Research article Special Issues

Comprehensive operating efficiency measurement of 28 Chinese airports using a two-stage DEA-Tobit method


  • Received: 29 September 2022 Revised: 10 December 2022 Accepted: 22 December 2022 Published: 17 January 2023
  • This paper presents a two-stage method combining data envelopment analysis (DEA) and a Tobit model to analyze the comprehensive operating efficiency of 28 airports in China in 2016. At the first stage, the DEA-BCC (Banker-Charnes-Cooper) model was employed to obtain the comprehensive operating efficiency of the combination of flight departure punctuality, non-cancellations, landing bridge rates from the perspective of airport infrastructure, surrounding airspace, route layouts, flight volume and weather. At the second stage, a Tobit model was used to analyze the influence of nine input variables from four aspects on obtained comprehensive operating efficiency, ultimately providing a clear and straightforward basis for formulating and testing policies. The comprehensive operating efficiency with this combination was further compared with each of the three efficiencies respectively. The important findings included the following: (1) The comprehensive operation efficiencies of most airports were greater than the individual efficiency; (2) These four types of operation efficiencies for most airports did not achieved DEA validity (100% efficiency), except for six airports (i.e., Haikou, Dalian, Jinan, Fuzhou, Nanning and Lanzhou); (3) These factors affecting each of the four types of operation efficiencies were different in that the number of terminals, duration of impact and average daily inbound and outbound flights had a negative impact on airport operational efficiency, while the average number of overnight aircraft per day and peak hour sorties had positive effects.

    Citation: Ming Wei, Shaopeng Zhang, Bo Sun. Comprehensive operating efficiency measurement of 28 Chinese airports using a two-stage DEA-Tobit method[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1543-1555. doi: 10.3934/era.2023078

    Related Papers:

    [1] Luana Muniz de Oliveira, Ágda Malany Forte de Oliveira, Railene Hérica Carlos Rocha Araújo, George Alves Dias, Albert Einstein Mathias de Medeiros Teodósio, José Franciraldo de Lima, Luana da Silva Barbosa, Wellinghton Alves Guedes . Spirulina platensis coating for the conservation of pomegranate. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(1): 76-85. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.76
    [2] Hesti Kurniasari, Wahyudi David, Laras Cempaka, Ardiansyah . Effects of drying techniques on bioactivity of ginger (Zingiber officinale): A meta-analysis investigation. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 197-211. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022013
    [3] Ilaria Marotti, Francesca Truzzi, Camilla Tibaldi, Lorenzo Negri, Giovanni Dinelli . Evaluation of licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) as a novel microgreen from the anti-inflammatory potential of polyphenols. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021001
    [4] Teti Estiasih, Jatmiko Eko Witoyo, Khofifah Putri Wulandari, Fadhillah Dwi Juniati, Widiastuti Setyaningsih, Hanifah Nuryani Lioe, Miguel Palma, Kgs Ahmadi, Hamidie Ronald Daniel Ray, Elya Mufidah . Stability comparison of conventional and foam-mat red and purple dried roselle calyces powder as a function of pH. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 177-198. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025010
    [5] Stefano Puccio, Anna Perrone, Giuseppe Sortino, Giuseppe Gianguzzi, Carla Gentile, Vittorio Farina . Yield, pomological characteristics, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Annona cherimola Mill. grown in mediterranean climate. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(3): 592-603. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.592
    [6] Rosalía García-Vásquez, Araceli Minerva Vera-Guzmán, José Cruz Carrillo-Rodríguez, Mónica Lilian Pérez-Ochoa, Elia Nora Aquino-Bolaños, Jimena Esther Alba-Jiménez, José Luis Chávez-Servia . Bioactive and nutritional compounds in fruits of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) landraces conserved among indigenous communities from Mexico. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 832-850. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023044
    [7] Katarzyna Gościnna, Elżbieta Wszelaczyńska, Jarosław Pobereżny . Potential of a new beetroot cultivar ‘Śnieżna kula’ (Beta vulgaris L. ssp.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 563-577. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.563
    [8] Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, Luiz Filipe Protasio Pereira, João Batista Gonçalves Dias da Silva, Marta de Toledo Benassi . Profile of the diterpenes, lipid and protein content of different coffee cultivars of three consecutive harvests. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(3): 254-264. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.3.254
    [9] Gad G. Yousef, Allan F. Brown, Ivette Guzman, James R. Ballington, Mary A. Lila . Variations in chlorogenic acid levels in an expanded gene pool of blueberries. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(3): 357-368. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.3.357
    [10] Francyelli Regina Costa-Becheleni, Enrique Troyo-Diéguez, Alan Amado Ruiz-Hernández, Fernando Ayala-Niño, Luis Alejandro Bustamante-Salazar, Alfonso Medel-Narváez, Raúl Octavio Martínez-Rincón, Rosario Maribel Robles-Sánchez . Determination of bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of the halophytes Suaeda edulis and Suaeda esteroa (Chenopodiaceae): An option as novel healthy agro-foods. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(3): 716-742. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024039
  • This paper presents a two-stage method combining data envelopment analysis (DEA) and a Tobit model to analyze the comprehensive operating efficiency of 28 airports in China in 2016. At the first stage, the DEA-BCC (Banker-Charnes-Cooper) model was employed to obtain the comprehensive operating efficiency of the combination of flight departure punctuality, non-cancellations, landing bridge rates from the perspective of airport infrastructure, surrounding airspace, route layouts, flight volume and weather. At the second stage, a Tobit model was used to analyze the influence of nine input variables from four aspects on obtained comprehensive operating efficiency, ultimately providing a clear and straightforward basis for formulating and testing policies. The comprehensive operating efficiency with this combination was further compared with each of the three efficiencies respectively. The important findings included the following: (1) The comprehensive operation efficiencies of most airports were greater than the individual efficiency; (2) These four types of operation efficiencies for most airports did not achieved DEA validity (100% efficiency), except for six airports (i.e., Haikou, Dalian, Jinan, Fuzhou, Nanning and Lanzhou); (3) These factors affecting each of the four types of operation efficiencies were different in that the number of terminals, duration of impact and average daily inbound and outbound flights had a negative impact on airport operational efficiency, while the average number of overnight aircraft per day and peak hour sorties had positive effects.



    Abbreviations: GAE/g: Gallic acid equivalents per one gram; CE/g: Catechin equivalents (CE) per one gram; RE/g: Rutin equivalents per one gram; QuE: Quercetin equivalent

    Pomegranate is native to Persia and Mediterranean zone and has been widely used in many countries and cultures [1]. Pomegranate has attracted considerable attention for its health benefits in recent years. Results show that pomegranate juice has markedly high total phenolic contents and antioxidant capacity, being responsible for beneficial activities of pomegranates. Total phenolic content plays a probable role in preventing different diseases related to oxidative stress such as cardiovascular [2,3,4], cancer [5,6] and neurodegenerative diseases [7,8]. Pomegranate juice has excellent antioxidant activity and is beneficial for atherosclerosis prevention [2,3,4], In this regard, polyphenols are capable of moderating the broad range of enzymes activities and cell receptors [9]. The main part of pomegranate seed oil is Punicic acid having anti-atherogenic effects [10].

    Pomegranate extract has potential to decrease the incidence of collagen-induced arthritis. In an in-vivo study into mice fed by pomegranate extract, it was indicated that joint inflammation, arthritis severity and IL-6 level were decreased remarkably [11]. Pomegranate has been widely accepted for its antimicrobial [12,13,14], and anti-candidial activities by in-vitro [15] and iv-vivo investigations [16]. Crude extract of pomegranate peel yielded a compound that demonstrated potent antifungal activity to Candida spp. [13]. The compound was recognized as punicalagin, based on spectral analyses [17]. Punicalagin showed high activity against Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis, as tested by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [14]. Pomegranate pericarp and peel extracts are reported to possess strong activity against Candida spp., with MICs of 125 μg/mL [18]. Salazar Aranda et al. [19] showed that polyphenolics compound had antioxidant activity, and they revealed its highest activity against C. glabrata by MIC test. The effect of their hydroxyl groups on their activity against C. glabrata is considerable. Furthermore, it has been shown that pomegranate peel has a high inhibition capacity against C. albicans [19,20]. Bassiri-Jahromi et al. in their in-vitro [15] and in-vivo [16] investigations indicated that pomegranate peel extract had potential antifungal activity against 5 various Candida species. This investigation demonstrated that among 8 different Persian pomegranate cultivars, Saveh sour malas peel extract indicated strongest antifungal activity against C.albicans, which was comparable to nystatin. Bassiri-Jahromi et al. reported that pomegranate peel extract had no adverse effects following application in the rats' model. Pomegranate peel extract application was effective and safe in treating oral candidiasis in the Wistar rats [21].

    Schubert et al. (1999) in their studies clearly demonstrated that pomegranate fermented juice and seed procurement and pomegranate seed oil contained powerful antioxidant properties [22]. Therefore, pomegranate can play a potential role as natural food preservative, health promotion and therapeutic agents.

    This paper provides a general review of the evaluation of polyphenolic and flavonoid contents of various pomegranate cultivars in different regions of the world.

    Pomegranate has considerable content of phytochemicals compounds such as punicalagin, ellagitannins, anthocyanins, tannins, hydrolysable tannins, and punicic acid [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Pomegranate peel is a valuable source of polyphenolic compounds, known as punicalagin, which is an ellagitannin with antioxidant capacity and is unrivaled and unique to pomegranate [24].

    Phenolic compounds have attracted increasing attention as agents for inhibiting and treating various oxidative stress correlated diseases, preventing conventional and novel biomarkers of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) induced tumor promotion, as well as possessing chemo-preventive role in various tumor models [25]. These compounds are recognized for their attributes in scavenging free radicals and preventing in-vitro lipid oxidation [26,27].

    Polyphenol is a significant antioxidant found in pomegranate seed and juice containing ellagitannin (punicalagin), gallic acid, ellagic acid, anthocyanins, catechins, caffeic acid, and quercetin [28]. Flavonoids may prevent coronary artery diseases by inducing various processes such as HDL increase, LDL decrease level, mast cell release reduction, and cardiovascular inflammation decrease. Flavonoids have been recognized with antiviral activity since the 1940s [29]. Selway et al. (1986) have reported that flavonoids contain antiviral activity against 11 types of viruses [30]. Furthermore, flavonoids possess protective effect against liver injury [31]. There is incisive documentary evidence that flavonoids have anti-mutagenic acting [32,33].

    Pomegranate peel is a significant source of bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, polyphenols, ellagitannins, and proanthocyanidin [34]; however, this part of the fruit is inedible. The antibacterial activity of peel extracts of Indian Ganesh variety was tested by Malviya et al. using the agar well diffusion method against four bacterial strains, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The pomegranate peel extracts showed significant antibacterial activities against all of the 4 bacterial strains tested [35].

    The abundance of these compounds and their activities are related to cultivar type, climate, and growing region [36,37]. Up to now, polyphenols of different pomegranate cultivars in Iran [38], Turkey [39], the United States [40], Italy [41] and South Africa have been investigated [42]. Fawole et al. showed that the highest peel extract activity against monophenolase activity and phenolase activity was Bhagwa cultivar and Arakta cultivar with IC50 values of 3.66 μg/mL and 15.88 μg/mL, respectively [43].

    Almost 50% of the pomegranate weight corresponds to the peel [44]. Total polyphenols, flavonoids and pro-athocyanidins contents are superior in pomegranate peel extract than in pomegranate pulp extract owing to their powerful antioxidant capacity [45].

    According to Shams Ardekani et al. (2011) [38] report from Iran, sour summer cultivar peel extract has the highest antioxidant activity with 118.074 mg or 274.132 μ mol trolox/g. Sour summer cultivar is a strong source of natural antioxidants, phenolic and flavonoid content and the peel of Sweet Saveh malas, Sour summer and Black peel cultivars are suitable sources of phenolic and flavonoid compounds.

    This review will investigate the evidence for the identity of the antioxidant content of various cultivars of pomegranate such as polyphenols and flavonoids, playing a probable role in preventing different diseases associated with oxidative stress such as cardiovascular, cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.

    The results provide significant information about the compound of polyphenols and antioxidant content of different cultivars of pomegranate, which can be useful for expanding fruit processing professions and choosing favorable pomegranate genotypes to provide commercial agriculture.

    The phenolic and flavonoids content are different; the antioxidant activity of various solvent extracts from pomegranate peel was also surveyed using in vitro assays.

    Gil et al. (2000) [27] evaluated antioxidant acting of pomegranate by four comparative assays: ABTS, DPPH, DMPD, FRAP, and they were detected and quantified using ellagic acid anthocyanins, and hydrolyzable tannins in pomegranate juice. They reported that the antioxidant capacity of commercial pomegranate juice was three times superior to red wine and green tea.

    Pomegranate peels have significant superior antioxidant potency compared to other parts of pomegranate against free radical activities. It also contains higher total polyphenols, flavonoids and pro-athocyanidins than pulp extract. Strong antioxidant potency of pomegranate peel extract may be due to its major polyphenolics contained [46]. In the present study, various cultivars from different regions were described evaluate the phenolic and flavonoid contents. Tables 1, 2 and 3 present the obtained data.

    Table 1.  Comparative evaluation of polyphenolic and flavonoid content of peels of various pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars from different regions in the world.
    No. Author/References Cultivar Region of growth (Country) Fruit part Total Polyphenolic Compound mg GAE/g extract Flavonoids (mg/g), Total flavonoids mg CE/g extract
    1 Fawole OA et al. (2012) [67] Ganesh South Africa Peel 295.5 ± 23.91 d mg GAE/ g DM 121.1 ± 3.12 c mg CAE/g DM
    2 Shiban MS et al. (2012) [68] Yemeni variety Yemen Peel 274.1 ± 17.2 mg GAE/g 56.4 ± 2.7 c mg (RE)/g.
    3 Ardekani MRS et al. (2011) [38] Black peel Iran Peel 250.13 ± 33.03 mg GAE/g 36.40 ± 1.34 mg CAE/g DM
    4 Kulkarni AP et al. (2004) [58] Kashmir India Peel 249.4 mg GAE/g 59.4 mg CE/g dry solids
    5 Li Y et al. (2006) [45] China China Peel 249.4 ± 17.2 mg/g 59.1 ± 4.8 (mg/g)
    6 Ardekani MRS et al. (2011) [38] Sour Summer Iran Peel 226.56 ± 18.98 mg GAE/g 35.92 ± 0.84 mg CAE/g DM
    7 Fawole OA et al. (2012) [67] Bhagwa South Africa Peel 224.1 ± 6.86 c mg GAE/g DM 112.6 ± 1.51 b mg CAEg DM
    8 Fawole OA et al. (2012) [67] Ruby South Africa Peel 218.2 ± 4.53 bc mg GAE/g DM 126.0 ± 0.57 c mg CAE/g DM
    9 Ardekani MRS et al. (2011) [38] Saveh sour malas Iran Peel 216.74 ± 19.01 mg GAE/g 34.71 ± 1.34 mg CAE/g DM
    10 Nasr CB et al. (1996) [69] Tunesia Tunesia Peel 216.9 ± 7.3 mg GAE/g
    11 Mphahlelea RR et al. (2016) [66] South Africa South Africa peel 215.21 ± 21.90 b 36.67 ± 3.43 ab
    12 Mphahlelea RR et al. (2016) [66] South Africa South Africa Peel & seed 138.36 ± 2.27 c 50.39 ± 6.93 a
    13 Mphahlelea RR et al. (2016) [66] South Africa South Africa Whole fruit 185.73 ± 3.89 b 23.35 ± 2.07 b
    14 Fawole OA et al. (2012) [67] Herskawitz South Africa Peel 198.1 ± 9.22 abc mg GAE/g DM 101.0 ± 1.02a mg CAE/g DM
    15 Ardekani MRS et al. (2011) [38] North white peel Iran Peel 192.72 ± 15.45 mg GAE/g 26.94 ± 0.48 mg CAE/g DM
    No. Author/References Cultivar Region of growth (Country) Fruit part Total Polyphenolic Compound mg GAE/g extract Flavonoids (mg/g), Total flavonoids mg CE/g extract
    16 Fawole OA et al. (2012) [67] Wonderful South Africa Peel 189.1 ± 3.79 ab mg GAE/g 97.8±2.10a mg GAE/g DM
    17 Fawole OA et al. (2012) [67] Arakta South Africa Peel 187.4 ± 6.44ab mg GAE/g DM 103.0 ± 1.86a mg CAE/g DM
    18 Rosas-Burgos EC (2017) [56] Cultivar (PTO8) Spain Peel 187 ± 4 mg GAE/g
    19 Ardekani MRS et al. (2011) [38] Sweet alac Iran Peel 184.10 ± 25.07 mg GAE/g 30.36 ± 2.44 mg CAE/g DM
    20 Fawole OA et al. (2012) [67] Molla de Elche South Africa Peel 179.3 ± 4.60a mg GAE/g DM 99.5 ± 2.94a mg CAE/g DM
    21 Ardekani MRS et al. (2011) [38] Agha mohammad ali Iran Peel 168.21 ± 13.9 mg GAE/g 33.52 ± 0.41 mg CAE/g DM
    22 Belkacem N et al. (2014) [70] Algerian pomegranate Algeria Peel 158.18 ± 0.66 mg GAE/g DM 12.8 ± 2.2 mg CE/g
    23 Negi P et al. (2003) [71] Pomegranate varieties from India India Peel 124.3 mg GAE/g 49.1 mg CE/g dry solids
    24 Ardekani MRS et al. (2011) [38] Sweet malas Iran Peel 121.11 ± 8.69 mg GAE/g 18.61 ± 0.53 mg CAE/g DM
    25 Ardekani MRS et al. (2011) [38] Sour white peel Iran Peel 98.24 ± 4.81 mg GAE/g 28.30 ± 0.54 mg CAE/g DM
    26 Al-Rawahi AS et.al. (2014) [72] Hellow Oman Peel 64.2 mg GAE/g 1.4 mg CE/g
    27 Dipnaik HS et al. (2014) [73] Indian pomegranate India Peel 59.73 ± 0.46 mg GAE/gm
    28 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Lefan Turkish Peel 3547.8a µg GAE/g fw
    31 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Katirbasi Turkish Peel 3127.0b µg GAE/g
    34 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Cekirdeksiz-Ⅳ Turkish Peel 2537.1c µg GAE/g fw. GAE/g fw
    35 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Asinar Turkish Peel 17.75.4d GAE/g fw
    36 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG1 Egypt Peel 172.4 ± 1.11c (GAE mg/g FW) 34.28 ± 1.47 (REmg/g FW)
    37 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG2 Egypt Peel 135.8 ± 0.92 (GAE mg/g FW) 29.65 ± 0.59a (REmg/g FW)
    38 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG3 Egypt Peel 98.6 ± 1.13a (GAE mg/g FW) 21.72 ± 0.38 (REmg/g FW)
    39 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG4 Egypt Peel 102.9 ± 1.28 30.29 ± 1.29a (REmg/g FW)
    40 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG5 Egypt Peel 95.8 ± 1.19a (GAE mg/g FW) 26.35 ± 1.16 (REmg/g FW)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  Comparative evaluation of polyphenolic and flavonoid content of juicees of various pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars from different regions.
    No. Author/References Cultivar Region of growth (Country) Total Polyphenolic Compound mg GAE/g extract Flavonoids (mg/g), Total flavonoids mg CE/g extract
    1 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Lefan Turkish 1551.5 µg GAE/g fw
    2 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Katirbasi Turkish 1229.5 mg/L µg GAE/g fw
    3 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Asinar Turkish 1307.3 µg GAE/g fw
    4 Nunzio MD et al. (2013) [75] Hershkovitz Italian 2057.2 ± 174.0a μg GAmL−1)
    5 Li X et al. (2015) [76] XJ-TSL China 4.352 ± 0.09 de d (GaE mg/mL) 0.118 ± 0.00 d QuE mg/mL
    6 Li X et al. (2015) [76] XJ-SSL China 6.147 ± 0.11 b (GaE mg/mL) 0.045 ± 0.01 h QuE mg/mL
    7 Li X et al. (2015) [76] SD-TSL China 7.429 ± 0.12 a (GaE mg/mL) 0.335 ± 0.13 a QuE mg/mL
    8 Li X et al. (2015) [76] SD-SSL China 4.481 ± 0.11 d (GaE mg/mL) 0.093 ± 0.00 e QuE mg/mL
    9 Li X et al. (2015) [76] YN-SZ China 3.234 ± 0.06 g (GaE mg/mL) 0.099 ± 0.00 e QuE mg/mL
    10 Li X et al. (2015) [76] YN-LZ China 3.151 ± 0.05 g(GaE mg/mL) 0.084 ± 0.00 f QuE mg/mL
    11 Li X et al. (2015) [76] YN-SSL China 4.142 ± 0.08 f (GaE mg/mL) 0.171 ± 0.00 c QuE mg/mL
    12 Li X et al. (2015) [76] SX-JPT China 4.219 ± 0.10 ef (GaE mg/mL) 0.259 ± 0.00 b QuE mg/mL
    13 Li X et al. (2015) [76] SX-SBT China 4.750 ± 0.08 c (GaE mg/mL) 0.170 ± 0.00 c QuE mg/mL
    14 Li X et al. (2015) [76] SX-SSL China 4.735 ± 0.03 c (GaE mg/mL) 0.054 ± 0.00 g QuE mg/mL
    15 Li X et al. (2015) [76] SD-TSL China 7.429 ± 0.12 a (GaE mg/mL) 0.335 ± 0.13 a QuE mg/mL
    16 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG1 Egypt 72.4 ± 0.22 (GAE mg/g FW) 12.31 ± 0.91a (REmg/g FW)
    17 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG2 Egypt 63.7 ± 1.16a (GAE mg/g FW) 9.64 ± 0.25 (REmg/g FW)
    18 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG3 Egypt 64.3 ± 0.29a (GAE mg/g FW) 10.38 ± 1.34b (REmg/g FW)
    19 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG4 Egypt 52.1 ± 0.18b (GAE mg/g FW) 10.68 ± 1.63b (REmg/g FW)
    No. Author/References Cultivar Region of growth (Country) Total Polyphenolic Compound mg GAE/g extract Flavonoids (mg/g), Total flavonoids mg CE/g extract
    20 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG5 Egypt 53.4 ± 0.32b (GAE mg/g FW) 12.91 ± 0.88a (REmg/g FW)
    21 Zarei M et al. (2010) [63] Aghaye Iran 7.9749 ± 0.110c (mg/gr)
    22 Zarei M et al. (2010) [63] Faroogh Iran 7.2053 ± 0.150 c (mg/gr)
    23 Zarei M et al. (2010) [63] Rabbab-e-Fars Iran 7.8620 ± 0.200 c (mg/gr)
    24 Zarei M et al. (2010) [63] Shahvar Iran 5.2640 ± 0120 c (mg/gr)
    25 Zarei M et al. (2010) [63] Shirin-e-Bihaste) Iran 5.6863 ± 0110 c (mg/gr)
    26 Zarei M et al. (2010) [63] Shirin-e-Mohali Iran 5.6581 ± 0110 c (mg/gr)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  Comparative evaluation of polyphenolic and flavonoid content of seeds of various pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars from different regions.
    No. Author/References Cultivar Region of growth (Country) Total Polyphenolic Compound mg GAE/g extract Flavonoids (mg/g), Total flavonoids mg CE/g extract
    1 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Cekirdeksiz-Ⅳ Turkish 117.0 µg GAE/g fw
    2 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Katirbasi Turkish 121.2 µg GAE/g fw
    3 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Lefan Turkish 125.3 µg GAE/g fw
    4 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG2 Egypt 95.6 ± 1.17a (GAE mg/g FW) 23.92 ± 1.34a (REmg/g FW)
    5 Gozlekci S et al. (2011) [74] Asinar Turkish 177.4 µg GAE/g fw
    6 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG1 Egypt 123.7 ± 1.35 (GAE mg/g FW) 26.45 ± 0.29 (REmg/g FW)
    7 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG3 Egypt 109.1 ± 0.68 22.59 ± 1.22 (REmg/g FW)
    8 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG4 Egypt 92.8 ± 0.59a (GAE mg/g FW) 24.23 ± 0.95a (REmg/g FW)
    9 Souleman AMA et al. (2016) [59] PG5 Egypt 86.7 ± 1.26 (GAE mg/g FW) 19.84 ± 1.37 (REmg/g FW)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Owing to the pomegranate health benefits, consumption of fresh pomegranates juice is increasing. Rich bioactive compound cultivars are a significant source of desirable antioxidant properties for health promotion. Pomegranate peel and pulp contain various kinds of antioxidants; however, pomegranate peel had the most antioxidant efficacy compared to the pulp and seed fractions [47].

    The results of a number of investigations on phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of eighteen various pomegranate cultivars grown in Morocco revealed that thepolyphenols concentration in pomegranate was high, and antioxidant activity and physico-chemical characteristics in pomegranates were influenced by the type of cultivar. Phenolic compounds of pomegranates are graded on phenolic acids (ellagic acid, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, vanillic acid, ferulic acids trans-2- Hydrocinnamic acid, quercetin). Additionally, some flavonoids such as catechin, rutin, quercetin and phloridzin were identified in pomegranate juice at various concentrations among the pomegranate cultivars [48].

    Although pomegranate peels and the other remaining tissues are inedible, it would be possible to use them to prepare new products such as flavonoids capsules and other nutraceuticals after extraction. There are many pomegranate cultivars, which are classified and correlated based on some important parameters such as morphological characteristics of flower and tree.

    Differences in the phenolic compound index among various parts of pomegranate were observed. Pomegranate peels indicated a high concentration of phenolic compounds, and ellagitannins have largest quantities in relation to pomegranate pulp and juice for each cultivar [49]. Owing to meeting the current market demand for fruits quality, the characteristics of pomegranate cultivars are important.

    This paper provides an overview of biology evaluation of the phenolic and flavonoid contents of different pomegranate cultivars.

    This review described a polyphenolic and flavonoid analysis and geographic origins of different pomegranate cultivars.

    Different parts of the pomegranate such as peel can act as potentially antimicrobial agents. Table 1 shows that the Ganesh cultivar possesses the highest polyphenilic compound, indicating an association between polyphenols level and antibacterial activities. Bassiri-Jahromi et al. in their in-vivo investigation indicated that Saveh sour malas Persian cultivar possessed the best activity against 8 Candida strains [16]. Owing to the significant amount of phenolic compounds, Saveh sour malas is one of the best cultivars (Table 1). These findings demonstrated the relationship between the amount of polyphenolic compounds and its anti-candidiasis effect.

    Therefore, it may be suggested as a natural alternative to synthetic antimicrobial agents. Punicalagin content in pomegranate extract is tannin, which is reported to be responsible for antimicrobial activity. Furthermore, the tannin rich bioactive fractions and ellagitannins have antibacterial [50], antifungal [51] and antimalaria properties [52].

    Moreover, polyphenolic compounds not only play a role in controlling various related diseases to oxidative stress [9], but also regulate the activity of various cell receptors and enzymes [53].

    Because the chemical composition of pomegranate peel is differ with the cultivar type such as sweet, sure, and sour-sweet [54,55], pomegranate antimicrobial activity may vary regarding its cultivar [56]. Tehranifar et al. (2010) [57] reported that total polyphenols and tannins content in pomegranate juice were dependent on major chemical factors.

    Kulkarni et al. [58] reported that antioxidant activity growth at the late-developmental phase was due to anthocyanins composition.

    By investigating nine different cultivars, Shams Ardakani indicated that pulp of Sour Summer cultivar as a strong source of original antioxidants had the highest antioxidant activity than other cultivars (p < 0.05). The peel of Sour Summer, Sweet saveh malas, and Black peel is a considerable source of phenolic and flavonoid compound appropriate for phenolic and flavonoid purification and extraction. In addition, they reported that peel extracts had higher potential antioxidant activity and polyphenolic and flavonoid content than the pulps [38]. The pomegranate peel extract antioxidant capacity is 10 times greater than that of the pomegranate pulp extract. The North white peel and Black peel cultivar contain the highest flavonoid. Souleman et al. (2016) reported that seed of Egyptian pomegranate cultivar (PG1) contained the most total phenolic and flavonoids compounds (Table 3) [59].

    Bassiri-Jahromi et al. (2015) [15] indicated that the peel extract of Saveh malas cultivar had the most effective element compared to other cultivars against Candida spp by MIC test [15]. Table 1 indicate that peel of Saveh malas pomegranate cultivar possesses a significant source of polyphenolic and flavonoid content compared to other cultivars. Difference in the pomegranate chemical compound is related to the cultivar, growing region, maturity, cultivation, climate, and storage situation [48]. This difference is also correlated with the latitude, altitude and longitude of growing regions [60]. The anthocyanin level of pomegranate juice variation was attributed to diversities of cultivars and growing region and various maturity levels of the pomegranate [40]. The pomegranate juice color is a significant index for juice quality; it is originally related to anthocyanin concentration.

    Middha et al. [61] reported that higher total flavonoid concentration of pomegranate juice was almost correlated with sweet and sour cultivar and growing area. Although pomegranate anthocyanin pigments concentration decreased during 100 days, a considerable decrease in acidity was found as the significant chemical factor for increased incidence in over-ripe fruits.

    This review clearly indicated that pomegranate peel extract possessed more natural antioxidants and activity as a health supplement than the pomegranate pulp extract. Derakhshani et al. in their study showed that the pomegranate peel extract contained high levels of antioxidant activity compared to seeds and juice in three different cultivars of various regions of Iran [62].

    Table 1 shows the comparative evaluation of phenolic and flavonoids compounds attributes to various peels of pomegranate cultivars grown in the world.

    These diversities may be owing to variety of cultivar, climate, edaphic condition, different maturity level, and particularly tannin specification method. Total tannin concentration pomegranate spectroscopic analyses by Khanavi et al. (2013) [1] in Iran revealed that Black peel cultivar had the most hyperoside content in its pulp and peel. Hyperoside is identified as the significant flavonoid with respect to antioxidant activity. The results indicated that commercial pomegranate juice had significant phenolic quantity and antioxidant capacity. Furthermore, Zarei et al. (2010) revealed a significant difference in total phenolics, tannins, and antioxidant activity in the juice of six different Persian cultivars (Table 2) [63]. The polyphenolic content and antioxidant potent of the whole pomegranate juice were remarkably superior to aril juice of pomegranate from the same cultivar, due to the entrance of phenolic compounds from the rind sections of pomegranate to the juice [64].

    Hajimahmoodi et al. [65] reported that pulp of Sour summer cultivar had the most antioxidant potent among the nine various pomegranate cultivars. The antioxidant capacity of pomegranate peel extract was 10 times higher than the pulp extract.

    The antioxidant activity of pomegranate peels showed a rapid decrease in 20 to 60 days of fruit development (13%) [58]. Furthermore, Kulkarni et al. [58] reported a slight but important decrease in anthocyanin pigment after 100 days (9.3%). Moreover, they concluded that the anthocyanin increasing and phenolics decreasing were correlated with each other. In this regard, phenolics were exhausted when the anthocyanin pigment formation and the phenols were destroyed and their contents reduced [56].

    Mphahlele et al. in their investigation showed that freeze-drying could be a viable method to proceed pomegranate peel to maintain the maximum natural value of their bioactive compounds [66].

    Different pomegranate cultivars had different polyphenol compositions and antioxidant potential. It is considerably associated with many factors such as cultivar type, growing region, maturity, cultivation, climate, edaphic condition, and storage situation [65]. They were also correlated with the latitude, altitude and longitude of growing regions. Additionally, difference in the average temperature and daily temperature during maturity and harvest period had significant effects on the total polyphenols, flavonoids and anthocyanin concentration of pomegranate.

    Further future investigations are necessary to establish a database for pomegranate showing polyphenol and flavonoids compositions, antioxidant activities, physiochemical characteristics and their relation to environmental factors in various growing areas of the world. The data would be useful to produce better crops with higher nutritional quality. This database provides geographic product labeling and pomegranate brand identification.

    This review is based on a method of systematic narrative review on comparative evaluation of bioactive compounds of various pomegranate cultivars. We conducted an extensive search using the PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus databases in April 2018 to obtain related studies. This review aimed to present an overview of the comparison of the chemical analysis of total phenolic and flavonoids content of various pomegranate cultivars grown in different geographic regions of the world and to shows perspective advantages of pomegranate compound. It also aimed to summarize the present data from in vitro and in vivo tests animal trial systems and human clinical trials concerning the benefit of pomegranate compound. In addition, this review considered the pomegranate peel and pulp extracts activities and their future potential.

    The findings of this review support that the pomegranate might be used in preventing and curing some diseases.

    This study demonstrated considerable differences among the cultivars in most measured factors such as total poly phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidant activity and anthocyanins content. It also highlights the current aspects and the new research into the potential therapeutic pomegranate for some diseases and the future of clinical research of pomegranate.

    We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Pasteur Institute of Iran Research Council (project No.TP-9003).

    No author of this paper has a conflict of interest, including specific financial interests, relationships, and/or affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials included in this manuscript.



    [1] L. W. Fan, F. Wu, P. Zhou, Efficiency measurement of Chinese airports with flight delays by directional distance function, J. Air Transp. Manage., 34 (2014), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.10.002
    [2] C. N. Wang, N. C. Kristofer, C. C. Huang, T T. Dang, Output targeting and runway utilization of major international airports: A comparative analysis using DEA, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10040551 doi: 10.3390/math10040551
    [3] M. K. Yilmaz, A. O. Kusakci, M. Aksoy, U. Hacioglu, The evaluation of operational efficiencies of Turkish airports: An integrated spherical fuzzy AHP/DEA approach, Appl. Soft Comput., 119 (2020), 108620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108620 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108620
    [4] M. G. Tsionas, Z. Chen, P. Wanke, A structural vector autoregressive model of technical efficiency and delays with an application to Chinese airlines, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 101 (2017), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.003
    [5] A. Lemetti, T. Polishchuk, R. Sáez, X. Prats, Analysis of weather impact on flight efficiency for Stockholm Arlanda airport arrivals, ENRI Int. Workshop ATM/CNS, 4 (2019), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4669-7_5 doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-4669-7_5
    [6] M. Schultz, S. Lorenz, R. Schmitz, L. Delgado, Weather impact on airport performance, Aerospace, 5 (2018), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5040109 doi: 10.3390/aerospace5040109
    [7] J. N. Sánchez, M. A. P. Eroles, D. Lebbink, Identification and empirical characterisation of flight arrival variation and the impact on departure punctuality, Int. J. Services Oper. Manage., 35 (2020), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2020.105373 doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2020.105373
    [8] M. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Cheng, Research on carbon emission efficiency in the Chinese construction industry based on a three-stage DEA-Tobit model, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28 (2021), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14298-3 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14298-3
    [9] X. Liang, J. Li, G. Guo, S. Li, Q. Gong, Evaluation for water resource system efficiency and influencing factors in western China: A two-stage network DEA-Tobit model, J. Cleaner Prod., 328 (2021), 129674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129674 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129674
    [10] T. M. Huynh, G. Kim, H. K. Ha, Comparative analysis of efficiency for major Southeast Asia airports: A two-stage approach, J. Air Transp. Manage., 89 (2020), 101898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101898 doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101898
    [11] T. Ngo, K. W. H. Tsui, A data-driven approach for estimating airport efficiency under endogeneity: An application to New Zealand airports, Res. Transp. Bus. Manage., 34 (2020), 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100412 doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100412
    [12] Z. Zeng, W. Yang, S. Zhang, F. Witlox, Analysing airport efficiency in East China using a three-stage data envelopment analysis, Transport, 35 (2020), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2020.12869 doi: 10.3846/transport.2020.12869
    [13] S. Pathomsiri, A. Haghani, M. Dresner, R. J. Windle, Impact of undesirable outputs on the productivity of US airports, Transp. Res. Part E Logistics Transp. Rev., 44 (2008), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2007.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2007.07.002
    [14] Z. Chen, P. Wanke, J. J. M. Antunes, N. Zhang, Chinese airline efficiency under CO2 emissions and flight delays: A stochastic network DEA model, Energy Econ., 68 (2017), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.015 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.015
    [15] S. Suzuki, P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld, E. Pels, A distance friction minimization approach in data envelopment analysis: A comparative study on airport efficiency, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 207 (2010), 1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.049 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.049
    [16] S. Yoo, J. Meng, S. Lim, An analysis of the performance of global major airports using two-stage network DEA model, J. Korean Soc. Qual. Manage., 45 (2017), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.1.065 doi: 10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.1.065
    [17] S. Lozano, E. Gutiérrez, Slacks-based measure of efficiency of airports with airplanes delays as undesirable outputs, Comput. Oper. Res., 38 (2011), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2010.04.007 doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2010.04.007
    [18] R. Paula, The role of delays in the efficiency analysis of air traffic management systems, ICRAT, 3 (2016), 34–51.
    [19] T. Ngo, K. W. H. Tsui, Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines, Oper. Res., 22 (2022), 3411–3434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-021-00667-w doi: 10.1007/s12351-021-00667-w
    [20] J. Tobin, Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables, Econometrica, 26 (1958), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382 doi: 10.2307/1907382
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. G. Ausias, G. Dolo, D. Cartié, F. Challois, P. Joyot, J. Férec, Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Laminated Thermoplastic Composites Manufactured by Laser-Assisted Automatic Tape Placement, 2020, 35, 0930-777X, 471, 10.3139/217.3976
    2. Angel Leon, Marta Perez, Anaïs Barasinski, Emmanuelle Abisset-Chavanne, Brigitte Defoort, Francisco Chinesta, Multi-Scale Modeling and Simulation of Thermoplastic Automated Tape Placement: Effects of Metallic Particles Reinforcement on Part Consolidation, 2019, 9, 2079-4991, 695, 10.3390/nano9050695
    3. Chady Ghnatios, Pavel Simacek, Francisco Chinesta, Suresh Advani, A non-local void dynamics modeling and simulation using the Proper Generalized Decomposition, 2020, 13, 1960-6206, 533, 10.1007/s12289-019-01490-7
    4. Tarek Frahi, Clara Argerich, Minyoung Yun, Antonio Falco, Anais Barasinski, Francisco Chinesta, Tape surfaces characterization with persistence images, 2020, 7, 2372-0484, 364, 10.3934/matersci.2020.4.364
    5. Aleksandr N. Anoshkin, Yulia S. Pristupova, Pavel V. Pisarev, Gleb S. Shipunov, 2020, 2216, 0094-243X, 040014, 10.1063/5.0004086
    6. Tarek Frahi, Clara Argerich, Minyoung Yun, Antonio Falco, Anais Barasinski, Francisco Chinesta, Tape surfaces characterization with persistence images, 2020, 7, 2372-0484, 364, 10.3934/ms.2020.4.364
    7. Antoine Runacher, Mohammad-Javad Kazemzadeh-Parsi, Daniele Di Lorenzo, Victor Champaney, Nicolas Hascoet, Amine Ammar, Francisco Chinesta, Describing and Modeling Rough Composites’ Surfaces by Using Topological Data Analysis and Fractional Brownian Motion, 2023, 15, 2073-4360, 1449, 10.3390/polym15061449
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2099) PDF downloads(183) Cited by(7)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(6)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog