The paper presents the results of experimental studies on a self-draining bipolar plate used in a low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (L-PEMFC). These studies investigated the cell's performance under varying platinum catalyst loadings and different hydrogen and oxygen flow rates.
Two catalyst loading configurations were tested: (ⅰ) 0.20 mg/cm2 (anode) and 0.40 mg/cm2 (cathode) and (ⅱ) 0.25 mg/cm2 (anode) and 0.50 mg/cm2 (cathode). The gas diffusion layer (GDL) employed was carbon paper, with the catalyst arranged on the carbon substrate.
Hydrogen flow rates of 80,100, and 120 ml/min were assessed alongside oxygen supplies at 50%, 100%, and 150% excess relative to the stoichiometric requirement (0%) in relation to the hydrogen supply for both catalyst loading conditions. Additional experiments were conducted at humidification temperatures of 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 ℃, using the optimal hydrogen flow rate and oxygen supply conditions. To evaluate the stability, the fuel cell operated continuously for 5 hours at the optimal humidification temperature to assess the stability of voltage and power output.
The fuel cell using the self-draining bipolar plate demonstrated an approximately 30% increase in load-bearing capacity. However, it did not show significant differences in voltage or power across the varying catalyst loadings. The optimal humidification temperature was determined to be 90 ℃. This study provides valuable insights into the continuous operation of fuel cells under optimal conditions of humidification, excess oxygen, and hydrogen flow rate.
Citation: Sudesh Bekal, Shripad T Revankar. Self-draining bipolar plate: Experimentation with various catalyst-loading in a low temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(2): 231-247. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025008
The paper presents the results of experimental studies on a self-draining bipolar plate used in a low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (L-PEMFC). These studies investigated the cell's performance under varying platinum catalyst loadings and different hydrogen and oxygen flow rates.
Two catalyst loading configurations were tested: (ⅰ) 0.20 mg/cm2 (anode) and 0.40 mg/cm2 (cathode) and (ⅱ) 0.25 mg/cm2 (anode) and 0.50 mg/cm2 (cathode). The gas diffusion layer (GDL) employed was carbon paper, with the catalyst arranged on the carbon substrate.
Hydrogen flow rates of 80,100, and 120 ml/min were assessed alongside oxygen supplies at 50%, 100%, and 150% excess relative to the stoichiometric requirement (0%) in relation to the hydrogen supply for both catalyst loading conditions. Additional experiments were conducted at humidification temperatures of 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 ℃, using the optimal hydrogen flow rate and oxygen supply conditions. To evaluate the stability, the fuel cell operated continuously for 5 hours at the optimal humidification temperature to assess the stability of voltage and power output.
The fuel cell using the self-draining bipolar plate demonstrated an approximately 30% increase in load-bearing capacity. However, it did not show significant differences in voltage or power across the varying catalyst loadings. The optimal humidification temperature was determined to be 90 ℃. This study provides valuable insights into the continuous operation of fuel cells under optimal conditions of humidification, excess oxygen, and hydrogen flow rate.
| [1] |
Li H, Tang Y, Wang Z, et al. (2008) A review of water flooding issues in the proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources 178: 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.068. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.068
|
| [2] |
Bao C, Ouyang M, Yi B (2006) Modeling and control of air stream and hydrogen flow with recirculation in a PEM fuel cell system—Ⅰ. Control-oriented modeling. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31: 1879–1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.02.031 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.02.031
|
| [3] |
Natarajan D, Nguyen TV (2003) Three-dimensional effects of liquid water flooding in the cathode of a PEM fuel cell. J Power Sources 115: 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00624-9S doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00624-9S
|
| [4] |
Karthikeyan M, Muthukumar M, Karthikeyan P, et al. (2019) Optimization of active area of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with better water management. J Ceram Proc Res 20: 490–498. https://doi.org/10.36410/jcpr.2019.20.5.490. doi: 10.36410/jcpr.2019.20.5.490
|
| [5] |
Palaniswamy K, Marappan M, Rajendran JV (2016) Influence of porous carbon inserts on scaling up studies for performance enhancement on PEMFC. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41: 2867–2874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.148 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.148
|
| [6] | Desai AN, Mohanty S, Ramadesigan V, et al. (2022) Investigating the water flooding effects on the performance of low-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Proceedings of WHEC 2022—23rd World Hydrogen Energy Conference: Bridging Continents by H2, 772–774. Available from: https://www.proceedings.com/content/065/065069webtoc.pdf. |
| [7] | Bozorgnezhad A, Shams M, Ahmadi G, et al. (2015) The experimental study of water accumulation in PEMFC cathode. ASME/JSME/KSME 2015 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, AJKFluids 2015. https://doi.org/10.1115/AJKFluids2015-22299 |
| [8] |
Liao P, Xu S, Ming P, et al. (2021) The effects of anode serpentine flow field structure and humidity on performance of PEMFCs. ECS Trans 104: 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1149/10408.0295ecst doi: 10.1149/10408.0295ecst
|
| [9] |
Shen J, Xu L, Chang H, et al. (2020) Partial flooding and its effect on the performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy Convers Manage, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112537 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112537
|
| [10] |
Aslam RM, Ingham DB, Ismail MS, et al (2018) Simultaneous direct visualisation of liquid water in the cathode and anode serpentine flow channels of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. J Energy Inst 91: 1057–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2017.07.003
|
| [11] |
Kim K, Kim J, Choi H, et al. (2023) Pre-diagnosis of flooding and drying in proton exchange membrane fuel cells by bagging ensemble deep learning models using long short-term memory and convolutional neural networks. Energy, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126441 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126441
|
| [12] |
Cho JIS, Neville TP, Trogadas P, et al. (2018) Capillaries for water management in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43: 21949–21958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.030 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.030
|
| [13] |
Pei H, Song S, Wang Z, et al. (2022) Effect of inner dehumidification technique on the performance of a dead-ended proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack. Int J Energy Res 46: 6436–6443. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7580 doi: 10.1002/er.7580
|
| [14] |
Sanchez DG, Ruiu T, Biswas I, et al. (2014) Effect of the inlet gas humidification on PEMFC behavior and current density distribution. ECS Trans 64: 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1149/06403.0603ecst doi: 10.1149/06403.0603ecst
|
| [15] |
Xu X, Li K, Liao Z, et al. (2022) Closed-loop water management methodology for PEM fuel cell system based on impedance information feedback. Energies 15: 7561. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207561 doi: 10.3390/en15207561
|
| [16] |
Chen X, Xu J, Liu Q, et al. (2020) Active disturbance rejection control strategy applied to cathode humidity control in PEMFC system. Energy Convers Manage, 224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113389 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113389
|
| [17] |
Kang S (2015) Quasi-three dimensional dynamic modeling of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with consideration of two-phase water transport through a gas diffusion layer. Energy 90: 1388–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.076 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.076
|
| [18] |
Natarajan D, Van Nguyen T (2001) A two-dimensional, two-phase, multicomponent, transient model for the cathode of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell using conventional gas distributors. J Electrochem Soc 148: a1324–a1335. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1415032 doi: 10.1149/1.1415032
|
| [19] |
Shimpalee S, Greenway S, Van Zee JW (2006) The impact of channel path length on PEMFC flow-field design. J Power Sources 160: 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.099 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.099
|
| [20] |
Springer TE, Zowodzinski TA, Gottesfeld S (1991) Polymer electrolyte fuel cell model. J Electrochem Soc 138: 2334–2342. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2085971 doi: 10.1149/1.2085971
|
| [21] |
Cheng W, Yu Y, Tu Z (2019) Study on removal time of droplets in the electrolyte of hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell. J Wuhan Univ Technol (Trans Sci Eng) 43: 652–656. https://doi.org/10.3963/j.issn.2095-3844.2019.04.015. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.2095-3844.2019.04.015
|
| [22] |
Li Y, Zhou Q, Zhang X (2014) Numerical analysis of steady state self-humidification performance of PEMFC. CIESC J 65: 1893–1899. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.05.048 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.05.048
|
Figures(8) / Tables(4)
Sudesh Bekal, Shripad T Revankar. Self-draining bipolar plate: Experimentation with various catalyst-loading in a low temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(2): 231-247. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025008
DownLoad: