inequality (3.6) and the axiom (Z2) of Z-simulation function, inequality (3.5) becomes,

    0Z(m(Υ(Λn+1)),Δ(Λn+1,Λn))Z(m(Λn+1),m(Λn))m(Λn)m(Λn+1), (3.7)

    that is, m(Λn)m(Λn+1) and hence, {m(Λn)} is a decreasing sequence of positive real numbers. Thus, we can find r0 such that limn m(Λn)=r. Next, we claim that r=0. To support our claim, suppose that r0, that is, r>0. Let un=m(Λn+1) and vn=m(Λn), then since un<vn, so by the axiom (Z3) of Z-simulation function, we have

    lim supn Z(m(Λn+1),m(Λn))=lim supn Z(un,vn)<0,

    which is contradiction to (3.7). Thus r=0 and hence {Λn} is a sequence of closed sets in B(Ξ) with Λn+1Λn, for all nN and limn m(Λn)=0, so the intersection set Λ=+n=1Λn is non-empty, closed and convex subset of Λ. Furthermore, since ΛΛn, for all nN, so by Definition 2.1(ii), m(Λ)m(Λn), for all nN. Thus m(Λ)=0 and hence Λkerm, that is, Λ is bounded. But Λ is closed so that Λ is compact. Therefore by Theorem 1.2, Fix(Υ). From Theorem 3.2 we obtain the following corollaries. We assume that ΛΩ.

    Corollary 3.3. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function such that

    ψ1(m(Υ(Λ1)))ψ2(max{m(Λ1),m(Υ(Λ1)),m(Υ(Λ2)),12m(Υ(Λ1)Υ(Λ2))}),

    for any non-empty subsets Λ1 and Λ2 of Λ, where m is MNC. Then Fix(Υ).

    Corollary 3.4. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function such that

    m(Υ(Λ1))Δ(Λ1,Λ2)f(Δ(Λ1,Λ2)),

    for any non-empty subsets Λ1 and Λ2 of Λ, where m is MNC and f:R+R+ is a lower semi-continuous function such that f1(0)={0}. Then Fix(Υ).

    The conclusion of Corollary 3.4 is true if f:R+R+ is continuous function such that f(t)=0   t=0.

    Corollary 3.5. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function such that

    m(Υ(Λ1))(Δ(Λ1,Λ2))Δ(Λ1,Λ2),

    for any non-empty subsets Λ1 and Λ2 of Λ, where m is MNC and :R+R+ is a function with lim supnr+ (t)<1. Then Fix(Υ).

    Corollary 3.6. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function such that

    m(Υ(Λ1))ϕ(max{m(Λ1),m(Υ(Λ1)),m(Υ(Λ2)),12m(Υ(Λ1)Υ(Λ2))}),

    for any non-empty subsets Λ1 and Λ2 of Λ, where m is MNC and ϕ:R+R+ is an upper semi-continuous mapping with ϕ(t)<t, t>0 and ϕ(0)=0. Then Fix(Υ).

    Corollary 3.7. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function such that

    m(Υ(Λ1))0λ(x)dxmax{m(Λ1),m(Υ(Λ1)),m(Υ(Λ2)),12m(Υ(Λ1)Υ(Λ2))},

    for any non-empty subsets Λ1 and Λ2 of Λ, where m is MNC and λ:R+R+ is a mapping such that ϵ0λ(x)dx exists and ϵ0λ(x)dx>ϵ, for every ϵ>0. Then Fix(Υ).

    Corollary 3.8. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function such that

    m(Υ(Λ1))Δ(Λ1,Λ2)1+Δ(Λ1,Λ2),

    for any non-empty subsets Λ1 and Λ2 of Λ, where m is MNC. Then Fix(Υ).

    In this section, we obtain some results on Lm-contraction. Let us denote by Θ the class of all functions θ:(0,)(1,) that satisfy conditions (θ1) and (θ2). First we introduce the notion of Lm-contraction as:

    Definition 4.1. Let ΛΩ. A self-mapping Υ on Λ is called Lm-contraction with respect to L if there exist θΘ such that, for all ΛΛ with m(Λ)>0,

    L(θ(m(Υ(Λ))),θ(m(Λ)))1, (4.1)

    where m is MNC defined in Ξ.

    Theorem 4.2. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous function. Assume that there exist θΘ and Υ is Lm-contraction with respect to L. Then Fix(Υ).

    Proof. Define a sequence {Λn}n=0 such that

    Λ0=Λ and  Λn=¯co(ΥΛn1), for all  nN. (4.2)

    Then Λn+1Λn and ΥΛnΛn, nN.

    Now, we discuss two cases, depending on the values of m. If we consider m as a non-negative integer with m(Λm)=0, then Λm is a compact set and hence by Theorem 1.2, Υ has a fixed point in ΛmΛ. Instead, assume that m(Λn)>0, for all nN. Then on setting Λ=Λn in contraction (4.1), we have

    1L(θ(m(Υ(Λn))),θ(m(Λn)))θ(m(Λn))θ(m(Υ(Λn))), (4.3)

    that is,

    θ(m(Υ(Λn)))θ(m(Λn)).

    Since θ is nondecreasing, so that

    m(Υ(Λn))m(Λn). (4.4)

    Now, using inequality (4.4), we have

    m(Λn+1)=m(¯co(Υ(Λn)))=m(Υ(Λn))m(Λn),

    that is, m(Λn+1)m(Λn) and hence, {m(Λn)} is a decreasing sequence of positive real numbers. Thus, we can find r0 with limn m(Λn)=r. Next, we claim that r=0. To support our claim, suppose that r0. Then in view of (θ2), we get

    limn θ(m(Λn))1,

    which implies that

    limn θ(m(Λn))>1. (4.5)

    Let un=θ(m(Λn+1)) and vn=θ(m(Λn)), then since unvn, so by the axiom (L3) of L-simulation function, we have

    1lim supn L(m(Λn+1),m(Λn))=lim supn L(un,vn)<1,

    which is contradiction. Thus r=0 and hence {Λn} is a sequence of closed sets from B(Ξ) such that Λn+1Λn, for all nN and limn m(Λn)=0, so the intersection set Λ=+n=1Λn is non-empty, closed and convex subset of Λ. Furthermore, since ΛΛn, for all nN, so by Definition 2.1(ii), m(Λ)m(Λn), for all nN. Thus m(Λ)=0 and hence Λkerm, that is, Λ is bounded. But Λ is closed so that Λ is compact. Therefore by Theorem 1.2, Fix(Υ).

    By taking L=Lb in Theorem 4.2, we obtain the following result.

    Corollary 4.3. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous functions such that, for all ΛΛ with m(Λ)>0,

    θ(m(Υ(Λ)))(θ(m(Λ)))k, (4.6)

    where θΘ and k(0,1). Then Fix(Υ).

    Remark 4.4. Corollary 4.3 is the Darbo type version of Theorem 2.1 in [7].

    By taking L=Lw in Theorem 4.2, we obtain the next result.

    Corollary 4.5. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous functions such that, for all ΛΛ with m(Λ)>0,

    θ(m(Υ(Λ)))θ(m(Λ))ϕ(θ(m(Λ))), (4.7)

    where θΘ and ϕ:[1,)[1,) is lower semi-continuous and nondecreasing with ϕ1({1})=1. Then Fix(Υ).

    By taking θ(t)=et, for all t>0 in Corollary 4.5, we obtain next result.

    Corollary 4.6. Let Υ:ΛΛ be a continuous functions such that, for all ΛΛ with m(Λ)>0,

    m(Υ(Λ))m(Λ)φ(m(Λ)), (4.8)

    where φ:R+R+ is lower semi-continuous and nondecreasing with φ1({0})=0. Then Fix(Υ).

    Remark 4.7. Corollary 4.6 is the Rhoades's Theorem of Darbo type [13].

    Let B(a,r) be the closed ball with center at a and radius r and Br be the ball B(0,r). We check the existence of solution to Caputo fractional Volterra–Fredholm integro differential equation

    cDμ(ϰ)=g(ϰ)+λ1ϰ0J1(ϰ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϰ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt, (5.1)

    under boundary conditions:

    aμ(0)+bμ(T)=1Γ()T0(Tt)1J3(ϰ,t)dt, (5.2)

    where (0,1], cD is the Caputo fractional derivative, λ1,λ2 are parameters, and a,b>0 are real constants, μ,g:[0,T]R, J1,J2,J3:[0,T]×[0,T]R and ξ1,ξ2:[0,T]×RR are continuous functions.

    Lemma 5.1. [10] For plR, l=0,1,,r1, we have

    I[cDh(t)]=h(t)+p0+p1t+p2t2+...+pr1tr1.

    Using Lemma 5.1, we can easily establish the following result.

    Lemma 5.2. Problem (5.1) is equivalent to the integral equation

    μ(ϰ)=1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1g(ϑ)dϑb(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1g(ϑ)dϑ+1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt)dϑb(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt)dϑ+1(a+b)Γ()T0(Tt)1J3(ϰ,t)dt. (5.3)

    Proof. Using Lemma 5.1, we obtain

    μ(ϰ)=c0+I(g(ϰ))+λ1I(ϰ0J1(ϰ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϰ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt) (5.4)

    Apply boundary conditions, we deduce that

    c0=b(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1g(ϑ)dϑ1(a+b)Γ()T0(Tt)1J3(ϰ,t)dt+b(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt)dϑ.

    Thus by substituting the values of c0 in (5.4), we get integral equation (5.3).

    Notice that the solution of Eq (5.1) is equivalent to Eq (5.3). Now, we are in a position to present the existence result.

    Theorem 5.3. Let μ,νBr,ϑ,τ[0,T], and a,b>0 be real constants. If μ,g:[0,T]R, J1,J2,J3:[0,T]×[0,T]R and ξ1,ξ2:[0,T]×RR are continuous functions satisfying the following axioms:

    1. there exist Ci>0,i=1,2 such that

    |ξi(t,μ(t))ξi(t,ν(t))|Ciμν; (5.5)

    2. there exist real numbers λ1 and λ2 with |λ1|C1K1+|λ2|C2K2<Γ(+1)2Tp such that

    2[g+|λ1|K1F1+|λ2|K2F2]+K3TΓ(+1)2[|λ1|C1K1+|λ2|C2K2]r, (5.6)

    where F1=sup|ξ1(t,0)|,F2=sup|ξ2(t,0)| and

    K1=supϑ0|J1(ϑ,τ)|dτ<, (5.7)

    and

    Ki=supT0|Ji(ϑ,τ)|dτ<,  i=2,3. (5.8)

    Then problem (5.3) has a solution in Br, equivalently problem (5.1) has a solution in Br.

    Proof. Let Br={μC([0,T],R):μr}. Then, Br is a non-empty, closed, bounded, and convex subset of C([0,T],R). Define the operator Υ:BrBr by

    Υμ(ϰ)=1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1g(ϑ)dϑb(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1g(ϑ)dϑ+1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt)dϑb(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt)dϑ+1(a+b)Γ()T0(Tt)1J3(ϰ,t)dt.

    Our first claim is Υ:BrBr is well-defined. Let μBr, for some r. Then for all ϰ[0,T], we have

    |Υμ(ϰ)|1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1|g(ϑ)|dϑ+b(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1|g(ϑ)|dϑ+1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1(|λ1|ϑ0|J1(ϑ,t)||ξ1(t,μ(t))|dt+|λ2|T0|J2(ϑ,t)||ξ2(t,μ(t))|dt)dϑ+1(a+b)Γ()T0(Tt)1|J3(ϰ,t)|dt+b(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1(|λ1|ϑ0|J1(ϑ,t)||ξ1(t,μ(t))|dt+|λ2|T0|J2(ϑ,t)||ξ2(t,μ(t))|dt)dϑ1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1|g(ϑ)|dϑ+1Γ()T0(Tϑ)1|g(ϑ)|dϑ+1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1{|λ1|ϑ0|J1(ϑ,t)|(|ξ1(t,μ(t))ξ1(t,0)|+|ξ1(t,0)|)dt+|λ2|T0|J2(ϑ,t)|(|ξ2(t,μ(t))ξ2(t,0)|+|ξ2(t,0)|)dt}dϑ+1Γ()T0(Tϑ)1{|λ1|ϑ0|J1(ϑ,t)|(|ξ1(t,μ(t))ξ1(t,0)|+|ξ1(t,0)|)dt+|λ2|T0|J2(ϑ,t)|(|ξ2(t,μ(t))ξ2(t,0)|+|ξ2(t,0)|)dt}dϑ+1Γ()T0(Tt)1|J3(ϰ,t)|dt
    gΓ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1dϑ+gΓ()T0(Tϑ)1dϑ+K3Γ()T0(Tt)1dt+|λ1|K1(C1μ+F1)+|λ2|K2(C2μ+F2)Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1dϑ+{|λ1|K1(C1μ+F1)+|λ2|K2(C2μ+F2)}Γ()T0(Tϑ)1dϑ,

    with the help of (5.6), (5.7) and (5.8), we get

    |Υμ(ϰ)|gΓ()ϰ+gΓ()T+|λ1|K1(C1r+F1)+|λ2|K2(C2r+F2)Γ()ϰ+|λ1|K1(C1r+F1)+|λ2|K2(C2r+F2)Γ()T+r+K3Γ()T(2g+2|λ1|K1(C1r+F1)+2|λ2|K2(C2r+F2)+K3)TΓ(+1)={2(g+|λ1|K1F1+|λ2|K2F2)+2r(|C1λ1|K1+|λ2|C2K2)+K3}TΓ(+1)r.

    That is, Υ(μ)r, for all μBr, which implies that Υ(μ)Br and hence Υ:BrBr is well-defined. Now, we have to show that Υ:BrBr is continuous. For this, using (5.7), (5.5) and (5.8), we have

    |Υμ(ϰ)Υν(ϰ)|=|1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt)dϑb(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,μ(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,μ(t))dt)dϑ1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,ν(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,ν(t))dt)dϑ+b(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1(λ1ϑ0J1(ϑ,t)ξ1(t,ν(t))dt+λ2T0J2(ϑ,t)ξ2(t,ν(t))dt)dϑ|1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1(|λ1|ϑ0|J1(ϑ,t)||ξ1(t,μ(t))ξ1(t,ν(t))|dt)dϑ+1Γ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1(|λ2|T0|J2(ϑ,t)||ξ2(t,μ(t))ξ2(t,ν(t))|dt)dϑ+b(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1(|λ1|ϑ0|J1(ϑ,t)||ξ1(t,μ(t))ξ1(t,ν(t))|dt)dϑ+b(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1(|λ2|T0|J2(ϑ,t)||ξ2(t,μ(t))ξ2(t,ν(t))|dt)dϑ
    C1K1|λ1|μν+C2K2|λ2|μνΓ()ϰ0(ϰϑ)1dϑ+bC1K1|λ1|μν+bC2K2|λ2|μν(a+b)Γ()T0(Tϑ)1dϑ=(C1K1|λ1|μν+C2K2|λ2|μν)ϰΓ(+1)+C1(K1|λ1|μν+C2K2|λ2|μν)TΓ(+1)2(C1K1|λ1|+C2K2|λ2|)TΓ(+1)μν.

    But |λ1|C1K1+|λ2|C2K2<Γ(+1)2Tp, that is h=2(C1K1|λ1|+C2K2|λ2|)TΓ(+1)(0,1). It follows from above that

    ΥμΥνhμν. (5.9)

    That is, Υ:BrBr is contraction and hence continuous. Next, we have to show that Υ is Lm-contraction. Let Λ be any subset of Br with m(Λ)>0, and μ,νΛ. Then from inequality (5.9), we write

    diam(ΥΛ)hdiam(Λ). (5.10)

    Now, let define θ:(0,)(1,) by θ(t)=et, then clearly θΘ. Using inequality (5.10), we have

    θ(m(Υ(Λ)))=θ(diam(Υ(Λ)))=ediam(Υ(Λ))ehdiam(Λ)=(ediam(Λ))h=(em(Λ))h=(θ(m(Λ)))h.

    Consequently,

    (θ(m(Λ)))hθ(m(Υ(Λ)))1.

    Thus for L(κ1,κ2)=κh2κ1, the above inequality becomes

    L(θ(m(Υ(Λ))),θ(m(Λ)))1,

    That is, Υ:BrBr is Lm-contraction and so Theorem 4.2 ensures the existence of a fixed point of Υ in Br, equivalently, the Eq (5.3) has a solution in Br.

    To illustrate the Theorem 5.3, we present an example.

    Example 5.4. Consider the following Caputo fractional Volterra–Fredholm integro-differential equation

    cD0.9μ(ϰ)=ϰ3eϰ4217ϰ0ϰ3sin(ϑ3)2ϑ+3[μ(ϑ)]2dϑ+12220ϰ25+2[μ(ϑ)]21+ϑϰ2dϑ, (5.11)

    with boundary condition

    5μ(0)+3μ(2)=1Γ(0.9)20(2ϑ)0.91scos(ϑ2)ϰ2+5dϑ, (5.12)

    Compare Eq (5.11) with Eq (5.1), we get

    λ1=17,λ2=122,a=5,b=3,g(ϰ)=ϰ3eϰ42,J1(ϰ,ϑ)=ϰ3sin(ϑ3),J2(ϰ,ϑ)=ϰ21+ϑϰ2,J3(ϰ,ϑ)=scos(ϑ2)ϰ2+5,ξ1(ϑ,μ(ϑ))=2ϑ+3[μ(ϑ)]2,ξ2(ϑ,μ(ϑ))=5+2[μ(ϑ)]2.

    Clearly g:[0,2]R, J1,J2,J3:[0,2]×[0,2]R and ξ1,ξ2:[0,2]×RR are continuous. Now, we have to verify condition (5.5) of Theorem 5.3. Consider

    |ξ1(ϑ,μ(ϑ))ξ1(ϑ,ν(ϑ))|=|2ϑ+3[μ(ϑ)]22ϑ+3[ν(ϑ)]2|=|2ϑ+3[μ(ϑ)]22ϑ3[ν(ϑ)]2|2ϑ+3[μ(ϑ)]2+2ϑ+3[ν(ϑ)]23|[μ(ϑ)]2[ν(ϑ)]2|3[|μ(ϑ)|+|ν(ϑ)|]=|μ(ϑ)ν(ϑ)||μ(ϑ)+ν(ϑ)||μ(ϑ)|+|ν(ϑ)|μν.

    Similarly,

    |ξ2(ϑ,μ(ϑ))ξ2(ϑ,ν(ϑ))|μν.

    Thus ξ1,ξ2:RR are Lipschitz with C1=C2=1.

    Next, we have to verify the conditions (5.7) and (5.8) of Theorem 5.3. To do this, we have

    K1=supϰ0|ϰ3sin(ϑ3)|dϑ=sup(|ϰ|cos(ϰ3))=0,
    K2=supϰ0|ϰ21+ϑϰ2|dϑ=sup(ln(1+ϰ3))2.197,

    and

    K3=sup(1ϰ2+5ϰ0ϑcos(ϑ2)dϑ)=sup(2ϰsin(ϰ2)+4cos(ϰ2)4ϰ2+5)0.17.

    Finally, to verify condition (5.6) of Theorem 5.3. Let B2={μC([0,2],R):μ2}, then since g=0,K1=0,K22.197,K3=0.17, F1=2, and F2=5, so we have

    |λ1|C1K1+|λ2|C2K20.104619<0.2576988Γ(+1)2Tp,

    and

    2[g+|λ1|K1F1+|λ2|K2F2]+K3TΓ(+1)2[|λ1|C1K1+|λ2|C2K2]1.953315<2.

    Thus Theorem 5.3 ensures the existence of a solution of (5.11) in B2.

    Darbo type contractions are introduced and fixed point results are established in a Banach space using the concept of measure of non compactness. Various existing results are deduced as corollaries to our main results. Further, our results are applied to prove the existence and uniqueness of solution to the Caputo fractional Volterra–Fredholm integro-differential equation under integral type boundary conditions which is further illustrated by appropriate example. Our study paves the way for further studies on Darbo type contractions and its applications.

    The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, for supporting this research.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] A. Audrito, J. L. Vázquez, The Fisher–KPP problem with doubly nonlinear "fast" diffusion, Nonlinear Anal., 157 (2017), 212–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2017.03.015 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2017.03.015
    [2] A. I. Volpert, V. A. Volpert, Traveling wave solutions of parabolic systems, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 140 (1994), American Mathematical Society.
    [3] A. N. Kolmogorov, I. G. Petrovskii, N. S. Piskunov, Study of the diffusion equation with growth of the quantity of matter and its application to a biological problem, Byull. Moskov. Gos. Univ., Sect. A, 1 (1937).
    [4] C. K. Jones, Geometric singular perturbation theory in dynamical systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlín, 1995.
    [5] D. Aronson, Density-dependent interaction-diffusion systems, Proc. Adv. Seminar on Dynamics and Modeling of Reactive System, Academic Press, New York, 1980.
    [6] D. Aronson, H. Weinberger, Nonlinear diffusion in population genetics, combustion and nerve propagation, Partial Differential Equations and Related Topics, Pub., New York, (1975), 5–49.
    [7] J. Karátson, A maximum principle for some nonlinear cooperative elliptic PDE systems with mixed boundary conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 44 (2016), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.06.062 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.06.062
    [8] D. Aronson, H. Weinberger, Multidimensional nonlinear diffusion arising in population genetics, Adv. Math., 30 (1978), 33–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(78)90130-5 doi: 10.1016/0001-8708(78)90130-5
    [9] P. Stehlik, Exponential number of stationary solutions for Nagumo equations on graphs, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 455 (2017), 1749–1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.075 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.075
    [10] D. Bonheure, F. Hamel, One-dimensional symmetry and Liouville type results for the fourth order Allen-Cahn equation in RN, Chin. Ann. Math. Sec. B, 38 (2017), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11401-016-1065-2 doi: 10.1007/s11401-016-1065-2
    [11] D. S. Cohen, J. D. Murray, A generalized diffusion model for growth and dispersal in a population, J. Math. Biology, 12 (1981), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276132 doi: 10.1007/BF00276132
    [12] E. A. Coutsias, Some effects of spatial nonuniformities in chemically reacting systems, California Institute of Technology, 1980.
    [13] J. Paseka, S. A. Solovyov, M. Stehlík, On the category of lattice-valued bornological vector spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 419 (2014), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.04.033 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.04.033
    [14] G. Hongjun, L. Changchun, Instabilities of traveling waves of the convective-diffusive Cahn-Hilliard equation, Chaos, Soliton. Fract., 20 (2004), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00372-2 doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00372-2
    [15] J. Alexander, R. Gardner, C. Jones, A topological invariant arising in the stability analysis of travelling waves, J. Reine Angew. Math., 410 (1990), 167–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1990.410.167 doi: 10.1515/crll.1990.410.167
    [16] Kiselev, Fundamentals of diffusion MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) physics, Wiley Online Library, 2017.
    [17] L. Bingtuan, H. Weinberger, Spreading speeds as slowest wave speeds for cooperative systems, Math. Biosci., 196 (2005), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2005.03.008 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2005.03.008
    [18] L. Zhenbang, L. Changchun, On the nonlinear instability of traveling waves for a sixth-order parabolic equation, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2012 (2012), Article ID 739156. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/739156 doi: 10.1155/2012/739156
    [19] F. Gregorio, D. Mugnolo, Bi-Laplacians on graphs and networks, Jour. Evol. Equ., 20 (2020), 191–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00028-019-00523-7 doi: 10.1007/s00028-019-00523-7
    [20] W. M. Schouten-Straatman, H. J. Hupkes, Travelling wave solutions for fully discrete FitzHugh-Nagumo type equations with infinite-range interactions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 502 (2021), 125272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125272 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125272
    [21] L. A. Peletier, W. C. Troy, Spatial Patterns, Higher order models in Physics and Mechanics, Progress in non linear differential equations and their applications, 45 (2001), Université Pierre et Marie Curie.
    [22] M. E. Akveld, J. Hulshof, Travelling wave solutions of a fourth-order semilinear diffusion equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 11 (1998), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00042-1 doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00042-1
    [23] F. Gregorio, D. Mugnolo, Higher-order operators on networks: Hyperbolic and parabolic theory, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory, 92 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-020-02610-8
    [24] N. Fenichel., Persistence and smoothness of invariant manifolds for flows, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 21 (1971), 193–226. https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1972.21.21017 doi: 10.1512/iumj.1972.21.21017
    [25] R. E. Beardmore, M. A. Peletier, C. J. Budd, M. A. Wadee, Bifurcations of periodic solutions satisfying the Zero-Hamiltonian constraint in reversible differential equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 36 (2005), 1461–1488. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141002418637 doi: 10.1137/S0036141002418637
    [26] A. Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Application to Partial Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, Appplied Math. Sciences, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5561-1
    [27] R. A. Fisher. The advance of advantageous genes, Ann. Eugenics, 7 (1937), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1937.tb02153.x
    [28] V. Galaktionov, Towards the KPP-Problem and Log-Front Shift for Higher-Order Nonlinear PDEs I, Bi-Harmonic and Other Parabolic Equations, Cornwell University arXiv: 1210.3513, (2012).
    [29] V. A. Galaktionov, S. I. Pohozaev, Existence and blow-up for higher-order semilinear parabolic equations: Majorizing Order-Preserving Operators, Indiana U. Math. J., 51 (2002), 1321–1338. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24902842
    [30] V. Goldshtein, A. Ukhlov, Weighted Sobolev spaces and embeddings theorems, T. Am. Math. Soc., 361 (2009), 3829–3850. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04615-7 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04615-7
    [31] V. Rottschäfer, A. Doelman, On the transition from the Ginzburg-Landau equation to the extended Fisher-Kolmogorov equation, Physica D, 118 (1998), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00035-9 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00035-9
    [32] A. Favini, G. R. Goldstein, J. A. Goldstein, S. Romanelli, Classification of general Wentzell boundary conditions for fourth order operators in one space dimension, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 333 (2007), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.11.058 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.11.058
    [33] W. Strauss, G. Wang, Instabilities of travelling waves of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, Chin. Ann. Math. B, 23 (2002), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0252959902000250 doi: 10.1142/S0252959902000250
    [34] X. Cabre, J. Roquejoffre, The influence of fractional diffusion in Fisher-KPP equations, Comm. Math. Phys., 320 (2013), 679–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-013-1682-5 doi: 10.1007/s00220-013-1682-5
    [35] S. Kesavan, Topics in Functional Analysis and Applications, New Age International (formerly Wiley-Eastern), 1989.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Stefano Biagi, Dimitri Mugnai, Eugenio Vecchi, Necessary condition in a Brezis–Oswald-type problem for mixed local and nonlocal operators, 2022, 132, 08939659, 108177, 10.1016/j.aml.2022.108177
    2. Cristiana De Filippis, Giuseppe Mingione, Gradient regularity in mixed local and nonlocal problems, 2022, 0025-5831, 10.1007/s00208-022-02512-7
    3. Xiangrui Li, Shuibo Huang, Meirong Wu, Canyun Huang, Existence of solutions to elliptic equation with mixed local and nonlocal operators, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 13313, 10.3934/math.2022735
    4. Prashanta Garain, Erik Lindgren, Higher Hölder regularity for mixed local and nonlocal degenerate elliptic equations, 2023, 62, 0944-2669, 10.1007/s00526-022-02401-6
    5. G.C. Anthal, J. Giacomoni, K. Sreenadh, A Choquard type equation involving mixed local and nonlocal operators, 2023, 527, 0022247X, 127440, 10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127440
    6. Serena Dipierro, Kanishka Perera, Caterina Sportelli, Enrico Valdinoci, An existence theory for superposition operators of mixed order subject to jumping nonlinearities, 2024, 37, 0951-7715, 055018, 10.1088/1361-6544/ad3793
    7. Alberto Maione, Dimitri Mugnai, Eugenio Vecchi, Variational methods for nonpositive mixed local–nonlocal operators, 2023, 26, 1311-0454, 943, 10.1007/s13540-023-00147-2
    8. Sabri Bahrouni, Symmetrization for Mixed Operators, 2024, 2391-4238, 10.2478/amsil-2024-0013
    9. João Vitor da Silva, Alessio Fiscella, Victor A. Blanco Viloria, Mixed local-nonlocal quasilinear problems with critical nonlinearities, 2024, 408, 00220396, 494, 10.1016/j.jde.2024.07.028
    10. Gianmarco Giovannardi, Dimitri Mugnai, Eugenio Vecchi, An Ahmad-Lazer-Paul-type result for indefinite mixed local-nonlocal problems, 2023, 527, 0022247X, 127442, 10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127442
    11. Serena Dipierro, Edoardo Proietti Lippi, Enrico Valdinoci, Some maximum principles for parabolic mixed local/nonlocal operators, 2024, 0002-9939, 10.1090/proc/16899
    12. Sun-Sig Byun, Deepak Kumar, Ho-Sik Lee, Global gradient estimates for the mixed local and nonlocal problems with measurable nonlinearities, 2024, 63, 0944-2669, 10.1007/s00526-023-02631-2
    13. Xifeng Su, Enrico Valdinoci, Yuanhong Wei, Jiwen Zhang, On some regularity properties of mixed local and nonlocal elliptic equations, 2025, 416, 00220396, 576, 10.1016/j.jde.2024.10.003
    14. Nicolò Cangiotti, Maicol Caponi, Alberto Maione, Enzo Vitillaro, Klein–Gordon–Maxwell Equations Driven by Mixed Local–Nonlocal Operators, 2023, 91, 1424-9286, 375, 10.1007/s00032-023-00387-0
    15. Prashanta Garain, Wontae Kim, Juha Kinnunen, On the regularity theory for mixed anisotropic and nonlocal p-Laplace equations and its applications to singular problems, 2024, 36, 0933-7741, 697, 10.1515/forum-2023-0151
    16. Shuibo Huang, Hichem Hajaiej, Lazer-mckenna type problem involving mixed local and nonlocal elliptic operators, 2025, 32, 1021-9722, 10.1007/s00030-024-01007-5
    17. Lovelesh Sharma, Brezis Nirenberg type results for local non-local problems under mixed boundary conditions, 2024, 16, 2836-3310, 872, 10.3934/cam.2024038
    18. Dimitri Mugnai, Edoardo Proietti Proietti Lippi, Quasilinear Fractional Neumann Problems, 2024, 13, 2227-7390, 85, 10.3390/math13010085
    19. Carlo Alberto Antonini, Matteo Cozzi, Global gradient regularity and a Hopf lemma for quasilinear operators of mixed local-nonlocal type, 2025, 425, 00220396, 342, 10.1016/j.jde.2025.01.030
    20. Tuhina Mukherjee, Lovelesh Sharma, On singular problems associated with mixed operators under mixed boundary conditions, 2025, 27, 1661-7738, 10.1007/s11784-025-01183-6
    21. R. Lakshmi, Sekhar Ghosh, Mixed local and nonlocal eigenvalue problems in the exterior domain, 2025, 1311-0454, 10.1007/s13540-025-00416-2
    22. Stefano Biagi, Serena Dipierro, Enrico Valdinoci, Eugenio Vecchi, A Brezis-Nirenberg type result for mixed local and nonlocal operators, 2025, 32, 1021-9722, 10.1007/s00030-025-01068-0
    23. Tuhina Mukherjee, Lovelesh Sharma, On elliptic problems with mixed operators and Dirichlet-Neumann boundary conditions, 2025, 32, 1021-9722, 10.1007/s00030-025-01093-z
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1832) PDF downloads(43) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog